HomeMy WebLinkAbout2013-014ORDINANCE NO.2013-014
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ARLINGTON, WASHINGTON
AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TO INCLUDE THE LAKEWOOD SCHOOL DISTRICT
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN AS PART OF THE
CITY OF ARLINGTON CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
WHEREAS, the City of Arlington, Washington has the authority to enact laws to
promote the health, safety and welfare of its citizens as a way of controlling the use and
development of property within its jurisdiction; and
WHEREAS, the City of Arlington has the authority to regulate land uses within
the City, and has gone through its periodic review and update of the Comprehensive Plan;
and
WHEREAS, included in the review of the Comprehensive Plan was a proposed
update to the Lakewood School District Capital Facilities Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission considered these amendments at their
August 6, and August 20, 2013 public hearings and the City Council considered the
same, along with the Planning Commission recommendations, at their workshop on
September 23, 2013, and at their Council meeting on October 7, 2013 and determined
approving the amendments was in the best interest of the City and its citizens; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the proposed comprehensive plan
amendment and finds the same to be consistent with city and state law and in the best
interests of the citizens;
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Arlington do hereby ordain
as follows:
Section 1. Comprehensive Plan Amended. The City of Arlington Final
Comprehensive Plan shall be amended to include the version of the
"Lakewood School District #306 Capital Facilities Plan 2012-
2017" approved by the Lakewood School District on September
19, 2012 as part of the Capital Facilities Element (CF) of the
Arlington Final Comprehensive Plan.
Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective five days from
its adoption and publication.
ORDINANCE NO. 2013-014 1
PASSED BY TI-I CITY COUNCIL AT A REGULAR MEETING THEREOF
ON THE + �- DAY OF U UOl QC - .2013.
CITY OF ARLINGTON, WASHINGTON
Barbara Tolbert, Mayor
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
KristNj Banfield, City CIA
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
St ven . P if'fle, ity Attorney
ORDINANCE NO. 2013-014 2
LAKEWOOD SCHOOL DISTRICT NO.306
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2012-2017
APPROVED:
SEPTEMBER 19, 2012
LAKEWOOD SCHOOL DISTRICT NO.306
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2012-2017
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
KELLY ALLEN, PRESIDENT
LARRY BEAN, VICE PRESIDENT
KEN CHRISTIANSEN
OSCAR ESCALANTE
GREGORY JENSEN
SUPERINTENDENT
DR. DENNIS HADDOCK
For information regarding the Lakewood School District Capital Facilities Plan, contact the Office of the Superintendent,
Lakewood School District, P.O. Box 220, North Lakewood, WA 98259-0220. Tel: (360) 652-4500 or Fax: (360) 652-4502.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Section1.
Introduction..............................................................................................................I
Section 2.
District Educational Program Standards
..................................................................4
Section 3.
Capital Facilities Inventory ...............................
Section 4.
Student Enrollment Projections.............................................................................11
Section S.
Capital Facilities Needs.........................................................................................13
Section 6.
Capital Facilities Financing Plan ...........................
................................ ................16
Section 7.
School Impact Fees ..................... .........................................................................
..19
Appendix A
............................................................Population
and Enrollment Data
Appendix B
.........................................................Student
Generation Factor Review
Appendix C
.............................................................School
Impact Fee Calculations
INTRODUCTION
A. Purpose of the Capital Facilities Plan
The Washington State Growth Management Act (the "GMA") includes schools in the category
of public facilities and services. School districts have adopted capital facilities plans to satisfy
the requirements of the GMA and to identify additional school facilities necessary to meet the
educational needs of the growing student populations anticipated in their districts.
The Lakewood School District (the "District") has prepared this Capital Facilities Plan (the
"CFP") to provide Snohomish County (the "County") and the cities of Arlington and Marysville
with a description of facilities needed to accommodate projected student enrollment and a
schedule and financing program for capital improvements over the next six years (2012-2017).
In accordance with the Growth Management Act, adopted County Policy, the Snohomish County
Ordinance Nos. 97-095 and 99-107, the City of Arlington Ordinance No. 1263, and the City of
Marysville Ordinance Nos. 2306 and 2213, this CFP contains the following required elements:
• Future enrollment forecasts for each grade span (elementary, middle, and
high school).
An inventory of existing capital facilities owned by the District, showing
the locations and capacities of the facilities.
• A forecast of the future needs for capital facilities and school sites.
• The proposed capacities of expanded or new capital facilities.
• A six -year plan for financing capital facilities within projected funding
capacities, which clearly identifies sources of public money for such
purposes. The financing plan separates projects and portions of projects
which add capacity from those which do not, since the latter are generally
not appropriate for impact fee funding.
• A calculation of impact fees to be assessed and supporting data
substantiating said fees.
In developing this CFP, the District followed the following guidelines set forth in the Snohomish
County General Policy Plan:
Districts should use information from recognized sources, such as the U.S.
Census or the Puget Sound Regional Council. School districts may
generate their own data if it is derived through statistically reliable
methodologies. Information must not be inconsistent with Office of
Financial Management ("OFM") population forecasts. Student generation
rates must be independently calculated by each school district.
The CFP must comply with the GMA.
The methodology used to calculate impact fees must comply with the
GMA. The CFP must identify alternative funding sources in the event that
impact fees are not available due to action by the state, county or cities
within the District.
The methodology used to calculate impact fees also complies with the
criteria and the formulas established by the County.
B. Overview of the Lakewood School District
The Lakewood School District is located along Interstate 5, north of Marysville, Washington,
primarily serving unincorporated Snohomish County and a part of the City of Arlington and the
City of Marysville. The District is bordered on the south by the Marysville School District, on
the west and north by the Stanwood School District, and on the east by the Arlington School
District.
The District serves a student population of 2,288 (October 1, 2011 FTE Enrollment) with three
elementary schools, one middle school, and one high school.
&A
FIGURE 1
MAP OF FACILITIES
®lMeam/ 61Igd �I/IW �nPn corer v'++� i.. ss a r� "ewrr N -� a hdr-
L it k e u v o o d 4 c qt �1 �� I D i rnm. tu..,, u„ qxq dla ve pqe. n.e dear n rq
Cp' Lhrl6 t t i c� t ..a,ry d �d.dr�/l, .'..r.« d11r e1 Pa dr• a11W Rx
n! Pef¢I• Pwae-Par apwi 9 11p�d Ne �4+.rtr o
wsb a rq mianry fe �, rreMp � 9,e4� 3fw
IJ � w erg,oy�andrr.„ae�,l..rr.e+a..tw�e�
j 2m er w+ ear dr4. m. u rnPei eta non nr .. � fi.
aaa
IursrodM WW'gh il.., IKM'13112% IVi psbYft
J $J �j u. d M aI.dALr. (tr'mm�cr P/w� 1 u�d.tl..! htl
- 9► Kn1q n. � 1v lonl.d wv�..." d.rf rrw ree.b uuq
13—h Mni i-t1 Lwr�.d .tjiwtri0�
1 hCl [Nlfll d,000 tN �� nlem;o— er r..lunirlrnMr'w tii Mrs .
