Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-12-2011_Council Workshop Packet SPECIAL ACCOMMODATIONS: The City of Arlington strives to provide accessible meetings for people with disabilities. Please contact the ADA coordinator at (360) 403-3441 or 1-800-833-8388 (TDD only) prior to the meeting date if special accommodations are required. CALL TO ORDER / PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA WORKSHOP ITEMS ~ NO FINAL ACTION WILL BE TAKEN 1. (5 min) Cascade Valley Hospital Utility Easement Dedication ATTACHMENT A 2. (5 min) COA-ASD Amendment to the 2002 Settlement Agreement & ROW Acceptance from ASD for 186th St NE ATTACHMENT B 3. (5 min) Presentation on PARC Recommended Blow Wall for 67th Ave, Phase 3 Project ATTACHMENT C 4. (5 min) Interlocal with Dawson’s Place for Child Interview Specialist ATTACHMENT D 5. (5 min) Fifth Amendment to Interlocal Agreement for Municipal Court Services with Marysville ATTACHMENT E 6. (10 min) Graafstra Annexation – Development Agreement ATTACHMENT F 7. (5 min) Review 2011 Budget Amendments ATTACHMENT G 8. (30 min) 2012 Budget Workshop ATTACHMENT H 9. Miscellaneous Council Items ADJOURNMENT To open all attachments, click here Arlington City Council Workshop December 12, 2011 – 7 PM City Council Chambers ~ 110 E. Third City of Arlington Council Agenda Bill AGENDA ITEM: WORKSHOP #1 ATTACHMENT A COUNCIL WORKSHOP DATE: December 12 , 2011 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Cascade Valley Hospital Utility Easements DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN: Public Works – Utilities Division ATTACHMENTS: • Utility Easement Exhibit Map EXPENDITURES REQUESTED: N/A BUDGET CATEGORY: N/A LEGAL REVIEW: Pending Final Review by City Attorney DESCRIPTION: Acceptance of new Utility Easements that are associated with the Cascade Valley Hospital Remodel and Expansion HISTORY: The recent remodel and expansion at Cascade Valley Hospital upgraded several City owned and operated utility services; as such, Utility Easements have to be dedicated to the City in order to perform necessary maintenance and repairs. ALTERNATIVES: • Remand to Staff for Additional Information • Table pending further discussion RECOMMENDED ACTION: No action requested at this time – Council will be asked to approve the acceptance of the Utility Easements at the December 19th Council Meeting. Water LineEasement Sewer Line Easement TVEIT RD S STILLAGUAMISH AVE E HIGHLAND DR MEDICAL CENTER DR "Legend Eas ement ROW County Parcels Scale:Date: File Name: Drawn By: CVH_UtilityE ase8.5x11_11.mxd 12/5/2011 lb Cascade Valley Hosp italWater & Sewer Line E asements City of Arling ton 1 inch = 100 fe et Maps and GIS data are distribute d “AS-IS” without wa rranties of any kin d, e ither exp ress or implied,including but not limited to warranties of suitability for a particular purpos e or use . Map data are compiled from a va riety of so urces which ma y con tain errors an d users who rely upon the information do so at their own risk. Users agree to indemnify, defe nd, and hold harmles s the City of Arlington for any a nd all liability of any na ture arising out of or re sulting from the lac k of accuracy or correctness of the data, or the use of the data presented in the ma ps. City of Arlington Council Agenda Bill AGENDA ITEM: WORKSHOP #2 ATTACHMENT B COUNCIL WORKSHOP DATE: December 12 , 2011 SUBJECT: Amendment to City of Arlington and Arlington School District Settlement Agreement Regarding Traffic Mitigation Fees DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN: Public Works – Utilities Division ATTACHMENTS: • Amendment to City of Arlington and Arlington School District Settlement Agreement EXPENDITURES REQUESTED: N/A BUDGET CATEGORY: N/A LEGAL REVIEW: Pending Final Review by City Attorney DESCRIPTION – Amendment to COA-ASD 2002 Settlement Agreement that obligates expenditures of fees for specific school district transportation improvement purpose and defers expenditure requirement to 2021. HISTORY: The City of Arlington (COA) and the Arlington School District (ASD) entered into an agreement on May 28, 2002 whereby ASD released claims and agreed not to sue COA for the return of traffic mitigation fees associated with the Arlington High School Land Use Permit, provided that the COA agreed to expend the traffic mitigation fees for the construction of a pedestrian overpass. This agreement was extended on January 14, 2008 to allow additional time for the construction of the overpass. The cost of the pedestrian overpass has grown so large that it is apparent that the mitigation funds cannot cover the cost of the overpass and that obtaining additional funding, grant or otherwise, is very unlikely. As such, ASD and COA have agreed extend the expenditure date to 2021 and obligate the funds for transportation and safety improvement projects in the vicinity of the Arlington High School, including construction of the District’s portion of ¾ street improvements for 186th St. NE frontage. ALTERNATIVES: • Remand to Staff for Additional Information • Table pending further discussion RECOMMENDED ACTION: No action requested at this time – Council will be asked to approve and authorize the mayor to sign the amendment to City of Arlington and Arlington School District 2002 Settlement Agreement regarding traffic mitigation fees at the December 19th Council Meeting. AGREEMENT AMENDING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 1 (27-287/sjp) AGREEMENT AMENDING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT The parties to this agreement are the CITY OF ARLINGTON, WASHINGTON, a municipal corporation of the state of Washington (hereinafter "CITY"), and ARLINGTON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 16, a municipal corporation of the state of Washington (hereinafter "the District"). RECITALS WHEREAS, both parties are parties to a settlement agreement dated May 28, 2002 entitled “SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT, RELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS, COVENANT NOT TO SUE, AND HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT” (hereafter “the settlement agreement”) arising out of the settlement of a lawsuit filed under Snohomish County Superior Court case #02- 2-04674-4; WHEREAS, the parties amended the settlement agreement by agreement dated January 14, 2008, to allow additional time for the construction of the overpass, which is now acknowledged to be unlikely to occur due to time and funding constraints; WHEREAS, the settlement agreement, the January 14, 2008 amendment to the settlement agreement, and the terms set forth herein are collectively referred to herein as the "Agreement"; and WHEREAS, the parties wish to amend the Agreement and continue to work together to assure that the funds paid in settlement, presently totaling $366,186.67 including interest, and other funds paid for trip generation fees for Pioneer Elementary School, presently totaling $115,095.19 with interest, are applied to transportation and safety improvement projects in the vicinity of the Arlington High School, including construction of the District’s portion of ¾ street improvements for 186th St. NE frontage; NOW, THEREFORE, the parties do agree, as follows: 1. The funds currently held by the City in the sum of $481,281.86, shall continue to be held by the City until expended for construction of the District’s portion of ¾ street improvements for 186th St. NE frontage as provided by Permit No. MJ-01-017 or other transportation and safety improvement projects in the vicinity of the Arlington High School mutually agreed upon by the City and the District. The City and the District shall cooperate and act jointly and in good faith to develop an interlocal agreement for the financing, design and construction of such transportation and safety improvement projects serving the school site. If any of these funds are not expended or encumbered by the City on or before December 31, 2021, the remaining funds shall be transferred to the City's Transportation Improvement Fund and may AGREEMENT AMENDING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 2 (27-287/sjp) be expended or encumbered for any project listed in the City's then-adopted Transportation Improvement Plan. The District expressly waives any refund rights or claims to such fees if expended, encumbered or transferred upon expiration of such term in accordance with this Agreement. 2. The parties agree that in lieu of the construction of a pedestrian overpass as originally contemplated by the parties, the City shall use the funds for any transportation and safety improvement project in the vicinity of the Arlington High School. . 3. The invalidity or unenforceability of any portion or provision of this Agreement shall in no way affect the validity or enforceability of any other portion or provision hereof. Any invalid or unenforceable portion or provision shall be deemed severed from this Agreement, and the balance of the Agreement shall be construed and enforced as if the Agreement did not contain such invalid or unenforceable provision. If any such provision of this Agreement is so declared invalid, the parties shall promptly negotiate in good faith new provisions to eliminate such invalidity and to restore this Agreement as near as possible to its original intent and effect. 