HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-18-2011_Council Meeting Packet
Arlington City Council
*Tuesday January 18, 2011 – 7 PM
City Council Chambers
110 E. Third
SPECIAL ACCOMMODATIONS: The City of Arlington strives to provide accessible meetings for people with disabilities. Please contact the ADA
coordinator at (360) 403-3441 or 1-800-833-8388 (TDD only) prior to the meeting date if special accommodations are required.
CALL TO ORDER / PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/ROLL CALL
APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
SWEARING IN:
INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS
-Arlington Police Department Employee of the Year
PUBLIC COMMENT For members of the public to speak to the Council regarding matters NOT on the agenda.
Please limit remarks to three minutes
CONSENT AGENDA
1. Minutes of the Jan. 3 & 10, 2011 meetings ATTACHMENT A
2. Accounts Payable
PUBLIC HEARING
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
NEW BUSINESS
1. Addendum #1 to Waste Management NW Contract ATTACHMENT B
2. Water/Wastewater Treatment Plant Security System ATTACHMENT C
3. Gifford Sidewalk Project Close-Out ATTACHMENT D
4. West Arlington Sub Area Plan - 2010 Comprehensive Plan Amendment ATTACHMENT E
5. Fourth Amendment to Interlocal Agreement for Municipal ATTACHMENT F
Court Services with the City of Marysville
DISCUSSION ITEMS
INFORMATION
ADMINISTRATOR & STAFF REPORTS
MAYOR’S REPORT
COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS – OPTIONAL
EXECUTIVE SESSION
1. Discussion of pending or potential litigation [RCW 42.30.110(1)(i)]
2. To review collective bargaining negotiations, grievances, or discussions regarding the
interpretation or application of a labor agreement [RCW 42.30.140(4)]
RECONVENE
ADJOURNMENT
To download all attachments, click here
DRAFT
Page 1 of 3
Council Chambers
110 East Third
January 3, 2011
City Council Members Present by Roll Call: Dick Butner Sally Lien, Scott Solla, Marilyn
Oertle, Chris Raezer, Linda Byrnes, and Steve Baker
Council Members Absent: There were no Council members absent.
City Staff Present: Mayor Larson, Allen Johnson, Kristin Banfield, Paul Ellis, Jim Chase, Jan
Bauer, Steve Peiffle – City Attorney
Also Known to be Present: Walt Riebe, Barbara Tolbert EMS Levy Chair, Sarah Arney –
North County Outlook, and Kirk Boxleitner – Arlington Times
Mayor Larson called the meeting to order at 7:00PM, and the pledge of allegiance to the flag
followed.
APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
Steve Baker moved to approve the Agenda. Sally Lien seconded the motion which passed with
a unanimous vote.
INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS
Scoutmaster Jeff Swanson, Boy Scouts of America, introduced the scouts in attendance and
explained that they are attending the meeting because they are working on a Citizenship in the
Community Merit Badge.
PUBLIC COMMENT
There was no one in the audience who wished to speak to matters not on the Agenda.
CONSENT AGENDA
Steve Baker moved and Sally Lien seconded the motion to approve the Consent Agenda which
unanimously passed to approve the following Consent Agenda items:
1. Minutes of the December 20, 2010 meeting
2. Accounts Payable
Approval of Electronic Payments and Claims Checks #72021 through #72158 dated
December 21, 2010 through December 30, 2010 in the amount of $640,874.57, and
Approval of Payroll Checks #26987 through #27016 and Electronic Payments #128317
through #128565 for the period of December 1, 2010 through December 31, 2010 in
the amount of $1,164,906.93
3. Appointment of Barbara Butner to the Cemetery Board to fill an unexpired term to April
1, 2014.
PUBLIC HEARING
There was no Public Hearing.
Minutes of the Arlington
City Council Meeting
Minutes of the City of Arlington City Council Meeting DRAFT January 3, 2011
Page 2 of 3
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
There was no Unfinished Business.
NEW BUSINESS
Authorization to Apply for Three City of Arlington Tourism/Economic Development
Grants for the 2011 Grant Application:
Summer Outdoor Recreation Events, Legion Park
Restroom Project, Kiosk for the Centennial Trail in Arlington
Assistant City Administrator Kristin Banfield and Assistant to the City Administrator for Special
Projects Paul Ellis noted the requests.
Paul Ellis briefly addressed the Legion Park Restroom Project, emphasizing the importance of
constructing the restrooms in light of impending Centennial Trail construction.
Marilyn Oertle moved and Chris Raezer seconded the motion to authorize all three grant
applications. The motion passed with a unanimous vote.
Kristin Banfield briefly spoke to the requested Resolution stating that the final wording being
completed and asked that the motion contain “subject to the review and approval of the City
Attorney”.
EMS Levy Resolution
City Attorney Steve Peiffle then explained the need for wording accuracy within the Resolution.
He briefly reviewed the Resolution changes.
Ms. Banfield gave a brief review of the Resolution history and requested Council approval.
Sally Lien moved and Dick Butner seconded approval of the proposed resolution to place
before the voters the establishment of a permanent Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Levy at
the 4/26/2011 Special Election, subject to the approval of the City Attorney. The motion passed
with a unanimous vote.
Kristin Banfield stated that January 31 and February 3 are the possible meeting nights for the
City Council - County Council meeting. January 31 was selected as the preferred date.
The Council retreat will take place this Saturday.
DISCUSSION ITEMS
Mayor Larson had nothing to report.
MAYOR’S REPORT
Sally Lien, Linda Byrnes, and Steve Baker gave brief reports while Dick Butner, Scott Solla,
Marilyn Oertle, and Chris Raezer had nothing to report at this time.
COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS – OPTIONAL
City Attorney announced that there would be no need for an Executive Session.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
ADJOURNMENT
With no further business to come before the Council, the meeting was adjourned at 7:25PM.
Minutes of the City of Arlington City Council Meeting DRAFT January 3, 2011
Page 3 of 3
_____________________________________
Margaret Larson, Mayor
DRAFT
Page 1 of 2
Council Chambers
110 East Third Street
January 10, 2011
Dick Butner Sally Lien, Scott Solla, Marilyn Oertle, Chris Raezer, Linda Byrnes, Steve Baker, Mayor
Larson, Allen Johnson, Kristin Banfield, Police Chief Nelson Beazley, Jim Kelly, Eric Scott, Cristy
Brubaker, Jan Bauer, Steve Peiffle – City Attorney
Council Members Absent: There were no Council members absent.
Also Known to be Present: Neil Knutson and Sarah Arney – North County Outlook
Mayor Larson called the meeting to order at 7:00PM and the pledge of allegiance to the flag followed.
Steve Baker moved to approve the Agenda, and Sally Lien seconded the motion, which passed with a
unanimous vote approving the Workshop Agenda.
WORKSHOP ITEMS – NO ACTION WAS TAKEN
Amy Spain, Director of the Snohomish County Tourism Bureau, along with Andy Tift, Manager from
Holiday Inn Express at 88
Tourism Promotion Area Interlocal
th
St in Marysville, gave the hard copy review of a previously presented power
point presentation on the topic of the establishment and benefits of a Tourism Promotion Area.
Throughout the presentation Ms. Spain and Mr. Tift answered Council questions. This will be addressed
by the Council next week.
With the use of a power point presentation Public Works Director Jim Kelly distributed the traffic study and
concerns of 35
35th Street Discussion
th
Street residents, and spoke to the traffic situation, background, location of the subject
area, and the suggested answers to the through-traffic problem. Throughout the presentation Mr. Kelly
and City Engineer Eric Scott answered questions. There was extended discussion on the issue. A
follow-up traffic count will take place in February. Mr. Kelly will also follow up with answers to questions
Mr. Jim Kelly addressed the Amendment to Waste Management and addressed a change in the
document that has occurred. The Council had no questions.
Addendum #1 to Waste Management NW Contract
Mr. Kelly noted a required vulnerability study that had been done in the past with no subsequent action
that had been taken. There is now action that will be taken regarding a proposed security system which
would be integrated with our IT system. Throughout the presentation Mr. Kelly answered Council
questions.
Water/Wastewater Treatment Plant Security System
Mr. Kelly noted the project close-out.
Gifford Sidewalk Project Close-Out
Minutes of the Arlington
City Council Workshop
Minutes of the City of Arlington City Council Meeting DRAFT January 10, 2011
Page 2 of 2
Assistant City Administrator Kristin Banfield addressed the Fourth Amendment to the Interlocal
Agreement between the City of Arlington and the City of Marysville. The Council asked questions of Ms.
Banfield.
Fourth Amendment to Interlocal Agreement for Municipal Court Services with the City of
Marysville
Chris Raezer announced a Relay for Life event planned for June 4 and 5 with hopes of participation by
the City Council.
Miscellaneous Council items
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 8:14PM.
____________________________
Margaret Larson, Mayor
City of Arlington
Council Agenda Bill
AGENDA ITEM:
New Business #1
ATTACHMENT B
COUNCIL MEETING DATE:
January 18, 2011
SUBJECT: Waste Management Northwest
Contract Amendment.
DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN:
Public Works – James Kelly
ATTACHMENTS:
Contract Amendment #1
EXPENDITURES REQUESTED: N/A
BUDGET CATEGORY: N/A
LEGAL REVIEW: Pending final review by City Attorney
DESCRIPTION: Contract Amendment #1 with Waste Management to correct confusion in
Multi-Family and Commercial Services.
HISTORY: City of Arlington entered into a new contract with Waste Management Northwest
on September 2010 for the refuse and recycling franchise within the City. It has been
discovered that the contract is in need of minor revisions to the wording in four sections.
ALTERNATIVES:
- None
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion authorizing the Mayor to sign Contract Amendment #1 with Waste Management
Northwest pending final review by City Attorney.
ADDENDUM TO CONTRACT FOR SOLID WASTE,
RECYCLING, AND COMPOSTABLE ORGANICS COLLECTION, AND DISPOSAL
BETWEEN THE CITY OF ARLINGTON, WASHINGTON
AND
WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WASHINGTON, INC.
THIS ADDENDUM TO CONTRACT FOR SOLID WASTE, RECYCLING, AND COMPOSTABLE
ORGANICS COLLECTION, AND DISPOSAL BETWEEN THE CITY OF ARLINGTON, WASHINGTON
AND WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WASHINGTON, INC. (this “Addendum”) is made as of November __,
2010 by and between the City of Arlington, a Washington municipal corporation (the “City”), and Waste
Management of Washington, Inc., a Washington corporation (“Contractor”). Each of Company and Contractor
is sometimes referred to herein as a “Party” and together as the “Parties
”. Capitalized terms used in this
Addendum and not otherwise defined shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Agreement.
RECITALS
A. City and Contractor are parties to that certain Contract for Solid Waste, Recycling, and
Compostable Organics Collection, and Disposal, dated effective as of September 7, 2010 (the “Agreement
”);
and
B. City and Contractor recently entered into the Agreement and have since discovered certain
errors and omissions in the Service Rate Schedule, which is attached to the Agreement as Exhibit B; and
C. City and Contractor now desire to correct these errors and omissions and amend and restate
in its entirety the Service Rate Schedule attached to the Agreement as Exhibit B, upon the terms set forth
herein.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained herein, the
receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties mutually agree as follows:
1. Revised Service Rate Schedule. The Service Rate Schedule attached to the Agreement as
Exhibit B (the “Old Rate Schedule”) is hereby amended and restated in its entirety by the Service Rate
Schedule attached to this Addendum as Attachment B (the “New Rate Schedule
”). The rates set forth
in the New Rate Schedule shall entirely replace and supersede the rates set forth in the Old Rate
Schedule, and will be applied retroactively back to the effective date of the Agreement. For
convenience, below is a summary of the changes being made and reflected in the New Rate Schedule:
• Section F (Multi-family Recycling) was removed from the Multi-Family & Commercial
Services page and added as Section F of the Residential Services page under the heading
“Multi-family Garbage and Recycling Rates,” and the line items “2-96 gal provided at no
cost,” “1 can monthly charge,” and “1.25 yard container monthly charge” were removed.
• Section G (Commercial Recycling) was removed from Multi-Family & Commercial
Services page and added as Section F of Commercial Services page and relabeled
“Commercial Recycling per pick-up, and the line item “3 bins per unit” was removed.
Commercial Recycling as an option for embedded service was removed as this is not an
option in the current contract.
• Sections H and I were removed from Multi-Family & Commercial Services page.
• Section D (Special Collections) was relabeled “Special Collections for Temporary
Service (per pick-up).” Temporary Service is described as any commercial service
account set up for less than 90 days.
2. Full Force and Effect. Except as otherwise provided in this Addendum, all other terms
and provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
[Signature Page Follows]
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Addendum as of the date set forth above.
CITY OF ARLINGTON
WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WASHINGTON,
INC.
By: ____________________________ By: _____________________________
Name: __________________________ Name: ___________________________
Title: __________________________ Title: ___________________________
Attest:
By: ____________________________
Name: __________________________
Title: __________________________
[SIGNATURE PAGE TO ADDENDUM TO CONTRACT FOR SOLID WASTE, RECYCLING, AND
COMPOSTABLE ORGANICS COLLECTION, AND DISPOSAL BETWEEN THE CITY OF
ARLINGTON, WASHINGTON AND WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WASHINGTON, INC.]
ATTACHMENT B
NEW RATE SCHEDULE
SERVICE TOTAL 2010 2011 2012
CURRENT Total Total Total
CLASS RATE SERVICE FEE SERVICE FEE SERVICE FEE
Percentage Increase 3.60%3.60%3.60%
RESIDENTIAL SERVICES
A. Weekly Residential Single Family
1 Can once per month 6.38$ 6.61$ 6.85$ 7.10$
1 Can service (20 gal. Mini-can))8.44$ 8.74$ 9.06$ 9.39$
1 Can (32 gal.)11.42$ 11.83$ 12.26$ 12.70$
2 Cans 17.62$ 18.25$ 18.91$ 19.59$
3 Cans 24.86$ 25.75$ 26.68$ 27.64$
4 Cans 32.05$ 33.20$ 34.40$ 35.64$
5 Cans 38.83$ 40.23$ 41.68$ 43.18$
20 gal Cart 9.84$ 10.19$ 10.56$ 10.94$
35 gal Cart 12.82$ 13.28$ 13.76$ 14.26$
64 gal Cart 19.00$ 19.68$ 20.39$ 21.12$
96 gal Cart 20.42$ 21.16$ 21.92$ 22.71$
Each additional can (32 gal)7.21$ 7.47$ 7.74$ 8.02$
Extra can, bag, or box (32 gal)4.68$ 4.85$ 5.02$ 5.20$
B. Once per month Residential Single Family
1 Can service (32 gal)6.38$ 6.61$ 6.85$ 7.10$
C. Single Family Recyclable Collection Rate
Residential Single Family Curbside Recycling: 3.88$ 4.02$ 4.16$ 4.31$
D. Single Family Yard Debris Collection Rate
Residential Single Family Curbside Yard Debris where
service is optional:
Per month for one container 9.39$ 9.73$ 10.08$ 10.44$
Additional 96gal Yard Debris Cart Rent per month 1.83$ 1.90$ 1.96$ 2.03$
E. SPECIAL COLLECTIONS
Mini Can each 1.89$ 1.96$ 2.03$ 2.10$
Garbage Cans, bundles, or wheeled containers each 4.50$ 4.66$ 4.83$ 5.00$
Carry Out over 5' but under 25'0.58$ 0.60$ 0.62$ 0.64$
Carry Out each additional 25' or fraction thereof 0.58$ 0.60$ 0.62$ 0.64$
Stairs & Steps each up or down 0.05$ 0.05$ 0.05$ 0.05$
Overhead Obstruction each less than 8' from ground 0.58$ 0.60$ 0.62$ 0.64$
Sunken or elevated can or unit above or below 4'0.58$ 0.60$ 0.62$ 0.64$
Drive-Ins on private roads or driveways of over 125'2.33$ 2.41$ 2.50$ 2.59$
F. Multi-family Garbage and Recycling Rates
(Contractor furnished detachable container for recyclables)
64 gal toter monthly charge 25.12$ 26.02$ 26.96$ 27.93$
1 yard container monthly charge 76.74$ 79.50$ 82.36$ 85.32$
1.5 yard container monthly charge 103.66$ 107.39$ 111.26$ 115.27$
2 yard container monthly charge 131.65$ 136.39$ 141.30$ 146.39$
3 yard container monthly charge 183.49$ 190.10$ 196.94$ 204.03$
4 yard container monthly charge 226.63$ 234.79$ 243.24$ 252.00$
6 yard container monthly charge 282.64$ 292.82$ 303.36$ 314.28$
8 yard container monthly charge 376.96$ 390.53$ 404.59$ 419.16$
1 of 4
CITY OF ARLINGTON
Attachment B
Residential Rates
TOTAL 2010 2011 2012
SERVICE CURRENT Total Total Total
CLASS RATE SERVICE FEE SERVICE FEE SERVICE FEE
Percentage Increase 3.60%3.60%3.60%
COMMERCIAL SERVICE
A. Can/Unit Garbage Collection
Per Can/Unit (customer owned)2.68$ 2.78$ 2.88$ 2.98$
Minimum monthly rate 16.10$ 16.68$ 17.28$ 17.90$
B. Container Garbage Collection Minimum 1x/wk service
64 gal cart per month 22.01$ 22.80$ 23.62$ 24.47$
1 yard per month 65.78$ 68.15$ 70.60$ 73.14$
1.5 yard per month 89.96$ 93.20$ 96.56$ 100.04$
2 yard per month 115.22$ 119.37$ 123.67$ 128.12$
3 yard per month 161.59$ 167.41$ 173.44$ 179.68$
4 yard per month 193.79$ 200.77$ 208.00$ 215.49$
6 yard per month 238.85$ 247.45$ 256.36$ 265.59$
8 yard per month 311.26$ 322.47$ 334.08$ 346.11$
3 yard compactor 398.53$ 412.88$ 427.74$ 443.14$
4 yard compactor 484.64$ 502.09$ 520.17$ 538.90$
6 yard compactor 652.29$ 675.77$ 700.10$ 725.30$
C. Container Garbage Monthly Rent
64 gal cart 1.77$ 1.83$ 1.90$ 1.97$
1 yard 3.57$ 3.70$ 3.83$ 3.97$
1.5 yard 4.74$ 4.91$ 5.09$ 5.27$
2 yard 6.42$ 6.65$ 6.89$ 7.14$
3 yard 8.08$ 8.37$ 8.67$ 8.98$
4 yard 9.51$ 9.85$ 10.20$ 10.57$
6 yard 14.57$ 15.09$ 15.63$ 16.19$
8 yard 16.66$ 17.26$ 17.88$ 18.52$
D. Special Collections for Temporary Service* (per pick-up)
Garbage Cans, bundles or wheeled containers 7.71$ 7.99$ 8.28$ 8.58$
1 cubic Yard detachable container 20.09$ 20.81$ 21.56$ 22.34$
1.5 cubic yard detachable container 23.30$ 24.14$ 25.01$ 25.91$
2 cubic Yard detachable container 31.44$ 32.57$ 33.74$ 34.95$
3 cubic yard detachable container 42.08$ 43.59$ 45.16$ 46.79$
4 cubic yard detachable container 49.45$ 51.23$ 53.07$ 54.98$
6 cubic yard detachable container 59.78$ 61.93$ 64.16$ 66.47$
8 cubic yard detachable container 76.40$ 79.15$ 82.00$ 84.95$
3 yard compactor 94.51$ 97.91$ 101.43$ 105.08$
4 yard compactor 114.37$ 118.49$ 122.76$ 127.18$
6 yard compactor 153.02$ 158.53$ 164.24$ 170.15$
10 cubic yard detachable container + dump fees 80.01$ 82.89$ 85.87$ 88.96$
20 cubic yard detachable container + dump fees 80.01$ 82.89$ 85.87$ 88.96$
2 of 4
*Temporary Service is any commercial service account set up for less than 90 days.