Q i1211v nree a>r mWbetl,.rK il:�rrl f•r e.rrrrpsrdgl
P.rwr arse w:� .pr1a m � nrdm swnr� .y rr
�� n.ea,.r�}-.1.cre.r.:,ebe11�1r.�.ir.m►e1�c.aR
r
m+lYl s° 1
mall
L NDd Will
¢` Ii
���°+ a Ism �,///, I o f +//ll {foal J
i * "{
1!� n
r 1T7 I,IkYwaad - I k JMlvl ARLAWON
0R ,.
a/ 'O
j IT{tt F (r A lid/ 1►1t51Y
j Il( I ,R U as !7[S76
N� l� IfTpY LLL!!! hratalq $ �; � "In fMIA
f, isms
A/�la YeYHlla# D!Tliw
slow.
q llfl, 16/Ih TI##i##fl#11#6
� I+
i J } 'c Olt lien
LE
WAR) 9VL
i jj 1/Jrd # ;I yy A r 1
1M0
WIi6
-3-
SECTION 2
DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM STANDARDS
School facility and student capacity needs are dictated by the types and amounts of space
required to accommodate the District's adopted educational program. The educational program
standards which typically drive facility space needs include grade configuration, optimum
facility size, class size, educational program offerings, classroom utilization and scheduling
requirements, and use of relocatable classroom facilities (portables), as well as specific and
unique physical structure needs required to meet the full access needs of students with special
needs.
In addition to factors which affect the amount of space required, government mandates and
community expectations may affect how classroom space is used. Traditional educational
programs offered by school districts are often supplemented by nontraditional, or special
programs such as special education, expanded bilingual education, remediation, migrant
education, alcohol and drug education, AIDS education, preschool and daycare programs,
computer labs, music programs, and others. These special or nontraditional educational
programs can have a significant impact on the available student capacity of school facilities, and
upon planning for future needs.
Special programs offered by the District at specific school sites include, but are not limited to:
Lakewood Elementary School (Preschool through 51h Grades)
• Bilingual Education Program
• Title I Remedial Services Program
• P — 5`h Grade Counseling Services
• Speech and Language Disorder Therapy Program
• Early Childhood Education and Assistance Program (ECEAP)
• Developmentally Delayed Preschool Program - Ages 3 to 5
• K-5`h Grade Special Education Resource Room Program
• Learning Assistance Program - Remedial Services
• Occupational Therapy Program
• K-5`h Grade Autism Program
English Crossing Elementary School (Kindergarten through 51h Grades)
• K through 5th Grade Special Education Resource Room Program
• Bilingual Education Program
• K — 5th Grade Counseling Services
• Speech and Language Disorder Therapy Program
• Learning Assistance Program - Tutorial Services
-4-
• Occupational Therapy Program
• Special Education EBD Program
Cougar Creek Elementary School (Kindergarten through 51h Grades)
• Bilingual Education Program
• Title I Remedial Services Program
• Speech and Language Disorder Therapy Program
• Learning Assistance Program — Remedial Services (Learning Lab)
• Occupational Therapy Program
• K — 5`h Grade Special Education Resource Room Program
• K — 5`h Grade Special Education Life Skills Program (serves all K-5 schools)
• K — 5`h Grade Counseling Services
• 3-5 1h Highly Capable/Enrichment Program (serves grades 3-5 district -wide)
Lakewood Middle School (6th through 8th Grades)
• Speech and Language Disorder Therapy Program
• 6th-8th Grade Special Education Resource and Inclusion Program
• Bilingual Education Program
• Learning Assistance Program - Tutorial Services
• Occupational Therapy Program
• 6`h — 8`' Grade Counseling Services
Lakewood High School
• 9th-12th Grade Special Education Resource Room and Transition Program
• 6th-12th Grade Special Education Life Skills Program
• Bilingual Education Program
• Occupational Therapy Program
• Speech and Language Disorder Program
• 9`h —12`h Grade Counseling Program
Variations in student capacity between schools may result from the special or nontraditional
programs offered at specific schools. Some students, for example, leave their regular classroom
for a short period of time to receive instruction in these special programs. Schools recently added
to the District's inventory have been designed to accommodate many of these programs.
However, existing schools often require space modifications to accommodate special programs,
-5-
and in some circumstances, these modifications may affect the overall classroom capacities of
the buildings.
District educational program standards may change in the future as a result of changes in the
program year, special programs, class sizes, grade span configurations, use of new technology,
and other physical aspects of the school facilities. The school capacity inventory will be
reviewed periodically and adjusted for any changes to the educational program standards. These
changes will also be reflected in future updates of this Capital Facilities Plan.
The District educational program standards which directly affect school capacity are outlined
below for the elementary, middle, and high school grade levels.
Educational Program Standards For Elementary Schools
• Class size for grades K — 4th will not exceed 26 students.
• Class size for grades 5th — 8th will not exceed 28 students.
• All students will be provided library/media services in a school library.
• Special Education for students may be provided in self-contained or specialized
classrooms.
• All students will be provided music instruction in a separate classroom.
• All students will have scheduled time in a computer lab. Each classroom will have
access to computers and related educational technology.
• Optimum design capacity for new elementary schools is 475 students. However, actual
capacity of individual schools may vary depending on the educational programs offered.
• All students will be provided physical education instruction in a gym or in a multipurpose
room.
Educational Program Standards For Middle and High Schools
• Class size for middle school grades will not exceed 28 students.
• Class size for high school grades will not exceed 30 students.
As a result of scheduling conflicts for student programs, the need for specialized rooms
for certain programs, and the need for teachers to have a work space during planning
periods, it is not possible to achieve 100% utilization of all regular teaching stations
throughout the day. In updating this Capital Facility Plan, a building review of classroom
use was conducted in order to reflect the actual classroom utilization in the high school
and middle school. Therefore, classroom capacity should be adjusted using a utilization
factor of 86% at the middle school and 83% at the high school to reflect the use of
classrooms for teacher planning. Special Education for students will be provided in self-
contained or specialized classrooms.
