HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-23-2012_Council Workshop
SPECIAL ACCOMMODATIONS: The City of Arlington strives to provide accessible meetings for people with disabilities. Please contact the ADA
coordinator at (360) 403-3441 or 1-800-833-8388 (TDD only) prior to the meeting date if special accommodations are required.
CALL TO ORDER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
WORKSHOP ITEMS ~ NO FINAL ACTION WILL BE TAKEN
1. (60 min) Aces Casino Relocation Request ATTACHMENT A
2. (20 min) 1st Quarter Financial Report ATTACHMENT B
3. (5 min) Interfund Loan Status Update ATTACHMENT C
4. (20 min) Resolution – Public Safety Sales Tax on August 7, 2012
Primary Ballot
ATTACHMENT D
5. (10 min) Authority to Bid 67th Ave NE, Phase III Project ATTACHMENT E
6. (5 min) Bid Support Contract with KBA for 67th Ave NE, Phase III
Project
ATTACHMENT F
7. (5 min) HDR Supplement #7 for 67th Ave NE, Phase III Project ATTACHMENT G
8. (5 min) Airport Water Line Project ATTACHMENT H
9. (5 min) Fee Resolution - Final Review ATTACHMENT I
10. (5 min) Appointments to Parks, Arts & Recreation Commission ATTACHMENT J
11. Miscellaneous Council Items
PUBLIC COMMENT
For members of the public to speak to the Council regarding matters on the Council Workshop agenda.
Please limit your remarks to three minutes.
ADJOURNMENT
To open all attachments, click here
Arlington City Council Workshop
April 23, 2012 – 7 PM
City Council Chambers ~ 110 E. Third
City of Arlington
Council Agenda Bill
Item:
WS #1
Attachment
A
COUNCIL MEETING DATE:
April 23, 2012
SUBJECT:
Aces Casino Relocation Request to Buzz Inn Steak House
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Council memo
2. 1000’ buffer map
3. Aces Casino Relocation Proposal
4. Letter of support from Smokey Point Shopping Center
DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN
Community Development – David Kuhl, 360-403-3445; Todd Hall, 360-403-3436
EXPENDITURES REQUESTED: -0-
BUDGET CATEGORY: N/A
LEGAL REVIEW:
DESCRIPTION:
Aces Casino is requesting to relocate their business from the existing site located at 5200
172nd Street to the Buzz Inn Steak House, located at 17216 Smokey Point Drive. Based
on Chapter 20.40, Permitted Uses, gambling establishments (Use 8.600 in Table 20.40-1:
Table of Permissible Uses) shall not be located within 1000 feet of daycare facilities,
schools, churches, synagogues or temples. As shown on the attached 1000’ buffer map,
both a church and daycare facility is located within the buffer area. Aces Casino has
requested that the City make an exception to the zoning regulations, although current
code does not permit exceptions for land uses.
HISTORY:
Representatives from both Aces Casino and Buzz Inn originally approached the City in
May 2011 to request relocation to the Buzz Inn site. In June 2011, staff denied the
request based on the 1000’ buffer criteria as noted in Chapter 20.40.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Direct staff to move forward with modifying Title 20 to reduce location
restrictions.
2. Maintain status quo with no modifications to existing regulations.
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
None at this time.
City of Arlington Community Development
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
238 N. Olympic Avenue Arlington, WA 98223
MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 23, 2012
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: David Kuhl, AICP, Director
Community Development
SUBJECT: Land Use Code Text Amendment Section 20.40.010
The City is interested in exploring the approval of a house-banked card room in
the area of town currently occupied by the Buzz Inn near I-5 and 172nd. The area
is currently zoned Highway Commercial (HC) and has the Buzz Inn, and a
shopping center that backs up to I-5 within the area of consideration. The
proposal would be to amend Chapter 20.40.010 of the Land Use Code to allow
the house-banked card room as well as modify footnote 21 of the Permissible
Uses Table to reduce or eliminate the distance separation requirements from a
house-banked card room to a daycare or school and a church, synagogue or
temple (see attached map).
There are several components of this issue that should be explored. These
include:
1. Review the State Gambling Commission rules to see how they apply to
our situation in Arlington.
2. Review of other cities that have house-banked card rooms, such as
Tukwila.
3. Review of any known studies of the secondary effects of gambling.
4. Review of police activity relating to the current house-banked card room,
aka Ace’s Casino.
5. Possible conditions of approval to include a stratified tax as used in
Tukwila.
6. Circle back to the discussion in the Comprehensive Plan as to where the
appropriate land use should be for a house-banked card room.
7. Review other possible locations in the long run that could include Island
Crossing.
City of Arlington Community Development
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
238 N. Olympic Avenue Arlington, WA 98223
State Gambling Commission
The State Gambling Commission’s position is that a local jurisdiction may decide
whether or not to allow social gambling and may tax it, but that is the limit of their
authority. In Tukwila, the City Attorney interprets the RCW the same; that local
jurisdictions do not have the legal authority to zone locations for mini-casinos.
There is a difference of opinion on the matter as Arlington, Shoreline and Renton
among others do in fact zone for social gambling. The legislature has not acted
to clarify this question, leaving the ultimate decision up to the courts.
Consequently, Tukwila took a different tack. They decided that if the City could
not determine where mini-casinos could be located, then these businesses would
be banned. This resulted in a casino backlash, so the Council put the issue on
the ballot for a non-binding advisory vote. The vote to keep the casinos was
approved by a super majority. Consequently, the Council voted to rescind its
earlier ban of the mini-casinos.
Tukwila was able to limit the number of casinos, however, through the legal
mechanism of tax rates for house banked card rooms. The Gambling
Commission allows a city to tax a mini-casino up to 20%. The Tukwila formula is
as follows:
•Up to four mini casinos, the tax rate for all casinos will be set at 12%.
•If there are between four and six mini-casinos, the rate will be assessed at 15%.
•If there are more than six casinos, the rate will be at the legal maximum of 20%.
Neighborhood Impacts
Studies of the secondary effects of gambling on a neighborhood are not
particularly prevalent.
The current State Law reflects the type of establishment that is known as Ace’s in
the City. These casinos are highly regulated; the management is responsible to
ensure that the business is orderly and processes are well-documented.
Consequently, our police department has indicated that there are no problems
with the casino.
City of Arlington Community Development
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
238 N. Olympic Avenue Arlington, WA 98223
Proposed Code Changes
Definition of church in the Code
We currently do not define church in our code. One possible definition could be
Kirkland’s definition. “Any establishment, the principal purpose of which is
religious worship, and for which the principal building or other structure contains
the sanctuary or principal place of worship, and which includes related accessory
uses.”
.
Changes to Permissible Use Table, Section 20.40.010.
Expand footnote 21 of the Use table to allow house banked card rooms in the
entire strip mall from Buzz Inn to Gold’s Gym. (I-5 on the west, Smokey Point
Drive on the east, 17216 172nd on the south and 3131 Smokey Point Drive on the
north).
In footnote 21 of the Table of Permissible Uses, reduce or eliminate the 1000 foot
buffering requirement for daycare facilities and schools as well as churches,
synagogues or temples.
Stratified Tax Proposal
Amend AMC 3.32.050 to establish plateaus for the tax on casinos after the base
rate gets to 12% in 2017. For example:
One casino – the rate will be assessed at 12%
Two casinos – the rate will be assessed at 15%
Three or more casinos – the rate will be assessed at 20%
Planning Commission Review
The Planning Commission met on April 17, 2012 and developed five
recommendations that include:
1. Give direction to the staff to schedule public hearings before the Planning
Commission and City Council.
City of Arlington Community Development
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
238 N. Olympic Avenue Arlington, WA 98223
2. Get a commitment from the staff and Council to circle back and look at this
issue in the Comprehensive Plan for a long-term solution.
3. Adopt a stratified tax schedule for multiple casinos.
4. Adopt a definition for churches.
5. Complete a text amendment to footnote 21 of the Permissible Uses Table,
Section 20.40.010 of the Development Code to reduce or eliminate the
buffering requirement between house-banked card rooms and schools,
daycares, churches, synagogues, and temples.
Kidzle B KidsDay C are
Buzz Inn
Praise Chapel Christian Fellowship
!"`$
?Ô
Smokey Point Blvd
173rd Pl NE
Smokey Pt Dr
City of Arlington
Business LocationReview Map
Maps and GIS data are distributed “AS-IS” withoutwarranties of any kind, either express or implied,including but not limited to warranties of suitability for aparticular purpose or use. Map data are compiled froma variety of sources which may contain errors andusers who rely upon the information do so at their ownrisk. Users agree to indemnify, defend, and holdharmless the City of Arlington for any and all liability ofany nature arising out of or resulting from the lack ofaccuracy or correctness of the data, or the use of thedata presented in the maps.
´
lb
Business LocRevie w11x17_11
5/23/2011
1 in = 250 feet
Scale:
Date:
File:
Cartographer:
Streams an d waterbodies courtesy of Snoh omish County Dept of Information Systems, June 2009.
Interstate
Sta te Routes
Major Roads
Primary Roads
Local roads
City Bo undary
DRAFT
Legend
Note: Not all bussiness lo cations are shown
Buzz In n Estimated1000 ft Buffer Area
Bussiness Location
Aces Casino and Sports Bar
Proposal to Switch locations
with
Buzz Inn Steak House
Taxes: Since our opening in October 2008 through December 31, 2011 we have
paid a total tax expense of $932,612 and collected and paid $241,648 in Sales Tax.
The following is a breakdown of the taxes:
Gambling Tax: To the City of Arlington $315,007 in Gambling Taxes. (The
Tax Rate has now increased effective January 2012 to 7% on Card Room Income.)
The Federal tax expense was $6,282.
Sales & B & O Tax: Through our retail sales we have collected and paid to
the City a total of $59,007 in Local Sales Tax and to the State a total of $182,641.
Additionally our B & O Tax expense paid to the State was $90,200.
Payroll Taxes: The total of the Payroll Taxes paid to the State and Federal
Government was $484,637.
Property Tax: Paid to the County was $36,566.
Jobs: Currently we employ 85 people.
The total wages earned from October 2008 through December 2011 was
$3,979,320.
Our current Gross Payroll paid on February 5, 2012 was $50,663.
There are no wages paid to owners or Corporate Officers from the business.
Job Development:
We have taken multiple people with little, or no, experience and taught
them skill sets. We have trained people in multiple areas such as cooks, servers,
bartenders, card dealers, security personnel, casino cashiers, surveillance
operators, and, on multiple occasions, have transitioned staff into management
roles. Whenever possible we promote from with-in. We have had success in
helping people work their way through school, and given people the ability to
enhance their resumes with the experience that is required in the majority of
these fields.
One of the previous Casino Managers moved on to become the North End
Regional Manager for the Washington Gold Casinos and is currently running three
of their properties. Two of the poker room managers have moved onto higher
paying management positions for tribal casinos. Our management takes pride in
the ability to help people find positions that fit their skill set. Currently two
former bartenders have been trained and promoted, one of them to be our Food
& Beverage Manager and the other is now the Bar Manager. We have trained a
former out of work computer technician to be a Surveillance Manager. Each of
our Security Manager, Poker Manager and Casino Manager had no experience in
management previous to their working for Aces. The present Accounting Manager
is in school for accounting but was unable to find work in her field due to her lack
of experience. In all of these cases the individuals mentioned have thrived in their
current roles.
Aces Casino has always enjoyed the ability to take young adults and provide
direction and opportunity. Many of our employees have, or will, move on to
other jobs that would’ve not been available to them previous to their
employment at Aces. It’s a tough industry to compete with the pay scale and
benefits provided by the surrounding tribal competition. It is expected that
people will move on, and new people will be given the opportunity to develop
into a higher paying leadership roles. The loss of our business will severely impact
the job market.
Community Building:
We have tried to be involved with community functions, although we have
not been able to help as much as we would like because our financial resources
are highly limited due to operating losses. We have run multiple promotions and
events based on gathering food for our local food bank. We have sponsored
multiple local sports events and teams. Specifically, we have sponsored an Indoor
Soccer team for 2+ years that plays every Friday at the Soccer First Arena; a Men’s
Softball team for 2+ years that plays Monday Nights and is made up of Arlington
residents; and sponsored the Mixed Martial Arts competition on both occasions
that it was held locally at the Soccer First Arena. We were sponsors of the Duck
Dash and some local car shows. We have made a positive impact on the Arlington
Fly-In, not as a sponsor, but as a promoter. We have held multiple fundraisers for
the Arlington Football team, Relay for Life Cancer research, and some local
individual causes in need.
Local Business Impact: The loss of our business will be felt community wide.
Our presence at this previously closed location has helped improve
surrounding businesses. The hotel has had a boost in occupancy. The gas
station’s numbers have had to increase in gas sales as well as in product sold. We
have been one of Crown Distributing's best local accounts. The liquor store has
told us we were the highest volume of anyone in our location previously. We
have held five golf tournaments at Glen Eagle Golf Course at approximately
$3,500 per event. We believe that we could have that same sort of impact for the
strip mall located next to the Buzz Inn. We also feel that the Buzz Inn coming to
our current location will maintain the positive effect on the hotel and gas station.
We have put a "Care Cab" service in place for our local residents that
include servicing the Marysville Buzz Inn, Smokey Point Buzz Inn, Aces Casino,
Marysville J.R.'s Steakhouse, and will be serving Razzals as of March 1st. This
service is provided at no charge to the customer and runs Wednesday through
Saturday from 8pm-2am in our efforts to keep our roads safe.
Business History:
Aces Casino is a family owned and operated business that has been
struggling since opening in October of 2008. Our continued efforts have fallen
short and we are unable to withstand the financial commitment it takes to
operate Aces Casino without a significant change. The Shareholders have
invested $1,275,900 to date to open and operate the location.
Zelma Simmons, owner of 50% of the business, sadly lost her husband in
April of 2011, and is running out of financial resources to invest. Bill Tackitt &
Sally Herschlip although still operating the Buzz Inn Steakhouses with various
other partners are not able to continue covering the losses from those
investments and have sold substantial assets to cover this investment.
After meeting recently and facing the necessity of closing the casino, and
the hard reality of putting all of these casino employees out of work, we decided
it was worth one last effort to try and salvage the operation.
Business Proposal:
Our proposal to the city is a swap of locations with the Buzz Inn Steak
House, which has operated in Arlington since 1991. They would continue their
operations at Aces location and we will take over theirs. We feel this could have a
positive impact on their operations and give them the ability to grow in a larger
facility. They should continue with success as they have an established clientele
and loyal customer base. It will also give them a needed area for providing
banquets. This will provide a well-known restaurant that caters to local families,
closer to the airport and eastern residential areas of Arlington.
The benefit for Aces Casino is being closer to the freeway. The customer
base we are seeking, that should save the Casino operation, is the Freeway
customers headed to the tribal casinos located to the south and north of us. This
clientele is already spending their entertainment dollars in gambling
establishments; however the City, County, and State get no tax benefits from the
tribal casinos.
The top revenue generating casinos in the state are located on the freeway.
The industry has been on the decline over the past several years. In the last three
years the state has declined from 81 Non-tribal card rooms to 55 that are still
operating. Although there has been a significant decline in operations this does
not reflect the possibilities of generating large amounts of revenue.
The House Bank Card Room Financial Statements of 2010, published on the
Washington State Gambling Commission Web Page, show of the 52 card rooms
operating, 30 of them turned a profit, while 20 fell short. The average card room
revenue is $3,443,626 of all 52 rooms, while Aces has averaged only $953,361 per
year since opening. If we were able to increase to the casino average, it would be
an additional $174,319, in tax at 7%, per year to the city. Although, realistically
we would expect our business to increase, we project it to be closer to an
increase of $40,000 in tax dollars to the city per year.
We truly feel that the city and state can ill afford to continue to have
businesses fail. If we are unable to move locations, we will fail. In addition to all
of the jobs and revenue lost, the City of Arlington may not get the opportunity to
capitalize on an industry that thrives in the Tribal Operations in the local vicinity.
