The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About104 Cox Ave_BLD442_2026 (3) AML CITY OF ARLINGTON 238 N. OLYMPIC AVE - ARLINGTON, WA. 98223 PHONE; (360) 403-3551 BUILDING PERMIT Address: 104/104.5 W Cox Avenue Permit#:442 Parcel#:00461804000100 Valuation:270000.00 OWNER APPLICANT CONTRACTOR Name:CITY OF ARLINGTON Name:City of Arlington Name:SkyCorp LTD Address:238 N OLYMPIC AVE Address:154 W Cox Avenue Address:526 N West Avenue City,State Zip:ARLINGTON,WA 98223 City,State Zip:Arlington,WA 98223 City,State Zip:Arlington,WA 98223 Phone: Phone:360-403-3505 Phone:425-367-7887 MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR PLUMBING CONTRACTOR Name. Name: Address: Address: City,State,Zip: City,Stale,Zip: Phone: Phone: LTC#: EXP: LTC#: EXP: JOB DESCRIPTION _ PERMIT TYPE: Demolition CODE YEAR: 2012 STORIES: 2 CONST.TYPE: DWELLING UNITS; I OCC GROUP: BUILDINGS: 1 OCC LOAD: PERMIT APPROVAL i I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUCTION AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY;NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE AND RCW 18.27. THIS APPLICATION IS NOT A PERMIT UNTIL SIGNED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL OR HIS/HER DEPUTY AND ALL FEES ARE PAID. IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. IBCI 10/IRCI 10. SALF,. ''AY NO'1'1C'F:Sa •: i re a n to construction and construction materials in the C'it . rlmg must be re:portcd on your sales la return fonn and co ity of Arlin�t It I ce C (I Signature rintName Date Re sed By Dale r- CONDITIONS I ti PERMIT AUTHORIZE ONLY THE WORK NOTED THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CO S RUCTION ON THE PUBLIC DOMAIN(CURBS,SIDEWALKS,DRIVEWAYS,MARQUEES,ETC)WILL REQUIRE SEPARATE PERMISSION PERMIT FEES Date Description Fee Amount 8/6/2014 Demolition Fee $100.00 8/6/2014 State Building Code Surcharge Fee $4.50 Total Due: S104.50 Total Payment: $0 00 Balance Due: $104.50 CALL FOR INSPECTIONS BUILDING(360)403-3417 When calling for an inspection please leave the following information: Permit Number,Type of inspection being requested,and whether you prefer morning or afternoon APPRAISAL GROUP OF THE NORTHWEST LLP Summary Appraisal of the Bystrom Residence located at 104 West Cox Avenue Arlington, WA 98223 For Mr. James Kelly Public Works Director Public Works Department City of Arlington 154 West Cox Avenue Arlington, Washington 98223-1337 by James B. Price, MAI, SRAVA Jimmy Denis Watts, Appraiser Appraisal Group of the Northwest LLP 1980 112th Avenue NE, Suite 270 Bellevue, WA 98004-2940 A-4181 �\ Appraisal Group of the Northwest LLP Central Park Building (425) 453-9292 Al980 1121h Ave.N.E. Suite 270 (800) 453-4408 �� Bellevue,WA 98004-2940 FAX: (425)455-9740 AGNW@AppraisalGroupNW.com July 29, 2011 Mr. James Kelly Public Works Director City of Arlington 154 West Cox Avenue Arlington, Washington 98223-1337 Re: Summary Appraisal of the Bystrom Residence, located at 104 West Cox Avenue, Arlington, WA 98223 Dear Mr. Kelly: In accordance with your request, we have employed all applicable methods of appraisal analysis required of a summary appraisal and report format. This format is intended to comply with the reporting requirements set forth under Standards Rule 2-2(b) of the Uniform Standards of Professional Practice for a summary appraisal report. The almost-rectangular parcel contains a total site area of 15,682 square feet,and is zoned Old Town Business District-3 by the City of Arlington. This appraisal is intended to comply with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) as adopted by the Appraisal Foundation. Our investigation included discussions with a representative of the ownership regarding the history and nature of the subject property, an inspection of the property, and consideration of other factors that were deemed necessary under the circumstances. We also reviewed information concerning the economy and market in which the property competes. Based upon our investigation and analysis,the market value of the Fee Simple interest in the subject real property as of July 20, 2011 is reasonably represented as: TWO HUNDRED SEVENTY THOUSAND DOLLARS $270,000 A-4181 APPRAISAL GROUP OF THE NORTHWEST LLP Mr. James Kelly/City of Arlington July 29, 2011 Page ii Thank you for the opportunity to be of service. If you have any questions regarding this appraisal, please feel free to contact us. Sincerely, J es B. Price, MAI, SR/WA Jimmy Denis Watts, Appraiser Certified General Real Estate Appraiser,WA Certified General Real Estate Appraiser,WA Certification No. 1100229 Certification No. 1100328 A-4181 APPRAISAL GROUP OF THE NORTHWEST LLP Mr. James Kelly/City of Arlington July 29, 2011 Page iii CERTIFICATION I certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: I. The statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct. 2. The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions,and are my personal,impartial,and unbiased professional analyses,opinions,and conclusions. 3. I have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report,and I have no personal interest with respect to the parties involved. 4. I have no bias with respect to the property that is the subject of this report or to the parties involved with this assignment. 5. My engagement in this assignment was not contingent upon developing or reporting predetermined results. 6. My compensation for completing this assignment is not contingent upon the development or reporting of a predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client, the amount of the value opinion,the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event directly related to the intended use of this appraisal. 7. My analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. 8. The reported analyses,opinions and conclusions were developed,and this report has been prepared,in conformity with the requirements of the Code of Professional Ethics and the Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice of the Appraisal Institute. 9. 1, Jimmy Denis Watts, Appraiser,have made a personal inspection of the property that is the subject of this report. 1,James B. Price, MAI, SR/WA,have not made a personal inspection of the property that is the subject of this report. 10. No one has provided significant real property appraisal assistance to the persons signing this certification. 11. The use of this report is subject to the requirements of the Appraisal Institute regarding review by its duly authorized representatives. 12. As of the date of this report,James B.Price,MAI,SR/WA,has completed the continuing education program of the Appraisal Institute. 13. I certify that I have acted in an independent capacity and the appraisal assignment is not based on a requested minimum valuation, a specific valuation, or the approval of a loan. James B. Price, MAI, SR/WA Jimmy Denis Watts, Appraiser July 29, 2011 July 29, 2011 Date Date A-4181 APPRAISAL GROUP OF THE NORTHWEST LLP Mr. James Kelly/City of Arlington July 29, 2011 Page iv SUMMARY OF FACTS AND CONCLUSIONS Name/Address Bystrom Residence 104 West Cox Avenue Arlington, WA 98223 Legal Description HALLER CITY BLK 040 D-00 - LOTS 1-2-3-4-5-6-7 Snohomish County Assessor's Parcel Number 00-4618-040-001-00 Census Tract Number 535.03 Site Area Total area: 15,682 square feet Property Type: Single family residence Flood Zone Data According to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) flood panel 5302710384E, dated November 8, 1999,the subject is located in Zone X, an area outside the 500-year floodplain. Zoning The subject site is zoned OTBD-3. Old Town Business District (OTBD) — This designation is intended for land uses in the downtown commercial center and the promotion of dense,active,pedestrian oriented commercial activities; and may allow for multi-family residential uses upstairs from commercial uses (mixed use) and civic uses. The subject is in compliance with the code requirements and restrictions of this designation. Historical Property Status A search of the Washington Information System for Architectural and Archaeological Records Data(WISAARD)for the subject's address and a review of WISAARD map for the City of Arlington area did not identify the subject as a historical property. A-4181 APPRAISAL GROUP OF THE NORTHWEST LLP Mr. James Kelly/City of Arlington July 29, 2011 Page v Date of Report July 29, 2011 Date of Valuation July 20, 2011 Date of Inspection July 20, 2011 Highest and Best Use The highest and best use of the site is for a commercial development or to hold for future commercial development. Value Indications Cost Approach Not Applicable Income Approach Not Applicable Sales Comparison Approach $270,000 FINAL VALUE ESTIMATE $270,000 A-41 H 1 APPRAISAL GROUP OF THE NORTHWEST LLP Mr. James Kelly/City of Arlington July 29, 2011 Page A TABLE OF CONTENTS LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL.................................................................................................................................i CERTIFICATION...................................................................................................................................................i i i SUMMARY OF FACTS AND CONCLUSIONS...................................................................................................iv TABLEOF CONTENTS.........................................................................................................................................vi INTRODUCTION REGIONAL MAP NEIGHBORHOOD MAP PLAT MAP SUBJECT BUILDING SKETCH AERIAL PHOTO LOCATION MAP SUBJECT PHOTOGRAPHS PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION-DESCRIPTIVE DATA 1 IDENTIFICATION..................................................................................................................................................1 PropertyIdentification.........................................................................................................................................1 OstensibleOwner.................................................................................................................................................1 LegalDescription.................................................................................................................................................1 ParcelNumber......................................................................................................................................................2 REPORTCRITERIA................................................................................................................................................2 Dateof the Inspection..........................................................................................................................................2 EffectiveDate of the Appraisal............................................................................................................................2 Dateof Appraisal Report......................................................................................................................................2 Function of the Appraisal Report.........................................................................................................................2 Purposeof the Appraisal......................................................................................................................................2 PropertyRights Appraised...................................................................................................................................2 Definitionof Market Value..................................................................................................................................2 Disclosure of Client and Intended User(s)...........................................................................................................3 Disclosure of Client's Intended Use.....................................................................................................................3 Scopeof the Appraisal.........................................................................................................................................3 Unavailabilityof Information...............................................................................................................................4 Disclosureof Competency...................................................................................................................................4 ASSUMPTIONS.......................................................................................................................................................5 Extraordinary Assumptions..................................................................................................................................5 LIMITINGCONDITIONS.......................................................................................................................................6 HypotheticalConditions.......................................................................................................................................6 PUGETSOUND REGION.......................................................................................................................................7 Description...........................................................................................................................................................7 Population............................................................................................................................................................7 Employment.........................................................................................................................................................7 Unemployment.....................................................................................................................................................9 Income..................................................................................................................................................................9 Transportation......................................................................................................................................................9 A-41 H 1 APPRAISAL GROUP OF THE NORTHWEST LLP Mr. James Kelly/City of Arlington July 29, 2011 Page vii AirportFacilities..................................................................................................................................................9 Shipping.............................................................................................................................................................10 Summary............................................................................................................................................................10 ARLINGTON NEIGHBORHOOD DATA............................................................................................................11 MARKETANALYSIS...........................................................................................................................................11 SingleFamily Sales Activity:.............................................................................................................................11 ExposureTime...................................................................................................................................................12 PriorSales and Listing History..........................................................................................................................12 SITE DESCRIPTION.............................................................................................................................................12 Locationand Access..........................................................................................................................................12 Shapeand Size...................................................................................................................................................12 Topography........................................................................................................................................................12 Soils,Drainage and Toxic Hazards....................................................................................................................13 Identification of Possible Flood Hazard.............................................................................................................13 Easements and Restrictions................................................................................................................................13 Utilities...............................................................................................................................................................13 SiteImprovements.............................................................................................................................................13 Assessment and Taxes-Snohomish County,Washington.................................................................................13 Zoning................................................................................................................................................................13 Description of Improvements.............................................................................................................................14 HIGHEST AND BEST USE ANALYSIS 15 APPROACHES TO VALUE 17 COSTAPPROACH................................................................................................................................................17 SALES COMPARISON APPROACH...................................................................................................................17 INCOME CAPITALIZATION APPROACH........................................................................................................17 APPROACHES TO VALUE USED......................................................................................................................18 SALES COMPARISON APPROACH 19 PROCEDURE........................................................................................................................................................19 DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS OF COMPARABLE SALES.........................................................................25 PropertyRights..................................................................................................................................................26 Conditionsof Sale/Financing.............................................................................................................................26 CONCLUSION SALES COMPARISON..............................................................................................................26 