HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-07-2012_Council Meeting
Arlington City Council
May 7, 2012 – 7 PM
City Council Chambers
110 E. Third
SPECIAL ACCOMMODATIONS: The City of Arlington strives to provide accessible meetings for people with disabilities. Please contact the ADA
coordinator at (360) 403-3441 or 1-800-833-8388 (TDD only) prior to the meeting date if special accommodations are required.
CALL TO ORDER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS
1. Presentation of Arlington Police Department Employees of the Year
2. Introduction of Kody Cunningham, Arlington Police Department’s 2012 Chief for a Day
3. Snohomish County Sheriff John Lovick
PROCLAMATIONS
1. National Police Week, May 13-19, 2012 ATTACHMENT A
PUBLIC COMMENT For members of the public to speak to the Council regarding matters NOT on the agenda.
Please limit remarks to three minutes.
CONSENT AGENDA
1. Minutes of the April 16 and April 23, 2012 Council Meetings ATTACHMENT B
2. Accounts Payable
PUBLIC HEARING
NEW BUSINESS
1. Adoption of the Resolution for Public Safety Sales Tax ballot proposal ATTACHMENT C
2. Appointment of Brittany Kleinman and Kaitlin Valenti to the Parks,
Arts, and Recreation Commission ATTACHMENT D
3. Ordinance Adopting the Airport Master Plan Update and associated
Comprehensive Plan Amendment ATTACHMENT E
4. Ordinance Adopting the 43rd Ave NE / 172nd St NE Comprehensive
Plan Amendment and Concurrent Rezone ATTACHMENT F
SPECIAL ACCOMMODATIONS: The City of Arlington strives to provide accessible meetings for people with disabilities. Please contact the ADA
coordinator at (360) 403-3441 or 1-800-833-8388 (TDD only) prior to the meeting date if special accommodations are required.
5. Ordinance Adopting the 43rd Ave NE / 51st Ave NE (National Food)
Comprehensive Plan Amendment ATTACHMENT G
6. 67th Avenue - Authority to Bid 67th Ave Project ATTACHMENT H
7. 67th Avenue - KBA Bid Support Fee ATTACHMENT I
8. 67th Avenue - HDR Supplement 7 ATTACHMENT J
9. Adoption of Fee Resolution ATTACHMENT K
DISCUSSION ITEMS
INFORMATION
ADMINISTRATOR & STAFF REPORTS
MAYOR’S REPORT
COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS – OPTIONAL
EXECUTIVE SESSION
• Discussion of pending or potential litigation [RCW 42.30.110(1)(i)]
• To review collective bargaining negotiations, grievances, or discussions regarding the
interpretation or application of a labor agreement [RCW 42.30.140(4)]
RECONVENE
ADJOURNMENT
To review all attachments, click here.
Proclamation
National Police Week 2012
WHEREAS, there are approximately 900,000 law enforcement officers serving in
communities across the United States, including the dedicated members of the Arlington Police
Department; and
WHEREAS, nearly 60,000 assaults against law enforcement officers are reported each
year, resulting in approximately 16,000 injuries; and
WHEREAS, since the first recorded death in 1791, almost 20,000 law enforcement
officers in the United States have made the ultimate sacrifice and been killed in the line of
duty; and
WHEREAS, the names of these dedicated public servants are engraved on the walls of
the National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial in Washington, D.C.; and
WHEREAS, 362 new names of fallen heroes are being added to the National Law
Enforcement Officers Memorial this spring, including 163 officers killed in 2011 and 199
officers killed in previous years; and
WHEREAS, the service and sacrifice of all officers killed in the line of duty will be
honored during the National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial Fund’s 24th Annual
Candlelight Vigil, on the evening of May 13, 2012; and
WHEREAS, the Candlelight Vigil is part of National Police Week, which takes place this
year on May 13-19; and
WHEREAS, May 15th is designated as Peace Officers Memorial Day, in honor of all
fallen officers and their families.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Barbara Tolbert do hereby proclaim
May 13-19, 2012
National Police Week
in the City of Arlington, Washington, and publicly salute the service of law enforcement
officers in our community and in communities across the nation.
Signed this 7th day of May, 2012.
______________________________
Mayor Barbara Tolbert
DRAFT
Page 1 of 3
Council Chambers
110 East Third
April 16, 2012
City Council Members Present by Roll Call: Dick Butner, Randy Tendering, Debora Nelson, Marilyn
Oertle, Chris Raezer, Ken Klein, and Steve Baker
Council Members Absent: No Council members were absent.
City Staff Present: Mayor Tolbert, Kristin Banfield, Paul Ellis, Jim Chase, Police Chief Nelson Beazley,
Jim Kelly, Eric Scott, Rob Putnam, Julie Good, Monica Schlagel, Cristy Brubaker, Jan Bauer, Steve
Peiffle – City Attorney
Also Known to be Present: Maxine Jenft – Volunteer Coordinator, Mike Hobson – Airport Commission,
Barbara Butner, Bruce Angell – Planning Commission Chair, Jim Cummins, and Sarah Arney – North
County Outlook
Mayor Tolbert called the meeting to order at 7:00PM, and the pledge of allegiance to the flag followed.
APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
Marilyn Oertle moved to approve the Agenda. Chris Raezer seconded the motion which passed with a
unanimous vote.
INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS
Presentation of Certificates of Appreciation for departing Board & Commission members -
Barbara Butner, Jim Cummins, Leslie Larson, Linda Snider, Mike Zachman
Mayor Tolbert read descriptions of each volunteer, and she then presented those in attendance, Barbara
Butner and Jim Cummins, a certificate of appreciation. The others were identified and individually
honored in absentia.
PROCLAMATIONS
National Volunteer Week, April 15 – 21, 2012
Paul Ellis introduced Maxine Jenft who had recently stepped up to be the City’s Volunteer Coordinator.
Mayor Tolbert then read the Proclamation City of Arlington, Washington, Celebrating People in
Action, proclaiming April 15 – 21 National Volunteer Week.
PUBLIC COMMENT
M.J. Drush, president of DABA, thanked the Council for grant money, and spoke to the possibility for
Arlington to be the Best Small City, at Best of the Road, an activity sponsored by Rand McNally. She
stated that the City’s parking lot on the corner of Olympic and Division needs to be more easily
distinguishable as a place for people to park. She also noted that the Welcome to Arlington sign on West
Arlington isn’t pleasing to the eye. Ms. Drush suggested funding both upgrade projects by selling bricks.
Assistant City Administrator Kristin Banfield gave an update on Team Arlington in the Relay for Life.
Daughter Teeghan Banfield modeled the Relay t-shirt.
Minutes of the Arlington
City Council Meeting
Minutes of the City of Arlington City Council Meeting DRAFT April 16, 2012
Page 2 of 3
CONSENT AGENDA
Marilyn Oertle moved and Chris Raezer seconded the motion to approve the Consent Agenda which was
unanimously carried to approve the following Consent Agenda items:
1. Minutes of the April 2 and April 9, 2012 meetings
2. Accounts Payable
Electronic Payments and Claims Checks #76364 through #76535 dated April 3, 2012 through
April 16, 2012 in the amount of $433,842.29
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
There was no Unfinished Business.
PUBLIC HEARING
Airport Master Plan Update Comprehensive Plan Amendment
With the use of a power point presentation, Airport Manager Rob Putnam gave a report on the Plan
history and requested Amendment updates.
The Public Hearing was opened at 7:40PM, and with no one wishing to speak, the Public Hearing was
immediately closed.
Mr. Putnam then answered Council questions.
No action was taken at this time. Final action will be taken at the May 7, 2012 City Council meeting on the
proposed Amendment.
NEW BUSINESS
Lease Agreement with BNSF for 67th Ave. NE Phase III
Public Works Director Jim Kelly noted that this is the last right-of-way acquisitions needed for the 67th
Avenue NE project. There are a total of 4 easements required from BNSF, and this is the first of those
sections. Even though there is unanticipated added expense, he stated that going back to the table with
BNSF would result in great cost to the City. Discussion followed.
Debora Nelson moved to approve the lease agreement necessary for additional BNSF right-of-way to
construct the 67th Avenue project and authorize the Mayor to sign, pending final approval by the City
Attorney. Marilyn Oertle seconded the motion that passed with a unanimous vote.
Appointment of Leilani Lucrisia to the Cemetery Advisory Board
Jim Kelly spoke to the duties of those on the Cemetery Advisory Board. The opening is sought to be filled
by Leilani Lucrisia, a qualified applicant who has been an Arlington resident since 2008.
Randy Tendering moved to appoint Leilani Lucrisia as Cemetery Board member to fill the current vacant
seat. Dick Butner seconded the motion that passed with a unanimous vote.
Adoption of Revised Policy for Appointing and/or Reappointing Citizens to Serve on Boards &
Commissions
Assistant City Administrator Kristin Banfield spoke briefly to the Revised Policy and asked for Council
approval.
Marilyn Oertle moved to approve the revised Policy for Appointing and / or Reappointing Citizens to Serve
on Boards and Commissions. Chris Raezer seconded the motion which passed with a unanimous vote.
ADMINISTRATOR & STAFF REPORTS
The grand opening for the new Visitor Center and Restrooms are coming up soon, and the Yellow Pages
will be presented next Monday. In addition there is an upcoming joint meeting with the Arlington School
District and the Hospital Board.
Minutes of the City of Arlington City Council Meeting DRAFT April 16, 2012
Page 3 of 3
MAYOR’S REPORT
Mayor Tolbert gave a report of meetings and activities she had recently attended.
COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS – OPTIONAL
Dick Butner, Randy Tendering, Debora Nelson, Marilyn Oertle, and Chris Raezer gave brief reports while
Ken Klein and Steve Baker had nothing to report at this time.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
City Attorney announced that there would be no need for an Executive Session.
ADJOURNMENT
With no further business to come before the Council, the meeting was adjourned at 8:05PM.
____________________________
Barbara Tolbert, Mayor
DRAFT
Page 1 of 3
Council Chambers
110 East Third Street
April 23, 2012
Dick Butner Randy Tendering, Debora Nelson, Marilyn Oertle, Chris Raezer, Ken Klein, Steve Baker,
Mayor Tolbert, Kristin Banfield, Jim Chase, Police Chief Nelson Beazley, Police Officers Lisa
Wojciechowicz and Rory Bolter, Fire Chief Bruce Stedman, Jim Kelly, Eric Scott, Rob Putnam, David
Kuhl, Todd Hall, Cristy Brubaker, Paul Ellis, Jan Bauer, Steve Peiffle – City Attorney
Council Members Absent: Everyone was present.
Also Known to be Present: Mike Hopson – Airport Commission, Bruce Angell – Planning Commission
Chair, Josh Herschlip – Aces Casino, Sarah Arney – North County Outlook
Mayor Tolbert called the meeting to order at 7:00PM.
Marilyn Oertle moved to approve the Agenda, and Chris Raezer seconded the motion, which passed with
a unanimous vote approving the Workshop Agenda.
Mayor Tolbert noted that for this meeting the Agenda would change to allowing attendees to comment at
the end of each presentation
Aces Casino Relocation Request
Community Development Director David Kuhl and Associate Planner Todd Hall presented the request for
a variance for house banked card rooms for the Aces Relocation proposed move to the Buzz Inn Steak
House building. With the use of an overhead projection, the area of the Buzz Inn site was projected. At
the conclusion of this presentation Mr. Kuhl asked for Council input.
Police Chief Nelson Beazley answered that there are very few calls for service in the vicinity of Aces
Casino. Discussion followed.
Planning Commission Chair Bruce Angell also spoke to the issue, noting that Aces Casino does well at
self-policing and the crime issue seems to be a non-issue, with the issue of secondary crimes study yet
unfounded. He continued by explaining the way in which Tukwila has addressed their gambling issue.
Chair Angell is hopeful that this issue can be permanently resolved through a formal City process of
changing rules and regulations. Discussion followed.
Josh Herschlip – Aces Casino Manager, 8402 76th Avenue Marysville, addressed the question of how
Aces is different than a tribal casino. He also answered several other Council questions. Mr. Herschlip
then made his presentation on the requested change, citing the positive results that could take place for
both the City of Arlington and his businesses of Aces and Buzz Inn.
Public Comment
Gary Wallen, pastor, Praise Chapel on Smokey Point Drive, gave a history of himself and of the
chapel, and he spoke to the issue of a possible nearby casino, noting his concern that this type of
establishment draws more undesirable individuals and, as a result, family-style businesses often
disappear. Pastor Wallen does realize that the City needs the revenue. He then answered Council
questions.
Minutes of the Arlington
City Council Workshop
Minutes of the City of Arlington City Council Meeting DRAFT April 23, 2011
Page 2 of 3
Martin Van Leuven, 11020 Maple Lane, Lake Stevens, owner of Kidzle B Kids, a daycare in close
proximity to the present Buzz Inn location, voiced concern and has reservations about the casino-type of
establishment being closer to his business.
William D Tackitt 12009 Lakeshore Drive, Lake Stevens, a 30+ year proprietor of the Buzz Inn and
initial investor in Aces Casino, spoke in favor of the requested change of locations which would result in
Aces being closer to I-5, and with that the center is on a downhill spiral, noted that Aces could be a
stimulus for that area. Mr. Tacket then answered Council questions.
Martin Van Leuven spoke again, noting that he does not oppose the Aces request, however he would
like the Council to look at the park area and make a win-win situation to deter crime that the park
encourages.
The Council indicated that it would like to go forward with Option 1, to direct staff to move forward with
modifying Title 20 to reduce location restrictions.
At 8:23PM the Council took a short break, and at 8:27PM the meeting was reconvened.
1st Quarter Financial Report
With the use of a power point presentation Finance Director Jim Chase gave a financial report on the first
quarter of 2012.
Throughout the presentation Mr. Chase addressed Council concerns and questions.
Interfund Loan Status Update
Jim Chase spoke to the interfund loans needing monetary assistance until revenues are actually
received. He answered Council questions throughout the presentation.
Resolution – Public Safety sales Tax on August 7, 2012 Primary Ballot
Assistant City Administrator Kristin Banfield spoke to the requested August 7 Public Safety Sales Tax.She
suggested that the Council seriously consider this as a means for funding Public Safety. She and Mr.
Chase then answered Council questions. Discussion followed.
Police Chief Nelson Beazley and Fire Chief Bruce Stedman answered Council questions and a lengthy
discussion followed regarding whether this item should be placed on the ballot.
Chief Beazley gave a report on Arlington Police Accreditation and then distributed a copy of the annual
report.
Authority to Bid 67th Ave NE, Phase III Project
With the use of a power point presentation City Engineer Eric Scott gave a brief overview of the 67th
Avenue Project, Phase III. Throughout the presentation Mr. Scott answered Council questions. This will
be considered for Council approval at the next Council meeting.
Bid Support Contract with KBA for 67th Ave NE, Phase III Project
Mr. Scott noted that three firms had been interviewed for the bid, and KBA has been selected. He had
presented the initial contract and proposal. Mr. Scott then answered Council questions. This will be
considered for Council approval at the next meeting.
HDTR Supplement #7 for 67th Ave. NE Phase III Project
This request, presented by Mr. Scott, is related to design and five design alternatives which provide
options as work proceeds. Throughout the presentation, Mr. Scott answered Council questions. This will
be addressed at the next Council meeting.
Minutes of the City of Arlington City Council Meeting DRAFT April 23, 2011
Page 3 of 3
Airport Water Line Project
Airport Manager Rob Putnam gave a presentation in regards to the request to complete the Water Line
Project prior to asphalting that area. Mr. Putnam answered Council questions throughout his presentation.
Fee Resolution – Final Review
Kristin Banfield noted the minor revisions and briefly spoke to changes made.
Appointments to Parks, Arts and Recreation Commission
Ms. Banfield noted the vacancies that would be filled, with Council approval of applicants Brittany
Kleinman and Kaitlin Valentini.
Miscellaneous Council Items
Steve Baker, Marilyn Oertle, and Debora Nelson gave brief reports, while Dick Butner, Chris Raezer, Ken
Klein and Randy Tendering had nothing to report.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Sarah Arney suggested that Aces spruce up the back of the strip mall with art, should they be allowed to
move to that area.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 9:45PM.
____________________________
Barbara Tolbert, Mayor
City of Arlington
Council Agenda Bill
Item:
NB #1
Attachment
C
COUNCIL MEETING DATE:
May 7, 2012
SUBJECT:
Resolution for a Public Safety Sales Tax to be placed on the August 7, 2012 ballot
ATTACHMENTS:
- Resolution for a ballot proposition for 0.1% sales tax increase to fund public safety
services
- RCW 82.14.450 authorizing cities to ask for the 0.1% sales tax increase
DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN
Executive – Contact: Kristin Banfield, 360-403-3444
EXPENDITURES REQUESTED: -0-
BUDGET CATEGORY: N/A
LEGAL REVIEW:
DESCRIPTION:
Council is requested to approve the attached resolution to send a ballot proposition to the
City’s voters to institute a 0.1% sales tax increase to fund public safety services.
State law requires such a measure to appear on either a primary election ballot or a general
election ballot. The next primary is August 7, 2012.
HISTORY:
Council originally adopted Resolution No. 2011-020 on December 19, 2011 authorizing a ballot
proposition for the February ballot. Since state law requires such a measure to appear on either
a primary or a general election ballot, the City’s choices are August 7th or November 6th.
Resolution No. 2012-001 was adopted on January 3, 2012, which rescinded the previous
resolution and directed staff to prepare a new resolution.
ALTERNATIVES
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
I move to adopt the proposed resolution providing for the submission to the voters of the city
at the August 7, 2012 primary election of a proposition authorizing an additional sales and use
tax at the rate of 0.1 percent pursuant to RCW 82.14.450 to be used exclusively for public safety
purposes; providing a form of the ballot proposition; entering legislative findings; and
providing direction to staff.
RESOLUTION NO. 2012-xxx___
RESOLUTION NO. 2012-xxx
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARLINGTON,
WASHINGTON, PROVIDING FOR THE SUBMISSION TO THE QUALIFIED
ELECTORS OF THE CITY AT THE AUGUST 7, 2012 PRIMARY ELECTION
OF A PROPOSITION AUTHORIZING AN ADDITIONAL SALES AND USE
TAX AT THE RATE OF 0.1 PERCENT PURSUANT TO RCW 82.14.450 TO
BE USED EXCLUSIVELY FOR PUBLIC SAFETY PURPOSES; PROVIDING
A FORM OF THE BALLOT PROPOSITION; ENTERING LEGISLATIVE
FINDINGS; AND PROVIDING DIRECTION TO STAFF.