All students will have access to computer labs. Each classroom is equipped with access
to computers and related educational -technology.
Sel
Identified students will also be provided other nontraditional educational opportunities in
classrooms designated as follows:
Counseling Offices
Resource Rooms (i.e. computer labs, study rooms)
Special Education Classrooms
Program Specific Classrooms (i.e. music, drama, art, physical education,
Industrial Arts and Agricultural Sciences).
Optimum design capacity for new middle schools is 600 students. However, actual
capacity of individual schools may vary depending on the educational programs offered.
Optimum design capacity for new high schools is 800 students. However, actual capacity
of individual schools may vary depending on the educational programs offered.
Minimum Educational Service Standards
The District will evaluate student housing levels based on the District as a whole system and not
on a school by school or site by site basis. This may result in portable classrooms being used as
interim housing, attendance boundary changes or other program changes to balance student
housing across the system as a whole. A boundary change or a significant programmatic change
would be made by the District's Board of Directors following appropriate public review and
comment.
The District has set minimum educational service standards based on several criteria. Exceeding
these minimum standards will trigger significant changes in program delivery. Minimum
standards have not been met if, on averaac using current FTE figures: K-4 classrooms have 26
or more students per classroom, 5-8 classrooms have 28 or more students per classroom, or 9-12
classrooms have 30 or more students per classroom. For purposes of this determination, the term
"classroom" does not include special education classrooms or special program classrooms (i.e.
computer labs, art rooms, chorus and band rooms, spaces used for physical education and other
special program areas). Furthermore, the term "classroom" does not apply to special programs
or activities that may occur in a regular classroom. The minimum educational service standards
are not District's desired or accepted operating standard.
The District reported the following information to Snohomish County in 2011 to demonstrate
compliance with the minimum educational service standards:
LOS Standard
MINIMUM
CURRENT
MINIMUM
CURRENT
MINIMUM
CURRENT
LOS#
LOS
LOS
LOS
LOS
LOS
Elementary
Elementary
Middle
Middle
High
High
Lakewood No. 306
26
17
28
24
30
29
The District determines the minimum service_level by adding the number of students in regular classrooms
at each grade level and dividing that number by the number of teaching stations.
-7-
SECTION 3
CAPITAL FACILITIES INVENTORY
The facilities inventory serves to establish a baseline for determining the facilities necessary to
accommodate future demand (student enrollment) at acceptable levels of service. This section
provides an inventory of capital facilities owned and operated by the District including schools,
relocatable classrooms, undeveloped land, and support facilities. Facility capacity is based on
the space required to accommodate the District's adopted educational program standards. See
Section 2. Attached as Figure 1 (page 3) is a map showing locations of District facilities.
A. Schools
The District maintains three elementary schools, one middle school, and one high school.
Lakewood Elementary School accommodates grades K-2, Cougar Creek Elementary School
accommodates grades K-5, and English Crossing Elementary School accommodates grades 3-5.
Lakewood Middle School serves grades 6-8, and Lakewood High School serves grades 9-12.
School capacity was determined based on the number of teaching stations within each building
and the space requirements of the District's adopted educational program. It is this capacity
calculation that is used to establish the District's baseline capacity, and to determine future
capacity needs based on projected student enrollment. The school capacity inventory is
summarized in Table 1.
Relocatable classrooms are not viewed by the District as a solution for housing students on a
permanent basis. Therefore, these facilities were not included in the school capacity calculations
provided in Table 1.
Table 1
School Capacity Inventory
Elementary School
Site Size
(Acres)
Building Area
(Square Feet)
Teaching
Stations
Permanent
Capacity
Year Built or
Remodeled
English Crossing
*
41,430
18
479
1994
Cougar Creek
10**
44,217
19
500
2003
Lakewood
*
45,400
1 16
1416
1 1998/1997
TOTAL
*
131,047
1 53
1 1,395
Site Size
Building Area
Teaching
Permanent
Year Built or
Middle School
(Acres)
(Square Feet)
Stations
Capacity
Remodeled
Lakewood Middle
*
62,835
25
602
1971, 1994,
and 2002
High School
Site Size
(Acres)
Building Area
(Square Feet)
Teaching
Stations
Permanent
Capacity
Year Built or
Remodeled
Lakewood High
*
79,422
24
598
1982
*Note; All facilities are located on one 89-acre campus located at Tax Parcel No. 31053000100300.
**The Cougar Creek site is approximately 22 acres located at 16216 l 1`h Ave NE, Arlington, WA 98223. Note that
the presence of critical areas on the site does not allow full utilization at this site.
B. Relocatable Classrooms
Relocatable classrooms are used on an interim basis to house students until funding can be
secured to construct permanent classrooms. The District currently uses 29 relocatable
classrooms at various school sites throughout the District to provide additional interim capacity.
A typical relocatable classroom can provide capacity for a full-size class of students. Current use
of relocatable classrooms throughout the District is summarized in Table 2. Table 2 includes
only those relocatable classrooms used for regular capacity purposes.
Table 2
Relocatable Classroom (Portable) Inventory
Elementary School
Relocatables
Interim
Capacity
English Crossing
5
135
Cougar Creek
0
0
Lakewood
7
182
SUBTOTAL
12
317
Middle School
Relocatables
Interim
Capacity
Lakewood Middle
10*
241
SUBTOTAL
10
241
High School
Relocatables
Interim
Capacity
Lakewood High
7
174
SUBTOTAL
7
174
TOTAL 29 732
*Six of the ten relocatables at the middle school level are unusable due to condition. These relocatables will be
replaced in 2012 and allow a continued total number of ten relocatables at the middle school level.
la
C. Support Facilities
In addition to schools, the District owns and operates additional facilities which provide
operational support functions to the schools. An inventory of these facilities is provided in
Table 3.
Table 3
Support Facility Inventory
Facility
Building Area
(Square Feet)
Administration
1,384
Business and Operations
1,152
Storage
2,456
Bus Garage
5,216
Maintenance Shop
4,096
Stadium
14,500
A Land Inventory
The District does not own any sites which are developed for uses other than schools and/or
which are leased to other parties.
-10-
SECTION 4
STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS
The District's October 1, 2011 FTE enrollment was 2,288. Enrollment projections are most
accurate for the initial years of the forecast period. Moving further into the future, more
assumptions about economic conditions and demographic trends in the area affect the projection.