Although the gaming industry has diminished for the private sector, it has
flourished for the tribes. From 2010-2011 the tribal casinos have increased 1%
which is a growth of $200,000,000 in one year. The tribes’ growth over the past
year is comparable to absorbing the entire independent industry.
Request: We are asking for a change in the ordinance, or a conditional waiver,
allowing this move.
We met, in May of 2011, with the planning commission and were told the
city ordinance states there will be no casinos within 1,000 feet of a day care,
school, church, synagogue, or temple.
There is a daycare center located in the vicinity. It is, at minimum, .28 miles
(1,478 feet), driving distance to the Buzz Inn Steakhouse. The driving distance
from the Buzz Inn to the daycare, is .42 miles, due to the limited road access.
There is also a church that is located well within the parameters, but it was
not built as a church, and is located in a leased space. The church’s hope is to
grow their congregation and relocate to a bigger space in the future. It is my
hope they would not oppose our move, as it is in the best interest of all the
employees, businesses, and the City, if our business continues to operate.
It should further be noted the Buzz Inn Steakhouse has had, and currently
provides, gambling since opening in 1991, in the form of Pulltabs, with an annual
average gross volume of $286,435.
Closing:
We would like to thank you for your time, and consideration, in reviewing
our proposal. We appeal to the city to make this exception, so we can continue
to do our part in battling this economic crisis with optimism and drive. We have
continued to move forward in a time where it seems most things are moving
backwards. We have always worked well with city officials, as well as our state
agencies, and hope to be given the opportunity to continue to build these
relations.
If you have any questions, concerns, or would like any further information,
please do not hesitate to contact me.
Josh Herschlip
General Manager
425-268-4901
City of Arlington
Council Agenda Bill
Item:
WS #2
Attachment
B
COUNCIL MEETING DATE:
April 23, 2012
SUBJECT:
First Quarter Financial Report
ATTACHMENTS:
1st Quarter 2012 Financial Report
DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN
Finance; Contact: Jim Chase – 360-403-3422
EXPENDITURES REQUESTED: -0-
BUDGET CATEGORY: N/A
LEGAL REVIEW:
DESCRIPTION:
Staff will review the Financial Report from the first quarter with Council.
HISTORY:
ALTERNATIVES
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
No action.
March 2012 Financial Report Jim Chase, Finance Director
In the General Fund, March receipts continued to be positive in the building area. Building Permits again
exceeded expectations (YTD collections currently at 83.7% of budget) as did Plan Check Fees (we have already
exceeded the amount budgeted). These two revenue sources, however, are not expected to continue to grow.
The remaining vacant lots in the Magnolia Meadows area all have building permits.
Sales Tax dollars received this month (for January sales) was $219,726, which is greater than amount received for
the same month last year. The year to date collections for 2012, however, still trail last year’s number by just
$3,646. As you can see on the attached chart, last year’s collection was $3,033,646. We budgeted $3,000,000 this
year.
The State’s budget, recently passed by the legislature for the next fiscal year (July 2012 to June 2013), includes a
reduction in distribution of Liquor Excise Tax revenues. The distribution of Liquor Excise Taxes to cities will
permanently end as of July 1. This will mean a reduction of about $64,000 to Arlington from what was
anticipated. We will continue to receive the State’s distribution of Liquor Profits.
Fines and Forfeitures revenue collections continue to be below budgeted projections. We are at just 19.2% of our
budget through March (where we should be at 25%).
Motor Vehicle Fuel Taxes (Street Fund) through March are trailing revenue projections by about 10%. If this trend
continues, it would mean more increased transfers from the General Fund to cover expenses.
Attached are the numbers and charts for major General Fund revenue accounts, as you are familiar with. Also
added is a chart for the Motor Vehicle Fuel Taxes.
Following the charts is General Fund Operating Statement for March. The report indicates that 23.56% of
budgeted revenues have been received but includes the interfund loan so as to keep the fund in the black. We
will receive Property Taxes in May and repay those loans. The report also shows that 23.81% of the annual
budget has been spent.
The Other Funds Operating Statements begin on page 8. Funds highlighted this month are the Stream Corridor
Restoration Fund, the Lodging Tax Fund the Cemetery Fund.
The Stream Corridor Restoration Fund is a small fund with budgeted expenditures in 2012 of $17,000. This fund
is used for capital improvements for restoration to or enhancements of stream corridors within the City.
The Lodging Tax Fund is used to distribute funds to promote tourism in and around Arlington. Lodging
establishments collect a 2% tax on all room charges and remit the tax to the State which then distributes the
dollars back to Arlington on a monthly basis. The Lodging Tax Committee accepts annual applications from
various entities to use the funds to promote tourism through a variety of activities. We expect a total of about
$75,000 to be collected from the Lodging Tax this year.
The Cemetery Fund provides for operation and maintenance of the Arlington Cemetery. Some of the services
provided include internment services and maintenance of the grounds and various structures. The cemetery staff
also sells plots, and a variety of goods that are used such as liners, urns, vaults and headstones.
General Fund Revenue Charts
Property Taxes
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Jan 2,065$ 9,953$ 10,730$ 43,863$ 13,735$
Feb 16,522 6,463 4,965 6,939 8,731
March 31,263 47,312 50,930 36,300 69,232
April 62,724 89,039 180,793 121,892 -
May 866,220 1,006,203 874,964 1,021,034 -
June (28,443) (15,120) 56,580 24,760 -
July 6,881 14,530 12,989 8,241 -
Aug 5,477 7,679 (68,052) 9,547 -
Sept 11,808 44,029 18,000 37,485 -
Oct 73,330 79,762 94,000 318,247 -
Nov 818,761 894,923 878,989 743,089 -
Dec 22,633 8,876 50,453 17,201 -
1,889,242 2,193,649 2,165,341 2,388,598 91,698
2012 Budget 2,392,000
3.83%
Retail Sales Taxes - 1%
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Jan 271,640$ 221,227$ 226,180$ 231,247$ 248,861$
Feb 356,148 280,181 271,533 327,957 285,165
March 268,175 224,708 200,501 198,195 219,727
April 274,578 206,233 240,071 236,714 -
May 317,981 240,634 258,531 276,830 -
June 281,195 236,531 252,005 244,488 -
July 311,099 251,301 252,678 250,540 -
August 325,121 302,202 284,617 277,164 -
Sept 290,051 287,843 256,168 250,027 -
October 258,291 241,080 250,811 247,503 -
Nov 293,780 276,283 270,709 250,547 -
Dec 248,057 237,530 211,020 242,434 -
3,496,116 3,005,753 2,974,824 3,033,646 753,753
2012 Budget 3,000,000
25.13%
Note:2007 Sales Tax Receipts = $4,012,997
SALES TAX RECEIPTS BY BUSINESS TYPE IN 2012
TOTAL PERCENT
AGRICULTURE & OTHER 35,282$ 1.2%
CONSTRUCTION 317,070 10.5%
MANUFACTURING 67,857 2.2%
TRANSPORATION & UTILITIES 114,171 3.8%
WHOLESALES 195,904 6.5%
RETAIL TRADE 1,966,769 64.8%
SERVICES 296,131 9.8%
PUBLIC SERVICES 40,462 1.3%
3,033,646$ 100.0%
$0
$100,000
$200,000
$300,000
$400,000
$500,000
$600,000
$700,000
$800,000
$900,000
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Retail Sales Tax - 1%
$0
$20,000
$40,000
$60,000
$80,000
$100,000
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Property Taxes
3
Snoh. Co. Criminal Justice Sales Tax - 0.1%
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Jan 20,604$ 17,595$ 17,577$ 18,911$ 18,796$
Feb 28,899 23,312 23,396 23,935 24,853
March 18,577 16,671 15,746 16,203 16,396
April 18,891 16,111 16,622 15,930 -
May 22,927 18,775 18,464 18,149 -
June 19,611 16,809 16,923 19,007 -
July 20,296 17,565 17,595 18,988 -
Aug 22,768 20,156 20,382 20,627 -
Sept 20,611 18,447 19,363 19,160 -
Oct 20,663 18,646 18,608 19,420 -
Nov 21,947 19,417 20,368 20,146 -
Dec 19,304 17,356 18,100 18,477 -
255,099 220,861 223,144 228,953 60,045
2012 Budget 230,000
26.11%
Streamlined Sales Tax Mitigation Payments
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Jan -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Feb - - - - -
March - 32,850 29,743 25,024 25,377
April - - - - -
May - - - - -
June - 14,024 29,860 25,161 -
July - - - - -
Aug - - - - -
Sept - 23,290 29,672 25,321 -
Oct - - - - -
Nov - - - - -
Dec 46,329 29,911 25,000 25,266 -
46,329 100,074 114,275 100,771 25,377
2012 Budget 100,000
25.38%
Utility Tax - Water
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Jan 11,792$ 12,919$ 13,013$ 15,779$ 16,437$
Feb 11,863 10,737 13,288 15,103 16,565
March 11,773 14,718 15,760 16,090 14,824
April 13,015 12,023 15,815 16,578 -
May 12,045 13,328 18,173 15,477 -
June 11,410 12,398 19,322 15,690 -
July 15,058 13,207 18,713 15,706 -
Aug 14,794 15,319 19,145 16,400 -
Sept 13,006 16,481 18,250 18,282 -
Oct 15,154 16,890 15,748 19,126 -
Nov 13,470 18,323 16,826 15,220 -
Dec 12,919 16,399 16,765 14,820 -
156,299 172,744 200,818 194,271 47,826
2012 Budget 215,000 Tax is currently at 5% of gross revenues.
22.24%
$0
$10,000
$20,000
$30,000
$40,000
$50,000
$60,000
$70,000
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Crim. Justice Sales Tax
$0
$5,000
$10,000
$15,000
$20,000
$25,000
$30,000
$35,000
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Streamlined Sales Tax
$0
$10,000
$20,000
$30,000
$40,000
$50,000
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Utility Tax - Water
4
Utility Tax - Sewer
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Jan 12,708$ 15,610$ 15,073$ 18,513$ 20,707$
Feb 14,944 10,737 15,058 17,132 20,725
March 12,642 17,565 17,034 20,022 21,603
April 15,185 13,377 18,369 18,484 -
May 13,278 16,063 19,702 20,239 -
June 13,756 13,970 23,506 18,908 -
July 15,212 16,063 18,734 19,883 -
Aug 16,220 15,480 17,617 19,567 -
Sept 15,538 16,445 18,174 19,746 -
Oct 15,467 14,719 16,143 21,101 -
Nov 13,055 16,854 18,069 18,874 -
Dec 15,610 15,368 18,097 20,577 -
173,617 182,252 215,576 233,046 63,035
2012 Budget 250,000 Tax is currently at 5% of gross revenues.
25.21%
Utility Tax - Natural Gas
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Jan 84,677$ 76,095$ -$ 36,179$ 35,573$
Feb - - 78,413 41,081 33,778
March - - - 30,449 29,154
April 111,768 154,007 94,519 39,426 -
May 5,289 - - 25,634 -
June 6,260 - - 23,779 -
July 73,721 67,871 - 13,874 -
Aug 5,430 - 62,496 9,629 -
Sept 3,700 - - 8,946 -
Oct 27,851 17,739 31,198 8,717 -
Nov - 8,348 12,042 12,464 -
Dec - - 21,772 22,809 -
318,696 324,061 300,440 272,987 98,505
2012 Budget 325,000 Tax is currently at 6% of gross revenues.
30.31%
Utility Tax - Cable TV
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Jan 41,789$ -$ 57,070$ 19,754 20,349$
Feb - 54,091 - 20,393 -
March - - - 20,296 40,313
April 42,778 - - 19,945 -
May - 53,136 56,981 20,130 -
June - - - 19,714 -
July 51,202 53,857 59,413 19,761 -
Aug - - - 20,146 -
Sept - - - 19,641 -
Oct 52,392 55,308 59,514 19,687 -
Nov - - 20,979 20,862 -
Dec - - 20,345 20,360 -
188,160 216,392 274,302 240,689 60,662
2012 Budget 370,000 Tax changes from 6% to 8% in March 2012.
16.40%
$0
$10,000
$20,000
$30,000
$40,000
$50,000
$60,000
$70,000
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Utility Tax - Sewer
$0
$20,000
$40,000
$60,000
$80,000
$100,000
$120,000
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Utility Tax - Nat. Gas
$0
$10,000
$20,000
$30,000
$40,000
$50,000
$60,000
$70,000
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Utility Tax - Cable TV
5
Utility Tax - Telephone
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Jan 95,152$ 88,965$ 86,694$ 49,514$ 48,104$
Feb 46,408 37,525 30,381 47,162 46,413
March 51,524 35,359 39,877 47,001 45,922
April 93,367 86,993 88,806 49,593 -
May 45,557 36,626 38,157 48,868 -
June 40,653 36,283 39,605 47,980 -
July 86,661 85,034 84,164 49,151 -
Aug 47,545 38,005 29,395 47,501 -
Sept 37,072 36,847 30,590 48,418 -
Oct 85,747 84,934 91,407 48,145 -
Nov 38,811 37,066 49,004 46,999 -
Dec 37,031 35,740 51,966 47,294 -
705,529 639,376 660,046 577,626 140,439
2012 Budget 600,000 Tax currently at 6% of gross revenues.
23.41%
Utility Tax - Electricity
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Jan 68,584$ 85,254$ 89,193$ 85,675$ 90,775$
Feb 42,022 45,564 47,266 45,924 52,732
March 74,167 88,361 84,004 85,151 91,009
April 39,848 46,327 49,177 52,944 -
May 76,806 74,454 73,938 78,401 -
June 37,999 35,509 38,623 42,306 -
July 66,617 63,927 62,864 66,531 -
Aug 35,593 32,027 35,312 33,892 -
Sept 62,350 61,434 61,005 66,854 -
Oct 31,897 33,812 34,659 30,989 -
Nov 69,761 68,237 68,018 70,805 -
Dec 33,238 33,372 44,113 39,772 -
638,882 668,279 688,172 699,244 234,516
2012 Budget 810,000 Tax changes from 5% to 6% in March 2012.
28.95%
Utility Tax - Solid Waste (Garbage)
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Jan 8,198$ 8,266$ 9,204$ 10,912$ 10,959$
Feb 8,594 8,165 8,907 10,495 10,516
March 9,084 8,696 9,912 10,794 11,108
April 9,532 9,914 9,901 10,148 -
May 9,604 10,282 10,132 10,848 -
June 9,353 9,786 10,013 10,104 -
July 9,613 10,497 10,452 10,781 -
Aug 9,169 10,088 9,906 9,984 -
Sept 9,447 10,936 10,477 10,419 -
Oct 9,346 9,556 9,959 10,586 -
Nov 9,678 9,912 10,754 11,150 -
Dec 8,722 9,929 10,178 10,479 -
110,340 116,028 119,795 126,700 32,583
2012 Budget 199,000 Tax changes from 5% to 8% in March 2012.
16.37%
$0
$50,000
$100,000
$150,000
$200,000
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Utility Tax - Telephone
$0
$50,000
$100,000
$150,000
$200,000
$250,000
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Utility Tax - Electricity
$0
$5,000
$10,000
$15,000
$20,000
$25,000
$30,000
$35,000
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Utility Tax - Garbage
6
Gambling Taxes
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Jan 6,096$ 1,665$ 2,141$ 9,892$ 10,232$
Feb - 38,202 26,034 4,270 9,479
March - - - 12,809 9,781
April 5,597 4,988 5,619 7,503 -
May - 43,661 22,153 5,894 -
June - - - 8,238 -
July 3,760 2,020 2,081 8,521 -
Aug - 49,602 26,093 7,435 -
Sept - - 1,580 6,790 -
Oct 2,435 1,787 22,631 7,404 -
Nov 7,559 39,154 9,846 7,689 -
Dec - - 9,517 8,479 -
25,447 181,077 127,695 94,924 29,492
2012 Budget 100,000 Tax on Pull tabs is 5% of gross receipts.
29.49%Tax on card games was 6% in 2011 and is 7% in 2012 and
will increase 1% per year and max at 12% in 2017.