ADDENDA 29 QUALIFICATIONS OF APPRAISERS A-4181 APPRAISAL GROUP OF THE NORTHWEST LLP SUBJECT PHOTOGRAPHS REGIONAL MAP r t.w IYOOrsoci Picket Ridge Gwen Rats Ink � Mourtt Baker Nauma r wl�wrrocc North COS odes Nownel Perk aw n J0 UkV wf:� ,men take Nwt Ccckr Juan BOW I 1ft� r Sodto ft and Ad 1• 1 LMrrD2n.I id Mouth- roan fd uer„ngtor, l Mi �laaer �T y T lalip 0 0� i � I.R I GanrGr Fa Marywile C } S26 Snohomish 2acihan 1 /Da Monroc sr nd N'ddmnans Sri (522- I nrtx i C 1 Botheq r in a- Duvall la 2 r - 1203 �' Ycgxornbh tt,o )) ao5 a Itedtnbtid Wddwilw" ai ,ft0 Csruelan a �4 1 (I� a klotn.t(Ssker-SnWuiln+r!National Corot B R r,d cey •' East Port Of nd Shr:acvr - NOrtA Br+Q i Bune n es}� Vaslwn Scalx a 1� Usti wojle.s KeM Gw ° Gig It'll )i Fcdcnl Vlay C/ ington _ J I`— Tacoma Auburn �. nq , p S>telt t' Urive sky Mace A-41 H 1 APPRAISAL GROUP OF THE NORTHWEST LLP SUBJECT PHOTOGRAPHS NEIGHBORHOOD MAP r,{: z y I + � S30 1 Arlirxjtwt Heights /- P S' �o x� sour ft er Arlingtotr Junction � Twin Rivcrc Pant m I i �i � Ed4DY 0 S30 NE I I gzeQ Tut rid 2 _ t o Jvfwn P"K rStNE n Rage Deck Wildida A,inpta 2tlltFt StN� Reserve cemetery Y F C~WY Rd L'F A-4181 APPRAISAL GROUP OF THE NORTHWEST LLP SUBJECT PHOTOGRAPHS PLAT MAP a 16 °T ' -�r 3 - 9f , - — ,9 H4FMYA`•tfi -O VV► EG t "" "" 1lRwS1PE� o s 13 IbA � r ,4 Is 2`11. I�N�tV� 1 17 r pp 30 I �2 ALLER �. AVE - HALLER- --j- -- �V`E---- -i _ IV 2 14 L� ,6 �a�I 30 1771 �- -- , LOT 5 4 A-41 H 1 APPRAISAL GROUP OF THE NORTHWEST LLP SUBJECT PHOTOGRAPHS SUBJECT BUILDINGS SKETCH 5.5R 21f1 14ft 11.5R ,moo t? 9R [217 Sq ft] 4✓ r+ MAIN HOUSE Carport Un u� in SeCofld Hoor [574 Sq ft] 51+ :4n :oft MAIN HOUSE First Floor L [1403.25 Sq ft] Ln 2411 rift SR v �• 1311 12ft lift o. 15ft r v Garage & Storage: 1558 Sq ft[ co Cottage [47.5 Sq ft] l7R zsn A-4181 APPRAISAL GROUP OF THE NORTHWEST LLP SUBJECT PHOTOGRAPHS AERIAL PHOTO LOCATION MAP Shown are subject whole property, access frontages, "North arrow", and camera location and direction for each subject photo. #3 i #5 #6 J #7 #1 #910 r 1 r4 f fff � it A-41 H 1 APPRAISAL GROUP OF THE NORTHWEST LLP SUBJECT PHOTOGRAPHS t - Photo #1 — Subject Front- Looking West across West Avenue • A` Photo #2—Subject Front- Looking South across West Cox Avenue A-4181 APPRAISAL GROUP OF THE NORTHWEST LLP SUBJECT PHOTOGRAPHS 1 Photo#3 —Subject Street View - Looking South on West Avenue with Subject on the Right Photo #4— Subject Street View - Looking North on West Avenue with Subject on the Left A-4181 APPRAISAL GROUP OF THE NORTHWEST LLP SUBJECT PHOTOGRAPHS _ NNW Photo#5 —Subject Street View - Looking East on West Cox Avenue with Subject on the Right t Photo#6—Subject Street View - Looking West on West Cox Avenue with Subject on the Left A-41 H 1 APPRAISAL GROUP OF THE NORTHWEST LLP SUBJECT PHOTOGRAPHS - V Photo #7—Subject Rear View - Looking East w I � Photo #8 — Subject Rear View - Looking North A-4181 APPRAISAL GROUP OF THE NORTHWEST LLP SUBJECT PHOTOGRAPHS _ 1 ti i 1 _ Photo #9—Cottage Front- Looking Southwest oil - - o / Photo #10—Cottage, Garage, and Storage Area Rear- Looking Northeast A-4181 APPRAISAL GROUP OF THE NORTHWEST LLP Page 1 PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION - DESCRIPTIVE DATA This is a summary appraisal report which is intended to comply with the reporting requirements set forth under Standards Rule 2-2(b)of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice for a summary appraisal report. As such, it presents only summary discussions of the data, reasoning and analyses that were used in the appraisal process to develop the appraisers' opinion of value. Supporting documentation concerning the data, reasoning and analyses may be retained in the appraisers'file. The depth ofdiscussion contained in this report is specific to the needs ofthe client and to the intended use stated below. The appraisers are not responsible for unauthorized use of this report. CLIENT: City of Arlington 154 West Cox Avenue Arlington, Washington 98223-1337 APPRAISERS: James B. Price, MAI, SR/WA Jimmy Denis Watts,Appraiser Appraisal Group of the Northwest LLP 1980 112th Avenue NE, Suite 270 Bellevue, WA 98004 SUBJECT: Bystrom Residence 104 West Cox Avenue Arlington, WA 98223 IDENTIFICATION Property Identification The subject is a one and one-half story, 1,977-square-foot, wood frame, single-family residence, and a 475-square-foot detached cottage constructed in 1895 and 1938 respectively,situated on a 15,682-square-foot,level,corner parcel located at 104 West Cox Avenue, Arlington, WA 98223 Ostensible Owner According to the Snohomish County public records, Teresa C. Bystrom is listed as the current owner of the subject property. Legal Description HALLER CITY BLK 040 D-00 - LOTS 1-2-3-4-5-6-7 The subject property can also be legally described as a portion of the tax parcel number,which is noted in the next section of this report. A-4181 APPRAISAL GROUP OF THE NORTHWEST LLP Page 2 Parcel Number Snohomish County Tax Parcel Number: 00-4618-040-001-00 REPORT CRITERIA Date of the Inspection July 20, 2011 Effective Date of the Appraisal July 20, 2011 Date of Appraisal Report July 29, 2011 Function of the Appraisal Report The function of the appraisal is to provide the client with an opinion of market value of the subject property interest. The intended use of this report is to assist the client in the determination of an amount which may be paid for the subject property's fee simple interest. Purpose of the Appraisal The purpose of this appraisal is to estimate the market value of the Fee Simple interest in the subject property. Property Rights Appraised Fee Simple Estate is absolute ownership unencumbered by any other interest or estate, subject only to the limitations imposed by the governmental powers of taxation, eminent domain,police power and escheat. Definition of Market Value Market value is the most probable price which a property should bring in a competitive and open market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, the buyer and seller each acting prudently and knowledgeably and assuming the price is not affected by undue stimulus. Implicit in this definition is the consummation of a sale as of a specified date and the passing of title from seller to buyer under conditions whereby: 1. buyer and seller are typically motivated; 2. both parties are well informed or well advised, and each acting in what he or she considers his or her own best interest; 3. a reasonable time is allowed for exposure in the open market; A-4181 APPRAISAL GROUP OF THE NORTHWEST LLP Page 3 4. payment is made in terms of cash in U.S.dollars or in terms of financial arrangements comparable thereto; and 5. the price represents the normal consideration for the property sold unaffected by special or creative financing or sales concessions granted by anyone associated with the sale.' Disclosure of Client and Intended User(s) The term client is defined in Uniform Standard of Professional Appraisal Practice,2010- 2011 edition as: "The parry or parties who engage an appraiser (by employment or contract) in a specific assignment." The term Intended User(s) is defined in Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice, 2010-2011 edition as: "The client and any other party as identified, by name or type, as users of the appraisal, appraisal review, or appraisal consulting report, by the appraiser on the basis of communication with the client at the time of the assignment." This report is intended for use only by the City of Arlington (the client), and any other users as authorized by the client. Use of this report by others is not intended by the appraiser. Disclosure of Client's Intended Use The term Intended Use is defined in Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice, 2010-2011 edition as: "The use or uses of an appraiser's reported appraisal, appraisal review, or appraisal consulting assignment opinions and conclusions,as identified by the appraiser based on communication with the client at the time of the assignment." The intended use of this appraisal is to establish the market value of the subject real property for possible acquisition purposes. Scope of the Appraisal The scope of the appraisal assignment included the following tasks: • An inspection of the subject property and comparable sales data considered. • An analysis of the subject property's physical, location, and investment characteristics. • An investigation and evaluation of market characteristics and trends. The Appraisal of Real Estate,13`h Edition,Appraisal Institute,Chicago 2008 pp.24-25 A-4181 APPRAISAL GROUP OF THE NORTHWEST LLP Page 4 • The collection and analysis of pertinent data. • The development of a conclusion as to the market value of the property through the application of all applicable approaches to value. The value conclusions contained in this report are based upon review and analysis of market conditions affecting real property value,with primary consideration of physical and site characteristics influencing the subject property,and with emphasis on recent sales and listings of generally similar type property, and the attributes of competitive properties. This information has been obtained from Costar Comps, MetroScan,public records, real estate brokers, property managers, buyers and sellers, Snohomish County Assessor's records, the Appraisal Group of the Northwest Puget Sound market database, personal inspections,and interviews with various market participants. The subject and comparable properties have been inspected and photographed. Note—the subject's interior was not inspected. Details regarding the quality and condition of the subject's interior improvements were obtained in a telephone interview with the property owner and occupant. This report is intended to comply with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice(USPAP) This is a summary appraisal report that is intended to comply with the reporting requirements set forth under Standards Rule 2-2(b)of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice for a summary appraisal report. As such, it presents only summary discussions of the data, reasoning and analyses that were used in the appraisal process to develop the appraisers' opinion of value. Supporting documentation concerning the data,reasoning and analyses is retained in the appraisers' file. The depth of discussion contained in this report is specific to the needs of the client and to the intended function stated previously. The appraisers are not responsible for unauthorized use of this report. Unavailability of Information The appraisers were not provided with a soils report, structural engineering report or an environmental report. This appraisal is based on the belief that none of this unavailable information would indicate the presence of any detrimental factors that would impact the value of the property. If they do, we reserve the right to alter our value conclusion. Disclosure of Competency The appraisers have performed appraisals of a variety of properties throughout the Puget Sound region, and have had recent experience in the valuation of properties similar to the subject. Please see the appraisers' qualifications in the Addenda. A-41 H 1 APPRAISAL GROUP OF THE NORTHWEST LLP Page 5 ASSUMPTIONS This appraisal is contingent upon the following assumptions: 1. The legal description is correct, and title to the property is good and marketable. 2. The title to the property is free and clear of liens or encumbrances. 3. The property has responsible owner(s) and competent property manager(s). 4. The information furnished by others is reliable,but no warranty is given for its accuracy. 5. All engineering is correct. (The plot plans and illustrative material in this report are included only to assist the reader in visualizing the property.) 6. There are no hidden, unapparent conditions of the property, subsoil, or structures that render it more or less valuable. This includes any toxic waste or asbestos insulation that may be present. We take no responsibility for such conditions or for arranging for engineering studies that may be required to discover them. 7. There is full compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local environmental regulations and laws. 8. The property conforms to all applicable zoning and use regulations and restrictions. 9. All required licenses, certificates of occupancy, consents, and other legislative or administrative authority from any local, state, or national government or private entity or organization have been or can be obtained or renewed for any use on which the value contained in this report is based. 10. The use of the land and improvements is within the boundaries or property lines of the property described and there is no encroachment or trespass. 11. We did not observe any hazardous materials, which may or may not be present, on the property. We have no knowledge of the existence of such materials on or in the property, but we are not qualified to detect such substances. The presence of such substances as asbestos,urea-formaldehyde foam insulation and other potentially hazardous materials may affect the value of the property. The opinion of value is formulated under the assumption that there is no such material on or in the property that would cause a loss in value. No responsibility is assumed for such conditions or for any expertise or engineering knowledge required to discover them. Extraordinary Assumptions Inasmuch as the subject's interior was not inspected, for the purposes of this appraisal assignment the subject's quality and condition are assumed to be average. A-4181 APPRAISAL GROUP OF THE NORTHWEST LLP Page 6 LIMITING CONDITIONS This appraisal report is subject to the following conditions: 1. Any allocation of the total value estimated in this report between the land and the improvements applies only under the stated program of utilization. The separate values allocated to the land and buildings must not be used in conjunction with any other appraisal and are invalid if so used. Any value estimates provided in the report apply to the entire property,and any proration or division of the total into fractional interests will invalidate the value estimate,unless the proration or division of interests has been set forth in the report. 2. Possession of this report, or a copy thereof, does not carry with it the right of publication. 3. No appraiser, by reason of this appraisal, is required to give further consultation or testimony or to be in attendance in court with reference to the property in question unless prior arrangements have been made. 4. Neither all nor any part of the contents of this report(especially any conclusions as to value, the identity of any appraiser, or the firm with which the appraiser is connected) shall be disseminated to the public through advertising,public relations,news,sales,or other media without the prior written consent and approval of the appraiser. 5. Appraisal Group of the Northwest and its associate appraisers and employees assume liability only to the client. 6. Appraisal Group of the Northwest and its associate appraisers and employees are not responsible for any costs incurred to discover or correct any deficiency in the property. If a lawsuit is instigated by a lender, partner, part-owner in any form of ownership, tenant, or any other party wherein this report is used in evidence in the disposition of any and all awards,settlements,or cost,regardless of outcome,Appraisal Group of the Northwest and its associate appraisers and employees will be held completely harmless. 7. No survey was furnished, so a Snohomish County Plat Map was used to ascertain the physical dimensions and area of the property. Should a survey prove this information to be inaccurate, it may be necessary for this appraisal to be adjusted. 8. The forecasts, projections, or operating estimates contained herein are based on current market conditions,anticipated short-term supply-and-demand factors,and a continued stable economy. These forecasts are, therefore, subject to changes with future conditions. 9. This is a summary appraisal report that is intended to comply with the reporting requirements set forth under Standards Rule 2-2(b) of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice for a summary appraisal report. As such, it presents summaries of the data, reasoning and analyses that were used in the appraisal process to develop the appraisers' opinion of value. Supporting documentation concerning the data, reasoning and analyses is retained in the appraisers' file. The depth of discussion contained in this report is specific to the needs of the client and to the intended function stated previously. The appraisers are not responsible for unauthorized use of this report. Hypothetical Conditions There are no hypothetical conditions. A-4181 APPRAISAL GROUP OF THE NORTHWEST LLP Page 7 PUGET SOUND REGION Description The subject property is located in the Greater Seattle-Tacoma Metropolitan Area surrounding Puget Sound in Western Washington. There are five contiguous counties in this region,each contributing to the overall character of the area with a variety of economic and demographic factors: King, Snohomish, Pierce, Kitsap and Thurston counties. A significant hub of transportation, the Puget Sound region is the gateway to Alaska and is the closest major seaport in the contiguous United States to the Far East. The center of the Puget Sound region is Seattle,which is located within King County and is the largest city in the state. Seattle is situated approximately 110 miles south of the United States-Canada border and approximately 170 miles north of the Washington-Oregon state line. Population Population growth in the five-county (King, Pierce, Snohomish, Kitsap and Thurston counties)central/south Puget Sound region has reflected prevailing economic conditions. Per the 2010 US Census figures recently published,the five-county region has an estimated population of 3,943,206 people. This represents an increase of 13.2% over 2000 census figures, i.e. an average growth rate of 1.32% per year. Seattle, with a 2010 estimated population of 608,660, is the largest city in the metropolitan area. Tacoma (198,397), Bellevue (122,363) and Everett (103,019) rank second, third and fourth. The estimated 2010 population for each county in the central/south Puget Sound region is as shown below: PUGET SOUND REGION COUNTY POPULATIONS County 2000 Census 2010 Census % Change King County 1,737,046 1,931,249 11.1% Pierce County 700,818 795,225 13.5% Snohomish County 606,024 713,335 17.7% Kitsap County 231,969 251,133 8.3% Thurston County 207,355 252,264 21.7% TOTAL 3,483,212 3,943,206 13.2% The total 2010 population(based on the 2010 Census)for Washington State is estimated at 6,724,540, a 14.1% increase from the 2000 census figure of 5,894,143. Employment The Puget Sound region supports a variety of economic activities,including