4. All other elements of the Agreement not modified by this amendment shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this Agreement have caused their names to be affixed hereto by their official representatives this ____ day of December, 2011. CITY OF ARLINGTON ARLINGTON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 16 ________________________ ________________________________ Margaret Larson, Mayor Jeff Huleatt, Board President ATTEST: ________________________ Kristin Banfield, City Clerk City of Arlington Council Agenda Bill AGENDA ITEM: WORKSHOP #3 ATTACHMENT C COUNCIL WORKSHOP DATE: December 12 , 2011 SUBJECT: 67th Ave Phase III Update – Retaining Wall DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN: Public Works – Eric Scott ATTACHMENTS: • None, display at meeting EXPENDITURES REQUESTED: N/A BUDGET CATEGORY: N/A LEGAL REVIEW: N/A DESCRIPTION – Recommendation of selected retaining wall block style and color for the 67th Ave, Phase 3 project. HISTORY: City staff has been engaged in the design of 67th Ave Phase 3 roadway improvement project. This project spans between 204th St and Lebanon and will replace the existing concrete retaining wall with a segmental block retaining wall. There will be a total of approximately 1,500 lineal feet of retaining wall installed along the east side of 67th Ave, a large architectural feature of this road project that will have an impact on the southern entrance into the historic Arlington area. As directed by Council, City staff has worked with the Arlington Parks, Arts, and Recreation Commission (PARC) and a local architect to evaluate several styles and colors for a new 1,500 LF retaining wall. After much discussion, the PARC recommended that the 67th Ave, Phase 3 project use the Allen Block, Europa Collection series. This project recently received a grant from TIB in the amount of $6,049,731 and will start construction in 2012. ALTERNATIVES: • N/A RECOMMENDED ACTION: Informational only - no action requested. City of Arlington Council Agenda Bill AGENDA ITEM: WORKSHOP #4 ATTACHMENT D COUNCIL MEETING DATE: December 19, 2011 SUBJECT: Professional Services Agreement with Snohomish County Child Advocacy Center d/b/a Dawson Place DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN: Police – Nelson Beazley ATTACHMENTS: -Proposed Resolution EXPENDITURES REQUESTED: N/A BUDGET CATEGORY: N/A LEGAL REVIEW: Reviewed by City Attorney DESCRIPTION: A contractual agreement between the City of Arlington and the Snohomish County Child Advocacy Center d/b/a Dawson Place for professional Child Interview Specialist services. HISTORY: Dawson Place Child Advocacy Center is a multi disciplinary center that provides a coordinated network of intervention and education services for the treatment of child physical and sexual abuse. The center provides a coordinated approach to the investigation, prosecution, and treatment of child physical and sexual abuse in a child-centered environment. One component of this multi disciplinary process is the utilization of a professional Child Interview Specialist to facilitate investigations of child abuse and other crimes wherein children are victims or witnesses. This service has previously been funded by Snohomish County and the City of Everett but due to budgetary constraints these services now require financial support of all end users on a proportional basis. ALTERNATIVES: -Bring back for additional discussion at a later date RECOMMENDED ACTION: No action requested at this time. This item will come before the Council at the December 19, 2011 meeting. 1 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR CHILD INTERVIEW SPECIALIST SERVICES This Professional Services Agreement For Child Interview Specialist Services (this “Agreement”) is made and entered into as of this _______ day of _________________, 2011, by and among Snohomish County Child Advocacy Center d/b/a Dawson Place, a duly registered Washington non-profit corporation (“DAWSON PLACE”) and Snohomish County, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, the City of Arlington, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, the City of Bothell, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, the City of Lake Stevens, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, the City of Lynnwood, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, the City of Marysville, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, the City of Granite Falls, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, the City of Edmonds, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, the City of Mill Creek, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, the City of Everett, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, the City of Mukilteo, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, the City of Snohomish, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, the City of Brier, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, and the Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians (all such county, municipal and tribal entities collectively, the “PARTICIPATING JURISDICTIONS”). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the PARTICIPATING JURISDICTIONS to utilize professional Child Interview Specialist (hereinafter referred to as “CIS”) services to facilitate investigations of child abuse and other crimes wherein children are victims or witnesses; and WHEREAS, DAWSON PLACE has agreed to provide trained professional CIS Services to the PARTICIPATING JURISDICTIONS for investigations; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants set forth below, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 1.0 TERM The term of this Agreement (the “Term”) shall commence on January 1, 2012 (the “Commencement Date”), and shall expire on December 31, 2014 (the “Expiration Date”); PROVIDED, however, that Snohomish County’s obligations are contingent upon local legislative appropriation of the necessary funds for this specific purpose in accordance with the Snohomish County Charter and applicable law. 2 2.0 SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED 2.1 DAWSON PLACE shall provide CIS services to the PARTICIPATING JURISDICTIONS on an as needed basis during the term of this Agreement. All cases of PARTICIPATING JURISDICTIONS will be given equal priority. 2.2 “CIS Services” include the following: 2.2.1 Interview child victims of sexual assault and physical abuse as requested. 2.2.2 Document interviews; maintain detailed records of all interviews and statistics. 2.2.3 Assist detectives on assigned cases working with victim’s family. 2.2.4 Assist investigators in interviewing victims and witnesses of other crimes involving children as requested; conduct courtesy interviews for police agencies in other states; work with interpreters to gather information from disabled children; interview children and adults who are developmentally delayed and/or physically disabled as requested. 2.2.5 Testify in court as requested; provide agencies with a DVD of the interviews; provide assistance to the Prosecuting Attorney’s Office, as requested for child interview DVD transcriptions. 2.2.6 Provide training to public and to detectives on child sex abuse issues. 2.2.7 Network with community agencies to maintain compatible working relationships. 2.3 DAWSON PLACE shall provide a quarterly report to the PARTICIPATING JURISDICTIONS that summarizes CIS Services performed on the PARTICIPATING JURISDICTIONS’ behalf during the previous quarter. 3.0 DAWSON PLACE OBLIGATIONS 3.1 DAWSON PLACE shall provide a CIS to the PARTICIPATING JURISDICTIONS. 3.2 DAWSON PLACE shall be responsible for coordinating daily operations related to the provision of CIS Services pursuant to this Agreement. 3.3 CIS interviews will be conducted at DAWSON PLACE, located at 1509 California Street, Everett, WA 98201, unless another location is agreed to by the PARTICIPATING JURISDICTIONS and DAWSON PLACE. 3 3.4 DAWSON PLACE shall ensure that any professional providing CIS Services pursuant to this Agreement has completed all required training. 3.5 DAWSON PLACE shall provide all equipment and training necessary to support the CIS Services, consistent with recognized and recommended practices within the field. Nothing in this section shall restrict the ability of the parties to mutually agree to changes in equipment or training necessary to maintain best practices, or to informally agree to share equipment or training costs in unforeseen circumstances. 3.6 All products of interviews conducted under this Agreement, which includes original recordings (audio and video), reports and statements, will be promptly provided to and remain under the control of the PARTICIPATING JURISDICTION that requested the interview. 3.7 DAWSON PLACE agrees that any professional who is providing CIS services pursuant to this Agreement shall not be considered for any purpose to be an employee or agent of any PARTICIPATING JURISDICTION. 3.8 SICK LEAVE TEMPORARY REPLACEMENT. If CIS Services are not available due to illness or injury for longer than ten (10) days, DAWSON PLACE shall make arrangements for temporary replacement CIS Services beginning on the eleventh (11th) work day until such time as regular CIS Services resume. 3.9 DISCIPLINARY TEMPORARY REPLACEMENT. If CIS Services are not available due to disciplinary action for a period in excess of one (1) work day, DAWSON PLACE shall make arrangements for replacement CIS Services during the remaining term of the discipline. 3.10 TEMPORARY REPLACEMENT; UNPLANNED OR ANNUAL LEAVE. If CIS Services are not available due to annual leave or any unplanned reason for a period of ten (10) consecutive work days, DAWSON PLACE shall make arrangements for replacement CIS Services beginning on the eleventh (11th) work day until such time as regular CIS Services resume. 3.11 TEMPORARY REPLACEMENT; PLANNED ABSENCE. If CIS Services are not available because of any pre-planned reason other than annual leave (example: attendance at a long term work-related training), for a period in excess of ten (10) consecutive work days, DAWSON PLACE shall make arrangements for replacement CIS Services beginning on the first day of the planned absence. 4.0 PARTICIPATING JURISDICTION OBLIGATIONS 4.1 After the items referenced in Section 3.6 above are provided to a PARTICIPATING JURISDICTION, it shall be the sole responsibility of that 4 PARTICIPATING JURISDICTION to properly secure, maintain, distribute, transcribe or dispose of said items. DAWSON PLACE may maintain a working copy of all CIS recordings, reports and/or documents. Each PARTICIPATING JURISDICTION acknowledges that transcriptions of audio/video CIS interviews are frequently required by the Prosecuting Attorney, the Defense or the Court, and each PARTICIPATING JURISDICTION agrees to complete any required transcribing of CIS interviews conducted under this Agreement. 4.2 A PARTICIPATING JURISDICTION shall attend and observe CIS interviews that the PARTICIPATING JURISDICTION requests, and shall control, maintain and retain the original DVD recording of such CIS interviews for evidentiary purposes, and shall be solely liable for third party arrest, prosecution and evidentiary issues, such as admissibility arising from or as a result of the interview contents of the DVD. The PARTICIPATING JURISDICTION shall indemnify and hold harmless DAWSON PLACE for such liability. 4.3 The PARTICIPATING JURISDICTIONS will coordinate scheduling interviews conducted under this Agreement with DAWSON PLACE. 4.4 In consideration of DAWSON PLACE providing the CIS Services as set forth in Section 2.0 and 3.0 herein, the PARTICIPATING JURISDICTIONS will pay DAWSON PLACE as set forth in Section 6.0. 5.0 INTENTIONALLY OMITTED 6.0 COMPENSATION, INVOICING AND PAYMENT 6.1 The PARTICIPATING JURISDICTIONS agree to pay the following amounts to DAWSON PLACE for providing CIS services set forth in this Agreement: 6.1.1 In consideration for the CIS Services provided by DAWSON PLACE from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012, the PARTICIPATING JURISDICTIONS shall, upon receipt of invoices in accordance with this Section 6, collectively pay to DAWSON PLACE a total amount of eighty three thousand seven hundred seventy three dollars ($83,773.00). 