Cable Franchise Fees
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Jan 117$ 704$ 45,192$ 51,054$ 51,635$
Feb - - - - -
March - - - - -
April 81 1,205 411 50,673 -
May - - 44,678 - -
June - 11,900 - - -
July 564 14,364 48,158 50,190 -
Aug - - - - -
Sept - - - - -
Oct 432 44,951 50,810 50,403 -
Nov - - - - -
Dec - - - - -
1,194 73,124 189,249 202,320 51,635
2012 Budget 205,000 Tax is 5% of revenues.
25.19%They will begin making monthly payments in 2012.
Building Permits
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Jan 15,461$ 21,462$ 82,320$ 9,672$ 52,758$
Feb 45,893 21,621 1,380 5,597 45,748
March 35,278 34,857 12,071 52,830 50,294
April 4,790 9,617 5,181 8,303 -
May 20,828 3,742 1,206 5,445 -
June 18,487 7,216 4,784 4,461 -
July 41,661 12,029 7,256 15,101 -
Aug 11,464 9,805 6,351 14,043 -
Sept 18,356 7,988 2,072 16,702 -
Oct 32,983 3,603 10,989 50,782 -
Nov 5,845 6,569 10,118 56,511 -
Dec 54,010 9,594 8,687 15,540 -
305,055 148,103 152,415 254,987 148,800
2012 Budget 180,000
82.67%
$0
$5,000
$10,000
$15,000
$20,000
$25,000
$30,000
$35,000
$40,000
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Gambling Taxes
$0
$20,000
$40,000
$60,000
$80,000
$100,000
$120,000
$140,000
$160,000
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Building Permits
$0
$10,000
$20,000
$30,000
$40,000
$50,000
$60,000
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Cable Franchise Fees
7
State Shared Revenues
Liquor Excise Taxes
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Jan 19,251$ 20,240$ 21,047$ 20,972$ 21,133$
Feb - - - - -
March - - - - -
April 21,085 21,914 22,553 22,886 -
May - - - - -
June - - - - -
July 19,218 19,542 20,196 21,077 -
Aug - - - - -
Sept - - - - -
Oct 21,025 21,721 21,541 22,244 -
Nov - - - - -
Dec - - - - -
80,579 83,417 85,337 87,179 21,133
2012 Budget 90,000
23.48%
Liquor Profits
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Jan -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Feb - - - - -
March 28,698 28,271 39,961 33,151 23,858
April - - - - -
May - - - - -
June 28,274 29,750 31,625 37,009 -
July - - - - -
Aug - - - - -
Sept 28,101 34,486 33,192 25,535 -
Oct - - - - -
Nov - - - - -
Dec 28,075 24,930 32,982 29,280 -
113,148 117,437 137,760 124,975 23,858
2012 Budget 110,000
21.69%
Street Fund Revenue
Motor Vehicle Fuel Taxes - Street Fund
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Jan 21,651$ 29,365$ 29,365$ 28,999$ 26,401$
Feb 21,367 25,560 31,059 29,651 31,775
March 28,407 29,880 28,088 29,230 26,930
April 30,212 28,049 27,051 28,331 -
May 31,399 30,897 31,140 32,958 -
June 30,774 29,937 30,446 30,897 -
July 33,392 33,359 32,377 31,626 -
Aug 31,636 32,554 31,621 33,033 -
Sept 32,558 34,329 34,057 30,629 -
Oct 33,549 33,887 33,710 34,751 -
Nov 31,449 31,514 31,670 31,765 -
Dec 36,668 32,226 32,441 32,080 -
363,062 371,557 373,025 373,950 85,106
2012 Budget 381,000
22.34%
$0
$10,000
$20,000
$30,000
$40,000
$50,000
$60,000
$70,000
$80,000
$90,000
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Motor Vehicle Fuel Taxes
$18,000
$18,500
$19,000
$19,500
$20,000
$20,500
$21,000
$21,500
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Liquor Excise Tax
$0
$5,000
$10,000
$15,000
$20,000
$25,000
$30,000
$35,000
$40,000
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Liquor Profits
8
OTHER FUNDS OPERATING STATEMENTS YTD
MARCH BUDGET
FUND NAME 2012 2012 %
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS (100 - 199)
- to account for the proceeds of specific revenue sources (other than for major capital projects)
that are legally restricted to expenditure for specified purposes.
FUND 101 STREET
Begin Fund Balance 437$ 1,000$
MV Fuel Taxes 85,107 381,000 22.3%
Interfund Transfers 183,256 575,000 31.9%
Misc. Revenues 6,316 27,200 23.2%
YTD Revenues 274,679 983,200 27.9%
Salaries & Wages 100,339 358,175 28.0%
Personnel Benefits 38,488 126,225 30.5%
Supplies 23,270 56,525 41.2%
Other Services & Charges 64,355 245,260 26.2%
Intergov Serv & Taxes 935 6,000 15.6%
Capital Outlays - 1,700 0.0%
Interfnd Payment for Svcs 47,728 189,400 25.2%
YTD Expenditures 275,115 983,285 28.0%
Ending Fund Balance 1$ 915$
FUND 104 PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT
Begin Fund Balance 22,814$ 10,000$
YTD Revenues 195,000 100 195000.0%
YTD Expenditures 10,531 - 0.0%
End Fund Balance 207,283$ 10,100$
FUND 107 GROWTH MANAGEMENT
Begin Fund Balance 2,915,659$ 3,400,000$
YTD Revenues 16,365 340,000 4.8%
YTD Expenditures 422,928 1,023,000 41.3%
End Fund Balance 2,509,096$ 2,717,000$
FUND 108 EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES
Begin Fund Balance 238,059$ 218,000$
Property Taxes Arlington 36,860 915,000 4.0%
FD #24 3,594 385,000 0.9%
FD #21 - 100,000 0.0%
FD #25 - 46,000 0.0%
Intergovernmental Grants - 1,600 0.0%
Transport Fees 154,176 840,000 18.4%
Interfund Payments-Airport 30,030 120,120 25.0%
Other Misc.140 1,000 14.0%
Interfund Loan 189,584 - 0.0%
YTD Revenues 414,384 2,408,720 17.2%
Salaries & Wages 374,127 1,478,575 25.3%
Personnel Benefits 109,896 504,125 21.8%
Supplies 18,279 68,800 26.6%
Other Services & Charges 71,125 264,350 26.9%
Intergov Serv & Taxes 8,912 9,600 92.8%
Non-Expenditures - 3,000 0.0%
Capital Outlays - 32,500 0.0%
Interfnd Payment for Svcs 70,104 265,000 26.5%
YTD Expenditures 652,443 2,625,950 24.8%
End Fund Balance -$ 770$
9
YTD
MARCH BUDGET
FUND NAME 2012 2012 %
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS - Cont.
FUND 109 STREAM COORIDOR RESTORATION
Begin Fund Balance 27,404$ 20,000$
YTD Revenues 2,085 250 834.0%
YTD Expenditures - 17,000 0.0%
End Fund Balance 29,489$ 3,250$
FUND 114 LODGING TAX
Begin Fund Balance 90,771$ 25,000$
YTD Revenues 14,858 76,000 19.6%
YTD Expenditures 48,676 77,700 62.6%
End Fund Balance 56,953$ 23,300$
FUND 116 CEMETERY
Begin Fund Balance 68,186$ 15,000$
Charges for Services 67,454 187,500 36.0%
Misc 1,578 175 901.7%
Non-Revenues 3,456 6,000 57.6%
YTD Revenues 72,488 193,675 37.4%
Salaries & Wages 17,330 66,975 25.9%
Personnel Benefits 7,214 30,200 23.9%
Supplies 7,032 30,300 23.2%
Other Services & Charges 5,207 22,275 23.4%
Intergov Serv & Taxes 4,754 10,000 47.5%
Capital Outlays - 575 0.0%
Interfnd Payment for Svcs 8,046 30,600 26.3%
Interfund Transfers/to Cap Improv 15,270 10,000 152.7%
YTD Expenditures 64,853 200,925 32.3%
End Fund Balance 75,821$ 7,750$
DEBT SERVICE FUNDS (200 - 299)
- to account for the accumulation of resources for, and the payment of, general long-term debt
FUND 212 LID #21
Begin Fund Balance 9,743$ 5,000$
YTD Revenues 113,811 62,100 183.3%
YTD Expenditures 119,000 65,000 183.1%
End Fund Balance 4,554$ 2,100$
10
YTD
MARCH BUDGET
FUND NAME 2012 2012 %
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS (300 - 399)
- to account for financial resources to be used for the acquisition or construction of major capital
facilities (other than those financed by proprietary funds and trust funds).
FUND 303 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 1
Begin Fund Balance 17,444$ 10,000$
YTD Revenues 55,711 126,100 44.2%
YTD Expenditures 13,856 102,700 13.5%
End Fund Balance 59,299$ 33,400$
FUND 304 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 2
Begin Fund Balance 4,881$ 1,000$
YTD Revenues 55,684 316,100 17.6%
YTD Expenditures 6,304 312,225 2.0%
End Fund Balance 54,261$ 4,875$
FUND 305 CAPITAL FACILITIES/BUILDING
Begin Fund Balance 17$ 1,000$
YTD Revenues 6,001 35,800 16.8%
YTD Expenditures 6,018 34,000 17.7%
End Fund Balance -$ 2,800$
FUND 310 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT
Begin Fund Balance 123,205$ 100,000$
YTD Revenues 205,200 7,283,100 2.8%
YTD Expenditures 328,402 7,073,300 4.6%
End Fund Balance 3$ 309,800$
FUND 311 PARK IMPROVEMENT
Begin Fund Balance 110,481$ 100,000$
YTD Revenues 61,922 55,600 111.4%
YTD Expenditures 172,402 152,000 113.4%
End Fund Balance 1$ 3,600$
FUND 312 LIBRARY CAPITAL
Begin Fund Balance 13,446$ 14,000$
YTD Revenues 23 - 0.0%
YTD Expenditures - - 0.0%
End Fund Balance 13,469$ 14,000$
FUND 316 CEMETERY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
Begin Fund Balance -$ -$
YTD Revenues 15,000 10,100 148.5%
YTD Expenditures - - 0.0%
End Fund Balance 15,000$ 10,100$
11
YTD
MARCH BUDGET
FUND NAME 2012 2012 %
ENTERPRISE FUNDS (400 - 499)
- an enterprise fund may be used to report activity for which a fee is charged to external users for goods
or services. An enterprise fund is also required for any activity whose principal revenue sources meet
any of the following criteria.
- Debt backed solely by fees and charges
- Legal requirement to recover costs
- Policy decision to recover costs
FUND 401 WATER/SEWER
Begin Fund Balance-Unreserved-Water 1,450,456$ 1,150,000$
Charges for Services 949,132 3,799,400 25.0%
Miscellaneous 7,487 18,500 40.5%
Non-Revenues - 5,000 0.0%
YTD Revenues-Water 956,619 3,822,900 25.0%
Salaries & Wages 183,580 686,225 26.8%
Personnel Benefits 71,973 258,475 27.8%
Supplies 23,584 100,875 23.4%
Other Services & Charges 100,848 375,780 26.8%
Intergov Serv & Taxes 93,213 378,800 24.6%
Non-Expenditures 750 2,000 37.5%
Capital Outlays - 4,000 0.0%
Debt Service 234,701 185,625 126.4%
Interfund Payment for Services 230,474 915,248 25.2%
Interfund Transfers - 715,000 0.0%
YTD Expenditures-Water 939,123 3,622,028 25.9%
End Fund Balance-Unreserved-Water 1,467,952$ 1,350,872$
Begin Fund Balance-Unreserved - Sewer 1,508,459$ 1,179,250$
Charges for Services 1,259,574 4,803,600 26.2%
Miscellaneous 49,920 5,000 998.4%
YTD Revenues-Sewer 1,309,494 4,808,600 27.2%
Salaries & Wages 137,275 548,350 25.0%
Personnel Benefits 53,839 212,450 25.3%
Supplies 40,061 192,750 20.8%
Other Services & Charges 159,664 488,240 32.7%
Intergov Serv & Taxes 89,372 343,100 26.0%
Non-Expenditures - 1,000 0.0%
Capital Outlays 3,056 4,000 76.4%
Debt Service 303 2,631,850 0.0%
Interfund Payment for Services 236,236 944,493 25.0%
Interfund Transfers - 109,560 0.0%
YTD Expenditures-Sewer 719,806 5,475,793 13.1%
End Fund Balance-Unreserved-Sewer 2,098,147$ 512,057$
12
YTD
MARCH BUDGET
FUND NAME 2012 2012 %
ENTERPRISE FUNDS (400 - 499) - Cont.
FUND 402 AIRPORT
Begin Fund Balance 355,346$ 5,000$
Rental Income 1,138,314 2,617,565 43.5%
Intergov. Revenues 11,265 - 0.0%
Other Misc Revenues 1,449 42,500 3.4%
Non-Revenues 165,699 322,890 51.3%
TYD Revenues 1,316,727 2,982,955 44.1%
Salaries & Wages 75,025 309,650 24.2%
Personnel Benefits 24,993 100,450 24.9%
Supplies 3,154 34,050 9.3%
Other Services & Charges 82,182 201,500 40.8%
Intergov Serv & Taxes 59 400 14.8%
Non-Expenditures 1,252 313,890 0.4%
Capital Outlays 83,421 379,237 22.0%
Debt Service 13,163 196,675 6.7%
Interfund Payment for Services 341,965 1,399,852 24.4%
Interfund Transfers - 11,700 0.0%
YTD Expenditures 625,214 2,947,404 21.2%
End Fund Balance 1,046,859$ 40,551$
FUND 404 W/S REVENUE BOND REDEMPTION
Begin Fund Balance 48,814$ -$
YTD Revenues - - 0.0%
YTD Expenditures 48,814 - 0.0%
End Fund Balance -$ -$
FUND 405 WATER IMPROVEMENT
Begin Fund Balance 5,304,683$ 2,675,000$
YTD Revenues 207,024 861,000 24.0%
YTD Expenditures 220,728 1,943,050 11.4%
End Fund Balance 5,290,979$ 1,592,950$
FUND 406 SEWER IMPROVEMENT
Begin Fund Balance 2,898,731$ 2,250,000$
YTD Revenues 417,620 288,000 145.0%
YTD Expenditures 9,829 628,025 1.6%
End Fund Balance 3,306,522$ 1,909,975$
FUND 407 PUBLIC WORKS-UTILITIES ADMINISTRATION
Begin Fund Balance 124,840$ 53,000$
Charges for Services 147,270 589,116 25.0%
Misc. Revenue 1,340 500 268.0%
YTD Revenues 148,610 589,616 25.2%
Salaries & Wages 82,461 336,225 24.5%
Personnel Benefits 32,374 137,675 23.5%
Supplies 1,332 7,000 19.0%
Other Services & Charges 8,165 80,640 10.1%
Interfund Payment for Services 8,353 - 0.0%
Capital Outlays - 7,000 0.0%
YTD Expenditures 132,685 568,540 23.3%
End Fund Balance 140,765$ 74,076$
13
YTD
MARCH BUDGET
FUND NAME 2012 2012 %
ENTERPRISE FUNDS (400 - 499) - Cont.