CITY OF ARLINGTON
Attachment B
Commercial Rates
CITY OF ARLINGTON
Attachment B
TOTAL 2010 2011 2012
SERVICE CURRENT Total Total Total
CLASS RATE SERVICE FEE SERVICE FEE SERVICE FEE
E. Extra Charges
Carry out over 5' under 25'0.12$ 0.12$ 0.12$ 0.12$
Carry out each additional 25'0.12$ 0.12$ 0.12$ 0.12$
Stairs & Steps each up or down 0.05$ 0.05$ 0.05$ 0.05$
Overhead Obstructions less than 8' from ground 0.10$ 0.10$ 0.10$ 0.10$
Sunken or Elevated Can above or under 4'0.10$ 0.10$ 0.10$ 0.10$
Drive-Ins on private roads or driveways over 125'0.59$ 0.61$ 0.63$ 0.65$
Extra Can/Bag 2.68$ 2.78$ 2.88$ 2.98$
Extra Yard 15.18$ 15.73$ 16.30$ 16.89$
Container Exchange 11.66$ 12.08$ 12.51$ 12.96$
Return Trip 2.55$ 2.64$ 2.74$ 2.84$
Lock Deposit 11.33$ 11.74$ 12.16$ 12.60$
Time Charge 1.81$ 1.88$ 1.95$ 2.02$
Delivery Drop Box 35.88$ 37.17$ 38.51$ 39.90$
Deliver Can/ Cart 11.64$ 12.06$ 12.49$ 12.94$
F. Commercial Recycling per pick-up
(Contractor furnished detachable container for recyclables)
2-96 gal provided at no cost -$ -$ -$ -$
64 gal cart 2.68$ 2.78$ 2.88$ 2.98$
90 gal cart 3.59$ 3.72$ 3.85$ 3.99$
1 yard container 8.64$ 8.95$ 9.27$ 9.60$
2 yard container 13.39$ 13.87$ 14.37$ 14.89$
3 yard container 18.42$ 19.08$ 19.77$ 20.48$
4 yard container 21.55$ 22.33$ 23.13$ 23.96$
6 yard container 25.36$ 26.27$ 27.22$ 28.20$
8 yard container 30.62$ 31.72$ 32.86$ 34.04$
3 of 4
Commercial Rates
TOTAL 2010 2011 2012
SERVICE CURRENT Total Total Total
CLASS RATE SERVICE FEE SERVICE FEE SERVICE FEE
Percentage Increase 3.60%3.60%3.60%
A. Drop Box Garbage Collection *
10 yard per pick-up 77.76$ 80.56$ 83.46$ 86.46$
15 yard per pick-up 77.76$ 80.56$ 83.46$ 86.46$
20 yard per pick-up 77.76$ 80.56$ 83.46$ 86.46$
25 yard per pick-up 77.76$ 80.56$ 83.46$ 86.46$
30 yard per pick-up 77.76$ 80.56$ 83.46$ 86.46$
40 yard per pick-up 77.76$ 80.56$ 83.46$ 86.46$
B. Drop Box Container Monthly Rent
10 yard 41.85$ 43.36$ 44.92$ 46.54$
15 yard 41.85$ 43.36$ 44.92$ 46.54$
20 yard 41.85$ 43.36$ 44.92$ 46.54$
25 yard 49.48$ 51.26$ 53.11$ 55.02$
30 yard 57.10$ 59.16$ 61.29$ 63.50$
40 yard 63.45$ 65.73$ 68.10$ 70.55$
C. Compactor Garbage Collection *
10 yard Compactor Haul 115.47$ 119.63$ 123.94$ 128.40$
15 yard Compactor Haul 115.47$ 119.63$ 123.94$ 128.40$
20 yard Compactor Haul 115.47$ 119.63$ 123.94$ 128.40$
25 yard Compactor Haul 115.47$ 119.63$ 123.94$ 128.40$
30 yard Compactor Haul 115.47$ 119.63$ 123.94$ 128.40$
35 yard Compactor Haul 115.47$ 119.63$ 123.94$ 128.40$
40 yard Compactor Haul 115.47$ 119.63$ 123.94$ 128.40$
4 of 4
* 15% Markup on disposal pass through charges $105 x 1.15% = $120.75
CITY OF ARLINGTON
Attachment B
Roll Off Rates
City of Arlington
Council Agenda Bill
AGENDA ITEM:
New Business #2
ATTACHMENT C
COUNCIL MEETING DATE:
January 18 , 2011
SUBJECT: Security System Upgrade for
Water-Wastewater Treatment Plants
DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN:
Public Works – Utilities Division
James Kelly
ATTACHMENTS:
Proposal from Simplex Grennel for security system
EXPENDITURES REQUESTED: $ 57,036.00
BUDGET CATEGORY: Water CIP Find (405)
WWTP Fund (408)
LEGAL REVIEW: Pending final review by City Attorney
DESCRIPTION – Proposal for installing a security system at the Utility Plant and at the PW
Utility Administration Building.
HISTORY: – This document recommended security improvements at the water treatment plant
that have yet been initiated; these improvements include building alarms and video monitoring.
With the recent upgrades to the wastewater treatment system, it is recommended that we
proceed with the improvements at this time.
Three firms were requested to provide proposals to provide security system that included a
multi-phased IP security camera system and building alarm system. Two firms included with
their cost a reoccurring monthly management fee, one firm designed a system that would be
connected to the WWTP SCADA system (and City’s internet) with no reoccurring monthly
management fee.
ALTERNATIVES:
Do not install a security system
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to authorize staff to prepare contracts for the proposed Simplex Grennel security system
and authorize the Mayor to sign the contract, pending final review by City Attorney.
City of Arlington
Council Agenda Bill
AGENDA ITEM:
New Business #3
ATTACHMENT D
COUNCIL MEETING DATE:
January 18, 2011
SUBJECT:
Gifford Sidewalk Project Construction
Acceptance Letter
DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN:
Public Works – James Kelly
ATTACHMENTS:
• Construction Acceptance Letter
EXPENDITURES REQUESTED: ARRA Grant $92,000.00
Transportation Funds $20,566.58
BUDGET CATEGORY: Transportation Improvement
LEGAL REVIEW: N/A
DESCRIPTION: R Custom Excavation has completed the Gifford Sidewalk Project, attached are
copies of final acceptance paperwork.
HISTORY: On February 11, 2010 R Custom Excavation of Port Orchard was awarded the
Gifford Sidewalk Project with a bid in the amount of $97,757.32. This project was originally
funded with a $92,000.00 ARRA Grant and Traffic Mitigation monies. The project
consisted of the installation of approximately 1600 linear feet of sidewalks, curb, gutter,
ADA ramps, driveways, surface restoration and other required items to make this
project complete. The project has been completed to the terms of the contract and to the
satisfaction of the City. A summary of the construction costs is as follows:
Engineer’s Estimate $ 113,730.00
Final Construction Cost $ 112,566.58
ALTERNATIVES:
• Remand to staff for additional information
• Table pending further discussion
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to authorize the Mayor to sign the Construction Acceptance Letter for the Gifford
Sidewalk Project.
City of Arlington
Council Agenda Bill
City of Arlington
Council Agenda Bill
AGENDA ITEM:
New Business #4
ATTACHMENT E
COUNCIL MEETING DATE:
January 18, 2011
SUBJECT:
West Arlington Sub Area Plan - 2010
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN:
Community Development – David Kuhl, Todd Hall
ATTACHMENTS:
1. City Council Workshop Memo, Final Draft West Arlington Sub Area Plan
2. January 18, 2011 Final Draft West Arlington Sub Area Plan
3. Comp Plan text amendment for Chapter 12 – Related Plans Adopted by Reference
4. Handouts for Power Point Presentation
EXPENDITURES REQUESTED: -0-
BUDGET CATEGORY: N/A
LEGAL REVIEW:
Ordinance has been reviewed by City Attorney
DESCRIPTION: City-initiated adoption of the West Arlington Sub Area Plan as an amendment
to the City of Arlington Comprehensive Plan. This project is within the 2010 City of Arlington
Comprehensive Plan Update docket cycle. The Sub Area Plan will guide future growth and
development in the western region of the City of Arlington. Specific goals are outlined in the
document, including but not limited to housing, commercial development, transportation,
public spaces, building types, and building placement. Brief discussion is included regarding
future implementation of a form-based code and transfer of development rights program.
HISTORY: The process to develop the West Arlington Sub Area Plan began in the summer of
2009. Open houses were held on October 20, 2009, May 20, 2010, and October 7, 2010. Each
meeting gave the public the opportunity to express their thoughts, ideas, and concerns for the
future growth and redevelopment of the sub area. Staff presented a draft plan at the October 7,
2010 public meeting, as well as at the November 2, 2010 Planning Commission meeting and
December 13, 2010 City Council workshop. The Final Draft was presented in front of the
Planning Commission at a public hearing on January 4th, 2011. The Planning Commission
recommended that the City Council review and approve the Sub Area Plan at the public hearing
on January 18, 2011.
ALTERNATIVES:
None.
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Move to approve the Final Draft West Arlington Sub Area Plan as presented by Community
Development staff and recommended for approval by the Planning Commission.
PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT
To: Arlington City Council
From: David Kuhl, AICP, Community Development Director
Todd Hall, Associate Planner
Hearing Date: January 18, 2011
Project: West Arlington Sub Area Plan, 2010 Comprehensive Plan Amendment
(PLN20100002)
A. INTRODUCTION
The West Arlington Sub Area Plan is a City-initiated project that is an amendment to the City of
Arlington Comprehensive Plan. The Plan is submitted under the 2010 Comprehensive Update
docket cycle. The Sub Area Plan will guide future growth and development in the western region of
the City of Arlington.
B. GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant/Owner: City of Arlington, 238 N. Olympic Ave., Arlington, WA 98223
Contact: David Kuhl, AICP, Community Development Director
Todd Hall, Associate Planner
General Location: City of Arlington, West Arlington Sub Area, neighborhoods of Smokey
Point, West Bluff and Island Crossing
Project Description: 2010 Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Requested Action: Hold public hearing and make a motion to adopt the West Arlington Sub
Area Plan, 2010 Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Review Process: See Title 20 – Land Use Code of AMC, Chapter 20.96 Amendments
Exhibits: 1. Draft West Arlington Sub Area Plan
2. Draft Comprehensive Plan Amendment: Chapter 12 – Other Related
Plans Adopted by Reference
C. DETALIED PROJECT INFORMATION
The Final Draft West Arlington Sub Area Plan is an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. The
development of the Plan has been an ongoing effort since 2009, involving City Council, Planning
Community Development
Planning Division
PLN20100002, West Arlington Sub Area Plan,
2010 Comprehensive Plan Amendment
January 18, 2011 2
Commission, stakeholders, business owners, local groups and organizations, and the citizens of
Arlington. The Plan will guide the future growth and development of the Smokey Point, West Bluff
and Island Crossing neighborhoods. There are a number of goals and recommendations outlined in
the document. In addition, a brief discussion regarding the future implementation of a form-based
code (FBC) and transfer of development rights (TDR) program is included. The FBC and TDR
programs will be developed in the next phase of the West Arlington Sub Area planning process.
The following is a brief discussion regarding the two elements as part of this Comprehensive Plan
amendment package.
1. West Arlington Sub Area Plan
The West Arlington Sub Area Plan outlines a number of goals and recommendations that
will guide development in the sub area. Focus areas include transportation, housing,
commercial development, public spaces, building types, building placement, civil services,
parks and natural environment.
The Sub Area planning process began in the summer of 2009. Three public open houses
were held during the process and gave the public the opportunity to express their thoughts,
ideas, and concerns for the future growth and redevelopment of the sub area.
2. Chapter 12 – Other Related Plans Adopted by Reference
A new subsection (12.11) of Chapter 12 of the Arlington Comprehensive Plan is being
amended to include discussion of the West Arlington Sub Area Plan. Chapter 12 discusses
the independent documents that are adopted by reference in the Comprehensive Plan.
Subsection 12.11 is a brief paragraph describing the Sub Area Plan and its purpose.
D. REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS
1. SEPA COMPLIANCE:
The amendment of a comprehensive plan is subject to provisions of the State
Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and Chapter 20.98 of the Arlington Municipal Code
(AMC). The City’s SEPA official has determined that the 2010 Comprehensive Plan
Amendments will not have a probable adverse impact on the environment. Therefore, an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) was not required.
On October 28, 2010, a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) was issued for the West
Arlington Sub Area Plan, 2010 Comprehensive Plan Amendment (PLN20100002). No
comments were received on the DNS.
2. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION/INVOVEVMENT:
a. Presentations and/or updates to the Planning Commission on September 20,
2009, February 18, 2010, October 19, 2010 and November 2, 2010.
b. Three public open houses were held at the Stillaguamish Senior Center on
PLN20100002, West Arlington Sub Area Plan,
2010 Comprehensive Plan Amendment
January 18, 2011 3
the following dates: October 20, 2009, May 20, 2010, and October 7, 2010.
c. The City presented information and advertised the open houses regarding
the West Arlington Sub Area Plan in the Arlington Times and Everett Herald.
d. A Notice of Public Hearing for the January 4, 2011 Planning Commission and January
18, 2011 meeting was posted at the Arlington and Smokey Point Post Offices, the
Arlington Library and City Hall. The Notice was also published in the Everett Herald
and Arlington Times.
3. WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE NOTIFICATION:
On October 21, 2010, the 2010 West Arlington Sub Area Plan Comprehensive Plan
Amendment was submitted to the Washington State Department of Commerce (DOC),
Material ID #16275 and the DOC notified the City that it was in procedural compliance
with RCW 36.70A.106.
4. GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT:
In accordance with RCW 36.70A.130, a city may revise its comprehensive plan, if
needed, on a yearly basis. This amendment is in accordance with this provision.
E. BACKGROUND INFORMATION
1. The City’s comprehensive plan was adopted on December 5, 2005 with
amendments approved on an annual basis since this time, the most recent of which
were approved in April 2009. The two Comprehensive Plan amendments received for
the 2010 docket were the West Arlington Sub Area Plan amendment and the Economic
Development Plan, which is still under development and pending DOC review.
F. ANALYSIS
1. The proposed changes to the Comprehensive Plan adds the West Arlington Sub Area
Plan as a document adopted by reference. A new subsection in Chapter 12 – Other
Related Plans Adopted by Reference, has been amended. The Economic Development
Plan amendment is under development and will be heard later by Planning Commission
after DOC review. No other substantive changes to the Comprehensive Plan are
proposed as part of this amendment process.
G. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
1. The call for 2010 Comprehensive Plan amendments was conducted in January 2010. An
application for the West Arlington Sub Area Plan amendment was submitted and
accepted on January 25, 2010.
PLN20100002, West Arlington Sub Area Plan,
2010 Comprehensive Plan Amendment
January 18, 2011 4
2. Two amendments were submitted for the 2010 docket cycle, including the West
Arlington Sub Area Plan (PLN20100002). The other proposed amendment is the
Economic Development Plan (PLN20100001), which is scheduled to be adopted as part
of the Comprehensive Plan in the spring 2011.
3. Public meetings were held on October 20, 2009, May 20, 2010, and October 7, 2010.
4. A Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) for PLN20100002 was issued on October 28,
2010. No comments were received.
5. The draft West Arlington Sub Area Plan and proposed amendments to Chapter 12 were
submitted to the DOC in accordance with RCW 36.70A.106 and the submittal met all
DOC’s procedural requirements.
6. On November 2, 2010, the Planning Commission reviewed a draft of the West Arlington
Sub Area Plan at their regular meeting.
7. On December 13, 2010, the City Council reviewed a draft of the West Arlington Sub Area
Plan.
8. Notice of public hearings were published in the December 20, 2010 Everett Herald and
the December 22, 2010 Arlington Times for the January 4, 2011 Planning Commission
public hearing and the January 18, 2011 City Council public hearing.
9. On December 17, 2010, a Notice of Public Hearing for the January 4, 2011 Planning
Commission public hearing and the January 18, 2011 City Council public hearing was
posted at Arlington City Hall, Arlington Post Office, Smokey Point Post Office and the
Arlington Public Library.
10. The application for PLN20100002 has been reviewed for consistency with the Arlington
Comprehensive Plan and for internal consistency and the 2010 Comprehensive Plan
amendments are consistent with, and internally consistent with, the Arlington
Comprehensive Plan.
11. PLN20100002 has been reviewed in accordance with, and is consistent with, the
Snohomish County Countywide Planning Policies.
12. The proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments were prepared in accordance with the
Washington State Enabling Legislation (RCW 35A.63) and the Growth Management Act.
13. Documentation supporting the findings of fact is located in the file PLN20100002, which
is adopted by reference into this approval.
14. Adoption of the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments, PLN20100002, furthers
the public health, safety and general welfare.
H. RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Arlington City Council hold a public hearing and make a motion
to adopt the West Arlington Sub Area Plan, 2010 Comprehensive Plan Amendment,
PLN20100002.
City of Arlington
West Arlington Sub Area Plan
January 18, 2011
West Arlington Sub Area Plan
Page | 2
This page intentionally left blank.
West Arlington Sub Area Plan
Page | 3
Table of Contents
Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………. 5
Purpose and Intent…………………………………………………………………………. 5
Sub Area Overview…….………………………………………………………….……… . 5
Brief History………………………………………….………………………………………… .6
General Vision……………………………………….……………………………………….… 7
Planning Issues and Constraints………………………………………………………….….... 7
Existing Conditions…………………………..………………………………………………… 7
The Private Realm………………………………………………………………………… 7
Land Uses……………………………………………………………………....... 7
Housing Characteristics……………………………………………………………. 8
Non-Residential Building Characteristics…………………………………………... 12
Signage……………………………………………………………………......... 12
The Public Realm………………………………………………………………………… 13
Thoroughfares……………………………………………………………….…… 13
Block Characteristics & Connectivity………………………………………………. 13
Transit Facilities………………………………………………………………….. 14
Bicycle Networks…………………………………………………………………. 14
Pedestrian Network ………………………………………………………………. 14
Utility Services……………………………………………………………………. 14
Civil Services……………………………………………………………………………… 15
Parks……………………………………………………………………………... 15
Police & Fire……………………………………………………………………… 15
Education………………………………………………………………………… 15
Other…………………………………………………………………………….. 15
Natural Environment……………………………………………………………………… 15
Topography………………………………………………………………………. 15
Soils……………………………………………………………………………… 15
Critical Areas…………………………………………………………………….. 16
Vegetation………………………………………………………………………... 16
Natural Hazards…………………………………………………………………… 16
Climate…………………………………………………………………………… 16
Sub Area Recommendations………………………………………………………………….. 17
Guiding Principles…………………………………………………………………………….. 17
Principles of New Urbanism……………………………………………………………….. 17
Form Based Codes………………………………………………………………………… 18
Public Realm Recommendations……………………………………………………………… 19
Rights-of-Way……………………………………………………………………………. 19
Thoroughfares……………………………………………………………………. 19
Block Standards & Intersection Spacing…………………………………………….. 19
Vehicular Travel Lanes……………………………………………………………. 20
Vehicular Parking Lanes…………………………………………………………… 20
West Arlington Sub Area Plan
Page | 4
Bicycle Lanes……………………………………………………………………… 20
Curb Type………………………………………………………………………... 20
Park Strips & Center Medians……………………………………………………… 21
Landscaping………………………………………………………………………. 21
Pedestrian Walkways & Crossings………………………………………………….. 21
Curb Ramps………………………………………………………………………. 22
Traffic Calming…………………………………………………………………… 22
Utility Services……………………………………………………………………. 22
Right-Of-Way Illumination………………………………………………………... 22
Gateways…………………………………………………………………………. 23
Signs……………………………………………………………………………… 23
Civic Spaces………………………………………………………………………………. 23
Open Spaces……………………………………………………………………… 23
Location, Size & Spatial Definition…………………………………………………. 23
Private Realm Recommendations…………………………………………………………….. 24
Regulating Plan…………………………………………………………………………… 24
The Rural to Urban Hierarchy…………………………………………………….. 24
General Building Form……………………………………………………………………. 25
Density…………………………………………………………………………… 25
Arrangement……………………………………………………………… 25
Calculation……………………………………………………………….. 25
Lot Configuration…………………………………………………………………. 25
Shape…………………………………………………………………….. 25
Dimensions………………………………………………………………. 26
Bulding Placement………………………………………………………………… 26
Disposition……………………………………………………………….. 26
Orientation & Spatial Arrangement………………………………………… 26
Building Types……………………………………………………………………. 26
Land Use Types…………………………………………………………………… 27
Specific Building Form…………………………………………………………….. 27
Building Height…………………………………………………………… 27
Ground-Floor Finished Level Height……………………………………….. 28
Minimum Ground-Floor Ceiling Height……………………………………. 28
Ancillary Buildings………………………………………………………… 28
Frontage Types……………………………………………………………. 28
Architecture………………………………………………………………………………. 29
Parking…………………………………………………………………………………… 29
Location………………………………………………………………………….. 29
Required Spaces…………………………………………………………………... 30
Paving Material…………………………………………………………………… 30
TDRs…………………………………………………………………………………….. 30
Implementation………………………………………………………………………………... 32
Attachments …………………………………………………………………………………… 33
West Arlington Sub Area Plan
Page | 5
Introduction
PURPOSE & INTENT
Creation of a sub area plan for the western region of the city will provide an organized blueprint for future
urban growth and development. This is needed to correct the discontinuity of land uses and lack of
transportation connectivity that was inherited with recent annexations. In 2009, the City Council named
the Smokey Point/Island Crossing corridor as a top priority for planning.
