Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20215 67TH AVE NE_BLD951856_2026 City of Arll- ,gton NOTICE and Inspection Report Phone# Permit No. �'"/ Legal Date Called �l0 Address Ti A/ Time Called Contractor/Owner/y S By Requested b ❑ Setback ❑ Roof Diaphragm ❑ Insulation ❑ Plumb GW ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall Nailing nal ❑ Foundation ❑ Rough-in Plumbing ❑ Reinspection ❑ Shear Wall ❑ Mechanical ❑ Other _ t ❑ APPROVAL ) ORRECTION REQUIRED corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Work listed below has been inspected and approved. ❑ CALL 435-0724 FOR REINSPECTION—24 hour notice required. i �l Inspector Date City of Arli ,gton NOTICE and Inspection Report Phone# Permit No. � � Legal Date Called Address Time Called Contractor/Owner By Requested by TYPE OF • ❑ Setback ❑ Roof Diaphragm ❑ Insulation ❑ Plumb GW ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall Nailing ,Final ❑ Foundation ❑ Rough-in Plumbing ❑ %inspection ❑ Shear Wall ❑ Mechanical ❑ Other _ ❑ APPROVAL QORRECTION REQUIRED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Work listed below has been inspected and approved. ❑ CALL 435-0724 FOR REINSPECTION—24 hour notice required. 21-1 l J ° J h F S Inspector Dated r City of Arlr-lgton NOTICE and Inspection Report o Phone# Permit No. �O Legal T11 Date Called _ — < Address Time � • �C Contractor/Owner By Requested by .� TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Setback ❑ Roof Diaphragm ❑ Insulation ❑ Plumb GW ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall NailingFnal ❑ Foundation ❑ Rough-in Plumbing ❑ Remspection ❑ Shear Wall ❑ Mechanical ❑ Other ❑ APPROVAL ORRECTION REQUIRED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Work listed below has been inspected and approved. ❑ CALL 435-0724 FOR REINSPECTION—24 hour notice required. Ad ZIAX 97, doe � 1 L/ G/ a Inspector ��-Date City of Arl:`- �gton NOTICE and Inspection Report Q Phone# Permit No. v J / Legal Date Called 2 —C�� Address /+ /� / J� Time Calle ' � Contractor/Owner /V By Requested by �(J TYPE OF-INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Setback ❑ Roof Diaphragm ❑ Insulation ❑ Plumb GW ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall Nailing ❑ Final ❑ Foundation ❑ Rough-in Plumbing ❑ Reinspection ❑ Shear Wall ❑ Mechanical Other 10 APPROVAL ❑ CORRECTION REQUIRED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. Q-W.—rk listed below has been inspected and approved. CALL 435-0724 FOR REINSPEC71ON—24 hour notice required. Inspector Data City of Arl =-1gton NOTICE and Inspection Report Phone# Permit No. //�`J `� ���C7 Legal Date Called %S� %�(. Address Time Calle jf Contractor/Owner By Requested by • ❑ Setback ❑ Roof Diaphragm ❑ Insulation ❑ Plumb GW ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping FS)oting ❑ Drywall Nailing ❑ Final ❑ Foundation ElRough-in Plumbing ❑ Reinspection ❑ Shear Wall ❑ Mechanical ❑ Other APPROVAL ❑ CORRECTION REQUIRED e:)rrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. listed below has been inspected an d nd approved. ❑ CALL 435-0724 FOR REINSPECTION—24 hour notice required. S � � Inspector �� � �j Date / —�_�% (,2 City of Arli—gton NOTICE and Inspection Report r Phone# Permit No. _�d S Legal Date Called /02 (0 ' Address 774- fC Time Called / Contractor/Owner ) By Requested by ❑ Setback ❑ f Diaphragm• ❑ Insulation ❑ Plumb GW ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing �Q ❑ Drywall Nailing ❑ Final [Foundation ❑ Rough-in Plumbing ❑ Reinspection ❑ Shear Wall ❑ Mechanical ❑ Other APPROVAL ❑ CORRECTION REQUIRED Krrectitons listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ed below has been inspected and approved. ❑ CALL 435-0724 FOR REINSPEC'nON—24 hour notice required. Inspector,`` �,� �`d - Date City of Ar14--ngton NOTICE and Inspection Report Phone# Permit No. ` — Leggy / , �7 ' Date Called ' Address 200 L S- `E/�' -/ � Time Called .� O _ Contractor/Owner s By Requested by TYPE OF • ❑ Setback ❑ Roof Diaphragm ❑ Insulation ❑ Plumb GW ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping Footing ❑ Drywall Nailing ❑ Final oundation ❑ Rough-in Plumbing ❑ Reinspection ❑ Shear Wall ❑ Mechanical ❑ Other APPROVAL ❑ CORRECTION REQUIRED rrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. � Work listed below has been inspected and approved. ❑ CALL 435-0724 FOR REINSPECTION—24 hour notice required. 124 Inspector Date 2 _ H O, 00 U U ZZ M JQ d E O a Q cr1 � U co 00 s a UV) Pz a U � Y010 a D Z � o ai E Q `� z S 3 Z � :: W G > Ct $ y ' J `� a 1 m E o Q o V Z CL Q > = Z U M J M iC Z a a S Lu W E H E Q ae C U 0) >- `D H w Q = � 8 to U. a c — WO W go u Q c o � n U C� Q W v J Y E m $ e a Q v c W ~ m do _ O�a a d 0 G ' ca n Z p a 0) Zo Q �EW E 8�; w � � as t m r x v 3fri N `s Q �' cc V N rn 2 m .N '$ C. y • c 0 LL N .� " ` J Q LL (n Y O H �a t ? V 1 aCL WC13 • LL CIS a � 2 o[ cd � " g W c p rH-I Q w Q • 1u D Z co o W w v 0 2 n LL B O O o � H �1���\ CC W Z n t4 N co LL 0 w E �O CV 0 CO Wo m y 4 Z • Ln c I w Z 1� rn o� y a a o N (a l\ IE rr 0 J U] O V QG) O 4-J �\ L W O MW4' a `-1 LL W 34 O r-1 Z7ad m NORTHWEST HARDWOODS AwA Division of The Weyerhaeuser Company P.O. BOX 7 20015 67th AVENUE N.E. ARLINGTON, WASHINGTON 98223 2061435-8502 FAX*: 2061435-9635 November 3, 1995 City of Arlington Community Development 600 East 1st. Street Arlington, WA 98223 I Attention: David Anderson f Reference: Permit Application High Yield Sawmill Dear David: The purpose of the high yield sawmill is to produce the maximum amount of high grade hardwood lumber from a smaller size log than is practicable to merchandise through the regular sawmill. As with all our current production we will use 95% alder logs with the remaining logs being either maple or birch. The process involves removing the bark through the existing debarker and breaking the log down into lumber through a series of saws with the excess being turned into sawdust and hardwood chips. The manufacturing of logs at our location no longer produces woodwaste that would need to be landfilled. All material is used to make lumber, pallet stock, sawdust, chips, or hogfuel. The focus of this mill is to achieve maximum recovery from the small log so the emphasis will be on recovery and quality not on production. The volumes of logs required to supply this mill will be relatively small - between five to seven loads of logs per shift. This is a relatively clean process which will not require the use of any hazardous materials other than what is normally used in a sawmill operation to oil the machinery. We do not treat the lumber in any way. The green lumber produced is unloaded at the stacker and moved to the sawmill where it will be loaded into the pre-existing kilns. There will be no bulk storage of chemicals at this facility. The sawdust, chips, and hogfuel that are generated in the manufacturing process will be continuously conveyed into the pre-existing bunkers which are part of our chip plant. If you have any questions on this process or the materials that will be used please feel free to contact Ken Wilkes - Environmental Coordinator, Bud Winter- Maintenance Supervisor, or Al Thomas who is in charge of all permit applications for this project. The phone number for this location is 435-8502. Sincerely, Ken Wilkes n �— NORTHWEST HARDWOODS A Division of The Weyerhaeuser Company P.O. BOX 7 ld�l� 20015 67th AVENUE N.E. ARLINGTON, WASHINGTON 98223 206/435-8502 FAX*: 2061435-9635 November 3 , 1995 City of Arlington Community Development 600 East ist Street Arlington, WA 98223 Attention: David Anderson RE : Permit Application High Yield Sawmill Dear David: Comments are in order per letter received starting as follows : GENERAL: 1, 2, 3 Page 1 - Cover 4, 5 Page 2 - Site Plan. (Note : Tom Cooper site review October 31, 1995 . ) 6 Attached soil report - Cover. 7 Page 3 - Floor Plan. 8 Attached WSEC - Cover. Also referenced Page 3 Floor Plan. OCCUPANCY: 1 thru 9 Page 3 - Floor Plan. (Note : 1, 2 , 3 , 7 . Reference Page 2 - Site Plan. 1 . Reference Page 1 - Cover) Page 3 and 4 - Attached statement cover. Page 3 , 4, 5 - Attached SPCC plan cover. WASHINGTON STATE REQUIRED BARRIER FREE DESIGN: 1 thru 7 Page 2 - Site plan. STRUCTURAL: 1 thru 8 Page 1 - Cover page . (Note : To follow submittals Quantum Construction, 719 - 28th Street, Anacortes, WA) City of Arlington October 3 , 1995 Page 2 OTHER (Modified) : Waste water discharge and SPCC specificiations and plans . Lead agency - Washington State Department of Ecology. Engineer - Roger Clay Attached Cover Sincerely, erett Winter Maintenance Supervisor NORTHWEST HARDWOODS ARLINGTON PUBLIC WORKS TEL : 1-360-435-7944 uct 0fY Of"AMNUT01V Public Works Department (360) 435.3811 FAX(360) 435-7944 Bud Winter Northwest Hardwoods October 10, 1995 20015 67th Ave: -NE P.O.S. 7 Arlington, Wa. 98223 Subject : High Yield Sawmill SEPA Dear Mr. wintex Your application fee for SEPA review will be returned. I have determined that a SEPA determination is unnecessary for this ro ru . I ind 't is ategorically exempt under WAC 197-11-900 , hpot1 r Ed McMillan Director Publi56 .Works cc Dave Ander6on s •r = r a 816 N. West Avenue O Mailing Address: 238 N. Olympic Ave. 0 Arlington, WA 98223 19 iY-.�=fr1�IMM1a.r Yra•p•LL : .•w .� — - -_—'M. � �i.. .. i, ..< �- - .. INTERNAT 'JAL CONFERENCE OF BUILDINr'-IFFICIALS PLAN REVIEW SERVICES APPLICATION Please plan Ian review services in accordance with the following information: P JURISDICTION INFORMATION 1. Name of Jurisdiction: 2. Jurisdiction Job No.: 3. Code Official Name: 4. Jurisdiction Address: 5. Jurisdiction Phone: Jurisdiction Fax: (5�q) 4 6. Alternate Contact Person: Phone: (JIaD) ��S 0724 PROJECT CONTACT INFORMAV\OW(Optional V. 1. Project Contact Persons ' 2. Title (Architect, Engineer, Owner, etc.): 3. Address: .g 4. City, State, Zip Code: 5. Phone: ( ) 6. Copy comments to contact person (circle one): yes no PROJECT INFORMATION 1 . Name of Project: S 2. Address of Job: 4U -3 - Please check plans under the following edition of the Uniform Building CodeTM' T, ( ) 1988 Edition ( ) 1991 Edition � ) Other: (please specify) f ygC 3. Please check plaris for compliance with the following additional codes: U.M.C. U.P.C." ( ) N.E.C. ( ) ( ) Edition Edition Edition Other ( ) Other ( Other ( ) Specify Specify Specify ti (over) ARLIPIGTON PUBLIC WORKS TEL : 1-360-435-7944 Oct 11 ,95 10 :4r No .UU4 F' .Ui ARLINGTC�/V PU- B- LIG WORKS FAX TRANSMITTAL SHEET PUBLIC WORKS OFFICE • 238 N. OLYMPIC AVENUE ARLINGTON, WA ' 98223 • (205) 435-3811 FAX 435-7944 DATE: - d/ a FIRM: -FAX NUMBER: FROM: - SUBJECT NUMBER OF PAGES TO FOLLOW:IF YOU EXPERIENCE PROBLEMS RECEIVING THIS FAX, OR IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE THE NUMBER OF PAGES INDICATED, PLEASE CALL OUR OFFICE AT (206) 435-3811 . . ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: - Faxed By: Date: Time: . � y OWCr II d ` Z W W a � � O � � Q � a u ¢ JCIE 0 OOv' Lv� O W W ftftftftw Z } O w QLL. I W z ~ o ¢ = � O Y d u O "7 O •yt N �_ O W Fw.. .M • • U T N W Y cr • O O _ - - - N N N N N N N �U w Y_ < OZD Q � � e e a tz OW O C C] 6 J n z=r a:�O O � Z O F _ Q W� `F- (.e UCV7 W G O < w2O > � cna F G < U 'pm a y F W >ui umy u z W O Z W Z O N O Vt > ~ ¢ >1 In Z — C�1 _ z (r s Z wi •a a O W l.� s �o eta d a V — ¢ Z 0 'm Z ,. 1NLU Z � ,`� z f n ^ O v7 ¢ U I p < < F F O F Q O o e1 Z o m W O O W < r J Z3 wU O = i y a o �' !d ^- z _ e w u o c ce oU O 1=o d c z W x u Z Z O m w Y ¢ O V u \ U v c a. U .� ` E C7 r� < G °� .3 z Y J U O "' < a z W O O z V 3 ❑ ,. u � WWZ0 � � o � a600F '`< < W z z z � 0 F' m � ¢ � m1- QJv�i � o o m < m9 a Q W o im -' 7Z � Z W ¢ Z < I I I I z < J O W < -Z Z < ~ i 3 Z ~ c lOOJ � 00C) X z d m d f W a 3 0 wi u.. Gn o Q O < z z \ In m u O V 7( Z J J Y W x < C I.0 } W o ce W a < - O — N \N\ N N ❑ ` �y Q N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Cr > Z 2 O z cc oc oocc cc 1 m c a c !• o c �. a l � a a c °a z oc U' � � � �J O � �OJ o , 3 cc z < Aa � < < n < o ,°�C� E°. d < Y x o < s� J� < Q W ` ` `Z ¢ w F m y„ z m ? ` RAJ cr Cd o < Q�+ Q1 1 O ` < y ^ c a �^ C� U 4 a ° d ° F °m� a m z V h° \ � Z � � � 3 � � z ' y � < O W ,c '� o Y C z 2 0: z U C, e i L � ��` j < ao ^O jmz Y C � \ amo � � � o � , Zo � q � 3� I x ° V °` Y ❑o m� `� °�� ,v y r a > 0 3 Z F z z o c o ,d m � tA uWi � Z '- m < r y c o < z a g o ? r z Z Q ° J c o o v\\> >\ \, U � u �J v � C � �7 V Z � m � � ;A ❑ 00 ~ a<c < O m '� < oc 1 _ d Q �` O u ZS "� i .n Z `� a < U 3 Q K zi W c < < y v W < n _ O SMOVUV N33M139 S?Nll 1Id 313ldW0o �- cb - co UOO � u v w Z N N N d a ~ ~ ~ui � � � Q < W X W LL- W ° u � oQ = � O LL o Z o Z S w > O Q td td u 8 8 8 h N w W U W C N N M N N N N N M VLLJ U v Z S c a Z w r J Z � Z z z Z WQZLL` W " O0p S F w Z 'm a O Z¢ :-0) U � w F 4 J p � � a7urW w o o = w w r VC � m W = � � a F < U m 9 y F W �, VV V = L Z O W O W — Q = � S UHO a j � m y a � � � � V p � � Z N N .�` ^ N J 1 - F• LLL"o E- Z < w - z � F, .7 ,� F i1 ttl w p V :7 7_ wUw O c O C- 6 �a w O g i 2 p n� N Q Z ° F < a_ `� z p z F a O v p Q <0 cc G lap ❑ J U � Oz ° y < '� a 0 ° o� Z Z ce °° LLJU Y J O O U ce O U d w e t -� ES, a E C� ^<- > < G ° ' Z Y < u p ' < ' z W O z ❑ owu Quo � o o < z > ° a ° < u W u < Lj 3 �¢ L, Z Z w w U F 2 Z Z J m _� � '- ' �_ s� mQ � mF- Q -+ Nj z j V m = W (}j a a W p a Z r J�u O u Z wZ Z JZOUZ < < Z f J cW Q W Z C O L �� O O = O j O N z J L m C C Vr W d 5 r ] 5 a 141 Q WLO Ne ❑ f 5 V O j O LL 0. J t` ❑ \ R `� <m Z a z a r Z < cc LU oc v 3 u r W w < r N p V C N _ < Q Li1'� to _ �l 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 e u ° a > o ✓Ni ` N N N VNi < N V. M N N N N N N N N N N N N N N d. > ❑ Z 2 o ❑ Elx ❑ cc Ice o m CE c� J �n J � O J O J o c\�J 3 ~ E" d a Z LLJ < „s < � < < C) F- o w`� � Y o D f f f o f < `�V �. 0- cc o a Q O � ^� Ir A� LLIv Z �ol� y F m y z W J Z Q k y z u o v ° oN, Ilk ° O a E< a a w J Z ` O i s ,y ow °J �' ai a O �. i ce m ° ` I `) p Cd G a z a z U < < N�� �� � Q � cc , � � y `` ate � °' c Z ray o °�o as " 0 m z x �{ ,� z O r� v O ^ F 3 < a ce LO m o o �030 o ❑ o 'b� `� Y =° a > o_ � °o ? J Z Z a �.r u '< V 3 Z 3 ` n Z Z_ p °u mJ W UI Z V Z U Z � Z N s v U of 0 -J < d ? c` SMOHHV N33M13' S_NII IIV 3131MOO CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY,INC. PREVIOUS N 76956 TESTNG&INSPECTION / +NGINEERS / GEOLOGISTS REPORT No 12919 N.E.126TH PLACE, 206]B23-9600 DATE CERT.NO. KIRKLAND,WA 9B034 f T Q EVERETT 1208]259-0617 ��i/ PROJECT �Jr, iJ LOCATION 200�5 G A t7 � BLDG.PERMIT NO. OWNER TO: WEATHER TEMP. AT AM _La Y AT PM ENGINEER m ARCHITECT ATTN: CONTRACTOR (2) ITEMS INSPECTED _ FOUNDATIONS INSPECTION PERFORMED _ RESTEELICONCRETE RESTEEL ONLY FOOTINGS _ SLAB _ RESTEEL/MASONRY STR.ST/WELDING _ AUGER CAST PILES _ COLUMNS OTHER STR.ST/BOLTING — DRILLED PIERS — WALLS lQ4Of A��J�1NG _ BEAMS -T 40CATION(AREAS) 1�o4r, 6G ifl� M �zAAt( CONCRETE/MASONRY MIX NO. DESIGN STRENGTH(f'c) TOTAL CU.YD.PLACED SUPPLIER SLUMP(INCHES) SPECIMENS CAST AIR CONTENT(%) SEE CYLINDER REPORT NO. YES—NO_ITEMS INSPECTED WERE IN CONFORMANCE WITH BLDG.DEPT.APPROVED PLANTS,SET NO. REMARKS: �S tj} � //VaS�EC/� �LJ�D�� �-/�t•IJ� � �b0� f./�CI'C1 J�C� �F �bt/�l,U �'1_LC.__ sp LJ,s, J . Jj eR �5 �D R� CalCK� D ��Y" u P (J r�D SA MAINS, o uR� �v HOURS ON PROJECT TRAVEL TIME TRAVEL MILEAGE APPROVED BY INSPECTO FI D REP R COPIES TO: �\w ) � SIGNED: FORM NO.CTL-89.1 C I TY QF' ARI—I NSTQh' CON ST R UCT I QN P E R M I T PERM I T NO- 95-1$tiG Owner: NW HARDWOODS 20015 67TH AVE ARLINGTON 98223 Value of Work: $258,875.00 Tax ID: 910470860 Phone: 4.35-8502 Describe Work: CONSTRUC STEEL BUILDING FOR SAW MILL Proposed Use: LUMBER MILL Legal Description: Job Address: 20015 67TH AVE Contractor' s Name Type Address License# G TOTALS Fee Permit Fee $1, 347.50 Plan Fee $875.88 Park Mitigation $634.00 J,' SIGNATURE: TOTAL FEE..... . .. . ... ..... $2,857.38 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND PAYNENTS.... . . ....... . . ...S0.0 KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND COR- RECT ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS AND TOTAL DUE. . . .......... .... $2,857.38 ORDI , LACES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WOR ILL B COMP LIE WIT WHETHER SP II IED H .`-'IN OT. DATE RECEIPT n� BU LDING OFFICIAL 4a - a �- 9� DD CASCADE TES7INL -ABORATORY,INC. PREVIOUS 86172 TESTING&INSPECTION / ENGINEERS / GEOLOGISTS REPORT No. 12919 N.E.126TH PLACE. 