Monitoring birth rates in Snohomish County and population growth for the area are essential
yearly activities in the ongoing management of the capital facilities plan. In the event that
enrollment growth slows, plans for new facilities can be delayed. It is much more difficult,
however, to initiate new projects or speed projects up in the event enrollment growth exceeds the
projection.
A. Six Year Enrollment Projections
Two enrollment forecasts were conducted for the District: an estimate by the Office of the
Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI) based upon the cohort survival method; and an
estimate based upon County population as provided by OFM ("ratio method").
Based on the cohort survival methodology, a total of 2,179 FTE students are expected to be
enrolled in the District by 2017, a decrease from the October 2011 enrollment levels. Notably,
the cohort survival method does not anticipate new students from new development patterns.
This is particularly true of new development resulting from annexation and rezoning (both of
which have recently occurred in the City of Marysville).
OFM population -based enrollment projections were estimated for the District using OFM
population forecasts for the County. The County provided the District with the estimated total
population in the District by year. Between 1990 and 2011, the District's student enrollment
constituted approximately 18.15% of the total population in the District. Assuming that between
2012 and 2017, the District's enrollment will continue to constitute 18.15% of the District's total
population and using OFM/County data, OFM/County methodology projects a total enrollment
of 2,743 FTEs in 2017.
Table 4
Projected Student Enrollment
2012-2017
Percent
Oct.
Change
Change
Projection
2011*
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2012-17
2012-17
OFM/County
2,288
2,363
2,438
2,513
2,588
2,663
2,743
455
19.89%
OSPI
2,288
2,405
2,372
2,336
2,329
2,302
2,179
(109)
(4.76%)
Cohort**
* Actual FTE, October 2011
**Based upon the cohort survival methodology (using FTE, which for the District is headcount
enrollment with kindergarten at 0.5); complete projections located at Appendix A.
-11-
In addition to the OFM population -based enrollment projections, the District is aware of pending
development within the District's portion of the City of Marysville. This information is based on
development applications filed with the City and does not consider additional projects that may
be submitted to the City within the six years of this plan period.
Given these pending developments and the fact that the OSPI method does not incorporate the
County's planning data, the District has chosen to rely on the OFM population -based enrollment
projections for purposes of planning for the District's needs during the six years of this plan
period. Future updates to the Plan may revisit this issue.
B. 2025 Enrollment Projections
Student enrollment projections beyond 2017 are highly speculative. Using OFM/County data as
a base, the District projects a 2025 student FTE population of 3,021. This is based on the
OFM/County data for the years 1990 through 2011 and the District's average fulltime equivalent
enrollment for the corresponding years (for the years 1990 to 2011, the District's actual
enrollment averaged 18.15% of the OFM/County population estimates). The total enrollment
estimate was broken down by grade span to evaluate long-term needs for capital facilities.
Projected enrollment by grade span for the year 2025 is provided in Table 5. Again, these
estimates are highly speculative and are used only for general planning purposes.
Table 5
Projected Student Enrollment
2025
Grade Span
FTE Enrollment —
October 2011
Projected Enrollment 2025*
Elementary (K-5)
959
1,266
Middle School(6-8)
598
789
High School(9-12)
731
967
TOTAL (K-12)
2,288
3,021
*Assumes that percentage per grade span will remain constant through 2025.
Note: Snohomish County Planning and Development Service provided the underlying data for the 2025
projections.
-12-
SECTION 5
CAPITAL FACILITIES NEEDS
The projected available student capacity was determined by subtracting projected FTE student
enrollment from permanent school capacity (i.e. excluding portables) for each of the six years in
the forecast period (2012-2017).
Capacity needs are expressed in terms of "unhoused students."
Projected future capacity needs are depicted on Table 6-A and are derived by applying the
projected enrollment to the capacity existing in 2012. The method used to define future capacity
needs assumes no new construction. For this reason, planned construction projects are not
included at this point. This factor is added later (see Table 7).
This table shows actual space needs and the portion of those needs that are "growth related" for
the years 2012-2017,
Table 6-A*
Additional Capacity Needs
2011-2017
Grade Span
2011**
2012-13
2013-14
2014-15
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
Pct.
Growth
Related
Elementary (K-5)
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Growth Related
-
-
-
--
0%
Middle School (6-8)
Total
0
0
0
1
19
37
56
Growth Related***
--
0
0
1
19
37
56
100%
High School
Total
133
168
192
216
241
265
291
Growth Related***
--
1 35
59
83
108
132
158
54.3%
*Please refer to Table 7 for capacity and projected enrollment information.
**Actual October 2011 FTE Enrollment
***This figure does not include growth -related needs from recent development activity within the District. Therefore,
the District's growth -related needs are much higher.
-13-
By the end of the six -year forecast period (2017), additional permanent classroom capacity will
be needed as follows:
Table 6-B
Unhoused Students
Grade Span
Unhoused Students
/Growth Related in
Parentheses)
Elementary (K-5)
0 / (0)
Middle School (6-8)
56 / (56)
High School (9-12)
291/ (158)
TOTAL UNHOUSED
(K-12)
347/(214)
It is not the District's policy to include relocatable classrooms when determining future capital
facility needs; therefore interim capacity provided by relocatable classrooms is not included in
Table 6-B. However, Table 6-C incorporates the District's current relocatable capacity (see
Table 2) for purposes of identifying available capacity.
Table 6-C
Unhoused Students — Mitigated with Relocatables
Grade Span
2017 Unhoused Students
/Growth Related in
(Parentheses)
Relocatable Capacity
Unhoused Students*
Elementary (K-5)
0/(0)
317
- --
Middle School (6-8)
56 / (56)
241
-----
High School (9-12)
291 / (158)
174
*Importantly, Table 6-C does not include relocatable adjustment that may be made to meet
capacity needs. For example, the relocatable classrooms currently designated to serve
elementary school needs could be used to serve high school capacity needs. Therefore, assuming
no permanent capacity improvements are made, Table 6-C indicates that the District will have
adequate interim capacity with the use of relocatable classrooms to house students during this
planning period.
Projected permanent capacity needs are depicted in Table 7. They are derived by applying the
District's projected number of students to the projected capacity. Planned improvements by the
District through 2017 are included in Table 7 and more fully described in Table 8.