Long-range planning for this area is intended to help ensure that quality urban design and a unique “sense of
place” is established for each neighborhood within the sub area. It is critical that residents and other
stakeholders are involved in the planning process to help foster civic pride and community.
SUB AREA OVERVIEW
The West Arlington Sub Area encompasses three neighborhoods: Smokey Point, West Bluff, and Island
Crossing. Sub area planning is typically done at the neighborhood level, but the objective here is to
coordinate development as it occurs in the western region of the city.
The West Arlington Sub Area Plan derives its name from its relative geographical position within the city
and will not replace existing neighborhood names. It is generally bounded by Interstate 5 to the west, the
Arlington Municipal Airport to the east, and city limits to the north and south (see Attachment 1.0).
Approximately 1,005 acres (1.57mi2), or about 17% of the current land area within city limits, is included
in the sub area. The Smokey Point neighborhood covers 796 acres, while West Bluff and Island Crossing
cover 85.5 and 123.6 acres respectively (see Attachment 2.0).
Land uses include a segregated mix of agriculture, commercial, and residential. Most of the area is zoned
for highway commercial and moderate residential density. Recreational open space is limited to York Park,
and a few small privately owned parks (e.g. Hero Park) although the Arlington Municipal Airport is just to
the east of the sub area and has public walking trails. Critical areas located within Island Crossing include
wetlands and floodplain and in West Bluff, steep slopes along the eastern periphery.
Much of the transportation infrastructure is not up to urban standards. Road sections that are up to standard
are fragmented as well as inconsistent in terms of streetscape design (see Attachment 3.0). Consequently,
the pedestrian realm is unsafe and not conducive to foot or bicycle traffic. Smokey Point Boulevard serves as
the only major north/south thoroughfare, while SR 531 (172nd St. NE) is the only major east/west
thoroughfare. Interstate 5, though, runs along the western boundary.
An estimated 3,773 people reside in the sub area—an average density of 3.75 people per acre. The Smokey
Point neighborhood has an estimated population of 3,675, West Bluff 84 people and Island Crossing 14
people (based on an average of 2.72 people per household).
West Arlington Sub Area Plan
Page | 6
Brief History
The City of Arlington is situated at the forks of the Stillaguamish River. Coast Salish people from pre-
historic times, primarily of the Stillaguamish Tribe, stopped to camp at the forks as they passed up and
down the river following the abundant fish runs and otherwise using the river as a primary travel corridor.
The Stillaguamish called the place Skabalko.
Exploration of the future Arlington area by setters of European descent began around 1851 with a
prospector visit followed in 1856 by a U.S. Army trail from present day Snohomish crossing the river just
below the forks. A rough wagon road closely following the old trail brought pioneers coming from the
Marysville area in the mid-1880s; others came by canoe. A store was opened at the forks in the spring of
1887 by Nels K. Tvete and Nils C. Johnson. The White House Hotel owned by loggers Lee Rogers and Al
Dinsmore opened about 4 months later.
In the spring of 1890, two rival towns were actually platted within one month of each other in what is
present-day Arlington. Arlington was platted in March of that year and Haller City in April. Haller City,
including the store and hotel, was located on the riverbank with Arlington on higher ground to the south.
It was Haller City which contained the much of City’s present-day shoreline areas since it was located along
the river with Arlington farther inland.
Rivalry between the two towns continued for a several years, with Arlington apparently having a distinct
advantage with respect to the location of a critical railroad depot. Haller City’s location along the river
bank was not as suitable for a depot, so it was built on higher ground farther from the river, in Arlington.
By year’s end, Arlington also had an express office, a warehouse, telegraph, and a post office while Haller
City had a blacksmith, hay dealers, shoemakers, stage line, meat market, livery, hotel, and vet surgeon. By
1895, however, a number of businessmen in Haller City conceded that it would be better to be up in
Arlington. Leading were Tvete and Johnson who moved their original general store by ox team up to a lot
on 4th Street in Arlington, and others followed. Eventually, all that was left in Haller City were the
shingles mills and housing.
The two towns were incorporated into one in 1903 (taking the name of Arlington), with Division Street
serving as a reminder that there were once two towns.
The community of Smokey Point itself got its name back in the 1950s from a restaurant named the Smokey
Point Café. Located on the northwest corner of 172nd Street NE and Smokey Point Boulevard/SR 531, the
café generated a plume of smoke, hence the name Smokey Point.
Controversy erupted in the 1990s regarding annexation of the area by and between the neighboring
communities of Arlington, Lakewood and Marysville. Despite the community’s strong desire to remain
intact with one municipality, or as a newly established municipality (called Smokey Point-Lakewood), the
Snohomish County Council ended up splitting the community between the cities of Arlington and
Marysville (with their control of urban growth boundary placement), assigning Arlington the north and east
portions and Marysville the south and west portions of the Smokey Point-Lakewood community. Arlington
and Marysville proceeded with annexation of their assigned areas in 1999 and 2005 respectively.
West Arlington Sub Area Plan
Page | 7
General Vision
The general vision for the sub area proposes that emphasis be given to the human element of place—that
close attention be given to the physical development and design of the human habitat within the sub area. By
giving attention to the physical form of the sub area, we can better ensure that the neighborhoods become
more desirable and livable places that are in harmony with the natural environment. Qualitative and
quantitative improvements are needed in both the public and private realms to achieve this. As a result,
each neighborhood should develop a distinguished character—focused around their unique topographic
features—to enhance local identity and encourage civic pride. Planning Issues & Constraints
Planning issues include deciding how to:
Improve transportation connectivity while taking into consideration existing development and
critical areas as well as traffic concerns by local residents
Find funding to bring sub-urban roads up to urban standard
Increase pedestrian safety
Acquire easements for public trails
Acquire more public space (i.e. parks)
Transition from Euclidean Zoning to Form-Based Codes
Mix land uses while preventing nuisances
Get the public involved and informed
Develop Island Crossing while protecting critical areas
Repair sprawl type development
Redevelop certain areas
Establish the sub area as a TDR receiving area
Improve civic services
The planning area lies entirely within the City’s Airport Protection District which will influence land use
and development patterns. The airport staff needs to be informed and involved in the planning process to
work out concerns and issues that they may have with regards to proposed changes in land use and
development. As development and redevelopment within the sub area occurs, proposed uses within the
Airport Protection District shall be compatible with the airport and its operations.
Existing critical areas will also affect development patterns, particularly in the Island Crossing
Neighborhood. Existing Conditions
THE PRIVATE REALM
Land Uses
West Arlington Sub Area Plan
Page | 8
The Smokey Point and Island Crossing neighborhoods serve as gateways to the City of Arlington from
Interstate 5. Annexation of the sub area occurred in 1999 (Smokey Point), 2008 (West Bluff), and 2009
(Island Crossing). Consequently, much of the development in the sub area occurred when the area was
under Snohomish County’s jurisdiction.
The prevailing development pattern in the area is suburban sprawl with auto-scale/oriented and service
type businesses being fairly predominant. Land uses are mostly commercial and residential in nature,
although professional services are available (see Attachments 4.0 and 5.0).
Vacant properties total 271 acres, while underdeveloped parcels total 154 acres (see Attachment 6.0). This
leaves the potential for the development of an estimated 442 dwelling units (mostly single family) and
3,472,323 square feet of commercial space under current zoning regulations. These numbers, though, do
not reflect the potential for redevelopment in the Smokey Point neighborhood or development restrictions
that will exist in Island Crossing.
Housing Characteristics
Prior to the mid 20th century, few homes existed here. In the 1960s, subdivisions began to convert
agricultural and forest lands into housing tracts and significant growth followed. Today the area is
comprised of a mix of housing types: detached single-unit homes (including manufactured homes),
duplexes, townhomes, and apartment buildings.
Figure 1. Median Year of Built Dwelling Units
In the Smokey Point (SP) neighborhood, there are 1,351 dwelling units (du) (as of 2010). Fifty-four
percent of those units are detached single family houses, 8% are manufactured houses, 20% are duplexes &
townhomes, and 15% are apartments (see Figures 2-5).
The West Bluff (WB) neighborhood has 31 dwelling units. Sixty percent are detached single family houses,
20% are manufactured houses and 20% are duplexes (see Figures 2-5).
Island Crossing (IC) has five dwelling units, 80% being detached single-family houses and 20%
manufactured (see Figures 2-4).
West Arlington Sub Area Plan
Page | 9
Figure 2. Number of Dwelling Units By Figure 3. Number of Single-Family Detached
Neighborhood Dwelling Units
Figure 4: Number of Single-Family Manufactured Figure 5: Number of Duplexes
Units
Most homes in the area fall under the architectural classification of modern post-war suburban. This
architectural type is simplistic because the early modernist movement in architecture drew its inspiration
from futuristic, not past, ideals. The most common post-war suburban housing types in the area are the
ranch styled rambler (see Figure 6), the split entry (see Figure 7), and the tri-level (see Figure 8). Post-war
suburban housing subdivisions were designed to mimic the romanticized countryside with its low density
and windy rural highways. Consequently, many of the area homes have deep setbacks and sit on relatively
large lots that abut curvilinear roads that are absent of sidewalks (see Figure 9). By the 1990s, garages
became the dominant feature of the front façade of many of the homes that were built (see Figure 10).
West Arlington Sub Area Plan
Page | 10
Figure 6: Ranch Style Rambler Figure 7: Split-Entry House
Figure 8: Tri-Level House
After the turn of the 21st century, two-story craftsman style homes (see Figure 11) were introduced to the
pallet of housing types being built in the area. While garages continued to make up a large portion of the
front façade of homes, entryways on craftsman style homes became more distinguished because of the use of
front porches, portals and porticos.
Figure 9: 1980s Style Rambler with No Sidewalks Figure 10: Garage-dominated House
West Arlington Sub Area Plan
Page | 11
Homeowners in some of the older housing stock (pre-1990s) have converted garages into additional living
space or have added-on to adjust for changing household needs. Older home sites (pre 1980) are beginning
to experience a valuation shift, where the lots these homes sit on are becoming worth more than the house
itself.
Figure 11: Two-story Craftsman Style House
According to 2010 tax assessment records, the average value of a dwelling unit was $188,056 in Smokey
Point, $280, 977 in West Bluff and $217,780 in Island Crossing. Smokey Point’s mean dwelling unit value
is likely lowest because of its greater diversity of housing stock which includes affordable housing options
like apartments and manufactured homes. West Bluff’s high average value is influenced by the fact that
many homes here are situated on large lots and have an underlying zoning classification of Highway
Commercial. Assessed values are broken down according to housing type (see Figures 12-15).
Figure 12: Average Assessed Value per Dwelling Figure 13: Average Assessed Value per Single-
Unit Family Detached Unit
West Arlington Sub Area Plan
Page | 12
Figure 14: Average Assessed Value per Townhouse Figure 15: Average Assessed Value per Single-
Family Manufactured Unit
Non-Residential Building Characteristics
Much of the non-residential building stock was built toward the latter end of the last century in the form of
strip malls, storage facilities and stand alone buildings spaced relatively far from each other and on large
lots. These buildings generally don’t follow after any particular architectural style and are relatively simple
in terms of architectural design and massing. Some of the strip malls have a gallery or shop-front type façade
(see Figures 16 and 17). Most of the non-residential buildings are single story although those buildings
containing office uses are multi-story. The tallest building is the Medallion Hotel which is four stories high.
Figure 16: Typical 1970s Strip Mall Figure 17: Typical 1980s Strip Mall
Signage
Stand-alone signs advertising for businesses are typically monument signs (see Figure 18) and internally lit.
Sandwich boards and off-site signs frequently line sidewalks and park-strips (see Figure 19).
West Arlington Sub Area Plan
Page | 13
Figure 18: Internally-lit Monument Sign Figure 19: Sandwich Board Sign THE PUBLIC REALM
Thoroughfares
Two major thoroughfares bisect the sub area—Smokey Point Boulevard and SR 531 (172nd St. NE).
Interstate 5 borders the area on the western periphery. Smokey Point Boulevard begins to the south as a
five lane arterial with sidewalks that immediately abut traffic lanes. Past 174th Place NE, the boulevard
narrows to 2 lanes with gravel shoulders until it ends at Highway 530 to the north. SR 531, identified as a
Project of Regional Significance by the Washington Transportation Commission between 43rd Ave NE and
SR 9, is also a wide arterial with sidewalks that immediately abut travel lanes until it crosses 43rd Ave NE
where it narrows to two lanes with paved shoulders. The State DOT has jurisdiction over this road and has
plans to make improvements as soon as funding becomes available. When the City’s population reaches
25,000, SR 530 will become our responsibility.
As mentioned before, 65% of the roads within the subarea are below urban standards. This means that
many of the roads lack sidewalks and park-strips in addition to curbs and gutters. Residential subdivisions
built prior to the 1980s have streets that are substandard.
In most of the old neighborhoods, road drainage occurs in adjacent open swales. Many of these swales have
been filled in by property owners, disrupting the flow of storm water runoff.
West Arlington Sub Area Plan
Page | 14
Block Characteristics & Connectivity
Growth in the area has occurred organically, resulting in a curvilinear network of meandering streets
dominated by cul-de-sacs. The result is a high level of neighborhood fragmentation. The sub area’s
connectivity index is at 0.88 on a scale of 0-2.5, with 2.5 being the highest level of connectivity.
Transit Facilities
Community Transit serves the Smokey Point neighborhood but currently does not have stops in West Bluff
or Island Crossing (see Attachment 7.0). Routes through Smokey Point include 201/202 which run from
Smokey Point to Lynnwood; 227, which runs from Arlington Park & Ride to Smokey Point and on to
Boeing in Everett; 230 that Runs from Smokey Point to Darrington; and the 240 which runs from
Stanwood to Arlington.
Bicycle Networks
Designated bike lanes exist along two fragmented segments. The first segment runs along SR 531 from the
I-5 interchange to the 4000 block. The second segment exists along Smokey Point Boulevard in front of the
Stillaguamish Senior Center. A trail conducive for pedestrians and cyclists will be built in conjunction with
the new 173rd Place connector street (1/2 mi. in length).
Pedestrian Network
The network of sidewalks is highly fragmented (see Attachment 8.0). Sidewalk width is typically no greater
than 5 feet. On major arterials (SR 531 and SPB) and on neighborhood streets built in the 1990s, sidewalks
are immediately adjacent to travel lanes, while roads built or improved under the City’s jurisdiction include
sidewalks separated from travel lanes by 5-foot park-strips. An estimated 39% of total roadway length in
the sub area is accompanied by sidewalks.
Utility Services
Water and sewer services are split between Marysville and Arlington. Generally, the City of Marysville
provides sewer and water service in the Smokey Point neighborhood south of 180th Street and west of 43rd
and 51st Avenues, while the rest of the sub area is serviced by the City of Arlington. Some homes still use
septic systems and access water from wells (see Attachment 9.0). Other utility lines, such as power and
telephone, are generally located above ground. Streets are illuminated by suburban “cobra” style lamps.
Stormwater utility services are provided to the entire subarea by the City of Arlington. Virtually the entire
area is underlain by soils conducive to infiltration. However, many parts of Smokey Point have a shallow
depth to groundwater. In addition, most of the subarea was constructed years before annexation into the
city, so the stormwater inventory is limited and infrastructure may not be fully understood. Many
stormwater facilities do not meet current engineering standards, or have exceeded their design life, or have
been under-maintained. Finally, Heyho Creek, draining Smokey Point to the south, and Portage Creek,
draining Island Crossing to the west, are low gradient streams that do not efficiently convey urban
stormwater downstream. Consequently, localized flooding is not uncommon; fortunately, stormwater
concerns can be readily resolved with prudent planning and design.
The 2010 Comprehensive Stormwater Plan identified six capital projects in the subarea focused on
stormwater planning and water quality improvements, including two in Smokey Point proposed for joint
developer/City funding. These include design and construction of regional detention and infiltration
systems that may serve as reduced-cost incentives to developers. The permeable soils also suggest low
impact development (LID) approaches that provide source control and prevent runoff generation would do
West Arlington Sub Area Plan
Page | 15
very well. These practices may include integration of open spaces (e.g., parks, trails, landscaping, reduced
lane widths, medians) into site design, rooftop rainwater capture for irrigation, and dispersion techniques
such as soil preparation, rain gardens, reverse slope sidewalks, “perforated” curbs, permeable pavement,
and on-site infiltration galleries.
CIVIL SERVICES
Parks
The area has one public park—York Park—which is located in Smokey Point. The Arlington Airport,
adjacent to Smokey Point, has public walking trails. Some privately owned and operated parks also exist in
the area (e.g. Hero Park near Lowes).
Police & Fire
Fire and police protection are provided by the City of Arlington. A temporary fire station exists in West
Bluff but the City plans to build a station in the near future.
Education
The Lakewood School District serves the Smokey Point Neighborhood, while Arlington School District
serves West Bluff and Island Crossing. No public schools are located in the sub area.
Other
The Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians has their administrative offices located in the Smokey Point
neighborhood.
NATURAL ENVIRONMENT
Topography
Smokey Point and West Bluff are situated in a flat valley between the Tulalip and Getchell Plateaus. Island
Crossing lies within the Stillaguamish River Valley. Views of the Cascades exist from numerous points
within the area, with Mt. Pilchuck, Three Fingers and Whitehorse being most prominent.
Soils
The Smokey Point Neighborhood primarily consists of Lynnwood loamy sand soil and Custer fine sandy
loam. Small areas of Mukilteo muck and Kitsap silt loam are located in the southeast corner of the
neighborhood. The Lynnwood soil type drains well and is suitable for urban development. The Custer soil
drains poorly and is subject to a high water table during wet months but is still suitable for urban
development. Mukilteo muck is moderately permeable but has a high water table and is subject to standing
water during wet months. This soil type is not suited for urban development. Kitsap soils drain slowly but
can be developable with drainage.
Island Crossing consists of Everett gravelly sandy loam and Alderwood-Everett gravelly sandy loams. The
Everett soil drains very well and is suitable for development. The Alderwood-Everett soil drains quickly but
is not suitable for development because of its steep slopes and the high probability of erosion.
The vast majority of Island Crossing sits atop Puget silty clay loam. This soil type is deep but drains slowly
and is found in flood-plains. Urban development is restricted by high water tables and the possibility of
flooding.
West Arlington Sub Area Plan
Page | 16
Critical Areas
The sub area encompasses portions of the Stillaguamish, Portage Creek, and Quilceda Creek watersheds
(see Attachment 10.0). Wetlands are primarily located within the Island Crossing neighborhood which
includes two waterways—South Slough and Portage Creek. West Bluff, which lies entirely within the
Portage Creek Watershed, is bounded by steep slopes along the eastern border. Critical areas in the
planning area provide habitat for salmon, cutthroat, amphibian, small and large mammals and many
different avian species.
Vegetation
The area was originally covered in evergreen forest before it first cleared for commercial logging and later
for farming and housing tracts. Mature, second growth evergreens (such as cedar and Douglas fir) now exist
scattered mostly throughout the residential areas. Native vegetation includes Douglas fir, Western
Hemlock, Red alder, Black Cottonwood, Big leaf maple. Native shrubs include Vine Maple, Indian Plum,
Service Berry, Oregon grape, Sword Fern and Salal. There are also several locations where native
mushroom species still exist in the forested areas that have recovered from logging activity.
Natural Hazards
Island Crossing is subject to fairly regular flood events from the Stillaguamish River with major flood events
in the last 10 years occurring in 2003, 2006 and January 2009. The eastern edge of West Bluff may become
subject to landslides if the existing steep slopes aren’t managed properly with appropriate setbacks and
vegetation retention. The entire sub area is subject to seismic activity although no known fault lines run
through the immediate area. Liquefaction hazard is highest in the Island Crossing neighborhood.
Climate
The area has a mild, Marine West Coast climate, receiving an average of 37.5 inches of rain annually.
Summer high temperatures peak at an average of 74 degrees and dip to an average low of 34 degrees in
winter (data obtained from www.weather.com).