1206]823-9000 DATE CE�5- 0 12919 .E. 2S 98034 EVERETT 120612 59-OB17 � ' PROJECT i'L -cT LOCATION }y V. BLDG. PERMIT NO, OWNER TO: YA WEATHER TEMP. AT AM AT PM Po. x ENGINEER D a TAR 9�2 _ a ARCHITECT ATTN: U CONTRACTOR (3) (2) ITEMS INSPECTED _. FOUNDATIONS INSPECTION PERFORMED RESTEEL RESTEEUCONCRETE ONLY — FOOTINGS _ SLAB— \ _ RESTEEUMASONRY STR.STIWELDING — AUGER CAST PILES V COLUMNS STR.STIBOLTING — DRILLED PIERS — WALLS — OTHER SS�r1'S ��r 1gI � BEAMS (4) LOCATION(AREAS) tx� Ll:3S CONCRETE/MASONRY MIX NO. DESIGN STRENGTH(f'c) TOTAL CU.YD. PLACED SUPPLIER S J SPECIMENS CAST LUMP(INCHES) SEE CYLINDER REPORT NO. AIR CONTENT(%) \LYES_NO_ITEMS INSPECTED WERE IN CONFORMANCE WITH BLDG.DEPT.APPROVED PLANS,SET NO. REMARKS: 1h-5UALL�. P a-TE U pL ' Lr l L J >r/]r r Ge/G F+�+ //l��T W c+f/ ■1 3 u r/LrIJ J f/J �G Sir�r!1 r`s 1)�RG�Ja� Q A B Z3 CMIV160 HOURS ON PROJECT pA6v1EL A. TRAVEL TIME TRAVEL MILEAGE APPROVED BY INSPECTO COPIES TO. wH Br- i , FIE REPO . SIGNED: FnRM Mn CT11141 MTCIMaterials Testing & Consulting, Inc. Report# � FIELD REPORT Materials Testing& Consulting FILE NO: 1687 Old Highway 99 S. DATE: 2 C� Mount Vernon,WA 98273 Phone: (360) 128-0900 PROJECT: N.U/. FAX: (360)428-6021 ADDRESS: 74b 12t.1 � CITY: I<. ENGINEER: ti CLIENT: G + Co, •I. .G ARCHITECT: ATTA M CONTRACTOR: ADDRESS: •7 I 2 +f, S+_ OWNER: N I �1,• r „-1 o r LJ�1 q o° PERMIT NO: Time: JA4 Temp: 6p0 —TC�S Fe(- Ca 4I C r S�I�c' ?}.A spa #AfC,4- ,i•, -�� G� + lei F3`�I c Ptu �/ r T r � 5� bz,4L ; 1/ 49A,i Q �-32 t' .rlo A � n �• r• ') � >V �T 1 r•� ..i � C o.n ✓ 0 r in �t /'i tr+ nTy r I %A)e t' •1�1;4, C L n cZ 1 � �/ ✓ �� � In P N.II�` Wl eLo / P(aHS V r L. trr rnl� �.r r �!� r n rY e^f 05 -f' 1 4f,A � tAwk, � c0V10r� • ®fn S CA LA ( ' � � ' S "� SP ,� Ce Cob�0lrf � r �•nC ��� GtiPS L4 r-J1rMr� U-�� l�Z�J Yo rr f o ���r,.- bo�-� •��5�;�� � �-vs;.,.,u..n �-� � .tee� cte -1�3r2 ,. Ll 7 !iA,'r t'je!/P ,OtO✓iJOmJ NO /t P n i 01f ff S -(- 0�r It �� °�v✓ P r Of o ti So a lu t�S �(� t�. 5.(� a� „tour. INSPECTOR ALL REPORTS ARE CONSIDERED CONFIDENTIAL AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF THE CLIENT AND MTC '. REPRODUCTION EXCEPT IN FULL,\WITHOUT THE\WRITTEN CONSENT OF MTC,IS STRICTLY FORBIDDEN Materials Testing &M T C I i Consulting, .c. Report# 1 4.21 FIELD REPORT Materials Testing& Consulting FILE NO: 1687 Old Highway 99 S. DATE: Mount Vernon,WA 98273 Phone: (360) 428-0900 PROJECT: l- FAX: (360)428-6021 ADDRESS: CITY: ENGINEER: CLIENT: ARCHITECT: ATTN: CONTRACTOR: ADDRESS: OWNER: P RMIT NO: ' Time: Temp: W e J c t.A f r Z� D rf S a� lo; ` ��f, �S �r N•f �Al��oS. I 1 1 1 � D� � •r_'.P��e�l ,. �71il�rie -P�sy r/f P IPveIr; aus .'l 7L oSP 1 m+ All +Iu5S. GlvC� P .0 . des / a S 1 I A D o ' 7 4 Y i f r^ 5 oeno Ar tQ PL r f (['�! J✓f !� �f e {I I/�h/ �[��G '1 D/T.� �7t� E' pz D�'P II T/ c3.nS !_-A �iJ' I � � ! ✓i t�r ��C� W � /"1 C�°/ -�Lr aT �r f!N ��B'r G. c i [•l�r�D/r•'��/ W/ 7 INSPECTOR ALL REPORTS ARE CONSIDERED CONFIDENTIAL AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF THE CLIENT AND MTC I REPRODUCTION EXCEPT IN FULL,WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF NITC,IS STRICTLY FORBIDDEN BUILDING pF� .iNIIT APPLICATION CHECKLIST RES & DUPLE` coNRt & RqD l�sb APPLICATION APPLICATION SITE PLAN SITE PLAN _ ARCH. DRAWINGS ARCH. DRAWINGS STRUCT DRAWINGS STRUCT DRAWING LEGAL DESCRIPTION LEGAL DESCRIPTION ENERGY CALCS ENERGY CALCS STORM DRAINAGE STORM DRAINAGEST SEPTIC TANK DESIGN �— S��DR�WP�TGS STRUCT CALCS THREE (S) COPIES OF EACH FOUR (a) COPIES OF EACH ARE ,ARE REQUIRED FOR APPLICATION REQL-ERlc-D FOR .APPLICATION — :! ZONING SETBACXS: FRONT USE REAR LOT COVERAGE SIDE PERMIT TRACKING Name ,' Pe:mit 7 s' I O � Project Type Date Received DISTRIBUTED RETURNED DISTRIBUTED RETURNED P,," 4 TL Engineering Public Works � � —' 5 Fire Dept. o i -i - , 7ohn Farrens Date Returned nor Corrections , p i ��'r1�✓ Date Resubmitted with Corrections Made Date Ready to Issue Date Issued D ATE: SIGNED: 1wp�llahemiC soekliat 3 P TRANSMITTAL FORM 1995 PROJECT NAME: Northwest Hardwoods - DATE:August 23, New Mill Materials are transmitted for: TO: David Anderson Review and Comments Terry Castle Arlington Fire Dept. Marc Hayes Rob Putnam Arlington Police Dept. Scheduled for Background: Request is for construction of an additional mill to Comments due be located across the tracts and behind the current facility. g/31/95 cu This following information is being transmitted: Description Copies Date 1 SEPA Checklist 1 Site Plan provide an address for this project as a Additional Remarks: *David Anderson - please part of your review. Signed: (. TO US EVEN IF YOU HAVE NO COMMENT. THIS FORM MUST E RETURNED h ent doing review. PLEASE INITIAL and ilude ENT- ch time was sp REVIEWED NO COMM t FIRE DEPAMIETIT CHEC-"�IU PERMIT # ®�J DATE: /42 v/%-#677 NAME: ADDRESS: LEGAL: BUILDING USE: OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION: A B E F H 1 1 2 2.1 3 4 1 T 2 3 1 2 1 2 1 3 4 5 6 7 I M R S V 1.1 1.2 2 3 1-T 3 1 2 3 1 4 5 1 2 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION '00I II III 1V V F.R. F.R. -HOUR FN ONE-HOUR N H.T. ONE-HOUR N Pleasenntt- all nere'quEy correcfions or requirements on sitel Site Plan: Approved L11 Denied Access Requirements: Fire lane required: Yes ✓/ No Sprinkler system required: Yes LZ No ,Alarm system required: Yes No Knox Box required: Yes No Location: Hydrant required: / Yes ✓ No # of hydrants required ( 3 Location of Hydrant: S — Fire Flow requirements: -1 e7pb) 2jA4-D- Alarm system required: Yes No Knox Box required: Yes No Location: Fire extinquishers required: Yes No Location: Address and Location on building: 173- hz)(— go/ FIRE CHItF: L��. _ Date: —0 %— con Build%onn\fdchecklistTI -S-qj— CITY OF ARLINGTON Building Department C�~' December 11, 1995 Bud Winter Northwest Hardwoods P.O. Box 7 Arlington, WA 98223 RE: PERMM NO. 1856 NEW HIGH YIELD SAWMILL FACILITY For NORTHWEST HARDWOODS 20015 67th Avenue NE Arlington, Washington 98223 ENGINEER: David S. Dayton, III (Metal Bldg.) Clemens J. Rossell (Foundations) Kriss P. Hamilton CODE DATA* OCCUPANCY GROUPS: F-1 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: II-N (Sprinkled) SEPARATIONS: N = 80' E = 515' S = 41'-3" W = 20'-0" NOTE: The site plan in the second sheet of Murray-Pacific, Design Services, Ltd. Is not to scale. BUILDING AREAS: (Noted by the Arlington Building Department's designation.) BUILDING A = 2,640 sf.. BUILDING B = 6,760 Sf. BUILDING C = 2,600 Sf. BUILDING D = 680 Sf. TOTAL BLDG 129680 Sf. BASIC ALLOWABLE AREAS: 12,000 SL ALLOWABLE AREA INCREASE: Separation on three sides over 20' 2.5% for each foot over 20'. 41.25 x 2.5% = 103.125% (100% Maximum) AREA TRIPLED FOR 1st FLOOR IF SPRR LIMED TOTAL ALLOWABLE AREA: 12,000 X 2 = 24,000 X 3 = 72,000 Sf. on Main Floor OCCUPANT LOAD: 63 VALUATION: 12,680 X $23.20 X .88 = $258,875.00 PERMIT FEE: $11347.50 PLAN CHECK FEE: $875.88 The permit, the permit fee and the plan check fee for the sprinkler system should be separate 12,680 X $1.80 X .88 = $20,085.00 SPRINKLER SYSTEM PERMIT FEE: $245.50 PLAN CHECK FEE: $159.58 238 N. Olympic Ave. ° Arlington, WA 98223 • (360) 435-0724 0 FAX (360) 435-3906 Permit No. 1856 coo FV New High Yield Sawmill Facility Northwest Hardwoods December 11, 1995 Page Two Dear Allen: The submitted drawings have been examined for compliance with the 1994 Edition of the Uniform Building Code. The following items should be corrected before the permit is issued: 1. The drawings submitted by Butler Manufacturing Company do not agree with the drawings of Murray- Pacific design Services: a) The dimensions are different; b) Apparently Murray-Pacific has exterior walls with doors. Butler has no walls for A Bldg; c) There are 3 engineers' stamps on the drawings and calculations. Just one should be professionally responsible for the entire project and the drawings should so state. 2. A correct plot plan should be submitted. 3. The letter from Everett Winter in reply to your comments written by ICBO refer to drawings and attached statements. All the references in his letter should be exact as to page, detail, etc., and the references should be submitted so the letter can be understood. 4. Special inspection should be provided for: (Section 1701) a) Concrete having an f c of 2,5000 p.s.i. and greater; b) Filling and compaction; c) Bolts installed in concrete; d) Structural welding; e) High strength bolting. 5. Special inspection shall not be by Quantum Construction as noted on Murray Pacific's cover sheet, but by an approved Inspection Service. 6. The required number of toilet fixtures required by Appendix "C" of the Uniform Plumbing Code based upon the number of people worldng in the building at any time, should be provided. 7. Toilet facilities shall be provided in the building or in a building adjacent thereto on the same property. The adjacent building should be within 300 feet or as required by the City of Arlington. Sec.3902.3 8. Existing toilet facilities should comply with the handicapped requirements. 9. A street address should be provided on the building visible from the street of a legible size. 10. The stairs should have the following: a) Open risers are not permitted; nwhardwo/1856-2 Permit No. 1856 CCO)FIV New High Yield Sawmill Facility Northwest Hardwoods December 11, 1995 Page Three 10. (Continued) b) A 2" maximum handrail should be on the stair and continuing 12" beyond the nosing on either end; c) Stair nosings shall be rounded to a radius of 1/2" max. Risers shall be sloped or the underside of the nosing shall have an angle of not less than 60 degrees from the horizontal. Nosing can be 1-I/2" max. (Barrier Free Code). d) Stairways should not be less than 36" wide, the width should be noted; e) If stairs are more than 44" wide, two handrails are required; f) Handrails should not be placed less than 34" nor more than 38" to the top of the handrail to the tread nosing below. 11. Guardrails should be provided: a) 42" high minimum for landings; b) Openings in guard rails shall not be greater than which a sphere 12" in diameter can pass. 12. A floor or landing not more than 1/2" below the threshold should be provided at all exterior doors. Sec. 1004.9 The landing's dimension below the floor should be noted. 13. Panic hardware should be provided for all exit doors if a latch or lock is provided. 14. Foundation drawings should be submitted as part of the construction set on the building site. The drawings sheets A, B, C, D, E and F of the Foundation Design Calculations by Clemens J. Rossell, P.E. , are not adequate as construction drawings. 15. Slab reinforcement shown on detail C of sheet E should carry down the foundation wall to within 3" of the bottom of the vertical section of the wall. 16. Plain concrete is not permitted in seismic zone 3. Section 1923.10.3. 17. #4 bars at 12" o.c. are required for the 12" wall. #4 at a greater space than 12" is not approved. Sec. 1914.3.2. 18. Structural calculations for the 40' X 65' building designed as Bldg. C should be submitted. 19. The soils report by Golder Associates should be submitted. 20. Drawings 269-P-00-01 through 269-P-00-19 as noted in Kris Hamilton's letter should be submitted. 21. Reference is made to Butler drawings 0104161 and 1080944 should be submitted. nwhardwo/1856-2 coo IPV Permit No. 1856 New High Yield Sawmill Facility Northwest Hardwoods December 11, 1995 Page Four 22. There seems to be a mistake on the wall grid 9 of the Butler drawings of B building. A Building has no wall grid 9, but B building shows the wall continuous from grid D to grid K. The floor plan of Murray Pacific shows no wall between grids J and K. 23. A plan of Bldg. D should be submitted showing the exterior walls and exit doors. 24. Illuminated exit signs should be installed at all building exits. Sec. 1012 and Sec. 1013. Si ce ly, vid W. Anderson Building Official DWA/rs nwhardwo/1856-2 a CQOCITYOFARLINGTON Building Department December 11, 1995 Everett Winter Northwest Hardwoods P.O. Box 7 Arlington, WA 98223 RE: PERMIT NO. 1856 NEW HIGH YIELD SAWMILL FACILITY For NORTHWEST HARDWOODS 20015 67th Avenue NE Arlington, Washington 98223 ENGINEER: David S. Dayton, III (Metal Bldg.) Clemens J. Rossell (Foundations) Kriss P. Hamilton CODE DATA• OCCUPANCY GROUPS: F-1 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: II-N (Sprinkled) SEPARATIONS: N = 80' E = 515' S = 41'-3" W = 20'-0" NOTE: The site plan in the second sheet of Murray-Pacific, Design Services, Ltd. Is not to scale. BUILDING AREAS: (Noted by the Arlington Building Department's designation.) BUILDING A = 2,640 sf.. BUILDING B = 6,760 Sf. BUILDING C = 2,600 Sf. BUILDING D = 680 Sf. TOTAL BLDG 12,680 Sf. BASIC ALLOWABLE AREAS: 12,000 Sf. ALLOWABLE AREA INCREASE: Separation on three sides over 20' 2.5% for each foot over 20'. 41.25 x 2.5% = 103.125% (100% Maximum) AREA TRIPLED FOR 1st FLOOR IF SPRINKLED TOTAL ALLOWABLE AREA: 12,000 X 2 = 24,000 X 3 = 72,000 Sf. on Main Floor OCCUPANT LOAD: 63 VALUATION: 12,680 X $23.20 X .88 = $258,875.00 PERMIT FEE: $1,347.50 PLAN CHECK FEE: $875.88 The permit, the permit fee and the plan check fee for the sprinkler system should be separate 12,680 X $1.80 X .88 = $20,085.00 SPRINKLER SYSTEM PERMIT FEE: $245.50 PLAN CHECK FEE: $159.58 238 N. Olympic Ave. • Arlington, WA 98223 • (360) 435-0724 • FAX (360) 435-3906 Permit No. 1856 f-F-)7\ New High Yield Sawmill Facility Northwest Hardwoods December 11, 1995 Page Two Dear Mr. Winter: The submitted drawings have been examined for compliance with the 1994 Edition of the Uniform Building Code. The following items should be corrected before the permit is issued: 1. The drawings submitted by Butler Manufacturing Company do not agree with the drawings of Murray- Pacific design Services: a) The dimensions are different; b) Apparently Murray-Pacific has exterior walls with doors. Butler has no walls for A Bldg; c) There are 3 engineers' stamps on the drawings and calculations. Just one should be professionally responsible for the entire project and the drawings should so state. 2. A correct plot plan should be submitted. 3. The letter from Everett Winter in reply to comments written by ICBO refer to drawings and attached statements. All the references in his letter should be exact as to page, detail, etc., and the references should be submitted so the letter can be understood. 4. Special inspection should be provided for: (Section 1701) a) Concrete having an f c of 2,5000 p.s.i. and greater; b) Filling and compaction; c) Bolts installed in concrete; d) Structural welding; e) High strength bolting. 5. Special inspection shall not be by Quantum Construction as noted on Murray Pacific's cover sheet, but by an approved Inspection Service. 6. The required number of toilet fixtures required by Appendix "C" of the Uniform Plumbing Code based upon the number of people worldng in the building at any time, should be provided. 7. Toilet facilities shall be provided in the building or in a building adjacent thereto on the same property. The adjacent building should be within 300 feet or as required by the City of Arlington. Sec.3902.3 8. Existing toilet facilities should comply with the handicapped requirements. 9. A street address should be provided on the building visible from the street of a legible size. 10. The stairs should have the following: a) Open risers are not permitted; nwhardwo/1856-2 Permit No. 1856 O [Pv New High Yield Sawmill Facility CC�(- 71 Northwest Hardwoods December 11, 1995 Page Three 10. (Continued) b) A 2" maximum handrail should be on the stair and continuing 12" beyond the nosing on either end; c) Stair nosings shall be rounded to a radius of 1/2" max. Risers shall be sloped or the underside of the nosing shall have an angle of not less than 60 degrees from the horizontal. Nosing can be 1-1/2" max. (Barrier Free Code). d) Stairways should not be less than 36" wide, the width should be noted; e) If stairs are more than 44" wide, two handrails are required; f) Handrails should not be placed less than 34" nor more than 38" to the top of the handrail to the tread nosing below. 11. Guardrails should be provided: a) 42" high minimum for landings; b) Openings in guard rails shall not be greater than which a sphere 12" in diameter can pass. 12. A floor or landing not more than 1/2" below the threshold should be provided at all exterior doors. Sec. 1004.9 The landing's dimension below the floor should be noted. 13. Panic hardware should be provided for all exit doors if a latch or lock is provided. 14. Foundation drawings should be submitted as part of the construction set on the building site. The drawings sheets A, B, C, D, E and F of the Foundation Design Calculations by Clemens J. Rossell, P.E. , are not adequate as construction drawings. 