WHEREAS, ensuring the protection and safety of the Arlington community is a
fundamental priority of the City of Arlington; and
WHEREAS, the recent economic downtown has significantly reduced the financial
resources available to the City, including the resources available for public safety activities; and
WHEREAS, the Washington Legislature has recently amended RCW 82.14.450 to
authorize cities to submit a proposition to local voters approving a sales and use tax increase, the
revenues from which may be utilized for public safety purposes; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with RCW 82.14.450, the City Council desires to submit a
proposition to local voters authorizing an additional sales and use tax at the rate of 0.1 percent of
the selling price and 0.1 percent of the value of the article used, respectively, the revenues from
which will be used by the City exclusively for public safety purposes;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARLINGTON,
WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findings. The above recitals are hereby adopted as legislative findings by the
City Council. The City Council further finds that the best interests and general welfare of the
City of Arlington would be served by imposing a 0.1 percent increase in the local sales and use
tax rate and utilizing the revenues collected from said tax for public safety purposes.
Section 2. Election. The Snohomish County Auditor, as ex officio supervisor of elections,
is hereby requested to submit to the qualified electors of the City of Arlington the proposition set
forth in Section 3 of this resolution at the August 7, 2012 election to be held within the City.
Section 3. Ballot Proposition. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed, no later
than May 11, 2012, to certify the following proposition to the Snohomish County Auditor in
substantially the following form:
RESOLUTION NO. 2012-xxx___
CITY OF ARLINGTON
PROPOSITION NO. ____
ADDITIONAL SALES AND USE TAX FOR
PUBLIC SAFETY PURPOSES
The City Council of the City of Arlington has adopted Resolution
No. 2012-xxx concerning a sales and use tax pursuant to RCW
82.14.450. If approved, this proposition would authorize an
additional sales and use tax at the rate of 0.1 percent to be used
exclusively for public safety purposes. Should this proposition be
APPROVED? ……………….
REJECTED? …………………
Section 4. Changes. The Mayor and City Attorney are authorized to make such minor
adjustments to the wording of such proposition as may be recommended by the Snohomish
County Auditor, provided that the intent of the proposition remains clear and consistent with the
intent of this resolution as approved by the City Council.
Section 5. Effective Date. This resolution shall take effect and be in full force
immediately upon passage by the City Council.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Arlington this _____ day of
__________________, 2012.
CITY OF ARLINGTON
___________________________
Barbara Tolbert, Mayor
Attest:
_____________________________
Kristin Banfield, City Clerk
Approved as to form:
______________________________
Steven J. Peiffle
City Attorney
Inside the Legislature
Find Your Legislator
Visiting the Legislature
Agendas, Schedules and
Calendars
Bill Information
Laws and Agency Rules
Legislative Committees
Legislative Agencies
Legislative Information
Center
E-mail Notifications
(Listserv)
Civic Education
History of the State
Legislature
Outside the Legislature
Congress - the Other
Washington
TVW
Washington Courts
OFM Fiscal Note Website
RCWs > Title 82 > Chapter 82.14 > Section 82.14.450
82.14.440 << 82.14.450 >> 82.14.455
RCW 82.14.450
Sales and use tax for counties and cities.
(1) A county legislative authority may submit an authorizing proposition to the county voters at a
primary or general election and, if the proposition is approved by a majority of persons voting, impose
a sales and use tax in accordance with the terms of this chapter. The title of each ballot measure must
clearly state the purposes for which the proposed sales and use tax will be used. The rate of tax under
this section may not exceed three-tenths of one percent of the selling price in the case of a sales tax,
or value of the article used, in the case of a use tax.
(2)(a) A city legislative authority may submit an authorizing proposition to the city voters at a
primary or general election and, if the proposition is approved by a majority of persons voting, impose
a sales and use tax in accordance with the terms of this chapter. The title of each ballot measure must
clearly state the purposes for which the proposed sales and use tax will be used. The rate of tax under
this subsection may not exceed one-tenth of one percent of the selling price in the case of a sales tax,
or value of the article used, in the case of a use tax. A city may not begin imposing a tax approved by
the voters under this subsection prior to January 1, 2011.
(b) If a county adopts an ordinance or resolution to submit a ballot proposition to the voters to
impose the sales and use tax under subsection (1) of this section prior to a city within the county
adopting an ordinance or resolution to submit a ballot proposition to the voters to impose the tax under
this subsection, the rate of tax by the city under this subsection may not exceed an amount that would
cause the total county and city tax rate under this section to exceed three-tenths of one percent. This
subsection (2)(b) also applies if the county and city adopt an ordinance or resolution to impose sales
and use taxes under this section on the same date.
(c) If the city adopts an ordinance or resolution to submit a ballot proposition to the voters to
impose the sales and use tax under this subsection prior to the county in which the city is located, the
county must provide a credit against its tax under subsection (1) of this section for the city tax under
this subsection to the extent the total county and city tax rate under this section would exceed three-
tenths of one percent.
(3) The tax authorized in this section is in addition to any other taxes authorized by law and must
be collected from those persons who are taxable by the state under chapters 82.08 and 82.12 RCW
upon the occurrence of any taxable event within the county.
(4) The retail sale or use of motor vehicles, and the lease of motor vehicles for up to the first
thirty-six months of the lease, are exempt from tax imposed under this section.
(5) One-third of all money received under this section must be used solely for criminal justice
purposes, fire protection purposes, or both. For the purposes of this subsection, "criminal justice
purposes" has the same meaning as provided in RCW 82.14.340.
(6) Money received by a county under subsection (1) of this section must be shared between the
county and the cities as follows: Sixty percent must be retained by the county and forty percent must
be distributed on a per capita basis to cities in the county.
(7) Tax proceeds received by a city imposing a tax under this section must be shared between the
county and city as follows: Fifteen percent must be distributed to the county and eighty-five percent is
retained by the city.
[2010 c 127 § 1; 2009 c 551 § 1; 2007 c 380 § 1; 2003 1st sp.s. c 24 § 2.]
Notes:
Legislature Home | Senate | House of Representatives | Contact Us | Search | Help
RCW 82.14.450: Sales and use tax for counties and cities.http://apps.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=82.14.450
1 of 2 12/14/2011 3:12 PM
Finding -- Intent -- 2003 1st sp.s. c 24: "The legislature finds that local governments in
the state of Washington face enormous challenges in the area of criminal justice and public
health. It is the legislature's intent to allow general local governments to raise revenues in
order to better protect the health and safety of Washington state and its residents. It is
further the intent of the legislature to provide such local governments relief from regulatory
burdens that do not harm the public health and safety of the citizens of the state as a
means of minimizing the need to generate new revenues authorized under this act." [2003
1st sp.s. c 24 § 1.]
Effective date -- 2003 1st sp.s. c 24: "This act is necessary for the immediate
preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or support of the state government and
its existing public institutions, and takes effect July 1, 2003." [2003 1st sp.s. c 24 § 6.]
Severability -- 2003 1st sp.s. c 24: "If any provision of this act or its application to any
person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the act or the application of the
provision to other persons or circumstances is not affected." [2003 1st sp.s. c 24 § 7.]
RCW 82.14.450: Sales and use tax for counties and cities.http://apps.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=82.14.450
2 of 2 12/14/2011 3:12 PM
City of Arlington
Council Agenda Bill
Item:
NB #2
Attachment
D
COUNCIL MEETING DATE:
May 7, 2012
SUBJECT:
Appointment of Brittany Kleinman and Kaitlin Valenti to the Parks, Arts, and
Recreation Commission
ATTACHMENTS:
Applications from Brittany Kleinman and Kaitlin Valenti
DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN
Executive – Contact Kristin Banfield, 360-403-3444
EXPENDITURES REQUESTED: -0-
BUDGET CATEGORY: N/A
LEGAL REVIEW:
DESCRIPTION:
With the resignations of Mike Zachman and Leslie Larson, the Parks, Arts, and
Recreation Commission has two vacancies. Council is requested to appoint Brittany
Kleinman and Kaitlin Valenti to these vacancies.
HISTORY:
A panel comprised of Councilmember Klein, Councilmember Oertle, PARC Chair Bob
Leonard, and Recreation Manager Sarah Lopez interviewed three candidates for the
two vacancies on April 11, 2012. The panel recommended the appointment of Ms.
Kleinman and Ms. Valenti.
ALTERNATIVES
Do not appoint.
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
I move to confirm the appointment of Brittany Kleinman and Kaitlin Valenti to the
Parks, Arts, and Recreation Commission.
City of Arlington
Council Agenda Bill
Item:
NB #3
Attachment
E
COUNCIL MEETING DATE:
May 7, 2012
SUBJECT:
Airport Master Plan Update
ATTACHMENTS:
Memo from Rob Putnam, Airport Director
Updates of the City Comprehensive Plan
DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN
Airport
EXPENDITURES REQUESTED: None
BUDGET CATEGORY: N/A
LEGAL REVIEW:
DESCRIPTION:
The Airport Commission is requesting the City Council approve the Airport Master
Plan Update.
HISTORY:
This Master Plan Update started in October 2008. Working Papers 1 & 2 were reviewed
by the Airport Commission on December 9, 2008, and Working Paper 3 on August 10,
2010. The majority of the time after Working Papers 1 & 2 was spent on the Glider
Operation Area and the Historical District. The final draft was reviewed by the Airport
Commission at a workshop in January 2012 and at the regular meeting on March 13,
2012. The Planning Commission approved the update at their March 20, 2012 meeting.
The Airport Commission approved the plan on April 10, 2012.
ALTERNATIVES
Approve Airport Commission Recommendation with Modifications
Table Staff’s Recommendation
Deny Staff’s Recommendation
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
I move to approve the Airport Master Plan Update and associated Comprehensive Plan
Amendments and direct the City Attorney to prepare an ordinance for adoption at the
next Council meeting.
MEMO
City of Arlington
Airport
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Rob Putnam, Airport Director
Date: May 3, 2012
Subject: Airport Master Plan Update
ISSUE: Approval of the Airport Master Plan Update and the proposed amendments to
the City of Arlington Comprehensive Plan.
BACKGROUND: The FAA requires airports to periodically update their Airport
Master Plans. In the 1995 Master Plan the Airport went through the process to
determine which type of airport the community wanted. Four scenarios were reviewed;
General Aviation, Commercial, Corporate, and Cargo. The preferred alternative was to
plan for a General Aviation airport with a corporate mix. The theme was carried
through the 2002 update and this update. Master Plans are eligible for FAA Airport
Improvement Funds (AIP) and this update was funded 95% FAA and 5% local. The
original contract with Barnard Dunkelberg was for $218,155. Barnard Dunkelberg will
exceed that contract amount by $19,575. The extra costs are associated with the
additional work that was required primarily with the glider issue and partially with the
historic district. The FAA has approved the extra costs and will reimburse the airport
90% of that amount through our next grant.
Working Paper One included two chapters; Inventory of Existing Conditions and
Aviation Activity Demand Forecasts.
• Inventory of Existing Conditions looked at the airport role and facilities, existing
airport utilities and services, airspace system/navigation and communication
aids, surrounding airports, environmental issues and financial inventory.
• The Aviation Activity Demand Forecasts looked at the historical and existing
aviation activity, the factors influencing aircraft activity, and regional and
national trends. Based on the above information the Aviation Activity and
Based Aircraft Forecasts were established.
MEMO
City of Arlington
Airport
Operations 2008 2013 2018 2023 2028
General
Aviation
133,472 146,206 154,789 161,726 168,174
Single
Engine
109,492 120,050 126,924 132,130 137,062
Multi-
Engine
10,050 10,717 11,145 11,483 11,772
Turboprop 58 80 155 323 505
Jet 107 154 310 647 841
Helicopter 13,785 15,205 16,252 17,143 17,995
Military 20 20 20 20 20
Military
Helicopters
20 20 20 20 20
Total
Operations
133,492 146,226 154,806 161,746 168,194
Local
Operations
76,694 83,848 89,001 92,526 95,051
Itinerant
Operations
56,798 62,378 65,805 69,220 73,143
Based
Aircraft by
Type
2008 2013 2018 2023 2028
Single
Engine
447 488 507 526 539
Multi-
engine
5 5 5 6 6
Turboprop 2 3 4 6 7
Jet 10 10 11 11 12
Helicopter 13 15 16 17 18
Gliders 45 50 52 55 57
Ultralights 60 65 68 71 73
Total Based
Aircraft
582 636 664 691 713
Working Paper Two dealt with the Airside Facility and the Landside Facility
Requirements needed to fulfill the Forecasts. Items covered in this paper included
MEMO
City of Arlington
Airport
looking at the existing weather/wind coverage, the design aircraft, airfield capacity,
runway dimensional standards, and the runway protection zones (RPZs).
Working Paper Three consisted of the development assumptions, goals for
development, Airside Development Concepts/Alternatives and Recommendations,
Landside Development Concepts and Recommendations, Alternatives Summary and
Potential Environmental Impacts.
The final draft incorporated all three papers into one document along with the historic
information and the Airport Layout Plan (ALP).
DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS: Because this plan was started in October 2008 some of the
information is already outdated, although none of that information had enough impact
to change any of the conclusions. One area that is outdated is the aircraft operations.
The major change in operations is the reduction of helicopter activities. The level
identified in 2008 was 13,785 which was primarily Silver State Helicopter’s operations.
Silver State is no longer in business and the number of operations is probably closer to
2,000. The number of based aircraft could take a big jump this year with the Carrera
project. Carrera is just now completing a 19 unit T-hangar and has plans for two more
buildings.
The Update still identifies a future need to extend the existing 5,332’ runway to a total
of 6,000’. That distance is more conducive for corporate activity, but the construction
will not occur until corporate activity increases by a fair amount. Another item crucial
for corporate activity is getting a precision approach approved by the FAA. Looking at
the feasibility of the precision approach was part of this Master Plan Update and I am
happy to say that it has already been implemented. One issue that may occur sooner
than the extension of the main runway is the relocation of the threshold on Runway 34
(south end of the main runway). Our future needs will require us to have at a
minimum 1,000’ of object free distance from SR531 to runway 34.
At the conclusion of the 2002 Master Plan Update the FAA determined that we would
have to look at the Glider Operation Procedures at the next update. This is where the
process got delayed. The original FAA planner stated that we had to airspace all of our
runways including the grass strips. Not only is this a fairly complicated process for the
consultants to do, but it also caused a lot of issues internally at the FAA. Two main
issues for the airport were; the gliders could no longer operate as they have been and
we could not get approval for a precision approach. We got the precision approach
issue settle, but the FAA was insistent that we relocate the glider operation into the
center of the airport. Our consultant prepared several alternative glider operating areas
MEMO
City of Arlington
Airport
on the airport. The glider club then using a GPS, flew and plotted each alternative.
With that information staff submitted a report to the FAA that basically stated that the
current operational area was by far the safest, which was backed up by over 30-years of
safe operations. Every other alternative conflicted with other airport user groups. The
end result after more than a year was that the current glider operation area remained
the same. By the glider operation area remaining the same though, the FAA did require
the existing piston grass strip be closed. The grass strip was relocated to the west side
of the runway between taxiway connectors B2 and B3, and it remains to be seen if the
FAA will approve this location.
The land use/zoning around and within the airport remains the same. Conceptual site
developments were created for vacant aeronautical land. These conceptuals show how
different types of aviation uses can be incorporated on the sites that allow separation of
aircraft and vehicles. The existing Airport Protection District is also incorporated into
the plan. The Airport Protection District overlays the City’s zoning and identifies types
of uses that are not compatible with airport operations. The noise impact to the
community was also reviewed. The critical Decimal level recognized by the FAA is 65
DNL. That level remains within the airport property with both the existing level and
future forecasted level of operations. The older jet engines are being phased out and the
newer engines are substantially quieter.
Within the Airport boundary lie a Historical District. The original district was
nominated by a third party and all three agencies (FAA, SHPO (State Historical and
Preservation Office) and the City) agreed that the original nomination needed to be
revised. The revision expanded the boundary slightly to include some old hard stands
and the gun bore sighting range, but eliminated all of the off-site buildings as non-
contributing. The only buildings within the boundary are the Navy Hangar and the
Engine Repair building (parachute loft).
The Airport Layout Plan (ALP) wraps all of the above information into one exhibit.
Any future FAA grant funding will be based on whether or not the project is identified
on the ALP.
ALTERNATIVES: Approve Airport Commission Recommendation with Modifications
Table Staff’s Recommendation
Deny Staff’s Recommendation
RECOMMENDATION:
I move to approve the Draft Airport Master Plan Update and the proposed
amendments to the City of Arlington Comprehensive Plan.
1/3/12 Land Use Page 20
Goal/Policy
PN
D SR
R-
L
M
D
R-
M
D
R-
H
D
OT
OT
B
D
-
1
OT
B
D
-
2
OT
B
D
-
3
NC GC HC BP LI GI
MS AF
P/
S
P
Applicable Land Use Designations
PL-16.87 The forested steep slopes along the floodplain should be protected for both environmental and
aesthetic purposes.X
PL-16.88
Care should be taken to not increase discharge of stormwater runoff onto the farmlands below.X
Island Crossing Subarea
PL-16.89 The property owners and City has been actively pursuing having this area brought into the UGA
since at least 1995.It has a long history of being drawn into the UGA,only to be challenged in
court and those decisions reversed. Nevertheless, Council continues to support it being drawn
into the UGA.
X
PL-16.90 As much of the area is within the 100-year floodplain and floods rather frequently,a drainage
plan would have to be developed and implemented to alleviate this problem.X
PL-16.91 A plan would also have to be developed for providing the necessary infrastructure to serve this
area were it to develop.X
The Airport
GL-17
PL-17.1 Promote a compatible relationship between the airport operations and surrounding land uses
through the application of proper zoning and the Airport Protection ordinance.X X X X
PL-17.2 Secure airport approach zones through either purchase or annexation and zoning,so that the
City can enforce regulatory controls in those areas.X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
PL-17.3 Secure avigation easements from new developments that are proposed within the airport
influence zone.X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
PL-17.4 The Arlington Airport is designated as an “Essential Transportation Facility.” This designation
provides leverage to maintain compatible zoning and land use options and helps protect its
airspace in the approach and transitional surface areas.