the aerospace industry, "high tech" industry, lumber, agriculture, shipping, and commercial fishing. Published employment figures produced by the Washington State Employment Security A-4181 APPRAISAL GROUP OF THE NORTHWEST LLP Page 8 Department (April 2011 data) estimate total non-agricultural employment for King, Snohomish, Pierce, Thurston and Kitsap counties as outlined in the following chart: PUGET SOUND REGION NON-AGRICULTURAL EMPLOYMENT County Aril 2011 Aril 2010 % Change King County 1,150,200 1,123,600 2.4% Pierce County 265,400 265,400 0.0% Snohomish County 245,500 242,100 1.4% Kitsap County 82,800 82,700 0.1% Thurston County 99,100 98,400 0.7% TOTAL 1,843,000 1,812,200 1.7% These trends reflect the overall economy in the nation and the region, although the Puget Sound region is less affected than many other parts of the country. These figures show small gains and fewer losses than in many of the reporting periods over the past two years, and may indicate that the economy is beginning to stabilize and improve. In the Seattle/Bellevue/Everett area (i.e. King and Snohomish counties), the bulk of non-farm employment for April 2011 (84.54%) was in the "Services" category, with the "trade, transportation and utilities"category making up the largest private portion(21.6%)of that sector. In the goods producing category(15.46%of non-farm employment),manufacturing makes up the largest portion(71.3%)of that sector,with aerospace products/parts(79,500 employees)being the majority(51.66%) of the manufacturing category. The Boeing Company remains the largest private employer in the Puget Sound region (75,558 employees locally as of April 28, 2011, up 5.2% from 71,802 employees as of April 29,2010). This is an improvement from larger losses over the past several years due to national and international economic conditions. The newest Boeing airplane model,the 787 "Dreamliner", was originally scheduled for Fall 2007. Production delays, a strike in Fall 2008,problems with the wing and tail designs,plus a Rolls Royce engine failure and a recent electrical problem have changed the anticipated completion date. The first test flight was delayed until late December 2009, and the first delivery of planes to buyers is now scheduled for late 2011 (but could realistically be further delayed as late as 2012). The first flight of the other new model currently in production (the 747-8) was also delayed from late 2009 due to changes in design and interruptions in manufacturing of replacement parts for parts which had already been installed. This will result in a delay of the first delivery, originally scheduled for the third quarter of 2010. A bright note for the region,however, was the recent award to Boeing of a contract with the US government for a military jet refueling tanker,which will add 11,000 jobs in the region over the next 10 years. Boeing is also now working on a proposed future revised model of the 737 which is now produced in Renton. Delivery for that revised model is estimated to be 2019 or 2020, with sales to begin in 2012,and production to begin in 2013 or 2014. The location for the new model is an unknown at this point. Microsoft is the largest employer in the high-tech sector in the Seattle area: 40,310 employees in the Puget Sound region as of March 31, 2011 (up 1.2% from 39,824 employees as of June 30, 2010). Total worldwide employment is 89,403, up 0.9% from 88,596 as of June 30,2010). As of March 31,2011,Microsoft owned 9,806,547 SF in 78 A-4181 APPRAISAL GROUP OF THE NORTHWEST LLP Page 9 buildings in the Puget Sound region,and leased 3,880,225 SF in 44 buildings,for a total of 14,828,384 SF in 122 buildings. The main Microsoft campus is in Redmond (nearly 91,000 SF), with other concentrations of space in Bellevue and other areas of the region. Joint Base Lewis-McChord (US Army and US Air Force) located south of Tacoma employs a total of 50,000 people including military and civilian personnel. As such it is the third largest employer in the state. The joint base will soon be adding approximately 1,400 more soldiers, increasing the military population to approximately 45,000. Unemployment The most currently published unemployment statistics (April 2011 preliminary figures, adjusted for seasonal changes) are 9.1% for Washington State (down from 9.2% in March 2011 and 9.8%in April 2010). The national rate for April 2011 was 9.0%,up from 8.8%in March 2011 and 9.8%in April 2010. The latest figures(April 2011)for individual markets (not seasonally adjusted) were 7.9% for King County, 9.4% for Snohomish County, 9.8%for Pierce County, 7.7%for Kitsap County, and 8.1%for Thurston County. While continuing to slowly decrease,these rates are up significantly over prior years, and reflect the ongoing economic downturn experienced in the nation and the region. Income The median household income for King County in 2010 (as reported in October 2010 by the Washington State Office of Financial Management) was $66,398 (1.6% less than the 2009 estimate of $67,468). The figures for neighboring counties were: $63,587 in Snohomish County (0.61% less than 2009), $55,302 in Pierce County (0.24% less than 2008),$57,988 in Thurston County(0.87%less than 2009),and$60,455 in Kitsap County (0.71% less than 2009). Median household income for the state of Washington was estimated at$55,379, 1.7% less than the 2009 estimate of$56,317. Transportation Transportation in the area is facilitated by several local and interstate highways. Interstate Highway 5 connects the Seattle Metropolitan Area with most of the other regional economic centers along the West Coast. Interstate Highway 90, which connects with Interstates 5 and 405,provides access to markets in the East. Interstate Highway 405 and State Highways 167, 509, and 99 provide alternate routes. Airport Facilities Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, one of the busiest passenger airports in the nation, which is served by 26 passenger carriers (16 domestic and 10 foreign), had 31,553,166 passengers in 2010. This was an increase of 327,654 passengers (1%) over 31,227,512 passengers in 2009 (although down slightly from 32,196,528 in 2008 and 32,296,628 in 2007). Domestic travel represented 90%of the air passenger statistics,and Alaska Airlines (based in Seattle)captured the largest portion(35%)of the passengers for 2010. Sea-Tac is also the 20t'busiest cargo airport in the US,with 283,425 metric tons of cargo transported in 2010,up 4.9% over the total of 270,142 metric tons of cargo transported in 2009. The county and the Port of Seattle, which includes the Sea-Tac operations, opened a third A-4181 APPRAISAL GROUP OF THE NORTHWEST LLP Page 10 runway in November 2008 for the airport to meet the increasing demands for air traffic in the Puget Sound region. A Sound Transit (light rail) link was connected to Sea-Tac in December 2009. In addition to Sea-Tac International Airport, there are various regional airports in each of the counties within the Puget Sound region. Shipping Ranking as one of the top rive ports in the US and as this country's ninth-largest container port (in terms of TEU's); the Port of Seattle has an excellent harbor (Elliott Bay) and a major inland waterway(Puget Sound)providing access to the Pacific Ocean. The port has emphasized container efficiency and intermodal capabilities. Tacoma and Everett also have container port facilities, and compete directly with the Port of Seattle, as do Los Angeles and Long Beach in California and Vancouver B.C. in Canada. Cargo in 2010 at the Port of Seattle totaled 2,133,548 cargo containers,up considerably(34.6%)from 2009 when it was only 1,584,596 cargo containers. Previous years were a 2008 total of 1,704,492 containers and 1,973,504 in 2007. As such, this is the highest number of containers ever recorded. The downward trend in previous years was due in part to ports on the East Coast attracting shipping through the recently widened Panama Canal,thereby avoiding rail congestion and fees imposed. The Port of Seattle's volume was down 20%in 2009 and the Port of Tacoma's volume was down 27%,with the overall West Coast drop at 10.5%. A projected 2014 completion of a third and wider series of locks at the Panama Canal could continue to affect the West Coast ports, but this is an unknown at this time. The Port of Seattle also operates a passenger ship cruise terminal in downtown Seattle, which operates cruises to Alaska and other West Coast destinations. Cruise passengers totaled 931,698 passengers in 2010,up 6.4%over the 875,473 passengers in 2009. In the first year of operation(1993)there were 10,820 passengers,which reveals the significant growth in this industry over the past 18 years, despite the current recession. Summary The Puget Sound region has emerged as a major metropolis, and its commerce, manufacturing, construction and other economic activities have resulted in a regional population of over 3.94 million people. Transportation facilities serving the metropolitan area include two major interstate freeways, two transcontinental rail systems, an international airport, and one of the largest container ports in the United States. Unemployment in the five-county Puget Sound region ranges from 8.4%(King County)to 10.7%(Pierce County)for March 2011 (compared to the March 2011 state unemployment rate at 9.2% and the national rate at 8.8%). Given the economic slowdown in both the region and the nation, we expect 2011 to continue to be difficult for the Puget Sound region,with the downturn continuing into 2012. Long term,however,with the diversity of our economy, we feel the Puget Sound area offers the necessary elements for economic viability, and will contribute to the economic stability of the subject property over time. A-4181 APPRAISAL GROUP OF THE NORTHWEST LLP Page 11 ARLINGTON NEIGHBORHOOD DATA The city of Arlington is located in Snohomish County approximately 10 miles north of the city of Everett and 41 miles north of the city of Seattle.While retaining a small town atmosphere in a rural setting,Arlington is conveniently located near larger metropolitan interests. Arlington was incorporated as a city in 1903 and has a rich local history that is evident in the architecture of the downtown area. The population of Arlington in 2010 was 17,926,a 53%increase over the 2000 population. As with the larger region, there has been a transformation from the dependency on timber and aerospace to an economy balanced by software, biotechnology, construction, the military, alternative energy and tourism. This area of Snohomish County is continuing to expand as residential demands increase due to the close proximity and access to the surrounding urban areas. The greatest challenge is in predicting the short- and long-term effects of the global economic crisis. MARKET ANALYSIS Single Family Sales Activity: The Northwest Multiple Listing Service (NWMLS) reports for 21 counties of Western Washington indicate total residential sales for year-to-date (YTD) June 2010 of 23,883 homes, with an average price of$346,318 and an average market time of 85 days. For YTD June 2011, sales volume dropped 5.3%%to 22,622 homes with an average price of $320,752 down 7.4% and an increased market time of 91 days. Snohomish County's sales of 3,782(YTD June 2010)represented 15.8%of the 21 counties reported. While the volume for YTD 2011 declined to 3,513, the percentage of the 21 counties remained unchanged at 15.8%. Sales prices for YTD 2011 averaged $278,564 down 8%from 302,869 YTD 2010 with an average market time YTD 2011 of 91 days up from 78 in 2010. The NWMLS reports for the northwest portion of Snohomish County,generally comprised of the cities of Arlington, Stanwood, Marysville and the adjacent unincorporated areas (NWMLS area#760), indicate that sales YTD 2011 of 676 homes (while down from 729 homes YTD 2010)represents a stable 19.2% of total sales for the county. However, the 2011 average sales price of$274,460 is a decline of 14.5% from 2010 while the county average price declined only 11% for a similar period. Finally, the average market times increased 13 days to 92 days which compares favorably with the county-wide market time of 90 days. In summary, the subject's market area reflects generally consistent declines in prices and volumes as reported both for the county and 21 counties of Western Washington,with the exception that the average sales price declined (-14.5%) at a higher percentage than the county(-I I%) and the 21 counties of Western Washington(-7.4%). A-4181 APPRAISAL GROUP OF THE NORTHWEST LLP Page 12 Exposure Time The term"exposure time"is defined by the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice, 2010-2011 edition, as: "the estimated length of time the property interest being appraised would have been offered on the market prior to the hypothetical consummation of a sale at market value on the effective date of the appraisal;a retrospective opinion based upon an analysis of past events assuming a competitive and open market."2 Exposure time differs from marketing time, in that exposure time is always presumed to precede the effective date of the appraisal. Based on the supply and demand conditions as of the effective date of this appraisal,the exposure time for a property with characteristics similar to the subject,if placed on the open market at a reasonable list price,is estimated at six months. This is based on the demand for such properties and the relatively few properties offered for sale, as revealed by our analysis and confirmed by real estate professionals in the subject's market area. Prior Sales and Listing History A review of the public records was unable to identify any change in ownership in the past five years. Additionally,no active listings or pending sales during the past twelve months were identified for the subject property. SITE DESCRIPTION Location and Access The subject property is an almost-rectangular, level, corner parcel. This neighborhood is most conveniently accessed by traveling approximately 4 miles east on State Route 530 from Interstate 5,then north one block on SR 9 to West Burke Avenue,east on Burke one block to West Avenue,then north on West Avenue to the subject at the southwest corner of West Cox Avenue and West Avenue. Shape and Size The subject site is an almost-rectangular,level,corner parcel with a total site area of 15,682 square feet. The site has approximately 140 feet of public street frontage along the south side of West Cox Avenue and approximately 100 feet of frontage along the west side of West Avenue. The subject is generally larger than many of the developed sites in this area. Topography The subject's topography is fairly level with its frontage on both West Cox Avenue or West Avenue. 2 USPAP, 2010-2011 Edition,p.U-89 A-4181 APPRAISAL GROUP OF THE NORTHWEST LLP Page 13 Soils,Drainage and Toxic Hazards No indications of toxic hazards were observed;detailed analysis of such potential is beyond the scope of this appraisal. However, the subject is immediately adjacent to the City of Arlington's waste water treatment facility and Public Works yard and it is across the street from an abandoned railroad grade now utilized as the Centennial Trail. While there were no indications of the presence of hazardous materials,the client is encouraged to obtain a Phase I and or Phase II report. It is assumed that the soil conditions are stable, adequately drained and able to support the improvements under the highest and best use, and free of toxic materials. Identification of Possible Flood Hazard The Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA)map shows the property in an area outside the 500-year floodplain(Zone X). The corresponding flood map number for the subject is 5302710384E, dated November 8, 1999. Easements and Restrictions An inspection of the property identified no adverse easements, encroachments, or other adverse conditions. Utilities All public utilities including sewer and water are believed to be available and at the street. Site Improvements There are no sidewalks,curbs and gutters;however,both fronting streets are paved asphalt and there is a street light. Assessment and Taxes - Snohomish County,Washington For 2010, the Snohomish County Assessor's records show the assessed value for the subject property is as follows: Tax Year Parcel Number Land Value Building Value Total Value Taxes 2010 00-4618-040-001-00 $201,500 $119,500 1 $321,000 $3,478.19 Zoning The subject property is zoned OTBD-3 by the City of Arlington. Old Town Business District(OTBD)—This designation is intended for land uses in the downtown commercial center and the promotion of dense, active,pedestrian oriented commercial activities; and may allow for multi-family residential uses upstairs from commercial uses(mixed use)and civic uses. The subject appears to be in compliance with the zoning code. A-4181 APPRAISAL GROUP OF THE NORTHWEST LLP Page 14 Description of Improvements Note: The subject interior was not inspected. The description of the interior was obtained in a phone interview with the owner-occupant. Based upon the description and the exterior inspection, the subject is assumed to be in average condition. The subject is a one and one-half story, detached single-family residence originally constructed in 1895. It measures 1,403 square feet on the first floor and 574 square feet on the second floor. The first floor is finished with a remodeled kitchen, dining area, living room, den, bedroom and remodeled full bath. The second floor is finished with two bedrooms,an extra room with plumbing,and a full bath. There are hardwood floors,dual pane windows,and electric baseboard heat. The plumbing,concrete foundation,electrical system,insulation and heating system have been upgraded. Attached to the main house is an oversized one-car carport. The detached cottage was originally constructed in 1938. This single story dwelling measured 475 square feet, and was reported to be finished with one bedroom, a small kitchen area and a three-quarter bath. Attached to the cottage are a storage room and a one car garage. The exterior of the main house is finished with both wood siding and a composite material and the exterior of the cottage is all wood siding. Both dwellings have composition roofs. A-4181 APPRAISAL GROUP OF THE NORTHWEST LLP Page 15 HIGHEST AND BEST USE ANALYSIS The highest and best use of a property is defined in The Appraisal ofReal Estate(Thirteenth Edition; Chicago: Appraisal Institute,2008;pp.277-78)as"the reasonably probable and legal use of vacant land or an improved property, which is physically possible, appropriately supported, financially feasible, and that results in the highest value." Highest and best use analysis is a method of inquiry in which the optimum use of a property,in light of market conditions,is determined. Because the price that potential purchasers consider feasible to pay for a property tends to be based on the use they