Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-18-26 Council Meeting Packet SPECIAL ACCOMMODATIONS: The City of Arlington strives to provide accessible meetings for people with disabilities. Please contact the ADA coordinator at (360) 403-3441 or 711 (TDD only) prior to the meeting date if special accommodations are required. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Don Vanney PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL Mayor Don Vanney – Raelynn APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA Mayor Pro Tem Michele Blythe INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS Mayor’s Volunteer Award presented to Maxine Jenft Mayor Don Vanney Recognition and presentation for Airport Commissioner Ruth Gonzales Monroe Whitman, Airport PROCLAMATIONS Public Works Week Mayor Don Vanney PUBLIC COMMENT For members of the public who wish to speak to the Council about any matter not on the Public Hearing portion of the meeting. Please limit remarks to three minutes. CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Pro Tem Michele Blythe 1. Minutes of the May 4 and May 11, 2026 Council meetings and ATTACHMENT A May 7, 2026 Audit Exit meeting. 2. Accounts Payable ATTACHMENT B 3. Ordinance Approving Amendment to Arlington Municipal Code ATTACHMENT C Chapter 20.76 Screening and Trees 4. Ordinance Approving Amendment to Arlington Municipal Code ATTACHMENT D Chapter 20.94 Annexations Arlington City Council Meeting Monday, May 18, 2026 at 6:00 pm City Council Chambers – 110 E 3rd Street SPECIAL ACCOMMODATIONS: The City of Arlington strives to provide accessible meetings for people with disabilities. Please contact the ADA coordinator at (360) 403-3441 or 711 (TDD only) prior to the meeting date if special accommodations are required. 5. Ordinance Approving Amendment to Arlington Municipal Code ATTACHMENT E Chapter 20.98 State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) 6. Community Aviation Revitalization Board (CARB) Electric Sweeper ATTACHMENT F Loan – Offer Acceptance and Resolution 7. Contract Amendment #7 to the SCJ Alliance Contract for the Island ATTACHMENT G Crossing Roundabout PUBLIC HEARING NEW BUSINESS 1. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Memorandum ATTACHMENT H of Agreement (MOA) Staff Presentation: Monroe Whitman Council Liaison: Nathan Senff 2. Update Council Rules and Procedures and Code of Ethics ATTACHMENT I For Meeting Time Staff Presentation: Paul Ellis Council Liaison: Leisha Nobach 3. Sole Source Resolution for Procurement and Servicing of Wilo ATTACHMENT J Pumps, Mixers, and Associated Support Equipment Staff Presentation: Jim Kelly Council Liaison: Yvonne Gallardo-Van Ornam COMMENTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS INFORMATION/ADMINISTRATOR & STAFF REPORTS MAYOR’S REPORT EXECUTIVE SESSION RECONVENE ADJOURNMENT Mayor Pro Tem Michele Blythe / Mayor Don Vanney Proclamation National Public Works Week WHEREAS, public works professionals focus on infrastructure, facilities, and services that are of vital importance to sustainable and resilient communities and to public health, high quality of life, and well-being of the people of the City of Arlington; and WHEREAS, the efficiency of the qualified and dedicated personnel who staff public works departments is materially influenced by the support of an understanding and informed citizenry and is vital to the efficient operation of programs such as water, sewers, streets and highways, public buildings, and solid waste collection; and WHEREAS, the quality and effectiveness of these infrastructure facilities, and services could not be provided without the dedicated efforts of public works professionals, who are engineers, managers, and employees at all levels; and WHEREAS, and the health, safety and comfort of this community greatly depends on these facilities and services; and WHEREAS, the year 2026 marks the 66th annual National Public Works Week sponsored by the American Public Works Association, NOW, THEREFORE, I, Don E. Vanney, Mayor of Arlington, do hereby proclaim The week of May 17-23, 2026 as National Public Works Week in The City of Arlington, and FURTHER, I call upon all citizens and civic organizations to acquaint themselves with the issues involved in providing our public works and to recognize the contributions which public works officials make every day to our health, safety, comfort, and quality of life. ________________________________ 5-18-2026____ Don E. Vanney, Mayor Date DRAFT Page 1 of 4 Council Chambers 110 East 3rd Street Monday, May 4, 2026 Councilmembers Present: Heather Watland, Rob Toyer, Michele Blythe, Nathan Senff, Tim Abrahamson, and Leisha Nobach. Council Members Absent: Yvonne Gallardo-Van Ornam: excused. Staff Present: Mayor Don Vanney, Paul Ellis, Raelynn Jones, Jim Kelly, Kris Wallace, Shelby Burke, City Attorney Oskar Rey, Bryan Terry, Rory Bolter, Shawn Friang, Sarah Lopez, Mandy Kruger. Also Known to be Present: Kathy Vanney, Randy Nobach, Steve Maisch, Holly Sloan-Buchanan, Department of Health Environmental Engineer Ryan Deem, Diane Kreig, Daniel Jackson, Toyosi Dosunmu, Nolan Kruger, and others. Mayor Don Vanney called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m., and the Pledge of Allegiance and roll call followed. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA Mayor Pro Tem Michele Blythe moved to approve the agenda as presented. Councilmember Nathan Senff seconded the motion, which passed with a unanimous vote. INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS Ryan Deem, an Environmental Engineer from the Department of Health, presented the National Drinking Water Week “Grace Under Pressure” Award to Zachary Resch, Daniel Petersen, and Bryan Simmons of the City of Arlington Public Works Department. Stilly Valley Chamber of Commerce Director, Diane Krieg introduced the Arlington Civic Bee Winners: Daniel Jackson, Toyosi Dosunmu, and Nolan Kruger. Each student gave a short presentation about their Civic Bee essay to City Council members and answered Council questions. PROCLAMATIONS None. PUBLIC COMMENT Tracey Gilroy (on behalf of Rick Graham), Stanwood, provided comments. Minutes of the Arlington City Council Meeting Minutes of the City of Arlington City Council Meeting April 6, 2026 Page 2 of 4 CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Pro Tem Michele Blythe moved, and Councilmember Nathan Senff seconded the motion to approve the Consent Agenda that was unanimously carried: 1. Minutes of the April 20 and April 27, 2026 Council meetings and April 24, 2026 Council Retreat 2. Accounts Payable: Approval of Petty Cash Check #2053 & 2054, and EFT/ACH Payments and Claims Checks #115721 through #115825, dated April 7th, 2026 through April 20th, 2026 in the amount of $1,442,745.34. 3. Position Request for Water Treatment Plant Operator Resolution for WSDOT Grant – Perimeter Fencing Improvement Project Stage 2 4. Change Order No. 2 for Water Treatment Expansion Design PUBLIC HEARING None. NEW BUSINESS Condemnation Ordinance for the 180th Street and Smokey Point Boulevard Roundabout Project Public Works Director Jim Kelly requested Council approve the condemnation ordinance for the 180th Street and Smokey Point Boulevard Roundabout Project. Arlington received a grant from Puget Sound Regional Council for the design and construction of a roundabout at 180th Street and Smokey Point Boulevard as part of the Smokey Point Boulevard Corridor improvement project. This project design is near completion and will be bid early summer. As part of the roundabout project, the City needed to obtain Right of Way (ROW) and Temporary Construction Easements (TCE) from several parcels; all parcels have been acquired except for a property located at the southwest corner of the intersection. The property owners have rejected fair, above market offers for the needed ROW and TCE. Construction of this intersection project will provide for mobility and safety, it is for the good of the public and community; as such, we are now moving to obtain the ROW and TCE through condemnation proceedings. Discussion followed with Mr. Kelly answering Council questions Mayor Pro Tem Michele Blythe moved, and Councilmember Leisha Nobach seconded the motion to approve the ordinance allowing the City to move forward with condemnation proceedings and authorize the Mayor to sign the ordinance. The motion passed 5-1 with Councilmember Tim Abrahamson voting no. Appointments to the Cemetery Board The Cemetery Board serves as an advisory board to the Mayor and City Council with respect to all aspects of the Arlington Cemetery, explained Public Works Director Jim Kelly. The board meets quarterly and reviews activities and operations as well as finances, capital planning, future expansion plans/needs and any other issues that may arise. Three vacancies were created on the Cemetery Board with one retirement, and two terms expiring. Minutes of the City of Arlington City Council Meeting April 6, 2026 Page 3 of 4 Allen Ice retired in 2026 after serving the Cemetery and community for 24 years – the City is grateful for Allen’s many years of service and will be acknowledged in an upcoming meeting. The City advertised for the open Cemetery Board positions and four applications were received. An interview committee consisting of city staff, a current cemetery board member, and an elected official (Michele Blythe) conducted interviews with the applicants on April 21, 2026. While all applicants are very well qualified, the interview committee is recommending the renewal of Annette Patterson, and the appointment of Alan Weil and Erika Coghill to fill the vacant positions. Councilmember Leisha Nobach moved, and Councilmember Tim Abrahamson seconded the motion to re-appoint Annette Patterson and appoint Alan Weil and Erika Coghill to the Arlington Cemetery Board. The motion passed unanimously. Lodging Tax Advisory Committee Appointments The Lodging Tax Advisory Committee (LTAC) consists of two representatives from the hotel/lodging industry, two representatives from businesses that are actively involved in activities eligible for lodging tax funding, and one City Council representative who serves as chair of the committee, explained Finance Director, Shelby Burke. All of these positions are currently either up for renewal or vacant. For the City Council representative and committee chair position, the Mayor has appointed Yvonne Gallardo-Van Ornam. One individual representing the hotel/motel side of the committee has expressed interest in continuing to serve on the committee: Rachel Ralson, representing Hotel Services Group (Best Western). Ms. Ralson has been a valuable contributor, providing hotel industry insight that has led to process improvements within the program. Historically, it has been difficult to find hoteliers willing to serve on the committee. At this time, no other individuals representing local hotels/motels have expressed interest. Staff will continue efforts to identify an additional hotelier to serve on the committee. Two individuals have expressed interest in serving on the LTAC as representatives of businesses actively involved in activities eligible for lodging tax funding. Michele Heiderer, representing the Stillaguamish Valley Museum, is interested in continuing on the committee for another two-year term. Matt Bass, who would represent the Downtown Arlington Business Association (DABA) and Windermere Arlington, has also expressed interest in joining the committee. Both Michele and Matt bring valuable perspectives based on their respective areas of expertise and would be strong additions to the committee. The Finance Director has been actively reaching out to individuals who may be interested in serving on the committee and conducting interviews. Due to the longstanding difficulty in filling positions on this committee, the recruitment process differs from that of other City of Arlington committees in order to meet representation requirements. Minutes of the City of Arlington City Council Meeting April 6, 2026 Page 4 of 4 Councilmember Tim Abrahamson moved, and Councilmember Heather Watland seconded the motion to confirm the appointment of Yvonne Gallardo-Van Ornam, Rachel Ralson, Matt Bass, and Michele Heiderer, to the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee. The motion passed unanimously. COMMENTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS Councilmember Heather Watland acknowledged Nurse’s and Teacher’s Week and expressed her appreciation. ADMINISTRATOR & STAFF REPORTS None. MAYOR’S REPORT Mayor Vanney stated that he attended the AWC Legislative Advisory Commission on April 30th and May 1st and provided a report on the event. EXECUTIVE SESSION None. ADJOURNMENT With no further business to come before the Council, the meeting was adjourned at 6:27 p.m. _________________________________________ Don E. Vanney, Mayor DRAFT 1 Minutes of the City of Arlington Special Meeting Audit Exit Conference Microsoft Teams May 7, 2026 Councilmembers Present: Michele Blythe and Tim Abrahamson both attended virtually. Staff Present: Mayor Don Vanney, Paul Ellis, Shelby Burke, Sheri Amundson, and Raelynn Jones. Also Known to be Present: Office of the Washington State Auditor; Assistant Audit Manager Erika Davies, Audit Manager Courtney Amonson, and Audit Lead Deb Kindinger. The special meeting began at 10:00 a.m. with introductions by Audit Lead Deb Kindinger, Audit Manager Courtney Amonson, and Assistant Audit Manager Erika Davies. City of Arlington staff and City Council members in attendance followed with introductions. DISCUSSION Accountability Audit Report Review of the report containing the results of their independent accountability audit that was performed on the financial statements of the City of Arlington, starting January 1, 2023 ending December 31, 2024, was provided by Ms. Kindinger, Ms. Davies, and Ms. Amonson. The report describes the overall results and conclusions for the areas that were examined. In most areas examined, City operations complied, in all material respects, with applicable state laws, regulations, and its own polices, and provided adequate controls over safeguarding of public resources. Recommendations for identified areas of improvements provided in the report were presented. Financial Statement and Federal Single Audit Report An unmodified opinion on the fair presentation of the city’s financial statements in accordance with its regulatory basis of accounting (BARS Manual) was presented. In addition, a separate adverse opinion on the fair presentation with regard to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) because the financial statements are prepared using a basis of accounting other than GAAP. It was reported that the audit did not identify any deficiencies in internal control that is considered to be material weakness. Additionally, the results of the tests disclosed no instances of noncompliance or other matters that are required to be reported under Government Auditing Standards. Minutes of the City of Arlington Audit Exit Conference September 23, 2024 2 Federal Awards An unmodified opinion on the City’s compliance with requirements applicable to its major federal program resulted in no reported findings that are required to be disclosed in accordance with 2 CFR 200.516(a). It was reported that the City complied, in all material respects, with the types of compliance requirements that could have a direct and material effect on each of its major federal programs for the year ended December 31, 2024. Identification of Major Federal Programs An unmodified opinion on compliance requirements applicable to the COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds program was selected in the audit of compliance in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and the Uniform Guidance of which no findings were reported. Ms. Davies provided information on the Financial Health intelligence tool that was utilized to provide a clear picture of the City’s overall financial health. Ms. Davies responded to a question asked by Councilmember Michele Blythe. Discussion followed. The next audit is scheduled to be conducted in Summer 2026. Ms. Kindinger provided closing remarks and thanked Finance Director Shelby Burke, Assistant Finance Director Sheri Amundson, and all other City staff for timely responses to the audit requests and the excellent documentation they provided. She stated they have been a pleasure to work with. ADJOURNMENT With no further business to be conducted, the special meeting ended at 10:32 a.m. ___________________________________________ Don E. Vanney, Mayor DRAFT Page 1 of 5 Council Chambers 110 East 3rd Street Monday, May 11, 2026 Councilmembers Present: Heather Watland, Rob Toyer, Yvonne Gallardo-Van Ornam, Michele Blythe, Nathan Senff, Tim Abrahamson, and Leisha Nobach. Council Members Absent: None. Staff Present: Mayor Don Vanney, Paul Ellis, Shelby Burke, Sheri Amundson, Jim Kelly, Thad Newport, Ameresia Lawlis, Lorene Robinson, Rory Butler, Seth Kinney and Chelsea Brewer. Also Known to be Present: Kathy Vanney, Randy Nobach, Steven Maisch, Holly Sloan-Buchanan, members of the press and others. Mayor Don Vanney called the meeting to order at 6:00 pm, and the Pledge of Allegiance and roll call followed. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA Mayor Pro Tem Michele Blythe moved to approve the agenda as presented. Councilmember Rob Toyer seconded the motion, which passed with a unanimous vote. INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS None. WORKSHOP ITEMS – NO ACTION WAS TAKEN Ordinance Approving Amendment to Arlington Municipal Code Chapter 20.76 Screening and Trees Associate Planner Ameresia Lawlis reviewed an ordinance amending Arlington Municipal Code (AMC) Chapter 20.76. The 2026 AMC Chapter 20.76 Zoning Code Amendment involves administrative updates, clarification of screening types, a simplified screening requirements table based on the zoning rather than the specific use for most situations, and updates to ensure middle housing has no additional requirements than those imposed on single family residences per House Bill 1110. The AMC Chapter 20.76 Zoning Code Amendments were proposed with the 2026 Docket. The Community and Economic Development Department needed to update the section to be in line with House Bill 1110 and the Middle Housing requirements. The uses table for screening requirements has proven to be difficult to enforce at times and provides for inconsistent landscaping requirements within a given area. Staff propose to simplify the table into zones rather than call out specific uses. Minutes of the Arlington City Council Workshop Minutes of the City of Arlington City Council Workshop April 13, 2026 Page 2 of 5 Ordinance Approving Amendment to Arlington Municipal Code Chapter 20.94 Annexations Associate Planner Ameresia Lawlis reviewed an ordinance amending Arlington Municipal Code (AMC) Chapter 20.94. The 2026 AMC Chapter 20.94 Zoning Code Amendment involves administrative updates and revisions to reflect the state’s most recent updates to the Boundary Review Board requirements. The AMC Chapter 20.94 Zoning Code Amendments were proposed with the 2026 Docket. The Community and Economic Development Department needed to update the section to be in line with House Bill 1304. This included revisions to sections 20.94.110 and 20.94.120 regarding the Boundary Review Board process. Ordinance Approving Amendment to Arlington Municipal Code Chapter 20.98 State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Associate Planner Ameresia Lawlis reviewed an ordinance amending Arlington Municipal Code (AMC) Chapter 20.98. The 2026 AMC Chapter 20.98 Zoning Code Amendment involves updating section 20.98.090 to mirror the state’s flexible thresholds for categorical exemptions. Additional supplemental documents to be added in line with the most current reference documents. Updates are also proposed for 20.98.210 to provide clarification of State Environmental Policy Act decision appeals and provide additional decision types per the Washington State Administrative Code (WAC) 197.11.680. The AMC Chapter 20.98 Zoning Code Amendments were proposed with the 2026 Docket. The Community and Economic Development Department proposed this update to provide more clarity around SEPA appeals and update thresholds to be in line with the state’s threshold limits. Arlington/Marysville Interlocal Agreement for Project Cascade Development Services Engineering Manager Thad Newport presented the draft Interlocal Agreement and PowerPoint presentation for Project Cascade to Council for discussion. Project Cascade is a proposed development of an approximate 1.2+/- million sq. ft. warehouse/distribution type facility on contiguous parcels and crosses the city limits lines of Arlington and Marysville. Since the proposed development of a single building will be built across the city limits of Arlington and Marysville, an Interlocal Agreement between Arlington and Marysville will be necessary to address several issues of jurisdiction, permitting responsibilities and development standards together with other complimentary issues. The proposed draft is attached and is being presented to both city councils in study sessions (Marysville on 5/4; and Arlington on 5/11) to review the draft language to reach a consensus for the agreement, which would then be brought back for approvals by both councils no later than the first available meeting in June, provided there are not substantive changes by either jurisdiction which would require further review. The subject site(s) is located in the southeast corner of the city within the Cascade Industrial Center (see attached site plan). Approximately 85-+% of the project will lie within the City of Minutes of the City of Arlington City Council Workshop April 13, 2026 Page 3 of 5 Arlington and the balance within the City of Marysville. The anticipated project opening date is 2029. Discussion followed with Mr. Newport answering Council questions. Community Aviation Revitalization Board (CARB) Electric Sweeper Loan – Offer Acceptance and Resolution Airport Operations Coordinator Lorene Robinson reviewed the Community Aviation Revitalization Board (CARB) Electric Sweeper Loan Offer Acceptance and Resolution. Airport staff applied for and were awarded a Community Aviation Revitalization Board (CARB) loan for the purchase of an electric airport sweeper in the amount of $353,242. The CARB loan program is a financing tool that helps public-use airports fund eligible capital projects and equipment purchases. Staff is requesting Council approve the CARB loan for the procurement of an electric sweeper in the amount of $353,242 (plus interest), with an annual interest rate of 2 percent and a five-year repayment term. Loan payments will be made annually, beginning in June 2027. The proposed electric sweeper will support existing Foreign Object Debris (FOD) removal efforts and provide equipment dedicated specifically for airfield use. It will improve airfield safety by offering a more effective, reliable, and environmentally responsible method of debris removal, helping reduce the risk of aircraft damage and operational disruptions. Over time, an electric sweeper will also reduce operational costs by lowering fuel and maintenance expenses. In addition, an electric sweeper advances Washington State environmental and sustainability objectives by reducing greenhouse gas emissions and lowering noise levels compared to a traditional fuel powered sweeper. Note: The City of Arlington was granted a 60-day extension from the April 30, 2026 date stated in the documents. Airport staff have historically relied on available maintenance equipment and airfield inspections to support FOD removal operations. The city currently has a fuel powered sweeper that is shared among departments; however, it is not dedicated solely to airport operations. Additionally, the current sweeper must be outfitted with plastic brushes before use on the airfield which increases time spent switching brush heads for street use vs. airfield use. As airfield maintenance needs have increased, staff identified the need for a dedicated airport sweeper to improve the efficiency of debris removal on airfield surfaces. Discussion followed with Ms. Robinson answering Council questions. Contract Amendment #7 to the SCJ Alliance Contract for the Island Crossing Roundabout Public Works Director Jim Kelly reviewed the Contract Amendment #7 to the SCJ Alliance Contract for the Island Crossing Roundabout. Staff is requesting to amend the existing contract with SCJ Alliance for design of the SR-530 and Smokey Point Boulevard roundabout. In 2019 the City of Arlington, Snohomish County and the Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians partnered together design and construct a roundabout the intersection of SR-530 and Smokey Point Boulevard. The City took the lead role in this partnership and entered into a contract with SCJ Alliance for design and permitting of the proposed roundabout. Staff secured funding in 2025 from the Transportation Improvement Board to move forward with Minutes of the City of Arlington City Council Workshop April 13, 2026 Page 4 of 5 construction. Amendment #7 will update the design, complete the environmental permit process and provide assistance through construction; a summary of project change orders is below. (Note: Amendments 2, 4, 5, and 6 were time extension only) Base Contract $ 268,025.00 Amendment #1 $ 40,375.00 (Add WSDOT ITS, Wat-Sew utilities, & GeoTech) Amendment #3 $ 105,882.00 (Revive project in 2023, add NEPA & ROW Coordination) Amendment #7 $ 99,076.64 (Revive project in 2026, final design, construction support) Revised Contract $ 513,358.64 Discussion followed with Mr. Kelly answering Council questions. Lodging Tax Advisory Committee (LTAC) Finance Director, Shelby Burke presented the draft 2027 Lodging Tax Funding Application for Council review and feedback to identify any additional changes before it is released to applicants. The anticipated timeline is as follows: • Application released to the public: May 15, 2026 • Application due date: June 30, 2026 • LTAC funding recommendations presented to Council for action: August 3, 2026 • Contracts mailed to