6.1.2 In consideration for the CIS Services provided by DAWSON PLACE from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2013, the PARTICIPATING JURISDICTIONS shall, upon receipt of invoices in accordance with this Section 6, collectively pay to DAWSON PLACE a total amount to be determined at a later date, but which will equal the total amount due for 2012 plus an increase in that amount equal to 100% of the June to June Seattle, Tacoma, Bremerton CPI-W published in June 2012, but not to exceed 3%. 5 6.1.3 In consideration for the CIS Services provided by DAWSON PLACE from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014, the PARTICIPATING JURISDICTIONS shall, upon receipt of invoices in accordance with this Section 6, collectively pay to DAWSON PLACE a total amount to be determined at a later date, but which will equal the total amount due for 2013 plus an increase in that amount equal to 100% of the June to June Seattle, Tacoma, Bremerton CPI-W published in June 2013, but not to exceed 3%. 6.2 Each PARTICIPATING JURISDICTION’S portion of the amount due to DAWSON PLACE will be calculated and paid as follows: 6.2.1 Payments due for 2012 are set forth in Exhibit B to the Interlocal Agreement Establishing Cooperative Financial Support for Dawson Place of even date herewith, attached hereto. Each PARTICIPATING JURISDICTION shall pay 2% of the base salary, plus a portion of the remaining amount due, calculated based on the number of interviews performed for each PARTICIPATING JURISDICTION during the previous year. Payments due for 2013 and 2014 will be calculated at a later date, and will be based on the provisions of Section 6.1, above, and the number of interviews performed for each PARTICIPATING JURISDICTION the previous year. While the payments due from each PARTICIPATING JURISDICTION will be calculated based on the number of interviews performed for them during the previous year, the payments made are intended to cover the costs of the work performed during the current year. It is anticipated that Exhibit B will be updated when the 2013 and 2014 costs are calculated, and may also be updated from time to time if and when the makeup of the PARTICIPATING JURISDICTIONS changes. Such an update, when made in accordance with this Section 6.1, is a clerical update to Exhibit B and is not an amendment to this Agreement. 6.2.2 In order to receive payment under this Section 6, DAWSON PLACE shall submit an invoice to each PARTICIPATING JURISDICTION each quarter, which invoice shall contain that PARTICIPATING JURISDICTION’S portion of the amount due to DAWSON PLACE for the CIS Services provided under this Agreement, as set forth in Exhibit B. Each PARTICIPATING JURISDICTION shall pay its invoice in full, within thirty (30) days after the PARTICIPATING JURISDICTION receives same. Should a PARTICIPATING JURISDICTION object to all or any portion of any invoice, the PARTICIPATING JURISDICTION shall notify DAWSON PLACE of its objection in writing within twenty (20) days after receiving the invoice at issue. Invoices shall be mailed to the persons specified in Exhibit A to this Agreement. 6 6.3 DAWSON PLACE agrees that payment of the sums listed in Sections 6.1 constitute full compensation for services provided under this Agreement and Dawson Place may, at its discretion, use such funds for all CIS Service-related costs incurred. Should a professional who is providing CIS Services pursuant to this Agreement be required to travel out of Snohomish County for work on a PARTICIPATING JURISDICTION investigation or to testify in court on behalf of a case, all travel costs, including conveyance, lodging and per diem, shall be paid by the requesting PARTICIPATING JURISDICTION. In order to be eligible for reimbursement, all travel must be pre-approved by that PARTICIPATING JURISDICTION and reimbursement for travel will not exceed that PARTICIPATING JURISDICTION’S reimbursement rates. 7.0 DIRECTION AND CONTROL DAWSON PLACE agrees that DAWSON PLACE will perform the services under this Agreement as an independent contractor and not as an agent, employee, or servant of the any PARTICIPATING JURISDICTION. The parties agree that DAWSON PLACE is not entitled to any benefits or rights enjoyed by employees of any PARTICIPATING JURISDICTION. DAWSON PLACE specifically has the right to direct and control DAWSON PLACE’S own activities in providing the agreed services in accordance with the specifications set out in this Agreement. The PARTICIPATING JURISDICTIONS shall only have the right to ensure performance. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to render the parties partners or joint venturers. 8.0 REMOVAL/REPLACEMENT OF CIS Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained elsewhere in this Agreement, the PARTICIPATING JURISDICTIONS shall have the right, at any time during the Term, to demand removal of the professional performing CIS Services under this Agreement. In order to exercise this right, the PARTICIPATING JURISDICTIONS must deliver to DAWSON PLACE a written notice, signed by authorized representatives of PARTICIPATING JURISDICTIONS that have collectively paid at least 50% of amounts paid to DAWSON PLACE since the effective date of this Agreement, demanding that DAWSON PLACE remove the professional providing CIS Services under this Agreement and outlining the basis for such demand (“Demand for Removal”). Within fifteen (15) days of receiving such Demand for Removal, DAWSON PLACE shall remove the individual performing CIS Services under this Agreement. Within fifteen (15) days of removal of the professional providing CIS Services under this Section, DAWSON PLACE shall make arrangements for replacement CIS Services to be provided to the PARTICIPATING JURISDICTIONS. If CIS Services are not replaced within thirty (30) days after the date on which DAWSON PLACE received the Demand for Removal, then this Agreement shall automatically terminate. 9.0 HOLD HARMLESS 7 Each party to this Agreement shall save, indemnify, defend and hold every other party and its agents, employees and contractors harmless from and against any and all costs, liabilities, suits, losses, damages, claims, expenses, penalties or charges, including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys’ fees and disbursements, that the other parties may incur or pay out by reason of any accidents, damages or injuries to persons or property, including claims by third parties or employees against which the parties would otherwise be immune under Title 51 RCW or other law, arising from the performance of this Agreement, but only to the extent the same are caused by any negligent or wrongful act of the indemnifying party. The provisions of this Section 9.0 shall survive the expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement. 10.0 WITHDRAWAL Any PARTICIPATING JURISDICTION may withdraw from participation in this Agreement effective January 1st for any reason or for no reason by providing written notice of such withdrawal to all parties no later than November 1st of the preceding calendar year. Withdrawal shall not affect the rights of the PARTICIPATING JURISDICTIONS under any other section or paragraph herein. If after November 1st there are fewer than five (5) PARTICIPATING JURISDICTIONS that have not given notice of withdrawal, then the PARTICIPATING JURISDICTIONS that have not given notice of withdrawal shall meet no later than November 15th. At the meeting, these PARTICIPATING JURISDICTIONS will have another option to withdraw from the Agreement effective January 1st, which may be exercised by giving notice of withdrawal at the meeting. If by the end of the meeting no PARTICIPATING JURISDICTION desires to remain in the Agreement, then this Agreement may be terminated effective January 1st by delivery of written notice to DAWSON PLACE no later than December 1st. 11.0 INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS DAWSON PLACE shall obtain and maintain continuously during the Term of this Agreement the following insurance: Commercial General Liability Insurance with a minimum limit of $1,000,000 per occurrence, $2,000,000 general aggregate, and endorsed to include all PARTICIPATING JURISDICTIONS and their officers, elected officials, agents, and employees as an additional insured with respect to the work performed for the PARTICIPATING JURISDICTIONS. Insurance shall be written on ISO occurrence form CG 00 01 or a substitute form providing equivalent coverage. Workers’ Compensation Coverage as required by the Industrial Insurance laws of the State of Washington. DAWSON PLACE’S obligation shall extend to all personnel performing work on behalf of DAWSON PLACE pursuant to this 8 Agreement and must be obtained before performing any work under this Agreement. The PARTICIPATING JURISDICTIONS will not be responsible for payment of workers’ compensation premiums or for any other claim or benefit for any individuals performing work on behalf of DAWSON PLACE that might arise under the Washington State Industrial Insurance laws. Professional Technical Liability insurance appropriate to the CIS’s profession with limits of $1,000,000 per claim and $1,000,000 policy aggregate limit. 12.0 DISPUTES In the event of a dispute between the parties that cannot be resolved to each party’s satisfaction, the issue shall be submitted to mediation through the Snohomish County Dispute Resolution Center. All parties agree to utilize this process prior to the institution of any legal action to enforce the terms and conditions of this Agreement. The cost of mediation shall be borne equally by the parties. 13.0 RECORDS DAWSON PLACE shall maintain adequate records to support billings for services set forth in this Agreement. Said records shall be maintained for a period of six (6) years after completion of this Agreement. The PARTICIPATING JURISDICTIONS or their authorized representatives shall have access, during normal working hours, to any DAWSON PLACE books, documents, papers or records, which relate to this Agreement. 14.0 CONFIDENTIALITY DAWSON PLACE shall not disclose, transfer, sell or otherwise release any client information gained by reason of performance under this Agreement to any person or entity. DAWSON PLACE may use such information solely for the purposes necessary to meet the requirements under this Agreement. 15.0 PUBLIC DISCLOSURE LAWS The parties acknowledge, agree and understand that the county and municipal PARTICIPATING JURISDICTIONS are public agencies subject to certain disclosure laws, including, but not limited to Washington’s Public Records Act, chapter 42.56 RCW. Each party understands that records related to this Agreement and DAWSON PLACE’s performance of Services under this Agreement may be subject to disclosure pursuant to the Public Records Act or other similar law. In order to comply with disclosure laws, a PARTICIPATING JURISDICTION may require records generated pursuant to this Agreement from DAWSON PLACE. DAWSON PLACE covenants that it shall cooperate with the PARTICIPATING JURISDICTIONS in the event records generated pursuant to this Agreement are requested. DAWSON PLACE agrees to provide such records to the PARTICIPATING JURISDICTION in a timely manner and in a format requested by the PARTICIPATING JURISDICTION, so long as it is reasonably feasible to provide such records in the format requested. 