plan for it, the highest and best use of the property is a major factor affecting its market value. This concept aids in determining what improvements should be constructed on a site if it were vacant,and how any present improvements can best be utilized. Land may be analyzed"as though vacant"and"as improved"to determine its highest and best use. The highest and best use of a site as though vacant may be different from the highest and best use of the same property as presently improved. For example,although a site may have a particular highest and best use if it were vacant and available for new development,the current use may be retained so long as the existing improvements continue to contribute to the overall value of the property. To determine the highest and best use of a property,four significant factors are analyzed. These are the possible uses that are: (1)legally permissible,(2)physically possible,(3)financially feasible,and (4) maximally productive. HIGHEST AND BEST USE AS VACANT LAND For the analysis of highest and best use of land or a site as though vacant, it is assumed that a parcel of land is vacant or that it can be made vacant through the demolition of any improvements. The subject site consists of an almost-rectangular,level,corner parcel containing a total site area of 15,682 square feet. The site is a level lot and the soils appear adequate to support a variety of structures. The subject site is zoned OTBD-3,Old Town Business District-3,by the City of Arlington. This is a zoning designation that allows for a broad range of uses including single- and multifamily residences,hotels,motels, some retail activities,office, churches, as well as some manufacturing or processing uses. The subject is considered to be a conforming use allowed by the current zoning. On the basis of this analysis,the highest and best use for the subject site as though vacant would typically be for a commercial development which would maximize the return to the land. However, the current market for commercial uses in the subject's market area is depressed with declining or stagnant sales prices due to the weak economic factors regionally, as well as nationally. Consequently,the highest and best use as vacant would be to defer development until such time as market conditions improve making the development of the property economically feasible. A-4181 APPRAISAL GROUP OF THE NORTHWEST LLP Page 16 HIGHEST AND BEST USE AS IMPROVED The analysis of highest and best use of the subject property as improved involves examining the improvements and their relationship to the site in order to determine the physical possibilities, legal permissibility, financial feasibility, and the maximum productivity of the property. It considers the site as it is presently improved and seeks to determine whether the improvements should be expanded, converted to another use, retained in their existing condition and status, or redeveloped with a new structure with greater utility and the ability to return a higher profit to the land. The existing improvements consist of an average quality single-family residence with a detached cottage, constructed in 1895 and 1938 respectively and that are currently in average condition. The subject appears to be in compliance with the zoning code. The improvements are in average condition, provide average functional utility and, as such, make a significant contribution to the underlying land value. Therefore,the Highest and Best Use"As Improved"is the continued use as a single-family residence with detached cottage on an interim basis until such time as demand for commercial uses for which the subject may be utilized improves. A-4181 APPRAISAL GROUP OF THE NORTHWEST LLP Page 17 APPROACHES TO VALUE There are three accepted methods of evaluating all types of real property:the cost approach,the sales comparison approach,and the income capitalization approach. All three approaches are used when applicable. When sufficient information is not available, only those approaches or that approach containing the most information is used and/or relied upon. COST APPROACH The cost approach to value arises from the economic concept of objective value. This concept implies that the value of anything is the cost incurred to create it. This approach is based upon the estimated reproduction or replacement cost new of the improvements. The cost new is then reduced in value by the accrued depreciation, if any. The depreciated value of site improvements,if any,and estimated land value are then added to the depreciated reproduction cost of the improvements to develop an indication of value by the cost approach. SALES COMPARISON APPROACH The sales comparison approach method of valuation reflects the opinion of buyers and sellers of comparable property about the value of the subject property. The sales comparison approach is based on the principle of substitution: no well-informed,prudent buyer is going to pay more for any property than is necessary to buy another equally desirable substitute property. The sales comparison approach requires the appraiser to assume the role of a typical buyer; gather sufficient data; and analyze, weigh, and adjust the data in such a manner as to properly apply this information to the property being appraised. INCOME CAPITALIZATION APPROACH The income capitalization approach method of valuation is used primarily in the appraisal of investment property. Therefore,the appraiser must analyze the rental value of the comparable properties and, in addition, obtain background information on what a prudent investor in this type of property expects as a return on investment. From this information, a return on the invested capital can be ascertained and then applied to the subject property's market rent to develop a reliable indication of value based on income. The rent paid or income received, commonly known as contract rent, is not always market rent for a given property. In other words, a survey of comparable properties must be made for the purpose of obtaining rental information to ascertain the going or market rent for comparable properties and the subject property. This information must then be related to the subject property being appraised. The income capitalization approach is the primary approach used in arriving at the indicated market value for income-producing property. A-41 H 1 APPRAISAL GROUP OF THE NORTHWEST LLP Page 18 APPROACHES TO VALUE USED The reliability of the cost approach is significantly impaired for older properties such as the subject due, in part, to the difficulty in identifying the value of the underlying land and the accrued depreciation and/or obsolescence from all sources. While it may be possible to estimate the rental value and related expenses for the subject property and subsequently convert the income estimate into a value estimate, this is not an approach that typical buyers or even informed investors use when purchasing residential properties. As such, the cost and income capitalization approaches are not considered applicable for this assignment. The sales comparison approach is widely understood and often used by market participants. Sales activity in the subject's market area and adjacent competing market areas has been adequately active over the past few years,and there have been enough recent sales of properties which are somewhat similar to the subject property. We have identified several sales of commercially zoned sites with residential improvements providing an interim contributory value in the subject's market area with which to make direct comparisons. A-4181 APPRAISAL GROUP OF THE NORTHWEST LLP Page 19 SALES COMPARISON APPROACH In the sales comparison approach,the value of a property is estimated by comparing it with similar properties in its market area that have sold recently. This approach is based on the premise that the value of a property is set by the prices of equally desirable substitute properties in the same area. The validity of this approach depends on identifying comparable sales transactions that are similar to the subject on the following factors: (1)Location: Comparable sales should be located in the same area or in areas of similar land use, traffic flow, access to amenities and access to transportation facilities; (2) Utility and Size: Comparable sales should be of similar size and have similar utility; (3) Overall Appeal: Investors who would consider purchasing the subject property should also be likely to consider purchasing the comparable sale properties, assuming all were on the market simultaneously. PROCEDURE Properties that are similar to the subject and have been sold recently are selected for comparison with the subject property. An appropriate unit of comparison is determined (e.g., whole property, price per square foot, price per room, etc.) and adjustments are made to each comparable sale in order to account for value differences between this comparable sale property and the subject. The adjustments are made for transaction characteristics such as financing terms,conditions of sale,and date of sale;and for property characteristics such as location and physical attributes. The result of appropriate adjustments applied to sales of comparable properties should be a relatively narrow indicated value range. From within this range, a specific estimate of the subject property's value is often selected. A search for sales of similar properties was conducted in the local area,utilizing the MetroScan, CBA, Costar and NWMLS databases. Search parameters were expanded to include sales occurring as far back January 2008 and within several communities of northwest Snohomish County. This search identified in excess of 20 comparable sales and active listings; a desktop review identified 13 properties for field inspection and, from these, four were selected as the best comparables for the subject property. Differences were noted and adjusted for. The sales and active listing are summarized in the following table and discussed in greater detail on the following pages. A map indicating the locations of the sales relative to the subject is also presented on the next page. The total site area of the subject is 15,682 square feet. We show the details of four comparable properties in the Sales Comparison Analysis and map on the following pages. The three sales and one active listing are all in the subject's market area,and have zoning designations that are similar to the subject and that would allow development similar to the subject. We applied adjustments in various categories to bring the comparable sales and the active listing into parity with the subject. A-4181 APPRAISAL GROUP OF THE NORTHWEST LLP Page 20 COMPARABLE LAND SALES CHART SALE IDENTIFICATION SALE SALE LOT SIZE BLDG. SIZE PRICE/SF ZONING DATE PRICE (SF) (SF) OF BLDG. Subject 104 West Cox Avenue, N/A N/A 15,682 1,977 N/A OTBD3 Arlington 1 315 E. Burke Avenue, 5/20/11 $190,000 4,792 1,344 $141 OTBD3 Arlington 2 227 E. Burke Avenue, 9/11/09 $170,000 7,405 1,114 $153 OTBD3 Arlington 3 117 W. Gilman Avenue, 3/6/09 $114,500 5,663 840 $136 OTBD3 Arlington 4 605 Broadway Street, Active $200,000 7,405 1,080 $185 OTBD2 Arlington z m Arlington Junction ComparLable#227 E.Be;Arlington, 230.18 m Comparable#3 ,e 117 W.Gilman Ave Srnish Arlington,WA 98223 E Haller Ave River 0.14 miles S urke Ave [sucks tam- Lnon e L Isitman S! Eble#1 z ke Ave W pivision St I s3o— z A 98223 es SE S Comparable#4 St a z 605 Broadway, o i z Arlington,WA 98223 J r 0.24 miles SE G E 4TH Sl 21 it E3RB 5t c � o S30 n� '+ -E 2ND 5i �• z r z � A-4181 APPRAISAL GROUP OF THE NORTHWEST LLP Page 21 COMPARABLE SALES PHOTOGRAPHS AND MAPS - - n ul{�liulll IIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIII IIIlilllllll IIIIII' ..IIII - - Sale No. 1: 315 E. Burke Avenue,Arlington WA L t 1 ! �aK �#aAiNi Y z ss ee N r �y N i ~ N Nt0I Y I'N {Yro N pU 5 4 - 3 }2 8 7 { 12,13 1412 1 ' } 3141516 A-4181 APPRAISAL GROUP OF THE NORTHWEST LLP Page 22 P Sale No. 2: 227 E. Burke Avenue, Arlington, WA -AV& - - -- - --� - - � ~ ~ eN ev ' 6- - 13 7 3 {2 1 8 7 . 6 A-4181 APPRAISAL GROUP OF THE NORTHWEST LLP , .- �, :~,'� +�� .. .�. r ,_�'. Imo♦ *� f'+�� ti` :r� k,;• 1 ' ♦ 1 -� ., �� --� �� r R � t� ' �� VVV WWW _ i � �� ... _�� .� `' �ir�w11AA1[ ei� GC71 - 1 � � � - i M�l� � .�I�rl� ` �3 �� r �..� .� . � �. Page 24 ash 4 V ( Active Listing No. 4: 605 Broadway Street, Arlington � 494I 3 f N • AA i ry i 8 6 4 3 2 3 2 6 is 15 16 17 1B 19 20 10 11 12 13 1� 6 18 — •--- �• 11 1Z 3 14 15 3 211 7 6 3 Z 1 6 7 6, B 4 3 2" 1 I ISM 17 10 19 20 1 12 i4h 18 . 9 0 !, i f 2 13 14 15 2 1 2 , 1 2 �I a I 19 3 Zoe zo °I A-4181 APPRAISAL GROUP OF THE NORTHWEST LLP Page 25 DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS OF COMPARABLE SALES Each sale is compared with the subject by making adjustments for variations in property and transaction features such as site size, building size, age, condition, date of sale, location, etc. These adjustments are applied to the whole property and therein provide a value estimated for comparison to the subject. Comparable Sale No. 1 is located 0.25 mile southeast of the subject at 315 E. Burke Avenue, Arlington. This is the May 2011, $190,000 "arms length", "all cash to the seller" sale of a 1,344-square-foot home on a 4,792-square-foot,OTBD3-zoned site. The listing agent indicated that the improvements were in average condition. This comparable sale is similar to the subj ect in its zoning,parcel shape,condition,quality of construction,utilities,and topography.Upward adjustments were indicated for its smaller lot size, (the marginal site value was adjusted at $8 per square foot), its inferior mid-block access, its inferior two-bedroom/one and one-half bathroom room count ($5,000 per bedroom and $3,000 per full bath), its smaller living area, (the Gross Living Area [GLA] was adjusted at $30 per square-foot), its lack of a detached cottage,and its inferior covered parking(garage is adjusted a$2,000 per space and a carport is adjusted at$1,500 per space). Downward adjustments were indicated for this comparable's sale date (an adjustment of 1/2 of 1% per month from the closing date to the date of inspection), superior location (not adjacent to a waste water treatment plant), its superior exposure on a primary arterial, and its superior effective age (adjusted at 1% per year difference). This property was on the market for 806 days at an initial asking price of $256,000. After adjustments, this comparable indicates a value for the subject of$298,000. Comparable Sale No.2 is located 0.18 mile southeast of the subject at 227 E. Burke Avenue, Arlington. This is the September 2009, $170,000 "arms length", "all cash to the seller" transaction of a 1,1 14-square-foot residence on a 7,405-square-foot, OTBD3-zoned site. The buyer's agent indicated the improvements were in inferior condition. This comparable sale is similar to the subject in its zoning, parcel shape, quality of construction, utilities, and topography. Upward adjustments were indicated for its smaller lot size(the marginal site value was adjusted at$8 per square foot), its inferior mid-block access,its inferior bathroom count, its smaller living area(the Gross Living Area [GLA] was adjusted at$30 per square foot), its lack of a detached cottage, and its inferior covered parking (garage is adjusted a $2,000 per space and a carport is adjusted at$1,500 per space),its inferior effective age(adjusted at 1%per year difference) and its inferior condition. Downward adjustments were indicated for this comparable's sale date, superior location,and its superior exposure on a primary arterial. This property was previously sold for $240,000 on November 3, 2006; it was transferred on February 26, 2009 by a trustees deed for $204,787. This bank-owned property was on the market for 88 days at an initial asking price of$199,900. After adjustments, this comparable indicates a value for the subject of$269,000. Comparable Sale No. 3 is located 0.14 mile south of the subject at 117 W. Gilman Avenue, Arlington. This is the March 2009,$114,500"arms length","all cash to the seller"transaction of a 840-square-foot residence on a 5,663-square-foot, OTBD3-zoned site. The listing agent indicated the improvements were in inferior condition at the time of closing and that the investor who purchased the property spent $15,000 repairing the property. This comparable sale is similar to the subject in its zoning, parcel shape, quality of construction, utilities, and A-4181 APPRAISAL GROUP OF THE NORTHWEST LLP Page 26 topography. Upward adjustments were indicated for its smaller lot size,its inferior mid-block access,its inferior two-bedroom/one bathroom room count,its smaller living area,its lack of a detached cottage,its inferior covered parking,its inferior effective age and its inferior condition. Downward adjustments were indicated for this comparable's sale date and superior location. This property was previously sold for $150,000 on August 30, 2004; it was transferred on September 30, 2008 by a trustees deed for $186,000. This bank-owned property was on the market for 50 days at an initial asking price of$140,000. After adjustments, this comparable indicates a value for the subject of$252,000. Comparable Sale No. 4 is located 0.24 mile southeast of the subject at 605 Broadway Street, Arlington. This is a $200,000 active listing for a 1,080-square-foot residence on a 7,405-square-foot,OTBD2-zoned site. The listing comments indicate the improvements are in average condition. This active listing comparable is similar to the subject in its zoning,corner access,parcel shape,effective age,condition,quality of construction,utilities,and topography. Upward adjustments were indicated for its smaller lot size, its inferior one bathroom room count, its smaller living area, and its lack of a detached cottage (this property was reported to have a 168-sgaure-foot unfinished basement which was adjusted at -$5/sf resulting in a net adjustment of$14,160). Downward adjustments were indicated for this comparable's superior location,exposure,and superior oversized garage. This property was previously transferred by a quit claim deed on January 4,2010. This property has been on the market for 344 days at an initial asking price of$199,500. After adjustments, this comparable indicates a value for the subject of$293,000. Property Rights The property rights conveyed for all the comparable sales is similar to the subject; therefore, no adjustments for property rights conveyed are necessary. Conditions of Sale/Financing All the closed comparables were confirmed to have been"arm's length", "all cash to the seller"transactions. CONCLUSION SALES COMPARISON After adjustments, the comparables analyzed have an adjusted range of property values of $252,000 to$298,000. Each of the comparable properties,as adjusted,is considered to provide good indications for the value of the subject property. Comparable Sale No.I is the timelier sale. Comparable No.4 is an active listing and is likely to represent the upper end of the market value range. It is our opinion that a market value for the subject of$270,000 is well supported. A-4181 APPRAISAL GROUP OF THE NORTHWEST LLP Page 27 SALES ADJUSTMENT GRID Subject Comparable Sale#1 Comparable Sale#2 Comparable Sale#3 Comparable Sale#4 Adj. Adj Adj. Adj Address 104 W.Cox Ave, 315 E.Burke Ave, 227 E.Burke Ave, 117 W.Gilrnan Ave, 605 Broadway, Arlington Arlington Arlington Arlington Arlington Distance from Subject 0.25 We SE 0.18 N&SE 0.14 Nfie S 0.24 Mle SE Sale Price $190,000 $170,000 $114,500 $200,000 Sale Price/SF land $39.65 $22.96 $20.22 $27.01 Sale Price/SF Imp. $141.37 $152.60 $136.31 $185.19 Date ofSale 5/20/11 $1,900 9/11/09 -$18,700 3/6/09 -$16,030 Active So Adjusted Price $188,100.00 $151,300.00 $98,470.00 $200,000.00 Tax IDNumber 004618-040-001-00 004618-032-021-00 00-4618-031-022-00 00-4618-017-014-00 00-4618-008-009-02 Lot(SF) 15,682 4,792 $87,120 7,405 $66,216 5,663 $80,152 71405 $66,216 Zoning OTBD3 OTBD3 OTBD3 OTBD3 OTB172 Location Average Superior -$10,000 Superior $10,000 Superior -$10,000 Superior -$10,000 Access Good k&rior $5,000 Inferior $5,000 haferior $5,000 Similar Exposure Average Superior $5,000 Superior -$5,000 Similar Superior -$5,000 Shape Good Similar Similar Similar Similar Room Count 7rrrs-3bd-Den-2BA 5ms-2bd-1.5 BA $6,500 5ms-3bd-lBA $3,000 4mis-2bd-IRA $8,000 5mis-3bd-113A $3,000 GLA 1977 1344 $18,990 1114 $25,890 840 $34,110 1080 $26,910 Other Cottage(475st) None $15,000 None $15,000 None $15,000 168sfL1n8n Bsmt $14,160 Parking 1 garage+l carport 1 garage $1,500 2 carport $500 1 garage $1,500 oversize 2gar -$2,000 Year Built/Eff.Age 1895/40 yrs 1920/35 yrs -$9,500 1901/45 yrs $8,500 1925/45 yrs $4,600 1912/40 yrs Condition Average Similar Interior $8,500 Inferior $15,000 Similar Quality ofConst. Average Similar Similar Similar Similar Utilities All available at the Sheet Similar Similar Similar Similar Topography Level Similar Similar Similar Similar Net Adjustment 1 $109,610 1 $117,606 1 $153,362 $93,286 Adjusted Value $298,000 $269,000 1 1 $252,000 $293,000 A-4181 APPRAISAL GROUP OF THE NORTHWEST LLP Page 28 Final Value Estimate As a result of our investigation and analysis,it is concluded that the"As Is"market value of the subject real property, as of July 20, 2011, is calculated as TWO HUNDRED SEVENTY THOUSAND DOLLARS $270,000 A-4181 APPRAISAL GROUP OF THE NORTHWEST LLP Page 29 ADDENDA A-41 H 1 APPRAISAL GROUP OF THE NORTHWEST LLP QUALIFICATIONS OF APPRAISERS A-4181 APPRAISAL GROUP OF THE NORTHWEST LLP QUALIFICATIONS OF APPRAISER JAMES B.PRICE,MAI,SR/WA www.APPRAISALGROUPNW.com;JPRICE(&APPRAISALGROUPNW.COM PHONE No.:(425)453-9292;FAx No.