successful applicants: Week of August 11, 2026 At the October 2025 Council retreat, the application was included on the agenda for discussion and input. Since that time, the application has been revised based on recommendations from the Council and the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee (LTAC). Discussion followed with Ms. Burke answering Council questions. ADMINISTRATOR AND STAFF REPORTS None. MAYOR’S REPORT Mayor Vanney stated that he attended the ribbon cutting for D-Bat Baseball and Softball Training facility in Smokey Point. COMMENTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS Councilmember Tim Abrahamson attended the Washington State Audit Exit Meeting for the City and expressed his appreciation and continued support for the Finance Department and acknowledged their excellent work with the audit. Councilmember Michele Blythe acknowledged her attendance at the Washington State Audit Exit Meeting and expressed her thoughts on the meeting. She also provided an update on her attendance at the Alliance Housing Authority (AHA) and a ride-along with the Arlington Police Department. PUBLIC COMMENT None. Minutes of the City of Arlington City Council Workshop April 13, 2026 Page 5 of 5 REVIEW OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING Councilmembers discussed and agreed to put the following items on the Consent Agenda for the May 18, 2026 Council meeting: 1. Ordinance Approving Amendment to Arlington Municipal Code Chapter 20.76 Screening and Trees 2. Ordinance Approving Amendment to Arlington Municipal Code Chapter 20.94 Annexations 3. Ordinance Approving Amendment to Arlington Municipal Code Chapter 20.98 State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) 5. Community Aviation Revitalization Board (CARB) Electric Sweeper Loan – Offer Acceptance and Resolution 6. Contract Amendment #7 to the SCJ Alliance Contract for the Island Crossing Roundabout EXECUTIVE SESSION None. ADJOURNMENT With no further business to come before the Council, the meeting was adjourned at 6:43 p.m. _________________________________________ Don E. Vanney, Mayor City of Arlington Council Agenda Bill Item: CA #2 Attachment B COUNCIL MEETING DATE: 05/18/2026 SUBJECT: Accounts Payable Claims Approval ATTACHMENTS: Claims Approval DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN Finance: Shelby Burke, Finance Director 360-403-3423 EXPENDITURES REQUESTED: 0 BUDGET CATEGORY: N/A BUDGETED AMOUNT: LEGAL REVIEW: DESCRIPTION: Claims approval for May 18th, 2026 Council Meeting HISTORY: ALTERNATIVES: RECOMMENDED MOTION: Consent agenda approval. City of Arlington May 18th, 2026 Council Meeting Claims Certification: We, the undersigned City Council of the City of Arlington, Washington, do hereby certify that the merchandise or services hereinafter specified have been received and that: Approval of EFT/ACH Payments and Claims Checks #115826 through #115900, dated April 21st, 2026 through May 4th, 2026 in the amount of $1,416,112.91, Approval of Payroll EFT Payments and Check #30495 through #30499 dated April 1st, 2026, through April 30th, 2026, in the amount of $1,838,542.07. City of Arlington Council Agenda Bill CA # 3 Attachment COUNCIL MEETING DATE: May 18, 202SUBJECT: Ordinance Approving Amendment to AMC Chapter 20.76 Screening & Trees ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance, Code Amendment Overview, Planning Commission Findings of Fact, and Staff Report DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN Community & Economic Development; Ameresia Lawlis, Associate Planner EXPENDITURES REQUESTED: None BUDGET CATEGORY: N/A BUDGETED AMOUNT: N/A LEGAL REVIEW: DESCRIPTION: The 2026 AMC Chapter 20.76 Zoning Code Amendment involves administrative updates, clarification of screening types, a simplified screening requirements table based on the zoning rather than the specific use for most situations, and updates to ensure middle housing has no additional requirements than those imposed on single family residences per House Bill 1110. HISTORY: The AMC Chapter 20.76 Zoning Code Amendments were proposed with the 2026 Docket. The Community and Economic Development Department needed to update the section to be in line with House Bill 1110 and the Middle Housing requirements. The uses table for screening requirements has proven to be difficult to enforce at times and provides for inconsistent landscaping requirements within a given area. Staff propose to simplify the table into zones rather than call out specific uses. ALTERNATIVES: Remand to staff for additional information RECOMMENDED MOTION: I move to approve the ordinance amending AMC Chapter 20.76 and authorize the Mayor to sign the ordinance. Page 1 of 2 New or Renamed Table of Contents Code Sections: •Table 20.76-1 Screening Requirements o Table of Screening Requirements added rather than being under anothersection New Language Sections: •20.76.040 Descriptions of Screens o (d) Added a “Type” matching the landscaping requirements of Single FamilyResidential and Middle Housing. o (e) Previously this was described under 20.76.090(b), however for consistency,it has been added as a “Type”. When it should be utilized is still located under20.76.090 Special Screening Requirements. •20.76.090 Special Screening Requirements o This section was completely rewritten for consistency and consistency. o (d) was added to provide clear screening requirements for drive aisles andparking lots that are consistent with the intended design requirements. o (e) was also added to provide clear screening requirements for outdoor storageand mechanical equipment that is consistent with the current designrequirements. •Table 20.76-1 Screening Requirements o This table replaced the previous table of screening requirements. The intent ofthis new table is to provide requirements based on the zone designation ratherthan a speci�ic use in most cases. This will allow for a more consistent outcomeof development design and reduce unnecessary requirements for similarand/or expected uses within each area. Screening types were determined byusing the most common “type” currently required for uses in that speci�ic zone.Certain uses that are especially incompatible are still addressed separatelyunder 20.76.090. Updated Language Sections: •20.75.020 General Screening Standards o (a) clari�ied that Single Family and Middle Housing types do not have toprovide screening in the same way as other uses. The intent for single familyhousing was already provided; however middle housing was added per therequirements of HB 1110. AMC Chapter 20.76 – SCREENING AND TREES Zoning Code Amendment Overview Summary - Ameresia Lawlis, Associate Planner Page 2 of 2 o (b) Single Family Residential and Middle Housing requirements were calledout here as a general standard. This requirement for single family waspreviously only referenced in the shading part of this chapter. o (c) This language was previously referenced in 20.76.030(b) but was movedand revised for consistency with the chapter. •20.76.040 Descriptions of Screens o (a) Renamed and provided simpli�ied, clearer requirements. o (b) Renamed and provided simpli�ied, clearer requirements. o (c) Renamed and provided simpli�ied, clearer requirements. •20.76.060 Flexibility in Administration Required o (a) Revised the Table of Screening Requirements reference. o (c) Revised the Table of Screening Requirements reference. o (d) Revised the Table of Screening Requirements reference. •20.76.070 Combination Uses o (a) Revised the Table of Screening Requirements reference. •20.76.124 Shade Trees on Lots o (b) Language revised to be based on Single Family Residential and MiddleHousing only rather than all residential zones. This ensures non-residentialuses within a residential zone provide appropriate screening. Removed Language Sections: •20.76.030 Compliance with Screening Standards o This section was removed and portions that were applicable were moved tomore appropriate sections to provide clarity in this chapter and removeunnecessary language. •20.76.090 Special Screening Requirements o This section was completely rewritten for clarity and consistency. •Table 20.76-1 Screening Requirements o This section was completely rewritten for clarity and consistency. •HB1110 Growth Management Act – Minimum Development Densities in ResidentialZones •RCW 36.70A.635 Minimum Residential Density Washington State Legislation or Other Requirements Staff Report & Recommendation AMC Chapter 20.76 Zoning Code Amendment – PJ25-0035 Page 1 of 4 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT & RECOMMENDATION To: Planning Commission From: Ameresia Lawlis, Associate Planner Meeting Date: May 11, 2026 Date Prepared: April 22, 2026 Regarding: 2026 AMC Chapter 20.76 Zoning Code Amendment – PJ25-0048 A. INTRODUCTION The AMC Chapter 20.76 Zoning Code Amendments is a City-initiated amendment to the Arlington Municipal code that includes updates to the general provisions chapter. Included with this staff report is the proposed code amendments. GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: City of Arlington Project Description: 2026 AMC Chapter 20.76 Zoning Code Amendment Requested Action: Approval of Ordinance B. DETAILED PROJECT INFORMATION The 2026 AMC Chapter 20.76 Zoning Code Amendment involves administrative updates, clarification of screening types, a simplified screening requirements table based on the zoning rather than the specific use for most situations, and updates to ensure middle housing has no additional requirements than those imposed on single family residences per House Bill 1110. Community and Economic Development Planning Division th Staff Report & Recommendation AMC Chapter 20.76 Zoning Code Amendment – PJ25-0048 Page 2 of 4 C.REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS, FINDINGS, AND CONCLUSIONS1.SEPA COMPLIANCE: Type of Determination Issue Date Distribution and Public Notice SEPA Determination on Non-Significance (DNS) 3/27/2026 City Public Notice Website Emailed to Review Agencies Posted at City Hall and Arlington Library The Herald Publish Date – 3/27/2026 Comment Period – 3/27/2026 to 4/3/2026 Public comments received during the public comment period. Comment Summary City Response No comments received to date. Not Applicable 2.PUBLIC NOTIFICATION/INVOLVEMENT: Public Notice and Meeting Type Meeting Date(s) Distribution and Public Notice Planning Commission Public Meeting Presentations Workshop: 4/7/2026 Meeting: 4/21/2026 Planning Commission Agenda Online Planning Commission Email Distribution List Washington State Department of Commerce (RCW 36.70A.106) N/A Date Sent for Expedited Review – 2/19/2026 Deadline for 60-Day Review – 4/20/2026 Planning Commission Public Hearing 4/21/2026 City Public Notice Website Planning Commission Agenda Online Planning Commission Email Distribution List The Herald Published Date – 3/27/2026 City Council Public Meeting Presentations Workshop: 5/11/2026 Meeting: 5/18/2026 City Council Agenda Online City Council Email Distribution List Agency Comments: Comment Summary Date Received City Response No comments received to date. Not applicable Staff Report & Recommendation AMC Chapter 20.76 Zoning Code Amendment – PJ25-0048 Page 3 of 4 3. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COMPLIANCE: Goal or Policy Goal Description Summary E-7.3 Enhance urban tree canopy to support ecological function, community resilience, mitigate urban heat, manage stormwater, conserve energy, improve mental and physical health, and strengthen economic prosperity. E-10.2 Use landscape buffers or vegetated low impact development facilities to serve as a visual screen between rights-of-way and industrial uses, filter suspended particulates, absorb air pollutants, and reduce noise. LU-2 Ensure equitable access to City resources and programs through proactive and transparent outreach efforts, completed on multiple platforms, and where appropriate, in multiple languages. LU-2.1 Regularly review existing development regulations to remove requirements that unnecessarily hinder the development process. LU-5.3 Separate industrial uses from incompatible land uses by utilizing transitional zoning, required setbacks and buffer areas, and other techniques to lessen impacts on adjacent uses. LU-9.2 Develop design standards and land use regulations to ensure compatibility of residential densities and surrounding non-residential uses. 4. COMPLIANCE WITH AMC CHAPTER 20.96 - AMENDMENTS Regulation Meets (a) Amendments to the text of this title may be made in accordance with the provisions of this chapter. has followed the provision of Chapter 20.96 by being processed through the 2026 Docket as a Development Regulation Amendment. Development Regulations. (a) All proposed text amendments to the development or zoning regulations shall be developed, submitted, and presented by the city staff, based on direction from the city council, planning commission, or the director of community and economic development. process. The City Council approved the 2026 Final Docket through Resolution 2025-009. Staff shall transmit to the department of commerce copies of all proposed amendments to the city’s development regulations at least sixty days in advance of adoption, as required by RCW 36.70A.106. Department of Commerce on February 19, 2026 for review. Regulation Amendments. (a) An open record public hearing shall be held before the planning commission for all amendments. (c) The city shall give public notice of all public hearings as required by section 20.24.020. hearing at the April 21, 2026 Planning Commission Meeting. The public noticing is described under Section 2 above. Staff Report & Recommendation AMC Chapter 20.76 Zoning Code Amendment – PJ25-0048 Page 4 of 4 Regulation Meets 20.96.130 Planning Commission Review of Development Regulation Amendments. The planning commission shall issue a recommendation for approval, approval subject to recommended modifications or conditions of approval, continuance, or a decision of denial, which decision shall be forwarded to the city council for review and decision. Findings of Fact that is signed by the Chair. City Staff then includes the Findings of Fact within the City Council packet for review prior to the City Council workshop and meeting. Development Regulation Amendments. The city council’s approval, modification, deferral, or denial of a development regulations amendment proposal shall be based on the following criteria: (1)The proposed amendment is consistent withthe goals, objectives, and policies of theComprehensive Plan, the Multi-County PlanningPolicies, County Planning Policies, and the GrowthManagement Act, RCW Chapter 36.70A; and(2)The proposed change is necessary to furtherthe public interest based on present needs andconditions. provided by staff and considers the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan, County Planning Policies, the Growth Management Act, and RCW Chapter 36.70A, along with the overall public interest prior to considering a decision. (d)RECOMMENDATIONWorkshop; discussion only. At the May 18, 2026, City Council Meeting, the recommended motion will be “I move to approve the ordinance amending AMC Chapter 20.76 and authorize the Mayor to sign the ordinance”. City of Arlington Community & Economic Development 18204 59th Avenue NE - Arlington, WA, 98223 - 360-403-3551 – www.arlingtonwa.gov FINDING OF FACTS Drew Bono, Chair FINDING OF FACTS 360.403.3551 REGARDING: PJ25-0048 AMC CHAPTER 20.76, Screening and Trees Zoning Code Amendment •This is a city-initiated zoning code amendment that involves administrative updates, clarification of screening types, a simplified screening requirements table based on the zoning rather than the specific use for most situations, and updates to ensure middle housing has no additional requirements than those imposed on single family residences. SUMMARY: This proposed amendment involves revisions to: •AMC 20.76.020, General Screening Standard. o Updated Single Family Residential and Middle Housing specific regulations to be in line with State requirements. o Moved language from 20.76.030(b) and clarified for consistency. •AMC 20.76.040 Descriptions of Screens. o Renamed and provided simplified, clearer requirements for sections (a) – (c). •AMC 20.76.060 Flexibility in Administration Required. o Revised the Table of Screening Requirements references. •AMC 20.76.070 Combination Uses. o Revised a Table of Screening Requirements reference. •AMC 20.76.124 Shade Trees on Lots. o Revised language in section (b) to be based on Single Family Residential and Middle Housing uses rather than all residential zoning designations. New sections added: •AMC 20.76.040 Description of Screens. o Added (d) to provide clear requirements regarding screening of drive isles and parking lots. o Added (e) to provide requirements regarding screening of outdoor storage and mechanical equipment. •AMC Table 20.76-1 Screening Requirements o New table with simplified screening requirements based on zoning rather than specific use. Sections Removed: •AMC 20.76.030 Compliance with Screening Standards. •AMC 20.76.090 Special Screening Requirements o Complete section rewrite •AMC Table 20.76-1 Screening Requirements o Complete table rewrite -2 - FINDINGS: SEPA Compliance: The SEPA Determination of Non-Significance was issued on March 27, 2026. Distribution of Public Notice included publishing in The Herald, online via the City Public Notice Website, email notification to review agencies, physical posting at City Hall and Arlington Library. No public comments were received, and no adverse impacts were identified during the review process. Public Notification/Involvement: 1.Department of Commerce: Sent for review on February 19, 2026. Deadline for review: April 20, 2026. 2.Planning Commission Workshop Presentation on: April 7, 2026. Distribution and Public Notices were posted on the Planning Commission Agenda Online and emails were distributed to those on the Planning Commission Email Distribution list. No public comments were received. 3.Planning Commission Public Hearing Overview on: April 21, 2026. Distribution and Public Notice was done via the City Public Notice website, the Planning Commission Agenda Online and emails sent to those on the Planning Commission Email Distribution List. Notice of Public Hearing on this item also included publishing in The Herald, online via the City Public Notice Website, email notification to review agencies, physical posting at City Hall and Arlington Library. No public comments were received. 4.City Council Workshop on: May 11, 2026. Distribution and Public Notice will be posted on the City Council Agenda Online and emails will be sent to those on the City Council Email Distribution List. 5.City Council Meeting on: May 18, 2026. Distribution and Public Notice will be posted on the City Council Agenda Online and emails will be sent to those on the City Council Email Distribution List. 6.The Planning Commission finds that the public notification and involvement process met all applicable requirements and provided adequate opportunity for public input. Washington State Legislation or Other Requirements: House Bill 1110 and RCW 36.70A.635 Purpose and Intent of Amendment: The proposed amendments are administrative in nature and are intended to simplify screening requirements, improve clarity and internal consistency within the code, and ensure compliance with state requirements, including House Bill 1110. Comprehensive Plan Compliance: These amendments comply with the following City of Arlington Comprehensive Plan Policies: E-7.3, E-10.2, LU-2, LU-2.1, LU-5.3 and LU-9.2. The Planning Commission finds that the proposed amendments are consistent with and support the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Compliance with AMC Chapter 20.96, Amendments. Amendment complies with; 20.96.010(a), 20.96.100, 20.96.120(a) and (c), 20.96.130, 20.96.140(1) and (2). CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission finds that the proposed amendments further the public interest by improving the clarity, consistency, and usability of development regulations while maintaining alignment with current state law. Based on the foregoing findings and a unanimous vote, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve the proposed zoning code amendment to AMC 20.76, Screening and Trees, Zoning Code Amendment, PJ25-0048. - 3 - Respectfully submitted through the Department of Community and Economic Development to the City Council This 29th Day of April 2026. __________________________________ Drew Bono Arlington City Planning Commission, Chair ORDINANCE NO. 2026-XXX 1 ORDINANCE NO. 2026-XXX AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ARLINGTON, WASHINGTON AMENDING CHAPTER 20.76 OF THE ARLINGTON MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING SCREENING AND TREES UNDER CITY PLANNING NO. PJ25-0048 WHEREAS, the city has proposed an update to the Screening and Trees regulations to the City zoning code; and WHEREAS, the Arlington Planning Commission considered the revisions on April 7, 2026 and at a public hearing conducted on April 21, 2026; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission made findings and provided its recommendations to the City Council concerning the proposed changes; and WHEREAS, the City Council considered the same at a workshop held on May 11, 2026, a meeting on May 18, 2026, and considered them along with the Planning Commission recommendations; and the City Council having determined approving said amendment was in the best interest of the City; and WHEREAS, the amendments were presented to the Department of Commerce for comment and said Department had no comments on the ordinance; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the proposed amendment to the municipal code and finds it to be consistent with city and state law and in the best interests of the citizens; and NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Arlington does hereby ordain as follows: Section 01. Arlington Municipal Code section 20.76.020 shall be hereby amended as follows: 20.76.020 General Screening Standards. (a) Every development, except for Single Family Residential and Middle Housing, shall provide sufficient screening, as provided in §20.76-1 (Table of Screening Requirements), so that: (1) Neighboring properties are shielded from any adverse external effects of that development; (2) The development is shielded from the negative impacts of adjacent uses such as streets or railroads. (b) Single Family Residential and Middle Housing shall be required only to plant at least (1) tree in the front yard and (1) tree in the back yard. (c) §20.76-1 (Table of Screening Requirements) represent the zones from AMC 20.36, and the screening type letter designations refer to types of screening as described in §20.76.040 (Descriptions of Screens). This table indicates the type of screening that is ORDINANCE NO. 2026-XXX 2 presumptively required within each zone. Where such screening is required, only the property under application for development is responsible for installing the screening. To determine the type of screening a proposed new development must install, find the proposed use in zone within the table to determine frontage landscaping and side/rear property lines. Section 02. Arlington Municipal Code section 20.76.030 shall hereby be repealed: 20.76.030 Compliance With Screening Standard. (a) Except as modified per §20.76.090 (Special Screening Requirements), the table set forth in §20.76.050 (Table of Screening Requirements), in conjunction with the explanations in 20.76.040 (Descriptions of Screens) concerning the types of screens, establishes screening requirements that presumptively satisfy the general standards established in §20.76.020 (General Screening Standard). However, this table is only intended to establish a presumption and should be flexibly administered in accordance with §20.76.060 (Flexibility in Administration Required). (b) The Table of Screening Requirements (§20.76.050) represent the allowed uses of the Tables of Permissible Uses (§20.40), and the screening type letter designations refer to types of screening as described in §20.76.040 (Descriptions of Screens). This table indicates the type of screening that is presumptively required between two uses. Where such screening is required, only the property under application for development is responsible for installing the screening. To determine the type of screening a proposed new development must install, find the proposed use in the table to determine frontage landscaping and side/rear property lines. (c) If, when the analysis described in Subdivision (b) is performed, the burdened use is an existing use but the required screening is not in place, then this lack of screening shall constitute a nonconforming situation, subject to all the provisions of Chapter 20.32 (Nonconforming Situations) of this Title. (d) Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, a multi-family development shall be required, at the time of construction, to install any screening that is required between it and adjacent existing uses according to the table set forth in §20.76.050 (Table of Screening Requirements). (e) Developments in the Old Town Business Districts 1, 2, and 3 shall be exempt from the screening requirements of §20.76.050 (Table of Screening Requirements) pertaining to screening along streets where the buildings abut the sidewalk. (f) Developments in the Old Town Residential District shall comply with the Old Town Residential Design Standards. Section 03. Arlington Municipal Code section 20.76.040 shall be hereby amended as follows: 20.76.040 Description of Screens The following three basic types of screens are hereby established and are used as the basis for the Table of Screening Requirements set forth in Table 20.76-1 Screening ORDINANCE NO. 2026-XXX 3 Requirements§20.76.050 (Table of Screening Requirements). (a)Opaque Screen, Type A – Heavy Perimeter Screening. A screen that is opaque from the ground to a height of at least six feet, with intermittent visual obstructions from the opaque portion to a height of at least twenty feet. The width shall be a minimum of five feet wide, but may be increased if, in the opinion of the