X X X X
PL-17.5 Implement the Airport Protection District to protect aviation interests by applying FAA and
WSDOT policies and land use restrictions.X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
PL-17.6 Obtain interlocal agreements with adjacent jurisdictions to help implement airport protection
policies.X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
PL-17.7 Until the Airport Protection Overlay Zone is adopted by Snohomish County and City of
Marysville the City should maintain a utility policy that requires that properties be annexed into
the City prior to obtaining sewer service.
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
As an Essential Public Facility, protect the Arlington Municipal Airport from encroaching non-compatible land uses so as to maintain its long-term viability.
1/3/12 Land Use Page 27
Goal/Policy
PN
D SR
R-
L
M
D
R-
M
D
R-
H
D
OT
OT
B
D
-
1
OT
B
D
-
2
OT
B
D
-
3
NC GC HC BP LI GI
MS AF
P/
S
P
Applicable Land Use Designations
PL-25.3 Prepare a documentation of the history of Arlington Naval Air Station in a format that can be
distributed to local schools, other organizations and placed on the City of Arlington website.X X X X
PL-25.4 DELETE this section.Actively seek grant funding for the rehabilitation of the Navy Hangar and
Engine Repair Building.X
GL-26
PL-26.1 Participate with Snohomish County in the Transfer of Development Rights program.X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
PL-26.2 Support the viability of long-term agricultural uses in the valley.X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
PL-26.3 Protect the natural resources of the valley.X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
PL-26.4 Maintain the valley's open space as a gateway to the City.X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
PL-26.5 Work with property owners,other jurisdictions,the Stillaguamish Tribe,and other interested
parties toward a long-term protection strategy.X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
PL-26.6 Designate the floodplain between SR-9 and I-5 as an Open Space Corridor pursuant to the
Growth Management Act, RCW 36.70A.160.X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
Public/Semi-Public Land Use
GL-27
PL-27.1 Public and semi-public development should be held to the same standards as private
development.X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
PL-27.2 Require new public/semi-public development proposals to include the design and construction
of walkways and/or sidewalks to integrate and link commercial activities and other
neighborhoods within the urban growth area.
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
Minimizing Risk of Natural Disasters
GL-28
PL-28.1 Arlington shall maintain a current comprehensive emergency management plan which shall
based on a hazard analysis and as a minimum include a basic document with the elements
listed in WAC 118-30-060 (1)-(8).Said plan shall address all natural and man-made
emergencies and disasters to which Arlington is vulnerable,and shall specify the purpose,
organization,responsibilities and facilities of agencies and officials of the political subdivision in
the mitigation of,preparation for,response to,and recovery from emergencies and disasters.
(Paraphrased from WAC 118-30-030 (9))
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
Prepare for and be able to respond to any predictable threat from natural disaster.
Promote equity in development regulations between private and public lands.
Protect the Stillaguamish Valley from further development.
1/3/12 Land Use Page 28
Goal/Policy
PN
D SR
R-
L
M
D
R-
M
D
R-
H
D
OT
OT
B
D
-
1
OT
B
D
-
2
OT
B
D
-
3
NC GC HC BP LI GI
MS AF
P/
S
P
Applicable Land Use Designations
PL-28.2 Regulate land use and development to protect natural topographic,geologic,vegetational,and
hydrological features in a manner that protects the citizens from those natural features through
avoidance of exposure.
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
PL-28.3 Protect geologically hazardous areas,especially forested steep slopes,recognizing that these
areas provide multiple critical areas functions.X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
PL-28.4 Promote soil stability and the use of the natural drainage system by retaining critical areas of
existing native vegetation.X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
PL-28.5 Prohibit development on unstable land and restrict development on potentially unstable land to
ensure public safety and conformity with natural constraints.X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
1/3/12 Land Use Page 20
Goal/Policy
PN
D SR
R-
L
M
D
R-
M
D
R-
H
D
OT
OT
B
D
-
1
OT
B
D
-
2
OT
B
D
-
3
NC GC HC BP LI GI
MS AF
P/
S
P
Applicable Land Use Designations
PL-16.87 The forested steep slopes along the floodplain should be protected for both environmental and
aesthetic purposes.X
PL-16.88
Care should be taken to not increase discharge of stormwater runoff onto the farmlands below.X
Island Crossing Subarea
PL-16.89 The property owners and City has been actively pursuing having this area brought into the UGA
since at least 1995.It has a long history of being drawn into the UGA,only to be challenged in
court and those decisions reversed. Nevertheless, Council continues to support it being drawn
into the UGA.
X
PL-16.90 As much of the area is within the 100-year floodplain and floods rather frequently,a drainage
plan would have to be developed and implemented to alleviate this problem.X
PL-16.91 A plan would also have to be developed for providing the necessary infrastructure to serve this
area were it to develop.X
The Airport
GL-17
PL-17.1 Promote a compatible relationship between the airport operations and surrounding land uses
through the application of proper zoning and the Airport Protection ordinance.X X X X
PL-17.2 Secure airport approach zones through either purchase or annexation and zoning,so that the
City can enforce regulatory controls in those areas.X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
PL-17.3 Secure avigation easements from new developments that are proposed within the airport
influence zone.X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
PL-17.4 The Arlington Airport is designated as an “Essential Transportation Facility.” This designation
provides leverage to maintain compatible zoning and land use options and helps protect its
airspace in the approach and transitional surface areas.
X X X X
PL-17.5 Implement the Airport Protection District to protect aviation interests by applying FAA and
WSDOT policies and land use restrictions.X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
PL-17.6 Obtain interlocal agreements with adjacent jurisdictions to help implement airport protection
policies.X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
PL-17.7 Until the Airport Protection Overlay Zone is adopted by Snohomish County and City of
Marysville the City should maintain a utility policy that requires that properties be annexed into
the City prior to obtaining sewer service.
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
As an Essential Public Facility, protect the Arlington Municipal Airport from encroaching non-compatible land uses so as to maintain its long-term viability.
1/3/12 Land Use Page 27
Goal/Policy
PN
D SR
R-
L
M
D
R-
M
D
R-
H
D
OT
OT
B
D
-
1
OT
B
D
-
2
OT
B
D
-
3
NC GC HC BP LI GI
MS AF
P/
S
P
Applicable Land Use Designations
PL-25.3 Prepare a documentation of the history of Arlington Naval Air Station in a format that can be
distributed to local schools, other organizations and placed on the City of Arlington website.X X X X
PL-25.4 DELETE this section.Actively seek grant funding for the rehabilitation of the Navy Hangar and
Engine Repair Building.X
GL-26
PL-26.1 Participate with Snohomish County in the Transfer of Development Rights program.X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
PL-26.2 Support the viability of long-term agricultural uses in the valley.X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
PL-26.3 Protect the natural resources of the valley.X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
PL-26.4 Maintain the valley's open space as a gateway to the City.X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
PL-26.5 Work with property owners,other jurisdictions,the Stillaguamish Tribe,and other interested
parties toward a long-term protection strategy.X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
PL-26.6 Designate the floodplain between SR-9 and I-5 as an Open Space Corridor pursuant to the
Growth Management Act, RCW 36.70A.160.X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
Public/Semi-Public Land Use
GL-27
PL-27.1 Public and semi-public development should be held to the same standards as private
development.X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
PL-27.2 Require new public/semi-public development proposals to include the design and construction
of walkways and/or sidewalks to integrate and link commercial activities and other
neighborhoods within the urban growth area.
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
Minimizing Risk of Natural Disasters
GL-28
PL-28.1 Arlington shall maintain a current comprehensive emergency management plan which shall
based on a hazard analysis and as a minimum include a basic document with the elements
listed in WAC 118-30-060 (1)-(8).Said plan shall address all natural and man-made
emergencies and disasters to which Arlington is vulnerable,and shall specify the purpose,
organization,responsibilities and facilities of agencies and officials of the political subdivision in
the mitigation of,preparation for,response to,and recovery from emergencies and disasters.
(Paraphrased from WAC 118-30-030 (9))
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
Prepare for and be able to respond to any predictable threat from natural disaster.
Promote equity in development regulations between private and public lands.
Protect the Stillaguamish Valley from further development.
1/3/12 Land Use Page 28
Goal/Policy
PN
D SR
R-
L
M
D
R-
M
D
R-
H
D
OT
OT
B
D
-
1
OT
B
D
-
2
OT
B
D
-
3
NC GC HC BP LI GI
MS AF
P/
S
P
Applicable Land Use Designations
PL-28.2 Regulate land use and development to protect natural topographic,geologic,vegetational,and
hydrological features in a manner that protects the citizens from those natural features through
avoidance of exposure.
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
PL-28.3 Protect geologically hazardous areas,especially forested steep slopes,recognizing that these
areas provide multiple critical areas functions.X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
PL-28.4 Promote soil stability and the use of the natural drainage system by retaining critical areas of
existing native vegetation.X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
PL-28.5 Prohibit development on unstable land and restrict development on potentially unstable land to
ensure public safety and conformity with natural constraints.X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
City of Arlington Comprehensive Plan Public Services & Capital Facilities Element
11 - 10 7 February 2011May 2012
generally facilitate infiltration. In addition,
the City promotes Low Impact Development
(LID) practices such as: rain gardens, per-
meable pavements, vegetation mainte-
nance, and other source reduction tech-
niques; and bioswales, wetands, and other
natural treatment techniques. The City’s
largest basins which discharge untreated
stormwater to the Stillaguamish River are
the 284-acre Butler and 67-acre Talcott
subbasins draining Old Town Arlington.
The City has designed and has secured
funding and permits for the construction of a
treatment wetland for the Butler basin in
2011. Target parameters are sediment, nu-
trients, bacteria, and to a lesser degree,
temperature.
Staffing and Facilities. The Stormwater
Utility was officially created in September
2001, but was not funded by a utility rate
until five years later. Other City departments
provided stormwater services, including:
plan reviews and project inspections (Engi-
neering Dept.); maintenance (Street Dept
and contract vendors); monitoring (Natural
Resources, Water, and Wastewater Depts);
illicit discharge response and stream and
drainage basin investigations (Natural Re-
sources), and public education and out-
reach (Natural Resources). In 2008 the City
hired its first Stormwater Department em-
ployee, a technician, to administer the regu-
latory provisions of the NPDES Phase II
Municipal Stormwater Permit, including ed-
ucation, infrastructure inventories, outfall
screening, private and public storm facility
inspections, implementation of pollution
prevention plans for City facilities, mainte-
nance scheduling, and monitoring. City staff
continue to coordinate stormwater functions
across departmental lines.
Facilities include:
• Administrative Offices (3,300 sq. ft.)
• Stormwater Treatment Wetland (8.7
acres.)
• M & O facilities, shared (see 11.4.1.5)
• Numerous detention and infiltration facil-
ities within public areas
The utility has a single sport utility vehicle
and a vactor truck it shares with the other
utilities. It also has confined space entry
gear and sampling equipment. It has the
benefit of backhoes, loaders, trucks, and
other equipment within the other utilities and
Public Works divisions.
11.4.1.5 Maintenance & Operations
The Public Works Maintenance & Opera-
tions division provides maintenance ser-
vices for many elements of the City’s infra-
structure, including:
• Airport
• Cemetery
• Equipment (except for police and fire)
• City Facilities (except for water and
wastewater)
• Parks, athletic fields, and public spaces
• Storm drainage system
• Streets and sidewalks
The buildings associated with the mainte-
nance functions of the City include:
• Maintenance Shop (6,840 sq.ft.)
• Outbuilding (2,372 sq.ft.)
• Equipment Storage Building (2,832
sq.ft.)
11.4.1.6 Airport
The Arlington Municipal Airport is part of
the national system of airports, as well as
of the transportation infrastructure serving
the City of Arlington, Snohomish County,
and the northern portion of the Seattle-
Tacoma Metropolitan Area.
The Airport is located north of the Seattle-
Tacoma Metropolitan Area, approximately
three (3) miles southwest of the Arlington
Central Business District (CBD), approxi-
mately one-third (0.3) of a mile from the
Highway Commercial District, and twelve
(12) miles north of the City of Everett. It is
owned and operated by the City of Arlington
City of Arlington Comprehensive Plan Public Services & Capital Facilities Element
11 - 11 7 February 2011May 2012
and is contained within the corporate
boundaries of the City.3
The airport is 1,1891200 acres and includes
light industrial, general industrial, business
park Fightline, commercial, and public land
uses, in addition to the aviation operations.
The majority of the existing general aviation
facilities are located along the east side of
Runway 16/34, between 59th Avenue NE
and Taxiway “A”. This part of the airport is
developed with aircraft storage facilities,
including over 400 T-hangars and apron ar-
ea to accommodate over eighty tiedown
spaces. The City of Arlington owns 78108
of the existing T-hangars. There are also
many Fixed Base Operator (FBO), mainte-
nance, and individually owned aircraft stor-
age hangars throughout this area.
Additional general aviation facilities are de-
veloping along the south side of Runway
11/29, adjacent to the east end of the run-
way. These facilities include tiedown apron
space for approximately 30 aircraft and
complexes of 52 corporate hangars and
17several new business-related aircraft
storage hangars. The existing ultra-light
hangar complex is in the northwest quad-
rant of the airport and has storage for ap-
proximately 62 aircraft.
There are approximately 569475 aircraft
based at the airport (including 62 helicop-
ters,45 5 gliders, and 61 60 ultralights). The
airport’s hangar occupancy rate is 100 per-
cent currently. There is significant demand
for the additional aircraft storage facilities
(approximately 5085 aircraft owners are on
file requesting space).
The Airport is home to one of the largest
ExperimentalExperimental Aircraft Associa-
tion gatherings, the Arlington the Northwest
Experimental Aircraft Association (NWEAA)
Fly-In. It has sufficient area to accommo-
date both aviation and non-aviation devel-
opment in an airport industrial park in addi-
tion to the area used for the Experimental
3 Airport Layout Plan, June 2002 p. A-17.
Aircraft Association (EAA)Arlington Fly-In.
The industrial park is approximately 102
acres and is located east of 59th Avenue NE,
within the northeast quadrant.
There are approximately 17030 businesses
on airport property that lease land and/or
facilities from the City. Approximately 25%
of these businesses involve aviation or avia-
tion-related uses associated with the airport.
The remaining businesses are non-aviation
uses in the Industrial Park, Business Park
and the Commercial zones on the airport.
The GMA recognizes airports in two ways.
Airports are considered essential public f a-
cilities under the GMA (RCW 36.70A.200)
and cities are required to plan accordingly to
protect them. In addition, RCW 36.70A.510
recognizes the potential conflict between
airports and surrounding uses and directs
that every county, city and town shall dis-
courage siting of incompatible uses next to
airports.
Arlington’s Municipal Code permits airports
and aviation-related uses in the Aviation
Flightline zoning district, thereby addressing
the requirements of RCW 36.70A.200, Es-
sential Public Facilities. To address the po-
tential conflict between the airport and other
land uses, the City has adopted an Airport
Protection ordinance and future zoning
should be compatible with the airport opera-
tions. could consider policies and regula-
tions designed to head off conflict as the
City grows. See §11.6.1.6 for further dis-
cussion.
11.4.1.7 Information Services
The Information Services Division provides
the entire network and telephone communi-
cation services for the City’s 118 full-time
employees as well as approximately 35 vol-
unteer firefighters. It currently has two full
time employee positions and two vehicles.