(425)455-9740 1980112T"AVENUE NE,STE 270,BELLEVUE,WA 98004-2940 EDUCATION Bachelor of Science in Finance,Real Estate Emphasis: Northern Illinois University/University of Illinois. Appraisal Institute courses include Capitalization Theory, Residential Valuation, Easement Valuation, and Standards of Professional Practice. Seminars and Classes include Real Estate Feasibility, Business Valuation, Valuation of Easements and Litigation Skills, Appraising for Pension Funds, and Appraisal of Partial Acquisitions. PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS Appraisal Institute Membership: MAI Designated Member of the Appraisal Institute since 1979 Formerly: President, Director, and Vice President, Seattle Chapter and Alaska Chapter International Right of Way Association Designation:SR/WA(Senior Right of Way Agent) Position: International Right of Way Association Valuation Committee Formerly: Regional Chair, Region 7, International Right of Way Association International Right of Way Association Director, President, and Vice President; Seattle, Washington and Fairbanks, Alaska Chapters EXPERIENCE: Over 35 years Currently: General Partner,APPRAISAL GROUP OF THE NORTHWEST LLP Developer of subdivision, office building, and residences Owner of office buildings and apartments Formerly: Proprietor, APPRAISAL GROUP OF THE NORTHWEST Appraiser, Schueler, McKown& Keenan Partner, Price &Associates, Alaska Senior Appraiser, First State Bank of Oregon Appraiser, Pacific First Federal Savings Bank Appraiser, U.S. Small Business Administration Appraiser, Washington State Dept. of Transportation Qualified as an expert witness in Superior Court,Federal Court Master's Hearings,and Federal Bankruptcy Court. Served as an arbitrator in property valuation and lease renewals. Fee reviewer; Washington Dept. of Transportation, major banks, and governmental clients. Qualified as a Master; held Master's Hearings in Alaska. Currently certified under the continuing education program of the Appraisal Institute. Currently certified in Washington State as a General Appraiser(Certificate No. 1100229) A-41 H 1 APPRAISAL GROUP OF THE NORTHWEST LLP QUALIFICATIONS OF JAMES B.PRICE,MAI,SR/WA Page 2 CLIENTS SERVED Abeyta&Associates, R/W Company Korea Exchange Bank Benson&McLaughlin, Accountants Lane &Associates, Inc., R/W Company Boston Private Bank John Lynch, CPA, Bellevue Bullivant, Houser, Bailey, Pendergrass & Ogden Murphy Wallace, Attorneys Hoffman; O. R. Colan Associates, Inc. Bureau of Indian Affairs (Acquisition Specialists) Bureau of Land Management Pacific Union Bank Center Bank Pharos Corporation(R/W Company) Certified Land Services Port of Friday Harbor Chevron Products Company Port of Orcas Church of God, Western Washington Port of Seattle City of Auburn Puget Sound Energy City of Des Moines Reid Middleton, Engineers City of Issaquah Saehan Bank City of Newcastle Seattle City Light City of Port Angeles Seattle School District City of Redmond Sound Transit City of SeaTac Tacoma Utilities City of Seattle Union Bank City of Tacoma U.S. Bank Coldwell Banker Relocation U.S. Fidelity& Guarantee Columbia Bank U.S. Postal Service Costco Universal Field Services, Inc. Eastman, Scott, Attorney, Bellevue Washington Dept. of Transportation- El Centro De La Raza; Felicia Gonzales Approved Appraiser& Reviewer Enumclaw Public Schools Washington State Dept. of Natural First Sound Bank Resources Johns Monroe Mitsunaga, Attorneys; Washington State Parks & Recreation Michael Monroe, Darrell Mitsunaga Commission Kent Schools Waste Management KeyBank of Washington Williams Northwest Pipeline Keating Bucklin&McCormack, Attorneys Wilshire State Bank King County Library System A-4181 APPRAISAL GROUP OF THE NORTHWEST LLP QUALIFICATIONS OF APPRAISER Jimmy DENIS WATTS,APPRAISER www.APPRAISALGROUPNW.COM;JIMDENIS(&MSN.COM PHONE No.:(425)453-9292;FAx No.(425)455-9740 1980112T"AVENUE NE,STE 270,BELLEVUE,WA 98004-2940 CERTIFICATION: State of Washington General Certified Appraiser No. 27011 1100328 STATEMENT OF EXPERIENCE: Real Estate Appraisal Right of Way Appraisal Real Estate Lending Real Estate Analysis Real Estate Consulting Feasibility Analysis WORK HISTORY: Appraisal Group of the Northwest, LLP 2007 - Present Position: Appraiser Chinook Appraisal Services, Woodinville, WA Self-Employed 1990 - 2007 Position: Residential Real Estate Appraiser Mechanics National Bank, Paramount, CA 1978 -1992 Position: Executive Vice President Duties included administration of Real Estate Lending Division, specifically including appraisal review World Savings and Loan, Lynwood, CA Position: Appraiser, Project Loan Department 1974-1978 OTHER CREDITS: .Delta Mu Delta Honors Society EDUCATION: California State Polytechnic University at Pomona Master of Business Administration June 1981 California State University at Long Beach Bachelor of Science, School of Business, Dept. of Finance with a Real Estate Specialization June 1972 A-4181 APPRAISAL GROUP OF THE NORTHWEST LLP QUALIFICATIONS OF JIMMY DENIS WATTS Page 2 EDUCATION SUMMARY: COURSE TITLE SPONSOR DATE LOCATION HOURS Advanced R.E.Appr. U.C.L.A. 1976 Los Angeles,CA 36 Principles of Indust.R.E. U.C.L.A. 1976 Los Angeles,CA 36 R.E.Finance&Investment CSULB 1972 Long Beach,CA 36 Directed Studies(Appraisal) CSULB 1972 Long Beach,CA 36 Legal Principles of R.E. CSULB 1972 Long Beach,CA 36 R.E.Appr.Fund. Lk.Wash Voc.Tech 1991 Kirkland,WA 30 Prof.Practice&Ethics Lk.Wash Voc.Tech 1991 Kirkland,WA 18 Standards of Prof.Practice Appraisal Institute 1992 Bellevue,WA 25 R.E. Finance Lk.Wash Voc.Tech 1994 Kirkland,WA 36 What's it worth?-Income Mykut Real Estate School 1996 Bellevue,WA 30 Property Evaluation Tools R.E.Appraisal Mykut Real Estate School 1999 Lynnwood,WA 30 SEMINAR TITLE SPONSOR DATE LOCATION HOURS ABA.AI phone briefing Appraisal Institute 2005 Seattle,WA 2 Fannie Mae Test Forms Mykut R E 2005 Lynnwood,WA 7 High Value Homes Appraisal Institute 2005 Seattle,WA 4 Locator Guided Tour Washington Realtors 2006 Tacoma,WA 3.5 Realist: Tax Date NWMLS 2006 Kirkland,WA 3 Fair Housing McKissock Schools 2006 Online Course 4 USPAP Update Mykut R E School 2010 Lynnwood,WA 7 Uniform Appraisal Standards for Federal Land Acquisitions"Yellow Appraisal Institute 2011 Kent,WA 16 Book" CLIENTS SERVED: Abeyta&Associates Diamond Mortgage Mountain View Mortgage Boeing Employees C.U. First Horizon Mortgage Performance Mortgage Capital Resources Group First Savings of Washington PNC Mortgage Cascade Land Conservancy First Union Rainier Mortgage Charter Funding GE Group RBC Mortgage Chevy Chase Bank Hana Small Business Richmond Equity City of Arlington, WA Lending Seattle Metro Credit Union City of Bothell Hanmi Bank Select Capital Mortgage City of Duvall HDR, Bellevue, WA Snohomish PUD City of Issaquah Home 123 Mortgage The Commerce Bank City of Monroe Homestone Mortgage, Inc. The Mortgage Company City of Redmond Interwest Mortgage Umpqua Bank City of Shoreline Kent School District Union Bank of California City of Stanwood King County United General Core Business Bank Liberty Financial Group Universal Field Services, Cornerstone Mortgage Lummi Nation Inc. Crossland Mortgage Mortgage One US Bank Wilshire State Bank A-4181 APPRAISAL GROUP OF THE NORTHWEST LLP � P.O. Box 81005 ER/CAN Seattle, WA 98108 - 1005 Environmental Construction LLC Phone: (206) 267-0746 Asbestos- Lead - Mold - Demolition Fax: (206) 267-0753 July 21, 2014 Name: Skycorp, LTD Attn: Skyler Waldal 526 NW Ave Suite #11 Arlington, WA 98223 Email: skycorpltd@yahoo.com --- Lotto► of Completion --- (14363) Re: Asbestos Abatement Services at: 104&1041/2 W Cox Ave Arlington, WA 98223 This is to certify that American Environmental Construction LLC has removed the asbestos containing material from the above referenced address per our Proposal & Contract dated June 11 , 2014. Clearance Air Monitoring (Sample Type=CL) as reported on the Air Sample Data Sheet (available upon request) indicates that the airborne asbestos level is below the EPA established standard of .01 fibers/cubic centimeter for clean air after an abatement project. Accordingly, the work area is safe, in regard to asbestos exposure, for re- occupancy. Please call me at 206-267-0746 if you have any questions or comments regarding this Letter of Completion. Respectfully submitted, American Environmental Construction, LLC Dee Surface-Office Manager Washington State Department of Labor & Industries Payment Receipt Your payment has been processed and your form has been submitted. Transaction Date 8/4/2014 Transaction Id 104431298 Project Name Airport Building 211 Demolition and Abatement Form Filed Affidavit Form Id 524085 Payment Type VISA**"""""0957 Amount Billed $40.00 What would you like to do next? Print this receipt for your records. File an affidavit from an approved intent. I Back to Home. File a new intent. Log off. Washington State Dept of Labor&Industries Use of this site is subject to the laws of the state of Washington Access W 11'ashinoon- i".'"I M",1 mm-1 w b life I CERTIFIED A$.-PROVIDED BY LAW AS : 5 OS SUPERVi50ti �I•t?I.CA7'E:NUM8ER: z '1500749`0;41s I :1I: TLON bAT• O MO LEY ROBERT Ulk 8408�220TFf'PL 5W ` EDMON'DS VNA8b2fi8�1:'li .: Signature Issued by DEPARTMEI`TT.OP LA-B.OR'AND INDUSTRIES I k s CERTIFIED A,$PROVIDED BY LAW AS •` Ems• Q#KEf�~ WT;IFLCA0E- NUMBER:201 021228A �F?ZC, bt ATlb [DATE;d2/08(2Q16 :1 / y} 14 _ f� ROCfRIGU.EZ•gAUTISTA,ROBERTO 1 11811'SE 31:2TH.ST ` . AUBUCV,�1�f1i4; g92 l i Signature Issued by AMNITART dF LA$AI� `N I1�DUSTRIES ` J f. 1 ' r _F. �' !� 1Y1"•�.•......�;'<,11. /yam• �' . 1 \.. •r_YA":W'�fl/'.t�w ..4-)��fr\J,• 11�i-1 I.-_ I ' Pagel of 3 L Dept. of Labor & Industries, Division of Occupational Safety & Health Asbestos Project Notification Form Form ID: 88041#91338Ameri616427 Notice Date: 6/25/2014 Start Date: 7/17/2014 Completion Date: 7/18/2014 Status: Amended Site Work Hours: 8:00 am -3:00 pm Site Work Days: Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Contractor: American Environmental Construction LLC Job Site C.A.S.: Jesse Trevino Your email address: dees@aeconlIc.com Contractor Phone Number: 206-267-0746 Property Owner Name: Owner's Agent: Skyler Waldal Company: Skycorp,LTD Address: 526 NW Ave Suite#11 City: Arlington State: WA Zip+4: 98223 Phone: 425-367-7887 Job Site Lu—.//_......1-5 .-_.. __../__r a-._/a_—.'__�..a--/-^L--`_-/T----T�-.-T1=---�--- ----^T'-----rT1_oOnA1n� '711111^n1 d Page 2 of 3 Address: 104 West Cox Ave Building Name: Room: City: Arlington Zip +4: 98223 County: Snohomish Facility Type: Commerical Age: 1895 Size: 1977 Type of activity: Demolition Quantity of Asbestos to Be Removed Outdoors Indoors Quantity: 2978 square feet CAB Sheet vinyl Other:Mortar Quantity: linear feet Control Measures Neg. pres. enclosure Wet methods HEPA vacuum Critical barriers Manual methods Respiratory Protection 1/2 mask APR PAPR Comments: http://www.Ini.wa.gov/safety/topics/atoz/asbestos/FormDataDisplay.asp?FonnlD=88041%... 7/21/2014 -� Page 3 of 3 this project is complete. AEC Job#14363 Date/Time Submitted 7/21/2014 8:29:23 AM http://www.Ini.wa.gov/safety/topics/atoz/asbestos/FormDataDisplay.asp?FormID=88041%... 7/21/2014 � Page 1 of 3 Dept. of Labor & Industries, Division of Occupational Safety & Health Asbestos Project Notification Form Form ID: 87928##1.338Ameri552301 Notice Date: 6/25/2014 Start Date: 7/17/2014 Completion Date: 7/30/2014 Status: Amended Site Work Hours: 8:00 am- 3:00 pm Site Work Days: Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Contractor: American Environmental Construction LLC Job Site C.A.S.: Jesse Trevino Your email address: dees@aeconllc.com Contractor Phone Number: 206-267-0746 Property Owner Name: Owner's Agent: Skyler Waldal Company: Skycorp,LTD Address: 526 NW Ave Suite#11 City: Arlington State: WA Zip+4: 98223 Phone: 425-367-7887 Job Site http://www.lni.wa.gov/safety/topics/atoz/asbestos/FormDataDisplay.asp?FormlD=87928%... 7/17/2014 -� Page 2 of 3 ;Address: 104 West Cox Ave Building Name: Room: City: Arlington Zip +4: 98223 County: Snohomish Facility Type: Commerical Age: 1895 Size: 1977 Type of activity: Demolition Quantity of.Asbestos to Be Removed Outdoors Indoors Quantity: 2978 square feet CAB Sheet vinyl Other:Mortar Quantity: linear feet Control Measures Neg. pres. enclosure Wet methods HEPA vacuum Critical barriers Manual methods Respiratory Protection 1/2 mask APR PAPR Comments: http://www.Ini.wa.gov/safety/topics/atoz/asbestos/FormDataDisplay.asp?FormID=87928%... 7/17/2014 Page 3 of 3 . J Changed the CAS. AEC Job#14363 Date/Time Submitted 7/17/2014 10:11:37 AM http://www.Ini.wa.gov/safety/topies/atoz/asbestos/FormDataDisplay.asp?FormID=87928%... 7/17/2014 Page 1 of 3 Dept. of Labor & Industries, Division of Occupational Safety & Health Asbestos Project Notification Form Form ID: 86982##1338Ameri984474 Notice Date: 6/25/2014 Start Date: 7/17/2014 Completion Date: 7/30/2014 Status: Initial Site Work Hours: 8:00 am- 3:00 pm Site Work Days: Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Contractor: American Environmental Construction LLC Job Site C.A.S.: John Asselin Your e-mail address: dees@aeconllc.com Contractor Phone Number: 206-267-0746 Property Owner Name: Owner's Agent: Skyler Waldal Company: Skycorp,LTD Address: 526 NW Ave Suite #11 City: Arlington State: WA Zip+4: 98223 Phone: 425-367-7887 Job Site http://www.Ini.wa.gov/safety/topics/atoz/asbesto s/FormDataD isplay.asp?FormID=86982%... 6/25/2014 Page 2 of 3 Address: 104 West Cox Ave Building Name: Room: City: Arlington Zip + 4: 98223 County: Snohomish Facility Type: Commerical Age: 1895 Size: 1977 Type of activity: Demolition Quantity of Asbestos to Be Removed Outdoors Indoors Quantity: 2978 square feet CAB Sheet vinyl Other:Mortar Quantity: linear feet Control Measures Neg. pres. enclosure Wet methods HEPA vacuum Critical barriers Manual methods Respiratory Protection 1/2 mask APR PAPR Comments: http://www.Ini.wa.gov/safety/topics/atoz/asbestos/FormDataDisplay.asp?FonnID=86982%... 6/25/2014 -� Page 3 of 3 AEC Job#14363 Date/Time Submitted 6/25/2014 3:07:39 PM �I http://www.lni.wa.gov/safety/topics/atoz/asbestos/FormDataDisplay.asp?FormID=86982%... 6/25/2014 Approved Transaction - it Page I of I pscIeanair.org Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Notification Case #: 201402471 This page must be printed.A printout of the notification,all amendments to the notification,and the asbestos survey shall be available for inspection at all times at the asbestos project or demolition site(Reg III,4.03(a)(6)), Fee Amount Paid $210.00 Credit Card Transaction #VR>`FAE889499 Transaction Date 06/25/14 Owner's Name Skycorp,LTD Phone (360)926-8989 Project Street Address 104-1041/2 W Cox Ave AEC]ob#14363 City Arlington Zip 98223 Contact Person Skyler Waldal Phone (360)367-7887 Mailing Address 526 N West Ave.Suite#11 Arlington,WA98223 This project includes asbestos removal. Project Size linear feet / 2978 square feet Project Start Date 07/17/14 Completion Date 07/30/14 Asbestos will be removed by a licensed asbestos abatement contractor Contractor American Environmental Construction,LLC Contractor Job # 14363 Contact Dee Surface Phone (206)267-0746 Mailing Address P.O. Box 81005 Seattle,WA98108-1005 (1)I certify that the Information I have provided Is to the best of my knowledge true and accurate. (2)I understand that I must file an Amendment to this Notification If: • The type of project has changed.The project types are asbestos and demolition. • The quantity of friable asbestos to be removed meets a larger project category. • The project's start or completion date has changed. (3) I understand one Notification must be filed for each structure. The only exception is for a single-family residence that includes multiple ancillary structures, such as a detached garage or other outbuildings having the same street address. If there is no street address, I have used a building number. (4) I understand the fees for this Notification are nonrefundable. Create Another Notification! View History Loa Out If you have questions,contact us at asbestos@pscleanair.org or 206.689.4058. https://secure.pseleanair.org/Asbestos/Approved.aspx 6/25/2014 14363 A.SN 4 ASBESTOS WASTE SHIPMENT REPORT FORM PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE!If you have questions,contact your local DEQ Regional Office in Portland at(503)229- 5364,Salem at(503)378-8240 ext.272,Medford at(541)776-60I0 ext.235,or Bend at(541)388-6146 ext.226,OR call(800)452-4011 for the location of your local regional DEQ office. WASTE GENERATOR: (Contractor,Facility,or Operator) I. Asbestos removal site name and address: Skycorp,LTD 1 04-1 04112 W Cox Ave. Arlington WA Snohomish 98223 Street City/State County Zip Contact person: Skyler Waldal Phone: 425-357-7887 2. Operator's name and address;American Environmental Construction LLC phone: 206-267-0746 7417-4th Avenue South Seattle, WA King 98108 Street City/State County Zip 3. Waste disposal site: Northem Wasr•.n rntintV I anrifill Phone:541-993-0089 2550 Steel Road The Dalles, OR Wasco 97058 Street City/State County Zip 4. Describe asbestos materials: �L 7l y EL 10!