permit-issuing authority, it is needed to better insulate or isolate uses; and in all cases be a minimum of ten feet along street frontages where required. An opaque screen is intended to exclude all visual contact between uses and to create a strong impression of spatial separation. The opaque screen may be composed of a wall, fence, landscaped earth berm, native vegetation, drought-tolerant vegetation, vegetated LID facilities, or existing vegetation. Compliance of vegetative screens or native vegetation will be judged based on the average mature height and density of foliage of the subject species, or field observation of existing vegetation. The opaque portion of the screen must be opaque in all seasons of the year. At maturity, the portion of intermittent visual obstructions should not contain any completely unobstructed openings more than ten feet wide. The portion of intermittent visual obstructions may contain deciduous plants. Suggested planting patterns that will achieve this standard are included in the development design standards and the public works' construction standards and specifications (1)The purpose of Type A landscaping is to provide extensive visual separation along property lines between potentially conflicting land uses. (2)Landscaping shall be installed and maintained so that, at maturity, there are no unobstructed openings from grade up to a height of 6 feet at a width of 5 feet and intermittently up to 20 feet with spacing no more than 10 feet. (A)Trees: Consisting of at least 75% evergreen along the applicable property lines. (B)Shrubs: As necessary to ensure there are no unobstructed openings from grade up to a height of 6 feet and be at least five feet wide. (C)Screening walls of fences of at least 6 feet may be utilized in place of vegetation. (b)Semi-Opaque Screen, Type B – Moderate Perimeter Screening. A screen that is opaque from the ground to a height of three feet, with intermittent visual obstruction from above the opaque portion to a height of at least twenty feet. The width shall be a minimum of five feet wide, but may be increased if, in the opinion of the permit- issuing authority, it is needed to better insulate or isolate uses; and in all cases be a minimum of ten feet along street frontages where required. The semiopaque screen is intended to partially block visual contact between uses and to create a strong impression of the separation of spaces. The semi-opaque screen may be composed of a wall, fence, landscaped earth berm, native vegetation, drought-tolerant vegetation, vegetated LID facilities, or existing vegetation. Compliance of vegetative screens or native vegetation will be judged based on the average mature height and density of foliage of the subject species, or field observation of existing vegetation. At maturity, the portion of intermittent visual obstructions should not contain any completely unobstructed openings more than ten feet wide. The zone of intermittent visual ORDINANCE NO. 2026-XXX 4 obstruction may contain deciduous plants. Suggested planting patterns that will achieve this standard are included in the development design standards and the public works' construction standards and specifications. (1)The purpose of Type B landscaping is to enhance the streetscapes, provide a moderate visual separation between uses and zoning districts and allow views to building entryways and signage. (2)Landscaping shall be installed and maintained so that, at maturity, there are no unobstructed openings from grade up to a height of 3 feet at a width of 5 feet and intermittently up to 10 feet with spacing to more than 10 feet. (3)Plant materials shall include the following: (A)Trees: A mix of deciduous and evergreen trees. (B)Shrubs: One shrub per 4 linear feet. (C)Groundcover: May include plant and non-plant material to cover all areas not otherwise covered by trees and shrubs. (c)Intermittent Screen, Type C – Light Perimeter Screening. A screen composed of intermittent visual obstructions from the ground to a height of at least twenty feet. The width shall be a minimum of five feet wide, but may be increased if, in the opinion of the permit-issuing authority, it is needed to better insulate or isolate uses; and in all cases be a minimum of ten feet along street frontages where required. The intermittent screen is intended to create the impression of a separation of spaces without necessarily eliminating visual contact between the spaces. It may be composed of native vegetation or existing vegetation. Compliance of vegetative screens or native vegetation will be judged based on the average mature height and density of foliage of the subject species, or field observation of existing vegetation. At maturity, the portion of intermittent visual obstructions should not contain any completely unobstructed openings more than ten feet wide. The screen may contain deciduous plants. Suggested planting patterns that will achieve this standard are included in the development design standards and the public works' construction standards and specifications. (1)The purpose of Type C landscaping is to enchance the streetscapes, provide a light visual separation between uses and zoning districts and allow views to building entryways and signage. (2)Landscaping shall be installed and maintained so that, at maturity, there is intermittent screening from grade up to 20 feet at a width of 5 feet. (3)Plant material shall include the following: (A)Trees: A mix of deciduous and evergreen trees. (B)Shrubs: One shrub per 7 linear feet. (C)Groundcover: May include plant and non-plant material to cover all areas not otherwise covered by trees and shrubs. (d) Type D – Single Family Residential, Accessory Dwelling Units and Middle Housing (4)The purpose of Type D landscaping is to ensure uniformity of the streetscape in the residential zone and provide shaing for the residences in both the front and rear yard. ORDINANCE NO. 2026-XXX 5 (5)Screening shall include the following: (A)Trees: At least 1 tree in the front yard and 1 tree in the back yard. (e)Type E – Incompatible Use Screening. a.The purpose of Type E landscaping is to minimize all noise contact between uses and create a strong impression of visual separation between two incompatible uses. b.Landscaping shall be installed and maintained so that, at maturity, there are no unobstructed openings from grade up to a height of 30 feet at a width of 30 feet. c.Screening shall include the following: i.Trees: Consisting of at least 75% evergreen trees along the applicable property lines growing to a height of at least 30 feet at maturity. The retention of existing significant trees that are not prone to windthrow is strongly encouraged. ii.Shrubs: Shall be installed and maintained with the trees to ensure that at maturity, there are no unobstructed openings from grade up to a height of 10 feet. iii.A sound wall may be utilized in place of the landscaping requirement with an approved Noise Study, at the director’s discretion. Section 04. Arlington Municipal Code section 20.76.050 shall hereby be repealed: 20.76.050 Table of Screening Requirements. See Table 20.76-1: Screening Requirements. Section 05. Arlington Municipal Code section 20.76.060(a), (c) and (d) shall be hereby amended as follows: 20.76.060 Flexibility in Administration Required (a)The Council recognizes that because of the wide variety of types of developments and the relationships between them, it is neither possible nor prudent to establish inflexible screening requirements. Therefore, as provided in §20.76.030 Compliance With Screening Standard, the permit-issuing authority may permit deviations from the presumptive requirements of §20.76-1 (Table of Screening Requirements)§20.76.050 (Table of Screening Requirements) and may either require more intensive or allow less intensive screening whenever it finds such deviations are more likely to satisfy the standard set forth in §20.76.020 (General Screening Standard) without imposing unnecessary costs on the developer. (c)Whenever the permit-issuing authority allows or requires a deviation from the presumptive requirements set forth in §20.76-1 (Table of Screening Requirements)§20.76.050 (Table of Screening Requirements), it shall enter on the face of the permit the screening requirement that it imposes to meet the standard set forth in §20.76.020 General Screening Standard and the reasons for allowing or requiring the deviation. ORDINANCE NO. 2026-XXX 6 (d)If the permit-issuing authority concludes, based upon information it receives in the consideration of a specific development proposal, that a presumption established by §20.76-1 (Table of Screening Requirements)§20.76.050 (Table of Screening Requirements) is erroneous, it shall initiate a request for an amendment to the Table of Screening Requirements in accordance with the procedures set forth in Chapter 20.96, Amendments. Section 06. Arlington Municipal Code section 20.76.070(a) shall be hereby amended as follows: 20.76.070 Combination Uses. (a) In determining the screening requirements that apply between a combination use and another use, the permit-issuing authority shall proceed as if the principal uses that comprise the combination use were not combined and reach its determination accordingly, relying on the table set forth in §20.76-1 Table of Screening Requirements§20.76.050 (Table of Screening Requirements) interpreted in the light of §20.76.060 (Flexibility in Administration Required). The developer shall be required to install the strictest form of screening required by any one of these principal uses. Section 07. Arlington Municipal Code section 20.76.090 shall be hereby repealed and reenacted as follows: 20.76.090 Special Screening Requirements. (a)Due to the potential for significantly worse adverse impacts between the following non- compatible uses, in addition to the other requirements of this chapter Type E screening shall be maintained along common boundaries between the following: (1)All uses adjacent to Interstate 5 (b)Due to the potential for significantly worse adverse impacts from the following uses, in addition to the other requirements of this chapter, Type A screening will be required on all sides. a.Scrap Materials Salvage Yards, Junkyards, Automobile Graveyards, and Automobile Recycling Facilities b.Crematorium c.Soil processing, mining, quarrying operations, including on-site sales of product d.Solid Waste Facilities e.Parking of vehicles or storage of equipment outside enclosed structures, where vehicles or equipment are owned and used by the person making use of the lot f.Utility Facilities g.Wireless Communication Facilities (c)Type A screening shall be required for any non-residential use proposed abutting an existing residential use or residential zone. For the purposes of this section, where a road separates the zoning districts or uses, the properties are not considered to abut. (d)Parking Areas and Drive-Thru Lanes located between the building and the public right-of-way shall require a 3 & ½ foot tall screen wall or opaque hedge. ORDINANCE NO. 2026-XXX 7 (e)Outdoor storage and mechanical equipment shall be screened from abutting public and private streets and from adjacent properties with the use of opaque evergreen plant material, opaque fencing or a wall not less than the height of the storage or equipment. Section 08. Arlington Municipal Code Table 20.76-1 shall hereby be repealed and reenacted as follows: Table 20.76-1 Screening Requirements Zone Frontage Landscaping Side Property Lines Rear Property Line Residential Ultra Low Capacity (RULC) Type C/D Type A Type A Residential Low Capacity (RLC) Type C/D Type A Type A Residential Moderate Capacity (RMC) Type C/D Type A Type A Residential Medium Capacity Type C/D Type B Type B Residential High Capacity (RHC) Type C/D Type B Type B Old Town Residential District (OTRD) See Old Town Residential Design Standards Old Town Business District I, II, & III (OTBD) See Old Town Business District Design Standards General Commercial (GC) Type C Type B Type B Highway Commercial (HC) Type C Type B Type B Commercial Corridor (CC) See AMC 20.110 Mixed Use Development Regulations Business Park (BP) Type C Type B Type B Light Industrial (LI) Type B Type B Type B General Industrial (GI) Type B Type B Type B Public/Semi Public (P/SP) Type C Type C Type C Medical Services (MS) Type C Type C Type C AF (Aviation Flightline) Type C N/A N/A Section 09. Arlington Municipal Code section 20.76.124(a) shall be hereby amended as follows: (a)The minimum number of required trees depends on the Zoning District in which the site falls, as follows: 1.Residential Ultra Low Capacity, Residential Low Capacity, Residential Moderate Capacity, Residential Medium Capacity, and Old Town Residential –Single Family Residential and Middle Housing uses - 2 trees per lot. 2.All other zoning districts uses – The tree requirement is satisfied by compliance with §20.76.020 (General Screening Standard), §20.76.090 (Special Screening ORDINANCE NO. 2026-XXX 8 Requirements), §20.76.110 (Required Trees Along Dedicated Streets), and §20.76.130 (Shade Trees in Parking Areas). Section 10. Severability. Should any section, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance, or its application to any person or circumstance, be declared unconstitutional or otherwise invalid for any reason, or should any portion of this ordinance be pre-empted by state or federal law or regulation, such decision or pre-emption shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance or its application to other persons or circumstances. Section 11. Effective Date. The title of this ordinance which summarizes the contents shall be published in the official newspaper of the City. This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force five (5) days after the date of publication as provided by law. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Arlington and APPROVED by the Mayor this ______ day of _____________________, 2026. CITY OF ARLINGTON ____________________________________ Don E. Vanney, Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________________ Raelynn Jones, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ___________________________________ Oskar Rey, City Attorney City of Arlington Council Agenda Bill CA # 4 Attachment COUNCIL MEETING DATE: May 18, 2026 SUBJECT: Ordinance Approving Amendment to AMC Chapter 20.94 Annexations ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance, Code Amendment Overview, Planning Commission Findings of Fact, and Staff Report DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN Community & Economic Development; Ameresia Lawlis, Associate Planner EXPENDITURES REQUESTED: None BUDGET CATEGORY: N/A BUDGETED AMOUNT: N/A LEGAL REVIEW: DESCRIPTION: The 2026 AMC Chapter 20.94 Zoning Code Amendment involves administrative updates and revisions to reflect the state’s most recent updates to the Boundary Review Board requirements. HISTORY: The AMC Chapter 20.94 Zoning Code Amendments were proposed with the 2026 Docket. The Community and Economic Development Department needed to update the section to be in line with House Bill 1304. This included revisions to sections 20.94.110 and 20.94.120 regarding the Boundary Review Board process. ALTERNATIVES: Remand to staff for additional information RECOMMENDED MOTION: I move to approve the ordinance amending AMC Chapter 20.94 and authorize the Mayor to sign the ordinance. Page 1 of 1 New or Renamed Table of Contents Code Sections: o None New Language Sections: o None Updated Language Sections: •20.94.060 Sixty Percent (60%) Petition – Notice of Intention to Annex. o Corrected a misspelling. •20.94.110 Boundary Review Board Filing for Notice of Intention to Annex. o Spelled out Boundary Review board rather than “BRB”, as the �irst reference tothe board. •20.94.100 Boundary Review Board Review Period o Updated language for clarity and consistency with state regulations •20.94.120 Boundary Review Board Hearing. o Updated language for clarity and consistency with state regulations Removed Language Sections: o None •HB 1304 Boundary Review Boards – Notice of Intention Effective Filing Date AMC Chapter 20.94 – ANNEXATIONS Zoning Code Amendment Overview Summary - Ameresia Lawlis, Associate Planner Washington State Legislation or Other Requirements Staff Report & Recommendation AMC Chapter 20.94 Zoning Code Amendment – PJ25-0050 Page 1 of 4 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT & RECOMMENDATION To: Planning Commission From: Ameresia Lawlis, Associate Planner Meeting Date: May 11, 2026 Date Prepared: April 22, 2026 Regarding: 2026 AMC Chapter 20.94 Zoning Code Amendment – PJ25-0050 A. INTRODUCTION The AMC Chapter 20.94 Zoning Code Amendments is a City-initiated amendment to the Arlington Municipal code that includes updates to the general provisions chapter. Included with this staff report is the proposed code amendments. GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: City of Arlington Project Description: 2026 AMC Chapter 20.94 Zoning Code Amendment Requested Action: Approval of Ordinance B. DETAILED PROJECT INFORMATION The 2026 AMC Chapter 20.94 Zoning Code Amendment involves updates to Sections 20.94.110 and 20.94.120 regarding the Boundary Review Board process per House Bill 1304. Planning Division th Staff Report & Recommendation AMC Chapter 20.94 Zoning Code Amendment – PJ25-0050 Page 2 of 4 C. REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS, FINDINGS, AND CONCLUSIONS 1. SEPA COMPLIANCE: Type of Determination Issue Date Distribution and Public Notice SEPA Determination on Non-Significance (DNS) 3/27/2026 City Public Notice Website Emailed to Review Agencies Posted at City Hall and Arlington Library The Herald Publish Date – 3/27/2026 Comment Period – 3/27/2026 to 4/3/2026 Public comments received during the public comment period. Comment Summary City Response No comments received to date. Not Applicable 2. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION/INVOLVEMENT: Public Notice and Meeting Type Meeting Date(s) Distribution and Public Notice Planning Commission Public Meeting Presentations Workshop: 4/7/2026 Meeting: 4/21/2026 Planning Commission Agenda Online Planning Commission Email Distribution List Washington State Department of Commerce (RCW 36.70A.106) N/A Date Sent for Expedited Review – 2/19/2026 Deadline for 60-Day Review – 4/20/2026 Planning Commission Public Hearing 4/21/2026 City Public Notice Website Planning Commission Agenda Online Planning Commission Email Distribution List The Herald Published Date – 3/27/2026 City Council Public Meeting Presentations Workshop: 5/11/2026 Meeting: 5/18/2026 City Council Agenda Online City Council Email Distribution List Agency Comments: Comment Summary Date Received City Response No comments received to date. Not applicable Staff Report & Recommendation AMC Chapter 20.94 Zoning Code Amendment – PJ25-0050 Page 3 of 4 3. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COMPLIANCE: Goal or Policy Goal Description Summary LU-2.1 Regularly review existing development regulations to remove requirements that unnecessarily hinder the development process. LU-10.2 Adopt and maintain development regulations that ensure growth is consistent with State and County laws; 4. COMPLIANCE WITH AMC CHAPTER 20.96 - AMENDMENTS Regulation Meets (a) Amendments to the text of this title may be made in accordance with the provisions of this chapter. has followed the provision of Chapter 20.96 by being processed through the 2026 Docket as a Development Regulation Amendment. Development Regulations. (a) All proposed text amendments to the development or zoning regulations shall be developed, submitted, and presented by the city staff, based on direction from the city council, planning commission, or the director of community and economic development. process. The City Council approved the 2026 Final Docket through Resolution 2025-009. Staff shall transmit to the department of commerce copies of all proposed amendments to the city’s development regulations at least sixty days in advance of adoption, as required by RCW 36.70A.106. Department of Commerce on February 19, 2026 for review. Regulation Amendments. (a) An open record public hearing shall be held before the planning commission for all amendments. (c) The city shall give public notice of all public hearings as required by section 20.24.020. hearing at the April 21, 2026 Planning Commission Meeting. The public noticing is described under Section 2 above. Development Regulation Amendments. The planning commission shall issue a recommendation for approval, approval subject to recommended modifications or conditions of approval, continuance, or a decision of denial, which decision shall be forwarded to the city Findings of Fact that is signed by the Chair. City Staff then includes the Findings of Fact within the City Council packet for review prior to the City Council workshop and meeting. Staff Report & Recommendation AMC Chapter 20.94 Zoning Code Amendment – PJ25-0050 Page 4 of 4 Regulation Meets Development Regulation Amendments. The city council’s approval, modification, deferral, or denial of a development regulations amendment proposal shall be based on the following criteria: (1) The proposed amendment is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, the Multi-County Planning Policies, County Planning Policies, and the Growth Management Act, RCW Chapter 36.70A; and (2) The proposed change is necessary to further the public interest based on present needs and conditions. provided by staff and considers the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan, County Planning Policies, the Growth Management Act, and RCW Chapter 36.70A, along with the overall public interest prior to considering a decision. (d) RECOMMENDATION Workshop; discussion only. At the May 18, 2026, City Council Meeting, the recommended motion will be “I move to approve the ordinance amending AMC Chapter 20.94 and authorize the Mayor to sign the ordinance”. City of Arlington Community & Economic Development 18204 59th Avenue NE - Arlington, WA, 98223 - 360-403-3551 – www.arlingtonwa.gov FINDING OF FACTS Drew Bono, Chair FINDING OF FACTS 360.403.3551 REGARDING: PJ25-0050 AMC CHAPTER 20.94, Annexations Zoning Code Amendment •This is a city-initiated zoning code amendment that involves administrative edits and revisions for consistency with state law. SUMMARY: This proposed amendment involves revisions to: •AMC 20.94.060 Sixty Percent (60%) Petition – Notice of Intention to Annex. o Revised “meets” to “metes” •AMC 20.94.100 Boundary Review Board Filing for Notice of Intention to Annex o Spelled out “Boundary Review Board” in place of “BRB”. •AMC 20.94.110 Boundary Review Board Review Period o Revised language and clarified language in line with HB 1304. •AMC 20.94.120 Boundary Review Board Hearing o Revised language and clarified language in line with HB 1304. FINDINGS: SEPA Compliance: The SEPA Determination of Non-Significance was issued on March 27, 2026. Distribution of Public Notice included publishing in The Herald, online via the City Public Notice Website, email notification to review agencies, physical posting at City Hall and Arlington Library. No public comments were received, and no adverse impacts were identified during the review process. Public Notification/Involvement: 1.Department of Commerce: Sent for review on February 19, 2026. Deadline for review: April 20, 2026. 2.Planning Commission Workshop Presentation on: April 7, 2026. Distribution and Public Notices were posted on the Planning Commission Agenda Online and emails were distributed to those on the Planning Commission Email Distribution list. No public comments were received. 3.Planning Commission Public Hearing Overview on: April 21, 2026. Distribution and Public Notice was done via the City Public Notice website, the Planning Commission Agenda Online and emails sent to those on the Planning Commission Email Distribution List. Notice of Public Hearing on this item also included publishing in The Herald, online via the City Public Notice Website, email notification to review agencies, physical posting at City Hall and Arlington Library. No public comments were received. 