9 16.0 LEGAL REQUIREMENTS All parties shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws in performing their duties under this Agreement. 17.0 APPLICABLE LAW AND VENUE This Agreement shall be construed under the laws of the State of Washington. Venue of any legal action brought to enforce any of the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall be Snohomish County, Washington. 18.0 NON-DISCRIMINATION DAWSON PLACE shall comply with the Snohomish County Human Rights Ordinance, Chapter 2.460 SCC, which is incorporated herein by this reference. Execution of this Agreement constitutes a certification by DAWSON PLACE of its compliance with the requirements of Chapter 2.460 SCC. If DAWSON PLACE is found to have violated this provision, or furnished false or misleading information in an investigation or proceeding conducted pursuant to Chapter 2.460 SCC, this Agreement may be subject to a declaration of default and termination at the County's discretion. This provision shall not affect DAWSON PLACE’S obligations under other federal, state, or local laws against discrimination. 19.0 PREVAILING PARTY ATTORNEY'S FEES In any legal action brought to enforce any of the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the prevailing party in said legal action shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees and costs incurred. 20.0 INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR DAWSON PLACE agrees that any professional providing CIS Services under this Agreement shall not be considered for any purpose an agent, employee, or servant of any PARTICIPATING JURISDICTION. The parties agree that professionals providing CIS Services under this Agreement are not entitled to any benefits or rights enjoyed by employees of the PARTICIPATING JURISDICTIONS. DAWSON PLACE specifically has the right to direct and control the activities of any professional providing the agreed CIS Services in accordance with the specifications set out in this Agreement. The PARTICIPATING JURISDICTIONS shall only have the right to ensure performance. 21.0 NOTICE Any notice to be given to a PARTICIPATING JURISDICTION under this Agreement shall be either mailed or personally delivered to the Notice Address shown in Exhibit A. Any notice to DAWSON PLACE shall be mailed or personally delivered to: Dawson Place Child Advocacy Center 1509 California Street 10 Everett, WA 98201 Any party may, by reasonable written notice to the other parties, designate a different contact person, or otherwise alter its contact information for the giving of notices. All notices shall be deemed given on the day each such notice is personally delivered, transmitted by facsimile (with evidence of receipt), or delivered by overnight courier service, or on the third business day following the day such notice is mailed if mailed in accordance with this Section. Exhibit A may be updated from time to time to reflect current addresses. Such an update, when made in accordance with this Section 21, is a clerical update to Exhibit A and is not an amendment to this Agreement. 22.0 AMENDMENT The parties reserve the right to amend this Agreement in the future from time to time as may be mutually agreed upon. No such amendment shall be effective unless written and signed with the same formality of this Agreement. 23.0 ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Agreement constitutes the whole and entire agreement among the parties as to CIS Services and no other understandings, oral or otherwise, regarding CIS Services shall be deemed to exist or bind the parties 24.0 SEVERABILITY If any part of this Agreement is unenforceable for any reason the remainder of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 25.0 EXECUTION OF MULTIPLE ORIGINAL COUNTERPARTS This Agreement may be reproduced in any number of original counterparts. Each party need sign only one counterpart and when the signature pages are all assembled with one original counterpart, that compilation constitutes a fully executed and effective agreement among all the PARTICIPATING JURISDICTIONS. 26.0 WARRANTY OF AUTHORITY Each of the signatories hereto warrants and represents that he or she is competent and authorized to enter into this Agreement on behalf of the party for whom he or she purports to sign this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the PARTICIPATING JURISDICTIONS and DAWSON PLACE have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written. DAWSON PLACE By: Mary Wahl, Executive Director As Approved by Dawson Place Board of Directors through Resolution Dated _______________. SNOHOMISH COUNTY By: Aaron Reardon, County Executive Dated: _____________________ RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL By: John Lovick, Sheriff Dated: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Deputy Prosecuting Attorney Dated: CITY OF EVERETT By: Ray Stephanson, Mayor Dated: _____________________ ATTEST: By: _____ Sharon Marks, City Clerk Dated: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: James D. Iles, City Attorney Dated: CITY OF ARLINGTON By: Title:_______________________ Dated: _____________________ ATTEST: By: _____ City Clerk Dated: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: City Attorney Dated: CITY OF BOTHELL By: Title:_______________________ Dated: _____________________ ATTEST: By: _____ City Clerk Dated: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: City Attorney Dated: CITY OF LAKE STEVENS By: Title:_______________________ Dated: _____________________ ATTEST: By: _____ City Clerk Dated: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: City Attorney Dated: CITY OF LYNNWOOD By: Title:_______________________ Dated: _____________________ ATTEST: By: _____ City Clerk Dated: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: City Attorney Dated: CITY OF MARYSVILLE By: Title:_______________________ Dated: _____________________ ATTEST: By: _____ City Clerk Dated: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: City Attorney Dated: CITY OF GRANITE FALLS By: Title:_______________________ Dated: _____________________ ATTEST: By: _____ City Clerk Dated: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: City Attorney Dated: CITY OF EDMONDS By: Mike Cooper, Mayor Dated: _____________________ ATTEST: By: _____ Sandra S. Chase, City Clerk Dated: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Sharon E. Cates Office of the City Attorney Dated: CITY OF MILL CREEK By: Title:_______________________ Dated: _____________________ ATTEST: By: _____ City Clerk Dated: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: City Attorney Dated: CITY OF MUKILTEO By: Title:_______________________ Dated: _____________________ ATTEST: By: _____ City Clerk Dated: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: City Attorney Dated: CITY OF SNOHOMISH By: Title:_______________________ Dated: _____________________ ATTEST: By: _____ City Clerk Dated: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: City Attorney Dated: CITY OF BRIER By: Title:_______________________ Dated: _____________________ ATTEST: By: _____ City Clerk Dated: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: City Attorney Dated: STILLAGUAMISH TRIBE OF INDIANS By: Title:_______________________ Dated: _____________________ EXHIBIT A PARTICIPATING JURISDICTION INVOICE ADDRESS NOTICE ADDRESS Snohomish County Snohomish County Sheriff’s Office Attn: Jill Iversen 3000 Rockefeller Ave M/S 606 Everett, WA 98201 Snohomish County Sheriff’s Office Attn: Jeff Miller 3000 Rockefeller Ave M/S 606 Everett, WA 98201 Stillaguamish Police Chief Joe Orford Stillaguamish Police Department 22714 6th Ave NE Arlington, WA 98223 Chief Joe Orford Stillaguamish Police Department 22714 6th Ave NE Arlington, WA 98223 City of Arlington Debbie Strotz City of Arlington Finance Dept. 238 N. Olympic Arlington, WA 98223 Chief Nelson Beazley City of Arlington Police Department 110 E. Third St. Arlington, WA 98223 City of Bothell Captain Drew Nielsen Bothell Police Department 18410 101st Ave NE Bothell, WA 98011 Captain Drew Nielsen Bothell Police Department 18410 101st Ave NE Bothell, WA 98011 City of Lake Stevens Finance Director City of Lake Stevens P.O. Box 259 Lake Stevens, WA 98258 Chief of Police City of Lake Stevens 2211 Grade Road Lake Stevens, WA 98258 City of Lynnwood Administrative Assistant to Chief of Police Lynnwood Police Department P.O. Box 5008 Lynnwood, WA 98046-5008 Deputy Chief Investigations/Services Lynnwood Police Department P.O. Box 5008 Lynnwood, WA 98046-5008 City of Marysville Margaret Vanderwalker Marysville Police Department 1635 Grove Street Marysville, WA 98270 Commander Ralph Krusey Marysville Police Department 1635 Grove Street Marysville, WA 98270 City of Granite Falls Chief Dennis Taylor Granite Falls Police Department 205 S. Granite Avenue P.O. Box 64 Granite Falls, WA 98252 Chief Dennis Taylor Granite Falls Police Department 205 S. Granite Avenue P.O. Box 64 Granite Falls, WA 98252 City of Edmonds Marlene Eager Edmonds Police Department 250 5th Ave. N. Edmonds, WA 98020 Gerry Gannon, Assistant Chief Edmonds Police Department 250 5th Ave. N. Edmonds, WA 98020 City of Mill Creek Jodie Gunderson City of Mill Creek Finance Department 15728 Main St. Mill Creek, WA 98012 Det. Sgt. Kate Hamilton Mill Creek Police Department 15728 Main St. Mill Creek, WA 98012 City of Everett Tracey Versteeg Everett Police Department 3002 Wetmore Avenue Everett, WA 98201 Deputy Chief Mike Campbell Everett Police Department 3002 Wetmore Avenue Everett, WA 98201 City of Mukilteo Mukilteo Police Department 10500 47th Pl. W Mukilteo, WA 98275 Chief Rex Caldwell Mukilteo Police Department 10500 47th Pl. W Mukilteo, WA 98275 City of Snohomish Chief John Turner City of Snohomish PD 230 Maple Avenue Snohomish, WA 98290 Chief John Turner City of Snohomish PD 230 Maple Avenue Snohomish, WA 98290 City of Brier Mickie Halverson Support Services Supervisor Brier Police Department 2901 228th St. SW Brier, WA 98036 Chief Donald E. Lane Brier Police Department 2901 228th St. SW Brier, WA 98036 EXHIBIT B 2012 Expenses * Salary / Benefits $62,273.12 Operating Expenses Computers $2,000.00 Equipment Maintenance $500.00 Supplies / Training $3,000.00 Office Space $16,000.00 Total $83,773.12 Participating Jurisdiction 2% of Salary Number of Interviews Cost Based On Use ($253.1933 per