FUND 408 WWTP IMPROVEMENT & EXPANSION
Begin Fund Balance 1,062,007$ 250,000$
YTD Revenues 1,826 1,000 182.6%
YTD Expenditures 27,347 105,000 26.0%
End Fund Balance 1,036,486$ 146,000$
FUND 409 SURFACE WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
Begin Fund Balance 122,898$ 110,000$
YTD Revenues 187,079 182,250 102.6%
YTD Expenditures 217,280 167,000 130.1%
End Fund Balance 92,697$ 125,250$
FUND 410 AIRPORT RESERVE
Begin Fund Balance 1,023,836$ 1,019,323$
YTD Revenues 1,032,951 10,000 10329.5%
YTD Expenditures 8,306 1,019,323 0.8%
End Fund Balance 2,048,481$ 10,000$
FUND 411 W/S BOND RESERVE
Begin Fund Balance 479,248$ -$
YTD Revenues - - 0.0%
YTD Expenditures - - 0.0%
End Fund Balance 479,248$ -$
FUND 412 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Begin Fund Balance 125,061$ 85,000$
Charges for Sevices 164,925 650,025 25.4%
Misc revenue 166 1,000 16.6%
YTD Revenues 165,091 651,025 25.4%
Salaries & Wages 38,276 150,675 25.4%
Personnel Benefits 14,872 55,950 26.6%
Supplies 207 6,500 3.2%
Other Services & Charges 15,387 29,455 52.2%
Intergov Serv & Taxes 10,848 36,900 29.4%
Interfund Payment for Services 37,760 149,975 25.2%
Debt Service - 50,000 0.0%
Interfund Transfers 93,453 247,250 37.8%
YTD Expenditures 210,803 726,705 29.0%
End Fund Balance 79,349$ 9,320$
FUND 413 AIRPORT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT (FAA)
Begin Fund Balance 389,858$ 233,000$
YTD Revenues 194,538 24,500 794.0%
YTD Expenditures 84,245 - 0.0%
End Fund Balance 500,151$ 257,500$
14
YTD
MARCH BUDGET
FUND NAME 2012 2012 %
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS (500 - 599)
departments or agencies of the governmental unit, or to other governmental units, on a cost-
reimbursement basis.
FUND 501 EQUIPMENT RENTAL - MAINT & OPERATIONS
Begin Fund Balance 47,240$ 10,000$
Rental Fees 106,398 -$ 0.0%
Non-Revenues 20,662 - 0.0%
YTD Revenues 127,060 425,710 29.8%
Operating Supplies 2,671 8,300 32.2%
Fuel 44,693 221,450 20.2%
Other services/Charges 51,241 57,225 89.5%
Vehicle Repairs & Maint.72,244 126,125 57.3%
Interfund Payment for Services 3,450 16,300 21.2%
YTD Expenditures 174,299 429,400 40.6%
End Fund Balance 1$ 6,310$
FUND 503 EQUIPMENT RENTAL REPLACEMENT
Begin Fund Balance 430,653$ 220,000$
YTD Revenues 106,497 424,760 25.1%
YTD Expenditures 28,843 47,000 61.4%
End Fund Balance 508,307$ 597,760$
FUND 504 PUBLIC WORKS GROUNDS & FACILITIES MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS
Begin Fund Balance 127,674$ 130,000$
Charges for Services 223,791 903,800 24.8%
Misc. Revenues/Rentals 4,329 18,300 23.7%
Non-Revenues 11,971 27,000 44.3%
240,091 949,100 25.3%
Salaries & Wages 94,022 393,775 23.9%
Personnel Benefits 37,488 128,050 29.3%
Supplies 5,941 70,800 8.4%
Other services/Charges 52,370 378,425 13.8%
Interfund Payment for Services 33,054 87,600 37.7%
Capital Outlays 1,000 0.0%
Interfund Transfers 1,500 0.0%
YTD Expenditures 222,875 1,061,150 21.0%
End Fund Balance 144,890$ 17,950$
TRUST FUND (601 - 610)
- to report all trust arangements under which principal and interest benefit individual, private
organizations and other government.
FUND 622 CEMETERY PRE-NEED TRUST
Begin Fund Balance 16,036$ 15,000$
YTD Revenues 28 10,150 0.3%
YTD Expenditures - 10,100 0.0%
End Fund Balance 16,064$ 15,050$
FUND 702 CEMETERY ENDOWMENT
Begin Fund Balance 200,617$ 190,000$
YTD Revenues 5,915 8,000 73.9%
YTD Expenditures - 2,500 0.0%
End Fund Balance 206,532$ 195,500$
15
City of Arlington
Council Agenda Bill
Item:
WS #3
Attachment
C
COUNCIL MEETING DATE:
April 23, 2012
SUBJECT:
Interfund Loans
ATTACHMENTS:
Detail of Interfund Loans
DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN
Finance Department
EXPENDITURES REQUESTED:
BUDGET CATEGORY:
LEGAL REVIEW:
DESCRIPTION:
At the end of March there were three funds that required Short Term Interfund loans to
prevent a negative month-end cash balance. In accordance with 2012-005, allowing the
Finance Director to make such interfund loans and report the status of such loans to the
City Council each month, the attached document (Exhibit 1) describes which funds
needed the loans and which funds provided the loans.
HISTORY:
The City has several Funds with small fund balances (cash positions) to begin 2012.
Those funds may need monetary assistance until revenues are actually received
(property taxes) to prevent them from reflecting a deficit fund balance at the end of any
month.
ALTERNATIVES
Do not make interfund loans and allow funds to remain in a negative fund balance at
month-end.
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
No action at this time. The Council will be asked to approve this item at the May 7, 2012
Council meeting.
2012 Interfund Loans Exhibit 1
Interest to be repaid at the Local Government Investment Pool monthly rate.
FROM:
Growth Fund Interest Payments Loan
TO:Date Loan Amount Charges Principal Interest Balance
General Fund 2/29/2012 92,700.00$ -$ -$ 92,700.00$
3/31/2012 32,284.00 129.22$ - - 125,113.22
- - - -
- - - -
124,984.00
Cause: Expect Property Tax Revenues in May to repay the loan
FROM:
Growth Fund Interest Payments Loan
TO:Date Loan Amount Charges Principal Interest Balance
Emergency Medical Services Fund 2/29/2012 65,500.00$ -$ -$ 65,500.00$
3/31/2012 124,084.00 91.31$ - - 189,675.31
- - - -
- - - -
189,584.00
Cause: Expect Property Tax Revenues in May to repay the loan
FROM:
Equip Rental Replacement Fund Interest Payments Loan
TO:Date Loan Amount Charges Principal Interest Balance
Equipment Rental M & O Fund 2/29/2012 14,000.00$ -$ -$ 14,000.00$
3/31/2012 6,662.00 19.52$ - - 20,681.52
- - - -
- - - -
20,662.00
Cause: Annual Insurance bill paid in January and large Fire Truck repair bill paid in Feb.
Local Gov. Investment Pool Rate
1/31/2012 0.1213%
2/29/2012 0.1394%
3/31/2012 0.1367%
4/30/2012
5/31/2012
City of Arlington
Council Agenda Bill
Item:
WS #4
Attachment
D
COUNCIL MEETING DATE:
April 23, 2012
SUBJECT:
Resolution for a Public Safety Sales Tax to be placed on the August 7, 2012 ballot
ATTACHMENTS:
- Resolution for a ballot proposition for 0.1% sales tax increase to fund police and fire
protection services
- RCW 82.14.450 authorizing cities to ask for the 0.1% sales tax increase
DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN
Executive – Contact: Kristin Banfield, 360-403-3441
EXPENDITURES REQUESTED: -0-
BUDGET CATEGORY: N/A
LEGAL REVIEW:
DESCRIPTION:
Council is requested to review the attached resolution to send a ballot proposition to the City’s
voters to institute a 0.1% sales tax increase to fund police and fire protection services.
State law requires such a measure to appear on either a primary election ballot or a general
election ballot. The next primary is August 7, 2012.
HISTORY:
Council originally adopted Resolution No. 2011-020 on December 19, 2011 authorizing a ballot
proposition for the February ballot. Desiring more time to fully educate the voters, the public
committee requested that the proposition be moved back to the April ballot. Resolution No.
2012-001 was adopted on January 3, 2012, which rescinded the previous resolution and directed
staff to prepare a new resolution.
ALTERNATIVES
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
No action at this time. The Council will be asked to approve the attached resolution at the May
7, 2012 Council meeting.
RESOLUTION NO. 2012-xxx___
RESOLUTION NO. 2012-xxx
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARLINGTON,
WASHINGTON, PROVIDING FOR THE SUBMISSION TO THE QUALIFIED
ELECTORS OF THE CITY AT THE AUGUST 7, 2012 PRIMARY ELECTION
OF A PROPOSITION AUTHORIZING AN ADDITIONAL SALES AND USE
TAX AT THE RATE OF 0.1 PERCENT PURSUANT TO RCW 82.14.450 TO
BE USED EXCLUSIVELY FOR PUBLIC SAFETY PURPOSES; PROVIDING
A FORM OF THE BALLOT PROPOSITION; ENTERING LEGISLATIVE
FINDINGS; AND PROVIDING DIRECTION TO STAFF.
WHEREAS, ensuring the protection and safety of the Arlington community is a
fundamental priority of the City of Arlington; and
WHEREAS, the recent economic downtown has significantly reduced the financial
resources available to the City, including the resources available for public safety activities; and
WHEREAS, the Washington Legislature has recently amended RCW 82.14.450 to
authorize cities to submit a proposition to local voters approving a sales and use tax increase, the
revenues from which may be utilized for public safety purposes; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with RCW 82.14.450, the City Council desires to submit a
proposition to local voters authorizing an additional sales and use tax at the rate of 0.1 percent of
the selling price and 0.1 percent of the value of the article used, respectively, the revenues from
which will be used by the City exclusively for public safety purposes;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARLINGTON,
WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findings. The above recitals are hereby adopted as legislative findings by the
City Council. The City Council further finds that the best interests and general welfare of the
City of Arlington would be served by imposing a 0.1 percent increase in the local sales and use
tax rate and utilizing the revenues collected from said tax for public safety purposes.
Section 2. Election. The Snohomish County Auditor, as ex officio supervisor of elections,
is hereby requested to submit to the qualified electors of the City of Arlington the proposition set
forth in Section 3 of this resolution at the August 7, 2012 election to be held within the City.
Section 3. Ballot Proposition. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed, no later
than May 11, 2012, to certify the following proposition to the Snohomish County Auditor in
substantially the following form:
RESOLUTION NO. 2012-xxx___
CITY OF ARLINGTON
PROPOSITION NO. ____
ADDITIONAL SALES AND USE TAX FOR
PUBLIC SAFETY PURPOSES
The City Council of the City of Arlington has adopted Resolution
No. 2012-xxx concerning a sales and use tax pursuant to RCW
82.14.450. If approved, this proposition would authorize an
additional sales and use tax at the rate of 0.1 percent to be used
exclusively for public safety purposes. Should this proposition be
APPROVED? ……………….
REJECTED? …………………
Section 4. Changes. The Mayor and City Attorney are authorized to make such minor
adjustments to the wording of such proposition as may be recommended by the Snohomish
County Auditor, provided that the intent of the proposition remains clear and consistent with the
intent of this resolution as approved by the City Council.
Section 5. Effective Date. This resolution shall take effect and be in full force
immediately upon passage by the City Council.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Arlington this _____ day of
__________________, 2012.
CITY OF ARLINGTON
___________________________
Barbara Tolbert, Mayor
Attest:
_____________________________
Kristin Banfield, City Clerk
Approved as to form:
______________________________
Steven J. Peiffle
City Attorney
City of Arlington
Council Agenda Bill
Item:
WS #5
Attachment
E
COUNCIL MEETING DATE:
April 23, 2012
SUBJECT:
67th Ave Phase III Authority to Bid Project
ATTACHMENTS:
None
DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN
Public Works – Eric Scott
EXPENDITURES REQUESTED: None
BUDGET CATEGORY: TIB Grant, Transportation Imp. Fund and
STP Grant
LEGAL REVIEW:
DESCRIPTION:
Design of 67th Ave Phase III is complete and sufficient funding has been allocated to
meet the engineers estimated cost of construction; staff is now requesting authority to
publically advertise for construction of this project.
HISTORY:
The 67th Ave Phase III project has completed the design process and has nearly
completed the ROW acquisition process, pending final approval of agreements with
BNSF. As such the project is moving forward with bidding and construction.
Estimated construction costs are $6,561,000.
ALTERNATIVES
• Remand to staff for additional information
• Table pending additional discussion
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Workshop only, no action requested. At the May 7th Council Meeting, staff will
recommend Council grant authority to bid the project, subject to review by the City
Attorney and final approval by WSDOT Local Programs and the Transportation
Improvement Board.
City of Arlington
Council Agenda Bill
Item:
WS #6
Attachment
F
COUNCIL MEETING DATE:
April 23, 2012
SUBJECT:
67th Ave Phase III – KBA, Inc. Bid Support
ATTACHMENTS:
Local Agency Standard Consultant Contract for KBA, Inc.
DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN
Public Works – Eric Scott
EXPENDITURES REQUESTED: $33,000
BUDGET CATEGORY: TIB Grant, Transportation Imp. Fund and
STP Grant
LEGAL REVIEW:
DESCRIPTION:
Scope and fee to provide support services during the bid phase of the 67th Ave Phase III
Project.
HISTORY:
The 67th Ave Phase III project has completed the design process and has nearly
completed the ROW acquisition process, pending final approval of agreements with
BNSF. As such the project is moving forward with bidding and construction.
Through a selection process, KBA, Inc. was chosen to provide construction
management services for the project. Their scope for bid support services is being
presented.
ALTERNATIVES
• Remand to staff for additional information
• Table pending additional discussion
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Workshop only, no action requested. At the May 7th meeting Staff will recommend
Council approve the contract with KBA, Inc. for Bid Support Services and authorize the
mayor to sign the Contract, subject to review by the City Attorney and final approval
by WSDOT Local Programs and the Transportation Improvement Board.”
KBA, Inc. April 18, 2012
S:\Projects\Contracts\Client\Arlington\012005-01-67thAve-PhIII\Drafts&NegotiationRecords\In-houseDrafts\Pre-con (LAG)\Scope-Arlington-67th-(Revised)-2012-0418.docx 1 of 5
EXHIBIT A-1
SCOPE OF SERVICES
Preconstruction Services
for
67th Avenue Phase III
Contract No.
KBA, Inc. (Consultant) will provide preconstruction services to the City of Arlington (Client) for the Project
known as 67th Avenue - Phase III.
This initial contract scope of services is for preconstruction services only. Further scope and budget for
continued preconstruction services and construction-phase services will be negotiated and authorized via
a supplemental to this Agreement.
Project Description: The Project will improve 67th Avenue NE, between 204th Street NE and Lebanon
Street. The proposed improvements include widening of the roadway for a center two -way left turn lane,
completion of the Centennial Trail within Arlington, culvert crossings, and installation of sidewalks and
lighting. The Designer of Record on this Project is HDR, Inc. (Designer).
I. CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SERVICES
A. Consultant Contract and Team Management. Provide overall day-to-day management of
the consultant contract and team, including:
1. Decide on best modes and frequency of communication with Client and Designer, and use
them. Liaison and coordinate with Client on a regular basis to discuss Project issues and
status.
2. Manage Consultant Team, comprised of Consultant’s staff and subconsultants. Organize
and layout work for Consultant Team.
3. Review monthly expenditures and Consultant Team scope activities. Prepare and submit to
Client monthly, an invoice and progress report describing Consultant Team services provided
that month. Prepare and submit reporting required by funding source(s), if any.
Deliverables
Monthly invoices and progress reports
B. Preconstruction Services
1. Begin preparation of a Construction Management Plan (CM Plan) for the Project. The CM
Plan will be developed based on the Consultant’s boilerplate document, and modified to
adapt to and include Client practices and funding agency requirements, including forms to be
used on the Project. Submit to Client for review and comment, and finalize based on those
comments. The CM Plan will cover at least the following:
a. Communication and coordination between the CM Team, Designer, Client and other
stakeholders
b. Project procedures and forms
c. Document control system, using SharePoint
2. During Bidding period:
a. Lead the Pre-Bid meeting(s). (The Client will arrange for the meeting, and take and
distribute meeting notes.)
b. Assist in analyzing bidder questions, as needed.
c. Assist Designer in researching and preparing Addenda, as needed.
KBA, Inc. April 18, 2012
S:\Projects\Contracts\Client\Arlington\012005-01-67thAve-PhIII\Drafts&NegotiationRecords\In-houseDrafts\Pre-con (LAG)\Scope-Arlington-67th-(Revised)-2012-0418.docx 2 of 5
3. Assist Client in checking and analyzing bids and bidders.
Deliverables
Construction Management Plan, draft
C. Public Outreach
1. Provide services of public outreach specialist, EnviroIssues (Sub-Consultant) to assist the
Consultant AND Client during the preconstruction phase of the Project. The Consultant AND
Sub-Consultant will share in the responsibilities and work identified in this section. This work
will be described in more detail in a communication plan, to be submitted by the Consultant.