-14-
Table 7
Projected Student Capacity
2012-2017
F.lementary Schnnl Surnlus/Delicienev
Oct2011
FTE
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
Existing Capacity
1,395
1,395
1,395
1,395
1,395
1,395
1,395
Added Permanent
Capacity
Total Capacity
1,395
1,395
1,395
1,395
1,395
1,395
1 1,395
Enrollment
959
1,030
1,063
1,096
1,128
1,161
1,196
Surplus (Deficiency)
436
365
332
299
267
234
199
Middle Schnnl Surnlus/Dclicienev
Oct2011
FTE
2012
1 2113
1014
2015
2016
2017
Existing Capacity
602
602
602
602
602
602
602
Added Permanent
Capacity*
Total Capacity
602
602
602
602
602
602
602
Enrollment
598
567
595
603
621
639
659
Surplus (Deficiency)
4
35
17
(1)
(19)
(37)
(56)
*See Section 6 for project information.
Moh Schnnl Surnlus/Deficiency
Oct2011
FTE
2012
2011
2012
2013
2014
2017
Existing Capacity
598
598
598
598
598
598
598
Added Permanent
Capacity*
300
Total Capacity
598
598
598
598
598
598
898
Enrollment
731
766
790
814
839
863
889
Surplus (Deficiency)
(133)
(168)
(192)
(216)
(241)
(265)
9
*See Section 6 for project information.
See Appendix A for complete breakdown of enrollment projections.
See Table 6-A for a comparison of additional capacity needs due to growth versus existing deficiencies
-15-
SECTION 6
CAPITAL FACILITIES FINANCING PLAN
A. Planned Improvements
In March 2000, the voters passed a $14,258,664 bond issue for school construction and site
acquisition. A new elementary school and a middle school addition were funded by that bond
measure. These projects are complete. Based upon current needs, the District anticipates that it
may need to consider the following acquisitions and/or improvements within the six years of this
Plan:
Projects Adding Permanent Capacity:
A three hundred (300) student expansion at Lakewood High School;
A potential expansion at Lakewood Middle School, subject to future
planning analysis and funding; and
Acquisition and siting of portable facilities to accommodate growth needs.
Non -Capacity Adding Projects:
High School modernization and improvements;
• Cougar Creek HVAC improvements;
English Crossing roof replacement;
Replacement of relocatable classrooms;
Bus Garage improvements;
Replace Administration Building;
• Replace Business Office Building; and
Land acquisition for future sites.
In the event that planned construction projects do not fully address space needs for student
growth and a reduction in interim student housing, the Board could consider various courses of
action, including, but not limited to:
• Alternative scheduling options;
Changes in the instructional model;
Grade configuration changes;
• Increased class sizes; or
Modified school calendar.
Funding for planned improvements is typically secured from a number of sources including voter
approved bonds, State Match funds, and impact fees. The District would need to request voter
authorization of a bond issue within the six years of this Plan to fund the above projects and/or
find other capital funding sources (including the use of school impact fees). The potential
funding sources are discussed below.
-16-
B. Financing for Planned Improvements
1. General Obligation Bonds
Bonds are typically used to fund construction of new schools and other capital
improvement projects. A 60% voter approval is required to approve the issuance of bonds.
Bonds are then retired through collection of property taxes. In March 2000, District voters
approved a $14,258,664 bond issue for school construction and site acquisition, which included
funding of the recently completed elementary school. The District is considering a request for
voter authorization of a bond issue within the six -years of this Plan to fund the school
construction projects identified in this plan. Additional details regarding the bond issue will be
included in future updates.
2. State School Construction Assistance
State School Construction Assistance funds come from the Common School Construction
Fund (the "Fund"). Bonds are sold on behalf of the Fund, and then retired from revenues
accruing predominantly from the sale of timber from common school lands. If these sources are
insufficient, the Legislature can appropriate funds or the State Board of Education can change
the standards. School districts may qualify for State School Construction Assistance funds for
specific capital projects based on a prioritization system. The District is eligible for State School
Construction Assistance funds for new schools at the 51.21% funding percentage level.
3. Impact Fees
Impact fees are a means of supplementing traditional funding sources for construction of
public facilities needed to accommodate new development. School impact fees are generally
collected by the permitting agency at the time plats are approved or building permits are issued.
4. Six Year Financing Plan
The Six -Year Financing Plan shown in Table 8 demonstrates how the District intends to
Rind new construction and improvements to school facilities for the years 2012-2017. The
financing components include a bond issue, impact fees, and State Match funds. Projects and
portions of projects which remedy existing deficiencies are not appropriate for impact fee
funding. Thus, impact fees will not be used to finance projects or portions of projects which do
not add capacity or which remedy existing deficiencies.
-17-
Table 8
Capital Facilities Plan
Improvements Addine Permanent Canad(v (Costs in Millions)
Project
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
Total
Cost
Bondst
Levy
State
Match
Impact
Fees
Elementary School
Middle School
Portables
56.000
X
X
Ili h School
Lakewood High
Addition
54.208
$12.623
S16.832
X
X
X
Secondary
Slte Acquisition
54.500
54.500
X
IX
Inlnrovements Not Addine Caoacily (Costs in Millions)
Pro ecl
2012
2013
201d
2015
2016
2017
Total
Cost
Bonds(
Le%h,
State
Match
Impact
Fees
Elementary
Middle School
Ili h School
Lakewood High
Modernization
and Shop/Lab
Replacement
$7.436
$22.269
$29.705
X
X
LHS Track
Improvements
$2.340
52.340
X
X
Total Permanent lmpl'ovCmelltS (Costs in jN4illions)
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
Total
Cost
Bonds/
Lew
State
Match
Impact
Fees
TOTAL
$6.000
$4.500
1 $11.6
1 $59.377
X
I X
I X
MMI
SECTION 7
SCHOOL IMPACT FEES
The GMA authorizes jurisdictions to collect impact fees to supplement funding of
additional public facilities needed to accommodate new development. Impact fees cannot be
used for the operation, maintenance, repair, alteration, or replacement of existing capital facilities
used to meet existing service demands.
A. School Impact Fees in Snohomish County
The Snohomish County General Policy Plan ("GPP") which implements the GMA sets
certain conditions for school districts wishing to assess impact fees:
• The District must provide support data including: an explanation of the
calculation methodology, a description of key variables and their
computation, and definitions and sources of data for all inputs into the fee
calculation.
Such data must be accurate, reliable and statistically valid.
• Data must accurately reflect projected costs in the Six -Year Financing
Plan.
• Data in the proposed impact fee schedule must reflect expected student
generation rates from the following residential unit types: single family;
multi-family/studio or 1-bedroom; and multi-family/2-bedroom or more.
Snohomish County established a school impact fee program in November 1997, and
amended the program in December 1999. This program requires school districts to prepare and
adopt Capital Facilities Plans meeting the specifications of the GMA. Impact fees calculated in
accordance with the formula, which are based on projected school facility costs necessitated by
new growth and are contained in the District's CFP, become effective following County Council
adoption of the District's CFP.
