Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-04-2012_Council Meeting Arlington City Council June 4, 2012 – 7 PM City Council Chambers 110 E. Third SPECIAL ACCOMMODATIONS: The City of Arlington strives to provide accessible meetings for people with disabilities. Please contact the ADA coordinator at (360) 403-3441 or 1-800-833-8388 (TDD only) prior to the meeting date if special accommodations are required. CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS PROCLAMATIONS PUBLIC COMMENT For members of the public to speak to the Council regarding matters NOT on the agenda. Please limit remarks to three minutes. CONSENT AGENDA 1. Minutes of the May 21 and May 29, 2012 Council Meetings ATTACHMENT A 2. Accounts Payable PUBLIC HEARING NEW BUSINESS 1. Renew Interlocal Agreement with Snohomish Regional Drug & Gang Task Force ATTACHMENT B 2. Award of Airport Blvd Phase 1A Construction Contract to the apparent low bidder ATTACHMENT C 3. Retail Competitiveness Analysis: Shea Carr Jewell contract amendment #2 & McConkey study ATTACHMENT D DISCUSSION ITEMS INFORMATION ADMINISTRATOR & STAFF REPORTS MAYOR’S REPORT SPECIAL ACCOMMODATIONS: The City of Arlington strives to provide accessible meetings for people with disabilities. Please contact the ADA coordinator at (360) 403-3441 or 1-800-833-8388 (TDD only) prior to the meeting date if special accommodations are required. COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS – OPTIONAL EXECUTIVE SESSION RECONVENE ADJOURNMENT To review all attachments, click here. DRAFT Page 1 of 3 Council Chambers 110 East Third May 21, 2012 City Council Members Present by Roll Call: Dick Butner, Randy Tendering, Debora Nelson, Marilyn Oertle, Chris Raezer, and Ken Klein Council Members Absent: Steve Baker City Staff Present: Mayor Tolbert, Kristin Banfield, Paul Ellis, Jim Chase, Fire Chief Bruce Stedman, Firemen Ruffner, Hargroves, Honsowetz, Price, Schmidt, Gustafson, Hillis, Musal, and DeMoors, Jim Kelly, Eric Scott, Jeff Pitman, Rob Putnam, David Kuhl, Jan Bauer, Steve Peiffle – City Attorney Also Known to be Present: Ken Levesque – Planning Commissioner member applicant, Mike Hopson – Airport Commission, Sarah Arney – North County Outlook, and Kevin Dunn – Airport Businessman Mayor Tolbert called the meeting to order at 7:00PM, and the pledge of allegiance to the flag followed. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA Marilyn Oertle moved to approve the Agenda. Chris Raezer seconded the motion which passed with a unanimous vote. PROCLAMATIONS National Emergency Medical Services Week, May 20-26, 2012 Fire Chief Bruce Stedman gave information on the numbers for services provided last year by Arlington’s EMS personnel, and the increase seen for this year. Mayor Tolbert then read the National Emergency Medical Services Week Proclamation. National Public Works Week, May 20-26 Randy Tendering and Mayor Tolbert read the Proclamation of Public Works Week for May 20-26, 2012. In honor of Public Works Week City Employees will be wearing orange tomorrow. PUBLIC COMMENT There was no one in the audience who wished to speak to matters not on the Agenda. CONSENT AGENDA Marilyn Oertle moved and Ken Klein seconded the motion to approve the Consent Agenda which was unanimously carried to approve the following Consent Agenda items: 1. Minutes of the April 30, 2012 Joint Meeting and the May 7 and May 14, 2012 Council Meetings 2. Accounts Payable Electronic Payments and Claims Checks #76699 through #76871 dated May 8, 2012 through May 21, 2012 in the amount of $804,246.81 3. Road Closures for Special events 4. Authorization to Proceed with a Privately Funded 9/11 Memorial at Firehouse 46 5. Resolution to transfer Public Works department equipment to other department 6. Ordinance Adopting the Airport Master Plan Update and associated Comprehensive Plan Amendment --- Marilyn Oertle noted that this item would be moved to the first item under New Business Minutes of the Arlington City Council Meeting Minutes of the City of Arlington City Council Meeting DRAFT May 21, 2012 Page 2 of 3 PUBLIC HEARING There was no Public Hearing. UNFINISHED BUSINESS There was no Unfinished Business. NEW BUSINESS Ordinance Adopting the Airport Master Plan Update and associated Comprehensive Plan Amendment Airport Manager Rob Putnam stated that there had been confusion within the distributed packet; he clarified the situation and asked for Council questions. There were none. Debora Nelson moved to adopt the Ordinance approving the Airport Master Plan Update and associated Comp Plan Amendments. Marilyn Oertle seconded the motion which passed with a unanimous vote. Appointment of Ken Levesque to the Planning