Continued public outreach services will be negotiated and authorized via a supplemental to
this Agreement. The preconstruction and construction phases for Public outreach work will
include the following tasks:
a. Communications Plan. Identify and compile preferred local communications avenues to
maximize outreach efforts during active construction. The plan will include emergency
response protocols, a construction information phone protocol, preferred local
communications avenues, and team structures and resources.
b. Pre-construction Community Meeting/Kick-off. Support the Client with a pre-construction
community kick -off and a “meet the construction team” meeting. The target audience for
this meeting will be affected property owners, residents and businesses in the Project
area as well as the general public.
c. Business Cards and Magnets with Contact Information. Develop business cards and
magnets that include key contact information - including the Project email address,
information phone line, and off-hours phone line. The Consultant will distribute the cards
as needed. Consultant will coordinate the advertising, coordination and materials
development for the preconstruction community meeting.
d. Construction Information Phone Line, Email and Issue Tracking. Set up, monitor and
respond to the Project information phone line and email address to field community
questions or concerns regarding construction. The information line and email account
will be checked during regular weekday office hours. Requests and inquiries will be
prioritized by the Sub-Consultant to reduce interruptions to the CM team and Contractor.
Urgent issues or issues that require team consultation will be forwarded to the
appropriate team member to address. Each inquiry, response and resolution will be
logged in the Project database. Any issues will be noted in the W eekly Outreach Report.
Calls received during off hours will be managed during the next working day. The Sub-
Consultant will coordinate with Client staff regarding any calls received specific to
construction on the Project during the next working day.
e. Communications and Contact Database and Outreach Reports. Utilize Sub-Consultant’s
web-based data management system (i.e. database) using Sub-Consultant’s existing
proprietary software to manage Project data, including but not limited to contacts,
comments and correspondence. Information stored in the database will be received
during construction through site visits and via the construction information line and email
account. This online system will include Project contact tracking, sorting and de-
duplication capabilities and can be set up to provide the Client access to view information
stored in the database.
f. Weekly Outreach Reports. Track all public concerns received and responses made in
the Project database. The log will be updated throughout the Project. The Sub-
Consultant will also generate and provide to the team weekly outreach reports, which will
note all correspondence received and sent during the past week and any issues that
were resolved or have yet to be resolved.
KBA, Inc. April 18, 2012
S:\Projects\Contracts\Client\Arlington\012005-01-67thAve-PhIII\Drafts&NegotiationRecords\In-houseDrafts\Pre-con (LAG)\Scope-Arlington-67th-(Revised)-2012-0418.docx 3 of 5
g. Construction Notifications. Support the Consultant in developing template and general
content for regular construction notifications regarding upcoming construction activities
and what to expect. These notifications may be developed and distributed in the
following formats:
i. Project Flyers. Develop an initial flyer template that can be updated on a periodic
basis as-needed based on upcoming work, and provided at information kiosks or
handed out during site visits. Flyers can be used by property owners with multiple
tenants to post in public areas.
ii. Project Website and Regular Notices. Develop website notifications to be posted by
the Client on a regular basis regarding construction and upcoming activities that
supplement general information about the Project maintained by the Client on the
Project website. The Sub-Consultant will develop website layout, including a
comment form function, and Consultant will provide content updates on a regular
basis. Website address will be linked from the Client’s website.
iii. Regular Project Emails. Develop an initial email template and provide updates for
the Client to send on a regular basis to provide information about upcoming
construction activities and what to expect.
h. Media and Social Media. Support Client-led media and social media efforts, including
drafting content regarding construction for press releases, articles and other information
submitted to the media during construction and at major Project milestones.
i. Project Materials. Draft and update content for general Project materials in coordination
with Client and Consultant staff. Materials may include a periodic construction
newsletter/progress report. Support the Client with other materials as needed by finalizing
content and graphic layout (i.e. frequently asked questions, onsite brochure, informal
signs, etc.).
j. Project Events and Celebration. Support the Client as it organizes and hosts a ground
breaking ceremony to mark the start of construction and a ribbon cutting ceremony to
mark the end of construction and Project completion. Attend the ceremonies and provide
the Client assistance with set-up, logistics, and day-of staffing.
Deliverables
Communication plan
Contact cards and magnets
Outreach materials
Meeting agendas and notes
D. Assumptions
1. Budget
a. Staffing levels are anticipated in accordance with the attached budget estimate.
b. The work is anticipated to be performed during daytime hours. Should night work be
necessary, a 15 percent premium for labor will be applied to all hours that Consultant
employees work between 7 pm and 7 am.
c. The level of effort in accomplishing the scope items is limited to the pre-approved budget.
Consultant will not exceed the approved budget without prior approval by the Client.
Consultant services are budgeted from April 2012 through May 2012 for preconstruction
services only. Should further preconstruction services be required, the Client and
Consultant will negotiate a supplement to this Agreement.
d. The budget allocations shown on Exhibit B are itemized to aid in Project tracking
purposes only. The budget may be transferred between tasks or people, or between
KBA, Inc. April 18, 2012
S:\Projects\Contracts\Client\Arlington\012005-01-67thAve-PhIII\Drafts&NegotiationRecords\In-houseDrafts\Pre-con (LAG)\Scope-Arlington-67th-(Revised)-2012-0418.docx 4 of 5
labor and expenses, provided the total contracted amount is not exceeded without prior
authorization.
e. The budget assumes that Consultant’s standard forms, logs, and processes will be used
on the Project SharePoint site. Any customization to meet specialized client
requirements will be Extra Work.
2. Items and Services Client will provide:
a. Meeting arrangements and facilities for pre-bid and preconstruction meetings.
b. Retain Engineer of Record for shop drawing review, RFI’s, design changes, and final
record drawings.
c. Coordination with and enforcement of utility franchise agreements and/or contracts and
schedules for services related to this Project.
d. Construction survey. Provide survey and staking that is not already assigned to the
construction contractor. Specifically: Project control, one time; and construction staking.
3. Scope
a. The SharePoint tool being used on this Project is proprietary to Consultant, Inc., and may
not be used by any other party, or on any other project, without the written permission
and involvement of Consultant.
b. If Consultant’s Scope of Services includes Constructability Review of design documents,
such review will be for constructability, for general conformance with the design concept,
and for contradictions and inconsistencies between the various parts of the design
documents. This review will not include review of the accuracy or completeness of
details, such as quantities, dim ensions, weights, or gauges, fabrication processes; and
will not include quantity takeoffs.
c. Review of Shop Drawings and other construction contractor submittals is not intended as
an approval of the submittals if they deviate from the Contract Documents or contain
errors, omissions and inconsistencies, nor is it intended to relieve the construction
contractor of their full responsibility for Contract performance, nor is the review intended
to ensure or guarantee lack of inconsistencies, errors, and/or omissions between the
submittals and the Contract requirements. This review will not include review of the
accuracy or completeness of details, such as quantities, dimensions, weights, or gauges,
fabrication processes, construction means or methods, or coordination of the work with
other trades, all of which are the sole responsibility of the construction contractor.
Review of a specific item will not indicate that the Consultant has reviewed the entire
assembly of which the item is a component.
d. Any opinions of probable construction cost provided by the Consultant will be on the
basis of experience and professional judgment. However, since Consultant has no
control over competitive bidding or market conditions, the Consultant cannot and does
not warrant that bids or ultimate construction costs will not vary from these opinions of
probable construction costs.
e. Development of construction schedules and/or sequencing, and/or reviewing and
commenting on contractor’s schedules, is for the purpose of estimating number of days to
complete a project, and for identifying potential schedule and coordination challenges
and determining compliance with the construction contract. It is not a guarantee that a
construction contractor will complete the Project in that sequence or timeline, as means
and methods are the responsibility of the construction contractor.
f. Consultant is not responsible for any costs, claims, or judgments arising from or in any
way connected with errors, omissions, conflicts or ambiguities in the Contract Documents
prepared by others. The Consultant does not have responsibility for the professional
KBA, Inc. April 18, 2012
S:\Projects\Contracts\Client\Arlington\012005-01-67thAve-PhIII\Drafts&NegotiationRecords\In-houseDrafts\Pre-con (LAG)\Scope-Arlington-67th-(Revised)-2012-0418.docx 5 of 5
quality or technical adequacy or accuracy of the design plans or specifications, nor for
their timely completion by others.
g. Client agrees to include the following requirements in the construction Bid Documents for
this Project:
i. The construction contractor(s) shall name KBA, Inc. and their subconsultants as
additional insureds on the contractor’s general liability and automobile insurance
policies.
ii. A statement saying: “Contractors, subcontractors, and equipment and material
suppliers on the Project, or their sureties, shall maintain no direct action against
either KBA, Inc. and their officers and employees, or KBA’s subconsultants for any
claim arising out of, in connection with, or resulting from the professional services
performed by KBA and their subconsultants. Client will be the only beneficiary of any
undertaking by KBA or their subconsultants."
h. Services provided by the Consultant under this Agreement will be performed in a manner
consistent with that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the same
profession currently practicing under similar circumstances , in the same geographical
area and time period.
i. Because data stored on electronic media can deteriorate undetected or can be modified
without Consultant’s knowledge, Client agrees that Consultant will not be held liable for
the completeness, correctness, readability, or compatibility of any electronic media
submitted to Client, after an acceptance period of 30 days after delivery of the electronic
files.
I. OPTIONAL SERVICES
When requested by the City, the Consultant shall provide additional services that may increase the le vel
of effort described in this document. Authorization to perform additional services will be in the form of a
mutually negotiated Supplement to this Agreement, specifying the services to be performed, and basis of
payment.
Construction Phase Services: The scope of services and budget for the Construction Phase will be
developed and added to this contract via a Supplement to this Agreement at a later date.
EXHIBIT E-1
Project Name:Arlington - 67th Project Month Apr-12 May-12
Client Project No.:TBD - Precon Only Days/Mo 21 22
KBA Project No.:012005-01 Hr/Mo 168 176
Contract Type:Cost + Fixed Fee (on DSC + OH)Extra Work 11%12%
Date Prepared:Adj Hr/Mo 187 198
Prepared by:Mike Roberts
Salary Escalation 4%
KBA Labor Hours
Employee Title 2012 Rate 2013 Rate Total Hours 2012 Total 2013 Total Apr-12 May-12
Mike Roberts Project Manager $74.00 $77.00 16 16 - 8 8
Dave Mohler Resident Engineer $47.32 $49.20 122 122 - 40 82
Cameron Bloomer Office Engineer $26.50 $27.60 40 40 - 40
Dave Scott Project Inspector $41.48 $43.10 - - - - -
Jennifer Smiley Project Assistant $26.40 $27.50 60 60 - 30 30
Connie Tomlinson Contract Admin $25.00 $26.00 2 2 - 2
Misty Fisher Operations Manager $34.00 $35.40 10 10 - - 10
Sean Mabin IT Administrator $36.00 $37.40 - - - - -
Subtotal - KBA Labor Hours 250 250 - 78 172
Direct Expenses
Item Total Costs 2012 Total 2013 Total Apr-12 May-12
Vehicles 670$ 670 - 220 450
Mileage 120$ 120 - 60 60
Misc: Supplies, Equipment 169$ 169 - - 169
Copier/Scanner/Printer -$ - - - -
Office Rental -$ - - - -
Subtotal - Direct Expenses 959$ 959 - 280 680
Subconsultant(s)
Subconsultants Total Costs 2012 Total 2013 Total Apr-12 May-12
Enviro Issues 7,000$ 7,000 - - 7,000
GeoTest -$ - - - -
Subtotal - Subconsultant Costs 7,000$ 7,000 - - 7,000
Combined Costs
Employee Title 2012 Rate 2013 Rate Total DSC 2012 Total 2013 Total Apr-12 May-12
Mike Roberts Project Manager $74.00 $77.00 1,184$ 1,184 - 592 592
Dave Mohler Resident Engineer $47.32 $49.20 5,773$ 5,773 - 1,893 3,880
Cameron Bloomer Office Engineer $26.50 $27.60 1,060$ 1,060 - - 1,060
Dave Scott Project Inspector $41.48 $43.10 -$ - - - -
Jennifer Smiley Project Assistant $26.40 $27.50 1,584$ 1,584 - 792 792
Connie Tomlinson Contract Admin $25.00 $26.00 50$ 50 - - 50
Misty Fisher Operations Manager $34.00 $35.40 340$ 340 - - 340
Sean Mabin IT Administrator $36.00 $37.40 -$ - - - -
Direct Salary Costs 9,991$ 9,991 - 3,277 6,714
Overhead @ 12,773$ 12,773 - 4,189 8,583
Subtotal (DSC + OH)22,764$ 22,764 - 7,466 15,298
Fixed Fee (on DSC + OH) @ 2,277$ 2,277 - 747 1,530
Subtotal (DSC + OH + FF)25,041$ 25,041 - 8,213 16,828
Direct Expenses (No Markup)959$ 959 - 280 680
Subconsultant(s)7,000$ 7,000 - - 7,000
Management Reserve -$ - - - -
TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS 33,000$ 33,000 - 8,492 24,508
127.84%
10.00%
4/18/2012
PRECON
De
t
e
r
m
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
of
H
o
u
r
s
Sc
h
e
d
u
l
e
Printed: 4/18/2012 3:04 PM S:\Projects\Contracts\Client\Arlington\012005-01-67thAve-PhIII\Drafts&NegotiationRecords\In-houseDrafts\Pre-con (LAG)\Exhibit-E1-Budget(CPFF)-Revised-2012-0418.xlsx
EXHIBIT G-1
Project Name:Arlington - 67th Project Apr-12 May-12
Client Project No.:TBD - Precon Only 21 22
KBA Project No.:012005-01 168 176
Contract Type:Cost + Fixed Fee (on DSC + OH)11%12%
Date Prepared:187 198
Prepared by:Mike Roberts
Salary Escalation 4%
Enviro Issues
Employee Title 2012
Rate
2013
Rate Total Hours 2012 Total 2013 Total Apr-12 May-12
TBD Associate 1 $26.00 $27.00 - - - - -
Ryan Bianchi Associate 2 $31.00 $32.20 46 46 - - 46
Elizabeth Faulkner Associate 3 $43.00 $44.70 4 4 - - 4
tbd Project Coordinator $21.00 $21.80 20 20 - - 20
tbd IT Senior Associate $60.00 $62.40 4 4 - - 4
tbd IT Tech Assoc 1 $22.00 $22.90 6 6 - - 6
tbd Graphic Designer $19.00 $19.80 4 4 - - 4
Subtotal - KBA Labor Hours 84 84 - - 84
Direct Expenses
Item Total Costs 2012 Total 2013 Total Apr-12 May-12
Vehicles -$ - - - -
Mileage -$ - - - -
Field Equipment -$ - - - -
Misc: Supplies, Equipment 73$ 73 - - 73
Copier/Scanner/Printer -$ - - - -
Subtotal - Direct Expenses 73$ 73 - - 73
Combined Costs
Employee Title 2012
Rate
2013
Rate Total DSC 2012 Total 2013 Total Apr-12 May-12
TBD Associate 1 $26.00 $27.00 -$ - - - -
Ryan Bianchi Associate 2 $31.00 $32.20 1,426$ 1,426 - - 1,426
Elizabeth Faulkner Associate 3 $43.00 $44.70 172$ 172 - - 172
tbd Project Coordinator $21.00 $21.80 420$ 420 - - 420
tbd IT Senior Associate $60.00 $62.40 240$ 240 - - 240
tbd IT Tech Assoc 1 $22.00 $22.90 132$ 132 - - 132
tbd Graphic Designer $19.00 $19.80 76$ 76 - - 76
Direct Salary Costs 2,466$ 2,466 - - 2,466
Overhead @ 3,831$ 3,831 - - 3,831
Subtotal (DSC + OH)6,297$ 6,297 - - 6,297
Fee (on DSC + OH) @ 630$ 630 - - 630
Subtotal (DSC + OH + FF)6,927$ 6,927 - - 6,927
Direct Expenses (No Markup)73$ 73 - - 73
Subconsultant(s)-$ - - - -
TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS 7,000$ 7,000 - - 7,000
155.36%
10.00%
De
t
e
r
m
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
of
H
o
u
r
s
3/20/2012
PRECON
Printed: 4/18/2012 3:05 PM S:\Projects\Contracts\Client\Arlington\012005-01-67thAve-PhIII\Drafts&NegotiationRecords\In-houseDrafts\Pre-con (LAG)\Ex-G-1-EnviroIssues-Budget-2012-0417.xlsx
City of Arlington
Council Agenda Bill
Item:
WS #7
Attachment
G
COUNCIL MEETING DATE:
April 23, 2012
SUBJECT:
HDR Engineering Contract for 67th Ave, Phase 3 project, Supplement #7
ATTACHMENTS:
Supplement #7 Scope of Work and Fee estimate
DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN
Public Works
EXPENDITURES REQUESTED: $60,077.03
BUDGET CATEGORY: Transportation Improvement & STP Grant
LEGAL REVIEW:
DESCRIPTION:
Supplement #7 to the HDR contract.