B. Methodology and Variables Used to Calculate School Impact Fees
Impact fees have been calculated utilizing the formula in the Snohomish County Impact
Fee Ordinance. The resulting figures are based on the District's cost per dwelling unit to
purchase land for school sites, make site improvements, construct schools, and purchase/install
relocatable facilities that add interim capacity needed to serve new development. As required
under the GMA, credits have also been applied in the formula to account for State Match funds
to be reimbursed to the District and projected future property taxes to be paid by the dwelling
unit. The costs of projects that do not add capacity are not included in the impact fee
calculations. Furthermore, because the impact fee formula calculates a "cost per dwelling unit",
an identical fee is generated regardless of whether the total new capacity project costs are used in
-19-
the calculation or whether the District only uses the percentage of the total new capacity project
costs allocated to the Districts growth -related needs, as demonstrated in Table 6-A. For purposes
of this Plan, the District has chosen to use the full project costs in the fee formula. Furthermore,
impact fees will not be used to address existing deficiencies. See Table 8 for a complete
identification of funding sources.
The following projects are included in the impact fee calculation:
• A capacity addition at Lakewood High School.
Please see Table 8 and page 21 for relevant cost data related to each capacity project.
-20-
FACTORS FOR ESTIMATED IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS
Student Generation Factors — Single Family
Elementary
.221
Middle
.125
Senior
.154
Total
.500
Student Generation Factors
— Multi Family (l Bdrm)
Elementary
.000
Middle
.000
Senior
.000
Total
.000
Student Generation Factors — Multi Family (2+ Bdrm)
Elementary
.122
Middle
.069
Senior
.061
Total
.252
Projected Student Capacity per Facility
High School (new addition) - 300
Required Site Acreage per Facility
Facility Construction/Cost Average
High School (Addition) $16,831,500
Permanent Facility Square Footage
Elementary
131,042
Middle
62,835
Senior
79,422
Total 93.56%
273,304
Temporary Facility Square Footage
Elementary
8,960
Middle
6,272
Senior
3,584
Total 6.44%
18,816
Total Facility Square Footage
Elementary
140,007
Middle
69,107
Senior
83,006
Total 100.00%
292,120
-21-
Average Site Cost/Acre
Temporary Facility Capacity
Capacity
Cost
State Match Credit
Current State Match Percentage
Construction Cost Allocation
Current CCA
District Average Assessed Value
Single Family Residence
District Average Assessed Value
Multi Family (1 Bedroom)
Multi Family (2+ Bedroom)
SPI Square Footage per Student
Elementary
Middle
High
District Debt Service Tax Rate for Bonds
Current/$1,000
General Obligation Bond Interest Rate
Current Bond Buyer Index
Developer Provided Sites/Facilities
Value
Dwelling Units
51.21 %
188.55
$295,743
$76,281
$111,402
90
108
130
$1.82
4.00%
0
0
C. Proposed Lakewood School District Impact Fee Schedule
Using the variables and formula described in subsection B, impact fees proposed for the
District are summarized in Table 9. See also Appendix C.
Table 9
School Impact Fees
Snohomish County, City of Arlington, City of Marysville
Housing Type
Impact Fee Per Dwelling Unit
Single Family
$892
Multi -Family (1 Bedroom)
$0
Multi -Family (2+ Bedroom)
$396
-22-
APPENDIX A
POPULATION AND ENROLLMENT DATA
Table A-1
HISTORICAL STUDENT ENROLLMENT 2003-2011
ACTUAL ENROLLMENTS ON OCTOBER 1st*
GRADES
2003
2004
2005
j 2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
K
100
102
98
89
95
86
97
82
99
1" Grade
204
193
200
205
186
186
175
181
164
2" Grade
201
189
194
204
189
190
184
158
179
31° Grade
174
197
190
204
199
189
183
181
162
4 Grade
204
183
202
200
200
209
194
171
175
5 Grade
214
205
177
200
194
192
210
1 181
180
6°'Grade
I 242
220
193
184
200
191
212
210
194
7 Grade
204
222
222
198
183
189
j 190
193
200
8'Grade
I 189
199
216
215
207
185
197
190
204
9 Grade
214
187
199
227
221
203
189
185
183
10` Grade
190
202
158
188
218
212
205
181
187
11` Grade
178
180
171
157
184
203
196
187
172
12Grade
163
172
175
171
161
188
204
180
189
Total
Enrollment
2,477
2,451
2,395
2,442
2.437
2.423
2.436
2.280
2.288
* FTE enrollment
A-1
Table A-2
PROJECTED STUDENT ENROLLMENT 2012-2017
Based on OSPI Cohort Survival*
(headcount Enrollment)
STATE• of L"atirN[iroN n.Ero RT E110. 10tC
8UPERINTENUNT OF PUBLIC IHH1RU411UN Hull UN 1b:11 uEi: u7 11
VLYMP3A
n r T F O N 1 NAT TON OF PROJECTED UNR a L L H E H T 3
B Y C O H O R T s U R V T v A L KK ClPdr I ►110J.lt 720M
LAI¢M000 DICTnICT "D. 0045 CNOHO 411 COIRTiY ND. 31
•-ACTUAL ENROLLNENTG ON OCTOBCR rIROT--- AVCR. %--------- I' 11 0 J C C T E D E N R O L L F1 E N T a
2:086 2007 2008 2OOD 2010 2011 Y.URV1vAL Stul-J %D1'S 1a14 JU17 101 is 2011,
KINDERGART2N 17A 1Ao 177 lad I 1-T 1041 1R7 lea 1Bs 191 192
ORADC 1 SOS lea lea 176 181 16-0 06.71 TIDE 186 1t36 10J 10N 140
WOVE 1 204 T89 190 184 1" 17q AA. 4A IZR 174q 1TR t7/1 1Ra lAl
GRADE 3 PO4 lee 100 100 101 162 Qla.06 177 1b6 187 177 177 178
G1H^Vk .1 uuu 1Ua 2u" 194 171 175 94_ }6 141 ITq IRA IR-S 17n I716
A11AS1F S 20C 1B4 192 21D 101 too So.49 17Y 1611 1 itl 1bJ lee lI•s
17R/4DE • 16-1 306 lol 7t2 21a 1— 101_31 1a4 170 109 lro 159 1n.11
K-C; IMA060UNT 1,07E 1.657 1.*Ro 1.362 1,246 1.261 1,285 1.2<O 1,231 .1.O.1B 1.:eea i,J71f
R-u NJRB I1z 1,2%tb 1.263 1,243 1.255 I, 404 I, IR7 t�14.S I, 1]" 1,1.n7 1,/!iy 1,157 I . I "
GRADE 7 low 1U7 IYY 1Vu I.. 1ou Ly-6" afltr 178 17■ 156 172 /P?