The Division’s 192 square feet of offices are
attached to the City Public Works Shop
Compound.4
4
City of Arlington Comprehensive Plan Public Services & Capital Facilities Element
11 - 13 7 February 2011May 2012
Table 11-4: Inventory of City Facilities
Facility Dept Address Street SF Year Built Public? Use
Original
Cost
Type of
Construction
City Hall Administration 238 N Olympic 8,578 1924 public admin, City Concrete
Police Station Police 110 E 3rd Street 18,000 2005 public Police annex Block
Library Administration 135 N Washington 5,140 1979 public Library $500,000 Masonry
Butler House Administration 200 W Cox public meeting room Wood Frame
Butler Barn Administration 200 W Cox 8,500 public vacant Pole Building
Butler Creamery Administration 200 W Cox 628 public vacant Block
Butler Loafing Shed Administration 200 W Cox 500 public vacant Wood Frame
Airport Office Airport 18204 59th Dr NE 1,3973550 20091978 public admin, Airport Wood/steel Frame
Cemetery Office &
Maintenance Building Finance 20310 67th Ave 2,700 2000 public
admin, Cemetery,
& maintenance shop $165,000 Wood Frame
Cemetery Storage/Well Building Finance 20310 67th Ave 792 1952 public storage & well Block
Fire Admin Fire 115 N Macleod 1,125 public admin, Fire Wood Frame
Siren/Antenna Building Fire 3rd & Robin Hood 90 public fire siren & antenna Block
Fire Station 46 Fire 137 N Macleod 6,618 1962 public fire station Masonry
Fire Station 47 Fire 6231 188th St NE 3,820 1984 public fire station Wood Frame
City Shop M&O 6205 188th Place NE 6,840 1944 public maintenance shop $30,000 Wood Frame
Boy's & Girl's Club/
Community Room M&O 18513 59th Drive 17,222 1992 public Recreation, meeting room $889,000
Restroom, Evans Park M&O 18813 59th Dr NE 396 1977 public restroom, park Wood Frame
Restroom, Quake Park M&O 18501 59th Dr NE 385 1973 public restroom, park $6,000 Block
Restroom, Haller Park M&O 1100 West Ave 508 1968 public restroom, park $11,000 Block
Restroom, Terrace Park M&O 809 E 5th St 360 1974 public restroom, park $5,942 Block
Restroom, Twin Rivers Park M&O SR-530 437 1982 public restroom, park $25,000 Block
City Shop Storage M&O 6205 188th Place NE 1,104 1944 public storage $30,000 Wood Frame
City Shop Equipment Shed M&O 6205 188th Place NE 2,832 1984 public storage Pole Building
City Shop Equipment Shed M&O 6205 188th Place NE 2,372 public storage Pole Building
York Park Garage M&O 3209 180th St NE 720 public storage Pole Building
Garage (Martin's) M&O 138 N Washington 720 public storage Wood Frame
York Park House M&O 3209 180th St NE 1,000 public vacant Wood Frame
Utilities Office Utilities 816 N West Ave 1,188 1992 public admin, Utilities $47,500 Wood Frame
City of Arlington Comprehensive Plan Public Services & Capital Facilities Element
11 - 14 7 February 2011May 2012
Facility Dept Address Street SF Year Built Public? Use
Original
Cost
Type of
Construction
Waste Water Office Utilities 108 W Haller 1,396 1987 public admin, Utilities $50,600 Wood Frame
Gleneagle Pump Station Utilities 17911 Country Club Dr 612 1993 public pump station $400,000 Block
Burn Hill Reservoir Utilities 200 Burn Rd 1,963 1962 public reservoir $150,000 Steel
Gleneagle Reservoir Utilities 17911 Country Club Dr 8,164 1975 public reservoir $400,000 Concrete
Reservoir Utilities 17003 91st Ave 13,267 1993 public reservoir $560,000 Steel
Waste Water Control Building Utilities 816 N West Ave 2,592 1999 public utilities control building Block
Waste Water Dewatering/
Lime Storage Utilities 816 N West Ave 1,722 1999 public utilities dewatering & lime storage $1,500,000 Block
Waste Water Electrical Building Utilities 816 N West Ave 441 public utilities electrical building Block
Waste Water Head Works Utilities 816 N West Ave 1,100 1999 public utilities head works Concrete
Waste Water Lab Utilities 816 N West Ave 864 1992 public utilities lab $101,000 Wood Frame
Utilities Shop Utilities 816 N West Ave 1,584 1975 public utilities shop $75,000 Block
Utilities Storage Building Utilities 816 N West Ave 600 1999 public utilities storage $10,000 Pole Building
Waste Water Storage Building Utilities 816 N West Ave 228 public utilities storage Block
Valve House Utilities 17003 91st Ave 572 1993 public valve house $105,000 Wood Frame
Water Treatment Plant (new) Utilities 816 N West Ave 5,000 2001 public water treatment plant $2,500,000 Concrete & Block
Water Treatment Plant (old) Utilities 816 N West Ave 5,000 1924 public
water treatment plant
(decommissioned) Concrete
Airport Well Utilities 18300 59th Dr 112 public well Wood Frame
Well 2 Utilities 1100 West Ave 513 2001 public well $300,000 Block
Well 3 Utilities 1100 West Ave 169 2001 public well Block
Aviation Inspection & Repair Airport 18928 59th Dr NE 3,686 1966 rented airplane inspection & repair Wood Frame
Navy Hanger Museum Airport 18008 59th Dr NE 25,746 1943 rented aviation museum $120,000 Wood Frame
West Coast Air Cargo Airport 18615 58th Ave NE 4,422 1944 rented cargo company $24,000 Wood Frame
Hanger A Delete Airport 17804 59th Dr NE 13,050 1960 rented hangers Pole Building
Hanger B Delete Airport 17912 59th Dr NE 13,050 1980 rented hangers Pole Building
Hanger C Airport 17910 59th Dr NE 12,960 1971 rented hangers Pole Building
Hanger D Airport 17908 59th Dr NE 12,960 1972 rented hangers $36,260 Pole Building
Hanger E Airport 17906 59th Dr NE 12,960 1974 rented hangers Pole Building
Hanger G Airport 17818 59th Dr NE 12,000 1975 rented hangers Pole Building
Hanger H Airport 17816 59th Dr NE 12,960 1976 rented hangers Pole Building
Hanger J Airport 17814 59th Dr NE 12,960 1977 rented hangers Pole Building
City of Arlington Comprehensive Plan Other Plans Adopted by Reference
12 - 3 7 February 2011May 2012
The City’s Comprehensive Stormwater Plan
was last updated in October 2010 and
adoption by Arlington City Council is pend-
ing (anticipated February 2011). The prior
plan was last prepared in 1995. The Plan
presents: a review of issues driving storm-
water management within the City; a de-
scription of the physyical environment influ-
encing stormwater in the City; an evaluation
of the MS4, by subbasins, and its needs for
correcting existing deficiencies, or accom-
modating anticipated growth; an evaluation
of staffing requirements to meet regulatory
programs required under the stormwater
discharge permit; a description and sched-
ule of improvements, and a financial plan to
accomplish the improvements. Federal and
state regulatory programs that are ad-
dressed through implementation of this Plan
include:
• Federal Clean Water Act NPDES re-
quirements.
• Federal Clean Water Act total maximum
daily load (TMDL) requirements, for the
Stillaguamish River and the Quilceda-
Allen watershed.
• Federal Safe Drinking Water Act well-
head protection requirements.
• Federal Endangered Species Act.
• State Water Quality Standards.
• Stillaguamish Instream Flow Rule
(State).
• State Underground Injection Control
program.
• State GMA requirements.
• State Centennial Clean Water Fund
grant requirements.
12.5 ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT PLAN
The Arlington Economic Development Plan,
adopted in October 2005, is a blueprint of
action items designed to give guidance to
the City in terms of proactive steps the City
can take to increase economic develop-
ment. See §10.4.2, Economic Development
Plan, for a description of the plan, and
§10.5.3, Specific Actions from the Economic
Development Plan, for a description of the-
se action items.
12.6 AIRPORT MASTER
PLAN
The Arlington City Council adopted the Ar-
lington Municipal Airport Master Plan in
1995. The Master Plan Plan was updated in
2002 and again in 2012.currently in use was
revised in June of 2002. This was due in
part by the Federal Aviation Administration's
(FAA) request to show the Fly-In and Arling-
ton Aeronautical Development land use
plans. Its revision cycle is every five to six
years. The report determined the short-, in-
termediate-, and long-range needs for facili-
ties at Arlington Municipal Airport.
The planned improvements recommended
therein were intended to:
• Allow Arlington Municipal Airport to con-
tinue to serve the general avia-
tion/corporate and aviation-related
needs of the area.
• Continue to provide those facilities
needed to serve the traditional users of
the Airport.
• Permit the continued development of the
Airport to serve potential increases in
the services required.
• Maintain a high degree of flexibility in
design so that future changes in the
designation of the Airport and needs of
potential users can be accommodated.
The Master Plan report includes a determi-
nation of the anticipated growth to be expe-
rienced at Arlington Municipal Airport and
an evaluation of the ability of the existing
facilities to accommodate this demand.
In preparing the scope and direction for the
Master Plan, it was determined that given
the context which the Arlington Airport is
currently operating within, it would be nec-
City of Arlington Comprehensive Plan Other Plans Adopted by Reference
12 - 4 7 February 2011May 2012
essary to analyze four different operational
alternatives, or roles, which the Airport
might be expected to serve over the speci-
fied planning period. The four roles, which
were analyzed as part of this master plan-
ning effort included:
• Remaining in its traditional role as a
general aviation-only facility. The Airport
would then respond to the forecasted
needs of the user group.
• Expanding the role of the Airport to pro-
vide regional commuter passenger ser-
vice. The Airport would assume regional
commuter passenger service and exist-
ing facilities would be provided to ac-
commodate aircraft such as the
Fairchild Metroliner, or Dornier 328.
• Promoting the Airport as an aviation-
related industrial facility. The Airport
would assume an industrial air cargo
role and would provide the necessary
facilities to accommodate aircraft such
as the Bae 146-100 cargo aircraft.
• Promoting the Airport as a business and
corporate aviation facility. The Airport
would assume a business/corporate role
and would provide the necessary im-
provements to accommodate aircraft
such as the IAI 1125 Westwind business
jet.
The traditional role of the Arlington Munici-
pal Airport is that of a general aviation (GA)
facility. This was determined after consider-
ation of all of the data and analyses pre-
sented during the preceding elements of the
Master Plan update. In addition, and after
much consideration, the Arlington Master
Plan Advisory Committee unanimously
chose the role to remain as a traditional
general aviation airport, including support of
business/corporate aircraft uses. The fore-
casts generated for the preferred each of
the four operational scenarios were then
used to determine whether or not existing
facilities at the Airport would be sufficient to
accommodate the forecast growth activity.
The Advisory Committee's recommenda-
tions were presented to both the Arlington
Airport Commission and the Arlington City
Council for review and approval. The Com-
mission and the Council both voted unani-
mously in support of the Advisory Commit-
tee's recommendations, and the Airport
Layout Plan was further refined to support
these decisions. Hence, the Airport remains
in its traditional GA role and existing facili-
ties will respond to the forecasted needs of
the user group.
The Master Plan is comprised of the follow-
ing:
• Airport Activity Forecasts
• Facility Requirements
• Development Concepts and Alternative
Analysis
• Airport Environs Land Use Plan and
Noise Analysis
• Airport Plans and Development Program
Forecasting is the key element in the plan-
ning process. Forecasts are essential for
analyzing existing airport facilities and iden-
tifying future needs and requirements for
these facilities. Historic and existing airport
activity plays an important role in determin-
ing future activity. Historically, the socioeco-
nomic conditions of a particular region im-
pact aviation activity within that region. Lo-
cal and itinerant operations as well as
based aircraft at the field help to project fu-
ture operations. The amount and kind of
aviation activity occurring at an airport is
dependant upon many factors, but are usu-
ally reflective of the services available to
aircraft operators, the businesses located
on the airport or within the community, and
the general economic conditions prevalent
within the surrounding area. The most often
analyzed indicators are population, em-
ployment, and income.
The ability of an airport to accommodate the
existing and forecasted aviation activity is
primarily a function of the major aircraft op-
erating surfaces that compose the facility
and the configuration of those surfaces
(runways and taxiways). Facility require-
ments are also related to and considered in
City of Arlington Comprehensive Plan Other Plans Adopted by Reference
12 - 5 7 February 2011May 2012
conjunction with weather conditions, the
surrounding airspace, the availability and
type of navigational facilities, and the type
and amount of landside access.
Development Concepts and Recommenda-
tions are presented in the Master Plan in
terms of both their concept and reasoning.
Therefore, several basic assumptions have
been established, which are intended to di-
rect the future expansion of airport devel-
opment. These assumptions are supported
by the aviation activity forecasts and include
a commitment for continued Airport expan-
sion, which supports the need of the region
and thus generates economic development.
The Airport Environs Land Use Plan and
Noise Analysis was developed due to the
following. The relationship between airports
and surrounding land uses is a very sensi-
tive issue in most communities today.
Hence, it must be carefully monitored and
regulated to avoid future airport/community
conflicts. Land use planning considerations
set forth in this document are intended to
present clear and concise recommendations
regarding the ownership and development
of land within the Arlington Municipal Airport
influence area. Interested parties would in-
clude homeowners and buyers, homebuild-
ers, developers, area representatives, and
local jurisdiction having land use control au-
thority.
The two primary issues associated with land
use planning in the vicinity of airports are
safety and noise. The issue of safety per-
tains to both public on the ground and the
public involved with the flight operation. The
issue of noise is related to the operation of
an aircraft and its impact upon the surround-
ing influence area of the airport.
The Washington State Growth Management
Act (GMA), requires that the comprehensive
plan of each county and city that plan under
the GMA, include a process for identifying
and siting essential public facilities. Airports
are designated as essential public facilities
within the State of Washington; therefore,
the implementation of both land use and
development controls is vested within the
authority of local city, county, or state gov-
ernments and they are responsible for en-
suring compatible land use and appropriate
zoning requirements around airports.
Under the Airport Plans and Development
Program, the plan for the future develop-
ment of Arlington Municipal Airport has
evolved from an analysis of numerous con-
siderations. Among these are: aviation de-
mand, aviation activity forecasts, aircraft
operational characteristics, facility require-
ments, and environmental considerations. In
addition, the general direction or thrust of
future airport development, as expressed by
the City of Arlington and as characterized in
the statement of goals, served as a basis for
this airport planning process.
12.7 SHORELINE MASTER
PLAN
The City has adopted the 1974 Snohomish
County Shoreline Management Master Pro-
gram as its Shoreline Master Plan, though it
has been amended numerous times. Truth
told, it is a very old document and complete-
ly out of line with today’s laws and sensibili-
ties. The City is required under state law to
update its shoreline plan by 2009.
12.8 ARLINGTON SCHOOL
DISTRICT CAPITAL
FACILITIES PLAN
The Arlington School District is required to
prepare a 6-year Capital Facilities Plan eve-
ry two years. Based on projected growth,
this plan details the projected capital facili-
ties the district will need to provide the re-
quired educational services. Every two
years the district applies for a Comprehen-
sive Plan amendment through the City so as
to incorporate their latest plan. It is on this
plan that school impact fees are based.
City of Arlington
Council Agenda Bill
Item:
NB #4
Attachment
F
COUNCIL MEETING DATE:
May 7, 2012
SUBJECT:
Ordinance approving 43rd Avenue NE / 172nd Street Comprehensive Plan Amendment
(CPA) and Concurrent Rezone (PLN20120004)
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Ordinance
2. 43rd / 172nd CPA and Concurrent Rezone – Proposed Land Use and Zoning
Maps
DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN
Community Development – David Kuhl, 360-403-3445; Todd Hall, 360-403-3436
EXPENDITURES REQUESTED: -0-
BUDGET CATEGORY: N/A
LEGAL REVIEW:
DESCRIPTION:
Planning staff is recommending a change to the land use designation and zoning of
approximately 4 acres of a City-owned property, a portion of parcel #31052100400100,
which is located at the NE corner of 43rd Avenue NE and 172nd St. NE (SR 531). The site
is currently designated and zoned Public/Semi-Public (P/SP) and is proposed to
change to Highway Commercial (HC) to accommodate future commercial
development. The site was previously reserved for the development of a fire station,
which is no longer proposed for that location.
HISTORY:
This item is listed on the 2012 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Final Docket, which
was approved by City Council on March 5, 2012.
ALTERNATIVES
1. No action.
2. Remand to staff to clarify any issue that Council deems appropriate.
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
I move to adopt the ordinance approving the 43rd Avenue NE / 172nd Street
Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Concurrent Rezone.
ORDINANCE NO. _____ 1
ORDINANCE NO. 2012-xxx
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ARLINGTON, WASHINGTON
APPROVING THE 43rd AVENUE NE / 172nd STREET NE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
AMENDMENT AND CONCURRENT REZONE
WHEREAS, the City of Arlington, Washington has the authority to regulate land uses
within the City, and has gone through its periodic review and update of the Comprehensive Plan;
and
WHEREAS, the City of Arlington Comprehensive Plan may be updated once per year
per RCW 36.70A.130; and
WHEREAS, included in the review of the Comprehensive Plan was a proposed
amendment to the City of Arlington Land Use Map of the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map;
and
WHEREAS, the 43rd Avenue NE / 172nd Street NE Comprehensive Plan Amendment is
included in the 2012 Comprehensive Plan Amendment docket; and
WHEREAS, staff reviewed the project for environmental impacts under the State
Environmental Protection Act and issued a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) on March
8, 2012 for the 43rd Avenue NE / 172nd Street NE Comprehensive Plan Amendment and
Concurrent Rezone; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the proposed Comprehensive Plan
land use map amendment and rezone at their March 20, 2012 public hearing and made a
recommendation to the City Council to adopt the amendment and rezone. The City Council
considered the amendment and rezone at their March 12, 2012 workshop and at a public hearing
on April 2, 2012 and determined approving the amendment and rezone was in the best interest of
the City and its citizens.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Arlington do hereby ordain as
follows:
Section 1. 43rd Avenue NE / 172nd Street NE Comprehensive Plan Amendment and
Concurrent Rezone. The City of Arlington Official Zoning Map, pursuant to AMC
§20.36.100, and the Land Use Map of the Comprehensive Plan shall be amended as
shown in Exhibit 1 (Proposed Highway Commercial Land Use Amendment) and Exhibit
2 (Proposed Highway Commercial Zoning Amendment), amending land use designations
and zoning as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. _____ 2
Parcel # 31052100400100 - Change land use and zoning designations of the NE
corner of 43rd Avenue NE / 172nd Street NE from Public-Semi Public (P/SP) to
Highway Commercial (HC).
Section 2. Severability. If any provision, section, or part of this ordinance shall be
adjudged to be invalid or unconstitutional, such adjudication shall not affect the validity
of the ordinance as a whole or any section, provision or part thereof not adjudged invalid
or unconstitutional.
Section 3. Effective Date. A summary of this Ordinance consisting of its title shall
be published in the official newspaper of the City, and shall take effect and be in full
force five (5) days of the date of publication.
PASSED BY the City Council and APPROVED by the Mayor this day of
________________, 2012.
CITY OF ARLINGTON
____________________________
Barbara Tolbert, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________
Kristin Banfield, City Clerk
APPROVED TO AS FORM:
__________________________
Steven J. Peiffle, City Attorney
UV9
!"`$
?Ó
?Ô
SR
530
SR 530 211TH PL NE
186TH ST NE
CEMETERY RD
SR 531
51ST AVE NE
TVEIT RD
188TH ST NE
E BURKE AVE
PIONEER HWY E
N OLYMPIC AVE
E HIGHLAND DR
47TH AVE NE
172ND ST NE
204TH ST NE
67TH
AVE
NE
172ND ST NE MCELROY RD
59TH AVE NE
SMOKEY POINT BLVD
SMOKEY POINT BLVD
SR 9
SR
9
N WEST AVE
BURN RD
City ofMarysville
City of Arlington
Cartographer:
File Name:
LandUseAmendNF_24x26_12.mxd
Maps and GIS data are distributed “AS-IS” without warranties of any kind, either express or im plied, including but not lim ited to w arranties of suitabilityfor a particular purpose or use. Map data are compiled from a variety of sources which may contain errors and users who rely upon the information do so at their own risk. Users agree to indem nify, defend, and hold harmless the City of Arlington for any and all liability of any nature arising out of or resulting from the lack of accuracyor correctness of the data, or the use of the data presented in the maps.
Proposed HighwayCommercial Land UseAmendment
Date:
Stream courses, waterbo dies (2009) Snoho mish C ounty Dept of In formation Syste ms GIS d ata se t.
Pa rce ls d ownlo aded from Snoh omish County Assessor's FTPsite 201 1.
Legend
172ND ST NE SR 531
HC
RMD BP
GC
BPP/SP
172ND ST NE SR 531
HC
HC
RMD BP
GC
BP
Curr ent C ity a nd U G A L and U se
Existing P/SP land use
SR = S urbur ban R esidentia l
RLM D = Lo w t o M oder ate D ensity R esidentia l
RM D = M ode rate Density Residen tial
RH D = H igh D ensity R esidential
OT RD = O ld Tow n R esidential Distr ict
NC = N eighbo rhood Com m er cia l
!!!!!
!!!!!
!!!!!