interview) Total Arlington Police Department $1,245.46 9 $2,278.74 $3,524.20 Brier Police Department $1,245.46 0 $0.00 $1,245.46 Bothell Police Department $1,245.46 4 $1,012.77 $2,258.24 Edmonds Police Department $1,245.46 10 $2,531.93 $3,777.40 Everett Police Department $1,245.46 53 $13,419.24 $14,664.71 Granite Falls Police Department $1,245.46 2 $506.39 $1,751.85 Lake Stevens Police Department $1,245.46 23 $5,823.45 $7,068.91 Lynnwood Police Department $1,245.46 11 $2,785.13 $4,030.59 Marysville Police Department $1,245.46 38 $9,621.35 $10,866.81 Mill Creek Police Department $1,245.46 12 $3,038.32 $4,283.78 Mukilteo Police Department $1,245.46 2 $506.39 $1,751.85 Snohomish County Sheriff** $1,245.46 91 $23,040.59 $24,286.05 Snohomish Police Department $1,245.46 7 $1,772.35 $3,017.82 Stillaguamish Police Department $1,245.46 0 $0.00 $1,245.46 Total $17,436.47 262 $66,336.64 $83,773.12 * 2013 and 2014 Expenses and amounts due from each Participating Jurisdiction to be determined at a later date. ** The total amount due from the Snohomish County Sheriff's Office includes $8,286.05 for interview services, plus the $16,000 due for Office Space, listed above. City of Arlington Council Agenda Bill AGENDA ITEM: WORKSHOP #5 ATTACHMENT E COUNCIL MEETING DATE: December 12, 2011 SUBJECT: Fifth Amendment to the Interlocal Agreement for Municipal Court Services between the City of Marysville and the City of Arlington DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN: Executive ATTACHMENTS: - Proposed 5th Amendment to the ILA for Municipal Court Services EXPENDITURES REQUESTED: BUDGET CATEGORY: Criminal Justice LEGAL REVIEW: City Attorney’s review is pending DESCRIPTION: The City of Marysville is requesting an amendment to its interlocal agreement with us for Court Services. The amendment changes the renewal of the agreement to an automatic renewal unless a party provides termination notification at least 180 days in advance. HISTORY: The City of Arlington has contracted with Marysville for Court Services since 2002. The last amendment to the Court ILA was executed in January 2011, which amended the court filing fees. ALTERNATIVES: RECOMMENDED ACTION: Review proposed amendment and recommend placement on the December 19, 2011 Council Agenda for formal action. M-02-033/Arlington agt amend 5 CS renewal 2011 1 FIFTH AMENDMENT TO INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR MUNICIPAL COURT SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF MARYSVILLE AND THE CITY OF ARLINGTON PROVIDING FOR RENEWAL OF THE AGREEMENT COMMENCING JANUARY 1, 2012; AUTOMATIC ONE YEAR RENEWAL; AND REVISING THE NOTICE PERIOD FOR TERMINATION. THIS AMENDMENT to Interlocal Agreement for Municipal Court Services is made and entered into this day by and between the City of Marysville ("Marysville"), a municipal corporation in the State of Washington, and the City of Arlington ("Arlington"), a municipal corporation in the State of Washington. WHEREAS, Marysville and Arlington entered into an Interlocal Agreement for Municipal Court Services recorded at the Snohomish County Auditor’s office on April 4, 2003; and WHEREAS, Marysville and Arlington entered into the First Amendment to Interlocal agreement for municipal court services between the City of Marysville and the City of Arlington and First Renewal for Three year term January 1, 2005 to May 30, 2008, which was recorded on 11/12/2005; and WHEREAS, Marysville and Arlington entered into the Second Amendment to Interlocal Agreement for Municipal Court Services between the City of Marysville and the City of Arlington, which was recorded on 08/24/2007; and WHEREAS, Marysville and Arlington entered into the Third Amendment to the Interlocal Agreement for Municipal Court Services on May 11, 2009; and WHEREAS, Marysville and Arlington entered into the Fourth Amendment to the Interlocal Agreement for Municipal Court Services on February 14, 2011; and WHEREAS, the parties wish to amend Paragraph 10 of the Agreement and renew the agreement for an additional one year period from January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2012 and to provide for automatic one year renewals from January 1 through December 31 of each year unless terminated by the parties; and WHEREAS, the parties wish to amend Paragraph 11 of the Agreement to provide for 180 days written notice by either party to terminate the agreement; and M-02-033/Arlington agt amend 5 CS renewal 2011 2 WHEREAS, the parties wish to agree to certain amendments and revisions to the agreement; NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF the terms and provisions hereof, Arlington and Marysville agree to amend the Interlocal Agreement for Municipal Court Services recorded at Snohomish County Auditor’s office on April 4, 2003, as amended by the First Amendment to Interlocal agreement for municipal court services between the city of Marysville and the city of Arlington and the First Renewal for Three year term January 1, 2005 to May 30, 2008, recorded on 11/12/2005, and by the Second Amendment to Interlocal Agreement for Municipal Court Services between the city of Marysville and the city of Arlington recorded on 08/24/2007; and by the Third Amendment to the Interlocal Agreement for Municipal Court Services on May 11, 2009; and by the Fourth Amendment to the Interlocal Agreement for Municipal Court Services on February 14, 2011, the parties do hereby agree as follows: 1. Paragraph 10 is amended to read as follows: 10. DURATION. In addition to the initial terms set forth in the original agreement and amendments, the term of this agreement is renewed for the period of one year from January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2012. Further the agreement shall automatically renew for additional one year periods from January 1 through December 31 of each year, unless a party provides Notice of Termination as set forth in Paragraph 11. The Fee as set forth in Section 3 shall remain the same for the renewal period unless the parties agree to amend the schedule of fees as set forth in Section 3. The Fee as set forth in Section 3 may be amended at any time by agreement of the parties. The parties may also agree to additional renewal terms. 2. Paragraph 11 is amended to read as follows: 11. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT. Either party shall provide 180 days written notice of its intent either to terminate or not to renew this agreement. In the event of termination or non-renewal of the agreement cases filed prior to the termination date in Marysville Municipal Court will remain in Marysville Municipal Court until either dismissed or formal closure. 3. Except as provided herein, all other provisions of the Interlocal Agreement for Municipal Court Services entered into on April 4, 2003, as amended by the First Amendment to Interlocal agreement for municipal court services between the city of Marysville and the city of Arlington and the First Renewal for Three year term January 1, 2005 to May 30, 2008, recorded on M-02-033/Arlington agt amend 5 CS renewal 2011 3 11/12/2005, and by the Second Amendment to Interlocal Agreement for Municipal Court Services between the city of Marysville and the city of Arlington recorded on 08/24/2007, and by the Third Amendment to the Interlocal Agreement for Municipal Court Services on May 11, 2009; and by the Fourth Amendment to the Interlocal Agreement for Municipal Court Services on February 14, 2011 shall remain in full force and effect, unchanged. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this agreement to be executed. CITY OF ARLINGTON CITY OF MARYSVILLE By________________________________ By________________________________ MARGARET LARSON, Mayor JON NEHRING, Mayor DATE:_____________________________ DATE:_____________________________ APPROVED as to form: APPROVED as to form: __________________________________ __________________________________ STEVEN PEIFFLE, City Attorney GRANT K. WEED, City Attorney DATE:________________________ DATE:______________________ City of Arlington Council Agenda Bill AGENDA ITEM: WORKSHOP #6 ATTACHMENT F COUNCIL MEETING DATE: December 12, 2011 SUBJECT: Graafstra Agreement for Annexation DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN: Community Development – Bill Blake ATTACHMENTS: 1. Amended Agreement regarding the Conditions of Annexation 2. DRAFT Urban Horticulture land use code EXPENDITURES REQUESTED: -0- BUDGET CATEGORY: N/A LEGAL REVIEW: City Attorney developed the agreement DESCRIPTION: The adoption of this document establishes an agreement between the City of Arlington and Graafstra Family to fulfill listed obligations as a condition of annexation. HISTORY: There has been a verbal agreement between the City of Arlington and Graafstra family that following the City acquisition of the bottomland the entire “Graafstra” area would be annexed in to the City. The area has been in the Arlington UGA for a number of years. The zoning of the bottomland parcels was changed in 2011 from residential to Public/Semi-Public in support of the park use. The upland is pre-zoned High Density residential. The proposed agreement identifies the need to change the upland zoning from High Density to Urban Horticulture. The proposed Urban Horticulture zoning will allow the Graafstra family to continue to support local agricultural activities associated with the City TDR program. It will also allow the Graafstra upland property to continue to function as an Incubator business site supporting local economic development. ALTERNATIVES: Discussion purposes only No Action AGREEMENT REGARDING CONDITIONS OF ANNEXATION 1 AMENDED AGREEMENT REGARDING CONDITIONS OF ANNEXATION The parties to this agreement are HENRY GRAAFSTRA and BETTY GRAAFSTRA, husband and wife (hereinafter “GRAAFSTRA”) and the CITY OF ARLINGTON, a municipal corporation of the state of Washington (hereinafter “CITY”). RECITALS A. GRAAFSTRA is the owner of certain real property, legally described on the attached Exhibit “A”, which has been designated by Snohomish County to be in the CITY’s urban growth area (UGA) (hereafter “the Property”). GRAAFSTRA previously conveyed approximately _____ acres of property to the CITY by deed dated April 1, 2010. B. GRAAFSTRA wishes to petition to the CITY to have the Property annexed to the CITY under certain terms and conditions. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties do agree as follows: COVENANTS 1. Agreement to Annex. Subject to applicable legal requirements, the CITY has agreed to annex the Property, subject to the following additional conditions: a. GRAAFSTRA shall take all steps necessary to submit an initial (10%) petition for annexation to the City of Arlington within thirty (30) days of the date of this agreement, and shall proceed to complete the annexation in due course thereafter following all necessary legal requirements. AGREEMENT REGARDING CONDITIONS OF ANNEXATION 2 b. The City shall expeditiously docket a comprehensive plan amendment for consideration at the next Growth Management Act (GMA) docketing process the consideration of zoning and development standards for the Property, which will include the adoption of development and zoning standard permitting urban horticultural or other agricultural-related enterprises. 