4.City Council Workshop on: May 11, 2026. Distribution and Public Notice will be posted on the City Council Agenda Online and emails will be sent to those on the City Council Email Distribution List. 5.City Council Meeting on: May 18, 2026. Distribution and Public Notice will be posted on the City Council Agenda Online and emails will be sent to those on the City Council Email Distribution List. 6.The Planning Commission finds that the public notification and involvement process met all applicable requirements and provided adequate opportunity for public input. -2 - Washington State Legislation or Other Requirements: House Bill 1304 Purpose and Intent of the Amendment: The proposed amendments are administrative in nature and are intended to improve clarity and ensure consistency with state law, including House Bill 1304, particularly as it relates to Boundary Review Board procedures. Comprehensive Plan Compliance: These amendments comply with the following City of Arlington Comprehensive Plan Policies: LU-2.1 and LU-10.2. The Planning Commission finds that the proposed amendments are consistent with and support the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Compliance with AMC Chapter 20.96, Amendments. Amendment complies with; 20.96.010(a), 20.96.100, 20.96.120(a) and (c), 20.96.130, 20.96.140(1) and (2). CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission finds that the proposed amendments further the public interest by ensuring that annexation procedures are clear, consistent, and aligned with current state law. Based on the foregoing findings and a unanimous vote, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve the proposed zoning code amendment to AMC 20.94, Annexations, Zoning Code Amendment, PJ25-0050. Respectfully submitted through the Department of Community and Economic Development to the City Council This 27th Day of April 2026. __________________________________ Drew Bono Arlington City Planning Commission, Chair ORDINANCE NO. 2026-XXX 1 ORDINANCE NO. 2026-XXX AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ARLINGTON, WASHINGTON AMENDING CHAPTER 20.94 OF THE ARLINGTON MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING ANNEXATIONS UNDER CITY PLANNING NO. PJ25-0050 WHEREAS, the city has proposed an update to the Annexations regulations to the City zoning code; and WHEREAS, the Arlington Planning Commission considered the revisions on April 7, 2026 and at a public hearing conducted on April 21, 2026; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission made findings and provided its recommendations to the City Council concerning the proposed changes; and WHEREAS, the City Council considered the same at a workshop held on May 11, 2026, a meeting on May 18, 2026, and considered them along with the Planning Commission recommendations; and the City Council having determined approving said amendment was in the best interest of the City; and WHEREAS, the amendments were presented to the Department of Commerce for comment and said Department had no comments on the ordinance; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the proposed amendment to the municipal code and finds it to be consistent with city and state law and in the best interests of the citizens; and NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Arlington does hereby ordain as follows: Section 01. Arlington Municipal Code section 20.94.060(a)(4) shall be hereby amended as follows: (4) Certified Legal Description and Map showing a meets metes and bounds continuous boundary description from a licensed surveyor. Section 02. Arlington Municipal Code section 20.94.100 shall be hereby amended as follows: 20.94.100 Boundary Review Board Filing for Notice of Intention to Annex (a)The applicant shall submit a check to the city, addressed to Snohomish County in the amount of the current filing fee per the Boundary Review Board. (b)City of Arlington staff prepares the Notice of Intention to Annex per Snohomish County and the BRB requirements. The submission is sent by certified mail and by email to the BRB contact. ORDINANCE NO. 2026-XXX 2 Section 03. Arlington Municipal Code section 20.94.110 shall be hereby amended as follows: 20.94.110 Boundary Review Board Review Period. (a)The BRB Chief Clerk has 30 calendar days from application to complete the sufficiency review. (b)The BRB has 45 calendar days from the effective filing date to review the Notice of Intention to Annexation and determine whether a hearing is required or issue a decision. (c)The BRB reviews the application for consistency with Snohomish County regulations, the assessor’s office, and the growth management act. Section 04. Arlington Municipal Code section 20.94.120 shall be hereby amended as follows: 20.94.120 Boundary Review Board Hearing. (a) If the BRB requests a Hearing a hearing is requested by the board, affected parties or stakeholders and confirmed by the board, the hearing is scheduled at the earliest date available of the BRB. (b) A representative of the City and the applicant are required to attached the hearing. (c) The BRB shall issue a decision within 120 days of the hearing request. Section 05. Severability. Should any section, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance, or its application to any person or circumstance, be declared unconstitutional or otherwise invalid for any reason, or should any portion of this ordinance be pre-empted by state or federal law or regulation, such decision or pre-emption shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance or its application to other persons or circumstances. Section 06. Effective Date. The title of this ordinance which summarizes the contents shall be published in the official newspaper of the City. This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force five (5) days after the date of publication as provided by law. ORDINANCE NO. 2026-XXX 3 PASSED by the City Council of the City of Arlington and APPROVED by the Mayor this ______ day of _____________________, 2026. CITY OF ARLINGTON ____________________________________ Don E. Vanney, Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________________ Raelynn Jones, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ___________________________________ Oskar Rey, City Attorney City of Arlington Council Agenda Bill Item: CA # 5 Attachment E COUNCIL MEETING DATE: May 18, 2026 SUBJECT: Ordinance Approving Amendment to AMC Chapter 20.98 State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance, Code Amendment Overview, Planning Commission Findings of Fact, and Staff Report DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN Community & Economic Development; Ameresia Lawlis, Associate Planner 360-403-3432 EXPENDITURES REQUESTED: None BUDGET CATEGORY: N/A BUDGETED AMOUNT: N/A LEGAL REVIEW: DESCRIPTION: The 2026 AMC Chapter 20.98 Zoning Code Amendment involves updating section 20.98.090 to mirror the state’s flexible thresholds for categorical exemptions. Additional supplemental documents to be added in line with the most current reference documents. Updates are also proposed for 20.98.210 to provide clarification of State Environmental Policy Act decision appeals and provide additional decision types per the Washington State Administrative Code (WAC) 197.11.680. HISTORY: The AMC Chapter 20.98 Zoning Code Amendments were proposed with the 2026 Docket. The Community and Economic Development Department proposed this update to provide more clarity around SEPA appeals and update thresholds to be in line with the state’s threshold limits. ALTERNATIVES: Remand to staff for additional information RECOMMENDED MOTION: I move to approve the ordinance amending AMC Chapter 20.98 and authorize the Mayor to sign the ordinance. Page 1 of 1 New or Renamed Table of Contents Code Sections: o None New Language Sections: •20.98.210 Appeals o Revised existing language and provided additional procedures regardingapplying for and processing an appeal. Updated Language Sections: •20.98.090 Flexible Thresholds for Categorical Exemptions. o Update to thresholds and corresponding table mirroring the State’s thresholdlimits. •20.98.200 Substantive Authority o Added and updated reference documents for consistency Removed Language Sections: o None •None AMC Chapter 20.98 – STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (SEPA) Zoning Code Amendment Overview Summary - Ameresia Lawlis, Associate Planner Washington State Legislation or Other Requirements Staff Report & Recommendation AMC Chapter 20.98 Zoning Code Amendment – PJ25-0051 Page 1 of 4 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT & RECOMMENDATION To: Planning Commission From: Ameresia Lawlis, Associate Planner Meeting Date: May 11, 2026 Date Prepared: April 22, 2026 Regarding: 2026 AMC Chapter 20.98 Zoning Code Amendment – PJ25-0051 A. INTRODUCTION The AMC Chapter 20.98 Zoning Code Amendments is a City-initiated amendment to the Arlington Municipal code that includes updates to the general provisions chapter. Included with this staff report is the proposed code amendments. GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: City of Arlington Project Description: 2026 AMC Chapter 20.98 Zoning Code Amendment Requested Action: Approval of Ordinance B. DETAILED PROJECT INFORMATION The 2026 AMC Chapter 20.98 Zoning Code Amendment involves updating section 20.98.090 to mirror the state’s flexible thresholds for categorical exemptions. Additional supplemental documents to be added in line with the most current reference documents. Updates are also proposed for 20.98.210 to provide clarification of State Environmental Policy Act decision appeals and provide additional decision types per the Washington State Administrative Code (WAC) 197.11.680. Planning Division th Staff Report & Recommendation AMC Chapter 20.98 Zoning Code Amendment – PJ25-0051 Page 2 of 4 C. REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS, FINDINGS, AND CONCLUSIONS 1. SEPA COMPLIANCE: Type of Determination Issue Date Distribution and Public Notice SEPA Determination on Non-Significance (DNS) 3/27/2026 City Public Notice Website Emailed to Review Agencies Posted at City Hall and Arlington Library The Herald Publish Date – 3/27/2026 Comment Period – 3/27/2026 to 4/3/2026 Public comments received during the public comment period. Comment Summary City Response No comments received to date. Not Applicable 2. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION/INVOLVEMENT: Public Notice and Meeting Type Meeting Date(s) Distribution and Public Notice Planning Commission Public Meeting Presentations Workshop: 4/7/2026 Meeting: 4/21/2026 Planning Commission Agenda Online Planning Commission Email Distribution List Washington State Department of Commerce (RCW 36.70A.106) N/A Date Sent for Expedited Review – 2/19/2026 Deadline for 60-Day Review – 4/20/2026 Planning Commission Public Hearing 4/21/2026 City Public Notice Website Planning Commission Agenda Online Planning Commission Email Distribution List The Herald Published Date – 3/27/2026 City Council Public Meeting Presentations Workshop: 5/11/2026 Meeting: 5/18/2026 City Council Agenda Online City Council Email Distribution List Agency Comments: Comment Summary Date Received City Response No comments received to date. Not applicable Staff Report & Recommendation AMC Chapter 20.98 Zoning Code Amendment – PJ25-0051 Page 3 of 4 3. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COMPLIANCE: Goal or Policy Goal Description Summary E-1.1 Protect and enhance the natural environment while planning for and accommodating growth. E-5.9 Use the best information available at all levels of planning, especially scientific information, when establishing and implementing environmental standards. E-8.1 Protect, maintain, and enhance elements of the environment including clean water, shoreline areas, open space, natural and scenic resources, and natural vegetation through adopted development regulations and a variety of educational, voluntary, and incentive programs. LU-2.1 Regularly review existing development regulations to remove requirements that unnecessarily hinder the development process. LU-6.1 Amend and adopt land development regulations as needed to adequately protect the attributes, functions, and amenities of the natural environment in all projected growth scenarios for the City. 4. COMPLIANCE WITH AMC CHAPTER 20.96 - AMENDMENTS Regulation Meets (a) Amendments to the text of this title may be made in accordance with the provisions of this chapter. has followed the provision of Chapter 20.96 by being processed through the 2026 Docket as a Development Regulation Amendment. Development Regulations. (a) All proposed text amendments to the development or zoning regulations shall be developed, submitted, and presented by the city staff, based on direction from the city council, planning commission, or the director of community and economic development. process. The City Council approved the 2026 Final Docket through Resolution 2025-009. Staff shall transmit to the department of commerce copies of all proposed amendments to the city’s development regulations at least sixty days in advance of adoption, as required by RCW 36.70A.106. Department of Commerce on February 19, 2026 for review. Regulation Amendments. (a) An open record public hearing shall be held before the planning commission for all amendments. (c) The city shall give public notice of all public hearings as required by section 20.24.020. hearing at the April 21, 2026 Planning Commission Meeting. The public noticing is described under Section 2 above. Staff Report & Recommendation AMC Chapter 20.98 Zoning Code Amendment – PJ25-0051 Page 4 of 4 Regulation Meets Development Regulation Amendments. The planning commission shall issue a recommendation for approval, approval subject to recommended modifications or conditions of approval, continuance, or a decision of denial, which decision shall be forwarded to the city council for review and decision. Findings of Fact that is signed by the Chair. City Staff then includes the Findings of Fact within the City Council packet for review prior to the City Council workshop and meeting. Development Regulation Amendments. The city council’s approval, modification, deferral, or denial of a development regulations amendment proposal shall be based on the following criteria: (1) The proposed amendment is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, the Multi-County Planning Policies, County Planning Policies, and the Growth Management Act, RCW Chapter 36.70A; and (2) The proposed change is necessary to further the public interest based on present needs and conditions. provided by staff and considers the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan, County Planning Policies, the Growth Management Act, and RCW Chapter 36.70A, along with the overall public interest prior to considering a decision. (d) RECOMMENDATION Workshop; discussion only. At the May 18, 2026, Council meeting, the recommended motion will be, “I move to approve the ordinance amending AMC Chapter 20.98 and authorize the Mayor to sign the ordinance.” City of Arlington Community & Economic Development 18204 59th Avenue NE - Arlington, WA, 98223 - 360-403-3551 – www.arlingtonwa.gov FINDING OF FACTS Drew Bono, Chair FINDING OF FACTS 360.403.3551 REGARDING: PJ25-0051 AMC CHAPTER 20.98, State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Zoning Code Amendment • This is a city-initiated zoning code amendment that involves administrative edits and revisions for consistency with state law. SUMMARY: This proposed amendment involves revisions to: • AMC 20.98.090 Flexible Thresholds for Categorical Exemptions. o Increased threshold limits • AMC 20.98.200 Substantive Authority o Revised (c) to clarify International Building Code vs general Building Code o Added Shoreline Master Plan • AMC 20.94.210 Appeals o Revised existing language and provided additional procedures regarding applying for and processing an appeal. FINDINGS: SEPA Compliance: The SEPA Determination of Non-Significance was issued on March 27, 2026. Distribution of Public Notice included publishing in The Hearld, online via the City Public Notice Website, email notification to review agencies, physical posting at City Hall and Arlington Library. No public comments were received, and no adverse impacts were identified during the review process. Public Notification/Involvement: 1. Department of Commerce: Sent for review on February 19, 2026. Deadline for review: April 20, 2026. 2. Planning Commission Workshop Presentation on: April 7, 2026. Distribution and Public Notices were posted on the Planning Commission Agenda Online and emails were distributed to those on the Planning Commission Email Distribution list. No public comments were received. 3. Planning Commission Public Hearing Overview on: April 21, 2026. Distribution and Public Notice was done via the City Public Notice website, the Planning Commission Agenda Online and emails sent to those on the Planning Commission Email Distribution List. Notice of Public Hearing on this item also included publishing in The Herald, online via the City Public Notice Website, email notification to review agencies, physical posting at City Hall and Arlington Library. No public comments were received. 4. City Council Workshop on: May 11, 2026. Distribution and Public Notice will be posted on the City Council Agenda Online and emails will be sent to those on the City Council Email Distribution List. 5. City Council Meeting on: May 18, 2026. Distribution and Public Notice will be posted on the City Council Agenda Online and emails will be sent to those on the City Council Email Distribution List. 6. The Planning Commission finds that the public notification and involvement process met all applicable requirements and provided adequate opportunity for public input. - 2 - Washington State Legislation or Other Requirements: None Purpose and Intent of Amendment: The proposed amendments are administrative in nature and are intended to align local regulations with state SEPA requirements, update categorical exemption thresholds, and clarify procedures related to appeals and substantive authority. Comprehensive Plan Compliance: These amendments comply with the following City of Arlington Comprehensive Plan Policies: E-1.1, E-5.9, E-8.1, LU-2.1, LU-6.1. The Planning Commission finds that the proposed amendments are consistent with and support the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Compliance with AMC Chapter 20.96, Amendments. Amendment complies with; 20.96.010(a), 20.96.100, 20.96.120(a) and (c), 20.96.130, 20.96.140(1) and (2). CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission finds that the proposed amendments further the public interest by ensuring environmental review procedures remain current, clear, and consistent with state regulations. Based on the foregoing findings and a unanimous vote, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve the proposed zoning code amendment to AMC 20.98, State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Zoning Code Amendment, PJ25-0051. Respectfully submitted through the Department of Community and Economic Development to the City Council This 29th Day of April 2026. __________________________________ Drew Bono Arlington City Planning Commission, Chair ORDINANCE NO. 2026-XXX 1 ORDINANCE NO. 2026-XXX AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ARLINGTON, WASHINGTON AMENDING CHAPTER 20.98 OF THE ARLINGTON MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (SEPA) UNDER CITY PLANNING NO. PJ25-0051 WHEREAS, the city has proposed an update to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) regulations to the City zoning code; and WHEREAS, the Arlington Planning Commission considered the revisions on April 7, 2026 and at a public hearing conducted on April 21, 2026; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission made findings and provided its recommendations to the City Council concerning the proposed changes; and WHEREAS, the City Council considered the same at a workshop held on May 11, 2026, a meeting on May 18, 2026, and considered them along with the Planning Commission recommendations; and the City Council having determined approving said amendment was in the best interest of the City; and WHEREAS, the amendments were presented to the Department of Commerce for comment and said Department had no comments on the ordinance; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the proposed amendment to the municipal code and finds it to be consistent with city and state law and in the best interests of the citizens; and NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Arlington does hereby ordain as follows: Section 01. Arlington Municipal Code section 20.98.090(a) shall be hereby amended as follows: 20.98.090 Flexible Thresholds for Categorical Exemptions (a) The City establishes the following maximum exempt levels for minor new construction under WAC 197-11-800 (1)(b) based on local conditions: (1) For single family residential detached units in WAC 197-11-800 (1)(b)(i): Up to 9 30 dwelling units. (2) For single family residential attached with the total square footage of less than 1,500 square feet per unit in WAC 197-11-800 (1)(b)(i): Up to 49 100 dwelling units (3) For multifamily residential units in WAC 197-11-800(1)(b)(ii): Up to 49 200 dwelling units. (4) For agricultural structures in WAC 197-11-800 (1)(b)(iii): Up to 10,00040,000 square feet. ORDINANCE NO. 2026-XXX 2 (5) For office, school, commercial, recreational, service or storage buildings in WAC 197-11-800 (1)(b)(iv): Up to 4,000 30,000 square feet and with associated parking facilities designed for up to 20 90 parking spaces. (6) For parking lots in WAC 197-11-800 (1)(b)(iv): Up to 20 90 parking spaces not associated with a structure. (7) For landfills and excavations in WAC 197-11-800 (1)(b)(v): Up to 250 1,000 cubic yards throughout the total lifetime of the fill or excavation and any excavation, fill or grading necessary for an exempt project in (i), (ii), (iii), or (iv) of this subsection shall be exempt. Single Family Residential - Detached Up to 9 30 units Single Family Residential Attached with the total square footage of less than 1,500 square feet per unit Up to 49 100 units Multi-Family Residential or Mixed-Use Development Up to 49 200 units Barn, Loafing Shed, Farm Equipment Storage, Produce Storage or Packing Structure Up to 10,000 40,000 square feet Office, School, Commercial, Recreational, Service, Storage Building, Parking Facilities Up to 4,000 30,000 square feet of gross floor area and up to 20 90 associated parking spaces Parking Facilities not associated with a structure Up to 20 90 parking spaces Fill or Excavation Up to 250 1,000 cubic yards Section 02. Arlington Municipal Code section 20.94.200(d)(3) shall be hereby amended as follows: (3) The City adopts by reference the policies in the following City codes, ordinances, resolutions, and plans, as may be amended: (A) AMC Title 20, the City’s Land Use Code; (B) The City’s Comprehensive plan; (C) International Building Code and related codes; (D) AMC Chapter 13.28, Stormwater Management; (E) Shoreline Master Plan (E) (F) Park and recreation plan; (F) (G) Airport master plan and related regulations; (G) (H) County health district regulations; (H) (I) Public Works construction standards; (I) (J) Water, sewer and other utility ordinances and regulations; (J) (K) Uniform Fire Code; (K) (L) Any Interlocal Agreements regarding reciprocal mitigation/impact fees. ORDINANCE NO. 2026-XXX 3 Section 03. Arlington Municipal Code section 20.98.210 shall be hereby amended as follows: 20.98.210 Appeals. (a) The City establishes the following administrative appeal procedures under RCW 43.21C.075 and WAC 197-11-680: (1) An agency or person may appeal the City’s procedural compliance with WAC Chapter 197-11 for issuance of the following: (A) A final Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS): Appeal of the DNS must be made to the Hearing Examiner within ten days of the date the DNS is final (see WAC 197-11-390 (2) (a). (B) A Determination of Significance (DS): The appeal must be made to the Hearing Examiner within ten days of the date the DS is issued. (C) Environmental Impact Statement (2) For any appeal under this subsection, the City shall provide for a record that consist of the following: (A) Findings and conclusions; (B) Testimony under oath; and (C) A taped or written transcript. (3) The procedural determination by the City’s responsible official shall carry substantial weight in any appeal proceeding. (2) All SEPA appeals must be filed in writing with the director either: (A) Within 14 calendar days after the date of issuance of a notice of decision if the responsible official does not designate a comment period in the threshold decision; or (B) Within 21 calendar days after the date of issuance of a notice of decision if the responsible official designates a comment period in the threshold decision. (3) The notice of decision shall state the applicable appeal period. All appeals shall contain a statement of reasons why the decision of the responsible official is allegedly in error and comply with the other requirements for a written appeal listed in AMC 20.20.010. (4) On receipt of a timely notice of appeal and the appeal fee set in the current Fee Schedule, the director shall advise the hearing examiner of the pendency of the appeal and the hearing examiner shall set a date to hear the appeal. When an appeal is received on a quasi-judicial application which requires an open record public hearing, the hearing examiner shall hold a consolidated open record public hearing on the appeal and the underlying application. (5) SEPA appeals shall be heard in open record public hearing. All relevant evidence shall be received during the hearing of the appeal. Appeals shall be considered de novo and limited to the issues cited in the notice of appeal. The procedural determination by the city’s responsible official shall carry substantial weight in any appeal proceeding. (6) The hearing examiner may postpone or continue a hearing for cause, but shall not grant requests for postponement or continuance of an appeal hearing to allow an applicant to proceed with an alternate development proposal under separate application, unless all parties to the appeal agree in writing. ORDINANCE NO. 2026-XXX 4 (7) For any appeal under this section, the city shall provide for a record that shall consist of the following: (A) Findings and conclusions; (B) Testimony under oath; and (C) A taped or written transcript of the open record hearing. (8) The decision of the hearing examiner on the SEPA appeal shall be final, with no additional administrative appeal. Upon filing of a judicial appeal under Chapter 36.70C RCW (the Land Use Petition Act) or any other available writ, any certified copies or written transcripts required for such shall be prepared by the city clerk at the expense of the appellant. (9) If a time limit is established by statute or ordinance for commencing a judicial appeal of the project permit, the responsible official shall give official notice of the date and place for commencing the appeal. The notice shall include: (A) Notice that any SEPA issues must be appealed within the time limit set by statute or ordinance for appealing the underlying governmental action; (B) The time limit for commencing the appeal of the underlying governmental action and SEPA issues, and the statute or ordinance establishing the time limit; and (C) Where the appeal may be filed. (10) Written notice shall be provided to the applicant, all parties to any administrative appeal, and all persons who have requested notice of decisions concerning the project. Such notice may be appended to the permit, the decision documents, the SEPA compliance documents, or may be printed separately. Section 04. Severability. Should any section, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance, or its application to any person or circumstance, be declared unconstitutional or otherwise invalid for any reason, or should any portion of this ordinance be pre-empted by state or federal law or regulation, such decision or pre-emption shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance or its