15. Slab reinforcement shown on detail C of sheet E should carry down the foundation wall to within 3" of the bottom of the vertical section of the wall. 16. Plain concrete is not permitted in seismic zone 3. Section 1923.10.3. 17. #4 bars at 12" o.c. are required for the 12" wall. #4 at a greater space than 12" is not approved. Sec. 1914.3.2. 18. Structural calculations for the 40' X 65' building designed as Bldg. C should be submitted. 19. Drawings 269-P-00-01 through 269-P-00-19 as noted in Kris Hamilton's letter should be submitted. 20. Reference is made to Butler drawings 0104161 and 1080944 should be submitted. nwhardwo/1856-2 Permit No. 1856 C,,��� D)W New High Yield Sawmill Facility Northwest Hardwoods December 11, 1995 Page Four 21. There seems to be a mistake on the wall grid 9 of the Butler drawings of B building. A Building has no wall grid 9, but B building shows the wall continuous from grid D to grid K. The floor plan of Murray Pacific shows no wall between grids 7 and K. 22. A plan of Bldg. D should be submitted showing the exterior walls and exit doors. 23. Illuminated exit signs should be installed at all building exits. Sec. 1012 and Sec. 1013. pavid IV, W. Anderson Building Official DWA/rs nwhardwo/1856-2 PERMIT NO. 1856 NEW HIGH YIELD SAWMILL FACILITY December 8, 1995 for NORTflMEST HARDWOODS 20015 67th Avenue N.E. Arlington, Washington ENGINEER: David S. Dayton, III (Metal Bldg.) Clemens J. Rossell (Foundations) Kriss P. Hamilton CODE DATA OCCUPANCY GROUPS: F-1 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: II-N (Sprinkled) SEPARATIONS: N = 80' E = 515' S = 41'-3 W = 20'-0" NOTE: The site plan in the second sheet of Murray-Pacific, Design Services, Ltd. is not to scale. BUILDING AREAS: (Noted by the ARLINGTON Building Department's designation.) BUILDING A = 2,640 S.F. BUILDING B = 6,760 S.F. BUILDING C = 2,600 S.F. BUILDING D = 680 S.F. TOTAL BLDG. 12,680 S.F. HA5IC.AL10WABLE AREAS: 12,000 S.F. ALLOWABLE AREA INCREASES: Separation on three sides over 20' 2.5% for each foot over 20'. - 41.25 X 2.5% = 103.125% (100% Maximum) AREA TRIPLED FOR lst FLOOR IF SPRINKLED. TOTAL ALLOWABLE AREA: 12,000 X 2 = 24,000 X 3 = 72,000 S.F. on Main Floor. OCCUPANT LOAD: 63 VALUATION: 12,680 X $23.20 X .88 = $258,875.00 PERMIT FEE: $1,347.50 PLAN CHECK FEE: $875.88 The permit, the permit fee and the plan check fee for the sprinkler system should be separate 12,680 X $1.80 X .88 = $20,085.00 SPRINKLER SYSTEM PERMIT FEE: $245.50 PLAN CHECK FEE: $159.58 Dear David: The submitted drawings have been examined for compliance with the 1994 Edition of the Uniform Building Code. The following items should be corrected before the permit is issued: 1. The drawings submitted by Butler 'Manufacturing Company do not agree with the drawings of Murray-Pacific Design Services a) The dimensions are different. b) Apparently Murray-Pacific has exterior walls with doors. Butler has no walls for A Bldg. c) There are 3 engineers' stamps on the drawings and calculations. Just one should be professionally responsible for the entire project and the drawings should so state. PERMIT NO. 1856 NEW HIGH YIELD SAMILL FACILITY -2- December 8. 1995 2. A correct plot plan should be submitted. 3. The letter from Everett Winter in reply to your comments written by ICBO refer to drawings and attached statements. All the references in his letter should be exact as to page, detail, etc. , and the references should be submit- ted so the letter can be understood. 4. You should ensure that the city agencies such as Planning, Zoning, Public Works and the Fire Department approve of the project. 5. You or the contractor should not mark up the corrections for drawings stamped by an architect or engineer. 6. Sprinkler drawings should be submitted and a permit issued for the sprinkler system. 7. Special inspection should be provided for: (Section 1701) a) Concrete having an f'c of 2,500 p.s.i. and greater. b) Filling and compaction. c) Bolts installed in concrete. d) Structural welding. e) High strength bolting. 8. Special inspection shall not be by Quantum. construction as noted on Murray Pacific's cover sheet, but by an approved Inspection Service. 9. The required number of toilet fixtures required by Appendix "C" of the Uni- form Plumbing Code based upon the number of people working in the building at any time, should be provided. 10. Toilet facilities shall be provided in the building or in a building adja- cent thereto on the same property. The adjacent building should be within 300 feet or as required by the City of Arlington. Sec. 3902.3 ll.Existing toilet facilities should comply with the handicapped requirements. 12. All exterior openings exposed to the weather should be flashed. 13. A street address should be provided on the building visible from the street of a legible size. 14. The stairs should have the following: a) Open risers are not permitted. b) A 2" maximum handrail should be on the stair and continuing 12" beyond the nosing on either end. c) Stair nosings shall be rounded to a radius of 1/2" max. Risers shall be sloped or the underside of the nosing shall have an angled of not less than 60 degrees from the horizontal. Nosing can be 1-1/2" max. (Barrier Free Code) . d) Stairways should not be less than 36" wide, the width should be noted. e) If stairs are more than 44" wide, two handrails are required. f) Handrails should not be placed less than 34" nor more than 38" to the top of the handrail to the tread nosing below. PER�4IT No. 1856 rUa KTGH YTE�L,D S.Pi�✓� JTII., FACILITY -3- December 8, 1995 15. Guardrails should be provided: a) 42" high minimum for landings. b) openings in guard rails shall not be greater than which a sphere 12" in diameter can pass. 16. Landings should be provided of not less than 44 inches in direction of travel at all exit doors. Sec. 1004.10 17. A floor or landing not more than 1/2" below the threshold should be provided at all exterior doors. Sec. 1004.9 The landing's dimension below the floor should be noted. 18. Panic hardware should be provided for all exit doors if a latch or lock is pr_ovidc-.. 19. Exit doors shall be openable from the inside without use of a key or special knowledge. 20. Foundation drawings should be submitted as part of the construction set on the building site. The drawings sheets A, B, C, D, E and F of the Foundation Design Calculations by Clemens J. Rossell, P.E. , are not adequate as construc- tion drawings. 21. Slab reinforcement shown on detail C of sheet E should carry down the founda- tion wall to within 3" of the bottom,of the vertical section of the wall. 22. Plain concrete is not permitted in seismic zone 3. Section 1923.10.3 23. #4 bars at 12" o.c. are required for the 12" wall. #4 at a greater space than 12" is not aplDrove-J. Sec. 1914.3.2 24. Structural calculations for the 40' X 65' building designed as Bldg. C should be submitted. 25. The soils report by Golder Associates should be submitted. 26. Drawings 269-P-00-01 through 269-P-00-19 as noted in Kris Hamilton's letter should be submitted. 27. Reference is made to Butler drawings 0104161 and 1080944 should be submitted. 28. There seems to be a mistake on the wall grid 9 of the Butler drawings of B-building. A Building has no wall at grid 9, but B building shows the wall continuous from grid D to grid K. The floor plan of Murray Pacific shows no wall between grids J and K. PERMIT NO. 1856 NEW HIGH YIELD SAIVILL FACILITY -4- December 8, 1995 29. A plan of Bldg. D should be submitted showingthe exterior walls and exit doors. 30. Exit doors should be openable from the inside without the use of a key or special knowledge. Surface bolts are prohibited. 31. Illuminated exit signs should be installed at all building exits. Sec. 1012 and Sec. 1013 32. The building is not heated. Sincerely, !t' /!� H. Farrens, Jr. • CITY OF ARLINGTON Building Department October 19, 1995 ATTN: Tom Knepper PLAN CHECK: 7416 Project: Northwest Hardwoods Address: 20015 6th Avenue NE 1994 Edition Uniform Building Code Type of Construction: V-N Occupancy: F2 S tories: 1 Floor Area: 10,000 sf. Valuation: $200,000 Occupant Load: 35 Seismic Zone: 3 Wind Speed: 80 mph Wind Exposure: B �pV Dear Tom: We have reviewed the plans and associated data for the project mentioned above to see if it conforms to the Uniform Building Code as well as parts of the Uniform Mechanical Code. In most cases, the designer should modify the plans and/or specifications to satisfy these comments. GENERAL 1. The architect or engineer of record should be assigned for this project. That person is responsible for reviewing and stamping the plans and coordinating all submittals including the deferred submittals listed below. Section 106.3.4 2. The plans should be stamped by an architect or engineer licensed in the state of Washington. 3. All deferred submittals should be listed on the plans. These should include: a) Final truss fabrication drawings; b) General steel fabrication drawings. 4. A site plan should be submitted showing all property lines, and legal description, north arrow and the building footprint with distances to the property line. 5. The Fire Department should ensure that the fire hydrants are within 150' of the site. Article 10.401. UFC The turn-around for the fire apparatus should be approved by the fire Department. The fire access CAbui1d\nwhard\1856 238 N. Olympic Ave. - Arlington, WA 98223 • (360) 435-0724 • FAX (360) 435-3906 Plan Check: 7416 Northwest Hardwoods October 20, 1995 Page Two 5. (Continued) road is greater than 150 feet in length and requires a turn-around area. The size of the turnaround should be determined by the Fire Department. Section 10.204(d) UFC the unobstructed width of the fire apparatus access road should be not less than 20' (and it should have an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13'6"). Article 10.207(c,d), UFC 6. The soils report should be submitted for review. 7. Since the floor plan and other details were not submitted, additional comments may be forthcoming when the revised plans are submitted. 8. Is the building provided.with heating equipment in excess of 1 watt/sf? If so the insulation should comply with the 1994 WASHINGTON STATE NON-RESIDENTIAL ENERGY CODE (WAC 51-11). OCCUPANCY 1. Information should be provided in order to classify the building. The use, building type, number of stories, occupancy, floor area, type of construction, justification of building area and area separation walls should be indicated on the plans. 2. A fully dimensioned floor plan should be provided showing all of the areas and uses of the building. It should also show partitions and all exit doors. 3. The applicant should submit a statement indicating the exact uses and materials used in the proposed facility. The amounts of any hazardous materials and how they are used and stored should also be indicated. 4. The high piled combustible stock for the project should be identified and classified by category and shown on the plans, per Table 81.10-A, UPC. All requirements for smoke venting, curtain boards, smoke alarms, etc. should be indicated and detailed on the plans. Article 81 UFC. 5. If the storage material is placed in racks, then plans and calculations for the racks should be provided for approval. 6. The types of saws, sanders, etc. used in the wood working shop should be indicated on the plans as well as the number. 7. A sprinkler system will be required if the equipment within the building produces finely divided combustible waste. Section 306.8 8. Illuminated exit signs should be placed at all stairways, exit doors and corridors to clearly indicate the direction of egress. CAbui1d\nwhard\1856 Plan Check: 7416 Northwest Hardwoods October 19, 1995 Page Three 9. Battery backup should be provided for the exit signs. WASHINGTON STATE REGULATIONS FOR BARRIEER-FREE DESIGN (WAC 51-20) 1. The site plan should show an accessible route of travel from the public way to the accessible entrances. 2. One accessible parking space is required. It should be van-accessible, per Table 11-F. 3. Van-accessible parking spaces should be shown with a maximum 1:48 slope. 4. The accessible parking spaces should be shown with a maximum 1:48 slope. 5. Each accessible parking space should be shown as having a sign 3'-5' high centered at the head of the space and bearing the words, "State Disabled Parking Permit Required". 6. Door thresholds should be shown as no higher than 1/7'. The edges should be beveled at 1 vertical: 2 horizontal, with a maximum edge height of 1/4". 7. The international symbol of access should be displayed at the accessible building entrances and all areas of evacuation assistance. STRUCTURAL 1. Special inspection should be provided for-the following: a. Reinforced concrete; b. Installation of high-strength bolts; c. Installation of anchor bolts; d. Onsite welding. 2. Anchor bolts subject to shear and tension should be designed in accordance with Section 1925-94 UBC. 3. The design Rw for seismic loads should be specified on the plans. 4. Wind forces at building corners and other areas of discontinuities should be accounted for in the design of the cladding, wall and roof purlins. Table 16-H, 94 UBC. 5. Manufacturer's data for the siding and the roof decking should be provided. The minimum section properties should be stated on the plans. 6. The braced frames should be designed for the requirements of Section 2211.8. Seismic forces should be increased by a factor of 1.5 for determining minimum requirements. Section 2211.8.4.1 C:\bui1d\nwhard11856 Plan Check: 7416 Northwest Hardwoods October 19, 1995 Page Four 7. Alternately the braced frames could use a seismic force of 3 RW/8 times the prescribed seismic forces. 8. All connections, including the roof X bracing, should be checked for a force of 3 Rw/8 times the prescribed seismic forces. Section 2211.8.3.1 All corrections shall be addressed on separate letter indicating on which sheet or detail the corrections may be found. The plans must be revised and resubmitted. Si ely, David W. Anderson Building Official DWA/rs Q\build\nwhard\1856 International Conference of Building Officials REGIONAL OFFICE: 2122-112th AVENUE, N.E.,SUITE B-300 • BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON 98004 • (206)451-9541 BOARD OF DIRECTORS October 19, 1995 OFFICES OF JERRY J.BARBERA,P.E. SENIOR REGIONAL MANAGER CHAIRMAN RON PERKEREWICZ,C.B.O. Plan Check: 7416 KATHLEEN CURRY,P.E. DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY REGIONAL ENGINEER DEVELOPMENT Project: Northwest Hardwoods COUNTY OF KITSAP Address: 20015 6th Ave. NE GREG GRIFFITH PORT ORCHARD,WASHINGTON REGIONAL ENGINEER FIRST VICE-CHAIRMAN 1994 Edition Uniform Building Code''' CHARLES J.WILLIAMS,P.E.,S.E. THOMAS R.THOMPSON,C.B.O. Type Of Construction: V-N SENIOR REGIONAL ENGINEER BUILDING OFFICIAL BROOMFIELD,COLORADO Occupancy: F2 SECOND VICE-CHAIRMAN Stories: 1 ALAN R OLSON,R.A.,C.B.O. ASSISTANT DEVELOPMENT Floor Area: 10,000 sf SERVICES DIRECTOR /� PHOENIX,ARIZONA y E'!alui�don: $200,000 IMMEDIATE PAST CHAIRMAN Occupant Load: 35 JAN R GASTERLAND,C.B.O. BUILDING CODE OFFICER Seismic Zone: 3 ST.PAUL,MINNESOTA Wind Speed: 80 mph THOMAS C.ANDERSON Wind Exposure: B BUILDING OFFICIAL P HOPKINS,MINNESOTA FRED B.CULLUM BUILDING OFFICIAL David Anderson BURLINGAME,CALIFORNIA Building Official PAULT.EDGERTON MANAGER,BUILDING AND CODE 238 North Olympic Ave. ENFORCEMENT VANCOUVER,WASHINGTON Arlington, WA 98223 ROGER R.EVANS,C.B.O. DIRECTOR OF BUILDING SERVICES SALT LAKE CITY,UTAH Dear Mr. Anderson: FRED HERMAN - CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL PALO ALTO,CALIFORNIA We have reviewed the plans and associated data for the project mentioned KENNETH G.LARSEN,C.B.O. above to see if it conforms to the Uniform Building Code as well as parts of DIRECTOR OF BUILDING AND HOUSING CHULA VISTA,CALIFORNIA the Uniform Mechanical Code. We have not reviewed them for requirements DAN R.NICKLE,C.B.O. CODES ADMINISTRATOR �of federal or other state and local regulatory agencies. In most cases, the LAKEWOOD,COLORADO designer should modify the plans and/or specifications to satisfy these RONALD L NIENABER,C.B.O. DIRECTOR OF INSPECTIONS comments. MAPLE GROVE,MINNESOTA JOHN E.PIERCE,BUILDING OFIC AL GIENTIE�,L Zr PLANO,TEXAS liLiL LARRY W.RICHARDS,C.B.O. BUILDING SAFETY DIRECTOR 1. The architect or engineer of record should be assigned for this project. GLENDALE,ARIZONA That person is responsible for reviewing and stamping the plans an RAIMAR W.SCHULLER,C.B.O. DIRECTOR,BUILDING DEPARTMENT coordinating all submittals including the deferred submittals listed below. NEWPORT BEACH,CALIFORNIA Section 106.3.4 RON K.WATTS,C.B.O. CHIEF OF BUILDING INSPECTIONS BUILDING SAFETY DIVISION ANCHORAGE,ALASKA 2, The plans should be stamped by an architect or engineer licensed in the state of Washington. PRESIDENT JON S.TRAW.RE- 3. All deferred submittals should be listed on the plans. These should include: a. Final truss fabrication drawings. b. General steel fabrication drawings. S Main Office: 5360 Workman Mill Road 0 Whittier,California 90601-2298 0 (310)699-0541 Plan Check: 7416 David Anderson, City of Arlington October 19, 1995 Page 2 4. A site plan should be submitted showing all property lines, and legal description, north arrow and the building footprint with distances to the property line. 5. Your Fire Department should ensure that the fire hydrants are within 150' of the site. Article 10.401 UFC The turn-around for the fire apparatus should be approved by your Fire Department. The fire access road is greater than 150 feet in length and requires a turnaround area. The size of the turnaround should be determined by your fire department. Section 10.204(d) UFC The unobstructed width of the fire apparatus access road should be not less than 20' (and it should have an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13'6"). Article 10.207(c,d), UFC Your Zoning Departcner_t should check the building setbacks and the access to the street. 