-mod ,C!24 5. Containers: Number: l Type: 1 � j 6. Total quantity(cubic yards): Z 7. OPERATOR'S CERTIFICATION; I hereby declare that the contents of this consignment are fully and accurately described above by proper shipping name and are classified,packaged,marked and labeled,and are in all respects in proper condition for transport according to all government regulations. All movement of this asbestos-containing material is recorded on this Waste Shipment Record Form. Name: r�?Sc�c i t 1lii� Company:American Environmental Construction L LC Signature: 4 / Date: TRANSPORTER(S): 8. Transporter#I:(Acknowledgment of receipt of materials) Agent: Company: D&B Trucking Address: 1905 East Lincoln Ave., Tacoma, WA 98421 Phone: 253-383-3860 Signature: Date: 9. Transporter 42:(Acknowledgment of receipt of materials) Agent: Driver Company: NTSI I D&S Trucking Address: 1905 East Lincoln Ave., Tacoma, W1.498421 Phone: 253-383-3860 Signature: Date: DISPOSAL:(Certification of receipt of asbestos materials covered by this manifest,except as noted in item 11 below.) 10. Waste Disposal Site: Northern Wasco County Landfill Name and Title: Date: 0 Signature: Phone: 11. DISCREPANCY SPACE;(Add attachments as needed) r- (Revised 6/03) NVL Laboratories, Inc, 4708 Aurora A�e. .,Seattle,WA 98103 A1HA-IH Al Tel:206.547, Fax:206,634.1936 #101861NOON .nvllabs.com Asbestos And Other Fibers Analysis ACCRlDITlD iA1101tAT0RY by Phase contrast Microscopy Client:American Environmental Construction LLC Batch #: 1412538.00 Address PO Box$1005 Method:NIOSH 7400 Beattie,WA 9$108 Client Project#:14363 Aftention:Mr,Jesse Trevino Date Received: 7/23/2014Samples Received:2 Project Location:104 W Cox Ave Arlington WA Samples Analyzed:2 Lab ID"4079164 Client's Sample#: 14363-7 Date sampled:7/17/2014 Time Flow Rate Sample type:Breathing Zone Start 10:15 AM 2,10 Location:Outside home End 02:01 PM 2.10 Activity:CAB,wet removal Minutes 226 Ave.2.10 Worker Roberto R Comments: Liters Pump!D LOQ fiberslcc Fibers/fads Fibers/mm2 RL f/cc �!Flbers/cc 474.E 303 min 0.081 max 1.055 21100 <7.0 0.006 <0.006 Lab ID: 14079165 Client's Sample#: 14363-8 Dale sampled:7/i7/2014 Time Flow Rate Sample type:Breathing Zone Start 07:15 AM 2.10 Location:Outside home End 11:59 AM 2,10 Activity:CAB,wet removal Minutes 284 Ave.2.10 Worker Angel Gomez 2014028937A Comments: Liters Pump ID LOQ fibers/cc Fibers/ftds Fiberslmm2 RL f/cc Fibers/Cc 596.4 303 min 0.065 max 0.839 3/100 <7.0 0.005 <0.005 Blank ave.(flmm2)0.0 Micro.field area(mma)0.00785 Effe.filtration area(mm2)385 Precision+/-20% Accuracy+1-9% Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Lori Tseng Date Analyzed:07/2312014 ,;,,i!":'. Reviewed by: Nick Ly Date Issued:07/2312014 Nick Ly,Technical Director samples are analyzed In accordance with the NiOSH 7400(Issue 2: 15 August 1994).If the samples were not collected by NVL Laboratories,then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity or the sample collector. The LOQ, Limits of Quantification, are the fiber concentrations, far the given volume of the sampled air, above and below which the results may be unreliable. The RL, Reporting Limit defined in (Method 7400 as LOD,is the fibers/cc below which the results may not be confidently distinguished from background levels. This report relates only to the items tested.It shall not be reproduced,except in full,without written approval of NVL Laboratories,Inc.. Unless otherwise indicated,the condition of ail samples was acceptable at ti for fiber count load range(Low=0.259,medium=o.151_high _ —._�-- -- -� — Page 1 of 1 QKmnen[al ° Scele VJA 98i06-i083 Fas�Zp�b`b�.�ggy Vac*I dorl- Mmlgm48M3 [ n n. 1412538 :,pent Company: �-/"� -Americanl LAB Job Number: Client Address: P.O. Box 81oos Number of Samples: . Seattle, 1/IIA 98108,1005 Phone Number. gas 623-4441 AEC Job Number 1 Fax Number {206) v22�k099 — Job Location:ID� 6,uci Report Resub To; TVice OfAnalvs�- ff hnrl�v�o Q At PRIME Number � AS s:�ST08 p L.O PCM(air) 7-1 PaintAt tE Mumber LQ soil Q Dust/Wipe(areal) ( FM Resufts Q PCM AIL Hard Copy (bulk) [Q Air(volume?) QI TCLP r 6�IE Q 098H Condition of Package: F31 Good Damaged Nog Spillage) P a9e) . Severe Damage(Spillage) -ab lb Sample [D A!R F AIR Lab ID Sample ID AIR 1 i` t3 17 3 18 19 4 5 20 21 7 S 23 1 24 Signature Date Time Sampled By. 1-7 DeFivered By: Received By-. 7 -2 / 3 :r� Analyzed By. RePoctod By: .c -tc► ' iUla`1ed By Invoiced By: Special: Read Abatement Sample# ONLY if Sample# is Greater Than.01 floc 1 � American Environmental Air Sample Date Sheet NVL Batch ID Job Location: R4. �= /.' .1412538 Sampled By: -- t Date: 7-17-,�. Time: Blank Count: Microscope FielclArea: Blank Cassettes: Samp7-- er ! �SampProtecs: �,�►cDeconEnviro Cert#: art/ads Rate: Start., Pump d z o t Rate: End I Fibers Fibers = Liters /field /cc Average Sample ID; Location: Sample Type: Work Activity: Protection: Observations- Decon: Worker. SS#: • Cert#: Environment: L' Time: Start-7,!,� Rate: Start,:?. / Pump#: 3 >-� Time: End -9 Rate: End�, i Fibers Fibers Minutes Average — Liters field /cc — PSam le ID; Location: e Type: Work Activity: tion: Observations: Decon: Worker: SS#: Cert#: Environment: Time: Start Rate: Start Pump#: Time: End Rate: End Fibers Fibers Minutes Average = Liters /field /cc Sample ID; Location: Sample Type: Work Activity: Protection: Observations: Decon: Worker: SS#: Cert#: Environment: Time: Start Rate: Start Pump#: Time: End Rate: End Fibers Fibers Liters Meld /cc Minutes= Average - •,: :. .:.:SAMI1�?i1�„�, ,�..*;. ,- ..�.;�r. ..._.:-.,. B - Breathing Zone P PreAbatement RESPIRATORY PROTECTION k DECONTAMINATION ,r ENVIRONMENT C - Gelling CL- Clearance M - Hal(MaskAPR D,S- Deconw/Shower H - HEPAVacum I - Inside Area H - HEPA Exhaust F - Full Face mask APR D -Decon w/Shower G - Gkwebag O - Outside Area BL - Fleld blank PAPR ME- Mini Enclosure a�sarvse CA- Continuous Flow Air FE- Full Enclosure PA- Pressure Demand Air NVL Laboratories, Inc, AIHA-IH 4708 Aurora Ave. N.,Seattle,WA 98103 #101861 Tel:206.547.0100, Fax:205.634.1936 ACCMtId! a www,nvllabs.com Asbestos And Other Fibers Analysis trAi°RATORY by Phase Contrast Microscopy Client:American Environmental Construction LLC Batch M 1412151.00 Addres:PO Box 81005 Method:NIOSH 7400 Seattle, WA 98108 Client Project#: 14363 Date Received: 7/17/2014 Attention:Mr. Jesse Trevino Samples Received: 6 Project Location: 104.6 W. Cox Ave,Arlington,WA Samples Analyzed:6 ol Lab ID:14076872 Client's Sample #: 14363-1 Date sampled:7/17/2014 Time Flow Rate Sample type:Pre Abatement Start 07:58 AM 12.20 Location:Kitchen End 09:02 AM 12.20 Activity:Set-up Minutes 64 Ave.12.20 CWorker: omments: Liters Pump ID LOQ fibers/cc Fibers/flds Fibers/mm' RL flcc Fibers/cc 780.8 302 min 0.049 max 0.641 2.5/100 <7.0 0.003 <0.003 Lab ID:14076873 Client's Sample##: 14363-2 Date sampled:7/17/2014 Time Flow Rate Sample type:Inside Regulated Area Start 09:07 AM 10.50 Location:Kitchen End 09:41 AM 10.50 Activity:Sheet vinyl flu mudd Worker: Minutes 34 Ave.10.50 commonts: Liters Pump ID LOQ fibers/cc Fibers/flds Fibers/mm' RL f/cc LFibers1cc 357 302 min 0.108 max 1.402 0.5/100 <7.0 0.008 .00$ Lab ID:14076874 Client's Sample#: 14363-3 Date sampled:7/1712014 Time Flow Rate Sample type: Ceiling Start 09:08 AM 2.10 Location:Inside ME kitchen bathroom End 09:38 AM 2.10 Activity:Flu mudd,slu Minutes 30 Ave. Worker:Roberto Rodriquez 21228A Comments: Liters Pump[D LOQ fiberslcc Fibers/flds Fiberslmm2 RL flcc Fibers/Cc 63 304 min 0.611 max 7.944 01100 <7.0 0.043 <0.043 11 Lab ID:14076875 Client's Sample#: 14363-4 Date sampled:7/17/2014 Time Flow Rate Sample type:Outside Regulated Area Start 09:12 AM 2.10 Location:Decon entrance End 09:49 AM 2.10 Activity: Worker: Mlnutes 37 Ave.2.10 Comments: Liters Pump ID LOQ fiberslcc Fibers/flds Fibers/mm' RL flcc F148rs/CC 77.7 303 min 0.495 max 6.441 01100 <7.0 0.035 <0.035 Blank ave.(f/mm)0.0 Micro,field area mm')0.00785 Effe.filtration area mm')385 Precision+/-20% Accuracy+1-9% Sampled by: Client -� Analyzed by: Matt Macfarlane Date Analyzed:07/2112014 Reviewed by: Nick Ly Date Issued,07/21/2014 .�p r�Nick Ly, Technical Director Samples are analyzed In accordance with the NIOSH 7400(Issue 2:15 August 1994).If the samples were not collected by NVL Laboratories,then the accuracy of the results Is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. The LOQ, Limits of Quantification, are the fiber concentrations,for the given volume of the sampled air, above and below which the results may be unreliable. The RL, Reporting Limit defined in Method 7400 as LOD,Is the fibers/cc below which the results may not be confldentfy distinguished from background levels. This report relates only to the items tested,It shall not be reproduced,except in full,without written approval of NVL Laboratories,Inc.. Unless otherwise indicated,the condition of all samples was acceptable at time of receipt. Average Sr values for fiber count load range(Low=0.259;medium=0.151:high Page 1 of 2 NVL Laboratories, Inc. AIHA-IHA 4708 Aurora Ave.N.,Seattle,WA 98103 #101861 Tel:206.547.0100, Fax:206.634.1936 AOCRMITED www.nvllabs.com Asbestos And Other Fibers Analysis ILABOKA'ION by Phase Contrast Microscopy Client:American Environmental Construction LLC Batch #: 1412151.00 Addres:PO Sox 81005 Method: NIOSH 7400 Seattle,WA 98108 Client Project#:14363 Date Received:7/17/2014 Attention:Mr.Jesse Trevino Samples Received:6 Project Location:104.5 W. Cox Ave,Arlington, WA Samples Analyzed:6 Lab ID: 14076876 Client's Sample##; 14363-5 Date sampled:7/17/2014 Time Flow Rate Sample type:HEPA Exhaust Start 09:42 AM 2.10 Location:HEPA exhaust,front door End 11:49 AM 2.10 Activity:None in this area Worker: Minutes 127 Ave.2.10 Comments: Liters Pump ID LOQ fiberstcc Fibers/fids Fibers/mm2 RL flcc FlberS/CG 266.7 304 min 0.144 max 1.877 0/100 <7,0 0.010 <0.010 Lab ID: 14076877 Client's Sample##: 14363-6 Date sampled:7/17/2014 el Time Flow Rate Sample type:Clearance Start 09:46 AM 12.20 Location:Inside ME kitchen End 11:26 AM 12.20 Activity: Minutes 100 Ave.12.20 worker: Comments—Rush analyzed by MM 7/17/14 13:20 Liters Pump ID LOQ fibers/cc Fibers/fids Fibers/mm2 RL f/cc Fibers/CC 1220 302 min 0.032 max 0.410 01100 <7.0 0.002 <0.002 Blank ave;f/mm')0.0 Micro.field area(mm2)0.00785 Effe.filtration area mm2)385 Precision+/-20% Accuracy+/-9% Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Matt Macfarlane Date Analyzed:07/21/2014 Reviewed by: Nick Ly Date Issued:07/21/2014 f Nick Ly,Technical Director Samples are analyzed in accordance with the NIOSH 7400(Issue 2:15 August 1994). If the sybimples.were not collected by NVL Laboratories,then the accuracy of the results Is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. The LOCI, Limits of Quantification, are the fiber concentrations, for the given volume of the sampled air, above and below which the results may be unreliable_ The RL, Reporting Limit defined in Method 7400 as LOD,is the fibers/cc below which the results may not be confidently distinguished from background levels. This report relates only to the items tested.It shall not be reproduced,except in full,without written approval of NVL Laboratories,Inc.. Unless otherwise Indicated,the condition of all samples was acceptable at time of receipt_ Average Sr values for fiber count load range(Low=0.259;medium=0.151;high=0.122). -- — — Page 2 of 2 o A4ZAtr Sample Log 1 Chain of Custody toNnan 1 Conshucf on LLC a�Rw. �,�,� NVL Batch ID wnomazaa0autPtica4aua LAB: :bent Company: American Environme I LAB Job Number. 1412151 Client Address: P.Q. Box 81005 Number of Samples: Seattle, WA 98108-1005 AEC Job Number, Phone Number: (206)523-4441 �� Fax Number. (206)522-+4099 Job Location: ) y z 1 �� RaportRssultsTo:,�e__% ,-r Tvne of Analysis (Check One) At FM Number 1F� Paint C] CM(air) 0 Soil AttR7lNumbar 25� a�[Q-`i33`l ClDusYMpe(area?) FAX Results ? OR Hard Copy PCM(bulk) C]Air(volume?) =TCLP l3�lA[t Condition of Package: ; Good Damaged(No Spillage) (� Severe Damage(Spillage) _alb ID Sample ID AIR Lab ID Sample ID AIR Lab ID Sample ID AIR 9 17 2 10 18 3 L 11 19 4 Cp A 12 20 5 16 13 21 6 14 22 7 15 23 8 16 24 Signature Date Time Sampled By: -2— / Delivered By. Received By: Analyzed By � �Ftepoi#ect:�y_ ' t5llafted-By Invotced By: Special: Read Abatement Sample# ONLY If Sample# is Greater Than.01 floc American Environmental Air Sample Date Sheet Page-A-Of-A- Job#: Job Location: �b�l r2-G9 C Avr !fir 1i tr�cp-�vr� 1 � _ Sampled By. r"a-Ur'�tr� Date:? Time: Blank Count: Microscope Field Area: Blank Cassettes: Sample ID: 1.q%3- Location: NFL Batch ID Sample Type. Work Activity: �L4-::j5j 1412151 Protection: Observations: Decon: Worker: SS#: Cert#: Environment: Time: Start2.)S-g Rate: Start I... Z #: Time: End `o L Rate: End t�Z Fibers Fibers Pum P ��. G - Liters /field /cc Minutes = Average 12 ,22- Sample ID: --2- Location: V%-f kS,� Sample Type: ]Work Activity. +ur •.,cr Protection: 11 Observations: Decon: D Worker: SS#: Ce►t#: Environment: Time: Start q,C) Rate: Start Fibers Fibers Pump#: ;,Z Time: End�j`;�1 ( Rate: End t� S Liters /field /cc Minutes = ? Average p;; lc�o �a-08 Sample ID: -7, Location: t�-s /,Ar= Sample Type: Work Activity: PU S ju Protection: iIz Observations: Decon: 0 Worker: ( -o SS#: Cert#: Environment: J-LlE Time: Startq:,,-/ Rate: Start ,�,� Fibers Fibers Pump#: 301 Time: Endg,137 Rate: End Liters /field /cc Minutes = 3o Average z,13 O two Qc� Sample ID: - Location: Sample Type:e Work Activity: Protection: `(z Observations: Decon: Q Worker: SS#: Cert#: Environment: P-Ie- Time: Startrj;yZ Rate: Start R. ( Fibers Fibers. Pump#: Time: Endo) �q Rate: End .t, ( Liters /field /cc Minutes = 7 - Average -z., (FCL_FTNl�1( 's{y1�?{ i. "��• ,+.1 �ii7.?.. :_ .?_-• r•Tt--'r"'!"+^ 1i itrl1 Y:.i y1�Y.._I _ �f f.:�'11ti1.�+„4��"' '�� :�.1 -M>r� B - Breathing Zone P Pre Abatement gESPIRATORyPROTECTION DECONTAMINATtQN J ENVIRQNMENT C - Ceiling CL- Clearance M Half Mask APR D,S- Decon w/Shower H - HEPA Vacum I Inside Area H HEPA Exhaust F - Futl Face mask APR D - Decon wl Shower G - Glovebag o - Outside Area BL - Field Blank PAPR ME- Mini Enclosure CA- Continuous FlowAir FE- Full Encicsure r-aispi.vs PA- Pressure Demand Air Jl American Environmental Air Sample Date Sheet Page of 2 Job Location: / l� . ob#• Sampled By:,_�r.� `,�it7?� Date:?./ 7_/, , Time: Blank Count: Microscope Field Area. Blank Cassettes: NVL Batch ID Sample 1D: Location: kWA � Sample Type: Work Activity: 1412151 Protection: ti/2 Observations: Decon: O Worker: SS#: Cert#.- Environment, ( AE_ Time: Start q;yZ Rate: Starts / Fibers Fibers Pump#: Time: End Rate: End l� `�`� ,?• � Liters /field /cc Minutes = f Z - Average Z,l Epp foam Sample ID: Location: Al Sample Type:C L Work Activity: --_ pilll Protection: 'It- Observations: Decon: D Worker: SS#: Cert#: Environment: A4 Time: Start q;y Rate: Start It. Fibers Fibers Pump#: Time: End Rate: End /z_ z Liters /freld !cc Minutes = 1 Average t-z,2 Sample ID: Location: Sample Type: Work Activity: Protection: Observations: Decon: Worker: SS# Cert#: Environment: Time: Start Rate: Start Pump#: Time: End Rate: End Fibers Fibers Liters /field /cc Minutes= Average Sample ID: Location: Sample Type: Work Activity: Protection: Observations: Decon: Worker: SS#: Cert#: Environment: Time: Start Rate: Start Pump#: Time: End Rate: End Fibers Fibers Liters /field /cc Minutes = Average .: 4777Owl P W F-.. , �,71-77'Y.r,�f!�57,T � Vi� B - Breathing Zone P - Pre Abatement RESPIRATORY PROTECTION DECONTAMINATION ENVIRONMENT C - ceiling CL- Clearance M - Half Mask APR D,S- Decon w/Shower H - HEPA Vacum I - Inside Area H - HEPA Exhaust F - Full Face mask APR D - Decon w/Shower G - Glovebag O - Outside Area BL Field Blank PAPR ME- Mini Enclosure r-ayspr,vsa CA- ConUnuous Flow Air FE- Full Enctosure PA- Pressure Demand Air lNVIL L A B S July 21,2014 INDUSTRIAL H Y G I E N E SERVICES Jesse Trevino Obointory i Management I Training American Environmental Construction LLC PO Box 81005 Seattle, WA 98108 RE: Asbestos&Other Fiber Analysis, NVL Batch#1412151.00 Dear Mr. Trevino, Enclosed please find test results for the air samples submitted to our laboratory for analysis. Examination of these samples was conducted in accordance with the NIOSH 7400 method. Results are reported in fibers per cubic centimeter (fibers/cc) and in fibers per square millimeter (fibers/mM2). The working range for the NIOSH 7400 method is between 100 and 1300 fibers per square millimeter.Test results not blank corrected unless field blanks were provided. Washington State Department of Labor and Industries requires that an employer provide airborne asbestos concentrations less than 0.1 fibers per cubic centimeter of air as an average for eight hours, and less than 1.0 fibers per cubic centimeter of air over a sampling period of thirty minutes to the employees (WAC 296-62-07705). For recent regulation updates please call the regulatory agencies. I Washington State Department of Labor and Industries also requires that post-abatement (clearance) area samples must not exceed the pre-abatement fiber concentration or 0.1 fibers per cubic centimeter whichever is lower(WAC 296-62-07709), The EPA definition of clean air is less than 0.01 fibers per cubic centimeter. Inter and intra-laboratory relative standard deviations can be made available upon request. We are pleased to have been of service and hope to work with you again. If you should have any questions regarding the NIOSH 7400 method or the results please feel free to call. Sincerely, ( Nick Ly,Technical Director ar� S 1.888_NVL.LABS %r—��` !?