application to other persons or circumstances. Section 05. Effective Date. The title of this ordinance which summarizes the contents shall be published in the official newspaper of the City. This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force five (5) days after the date of publication as provided by law. ORDINANCE NO. 2026-XXX 5 PASSED by the City Council of the City of Arlington and APPROVED by the Mayor this ______ day of _____________________, 2026. CITY OF ARLINGTON ____________________________________ Don E. Vanney, Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________________ Raelynn Jones, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ___________________________________ Oskar Rey, City Attorney City of Arlington Council Agenda Bill Item: CA #6 Attachment F May 18, 2026 Community Aviation Revitalization Board (CARB) Electric Sweeper Loan - Offer Acceptance and Resolution CARB Initial Offer of Financial Aid Memo, Initial Offer of Financial Aid Acceptance Letter, Loan Amortization Schedule, Resolution, and Airport Program Loan Assurances Airport; Lorene Robinson, Airport Operations Coordinator 360-403-3472 EXPENDITURES REQUESTED: $353,242 (plus interest) BUDGET CATEGORY: CIP BUDGETED AMOUNT: LEGAL REVIEW: purchase of an electric airport sweeper in the amount of $353,242. The CARB loan program is a financing tool that helps public-use airports fund eligible capital projects and equipment purchases. Staff is requesting Council approve the CARB loan for the procurement of an electric sweeper in the amount of $353,242 (plus interest), with an annual interest rate of 2 percent and a five-year repayment term. Loan payments will be made annually, beginning in June 2027. The proposed electric sweeper will support existing Foreign Object Debris (FOD) removal efforts and provide equipment dedicated specifically for airfield use. It will improve airfield safety by offering a more effective, reliable, and environmentally responsible method of debris removal, helping reduce the risk of aircraft damage and operational disruptions. Over time, an electric sweeper will also reduce operational costs by lowering fuel and maintenance expenses. In addition, an electric sweeper advances Washington State environmental and sustainability objectives by reducing greenhouse gas emissions and lowering noise levels compared to a traditional fuel powered sweeper. Note: The City of Arlington was granted a 60-day extension from the April 30, 2026, date stated in the City of Arlington Council Agenda Bill Item: CA #6 Attachment F HISTORY: Airport staff have historically relied on available maintenance equipment and airfield inspections to support FOD removal operations. The city currently has a fuel powered sweeper that is shared among departments; however, it is not dedicated solely to airport operations. Additionally, the current sweeper must be outfitted with plastic brushes before use on the airfield which increases time spent switching brush heads for street use vs. airfield use. As airfield maintenance needs have increased, staff identified the the Community Aviation Revitalization Board (CARB) loan for the procurement of an electric airport sweeper in the amount of $353,242 (plus interest), and to authorize the Mayor and City Attorney to sign Project Number: 2026-033 EXHIBIT B Washington State Community Aviation Revitalization Board Initial Offer of Financial Aid City of Arlington SWV Number: SW00001819 00 Offer Date: April 2, 2026 The Community Aviation Revitalization Board (CARB) is authorized by SB 5031 ch. 175, Session Laws of 2021 for direct loans to airport sponsors of public use airports in the State of Washington for the purposes of improvements that primarily support general aviation activities. This Initial Offer of Financial aid is contingent upon the availability of CARB funds. CARB hereby offers to make funds available to the City of Arlington, hereafter referred to as the "Recipient,” to aid in financing the cost of, or improvements to, airport facilities and equipment consisting of the Electric Sweeper Purchase project as described in the application (hereafter collectively referred to as the "Project"). This offer consists of:  General Obligation loan of $353,242.00  Interest rate: 2.0 percent (%) per annum on the outstanding principal balance  Term: 20 years maximum, including up to 3 years of deferred principal and interest This offer is subject to completion of pre-contract conditions, as described in Attachment A. A final contract shall be developed by CARB prior to disbursement of funds. No project costs incurred prior to this offer date will be reimbursed by CARB. In the event a final contract is not executed, no CARB funds will be disbursed. If accepted, this Initial Offer of Financial Aid must be signed and returned to CARB by April 30, 2026. ACCEPTANCE FOR CARB FOR THE RECIPIENT Ann B. Richart Signature* Director, WSDOT – Aviation Board Member, CARB Name: Date: Title: Date: * Authorized to accept offer on behalf of RECIPIENT 310 Maple Park Ave SE • Olympia, WA 98504 • (360) 705-7839 April 2, 2026 Lorene Robinson Airport Operations Coordinator City of Arlington 18204 59th Drive NE Arlington, WA 98223 RE: CARB Initial Offer of Financial Aid Dear Lorene Robinson, Congratulations! The Community Aviation Revitalization Board (CARB) has selected your project and is offering a low-interest loan in the amount of $353,242 for your Electric Sweeper Purchase project at the Arlington Municipal Airport. The next steps will be to develop and sign the loan agreement so that eligible project expenditures may be reimbursed. Please note that no project costs incurred prior to the Initial Offer of Financial Aid date will be reimbursed by CARB. After contract execution, a signed copy will be forwarded for the City of Arlington’s records. The execution date of the final contract will be based on the signature of the CARB Chairperson or designee. An estimated repayment schedule is attached to confirm your desired repayment term and grace period up to 20 years. Also attached is a copy of the loan assurances that apply to state-funded projects and related acknowledgements that will become part of your loan agreement. Our intent is to have your loan agreement ready for signature by May 2026. I will be your primary contact during this contracting process. If you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to contact me at (360) 705-7839 / (360) 628-1767 or chenaud@wsdot.wa.gov. Sincerely, David Chenaur Aviation Loan Program Manager Attachments: • Initial Offer of Financial Aid (IOFA) • Loan Assurances • Repayment Resolution/Ordinance (sample) • Estimated loan repayment schedule COMMUNITY AVIATION REVITALIZATION BOARD Attachment A CARB Pre-Contract Requirements Initial Offer of Financial Aid If you wish to accept CARB's offer, please confirm the Statewide Vendor Number (SWV) listed is valid for loan disbursements and sign and return the attached Initial Offer of Financial Aid by April 30, 2026. A copy of the executed Initial Offer will be included as an exhibit in your loan agreement and provided for your records. If the terms and conditions of this offer are not acceptable, you may request in writing that CARB reconsider, amend or modify its offer. Pre-Contract Requirements Please complete the conditions below and submit the appropriate documentation to CARB. If all conditions are not completed by April 30, 2026, you have the option to request an extension from the Board. If the Board does not approve an extension of the initial offer, the offer will expire. 1. Signed copy of the Initial Offer of Financial Aid (IOFA) 2. Repayment Resolution or Ordinance 3. Signed copy of the Loan Assurances 4. Confirm the length of loan and any grace period (deferred principal and interest) requested up to 3 years (Estimated loan repayment schedule enclosed) EXHIBIT C, ESTIMATED LOAN REPAYMENT SCHEDULE - City of Arlington ENTER VALUES LOAN SUMMARY $353,241.77 $74,943.21 2.00%5 5 1 1 $0.00 6/1/2027 $21,474.26 $0.00 LENDER NAME PMT NO PAYMENT DATE BEGINNING BALANCE SCHEDULED PAYMENT EXTRA PAYMENT TOTAL PAYMENT PRINCIPAL INTEREST ENDING BALANCE CUMULATIVE INTEREST 1 6/1/2027 $353,241.77 $74,943.21 $0.00 $74,943.21 $67,878.37 $7,064.84 $285,363.40 $7,064.84 2 6/1/2028 $285,363.40 $74,943.21 $0.00 $74,943.21 $69,235.94 $5,707.27 $216,127.46 $12,772.10 3 6/1/2029 $216,127.46 $74,943.21 $0.00 $74,943.21 $70,620.66 $4,322.55 $145,506.80 $17,094.65 4 6/1/2030 $145,506.80 $74,943.21 $0.00 $74,943.21 $72,033.07 $2,910.14 $73,473.73 $20,004.79 5 6/1/2031 $73,473.73 $74,943.21 $0.00 $74,943.21 $73,473.73 $1,469.47 $0.00 $21,474.26 $374,716.03 $353,241.77 $21,474.26 Scheduled payment Scheduled number of payments Actual number of payments Total early payments Total interest Optional extra payments Loan amount Annual interest rate Loan period in years Number of payments per year Start date of loan Page 1 {OER4911-8578-1671;1/13217.000005/} RESOLUTION NO. 2026-xxx A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ARLINGTON AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE ON BEHALF OF THE CITY AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE WASHINGTON STATE COMMUNITY AVIATION REVITALIZATION BOARD AND THE CITY FOR AID IN FINANCING THE COSTS OF AN ELECTRIC SWEEPER PURCHASE FOR THE ARLINGTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT. WHEREAS, the City applied for a low-interest loan from the Community Aviation Revitalization Board (CARB) to finance the purchase of an electric sweeper for the Arlington Municipal Airport; and, WHEREAS, CARB offered the City a low-interest loan in the amount of $353,242; and, WHEREAS, the City would like to accept the loan on the terms and conditions offered by CARB. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARLINGTON AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Mayor of the City of Arlington is hereby authorized and directed to execute, on behalf of the City, a Final Contract between CARB and the City and such other documents as may be required for securing aid in financing the cost of the electric sweeper purchase. Section 2. The City Council accepts the loan from CARB in the amount of $353,242, said loan to bear interest at the rate of 2% per annum on the outstanding principal balance. Section 3. Repayment of said general obligation loan shall be consistent with the terms provided in the signed Initial Offer of Financial Aid, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein. Section 4. The City reserves the right to accelerate payments on principal and eliminate the interest on any accelerated principal payments. This obligation shall be considered as a legal general obligation of the City and the City hereby pledges its full faith and credit to the payment thereof. Section 5. The City shall establish a separate fund to be known as the CARB Fund. Establishment of this fund applies to CARB loans. In the case of a loan, there shall be sufficient moneys placed in this Fund to meet the applicable repayment schedule. CITY OF ARLINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 2026-xxx Page 2 {OER4911-8578-1671;1/13217.000005/} PASSED by the City Council and Approved by the Mayor this ___ day of May, 2026. CITY OF ARLINGTON __________________________________ Don E. Vanney, Mayor ATTEST: __________________________________ Raelynn Jones, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: __________________________________ Oskar Rey, City Attorney City of Arlington Council Agenda Bill CA #7 Attachment May 18, 2026 Contract Amendment #7 to the SCJ Alliance Contract for Island Crossing Roundabout Scope of Work and Fee from SCJ Alliance for Island Crossing Roundabout Public Works Department; Jim Kelly, Director 360-403-3505 EXPENDITURES REQUESTED: $99,076.64 BUDGET CATEGORY: Transportation Improvement Fund, TIB Grant BUDGETED AMOUNT: $3,300,000.00 (total 2026 budgeted in Transpo)LEGAL REVIEW: DESCRIPTION: Staff is requesting to amend the existing contract with SCJ Alliance for design of the SR-530 and Smokey Point Boulevard roundabout. HISTORY: In 2019 the City of Arlington, Snohomish County and the Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians partnered together design & construct a roundabout the intersection of SR-530 and Smokey Point Boulevard. The City took the lead role in this partnership and entered into a contract with SCJ Alliance for design and permitting of the proposed roundabout. Staff secured funding in 2025 from the Transportation Improvement Board to move forward with construction. Amendment #7 will update the design, complete the environmental permit process and provide assistance through construction; (Note: Amendments 2, 4, 5 ,and 6 were time extension only) Base Contract $ 268,025.00 Amendment #1 $ 40,375.00 (Add WSDOT ITS, Wat-Sew utilities, & GeoTech) Amendment #3 $ 105,882.00 (Revive project in 2023, add NEPA & ROW Coordination) Amendment #7 $ 99,076.64 (Revive project in 2026, final design, construction support) ALTERNATIVES: Remand to staff for further consideration Reject Amendment #7 I move to approve Amendment No. 7 to the SCJ Alliance contract and authorize the Mayor to sign Amendment #7 to the SCJ Alliance Contract for Island Crossing Roundabout. 05/05/26 12:37 PM \\arlington\city\PW_Admin\Contracts\SCJ Alliance\04_Island Crossing Roundabout\_Amendment #7\SR 530 RAB Amend #7_FINAL.docx Contract Amendment No. 7 To Professional Services Agreement For SR 530 & Smokey Point Blvd Intersection Project This amendment authorizes the modification of the Professional Services Agreement between the City of Arlington and Shea, Carr, & Jewell, Inc. (dba SCJ Alliance). for the SR 530 & Smokey Point Blvd Intersection Project contract, executed on December 17, 2019. Unless modified below, all terms and conditions contained in the Professional Service Agreement remain current and in effect for the completion of the contract. It is mutually agreed that the above referenced agreement is amended as follows: AMENDMENT 1.Scope of Work - The project scope of work is increased for additional tasks as detailed in the Scope of Work, dated April 29, 2026, and included with this amendment as Exhibit A. 2.Fee - This additional work included under this amendment shall be performed for a not to exceed fee of $ 99,076.64 in accordance with the fee schedule included with this amendment as Exhibit A. EXECUTION IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the day and year first above written. SCJ Alliance City of Arlington Signature: Eric Johnston, Executive VP Signature: Don E. Vanney, Mayor Date Date Exhibit A Amendment #7 - Scope of Work SR530 and Smokey Point Boulevard Intersection Arlington, WA Prepared For: James Kelly Prepared By: Ryan Harmon, P.E. Date Prepared:April 29, 2026 Background / Overview Amendment 3 was executed on September 20th, 2023, and was intended to con$nue the design phase and switch to a federally funded project through FHWA funding and a Tribal Transporta$on Federal Highway Administra$on (FHWA) and Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) process for right-of-way. In addi$on, the project plan and specifica$ons required updates to align with changes in the WSDOT Design Approval process. At that $me, it was assumed that the City would provide the required flood zone mi$ga$on bank credits outside the scope of this amendment. Since the comple$on of this amendment, three addi$onal amendments (Amendments 4-6) were executed to extend the contract expira$on while the City worked to secure construc$on funding. Over the last two and a half years, SCJ Alliance has con$nued to assist the City with progressing the project in areas that were able to move forward towards comple$ng the design and environmental processes, which included primarily the following: •Upda$ng project plans since the latest itera$on (January 7, 2022) •Con$nued coordina$on with the City on project changes with flood mi$ga$on op$ons. •Coordina$on with WSDOT for Design Approval o Reques$ng comments/review status o Intersec$on Control Evalua$on o Plans For Approval o Summary of Design o Update of Summary of Design to Basis of Design •Ini$al NEPA CE documenta$on •Coordina$ng on process with Tribal Transporta$on Program and BIA. •Right-of-Way Funding Es$mate updates. •Flood zone permi@ng and compensatory storage requirements SR530 / Smokey Point Blvd Intersection Improvements – Amendment #7 April 29, 2026 Page 2 of 9 25 N Wenatchee Ave, Suite 238  Wenatchee, WA 98801  Office 509.886.3265  Fax 360.352.1509  scjalliance.com •Review of Island Crossing Subarea Plan •Assistance with grant applica$ons. •Assistance with the successful TIB Grant applica$on that secured construc$on funding. The $me required to confirm the Flood Zone Mi$ga$on and nego$ate was key to the project's approach to comple$ng the design and permi@ng process. Without this method being confirmed, the project could not communicate its footprint and area of impact to regulatory agencies. While the City nego$ated this mi$ga$on, SCJ paused further development of project documents to limit the poten$al for rework on exis$ng documents. SCJ focused its efforts on suppor$ng the City by providing calcula$ons, reports, and exhibits to confirm compliance with regulatory requirements. During this $meframe, the City has also been working to solidify the overall vision of the project area. In October 2025, the City Council adopted the City of Arlington Island Crossing Subarea Plan that iden$fied addi$onal changes to the exis$ng construc$on plan set to beJer align with the new SR 530 Corridor Vision. In November 2025, the City secured construc$on funding from the Washington State Transporta$on Improvement Board (TIB). Since that $me, SCJ has been working to refresh the plans to current standards, con$nued coordina$on for Compensatory Storage, and worked to secure WSDOT design approval. While every effort has been made to complete the associated work under the established contract, all funds have been exhausted. SCJ has been working to update the project package and align it with the Island Crossing Subarea Plan by adding a new west-leg pedestrian connec$on and redesigning the Smokey Point Boulevard alignment and sec$on to accommodate future shared-use paths. SCJ has also redesigned the 27th Avenue profile and sec$on to remove Right-of-Way schedule risk. This amendment aims to extend the dura$on of professional services and include previously added tasks within the scope of work (compensatory storage requirements and loca$on evalua$on, upda$ng WSDOT approval requirements, upda$ng State funding, and grant applica$on work). Comple$on of this amendment, per this scope of work, aims to deliver an approved bid-ready package for the public bid process in the Fall of 2026. This addendum will amend the following phases of the current contract: Phase 1 – Project Management Phase 2 – Project Mee$ngs Phase 5 – Environmental Permi@ng Phase 10 – Final PSE Phase 13 – U$lity Design (Water/Sewer) Phase 15 – Soundview Consultants SR530 / Smokey Point Blvd Intersection Improvements – Amendment #7 April 29, 2026 Page 3 of 9 25 N Wenatchee Ave, Suite 238  Wenatchee, WA 98801  Office 509.886.3265  Fax 360.352.1509  scjalliance.com Phase 41 – On-Call Construc$on Support Phase 1 Project Management This phase of work consists of increasing the budget to account for the extension of the project from February 2024 to November 2026 (15 months) and will support overall project management. The descrip$on of these services is the same as the original scope of work. Deliverables •See the original scope of work. Understanding: •See the original scope of work. Phase 2 Project Meetings This phase of work is amended to include the following es$mated mee$ngs for the remaining 8 months: ♦Weekly City Coordina$on Mee$ng (Online, 30 mee$ngs at 30mins) ♦WSDOT Re-Engagement Mee$ng (Online) ♦WSDOT Comment Review Mee$ngs (2) ♦City/SCJ Updated 95% Plan Set Review (In-person) ♦City/SCJ WSDOT Re-submiJal Comment and Response Review (Online) Phase 5 Environmental Permitting Previous assump$ons for this work include comple$ng NEPA Categorical Exclusion permi@ng work. Now, it is our understanding that the SEPA checklist will be adopted by BIA in lieu of the Tribal NEPA CE process. This phase of work is amended for the addi$onal effort to update and deliver environmental documents to support project permi@ng. The SEPA checklist and suppor$ng documents were par$ally started in the past but now require a review of their en$rety, as updated codes, triggers, and species of concern have changed over the past 3 years. Dual coordina$on of the SEPA process will be with the City and with BIA to complete their environmental process. Flood Zone Impacts: Previous Amendments assumed that SCJ would not be assis$ng in flood zone mi$ga$on and compensator storage requirements. Per City direc$on, over the last two and a half years, SCJ has been working with the City to iden$fy Compensatory Storage volume needs and provide evalua$on of SR530 / Smokey Point Blvd Intersection Improvements – Amendment #7 April 29, 2026 Page 4 of 9 25 N Wenatchee Ave, Suite 238  Wenatchee, WA 98801  Office 509.886.3265  Fax 360.352.1509  scjalliance.com proposed loca$ons. During that $me SCJ has provided calcula$ons and exhibits to the City for communica$on with the Tribe on proposed loca$ons. Recently, the City has worked towards partnering with a neighboring development to capture compensatory storage needs for this project, and all required permi@ng will be captured through that development’s work. The efforts over the last several years have exhausted available funding for this work, and this Amendment is intended to capture the efforts required to complete the SEPA Checklist and gain environmental approvals. Deliverables •DraN SEPA Checklist with aJachments. •Final SEPA Checklist with aJachments. •Public Comment responses. Understanding: ♦The SEPA will be an MDNS determina$on primarily due to the Flood Plane impacts. ♦The City will be ac$ng as the lead agency for the SEPA process. ♦The City will coordinate SEPA submiJal with the BIA. ♦The BIA intends to issue a Categorical Exclusion finding based on the prepared SEPA and will not require further revisions/documenta$on. ♦The project does not an$cipate any on-site wetlands or stream features that would sa$sfy the criteria for jurisdic$onal status or for impacts. ♦Public comments will be minor and not require any addi$onal studies. ♦There are no changes to the Area of Poten$al Effect or Cultural Studies updates required. ♦No addi$onal permits are required. Phase 10 Final PSE This project has been si@ng while the City worked to secure construc$on funding. During that $me frame, SCJ has assisted the City in preparing for several grant applica$ons including upda$ng cost es$mates, providing exhibits, and checking grant eligibility. In November 2025, the City was successful in securing construc$on funding through the Washington State Transporta$on Improvement Board (TIB). The City adopted the Island Crossing Subarea Plan in October 2025. This plan iden$fied the need for a new shared-use path connec$on on the west leg of the roundabout, it also demonstrated a need for a future shared-use path along Smokey Point Boulevard. In order to remain consistent with this Subarea Plan, the City directed SCJ Alliance to proceed with design of the SR 530 west end shared-use path and SR530 / Smokey Point Blvd Intersection Improvements – Amendment #7 April 29, 2026 Page 5 of 9 25 N Wenatchee Ave, Suite 238  Wenatchee, WA 98801  Office 509.886.3265  Fax 360.352.1509  scjalliance.com shiN of the Smokey Point Boulevard alignment to accommodate a future shared-use path. Previous design also reflects the need for TCEs that would unlikely be secured in $me for construc$on. To priori$ze constructability, the City directed SCJ to revise the 27th Avenue profile and sec$on to keep all work on exis$ng City ROW. These efforts have led to a redesign of the alignment, profile, typical sec$ons, corridor modeling, driveway $e-ins, channeliza$on tapers, and stormwater structure spacing. As the project has been on hold for the last 15-months, SCJ will review and update the project package to update to the latest design standards, WSDOT standard specifica$ons and GSPs, and also TIB construc$on requirements. This phase will consist of the following work to achieve WSDOT Design Approval and TIB Bid Approval of a bid-ready package for adver$sement in the Fall of 2026: TIB Grant Support ♦SCJ supported the City with Construc$on Funding requests and updated project es$mates at short no$ce. The key effort was in 2024 for a TIB funding request. That effort was successful and now accounts for the majority of the construc$on funding commiJed. This amendment replaces the effort previously intended for project tasks under that grant. This work has already been paid for by the City and is viewed as a budget adjustment. Contract Plan Update ♦Review plan set for updates due to design standard changes. ♦Updates to exis$ng plans based on updates to current standards. ♦Updates per City u$lity (water, sewer, fiber) comments. ♦Update PUD/Private u$lity informa$on. ♦Design new west pedestrian shared-use path extension. Per the City, this will be a 10-N wide path. ♦Design new retaining wall and handrail for west pedestrian shared-use path extension. The wall is es$mated to be a modular block retaining wall less than 4-N in overall height. ♦Design curb ramp and intersec$on grading for ADA crossing at west Smokey Point Blvd. ♦Update the overall plan set to reflect the incorpora$on of the shared-use path extension. ♦Re-design Smokey Point Boulevard (B-line) alignment, profile, sec$on and storm layout to accommodate future shared-use path. ♦Update the overall plan set to reflect the B-line revisions. ♦Re-design 27th Avenue (C-line) profile and sec$on. ♦Update the overall plan set to reflect C-line revisions. ♦Update the engineer es$mate to reflect the addi$onal quan$$es and bid items. ♦Update Right of Way Plan for the west pedestrian shared-use path extension. SR530 / Smokey Point Blvd Intersection Improvements – Amendment #7 April 29, 2026 Page 6 of 9 25 N Wenatchee Ave, Suite 238  Wenatchee, WA 98801  Office 509.886.3265  Fax 360.352.1509  scjalliance.com Specificaons ♦ Update to current GSPs per the 2026 WSDOT Specifica$on Book. ♦ Incorporate new non-standard items and GSP’s for new items (For example, the wall). ♦ Update special provisions to the 2026 WSDOT. ♦ Update Bid Proposal Spreadsheet due to different funding components. ♦ Update Construc$on Working Day schedule and es$mate. ♦ Develop Bid Adver$sement and assemble bid documents (Cover, index, proposal, draN contract, wage rates, appendices). TIB Bid Authorizaon ♦ TIB 95% Review package development and submiJal through the City. ♦ Assist with the TIB Bid Authoriza$on spreadsheet. WSDOT Design Approval The es$mate of hours and effort for the update to the Design Approval package was made without knowing the type or level of effort required for comments from WSDOT. They have been holding onto the review package since our last submiJal on November 26, 2024. To maintain the schedule, we have es$mated our effort based on the following comments and level of effort:  Clarifica$ons to the Drainage Report. No changes to the TDA’s or treatment type.  