!!!!!OT BD - 1 = O ld Town Busine ss Distr ict 1
OT BD - 2 = O ld Town Busine ss Distr ict 2
D D D D D
D D D D D
D D D D D
D D D D D OT BD - 3 = O ld Town Busine ss Distr ict 3
GC = G ene ral C om m ercial
HC = H ighw ay C om m ercial
BP = Business P ark
LI = L ight In dustrial
GI = G ener al Indust rial
P/S P = P ublic/S em i-P ublic
MS = Me dical Se rvices
AF = Aviation F lightline
kdk
01/30/2012
Proposed H C land use
Proposed
HC = Hig hway Comm ercia l
UV9
!"`$
?Ó
?Ô
SR
530
SR 530 211TH PL NE
186TH ST NE
CEMETERY RD
SR 531
51ST AVE NE
TVEIT RD
188TH ST NE
E BURKE AVE
PIONEER HWY E
N OLYMPIC AVE
E HIGHLAND DR
47TH AVE NE
172ND ST NE
204TH ST NE
67TH
AVE
NE
172ND ST NE MCELROY RD
59TH AVE NE
SMOKEY POINT BLVD
SMOKEY POINT BLVD
SR 9
SR
9
N WEST AVE
BURN RD
City ofMarysville
City of Arlington
Cartographer:
File Name:
ZoningAmendNF_24x26_12.mxd
Maps and GIS data are distributed “AS-IS” without warranties of any kind, either express or im plied, including but not lim ited to w arranties of suitabilityfor a particular purpose or use. Map data are compiled from a variety of sources which may contain errors and users who rely upon the information do so at their own risk. Users agree to indem nify, defend, and hold harmless the City of Arlington for any and all liability of any nature arising out of or resulting from the lack of accuracyor correctness of the data, or the use of the data presented in the maps.
Proposed HighwayCommercial ZoningAmendment
Date:
Stream courses, waterbo dies (2009) Snoho mish C ounty Dept of In formation Syste ms GIS d ata se t.
Pa rce ls d ownlo aded from Snoh omish County Assessor's FTPsite 201 1.
Legend
172ND ST NE SR 531
HC
BP
HC
BPP/SP
GC
RMD
172ND ST NE SR 531
HC
HC
BP
HC
BP
GC
RMD
Curr ent C ity a nd U G A Z oning
Existing P/SPzoning
SR = S urbur ban R esidentia l
RLM D = Lo w t o M oder ate D ensity R esidentia l
RM D = M ode rate Density Residen tial
RH D = H igh D ensity R esidential
OT RD = O ld Tow n R esidential Distr ict
NC = N eighbo rhood Com m er cia l
!!!!!
!!!!!
!!!!!
!!!!!OT BD - 1 = O ld Town Busine ss Distr ict 1
OT BD - 2 = O ld Town Busine ss Distr ict 2
D D D D D
D D D D D
D D D D D
D D D D D OT BD - 3 = O ld Town Busine ss Distr ict 3
GC = G ene ral C om m ercial
HC = H ighw ay C om m ercial
BP = Business P ark
LI = L ight In dustrial
GI = G ener al Indust rial
P/S P = P ublic/S em i-P ublic
MS = Me dical Se rvices
AF = Aviation F lightline
kdk
01/30/2012
Proposed H C zoning
Propose d
HC = Highway Comm ercia l
City of Arlington
Council Agenda Bill
Item:
NB #5
Attachment
G
COUNCIL MEETING DATE:
May 7, 2012
SUBJECT:
Ordinance approving 43rd Avenue NE – 51st Avenue NE (National Food)
Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA) (PLN20120005)
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Ordinance
2. 43rd Avenue NE – 51st Avenue NE (National Food) CPA - Proposed Land Use
Map
DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN
Community Development – David Kuhl, 360-403-3445; Todd Hall, 360-403-3436
EXPENDITURES REQUESTED: -0-
BUDGET CATEGORY: N/A
LEGAL REVIEW:
DESCRIPTION:
Planning staff is recommending a change to the land use designation of parcel #s
31052800100400, 31052800100500, 31052800100100, 31052800100101, 31052800100300,
31052800101300 and portion of 31052700200201 from General Commercial (GC) to
Highway Commercial (HC). This is change is to be consistent with the existing zoning
designation for the properties.
HISTORY:
This item is listed on the 2012 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Final Docket, which
was approved by City Council on March 5, 2012.
ALTERNATIVES
1. No action.
2. Remand to staff to clarify any issue that Council deems appropriate.
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
I move to adopt the ordinance approving the 43rd Avenue NE – 51st Avenue NE
(National Food) Comprehensive Plan Amendment.
ORDINANCE NO. _____ 1
ORDINANCE NO. 2012-xxx
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ARLINGTON, WASHINGTON
APPROVING THE 43rd AVENUE NE – 51st AVENUE NE (NATIONAL FOOD)
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
WHEREAS, the City of Arlington, Washington has the authority to regulate land uses
within the City, and has gone through its periodic review and update of the Comprehensive Plan;
and
WHEREAS, the City of Arlington Comprehensive Plan may be updated once per year
per RCW 36.70A.130; and
WHEREAS, included in the review of the Comprehensive Plan was a proposed
amendment to the City of Arlington Land Use Map of the Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, the 43rd Avenue NE – 51st Avenue NE (National Food) Comprehensive Plan
Amendment is included in the 2012 Comprehensive Plan Amendment docket; and
WHEREAS, staff reviewed the project for environmental impacts under the State
Environmental Protection Act and issued a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) on March
8, 2012 for the 43rd Avenue NE – 51st Avenue NE (National Food) Comprehensive Plan
Amendment; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the proposed Comprehensive Plan
land use map amendment at their March 20, 2012 public hearing and made a recommendation to
the City Council to adopt the amendment. The City Council considered the amendment at their
March 12, 2012 workshop and at a public hearing on April 2, 2012 and determined approving the
amendment was in the best interest of the City and its citizens.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Arlington do hereby ordain as
follows:
Section 1. 43rd Avenue NE – 51st Avenue NE (National Food) Comprehensive Plan
Amendment. The City of Arlington Land Use Map of the Comprehensive Plan shall be
amended as shown in Exhibit 1 (Proposed Highway Commercial Land Use Amendment),
amending land use designations as follows:
Parcel #s 31052800100400, 31052800100500, 31052800100100, 31052800100101,
31052800100300, 31052800101300 and portion of 31052700200201 – Change land
use designation from General Commercial (GC) to Highway Commercial (HC).
Section 2. Severability. If any provision, section, or part of this ordinance shall be
adjudged to be invalid or unconstitutional, such adjudication shall not affect the validity
ORDINANCE NO. _____ 2
of the ordinance as a whole or any section, provision or part thereof not adjudged invalid
or unconstitutional.
Section 3. Effective Date. A summary of this Ordinance consisting of its title shall
be published in the official newspaper of the City, and shall take effect and be in full
force five (5) days of the date of publication.
PASSED BY the City Council and APPROVED by the Mayor this day of
________________, 2012.
CITY OF ARLINGTON
____________________________
Barbara Tolbert, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________
Kristin Banfield, City Clerk
APPROVED TO AS FORM:
__________________________
Steven J. Peiffle, City Attorney
UV9
!"`$
?Ó
?Ô
SR
530
SR 530 211TH PL NE
186TH ST NE
CEMETERY RD
SR 531
51ST AVE NE
TVEIT RD
188TH ST NE
E BURKE AVE
PIONEER HWY E
N OLYMPIC AVE
E HIGHLAND DR
47TH AVE NE
172ND ST NE
204TH ST NE
67TH
AVE
NE
172ND ST NE MCELROY RD
59TH AVE NE
SMOKEY POINT BLVD
SMOKEY POINT BLVD
SR 9
SR
9
N WEST AVE
BURN RD
City ofMarysville
City of Arlington
Cartographer:
File Name:
LandUseAmendNF_24x26_12.mxd
Maps and GIS data are distributed “AS-IS” without warranties of any kind, either express or im plied, including but not lim ited to w arranties of suitabilityfor a particular purpose or use. Map data are compiled from a variety of sources which may contain errors and users who rely upon the information do so at their own risk. Users agree to indem nify, defend, and hold harmless the City of Arlington for any and all liability of any nature arising out of or resulting from the lack of accuracyor correctness of the data, or the use of the data presented in the maps.
Proposed HighwayCommercial Land UseAmendment
Date:
Stream courses, waterbo dies (2009) Snoho mish C ounty Dept of In formation Syste ms GIS d ata se t.
Pa rce ls d ownlo aded from Snoh omish County Assessor's FTPsite 201 1.
Legend
172ND ST NE
51ST
AVE
NE
SR 531
HC
RMD
RMD
GC
GI
LI
AFBP
GC
BPP/SP
51ST
AVE
NE
172ND ST NESR 531
HC
HC
RMD
RMD GC GI
LI
AF
BP
BPP/SP
GC
Curr ent C ity a nd U G A L and U se
Existing GC land use
SR = S urbur ban R esidentia l
RLM D = Lo w t o M oder ate D ensity R esidentia l
RM D = M ode rate Density Residen tial
RH D = H igh D ensity R esidential
OT RD = O ld Tow n R esidential Distr ict
NC = N eighbo rhood Com m er cia l
!!!!!
!!!!!
!!!!!
!!!!!OT BD - 1 = O ld Town Busine ss Distr ict 1
OT BD - 2 = O ld Town Busine ss Distr ict 2
D D D D D
D D D D D
D D D D D
D D D D D OT BD - 3 = O ld Town Busine ss Distr ict 3
GC = G ene ral C om m ercial
HC = H ighw ay C om m ercial
BP = Business P ark
LI = L ight In dustrial
GI = G ener al Indust rial
P/S P = P ublic/S em i-P ublic
MS = Me dical Se rvices
AF = Aviation F lightline
kdk
01/30/2012
Proposed H C land use
Proposed
HC = Hig hway Comm ercia l
City of Arlington
Council Agenda Bill
Item:
NB #6
Attachment
H
COUNCIL MEETING DATE:
May 7, 2012
SUBJECT:
67th Ave Phase III Authority to Bid Project
ATTACHMENTS:
None
DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN
Public Works – Eric Scott
EXPENDITURES REQUESTED: None
BUDGET CATEGORY: TIB Grant, Transportation Imp. Fund and
STP Grant
LEGAL REVIEW:
DESCRIPTION:
Design of 67th Ave Phase III is complete and sufficient funding has been allocated to
meet the engineers estimated cost of construction; staff is now requesting authority to
publically advertise for construction of this project.
HISTORY:
The 67th Ave Phase III project has completed the design process and has nearly
completed the ROW acquisition process, pending final approval of agreements with
BNSF. As such the project is moving forward with bidding and construction.
Estimated construction costs are $6,561,000.
ALTERNATIVES
• Remand to staff for additional information
• Table pending additional discussion
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
I move to grant City staff the authority to bid the project, subject to review by the City
Attorney and final approval by WSDOT Local Programs and the Transportation
Improvement Board.
City of Arlington
Council Agenda Bill
Item:
NB #7
Attachment
I
COUNCIL MEETING DATE:
May 7, 2012
SUBJECT:
67th Ave Phase III – KBA, Inc. Bid Support
ATTACHMENTS:
Local Agency Standard Consultant Contract for KBA, Inc.
DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN
Public Works – Eric Scott
EXPENDITURES REQUESTED: $33,000
BUDGET CATEGORY: TIB Grant, Transportation Imp. Fund and
STP Grant
LEGAL REVIEW:
DESCRIPTION:
Scope and fee to provide support services during the bid phase of the 67th Ave Phase III
Project.
HISTORY:
The 67th Ave Phase III project has completed the design process and has nearly
completed the ROW acquisition process, pending final approval of agreements with
BNSF. As such the project is moving forward with bidding and construction.
Through a selection process, KBA, Inc. was chosen to provide construction
management services for the project. Their scope for bid support services is being
presented.
ALTERNATIVES
• Remand to staff for additional information
• Table pending additional discussion
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
I move for Council to approve the contract with KBA, Inc. for Bid Support Services and
authorize the mayor to sign the Contract, subject to review by the City Attorney and
final approval by WSDOT Local Programs and the Transportation Improvement Board.
KBA, Inc. April 18, 2012
S:\Projects\Contracts\Client\Arlington\012005-01-67thAve-PhIII\Drafts&NegotiationRecords\In-houseDrafts\Pre-con (LAG)\Scope-Arlington-67th-(Revised)-2012-0418.docx 1 of 5
EXHIBIT A-1
SCOPE OF SERVICES
Preconstruction Services
for
67th Avenue Phase III
Contract No.
KBA, Inc. (Consultant) will provide preconstruction services to the City of Arlington (Client) for the Project
known as 67th Avenue - Phase III.
This initial contract scope of services is for preconstruction services only. Further scope and budget for
continued preconstruction services and construction-phase services will be negotiated and authorized via
a supplemental to this Agreement.
Project Description: The Project will improve 67th Avenue NE, between 204th Street NE and Lebanon
Street. The proposed improvements include widening of the roadway for a center two -way left turn lane,
completion of the Centennial Trail within Arlington, culvert crossings, and installation of sidewalks and
lighting. The Designer of Record on this Project is HDR, Inc. (Designer).
I. CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SERVICES
A. Consultant Contract and Team Management. Provide overall day-to-day management of
the consultant contract and team, including:
1. Decide on best modes and frequency of communication with Client and Designer, and use
them. Liaison and coordinate with Client on a regular basis to discuss Project issues and
status.
2. Manage Consultant Team, comprised of Consultant’s staff and subconsultants. Organize
and layout work for Consultant Team.
3. Review monthly expenditures and Consultant Team scope activities. Prepare and submit to
Client monthly, an invoice and progress report describing Consultant Team services provided
that month. Prepare and submit reporting required by funding source(s), if any.
Deliverables
Monthly invoices and progress reports
B. Preconstruction Services
1. Begin preparation of a Construction Management Plan (CM Plan) for the Project. The CM
Plan will be developed based on the Consultant’s boilerplate document, and modified to
adapt to and include Client practices and funding agency requirements, including forms to be
used on the Project. Submit to Client for review and comment, and finalize based on those
comments. The CM Plan will cover at least the following:
a. Communication and coordination between the CM Team, Designer, Client and other
stakeholders
b. Project procedures and forms
c. Document control system, using SharePoint
2. During Bidding period:
a. Lead the Pre-Bid meeting(s). (The Client will arrange for the meeting, and take and
distribute meeting notes.)
b. Assist in analyzing bidder questions, as needed.
c. Assist Designer in researching and preparing Addenda, as needed.
KBA, Inc. April 18, 2012
S:\Projects\Contracts\Client\Arlington\012005-01-67thAve-PhIII\Drafts&NegotiationRecords\In-houseDrafts\Pre-con (LAG)\Scope-Arlington-67th-(Revised)-2012-0418.docx 2 of 5
3. Assist Client in checking and analyzing bids and bidders.
Deliverables
Construction Management Plan, draft
C. Public Outreach
1. Provide services of public outreach specialist, EnviroIssues (Sub-Consultant) to assist the
Consultant AND Client during the preconstruction phase of the Project. The Consultant AND
Sub-Consultant will share in the responsibilities and work identified in this section. This work
will be described in more detail in a communication plan, to be submitted by the Consultant.
Continued public outreach services will be negotiated and authorized via a supplemental to
this Agreement. The preconstruction and construction phases for Public outreach work will
include the following tasks:
a. Communications Plan. Identify and compile preferred local communications avenues to
maximize outreach efforts during active construction. The plan will include emergency
response protocols, a construction information phone protocol, preferred local
communications avenues, and team structures and resources.
b. Pre-construction Community Meeting/Kick-off. Support the Client with a pre-construction
community kick -off and a “meet the construction team” meeting. The target audience for
this meeting will be affected property owners, residents and businesses in the Project
area as well as the general public.
c. Business Cards and Magnets with Contact Information. Develop business cards and
magnets that include key contact information - including the Project email address,
information phone line, and off-hours phone line. The Consultant will distribute the cards
as needed. Consultant will coordinate the advertising, coordination and materials
development for the preconstruction community meeting.
d. Construction Information Phone Line, Email and Issue Tracking. Set up, monitor and
respond to the Project information phone line and email address to field community
questions or concerns regarding construction. The information line and email account
will be checked during regular weekday office hours. Requests and inquiries will be
prioritized by the Sub-Consultant to reduce interruptions to the CM team and Contractor.
Urgent issues or issues that require team consultation will be forwarded to the
appropriate team member to address. Each inquiry, response and resolution will be
logged in the Project database. Any issues will be noted in the W eekly Outreach Report.
Calls received during off hours will be managed during the next working day. The Sub-
Consultant will coordinate with Client staff regarding any calls received specific to
construction on the Project during the next working day.
e. Communications and Contact Database and Outreach Reports. Utilize Sub-Consultant’s
web-based data management system (i.e. database) using Sub-Consultant’s existing
proprietary software to manage Project data, including but not limited to contacts,
comments and correspondence. Information stored in the database will be received
during construction through site visits and via the construction information line and email
account. This online system will include Project contact tracking, sorting and de-
duplication capabilities and can be set up to provide the Client access to view information
stored in the database.
f. Weekly Outreach Reports. Track all public concerns received and responses made in
the Project database. The log will be updated throughout the Project. The Sub-
Consultant will also generate and provide to the team weekly outreach reports, which will
note all correspondence received and sent during the past week and any issues that
were resolved or have yet to be resolved.
KBA, Inc. April 18, 2012
S:\Projects\Contracts\Client\Arlington\012005-01-67thAve-PhIII\Drafts&NegotiationRecords\In-houseDrafts\Pre-con (LAG)\Scope-Arlington-67th-(Revised)-2012-0418.docx 3 of 5
g. Construction Notifications. Support the Consultant in developing template and general
content for regular construction notifications regarding upcoming construction activities
and what to expect. These notifications may be developed and distributed in the
following formats:
i. Project Flyers. Develop an initial flyer template that can be updated on a periodic
basis as-needed based on upcoming work, and provided at information kiosks or
handed out during site visits. Flyers can be used by property owners with multiple
tenants to post in public areas.
ii. Project Website and Regular Notices. Develop website notifications to be posted by
the Client on a regular basis regarding construction and upcoming activities that
supplement general information about the Project maintained by the Client on the
Project website. The Sub-Consultant will develop website layout, including a
comment form function, and Consultant will provide content updates on a regular
basis. Website address will be linked from the Client’s website.
iii. Regular Project Emails. Develop an initial email template and provide updates for
the Client to send on a regular basis to provide information about upcoming
construction activities and what to expect.
h. Media and Social Media. Support Client-led media and social media efforts, including
drafting content regarding construction for press releases, articles and other information
submitted to the media during construction and at major Project milestones.
i. Project Materials. Draft and update content for general Project materials in coordination
with Client and Consultant staff. Materials may include a periodic construction
newsletter/progress report. Support the Client with other materials as needed by finalizing
content and graphic layout (i.e. frequently asked questions, onsite brochure, informal
signs, etc.).
j. Project Events and Celebration. Support the Client as it organizes and hosts a ground
breaking ceremony to mark the start of construction and a ribbon cutting ceremony to
mark the end of construction and Project completion. Attend the ceremonies and provide
the Client assistance with set-up, logistics, and day-of staffing.