HISTORY:
The City has been under contract with HDR for the preliminary engineering, final
engineering, Right-of-Way procurement, and preparation of construction plans for the
67th Ave, Phase 3 project. Project conditions have changed and require additional work
from the consultant. This supplement addresses that additional work:
- Prepare design changes to meet property owner needs
- Additional ROW negotiation with landowners
- Complete remaining escrow and closures in-house
- Add additional City of Arlington utility specification language (water & sewer)
ALTERNATIVES
- Remand to staff for additional information
- Table pending further discussion
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Workshop only, no action requested. At the May 7th meeting the recommendation will
be: “I move to approve Supplement #7 to the City of Arlington – HDR contract and
authorize the mayor to sign Supplement #7, pending final approval by the City
Attorney.”
Section IV, TIME FOR BEGINNING AND COMPLETION, is amended to change the number of calendar days for
completion of the work to read:
Section 1, SCOPE OF WORK, is hereby changed to read:
DOT Form 140-063 EF
Revised 9/2005
If you concur with this supplement and agree to the changes as stated above, please sign in the appropriate spaces
below and return to this office for final action.
By:
Consultant Signature
By:
I
Section V, PAYMENT, shall be amended as follows:
Ronald G. Ohlsen Vice President
Supplemental Agreement
Number
Organization and Address
Project Number
Description of Work
HDR Engineering, Inc.
500 108th NE Suite 1200
Bellevue, WA 98004-5549
City of Arlington 67th Ave., Phase III Reconstruction
All provisions in the basic agreement remain in effect except as expressly modified by this supplement.
and executed on
The Local Agency of
desires to supplement the agreement entered into with
See attachment A for additional scope of work
Extend completion date to Dec. 31, 2012
See Exhibit A fro additional Fee
1,353,970.10
as set forth in the attached Exhibit A, and by this reference made a part of this supplement.
Arlington 67th Ave., Phase III Reconstruction
Project Title New Maximum Amount Payable
Original Agreement Number
425-450-6200Phone:
City of Arlington
HDR Engineering, Inc.
05/27/2009 and identified as Agreement No.
$
The changes to the agreement are described as follows:
II
III
Approving Authority Signature
7
Date
5/27/2009 12/31/2012
Execution Date Completion Date
Attachment A, Scope of Services
Supplement 7 Page 1
Attachment A
67th Avenue Phase III Reconstruction
City of Arlington, Washington
Supplement 7 Scope of Services
Introduction
During the term of this Supplement, HDR Engineering, Inc., (CONSULTANT) will
perform professional services for the City of Arlington (CITY) in connection with the
67th Avenue Phase III Reconstruction Project (PROJECT). This Scope of Services will be
used to plan, conduct, and complete the work on the PROJECT as described herein or as
amended by additional supplement between the CONSULTANT and CITY.
This supplement addresses the need for additional design services and right of way
services, the use of additive alternates, and bidding assistance.
Task A - Project Management
Scope of services for this task remains the same as the original contract and
approved supplements 1 through 6, with the following change.
Assumptions:
• Project duration for this supplement will be 6 months
• 6 1-hour progress meetings will occur (3 conference call, 3 in-person)
Deliverable(s):
• Monthly invoices and progress reports (1 hard copy)
• Meeting minutes from progress meetings (1 electronic PDF copy)
Task G - Right of Way
Scope of services for this task remains the same as previously agreed with the
following change.
General Right of Way Assumptions:
• Condemnation may be pursued on two parcels if elected by the CITY.
CONSULTANT involvement in the condemnation process will be
considered extra work.
4. ROW Acquisitions and Negotiations
a. CONSULTANT will make up to three meaningful contacts (meaningful
contact being an in-person meeting or detailed phone conversation, email
or written correspondence with landowner) with each of the 5 remaining
property owners who have yet to sign property agreements. If after these
three meaningful contacts a settlement has not been reached with the
landowner, then CITY and CONSULTANT agree to meet and develop an
appropriate acquisition strategy for any unsettled parcel. Implementation
Attachment A, Scope of Services
Supplement 7 Page 2
of the acquisition strategy is extra work and requires supplement to this
scope and additional negotiated fee.
7. Escrow and Closings
a. CONSULTANT will complete in-house closings for a maximum of 10
parcels. Closings will include a final review of the title update, clearing or
recommending acceptance of all encumbrances, recording documents,
paying recording fees, and processing payments to landowners.
Assumptions:
• CONSULTANT will complete in-house closings for a maximum of 10
parcels.
Deliverables:
• Recordable encumbrance releases (1 hard copy)
• Recorded Conveyance Documents (1 hard copy)
Task S - Plans, Specifications, and Estimate
Scope of services for this task remains the same as previously agreed with the
following change.
1. Plans
• CONSULTANT will include property owner design alternatives preparation
as a part of the effort to prepare construction plans. CONSULTANT will
prepare a maximum of 30 property owner design alternatives.
• CONSULTANT will assist the CITY in incorporating the architectural
elements of the retaining wall being prepared by others. CONSULTANT will
provide detailed design for inset block for future art inclusion. CITY will
coordinate art inclusion following construction of this PROJECT.
• CONSULTANT will design a new parallel sewer line to be located
approximately five feet from the existing line, rather than replacing the
existing line as originally assumed.
2. Specifications
• CONSULTANT will include the latest CITY general special provisions in the
bid package.
3. Estimate
• CONSULTANT will include elements in the Plans section above in the cost
estimate.
Assumptions:
• CITY will coordinate design elements with the wall architect.
Deliverables:
Attachment A, Scope of Services
Supplement 7 Page 3
• Property owner design alternative exhibits for 10 properties, 3 alternatives
maximum per property (1 PDF copy each alternatives)
Task X - Additive Alternates
CONSULTANT will assist the CITY in determining which project elements will
be bid as Additive Alternates.
Assumptions:
• A new plan sheet will be required to identify which elements are additive
alternates. The new plan sheet will show the entire project area and
identifying the additive alternates with construction notes. No significant
design changes will be required.\
• Additive alternates will be shown in the bid documents on a separate bid
schedule, and described in the bid instructions.
Deliverables
• One additional plan sheet showing additive alternates (1 PDF copy and 1
hard copy)
• One additional bid schedule for additive alternates (1 PDF copy and 1 hard
copy)
Task Y - Bidding Assistance
CONSULTANT will provide the following bid assist services to the CITY:
• Provide clarification and interpretation to CITY, as needed during the
advertisement period.
• Prepare addenda if modifications to the contract documents are deemed
warranted and respond to bidder's questions relayed through the CITY.
Assumptions:
• CONSULTANT will prepare a maximum of three addenda.
Deliverables
• Plan sheets and/or project manual addenda (1 PDF copy and 1 hard copy)
Supplement 7
Project Name City of Arlington 67th Ave. Phase III Reconstruction Firm:HDR
OH Rate:164.22%
Fee Rate:30.0%
Fee Estimate
Labor Category (Hours)66.63 46.9 41.31 33.13 55.36 62.47 67.79 39.62 24.5 27.32 39.52
Rob Gorman Eric Dawson Todd Livingston Brian Gardner Cary Stewart Rob Richardson Jim Prossick Teresa Weaver Rob Chelton
Maureen
Finn
Liya Huang-
Bardley
Work
Element Title Pr
i
n
c
i
p
a
l
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Ma
n
a
g
e
r
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
De
s
i
g
n
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
Sr
.
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
Sr
.
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
RO
W
Ma
n
a
g
e
r
Sr
.
R
O
W
A
g
e
n
t
RO
W
Te
c
h
n
i
c
i
a
n
Ad
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
at
o
r
Se
n
i
o
r
Ad
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
at
o
r
To
t
a
l
s
SCOPE OF SERVICES
Task A Project Management
1 Meetings and Project Reporting 2 24 4 6 36
2 Schedule 8 8
3 Sub-Consultant Management 2 2
Total Task hrs 2 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 6 46
amount 133.26 1,594.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 109.28 237.12 $2,074.26
Task G Right of Way
1 ROW Acquisitions and Negotiations 8 60 20 88
2 Escrow and Closings 8 40 28 76
Total Task hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 100 48 0 0 164
amount 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,084.64 3,962.00 1,176.00 0.00 0.00 $6,222.64
Task S Plans, Specifications, and Estimate
1 Plans 40 60 80 180
2 Specifications 8 8
3 Estimate 4 4 4 12
Total Task hrs 0 52 64 84 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 200
amount 0.00 2,438.80 2,643.84 2,782.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $7,865.56
Task X Additive Alternates
1 Modify Plans and Specs for Additive Alternates 16 8 8 32
0
Total Task hrs 0 16 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32
amount 0.00 750.40 330.48 265.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $1,345.92
Task Y Bidding Assistance
1 Bidding Assistance 24 8 8 40
Total Task hrs 0 24 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40
amount 0.00 1,125.60 330.48 265.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $1,721.12
Grand Total Project Hrs 2 126 80 100 0 0 16 100 48 4 6 482
Grand Total Project Amount 133.26 5,909.40 3,304.80 3,313.00 0.00 0.00 1,084.64 3,962.00 1,176.00 109.28 237.12 19,229.50
133.26 5909.4 3304.8 3313 0 0 1084.64 3962 1176 109.28 237.12 19,230
Total labor cost for Right of Way 6,222.64 total direct labor #REF!29,806
Overhead Rate 164.22%10,218.82 OH #REF!
Total Direct labor and overhead 16,441.46 #REF!49,035
Fee Rate on Direct labor 30%1,866.79
Sub-Total Extra Work Right of Way 18,308.25 direct exp #REF!1,783
Mileage 1,000.00 #REF!1,000
Recording Fees 2,500.00
Total labor cost and Direct Exp for ROW 21,808.25 profit #REF!2,783
#REF!51,819
Total labor cost for Design 13,006.86 profit 8,258
Overhead Rate 164.22%21,359.87
Total Direct labor and overhead 34,366.73 profit % 13.75%
Fee Rate on Direct labor 30%3,902.06
Sub Total Extra Work Design 38,268.78
Total Supplement #7 $60,077.03
City of Arlington
Council Agenda Bill
Item:
WS #8
Attachment
H
COUNCIL MEETING DATE:
April 23, 2012
SUBJECT:
Water Line Construction
ATTACHMENTS:
Memo from Rob Putnam, Airport Director and Construction Drawings
DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN
Airport
EXPENDITURES REQUESTED: $90,000 -$100,000
BUDGET CATEGORY: Airport Reserves
LEGAL REVIEW:
DESCRIPTION:
Construction of a water line from the intersection of 188th and 58th north to the Bayliner
ramp area.
HISTORY:
Various portions of this loop have been constructed in the past. With Arlington Flight
Services leasing Building 44, at least a portion should be constructed prior to asphalting
a larger ramp area in front of the building.
ALTERNATIVES
Approve with modifications
Table
Deny
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
For discussion only at this time.
MEMO
City of Arlington
Airport
To: Mayor Tolbert and City Council
From: Rob Putnam, Airport Director
Date: April 18, 2012
Subject: Water Line Project
ISSUE: Discussion on construction of a water line.
BACKGROUND: For several years a water line has been planned to extend from the
northern most hangars along Alpha taxiway to 188th and 58th. Currently the only fire
protection is along 59th. Portions of the line has been constructed as development has
occurred. The first portion from the northern most hangar south to 192 and looped
back to 59th was installed during when Flightline Condo Association was built, around
1992. The next stretch was put in place prior to the repaving of the Bayliner Ramp area,
around 2001. Since then work was done on two additional taxilanes and pipe was
installed under the new work but not connected. With the leasing of building 44 staff
has had construction plans developed for the balance of the water line loop.
DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS: With Arlington Flight Services lease on building 44 and
Kevin’s intention to enlarge the paving in front of the building it would be prudent to
extend the line. At the minimum the line should be extended from 188th & 58th West to
almost the taxiway and then North to the edge of the asphalt of Fliteline property
(fueling station). That would take the line beyond Kevin’s project and would include a
hydrant. Ideally it would be best if we could install the rest of the line at the same time.
Staff would propose that the bidding be broken out into two sections. The base bid
would be for the portion up to the hydrant with an alternate bid for the balance of the
project. That way if the bids come in higher than anticipated we would be able to fall
back on the base bid.
This project is not funded in the 2012 budget and staff would be proposing to take the
funds from reserves. The preliminary estimate for the entire project is $90,000-$100,000.
ALTERNATIVES:
Approve with modifications
Table
Deny
RECOMMENDATION: This item is for discussion only at this time.
City of Arlington
Council Agenda Bill
Item:
WS #9
Attachment
I
COUNCIL MEETING DATE:
April 23, 2012
SUBJECT:
Draft Fee Resolution to revise the City’s current fee resolution
ATTACHMENTS:
Draft Fee Resolution in strikeout format
DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN
Executive Contact: Kristin Banfield
EXPENDITURES REQUESTED: -0-
BUDGET CATEGORY: N/A
LEGAL REVIEW:
DESCRIPTION:
City staff is proposing revisions to the City’s fee schedule for Cemetery Fees, Fire Life-
Safety inspection fees, and EMS fees. Included in the proposed revisions are revised
cemetery fees, as recommended by the City’s Cemetery Board, as well as an update of
the EMS fees, which has not been done since 2010.
The Fire Department is requesting the addition of a new fee for life-safety inspections
when the City has to repeat inspections more than three times for a business to correct a
life-safety issue.
Council requested additional information on the proposed grading fees. The current
grading fees have been in place since 2010 and are not being changed.
HISTORY:
The Council last updated the fee schedule on February 22, 2011.
ALTERNATIVES
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
No action at this time. Council is asked to review the proposed revised fees and
additional information requested. Action will be requested in May, if the Council is
ready.
Page 1
RESOLUTION NO. 2011-0032012-xxx
A RESOLUTION REPLACING RESOLUTION NOS.20102011-002 003AND 2010-006,
AND ADOPTING A REVISED FEE SCHEDULE
WHEREAS, the City Council, through ordinance, has adopted regulations requiring certain
actions and services; and,
WHEREAS, these various ordinances set forth that fees shall be set by resolution; and,
WHEREAS, the cost of providing these various services consistent with applicable codes,
regulations, and policies periodically increase or decrease, or certain services or practices are
discontinued and fees are no longer needed; and,
WHEREAS, it is the intent of the City of Arlington to charge appropriate fees and charges
that are consistent with the services provided and to cover the public cost of providing these
various services so that the public is not subsidizing individual benefits derived therefrom;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ARLINGTON AS FOLLOWS:
The following rates, fees, and charges for various services provided, actions performed, or items
sold by the city and/or its contract service providers, and fines levied against code violators, are
hereby adopted:
Section 1. Fees and Charges—General.
1.1 Fees. Fees are intended to cover the normal, recurring costs associated with
providing a given service. Fees are non-refundable.
1.2 Prices. In some instances, the City provides certain goods and merchandise for
sale. Prices for these goods may be included in this resolution.