Updates to the Plan For Approval for the pedestrian path extension only.  Narra$ve updates to Design Approval elements like the Basis of Design and Design Decision Memorandum.  No changes to the Intersec$on Control Evalua$on. ♦ Develop responses to the WSDOT DA comments. ♦ Update the Design Approval Package from 11/26/2024. ♦ One resubmiJal of the Design Approval Package to WSDOT for approval. ♦ Update Minor revisions and clarifica$ons. ♦ Status updates and communica$on with WSDOT on status of review. Submi&als/Comment Responses The submiJals remaining to complete the design and right of way process to bid adver$sement consist of the following: ♦ SubmiJal prepara$on of 95% Plans, Specifica$ons, and es$mates to City/WSDOT/TIB. ♦ 95% SubmiJal Comment review responses to the Plans, Specifica$ons, and Es$mate. SR530 / Smokey Point Blvd Intersection Improvements – Amendment #7 April 29, 2026 Page 7 of 9 25 N Wenatchee Ave, Suite 238  Wenatchee, WA 98801  Office 509.886.3265  Fax 360.352.1509  scjalliance.com ♦ Revisions per the City/WSDOT 95% PSE package comments and resubmiJal for final approval. Right of Way Support SCJ is suppor$ng the City led right-of-way phase of the project. Our support consists of the following: ♦ Coordina$on/communica$on with City/WSDOT/BIA for process. ♦ Mee$ngs (3) for City/WSDOT/BIA processing ♦ Updated Overall Right of Way Plan based on shared use path extension, and removal of TCE on 27th Ave. ♦ Tribal Easement Exhibits ♦ Updates to the exhibits based on the property owner and City feedback. Deliverables • Construc$on Working Day Es$mate/Schedule. • 95% Construc$on Plans, Contract, Specifica$ons, and Es$mated project cost. • TIB Bid Authoriza$on submiJal request. • Design Approval Package SubmiJal (1) • 100% PSE package • Bid Ready Construc$on Plans, Contract, Specifica$ons, and Es$mated project cost. • Bid Adver$sement • Updated Right of Way Plan • WSDOT ROW Plan Red and Green Markups • Coordina$on with WSDOT ROW group for needed informa$on • Tribal Easement Exhibits with revisions (9 total) Understanding: • WSDOT PFA, ICE, Hydraulic Report or SOD will not have to be modified or resubmiJed to WSDOT. • City is managing TIB Funding Authoriza$on correspondence. • There will not be a change to the drainage system based on the extension of the shared-use path. • No changes are required to the stormwater approach/methodology. • Legal descrip$ons will be provided by others. • City is managing and execu$ng property/easement nego$a$ons and authoriza$on. SR530 / Smokey Point Blvd Intersection Improvements – Amendment #7 April 29, 2026 Page 8 of 9 25 N Wenatchee Ave, Suite 238  Wenatchee, WA 98801  Office 509.886.3265  Fax 360.352.1509  scjalliance.com • No addi$onal public event services are required by SCJ. • PIFs and/or Design Jus$fica$ons are not required. • The City is leading the right-of-way efforts. • Agreements between agencies will be developed and processed by others. • The City is leading the effort between WSDOT and the Tribe. Phase 15 Soundview Consultants Soundview Consultants have been engaged to provide environmental technical reviews of cri$cal areas within the project limits to support the NEPA CE effort. Through this work, addi$onal tasks have been required to fulfill NEPA CE approval, exhaus$ng all of their funds. See Soundview Consultants’ scope of work for capturing an$cipated $me needed for addi$onal regulatory coordina$on needed to finalize permi@ng approvals. Further details of their scope of work and the fee es$mate aJached. A 10% sub- consultant markup will be applied to their fee es$mate for taxes SCJ will incur. Phase 41 On-Call Construction Support SCJ will provide the City with construc$on support services on an as-requested basis for an es$mated dura$on of 12 months, occurring between October 2026 and the end of October 2027. This phase of work was requested by the City without a defined scope of services. If the requested services start to accumulate near the alloJed budgeted amount, SCJ will no$fy the City with an es$mate of costs to complete the requested services prior to execu$on. Task 1 Project Management 1) General Project Management through construction (12 months) 2) Coordination with Construction Administration team. 3) Progress Billing Task 2 Pre-Construction 1) Pre-construction meeting preparation. 2) Pre-construction meeting (1 online meeting). Task 3 Office Engineering 1) Contractor schedule submittal review. 2) Review of traffic control and staging plans. 3) Request for Information (RFI’s) ♦ Review an estimate of 8 based on project size and complexity. ♦ Response to RFI’s. 4) Change Order(s) SR530 / Smokey Point Blvd Intersection Improvements – Amendment #7 April 29, 2026 Page 9 of 9 25 N Wenatchee Ave, Suite 238  Wenatchee, WA 98801  Office 509.886.3265  Fax 360.352.1509  scjalliance.com ♦ Review or develop and RFP. ♦ Estimate 6 based on the size and complexity of the project. Understanding 1) The intent of this support role is to respond to clarifications and technical material reviews. 2) Budget was added to Phase 99 Expenses for a site visit if requested. 3) This scope does not represent standard construction administration or inspection services. 4) City will lead coordination work with WSDOT throughout Construction. Deliverables 5) Email responses to City request for clarification or review of submittals. Fee Esmate Proposal Project Phase Phase Est. Total Fee Type Phase 1 $12,720 T&M Phase 2 $8,658 T&M Phase 10 $57,933 T&M Phase 15 $5,500 T&M Phase 41 $13,881 T&M Phase 99 $384.64 T&M Total Esmated Amendment Fee $99,076.64 T&M Current Contract Amount $414,282 T&M Revised Contract Amount $513,358.64 T&M END OF PROPOSAL Subconsultant Billing Rate Schedule SCJ Alliance Client:Hourly Rate Table Format: Billing Rate Schedule Project:Allowable Overhead Rate: N/A Job #:Negotiated Fixed Fee: N/A File Name:2026-0429 Labor-Estimate_Amendment 7.xlsm Labor Template Version: 1/15/2026 Date: Total Hourly Total Hourly --Billing Rates Billing Rates Minimum NTE - - $220.00 $465.00 - - $200.00 $460.00 - - $190.00 $350.00 - - $170.00 $300.00 - - $160.00 $290.00 - - $150.00 $275.00 - - $160.00 $245.00 - - $150.00 $235.00 - - $130.00 $185.00 - - $120.00 $160.00 - - $110.00 $155.00 - - $135.00 $200.00 - - $140.00 $185.00 - - $120.00 $165.00 - - $110.00 $145.00 - - $100.00 $130.00 - - $180.00 $265.00 - - $140.00 $190.00 - - $120.00 $185.00 - - $110.00 $160.00 - - $100.00 $145.00 - - $135.00 $225.00 - - $120.00 $170.00 - - $110.00 $150.00 - - $95.00 $155.00 - - $80.00 $125.00 - - $145.00 $230.00 - - $0.00 $0.00 - - $0.00 $0.00 - - $0.00 $0.00 - - $0.00 $0.00 - - $0.00 $0.00 - - $0.00 $0.00 - - $0.00 $0.00 - - $0.00 $0.00 - - $0.00 $0.00 - - $100.00 $185.00 - - $0.00 $0.00 - - $120.00 $165.00 - - $100.00 $155.00 - - $100.00 $200.00 - - $0.00 $0.00 - - $0.00 $0.00 - - $0.00 $0.00 - - $0.00 $0.00 - - $0.00 $0.00 Senior Marketing Coordinator Marketing Coordinator Communications Manager Information Services Manager PC3 Project Coordinator - CM Only PC2 Project Coordinator PC1 Project Coordinator Project Accountant IT Specialist L4 Landscape E3 Engineer CI2 Construction Inspector CI1 Construction Inspector Graphic Designer Senior Landscape Architect E1 Engineer RE 1 Construction Resident Engineer T1 Technician L3 Landscape T3 Technician T2 Technician L2 Landscape L1 Landscape Senior Planner P3 Planner City of Arlington SR 530 and Smokey Point Blvd Intersection 698.06 Billing Rate Schedule Job Classifications 2/6/26 E4 Engineer Senior Consultant Senior Project Manager PM3 Project Manager PM2 Project Manager PM1 Project Manager Senior Engineer P2 Planner RE 2 Construction Resident Engineer P4 Planner P1 Planner Senior Technician Construction Office Engineer CI3 Construction Inspector CI4 Construction Inspector Principal Construction Inspector T4 Technician Senior Construction Manager RE 3 Construction Resident Engineer E2 Engineer Subconsultant Labor Hour Estimate SCJ Alliance Client:City of Arlington Template Version: 1/15/2026 Project:SR 530 and Smokey Point Blvd Intersection Contract Type:Billing Rate Schedule No. of Sheets: No. of Sheets: 0 N/A Job #:698.06 No. of Lots: No. of Lots: 0 N/A File Name: 2026-0429 Labor-Estimate_Amendment 7.xlsm Totals:270 237 150 120 80 130 0 $0.00 Phase & Task No.Principal PM3 Project Manager E4 Engineer T3 Technician T1 Technician Project Accountant Total Direct Labor Hours & Cost Total Cost Phase 1 Task 1 7,842.00$ 1 2.0 8.0 10.0 2,436.00$ 2 2.0 6.0 8.0 1,962.00$ 3 12.0 4.0 16.0 3,444.00$ Subtotal Hours: 4.0 26.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 34.0 7,842.00$ Task 2 4,878.00$ 1 6.0 6.0 1,422.00$ 2 6.0 8.0 14.0 2,462.00$ 3 2.0 4.0 6.0 994.00$ Subtotal Hours: 0.0 14.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.0 26.0 4,878.00$ Total Phase Hours: 4.0 40.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 12.0 60.0 60.0 Total Phase Direct Labor: $1,080.00 $9,480.00 $600.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,560.00 $12,720.00 12,720.00$ Project Management Phase & Task Title Coordination Progress Reports Progress Billings Management Overall Management Schedule and Budget Administration Subcontractor Contracting 2 of 9 4/29/2026 Subconsultant Labor Hour Estimate SCJ Alliance Client:City of Arlington Template Version: 1/15/2026 Project:SR 530 and Smokey Point Blvd Intersection Contract Type:Billing Rate Schedule No. of Sheets: No. of Sheets: 0 N/A Job #:698.06 No. of Lots: No. of Lots: 0 N/A File Name: 2026-0429 Labor-Estimate_Amendment 7.xlsm Totals:270 237 150 120 80 130 0 $0.00 Phase & Task No.Principal PM3 Project Manager E4 Engineer T3 Technician T1 Technician Project Accountant Total Direct Labor Hours & Cost Total CostPhase & Task Title Phase 2 Task 1 5,592.00$ 1 16.0 12.0 28.0 5,592.00$ Subtotal Hours: 0.0 16.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 28.0 5,592.00$ Task 3 3,066.00$ 1 1.0 1.0 2.0 507.00$ 2 1.0 1.0 237.00$ 3 5.0 5.0 10.0 1,935.00$ 4 1.0 1.0 2.0 387.00$ Subtotal Hours: 1.0 8.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 43.0 3,066.00$ Total Phase Hours: 1.0 24.0 18.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 43.0 43.0$ Total Phase Direct Labor: $270.00 $5,688.00 $2,700.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $8,658.00 8,658.00$ Phase 10 Task 10 3,605.00$ 1 1.0 1.0 2.0 4.0 8.0 1,127.00$ 2 1.0 4.0 2.0 7.0 997.00$ 3 1.0 2.0 4.0 7.0 857.00$ 4 2.0 1.0 3.0 624.00$ Subtotal Hours: 1.0 5.0 9.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 25.0 3,605.00$ Minor revisions and clarifications Communication with WSDOT City/SCJ Updated 95% Plan Set Review (In person) City/SCJ WSDOT Re-submittal Comment and Response Review (Online) Responses to WSDOT DA Comments Final PS&E WSDOT Permitting City Meetings Weekly Coordination Meetings (Online, 30 mins) Project Meetings Additional Project Meetings WSDOT Re-Engagement Meeting (Online) Update of DA package and resubmittal WSDOT Comment Review Meetings (2 Online) 3 of 9 4/29/2026 Subconsultant Labor Hour Estimate SCJ Alliance Client:City of Arlington Template Version: 1/15/2026 Project:SR 530 and Smokey Point Blvd Intersection Contract Type:Billing Rate Schedule No. of Sheets: No. of Sheets: 0 N/A Job #:698.06 No. of Lots: No. of Lots: 0 N/A File Name: 2026-0429 Labor-Estimate_Amendment 7.xlsm Totals:270 237 150 120 80 130 0 $0.00 Phase & Task No.Principal PM3 Project Manager E4 Engineer T3 Technician T1 Technician Project Accountant Total Direct Labor Hours & Cost Total CostPhase & Task Title Task 11 38,411.00$ 1 1.0 2.0 3.0 537.00$ 2 6.0 24.0 30.0 3,780.00$ 3 1.0 2.0 4.0 7.0 1,017.00$ 4 2.0 12.0 16.0 30.0 3,554.00$ 5 2.0 8.0 10.0 940.00$ 6 4.0 8.0 12.0 1,240.00$ 7 1.0 4.0 5.0 470.00$ 8 18.0 58.0 76.0 12,966.00$ 9 36.0 36.0 2,880.00$ 10 10.0 30.0 40.0 6,870.00$ 11 18.0 18.0 1,440.00$ 12 1.0 8.0 16.0 25.0 2,717.00$ Subtotal Hours: 0.0 33.0 125.0 28.0 106.0 0.0 292.0 38,411.00$ Update engineer's estimate Plan set updates for shared-use path Contract Plans Design standard review and updates Plan modifications Update plan set for 27th Ave changes Redesign 27th Ave profile and section Update plan set for Smokey Point Blvd changes Redesign Smokey Point Blvd alignment, profile, section, storm, and tie-ins Private Utility updates Design west shared-use path extension Design curb ramp and intersection grading for ADA crossing Design new wall and handrail 4 of 9 4/29/2026 Subconsultant Labor Hour Estimate SCJ Alliance Client:City of Arlington Template Version: 1/15/2026 Project:SR 530 and Smokey Point Blvd Intersection Contract Type:Billing Rate Schedule No. of Sheets: No. of Sheets: 0 N/A Job #:698.06 No. of Lots: No. of Lots: 0 N/A File Name: 2026-0429 Labor-Estimate_Amendment 7.xlsm Totals:270 237 150 120 80 130 0 $0.00 Phase & Task No.Principal PM3 Project Manager E4 Engineer T3 Technician T1 Technician Project Accountant Total Direct Labor Hours & Cost Total CostPhase & Task Title Task 12 6,376.00$ 1 2.0 4.0 6.0 1,074.00$ 2 1.0 4.0 5.0 837.00$ 3 1.0 4.0 5.0 837.00$ 4 2.0 8.0 10.0 940.00$ 5 2.0 2.0 4.0 1,014.00$ 6 2.0 8.0 10.0 1,674.00$ Subtotal Hours: 2.0 8.0 22.0 0.0 8.0 0.0 40.0 6,376.00$ Task 13 934.00$ 1 0.0 -$ 2 1.0 2.0 3.0 537.00$ 3 1.0 2.0 3.0 397.00$ 4 0.0 -$ 5 0.0 -$ Subtotal Hours: 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 6.0 934.00$ Specifications Incorporate new non-standard items and GSP's for new items Update special provisions to the 2026 WSDOT book. Update Bid Proposal Spreadsheet due to different funding components TIB Grant Grant support for TIB Construction Funding 95% Review submittal for TIB Assist with TIB Bid Authorization spreadsheet Subtask Title Subtask Title Update GSPs to current WSDOT Specification Book Develop bid advertisement and assemble bid documents Update Construction Working Day schedule and estimate 5 of 9 4/29/2026 Subconsultant Labor Hour Estimate SCJ Alliance Client:City of Arlington Template Version: 1/15/2026 Project:SR 530 and Smokey Point Blvd Intersection Contract Type:Billing Rate Schedule No. of Sheets: No. of Sheets: 0 N/A Job #:698.06 No. of Lots: No. of Lots: 0 N/A File Name: 2026-0429 Labor-Estimate_Amendment 7.xlsm Totals:270 237 150 120 80 130 0 $0.00 Phase & Task No.Principal PM3 Project Manager E4 Engineer T3 Technician T1 Technician Project Accountant Total Direct Labor Hours & Cost Total CostPhase & Task Title Task 14 8,607.00$ 1 1.0 8.0 9.0 2,166.00$ 2 1.0 8.0 9.0 1,197.00$ 3 8.0 12.0 20.0 2,856.00$ 4 4.0 12.0 16.0 2,388.00$ Subtotal Hours: 1.0 21.0 0.0 20.0 12.0 0.0 54.0 8,607.00$ Total Phase Hours: 4.0 69.0 158.0 48.0 138.0 0.0 417.0 417.0$ Total Phase Direct Labor: $1,080.00 $16,353.00 $23,700.00 $5,760.00 $11,040.00 $0.00 $57,933.00 57,933.00$ Phase 15 Task 1 -$ 1 0.0 -$ Subtotal Hours: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -$ Total Phase Hours: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -$ Total Phase Direct Labor: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 -$ Task Title Tribal Easement Exhibits with Updates Updated Right of Way Plan for shared-use path Soundview Consultants Exhibits for WSDOT ROW Soundview Consultants Right-of-Way Support Coordination with City/WSDOT/BIA 6 of 9 4/29/2026 Subconsultant Labor Hour Estimate SCJ Alliance Client:City of Arlington Template Version: 1/15/2026 Project:SR 530 and Smokey Point Blvd Intersection Contract Type:Billing Rate Schedule No. of Sheets: No. of Sheets: 0 N/A Job #:698.06 No. of Lots: No. of Lots: 0 N/A File Name: 2026-0429 Labor-Estimate_Amendment 7.xlsm Totals:270 237 150 120 80 130 0 $0.00 Phase & Task No.Principal PM3 Project Manager E4 Engineer T3 Technician T1 Technician Project Accountant Total Direct Labor Hours & Cost Total CostPhase & Task Title Phase 41 Task 1 5,826.00$ 1 12.0 12.0 2,844.00$ 2 0.0 -$ 3 6.0 12.0 18.0 2,982.00$ Subtotal Hours: 0.0 18.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.0 30.0 5,826.00$ Task 3 2,085.00$ 1 1.0 2.0 3.0 537.00$ 2 4.0 4.0 8.0 1,548.00$ Subtotal Hours: 0.0 5.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.0 2,085.00$ Task 3 5,970.00$ 1 2.0 2.0 474.00$ 2 2.0 2.0 300.00$ 3 4.0 12.0 16.0 2,748.00$ 4 4.0 10.0 14.0 2,448.00$ Subtotal Hours: 0.0 10.0 24.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 34.0 5,970.00$ Total Phase Hours: 0.0 33.0 30.0 0.0 0.0 12.0 75.0 75.0$ Total Phase Direct Labor: $0.00 $7,821.00 $4,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,560.00 $13,881.00 13,881.00$ Pre-Construction Precon Meeting Prep Precon Meeting (Online Meeting) Coordination Progress Billings Project Management Overall Project Management RFI Review and Response (8) Change Order Review and Response Office Engineering Schedule Review Traffic Control Plan Review On-Call Construction Support 7 of 9 4/29/2026 Subconsultant Labor Hour Estimate SCJ Alliance Client:City of Arlington Template Version: 1/15/2026 Project:SR 530 and Smokey Point Blvd Intersection Contract Type:Billing Rate Schedule No. of Sheets: No. of Sheets: 0 N/A Job #:698.06 No. of Lots: No. of Lots: 0 N/A File Name: 2026-0429 Labor-Estimate_Amendment 7.xlsm Totals:270 237 150 120 80 130 0 $0.00 Phase & Task No.Principal PM3 Project Manager E4 Engineer T3 Technician T1 Technician Project Accountant Total Direct Labor Hours & Cost Total CostPhase & Task Title Total Hours All Phases 9.0 166.0 210.0 48.0 138.0 24.0 595.0 595.0 Total Direct Labor Estimate All Phases $2,430.00 $39,342.00 $31,500.00 $5,760.00 $11,040.00 $3,120.00 $93,192.00 93,192.00$ Indirect Costs Subconsultants: Soundview Consultants $5,000.00 Subconsultant Subtotal:5,000.00$ Subconsultant Markup:500.00$ Subconsultant Total:5,500.00$ Reimbursable Expenses: Copies, Printing, etc.93.19$ Mileage 291.45$ Expenses Subtotal:384.64$ Expenses Markup:-$ Expenses Total:384.64$ Management Reserve:-$ Total Indirect Costs:5,884.64$ Total: 99,076.64$ 8 of 9 4/29/2026 SCJ Alliance Client: Project: Job #:Template Version: File Name: 2026-0429 Labor-Estimate_Amendment 7.xlsm Contract Type: Consultant Fee Determination DIRECT SALARY COST Classification Hours Fully Burdened Rate Amount Principal 9.0 $270.00 $2,430.00 PM3 Project Manager 166.0 $237.00 $39,342.00 E4 Engineer 210.0 $150.00 $31,500.00 T3 Technician 48.0 $120.00 $5,760.00 T1 Technician 138.0 $80.00 $11,040.00 Project Accountant 24.0 $130.00 $3,120.00 TOTAL SALARY COST Total Salary Cost $93,192.00 SUBCONSULTANTS Yes $5,000 x Subconsultant Fee Subtotal:$0 $5,000.00 Q Subconsultant Markup:10%$500.00 REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES Copies, Printing, etc. 0.1% of the Total Salary Costs $93.19 Mileage 402 miles at $0.725 per mile $291.45 Expenses Subtotal: $384.64 Expenses Markup:0%$0.00 SUBTOTAL (SALARY, SUBCONSULTANTS AND EXPENSES) Subtotal (Salary, Subconsultants and Expenses)$99,076.64 MANAGEMENT RESERVE FUND (MRF) Management Reserve: $0 $0.00 Total Estimated Budget: $99,076.64 Billing Rate Schedule City of Arlington Subconsultant Fee Determination Summary SR 530 and Smokey Point Blvd Intersection 1/15/2026698.06 Soundview Consultants Phase 15 Soundview Consultants 4/29/2026 Page 9 SR 530 and Smokey Point Blvd Intersection Project #: 698.06 Phase # Phase Title SCJ Hours SCJ Direct Labor Total Cost SCJ Labor Phase 1 Project Management 60.0 $12,720 $12,720 Phase 2 Project Meetings 43.0 $8,658 $8,658 Phase 10 Final PS&E 417.0 $57,933 $57,933 Phase 15 Soundview Consultants 0.0 $0 $0 Phase 41 On-Call Construction Support 75.0 $13,881 $13,881 Subtotal 595.0 $93,192.00 $93,192.00 Subconsultants Phase 15 Soundview Consultants $5,000 Subconsultant Markup: $500 Subtotal $5,500.00 Reimbursable Expenses Phase 99 Reimbursable Expenses $385 Reimbursable Markup: $0 Subtotal $384.64 Management Reserve Fund (MRF) Phase 98 $0 Total $99,076.64 PHASE SUMMARY TABLE Change Order No.: 001 Name of Client: SCJ Alliance Name of Project: 2665.0001 – Smokey Point RAB Date: February 27, 2026 Trinity Consultants, Inc. dba Soundview Consultants LLC (Soundview) has been assisting SCJ Alliance (Client) with environmental consulting services on 31.58-acre site located at South Route 530 and Smokey Point Boulevard in the City of Arlington (Snohomish County Tax Parcel Numbers 31050800400400, 31050800300100, and 31050800100300). To further support the project, Soundview proposes the following Phases: Phase 600 – Additional Regulatory Coordination • Soundview will continue to support the project as it is reviewed at the local, state, and federal levels. This phase includes project management and general support including coordination with regulatory staff to keep the review process moving forward efficiently. • Continued coordination and support may include normal email and phone correspondence and continued contact with project managers and staff, responding to comments or questions issued by the regulatory agencies. • This phase does not include a post-submission site visit and may include formal technical memorandum responses to comments from reviewing agency staff. COST(S). Soundview’s estimate, to the best of our ability and in good faith, of the total cost of Services added by this Change Order is as outlined in the table below. Additional Regulatory Coordination Total Estimated Cost* $ 5,000.00 *Billing rates and overall cost estimates will be subject to a regional inflation adjustment on an annual basis. ADJUSTMENT IN PRICE. The adjustment in price is based on the anticipated level of effort required to complete the Phases above, which is founded on Soundview’s experience supporting similar projects. This is to be on a Time and Expense basis based on current billing rates as outlined below. Services will be billed for actual time and expenses required to effectively perform these activities up to the Total Estimated Cost. ASSUMPTIONS: • The work will be in addition to the original Scope of Work: Agreement for Consulting Services (Terms and Conditions). • Client will provide any and all available data, digital or hard copy, pertaining to the site. • All deliverables will be provided electronically (in PDF format). • Client will provide right of entry to conduct the proposed field work and Soundview can reasonably access the entire subject property and dense brush or other obstructions will not prevent an appropriate inspection of the entire site. • This change order does not include any effort from a Professional Licensed Surveyor (PLS). • This change order does not include site survey, geotechnical analysis, Oregon white oak assessments, fluvial geomorphological assessment and analysis, wetland ratings, arborist services, impact analysis, mitigation planning or design, applications, application fees, or permitting. • Any additional work or phases not covered by the language in this change order will be considered out of scope and be performed under an additional scope and fee. • The work will be invoiced on a Time and Expense (T&E) basis in accordance with current Staff Billing and Mileage Rates outlined below. SCJ Alliance Signature Signature Ben Wright Printed Name Printed Name Principal Current Staff Billing and Mileage Rates can be found on the following page. STAFF BILLING AND MILEAGE RATES Billing rates and overall cost estimates will be subject to a regional inflation adjustment on an annual basis. Expenses are subject to Consumer Price Index adjustments on an annual basis. For extended contracts over multiple years, billing rates may be subject to multiple adjustments. Scope amendments describing these changes in cost estimates for extended contracts can be provided annually at the Client’s request, otherwise Client agreement to these anticipated changes is assumed at contract execution. Soundview Consultants LLC hourly billing rates for this agreement are as follows: Senior Principal Consultant / Managing Principal 304.00/hr Senior Project Manager 249.00/hr Senior Environmental Scientist III Senior Fish Biologist III Senior Environmental Scientist II Senior Fish Biologist II 184.00/hr Senior Environmental Scientist I Senior Fish Biologist I Environmental Scientist III Fish Biologist III 164.00/hr Environmental Scientist II Fish Biologist II 146.00/hr Environmental Scientist I Fish Biologist I Staff Scientist III Staff Scientist II Staff Scientist I Senior Geomorphologist Geomorphologist Senior Water Resources Engineer Water Resources Engineer 164.00/hr Senior Geospatial Analyst II / Senior Designer II 184.00/hr Senior Geospatial Analyst I / Senior Designer I 164.00/hr Geospatial Analyst III / Designer III 146.00 Geospatial Analyst II / Designer II Geospatial Analyst I / Designer I CAD Drafter 146.00 Litigation Expert Mileage Reimbursement Daily Use: Company Vessel Daily Use: 4x4 Pickup City of Arlington Council Agenda Bill Item: NB #1 Attachment H May 18, 2026 Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) Airport; Marty Wray, Airport Director, 360-403-3477 EXPENDITURES REQUESTED: $0 BUDGET CATEGORY: N/A BUDGETED AMOUNT: LEGAL REVIEW: Management Agency (FEMA) and the City of Arlington. Under this MOA, the City authorizes FEMA’s temporary use of Arlington Municipal Airport to establish and operate an incident support base, federal staging area, responder support camp, personnel mobilization center, manufactured housing unit staging Airport has made its staging area available for use in the event of a major emergency or natural disaster, including the storage and staging of emergency supplies and equipment on airport property in support of Page 1 of 6 U.S. Department of Homeland Security Federal Emergency Management Agency Region 10 130 228th Street, SW Bothell, WA 98021-8627 MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY AND THE CITY OF ARLINGTON I. PARTIES: The parties to this Memorandum of Agreement ("Agreement") are the U.S. Department of Homeland Security/Federal Emergency Management Agency ("FEMA") and the City of Arling ton, WA ("CITY ") II. AUTHORITY: This Agreement is authorized by: A. Sections 503,504, and 507 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107- 296, Title V (2002) (codified as amended at 6 U.S.C. §§ 313,314, and 317) B. The Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, Pub. L. No. 93- 288 (1974) (42 U.S.C. § 512 1) III. PURPOSE: FEMA desires to use, and the CITY agrees to license and permit FEMA to use the following described property (hereinafter referred to as the "Premises") at no cost to FEMA: Temporary use of Arlington Municipal Airport (AWO) so that FEMA can establish an Incident Support Base, Federal Staging Area, Responder Support Camp, Personnel Mobilization Center, Manufactured Housing Unit Staging Area, or a Field Medical Station. Temporary use under this Agreement is intended for durations not to exceed 28 calendar days. Should FEMA determine that continued occupancy beyond 28 calendar days is operationally necessary, FEMA may coordinate with the General Services Administration regarding the potential execution of a separate real property agreement. The CITY shall provide the following areas located at AWO (Enclosure 1)1: • North Ramp Near Taxiway A4 (2.63 acres) • Closed Runway and Northwest Taxiway (22.1 acres) • Active Runway 11/29 (10.55 acres) • Northwest Unimproved Lot (40.13 acres) • Active Taxiways B, D, D2, D3, and E (14.25 acres) 1. In line with runway safety boundaries and height restrictions as appropriate. Page 2 of 6 • Building 19128 Near North Ramp IV. RESPONSIBILITIIES: A. FEMA shall: 1. Notify the CITY as soon as practicable of AWO activation and requirements for resources, footprint, changes to plans or other activities required by FEMA. 2. Provide the CITY with a projected timeline for use of the Premises and the date and time for which the property must be available to FEMA. Notice shall be in writing, unless impracticable, in which case FEMA shall provide oral notice and send later written confirmation of notice upon request. 