CJi Ai1F R 71M V67 1A-q 197 ISO 2434 103.11 200 192 104 171S 161 177
7.8 HE/•ODDUNT 413 800 374 3117 JWa 404 .iv2 3ru 7Yx :2-A1 '924
nawnr q fi97 orl can 1" 186 188 48.64 201 203 Too 181 171 169
ta1/WG I Ivu J141 212 205. 191 COT P7 QR 17Q 1"7 HQa I.., 17T 17q
GRADE 11 157 1O4 200 186 107 17e 90.93 176 18a 188 157 174 1B6
6HAUk 1J 171 1tl1 -Iam 2uti 1So 1$91 DO. E2 171 17¢ Mf 1F64 @Ad.. 17.1
0-19. HFMCOUNT 743 784 990 794 733 701 7C7 740 740 707 711 see
1c-la mr^nt1Mt 7, 7T1 7,•11t 7, San 2,330, 2.341 2.380 2, DOC. 2.342 2,326 P,010 2.,296 £,P75
* The cohort survival method of predicting future enrollment does not consider enrollment attributable to new development in the District. Enrollment
projections are most accurate for the initial years of the forecast period.
A-2
Table A-3
AVERAGE PERCENTAGE ENROLLMENT BY GRADE SPAN
(OSPI Enrollment Projections — Using FTE Enrollment)
Enrollment by
Grade Span
Oct.
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
Elementary (K-5)
959
957
958
974
976
999
994
Middle School(6-8)
598
578
548
518
511
491
517
High School(9-12)
731
727
743
740
737
711
668
TOTAL
28888
1 2.262
1 2.249
2.232
1 2.224
1 2,201
1 2.179
Percentage by
Grade Span
Oct.
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
Element (K-5)
42%
42%
43%
44%
44%
45%
45%
Middle School (6-8)
26%
26%
24%
23%
23%
22%
24%
High School(9-12)
32%
32%
1 33%
33%
33%
33%
31°%
TOTAL**
1100%
1 100%
1 100%
1 100%
1 100%
1 100%
100%
Average Percentage
by Grade Span
Flemertary (K-5)
43.6%
Middle School (6-8)
24.0%
High School(9-12)
32.4%
TOTAL.
100%
A-3
Table A4
AVERAGE PERCENTAGE ENROLLMENT BY GRADE SPAN
(COUNTY/OFM Enrollment Projections)***
Enrollment by
Grade Span
Oct.
2011*
Avg.
%a a
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
Elementary (K-5)
959
43.6%
1,030
1,063
1,096
1,128
1,161
1,196
Middle School(6-8)
598
24.0%
567
585
603
621
639
658
High School(9-12)
731
32.4%
766
790
814
839
863
889
TOTAL**
2.288
1 100%
1 2.363
J 2.438
1 2.513 1
2588
1 2.663
1 2.743
*Actual October 2011 Enrollment.
** Totals may vary due to rounding.
***Using average percentage by grade span.
FQ1
APPENDIX B
STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR REVIEW
DOYLE
CONSULTING
-), ENABLING SCHOOL DISTRICTS TO MANAGE AND USE STUDENTASSESSMENT DATA
Student Generation Rate Study
for the
Lakewood School District
3130/2012
This document describes the methodology used to calculate student generation rates
(SGRs) for the Lakewood School District, and provides results of the calculations.
SGRs were calculated for two types of residential construction- Single family detached,
and multi -family with 2 or more bedrooms. Attached condominiums, townhouses and
duplexes are included in the multi -family classification since they are not considered
"detached". Manufactured homes on owned land are included in the single family
classification.
1. Electronic records were obtained from the Snohomish County Assessors Office
containing data on all new construction within the Lakewood School District from
January 2004 through December 2010. As compiled by the County Assessor's
Office, this data Included the address, building size, assessed value, and year built
for new single and multi -family construction. The data was "cleaned up" by
eliminating records which did not contain sufficient information to generate a match
with the District's student record data (i_e_ incomplete addresses).
2. The District downloaded student records data Into Microsoft Excel format. This data
included the addresses and grade levels of all K-12 students attending the
Lakewood School District as of March 2012. Before proceeding, this data was
reformatted and abbreviations were modifled as required to provide consistency with
the County Assessor's data.
210 Polk Street, Suite 6A • Port Townsend, WA 08368 • (360) 680-9014
B-1
3. Single Family Rates: The data on all new single family detached residential units in
County Assessors data were compared with the District's student record data, and
the number of students at each grade level living in those units was determined.
The records of 272 single family detached units were compared with data on 2,378
students registered in the District, and the following matches were found by grade
level(s)":
COUNT
OR
CALCULATED
GRADE(S)
MATCHES
RATE
K
13
0 048
1
0.033
2
12_
0.04.1
3
10
0.037
4
9
0.033
5
7
0.026
6
-
0.044
7
-12
5
0.033
8
13
0.048
9
7
0.026
10
5
0.033
11
10
0.037
12
16
0.059
K•5
f0
0.221
6-8
34
0.125
9.12
42
0.15.1
K-12
13C
0.500
4. Large Multi -Family Developments: Snohomish County Assessor's data does not
specifically Indicate the number of units or bedrooms contained In large multi -family
developments. Additional research was performed to obtain this information from
specific parcel ID searches, and information provided by building management,
when available. Information obtained Included the number of 0-1 bedroom units, the
number of 2+ bedroom units, and specific addresses of 0-1 bedroom units.
Small Multi -Family Developments: This method included all developments in the
County Assessor's data containing four-plexes, td-plexes, duplexes, condominiums
and townhouses. This data contained information on the number of bedrooms for all
townhouses and condominiums. Specific parcel ID searches were performed for
duplex and larger units in cases where number of bedroom data was missing.
B-2
5. Multi -Family 2+ BR Rates: The multi -family 2+ BR SGR's were calculated by
comparing data on 2+ BR multi -family units with the District's student record data,
and the number of students at each grade level living in those units was determined.