1.3 Payment Due. Fees are due at the time the action is requested (e.g., at time of
application) or occurs (e.g., prior to a specific action). An applicant may pay all
fees of a multi-phased project in advance; however, doing so does not vest
applicable fees due. Fees due are those in effect at the time the specific action or
phase of an action is requested or occurs.
1.4 Waivers. Upon petition by the applicant, the City Council may waive any of the
fees, or portions thereof, for any non-profit organization or government agency.
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #2011-0032012-XXX
Page 2
Section 2. Land Use Fees. Fees for various services, actions, and permits regarding land use,
as per AMC Title 20 Land Use Code, shall be as listed in Table 1: Land Use Fees
Table 1: Land Use Fees
Action Fee ($)
Land Use Permits
Zoning Permit 2,222
Special Use Permit 3,306 plus actual cost of Hearing
Examiner (if req’d)
Conditional Use Permit 3,862 plus actual cost of Hearing
Examiner
Administrative Conditional Use Permit
Seasonal/Special Event
Homeless Encampment
102
508
Preliminary Plats and Binding Site Plans
Conditional Use Permit for a Long Plat 6,983 plus actual cost of Hearing
Examiner
Zoning Permit for a Short Plat 3,068
Final Plats and Binding Site Plans
Long Plat 3,389
Short Plat 1,823
Development Agreements 3,862 plus actual cost of Hearing
Examiner (if req’d)
Master Plan 12,500
Design Review
Administrative 212
Design Review Board 423
Forest Practices Permits
Permit Review 423
Forest Practices Permit Application Fee 106 plus 106 per acre
Review Fee for Conversion Option Harvest Plan Approval 106 plus 106 per acre
Review Fee To Lift Moratorium 300
Inspection Fee 127 per hour plus 106 per acre
Appeals
To City Council 212
To Planning Commission 212
To Hearing Examiner 582 plus actual cost of Hearing
Examiner
To Shoreline Hearings Board 582
Reconsideration of Decision by:
Community Development Director and/or a designee 79
Planning Commission 106
Hearing Examiner 212 plus actual cost of Hearing
Examiner
City Council 132
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #2011-0032012-XXX
Page 3
Action Fee ($)
Permit Extension
Extension 53
Amendment to or Modification of Permit
Insignificant Design Deviations 53
Minor Amendment 317
Major Amendment 1,067 plus cost of Hearing
Examiner (if req’d)
Binding Site Plans
Text and/or Design Deviation 741
Lot Line Adjustment or Changes to Number of Lots 1,323
Development Agreement 741 plus actual cost of Hearing
Examiner (if req’d)
Boundary Line Adjustment
Boundary Line Adjustment 1,664
Land Use Ordinance Amendment
Amendment to Text of Land Use Ordinance 741
Amendment to Zoning Map (rezone)
< 5 acres 1,111
> or = 5 acres 1,957
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Minor Amendment (annual cycle) 1,428
Major Amendment (5-year cycle) 2,116
Annexations
Submission of 10% Petition 106
Submission of 60% Petition 1,058
If it goes to BRB hearing 794
Shoreline Development Permit
SDP in conjunction with a Land Use Permit 529
SDP not in conjunction with a Land Use Permit 1,058
Variance
Administrative 635
If it goes to hearing (fee in addition to that paid for
Admin. Decision)
1,217 plus actual cost of
Hearing Examiner
Miscellaneous Actions/Items
Zoning Interpretation 106
Pre-Application Meetings
1st two hours 0
Subsequent meetings 317 per meeting
SEPA Review (note: review of checklist included in
Land Use Permit fee )
SEPA Only (no land use permit required) 529
Review of requested studies (i.e. traffic, wetland, etc) 159
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #2011-0032012-XXX
Page 4
Action Fee ($)
Review of requested studies (i.e. drainage, geo-tech, etc) 711
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) 1,058 plus actual cost of consultant
Request of Utility Services Outside City
Single-Family Residence/Duplex 212
Other Development 635
Section 3. Public Works Fees. Fees for various services, actions and permits shall be as
listed in Tables 2-1: Review Fees, 2-2: Grading Plan Review Fees, and 2-3: Grading Permit
Fees, and 2-4: Public Works Labor and Equipment Charges.
Table 2-1: Review Fees
Action Fee ($)
Site Civil Review 6% E.E.C.C* with a minimum charge of 1,587
Additional Plan Review Fee 212 each
Miscellaneous Engineering Fee 529 each
As-Built Review Fee Included in the site civil review fee
Final Plat Review Fee Included in the site civil review fee
Inspection Fee 127 per hour-1/2 hour minimum
Outside Consultant Review Fee Actual cost
Simple Site Plan Review 265 per lot
Right of Way 6% E.E.C.C* or maximum 1,058 with a
minimum charge of 106 plus inspection fees
Right of Way Vacation 1,058
Miscellaneous Staff Time 127 per hour per person-1/2 hour minimum
Engineering Meetings-after 2 hours 317 per meeting
Water Availability Certificate SFR 32 – Non-SFR 106
Recovery Contract 1,058 plus actual cost
GIS
Zoning and Land Use Maps 10.00
11x17 5.00
2x3 13.00
3x3 19.00
3x4 25.00
Map CD 26.00
Data CDs/FTP 26.00 per client
Hourly Rate for Custom Work 127 per hour, ½ hour minimum
Laminating 3/sq ft
Shipping 5.00
Fee none
* E.E.C.C Engineer’s Estimated Cost of Construction-Includes labor, equipment, material, overhead and profit.
Prices shall be from RS Means (latest edition) data adjusted for the Snohomish County area or from local sources if
not included in the RS Means database.
* Simple Site Plan Review - No water or sewer extension - Single family residence with maximum of 2 lots.
* Additional plan review applies when there is a change, addition or revision to the plan.
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #2011-0032012-XXX
Page 5
* Additional plan review fees will be charged at any point in the project when more than 2 reviews are required.
* Inspection Fee - commercial and residential plats (storm drainage, landscape, right-of-way and bond
inspections).
* Outside Consultant Review Fee.
* Water Availability Certificate Fee.
* Engineering Meetings (first 2 hours are no charge).
* Miscellaneous engineering fee - traffic and storm water report/design reviewed in-house.
Table 2-2: Grading Plan Review Fees
2009 Fee ($) 2010 Fee ($)
50 Cubic Yards or less No fee No fee
51 to 100 cubic yards 25.00 25.50
101 to 1,000 cubic yards 39.25 40.00
1,001 to 100,000 cubic yards
First 1,000 cubic yards
Plus - for each additional
10,000 yards or fraction thereof
52.30
26.00
53.35
26.50
100,001 to 200,000 cubic yards
For the first 100,000 cubic yards
Plus - for each additional
10,000 yards or fraction thereof
286.25
14.10
292.00
14.40
200,001 cubic yards or more
For the first 200,000 cubic yards
Plus - for each additional 10,000 cubic yards or fraction
thereof
426.90
7.70
435.45
7.85
Other Fees: Additional plan review required by changes,
additions or revisions to approved plans (minimum
charge – 1/2 hour)
53.60*
Per hour
54.70*
Per hour
*Or the total hourly cost to the City, whichever is the greatest. This cost shall include supervision, overhead,
equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of the employees involved.
Table 2-3: Grading Permit Fees
2009 Fee ($) 2010 Fee ($)
50 cubic yards or less 25.00 25.50
51 to 100 cubic yards 39.25 40.00
101 to 1,000 cubic yards
First 100 cubic yards
Plus – for each additional 100 cubic yards or fraction
thereof
39.25
18.55
40.00
18.90
1,001 to 10,000 cubic yards
For the first 1,000 cubic yards
Plus - for each additional
1,000 yards or fraction thereof
206.40
15.40
210.50
15.70
10,001 to 100,000 cubic yards
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #2011-0032012-XXX
Page 6
For the First 10,000 cubic yards
Plus - for each additional
10,000 yards or fraction thereof
344.90
70.00
351.80
71.40
100,001 or more cubic yards or more
For the first 100,000 cubic yards
Plus - for each additional 10,000 cubic yards or fraction
thereof
975.30
38.75
994.80
39.50
Table 2-4: Public Works Labor and Equipment Charges
A. Services and work included in the below schedule will be charged a 15%
administrative/overhead fee for accounting, billing and general City administrative costs.
B. All work or services not included in the below schedule must be mutually agreed upon
prior to the commencement of work.
C. Equipment and machinery that is not explicitly included in the below schedule will be
charged at the rate set forth in the most current Rental Rate Blue Book for Construction
Equipment ("Blue Book"). If the equipment or machinery rate is not available in the Blue
Book, the City will determine an appropriate fee or rate based on the original cost of the
asset plus operating and maintenance cost and/or comparable rates charged by other
organizations.
Item Fee ($)
Labor Rate Cost
Lead Maintenance Worker Hourly $ 60.00
Sr. Maintenance Worker Hourly $ 55.00
Maintenance Worker Hourly $ 50.00
PW Inspector Hourly $ 60.00
Administrative Staff Hourly $ 45.00
Equipment
Pick-up Truck Hourly $ 15.00
Dump Truck Hourly $ 75.00
Back-hoe Hourly $ 55.00
Vactor-Jetter Truck Hourly $ 105.00
Snow Plow Hourly $ 75.00
Street Sweeper Hourly $ 55.00
Formatted Table
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #2011-0032012-XXX
Page 7
Section 4. Building Permit Fees. For determining the value of a structure, the most current
issue of the Building Safety Journal Magazine, which offers the legacy building valuation
data fee schedule as published by the International Code Council, is adopted by reference.
Fees shall be as listed in Tables 3-1: Building Permit Fees, 3-2: Miscellaneous Building
Inspection Fees and 3-3: Miscellaneous Building Permit Fees.
Table 3-1: Building Permit Fees
Total
Valuation($)
2009 2010 2011 2012 Fee ($)
1.00 – 500.00 28.50 29.00 29.50 30.00 0.00 to 500.00
501.00 – 2,000.00 28.50
3.75
29.00
3.75
29.50
3.83
30.00
3.90
For the first 500.00 plus
For each additional 100.00, or
fraction thereof, to and including
2,000.00
2001.00 –
25,000.00
84.75
17.00
86.00
17.25
86.95
17.60
88.50
17.95
For the first 2,000.00 plus
For each additional 1,000.00, or
fraction thereof, to and including
25,000.00
25,001.00 –
50,000.00
475.75
12.25
482.75
12.50
491.75
12.75
501.35
13.01
For the first 25,000.00 plus
For each additional 1,000.00, or
fraction thereof, to and including
50,000.00
50,001.00 –
100,000.00
782.00
8.50
795.25
8.70
810.50
8.87
820.10
9.05
For the first 50,000.00 plus
For each additional 1,000.00, or
fraction thereof, to and including
100,000.00
100,001.00 –
500,000.00
1,207.00
6.80
1,230.25
6.90
1,254.00
7.04
1,272.60
7.18
For the first 100,000.00 plus
For each additional 1,000.00, or
fraction thereof, to and including
500,000.00
500,001.00 –
1,000,000.00
3,927.00
5.75
3,990.25
5.90
4,070.00
6.02
4,144.60
6.14
For the first 500,000.00 plus
For each additional 1,000.00, or
fraction thereof, to and including
1,000,000.00
1,000,001.00
and up
6,802.00
4.45
6,940.25
4.50
7,080.00
4.59
7,214.60
4.68
For the first 1,000,000.00 plus
For each additional 1,000.00, or
fraction thereof
Total
Valuation($)
2013 2014 2015 2016 Fee ($)
1.00 – 500.00 30.50 31.00 31.50 32.00 0.00 to 500.00
501.00 – 2,000.00 30.50
3.98
31.00
4.06
31.50
4.14
32.00
4.22
For the first 500.00 plus
For each additional 100.00, or
fraction thereof, to and including
2,000.00
Formatted: Indent: First line: 0"
Formatted: Indent: First line: 0"
Formatted: Indent: First line: 0"
Formatted: Indent: First line: 0"
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #2011-0032012-XXX
Page 8
2001.00 –
25,000.00
90.20
18.31
91.90
18.67
93.60
19.05
95.30
19.43
For the first 2,000.00 plus
For each additional 1,000.00, or
fraction thereof, to and including
25,000.00
25,001.00 –
50,000.00
511.33
13.27
521.31
13.53
531.75
13.80
542.19
14.08
For the first 25,000.00 plus
For each additional 1,000.00, or
fraction thereof, to and including
50,000.00
50,001.00 –
100,000.00
843.08
9.23
859.56
9.42
876.75
9.61
894.19
9.80
For the first 50,000.00 plus
For each additional 1,000.00, or
fraction thereof, to and including
100,000.00
100,001.00 –
500,000.00
1,304.58
7.32
1,330.56
7.47
1,357.25
7.62
1,384.19
7.77
For the first 100,000.00 plus
For each additional 1,000.00, or
fraction thereof, to and including
500,000.00
500,001.00 –
1,000,000.00
4,232.58
6.26
4,318.56
6.39
4,405.25
6.51
4,492.19
6.64
For the first 500,000.00 plus
For each additional 1,000.00, or
fraction thereof, to and including
1,000,000.00
1,000,001.00
and up
7,362.58
4.78
7,513.56
4.87
7,660.25
4.97
7,819.19
5.07
For the first 1,000,000.00 plus
For each additional 1,000.00, or
fraction thereof
Total
Valuation($)
2017 2018 2019 2020 Fee ($)
1.00 – 500.00 32.50 33.00 33.50 34.00 0.00 to 500.00
501.00 – 2,000.00 32.50
4.31
33.00
4.39
33.50
4.48
34.00
4.57
For the first 500.00 plus
For each additional 100.00, or
fraction thereof, to and including
2,000.00
2001.00 –
25,000.00
95.17
19.81
98.85
20.21
100.70
20.62
102.55
21.03
For the first 2,000.00 plus
For each additional 1,000.00, or
fraction thereof, to and including
25,000.00
25,001.00 –
50,000.00
552.78
14.36
563.68
14.65
574.96
14.94
586.24
15.24
For the first 25,000.00 plus
For each additional 1,000.00, or
fraction thereof, to and including
50,000.00
50,001.00 –
100,000.00
911.78
9.99
929.93
10.19
948.46
10.40
967.24
10.61
For the first 50,000.00 plus
For each additional 1,000.00, or
fraction thereof, to and including
100,000.00
100,001.00 –
500,000.00
1,411.28
7.93
1,439.43
8.08
1,468.46
8.25
1,497.74
8.41
For the first 100,000.00 plus
For each additional 1,000.00, or
fraction thereof, to and including
Formatted: Indent: First line: 0"
Formatted: Indent: First line: 0"
Formatted: Indent: First line: 0"
Formatted: Indent: First line: 0"
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #2011-0032012-XXX
Page 9
500,000.00
500,001.00 –
1,000,000.00
4,583.28
6.78
4,671.43
6.91
4,768.46
7.05
4,861.74
7.19
For the first 500,000.00 plus
For each additional 1,000.00, or
fraction thereof, to and including
1,000,000.00
1,000,001.00 and
up
7,973.28
5.17
8,126.43
5.27
8,293.46
5.38
8,456.74
5.49
For the first 1,000,000.00 plus
For each additional 1,000.00, or
fraction thereof
Table 3-2: Miscellaneous Building Inspection Fees
Action Fee ($)
Inspections outside of normal business hours 50.00 per hour1 (minimum charge 1 hour)
Reinspection fees assessed under provisions of the
current IBC
50.00 per hour1
Inspection for which no fee is specifically
indicated
50.00 per hour1 (minimum charge—1 hour)
Additional plan review required by changes,
additions or revised plans
50.00 per hour1 (minimum charge—1 hour)
For use of outside consultants for plan review and
inspections, or both.
Actual costs2
Stop work order (working without permit) 3
1 Or the total hourly cost to the City, whichever is greatest. This cost shall include supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly
wages, and benefits of the employees involved. 2 Actual costs include administrative and overhead costs.
3 Stop work order (SWO): failure to obtain a valid permit within 48 hour of a SWO will result in double permit fees or a fine
of $500 whichever is less. A permit applied for within the 48 hour timeframe may be subject to a fine and/or fee at the
discretion of the building official.