Commission Community Development Director David Kuhl gave the background of the search for a Planning Commissioner Replacement. He noted the presence of Ken Levesque in the audience. Marilyn Oertle moved to approve the appointment of Ken Levesque to the Planning Commission. Chris Raezer seconded the motion that passed with a unanimous vote. 67th Ave. NE Phase III – BNSF Lebanon Crossing and Construction Easements City Engineer Eric Scott spoke to the requested easements, and he announced that Burlington Northern has now approved and signed the needed agreement. Mr. Scott then answered Council questions. Debora Nelson moved to approve the BNSF Lebanon Crossing and Construction Easements necessary for construction of the 67th Ave. project and authorize the Mayor to sign, pending final review by the City Attorney. Randy Tendering seconded the motion that passed with a unanimous vote. Authority to Bid the 2012 A/C Water Main Replacement Eric Scott stated that the City has 95 miles of waterline and a percentage of that is concrete/asbestos which is deteriorating. Portions of that waterline by the airport, as well as a small segment on Broadway, need to be replaced. He then answered Council questions. Dick Butner moved to grant City Staff the authority to bid the 2012 Water main Replacement Project, subject to review by the City Attorney. Marilyn Oertle seconded the motion that passed with a unanimous vote. Airport Water Main Extension Bid Award Airport Manager Rob Putnam noted that this Bid Award had been addressed in an April Council Workshop meeting. Debora Nelson moved to approve the contract for the 2012 Arlington Airport Water Main Extension Project with DG Buchanan Construction, Inc., in the amount of $80,119.65. Randy Tendering seconded the motion that passed with a unanimous vote. Approval of Short Term Interfund Loans Finance Director Jim Chase gave a brief update of General Funds. Marilyn Oertle moved to approve the Short Term Interfund Loans made at the end of April 2012, as presented by the Finance Director, and direct those loans to be paid as soon as there are sufficient funds to do so. Chris Raezer seconded the motion that passed with a unanimous vote. MAYOR’S REPORT Mayor Tolbert gave a report of meetings and events she had recently attended. Minutes of the City of Arlington City Council Meeting DRAFT May 21, 2012 Page 3 of 3 COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS – OPTIONAL Dick Butner, Randy Tendering, Debora Nelson, Marilyn Oertle, Chris Raezer, and Ken Klein gave brief reports. EXECUTIVE SESSION There was no need for an Executive Session. With no further business to come before the Council, the meeting was adjourned at 7:34PM. ____________________________ Barbara Tolbert, Mayor Page 1 of 2 Council Chambers 110 East Third Street May 29, 2012 Dick Butner Randy Tendering, Debora Nelson, Marilyn Oertle, Ken Klein, Steve Baker, Mayor Tolbert, Kristin Banfield, Jim Chase, Police Chief Nelson Beazley, Paul Ellis, Jim Kelly, Eric Scott, David Kuhl, Cristy Brubaker, Jan Bauer, and Steve Peiffle – City Attorney Council Members Absent: Chris Raezer Also Known to be Present: Maxine Jenft – Cemetery Board, Mayor Tolbert called the meeting to order at 7:00PM. Marilyn Oertle moved to approve the Agenda, and Steve Baker seconded the motion, which passed with a unanimous vote approving the Workshop Agenda. WORKSHOP ITEMS – NO FINAL ACTION WAS TAKEN Renew Interlocal Agreement with Snohomish Regional Drug & Gang Task Force Police Chief Nelson Beazley asked to renew the Interlocal with the task force, speaking to the rate increase for the requested agreement. He then answered Council questions. April Financial Report to Council With the use of a power point presentation Finance Director Jim Chase gave an update on the April 2012 Financial Report. Community Development Director David Kuhl gave information on building permits and the current construction that is happening. Throughout the presentation Mr. Chase answered Council questions and addressed Council comments. Airport Blvd – Apparent low bidder of Construction Contract City Engineer Eric Scott spoke to the Airport Boulevard Project. He reviewed the bidding process and distributed the results of the bid opening of May 24, 2012. The next process will be to check bidders and references, followed by a request for Council approval of the chosen company. Mr. Scott and Public Works Director Jim Kelly also answered Council questions. Retail Competitiveness Analysis: Shea Carr Jewell Contract Amendment #2 & McConkey Study Public Works Director Jim Kelly and Assistant to the City Administrator for Special Projects Paul Ellis spoke to the Competitiveness Analysis