Deliverables
Communication plan
Contact cards and magnets
Outreach materials
Meeting agendas and notes
D. Assumptions
1. Budget
a. Staffing levels are anticipated in accordance with the attached budget estimate.
b. The work is anticipated to be performed during daytime hours. Should night work be
necessary, a 15 percent premium for labor will be applied to all hours that Consultant
employees work between 7 pm and 7 am.
c. The level of effort in accomplishing the scope items is limited to the pre-approved budget.
Consultant will not exceed the approved budget without prior approval by the Client.
Consultant services are budgeted from April 2012 through May 2012 for preconstruction
services only. Should further preconstruction services be required, the Client and
Consultant will negotiate a supplement to this Agreement.
d. The budget allocations shown on Exhibit B are itemized to aid in Project tracking
purposes only. The budget may be transferred between tasks or people, or between
KBA, Inc. April 18, 2012
S:\Projects\Contracts\Client\Arlington\012005-01-67thAve-PhIII\Drafts&NegotiationRecords\In-houseDrafts\Pre-con (LAG)\Scope-Arlington-67th-(Revised)-2012-0418.docx 4 of 5
labor and expenses, provided the total contracted amount is not exceeded without prior
authorization.
e. The budget assumes that Consultant’s standard forms, logs, and processes will be used
on the Project SharePoint site. Any customization to meet specialized client
requirements will be Extra Work.
2. Items and Services Client will provide:
a. Meeting arrangements and facilities for pre-bid and preconstruction meetings.
b. Retain Engineer of Record for shop drawing review, RFI’s, design changes, and final
record drawings.
c. Coordination with and enforcement of utility franchise agreements and/or contracts and
schedules for services related to this Project.
d. Construction survey. Provide survey and staking that is not already assigned to the
construction contractor. Specifically: Project control, one time; and construction staking.
3. Scope
a. The SharePoint tool being used on this Project is proprietary to Consultant, Inc., and may
not be used by any other party, or on any other project, without the written permission
and involvement of Consultant.
b. If Consultant’s Scope of Services includes Constructability Review of design documents,
such review will be for constructability, for general conformance with the design concept,
and for contradictions and inconsistencies between the various parts of the design
documents. This review will not include review of the accuracy or completeness of
details, such as quantities, dim ensions, weights, or gauges, fabrication processes; and
will not include quantity takeoffs.
c. Review of Shop Drawings and other construction contractor submittals is not intended as
an approval of the submittals if they deviate from the Contract Documents or contain
errors, omissions and inconsistencies, nor is it intended to relieve the construction
contractor of their full responsibility for Contract performance, nor is the review intended
to ensure or guarantee lack of inconsistencies, errors, and/or omissions between the
submittals and the Contract requirements. This review will not include review of the
accuracy or completeness of details, such as quantities, dimensions, weights, or gauges,
fabrication processes, construction means or methods, or coordination of the work with
other trades, all of which are the sole responsibility of the construction contractor.
Review of a specific item will not indicate that the Consultant has reviewed the entire
assembly of which the item is a component.
d. Any opinions of probable construction cost provided by the Consultant will be on the
basis of experience and professional judgment. However, since Consultant has no
control over competitive bidding or market conditions, the Consultant cannot and does
not warrant that bids or ultimate construction costs will not vary from these opinions of
probable construction costs.
e. Development of construction schedules and/or sequencing, and/or reviewing and
commenting on contractor’s schedules, is for the purpose of estimating number of days to
complete a project, and for identifying potential schedule and coordination challenges
and determining compliance with the construction contract. It is not a guarantee that a
construction contractor will complete the Project in that sequence or timeline, as means
and methods are the responsibility of the construction contractor.
f. Consultant is not responsible for any costs, claims, or judgments arising from or in any
way connected with errors, omissions, conflicts or ambiguities in the Contract Documents
prepared by others. The Consultant does not have responsibility for the professional
KBA, Inc. April 18, 2012
S:\Projects\Contracts\Client\Arlington\012005-01-67thAve-PhIII\Drafts&NegotiationRecords\In-houseDrafts\Pre-con (LAG)\Scope-Arlington-67th-(Revised)-2012-0418.docx 5 of 5
quality or technical adequacy or accuracy of the design plans or specifications, nor for
their timely completion by others.
g. Client agrees to include the following requirements in the construction Bid Documents for
this Project:
i. The construction contractor(s) shall name KBA, Inc. and their subconsultants as
additional insureds on the contractor’s general liability and automobile insurance
policies.
ii. A statement saying: “Contractors, subcontractors, and equipment and material
suppliers on the Project, or their sureties, shall maintain no direct action against
either KBA, Inc. and their officers and employees, or KBA’s subconsultants for any
claim arising out of, in connection with, or resulting from the professional services
performed by KBA and their subconsultants. Client will be the only beneficiary of any
undertaking by KBA or their subconsultants."
h. Services provided by the Consultant under this Agreement will be performed in a manner
consistent with that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the same
profession currently practicing under similar circumstances , in the same geographical
area and time period.
i. Because data stored on electronic media can deteriorate undetected or can be modified
without Consultant’s knowledge, Client agrees that Consultant will not be held liable for
the completeness, correctness, readability, or compatibility of any electronic media
submitted to Client, after an acceptance period of 30 days after delivery of the electronic
files.
I. OPTIONAL SERVICES
When requested by the City, the Consultant shall provide additional services that may increase the le vel
of effort described in this document. Authorization to perform additional services will be in the form of a
mutually negotiated Supplement to this Agreement, specifying the services to be performed, and basis of
payment.
Construction Phase Services: The scope of services and budget for the Construction Phase will be
developed and added to this contract via a Supplement to this Agreement at a later date.
EXHIBIT E-1
Project Name:Arlington - 67th Project Month Apr-12 May-12
Client Project No.:TBD - Precon Only Days/Mo 21 22
KBA Project No.:012005-01 Hr/Mo 168 176
Contract Type:Cost + Fixed Fee (on DSC + OH)Extra Work 11%12%
Date Prepared:Adj Hr/Mo 187 198
Prepared by:Mike Roberts
Salary Escalation 4%
KBA Labor Hours
Employee Title 2012 Rate 2013 Rate Total Hours 2012 Total 2013 Total Apr-12 May-12
Mike Roberts Project Manager $74.00 $77.00 16 16 - 8 8
Dave Mohler Resident Engineer $47.32 $49.20 122 122 - 40 82
Cameron Bloomer Office Engineer $26.50 $27.60 40 40 - 40
Dave Scott Project Inspector $41.48 $43.10 - - - - -
Jennifer Smiley Project Assistant $26.40 $27.50 60 60 - 30 30
Connie Tomlinson Contract Admin $25.00 $26.00 2 2 - 2
Misty Fisher Operations Manager $34.00 $35.40 10 10 - - 10
Sean Mabin IT Administrator $36.00 $37.40 - - - - -
Subtotal - KBA Labor Hours 250 250 - 78 172
Direct Expenses
Item Total Costs 2012 Total 2013 Total Apr-12 May-12
Vehicles 670$ 670 - 220 450
Mileage 120$ 120 - 60 60
Misc: Supplies, Equipment 169$ 169 - - 169
Copier/Scanner/Printer -$ - - - -
Office Rental -$ - - - -
Subtotal - Direct Expenses 959$ 959 - 280 680
Subconsultant(s)
Subconsultants Total Costs 2012 Total 2013 Total Apr-12 May-12
Enviro Issues 7,000$ 7,000 - - 7,000
GeoTest -$ - - - -
Subtotal - Subconsultant Costs 7,000$ 7,000 - - 7,000
Combined Costs
Employee Title 2012 Rate 2013 Rate Total DSC 2012 Total 2013 Total Apr-12 May-12
Mike Roberts Project Manager $74.00 $77.00 1,184$ 1,184 - 592 592
Dave Mohler Resident Engineer $47.32 $49.20 5,773$ 5,773 - 1,893 3,880
Cameron Bloomer Office Engineer $26.50 $27.60 1,060$ 1,060 - - 1,060
Dave Scott Project Inspector $41.48 $43.10 -$ - - - -
Jennifer Smiley Project Assistant $26.40 $27.50 1,584$ 1,584 - 792 792
Connie Tomlinson Contract Admin $25.00 $26.00 50$ 50 - - 50
Misty Fisher Operations Manager $34.00 $35.40 340$ 340 - - 340
Sean Mabin IT Administrator $36.00 $37.40 -$ - - - -
Direct Salary Costs 9,991$ 9,991 - 3,277 6,714
Overhead @ 12,773$ 12,773 - 4,189 8,583
Subtotal (DSC + OH)22,764$ 22,764 - 7,466 15,298
Fixed Fee (on DSC + OH) @ 2,277$ 2,277 - 747 1,530
Subtotal (DSC + OH + FF)25,041$ 25,041 - 8,213 16,828
Direct Expenses (No Markup)959$ 959 - 280 680
Subconsultant(s)7,000$ 7,000 - - 7,000
Management Reserve -$ - - - -
TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS 33,000$ 33,000 - 8,492 24,508
127.84%
10.00%
4/18/2012
PRECON
De
t
e
r
m
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
of
H
o
u
r
s
Sc
h
e
d
u
l
e
Printed: 4/18/2012 3:04 PM S:\Projects\Contracts\Client\Arlington\012005-01-67thAve-PhIII\Drafts&NegotiationRecords\In-houseDrafts\Pre-con (LAG)\Exhibit-E1-Budget(CPFF)-Revised-2012-0418.xlsx
EXHIBIT G-1
Project Name:Arlington - 67th Project Apr-12 May-12
Client Project No.:TBD - Precon Only 21 22
KBA Project No.:012005-01 168 176
Contract Type:Cost + Fixed Fee (on DSC + OH)11%12%
Date Prepared:187 198
Prepared by:Mike Roberts
Salary Escalation 4%
Enviro Issues
Employee Title 2012
Rate
2013
Rate Total Hours 2012 Total 2013 Total Apr-12 May-12
TBD Associate 1 $26.00 $27.00 - - - - -
Ryan Bianchi Associate 2 $31.00 $32.20 46 46 - - 46
Elizabeth Faulkner Associate 3 $43.00 $44.70 4 4 - - 4
tbd Project Coordinator $21.00 $21.80 20 20 - - 20
tbd IT Senior Associate $60.00 $62.40 4 4 - - 4
tbd IT Tech Assoc 1 $22.00 $22.90 6 6 - - 6
tbd Graphic Designer $19.00 $19.80 4 4 - - 4
Subtotal - KBA Labor Hours 84 84 - - 84
Direct Expenses
Item Total Costs 2012 Total 2013 Total Apr-12 May-12
Vehicles -$ - - - -
Mileage -$ - - - -
Field Equipment -$ - - - -
Misc: Supplies, Equipment 73$ 73 - - 73
Copier/Scanner/Printer -$ - - - -
Subtotal - Direct Expenses 73$ 73 - - 73
Combined Costs
Employee Title 2012
Rate
2013
Rate Total DSC 2012 Total 2013 Total Apr-12 May-12
TBD Associate 1 $26.00 $27.00 -$ - - - -
Ryan Bianchi Associate 2 $31.00 $32.20 1,426$ 1,426 - - 1,426
Elizabeth Faulkner Associate 3 $43.00 $44.70 172$ 172 - - 172
tbd Project Coordinator $21.00 $21.80 420$ 420 - - 420
tbd IT Senior Associate $60.00 $62.40 240$ 240 - - 240
tbd IT Tech Assoc 1 $22.00 $22.90 132$ 132 - - 132
tbd Graphic Designer $19.00 $19.80 76$ 76 - - 76
Direct Salary Costs 2,466$ 2,466 - - 2,466
Overhead @ 3,831$ 3,831 - - 3,831
Subtotal (DSC + OH)6,297$ 6,297 - - 6,297
Fee (on DSC + OH) @ 630$ 630 - - 630
Subtotal (DSC + OH + FF)6,927$ 6,927 - - 6,927
Direct Expenses (No Markup)73$ 73 - - 73
Subconsultant(s)-$ - - - -
TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS 7,000$ 7,000 - - 7,000
155.36%
10.00%
De
t
e
r
m
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
of
H
o
u
r
s
3/20/2012
PRECON
Printed: 4/18/2012 3:05 PM S:\Projects\Contracts\Client\Arlington\012005-01-67thAve-PhIII\Drafts&NegotiationRecords\In-houseDrafts\Pre-con (LAG)\Ex-G-1-EnviroIssues-Budget-2012-0417.xlsx
City of Arlington
Council Agenda Bill
Item:
NB #8
Attachment
J
COUNCIL MEETING DATE:
May 7, 2012
SUBJECT:
HDR Engineering Contract for 67th Ave, Phase 3 project, Supplement #7
ATTACHMENTS:
Supplement #7 Scope of Work and Fee estimate
DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN
Public Works
EXPENDITURES REQUESTED: $60,077.03
BUDGET CATEGORY: Transportation Improvement & STP Grant
LEGAL REVIEW:
DESCRIPTION:
Supplement #7 to the HDR contract.
HISTORY:
The City has been under contract with HDR for the preliminary engineering, final
engineering, Right-of-Way procurement, and preparation of construction plans for the
67th Ave, Phase 3 project. Project conditions have changed and require additional work
from the consultant. This supplement addresses that additional work:
- Prepare design changes to meet property owner needs
- Additional ROW negotiation with landowners
- Complete remaining escrow and closures in-house
- Add additional City of Arlington utility specification language (water & sewer)
ALTERNATIVES
- Remand to staff for additional information
- Table pending further discussion
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
I move to approve Supplement #7 to the City of Arlington – HDR contract and
authorize the mayor to sign Supplement #7, pending final approval by the City
Attorney.
Section IV, TIME FOR BEGINNING AND COMPLETION, is amended to change the number of calendar days for
completion of the work to read:
Section 1, SCOPE OF WORK, is hereby changed to read:
DOT Form 140-063 EF
Revised 9/2005
If you concur with this supplement and agree to the changes as stated above, please sign in the appropriate spaces
below and return to this office for final action.
By:
Consultant Signature
By:
I
Section V, PAYMENT, shall be amended as follows:
Ronald G. Ohlsen Vice President
Supplemental Agreement
Number
Organization and Address
Project Number
Description of Work
HDR Engineering, Inc.
500 108th NE Suite 1200
Bellevue, WA 98004-5549
City of Arlington 67th Ave., Phase III Reconstruction
All provisions in the basic agreement remain in effect except as expressly modified by this supplement.
and executed on
The Local Agency of
desires to supplement the agreement entered into with
See attachment A for additional scope of work
Extend completion date to Dec. 31, 2012
See Exhibit A fro additional Fee
1,353,970.10
as set forth in the attached Exhibit A, and by this reference made a part of this supplement.
Arlington 67th Ave., Phase III Reconstruction
Project Title New Maximum Amount Payable
Original Agreement Number
425-450-6200Phone:
City of Arlington
HDR Engineering, Inc.
05/27/2009 and identified as Agreement No.
$
The changes to the agreement are described as follows:
II
III
Approving Authority Signature
7
Date
5/27/2009 12/31/2012
Execution Date Completion Date
Attachment A, Scope of Services
Supplement 7 Page 1
Attachment A
67th Avenue Phase III Reconstruction
City of Arlington, Washington
Supplement 7 Scope of Services
Introduction
During the term of this Supplement, HDR Engineering, Inc., (CONSULTANT) will
perform professional services for the City of Arlington (CITY) in connection with the
67th Avenue Phase III Reconstruction Project (PROJECT). This Scope of Services will be
used to plan, conduct, and complete the work on the PROJECT as described herein or as
amended by additional supplement between the CONSULTANT and CITY.
This supplement addresses the need for additional design services and right of way
services, the use of additive alternates, and bidding assistance.
Task A - Project Management
Scope of services for this task remains the same as the original contract and
approved supplements 1 through 6, with the following change.
Assumptions:
• Project duration for this supplement will be 6 months
• 6 1-hour progress meetings will occur (3 conference call, 3 in-person)
Deliverable(s):
• Monthly invoices and progress reports (1 hard copy)
• Meeting minutes from progress meetings (1 electronic PDF copy)
Task G - Right of Way
Scope of services for this task remains the same as previously agreed with the
following change.
General Right of Way Assumptions:
• Condemnation may be pursued on two parcels if elected by the CITY.
CONSULTANT involvement in the condemnation process will be
considered extra work.
4. ROW Acquisitions and Negotiations
a. CONSULTANT will make up to three meaningful contacts (meaningful
contact being an in-person meeting or detailed phone conversation, email
or written correspondence with landowner) with each of the 5 remaining
property owners who have yet to sign property agreements. If after these
three meaningful contacts a settlement has not been reached with the
landowner, then CITY and CONSULTANT agree to meet and develop an
appropriate acquisition strategy for any unsettled parcel. Implementation
Attachment A, Scope of Services
Supplement 7 Page 2
of the acquisition strategy is extra work and requires supplement to this
scope and additional negotiated fee.
7. Escrow and Closings
a. CONSULTANT will complete in-house closings for a maximum of 10
parcels. Closings will include a final review of the title update, clearing or
recommending acceptance of all encumbrances, recording documents,
paying recording fees, and processing payments to landowners.
Assumptions:
• CONSULTANT will complete in-house closings for a maximum of 10
parcels.
Deliverables:
• Recordable encumbrance releases (1 hard copy)
• Recorded Conveyance Documents (1 hard copy)
Task S - Plans, Specifications, and Estimate
Scope of services for this task remains the same as previously agreed with the
following change.
1. Plans
• CONSULTANT will include property owner design alternatives preparation
as a part of the effort to prepare construction plans. CONSULTANT will
prepare a maximum of 30 property owner design alternatives.