2. Obligations of the Parties. GRAAFSTRA and the CITY agree to execute whatever additional documents may be reasonably required to fully implement this agreement, including, but not limited to, those petitions for annexation, notices, or other documents necessary to effectuate the annexation and the processing of docketing requests contemplated by this agreement. 3. Covenant on Property. This agreement shall be a covenant on the Property and shall bind the heirs, executors, assigns, and successors in interest of the undersigned relating to the Property. 4. Relationship To Existing Laws And Statutes. This Agreement in no way modifies or supersedes existing laws and statutes. In meeting the commitments encompassed in this Agreement, all parties shall comply with the requirements of the Growth Management Act, State Environmental Policy Act, Annexation Statutes, and other applicable federal, state or local law. 5. Severability. Should a court of competent jurisdiction declare any clause, phrase, sentence or paragraph of this AGREEMENT invalid or void, the remaining provisions of this AGREEMENT not so declared shall remain in full force and effect. AGREEMENT REGARDING CONDITIONS OF ANNEXATION 3 6. Exercise Of Rights Or Remedies. Failure of either party to exercise any rights or remedies under this AGREEMENT shall not be a waiver of any obligation by either party and shall not prevent either party from pursuing that right at any future time. Dated this ____ day of __________________, 2011. CITY OF ARLINGTON GRAAFSTRA: _____________________________ ______________________________ Margaret Larson Henry Graafstra Mayor Date: ________________________ ______________________________ Betty Graafstra ATTEST: _____________________________ Kristin Banfield City Clerk Approved as to form: _____________________________ Steven J. Peiffle City Attorney AGREEMENT REGARDING CONDITIONS OF ANNEXATION 4 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) : ss COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH ) On this _____ day of __________________, 2011, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared Margaret Larson and Kristin Banfield, to me known to be the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the City of Arlington, the municipal corporation that executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said municipal corporation, for the uses and purposes herein mentioned, and on oath stated that they are authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed (if any) is the corporate seal of said municipal corporation. Witness my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. ________________________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at _____________________ My commission expires: ____________________ Name: ___________________________________ STATE OF WASHINGTON) :ss COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH) On this day personally appeared before me HENRY GRAAFSTRA and BETTY GRAAFSTRA, to me known to be the persons who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that they signed the same as their free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and official seal this _____ day of __________________, 2011. ___________________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at _________________. My commission expires:________ Name: ________________________ DRAFT Arlington Comprehensive Plan URBAN HORTICULTURE LAND USE GOAL LU 10: Maintain a standard that designates areas located within the City limits adjacent to agricultural areas for low density, low impact uses which will not adversely impact the adjacent agricultural uses. Policies: UH XX.1: Maintain a practice that the Urban Horticulture area will allow uses which do not require extensive structures or development and require large land areas; these include intensive agriculture operation, processing and sale of agriculture products, sale of added value products, sales of landscaping materials and supplies, farmer's markets, outdoor recreation activities and log and lumber storage. A minimum of 60% of the building square footage must be used to support the activities associated with the planting, harvesting, processing and managing the distribution of food or added value products. These areas are intended to act as areas of less intense development between the urban areas in the City and adjacent Agricultural areas. Comprehensive Plan Land Use UH XX.2: Maintain a practice that the Urban Horticulture areas shall be within the City limits which are adjacent to Open space and Agriculture areas and are either currently in agriculture uses, seasonal agriculture farm retail uses, produce markets, produce vendor, resource processing, open space recreation or tourism related attractions. UH XX.3: Maintain a practice that Development of the Urban Horticulture area should be done with a minimum of permanent structures requiring that at least 60 percent of a parcel remain unbuilt and no additional pervious surfaces be created. Uses which may negatively impact adjacent Agricultural uses will be discouraged. UH XX.4 These areas may be identified as locations for incubator businesses that may request from the Director of Community Development the ability to not meet the 60% square footage requirement for a specified period of time not to exceed 24-months. To be added to Arlington Municipal Code XX.XXX.XX Urban Horticulture Designation. The Urban Horticulture designation provides a buffer between the urban areas of the City and adjacent agricultural lands. Lands uses within this designation will be low density and will have low impact to adjacent agricultural and open space areas. The following general criteria shall govern development in this designation: 1. Land uses are allowed that do not require extensive structures or development and that do require large land areas, such as intensive agriculture operation, sales of agriculture products, processing of food products, processing of added value products sales of landscaping materials and supplies, farmer’s markets, outdoor recreation activities, and log and lumber storage. 2. This designation shall be for lands that are within the City limits, are adjacent to agriculture areas and open space areas , and are either currently in agricultural uses or vacant. 3. Minimal structures shall be allowed for development, and 60 percent of a lot shall be left unbuilt and unpaved with no additional impervious surface added. 4. Uses which negatively impact adjacent agricultural uses shall be discouraged. Incubator businesses including the sales of goods not produced on the premises or other ancillary business may be allowed with the condition that 60% of the gross building square footage must meet urban horticulture use criteria. 6. Single-family residences shall be allowed at a density of no more than one (1) unit per (5) acres. City of Arlington Council Agenda Bill AGENDA ITEM: WORKSHOP #7 ATTACHMENT G COUNCIL MEETING DATE: December 12, 2011 SUBJECT: Amending the 2011 budget DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN: Contact: Allen Johnson, Executive, 403-3443 Jim Chase, Finance, 403-3422 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Ordinance amending 2011 budget 2. Attachment – Exhibit A 3. Amendment Descriptions EXPENDITURES REQUESTED: N/A BUDGET CATEGORY: Breakdown attached LEGAL REVIEW: Ordinance has been reviewed by City Attorney DESCRIPTION: Each year budget adjustments are proposed to reflect expenditures that were unforeseen and changes that have occurred since the original budget was adopted. This is a housekeeping item in that revenues have been received and expenditures have been approved throughout the year. This is the final budget piece for 2011. HISTORY: The major portion of the proposed amendments include the final remodel/construction costs to Fire St. 46, adding Accounting and administrative services costs to the Sewer Fund that was erroneously omitted in the original ordinance, increased fuel costs and repairs in the Equipment Rental Maintenance & Operations Fund, transfers for capital projects and the closing of several funds and the related transferring those fund balances. The remaining amounts of the amendment provide for variety of items and are all listed in detail on the attachment to this document. ALTERNATIVES If the amendment s are not done by the end of the year, the related funds will exceed spending authority and we will be out of compliance with state law. RECOMMENDED ACTION: The City Council is requested to adopt the proposed ordinance amending the 2011 budget for the City of Arlington. City of Arlington Council Agenda Bill AGENDA ITEM: WORKSHOP #8 ATTACHMENT H COUNCIL MEETING DATE: December 12, 2011 SUBJECT: Public Hearing on the 2012 Budget DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN: Executive Contact: Kristin Banfield, 360-403-3444 ATTACHMENTS: - Comments received on 2012 Budget (emails & comment at 12/5/11 meeting) - Ordinance adopting the 2012 Budget - Utility Tax Ordinance - Resolution for a ballot proposition for 0.1% sales tax increase to fund Public Safety services EXPENDITURES REQUESTED: N/A BUDGET CATEGORY: N/A LEGAL REVIEW: Complete DESCRIPTION: Council is requested to receive review the comments received on the 2012 Budget. Council is also requested to review the adopting ordinances and resolution in preparation for Council action on the 2012 Budget on December 19, 2011. ALTERNATIVES: RECOMMENDED MOTION: No action at this time. The Council will be requested to take action on December 19, 2011. DRAFT Page 1 of 3 Council Chambers 110 East Third December 5, 2011 City Council Members Present by Roll Call: Dick Butner, Sally Lien, Debora Nelson, Marilyn Oertle, Chris Raezer, Linda Byrnes, and Steve Baker Council Members Absent: There were no Council members absent City Staff Present: Mayor Larson, Allen Johnson, Kristin Banfield, Paul Ellis, Jim Chase, Fire Chief Bruce Stedman, Doug Schmidt, Brian Price, Jim Kelly, Brian DeWitt, Rory Bolter, Dan Hargroves, Bob Beam, Eric Scott, David Kuhl, Bill Blake, Lynne Bridges, Linda Taylor, Elizabeth Chamberlin, Seth Kinney, Kris Wallace, Monica Schlagel, Roxanne Guenzler, Debbie Strotz, Julie Good, Cristy Brubaker, Jan Bauer, Steve Peiffle – City Attorney Also Known to be Present: Terry Marsh, Bob Nelson, Barbara Tolbert, Bruce Angell, Gale Fiege – Everett Herald, Sarah Arney – North County Outlook, Mike Hobson, Cory Duskin, and Kirk Boxleitner – Arlington Times Mayor Larson called the meeting to order at 7:00PM, and the pledge of allegiance to the flag followed. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA Steve Baker moved to approve the Agenda. Marilyn Oertle seconded the motion which passed with a unanimous vote. INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS Cornerstone Award ~ Absolute Airpark With the use of a power point presentation Assistant to the City Administrator for Special Projects Paul Ellis introduced Absolute Airpark. There was no one in attendance from this indoor trampoline center. Jim Barron, from the American Legion, spoke to the American Veterans’ memorial project which has now been finished. He presented the extra $7293.75 project money to the City for project upkeep and maintenance. PUBLIC COMMENT There was no one in the audience who wished to speak to matters not on the Agenda. CONSENT AGENDA Steve Baker moved and Marilyn Oertle seconded the motion to approve the Consent Agenda which was unanimously carried to approve the following Consent Agenda items: 1. Minutes of the November 21 and 28, 2011 meetings 2. Accounts Payable Electronic Payments and Claims Checks #75246 through #75343 dated November 22, 2011 through December 5, 2011 in the amount of $224,519.14 and Payroll Checks #27404 through #27424 and Electronic Payments and Payroll Checks for the period of November 1, 2011 through November 30, 2011 in the amount of $1,254,138.60 3. Request for Authorization to apply for tourism grant funds 4. 2011 AC Water Main Project Closeout 5. Appoint Jerrie Inman to Library Board Minutes of the Arlington City Council Meeting Minutes of the City of Arlington City Council Meeting DRAFT December 5, 2011 Page 2 of 3 PUBLIC HEARING 2012 Budget With the use of a power point presentation City Administrator Allen Johnson spoke to the proposed 2012 Budget which was also distributed in hard copy prior to the presentation. He reviewed the budget process history and noted that the budget is now balanced. It is a 10% reduction from the 2011 budget. Mr. Johnson then reviewed Revenues and Expenditures, a breakdown of the 2012 Budget, a breakdown of Tax Sources, and a distribution of the Revenues. The Public Hearing was opened at 7:14PM. Brian Price, 18617 Balmoral Drive, Arlington, introduced himself as a City of Arlington Fire Department employee and an Arlington Resident. He urged the Council not to cut police and fire services. He also noted that Police and Fire go only to mandatory training, while all other training is paid by the officers, themselves. The Public Hearing was closed at 7:16PM. Marilyn Oertle asked if the health insurance cut includes the Council and the Mayor, as well, and it was noted that it does. No action was taken at this time. Discussion of this evening’s comments will be heard on December 12, 2011 with requested action taken on December 19, 2011. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Ordinance Adopting the Shoreline Management Plan Natural Resources Manager Bill Blake stated that the Shoreline Master Plan now has been presented in its new corrected form. Discussion followed. Steve Baker moved to authorize the Mayor to sign the Ordinance adopting Chapter 20.93 regarding Critical Areas. Sally Lien seconded the motion that passed with a unanimous vote. Ordinance Adopting the FEMA Flood Plain Regulations Mr. Blake spoke to the FEMA Floodplain Regulations, giving a background of the Ordinance and asking for Council support of the Regulations adoption. Steve Baker moved to approve the Council approve the proposed Ordinance adopting the Amended Floodplain Regulations in AMC Chapter 20.64 Floodways, Floodplains, Drainage, and Erosion; and the Riparian Habitat Zone map. Sally Lien seconded the motion that passed with a unanimous vote. NEW BUSINESS Interlocal Agreement with Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians Adopting a Framework for a Government- to-Government Relationship Bill Blake reviewed the purpose for the Interlocal Agreement. Sally Lien moved to approve the proposed Interlocal Agreement between the City of Arlington and the Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians Adopting a Framework for a Government-to-Government Relationship and authorize the Mayor to sign. Dick Butner seconded the motion that passed with a unanimous vote. Advanced Arlington Manufacturing Center Binding Site Plan Community Development Director David Kuhl addressed the Arlington Manufacturing Center Binding Site Plan, located on the former Bayliner site. Developer Brent Nickelson as present to answer questions any questions that might arise. All of this is subject to final review by the City Attorney. Steve Baker moved to accept the dedications and easements as shown on the Advanced Arlington Manufacturing Center Binding Site Plan, subject to final review by the City Attorney. Dick Butner seconded the motion that passed with a unanimous vote. Minutes of the City of Arlington City Council Meeting DRAFT December 5, 2011 Page 3 of 3 Approval of 67th ROW, Package #3 Public Works Director Jim Kelly spoke to the Right of Way Package. Mr. Kelly then answered Council questions regarding the number of parcels yet needing approval. Debora Nelson moved to approve, and authorize the Mayor to sign, the 67th Ave Phase 3 project Right- of-Way, Easement, and Real Estate transactions negotiated by the City of Arlington and their real estate transaction agent, HDR, Inc., for the Alspach, the Stillaguamish Valley Pioneer Assn. and the Kjolso properties, pending final review by the City Attorney. Chris Raezer seconded the motion that passed with a unanimous vote. 2011 Centennial Trail Project Closeout With the use of a power point presentation Mr. Kelly projected the Trail location, and with this answered Council questions asked at the previous presentation. Marilyn Oertle moved to approve and authorize the Mayor to sign the Construction Acceptance Letter for the 2011 Centennial Trail Project. Sally Lien seconded the motion that passed with a unanimous vote. Joint Resolution for Manufacturing Industrial Center David Kuhl spoke to the proposed Manufacturing Industrial Center and asked for consideration of a Resolution between the Cities of Arlington and Marysville and the Tribe. He distributed a revised Resolution reducing the 737 Max and Boeing language. Discussion followed. Steve Baker moved to approve the Joint Resolution between Marysville, the Tulalip Tribe and the City of Arlington relating to the advancement of the planning and implementation of a regional Manufacturing and Industrial Center in the Smokey Point and airport industrial areas, and to coordinate with regional partners to facilitate supplier expansion in the area. Sally Lien seconded the motion which passed with a unanimous vote. ADMINISTRATOR & STAFF REPORTS Orientation for the Mayor elect and Council members elect begins soon. MAYOR’S REPORT Mayor Larson reported on meeting and events she had recently attended. COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS – OPTIONAL Dick Butner, Sally Lien, Debora Nelson, Marilyn Oertle, Linda Byrnes, and Steve Baker gave brief reports while Chris Raezer had nothing to report at this time. EXECUTIVE SESSION City Attorney announced that there would be need for an Executive Session lasting approximately 15 minutes with no action taken during or after that meeting, to review collective bargaining negotiations, grievances, or discussions regarding the interpretation or application of a labor agreement [RCW 42.30.140(4)]. The meeting was adjourned into Executive Session at 7:50PM, after a 5-minute break was taken. The meeting was reconvened at 8:11PM, and with no further business to come before the Council, the meeting was adjourned at ____________________________ Margaret Larson, Mayor ORDINANCE NO. 2011-000 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE CITY OF ARLINGTON BUDGET FOR THE YEAR 2012. WHEREAS, subsequent to due notice and public hearing thereon, the City Council of the City of Arlington has approved the annual budget for the year 2012; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARLINGTON, WASHINGTON DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section One.The following expenditures budget containing the totals set forth for each fund for the year 2012 is hereby adopted. BEGINNING ENDING FUND FUND FUND BALANCES REVENUES EXPENDITURES BALANCES GENERAL FUND $0 $12,999,825 12,804,765$ $195,060 STREETS MAINTENANCE FUND 1,000 983,200 983,285 915 PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT FUND 10,000 100 0 10,100 GROWTH FUND 3,400,000 340,000 773,350 2,966,650 EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES FUND 218,000 2,393,720 2,609,500 2,220 STREAM CORRIDOR RESTORATION FUND 20,000 250 17,000 3,250 LODGING TAX FUND 25,000 76,000 77,700 23,300 CEMETERY IMPROVEMENT FUND 15,000 193,675 200,925 7,750 LID #21 5,000 62,100 65,000 2,100 REET 1 FUND 10,000 126,100 102,700 33,400 REET 2 FUND 1,000 316,100 312,225 4,875 CAPITAL FACILITIES/BUILDING FUND 1,000 35,800 34,000 2,800 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT FUND 100,000 984,450 946,300 138,150 PARK IMPROVEMENT 100,000 55,600 152,000 3,600 CEMETERY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 0 10,100 0 10,100 WATER / SEWER FUND 1,850,000 8,631,500 9,097,821 1,383,679 AIRPORT FUND 5,000 2,982,955 2,947,404 40,551 WATER IMPROVEMENT FUND 2,675,000 861,000 2,173,050 1,362,950 SEWER IMPROVEMENT FUND 2,250,000 288,000 490,025 2,047,975 PUBLIC WORKS-UTILITIES ADMINISTRATION FUND 53,000 589,616 568,540 74,076 WWTP IMPROVEMENT 250,000 1,000 205,000 46,000 SURFACE WATER CIP FUND 110,000 182,250 175,000 117,250 AIRPORT RESERVE FUND 1,019,323 10,000 1,019,323 10,000 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FUND 85,000 651,025 726,705 9,320 AIRPORT CIP 233,000 24,500 0 257,500 EQUIPMENT RENTAL MAINT & OPERATIONS FUND 10,000 425,710 429,400 6,310 EQUIP RENTAL DEPREC (REPLACEMENT) FUND 220,000 424,760 47,000 597,760 PUB WORKS MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS FUND 130,000 949,100 1,061,150 17,950 CEMETERY ENDOWMENT FUND 190,000 8,000 2,500 195,500 CEMETERY PRE-NEED TRUST FUND 15,000 10,150 10,100 15,050 GRAND TOTAL ALL FUNDS 13,001,323$ 34,616,586$ 38,031,768$ 9,586,141$ Section Two.This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect on January 1, 2012. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Arlington on this 5th day of December, 2011. ATTEST: Margaret Larson, Mayor Kristin Banfield, City Clerk Steve Peiffle, City Attorney 1 ORDINANCE NO. 2011-XXX ORDINANCE NO. 2011-XXX AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ARLINGTON, WASHINGTON AMENDING THE ARLINGTON MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 3.16 TO INCREASE THE RATE OF UTILITY TAXES FOR ELECTRICAL, COAXIAL TELEVISION CABLE TELEVISION, AND GARBAGE SERVICES AND ADOPTING A SUNSET CLAUSE WHEREAS, the City of Arlington, Washington has the authority to enact laws to tax certain activities occurring within the City; and WHEREAS, the City levies utility taxes upon providers of electrical, coaxial cable television, and garbage services to the public; and WHEREAS, the City Council believes it is in the best interest of its citizens to increase the electrical, coaxial television cable, and garbage services utility taxes for the purpose of ensuring the ability to continuing a reasonable level of services to the public; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Arlington do hereby ordain as follows: Section 1. Arlington Municipal Code section 3.16.040(1) shall be amended to read as follows: 3.16.040 Business activities subject to tax – Amounts. There shall be levied upon and shall be collected from all persons engaging in the following utility business activities a utility gross receipts tax or license fee measured by multiplying the rate specified times the gross income as follows: (1) Upon every person engaged within the city in the business of selling or supplying domestic water, sewer service, or stormwater service, a fee or tax equal to five percent of the total gross income; Section 2. Arlington Municipal Code section 3.16.040(2) shall be amended to read as follows: (2) Upon every person engaged within the city in or carrying on a coaxial cable television business, a fee or tax equal to eight percent of the total gross income from such business in the city during the current calendar year from which the license is required; ORDINANCE NO. 2011-XXX Section 3. Arlington Municipal Code section 3.16.040(5) shall be amended to read as follows: (5) Upon every public utility district engaged in or carrying on the sale of electricity within the city limits, a fee or tax equal to six percent of the total gross revenue from such business in the city, except for revenues derived from the sale of electricity for the purpose of resale; Section 4. A new section Arlington Municipal Code section 3.16.040(6) shall be added to read as follows: (6) Upon every person engaged within the city in the business of collecting of garbage and/or other wastes, a fee or tax equal to eight percent of the total gross income. Section 5. Severability. If any provision, section, or part of this ordinance shall be adjudged to be invalid or unconstitutional, such adjudication shall not affect the validity of the ordinance as a whole or any section, provision or part thereof not adjudged invalid or unconstitutional. Section 6. Sunset Clause. This ordinance will automatically expire and sunset on December 31, 2014 unless sooner extended, repealed, or amended by action of the Arlington City Council. Section 7. Effective Date. Section 3 of this ordinance shall be effective sixty- one days from its adoption and publication as required by RCW 35.21.865. All other sections of this ordinance shall be effective five days after adoption and publication. PASSED BY the City Council and APPROVED by the Mayor this ________ day of December, 2011. CITY OF ARLINGTON ____________ Margaret Larson, Mayor Attest: ______ Kristin Banfield, City Clerk ORDINANCE NO. 2011-XXX Approved as to form: ___________ Steven J. Peiffle, City Attorney CURRENT CITY CODE Arlington, Washington, Code of Ordinances >> Title 3 - REVENUE AND FINANCE >> Chapter 3.16.040 - OCCUPATION TAXES >> Chapter 3.16 - OCCUPATION TAXES 3.16.040 - Business activities subject to tax—Amounts. There is levied upon and shall be collected from all persons engaging in the following utility business activities a utility gross receipts tax or license fee measured by multiplying the rate specified times the gross income as follows: (1) Upon every person engaged within the city in the business of selling or supplying domestic water, sewer service or collecting or disposing of garbage and/or sewage or other wastes, a fee or tax equal to five percent of the total gross income; (2) Upon every person engaged within the city in or carrying on a coaxial television cable distribution business, a fee or tax equal to six percent of the total gross income from such business in the city during the current calendar year from which the license is required; (3) Upon any telephone business there shall be levied a tax equal to six percent of the total gross operating revenues, including revenues from intrastate toll, derived from the operation of such business within the city; (4) Upon every person engaged within the city in or carrying on the sale, delivery, distribution or furnishing of natural gas for domestic, business or industrial consumption, a fee or tax equal to six percent of the total gross revenue from such business in the city; (5) Upon every public utility district engaged in or carrying on the sale of electricity within the city limits, a fee or tax equal to five percent of the total gross revenue from such business in the city, except for revenues derived from the sale of electricity for the purpose of resale. PROPOSED CITY CODE Arlington, Washington, Code of Ordinances >> Title 3 - REVENUE AND FINANCE >> Chapter 3.16.040 - OCCUPATION TAXES >> Chapter 3.16 - OCCUPATION TAXES 3.16.040 - Business activities subject to tax—Amounts. There is levied upon and shall be collected from all persons engaging in the following utility business activities a utility gross receipts tax or license fee measured by multiplying the rate specified times the gross income as follows: (1) Upon every person engaged within the city in the business of selling or supplying domestic water, sewer service, or stormwater servicecollecting or disposing of garbage and/or sewage or other wastes, a fee or tax equal to five percent of the total gross income; (2) Upon every person engaged within the city in or carrying on a coaxial television cable distribution business, a fee or tax equal to six eight percent of the total gross income from such business in the city during the current calendar year from which the license is required; (3) Upon any telephone business there shall be levied a tax equal to six percent of the total gross operating revenues, including revenues from intrastate toll, derived from the operation of such business within the city; (4) Upon every person engaged within the city in or carrying on the sale, delivery, distribution or furnishing of natural gas for domestic, business or industrial consumption, a fee or tax equal to six percent of the total gross revenue from such business in the city; (5) Upon every public utility district engaged in or carrying on the sale of electricity within the city limits, a fee or tax equal to five six percent of the total gross revenue from such business in the city, except for revenues derived from the sale of electricity for the purpose of resale. (6) Upon every person engaged within the city in the business of collecting or disposing of garbage and/or other wastes, a fee or tax equal to eight percent of the total gross income; RESOLUTION NO. 2011-xxx A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARLINGTON, WASHINGTON, PROVIDING FOR THE SUBMISSION TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF THE CITY AT THE FEBRUARY 14, 2012 SPECIAL ELECTION OF A PROPOSITION AUTHORIZING AN ADDITIONAL SALES AND USE TAX AT THE RATE OF 0.1 PERCENT PURSUANT TO RCW 82.14.450 TO BE USED EXCLUSIVELY FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE PURPOSES; PROVIDING A FORM OF THE BALLOT PROPOSITION; ENTERING LEGISLATIVE FINDINGS; AND PROVIDING DIRECTION TO STAFF. WHEREAS, ensuring the protection and safety of the Arlington community is a fundamental priority of the City of Arlington; and WHEREAS, the recent economic downtown has significantly reduced the financial resources available to the City, including the resources available for criminal justice activities; and WHEREAS, the Washington Legislature has recently amended RCW 82.14.450 to authorize cities to submit a proposition to local voters approving a sales and use tax increase, the revenues from which may be utilized for criminal justice purposes; and WHEREAS, in accordance with RCW 82.14.450, the City Council desires to submit a proposition to local voters authorizing an additional sales and use tax at the rate of 0.1 percent of the selling price and 0.1 percent of the value of the article used, respectively, the revenues from which will be used by the City exclusively for criminal justice purposes; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARLINGTON, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findings. The above recitals are hereby adopted as legislative findings by the City Council. The City Council further finds that the best interests and general welfare of the City of Arlington would be served by imposing a 0.1 percent increase in the local sales and use tax rate and utilizing the revenues collected from said tax for criminal justice purposes. Section 2. Election. The Snohomish County Auditor, as ex officio supervisor of elections, is hereby requested to submit to the qualified electors of the City of Arlington the proposition set forth in Section 3 of this resolution at the February 14, 2012 election to be held within the City. Section 3. Ballot Proposition. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed, no later than December 30, 2011, to certify the following proposition to the Snohomish County Auditor in substantially the following form: CITY OF ARLINGTON PROPOSITION NO. ____ SALES AND USE TAX INCREASE FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE PURPOSES The City Council of the City of Arlington has adopted Resolution No. 2011-xxx concerning a sales and use tax pursuant to RCW 82.14.450. If approved, this proposition would authorize an additional sales and use tax at the rate of 0.1 percent to be used exclusively for criminal justice purposes. Should this proposition be APPROVED? ………………. REJECTED? ………………… Section 4. Changes. The Mayor and City Attorney are authorized to make such minor adjustments to the wording of such proposition as may be recommended by the Snohomish County Auditor, provided that the intent of the proposition remains clear and consistent with the intent of this resolution as approved by the City Council. Section 5. Effective Date. This resolution shall take effect and be in full force immediately upon passage by the City Council. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Arlington this _____ day of __________________, 2011. CITY OF ARLINGTON ___________________________ Margaret Larson, Mayor Attest: _____________________________ Kristin Banfield, City Clerk Approved as to form: ______________________________ Steven J. Peiffle City Attorney