and need to discover the reason retail business is not coming to Arlington. In addition, the City had contracted with Sea Carr Jewell to update the City’s Transportation Comprehensive Plan, and while the work is nearly complete, additional efforts are necessary. Discussion and questions followed. Miscellaneous Council Items City Administrator Allen Johnson will be returning Monday on a limited schedule. PUBLIC COMMENT There were no members of the Public who wished to speak on matters on the Agenda. The meeting was adjourned at 7:49PM. Minutes of the Arlington City Council Workshop Minutes of the City of Arlington City Council Meeting May 14, 2012 Page 2 of 2 ____________________________ Barbara Tolbert, Mayor City of Arlington Council Agenda Bill Item: NB #1 Attachment B COUNCIL MEETING DATE: June 4, 2012 SUBJECT: Renew Interlocal Agreement with Snohomish Regional Drug & Gang Task Force ATTACHMENTS: Interlocal Agreement with Snohomish County DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN Police Contact: Chief Nelson Beazley, 360-403-3400 EXPENDITURES REQUESTED: $4,477.00 BUDGET CATEGORY: Police – Narcotics Investigations Expenditures LEGAL REVIEW: DESCRIPTION: This is an annual renewal of the interlocal agreement for the City of Arlington to participate in the Snohomish Regional Drug & Gang Task Force. This agreement sets out the terms, the fees, the organization and the operational conditions of this multi- agency task force and reflects an approximate .07% increase over the current agreement. HISTORY: The Task Force was formed in 1988 and the City of Arlington has been a steady participant. The Task Force was founded to work street narcotics and has evolved to investigating the highest level of drug dealers. The Task Force is staffed by detectives from the Sheriff’s Office and the City of Everett, and is assisted by a host of local and federal agencies. The Task Force continues to provide essential assistance to the Police Department especially in the area of training and undercover operations. The City’s financial contribution is only 2.5% of the total but receives far more in returned services. The Task Force also receives funding from the Federal government. ALTERNATIVES Non-renewal and withdrawing from participation in the Task Force. RECOMMENDED MOTION: I move to authorize the Mayor to sign the Interlocal Agreement with the Snohomish Regional Drug and Gang Task Force. City of Arlington Council Agenda Bill Item: NB #2 Attachment C COUNCIL MEETING DATE: June 4, 2012 SUBJECT: Airport Boulevard Authorization to Award Construction Contract ATTACHMENTS: Bid Opening Results DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN Public Works – Eric Scott EXPENDITURES REQUESTED: $1,143,953.61 BUDGET CATEGORY: Transportation Improvement fund, Airport CIP, Water CIP and Sewer CIP LEGAL REVIEW: DESCRIPTION: Design of Airport Blvd, Phase 1 is complete and sufficient funding has been obtained to meet the estimated cost of construction; staff advertised for bid in May. Bids were opened on May 24, 2012, and Reece Trucking was the apparent low bidder. HISTORY: The City of Arlington obtained $452,485.00 in federal grant funding for construction of Airport Boulevard, Phase 1. The design of Airport Boulevard was started in 2009 in conjunction with the development of the Airport Business Park on the west side of Arlington Municipal Airport. Difficulties with the Developers on that project and then the economic downturn placed this project on hold. In 2010 City Staff started pursuing grant funding for the project and began the completion of the bid documents by City Staff. The Construction Estimate for the project is $1,293,000. ALTERNATIVES • Remand to staff for additional information • Table pending additional discussion RECOMMENDED MOTION: I move to award the construction contract for Airport Blvd Phase 1A to Reece Trucking for the amount of $1,143,953.61 and authorize the Mayor to sign the contact, subject to review by the City Attorney. City of Arlington Engineering Division Memo To: Mayor, City Council Cc: Jim Kelly – Public Works Director From: Eric Scott – City Engineer Date: June 4, 2012 Re: Airport Blvd Phase 1a Bid Summary The following are the results from the bid opening on May 24, at 2pm: Construction Estimate: $1,293,000.00 Reece Construction: $1,143,953.61 (Lowest Responsible Bidder) Interwest Construction: $1,191,751.00 Strider Construction: $1,240,892.58 Colacurcio Brothers: $1,458,411.05 Award Construction: $1,536,897.05 City of Arlington Council Agenda Bill Item: NB #3 Attachment D COUNCIL MEETING DATE: June 4, 2012 SUBJECT: Retail Competitiveness: Transportation Comprehensive Plan Update – Shea