• CONSULTANT will assist the CITY in incorporating the architectural
elements of the retaining wall being prepared by others. CONSULTANT will
provide detailed design for inset block for future art inclusion. CITY will
coordinate art inclusion following construction of this PROJECT.
• CONSULTANT will design a new parallel sewer line to be located
approximately five feet from the existing line, rather than replacing the
existing line as originally assumed.
2. Specifications
• CONSULTANT will include the latest CITY general special provisions in the
bid package.
3. Estimate
• CONSULTANT will include elements in the Plans section above in the cost
estimate.
Assumptions:
• CITY will coordinate design elements with the wall architect.
Deliverables:
Attachment A, Scope of Services
Supplement 7 Page 3
• Property owner design alternative exhibits for 10 properties, 3 alternatives
maximum per property (1 PDF copy each alternatives)
Task X - Additive Alternates
CONSULTANT will assist the CITY in determining which project elements will
be bid as Additive Alternates.
Assumptions:
• A new plan sheet will be required to identify which elements are additive
alternates. The new plan sheet will show the entire project area and
identifying the additive alternates with construction notes. No significant
design changes will be required.\
• Additive alternates will be shown in the bid documents on a separate bid
schedule, and described in the bid instructions.
Deliverables
• One additional plan sheet showing additive alternates (1 PDF copy and 1
hard copy)
• One additional bid schedule for additive alternates (1 PDF copy and 1 hard
copy)
Task Y - Bidding Assistance
CONSULTANT will provide the following bid assist services to the CITY:
• Provide clarification and interpretation to CITY, as needed during the
advertisement period.
• Prepare addenda if modifications to the contract documents are deemed
warranted and respond to bidder's questions relayed through the CITY.
Assumptions:
• CONSULTANT will prepare a maximum of three addenda.
Deliverables
• Plan sheets and/or project manual addenda (1 PDF copy and 1 hard copy)
Supplement 7
Project Name City of Arlington 67th Ave. Phase III Reconstruction Firm:HDR
OH Rate:164.22%
Fee Rate:30.0%
Fee Estimate
Labor Category (Hours)66.63 46.9 41.31 33.13 55.36 62.47 67.79 39.62 24.5 27.32 39.52
Rob Gorman Eric Dawson Todd Livingston Brian Gardner Cary Stewart Rob Richardson Jim Prossick Teresa Weaver Rob Chelton
Maureen
Finn
Liya Huang-
Bardley
Work
Element Title Pr
i
n
c
i
p
a
l
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Ma
n
a
g
e
r
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
De
s
i
g
n
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
Sr
.
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
Sr
.
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
RO
W
Ma
n
a
g
e
r
Sr
.
R
O
W
A
g
e
n
t
RO
W
Te
c
h
n
i
c
i
a
n
Ad
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
at
o
r
Se
n
i
o
r
Ad
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
at
o
r
To
t
a
l
s
SCOPE OF SERVICES
Task A Project Management
1 Meetings and Project Reporting 2 24 4 6 36
2 Schedule 8 8
3 Sub-Consultant Management 2 2
Total Task hrs 2 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 6 46
amount 133.26 1,594.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 109.28 237.12 $2,074.26
Task G Right of Way
1 ROW Acquisitions and Negotiations 8 60 20 88
2 Escrow and Closings 8 40 28 76
Total Task hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 100 48 0 0 164
amount 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,084.64 3,962.00 1,176.00 0.00 0.00 $6,222.64
Task S Plans, Specifications, and Estimate
1 Plans 40 60 80 180
2 Specifications 8 8
3 Estimate 4 4 4 12
Total Task hrs 0 52 64 84 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 200
amount 0.00 2,438.80 2,643.84 2,782.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $7,865.56
Task X Additive Alternates
1 Modify Plans and Specs for Additive Alternates 16 8 8 32
0
Total Task hrs 0 16 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32
amount 0.00 750.40 330.48 265.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $1,345.92
Task Y Bidding Assistance
1 Bidding Assistance 24 8 8 40
Total Task hrs 0 24 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40
amount 0.00 1,125.60 330.48 265.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $1,721.12
Grand Total Project Hrs 2 126 80 100 0 0 16 100 48 4 6 482
Grand Total Project Amount 133.26 5,909.40 3,304.80 3,313.00 0.00 0.00 1,084.64 3,962.00 1,176.00 109.28 237.12 19,229.50
133.26 5909.4 3304.8 3313 0 0 1084.64 3962 1176 109.28 237.12 19,230
Total labor cost for Right of Way 6,222.64 total direct labor #REF!29,806
Overhead Rate 164.22%10,218.82 OH #REF!
Total Direct labor and overhead 16,441.46 #REF!49,035
Fee Rate on Direct labor 30%1,866.79
Sub-Total Extra Work Right of Way 18,308.25 direct exp #REF!1,783
Mileage 1,000.00 #REF!1,000
Recording Fees 2,500.00
Total labor cost and Direct Exp for ROW 21,808.25 profit #REF!2,783
#REF!51,819
Total labor cost for Design 13,006.86 profit 8,258
Overhead Rate 164.22%21,359.87
Total Direct labor and overhead 34,366.73 profit % 13.75%
Fee Rate on Direct labor 30%3,902.06
Sub Total Extra Work Design 38,268.78
Total Supplement #7 $60,077.03
City of Arlington
Council Agenda Bill
Item:
NB #9
Attachment
K
COUNCIL MEETING DATE:
May 7, 2012
SUBJECT:
Fee Resolution to revise the City’s current fee resolution
ATTACHMENTS:
Finalized Fee Resolution
DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN
Executive Contact: Kristin Banfield
EXPENDITURES REQUESTED: -0-
BUDGET CATEGORY: N/A
LEGAL REVIEW:
DESCRIPTION:
City staff is proposing revisions to the City’s fee schedule for Cemetery Fees, Fire Life-
Safety inspection fees, and EMS fees. Included in the proposed revisions are revised
cemetery fees, as recommended by the City’s Cemetery Board, as well as an update of
the EMS fees, which has not been done since 2010.
The Fire Department is requesting the addition of a new fee for life-safety inspections
when the City has to repeat inspections more than three times for a business to correct a
life-safety issue.
Council requested additional information on the proposed grading fees. The current
grading fees have been in place since 2010 and are not being changed.
HISTORY:
The Council last updated the fee schedule on February 22, 2011.
ALTERNATIVES
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
I move to approve the Fee Resolution as presented.
Page 1
RESOLUTION NO. 2012-xxx
A RESOLUTION REPLACING RESOLUTION NO.2011-003,
AND ADOPTING A REVISED FEE SCHEDULE
WHEREAS, the City Council, through ordinance, has adopted regulations requiring certain
actions and services; and,
WHEREAS, these various ordinances set forth that fees shall be set by resolution; and,
WHEREAS, the cost of providing these various services consistent with applicable codes,
regulations, and policies periodically increase or decrease, or certain services or practices are
discontinued and fees are no longer needed; and,
WHEREAS, it is the intent of the City of Arlington to charge appropriate fees and charges
that are consistent with the services provided and to cover the public cost of providing these
various services so that the public is not subsidizing individual benefits derived therefrom;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ARLINGTON AS FOLLOWS:
The following rates, fees, and charges for various services provided, actions performed, or items
sold by the city and/or its contract service providers, and fines levied against code violators, are
hereby adopted:
Section 1. Fees and Charges—General.
1.1 Fees. Fees are intended to cover the normal, recurring costs associated with
providing a given service. Fees are non-refundable.
1.2 Prices. In some instances, the City provides certain goods and merchandise for
sale. Prices for these goods may be included in this resolution.
1.3 Payment Due. Fees are due at the time the action is requested (e.g., at time of
application) or occurs (e.g., prior to a specific action). An applicant may pay all
fees of a multi-phased project in advance; however, doing so does not vest
applicable fees due. Fees due are those in effect at the time the specific action or
phase of an action is requested or occurs.
1.4 Waivers. Upon petition by the applicant, the City Council may waive any of the
fees, or portions thereof, for any non-profit organization or government agency.
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #2012-XXX
Page 2
Section 2. Land Use Fees. Fees for various services, actions, and permits regarding land use,
as per AMC Title 20 Land Use Code, shall be as listed in Table 1: Land Use Fees
Table 1: Land Use Fees
Action Fee ($)
Land Use Permits
Zoning Permit 2,222
Special Use Permit 3,306 plus actual cost of Hearing
Examiner (if req’d)
Conditional Use Permit 3,862 plus actual cost of Hearing
Examiner
Administrative Conditional Use Permit
Seasonal/Special Event
Homeless Encampment
102
508
Preliminary Plats and Binding Site Plans
Conditional Use Permit for a Long Plat 6,983 plus actual cost of Hearing
Examiner
Zoning Permit for a Short Plat 3,068
Final Plats and Binding Site Plans
Long Plat 3,389
Short Plat 1,823
Development Agreements 3,862 plus actual cost of Hearing
Examiner (if req’d)
Master Plan 12,500
Design Review
Administrative 212
Design Review Board 423
Forest Practices Permits
Permit Review 423
Forest Practices Permit Application Fee 106 plus 106 per acre
Review Fee for Conversion Option Harvest Plan Approval 106 plus 106 per acre
Review Fee To Lift Moratorium 300
Inspection Fee 127 per hour plus 106 per acre
Appeals
To City Council 212
To Planning Commission 212
To Hearing Examiner 582 plus actual cost of Hearing
Examiner
To Shoreline Hearings Board 582
Reconsideration of Decision by:
Community Development Director and/or a designee 79
Planning Commission 106
Hearing Examiner 212 plus actual cost of Hearing
Examiner
City Council 132
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #2012-XXX
Page 3
Action Fee ($)
Permit Extension
Extension 53
Amendment to or Modification of Permit
Insignificant Design Deviations 53
Minor Amendment 317
Major Amendment 1,067 plus cost of Hearing
Examiner (if req’d)
Binding Site Plans
Text and/or Design Deviation 741
Lot Line Adjustment or Changes to Number of Lots 1,323
Development Agreement 741 plus actual cost of Hearing
Examiner (if req’d)
Boundary Line Adjustment
Boundary Line Adjustment 1,664
Land Use Ordinance Amendment
Amendment to Text of Land Use Ordinance 741
Amendment to Zoning Map (rezone)
< 5 acres 1,111
> or = 5 acres 1,957
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Minor Amendment (annual cycle) 1,428
Major Amendment (5-year cycle) 2,116
Annexations
Submission of 10% Petition 106
Submission of 60% Petition 1,058
If it goes to BRB hearing 794
Shoreline Development Permit
SDP in conjunction with a Land Use Permit 529
SDP not in conjunction with a Land Use Permit 1,058
Variance
Administrative 635
If it goes to hearing (fee in addition to that paid for
Admin. Decision)
1,217 plus actual cost of
Hearing Examiner
Miscellaneous Actions/Items
Zoning Interpretation 106
Pre-Application Meetings
1st two hours 0
Subsequent meetings 317 per meeting
SEPA Review (note: review of checklist included in
Land Use Permit fee )
SEPA Only (no land use permit required) 529
Review of requested studies (i.e. traffic, wetland, etc) 159
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #2012-XXX
Page 4
Action Fee ($)
Review of requested studies (i.e. drainage, geo-tech, etc) 711
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) 1,058 plus actual cost of consultant
Request of Utility Services Outside City
Single-Family Residence/Duplex 212
Other Development 635
Section 3. Public Works Fees. Fees for various services, actions and permits shall be as
listed in Tables 2-1: Review Fees, 2-2: Grading Plan Review Fees, 2-3: Grading Permit Fees,
and 2-4: Public Works Labor and Equipment Charges.
Table 2-1: Review Fees
Action Fee ($)
Site Civil Review 6% E.E.C.C* with a minimum charge of 1,587
Additional Plan Review Fee 212 each
Miscellaneous Engineering Fee 529 each
As-Built Review Fee Included in the site civil review fee
Final Plat Review Fee Included in the site civil review fee
Inspection Fee 127 per hour-1/2 hour minimum
Outside Consultant Review Fee Actual cost
Simple Site Plan Review 265 per lot
Right of Way 6% E.E.C.C* or maximum 1,058 with a
minimum charge of 106 plus inspection fees
Right of Way Vacation 1,058
Miscellaneous Staff Time 127 per hour per person-1/2 hour minimum
Engineering Meetings-after 2 hours 317 per meeting
Water Availability Certificate SFR 32 – Non-SFR 106
Recovery Contract 1,058 plus actual cost
GIS
Zoning and Land Use Maps 10.00
11x17 5.00
2x3 13.00
3x3 19.00
3x4 25.00
Map CD 26.00
Data CDs/FTP 26.00 per client
Hourly Rate for Custom Work 127 per hour, ½ hour minimum
Laminating 3/sq ft
Shipping 5.00
Fee none
* E.E.C.C Engineer’s Estimated Cost of Construction-Includes labor, equipment, material, overhead and profit.
Prices shall be from RS Means (latest edition) data adjusted for the Snohomish County area or from local sources if
not included in the RS Means database.
* Simple Site Plan Review - No water or sewer extension - Single family residence with maximum of 2 lots.
* Additional plan review applies when there is a change, addition or revision to the plan.
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #2012-XXX
Page 5
* Additional plan review fees will be charged at any point in the project when more than 2 reviews are required.
* Inspection Fee - commercial and residential plats (storm drainage, landscape, right-of-way and bond
inspections).
* Outside Consultant Review Fee.
* Water Availability Certificate Fee.
* Engineering Meetings (first 2 hours are no charge).
* Miscellaneous engineering fee - traffic and storm water report/design reviewed in-house.
Table 2-2: Grading Plan Review Fees
Fee ($)
50 Cubic Yards or less No fee
51 to 100 cubic yards 25.50
101 to 1,000 cubic yards 40.00
1,001 to 100,000 cubic yards
First 1,000 cubic yards
Plus - for each additional
10,000 yards or fraction thereof
53.35
26.50
100,001 to 200,000 cubic yards
For the first 100,000 cubic yards
Plus - for each additional
10,000 yards or fraction thereof
292.00
14.40
200,001 cubic yards or more
For the first 200,000 cubic yards
Plus - for each additional 10,000 cubic yards or fraction
thereof
435.45
7.85
Other Fees: Additional plan review required by changes,
additions or revisions to approved plans (minimum
charge – 1/2 hour)
54.70*
Per hour
*Or the total hourly cost to the City, whichever is the greatest. This cost shall include supervision, overhead,
equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of the employees involved.
Table 2-3: Grading Permit Fees
Fee ($)
50 cubic yards or less 25.50
51 to 100 cubic yards 40.00
101 to 1,000 cubic yards
First 100 cubic yards
Plus – for each additional 100 cubic yards or fraction
thereof
40.00
18.90
1,001 to 10,000 cubic yards
For the first 1,000 cubic yards
Plus - for each additional
1,000 yards or fraction thereof
210.50
15.70
10,001 to 100,000 cubic yards
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #2012-XXX
Page 6
For the First 10,000 cubic yards
Plus - for each additional
10,000 yards or fraction thereof
351.80
71.40
100,001 or more cubic yards or more
For the first 100,000 cubic yards
Plus - for each additional 10,000 cubic yards or fraction
thereof
994.80
39.50
Table 2-4: Public Works Labor and Equipment Charges
A. Services and work included in the below schedule will be charged a 15%
administrative/overhead fee for accounting, billing and general City administrative costs.
B. All work or services not included in the below schedule must be mutually agreed upon
prior to the commencement of work.
C. Equipment and machinery that is not explicitly included in the below schedule will be
charged at the rate set forth in the most current Rental Rate Blue Book for Construction
Equipment ("Blue Book"). If the equipment or machinery rate is not available in the Blue
Book, the City will determine an appropriate fee or rate based on the original cost of the
asset plus operating and maintenance cost and/or comparable rates charged by other
organizations.
Item Fee ($)
Labor Rate Cost
Lead Maintenance Worker Hourly $ 60.00
Sr. Maintenance Worker Hourly $ 55.00
Maintenance Worker Hourly $ 50.00
PW Inspector Hourly $ 60.00
Administrative Staff Hourly $ 45.00
Equipment
Pick-up Truck Hourly $ 15.00
Dump Truck Hourly $ 75.00
Back-hoe Hourly $ 55.00
Vactor-Jetter Truck Hourly $ 105.00
Snow Plow Hourly $ 75.00
Street Sweeper Hourly $ 55.00
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #2012-XXX
Page 7
Section 4. Building Permit Fees. For determining the value of a structure, the most current
issue of the Building Safety Journal Magazine, which offers the legacy building valuation
data fee schedule as published by the International Code Council, is adopted by reference.
Fees shall be as listed in Tables 3-1: Building Permit Fees, 3-2: Miscellaneous Building
Inspection Fees and 3-3: Miscellaneous Building Permit Fees.