6. The soils report should be submitted for review. 7. Since the floor plan and other details were not submitted, additional comments may be forthcoming when the revised plans are submitted. 8. Is the building provided with heating equipment in excess of 1 watt/sf7. If so the insulation should comply with the 1994 WASHINGTON STATE NON-RESIDENTIAL ENERGY CODE (WAC 51-11). OCCUPANCY 1. Information should be provided in order to classify the building. The use, building type, number of stories, occupancy, floor area, type of construction,justification of building area and area separation walls should be indicated on the plans. 2. A fully dimensioned floor plan should be provided showing all of the areas and uses of the building. It should also show partitions and all exit doors. 3. The applicant should submit a statement indicating the exact uses and materials used in the proposed facility. The amounts of any hazardous materials and how they are used and stored should also be indicated. 4. The high piled combustible stock for the should be identified and classified by category and shown on the plans, per Table 81.10-A, UFC. All requirements for smoke venting, curtain boards, smoke alarms, etc. should be indicated and detailed on the plans. Article 81 UFC 5. If the storage material is placed in racks, then plans and calculations for the racks should be provided for approval. 6. The types of saws, sanders, etc. used in the wood working shop should be indicated on the plans as well as the number. 7. A sprinkler system will be required if the equipment within the building produces finely divided combustible waste. Section 306.8 Plan Check: 7416 David Anderson, City of Arlington October 19, 1995 Page 3 8. The floor level on each side of the exit doors should not be lower than 1/2" from the top of the threshold. 9. It should be shown that all exit doors have landings and that they will not be less than the door width x 44" minimum. 10. Illuminated exit signs should be placed at all stairways, exit doors and corridors to clearly indicate the direction of egress. 11. illuminated exit signs should be placed at all stairways, exit doors and corridors to clearly indicate the direction of egress. 12. Battery backup should be provided for the exit signs. WASHINGTON STATE REGULATIONS FOR BARRIER-FREE DESIGN (WAC 51-20) 1. The site plan should show an accessible route of travel from the public way to the accessible entrances. 2. One accessible parking space is required. It should be van-accessible, per Table 11-F. 3. Van-accessible parking spaces should be 8' wide, with adjacent 8' wide access aisles (which may be shared with an adjoining space). 4. The accessible parking spaces should be shown with a maximum 1:48 slope. 5. Each accessible parking space should be shown as having a sign 3'-5' high centered at the head of the space and bearing the words, "State Disabled Parking Permit Required". 6. Door thresholds should be shown as no higher than 1W. The edges should be beveled at 1 vertical:2 horizontal, with a maximum edge height of 1/4". 7. All doors in the building which have a latch set or lock set should have lever-type operating hardware. 8. The international symbol of access should be displayed the accessible building entrances and all areas of evacuation assistance. STRUCTURAL 1. Special inspection should be provided for the following: a. Reinforced concrete. b. Installation of high-strength bolts. C. Installation of anchor bolts. d. Onsite welding. Plan Check: 7416 David Anderson, City of Arlington October 19, 1995 Page 4 2. Anchor bolts subject to shear and tension should be designed in accordance with Section 1925- 94 UBC 3. The design Rw for seismic loads should be specified on the plans. 4. Wind forces at building corners and other areas of discontinuities should be accounted for in the design of the cladding, wall and roof purlins. Table 16-H, 94 UBC 5. Manufacturer's data for the siding and the roof decking should be provided. The minimum section properties should be stated on the plans. 6. The braced frames should be designed for the requirements of Section 2211.8. Seismic forces should be increased by a factor of 1.5 for determining minimum requirements. Section 2211.8.4.1 7. Alternately the braced frames could use a seismic force of 3 Rw/8 times the prescribed seismic forces. 8. All connections, including the roof X bracing, should be checked for a force of 3 Rw/8 times the prescribed seismic forces. Section 2211.8.3.1 Our headquarters accounting department in Whittier, California will send you an invoice for this plan reviewing service based on a valuation of $200,000. I am retaining all data and plans in anticipation of telephone calls from the designer and also that I will be doing the recheck. I am taking the liberty of sending a copy of this plan checking list directly to them. Please instruct them to indicate on a separate letter on which sheet or detail the corrections may be found and to REVISE AND RESUBMIT THE PLANS. Please feel free to contact us if there are any questions. Very truly yours, elQl Charles J. Williams, S.E. Senior Regional Engineer pkw NAIHING704 5 T A T E OEPARTVENT OF ECOLOGY WASTEWATER DISCHARGE PERMIT FEE PROGRAM BILLING NOTICE: JULY 1995 - JUNE 1996 NOTICE DATE: 07/21/95 Invoice No: 15921 NORTHWEST HARDWOODS Customer No: S03000200 KEN WILKES Permit No: S03000200 20015 67TH AVENUE NE Category: PF533 PO BOX 7 STORM WATER ONLY ARLINGTON WA 98223-0007 B - FACILITIES COVERED UNDER BASELINE PREVIOUS + CURRENT FEE + ADJUSTMENT + CURRENT MONTH - PAYMENTS = TOTAL BALANCE BILLING * INTEREST RECEIVED DUE 265.00 I 265.00 0.00 0.00 I (265.00) 265.00 'CURRENT FEE AMOUNT IS DUE 09/08/95 Interest for nongovernmental permittees shall be accrued at the rate of 1% per month or fraction thereof on the past due permit fee. To avoid interest charges, payments must be postmarked no later than the last day of the month. Any person disagreeing with their fee determination may file a written appeal to the Department of Ecology requesting review of their fee category by the first billing due date. Industrial Permittees may be eligible to apply for a small business fee reduction. Please call the permit fee program at (360) 407-6425, with any questions regarding your billing, small business fee reduction requests, or procedures for appealing your permit fee. Please include your permit number on your check and return the lower portion of the invoice to: The Department of Ecology Wastewater Discharge Permit Fees PO Box 5128 Lacey, WA 98503-0210 Permits may be canceled for nonpayment of fee. Persons violating state law by continuing to operate without a required permit may ' be subject to civil penalties and criminal orosecution. Detach and return the bottom portion with your check. PLEASE INCLUDE THE PERMIT NUMBER ON YOUR CHECK. WASTEWATER PERMIT FEE BILLING NOTICE 15921 Notice Date: 07/21/95 NORTHWEST HARDWOODS Customer No: S03000200 REC Ell Vj,;E JA KEN WILKES Permit No: S03000200 20015 67TH AVENUE NE Category: PF533 SEP 12 1995 PO BOX 7 STORM WATER ONLY ARLINGTON WA 98223-0007 ;I I r uF ARLINGTON, * CURRENT FEE AMOUNT IS DUE 09/08/95 FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TOTAL DUE: $265.00 FUND oR2EVENUE CODE Ca p Te ECY 010-72 Department of Ecology,P.O.Box 5128, cti WA 9850.9-0Pf0 000196 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN NORTHWEST HARDWOODS ARLINGTON 20015 67TH AVE N.E ARLINGTON WA 98223-0007 206-435=8502 NOVEMBER 18, 1993 KEY CONTACTS FOR THIS LOCATION: KEN WILKES ENVIRONMENTAL COORDINATOR DENNIS THOMPSON PLANT MANAGER PURPOSE The purpose of this document is to describe in written form the process which will be used to prevent contamination of stormwater which comes in contact with our facility. This plan is written according to the criteria listed on pages 14 through 17 of the NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM AND STATE WASTE DISCHARGE BASELINE GENERAL PERMIT FOR STORMWATER DISCHARGES ASSOCIATED WITH INDUSTRIAL ACTIVMES. Northwest Hardwoods was issued Permit No. S03-000200 on January 6, 1993. Northwest Hardwoods also has an SPCC plan dated August 23, 1993 in operation for the aboveground diesel storage tank. Many parts of that plan overlap with sections of this plan as will be noted in applicable sections of this plan. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF FACILITY This is a 50+ acre facility located inside the city of Arlington. It is geographically divided into four areas. There are approximately ten acres an the west side of the railroad tracks. This area is the location of the sawmill, planer mill, and main office. This area has 95% covered surface with a storm sewer system which puts all surface water into a settling pond on the north end of the planer building. There is an eleven acre piece on the east side of the railroad tracks which is used for the chip plant, employee parking lot, bone yard, and log storage. Surface water in this area is directed to infiltration ponds located in the center of this piece. The third piece is located on a slight elevation and consist of twenty acres. This area has the truck shop, log yard office with scales, and log storage. The only directed flow in this area is around the truck shop into an oil/water separator located on the southwest corner of the truck shop area. The last piece is a ten acre active wood waste landfill licensed by the Snohomish Health District. Current plans call for removal of this landfill in a five year project started in 1992. SITE MAPS Four site maps have been developed to assist in explanation of what affects this facility has on stormwater. The maps, located at the end of this narrative, are designed to show the following information; Map A - Yellow highlighting shows general stormwater flow. The two highlights in pink show the location of existing oil/water separators. Map B - Yellow areas are the paved surfaces. Pink areas represent the log storage areas. Green represents areas where existing berms are in place to prevent run-on/run-off of stormwater. Map C - Pink areas show location of end product loading. Yellow areas show locations with hog fuel and sawdust on the ground. Green areas show where raw materials are unloaded. Map D - Pink shows existing structured storm drain system. Yellow shows the areas of outdoor maintenance. Green area 1 is the equipment wash area. Green area 2 is the equipment fueling station. STORMWATER POLLUTION ASSESSMENT SURVEY Sawmill Area - The sawmill is located on the west side of the property separated by the Burlington Northern railroad tracks which form the eastern boundary of this section. The western boundary for this section is 67th. Ave N.E. Throughout this portion of the property is a built in stormwater drainage system as pointed out in Map D. The system drains all water except for the small portion which runs along the railroad tracks. Storm drains for the system run along 67th and into the interior of the mill site. All drainage is fed into an oil/water separator which empties into an infiltration pond. Stormwater in this area has the possibility of coming into contact with the following material on this side of the plant: 1) Logs -Storage of green logs necessary to feed sawmill for one shift. There is also storage of a small amount of miscellaneous species sorted out of the run and short, debarked, and oversize logs. 2) Bark - Accumulations of bark will occur in the following areas, in log storage decks, under sawmill infeed decks, out of hog fuel system storage, and spillage out of bunkers. 3) Sawdust - Accumulations of sawdust will occur under the cut-off saws, under the chip/n/cantor, out of sawdust shaker elevator system and out of spillage from sawdust bunker. 4) Chips - Located under chip/n/cantor, chip shaker and under chip bunker. 5) Green lumber - Storage before drying in green yard and on kiln infeed tracks. (A "roof' of wafer board is usually placed on top of units in the green storage area.) 6) Pallet Stock - Finished material is stored in two area while waiting for shipment out either by rail or truck. 7) Metal - There is a limited amount of metal storage in front of the millwright shop. Scrap metal boxes are used for recycling scrap metal and are picked up by a local scrap metal dealer. 8) Exposed Portion of The Sawmill - The front end of the merchandising process is done outside with resultant exposure to stormwater of the infeed decks, conveyors, barker, and chip/n/cantor. All additional areas are covered-roofed thus allowing no further contamination of the stormwater other than that leached off the galvanized roofs. There is limited exposure to vehicular traffic of forklifts, lumber trucks, and some vehicle parking. Drainage from this area will contain elevated levels of tannin, lignin, and TSS. This area also has the potential to have elevated levels of oil and grease mostly from the trucks in the loading area and a limited amount of runoff from the manufacturing process especially in the raw log merchandising area. Chip Plant/ Lower Yard - Located directly across the railroad tracks is the whole log chipping operation. This is an uncovered operation consisting of a hydraulic loader, conveyors, a chop saw, debarker, chipper, hog fuel system and five bunkers used to store the material in before it is transported. There is a bark and sawdust accumulation on the ground due to the manufacturing process. Also located in this area is the employee parking lot, a "bone yard" for storage of metal parts, an unloading area for incoming log trucks, and storage of green chip logs for the chip plant and sawmill. The stormwater in this area is directed toward the center where a series of infiltration ponds are located. Possible stormwater contamination could include elevated levels of tannin and lignin from wood byproducts, oil and grease from vehicle traffic and exposed mechanical equipment, and minimal amounts of trace metals leached off materials stored in the 'bone yard". Upper Log Yard/Truck Shop - This upper area consist mostly of storage of raw material storage with the inherent problem of bark contamination of the stormwater. Also located in the upper yard is the truck scales, log truck unloading area, and scaling bays. The truck shop is a metal building. Also located in this area is the closed loop steam cleaner system, a used oil storage tank, and bulk diesel and gasoline tanks. All tanks are covered and contained to eliminate the possibility of stormwater contamination even if there were a spill. All stormwater that lands on the paved surfaces around the truck shop is directed through an oil/water separator. All mobile log yard equipment is parked in the areas around the truck shop and log yard office when not in use. STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION TEAM The continual efforts in meeting the requirements of these regulations will be accomplished by the use of the following team who will meet when necessary to maintain and upgrade our status. Team members will be as follows: Ken Wilkes Environmental coordinator Dennis Thompson Plant manager Bud Winters Maintenance supervisor Stan Strid Log Yard Supervisor INSPECTIONS As in accordance with the requirements set for in this permit semi- annual inspection will be performed. A wet weather inspection will be conducted between October and March in a moderate storm event with the emphasis placed on flow patterns, run-on/run-off locations and problems, and visual contamination problems. A dry weather inspection will be conducted between July and September. In this inspection the emphasis will be placed on storage problems, process water flow patterns, and any sources of contamination that are visually present. All inspection will be documented with the results kept in the back of this program for at least five years and will be available to any Department of Ecology personnel who wish to see them. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES The most effective method of reducing stormwater contamination comes in prevention of exposure to as many pollutants as possible. In order to accomplish this the following methods will be used: 1) Housekeeping - A committed effort must be made to keeping pollutant sources off the ground where contact with stormwater will be made. All outside garbage receptacles will be covered and emptied on a regular basis. All employees will be held responsible for making sure that all garbage is placed in the proper receptacle. Control of fugitive byproducts such as bark and sawdust will be addressed on a regular and constant basis. 2) Chemical Storage - All chemicals on the plant site will be stored in contained and covered areas that will contain the total contents of a spill in case one should occur. Containment areas will be covered to prevent the entry of and as much other material as possible. In situations where sawdust or other material gets into the containment then a regular clean out schedule will be maintained. 3) Chemical Inventory - All chemicals used on the plant site will be maintained at a reasonable quantity to in relation to the amount used and the availability of the product. Bulk tanks in containment will be used as much as possible to minimize the chances for spilling during restocking and transferring processes: 4) Preventative Maintenance - All equipment will be maintained on the prescribed maintenance schedule as recommended by the manufacturer. At the time of the servicing a through inspection will be done by the maintenance personnel to check for structural weakness in all parts with special emphasis on hoses and other areas that have potential to break or rupture. In addition it will be the operators responsibility to visually inspect the machine for leaks before the start of each shift and during the operation of the machine. As a part of their training all operators will understand that it is their responsibility to shut down any piece of equipment that is leaking and have maintenance correct the problem before the machine is operated again. 5) SPCC Plan - This operation has an active SPCC plan in which all employees have been trained. All chemical spills will be handled according to the procedures outlined in the SPCC plan 6) Employee Training - Northwest Hardwoods commitment to the environment is demonstrated by the amount of training that is conducted on an annual basis. Each year hazard communication, spill prevention and cleanup procedures, and general environmental education training is conducted for all employees. All new employees receive environmental awareness education as part of their new hire orientation. Documented training is also conducted on all employees when transferring from one department to another. Enforcement of company environmental rules and regulations is handled in the same manner as all other general and safety rules through the corrective action policy. Treatment Best Management Practices The pollution prevention plan is designed to minimize the amount of contamination which can come in contact with stormwater. Due to the nature of this operation total elimination of contamination is not realistic or economically feasible. In order to minimize the possible negative impacts the following treatment BMPs have been installed at this location: Oil/Water Separators - Two oil/water separators have been installed in order to collect the trace amounts of oil that comes off the paved surfaces in the lower yard and also around the truck shop. Maintenance is performed on these on a regular basis. Outfall from both of these separators goes into infiltration ponds where all discharge goes into the ground water. Closed Loop Stream Cleaner System - All steam cleaning of mobile equipment is performed at the steam cleaning station located behind the truck shop. This is a closed loop system with no discharge to the surrounding area. It is our policy not to allow the use of any soap in the steam cleaning process to improve the amount of purification that is handled by the system. Source Control BMPs - As more information becomes available as to what is required in specific BMPs for log yards and other specific operations that are performed here we will modify this plan taking that information into account. �'.�` .. - =: _ - R-. e`'i '�✓�S�-'+car. • . W:-' .. �: . 77 ~ MAP LL If � + � F .1 A t R I C 7' I , WOODENVILLE TRLlSs Cam SPAN 'Y J—Et\i5E&I —"� TNDUZTRIAL. PARK 4 -- — c : a 1fQ`_ c)e- 4 BONE c` W YARD guRM r ! jCL i =jam �\ LSt` � F / WOOD WASTE OZ \',` �L S LANDFILL I cc II \ u1 ~ CQ UNDEVELOPED r, F \\. ICI x LS ` RECEIVING GS— GFIEEN 5TORAGE >'• ``��.\\\�\�'t\ \ \ pQ- PLAN? OFFICE DK- _DRY KI LN WEST COASTDS — DRY. STORAGE 'pM. PLANER MILL FEW E ar PRo0Lx crs I SM_ SAWMILL - IP7_SNFILTRAT►0N POND NORTHWEST -Bup'M TS - -TRUCK -SHOP - HARDWOODS N — N.w,_ $A1�lDusT I 'CK - CAST<E? C.O. - -- iqR L! IVGTON , WA I 35 - . TRUCK SGf}LV HOUSE LS - LOG STORAGE I t i M AP B /t LL. ! i J ` 1. / lj 1 WOODENVILLE ^ TRuSs CoM ��N '� J NSEN I ' W TNDU -TRIAL IICAPK Fo r -� � : � a BONE i n i r F 1 < W Q YARD I cc SrtRM LAI f > \\' 'WOOD WA S rE LAND FILL I I \\\ l ul 1- ( --5 CO ` `� ,' UNDEVELOPED {Q O I T R.I AL. PA;k K l Ili / �•77 / \ ••--,i.r � , ! i x- LJ ' N 7 T� / r' lydt\:\r �;�•\'� \��_ LS .\� \ I� — RECEIVING \ t GS- GREEN STORAGE pQ— PLAN? OFFICE i f PK- DRY 1/0 LN I ' WEST CoAs-7 DS - DRY S-TaRAGE FoREar PRO DQcrs -pm-_ PLANER MILL - I SM - SAWMILL .IP.-_SNFILTRAT�aN PON0 (NORTHWEST BURM TS - TRUCK SHOP HARDWOODS I N - N.w, SAr,.�DUS7 1 '-CK - CA511E7 Co. - AR LI NGTON , WA I B - . TRucl, SCALE HousE LS - LOG STORAGE 1 I + MAP I o 1 - _ l I IL I w j t PRAIRIE - _ S ► L I _CRc. , U a - WooDENVILLE TNC)tAZTRIAL PARK i .o f of a BONE (9 F n ( o YARD BUR M p C \'• - WboD WA s rr= LAND FILL 1 z z 1' J 1 c K I \ L S 1CC , _ I} m ; ` \ UNDEVELOPED ¢ a I \ Zl%l0(A5TRlikL PARK f \�; fx = N s o LS R RECEIVING GREEN 5TORAGE pQ- PLANT OFFICE j { I DK- DRY KILN WEST COAST I DS- DRY STORAGE FOREST PRODLtGTS P_M-__P_LANER MILL SAWMILL I lP.-_INFILTRAT1aN -POND NORTHWEST -BuRM TS -_TRUCK SHOP HARDWOODSI N - N.w, sawOusT CK - CASKET co. AR LI NGT-ON , WA I 5 - - TRUCK SCALE 1-IOUS� LS - LOG STORAGE I l I MAP \ D , I - I � � a• 1 I PRArRrE WOCOENVILLE I -k !i ~ J4 J TRUSS CoM pAN Y SEI\1sE&I TNDUASTRIAL PARK O f 4 :JY�� �•. a --. i r `' a BONE � /a F " I <` `�' 4 YA R D 1 Qil l - VCOD 1WJA S TE LAND FILL r Z Z CK J LSD - -- UNDEVELOPED a i � ! TsI f - ,` ,\ P+ECEIVING GS- GREEN STORAGE E , PO= Pi ANT OFFICE I I VK-__DRY KILN -WE5T COST I DS- DRY S-TORAGC FO(iEst PRODutCTS PM-. .eLANER MILL SAWMILL .IP- INFILTRATION POND NORTHWEST -BuRM _TS -_TRUCK -SHOP 1�ARDWOODS I N - N.w, _ SaWousT _CK - .CA51<ET C.O. -- AR LI NGTON, WA I S - TRUCK SC ALE HOUSE LS - LOG STORAGE I l I MAP " D ' W LL =1 ; I PpArRr ,a I WOODENVILLE \: r ;K TRuS'S C-0M ,PAN y I JE-N 5 E f\I !1 / INDUSTRIAL PARK o"o Cx 1 Q _� Of (9 n�� F 0 BONE a j r <` W YARD BtARM WCOD WASrE I. 10 \L s' ',' \�, LAAm FILL ;. I Z I \ L S - -- !� m � ' \ �¢ CL ; ; \ \ UNDEVELOPED ZN oLISTRIAL pAAK ICI V y Vs I La ,' \ V,0 \�Jb \, LS 11 RECEIVING \�`�\ \ \ \J_ GS— GREEN STORAGE PO- PLANT OFFICE I DK- _DRY ICI LN WEST COAST DS - DRY STORAG[ Fot;Esr PAo1)LtcrS I p�''( PLANER MILL .SM - SAWMILL NORTHWEST' TP=SNFILTRAT►ON POND -BuRm TS -_TFZUCK SHOP HARDWOODS I N — N.W. SAWDUST AR LI NGTON, ►,,/A I -CK - CA5►4ET C.O. .S - TRUCK SCALE House LS - LOG STORAGE l I MAP 11 , � r ( I� ` , I PRAIRIE o WOODENVILLE SS TRLI. c-cm pAN Y i J�n�sFnt oINDUSTRIAL PARK _1 O 9 Q BONE YARD Bu R M PLY, -`� O r \ ti LS• ��`\ r WOOD WASTE 0 V,, '�\ ' I' `� L S 1•\\\\\, LAn1D FILL z / EK } ,� \ ;\\ LSD _ r �'wSr ` �� - !¢ O I \ UNDEVELOPED Pier Fk K Ld z r ,.`�. rs \ , N \ \• LS RECEIVING �\\\\'• ` ,••,�� \ \ GS- GREEN sTOaAGE PO- PLANT OFFICE DK-_ OctY KILN WEST COAST DS - DRY S?aRAGE FOREST PRODI-�tCTS I PM TLANEA MILL I .SM - SAWM(LL NORTHWE ST IP-INFILTRATION POND �UaM TS -__TRUCK SHOP HARDWOODS l N — mw, SAwouST AR L! NGTON, WA I _CK - CASI<eT co. - TRUCK SCALE Hou5E LOG STORAGE I I /VO�Q fGt GliE57 f�AeDu�.���s -51W 411 /e 9 . �/lo/9s COMMENCING AT THE PJOR-TIIWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER Or- THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTIUII 14, TOWNSHIP 31 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. SNOHOMI SH COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE GOING EASTERLY ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER 489 . 60 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE SAID NORTH LINE WITH THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF THE NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 655 . 31 FEET; THENCE SOUTH PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF TIIE NORTHWEST QUARTER 320 FEET; THENCE WEST PARALLEL WITH THE SAID NORTH LINE 705. 93 FEET TO THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID RAILROAD; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY 324 . 18 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING . i I f I i S RECEm .p SEP 12 1995 9�- f��4 A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Northwest Hardwoods - Arlington High Yield Sawmill 2 . Name of Applicant: Northwest Hardwoods 3 . Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 20015-67th Ave. NE, PO Box 7, Arlington, WA 98223 Ken Wilkes 4 . Date checklist prepared: Bud Winte435-85, July 20, 1995 5 . Agency requesting checklist: City of Arlington 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable) : Start up on 1/2/96 or as soon as possible after that date. 7 . Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? No 8 . List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency has signed off on this project as not requiring any additional permits if installed as currently proposed. 9 . Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. City of Arlingoon Building Permits 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Build and operate a high yield sawmill in an L shaped building approximately 7500 square feet in size. The building will contain the following equipment; bandmill, carriage, gang/board edger, trim saws , sorter, stacker, and chipper. There will be three external decks ; infeed log deck, green chain, and stacker outfeed. There will be one outfeed conveyor for the sawdust and chips that are produced. 2 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a Person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site (s) . Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. while you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The project will be located in the middle of Northwest Hardwoods property at 20015-67th Ave. NE, Arlington, WA Exhibit 1 & 2 should help describe the exact location. TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELE14ENTS I. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one) : Flat, rolling,hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope) ? C. What general types of soils are found on on the site ( for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck) ? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note andy prime farmland. See Exibit 3 d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Minimal fill, except to installfoundation 3 f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No--hard surfaced g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction(for example, asphalt or buildings) ? All areas around buildings will be hard surfaced. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Storm water will be controlled as required by the Department of Ecology. We have been issued permit #503-000-200 for storm water. Runoff will be to infiltration ponds. No process water will leave 2 . plig facility. a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i. e. ,dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and qive approximate quantities if known. There will be no significant changes to air quality. Air quality consistant with new construction. All conveyors will be either internal or covered up to the point where they are added to the exis' b. Are there any off-site sources of ing system. emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No C. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: All external conveyors - 1 chip/sawdust belt will be covered up to the point where it enters existing system. 3 . Water. a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands) ? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No 4 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described watars'. If yes, please describe and attach available plans. N/A 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicated the source of fill material. N/A 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No.-_ 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No -- Any process water would be mixed into the chips and sawdust. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, , and approximate quantities if known. No. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example : Domestic sewage ; industrial, containing the following chemicals. . . ; agricultural; etc. ) . None 5 Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable) , or the number of animals or humans the systems) are expected to serve. N/A c. Water Runoff (including storm water) : 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known) . Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Covered under permit #503-000-200. All stormwater will sheet flow into existing infiltration ponds located Northeast of the proposed facility. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff impacts, if any: Covered facility with directed outflow. 4 . Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: None deciduous tree: alder,maple,aspen,other evergreen tree:fir, cedar,pine,other shrubs grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants : cattail , buttercup,bulrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants : waterlily , eelgrass,milfoil,other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? None C. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near site. None 6 d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: None 5 . Animals a. circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk,heron, eagle,songbirds,other: Crow, Starlins, Swallow mammals:deer,bear, elk,beaver,other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. what kinds of energy ( electric, natural gas, oil, Wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. The sole source of power for this facility will be electricity. For heating & manufacturing, primary manufacturing. 7 b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No C. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Energy efficient lighting & motors 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, rick of fire and explosion, spill or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Only normal fire protection will be required. The building will be equipped with a sprinkler system to minimize risk. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: All employees trained in accordance with all federal, state and loca standards for environmental compliance. b. Noise 1) -hat types of noise your ithe project ( area rea which may affect y example: traffic, equipment, operation, other) ? This is an industrial setting on an existing industrial plant. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for 8 example : traffic, construction, operation, other) ? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Typical during construction phase, the high yield mill is expected to operate two shifts a day Monday-Friday from 6:00a.m.