West Arlington Sub Area Plan
Page | 17
Sub Area Recommendations Guiding Principles
New Urbanism is a planning theory taking hold in municipalities across the United States. This theory
advocates for the return to time-tested methods of good urban design that have generally been disregarded
since the early 20th century (with the advent of Euclidean zoning and the automobile).
R1 Incorporate the principles of New Urbanism into the Sub Area plan.
PRINCIPLES OF NEW URBANISM:
P1 WALKABILITY – Most activities of daily life (e.g. schools, commercial services & employment
opportunities) should exist within a 15-20 minute walk of where people live. Pedestrian comfort
should be ensured by good streetscape design.
P2 CONNECTIVITY – Streets should be interconnected to form a grid network that disperses traffic and
facilitates alternate methods of transportation (like walking, bicycling and transit).
P3 MIXING LAND USES – Compatible land uses should be mixed to ensure a variety of business and
housing types are within close proximity for ease of access.
P4 VARIETY – A wide range of housing types should be encouraged to accommodate market needs.
P5 QUALITY ARCHITECTURE & URBAN DESIGN – Emphasis is placed on aesthetics, human comfort, and
optimal placement of civic spaces.
P6 TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD STRUCTURE – Neighborhoods should have a discernable center and
edge with quality public spaces and art.
P7 COMPACT DESIGN – Buildings should be placed close together to help facilitate human scale and
efficient land use.
P8 SUSTAINABILITY – New development should be compatible with the natural environment and be
encouraged to incorporate eco-friendly design elements.
P9 PRESERVATION – Farmland, open space, and critical areas should be protected, with new
development directed towards already existing communities.
P10 INVOLVEMENT – Community members and stakeholders alike should participate in the planning
process.
West Arlington Sub Area Plan
Page | 18
FORM BASED CODES
A Form-Based Code (FBC) is one of several tools that can be used by local governments to regulate growth
and development. FBCs were first developed and used 30 years ago and have since been adopted by a
growing number of communities throughout the country. Communities that agree with the principles of
New Urbanism often adopt FBCs because they have proven to be effective tool for implementing New
Urbanist principles.
With FBCs, the organizing principle behind development regulation is form, as opposed to land-use (upon
which Euclidean zoning is based). It is important to note that land use is still regulated under FBCs—in
order to prevent the occurrence of nuisances—but land uses are not the primary focus of regulations.
FBCs have five major components: a Regulating Plan (zoning map), Civic Space Standards, Building
Configuration Standards, Building Type Standards, and Architectural Standards. It is important to note that
FBCs can function as a code overlay on the City’s current Land Use Code (LUC). Where FBC and LUC
codes conflicted, the FBC would take precedence.
R1 Adopt and use Form-Based Codes as a tool for regulating development in the sub area.
West Arlington Sub Area Plan
Page | 19
Public Realm Recommendations
The public realm includes all publicly owned and accessible spaces such as street right-of-ways, open spaces
(i.e. parks), and civic buildings. The public realm could also include any place privately owned that is
accessible to the public.
RIGHTS-OF-WAY
Thoroughfares
How streets are designed and laid out impacts a community’s look, feel, and function. Roadway
improvements are needed in the sub area to bring streets up to urban standards (see Existing Conditions
above), improve traffic circulation, and help establish a “unique sense of place.”
R1 Attachment 11.0 shows the recommended Road and Pedestrian Network Plan for the sub area.
o Traffic safety measures should be implemented to improve visibility and turn movements at
35th Ave NE and Smokey Point Boulevard.
o Roundabouts are recommended along 172nd Street NE/SR 531, at 43rd and 51st Avenues, at
the east leg of the “Y” intersection of Smokey Point Blvd. and SR 531, as well as other key
intersections throughout the sub area as shown on the map.
o All improvements to SR 530 and SR531, including roundabouts, shall be coordinated with
the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) and Stillaguamish Tribe
and conform to WSDOT Design Standards.
o If proposed, a new Interstate 5 interchange at 188th Street NE shall require approval by
WSDOT and the Federal Highway Administration. Future design and possible relocation
of the existing I-5 rest area would be conducted during design phases.
R2 New thoroughfare options and standards should be developed that address movement type, design
speed, pedestrian crossing time, ROW width, curb-face to curb-face width, number of traffic
lanes, presence of bicycle lanes, presence of on- street parking, curb type, parkstrips, landscaping,
walkway type, illumination, and curb radius.
R3 Streetscapes should be designed with emphasis placed on pedestrian comfort and safety.
R4 Cul-de-sacs should be prohibited with new development.
R5 Streets associated with new subdivisions should be required to provide access links to neighboring
parcels that are vacant.
R6 The establishment of private roads should be prohibited to ensure that right-of-way design
conforms to City standards.
R7 Gated thoroughfares should be expressly prohibited to allow for connectivity and ease of access for
emergency vehicles.
Block Standards & Intersection Spacing
Block standards are necessary to ensure that high levels of connectivity result with new development in the
area. Higher levels of connectivity will help make all modes of transportation more efficient—conserving
both time and resources. Any new roadway connections with State highways, including SR 530 and SR
531/172nd Street NE shall conform to WSDOT Access Guidelines. New roadway improvements shall
follow recommendations per the SR 531 Corridor Recommendations document from WSDOT.
West Arlington Sub Area Plan
Page | 20
R1 Block standards should be developed in relation to each transect.
R2 A connectivity index standard should be set for all new subdivisions to ensure a grid network and
connectivity to undeveloped parcels.
R3 Intersection spacing should not exceed 495 feet on pedestrian oriented thoroughfares.
Vehicular Travel Lanes
Vehicular lane width influences neighborhood walkability, driver speed, and vehicle accommodation.
R1 Thoroughfare types should be sensitive to this neighborhood walkability, driver speed, and vehicle
accommodation in their design.
R2 Vehicular travel lanes should be narrower on local access streets and wider on major thoroughfares
(arterials).
R3 New vehicular lanes should not be curvilinear in design but may change angle by varying degrees.
This helps ensure good block design and discourages awkward lot shapes.
Vehicular Parking Lanes
On-street parking provides convenience, increased parking availability, and additional buffering between
the pedestrian realm and travel lanes. They can also function as method for traffic calming.
R1 On-street parking should be provided on all non-arterial roads where feasible.
R2 Parking lanes should be relatively narrow on neighborhood streets.
R3 Parking stalls on commercial streets should primarily be diagonal.
Bicycle Lanes
Bicycle lanes help to encourage bicycle use and improve the safety and comfort of both bicyclists and
pedestrians.
R1 Bicycle lanes should be provided on all new or improved streets with a design speed of 30mph or
greater (except where an adjacent paved trail exists or is planned).
R2 Bicycle lanes should be installed on the already improved section of Smokey Point Boulevard
(16400-17400 blocks).
Curb Type
Curbs help physically separate the pedestrian realm from vehicular travel lanes and provide definition to the
roadway.
R1 Vertical curbing should be included with motor-courts (access easements) to provide spatial
definition and discourage encroachment from adjacent properties.
R2 Rolled curbs may be necessary where “neckdowns” occur to accommodate the turning radius of
large vehicles.
R3 Horizontal curbs should be included with rear alleys to provide spatial definition or support
drainage.
West Arlington Sub Area Plan
Page | 21
Park Strips & Center Medians
Park strips provide a buffer between travel lanes and sidewalks—increasing pedestrian comfort and
softening the streetscape.
R1 Parkstrip widths should be increased on new or improved roads from the standard 5 feet to a
minimum 7 feet.
R2 Creative uses for parkstrips, such as gardening, should be allowed in residential neighborhoods.
R3 Parkstrips should be added on the already improved section of Smokey Point Boulevard (16400 -
17400 blocks).
R4 Landscaped center medians should be added to Smokey Point Boulevard and incorporated where
feasible on new streets.
Landscaping
Landscaped parkstrips and roadway medians soften the streetscape and add to the overall quality of a place
by improving air quality, reducing the “heat island” effect, providing water quality treatment, and reducing
the amount of impervious surface.
R1 Landscaping along arterials should be low-maintenance (and native) except for in certain areas the
city may want emphasized.
R2 A single street tree species should be selected for use in parkstrips along Smokey Point Boulevard.
R3 A limited list of approved street trees should be assigned to specific thoroughfare types for aesthetic
uniformity.
Pedestrian Walkways & Crossings
Sidewalk design is important for pedestrian accommodation. Unique design features can also add to a
community’s “unique sense of place.”
R1 Appropriate sidewalk width should be prescribed to each thoroughfare type and associated building
types.
R2 On commercial streets, sidewalk width should be wide enough to not only accommodate
pedestrians but uses from adjacent buildings that may extend out onto the sidewalk (such as an
outdoor café or sidewalk sale).
R3 Sidewalks in the right-of-way should parallel vehicular travel lanes to ensure walking distances are
minimized.
R4 Special design elements, such as stamping and name imprinting, should be considered for
commercial streets.
R5 Street furniture should be included for pedestrian comfort, especially on commercial streets.
R6 The use of sky bridges should be considered on major arterials to increase crossing options and
walkability.
R7 Unique crosswalk designs should be used on all pedestrian street crossings.
West Arlington Sub Area Plan
Page | 22
Curb Ramps
Curb ramps provide access between the sidewalk and the street and are critical for the safety of individuals
with disabilities.
R1 Combined parallel and perpendicular curb ramps should be used instead of diagonal curb ramps so
that drivers can more easily decipher the intended direction of the pedestrian.
R2 Curb extensions should be used on neighborhood and commercial streets to increase pedestrian
visibility and reduce pedestrian crossing times.
Traffic Calming
Traffic calming is necessary to ensure drivers do not speed on roads where safety and high traffic volume are
concerns.
R1 Traffic calming devices should be used in roadway design of local access streets and put in place on
some existing streets in the sub area.
R2 Suggested traffic calming devices for local access streets include: raised crosswalks, textured
surfacing, traffic circles, realigned intersections, neckdowns, center island narrowings, and raised
intersections.
Utility Services
R1 Utility lines above ground on Smokey Point Boulevard should be placed under-ground to help
improve the streets visual appeal.
R2 All future developments should utilize innovative and low-impact designs to manage stormwater in
the area. The use of raingardens should be highly encouraged where groundwater infiltration is
adequate. Additionally, a regional approach for managing stormwater should be evaluated with the
concept of infiltration to match the design completed for the Airport Business Park along the north
side of 172nd Street NE/SR 531.
Right-Of-Way Illumination
Improvements in right-of-way illumination are needed in the area to increase both driver and pedestrian
safety. Particular attention should be given to the illumination of the pedestrian realm.
R1 Unique street lamps should be used on new and improved right-of-ways instead of cobra-style
street lamps in an effort to help create a “sense of place” for the area.
R2 Street lamps should be able to accommodate hanging flower-baskets and/or banners where
appropriate.
R3 Different street lamp types of the same style should be assigned for use with specific thoroughfare
types.
R4 Street lamps should illuminate both travel lanes and sidewalks.
R5 Measures should be taken to ensure that light pollution and energy consumption are minimized,
especially near critical areas and within the Airport Protection District.
R6 On neighborhood streets, placement of street lamps should be limited to intersections because
porch lights on individual homes usually provide sufficient light.
West Arlington Sub Area Plan
Page | 23
Gateways
Gateways are need in the area to help give spatial definition to City boundaries, welcome visitors, and
distinguish the individual neighborhoods that exist in the sub area.
R1 Gateways should be placed at all major entrances to the sub area (see Attachment 12.0). Major
entrance points include:
16400 Block of Smokey Point Boulevard
16400 Block of 51st AVE NE
3200 Block of 172nd St. NE
2600 Block of HWY 530
R2 Gateways should include neighborhood name under the City name.
R3 Gateways should be developed as monuments instead of roadside signs.
R4 Gateways should be placed in center medians where feasible. Where monument signs are placed
along SR 530 or SR 531, signs shall comply with clear zone regulations as required by WSDOT.
SIGNS
Directional signs are needed to help visitors navigate their way around Smokey Point, West Bluff and Island
Crossing and as well as towards other sections of town.
R1 Wayfinding signs should be oriented toward drivers, cyclists and pedestrians and should be
strategically placed throughout the sub area.
R2 Neighborhood monument signs should be encouraged at the entrance to neighborhoods to help
visitors identify neighborhoods while also providing ownership to residents.
CIVIC SPACES
Open Spaces
Open spaces are vital to a community’s health and vibrancy and become increasingly valuable as
communities mature in density. A variety of civic spaces should be encouraged in the sub area to improve
the area’s livability.
R1 Recommended types of open spaces include playgrounds, parks, trails, greens, sports fields, plazas,
and squares.
Location, Size & Spatial Definition
R1 With new development, open space should not be made up of the residual space that is left after
buildings are placed on site. Instead, new site plans should be organized around well
placed/designed open spaces.
R2 In residential developments, dwelling units adjacent to open spaces should be oriented facing the
open space.
R3 Squares and plazas should be spatially framed and activated by buildings and streets on at least two
sides.
R4 Minimum size and shape requirements should be established for each type of civic open space to
ensure that each space is scaled appropriately for the planned use.
West Arlington Sub Area Plan
Page | 24
Private Realm Recommendations
The private realm is generally defined as all real property that is held or owned by individuals or entities
other than the public. Some property in the private realm can be quasi-public in that it is privately owned
and maintained but open to, and commonly used by, the public.
REGULATING PLAN
The Rural-to-Urban Hierarchy
The central component of a Form-Based Code is the concept that communities should have discernable
neighborhood centers and edges. This is achieved through zoning that is organized around development
intensity. Each zone (called a “transect”) (see Figure 20) is purposefully assigned to a land area as part of the
Regulating Plan (zoning map), establishing a sequential “hierarchy” of development intensity. This is in
contrast to Euclidean Zoning which often falls short of establishing an organized pattern of development.
R1 Replace existing zoning with new transect zones consistent with FBCs (see Attachment 13.0)
Figure 20: Rural to Urban Transect
Figure 21: Regulating Plan Example
West Arlington Sub Area Plan
Page | 25
GENERAL BUILDING FORM
DENSITY
Arrangement
Current zoning in the sub area doesn’t establish an organized pattern of density distribution and as a
consequence, a well defined neighborhood center hasn’t developed. In order to help the community
develop a “sense of place” with a vibrant neighborhood center, differing levels of allowed development
intensity need to be spatially organized and defined.
R1 Reinforce the rural-to-urban hierarchy through the establishment of transect zoning (see Regulating
Plan above).
Calculation
Density is currently calculated by lot size, lot coverage and building height (in ft.) restrictions. This
encourages applicants to maximize total lot yields when subdividing and discourages good urban design.
R2 Density should be calculated by a guaranteed set number of allowable dwelling units per acre. This
gives applicants predictability and the flexibility needed to adhere to spatial arrangement
requirements set forth in the FBC.
LOT CONFIGURATION
Shape
Lot shape impacts how a building is able to engage the public realm. “Flag” lots (Figure 22) disrupt the
urban fabric because of their isolative nature and “stacked” lots fail to create a vibrant urban form because
they hide buildings from the public realm. In commercial areas within the sub area, “flag” lots and “stacked”
lots have severely limited the visibility of some businesses from the public realm, making them difficult to
find and access (block standards will also help solve this problem).
Figure 22: Flag Lot
R1 The creation of “flag” lots should be prohibited.
R2 New lots should adhere to the parameters set regarding spatial arrangement to prevent “stacked
lots”.
West Arlington Sub Area Plan
Page | 26
R3 New lots should be required to be rectangular in shape with exceptions provided to accommodate
certain topographical realities or other limiting factors such as easements.
Dimensions
Dimensional requirements have an impact on the spatial arraignment of both short and long plat
developments. Currently, lot creation is regulated by minimums. Minimum lot width requirements can
prevent good infill projects and should only be used in rural zones to help preserve the open character.
Maximum lot width parameters can help ensure that new development is appropriately scaled to the desired
urban form for the area.
R1 Replace minimum lot width requirements with maximum lot width parameters calibrated to each
transect to ensure new development is properly scaled.
BUILDING PLACEMENT
Disposition
Building placement has an impact on the overall urban form and plays a role in shaping the public realm as
well. Current zoning regulations in the sub area only proscribe setback requirements that require buildings
to be placed somewhere in the lot interior. This limits developers from making better use of limited space,
(particularly in higher density transects) and fails to encourage the development of a cohesive and
predictable urban form.
R1 Set parameters for acceptable building dispositions by transect to encourage good urban form.
R2 Incorporate build-to-lines/zones for building fronts to ensure a contiguous street-wall develops and
that the public realm is appropriately defined.
R3 Recommended building dispositions include: edge yard, side yard, rear yard and specialized.
Orientation & Spatial Arrangement
Commercial buildings subject to design review must meet a set of design criteria, including orientation and
spatial arrangement. However, under the current code, options for residential building orientation are not
specified or defined. Consequently, by default, buildings in both short and long plats face either the right-
of-way, access easement, or a parking lot. By allowing and defining different spatial arrangements, variety
can be added to the urban fabric and more housing/commercial options can be provided to the market.
R1 Set parameters for acceptable building orientations and spatial arrangements of both short and long
plats to encourage variety in the urban form.
R2 The following are recommended orientations/spatial arrangements: street, linear court, square
court, and motor court (residential use only).
BUILDING TYPES
A wider variety of Building Types should be encouraged within the sub area, particularly in the housing
stock. Having a variety of housing types will enrich the existing urban fabric by providing a greater range of
housing options for current and future residents.
R1 Desired Building Types for the sub area should specified, defined, and assigned to an appropriate
transect and Thoroughfare Type. Recommended allowed Building Types include:
West Arlington Sub Area Plan
Page | 27
Detached, Single Unit Houses (including cottages, bungalows, etc.)
Twin Houses
ADUs (Accessory Dwelling Units)
Village Houses
Rowhouses
Stacked Housing Units (low, medium rise)
Mansion House Apartment/Condo bldg.
Courtyard Apartment/Condo bldg.
Live/Work Units
Shopkeeper Dwellings
Mixed Use Bldgs. with residential component (low, medium rise)
Commercial Bldgs. w/o residential component (low, medium rise)
Parking Structures
Civic Buildings
R2 In residential subdivisions, similar floor plans should not be placed side-by-side.
R3 Code requirements should ensure a variety of floor plans are used in residential subdivisions. LAND USE TYPES
Land uses in the area are highly segregated and mixed uses should be encouraged to reduce auto-
dependency and allow for greater variety in the urban fabric. Under FBCs, land uses are often listed in a
more generic form compared to Euclidean Zoning. This is done to allow for more flexibility in the number
and types of allowed land uses. Subtypes of general land uses that need more discretionary review and/or
distinction between and within each transect are also listed. For simplicity, land uses that are not allowed
should be omitted unless certain uses need to be expressly prohibited.
R1 Mixed use should be encouraged to reduce auto-dependency and increase walkability.
R2 Allowed Land Use Types should be concise for simplicity and calibrated by transect.
R3 Recommended general Land Use Types (liberally interpreted) for the sub area include:
Assembly, Recreation, and Education
Residential
Retail
Services: Business, Financial, and Professional
Services: General
Transportation, Communication, and Associated Infrastructure
SPECIFIC BUILDING FORM
The purpose of Building Form regulations is to help ensure cohesive urban form. Buildings create “walls”
that spatially define public spaces such as a street or park. The impact of buildings on the public realm
should not be underestimated and therefore be carefully regulated.
Building Height
Building height that is simply regulated by feet encourages applicants to use minimal floor heights to
maximize as many floors as possible which can lead to poor building design. Instead, height restrictions
West Arlington Sub Area Plan
Page | 28
based on number of stories allows applicants the flexibility to build stories with higher floor-to-ceiling
dimensions which helps ensure buildings are functional for a variety of uses.
R1 Building height should be regulated by number of stories (above ground) instead of feet to allow for
better building functionality (although airport height restrictions would still apply).
R2 Where parcels in a higher order Transect (T4, T5) abut a mostly residential, lower order Transect,
the allowable building height should not be greater than ½ stories higher than allowed in the
neighboring lower order Transect for all building that occurs within 35 feet of the transitional
property line to ensure cohesive transitions between zones.
Ground-Floor Finished Level Height
The ground-floor finished level height is the distance between ground level and the first floor of a building
measured at the front façade. This measurement becomes critical in higher density areas where privacy from
the public realm is desired.
R1 Ground-floor finished level height should be a minimum of 18 inches for residential units and 6
inches maximum for commercial and retail uses. Residential units close to the sidewalk should
have higher ground-floor finished level heights to provide privacy from the pedestrian realm.