� � NVL Laboratories, Inc. .r3fic,.t� ;, s/:?7i �� ii+�lifbeillhi i�r - 4708 Aurora Ave N,Seattle,WA 98103 vrvv.nvllabs.cvlT Enc.: Sample results Bt}t 1 N206.547.0100 If206,634,1936 A-T ASBESTO-TEST, INC. ,oEPA d� NAi-46033 1 ASBESTOS SURVEY "Occupied" house A 104 Cox Ave.,Arlington,WA 98223 Page I of 5 2120729B July 25, 2012 City of Arlington 238 N. Olympic Ave Arlington,WA 98223 Attn: Kurt Patterson 360-403-3454 kpatterson(&arlingtonwa.gov On July 16, 2012,Asbesto-Test personnel conducted an Asbestos survey(per U.S.E.P.A./A.H.E.R.A. guidelines as designated and specified by Puget Sound Clean Air Agency and Washington State Department of Labor and Industries) of the single family dwelling house A 104 Cox Ave.,Arlington, Snohomish County, Washington 98223. This survey purpose is to identify any Asbestos Containing Materials that may be present and will require professional removal prior to demolition. Note: This structure was occupied and"in use"at the time of the survey. Due to the occupancy,destructive sampling was inherently limited. There may be asbestos containing materials present that were not discovered in this inspection. If there are any additional suspect Asbestos Containing Materials located prior to or during demolition(such as,but not limited to,those materials listed on the last page of this report),that were not discovered in this survey,those material(s)are also PACM unless tested otherwise by laboratory analysis. There should be an AHERA building inspector on site during demolition to ensure there are no additional suspect Asbestos Containing Materials present that are not identified in this inspection. continue to page 2 1429 Ave.D.#187,Snohomish,WA 98290 425-489-4040;c 206-914-5500;f 775-665-0420 e mail arlynnCaasbestotest.com;web:www.asbestotest.com 1 BBB Page 2 of 5 July 25, 2012 CB2120729B Asbesto-Test,Inc. 425-489-4040 "Occupied" house (a) 104 Cox Ave.,Arlington,WA 98223 NARRATIVE OF FINDINGS BASIC CONSTRUCTION: The house is two story wood frame on a post and beam foundation. The siding is Concrete Asbestos Board. The CAB siding materials were sampled. The roofing is composition. The composition roofing materials were also sampled. The torch down roofing was sampled from over the attached carport area. INTERIOR CONSTRUCTION, FINISHES, AND FLOORINGS: The interior construction is wood and drywall. The drywall/taping materials were sampled. The vinyl flooring materials with relating mastic and backing materials were representatively sampled. The misc. mastic materials were sampled. The acoustic ceiling tile materials were also sampled. INSULATION: The insulation materials were sampled. ELECTRICAL SYSTEM: The electrical wiring insulation did not appear to be the kind to be ACM. The power was"on"at the time of the inspection,thus sampling was not safe. Any suspect electrical wiring insulation or any suspect TSI(Thermal System Insulation)found in, around, or behind any located fuse or breaker boxes should be considered to be ACM(Asbestos Containing Material), unless determined otherwise by laboratory analysis. HEATING AND VENTILATION SYSTEM: Heating throughout is baseboard/wall electric. There was no visible suspect ACM located associated with any of the electric heating units.Note: It was not possible to dismantle the electric heating units to locate and/or evaluate any additional suspect ACM which may be concealed, inside the units, or associated in hidden areas. It is our opinion any further handling of the heating units should be coordinated by the project manager and/or abatement contractor. If any additional relating suspect materials are located prior to and/or during any demolition or renovation, any and all additional related suspect materials should be considered to be ACM(Asbestos Containing Material),unless determined to be otherwise by laboratory analysis. MISC.: None. ADDITIONAL STRUCTURES ON SITE INCLUDED IN SURVEY: None. #of structures included in survey: one Requested By: Kurt Patterson Carl Dykstra Inspector, certified A.H.E.R.A. Accred.#137084 EXP.May 30, 2013 continue to page 3 B CA-D 1429 Ave.D.#187,Snohomish,WA 98290 4254894040;c 206-914-5500;f 775-665-0420 e mail Asbestotest(a msn.com;web:www.asbestotest.com Page 3 of 5 July 25, 2012 CB2120729B Asbesto-Test,Inc. 425-489-4040 "Occupied" house (a) 104 Cox Ave.,Arlington,WA 98223 Any and all materials identified as ACM or PACM in this report(and/or additional materials associated with the structure that may be discovered and later identified as ACM or PACM),must be professionally abated prior to demolition.ASSESSMENT AND QUANTIFICATION OF ACM FOR ABATEMENT PURPOSES AND/OR PRICING FOR REMOVAL SHOULD BE DETERMINED BY ON SITE EVALUATION,AS LISTED QUANTITIES ARE NOT GUARANTEED AND ARE AN APPROXIMATION ONLY. SAMPLES 1&2 ARE ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIALS ANALYSIS ID ASBESTOS//TYPE//QUANTITY OTHER MATERIAL 1.0 CAB EXTERIOR SIDING yes//chrysotile//18% non-fibrous materials Concrete Asbestos Board ACM FRIABLE FOR DEMOLITION PURPOSES APPROX. 2800 SQ. FT. 2.0 FLUE MORTAR PACKING yes//chrysotile//3% non-fibrous materials NON-FRIABLE-LESS THAN 1 SQ.FT. ACM Circle of packing material around flue opening in the kitchen THERE WAS NO ASBESTOS DETECTED IN ANY OF THE REMAINING SAMPLES 3.0 sheet vinyl flooring NAD non-fibrous materials, laundry&bathroom—color: light tan&cream cellulose,fiberglass 4.0 mastic NAD adhesive beneath previous sample listed 5.0 drywall NAD non-fibrous materials lst floor 6.0 drywall taping compounds NAD non-fibrous materials, SAMPLED PER AHERA GUIDELINE cellulose,fiberglass lst floor 7.0 mastic NAD adhesive,cellulose holding laminate on kitchen countertop-main floor 7.1 mastic NAD adhesive,cellulose holding laminate on kitchen countertop-upper floor 8.0 sheet vinyl flooring NAD non-fibrous materials, Kitchen-color: light tan cellulose,fiberglass 9.0 mastic NAD adhesive beneath previous sample listed continue to page 4 B A-T 1429 Ave.D.#187,Snohomish,WA 98290 4254894040;c 206-914-5500;f 775-665-0420 e mail Asbestotest(a msn.com;web:www.asbestotest.com Page 4 of 5 July 25, 2012 CB2120729B Asbesto-Test,Inc. 425-489-4040 "Occupied" house A 104 Cox Ave.,Arlington,WA 98223 ANALYSIS ID ASBESTOS//TYPEHQUANTITY OTHER MATERIAL 10.0 sheet vinyl flooring NAD non-fibrous materials, bathroom—color: light gray&green cellulose,fiberglass 11.0 mastic NAD adhesive beneath previous sample listed 12.0 drywall NAD non-fibrous materials bathroom paint,gypsum 13.0 drywall taping compounds NAD non-fibrous materials, SAMPLED PER AHERA GUIDELINE cellulose,fiberglass bathroom 14.0 acoustic ceiling tile NAD cellulose,paint NOTE:ANY MASTIC THAT MAY BE PRESENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS TILE MATERIAL IS PACM. DESTRUCTIVE SAMPLING WAS LIMITED DUE TO OCCUPANCY. 15.0 insulation NAD cellulose,fiberglass 16.0 composition roofing NAD cellulose,tar fiberglass, non-fibrous materials 17.0 roofing vapor barrier NAD cellulose,tar 18.0 composition roofing mastic NAD cellulose,tar,adhesive 19.0 siding vapor barrier NAD cellulose,tar material beneath CAB siding exterior 20.0 torch down roofing NAD cellulose,tar, &underlying materials fiberglass, over carport non-fibrous materials 21.0 roofing vapor barrier NAD cellulose,tar beneath previous sample listed continue to page 5 B CA-D 1429 Ave.D.#187,Snohomish,WA 98290 4254894040;c 206-914-5500;f 775-665-0420 e mail Asbestotest(a msn.com;web:www.asbestotest.com Page 5 of 5 July 25, 2012 CB2120729B Asbesto-Test,Inc. 425-489-4040 "Occupied" house (a) 104 Cox Ave.,Arlington,WA 98223 NOT TO SCALE ................................................ Cox Ave N ..............................................: I 104 Lftiftiftifti ��ti�tittitti :;rti fti fti fti 104=HOUSE INCLUDED IN SURVEY 0 =structure not included in survey Some sample analyses listed maybe a representative analysis of individual and separate samplings and analysis of homogenous materials,as prescribed by A.H.E.R.A.protocol. Samples taken are listed with their corresponding analyses.If asbestos is detected,those samples containing asbestos are listed first and noted with the initials ACM". If,during demolition or renovation,any additional hidden or covered suspect materials similar to those identified in the survey are located[may include but not limited to:sheet vinyl flooring,the flooring,wall or ceiling texturings or paints,concrete siding or skirting,cement pipes,cement wallboard,electrical cloth,electrical wiring insulation,thermal paper,wallboard,joint compounds,vinyl wall coverings,spackling compounds,or any other suspect TSI(Thermal System Insulation)],they are presumed Asbestos Containing Materials unless determined to be non-asbestos by laboratory analysis. Asbesto-Test Inc.does not guarantee approximations of quantities of ACM,which may be listed with the analyses.It is therefore recommended professional abatement price and/or disposal quotes be obtained by inquiring as to fees per area of specific ACM material(i.e.square or linear foot,etc.),or by on site assessment. Any and all materials identified as ACM and/or PALM in this report must be abated prior to disturbance in renovation or demolition. PLM(polarized light microscopy)has been known to miss asbestos in small percentages of some samples,which contain asbestos,thus negative PLM results cannot be guaranteed.Floor tiles and wipes should be tested with SEM(scanning electron microscope)or TEM(transmitting electron microscope),to insure analytical accuracy when asbestos is reported in small percentages. Analytical test method:USEPA 600/R93/116**(PLM);WAC 296-61-07753 App.J **One percent is the USEPA regulatory limit for asbestos in bulk samples. Kev., "FRIABLE"signifies"Easily Airborne" ACM signifies Asbestos Containing Material" PACM signifies"Presumed Asbestos Containing Material' CAB signifies"Concrete Asbestos Board" < signifies"less than" TSI signifies'Thermal System Insulation" HVAC signifies"Heating Ventilating Air-Conditioning" NAD signifies"No Asbestos Detected" END OF REPORT ArLynn Hammond,Pres.,BSc. Analytical Chemist,AIHA proficient Inspector, certified A.H.E.R.A. accred.#113297(Expires August 16,2012) O sB a-z 1429 Ave.D.#187,Snohomish,WA 98290 4254894040;c 206-914-5500;f 775-665-0420 e mail Asbestotest(a msn.com;web:www.asbestotest.com A-T ASBESTO-TEST, INC. ,oEPA d� NAi-46033 1 ASBESTOS SURVEY "Occupied" house A 104'/z Cox Ave.,Arlington,WA 98223 Page I of 5 2120729A July 25, 2012 City of Arlington 238 N. Olympic Ave Arlington,WA 98223 Attn: Kurt Patterson 360-403-3454 kpatterson(&arlingtonwa.gov On July 16, 2012,Asbesto-Test personnel conducted an Asbestos survey(per U.S.E.P.A./A.H.E.R.A. guidelines as designated and specified by Puget Sound Clean Air Agency and Washington State Department of Labor and Industries) of the single family dwelling house A 104 V2 Cox Ave.,Arlington, Snohomish County, Washington 98223. This survey purpose is to identify any Asbestos Containing Materials that may be present and will require professional removal prior to demolition. Note: This structure was occupied and"in use"at the time of the survey. Due to the occupancy,destructive sampling was inherently limited. There may be asbestos containing materials present that were not discovered in this inspection. If there are any additional suspect Asbestos Containing Materials located prior to or during demolition(such as,but not limited to,those materials listed on the last page of this report),that were not discovered in this survey,those material(s)are also PACM unless tested otherwise by laboratory analysis. There should be an AHERA building inspector on site during demolition to ensure there are no additional suspect Asbestos Containing Materials present that are not identified in this inspection. continue to page 2 1429 Ave.D.#187,Snohomish,WA 98290 425-489-4040;c 206-914-5500;f 775-665-0420 e mail arlynnCaasbestotest.com;web:www.asbestotest.com 1 BBB Page 2 of 5 July 25, 2012 CB2120729A Asbesto-Test,Inc. 425-489-4040 "Occupied" house 0) 1041/2 Cox Ave.,Arlington,WA 98223 NARRATIVE OF FINDINGS BASIC CONSTRUCTION: The structure is one story wood frame. There is an attached storage area in the back. The siding is wood with no vapor barrier located. The composition roofing materials were sampled. INTERIOR CONSTRUCTION, FINISHES, AND FLOORINGS: The interior construction is wood, drywall, and pressboard. The drywall/taping materials were sampled. The vinyl flooring materials with relating mastic and backing materials were representatively sampled. The misc.mastic materials were sampled. The acoustic ceiling tile materials were also sampled. INSULATION: The insulation materials were sampled. ELECTRICAL SYSTEM: The electrical wiring insulation did not appear to be the kind to be ACM. The power was"on"at the time of the inspection,thus sampling was not safe. Any suspect electrical wiring insulation or any suspect TSI(Thermal System Insulation)found in, around, or behind any located fuse or breaker boxes should be considered to be ACM(Asbestos Containing Material), unless determined otherwise by laboratory analysis. HEATING AND VENTILATION SYSTEM: There is a free standing gas heater in the house. There was no visible suspect ACM located associated with the heating unit.Note:It was not possible to dismantle the heating unit to locate and/or evaluate any additional suspect ACM which may be concealed, inside the unit, or associated in hidden areas. It is our opinion any further handling of the heating unit should be coordinated by the project manager and/or abatement contractor. If any additional relating suspect materials are located prior to and/or during any demolition or renovation, any and all additional related suspect materials should be considered to be ACM(Asbestos Containing Material), unless determined to be otherwise by laboratory analysis. Any metal insulated chimney system that may be present is presumed asbestos containing. MISC.: None. ADDITIONAL STRUCTURES ON SITE INCLUDED IN SURVEY: None. #of structures included in survey: one Requested By: Kurt Patterson Carl Dykstra Inspector, certified A.H.E.R.A. Accred.#137084 EXP.May 30,2013 continue to page 3 BBB. O A-T 1429 Ave.D.#187,Snohomish,WA 98290 4254894040;c 206-914-5500;f 775-665-0420 e mail Asbestotest(a msn.com;web:www.asbestotest.com Page 3 of 5 July 25, 2012 CB2120729A Asbesto-Test,Inc. 425-489-4040 "Occupied" house (& 1041/2 Cox Ave.,Arlington,WA 98223 Any and all materials identified as ACM or PACM in this report(and/or additional materials associated with the structure that may be discovered and later identified as ACM or PACM),must be professionally abated prior to demolition.ASSESSMENT AND QUANTIFICATION OF ACM FOR ABATEMENT PURPOSES AND/OR PRICING FOR REMOVAL SHOULD BE DETERMINED BY ON SITE EVALUATION,AS LISTED QUANTITIES ARE NOT GUARANTEED AND ARE AN APPROXIMATION ONLY. SAMPLES 1-3 ARE ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIALS ANALYSIS ID ASBESTOS//TYPE//QUANTITY OTHER MATERIAL 1.0 SHEET VINYL FLOORING yes//chrysotile//38% non-fibrous materials, FRIABLE ACM cellulose Kitchen—color: gold Note: The asbestos is in the gray/white vinyl backing. The mastic is also ACM as it cannot be separated from the friable vinyl backing material. APPROX. 100 SQ. FT. ON TAR PAPER OVER WOOD NOTE:THE TAR PAPER IS ACM AS IT IS CONTAMINATED WITH AND ADHERED TO THE FRIABLE ACM VINYL BACKING. 2.0 SHEET VINYL FLOORING yes//chrysotile//38% non-fibrous materials, FRIABLE ACM cellulose Bathroom & front entry—color: brown Note: The asbestos is in the gray/white vinyl backing. The mastic is also ACM as it cannot be separated from the friable vinyl backing material. APPROX. 75 SQ. FT. ON PLYWOOD NOTE:Any additional colors or kinds of vinyl flooring and/or tile with any relating mastics/backings that were not discovered in this survey and may later be located in this structure are also presumed to contain asbestos unless tested otherwise by laboratory analysis 3.0 FLUE MORTAR PACKING yes H chrysotile//3% non-fibrous materials NON-FRIABLE- ACM Circle of packing material around 2 flues in kitchen& living room LESS THAN 2 SQ. FT. continue to page 4 1 A-T BBB 1429 Ave.D.#187,Snohomish,WA 98290 425-489-4040;c 206-914-5500;f 775-665-0420 e mail Asbestotest(a)msn.com;web:www.asbestotest.com Page 4 of 5 July 25, 2012 CB2120729A Asbesto-Test,Inc. 425-489-4040 "Occupied" house 0) 1041/2 Cox Ave.,Arlington,WA 98223 ANALYSIS ID ASBESTOS//TYPEHQUANTITY OTHER MATERIAL THERE WAS NO ASBESTOS DETECTED IN ANY OF THE REMAINING SAMPLES 4.0 linoleum flooring NAD non-fibrous materials, bedroom—color: multi color cellulose,tar 5.0 mastic/backing NAD cellulose,tar beneath previous sample listed 6.0 drywall NAD non-fibrous materials paint,gypsum 7.0 drywall taping compounds NAD non-fibrous materials, SAMPLED PER AHERA GUIDELINE cellulose,fiberglass 8.0 acoustic ceiling tile NAD cellulose,paint NOTE:ANY MASTIC THAT MAY BE PRESENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS TILE MATERIAL IS PACK DESTRUCTIVE SAMPLING WAS LIMITED DUE TO OCCUPANCY. 9.0 mastic NAD adhesive,cellulose holding laminate on kitchen countertop 10.0 composition roofing NAD cellulose,tar fiberglass, non-fibrous materials 11.0 roofing vapor barrier NAD cellulose,tar beneath previous sample listed 12.0 composition roofing mastic NAD adhesive,cellulose 13.0 insulation NAD cellulose,fiberglass continue to page 6 B CA-D 1429 Ave.D.#187,Snohomish,WA 98290 4254894040;c 206-914-5500;f 775-665-0420 e mail Asbestotest(a msn.com;web:www.asbestotest.com Page 5 of 5 July 25, 2012 CB2120729A Asbesto-Test,Inc. 425-489-4040 "Occupied" house 0) 1041/2 Cox Ave.,Arlington,WA 98223 NOT TO SCALE ................................................ Cox Ave N ..............................................: I ti•ti ��ftiftirtif{. f•r•r•r• fti�tifti�ti. 1041/2 104 1/2=HOUSE INCLUDED IN SURVEY 0 =structure not included in survey Some sample analyses listed maybe a representative analysis of individual and separate samplings and analysis of homogenous materials,as prescribed by A.H.E.R.A.protocol. Samples taken are listed with their corresponding analyses.If asbestos is detected,those samples containing asbestos are listed first and noted with the initials'ACM". If,during demolition or renovation,any additional hidden or covered suspect materials similar to those identified in the survey are located[may include but not limited to:sheet vinyl flooring,the flooring,wall or ceiling texturings or paints,concrete siding or skirting,cement pipes,cement wallboard,electrical cloth,electrical wiring insulation,thermal paper,wallboard,joint compounds,vinyl wall coverings,spackling compounds,or any other suspect TSI(Thermal System Insulation)],they are presumed Asbestos Containing Materials unless determined to be non-asbestos by laboratory analysis. Asbesto-Test Inc.does not guarantee approximations of quantities of ACM,which may be listed with the analyses.It is therefore recommended professional abatement price and/or disposal quotes be obtained by inquiring as to fees per area of specific ACM material(i.e.square or linear foot etc.),or by on site assessment. Any and all materials identified as ACM and/or PACM in this report must be abated prior to disturbance in renovation or demolition. PLM(polarized light microscopy)has been known to miss asbestos in small percentages of some samples,which contain asbestos,thus negative PLM results cannot be guaranteed.Floor tiles and wipes should be tested with SEM(scanning electron microscope)or TEM(transmitting electron microscope),to insure analytical accuracy when asbestos is reported in small percentages. Analytical test method:USEPA 600/R931116**(PLM);WAC 296-61-07753 App.J **One percent is the USEPA regulatory limit for asbestos in bulk samples. Kev., "FRIABLE"signifies"Easily Airborne" ACM signifies"Asbestos Containing Material" PACM signifies"Presumed Asbestos Containing Material" CAB signifies"Concrete Asbestos Board" < signifies"less than" TSI signifies'Thermal System Insulation" HVAC signifies"Heating Ventilating Air-Conditioning" NAD signifies"No Asbestos Detected" END OF REPORT ArLynn Hammond,Pres.,BSc. Analytical Chemist,AIHA proficient Inspector, certified A.H.E.R.A. accred.