-2:00a.m. There will be additional forklift and log loader traffic during that time but it should not be noticable since the current plant is in operation during these hours. 3) proposed measures to reduce or can noise impacts, if any: The building will be constructed in a way to minimize all external noise impacts as much as possible. By locating at the center of the property all noise impacts to the surrounding properties should be minimized. Sound board--high density noise reducing building materia 8 . Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Log storage , material storage, log truck unloading area. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. C. Describe any structures on the site. Whole log chipping facility d. Will any structures be demolished? if so, what? N6 a. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Industrial f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Industrial g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. N/A 9 i. Approximately how may people would reside or work in the completed project? 10 Full time employees j . Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? 0 k. proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A 1. proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatibla with existing and projected land uses and plan, if any: Zoned Heavy Industrial 9 . Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. N/A b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether higqh, middle or low-income housing. N/A C. proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structurs (s) , not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material (s) proposed? Building height of 42 ' to cover filing room above sawmill. 10 b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None C. proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None il. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None--Painted galvanized siding. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No C. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Painted galvanized siding. 12 . Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None 11 13 . Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site' If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: N/A 12 14 . Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. 67th Avenue NE. No changes will be necessary because of this addition. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes C. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Park;nL, is on company property, employee parking would be in the existing employee parking lot . No additional area would be required. d. will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including. driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private) . None e. will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of ) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. There would be approximately 1 extra chip truck and 1 lumber truck per day g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None 13 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other) ? If so, generally describe. No b. proposed measures to reduce control direct impacts on public services, if Building will contain fire protection system, with trained personnel in health & safety. 16. utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site; electricity, natural gas, water,refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. Sanitary sewer located in existing sawmill building. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Electric -- Snohomish County P.U.D. Refuse Service -- Waste Mgt- Water ���- City of Arlington c. se GI&jgOo - -- GTE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Environmental Coordinator Date Submit ad: August 9 lAQS 14 CORRECTED MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Construction of a 60,000 sq.ft. Industrial building for manufacture of pre-engineered buildings. PROPONENTS: HCI Steel Products, Inc. 18520 67th Ave NE Arlington, WA 98223 Location of Proposal: Generally located at the Southwest quadrant of the intersection of 188th Street and 67th Ave NE. Commonly known as 18520 67th Ave NE, Arlington, WA 98223 Lead Agency: City of Arlington 238 North Olympic Ave. Arlington, WA 98223 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. The significant probable impacts adverse impacts have been mitigated per the mitigation agreement on tile. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(e). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental impact checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. This MDNS is issued under 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by December 4th,1994 Responsible Official: Thomas R. Myers Position/Title: City Administrator Address: City of Arlington Department of Community Development 238 North Olympic Arlington, WA 98223 Date: November 23th, 1994 Signature: For Thomas R. Myers i j 1 MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Construction of a 6, 000 sq. ft. Industrial building for manufacture of pre-engineered buildings. PROPONENTS: HCI Steel Products, Inc. 18520 67th Ave NE Arlington, WA 98223 Location of Proposal: Generally located at the Southwest quadrant of the intersection of 188th Street and 67th Ave NE. Commonly known as 18520 67th Ave NE, •Arlington, WA 98223 Lead Agency: City of Arlington 238 North Olympic Ave. Arlington, WA 98223 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. The significant probable impacts adverse impacts have been mitigated per the mitigation agreement on file. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43 . 21C. 030 (2) (c) . This decision was made after review of a completed environmental impact checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. This MDNS is issued under 197-11-340 (2) ; the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by December 4th, 1994 Responsible Official: Thomas R. Myers Position/Title: City Administrator Address: City of Arlington Department of Community Development 238 North Olympic Arlington, WA 98223 Date: November 18th, 1994 Signature: / �//�LLCCC�•(J ` ( • . For Thomas R. Myers City of Arlington-Environmental Assessment HCI Steel - Construction of manufacturing facility, 60,000 sq. ft. of building 18520 67th Ave NE Arlington, WA 98223 November 7, 1994 The applicant submitted a checklist which was reviewed by staff resulting in the issuance of a Mitigated Determination of Non-significance subject to the mitigation of the impacts as identified in the following statements. L. Earth The site is generally flat, except for along the East property line, where there is a topographic difference running parallel with 67th Ave N.E. Mitigation: 1. A Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan, subject to approval by the City Engineer, will be implemented prior to site construction. 2. Building setbacks from the steep slopes will be subject to the Uniform Building Code. 3. An onsite drainage analysis will be required and the amount of proposed impervious surface shall be verified. 2. Air During construction there would be exhaust from the construction equipment, welding of steel, painting of the finished product. Mitigation: There is no significant impact on this element of the environment. L. Water Mitigation: 1. An onsite drainage analysis shall be completed and shall consider the feasibility of infiltration of stormwater runoff. Infiltration shall be utilitized if feasible in preference to surface discharge. 2. The analysis and methods of collection and disposal will be in accordance with the Puget Sound Water Quality Authority-Technical Manual. 3. Oil\Water Separators will be built to City standards. 4. Plants Grass and weeds are the only vegetation on this site. 9. Housin The site is zoned Industrial. Mitigation: There is no significant environmental impact on this element of the environment. 10. Aesthetics This site is currently occupied by an industrial manufacturing facility. The addition of this building will expand the existing business. There is residential property located to the East along 67th Ave NE. Mitigation: 1. A 5 foot landscape buffer shall be placed along 67th Ave NE for the frontage of the property. Landscape design is subject to approval by the City Engineer. 11. Light and Glare The additional building and related parking areas will create additional lighting in the area through building and parking lot lighting. Mitigation: There are no significant adverse impacts from this element of the environment. 12. Recreation This project will impact the City of Arlington as industrial development. Mitigation: 1) Per AMC 18.12.040 the developer shall pay $.05 per sq. ft. of development. ($.05 x 6,400 sq.ft. = $3,200.00) 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation This parcel is not known or suspected to have, or have had, any structures or facilities or historic or cultural value. Mitigation: Should any archeological materials be found, then appropriate agencies shall be contacted and measures taken to preserve the materials and the site. 14. Transportation Discussions have occurred with the applicant to determine appropriate mitigation based upon expected increased traffic. Mitigation: There is no significant impact on this element of the environment. L. Animals There is no significant animal life on this site. Mitigation: There is no significant impact on this element of the environment. (. Enerey and Natural Resources Electricity is provided from Snohomish County PUD District#1 and is the resource for this element. Development of the project will require provision of service resulting in the consumption of electricity. Mitigation: All building construction shall conform to the current edition of the Washington State Energy Code at the time of application of permits. The applicant shall also coordinate with Snohomish County PUD for provision of service to the site. L. Environmental Health The resource for this element is the general welfare and quality of public health. Noise is also an issue which can effect environmental health. Development of the site would increase the potential for noise from the site that may affect adjacent residential properties. Mitigation: 1. Effective mitigation of interior noise levels shall be achieved through the use of sound proofing materials. 2. Construction hours shall be limited to 7 AM to 7 PM 3. Land to the East is developed residentially. Noise shall be reduced/mitigated to meet applicable local and state law limitations. 8. Land and Shoreline Use The site is zoned Industrial and this is technically an expansion of an existing business. Mitigation: There is no significant environmental impact on this element of the environment. Mitigation: 1. HCI will dedicate additional right of way along 67th Ave NE to provide a total of 30 feet from the center of the existing road. This will be the entire length of HCI property and include a 30' radius at the intersection of 188th and 67th Ave NE. 2. HCI will dedicate a drainage easement to the City of Arlington from 67th Ave west to the railroad right of way. The drainage system will be constructed by Gleneagle Development and will accommodate their run off as well as HCI's. 3. HCI will install fire hydrants as required. 4. HCI will not be required to provide any road frontage improvements along 67th Ave. or 188th Street nor the S.W. quadrant of the 67th Ave and 188th Street intersections. 5. HCI will construct two paved driveways (one on 67th Ace and one on 188th Street) per Item#5 of the city's preliminary review comments. 6. HCI will grant a temporary slope construction easement along 67th Ave for both parcels at no cost when 67th Ave is constructed. 15. Public Services The development of this site with an industrial user does not create a significant impact on the elements of the environment. 16. Utilities Utilities currently available to the site consist of electricity,telephone, refuse service, cable tv,natural gas, water and sewer. Mitigation: 1. Utilities shall be extended to site. 2. HCI will be provided public sewer and water hook-ups at not charge. The City will waive water/sewer fees for one equivalent residential connection. NCI's contractor will make actual physical connection. NOTE: Infrastructure requirements are based on conceptual information as submitted by the applicant. Additional specific requirements may be required upon review of the engineered construction drawings as submitted by the applicant. All improvements are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer prior to acceptance. All utilities shall be constructed underground. VOLUNTARY OFFER This threshold determination was reached on the basis of the mitigation as outlined above. All approvals are subject to this offer. The voluntary offer listed above was evaluated as part of this determination, and is considered necessary to reduce the overall level of impact below that which is probable, significant and adverse. DISCLAIMER The determination that an environmental impact statement does not have to be filed does not mean there will be no adverse environmental impacts. City of Arlington codes governing noise control, land use performance standards, construction and improvement of city roads, off-site road improvement obligations,drainage control, fire protection and building practices will provide substantial mitigation of the aforementioned impacts. The issuance of this Mitigated Determination of Non-significance should not be interpreted as acceptance or approval of this proposal as presented. The City of Arlington reserves the right to deny or approve said proposal subject to conditions if it is determined to be in the best interest of the City and/or necessary for the general health,safety and welfare of the public to do so. The Determination was issued on November 18th, 1994 and circulated to agencies with jurisdiction with a 15 day comment period. This comment period expires December 4th, 1994. A. BACXGROQND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: HCI Manufacturing Plant Expansion HCI Steel Products, Inc. 18520 67th Avenue NE Arlington, WA 98223-8942 (206) 435-8871 2 . Name of Applicant: HCI Steel Products, Inc. 3 . Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 18520 67th Ave. NE, Arlington (206) 435-8871 George Breuel 4 . Date checklist prepared: August 25, 1994 5 . Agency requesting checklist: City of Arlington - Dept. of Community Development 6 . Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable) : Completion - April 1995 7 . Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? Yes, proposed future office addition (approx. 6,000 s.f) 8 . List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None known 9 . Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly as'fecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, ' explain. No - None 10 . List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Building Permit 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. New manufacturing facility for the manufacture of pre-engineered buildings. Building Size - 60,000 s.f. Site - Approx. 5.3 acres 2 12 - Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal wduld occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site (s) . Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. while you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps, or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. See attached plot plan TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS I. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one) : Flat, rolling,hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b . What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope) ? 1% or less C. What general types of soils are found on on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck) ? If you know_ classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note andy prime farmland. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. None Known e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Preparation of building pad. Grading of on site materials (soils) to facilitate drainage. 3 f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Yes, during construction and earthwork operations q. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction(for example, asphalt or buildings) ? Approx. 28% h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Temporary erosion control plan to be implemented during construction/earthwork operations. 2 . Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.. e. ,dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Construction - exhaust from construction equipment, welding of steel, painting of finish product. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. None known c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: N/A 3 . Water. a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site ( including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands) ? If yes, describe type and provide names . If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into . None 4 2) will the project require any work over, ; n, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. N/A 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicated the source of fill material. None 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. - No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Not known 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, it any (for example : Domestic sewage ; industrial, containing the following chemicals. . . ; agricultural; etc. ) . None 5 Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable) , or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. N/A C. water Runoff (including storm. water) : 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known) . where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Collection of storm water by catch basin - Disposal not known at this time. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. None anticipated. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff impacts, if any: Use of oil/water separator. 4 . Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder,maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar,pine,other shrubs X grass/weeds pasture crop or grain wet soil plants : cattail , buttercup,bulrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants : waterlily , eelgrass,milfoil,other other types of vegetation b. what kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Most of the existing field grasses will be stripped from site. C. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near site. ' None known 6 I,. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: None S . Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds : hawk,heron, eagle, songbi__r____d__s��other: mammals:deer,bear, elk,beaver, other: Rabbit fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known C. Is the site part of, a migration route? If so, explain. None d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None S . Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project' s energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electrical energy - manufacturing, lighting, natural gas - heat 7 b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar enerTY by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No C. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Energy efficient lighting, Natural light system, Building insulation 7 . Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, rick of fire and explosion, spill or hazardous waste, that could- occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No �) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None 2) proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project ( for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other) ? None 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for a example : traffic, construction, operation, other) ?- Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short term - Construction equipment, normal working hours Long term - Normal types & levels associated with steel fabrication Normal working hours 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Mufflers on construction equipment. New plant will be provided with acoustic'/thermal insulation 8 . Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Industrial b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Not known C. Describe any structures on the site. None d. Will any structures be demolished? if so, what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Industrial f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Heavy Industrial g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. i. Approximately how may people would reside or work in the completed project? 50 j . Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? 0 k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A - None 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plan, if any: Complies with current zoning and plan 9 . Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. N/A b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle or low-income housing. N/A C. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A 10 . Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s) , not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material (s) proposed? 30'-01' Metal siding 10 b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: N/A 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Artificial light - Night b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No C. What existing off-site souzces of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None 12 . Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None 11 13 . Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? It so, generally describe. None known b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None known C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None 12 14 . Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. See attached site plan b• Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? No - Not known a• How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 60 spaces - none eliminated d• will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private) . No - Not known e. will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of ) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f• How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Not known - Volume consistant with present use. Peak volume at change of shift. g• Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None 13 15 . Public services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other) ? If so, generally describe. No b. Proposed measures to reduce control direct impacts on public services, if any. N/A 16 . Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available-at! t e site • e ectricit ur wat re se T c , tele hone sanitar sewer, sep is syst other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Water and sanitary sewer provided by City of Arlington. Electrical - Snohomish County P.U.D. . Natural gas - Washington Natural Gas. c. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to ake its decision. C Signature: l Date submitted: /y 14 0 0 a w— — — — — — 0.00 8 0 RELOCAI i I I Iw � z � I I TIW P 36'DRIVEWAY I EXISTING H C I MANUFACTURING FACILITY I ~I cn co I � � m i 400.00' o � � 6?TH AVENUE N.E. N.E.SEC.COR. SCALE = 1'= 100.0' SEC 22-31-5 H C I STEEL PRODUCTS HCI PLAT PLAN STEEL ARLINGTON. WA. PRODUCTS INC. am(206) 435-6671 D. oico fI C. 8/1 8/10/94 fAx (206) 435-9267 DRAWING# PLAT-1 CERTIFICATION OF LOT STATUS CITY OF ARLINGTON WARNING THIS DOCUMENT SHOULD NOT BE CONSTRUED AS AUTHORIZING ANY FURTHER DIVISION OF SAID LOT; ANY SUCH DIVISION IS SUBJECT TO ANY AND ALL RULES AND REGULATIONS RELATING TO LAND DIVISIONS IN EFFECT AT THE TIME SUCH DIVISION IS PROPOSED. PART I: OWNERIS CERTIFICATION I do hereby certify from personal knowledge the following: A. That I am an owner of certain parcels of real property, the legal descriptions of which are attached as Exhibits "A" and "B" and incorporated by reference. B. That I have had said interest since August 8, 1986 . C. The parcels were created by lot division in 1971. I understand that any division by sale or lease of this property on or after September 12 , 1972 , may prevent the issuance of a building or other development permit if such division was, or is not, done in conformance with all City laws relating to land divisions effective at the time of such division. Signed,* Date,., -- Part II: TITLE COMPANY CERTIFICATION the present owns+- or contract purchaser of those certain parcels of land which bear Assessor's Account Number and and whose legal descriptions are attached hereto, has been asked by the City of Arlington to verify the status of the above parcels, Your assistance would be greatly appreciated. Cnc aAM RB99:2"2.33:155E25.1 1 .. z I +. A. The above parcels were created in their present configurations Prior to September 12, 1972 (Date of creation: 6/28/71) or On or after September 12, 1972. (Date of creating: ) B. Access to these parcels is by City Street. PLEASE TRANSMIT COPIES OF DOCUMENTS INVOLVING CREATION OF THE PARCEL. I hereby certify that the above information is based on records held on file by our office and is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Signed: Date: Part III: CITY OF ARLINGTON Having reviewed the information provided in Part I and/or Party II above, I hereby find that the parcels described in Exhibits "All and "B" are legal lots for building purposes under the City Zoning Code. Furthermore, this certification is subject to revocation if it is determin at the information upon which it is based is erroneous. uthor zed s gnature) Date: 4 � � w D -1 V CnC(CAN)RE99:2 R2-33:1558?S-1 2 EXHIBIT "A" The NE 1/4 of the NE 1./4 of Section 22, Township 31N, Range 5 East, W.M. , lying East of Northern Pacific Railroad Company right-of-way; LESS, THE SOUTH 400 FEET THEREOF, and EXCEPT COUNTY ROADS. CM(LAM REW248243:155925-1 3 EXHIBIT "B" The South 400 feet of the NE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 22 , Township 31 N, Range 5 East, W.M. , lying East of Northern Pacific right=of-way. EXCEPT COUNTY ROADS. cnc U-VO RE":2492.33:13ss23-► 4 c- HCI STEEL ..- BUILDING SYSTEMS, INC. Steel Building Systems • Steel Roof Systems • Building Components Corporate Office: 18520 67th Ave.N.E. Arlington,WA 98223 FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION COVER SHEET (360)435-8871 (360)435-9267 Fax Anchorage Office: / 4041 B.St.Ste.202 DATE: 6,76 Anchorage,AK99503 (907)561-8TR NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER (907)561-0381 Fax ATTENTION: _ COMPANY: FROM: `-�--� REFERENCE: COMMENTS: TO FAX A REPLY DIAL (360) 435-9267 RECEIVED APR 03 1996 ANDERSON HUNTER A Profeealonal Service Corporation 2707 COLBY AVENUE, SUITE 1001 P,O,SOX 5397 EVERM.WASHINGTDN 98208 O.DOUGLAS FERGUSON (2061 252-5161 JENNIFER RINALDI COOK H.SCOTT HOLTE FACSIMILE 12001 250.3345 JO M.NOACK ROSERT S.WILLOUGHBY SALLY JEFFERS WYE" GLENN PAUL C ARPENTCR :. JONI LARSON BRADFORD N.CATTLE /� >` VICKIE X.NORRIS H JUUAN C.PEwE1L VIFiGINIA CELLA ANTIPOLO THOM46 R. COUINS JEFFREY H.CAPELOTO FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION COVER SHEET or CDVNSEL J,ROBERT LEACH CHRISTOPHER J.KNAPf' O.D.ANDERSON (1892-1561) JOHN ANTHONY FOLDS JAWS P,HUNTER(1015.19801 DATE: 4/3/9 6 NUMBER OF PAGES TIME: 6� p.m. INCL COVER SHEET AH CLIENT/MATTER: TRANSMISSION TO COMPANY FAX NUMBER PHONE NUMBER Lee McDaniel HCI Steel NOTE > Being faxed to you are the fallowing: Certification of Lot Status and an Access License. PLEASE NOTE THAT ON THE ACCESS LICENSE you must attach as Exhibit A: description of HCI property; and Exhibit B: description of area to be used for access. / TgANSMISSION FROMI l If any portion of this transmission is missing or of poor quality, please call Linda Nelson at (206) 252-5161. THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS FACSIMILE MESSAGE I$ATTORNEY PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL AND IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY NAMED ABOVE. IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT,YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION.DISTRIBUTION OR COPY OF THIS COMMUNICATION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR,PLEASE IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY US BY TELEPHONE AND RETURN THE ORIGINAL MESSAGE TO US AT THE ABOVE ADDRESS VIA THE U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, POSTAGE WILL BE REIMBURSED. THANK YOU. LAN(LAN)AHOI:2637-1:118592-1 t. 1 pple Builders Inc. 18705 - 67th Ave. N.E. •Arlington, WA 98223 • (360) 435-6658• FAX: (360) 435-6079 February 23, 1996 City of Arlington D 238 N. Olympic Ave. fas t Arlington, WA. 98223 Attention: Ed McMillian Department of Community Development Reference: HCI Steel Products, Inc. Project Permit 4 1633 Add(1)Vehicle Door East Sidewall. Dear Ed, Apple Builders, Inc. is the construction manager for HCI Steel Products, Inc. new building project. It has come to my attention that there is an issue regarding(1)Vehicle door for access into the building from the East off of 67th Ave. NE. The owner always intended to have (1)Vehicle door for entry into the building from 67th Ave. NE. This door is essential to their operations. As the construction project is underway and our desire is to complete the project as quickly as possible this issue needs immediate resolution. We understand that due to your work load you may have to hire an outside consultant to expedite this Project Modification. Upon investigation and review of the documents we submit the following for your review and response. 1. Is it possible to modify the Final Voluntary Mitigation Agreement without a drawn out process. It appears that the only thing that needs to be revised is one paragraph in the Environmental Health section of the Final Voluntary Mitigation Agreement. 2. The SEPA paper work has been completed,with a determination of non significance. 3. The request for project modification is only for(1)vehicle door for entry into the building form the East off 67th Ave. NE. That has no significant adverse impact on the project. 4. The drawings approved 10-11-95 show the door located at the East Sidewall entering the building from 67th Ave. NE.. .r r � ;1 ', :� i -� ., .. � ! �;� ��=�._ February 23, 1996 HCI Steel Products,Inc. Permit# 1633 Page Two of Three 5. The Final Voluntary Mitigation Agreement dated 3-3-95. Environmental Health Item# 4 The potential for excessive noise exists, The Building shall be insulated to minimize noise. No Vehicle Door at the East side of the building. Workers should be trained to handle materials as quietly as possible. In the event of future complaint, it will be necessary that you meet with the complainant and resolve the problem and provide a report to the City. 6. The Draft Voluntary Mitigation Agreement dated 2-6-95 Environmental Health Item#4 The potential for excessive noise exists. The Building shall be insulated to minimize noise. Workers should be trained to handle materials as quietly as possible. In the event of future complaint, it will be necessary that you meet with the complainant and resolve the problem and provide a report to the City. 7. The Draft Voluntary Mitigation Agreement dated 2-6-95 had no mention of the door being excluded or eliminated. The owner understood the building insulation would allow for the vehicle door on the East Sidewall. 8. Communications this day with David Anderson, City of Arlington Building Official directed us to contact you regarding the process for modifications to the project for the addition of a vehicle door on the East Sidewall of the building. 9. Per our meeting and conversation with you this morning, our understanding is that the addition of this door must be obtained by a Project Modification. 10. We understand as the lead agency you have indicated to us that the requested Project Modification to the project will not result in significant adverse environmental impacts, and no further SEPA documentation is required. 11. We understand as a SEPA document exists and the lead agency has determined there will be no significant adverse environmental impacts. As lead agency you may issue an addendum to the original SEPA document which identifies the changes to the proposal. The following is a description of the modification request. The addition of(1)Vehicle door for entry into the building off 67th Ave.NE. This door is essential to the operations. The North 25' Bay of the building is the receiving for our raw materials. The North 120' of the building is the warehouse of raw material storage. The manufacturing areas are located to the South of the Warehouse area. :r{SJ�•!i> ..-i2•: fJ ••1'.f� !r' d tt/ •_ ;' ie• ' ;r h:... � -.t: �If��:::•% i.. . �"'.!' t' .� � r11i� +;i.. �!:r'r� i' :r: ,R r lt��C:�l�r`'j '. ':r .r:�.r ��: ��;J :� . ..� J1 t _tY�.� 'i2i. J d:f: J•-il ! J•i �a1..11 •� ..is•>:. }f�. .A17 -. _ ..�• �. .- Si i.,t�., .�, {1 .