Minimum Ground-Floor Ceiling Height
This regulation helps ensure that the street level story is functional for businesses in mixed-use and
commercial buildings.
R1 Minimum ground-floor ceiling height for mixed use and commercial buildings should be 14 feet to
ensure floor space is compatible for commercial uses.
Ancillary Buildings
Ancillary buildings are usually associated with single family residential units and can function as a detached
garage, ADU, or both. More ADUs are needed in the sub area to help provide more affordable housing that
is evenly distributed throughout the area.
R1 Second story windows should avoid facing into the nearest adjacent parcel.
R2 Regulations should ensure ancillary buildings are not equal or nearly equal to the principle building
in terms of size.
R3 An appropriate distance should separate the ancillary building from the principle building to ensure
an appropriate relationship.
Frontage Types
The front façade of a building plays an important role in engaging the public realm. The purpose of
regulating front facades is to ensure that the transition from the public to private realm is appropriately
defined. Current codes for the area don’t set requirements for front facades. In residential areas, garages
have become the dominant feature of front facades.
R1 Allowed frontage types should be associated with specific building types. Recommended frontage
types include:
West Arlington Sub Area Plan
Page | 29
Common Lawn
Porch & Fence
Portal
Stoop
Terrace
Gallery
Arcade
Shopfront & Awning
Forecourt
R2 Dimensional standards should be set for all frontage types to ensure proper design. For instance,
porches need a minimum 6 feet clear depth to be functional.
R3 With subdivisions, minimum percentage standards should be set to ensure a variety of Frontage
Types are used.
R4 In commercial areas, awnings should be allowed to encroach over sidewalks to add human scale and
protection to pedestrians from inclement weather. Awnings should also have a minimum clearance
and not be allowed to conflict with street trees or lighting.
R5 Upper story gallery facades should not be used as a primary means of upper story building
circulation in order to allow for outdoor uses by upper story businesses/residents.
Architectural standards will help give the sub area a more distinguished look and feel—adding to the
creation of a unique “sense of place” for the community.
ARCHITECTURE
R1 Architectural standards should be used in place of design guidelines in order to make development
review more predictable, fair, and expedited for applicants.
R2 Architectural standards should be based on historical and local precedents/preferences.
R3 Use of vinyl or similar siding should be prohibited.
R4 Low-Impact design elements should be defined and encouraged.
Where parking is located and how many spaces are required, has a significant impact on urban design,
pedestrian comfort and safety, walkability of a place, development costs, how much land is covered in
asphalt relative to the associated building footprint, and how destinations are primarily accessed.
PARKING
LOCATION
R1 To prevent the occurrence of “garagescape” and to help “activate” residential streets as well as
increase pedestrian safety, vehicular access to Lots should be taken from a rear alley. Where alleys
are not feasible with new development, garages and parking areas should be located within the third
layer of the Lot. Driveways of neighboring lots should be placed side-by-side.
R2 On-site parking associated with mixed use and commercial buildings should be located to the side
and/or rear to allow for buildings to be placed close to the right-of-way, which helps to activate the
street front and encourage walkability.
R3 In the Neighborhood Center transect, on-site parking should be located in the block interior.
West Arlington Sub Area Plan
Page | 30
R4 On-street parking should be included on all non-arterial roads where feasible to help reduce the
size of parking lots and support businesses in commercial areas as well as allow a place for guests to
park in residential areas.
R5 The City should encourage shared parking areas to help reduce development costs and the overall
amount of land used for parking.
R6 Access drives to parking areas should be consolidated to reduce the amount of curb-cuts in
sidewalks, which increases pedestrian comfort and safety.
REQUIRED SPACES
R1 Parking requirements should be calibrated in relation to each transect and allowed building types
therein to ensure parking requirements don’t prevent the creation of a walkable community.
R2 In the Neighborhood Center transect, developers should be encouraged to “unbundle” the cost of
parking from the cost of housing to encourage affordability. Unbundling means housing units and
parking spaces are sold separately.
R3 On street parking in front of commercial and mixed use buildings should count towards required
parking spaces to help reduce the amount of private land consumed by parking spaces.
R4 To help small businesses, minimum parking requirements should be waived for commercial uses
occupying less than 2,500 square feet of space.
R5 A strategy should be developed for encouraging shared parking to help maximize efficiency.
R6 To allow for more affordable housing, required on-site parking spaces should not be required to be
covered (i.e., homes shouldn’t be required to have garages).
R7 To make transportation alternatives more feasible in the area, accommodation should be given to
pedestrians and bicyclists through incorporation of good streetscape and urban design.
R8 In an effort to encourage affordable housing, on-site parking should be waved for ADUs less than or
equal to 350 square feet.
PAVING MATERIAL
R1 Low impact design elements should be used to reduce storm-water run-off from parking areas
associated with commercial, mixed use and residential uses.
a. Storm-water retention ponds should be designed look and function like natural ponds.
In an effort to create higher quality development in the sub area, a land use incentive called Transfer of
Development Rights (TDR) will be used. This voluntary, incentive-based approach is an effort to guide
growth away from productive agricultural and natural resource lands to more urbanized areas which can
benefit from higher densities.
TDRs
Within the TDR program, there are sending properties and receiving properties. Properties located
outside the City in the Stillaguamish River Valley adjacent to the West Bluff and Island Crossing
neighborhoods would qualify as a TDR sending properties. The sending property’s development right is
turned into a tradable commodity, the landowner is compensated based on current market conditions, and
the property itself is preserved through a conservation easement. With the use of TDR certificates from the
sending site, a developer will be able to use the development rights at a receiving property to achieve higher
densities than would otherwise be permitted.
West Arlington Sub Area Plan
Page | 31
Within the TDR program, there are multiple benefits achieved. The property owners receive
compensation and maintain low property taxes while still continuing to operate their business and live on-
site. The Stillaguamish Valley would continue to be preserved and maintained for food production and for
conservation of the natural resource and riverine habitats along the rivers and creeks. And, the local
developers within the City limits would be able to develop their properties in the future with higher
development potential.
R1 The sub area should be established as a TDR receiving area in an effort to help preserve the rural
nature of the Stillaguamish River Valley.
West Arlington Sub Area Plan
Page | 32
Implementation
The West Arlington Sub Area Plan shall serve as an implementation strategy to support the vision of the
residents of Smokey Point, West Bluff and Island Crossing, as well as the Growth Management Act and
Snohomish County Countywide Planning Policies.
With the use of Form Based Code, TDR program and other strategies as outlined in this document, the goal
is to enable Smokey Point, West Bluff and Island Crossing to create their own unique sense of identity while
maintaining the same community values that are known for the City of Arlington.
An implementation plan for the Sub Area Plan should be developed to identify the number of initiatives that
will occur over the next several years. The implementation plan will be necessary in order to carry-out the
recommendations that have been outlined in this Plan.
It is important that the community be involved throughout the implementation process. The City Council,
as well as the Planning Commission, will play a substantial role in the adoption of this and future guiding
documents. Prior to approval from the Council, the Sub Area plan will need to be discussed with various
groups, including:
1. Stakeholders
a. Community Residents & Businesses
b. Chamber of Commerce
c. Rotary Club
d. Stillaguamish Tribe
e. Community Transit
2. City Departments (i.e. Community Development, Public Works, Utilities, Airport)
3. City Advisory Committees
a. Planning Commission
b. Airport Commission
c. Parks, Arts and Recreation Commission
After approval, a Form Based Code (FBC) will need to be created and adopted into the City’s Land Use
Code (LUC) and new transect zoning districts will need to be created. Although the FBC will act as an
overlay to the base zoning, the FBC for the sub area will likely require substantive changes to the LUC as
development occurs over time.
As redevelopment occurs within the sub area, the City will need to monitor development patterns and
evaluate progress of the Sub Area Plan implementation. The FBC and LUC should be calibrated as needed
to adjust for development and market conditions, community needs and the overall vision of the sub area.
West Arlington Sub Area Plan
Page | 33
Attachments
He
y
h
o
C
r
e
e
k
West
F
o
r
k
Q
u
i
l
c
e
d
a
C
r
e
e
k
Ed
g
e
c
o
m
b
e
C
r
e
e
k
South Slough
March Creek
Bjorn Creek
Portage Creek
Stillaguamish River
Sm
o
k
e
y
P
o
i
n
t
B
l
v
d
City of Arlington
Twin
Lakes
?Ó
!"`$
?Ô
Arlington Municipal Airport
SM
O
K
E
Y
P
O
I
N
T
B
L
V
D
172ND ST NE
204TH ST NE
51
S
T
A
V
E
N
E
23
R
D
A
V
E
N
E
59
T
H
A
V
E
N
E
59
T
H
D
R
N
E
188TH ST NE
43
R
D
A
V
E
N
E
200TH ST NE
27
T
H
A
V
E
N
E
45
T
H
D
R
N
E
TW
I
N
L
A
K
E
S
A
V
E
31
S
T
A
V
E
N
E
168TH ST NE
35
T
H
A
V
E
N
E
169TH PL NE
SPRING LANE AVE
196TH PL NE
AIRPORT BLVD
166TH ST NE25
T
H
A
V
E
N
E
176TH PL NE
62
N
D
A
V
E
N
E
31ST DR NE
180TH ST
180TH ST NE
51
S
T
D
R
N
E
186TH PL NE
182ND ST
40
T
H
A
V
E
N
E
177TH PL NE
171ST PL NE
175TH PL NE
178TH PL NE
169TH ST NE
174TH PL NE
195TH ST NE
179TH PL NE
HIGH CLOVER BLVD NE
46TH DR NE
61
S
T
A
V
E
N
E
46
T
H
A
V
E
N
E
184TH PL
43
R
D
D
R
N
E
174TH PL
42
N
D
D
R
N
E
170TH PL NE
60
T
H
A
V
E
N
E
168TH PL NE
173RD PL NE
58
T
H
A
V
E
N
E
197TH PL NE
43
R
D
A
V
E
N
E
188TH ST NE
27
T
H
A
V
E
N
E
60
T
H
A
V
E
N
E
59
T
H
D
R
N
E
188TH ST NE
177TH PL NE
175TH PL NE
200TH ST NE
West ArlingtonSub-Area Boundary
West Arlington
Arlington City Limits
Roads-private
Watercourse
Waterbody
State Highway
Off ramp
State Route
Arterial
Streets
Attachment 1.0
Water bodies, water courses(2006),Snohomish County Dept of Information Systems, GIS dataset.
Cartographer : LB
File : WArlAttachment1.0.mxd
Date :9/1/2010
Maps and GIS data are distributed “AS-IS” without warranties of any kind, either express or implied,including but not limited to warranties of suitability for a particular purpose or use. Map data are compiled from a variety of sources which may contain errors and users who rely upon the information do so at their own risk. Users agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City of Arlington for any and all liability of any nature arising out of or resulting from the lack of accuracy or correctness of the data, or the use of the data presented in the maps.
0 1,000 2,000500 Feet
"
He
y
h
o
C
r
e
e
k
West
F
o
r
k
Q
u
i
l
c
e
d
a
C
r
e
e
k
Ed
g
e
c
o
m
b
e
C
r
e
e
k
South Slough
March Creek
Bjorn Creek
Portage Creek
Stillaguamish River
Sm
o
k
e
y
P
o
i
n
t
B
l
v
d
City of Arlington
ArlingtonMunicipalAirport
?Ó
?Ô
!"`$
Twin
Lakes
172ND ST NE
SM
O
K
E
Y
P
O
I
N
T
B
L
V
D
204TH ST NE
51
S
T
A
V
E
N
E
23
R
D
A
V
E
N
E
59
T
H
A
V
E
N
E
59
T
H
D
R
N
E
43
R
D
A
V
E
N
E
27
T
H
A
V
E
N
E
188TH ST NE
45
T
H
D
R
N
E
TW
I
N
L
A
K
E
S
A
V
E
200TH ST NE
31
S
T
A
V
E
N
E
168TH ST NE
35
T
H
A
V
E
N
E
169TH PL NE
SPRING LANE AVE
180TH ST
196TH PL NE
AIRPORT BLVD
166TH ST NE25
T
H
A
V
E
N
E
176TH PL NE
62
N
D
A
V
E
N
E
31ST DR NE
180TH ST NE
51
S
T
D
R
N
E
195TH ST N
E
186TH PL NE
182ND ST
40
T
H
A
V
E
N
E
177TH PL NE
171ST PL NE
175TH PL NE
178TH PL NE
169TH ST NE
174TH PL NE
179TH PL NE
206TH ST NE
207TH ST NE
HIGH CLOVER BLVD NE
46T
H
DR NE
46
T
H
A
V
E
N
E
200TH PL NE
184TH PL
43
R
D
D
R
N
E
174TH PL
42
N
D
D
R
N
E
170TH PL NE
60
T
H
A
V
E
N
E
168TH PL NE
173RD PL NE
58
T
H
A
V
E
N
E
197TH PL NE
59
T
H
D
R
N
E
27
T
H
A
V
E
N
E
200TH ST NE
188TH ST NE
43
R
D
A
V
E
N
E
177TH PL NE
188TH ST NE
175TH PL NE
West ArlingtonNeighborhood Boundaries
West Arlington
Island Crossing
West Bluff
Smokey Point
Arlington City Limits
Roads-private
Watercourse
Waterbody
State Highway
Off ramp
State Route
Arterial
Streets
Attachment 2.0
Water bodies, water courses(2006),Snohomish County Dept of Information Systems, GIS dataset.
Cartographer : LB
File : WArlAttachment2.0.mxd
Date :9/1/2010
Maps and GIS data are distributed “AS-IS” without warranties of any kind, either express or implied,including but not limited to warranties of suitability for a particular purpose or use. Map data are compiled from a variety of sources which may contain errors and users who rely upon the information do so at their own risk. Users agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City of Arlington for any and all liability of any nature arising out of or resulting from the lack of accuracy or correctness of the data, or the use of the data presented in the maps.
0 1,000 2,000500 Feet
"
Attachment 3.0 Inventory of Roads Below Urban Standards
Road Block Range Length
(miles)
Road
Type1
Lanes Sidewalk Park
Strip
Bike
Lane
174th Pl. NE 3500-3800 0.21 LA 2 No No --
38th Dr. NE 17400-17500 0.08 LA 2 No No --
175th Pl NE 3500-3800 0.21 LA 2 No No --
176th Pl NE 3500-3900 0.27 LA 2 No No --
39th Dr. NE 17600-17700 0.10 LA 2 No No --
Totem Park Ln. 3900-4100 0.16 LA 2 No No --
177th Pl NE 4100-4300 0.15 LA 2 No No --
178th Pl NE 3900-4100 0.10 LA 2 No No --
39th DR NE 17800-17900 0.06 LA 2 No No --
179th Pl NE 3700-4000 0.19 LA 2 No No --
37th Dr. NE 17800-17900 0.06 LA 2 No No --
178th Pl NE 3500-3800 0.22 LA 2 No No --
36th Dr. NE 17600-17700 0.06 LA 2 No No --
177th Pl NE 3600-3800 0.12 LA 2 No No --
38th Dr. NE 17600-17700 0.06 LA 2 No No --
43rd Ave NE 17200-18000 0.50 LC 2 No No --
181st Pl NE 3500-3600 0.08 LA 2 No No --
36th Dr. NE 18100 0.04 LA 2 No No --
183rd Pl NE 3500-3600 0.11 LA 2 No No --
Smokey Pt. Dr. 3300-3500 0.37 LA 2 No No No
177th Pl NE 3100-3500 0.26 LA 2 No No --
34th Ave NE 17600-17700 0.05 LA 2 No No --
176th Pl NE 3100-3400 0.15 LA 2 No No --
31st Dr. NE 17600-18000 0.24 LA 2 No No --
179th St. NE 3100-3300 0.13 LA 2 No No --
33rd Ave NE 17700-17900 0.11 LA 2 No No --
180th St. NE 3100-3500 0.25 LA 2 No No --
31st Ave NE 18000-18600 0.41 LA 2 No No --
186th Pl NE 2900-3100 0.08 LA 2 No No --
29th Ave NE 18600-18800 0.08 LA 2 No No --
188th St. NE 2900-3700 0.50 Arterial 2 No No No
Smokey Pt.
Blvd
17300-21200 2.50 Arterial 2 No No No
Total Sub-Area
Roads = 12.7
Miles
8.27
Total
Below
Urban
Standard
21
Closed-
end
streets
23 Cul-
de-sac’s
1 LA = Local access
Attachment 4.0 Business Inventory
Advertising & Media
Press/Publications/Radio/Marketing
Business Name Address Neighborhood
American Printers 16821 Smokey Point Blvd. SP
Mr. Deez Marketing Group 19018 Smokey Point Blvd. WB
Arts, Culture & Entertainment
Business Name Address Neighborhood
Ancient Arts Family Karate 3131 Smokey Pt Dr. SP
Club Paradise 16820 Smokey Pt Blvd. SP
Automotive & Marine
Sales/Oil Change/Cleaning
Business Name Address Neighborhood
Crossroads Mkt/Car Wash 5200 172nd St. NE SP
Jiffy Lube 17317 Smokey Pt. Blvd. SP
Les Schwab 16607 Smokey Pt. Blvd. SP
Marysville Speed ‘n
Custom
18824 Smokey Pt. Blvd. WB
Margo’s Safety 1 Driving
School
16710 Smokey Pt. Blvd. #202 SP
Oil Can Henry’s 3905 171st St NE SP
Rairdon Auto 16610 Smokey Pt. Blvd. SP
O’Reilly Auto Supply 3533 172nd St. NE SP
Smokey Point Buick/GM 16632 Smokey Pt. Blvd. SP
Computers & Telecommunications
Business Name Address Neighborhood
Smart Wireless 3617 172nd St. NE SP
Construction Equipment & Contractors
Architectural Design & Building
Business Name Address Neighborhood
Chopelas & Associates
(Engineering & Design)
3611 168th St. NE SP
Gray & Osborne, INC
(Consulting Engineers)
3710 168th St. NE SP
HomeRite Construction 17215 Smokey Pt. Dr. SP
PowerCo Drywall 18824 Smokey Pt. Blvd. #101 SP
Finance & Insurance
Banks/Credit Unions/Insurance/Financial & Investment Services
Business Name Address Neighborhood
American Insure-All 3323 169th Pl. NE #D SP
Bank of America 3230 172nd St. NE SP
Cascade Bank 3532 172nd St. NE SP
Chase Bank 3704 172nd St. NE SP
Country Financial 3710 168th St. NE A201 SP
Diversified Research 4007 168th St. NE SP
Edward Jones 3707 172nd St NE #14 SP
Edward Jones 3719 168th St NE SP
Farmers Insurance 3131 Smokey Pt. Dr. SP
Farmers Insurance 19127 Smokey Pt. Blvd. Bldg 2 WB
Farmers Insurance 16817 Smokey Pt. Blvd. SP
Key Bank 17311 Smokey Pt. Dr. SP
Mt. Crest Credit Union 3710 168th St. NE #A108 SP
North County Bank 16419 Smokey Pt. Blvd. SP
Schlagel Insurance 17215 Smokey Pt. Dr. SP
Total Buy, Sell and Loan 3131 Smokey Pt. Dr. SP
Union Bank 3506 168th St. NE SP
Vintage Lane Venture Group 3710 168th St. NE #207B SP
Whidbey Island Bank 4220 172nd St. NE SP
Fuel
Gas Stations/Heating/Natural Gas
Business Name Address Neighborhood
Aire Force Heating & Gas 3810 166th Pl. NE #W-1 SP
76 2313 SR 530 NE IC
Chevron 2233 SR 530 NE IC
Safeway Gas 3521 172nd St NE SP
Shell 3316 172nd St. NE SP
Tesoro 2324 SR 530 E IC
Government & Education
Business Name Address Neighborhood
Liquor & Wine 3704 172nd St. NE #G SP
Postal & Pay Licensing Sub-Agency 3131 Smokey Pt. Dr. SP
U.S Post Office/Smokey Pt. Branch 3621 168th St. NE SP
WA State Dept. of Social/Health
Services
3704 172nd St NE #P SP
WA State Drivers Licensing 3704 17nd St. NE #K1 SP
Health Care
Dental/Hospitals & Clinics/Chiropractors/Medical/Dental & Nursing Care/Pharmacy
Business Name Address Neighborhood
All American Hearing Aids 3402 173rd Pl. NE #102 SP
Alpine Professional
Center***
17432 Smokey Pt. Blvd. #102-
103
SP
Arlington Pediatric
Dentistry
3710 168th St. NE SP
Compass Health 3220 173rd Pl NE SP
Cumulus Professional
Park****
16410 Smokey Pt. Blvd. SP
Ernst Chiropractic Clinic 16714 Smokey Pt. Blvd. SP
Family Dentistry 3210 Smokey Pt. Dr. SP
Gutierrez Chiropractic 3704 172nd St. #N SP
Message Therapy 16410 Smokey Pt. Blvd. #303 SP
N. Sound Physical Therapy 3405 172nd St. NE #10 SP
Pilchuck Plaza – Doctors (2) 3710 168th Pl. NE SP
Points & Pathways
Acupuncture
3710 168th St. NE #A101 SP
Professional Services Ctr** 3225 Smokey Pt. Dr. SP
Puget Sound Kidney Center 18828 Smokey Pt. Blvd. WB
Smokey Point Chiropractic 4113 172nd St. NE SP
Smokey Point Family
Dentistry
3533 172nd St. NE #B SP
Stillaguamish Behavioral
Health Center
4126 172nd St. NE #B SP
The Pacific Building* 3210 Smokey Pt. Dr. SP
*Acupuncture, dentists (2)
**Lee & Associates—Attorney’s, Timberland Reality Group, Smokey Point Orthodontics, doctors (2)
***Chiropractors (2), Foot & Ankle Specialist, Vision Clinic, Dentist
****Vision Center, Cascade Valley Clinic, Harmony Massage Therapy, Family Dentistry, Hellerwork
Healing Arts, Pharmacy, Psychiatric Practitioner, M.P.C Clinic—permanent cosmetics, Lavenders Skin
Care, Terry Benham Physical Therapy, Smokey Point Massage Therapy, Cascade Rehab Associates, NW
Eye Surgeons, Alpine Recovery Services.