Table 3-1: Building Permit Fees
Total
Valuation($)
2009 2010 2011 2012 Fee ($)
1.00 – 500.00 28.50 29.00 29.50 30.00 0.00 to 500.00
501.00 – 2,000.00 28.50
3.75
29.00
3.75
29.50
3.83
30.00
3.90
For the first 500.00 plus
For each additional 100.00, or
fraction thereof, to and including
2,000.00
2001.00 –
25,000.00
84.75
17.00
86.00
17.25
86.95
17.60
88.50
17.95
For the first 2,000.00 plus
For each additional 1,000.00, or
fraction thereof, to and including
25,000.00
25,001.00 –
50,000.00
475.75
12.25
482.75
12.50
491.75
12.75
501.35
13.01
For the first 25,000.00 plus
For each additional 1,000.00, or
fraction thereof, to and including
50,000.00
50,001.00 –
100,000.00
782.00
8.50
795.25
8.70
810.50
8.87
820.10
9.05
For the first 50,000.00 plus
For each additional 1,000.00, or
fraction thereof, to and including
100,000.00
100,001.00 –
500,000.00
1,207.00
6.80
1,230.25
6.90
1,254.00
7.04
1,272.60
7.18
For the first 100,000.00 plus
For each additional 1,000.00, or
fraction thereof, to and including
500,000.00
500,001.00 –
1,000,000.00
3,927.00
5.75
3,990.25
5.90
4,070.00
6.02
4,144.60
6.14
For the first 500,000.00 plus
For each additional 1,000.00, or
fraction thereof, to and including
1,000,000.00
1,000,001.00
and up
6,802.00
4.45
6,940.25
4.50
7,080.00
4.59
7,214.60
4.68
For the first 1,000,000.00 plus
For each additional 1,000.00, or
fraction thereof
Total
Valuation($)
2013 2014 2015 2016 Fee ($)
1.00 – 500.00 30.50 31.00 31.50 32.00 0.00 to 500.00
501.00 – 2,000.00 30.50
3.98
31.00
4.06
31.50
4.14
32.00
4.22
For the first 500.00 plus
For each additional 100.00, or
fraction thereof, to and including
2,000.00
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #2012-XXX
Page 8
2001.00 –
25,000.00
90.20
18.31
91.90
18.67
93.60
19.05
95.30
19.43
For the first 2,000.00 plus
For each additional 1,000.00, or
fraction thereof, to and including
25,000.00
25,001.00 –
50,000.00
511.33
13.27
521.31
13.53
531.75
13.80
542.19
14.08
For the first 25,000.00 plus
For each additional 1,000.00, or
fraction thereof, to and including
50,000.00
50,001.00 –
100,000.00
843.08
9.23
859.56
9.42
876.75
9.61
894.19
9.80
For the first 50,000.00 plus
For each additional 1,000.00, or
fraction thereof, to and including
100,000.00
100,001.00 –
500,000.00
1,304.58
7.32
1,330.56
7.47
1,357.25
7.62
1,384.19
7.77
For the first 100,000.00 plus
For each additional 1,000.00, or
fraction thereof, to and including
500,000.00
500,001.00 –
1,000,000.00
4,232.58
6.26
4,318.56
6.39
4,405.25
6.51
4,492.19
6.64
For the first 500,000.00 plus
For each additional 1,000.00, or
fraction thereof, to and including
1,000,000.00
1,000,001.00
and up
7,362.58
4.78
7,513.56
4.87
7,660.25
4.97
7,819.19
5.07
For the first 1,000,000.00 plus
For each additional 1,000.00, or
fraction thereof
Total
Valuation($)
2017 2018 2019 2020 Fee ($)
1.00 – 500.00 32.50 33.00 33.50 34.00 0.00 to 500.00
501.00 – 2,000.00 32.50
4.31
33.00
4.39
33.50
4.48
34.00
4.57
For the first 500.00 plus
For each additional 100.00, or
fraction thereof, to and including
2,000.00
2001.00 –
25,000.00
95.17
19.81
98.85
20.21
100.70
20.62
102.55
21.03
For the first 2,000.00 plus
For each additional 1,000.00, or
fraction thereof, to and including
25,000.00
25,001.00 –
50,000.00
552.78
14.36
563.68
14.65
574.96
14.94
586.24
15.24
For the first 25,000.00 plus
For each additional 1,000.00, or
fraction thereof, to and including
50,000.00
50,001.00 –
100,000.00
911.78
9.99
929.93
10.19
948.46
10.40
967.24
10.61
For the first 50,000.00 plus
For each additional 1,000.00, or
fraction thereof, to and including
100,000.00
100,001.00 –
500,000.00
1,411.28
7.93
1,439.43
8.08
1,468.46
8.25
1,497.74
8.41
For the first 100,000.00 plus
For each additional 1,000.00, or
fraction thereof, to and including
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #2012-XXX
Page 9
500,000.00
500,001.00 –
1,000,000.00
4,583.28
6.78
4,671.43
6.91
4,768.46
7.05
4,861.74
7.19
For the first 500,000.00 plus
For each additional 1,000.00, or
fraction thereof, to and including
1,000,000.00
1,000,001.00 and
up
7,973.28
5.17
8,126.43
5.27
8,293.46
5.38
8,456.74
5.49
For the first 1,000,000.00 plus
For each additional 1,000.00, or
fraction thereof
Table 3-2: Miscellaneous Building Inspection Fees
Action Fee ($)
Inspections outside of normal business hours 50.00 per hour1 (minimum charge 1 hour)
Reinspection fees assessed under provisions of the
current IBC
50.00 per hour1
Inspection for which no fee is specifically
indicated
50.00 per hour1 (minimum charge—1 hour)
Additional plan review required by changes,
additions or revised plans
50.00 per hour1 (minimum charge—1 hour)
For use of outside consultants for plan review and
inspections, or both.
Actual costs2
Stop work order (working without permit) 3
1 Or the total hourly cost to the City, whichever is greatest. This cost shall include supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly
wages, and benefits of the employees involved. 2 Actual costs include administrative and overhead costs.
3 Stop work order (SWO): failure to obtain a valid permit within 48 hour of a SWO will result in double permit fees or a fine
of $500 whichever is less. A permit applied for within the 48 hour timeframe may be subject to a fine and/or fee at the
discretion of the building official.
Table 3-3: Miscellaneous Building Permit Fees
Action Fee ($)
Change lot after plan review completed 100.00
Change plans during or after plan review. New Plan Review Fee
Change or revise plans after issuance of
permit.
Current hourly rate per IBC or new plan review fee
Action Fee ($)
Commercial or industrial re-roof IBC value or bid amount
Demolitions 100.00
Espresso carts (portable and stand alone) 250.00
Fences over 6 feet in height Current hourly rate per IBC for plan review plus 20.00
permit fee
Mobile homes 500.00
Modular offices (job shacks) 350.00
Moved buildings 100.00 prior to moving together with a building permit
fee based on the IBC valuation for new building and
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #2012-XXX
Page 10
cost of moved building.
Residential re-roofs 0
if plan review required 50.00
Retaining walls (permit not required under
four (4) feet
100.00 or IBC valuation, whichever is greater
Signs IBC valuation, using permit fee only
4.2 Plumbing Fees. Plumbing fees shall be as listed in Table 3-4: Plumbing Fees.
Table 3-4: Plumbing Permit Fees
Action Fee ($)
PERMIT ISSUANCE
Plumbing Permit Base Fee 25.00
Medical Gas Systems 100.00
Fixtures and Vents
For each plumbing fixture or trap or set of fixtures on one trap (including water, drainage
piping and backflow protection thereof)
12.00
Sewers, Disposal Systems and Interceptors
For each industrial waste pretreatment interceptor, including its trap and vent, except
kitchen-type grease interceptors functioning as fixture traps
25.00
Water Piping and Water Heaters
For each water heater including vent 25.00
Lawn Sprinklers, Vacuum Breakers and Backflow Protection Devices
For each lawn sprinkler system on any one meter, including backflow protection devices
thereof
25.00
Swimming Pools For each swimming pool or spa:
Public pool 90.00
Public spa 90.00
Private pool 60.00
Private spa 30.00
Miscellaneous
For each appliance or piece of equipment regulated by the Plumbing Code but not
classed in other appliance categories, or for which no other fee is listed in this code
12.00
4.3 Mechanical Permit Fees. Mechanical permit and inspection shall be as listed in
Table 3-5: Mechanical Permit and Inspection Fees.
Table 3-5: Mechanical Permit & Inspection Fees
Action Fee ($)
PERMIT ISSUANCE AND HEATERS
Mechanical Permit Base Fee 25.00
Furnaces 25.00
Appliance Vents
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #2012-XXX
Page 11
Action Fee ($)
For the installation, relocation or replacement of each appliance vent installed and not
included in an appliance permit
10.00
Boilers 25.00
AHU’s and Condensing Units 100.00
Evaporative Coolers & Heat Pumps 25.00
Ventilation and Exhaust
For each ventilation fan connected to a single duct 10.00
Refrigeration Systems 50.00
For each gas piping system of 1 to 5 outlets 10.00
For each additional outlet over 5, each 1.00
Miscellaneous
For each appliance or piece of equipment regulated by the Mechanical Code but not
classed in other appliance categories, or for which the fee is listed in the table
25.00
Table 3-6: Plumbing & Mechanical Plan Review Fees
< THAN $500.00 ROUND DOWN TO NEAREST $1,000. > THAN $500.00 ROUND UP TO NEAREST $1,000.00
Total Valuation Fee ($)
Less than $1,000.00 150.00
$1,000.00 to $9,999.99 200.00
$10,000 to $19,999.99 250.00
$20,000.00 to $29,999.99 300.00
$30,000.00 to $39,999.99 350.00
$40,000.00 to $49,999.99 400.00
$50,000.00 to $59,999.99 450.00
$60,000.00 to $69,999.99 500.00
$70,000.00 to $79,999.99 550.00
$80,000.00 to $89,999.99 600.00
$90,000.00 to $99,999.99 650.00
$100,000.00 to $199,999.99 700.00
$200,000.00 to $299,999.99 800.00
$300,000.00 to $399,999.99 900.00
$400,000.00 to $499,999.99 1,000.00
$500,000.00 to $599,999.99 1,100.00
$600,000.00 to $699,999.99 1,200.00
$700,000.00 to $799,999.99 1,300.00
$800,000.00 to $899,999.99 1,400.00
$900,000.00 to $999,999.99 1,500.00
$1,000,000.00 to $1,999,999.99 1,600.00
$2,000,000.00 to $2,999,999.99 1,700.00
$3,000,000.00 to $3,999,999.99 1,800.00
$4,000,000.00 to $4,999,999.99 1,900.00
5 Million and Up 2,000.00 for the first $5M plus
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #2012-XXX
Page 12
$1.00 for each additional
$1,000.00 or fraction thereof
Table 3-7: Fire Permit Fees
Action Fee ($)
Fire Sprinklers
Plan Review Fee 100.00
Permit Fee Based on Valuation
Fire Alarms
Plan Review Fee 100.00
Permit Fee Based on Valuation
Commercial Hoods (Type I & Type II)
Plan Review Fee 100.00
Permit Fee Based on Valuation
Other Fire Safety System
Plan Review Fee 100.00
Permit Fee Based on Valuation
Section 5. Fire Department Life-Safety Inspection Fees. Fees for re-inspections for life-
safety issues conducted by the Fire Department shall be as listed in Table 4: Fire Department
Life-Safety Inspection Fees.
Table 4: Fire Department Life-Safety Inspection Fees
Action Fee ($)
Life / Safety Inspections of Businesses
Initial Inspection 0.00
First reinspection for corrections 0.00
Second reinspection for corrections 100.00
Third reinspection for corrections 150.00
Additional inspections to complete life/safety corrections
and attain compliance
250.00
Section 6. Cemetery Fees. Fees and prices for various services, actions, and merchandise for
cemetery use shall be as listed in Table 5: Cemetery Fees and Prices.
Table 5: Cemetery Fees and Prices
Product / Service / Action Fee ($)
Traditional Burial
Burial Lot $1,500
Opening & Closing (during business hours) $1,000
Opening & Closing (after business hours) $1,300
Concrete Grave Liner $800
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #2012-XXX
Page 13
Vaults
Monticello $1,595
Continental $1,895
Venetian $2,295
Cameo Rose / SST Triune $2,995
Vault Internment System $350
Inurnment
Cremation Lot / Urn Garden $650
Second Right Inurnment $500
Opening & Closing (during business hours) $445
Opening & Closing (after business hours) $695
Liner $310
Childrens Garden
Children’s Garden Lot $397
Opening & Closing (all times) $488
Children’s Garden Liner $658
Niche
Niche Wall I and II, rows 1-3 top half $1,142
Niche Wall I and II, rows 4-6 bottom half $1,089
Opening & Closing (during business hours) $445
Opening & Closing (after business hours) $695
Second Right Niche Wall $545
Niche Inscription – Single $363
Niche Inscription – Double $563
Tent and Chairs for Inurnment $163
Flower Vase for Niche Wall $205
Headstones and Monuments
Headstone Setting & Inspection Fee - 30 x 18 or smaller $275
Headstone Setting & Inspection Fee - 28 x 34 or larger $375
Setting Fee - vase block or garden marker $60
Headstone Re-Setting Fee $175
Setting and Inspection Fee - upright monument (single) $575
Setting and Inspection Fee - upright monument (double) $675
Headstone Final Inscription (off site) $550
Headstone Final Inscription (on site) $363
Headstone Sales - varies Call
Headstone Inspection Fee $100
Memorial Marker - varies Call
Other Services
Memorial Tree w/ garden marker $800
Disinterment / Traditional Burial $1,995
Disinterment / Cremation $650
Pressure Washing $ 40 for first headstone
$25 for each additional
headstone
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #2012-XXX
Page 14
Section 7. Fees for the Use of City Owned Facilities. Fees for various services, actions,
and permits regarding use of City owned facilities shall be as listed in Table 5: Fees for the
Use of City Owned Facilities.
Table 6: Fees for the Use of City Owned Facilities
Use/Activity Fee ($)
Hadley Hall at the Arlington Community Youth Center
Without Kitchen
One to three hours 15 per hour
Over three hours 75
With Kitchen
One to three hours 20 per hour
Over three hours 125
Athletic Fields
League
Baseball
Youth, resident team 7.50 per youth per season
Youth, non-resident team 10 per team per use
Adult 25 per use
Softball
Youth, resident team 7.50 per youth per season
Youth, non-resident team 10 per team per use
Adult 25 per use
Soccer
Youth, resident team 7.50 per youth per season
Youth, non-resident team 10 per team per use
Adult 25 per use
Other
Youth, resident team 7.50 per youth per season
Youth, non-resident team 10 per team per use
Adult 25 per use
Tournament
Baseball
Youth, resident team 7.50 per youth per tournament
Youth, non-resident team 10 per team per use
Adult 25 per use
Softball
Youth, resident team 7.50 per youth per tournament
Youth, non-resident team 10 per team per use
Adult 25 per use
Soccer
Youth, resident team 7.50 per youth per tournament
Youth, non-resident team 10 per team per use
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #2012-XXX
Page 15
Adult 25 per use
Other
Youth, resident team 7.50 per youth per season
Youth, non-resident team 10 per team per use
Adult 25 per use
Lighting
Youth 3 per hour
Adult 6 per hour
Scheduling Fee for League and Tournament
League 15 per team
Tournament 15 per tournament
Concession Sales
League 50 per season
Tournament 25per day
6.1 Definitions.
A. “Youth” is defined as any person 18 years of age or younger.
B. “Resident” is defined as any team composed of at least 51% Arlington
residents.
Section 8. Appeal Fees for Violations and Abatement. Fees for various services and
actions regarding violations and abatement as per Chapter 11.01 of the Arlington Municipal
Code shall be as listed in Table 6: Appeal Fees for Violations and Abatement.
Table 7: Appeal Fees for Violations and Abatement
Action Fee ($)
Appeals
To Hearing Examiner 582 plus actual cost of Hearing Examiner
Fines
Forest Practice Violation Fine 317
Section 9. Licensing Fees. Licensing fees for various licenses issued under various sections
of the Arlington Municipal Code shall be as listed in Table 7:- Licensing Fees.
Table 8: Licensing Fees
License/Activity Fee ($)
Annual/renewal business license under AMC Chapter 5.28 60.00
Late payment penalty for each month of delinquency of business
license under AMC Chapter 5.28
5.00 per month of delinquency
For new applications applied for between October 1st through
December 30th the new business license applications pay the
following fee of $45.
45.00
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #2012-XXX
Page 16
For new applications applied for between January 1st through
March 30th new business license applications pay the following fee
of $30
.
30.00
For new applications applied for April 1st through June 30th new
business license applications pay the following fee. Note: $15 for
the remainder of the current business license year and $60 for the
new business license year for a total of $75, making the business
license valid thru June 30th of the following year.
75.00
Businesses with offices located outside of city limits but conducting
business within city limits (AMC Chapter 5.28)
20.00
Peddlers & Solicitors License under AMC Chapter 5.04 25.00
Vehicles for Hire License under AMC Chapter 5.12
- First vehicle
- Each vehicle thereafter
35.00
15.00
Cabaret License under AMC Chapter 5.16 (annual) 75.00
Section 10. EMS Fees and Charges.
9.1 Fees and Mileage Charges Established. For purposes of AMC Chapter
3.06, fees and mileage for EMS services shall be set as set forth in Table 9:
Emergency Medical Services Rates and Charges.
9.2 Beginning on January 1, 2013, the rates set forth for the year 2012 shall be
increased annually by the June reported percentage increase of the
Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton area for All
Urban Consumers, or other measure commonly used by the city should it
change; provided, however, that notwithstanding any reduction in the CPI,
rates shall not decrease.
9.2 EMS Transport Fees. In accordance with the requirements of 42 Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) Parts 410 and 414, which provides that Medicare
fees and charges shall apply to Medicare recipients;
A. Unmet (excess fee) Part B Deductible and Part B coinsurance amounts. In
accordance with the provisions of 42 CFR Parts 410 and 414, the City
shall bill the patient for any unmet or excess fee to the extent authorized
by federal law.
B. Inability to Pay Excess Fee. Individuals who are on fixed or low incomes
or do not have the ability to pay the differential because of financial
difficulties may submit a request to waive the differential to the City with
supporting documentation of the inability to pay.
Table 9: Emergency Medical Services Rates and Charges
Service 2011 Rate ($) 2012 Rate ($)
BLS Non-emergent 476.00 491.23
BLS Emergent 476.00 491.23
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #2012-XXX
Page 17
ALS Emergent 741.00 764.71
ALS 2 846.00 873.07
ALS Response Fee 265.00 273.48
Specialty Care Transport Fee 846.00 873.07
Mileage (all categories) 16.00 per mile 16.51 per mile
Section 11. Dog Licensing Fees.
License Annual Fee ($)
Dog - unaltered $ 20
Dog – altered $ 10
Dog – altered (senior citizen owner) $ 5
Dog – altered & micro-chipped $ 5
Replacement Tag fee $ 5
Late Fee – for failure to purchase annual license before March 1 $ 10
Per RCW 49.60.380, the City of Arlington shall honor a request by a blind person or hearing impaired
person not to be charged a fee to license his or her guide dog, or a request by a physically disabled
person not to be charged a fee to license his or her service animal.
All dogs require proof of current Rabies vaccination to be licensed.
Proof is also required for alteration and micro-chip to be eligible for the reduced fee.
Section 12. Repeal of Previous Fee Resolution. Resolution 2011-003 is hereby repealed.
Section 13. Effective Date. This resolution will become effective immediately upon
passage.
PASSED by the City Council and APPROVED by the Mayor this _____ day of
______________________ 2012.
CITY OF ARLINGTON
_________________________________
Barbara Tolbert, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________________
Kristin Banfield, City Clerk
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #2012-XXX
Page 18
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________
Steve Peiffle, City Attorney