3. Notify the CITY at least seven (7) days prior to departure from the property unless circumstances render such notice impractical. 4. Maintain the Premises in a clean and orderly condition. Repair and/or restore the Premises to substantially the same condition at the time of initial occupancy, except for reasonable wear and tear. 5. Repair and maintain structures during ongoing operations that are damaged if required for safety and security reasons. 6. At the time of activation, address any incidental costs of occupancy and operations such as trash removal and utilities through a separately negotiated agreement. 7. Provide for required security and or other expenses for services deemed necessary by FEMA under separate contract at FEMA expense. B. The CITY shall: 1. Allow FEMA to occupy the Premises and to stage resources and other equipment necessary to carry out their mission on the Premises. 2. Allow FEMA to park and utilize telecommunications vehicles on the Premises and to run telecommunications cables in and around the Premises. 3. Permit FEMA access to the Premises twenty-four (24) hours per day, seven (7) days per week, and provide FEMA with all necessary means to access all parts of the Premises as aforementioned. Depending on the condition of the areas allocated above, the CITY will provide Page 3 of 6 alternatives if they are deemed unsuitable or if directed by FEMA’s requirements. 4. Permit FEMA to install, if necessary, fencing, portable toilets, additional lighting, generators, temporary guard shelters, signage, electrical and telecommunications upgrades, and other personal property necessary to carry out the intended use of the Premises. 5. Any other areas outside of those agreed upon in Section III of this Agreement will require execution of a separate agreement. 6. If the areas above, identified as “undeveloped” is available at the time of activation, the CITY will remove any barriers, making available to FEMA use of the contiguous areas. V. OTHER PROVISIONS: A. FEMA understands that the CITY may have an existing or may be working on a MOU with the State of Washington, Military Department Emergency Management Division (WA- EMD). Prior to activation, FEMA will coordinate with WA-EMD to resolve potential overlapping usage of the P remises that may exist. B. Nothing in this Agreement is intended to conflict with current law or regulations or the directives of FEMA or the CITY. If a term of this Agreement is inconsistent with any such authority, then that term shall be invalid, but the remaining terms and conditions of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. C. Nothing in this Agreement is intended to restrict the authority of either party to act as provided by statute or regulation. D. Nothing in this Agreement shall be interpreted as affording FEMA or the CITY any role in the content or programming decisions of either FEMA or the CITY, respectively. E. Any information shared under this Agreement will comply with the Privacy Act, and to the extent required and allowable, the Freedom of Information Act, and any other applicable statute, Executive Order, or regulation. F. This Agreement is between FEMA and the CITY and does not confer or create any right, benefit, or trust responsibility, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or equity, by any third person or party (public or private) against the United States, its agencies, its officers, or any Page 4 of 6 person; or against the CITY, their officers or employees or any other person. G. This Agreement creates neither a partnership nor a joint venture, and neither party has the authority to bind the other. This Agreement is not intended to be enforceable in any court of law or dispute resolution forum. H. The parties will use or display each other's name, emblem, or trademarks only in the case of particular projects and only with the prior written consent of the other party. The DHS seal is protected by 18 U.S.C. §§ 506, 701, and 1017, among other laws, and use of the seal is controlled by the DHS Office of Public Affairs through DHS Management Directive No. 0030 (MD 0030). Written permission is required to use the DHS Seal. I. The CITY warrants that the Premises may be used for the purposes intended by FEMA as described in this Agreement. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to create a duty on FEMA to inspect for toxic material or latent environmental conditions, which could be affected by FEMA's intended use of the Premises. Any known environmental conditions, which could affect FEMA's use of the Premises, known to the CITY, must be disclosed to FEMA. J. This Agreement, upon execution, contains the entire agreement of the parties and no prior written or oral agreement, express or implied, shall be admissible to contradict the provisions of this Agreement. Any changes to this Agreement must be made in writing with the mutual consent of the parties. VI. POINTS OF CONTACT: A. The FEMA Point of Contact is: Chris Roberts, Logistics Branch Chief, Region 10 Response Division 130 228th Street, SW Bothell, WA 98021-8627 (425) 487-2202 (office) / (202) 394-1506 (cell) christopher.roberts @fema.dhs.gov Alternates: Robert Lantz-Brazil, Senior Logistics Planner: (425) 487-4602 (office) / (202) 812-6766 (cell) / robert.lantzbrazil@fema.dhs.gov Regional Response Coordination Center (Upon Activation): Logistics Section Chief: (425 ) 487-4666 / r10-rrcc- logisticssectionchief@fema.dhs.gov Page 5 of 6 Operations Section Chief: (425 ) 487-4660 / r10-rrcc- operationssectionchief@fema.dhs.gov B. The CITY Point of Contact is: Marty D. Wray, Director, Arlington Municipal Airport 18204 59th Dr. NE, Suite A Arlington, WA 98223 (360) 403-3477 (cell) mwray@arlingtonwa.gov Alternates: Lorene Robinson, Airport Operations Coordinator: (360) 403-3472 (cell) / lrobinson@arlingtonwa.gov VII. EFFECTIVE DATE: The terms of this Agreement will become effective on the date and signature of the representatives of all parties. VIII. MODIFICATION: This Agreement may be modified upon the mutual written consent of FEMA and the CITY. IX. TERMINATION: This Agreement will terminate on May 31, 2031, unless extended by written amendment of this Agreement. Either party, upon forty-five (45) days written notice to the other party, may terminate this Agreement. X. NON-FUND OBLIGATING AGREEMENT: This Agreement is not a fiscal or funds obligation document. This is a no-fund Agreement. Any funds, services, or equipment provided to accomplish the goals anticipated under this Agreement are done so without expectation of reimbursement or the payment of fees related to the provision. Any specific work or activity that involves the transfer of funds, services, or property among the parties will require execution of a separate agreement, and will be contingent upon the availability of appropriated funds. Such activities must be independently authorized by appropriate statutory or other authority. This Agreement does not provide such authority. XI. LIABILITY: A. Congress has provided that the exclusive remedy for common law torts committed by employees of the U.S. Government, acting within the scope of their employment, is an action against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346 (b), 2671-2680. FEMA and the CITY agree that they are each responsible for the wrongful or negligent acts or omissions of their respective employees, to the extent that those acts or omissions occur within the scope of employment and arise under this Agreement. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as a waiver of any sovereign immunity of the United States. Page 6 of 6 B.FEMA and the CITY further agree to notify each other promptly of any claims arising under this Agreement, and to cooperate in good faith to resolve any claims promptly and appropriately. Each party's designated legal representatives will, within seven (7) calendar days of receipt, provide each other's designated legal representatives copies of any documents memorializing such claims. XII.APPLICABLE LAW: Federal law shall govern this Agreement. APPROVED BY: The following persons are authorized to sign this Agreement on behalf of their respective party. On Behalf of DHS/FEMA: On Behalf of CITY OF ARLINGTON Scott D. Zaffram Response Division Director FEMA Region 10 Date: Don E. Vanney M ay or City of Arlington Date: Premises Identified for Emergency Response and Recovery Operations at Arlington Municipal Airport Enclosure (1) Support to Incident Type 3 or Type 2 Events Require Primary Use Areas (Yellow Border): • North Ramp Near Taxiway A4 (2.63 acres) • Closed Runway and Northwest Taxiway (22.1 acres) • Active Runway 11/29 (10.55 acres) • Building 19128 Near North Ramp Support to Incident Type 2 or Type 1 Events Require Primary Use Areas (Yellow Border) as aforementioned and Secondary Use Areas (Red Border): • Northwest Unimproved Lot (40.13 acres) • Active Taxiways B, D, D2, D3, and E (14.25 acres) City of Arlington Council Agenda Bill NB #2 Attachment May 18, 2026 Update City Council Rules of Procedure and Code of Ethics for Meeting Time. City Council Rules of Procedure and Code of Ethics Executive; Paul Ellis, City Administrator EXPENDITURES REQUESTED: N/A BUDGET CATEGORY: N/A BUDGETED AMOUNT: LEGAL REVIEW: DESCRIPTION: meeting times to 6:00 p.m. On October 17th, 2022, City Council approved a change of the official time for City council meetings, moving them to 6:00 p.m. The proposed update to the City Council Rules of Procedure and Code of ALTERNATIVES: meeting times to 6:00 PM. ORDINANCE NO. 2022-035 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ARLINGTON, WASHINGTON AMENDING SECTION 2.04.020 OF THE ARLINGTON MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING MEETING TIMES WHEREAS, the COVID-19 pandemic has changed the conduct of business for the City of Arlington and other municipalities; and WHEREAS, increased access to "live -streamed" City Council meetings has led to reduced in -person attendance and increased remote attendance by citizens; and WHEREAS, the City Council and staff would benefit from an earlier City Council meeting time, and believe the citizens can remain connected with City Council meetings through the increased use of technology; and WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to amend Section 2.04.020 of the Arlington Municipal Code to reflect a change in meeting times; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Arlington does hereby ordain as follows: Section 1. Arlington Municipal Code Section 2.04.020 shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 2.04.020 - Meetings —Time and place —When meetings fall on legal holidays. The city council shall hold its regular public meetings on the first, second, third, and fourth Mondays of each month; provided, however, that the city council shall not hold meetings on the second, third, and fourth Mondays of August or the first full week of September. The meetings on the second and fourth Mondays of each month shall be reserved for workshops. Whenever any regular meeting falls upon a Monday declared in RCW 1.16.050 now or in the future as a legal holiday, then the regular meeting of the city council shall be held on the next business day and no special notice of such meeting need be given. If there is no business for which a meeting is needed, the meeting may be cancelled. All meetings shall begin at levee six 6:00 p.m. Meetings shall be held at the city police station/city hall annex, 110 E. 3rd St., Arlington, Washington; provided that the city council may adjourn from time to time to meet at any other publicly announced place. Section 2. Severability. Should any section, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance, or its application to any person or circumstance, be declared unconstitutional or otherwise invalid for any reason, or should any portion of this ordinance be pre-empted by state or federal law or regulation, such decision or pre-emption shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance or its application to other persons or circumstances. ORDINANCE 2022-035 Section 3. Effective Date. The title of this ordinance which summarizes the contents shall be published in the official newspaper of the City. This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force five (5) days after the date of publication as provided by law; provided, however, that in no event shall the ordinance be effective until January 1, 2023. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Arlington and APPROVED by the Mayor this 17th day of October, 2022. CITY OF ARLINGTON Barbara Tolbert, Mayor ATTEST: Wendy Va Der Meersche, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: sue ffft y ORDINANCE 2022-035 2 CERTIFICATION OF ORDINANCE I, Wendy Van Der Meersche, being the duly appointed City Clerk of the City of Arlington, Washington, a municipal corporation, do hereby certify that the following Ordinance No. 2022-035 was approved at the October 17, 2022 City Council meeting. ORDINANCE NO. 2022-035 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ARLINGTON, WASHINGTON AMENDING SECTION 2.04.020 OF THE ARLINGTON MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING MEETING TIMES" A true and correct copy of the original ordinance is attached. Dated this 18th day of October, 2022 J Wendy Va er Meersche City Clerk for the City of Arlington City Council Rules of Procedure Amended 05-18-2026 City of Arlington City Council Rules of Procedure City Council Rules of Procedure and Code of Ethics 1. General Rules 1.1 Meetings to be Public: All official meetings of the Arlington City Council shall be open to the public with the exception of executive sessions for certain limited topics (as defined in RCW Chapter 42.30). The journal of proceedings (minute book) shall be open to public inspection. 1.2 Quorum: Four Council members shall be in attendance to constitute a quorum and be necessary for the transaction of business. If a quorum is not present, those in attendance will be named and they shall adjourn to a later time, but no adjournment shall be for a longer period than until the next regular meeting. 1.3 Attendance, Excused Absences: RCW 35A. 12.060 provides that a Council member shall forfeit his/her office by failing to attend three (3) consecutive regular meetings of the Council without being excused by the Council. Members of the Council may be so excused by complying with this section. The member shall contact the Chair prior to the meeting and state the reason for his/her inability to attend the meeting. If the member is unable to contact the Chair, the member shall contact the City Clerk or Deputy City Clerk, who shall convey the message to the Chair. The Chair shall inform the Council of the member's absence, state the reason for such absence and inquire if there is a motion to excuse the member. Upon passage of such motion by a majority of members present, the absent member shall be considered excused, and the Recorder will make an appropriate notation in the minutes. If the motion is not passed, the Recorder will note in the minutes that the absence is unexcused. 1.4 Journal of Proceedings: A journal of all proceedings of the Council shall be kept by the City Clerk and shall be entered in a book constituting the official record of the Council. 1.5 Right of Floor: Any member desiring to speak shall be recognized by the Chair and shall confine his/her remarks to one subject under consideration or to be considered. 1.6 Rules of Order. Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised shall be the guideline procedures for the proceedings of the Council. If there is a conflict, these rules shall apply City Council Rules of Procedure Amended 05-18-2026 1.7 Remote Attendance. From time to time, it is not possible for a councilmember to attend a City Council meeting and the City would benefit by a Councilmember’s attendance by means of remote communication. The Council recognizes the benefits of fullest practicable attendance and participation by its members. Attendance from remote locations is intended to be an alternative and relatively infrequently used method for participation by Councilmembers. Remote attendance may occur in the following circumstances: (a) The City Administrator may approve a Councilmember’s written request for attendance at a Council meeting via remote communication when there is good cause. For purpose of this policy, the following shall constitute good cause and shall have priority as follows: (i) when traveling on City business; (ii) when illness, injury or family emergency prevents the Councilmember from attending; and (iii) when the Councilmember is away on planned vacations. The request and the reasons for the request shall be made in writing or via email to the City Administrator and City Clerk. The request shall be made as early as reasonably possible, to allow the City Administrator to confirm the availability of the remote communication technology and any required technical staff to participate in the meeting. (b) A Councilmember may attend via remote communication, when approved by the City Administrator, no more than four (4) times per year for planned vacations, and in no event more frequently than three (3) consecutive meetings. (c) Current technology limits the number of Councilmembers who may attend via remote communication to one Councilmember. If more Councilmembers are requesting approval to attend remotely, the priorities set forth in paragraph 1.7(a), above shall determine which Councilmember(s) may attend remotely. The Councilmembers requesting permission to attend remotely shall attempt to reach agreement on which may attend if technological limits prevent all requesting Councilmembers from attending remotely. In the absence of an agreement or a difference in priority levels, the Councilmembers who first requested remote attendance shall have priority to attend remotely. (d) In no event shall the City Administrator approve a Councilmember’s remote attendance request unless satisfactory video conferencing equipment or technology is available. Satisfactory equipment shall mean video conferencing software and connectivity to support the use of the City’s preferred video conferencing platform and complies with the requirements of state law. The device or technology must allow the Councilmember to pose and answer questions that are posed from time to time, and to permit the public to see and hear the Councilmember at all times. (e) During any meeting that a Councilmember is attending via remote communication, the presiding officer or City Administrator shall state for the record that a particular Councilmember is attending via remote communication and the reasons for such attendance. City Council Rules of Procedure Amended 05-18-2026 (f) Councilmembers appearing via remote communication may participate and vote during the meeting as if they were physically present at the meeting. (g) Councilmembers appearing remote communication shall comply with all rules and procedures as if they were physically present at the meeting. In the case of executive sessions, the City Administrator may permit participation from remote location(s) only when the City Administrator on a case-by-case basis considers such participation to be necessary and the City Administrator is confident in the security of such remote communications. (h) These provisions may be superseded in the case of pandemic or other emergency during which the requirements of the Open Public Meetings Act have been suspended by operation of law or proclamation of the Governor or other official with jurisdiction. The City Council reserves the right to make exceptions to the provisions of this paragraph 1.7 via motion at any duly noticed City Council meeting. 2. Types of Meetings 2.1 Regular Council Meetings: The Council shall meet on the first and third Monday of each month at 6:007 p.m. When a Council meeting falls on a holiday, the Council shall meet on Tuesday following the Monday holiday. The Council may reschedule regular meetings to a different date or time by motion. The location of the meetings shall be the Council Chambers at 110 E. Third Street, unless specified otherwise by a majority vote of the Council. All regular and special meetings shall be public. 2.2 Special Meetings: Special meetings may be called by the Mayor or any four (4) members of the Council. The City Clerk shall prepare a notice of the special meeting stating the time, place and business to be transacted. The City Clerk shall attempt to notify each member of the Council, either by telephone or otherwise, of the special meeting. The City Clerk shall give at least 24 hours' notice of the special meeting to each local newspaper of general circulation and to each local radio and/or television station, which has filed with the Clerk a written request to be notified of special meetings. No subjects other than those specified in the notice shall be considered. The Council may not make final disposition on any matter not mentioned in the notice. Special meetings may be called in less than 24 hours, and without the notice required in this section, to deal with emergencies involving injury or damage to persons or property or the likelihood of such injury or damage if the notice requirements would be impractical or increase the likelihood of such injury or damage. 2.3 Continued and Adjourned Sessions: Any session of the Council may be continued or adjourned from day to day, or for more than one day, but no adjournment shall be for a longer period than until the next regular meeting. City Council Rules of Procedure Amended 05-18-2026 2.4 Study Sessions and Workshops: The Council may meet informally in study sessions and workshops, at the call of the Mayor or of any three or more members of the Council, to review forthcoming programs of the city, receive progress reports on current programs or projects, receive other similar information from city department heads or conduct procedures workshops, provided that all discussions and conclusions thereon shall be informal and do not constitute official actions of the Council. Study sessions and workshops held by the Council are "special meetings" of the Council, and the notice required by RCW 42.30.080 must be provided. 2.5 Executive Sessions: Executive sessions or closed meetings may be held in accordance with the provisions of the Washington State Open Public Meetings Act (Chapter 42.30 RCW). Among the topics that may be discussed in executive session or closed meetings are: (1) personnel matters; (2) consideration of acquisition of property for public purposes or sale of city-owned property; and (3) potential or pending litigation in which the city has an interest, as provided in the Revised Code of Washington. The Council may hold an executive session during a regular or special meeting. Before convening in executive session the Chair shall publicly announce the purpose for excluding the public from the meeting place and the time when the executive session will be concluded. If the Council wishes to adjourn at the close of a meeting from executive session, that fact will be announced along with the estimated time for the executive session. The announced time limit for executive sessions may be extended to a stated later time by the announcement of the Chair. 2.6 Attendance of Media at Council Meetings: All official meetings of the Council and its committees shall be open to the media, freely subject to recording by radio, television and photographic services at any time, provided that such arrangements do not interfere with the orderly conduct of the meetings. 3. Chair and Duties 3.1 Chair: The Mayor, if present, shall preside as Chair at all meetings of the Council. In the absence of the Mayor, the Mayor Pro Tem shall preside. In the absence of both the Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem, the Council shall elect a Chair. 