Home & Garden
Business Name Parcel Reference Number Neighborhood
Lowe’s 3300 169th Pl. NE SP
Parker Paint 17306 Smokey Pt. Dr. SP
Sherman Williams Paint 3707 172nd St. NE SP
Virtual Floor 3323 169th Pl. NE #E SP
Legal
Tax Preparation/Attorney’s/Legal Services
Business Name Parcel Reference Number Neighborhood
Riley Lee, Attorney 3325 Smokey Pt. Dr. SP
Abelite Law Office 16710 Smokey Pt. Blvd. #200 SP
Witsoe-Haug & Associates 3727 168th St. NE SP
Lodging & Travel
Hotels/Motels/Travel Agencies
Business Name Parcel Reference Number Neighborhood
Arlington Chamber of
Commerce
3710 168th St. NE SP
Arlington Motor Inn 2214 SR 530 IC
Medallion Hotel 16710 Smokey Pt. Blvd. SP
Smokey Point Motor Inn 17329 Smokey Pt. Blvd. SP
Snohomish County
Tourism
3710 168th St. NE SP
Manufacturing, Production & Wholesale
Business Name Parcel Reference Number Neighborhood
Aire Force Heating & Gas 3810 166th Pl. NE #w1 SP
Artistic Drywall Textures,
INC
3810 166th Pl. NE #205 SP
Duncan Electric 4413 196th Pl NE WB
R & S Electric 18220 Smokey Pt. Blvd SP
Hertz Rental 16424 Smokey Pt. Blvd. SP
Indian Fireworks SR 530 & Smokey Pt. Blvd. IC
National Food Corp. 6524 180th St. NE SP
NORETEP Poeschel &
Schultz
19203 Smokey Pt. Blvd IS
NW Pluming Contractors 3810 166th Pl. NE #123 SP
Olympic Security 3810 166th Pl. NE #101 & W5 WB
Pacific Surveying
Equipment
16716 Smokey Pt. Blvd. #1 SP
Smokey Point Electric, INC 3810 166th Pl. NE#203 SP
Personal Services & Care
Beauty Salons/Spas/Massage Therapy/Security Services/Childcare
Business Name Parcel Reference Number Neighborhood
Advanced Mobility 3710 168th St. NE #201 SP
All Mind & Body 3719 168th St. NE #C SP
Arlington Massage 18725 Smokey Pt. Blvd. SP
Chrysalis Clinic—
Cosmetics
3710 168th St. NE #B101 SP
CK Nails & Spa 3323 169th Pl. NE #H SP
Cleaners 3704 172nd St NE #J SP
Communication for Kids
(Pediatric Speech
Pathologists)
3710 168th St. NE B #103 SP
Crown Creations Hair
Design
4127 172nd St. NE #B SP
Hair Masters 3704 172nd St. NE #M SP
Hair Masters 3411 169th Pl. NE #G SP
Hi-Tek Nails 3405 172nd St. NE #6 SP
Hot Tans 3411 169th Pl. NE #F SP
Jenny’s Family Haircuts 19201 Smokey Pt. Blvd. WB
Kids ‘N Us Childcare 3602 166th Pl. NE SP
Kids N’ Play Learning Ctr 3707 168th St. NE#3 SP
Little Caboose Daycare 19702 48th Ave. NE WB
Mariner Hair Design 3131 Smokey Pt. Dr. Ste. D SP
Suds & Duds Laundry 3131 Smokey Pt. Dr. #H SP
NW Children’s School 3833 168th St. NE #1 SP
Shawna’s Family Daycare 4628 191st Pl. NE WB
Ronning Chiropractic &
Massage
3116 A 188th St. NE SP
Salon Daidree 3426 177th Pl NE SP
Salon Savvy 3710 168th St NE B #101 SP
Smokey Pt. Cleaners 3323 169th Pl NE SP
Smokey Pt. Daycare 3719 168th Pl NE #E SP
Sophisticut 3719 168th St NE #A SP
Tina’s Family Daycare 20008 48th Dr. NE WB
Pets & Veterinary
Business Name Parcel Reference Number Neighborhood
Advanced Care Animal
Clinic
16820 Smokey Pt. Blvd. #2 SP
Family Pet Medical Surgery 3704 172nd St. NE #L SP
Smokey Pt. Animal Hospital 16720 Smokey Pt. Blvd. SP
Smokey Pt. Grooming 3833 168th St. NE #3 SP
Real Estate, Moving & Storage
Business Name Parcel Reference Number Neighborhood
Bull Dog Self Storage 3832 172nd St. NE SP
Midway Reality 17303 Smokey Pt. Blvd. SP
Papa’s Lockers 16632 Smokey Pt. Blvd. SP
Ramo Realty 16710 Smokey Pt. Blvd. SP
RE/Max 3131 Smokey Pt. Dr. #B SP
Sterling Realty-Smokey Pt.
Mini Storage
3830 168th St. NE SP
Religious/Community Organizations
Church Name Parcel Reference Number Neighborhood
Iglesia Agape 17215 Smokey Pt. Dr. SP
Jake’s House Ministries 18824 Smokey Pt. Blvd, #105 WB
Smokey Point Community
Church
17721 Smokey Pt. Blvd SP
Smokey Point Church of
Christ
18526 35th Ave NE WB
Stillaguamish Senior Center 18308 Smokey Pt. Blvd. SP
The Church of Jesus Christ
of Latter-day Saints
17222 43rd Ave. NE SP
Restaurants, Food & Beverages
Restaurants, Grocery Stores, Fast Food, Espresso Stands
Business Name Parcel Reference Number Neighborhood
#1 Teriyaki 3405 172nd St. NE #A23 SP
Alfy’s Pizza 3405 173rd Pl. NE SP
Baskin Robbins 3411 169th Pl NE #I SP
BLVD Espresso 16831 Smokey Pt. Blvd. SP
Buzz Inn 17216 Smokey Pt. Dr. SP
Country Mudd 5200 172nd St. NE SP
Denny’s 2202 SR 530 E IC
Domino’s Pizza 3131 Smokey Pt. Dr. SP
El Gitano 3528 168th St. NE SP
Ellie’s Restaurant 3525 168th Pl. NE SP
Iversen Dairy Distributing 3818 168th St. NE #13 SP
Jack-In-The-Box 3818 172nd St. NE SP
KFC 3433 1679th Pl NE SP
Las Coronas 3131 Smokey Pt. Dr. SP
McDonalds 3529 172nd St. NE SP
Moose Creek BBQ 3617 172nd St. NE #5 SP
Nadine’s All American 3131 Smokey Pt. Dr. #8 SP
Olympic Pizza House 17324 Smokey Pt. Dr. SP
Papa Murphy’s 3411 169th Pl. NE #H SP
Paraiso 3611 168th St. NE SP
Patty’s Nest Egg 2310 SR 530 NE IC
Peking Palace 16820 Smokey Pt. Blvd.#3 SP
Pho Dat 3411 169th Pl. NE #E SP
Produce Place 5702 172nd St. NE #D SP
Safeway 3532 172nd St. NE SP
7-11 17127 Smokey Pt. Blvd. SP
Smoke Shop SR 530 & Smokey Pt. Blvd IC
Smokey Point Espresso 17316 Smokey Pt. Blvd. SP
Sports Buzz, The 2431 SR 530 NE IC
Starbucks 3617 172nd St. NE SP
Subway 16820 Smokey Pt. Blvd. #1 SP
Taco Del Mar 3707 172nd St. NE SP
Taco Time 3405 172nd St. NE SP
Teriyaki Point 3617 172nd St. NE #4 SP
Tokyo House Restaurant 3323 169th Pl. NE #G SP
Wendy’s 3404 172nd St. NE SP
Shopping & Specialty Retail
Antiques/Florists /Drug Store
Business Name Parcel Reference Number Neighborhood
Aunt Mary’s Quilt Shop 3323 169th Pl NE SP
Big Foot Music 3405 172nd St. NE #21 SP
Brushstrokes Art Supply 5702 172nd St. NE #B SP
Casa de Novias 17306 Smokey Pt. Dr. #15 SP
Games Plus 17306 Smokey Pt. Dr. #19 SP
Hook, Line & Sinker 17306 Smokey Pt. Dr. #18 SP
Mailbox Depot 3405 172nd St. NE #5 SP
Pacific Survey Supply 16716 Smokey Pt. Blvd. #1 SP
Reader’s Choice Used Books 3323 169th Pl. NE #F SP
Rite Aid 17226 Smokey Pt. Blvd. SP
Smokey Point Jewelry &
Pawn
3405 172nd St. NE #23 SP
Smokin 67 3405 172nd St. NE #4 SP
The Glass Cottage 4127 172nd St. NE SP
Technical Advantage 16710 Smokey Pt. Blvd.#304 SP
Your Healthy Home Store 3405 172nd St. NE SP
Virtual Floor 3323 169th Pl. NE #E SP
Sports & Recreation
Fitness/Country Clubs
Business Name Parcel Reference Number Neighborhood
Gold’s Gym 3131 Smokey Pt. Dr. SP
Northwest Dance & Acro
Center
5200 172nd St. NE #104 SP
Trinity Martial Arts 3405 172nd St. NE SP
«5
«3
«2
«1
«2
«4
«3 «3
«1
«2
«4
«4
«2
«3
«3
«3
«1
«2
«1
«2
«5
«3
«C
«A
«B
«B
«C
He
y
h
o
C
r
e
e
k
West
F
o
r
k
Q
u
i
l
c
e
d
a
C
r
e
e
k
Ed
g
e
c
o
m
b
e
C
r
e
e
k
South Slough
March Creek
Bjorn Creek
Portage Creek
Stillaguamish River
Sm
o
k
e
y
P
o
i
n
t
B
l
v
d
City of Marysville
City of Arlington
Twin
Lakes
?Ó
?Ô
!"`$
172ND ST NE
SM
O
K
E
Y
P
O
I
N
T
B
L
V
D
204TH ST NE
51
S
T
A
V
E
N
E
23
R
D
A
V
E
N
E
59
T
H
A
V
E
N
E
59
T
H
D
R
N
E
43
R
D
A
V
E
N
E
27
T
H
A
V
E
N
E
188TH ST NE
45
T
H
D
R
N
E
200TH ST NE
TW
I
N
L
A
K
E
S
A
V
E
31
S
T
A
V
E
N
E
168TH ST NE
35
T
H
A
V
E
N
E
169TH PL NE
SPRING LANE AVE
196TH PL NE
AIRPORT BLVD
166TH ST NE25
T
H
A
V
E
N
E
176TH PL NE
62
N
D
A
V
E
N
E
31ST DR NE
195TH ST N
E
180TH ST NE
51
S
T
D
R
N
E
186TH PL NE
182ND ST
40
T
H
A
V
E
N
E
177TH PL NE
171ST PL NE
175TH PL NE
178TH PL NE
169TH ST NE
174TH PL NE
62ND DR NE
179TH PL NE
206TH ST NE
207TH ST NE
HIGH CLOVER BLVD NE
46
TH D
R NE
46
T
H
A
V
E
N
E
184TH PL
42
N
D
D
R
N
E
60
T
H
A
V
E
N
E
168TH PL NE
173RD PL NE
58
T
H
A
V
E
N
E
197TH PL NE
59
T
H
D
R
N
E
188TH ST NE
200TH ST NE
43
R
D
A
V
E
N
E
27
T
H
A
V
E
N
E
177TH PL NE
188TH ST NE
175TH PL NE
West ArlingtonCurrent Zoning
Attachment 5.0
Zoning is shown for West Arlington Sub-Area and Aviation Flightline only. Water bodies, water courses(2006),Snohomish County Dept of Information Systems, GIS dataset.
Cartographer : LB
File : WArlAttachment5.0.mxd
Date :9/1/2010
Maps and GIS data are distributed “AS-IS” without warranties of any kind, either express or implied,including but not limited to warranties of suitability for a particular purpose or use. Map data are compiled from a variety of sources which may contain errors and users who rely upon the information do so at their own risk. Users agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City of Arlington for any and all liability of any nature arising out of or resulting from the lack of accuracy or correctness of the data, or the use of the data presented in the maps.
0 1,000 2,000500 Feet
RHD=High Density ResidentialRMD=Moderate Density ResidentialNC=Neighborhood CommercialGC=General CommercialHC=Highway CommercialBP=Business ParkLI=Light IndustrialP/SP= Public/Semi-PublicAF=Aviation Flightline
APD Safety Zones
APD Subdistricts
A B DC
West Arlington
Arlington City Limits
Watercourse
Waterbody
State Highway
Off ramp
State Route
Arterial
Streets "
Attachment 6.0 Available Land Inventory
Conditions Under Current Zoning
Neighborhood Acreage Parcels1 Avg. Size Infill-Res. Infill-Com.
Smokey Point 796 1343 0.59ac 422 du
West Bluff 85 51 1.67ac 20 du
Island Crossing 124 34 3.65ac 0 du
Total:
1005 1428 442 du 3472323 sf
Total Vacant
Land Acreage Parcels Avg. Size Infill-Res. Infill-Com.
Zoned HC
183.74 28 6.56 1840854 sf
Zoned GC
65.34 9 7.26 569242 sf
Zoned RMD 21.61 11 1.96 129 du*
Total:
270.69 48 129 du 2410096 sf
Premature Land Acreage Parcels Avg. Size Infill-Res. Infill-Com.
Zoned HC 102.58 31 3.31 1027728 sf
Zoned NC
3.96 4 0.99 34499 sf
Zoned RMD 45.31 48 1.01 288 du*
Zoned RHD 2.12 2 1.06 25 du**
Total:
153.97 85 313 du 1062227 sf
1Some properties have multiple parcel numbers to indicate that there is more than one owner.
Attachment 7.0 Community Transit
Source: Community Transit
He
y
h
o
C
r
e
e
k
West
F
o
r
k
Q
u
i
l
c
e
d
a
C
r
e
e
k
Ed
g
e
c
o
m
b
e
C
r
e
e
k
South Slough
March Creek
Bjorn Creek
Portage Creek
Stillaguamish River
188th St NE
186th St NE
180th St NE
178th St NE
182ndSt NE
184th St NE
176th St NE
174th St NE
170th St NE
172nd St NE
168th St NE
166th St NE
164th St NE
33rd A
v
e
N
E
41st A
v
e
N
E
39th A
v
e
N
E
37th A
v
e
N
E
35th A
v
e
N
E
43rd A
v
e
N
E
45th A
v
e
N
E
47th A
v
e
N
E
49th A
v
e
N
E
51st A
v
e
N
E
Sm
o
k
e
y
P
o
i
n
t
B
l
v
d
City of Arlington
Twin
Lakes
?Ó
?Ô
!"`$
Arlington Municipal Airport
204th St NE
Current West Arlington Pedestrian Network
Trails
West Arlington
City Limits
Roads-private
Watercourse
Waterbody
Public Sidewalks
State Highway
Off ramp
State Route
Arterial
Streets
Attachment 8.0
Water bodies, water courses(2006),Snohomish County Dept of Information Systems, GIS dataset.
Cartographer : LB
File : WArlAttachment8.0.mxd
Date :9/01/2010
Maps and GIS data are distributed “AS-IS” without warranties of any kind, either express or implied,including but not limited to warranties of suitability for a particular purpose or use. Map data are compiled from a variety of sources which may contain errors and users who rely upon the information do so at their own risk. Users agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City of Arlington for any and all liability of any nature arising out of or resulting from the lack of accuracy or correctness of the data, or the use of the data presented in the maps.
0 1,000 2,000500 Feet
"
He
y
h
o
C
r
e
e
k
West
F
o
r
k
Q
u
i
l
c
e
d
a
C
r
e
e
k
Ed
g
e
c
o
m
b
e
C
r
e
e
k
South Slough
March Creek
Bjorn Creek
Portage Creek
Stillaguamish River
Sm
o
k
e
y
P
o
i
n
t
B
l
v
d
City of Arlington
?Ó
?Ô
!"`$
Twin
Lakes
Arlington Municipal Airport
172ND ST NE
SM
O
K
E
Y
P
O
I
N
T
B
L
V
D
204TH ST NE
51
S
T
A
V
E
N
E
23
R
D
A
V
E
N
E
59
T
H
A
V
E
N
E
59
T
H
D
R
N
E
188TH ST NE
43
R
D
A
V
E
N
E
27
T
H
A
V
E
N
E
200TH ST NE
45
T
H
D
R
N
E
TW
I
N
L
A
K
E
S
A
V
E
31
S
T
A
V
E
N
E
168TH ST NE
35
T
H
A
V
E
N
E
169TH PL NE
SPRING LANE AVE
196TH PL NE
AIRPORT BLVD
166TH ST NE25
T
H
A
V
E
N
E
176TH PL NE
62
N
D
A
V
E
N
E
180TH ST31ST DR NE
180TH ST NE
51
S
T
D
R
N
E
186TH PL NE
182ND ST
40
T
H
A
V
E
N
E
177TH PL NE
171ST PL NE
175TH PL NE
178TH PL NE
169TH ST NE
174TH PL NE
195TH ST N
E
179TH PL NE
HIGH CLOVER BLVD NE
46TH D
R NE
61
S
T
A
V
E
N
E
46
T
H
A
V
E
N
E
184TH PL
43
R
D
D
R
N
E
174TH PL
42
N
D
D
R
N
E
170TH PL NE
60
T
H
A
V
E
N
E
168TH PL NE
173RD PL NE
58
T
H
A
V
E
N
E
197TH PL NE
59
T
H
D
R
N
E
60
T
H
A
V
E
N
E
43
R
D
A
V
E
N
E
188TH ST NE188TH ST NE
200TH ST NE
177TH PL NE
27
T
H
A
V
E
N
E
175TH PL NE
West ArlingtonWater and WastewaterUtility Services
Attachment 9.0
Water bodies, water courses(2006) Snohomish County Dept of Information Systems, GIS dataset.
Cartographer : LB
File : WArlAttachment9.0.mxd
Date :9/01/2010
Maps and GIS data are distributed “AS-IS” without warranties of any kind, either express or implied,including but not limited to warranties of suitability for a particular purpose or use. Map data are compiled from a variety of sources which may contain errors and users who rely upon the information do so at their own risk. Users agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City of Arlington for any and all liability of any nature arising out of or resulting from the lack of accuracy or correctness of the data, or the use of the data presented in the maps.