The records of 131 multi -family 2+ BR units were compared with data on 2,378
students registered in the District, and the following matches were found by grade
level(s)`:
GRADE 8
COUNT
OF
MATCHES
CALCULATED
RATE
K
23
0.015
_
1
27
0:053
2
3
25
24
0.008
0.000
4
5
6
18
24
17
0.023
0.023
0.023
7
14
0.031
B
16
0.015
9
12
0.016
10
11
0.015
11
12
6
5
0.015
0.016
K-5
8.0
16
9
0.122
1 0.069
9.12
8
0.061
K-12
33
0,252
6. Multi -Family 0-1 BR Rates: Research indicated that no (0) multi -family 0-1 BR units
were constructed within District boundaries during the time period covered by this
study.
7. Summary of Student Generation Ratev*t
K 5 6-8 9-12 K-12
Single Family .221 .125 .154 .500
Multi -Family 2+ DR .122 .069 .061 .252
*Calculated rates for grade level groups nwy not equal tie sum of Individual grade rates due to rounding.
B-3
APPENDIX C
SCHOOL IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS
SCHOOL IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS
Bnolromish Coun 1Ctaes of Allis on and Marysvllle
DISTRICT
Lakewood School District
rum
2012
School She Ac ukttlon Coat
((AoresxCcst per Acle)/FaePlty Capaclly)xStudent Generation Factor
ftudent
Student Student
Facll' Cost/
Ifacilify
[FaCtor
IPactor Faclor
Cost/
Cast/
Cost;
Acreage Acre
Element C.80 6 -
Middle
Well
School Conslmietion Cast:
1copacily, [$fit
• S00• • • b.311
'd.125'.'.'.'0000.'•
i fS• • ' • 0,!$4
Mf*(1) MFR(2+)
• •G.000. - 4i.1�1
.Y1069
, , B.00Q , - ,O.Q61
Istit
MFR(1)
MFR
SO
$0
SO
s0
so
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
SO
$o
Facility C011111'acilitV Capacl xStudent Generation Factor anent!Total Sq H
Student
Student Student
%tams/ Facility
factor factor
Cost/
COW
Coil!
elol Sq,FI. Coat
Elementary • •03;56%, S' •' • • •'
Middle P36bS.$. ,'
High • • •t3.36x • • 16;831,6. •
Temporary Facility Cost:
lCapoelly
• 30b•
a5'
• • . 000•
1
JSFR
MFR 1 MFR (2+1
SFR
MFR 1
MFR 2+
0.221
0.125
0.000 0.122
0.000 0069
So
SD
$0
$0
5o
$0
0.134
0.000 D Ofi1
$8-08A
$0
53.202
1
TOTAL
58.OB4
SO
33.202
Facility C031/Facility
Ca acll xSludenl Generation
Factorlx em oreryyYotal
Square Feet
student
Sluderd Student
Calif
C0311
Cast/
%70mp/ Facility
total Sq.FI. Cost
Elemen 6.4495 $
Middle 6.44%.
Mph 6.44%•i•,•_•.'.'.'.'.•••••••�p•
FaelRry
tine
26-
29'
Factor
SFR
Factor Factor
MFR 1) MFR (2+)
SFR
MFR (1)
MFR (2+)
0.221
a 000 0 122
so
$o
$0
0.125
0_000 0069
SD
So
$0
D.IS4
0.o00 0061
TOTAL
so
$o
$0
s0
so
so
State Matching Credit:
6oeckh Index X SPI Square rootage X Dlshtct Match % X Student Factor
Aoeckh SPI
Distri
Student
Factor
Studerti Student
rector Factor
Cast/
Cost
Cesi/
Index Footage1-ht
•5, - • •ltl8.55• 90
.... .TOB.
S 188.55 ' , ' , (]Q
74
• • • 01,00116-
.. 0001b
• . • _ • 54,2�7L,
SFR
MFR (1) MFR (2+)
SFR
MFR 1
MFR 21.
Liam enl
0.221
0000 0122
So
so
So
Middle .'S.180.55.
0.12$
0.000 0.069
s0
$0
$0
Sr. High
0,154
0,000 0 061
$1,933
$0
$766
TOTAL
$1.933
SO
$78d
Tax Payment Credit:
Average Assessed Value
SFR IMFR (1) MFR (2+)
'•:295,f43-•-,-ib:?•Bl,•.• S71(.gD2,
. • .4 007" 4 OOye 4A071•
$2.398,741 I $615.707 I $903.570
- • -1D _. . 10 _ . 'FD
'.'SL82$1.52 51.62
_
Capital Bond Interesl Rate
Net Frerent Value of Average Dwelling
Yeas Amortized
Frol»rly Tax Levy Rule (Bondi)
Present Value of Revenue Stream
54.366
$1.126
51.644
Fee Summary:
Single
Family
MuRI- Mum.
Fam' 1 Family 2+
Site Ac uistion Costs
50
5o $0
Permanent Facility Cost
$D $3,202
Temporary Facaw Cost
__Se.M4
SO
_
$0 so
Rate Match Crecill
ram Payment Credit
FCf AS CALCULATED
($1,933)
($4,366)
$1,7as
$0 ($766)
(S1,126) ($1,644)
$0 $792
FEE AS DISCOUNTED S0A
92
396
CERTIFICATION OF ORDINANCE
I, Kristin Banfield, being the duly appointed and acting Clerk of the City of Arlington,
Washington, a municipal corporation, do hereby certify that the following Ordinance #2013-014
was approved at the October 7, 2013 City Council meeting.
ORDINANCE #2013-014
"AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ARLINGTON, WASHINGTON
AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO INCLUDE THE
LAKEWOOD SCHOOL DISTRICT CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN AS
PART OF THE CITY OF ARLINGTON CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN"
A true and correct copy of the original ordinance is attached.
Dated this 141" day of October, 2013.
a-o
Kristin anfield
City Cle k for the City of Arlington
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE ADOPTIONS
You are hereby notified that on October 7, 2013, the City Council of the City of
Arlington, Washington, did adopt Ordinance No. 2013-014 entitled,
"AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ARLINGTON, WASHINGTON
AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO INCLUDE THE
LAKEWOOD SCHOOL DISTRICT CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN AS PART
OF THE CITY OF ARLINGTON CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN"
And Ordinance No. 2013-015 entitled,
" AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ARLINGTON, WASHINGTON
MODIFYING SPEED LIMITS ON PORTIONS OF STATE ROUTE 5 3 1 "
These ordinances are effective five days from passage and publication, except as
otherwise specified in the ordinance.
The full text of the ordinances is available to interested persons and will be mailed upon
request.
Kristin anfield
City Clerk
City of Arlington