Carr Jewell Amendment No. 2 & McConkey Study ATTACHMENTS: Transportation Comp Plan Amendment #2 McConkey Development Proposal DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN Public Works – James Kelly / Executive – Paul Ellis EXPENDITURES REQUESTED: $14,516 -$8,000.00 (Shea Carr Jewell) -$6,516 (McConkey) – Not to exceed BUDGET CATEGORY: Utilities - $4,365; Community Development - $2,151; Transportation Imp Fund - $8,000 LEGAL REVIEW: DESCRIPTION: In order to fully understand why Arlington is lagging behind in the retail development, the City needs to identify the areas of improvement to gain a competitive advantage. The proposed methodology would be to first study the competitiveness of Arlington and its ability to meet the needs of the commercial development community. The attached proposal from McConkey Development Co. would provide a comparison of Arlington’s development fees; permit timing, mitigation fees, zoning codes and design review requirements with neighboring cities. This study would be completed within 60 days of the Notice to Proceed. The amendment to the Shea-Carr-Jewell contract is due to out of scope work and additional work required for Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) Analysis, connected with the McConkey Study. The McConkey study will help shape the appropriate way to assess TIFs to help the City gain a competitive edge with commercial development. HISTORY: Arlington has a vibrant industrial area surrounding the airport and has been successful in its efforts to recruit and retain industrial businesses. The recent economic challenges have created vacancies in both the commercial and industrial areas. The City of Arlington has been able to fill the vacant industrial properties at a greater rate than surrounding areas, but is lagging behind in comparison in recruitment of commercial retailers. The mean jobs per household, income level and residential demographics remain greater in Arlington than in surrounding areas and would provide a sustainable commercial environment for retail development. The lack of retail development has created a need for the labor force and residents to purchase goods outside of Arlington, creating leakage in commercial commerce and results in lower sales tax collection. As part of the General Comprehensive Plan, the City must also produce a Transportation Comprehensive Plan (Transportation Element) consistent with the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan and consistent with Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) requirements. The City contracted with Shea Carr Jewell in April 2011 to update the City’s Transportation Comp Plan. While the majority of the work effort is complete, to provide an updated plan, additional efforts have been identified necessary to incorporate on-going strategic planning by City staff and to examine funding requirements for long range transportation projects. Amendment #2 is needed for the effort associated with the extra out-of-scope work. Initial Agreement / Phase 1 – Project Definition $ 8,300 Amendment #1 - Transportation Comp Plan Update $ 91,419 Amendment #2 – TIF Update and Public Meetings $ 8,000 Total $ 107,719 ALTERNATIVES No Action at this time RECOMMENDED MOTION: I move to approve and authorize the mayor to sign Amendment #2 to the Shea Carr Jewell Transportation Comprehensive Plan Contract, and I move to accept the McConkey proposal and authorize staff to move forward with the competitive advantage study. _________________________________________________________________________ April 20, 2012 Page 1 Amendment No. 2 Scope of Work for Engineering & Planning Services City of Arlington Traffic Impact Fee Update and Transportation Plan Additional Services Prepared for: Jim Kelly, PE, Director of Public Works City of Arlington Prepared By: Eric Johnston, PE, Associate Principal Shea Carr Jewell, Inc. Date prepared: April 20, 2012 Overview Shea Carr Jewell (SCJ) has been contracted by the City of Arlington to provide an update to the City’s Transportation Plan. While the majority of the work effort is complete to provide an updated plan, additional efforts have been identified necessary to incorporate on-going strategic planning by City staff and elected officials to meet immediate and long-term transportation infrastructure needs in the City. At the request of the City, this Amendment No. 2 will allow SCJ to incorporate recent additions to funding strategies and additional meeting time. Initial Agreement / Phase 1 – Project Definition  Complete. Amendment #1 / Phase 2 – Transportation Plan Update  Data collection complete.  Modeling complete.  Operations analysis complete.  