0 1,000 2,000500 Feet
City of Arlington Water/Wastewater Utility Service Area
City of Marysville Water/Wastewater Utility Service Area
West Arlington
Arlington City Limits
Roads-private
Watercourse
Waterbody
State Highway
Off ramp
State Route
Arterial
Streets
Utility Services are shown for the West Arlington Sub-Area only
"
He
y
h
o
C
r
e
e
k
West
F
o
r
k
Q
u
i
l
c
e
d
a
C
r
e
e
k
Ed
g
e
c
o
m
b
e
C
r
e
e
k
South Slough
March Creek
Bjorn Creek
Portage Creek
Stillaguamish River
Sm
o
k
e
y
P
o
i
n
t
B
l
v
d
City of Arlington
Twin Lakes
?Ó
?Ô
!"`$
L o w e r M a i n s t e m S t i l l a g u a m i s h Wa t e r s h e d
P o r t a g e C r e e k Wa t e r s h e d
M i d d l e F o r k Q u i l c e d a C r e e k Wa t e r s h e d
We s t F o r k Q u i l c e d a C r e e k Wa t e r s h e d
Arlington Municipal Airport
172ND ST NE
SM
O
K
E
Y
P
O
I
N
T
B
L
V
D
204TH ST NE
51
S
T
A
V
E
N
E
23
R
D
A
V
E
N
E
59
T
H
A
V
E
N
E
59
T
H
D
R
N
E
188TH ST NE
43
R
D
A
V
E
N
E
27
T
H
A
V
E
N
E
200TH ST NE
45
T
H
D
R
N
E
TW
I
N
L
A
K
E
S
A
V
E
31
S
T
A
V
E
N
E
168TH ST NE
35
T
H
A
V
E
N
E
169TH PL NE
SPRING LANE AVE
196TH PL NE
AIRPORT BLVD
166TH ST NE25
T
H
A
V
E
N
E
180TH ST
176TH PL NE
62
N
D
A
V
E
N
E
31ST DR NE
180TH ST NE
51
S
T
D
R
N
E
186TH PL NE
182ND ST
40
T
H
A
V
E
N
E
177TH PL NE
195TH ST N
E
175TH PL NE
178TH PL NE
169TH ST NE
174TH PL NE
179TH PL NE
HIGH CLOVER BLVD NE
206TH ST NE
46T
H
DR NE
46
T
H
A
V
E
N
E
184TH PL
43
R
D
D
R
N
E
174TH PL
42
N
D
D
R
N
E
170TH PL NE
60
T
H
A
V
E
N
E
173RD PL NE
58
T
H
A
V
E
N
E
197TH PL NE
43
R
D
A
V
E
N
E
59
T
H
D
R
N
E
188TH ST NE188TH ST NE
200TH ST NE
177TH PL NE
175TH PL NE
West ArlingtonKnown Critical Areas
Water bodies, water courses(2006),Snohomish County Dept of Information Systems, GIS dataset.
Cartographer : LB
File : WArlingtonAtt10.0.mxd
Date :9/1/2010
Maps and GIS data are distributed “AS-IS” without warranties of any kind, either express or implied,including but not limited to warranties of suitability for a particular purpose or use. Map data are compiled from a variety of sources which may contain errors and users who rely upon the information do so at their own risk. Users agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City of Arlington for any and all liability of any nature arising out of or resulting from the lack of accuracy or correctness of the data, or the use of the data presented in the maps.
"
West Arlington
Arlington City Limits
Roads-private
Watercourse
Waterbody
State Highway
Off ramp
State Route
Arterial
Streets
0 1,000 2,000500 Feet
Attachment 10.0
* It is anticipated that more Critical Areas will be added as this data set is "a work in progress".
2% Annual Chance of Flood Hazard
Flood data from the Federal Emergency Management Agency is preliminaryand should be considered draft data.
Critical Areas *
COA Designated Wetlands
Lower Mainstem Stillaguamish
MF Quilceda Creek
Portage Creek
WF Quilceda Creek
!Rèéë
!R !R
!R !R
!R
!R
!R
!R
He
y
h
o
C
r
e
e
k
West
F
o
r
k
Q
u
i
l
c
e
d
a
C
r
e
e
k
Ed
g
e
c
o
m
b
e
C
r
e
e
k
South Slough
March Creek
Bjorn Creek
Portage Creek
Stillaguamish River
River Trail
View Deck
188th St NE
186th St NE
180th St NE
178th St NE
182ndSt NE
184th St NE
176th St NE
174th St NE
170th St NE
172nd St NE
168th St NE
166th St NE
164th St NE
33rd A
v
e
N
E
41st A
v
e
N
E
39th A
v
e
N
E
37th A
v
e
N
E
35th A
v
e
N
E
43rd A
v
e
N
E
45th A
v
e
N
E
47th A
v
e
N
E
49th A
v
e
N
E
51st A
v
e
N
E
Sm
o
k
e
y
P
o
i
n
t
B
l
v
d
City of Arlington
Twin Lakes
Possible Future Freeway Interchange
?Ó
?Ô
!"`$
35th Ave./ Smokey Point Blvd.Improvements
Arlington Municipal Airport
204th St NE
West Arlington Proposed Road and Pedestrian Network Plan
Attachment 11.0
Local Access
Local Collector
Collector Arterial (3 lane)
Arterial (5 lane)
New Local Access
New Local Collector
New Collector Arterial (3 lane)
New Arterial (4 lane)
!R New 2 Lane Roundabout
èéë New Signal
* Proposed Trails
Planned
West Arlington
Watercourse
Waterbody
Arlington City Limits
Roads-private
State Highway
Off ramp
State Route
Arterial
Streets
Existing
Water bodies, water courses(2006), Snohomish County Dept of Information Systems, GIS dataset.
Applied Principles: 1. Connectivity 2. Accomodation for a Variety of Transposrtation Types 3.Sprawl Repair
Cartographer : LB
File : WArlAttachment11.0.mxd
Date :10/19/2010
Maps and GIS data are distributed “AS-IS” without warranties of any kind, either express or implied,including but not limited to warranties of suitability for a particular purpose or use. Map data are compiled from a variety of sources which may contain errors and users who rely upon the information do so at their own risk. Users agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City of Arlington for any and all liability of any nature arising out of or resulting from the lack of accuracy or correctness of the data, or the use of the data presented in the maps.
0 1,000 2,000500 Feet
* It is importatnt to note that all proposed trails are located outside of critical areas.
"
He
y
h
o
C
r
e
e
k
West
F
o
r
k
Q
u
i
l
c
e
d
a
C
r
e
e
k
Ed
g
e
c
o
m
b
e
C
r
e
e
k
South Slough
March Creek
Bjorn Creek
Portage Creek
Stillaguamish River
Sm
o
k
e
y
P
o
i
n
t
B
l
v
d
City of Arlington
?Ó
?Ô
!"`$
Twin
Lakes
A
SM
O
K
E
Y
P
O
I
N
T
B
L
V
D
172ND ST NE
204TH ST NE
51
S
T
A
V
E
N
E
23
R
D
A
V
E
N
E
59
T
H
A
V
E
N
E
59
T
H
D
R
N
E
188TH ST NE
43
R
D
A
V
E
N
E
27
T
H
A
V
E
N
E
200TH ST NE
TW
I
N
L
A
K
E
S
A
V
E
45
T
H
D
R
N
E
31
S
T
A
V
E
N
E
168TH ST NE
35
T
H
A
V
E
N
E
169TH PL NE
SPRING LANE AVE
196TH PL NE
AIRPORT BLVD
166TH ST NE25
T
H
A
V
E
N
E
180TH ST
176TH PL NE
62
N
D
A
V
E
N
E
31ST DR NE
186TH PL NE
180TH ST NE
51
S
T
D
R
N
E
182ND ST
40
T
H
A
V
E
N
E
177TH PL NE
171ST PL NE
175TH PL NE
178TH PL NE
169TH ST NE
174TH PL NE
179TH PL NE
HIGH CLOVER BLVD NE
46TH DR NE
61
S
T
A
V
E
N
E
46
T
H
A
V
E
N
E
184TH PL
43
R
D
D
R
N
E
174TH PL
42
N
D
D
R
N
E
170TH PL NE
189TH PL NE
60
T
H
A
V
E
N
E
173RD PL NE
58
T
H
A
V
E
N
E
197TH PL NE
59
T
H
D
R
N
E
188TH ST NE 188TH ST NE
43
R
D
A
V
E
N
E
200TH ST NE
177TH PL NE
175TH PL NE
27
T
H
A
V
E
N
E
Proposed West ArlingtonGateway Monument Placement
West Arlington
Arlington City Limits
Roads-private
Watercourse
Waterbody
State Highway
Off ramp
State Route
Arterial
Streets
Attachment 12.0
Water bodies, water courses(2006),Snohomish County Dept of Information Systems, GIS dataset.
Cartographer : LB
File : WArlAttachment12.0.mxd
Date :9/1/2010
Maps and GIS data are distributed “AS-IS” without warranties of any kind, either express or implied,including but not limited to warranties of suitability for a particular purpose or use. Map data are compiled from a variety of sources which may contain errors and users who rely upon the information do so at their own risk. Users agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City of Arlington for any and all liability of any nature arising out of or resulting from the lack of accuracy or correctness of the data, or the use of the data presented in the maps.
0 1,000 2,000500 Feet
Arlington Municipal Airport
A Gateway Monument
"
He
y
h
o
C
r
e
e
k
West
F
o
r
k
Q
u
i
l
c
e
d
a
C
r
e
e
k
Ed
g
e
c
o
m
b
e
C
r
e
e
k
South Slough
March Creek
Bjorn Creek
Portage Creek
Stillaguamish River
Sm
o
k
e
y
P
o
i
n
t
B
l
v
d
City of Arlington
Lakes
?Ó
?Ô
!"`$
SD-1
T1-NZ
SD-1
SD-1 SD-1T4-NG T4-NG
T4-NG
T1-NZ
T1-NZ
T1-NZ
T5-NC
T5-NC
T1-NZ
T1-NZ
T3-NS
T3-NS
T3-NS
204th St. NE
172ND ST NE
SM
O
K
E
Y
P
O
I
N
T
B
L
V
D
204TH ST NE
51
S
T
A
V
E
N
E
23
R
D
A
V
E
N
E
59
T
H
A
V
E
N
E
59
T
H
D
R
N
E
43
R
D
A
V
E
N
E
188TH ST NE
27
T
H
A
V
E
N
E
45
T
H
D
R
N
E
200TH ST NE
TW
I
N
L
A
K
E
S
A
V
E
31
S
T
A
V
E
N
E
168TH ST NE
169TH PL NE
SPRING LANE AVE
196TH PL NE
AIRPORT BLVD
166TH ST NE
180TH ST
25
T
H
A
V
E
N
E
176TH PL NE
62
N
D
A
V
E
N
E
31ST DR NE
180TH ST NE
51
S
T
D
R
N
E
186TH PL NE
182ND ST
195TH ST N
E
177TH PL NE
171ST PL NE
175TH PL NE
178TH PL NE
174TH PL NE
179TH PL NE
HIGH CLOVER BLVD NE
206TH ST NE
207TH ST NE
46T
H
DR NE
46
T
H
A
V
E
N
E
200TH PL NE
184TH PL
43
R
D
D
R
N
E
174TH PL
42
N
D
D
R
N
E
60
T
H
A
V
E
N
E
187TH PL
168TH PL NE
173RD PL NE
58
T
H
A
V
E
N
E
197TH PL NE
188TH ST NE 188TH ST NE
200TH ST NE
59
T
H
D
R
N
E
43
R
D
A
V
E
N
E
27
T
H
A
V
E
N
E
175TH PL NE
Proposed West ArlingtonRegulating Plan
Attachment 13.0
Cartographer : LB
File : WArlAttachment13.0.mxd
Date :9/1/2010
Maps and GIS data are distributed “AS-IS” without warranties of any kind, either express or implied,including but not limited to warranties of suitability for a particular purpose or use. Map data are compiled from a variety of sources which may contain errors and users who rely upon the information do so at their own risk. Users agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City of Arlington for any and all liability of any nature arising out of or resulting from the lack of accuracy or correctness of the data, or the use of the data presented in the maps.
0 1,000 2,000500 Feet
West Arlington
Arlington City Limits
Roads-private
Watercourse
Waterbody
State Highway
Off ramp
State Route
Arterial
Streets "Water bodies, water courses(2006),Snohomish County Dept of Information Systems, GIS dataset.
Arlington Municipal Airport
Special District (SD)
T3 Neighborhood Suburban (NS)
T4 Neighborhood General (NG)
T5 Neighborhood Center (NC)
T1 Natural Zone (NZ) *
Chapter 12:
Other Related Plans Adopted
by Reference
12.1 PURPOSE OF THIS CHAPTER .............................................................................. 12-1
12.2 SEWER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ......................................................................... 12-1
12.3 WATER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ......................................................................... 12-1
12.4 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ......................................... 12-3
12.5 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN ........................................................................ 12-3
12.6 AIRPORT MASTER PLAN .................................................................................... 12-3
12.7 SHORELINE MASTER PLAN ................................................................................. 12-6
12.8 ARLINGTON SCHOOL DISTRICT CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN .................................... 12-6
12.9 LAKEWOOD SCHOOL DISTRICT CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN .................................... 12-6
12.10 SNOHOMISH COUNTY SOLID W ASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN .................................... 12-6
12.11 WEST ARLINGTON SUB AREA PLAN…………………………………………... 12-6
City of Arlington Comprehensive Plan Other Plans Adopted by Reference
12 - 1 5 December 2005January 2011
12 Other Related Plans Adopted by
Reference
12.1 PURPOSE OF THIS
CHAPTER
There are several Comprehensive Plans
developed independently of this document
that nevertheless work in tandem with it and
are therefore considered a part of this Com-
prehensive Plan. When these documents
are created and/or updated, information
from this plan is used in formulating them or
vice-versa.
The following plans are hereby adopted by
reference as a part of this plan.
12.2 SEWER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The City of Arlington's sanitary sewer sys-
tem is a major infrastructure, much of which
is imperceptible to the people that discharge
waste to it. The sanitary sewer system re-
quires qualified staff to operate and main-
tain it, and an ongoing capital improvement
program to replace old components to meet
the requirements mandated by federal and
state laws. The primary purpose of the City
of Arlington Comprehensive Sewer System
Plan is:
To evaluate existing sewer flow data
and project future flows.
To analyze the existing sewer system to
determine if it meets minimum require-
ments mandated by DOE and the City’s
own policies and design criteria.
Determine the overall reliability and vul-
nerability of existing wastewater lift sta-
tions.
To identify sewer system improvements
that will resolve existing system defi-
ciencies and accommodate future needs
of the system for at least 20 years into
the future.
To prepare a schedule of improvements
that meets the goals of the City’s finan-
cial program.
The City of Arlington Comprehensive Sewer
Plan is presently being updated and should
be completed in early 2006. Although not
completed, the Plan is expected to present
a description of the existing sewer system
and service area, a forecast of future sewer
demands, policies and design criteria for
sewer system operation and improvements,
the operations and maintenance program,
staffing requirements, a schedule of im-
provements, and a financial plan to accom-
plish the improvements. The Plan should
also include several ancillary elements such
as sludge management, solids handling and
wastewater pretreatment programs, and
NPDES and other permitting requirements.
12.3 WATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The City of Arlington's water system is a
major infrastructure, much of which is invisi-
ble to the people that receive water from it.
The water system requires qualified staff to
operate and maintain it, and an ongoing
capital improvement program to replace old
components to meet the requirements man-
dated by federal and state laws. The prima-
ry purpose of the City of Arlington Compre-
hensive Water System Plan is:
To evaluate existing water demand data
and project future water demands.
To analyze the existing water system to
determine if it meets minimum require-
ments mandated by DOH and the City’s
own policies and design criteria.
City of Arlington Comprehensive Plan Other Plans Adopted by Reference
12 - 2 5 December 2005January 2011
To identify water system improvements
that resolve existing system deficiencies
and accommodate future needs of the
system for at least 20 years into the f u-
ture.
To prepare a schedule of improvements
that meets the goals of the City’s finan-
cial program.
To evaluate past water quality and iden-
tify water quality improvements, as ne-
cessary.
To document the City’s operations and
maintenance program.
To prepare conservation, emergency
response, cross connection control,
wellhead and watershed protection, and
water quality monitoring plans.
To comply with all other water system
plan requirements of DOH.
This plan complies with Washington State
Department of Health (DOH) regulations
under WAC 246.290.100, which requires
water purveyors to update their water sys-
tem plans every six years. The current City
of Arlington Water System Comprehensive
Plan was approved by DOH in August 2004
and adopted by Arlington City Council in
August 2005.
The Comprehensive Water System Plan
presents a description of the existing water
system and service area, a forecast of fu-
ture water demands, policies and design
criteria for water system operation and im-
provements, the operations and mainten-
ance program, staffing requirements, a
schedule of improvements, and a financial
plan to accomplish the improvements. The
Plan also includes several ancillary ele-
ments, which include a water conservation
plan, a water quality monitoring plan, a
wellhead protection plan, and an emergency
response plan.
The existing water system was evaluated
to determine its ability to meet the policies
and design criteria of the City and those
mandated by the Department of Health. The
results of the evaluation are summarized
below.
The City has sufficient water supply to
meet the demands of the existing water
system customers. However, additional
water supply will be needed as early as
2014 to meet the projected demands of
the system based on the forecasted
population growth.
The existing Airport Well need rehabili-
tation related to the aging structure and
general safety issues. If the City can ob-
tain additional water rights for the well,
the capacity of the well will be increased
and the water will require iron and man-
ganese treatment.
Additional storage is needed for system
redundancy and for future storage re-
quirements related to growth.
The Burn Road Reservoir is surrounded
by steep slopes and is reaching its de-
sign life. Abandonment of the storage
reservoir is necessary.
General structural and ventilation im-
provements are necessary at the Gle-
neagle Reservoir.
Several areas of system require re-
placement of existing water main to re-
solve deficiencies related to low fire
flows, aging water main, and undesira-
ble materials.
An additional pressure reducing station
is needed to improve fire flow in a loca-
lized area.
The existing remote telemetry units are
linked to the master telemetry unit with
leased telephone lines and should be
upgraded to a radio-based or fiber-optic
based telemetry system.
Improvements to the water system are ne-
cessary, primarily to resolve existing system
deficiencies, but also to accommodate the
increase in water demands from future
growth. Improvements identified for the first
six years of the capital improvement pro-
gram (2004-2009) are estimated to cost ap-
proximately $14,317,000, which results in
an average expenditure of approximately
City of Arlington Comprehensive Plan Other Plans Adopted by Reference
12 - 3 5 December 2005January 2011
$2,386,000 per year. Improvements in the
following six years (2010-2015) are esti-
mated to cost approximately $11,516,000.
The financial analysis is intended to illu-
strate the feasibility of funding the operation
and maintenance and capital improvements
recommended for the water system for the
next six years. The first six years of capital
improvements can be funded from a combi-
nation of sources that include low interest
Public Works Trust Fund loans, connection
charges, rates and reserves. The cost of
operating the water system and funding
capital improvements over the upcoming six
years will require an increase in rates and
connection charges.
12.4 STORMWATER
MANAGEMENT
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The City of Arlington has many programs
and activities in place to protect the quality
of surface waters and groundwater. The
City developed a stormwater comprehen-
sive plan in 1995 that addressed both the
management of stormwater quantity and
quality (local flooding or stormwater pollu-
tion problems). The City regulates stormwa-
ter impacts through its stormwater ordin-
ance (Ordinance No. 1266) adopted by the
City Council on September 4, 2001, and will
soon begin to finance stormwater capital
facilities through the implementation of a
stormwater utility authorized by the same
ordinance. Because the regulatory environ-
ment has changed since 1995, particularly
with respect to endangered species and the
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) Phase II stormwater dis-
charge permit for small municipalities, the
City is obligated to re-visit its stormwater
management plan to ensure that spending
on capital facilities is focused on appropriate
goals.
The City of Arlington is in the process of up-
dating its Stormwater Management Com-
prehensive Plan. The expected completion
date of the Plan is May 2006. Several fed-
eral, state, and local regulatory programs
that address management of both surface
and groundwater in the Arlington area will
affect preparation of the Stormwater Man-
agement Comprehensive Plan. Some of the
most pertinent regulations and programs
are:
Federal Clean Water Act NPDES re-
quirements.
Federal Clean Water Act total maximum
daily load (TMDL) requirements, for the
Stillaguamish River and the Quilceda-
Allen watershed.
Federal Safe Drinking Water Act sole
source aquifer and wellhead protection
requirements.
Federal Endangered Species Act.
State Water Quality Standards.
State In-stream Flow Rule.
State Underground Injection Control
program.
State GMA requirements.
State Centennial Clean Water Fund
grant requirements.