3.2 Call to Order: The meetings of the Council shall be called to order by the Mayor or, in his or her absence, by the Mayor Pro Tem. In the absence of both the Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem, the meeting shall be called to order by the City Clerk or Clerk's designee for the election of a temporary Chair. 3.3 Preservation of Order: The Chair shall preserve order and decorum; prevent attacks on personalities or the impugning of members' motives and confine members in debate City Council Rules of Procedure Amended 05-18-2026 to the question under discussion. 3.4 Points of Order: The Chair shall determine all points of order, subject to the right of any member to appeal to the Council. If any appeal is taken, the question shall be "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?". 3.5 Questions to be Stated: The Chair shall state all questions submitted for a vote and announce the result. A roll call vote shall be taken upon all questions. 3.6 Mayor - Powers: The Mayor may not make or second motions, but may participate in debate to the extent that such debate does not interfere with chairing the meeting. If the mayor wishes to participate vigorously in the debate of an issue, the Mayor shall turn over chairing of that portion of the meeting to the Mayor Pro Tem, or to another Council member if the Mayor Pro Tem is absent. The Mayor's voting rights and veto power are as specified in RCW 35A. 12. 100. 4. Order of Business and Agenda 4.1 Order of Business For Regular Meetings: The order of business for all regular meetings shall be transacted as follows unless the Council, by a majority vote of the members present suspends the rules and changes the order: (1) Call to Order (2) Pledge of Allegiance (3) Approval of the Agenda (4) Special Guests/Presentations/Proclamations (5) Public Comment (6) Consent Agenda (7) Public Hearings (8) Action Items (9) Comments from Council Members (10) Information/Administrator & Staff Reports (11) Mayor’s Report (12) Executive Session/Reconvene (13) Adjourn The Consent Agenda may contain items which are of a routine and non-controversial nature which may include, but are not limited to, the following: meeting minutes, payroll, claims, budget amendments, park use requests and any item previously approved by Council with a unanimous vote and which is being submitted to Council for final approval. Any item on the Consent Agenda may be removed and considered separately as an agenda item at the request of any Council member or any person attending a Council meeting. City Council Rules of Procedure Amended 05-18-2026 4.2 Order of Business for Workshop Meetings: The order of business for all workshop meetings shall be transacted as follows unless the Council, by a majority vote of the members present suspends the rules and changes the order: (1) Call to Order (2) Pledge of Allegiance (3) Approval of the Agenda (4) Special Guests/Presentations (5) Workshop Items (6) Information/Administrator & Staff Reports (7) Mayor’s Report (8) Comments from Council Members/Councilmember Reports (9) Review of Consent Agenda Items for Next Meeting (10) Executive Session/Reconvene (11) Adjourn 4.3 Council Agenda: The mayor shall prepare the agenda for Council meetings. Subject to the Council's right to amend the agenda, no legislative item shall be voted upon which is not on the Council agenda, except in emergency situations (defined as situations which would jeopardize the public's health, safety or welfare). 4.4 Mayor and Council member Comments: The agenda shall provide a time when the Mayor ("Mayor's Report") or any Council member ("Comments From Council Members") may bring before the Council any business that he/she feels should be deliberated upon by the Council. These matters need not be specifically listed on the agenda, and deliberation may be deferred until a following Council Workshop. Any formal action on such matters (i.e., Council vote) may be taken at a subsequent Council meeting, except that immediate action may be taken upon a vote of a majority of all members of the Council. There shall be no lectures, speeches or grandstanding. 5. Consensus and Motions 5.1 Motions: No motion shall be entertained or debated until duly seconded and announced by the Chair. The motion shall be recorded and, if desired by any Council member, it shall be read by the Recorder before it is debated and, by the consent of the Council, may be withdrawn at any time before action is taken on the motion. 5.2 Votes on Motions: Votes shall be taken by voice vote; provided, that any member of the Council may request a roll call vote on any matter. Each member present shall vote on all questions put to the Council except on matters in which he or she has been disqualified for a conflict of interest or under the appearance of fairness doctrine. Such member shall disqualify him or herself prior to any discussion of the matter and shall leave the Council Chambers. When disqualification of a member or members City Council Rules of Procedure Amended 05-18-2026 results or would result in the inability of the Council at a subsequent meeting to act on a matter on which it is required by law to take action, any member who was absent or who had been disqualified under the appearance of fairness doctrine may subsequently participate, provided such member first shall have reviewed all materials and listened to all tapes of the proceedings in which the member did not participate. 5.3 Failure to Vote on a Motion: Any Council member present who fails to vote without a valid disqualification shall be declared to have voted in the affirmative on the question. 5.4 Motions to Reconsider: A motion to reconsider must be made by a person who voted with the majority on the principal question and must be made at the same or succeeding regular meeting. No motion to reconsider an adopted quasi-judicial written decision shall be entertained after the close of the meeting at which the written findings were adopted. 6. Public Hearing Procedures 6.1 Speaker Sign-In: Prior to the start of a public hearing the Chair may require that all persons wishing to be heard sign in with the Recorder, giving their name and whether they wish to speak as a proponent, opponent or from a neutral position. Any person who fails to sign in shall not be permitted to speak until all those who signed in have given their testimony. The Chair, subject to the concurrence of a majority of the Council, may establish time limits and otherwise control presentations. (Suggested time limit is three minutes per speaker or five minutes when presenting the official position of an organization or group.) The Chair may change the order of speakers so that testimony is heard in the most logical groupings (i.e. proponents, opponents, adjacent owners, etc.). 6.2 Conflict of Interest/Appearance of Fairness: Prior to the start of a public hearing the Chair will ask if any Council member has a conflict of interest or Appearance of Fairness Doctrine concern which could prohibit the Council member from participating in the public hearing process. A Council member who refuses to step down after challenge and the advice of the City Attorney, a ruling by the Mayor or Chair and/or a request by the majority of the remaining members of the Council to step down is subject to censure. The Council member who has stepped down shall not participate in the Council decision nor vote on the matter. The Council member shall leave the Council Chambers while the matter is under consideration, provided, however, that nothing herein shall be interpreted to prohibit a Council member from stepping down in order to participate in a hearing in which the Council member has a direct financial or other personal interest. City Council Rules of Procedure Amended 05-18-2026 6.3 The Public Hearing Process: The Chair introduces the agenda item, opens the public hearing and announces the following Rules of Order: (1) All comments by proponents, opponents or other members of the public shall be made from the podium; any individuals making comments shall first give their name and address. This is required because an official recorded transcript of the public hearing is being made. (2) No comments shall be made from any other location. Anyone making "Out of Order" comments shall be subject to removal from the meeting. If you are disabled and require accommodation, please advise the Recorder. (3) There will be no demonstrations during or at the conclusion of anyone's presentation. (4) These rules are intended to promote an orderly system of holding a public hearing, to give every person an opportunity to be heard, and to ensure that no individual is embarrassed by exercising his/her right of free speech. · The Chair calls upon city staff to describe the matter under consideration. · The Chair calls upon proponents, opponents and all other individuals who wish to speak regarding the matter under consideration. · The Chair inquires as to whether any Council member has questions to ask the proponents, opponents, speakers or staff. If any Council member has questions, the appropriate individual will be recalled to the podium. · The Chair continues the public hearing to a time specific or closes the public hearing. 7. Duties and Privileges of Citizens 7.1 Meeting Participation: Citizens are welcome at all Council meetings and are encouraged to attend and participate prior to the deliberations of the Council. Recognition of a speaker by the Chair is a prerequisite and necessary for an orderly and effective meeting, be the speaker a citizen, Council member or staff member. Further, it will be expected that all speakers will deliver their comments in a courteous and efficient manner and will speak only to the specific subject under consideration. Anyone making out-of-order comments or acting in an unruly manner shall be subject to removal from the meeting. Use of cellular telephones is prohibited in the Council Chambers. 7.2 Subjects Not on the Current Agenda: Under agenda item "Comments from Citizens" citizens may address any item they wish to discuss with the Mayor and Council. They shall first obtain recognition by the Chair, state their name, address and subject of their comments. The Chair shall then allow the comments, subject to a three (3) minute limitation per speaker, or other limitations as the Chair or Council may deem necessary. Following such comments, if action is required or has been requested, the Chair may place the matter on the current agenda or a future agenda or refer the City Council Rules of Procedure Amended 05-18-2026 matter to staff or a Council committee for action or investigation and report at a future meeting. 7.3 Subjects on the Current Agenda: Any member of the public who wishes to address the Council on an item on the current agenda shall make such request to the Chair or Presiding Officer. The Chair shall rule on the appropriateness of public comments as the agenda item is reached. The Chair may change the order of speakers so that testimony is heard in the most logical grouping (i.e. proponents, opponents, adjacent owners, etc.). All comments shall be limited to three (3) minutes per speaker, or other limitations as the Chair or Council may deem necessary. 7.4 Manner of Addressing the Council - Time Limit: Each person addressing the Council shall step up to the podium, give his/her name and address in an audible tone of voice for the record and, unless further time is granted by the Council, shall limit his/her remarks to three (3) minutes. Agenda items "Comments from Citizens" and "Continued Comments from Citizens" shall be limited to a total of 30 minutes each, unless additional time or less time is agreed upon by the Council (dependent upon the length of the Council agenda). All remarks shall be addressed to the Council as a body and not to any member thereof. No person, other than the Chair, members of the Council and the person having the floor, shall be permitted to enter into any discussion, either directly or through the members of the Council. No questions shall be asked of the Council members, except through the Chair. The Council will then determine the disposition of the issue (information -only, place on present agenda, workshop, a future agenda, assign to staff, assign to Council Committee or do not consider). 7.5 Personal and Slanderous Remarks: Any person making personal, impertinent or slanderous remarks or who shall become boisterous while addressing the Council may be requested to leave the meeting and may be barred from further audience before the Council during that Council meeting by the Chair or Presiding Officer. 7.6 Written Communications: Interested parties, or their authorized representatives, may address the Council by written communication in regard to any matter concerning the city's business or over which the Council had control at any time. The written communication may be submitted by direct mail or by addressing the communication to the City Clerk who will distribute copies to the Council members. The communication will be entered into the record without the necessity for reading as long as sufficient copies are distributed to members of the audience/public. 7.7 Comments in Violation of the Appearance Of Fairness Doctrine: The Chair may rule out of order any comment made with respect to a quasi-judicial matter pending City Council Rules of Procedure Amended 05-18-2026 before the Council or its Boards or Commissions. Such comments should be made only at the hearing on a specific matter. If a hearing has been set, persons whose comments are ruled out of order will be notified of the time and place when they can appear at the public hearing on the matter and present their comments. 7.8 ”Out of Order” Comments: Any person whose comments have been ruled out of order by the Chair shall immediately cease and refrain from further improper comments. The refusal of an individual to desist from inappropriate, slanderous or otherwise disruptive remarks after being ruled out of order by the Chair may subject the individual to removal from the Council Chambers. These rules are intended to promote an orderly system of holding a public meeting and to give every person an opportunity to be heard. 8. Filling Council Vacancies and Selecting Mayor Pro Tem 8.1 Notice of Vacancy: If a Council vacancy occurs, the Council will follow the procedures outlined in RCW 42.12.070. In order to fill the vacancy with the most qualified person available until an election is held, the Council will widely distribute and publish a notice of the vacancy and the procedure and deadline for applying for the position. 8.2 Application Procedure: The Council will draw up an application form which contains relevant information that will answer set questions posed by Council. The application form will be used in conjunction with an interview of each candidate to aid the Council's selection of the new Council member. 8.3 Interview Process: All candidates who submit an application by the deadline will be interviewed by the Council during a regular or special Council meeting open to the public. The order of the interviews will be determined by drawing the names; in order to make the interviews fair, applicants will be asked to remain outside the Council Chambers while other applicants are being interviewed. Applicants will be asked to answer questions submitted to them in advance of the interview and questions posed by each Council member during the interview process. The Council members will ask the same questions of each candidate. Each candidate will then be allowed two (2) minutes for closing comments. Since this is not a campaign, comments and responses about other applicants will not be allowed. 8.4 Selection of Council member: The Council may recess into executive session to discuss the qualifications of all candidates. Nominations, voting and selection of a person to fill the vacancy will be conducted during an open public meeting. City Council Rules of Procedure Amended 05-18-2026 8.5 Selecting Mayor Pro Tem and Alternate Mayor Pro Tem: The Mayor Pro Tem and Alternate Mayor Pro Tem will be selected by a majority vote of the Council members at the second meeting in January in even years or when there is a vacancy. In selecting the Mayor Pro Tem, the Council will be guided by the following principles: • To preserve continuity in the office, the Mayor Pro Tem shall generally serve for a term of two (2) years. • The Mayor Pro Tem should have served as a Council member for at least two (2) years before appointment to the office of Mayor Pro Tem. • The Mayor Pro Tem will generally be selected from the eligible Council members who have served the longest in office. The Alternate Mayor Pro Tem will be the Council member that most recently served as Mayor Pro Tem. 9. Creation of Committees, Boards and Commissions 9.1 Citizen Committees, Boards and Commissions: The Council may create committees, boards and commissions to assist in the conduct of the operation of city government with such duties as the Council may specify not inconsistent with the city code. 9.2 Membership and Selection: Membership and selection of members shall be as provided by the Council if not specified otherwise in the city code. Any committee, board or commission so created shall cease to exist upon the accomplishment of the special purpose for which it was created, or when abolished by a majority vote of the Council. No committee so appointed shall have powers other than advisory to the Council or to the Mayor except as otherwise specified in the city code. 10. City Code of Ethics 10.1. Personal integrity. The professional and personal conduct of City elected officials must be above reproach and avoid even the appearance of impropriety. City elected officials shall endeavor to treat citizens equally and with respect and shall refrain from abusive conduct, threats of official action, personal accusations or verbal attacks upon the character or motives of other members of the Mayor or Council, boards and commissions, the staff or public. City elected officials shall maintain truthfulness and honesty and not compromise them for advancement, honor, or personal gain. Additionally, City elected officials shall not directly or indirectly induce, encourage or aid anyone to violate the Code of Ethics and it is incumbent upon City elected officials to make a good faith effort to address apparent violations of this Code of Ethics. City Council Rules of Procedure Amended 05-18-2026 10.2. Respect for Process. City elected officials shall perform their duties in accordance with the processes and rules of order established by the City Council and board and commissions governing the deliberation of public policy issues, meaningful involvement of the public, and implementation of policy decisions of the City Council by City staff. 10.3. Conduct of Public Meetings. City elected officials shall prepare themselves for public issues; listen courteously and attentively to all public discussions before the body; and focus on the business at hand. They shall refrain from interrupting other speakers; making personal comments not germane to the business of the body; or otherwise interfering with the orderly conduct of meetings. 10.4. Decisions Based on Merit. City elected officials shall base their decisions on the merits and substance of the matter at hand, rather than on unrelated considerations. 10.5. Public Disclosure. City elected officials shall publicly disclose substantive information that is relevant to a matter under consideration by the Council or boards and commissions, which they may have received from sources outside of the public decision-making process. Council members shall represent when making public statements that opinions stated are the Member's own and do not necessarily represent those of the Council unless the Council has voted and passed an ordinance, resolution or motion that so states the expressed policy. 10.6 Punishment. The Council has power under state law to impose punishment on its members, short of removal of office, for violation of state law or Council rules. If a member of the Council shall transgress these rules, the presiding officer shall call such member to order, in which case such member shall be silent except to explain or continue in order. If the presiding officer shall transgress these rules or fail to call such member to order, any other member of the Council may, under a point of order, call the presiding officer or such other member to order, in which case the presiding officer or such member, as the case may be, shall be silent except to explain or continue in order. Additional consequences may include a verbal admonition, written reprimand, censure, expulsion from the meeting at which the conduct is occurring, removal of the Councilmember from the Council committee chair positions or committee memberships, or removal of intergovernmental duties, based on an affirmative vote of a majority of the Council; in such a vote the elected official shall not be entitled to vote. Expulsion for such behavior in the Council’s presence shall require the affirmative vote of a majority of the Council, specifying in the motion or order of expulsion the cause for expulsion. City Council Rules of Procedure Amended 05-18-2026 11. Suspension and Amendment of These Rules 11.1 Suspension of these Rules: Any provision of these rules not governed by the city code may be temporarily suspended by a vote of a majority of the Council. 11.2 Amendment of These Rules: These rules may be amended or new rules adopted by a majority vote of all members of the Council, provided that the proposed amendments or new rules shall have been introduced into the record at a prior Council meeting. City of Arlington Council Agenda Bill NB #3 Attachment COUNCIL MEETING DATE: May 18, 2026 SUBJECT: Sole Source Resolution for Procurement and Servicing of Wilo Pumps and Mixers and Associated Support Equipment. ATTACHMENTS: DRAFT Sole Source Resolution Letter of Certification from Wilo USA, LLC DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN Public Works Department; Jim Kelly, Director 360-403-3505 EXPENDITURES REQUESTED: $0 BUDGET CATEGORY: N/A BUDGETED AMOUNT: $0 LEGAL REVIEW: DESCRIPTION: Sole source resolution recognizing Correct Equipment, Inc. as the only appointed Wilo USA, LLC water and wastewater pump and mixer sales representative for our service area. HISTORY: The City of Arlington uses Wilo USA pumps and mixers in many processes (Water Treatment Plant, Water Reclamation Facility, Lift Stations, Booster Pump Stations, etc.). Wilo pumps and mixers and associated components are manufactured by Wilo USA, LLC and distributed locally by Correct Equipment, Inc. Correct Equipment is the authorized agent in the Arlington geographical area for Wilo products and, as such, staff is requesting a sole source resolution allowing the City to waive Washington Public Works bid requirements and contract directly with Correct Equipment for purchase and or related services for these products. ALTERNATIVES: Do not issue sole source resolution Remand to staff for further evaluation RECOMMENDED MOTION: I move to recognize Correct Equipment as the authorized agent for purchase and or related services for Wilo pump systems and approve a Sole Source Resolution allowing the City to contract directly with Correct Equipment, Inc. WILO USA LLC T + 888-945-6872 9550 W. Higgins Rd. #300 F + 888-945-6873 Rosemont, IL 60018 www.wilo-usa.com May 12, 2026 Subject: City of Arlington, Washington To Whom It May Concern, This letter confirms that Correct Equipment is the sole and exclusive contracted sales representative for Wilo USA, LLC water & wastewater pump and mixer sales for your served area. Wilo USA, LLC, a subsidiary of Wilo SE, is the sole provider in the United State of Pump and Mixers manufactured under the Wilo brand. Please note that all Wilo Warranties and Operations and Maintenance Manuals require the use of genuine Wilo components for the warranties to be valid and ensure proper operation. Should you have any questions, please contact me via email at tom.webb@wilo.com , via phone (818) 307-6126. Best Regards, Tom M. Webb Western Regional Manager Water Management M: +1 818-307-6126 T: +1 262-204-6661 F: +1 847-825-9456 tom.webb@wilo-usa.com RESOLUTION NO. _____ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ARLINGTON TO WAIVE BID REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PURCHASE OF WILO USA, LLC WATER AND WASTEWATER PUMPS, MIXERS, AND MISCELLANEOUS SUPPORT PRODUCTS AND RELATED SERVICES FOR USE BY THE CITY OF ARLINGTON UTILITY DEPARTMENT WHEREAS, the City of Arlington Utility Department maintains water and wastewater systems for all of its customers; and WHEREAS, to maintain the consistency of treatment plants, lift stations, booster pump stations, and other miscellaneous support products and related services within the Utility treatment systems, and to avoid the cost associated with repairs to the system that may occur using non genuine original equipment manufacturer (OEM) replacement controls; a supplier of Wilo USA, LLC products is required; and WHEREAS, Correct Equipment, Inc. is the only authorized agent for purchase of Wilo USA, LLC products within the City of Arlington’s geographical region; and WHEREAS, RCW 35.23.352(9) permits the waiving of bidding requirements for the purchase of materials which are clearly and legitimately limited to a single source of supply or services which are subject to special market conditions; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Arlington, as follows: Section 1: The City Council of the City of Arlington hereby waives the bidding requirements for purchase of Wilo USA, LLC products for use by the City of Arlington Utility Department. Section 2: This resolution will be effective for three (3) years from the date of adoption. PASSED by the City Council and Approved by the Mayor this _____day of May 2026. CITY OF ARLINGTON ___________________________________ Don E. Vanney, Mayor ATTEST: __________________________________ Raelynn Jones, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: __________________________________ Oskar Rey, City Attorney