#113297 (Expires August 16,2012) B a-z 1429 Ave.D.#187,Snohomish,WA 98290 4254894040;c 206-914-5500;f 775-665-0420 e mail Asbestotest(a msn.com;web:www.asbestotest.com DEMOLITION PERMIT APPLICATION Department of Community& Economic Development City of Arlington •.18204 59th Ave NE • Arlington, WA 98223 • Phone (360) 403-3551 THIS APPLICATION MUST BE ACCOMPANIED WITH A COPY OF THE ASBESTOS/DEMOLITION NOTIFICATION FROM PUGET SOUND CLEAN AIR AGENCY, TWO(2) COPIES OF AN ASBESTOS SURVEY REPORT AND ABATEMENT REPORT (if applicable) COMPLETED BYAN APPROVED AGENCY. Type of Permit: (check one) ® Residential ❑ Commercial ❑ Industrial Project Address: 104 and 104.5 West Cox Ave Parcel ID#: Lot#: Subdivision. Valuation: $270,000.00 Building Area (sq ft) : No. of floors: 2 floors Number of Buildings: 2 buildings Owner: City of Arlington Phone Number: (360)403-3526 Address: 154 West Cox Ave City: Arlington State:WA Zip Code: 98223 Contact Person:James Kelly Phone Number: (360)403-3526 Cell Phone: (425)754-7431 Fax: E-mail: JKelly@Arlingtonwa.gov Address: 154 West Cox Ave City: Arlington State: WA Zip Code: 98223 Scope of Work: The Work for this project entails the full and complete removal of the main house and out-building (a total of two structures)located at 104 West Cox Ave. Complete and full removal includes the removal and disposal of all aspects of the structure,foundation, and all above ground utility appurtenances that are not owned by a utility company. Removal and disposal may be completed by structure relocation, by select salvage and asset recovery, or by demolition and disposal. The City will allow removal of landscape items to complete this scope of work. Attached Documents: - Property Appraisal Report(2011) - Historic Evaluation Report(2013/14) - Asbestos Survey Data(2012) - LBP Survey Report(2012) - L&I Asbestos Project Notification Form - Certificate of Asbestos Removal - Asbestos Air Monitoring Results - Asbestos Waste Shipment form - Asbestos Waste Lab Analysis Contractor: SkyCorp, LTD(Mr. Skyler Waldal) Phone Number: 425-367-7887 Email: skykcorpltd@yahoo.com Address: 526 N.West Ave City: Arlington State:WA Zip Code: 98223 Contractor's License Number: SKYCOL*899DD Expiration: Mar 16, 2015 I hereby certify that the above information is correct and that the construction on, and the occupancy and the use of the above- described property will b i ac r e with the laws, rules and regulations of the Stat of Washington _,�x _� Au gust 4, 2014 App'cant Signatur Date JAMES X. KELLY Print Applicants Name FOR STAFF USE ONLY Permit# Accepted By Amount Received Receipt# Date Received ARTMENT OF ARCHAEOLOGY& Historic Inventory Report HISTORIC PRESERVATION P=ed Me F&VKW Poe UM Location Field Site No. DAHP No. Historic Name: 104 Cox Avenue Common Name: Bystrom House Property Address: 104 West Cox Avenue,Arlington,WA 98223 Comments: Tax No./Parcel No. Plat/Block/Lot Acreage Supplemental Map(s) Township/Range/EW Section 1/4 Sec 1/4 1/4 Sec County Quadrangle T31R05E 02 Snohomish ARLINGTON WEST Coordinate Reference Easting: 1243348 Northing: 1050263 Projection: Washington State Plane South Datum: HARN (feet) Identification Survey Name: Bystrom Date Recorded: 09/11/2012 Field Recorder: Dave Iversen Owner's Name: Teresa C. Bystrom Owner Address: 104 West Cox Avenue City: Arlington State: WA Zip: 98223 Classification:Building Resource Status: Comments: Survey/Inventory Within a District? No Contributing?No National Register: Local District: National Register District/Thematic Nomination Name: Eligibility Status: Not Determined-SHPO Determination Date: 1/1/0001 Determination Comments: Monday,September 17,2012 Page 1 of 6 ARfMEM OF ARCHAEOLOGY& Historic Inventory Report HISTORIC PRESERVATION Nr Pmt 1*e Me Um Description Historic Use: Residential Current Use: Residential Plan: Irregular Stories: 2 Structural System: Braced Frame Changes to Plan: Moderate Changes to Interior: Unknown Changes to Original Cladding: Extensive Changes to Windows: Extensive Changes to Other: Not Applicable Other(specify): Style: Cladding: Roof Type: Roof Material: Vernacular Shingle- Hip Asphalt/Composition Concrete/Asbestos Veneer-Vinyl Siding Foundation: Form/Type: Concrete-Poured Single Family Narrative Study Unit Other Community Planning/Development Date of Construction: 1895 Built Date Builder: Unknown 1938 Remodel Engineer: Unknown Architect: Unknown Property appears to meet criteria for the National Register of Historic Places:No Property is located in a potential historic district(National and/or local):No Property potentially contributes to a historic district(National and/or local): No Monday,September 17,2012 Page 2 of 6 ARfMEM OF ARCHAEOLOGY& Historic Inventory Report HISTORIC PRESERVATION Statement of In 1853,John Gould and Peter Goutre built a sawmill in what is not Snohomish County. By 1874, logging Significance: activities was one of the few lucrative businesses that brought more people to the Pacific Northwest,and specifically to Snohomish County.At this time Washington was still a territory,and it was not until 1889 that Washington became a state.The following year,a developer named Haller bought and platted Haller City in Snohomish County,where the subject property is located today.The same year in 1890,the community of Arlington was established by a railroad contractor whose area of land was awarded a railroad depot for the Seattle Lake Shore and Eastern railroad (SLS&E RR). In the spring of 1890, Arlington's first post office, newspaper and commercial center opened. By 1896, Haller City was merged with Arlington.At the turn of the twentieth century, more people settled in the Arlington area.The population in 1900 was approximately 800 people(Gillis 2006).The Bystrom house was constructed in 1895 during the initial settlement period of this area. The neighborhood surrounding the Bystrom house was originally commercial,and at the turn of the twentieth century became primarily residential (Gillis 2006; NWAA 2008).Today the surrounding neighborhood is composed mainly of one and two-story single family residences that date to the early 1900s. Most of these houses have been altered since original construction.The Bystrom house has been altered since its original construction. The Bystrom Residence at 104 West Cox Avenue was constructed as a single family residence in 1895, with additions and modifications in 1938 and later. It is a vernacular building,with few stylistic elements of the Queen Anne style, and the architect is unknown.The Bystrom Residence at 104 West Cox Avenue has lost its integrity due to the amount of modifications to the building including replacement siding, windows and two large additions.While it is associated with the early development of this neighborhood, it has lost integrity and is therefore not eligible under Critierion A. No information could be found on any historically significant events or people associated with the property.Therefore the Bystrom House is not recommended eligible under Criterion B.The building was not constructed by a significant architect or builder and does not represent the work of a master. It is therefore not recommended eligible under Criterion C.The building is a common resource type and is therefore unlikely to yield important information about history,and is therefore not recommended eligible under Criterion D. Therefore,the Bystrom House at 104 West Cox Avenue is recommended not eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places as it fails to meet criteria A, B,C or D. Description of The Bystrom Residence at 104 West Cox Avenue was constructed in 1895,with additions and alterations Physical in 1938 in a vernacular style with some Queen Anne features. It is a two-story single family residence Appearance: building located on the southwest corner of West Cox and West avenues in Arlington,Washington.The residence has a wood frame,an irregular floor plan with a concrete foundation.The exterior is clad in vinyl and asbestos siding.The roof is hipped with overhanging eaves and clad in asphalt shingles.On the east elevation,wood steps lead to a partial-width recessed front porch.Classical columns support the porch roof.The primary entrance is located within the porch and consists of a single wood door.The windows consist of double hung metal sash windows.There are also two angled bay windows on the east and north elevations of the building.Queen Anne features of the building include the ornamental spindlework on the porch and second story,the bay windows,the cutaway bay feature on the second floor that also has a decorative finial and corbels,the vertical orientation of the windows and the porch columns.Additions include a one story modification on the west elevation that includes a covered porch, and a one-story addition on the south elevation. Modifications to the building include the replacement of windows,doors,siding,the two additions,and the non-original vinyl awnings on the south elevation. Landscape features include a grass lawn,some shrubs and trees. In addition to the house there is also a one-story garage that has been converted to a secondary residence. Monday,September 17,2012 Page 3 of 6 ARfMEM OF ARCHAEOLOGY& Historic Inventory Report HISTORIC PRESERVATION Nx F&,,IKW Poe M, Major Gillis, Nichole A. Bibliographic 2006 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Arlington Wastewater Treatment Project,Arlington, References: Washington. Report prepared for Kennedy/Jenks Consultants by Northwest Archaeological Associates, Inc. Northwest Archaeological Associates, Inc. 2008 Data Recovery at 45SN409 The Teager/Weimer Site,Arlington,Washington,Snohomish County. Submitted to City of Arlington, 238 North Olympic Avenue,Arlington,Washington 98223. Price,James B. and Jimmy Denis Watts 2011 Summary Appraisal of the Bystrom Residence located at 104 West Cox Avenue,Arlington,WA 98223. Report submitted to James Kelly, Public Works Director, Public Works Department,City of Arlington,Arlington,WA 98223-1337. Monday,September 17,2012 Page 4 of 6 jkKNEOF EOLOGY& Historic Inventory Report W :IC PRESERVARON Pml.HnpetheFAue Photos 1 � East Elevation of Main House South Elevation of Main House 2012 2012 i West Elevation of Main House North Elevation of Main House 2012 2012 Monday,September 17,2012 Page 5 of 6 IRTMENT OF ARCAHAEO OGY& Historic Inventory Report HISTORIC PRESERVATION -- —_-_ Faxed Me Rnt SfKw Poe RAW AK Note the cutaway bay feature on the second story and the angled bay window on the first floor of the building the rear outbuilding the upper story of the north elevation of the Main House 2012 2012 Monday,September 17,2012 Page 6 of 6 .444 DEPARTMENT OF ARCHAEOLOGY& Allyson Brooks Ph.D.,Director HISTORIC PRESERVATION State Historic Preservation Officer - 1-1 -1 rr '— -1 . 1 March 25, 2014 Mr. James Kelly City of Arlington 154 W Cox Avenue Arlington, WA 98223 In future correspondence please refer to: Log: 032514-50-SN Property: City of Arlington Waste Water Treatment Expansion Re: NOT Eligible Dear Mr. Kelly: Thank you for contacting the Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (DAHP). The above referenced property has been reviewed on behalf of the State Historic Preservation Officer under provisions of SEPA. My review is based upon documentation contained in your communication. Research indicates that the above referenced property is not currently listed in the Washington Heritage Register or National Register of Historic Places. The referenced property is NOT ELIGIBLE for the National Register of Historic Places under criterion C. As a result of this finding, further contact with DAHP is not necessary. However, if additional information on the property becomes available, or if any archaeological resources are uncovered during construction, please halt work in the area of discovery and contact the appropriate Native American Tribes and DAHP for further consultation. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment. Should you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Russell Holter Project Compliance Reviewer (360) 586-3533 russell.holter@dahp.wa.gov STATE o State of Washington • Department of Archaeology& Historic Preservation P.O. Box 48343 • Olympia, Washington 98504-8343 • (360) 586-3065 Q _ www.dahp.wa.gov �H� rsas 9° Date: 09/14/2026 Permit#: 442 Permit Date: 08/05/2014 Review Date: 08/05/2014 Permit Type: DEMOLITION Review Type: Residential Demolition Target Date: 08/06/2014 Scheduled Time: Completed Date: 08/06/2014 Description: Ok to issue once asbestos abatement has occurred. Review Status: Assigned To: z.Christopher Young Time In: Time Out: Hours: Property Information Parcel#: 00461804000100 CITY OF ARLINGTON CITY OF ARLINGTON 238 N OLYMPIC AVE 104 COX AVE ARLINGTON, WA 98223 Zoning: 112 2 Single Family ResidencesLot: Block: Permit#: 442 Permit Date: 08/05/14 Permit Type: DEMOLITION Project Name: Bystom House Demo Applicant Name: City of Arlington Applicant Address: 154 W Cox Avenue Applicant, City, State, Zip: Arlington,WA 98223 Contact: Jim Kelly Phone: 360-403-3505 Email:jkelly@arlingtonwa.gov Scope of Work: Demo existing house and garage Valuation: 270000.00 Square Feet: 0 Number of Stories: 0 Construction Type: Occupancy Group: ID Code: Permit Issued: 08/07/2014 Permit Expires: Permit Form Type: Civic Plus Number: Status: COMPLETE Assigned To: Launa Black Property Parcel# Address Legal Description Owner Name Owner Phone Zoning 00461804000100 104 COX AVE CITY OF 112 2 Single Family ARLINGTON Residences Contractors Contractor Primary Contact Phone Address Contractor Type License License# SkyCorp LTD Skyler Waldal 425-367-7887 526 N West CONSTRUCTION COA 603 077 334 Avenue CONTRACTOR SkyCorp LTD Skyler Waldal 425-367-7887 526 N West CONSTRUCTION Labor& SKYCOL*899DD Avenue CONTRACTOR Industries Plan Reviews Date Review Type Description Assigned To Review Status 08/05/2014 Residential Demolition Ok to issue once asbestos abatement has occurred. z.Christopher Young Fees Fee Description Notes Amount Demolition $100.00 State Surcharge- 1st DU Residential- 1st Unit $4.50 Total $104.50 Attached Letters Date Letter Description 08/06/2014 Building Permit Payments Date Paid By Description Payment Type Accepted By Amount 08/11/2014 Utilites Bystrom House interfund transfer Launa Black $104.50 Outstanding Balance $0.00 Notes Date Note Created By: 08/05/2014 All Utilities have been disconnected Launa Black Uploaded Files Date File Name 08/07/2014 422-Signed Permit(1).pdf 08/05/2014 Bystrom Demo AP(08-04-14).pdf 08/05/2014 Historic Eval(104 W Cox Ave).ndf 08/05/2014 Asbestos Survey-.pdf 08/05/2014 LBP Survey-.pdf 08/05/2014 Appraisal Report-Bystrom(07-29-12).pdf 08/05/2014 Asbestos Abatement Info(Bystrom 08-04-14)Partl.pdf 08/05/2014 Asbestos Abatement Info(Bystrom 08-04-14)PartIpdf 08/05/2014 Asbestos Abatement Info(Bystrom 08-04-14)Part2.pdf A-T ASBESTO-TEST, INC. ':,EPA . NAT-46033-1 "Occupied" house na, 104 Cox Ave.,Arlington,WA 98223 Page 1 of I Pb paints 2120729B July 25, 2012 City of Arlington 238 N. Olympic Ave Arlington,WA 98223 Attn: Kurt Patterson 360-403-3454 kpatterson(&arhngtonwa.gov SUBJECT:Lead surface paint tests SAMPLE REQUESTED BY:Client DATE SUBMITTED:July 16,2012 Analytical Test Method: USEPA recognized(when used by a certified renovator)D-Lead®Paint Test Kit manufactured by ESCA Tech,Inc.,and/or"LEAD CHECK"(link:http://www.epa.gov/lead/pubs/testkit.htm) Number of Samples: 13 Sampled By:Asbesto-Test,Inc.Personnel -Cart Dykstra R-I 19412-10-00247 Exp 448-2015 Geographic ID: 104 Cox Ave.,Arlington,WA 98223 THERE WAS NO LEAD(Pb)DETECTED GREATER THAN THE USEPA REGULATORY LIMIT IN ANY OF THE SAMPLES TAKEN PAINT SAMPLE LOCATION (Pb)LEAD DETECTED 1- INTERIOR WALLS&CEILINGS PAINT NLD>USEPA reg.limit 2- INTERIOR DOOR TRIM PAINT NLD>USEPA reg.limit 3- INTERIOR WINDOW TRIM PAINT NLD>USEPA reg.limit 4- INTERIOR BEDROOM FLOOR PAINT NLD>USEPA reg.limit 5- INTERIOR UTILITY FLOOR PAINT NLD>USEPA reg.limit 6- INTERIOR UPSTAIRS CEILING PAINT NLD>USEPA reg.limit 7- INTERIOR UPSTAIRS KITCHEN CABINET PAINT NLD>USEPA reg.limit 8- INTERIOR UPSTAIRS WALL PAINT NLD>USEPA reg.limit 9- INTERIOR UPSTAIRS WINDOW TRIM PAINT NLD>USEPA reg.limit 10- INTERIOR UPSTAIRS DOOR TRIM PAINT NLD>USEPA reg.limit It- EXTERIOR DECK PAINT NLD>USEPA reg.limit 12- EXTERIOR WINDOW TRIM PAINT NLD>USEPA reg.limit 13- EXTERIOR SIDING PAINT(NOT ON CONCRETE ASBESTOS BOARD) NLD>USEPA reg.limit key-- aft"signifies LEAD ",',signifies`greater than" "NLD"signifies NO LEAD DETECTED "LD"signifies LEAD DETECTED "reg.limit"signifies REGULATORY LIMIT END OF REPORT Respectfully Submitted, ArLynn Hammond,Pres. B.Sc.Analytical Chemist R-1-19412-10-00250 Exp.4-18-2015 1429 Ave.D.#187,Snohomish,WA 98290 425-489-4040;c 206-914-5500;f 775-665-0420 e mail Asbestotest(a>msn.com;web:www.asbestotest.com �B A-T ASBESTO-TEST, INC. ':,EPA . NAT-46033-1 "Occupied" house (a, 1041/2 Cox Ave.,Arlington,WA 98223 Page 1 of I Pb paints 2120729A July 25, 2012 City of Arlington 238 N. Olympic Ave Arlington,WA 98223 Attn: Kurt Patterson 360-403-3454 kpatterson(&arhngtonwa.2ov SUBJECT:Lead surface paint tests SAMPLE REQUESTED BY:Client DATE SUBMITTED:July 16,2012 Analytical Test Method: USEPA recognized(when used by a certified renovator)D-Lead®Paint Test Kit manufactured by ESCA Tech,Inc.,and/or"LEAD CHECK"(link:http://www.epa.gov/lead/pubs/testkit.htm) Number of Samples: 8 Sampled By:Asbesto-Test,Inc.Personnel -Carl Dykstra R-I-19412-10-00247Exp4-r8-201s Geographic ID: 104'h Cox Ave.,Arlington,WA 98223 THERE WAS NO LEAD(Pb)DETECTED GREATER THAN THE USEPA REGULATORY LIMIT IN ANY OF THE SAMPLES TAKEN PAINT SAMPLE LOCATION (Pb)LEAD DETECTED 1- INTERIOR DOOR TRIM PAINT NLD>USEPA reg.limit 2- INTERIOR WINDOW TRIM PAINT NLD>USEPA reg.limit 3- INTERIOR WALL PAINT NLD>USEPA reg.limit 4- KITCHEN CABINET PAINT NLD>USEPA reg.limit 5- INTERIOR CEILING TILE PAINT NLD>USEPA reg.limit 6- INTERIOR GREEN DOOR PAINT NLD>USEPA reg.limit 7- EXTERIOR SIDING PAINT NLD>USEPA reg.limit 8- EXTERIOR TRIM PAINT NLD>USEPA reg.limit key: "Pb"signifies LEAD ">"signifies"greater than" "NLD"signifies NO LEAD DETECTED "LD"signifies LEAD DETECTED "reg.limit"signifies REGULATORY LIMIT END OF REPORT Respectfully Submitted, ArLynn Hammond,Pres. B.Sc.Analytical Chemist R-1-19412-10-00250 Exp.4-18-2015 1429 Ave.D.#187,Snohomish,WA 98290 425-489-4040;c 206-914-5500;f 775-665-0420 e mail Asbestotest(a>msn.com;web:www.asbestotest.com �B