12.5 ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT PLAN
The Arlington Economic Development Plan,
adopted in October 2005, is a blueprint of
action items designed to give guidance to
the City in terms of proactive steps the City
can take to increase economic develop-
ment. See §10.4.2, Economic Development
Plan, for a description of the plan, and
§10.5.3, Specific Actions from the Economic
Development Plan, for a description of
these action items.
12.6 AIRPORT MASTER
PLAN
The Arlington City Council adopted the Ar-
lington Municipal Airport Master Plan in
City of Arlington Comprehensive Plan Other Plans Adopted by Reference
12 - 4 5 December 2005January 2011
1995. The Master Plan currently in use was
revised in June of 2002. This was due in
part by the Federal Aviation Administration's
(FAA) request to show the Fly-In and Arling-
ton Aeronautical Development land use
plans. Its revision cycle is every five to six
years. The report determined the short-, in-
termediate-, and long-range needs for facili-
ties at Arlington Municipal Airport.
The planned improvements recommended
therein were intended to:
Allow Arlington Municipal Airport to con-
tinue to serve the general aviation and
aviation-related needs of the area.
Continue to provide those facilities
needed to serve the traditional users of
the Airport.
Permit the continued development of the
Airport to serve potential increases in
the services required.
Maintain a high degree of flexibility in
design so that future changes in the de-
signation of the Airport and needs of po-
tential users can be accommodated.
The Master Plan report includes a determi-
nation of the anticipated growth to be expe-
rienced at Arlington Municipal Airport and
an evaluation of the ability of the existing
facilities to accommodate this demand.
In preparing the scope and direction for the
Master Plan, it was determined that given
the context which the Arlington Airport is
currently operating within, it would be ne-
cessary to analyze four different operational
alternatives, or roles, which the Airport
might be expected to serve over the speci-
fied planning period. The four roles, which
were analyzed as part of this master plan-
ning effort included:
Remaining in its traditional role as a
general aviation-only facility. The Airport
would then respond to the forecasted
needs of the user group.
Expanding the role of the Airport to pro-
vide regional commuter passenger ser-
vice. The Airport would assume regional
commuter passenger service and exist-
ing facilities would be provided to ac-
commodate aircraft such as the Fair-
child Metroliner, or Dornier 328.
Promoting the Airport as an aviation-
related industrial facility. The Airport
would assume an industrial air cargo
role and would provide the necessary
facilities to accommodate aircraft such
as the Bae 146-100 cargo aircraft.
Promoting the Airport as a business and
corporate aviation facility. The Airport
would assume a business/corporate role
and would provide the necessary im-
provements to accommodate aircraft
such as the IAI 1125 Westwind business
jet.
The traditional role of the Arlington Munici-
pal Airport is that of a general aviation (GA)
facility. This was determined after consider-
ation of all of the data and analyses pre-
sented during the preceding elements of the
Master Plan update. In addition, and after
much consideration, the Arlington Master
Plan Advisory Committee unanimously
chose the role to remain as a traditional
general aviation airport, including support of
business/corporate aircraft uses. The fore-
casts generated for each of the four opera-
tional scenarios were then used to deter-
mine whether or not existing facilities at the
Airport would be sufficient to accommodate
the forecast growth activity. The Advisory
Committee's recommendations were pre-
sented to both the Arlington Airport Com-
mission and the Arlington City Council for
review and approval. The Commission and
the Council both voted unanimously in sup-
port of the Advisory Committee's recom-
mendations, and the Airport Layout Plan
was further refined to support these deci-
sions. Hence, the Airport remains in its tra-
ditional GA role and existing facilities will
respond to the forecasted needs of the user
group.
City of Arlington Comprehensive Plan Other Plans Adopted by Reference
12 - 5 5 December 2005January 2011
The Master Plan is comprised of the follow-
ing:
Airport Activity Forecasts
Facility Requirements
Development Concepts and Alternative
Analysis
Airport Environs Land Use Plan and
Noise Analysis
Airport Plans and Development Program
Forecasting is the key element in the plan-
ning process. Forecasts are essential for
analyzing existing airport facilities and iden-
tifying future needs and requirements for
these facilities. Historic and existing airport
activity plays an important role in determin-
ing future activity. Historically, the socioeco-
nomic conditions of a particular region im-
pact aviation activity within that region. Lo-
cal and itinerant operations as well as
based aircraft at the field help to project fu-
ture operations. The amount and kind of
aviation activity occurring at an airport is
dependant upon many factors, but are
usually reflective of the services available to
aircraft operators, the businesses located
on the airport or within the community, and
the general economic conditions prevalent
within the surrounding area. The most often
analyzed indicators are population, em-
ployment, and income.
The ability of an airport to accommodate the
existing and forecasted aviation activity is
primarily a function of the major aircraft op-
erating surfaces that compose the facility
and the configuration of those surfaces
(runways and taxiways). Facility require-
ments are also related to and considered in
conjunction with weather conditions, the
surrounding airspace, the availability and
type of navigational facilities, and the type
and amount of landside access.
Development Concepts and Recommenda-
tions are presented in the Master Plan in
terms of both their concept and reasoning.
Therefore, several basic assumptions have
been established, which are intended to di-
rect the future expansion of airport devel-
opment. These assumptions are supported
by the aviation activity forecasts and include
a commitment for continued Airport expan-
sion, which supports the need of the region
and thus generates economic development.
The Airport Environs Land Use Plan and
Noise Analysis was developed due to the
following. The relationship between airports
and surrounding land uses is a very sensi-
tive issue in most communities today.
Hence, it must be carefully monitored and
regulated to avoid future airport/community
conflicts. Land use planning considerations
set forth in this document are intended to
present clear and concise recommendations
regarding the ownership and development
of land within the Arlington Municipal Airport
influence area. Interested parties would in-
clude homeowners and buyers, homebuild-
ers, developers, area representatives, and
local jurisdiction having land use control au-
thority.
The two primary issues associated with land
use planning in the vicinity of airports are
safety and noise. The issue of safety per-
tains to both public on the ground and the
public involved with the flight operation. The
issue of noise is related to the operation of
an aircraft and its impact upon the surround-
ing influence area of the airport.
The Washington State Growth Management
Act (GMA), requires that the comprehensive
plan of each county and city that plan under
the GMA, include a process for identifying
and siting essential public facilities. Airports
are designated as essential public facilities
within the State of Washington; therefore,
the implementation of both land use and
development controls is vested within the
authority of local city, county, or state gov-
ernments and they are responsible for en-
suring compatible land use and appropriate
zoning requirements around airports.
Under the Airport Plans and Development
Program, the plan for the future develop-
ment of Arlington Municipal Airport has
evolved from an analysis of numerous con-
City of Arlington Comprehensive Plan Other Plans Adopted by Reference
12 - 6 5 December 2005January 2011
siderations. Among these are: aviation de-
mand, aviation activity forecasts, aircraft
operational characteristics, facility require-
ments, and environmental considerations. In
addition, the general direction or thrust of
future airport development, as expressed by
the City of Arlington and as characterized in
the statement of goals, served as a basis for
this airport planning process.
12.7 SHORELINE MASTER
PLAN
The City has adopted the 1974 Snohomish
County Shoreline Management Master Pro-
gram as its Shoreline Master Plan, though it
has been amended numerous times. Truth
told, it is a very old document and complete-
ly out of line with today’s laws and sensibili-
ties. The City is required under state law to
update its shoreline plan by 2009.
12.8 ARLINGTON SCHOOL
DISTRICT CAPITAL
FACILITIES PLAN
The Arlington School District is required to
prepare a 6-year Capital Facilities Plan
every two years. Based on projected
growth, this plan details the projected capi-
tal facilities the district will need to provide
the required educational services. Every two
years the district applies for a Comprehen-
sive Plan amendment through the City so as
to incorporate their latest plan. It is on this
plan that school impact fees are based.
12.9 LAKEWOOD SCHOOL
DISTRICT CAPITAL
FACILITIES PLAN
The Lakewood School District is required to
prepare a 6-year Capital Facilities Plan
every two years. Based on projected
growth, this plan details the projected capi-
tal facilities the district will need to provide
the required educational services. Every two
years the district applies for a Comprehen-
sive Plan amendment through the City so as
to incorporate their latest plan. It is on this
plan that school impact fees are based.
12.10 SNOHOMISH
COUNTY SOLID WASTE
MANAGEMENT PLAN
Arlington is signatory to this plan and our
solid waste planning is completed in con-
junction with Snohomish County; this is our
official solid waste planning document.
12.11 WEST ARLINGTON
SUB AREA PLAN
The West Arlington Sub Area Plan, adopted
in January 2011, is a blueprint for urban
growth and development in the western
neighborhoods of the City, including Smo-
key Point, West Bluff and Island Crossing.
Long range planning for this area include
the incorporation of guiding principles that
focus around the theory of “new urbanism”
and the creation of a “sense of place.” The
Plan focuses on a variety of public and pri-
vate realm recommendations, including im-
proved connectivity, a variety of homes and
businesses, improved transportation, new
civic and public spaces and improved archi-
tecture. The Plan sets the stage for the im-
plementation of a form-based code and the
use of transfer of development rights to in-
crease density in the sub-area while pre-
serving valuable resource lands within the
Stillaguamish River Valley.
City of Arlington
Council Agenda Bill
AGENDA ITEM:
New Business #4
ATTACHMENT E
COUNCIL MEETING DATE:
January 18, 2011
SUBJECT:
West Arlington Sub Area Plan - 2010
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN:
Community Development – David Kuhl, Todd Hall
ATTACHMENTS:
1. City Council Workshop Memo, Final Draft West Arlington Sub Area Plan
2. January 18, 2011 Final Draft West Arlington Sub Area Plan
3. Comp Plan text amendment for Chapter 12 – Related Plans Adopted by Reference
4. Handouts for Power Point Presentation
EXPENDITURES REQUESTED: -0-
BUDGET CATEGORY: N/A
LEGAL REVIEW:
Ordinance has been reviewed by City Attorney
DESCRIPTION: City-initiated adoption of the West Arlington Sub Area Plan as an amendment
to the City of Arlington Comprehensive Plan. This project is within the 2010 City of Arlington
Comprehensive Plan Update docket cycle. The Sub Area Plan will guide future growth and
development in the western region of the City of Arlington. Specific goals are outlined in the
document, including but not limited to housing, commercial development, transportation,
public spaces, building types, and building placement. Brief discussion is included regarding
future implementation of a form-based code and transfer of development rights program.
HISTORY: The process to develop the West Arlington Sub Area Plan began in the summer of
2009. Open houses were held on October 20, 2009, May 20, 2010, and October 7, 2010. Each
meeting gave the public the opportunity to express their thoughts, ideas, and concerns for the
future growth and redevelopment of the sub area. Staff presented a draft plan at the October 7,
2010 public meeting, as well as at the November 2, 2010 Planning Commission meeting and
December 13, 2010 City Council workshop. The Final Draft was presented in front of the
Planning Commission at a public hearing on January 4th, 2011. The Planning Commission
recommended that the City Council review and approve the Sub Area Plan at the public hearing
on January 18, 2011.
ALTERNATIVES:
None.
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Move to approve the Final Draft West Arlington Sub Area Plan as presented by Community
Development staff and recommended for approval by the Planning Commission.
ORDINANCE NO. _____ 1
ORDINANCE NO. 2011-xxx
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ARLINGTON, WASHINGTON
ADOPTING THE WEST ARLINGTON SUB AREA PLAN AS A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF ARLINGTON COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
WHEREAS, the City of Arlington, Washington has the authority to regulate land uses
within the City, and has gone through its periodic review and update of the Comprehensive Plan;
and
WHEREAS, the City of Arlington Comprehensive Plan may be updated once per year
per RCW 36.70A.130; and
WHEREAS, the City of Arlington has developed the West Arlington Sub Area Plan, a
document; and
WHEREAS, the West Arlington Sub Area Plan and Chapter 12 of the Comprehensive
Plan are included in the 2010 Comprehensive Plan Amendment docket; and
WHEREAS, the West Arlington Sub Area Plan serves as a guiding document for future
growth and development in the western neighborhoods of the City of Arlington, including
Smokey Point, West Bluff and Island Crossing; and
WHEREAS, long range planning for the West Arlington Sub Area includes the
incorporation of new urbanism principles and the creation of a “sense of place;” and
WHEREAS, public and private improvements are proposed, including improved
connectivity, variety of businesses, improved transportation, new civic and public spaces, and
improved architecture; and
WHERAS, in conjunction with the West Arlington Sub Area Plan, the City proposes a
form-based code to implement the vision for the sub-area; and
WHEREAS, a transfer of development rights program will be developed to increase
densities within the sub-area while preserving valuable resource lands within the Stillaguamish
River Valley; and
WHEREAS, the West Arlington Sub Area Plan and amendments to Chapter 12 of the
Comprehensive Plan were submitted and reviewed by the Washington State Department of
Commerce on October 21, 2010, in compliance with RCW 36.70A.106; and
WHEREAS, staff reviewed the project for environmental impacts under the State
Environmental Protection Act and issued a Determination of Nonsignificance on October 28,
2010; and
ORDINANCE NO. _____ 2
WHEREAS, public meetings were held on October 20, 2009, May 20, 2010, and October
7, 2010 to give the citizens of Arlington and general public the opportunity to review and
comment on the proposed sub-area plan; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the proposed Comprehensive Plan
amendments, including the West Arlington Sub Area Plan and amendments to Chapter 12 of the
Comprehensive Plan at their January 4, 2011 public hearing and made a recommendation to the
City Council to adopt the amendments. The City Council considered these amendments at their
December 13, 2010 workshop and at a public hearing on January 18, 2011 and determined
approving the amendments was in the best interest of the City and its citizens.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Arlington do hereby ordain as
follows:
Section 1. West Arlington Sub-Area Plan Comprehensive Plan Amendment
(PLN20100002). The City of Arlington Comprehensive Plan shall be amended to
include the West Arlington Sub-Area Plan as a plan adopted and incorporated by
reference as listed in Chapter 12: Other Related Plans Adopted by Reference.
Section 2. A new subsection of the Comprehensive Plan (12.11 – West Arlington
Sub-Area Plan) shall be added to Chapter 12: Other Related Plans Adopted by Reference,
and shall be amended to read as follows:
12.11 WEST ARLINGTON SUB AREA PLAN
The West Arlington Sub Area Plan, adopted in January 2011, is a blueprint for urban
growth and development in the western neighborhoods of the City, including Smokey
Point, West Bluff and Island Crossing. Long range planning for this area include the
incorporation of guiding principles that focus around the theory of “new urbanism” and
the creation of a “sense of place.” The Plan focuses on a variety of public and private
realm recommendations, including improved connectivity, a variety of homes and
businesses, improved transportation, new civic and public spaces and improved
architecture. The Plan sets the stage for the implementation of a form-based code and the
use of transfer of development rights to increase density in the sub-area while preserving
valuable resource lands within the Stillaguamish River Valley.
Section 3. Severability. If any provision, section, or part of this ordinance shall be
adjudged to be invalid or unconstitutional, such adjudication shall not affect the validity
of the ordinance as a whole or any section, provision or part thereof not adjudged invalid
or unconstitutional.
Section 4. Effective Date. A summary of this Ordinance consisting of its title shall
be published in the official newspaper of the City, and shall take effect and be in full
force five (5) days of the date of publication.
ORDINANCE NO. _____ 3
PASSED BY the City Council and APPROVED by the Mayor this day of
________________, 2011.
CITY OF ARLINGTON
____________________________
Margaret Larson, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________
Kristin Banfield, City Clerk
APPROVED TO AS FORM:
__________________________
Steven J. Peiffle, City Attorney
City of Arlington
Council Agenda Bill
AGENDA ITEM:
New Business #5
ATTACHMENT F
COUNCIL MEETING DATE:
January 18, 2011
SUBJECT:
Fourth Amendment to the Interlocal
Agreement for Municipal Court Services
between the City of Marysville and the City of
Arlington
DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN:
Executive
ATTACHMENTS:
- Proposed 4th Amendment to the ILA for Municipal Court Services
EXPENDITURES REQUESTED:
BUDGET CATEGORY: Criminal Justice
LEGAL REVIEW: City Attorney review is complete.
DESCRIPTION:
The City of Marysville is requesting an amendment to its interlocal agreement with the City of
Arlington for Court Services. The amendment increases in the filing fee for criminal citations
from $90 to $110. The filing fee for infractions will remain at $42.
HISTORY:
The City of Arlington has contracted with Marysville for Court Services since 2002. The last
amendment to the Court ILA was executed in May 2009.
ALTERNATIVES:
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
I move Council authorize the Mayor to sign the Fourth Amendment to the Interlocal
Agreement for Municipal Court Services between the City of Marysville and the City of
Arlington.
Arlington agt amend 4 CS filing fee 2011
1
FOURTH AMENDMENT TO
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR
MUNICIPAL COURT SERVICES
BETWEEN THE CITY OF MARYSVILLE
AND THE CITY OF ARLINGTON
INCREASING FILING FEES TO $110.00 FOR CRIMINAL CITATIONS
THIS AMENDMENT to Interlocal Agreement for Municipal Court Services is made and
entered into this day by and between the City of Marysville, a municipal corporation in the State
of Washington (“Marysville”), and the City of Arlington, a municipal corporation in the State of
Washington (“Arlington”).
WHEREAS, Marysville and Arlington entered into an Interlocal Agreement for
Municipal Court Services recorded at the Snohomish County Auditor’s office on April 4, 2003;
and
WHEREAS, Marysville and Arlington entered into a First Amendment to Interlocal
Agreement for Municipal Court Services and First Renewal for Three Year term January 1, 2005
to May 30, 2008, which was recorded on November 12, 2005; and
WHEREAS, Marysville and Arlington entered into a Second Amendment to Interlocal
Agreement for Municipal Court Services between the City of Marysville and the City of
Arlington which was recorded on August 24, 2007; and
WHEREAS, Marysville and Arlington entered into a Third Amendment to the Interlocal
Agreement for Municipal Court Services on May 11, 2009; and
WHEREAS, the parties recognize the need for increased fees to fund the increased case
load and the agreement as revised in the Second Amendment provides in Paragraph 3 that fees
may be revised prior to the contract renewal date.
Paragraph 3. FEES. In consideration of the services and supplies enumerated in
Section 2 above, Arlington shall pay Marysville $35 for the fining of each
infraction and each criminal citation. The above-referenced fees may be revised
prior to contract renewals for the succeeding contract.
WHEREAS, the parties wish to agree to certain amendments and revisions to the
agreement regarding the increased filing fees.
NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF the terms and provisions hereof,
Arlington and Marysville agree to amend the Interlocal Agreement for Municipal Court Services
entered into on June 17, 2002 and the First Amendment to Interlocal Agreement for Municipal
Court Services dated October 10, 2005, and the Second Amendment to Interlocal Agreement for
Municipal Court Services between the City of Marysville and the City of Arlington entered on
Arlington agt amend 4 CS filing fee 2011
2
July 23, 2007, and the Third Amendment to the Interlocal Agreement for Municipal Court
Services entered on May 11, 2009, as follows:
1. Paragraph 3 is amended to read as follows:
3. FEES. In consideration of the services and supplies enumerated in Section 2
above, Arlington shall pay Marysville $42.00 for the fining of each infraction and
$110.00 for each criminal citation. The above-referenced fees shall be increased
at a rate of 100% of the Seattle CPI-W June Index for the year prior with a
minimum of 0% to a maximum of 2.25%. The rate increase will occur on January
1 of each year unless otherwise negotiated and agreed by the parties.
Effective date of the fees will be January 1, 2011
2. Except as provided herein, all other provisions of the Interlocal Agreement for
Municipal Court Services entered into on June 17, 2002 and the First Amendment
to Interlocal Agreement for Municipal Court Services dated October 10, 2005,
and the Second Amendment to Interlocal Agreement for Municipal Court
Services between the City of Marysville and the City of Arlington entered on July
23, 2007, and the Third Amendment to the Interlocal Agreement for Municipal
Court Services entered on May 11, 2009 shall remain in full force and effect,
unchanged.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this agreement to be executed.
CITY OF ARLINGTON CITY OF MARYSVILLE
By ______________________________ By ______________________________
MARGARET LARSON, Mayor JOHN NEHRING, Mayor
Date______________________________ Date_____________________________
APPROVED as to form: APPROVED as to form:
_________________________________ _________________________________
STEVEN J. PEIFFLE, City Attorney GRANT K. WEED, City Attorney
Date______________________________ Date_____________________________