2035 improvement projects identification complete. _________________________________________________________________________ April 20, 2012 Page 2  Financing plan in draft stage.  Graphics/figures complete.  Document in draft stage.  Public process to be determined. Amendment #2 / Phase 3 – TIF Update and Public Meetings  Additional meetings and coordination with the City.  Add collision data to Transportation Plan document.  Advise City staff on TIF methodology.  Provide traffic volume data in support of new TIF.  Incorporate updated financial strategies in the 2035 Transportation Plan document, including revised Traffic Impact Fee text. Provide stand-alone memorandum regarding TIF update methodology developed by City staff. Amendment #2 Lump Sum Fee: $8,000 Fee Initial Agreement / Phase 1 – Project Definition $8,300 Amendment #1 / Phase 2 – Transportation Plan Update 91,419 Amendment #2 / Phase 3 – TIF Update and Public Meetings 8,000 TOTAL FEE AMENDMENT #2 / PHASE 3 $8,000 Acceptance of Fee Proposal If this scope of work and fee estimate is acceptable, please sign below as your formal acceptance of the terms outlined in this proposal and return a copy to us. We appreciate this opportunity to provide professional services to the City of Arlington and look forward to initiating this contract amendment. ______________________________________ ______________________________ Authorization Date End of Proposal May 10, 2012 Mayor Barbara Tolbert City of Arlington 238 N. Olympic Ave. Arlington, WA 98223 Re: Retail Development in Arlington Dear Mayor Tolbert: It was a pleasure meeting with you and Paul Ellis to discuss Arlington’s retail competitiveness. As we discussed, major retailers are totally profit driven. They first identify a “gap” in the market, evaluate various locations, and then settle on a site. Sometimes it matters which city the site is located, but more often than not, the best location dictates where they build a store. A successful new retail project involves developers, tenants, brokers, lenders, government officials, and City staff. All of these participants need to work together to build a successful retail project. A Developer concentrates on: 1. Demand for a building, at the time it is ready for occupancy. 2. Reputation of a City of issuing timely permits, without extraordinary mitigation or design review requirements. 3. Absorption; how long will it take to lease up the project, at the forecasted rents? A Tenant or User wants: 1. Lowest possible cost. 2. Prime location 3. Freeway visibility 4. Minimal design requirements 5. Low construction costs and traffic mitigation, which equates into lower rent. Mayor Barbara Tolbert May 9, 2012 Page 2 A Broker: 1. Wants to make a deal, and get paid. 2. Will steer the developer to the city that is the most reliable for delivering timely permits. The Investor and Lender wants: 1. Certainty of timing and delivery date of a project. 2. Minimal retail competition of that retailer’s product. 3. The retailers to cluster so the shopping center has a market draw. 4. High residential density and high household incomes around the project. The City wants: 1. New retail tenants to serve it’s residents and to pull more dollars into their city. 2. Increased Sales Tax Revenue 3. Attractive buildings 4. Minimal traffic problems, with mitigation improvements paid for by the developer, or through a grant. A City can be at odds with a developer, as they have competing interests. The City has it’s needs, but doesn’t want to drive development into another City. All things being equal, a developer will go to the city that is the fastest to deliver permits with minimal costs added onto the project. A developer is under pressure from the big box retailers to get a store opened on time and on budget. A timing delay can cost a retailer several million dollars a month in lost sales. The developer often has incentives, and penalties dependent on the delivery date of a project. My proposal is to work with the City of Arlington’s staff to assemble information on how Arlington competes with neighboring cities on development fees, permit timing, mitigation fees, zoning code, and design review requirements. I will then make recommendations on how Arlington can get ahead of the competition, and will work with staff to implement those changes. My consulting fee for this service is $150/hr, not to exceed $6,000. The final product be completed within 60 days of authorization, and will include written recommendations, and a presentation to the City Council. My website describes my experience as a developer for 30 years, and as a Mayor for 14 years; www.McConkeyDev.com Sincerely, Fred McConkey President