Table 3-3: Miscellaneous Building Permit Fees
Action Fee ($)
Change lot after plan review completed 100.00
Change plans during or after plan review. New Plan Review Fee
Change or revise plans after issuance of
permit.
Current hourly rate per IBC or new plan review fee
Action Fee ($)
Commercial or industrial re-roof IBC value or bid amount
Demolitions 100.00
Espresso carts (portable and stand alone) 250.00
Fences over 6 feet in height Current hourly rate per IBC for plan review plus 20.00
permit fee
Mobile homes 500.00
Modular offices (job shacks) 350.00
Moved buildings 100.00 prior to moving together with a building permit
fee based on the IBC valuation for new building and
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #2011-0032012-XXX
Page 10
cost of moved building.
Residential re-roofs 0
if plan review required 50.00
Retaining walls (permit not required under
four (4) feet
100.00 or IBC valuation, whichever is greater
Signs IBC valuation, using permit fee only
4.2 Plumbing Fees. Plumbing fees shall be as listed in Table 3-4: Plumbing Fees.
Table 3-4: Plumbing Permit Fees
Action Fee ($)
PERMIT ISSUANCE
Plumbing Permit Base Fee 25.00
Medical Gas Systems 100.00
Fixtures and Vents
For each plumbing fixture or trap or set of fixtures on one trap (including water, drainage
piping and backflow protection thereof)
12.00
Sewers, Disposal Systems and Interceptors
For each industrial waste pretreatment interceptor, including its trap and vent, except
kitchen-type grease interceptors functioning as fixture traps
25.00
Water Piping and Water Heaters
For each water heater including vent 25.00
Lawn Sprinklers, Vacuum Breakers and Backflow Protection Devices
For each lawn sprinkler system on any one meter, including backflow protection devices
thereof
25.00
Swimming Pools For each swimming pool or spa:
Public pool 90.00
Public spa 90.00
Private pool 60.00
Private spa 30.00
Miscellaneous
For each appliance or piece of equipment regulated by the Plumbing Code but not
classed in other appliance categories, or for which no other fee is listed in this code
12.00
4.3 Mechanical Permit Fees. Mechanical permit and inspection shall be as listed in
Table 3-5: Mechanical Permit and Inspection Fees.
Table 3-5: Mechanical Permit & Inspection Fees
Action Fee ($)
PERMIT ISSUANCE AND HEATERS
Mechanical Permit Base Fee 25.00
Furnaces 25.00
Appliance Vents
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #2011-0032012-XXX
Page 11
Action Fee ($)
For the installation, relocation or replacement of each appliance vent installed and not
included in an appliance permit
10.00
Boilers 25.00
AHU’s and Condensing Units 100.00
Evaporative Coolers & Heat Pumps 25.00
Ventilation and Exhaust
For each ventilation fan connected to a single duct 10.00
Refrigeration Systems 50.00
For each gas piping system of 1 to 5 outlets 10.00
For each additional outlet over 5, each 1.00
Miscellaneous
For each appliance or piece of equipment regulated by the Mechanical Code but not
classed in other appliance categories, or for which the fee is listed in the table
25.00
Table 3-6: Plumbing & Mechanical Plan Review Fees
< THAN $500.00 ROUND DOWN TO NEAREST $1,000. > THAN $500.00 ROUND UP TO NEAREST $1,000.00
Total Valuation Fee ($)
Less than $1,000.00 150.00
$1,000.00 to $9,999.99 200.00
$10,000 to $19,999.99 250.00
$20,000.00 to $29,999.99 300.00
$30,000.00 to $39,999.99 350.00
$40,000.00 to $49,999.99 400.00
$50,000.00 to $59,999.99 450.00
$60,000.00 to $69,999.99 500.00
$70,000.00 to $79,999.99 550.00
$80,000.00 to $89,999.99 600.00
$90,000.00 to $99,999.99 650.00
$100,000.00 to $199,999.99 700.00
$200,000.00 to $299,999.99 800.00
$300,000.00 to $399,999.99 900.00
$400,000.00 to $499,999.99 1,000.00
$500,000.00 to $599,999.99 1,100.00
$600,000.00 to $699,999.99 1,200.00
$700,000.00 to $799,999.99 1,300.00
$800,000.00 to $899,999.99 1,400.00
$900,000.00 to $999,999.99 1,500.00
$1,000,000.00 to $1,999,999.99 1,600.00
$2,000,000.00 to $2,999,999.99 1,700.00
$3,000,000.00 to $3,999,999.99 1,800.00
$4,000,000.00 to $4,999,999.99 1,900.00
5 Million and Up 2,000.00 for the first $5M plus
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #2011-0032012-XXX
Page 12
$1.00 for each additional
$1,000.00 or fraction thereof
Table 3-7: Fire Permit Fees
Action Fee ($)
Fire Sprinklers
Plan Review Fee 100.00
Permit Fee Based on Valuation
Fire Alarms
Plan Review Fee 100.00
Permit Fee Based on Valuation
Commercial Hoods (Type I & Type II)
Plan Review Fee 100.00
Permit Fee Based on Valuation
Other Fire Safety System
Plan Review Fee 100.00
Permit Fee Based on Valuation
Section 5. Fire Department Life-Safety Inspection Fees. Fees for re-inspections for life-
safety issues conducted by the Fire Department shall be as listed in Table 4: Fire Department
Life-Safety Inspection Fees.
Table 4: Fire Department Life-Safety Inspection Fees
Action Fee ($)
Life / Safety Inspections of Businesses
Initial Inspection 0.00
First reinspection for corrections 0.00
Second reinspection for corrections 100.00
Third reinspection for corrections 150.00
Additional inspections to complete life/safety corrections
and attain compliance
250.00
Section 56. Cemetery Fees. Fees and prices for various services, actions, and merchandise
for cemetery use shall be as listed in Table 45: Cemetery Fees and Prices.
Table 45: Cemetery Fees and Prices
Product / Service / Action Fee ($)
Traditional Burial
Burial Lot $1,500
Opening & Closing (during business hours) $1,000
Opening & Closing (after business hours) $1,300
Concrete Grave Liner $800
Formatted Table
Formatted Table
Formatted: Left
Formatted: Font: Not Bold
Formatted: Left
Formatted: Right
Formatted: Font: Not Bold
Formatted: Left
Formatted: Font: Not Bold
Formatted: Right
Formatted: Font: Not Bold
Formatted: Left
Formatted: Font: Not Bold
Formatted: Right
Formatted: Left
Formatted: Font: Not Bold
Formatted: Right
Formatted: Font: Not Bold
Formatted: Font: Not Bold, No underline
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #2011-0032012-XXX
Page 13
Vaults
Monticello $1,595
Continental $1,895
Venetian $2,295
Cameo Rose / SST Triune $2,995
Vault Internment System $350
Inurnment
Cremation Lot / Urn Garden $650
Second Right Inurnment $500
Opening & Closing (during business hours) $445
Opening & Closing (after business hours) $695
Liner $310
Childrens Garden
Babyland Children’s Garden Lot $397
Opening & Closing (all times) $488
Babyland Children’s Garden Liner $658
Niche
Niche Wall I and II, rows 1-3 top half $1,142
Niche Wall I and II, rows 4-6 bottom half $1,089
Opening & Closing (during business hours) $445
Opening & Closing (after business hours) $695
Second Right Niche Wall $545
Niche Inscription – Single $363
Niche Inscription – Double $563
Tent and Chairs for Inurnment $163
Flower Vase for Niche Wall $205
Headstones and Monuments
Headstone Setting & Inspection Fee - 28 x16 30 x 18 or smaller $275
Headstone Setting & Inspection Fee - 32 x 20 28 x 34 or larger $375
Setting Fee - vase block or garden marker $60
Headstone Re-Setting Fee $175
Setting and Inspection Fee - upright monument (single) $575
Setting and Inspection Fee - upright monument (double) $675
Headstone Final Inscription (off site) $550
Headstone Final Inscription (on site) $363
Headstone Sales - varies Call
Headstone Inspection Fee (outside sales) $375 $100
Memorial Marker - varies Call
Other Services
Memorial Tree w/ garden marker $800
Disinterment / Traditional Burial $1,995
Disinterment / Cremation $650
Pressure Washing $ 40 for first headstone
$25 for each additional
headstone
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #2011-0032012-XXX
Page 14
Section 67. Fees for the Use of City Owned Facilities. Fees for various services, actions,
and permits regarding use of City owned facilities shall be as listed in Table 5: Fees for the
Use of City Owned Facilities.
Table 56: Fees for the Use of City Owned Facilities
Use/Activity Fee ($)
Hadley Hall at the Arlington Community Youth Center
Without Kitchen
One to three hours 15 per hour
Over three hours 75
With Kitchen
One to three hours 20 per hour
Over three hours 125
Athletic Fields
League
Baseball
Youth, resident team 7.50 per youth per season
Youth, non-resident team 10 per team per use
Adult 25 per use
Softball
Youth, resident team 7.50 per youth per season
Youth, non-resident team 10 per team per use
Adult 25 per use
Soccer
Youth, resident team 7.50 per youth per season
Youth, non-resident team 10 per team per use
Adult 25 per use
Other
Youth, resident team 7.50 per youth per season
Youth, non-resident team 10 per team per use
Adult 25 per use
Tournament
Baseball
Youth, resident team 7.50 per youth per tournament
Youth, non-resident team 10 per team per use
Adult 25 per use
Softball
Youth, resident team 7.50 per youth per tournament
Youth, non-resident team 10 per team per use
Adult 25 per use
Soccer
Youth, resident team 7.50 per youth per tournament
Youth, non-resident team 10 per team per use
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #2011-0032012-XXX
Page 15
Adult 25 per use
Other
Youth, resident team 7.50 per youth per season
Youth, non-resident team 10 per team per use
Adult 25 per use
Lighting
Youth 3 per hour
Adult 6 per hour
Scheduling Fee for League and Tournament
League 15 per team
Tournament 15 per tournament
Concession Sales
League 50 per season
Tournament 25per day
6.1 Definitions.
A. “Youth” is defined as any person 18 years of age or younger.
B. “Resident” is defined as any team composed of at least 51% Arlington
residents.
Section 78. Appeal Fees for Violations and Abatement. Fees for various services and
actions regarding violations and abatement as per Chapter 11.01 of the Arlington Municipal
Code shall be as listed in Table 6: Appeal Fees for Violations and Abatement.
Table 67: Appeal Fees for Violations and Abatement
Action Fee ($)
Appeals
To Hearing Examiner 582 plus actual cost of Hearing Examiner
Fines
Forest Practice Violation Fine 317
Section 89. Licensing Fees. Licensing fees for various licenses issued under various
sections of the Arlington Municipal Code shall be as listed in Table 7:- Licensing Fees.
Table 78: Licensing Fees
License/Activity Fee ($)
Annual/renewal business license under AMC Chapter 5.28 60.00
Late payment penalty for each month of delinquency of business
license under AMC Chapter 5.28
5.00 per month of delinquency
For new applications applied for between October 1st through
December 30th the new business license applications pay the
following fee of $45.
45.00
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #2011-0032012-XXX
Page 16
For new applications applied for between January 1st through
March 30th new business license applications pay the following fee
of $30
.
30.00
For new applications applied for April 1st through June 30th new
business license applications pay the following fee. Note: $15 for
the remainder of the current business license year and $60 for the
new business license year for a total of $75, making the business
license valid thru June 30th of the following year.
75.00
Businesses with offices located outside of city limits but conducting
business within city limits (AMC Chapter 5.28)
20.00
Peddlers & Solicitors License under AMC Chapter 5.04 25.00
Vehicles for Hire License under AMC Chapter 5.12
- First vehicle
- Each vehicle thereafter
35.00
15.00
Cabaret License under AMC Chapter 5.16 (annual) 75.00
Section 910. EMS Fees and Charges.
9.1 Fees and Mileage Charges Established. For purposes of AMC Chapter
3.06, fees and mileage for EMS services shall be set as set forth in Table 89:
Emergency Medical Services Rates and Charges.
9.2 Beginning on January 1, 2013, the rates set forth for the year 2012 shall be
increased annually by the June reported percentage increase of the
Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton area for All
Urban Consumers, or other measure commonly used by the city should it
change; provided, however, that notwithstanding any reduction in the CPI,
rates shall not decrease.
9.2 EMS Transport Fees. In accordance with the requirements of 42 Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) Parts 410 and 414, which provides that Medicare
fees and charges shall apply to Medicare recipients;
A. Unmet (excess fee) Part B Deductible and Part B coinsurance amounts. In
accordance with the provisions of 42 CFR Parts 410 and 414, the City
shall bill the patient for any unmet or excess fee to the extent authorized
by federal law.
B. Inability to Pay Excess Fee. Individuals who are on fixed or low incomes
or do not have the ability to pay the differential because of financial
difficulties may submit a request to waive the differential to the City with
supporting documentation of the inability to pay.
Table 89: Emergency Medical Services Rates and Charges
Service 2011 Rate ($) 2012 Rate ($)
BLS Non-emergent 476.00 491.23
BLS Emergent 476.00 491.23
Formatted Table
Formatted: Right
Formatted: Right
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #2011-0032012-XXX
Page 17
ALS Emergent 741.00 764.71
ALS 2 846.00 873.07
ALS Response Fee 265.00 273.48
Specialty Care Transport Fee 846.00 873.07
Mileage (all categories) 16.00 per mile 16.51 per mile
Section 911. Dog Licensing Fees.
License Annual Fee ($)
Dog - unaltered $ 20
Dog – altered $ 10
Dog – altered (senior citizen owner) $ 5
Dog – altered & micro-chipped $ 5
Replacement Tag fee $ 5
Late Fee – for failure to purchase annual license before March 1 $ 10
Per RCW 49.60.380, the City of Arlington shall honor a request by a blind person or hearing impaired
person not to be charged a fee to license his or her guide dog, or a request by a physically disabled
person not to be charged a fee to license his or her service animal.
All dogs require proof of current Rabies vaccination to be licensed.
Proof is also required for alteration and micro-chip to be eligible for the reduced fee.
Section 1012. Repeal of Previous Fee Resolutions. Resolutions 2010-0022011-003 and
Resolution 2010-006 areis hereby repealed.
Section 1113. Effective Date. This resolution will become effective immediately upon
passage.
PASSED by the City Council and APPROVED by the Mayor this _____ day of
______________________ 20112012.
CITY OF ARLINGTON
_________________________________
Margaret LarsonBarbara Tolbert, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________________
Kristin Banfield, City Clerk
Formatted: Right
Formatted: Right
Formatted: Right
Formatted: Right
Formatted: Right
Formatted: Centered, Tab stops: 0.3", Left +
0.6", Left
Formatted Table
Formatted: Right
Formatted: Right
Formatted: Right
Formatted: Right
Formatted: Right
Formatted: Right
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #2011-0032012-XXX
Page 18
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________
Steve Peiffle, City Attorney
City of Arlington
Council Agenda Bill
Item:
WS #10
Attachment
J
COUNCIL MEETING DATE:
April 23, 2012
SUBJECT:
Appointment of Brittany Kleinman and Kaitlin Valenti to the Parks, Arts, and
Recreation Commission
ATTACHMENTS:
Applications from Brittany Kleinman and Kaitlin Valenti
DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN
Executive – Contact Kristin Banfield, 360-403-3444
EXPENDITURES REQUESTED: -0-
BUDGET CATEGORY: N/A
LEGAL REVIEW:
DESCRIPTION:
With the resignations of Mike Zachman and Leslie Larson, the Parks, Arts, and
Recreation Commission has two vacancies. Council is requested to appoint Brittany
Kleinman and Kaitlin Valenti to these vacancies.
HISTORY:
A panel comprised of Councilmember Klein, Councilmember Oertle, PARC Chair Bob
Leonard, and Recreation Manager Sarah Lopez interviewed three candidates for the
two vacancies on April 11, 2012. The panel recommended the appointment of Ms.
Kleinman and Ms. Valenti.
ALTERNATIVES
Do not appoint.
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
No action at this time. Council will be requested to approve the appointments at the
May 7, 2012 Council meeting.