• ) t t. 't>>: •' 't•r'•j,l ll. 1'=�, 't •.. Ii.�:•• _ i i•t ._ .... .:+.. ,�t �i :,.i S„+``r r.. F. :}J , -i- .• .. ;i�i tF- - !f!j -r+ r: ,. .�1lYi �tr.ljvi�'• r,- r. . !. r • .r. �/ � it� . - _ t�. `l.l��r.i,� i% •tf_ ii r .. I •. 1 F' a .,' i . . !�-,- .:e? .•9 t. f i� :t �J a<►'I .,. � �scr,f`: .C.' '; a . . 1. .. is : .'rtJ; '' ;r, �, ;•_;.!'' '� f: oil •f• 1. {", it Jr ;- 3-. -. tt!!. r '•,. ',r... •t . r:7_. 1 .! . . r4 rlt:'•1..rl�.•d rl. r :f !�!("l� �i •!.•;.'!':tf•r} ••, • 'i i' r February 23, 1996 HCI Steel Products,Inc. Permit# 1633 Page Three of Three We request that the Environmental Health section of the Voluntary Mitigation Agreement be modified as follows with an insulated door installed: a. The door will be located in the East Sidewall of the new building. Reference Drawing: Grid Line 32 - 33 the End Bay to the North. b. Description of door. (1) ea. 20' wide x 16' high Steel Sectional Type Door, 24 gauge steel. Insulated with Polystyrene and ABS Backskins with full Perimeter Seals. 3"Angle Mount Track,Highlift hardware. The door to be motor operated. c. The door will only be opened long enough to allow Vehicle entry into the building. d. The door will remain closed during off loading of the trucks. e. The Building shall be insulated to minimize noise. f. Workers should be trained to handle materials as quietly as possible. g. In the event of future complaint, it will be necessary that you meet with the complainant and resolve the problem and provide a report to the City. Thank you for your time in working to resolve this issue. We look forward to working with you. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to call. You may contact me at Phone: 360-435-6658, or Fax: 360-435-6079 Sincerely, Kent Boyd,President Apple Builders,Inc. c: file Job#95-24 HCI Steel Products,Inc. i __ . . , f. . . �,. �,, _ � . ,; �. f ,. -,f .. . ,. �' �. � ''1 , .:�;it , . . . it •��� ... .�''-'Y�. •!, •. ��.. , ... r.. . . �'f .'. :, . f . .. ' '"{3' ' . fa :,,err .� i' 'r � .. , ,�� �'�`r, .. .. .�.) is � 't .. if�, ;�_ str�� ;.r: .i'.. .• �;,`, , r Chapter 173-60 WAC 1 1 ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE LEVELS WAC owned, rented, or leased by one or more persons, from 173-6"10 Authority and purpose. that owned, rented. or leased by one or more other per- 173-i0-020 Definitions. sons, and its vertical extension. 173--60-d30 ldenuftcauon of c"ronments.-040 12 *Racingevent" means any motor vehicle compe- ivlazimum pernuvte environ mental noise levels. 173--60 ( ) 173-6 -os0 F�ce>nPu�+- tition conducted under a per-mit issued by a governmen- 173-6o4W Nuisance reaul■tions trot prohibited. tal authority having jurisdiction or. if such permit is not re 173-64-070 Future sulatiom required, then under the auspices of a recognized sanc- 171-60-NO variances and implementation schedules. tioning body. 173-6o-M Enfor =v=policy. (13) "Receiving property' means real propertywithin 173-60-100 Appeal$. 173-60-110 Cooperation with local governmenL which the maximum permissible noise levels specified 173-40-120 Effective date, herein shall not be exceeded from sources outside such WAC 173--60-010 Authority and Purpose. These property. (14) Sound level meter" means a device which mea- rules are adopted pursuant to chapter 70.107 RCW, the sures sound pressure levels and conforms to Type l or Noise Control Act of 1974, in order to establish maxi- Type 2 as specified in the American National Standards mum noise levels permissible in identified environments, institute Specification S1.4-1971. and thereby to provide use standards relating to the re- (15) *Watercraft' means any contrivance, excluding ception of noise within such environments. (Order 74- aircraft used or capable of being used as a means of 32, § 173-64-010, filed 4/22/75, effective 9/1/75.1 transportation or recreation on water. [Statutory Au- WAC 173-60-020 Definitions. (1) 'Background thority: Chapter 70.107 RCW. 83-15-046 (Order DE 82-42), § 173-60-020, filed 7/19/83;Order DE 77-1. § sound level' means the level of all sounds in a given en- 173-�U-020, filed 6/I/77; Order 74-32. § 173-60-020. vironmcnt, independent of the specific source being filed 4/22/75, effective 9/1/75.] measured. (2) '-dBA' means the sound pressure level in decibels WAC 173-60-030 Identification of environments. measured using the "A" weighting network on a sound (1) Except when included within specific prior designa- level meter. The sound pressure level, in decibels, of a [ions as provided in subsections (2). (3). and (4) of this sound is 20 times the-logarithm to the base 10 of the section, the EDNA of any property shall be based on the ratio of the pressure of the sound to a reference pressure following typical uses, taking into consideration the of 20 micropascals. present, future, and historical usage, as well as the usage (3) 'Department' means the department of ecology- of adjacent and other lands in the vicinity. (4) 'Director' means the director of the department (a) Class A EDNA - Lands where human beings re- of ecology. side and sleep. Typically, Class A EDNA will be the (5) "Distribution facilities' means any facility used following types of property used for human habitation: for distribution of commodities to final consumers. in- (i) Residential eluding facilities- of utilities that convey water, waste (ii) Multiple family living accommodations water, natural gas, and electricity. (iii) Recreational and entertainment, (e.g., camps. (6) "EDNA' means the environmental designation for parks, camping facilities, and resorts) m noise abatement. being an area or zone (environment) (iv) Community service. (e.g.. orphanages, homes for within which maximum permissible noise levels are the aged, hospitals, health and correctional facilities) established. (b) Class B EDNA - Lands involving uses requiring (7) "Existing" means a process, event, or activity in protection against noise interference with speech. Typi- an established area, producing sound subject to or ex- ally, Class B EDNA will be the following types of empt from this chapter, prior to the effective date of property. September-1, 1975. (i) Commercial living accommodations (8) 'Local government' means county or city govern- (ii) Commercial dining establishments ment or any combination of the two. (iii) Motor vehicle services (9) 'Noise' means the intensity, duration and char- (iv) Retail services acter of sounds, from any and all sources. (v) Banks and office buildings, (10) 'Persons means any individual. corporation, (vi) Miscellaneous commercial services. property not partnership, association• governmental body, state use for human habitation agency or otherentity whatsoever: (vii) Recreation and entertainment, property not used (11) 'Property boundary' mans the surveyed line at for human habitation (e.g.. theaters, stadiums, fair- ground surface, which separates the real property grounds, and amusement parks) JCL 173.- 0 WAC—p 11 (314/87) 173- 0-030 Maximum Environmental Noise L j (viii) Community services, property not used for hu- WAC 173-60-040 man habitation (c.g.; educational, religious, overnmen- Maximum Permissible environ- f; mental noise levels. (1) No person shall cause or permit tat, c aturai and recreational facilities)- noise to intrude into the property of another person (c) Class C EDNA - Lands involving economic activ- which noise exceeds the maximum permissible noise lev- ities of such a nature that higher noise leveis than expe- els set forth below in this section, ncnced in other areas is normally to be anticipated. (2)(a) The noise limitations established are as set Persons working in these areas are normally covered by forth in the following table after any applicable adjust- noisc Control regulations of the department of labor and menu provided for herein are applied. industries. Uses typical of Class A EDNA are generally not permitted within such areas. Typically, Class C EDNA of EDNA of EDNA will be the following types of property: NOISE SOURCE RECEIVING PROPERTY (i) Storage, warehouse. and distribution facilities. (ii) Industrial property used for the production and Class A Class B Class C fabrication of durable and nondurable man-made goods (iii) Agricultural and silvicultural property used for CLASS A 55 dBA 57 dBA 60 dBA the production of crops, wood products, or livestock. (d) Where there is neither a zoning ordinance in ef- CLAM ti 57 60 65 feet nor an adopted comprehensive plan, the legislative Cy AM C 60 65 authority of local government may, by ordinance or res- 70 olution. designate specifically described EDNAs which conform to the above use criteria and, upon departmen- (b) Between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. the tal approval. EDNAs so designated shall be as set forth noise limitations of the foregoing table shall be reduced in such local determination. by 10 dBA for receiving property within Class A (c) Where no specific prior designation of EDNAs has EDNAs. been made, the appropriate EDNA for properties in, (c) At any hour of the day or night the applicable volved in any enforcement activity will be determined by noise limitations in (a) and (b) above may be exceeded Y the investigating official on the basis of the criteria of for an rcceiving Property by no more than: (a), (b), and (c) of this subsection. (i) 5 dBA for a total of 15 minutes in any one-hour (2) In areas covered by a local zoning ordinance, the Period: or legislative authority of the local government may, by or- 00 10 dBA for a total of 5 minutes.in.any one-hour dinance or resolution designate EDNAs to conform with period; or the zoning ordinance as follows: (iii) 15 dBA for a total of 1.5 minutes.in any one- (a) Residential zones - CIass A EDNA hour period. (Order 74-32, (b) Commercial zones - CIass B EDNA 4/22/75, cfFcctive 9/1/75.] § 73-6Q-040, filed (c) Industrial zones-Class C EDNA WAC 173-40-050 Exemptions, (1) The following Upon approval by the department, EDNAs so desig- shall be exempt from the provisions of WAC 173-60- aated shall be as set forth in such local determination. 040 between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m.: EDNA designations shall be amended as necessary to (a) Sounds originating from residential..property re- conform to zone changes under the zoning ordinance. (3) In areas not covered by a local zoning ordinance Ming to temporary and for the maintenance or re- but within the coverage of an adopted comprehensive Pair of homes, grounds and appurtenances. plan the legislativc- authority of the local government (b) Sounds created ge the discharge of firearms on may, by ordinance or resolution desi authorized.shooting ranges_ conform with the comprehensive plan designate. to (c) Sounds created by blasting. (a) Residential arils-Class A EDNA (d) Sounds created-by aircraft engine testing and (b) Commercial areas - Class B EDNA maintenance not related to flight operations: Provided, (c) Industrial areas a Class C EDNA That aircraft testing and maintenance shall be con- Upon approval by the department EDNAsso dcsi _ ducts at remote-sites whenever possible. hated shall be as set forth in such local determination. (e) Sounds created by the installation or repair of es- EDNA designations shall be amended-as n sential utility services. ry to (2) The following shall be exempt from the provisions conform to changes in the comprehensive p (4) The departmentrecognizes that on certain lands, of WAC 173-00-040 (2)(b); serenity, tranquillity, or quiet are an essential part of the (a) Noise from electrical substations.sand existing sea_ quality of the environment and serve an important public waste equipment used in the conveyance of water, need. Special designation of such!sands with a waste water, and natural gas.by a utility_ noise level standards b local PPropna' (b) Noise from existing industrial installations which Y government may be exceed the standards contained in these regulations and adopted subject:to approval by the departtneatrThe di-- rector may make such special designation pursuant- which* over the prerious,.threc years„ havo.consistently the procedures of the Aecial esig otioprocdurr toct, °�� in excess of 15 hours per day as a consequence of Pr chapter-34.04 RCW. (Order 74-32, ed ekxss:ncL= sity and/or dctnorutratai routine normal 4/22/75, effective 9/l/75.] 173- -030, filed. operation_Changes in working hours, which would affect JCL 173-"WAC—*21 (3/4/87) M2Ximum Environmental Noise L.e% 17 U80 exemptions under this regulation, require approval of the fly�/7550. f lefdfective 9/1/de 74-32• § 173-60-050. department_ (3) The following shall be exempt from the provisions WAC 173-60-OW Nuisance regulations not prohib- of WAC 173-b0-040, except insofar as such provisions relate to the reception of noise within Class A EDNAs ited- Nothing in this chapter or the exemptions provided herein. shall be construed as preventing local govern- between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. (a) Sounds originating from temporary construction meat from regulating noise from any source as a nui- sauce. Local resolutions, ordinances, rules or regulations sites as a result of construction activity. b) Sounds originating from forest harvesting and sil- regulating noise on such a basis shall not be deemed in- ( ic b) Sol activity. consistent with this chapter by the department. (Order v (4) The following shall be exempt from all provisions 74-32, § 173-60-060, filed 4/22/75, effective 9/1/75.1 of WAC 173-60-OQ: g WAC 173-60-070 Future regulations. It is the in- (a) Sounds created by motor vehicles when regulated tention of the department to establish use standards by'chapter 173-62 WAC• and/or performance standards for the following sources (b) Sounds originating from aircraft in flight and of noise exempted or partially exempted from the re- sounds that originate at airports which arc directly re- lated to flight operations. quirements of this chapter within two years after adc- (c) Sounds created by surface carriers engaged in in- quate legislative funding conduct di is made available to terstate commerce by railroad. studies providing the ncccssary data. 1 Sounds created by aircraft engine test continuously for more than five minutes, or bells, ing and (d) Sounds created by warning devices not operating maintenance not related to flight operations. through the adoption of a new chapter 173-b4 WAC. chimes, and carillons. 2 Sounds created by construction equipment and (e) Sounds created by safety and protective devices emanating from construction sites, through the adoption where noise suppression would defeat the intent of the of a new chapter 173-66 WAC. device or is not economically feasible. 3 Sounds created by motor vehicle racing events. (f) Sounds created by emergency equipment and work g necessary in the interests of law enforcement or for thirou h the adoption of a new chapter 173-63 WAC. health safety or welfare of the community. (4) Sounds created by watercraft, through the adop- i (g) Sounds originating from motor vehicle racing lon of a new chapter 173-70 WAC. (5) Sounds created by the operation of equipment or events at existing authorized facilities. (h) Sounds originating from officially sanctioned pa- facilities of surface carriers engaged in commerce by rades and other public events. railroad, to the extent consistent with federal law and (i) Sounds emitted from petroleum refinery boilers regulations through the adoption of a new-chapter 173- during startup of said boilers: Provided. Thai the startup 72 WAC. [Order DE 77-1, § 173-60-070. filed 6/l/77: operation is performed during daytime hours whenever Order 74-32, § 173-60-070, filed 4/'2/75, effective possible. 9/1/75.] 6) Sounds created by watercraft. WAC 173-60-080 Variances' and` implementation (k) Sounds created by the discharge of firearms in the schedules.. (1) Variances may be granted to any person course of hunting. from any particular requirement of this chapter, if find- (1) Sounds caused by natural phenomena and unamp- ings are made that-immediate compliance-with such re- lified human voices. quirement cannot- be achieved because of special (in) Sounds created by motor vehicles, licensed or un- circumstances rendering immediate compliance unrea- licensed, when operated off public highways EXCEPT sonable in light of economic or physical factors, en- when such sounds are received in Class A EDNAs. toachment (encroachment] upon an existing noise (n) Sounds originating from existing natural gas source, or bemuse of nonavailability of feasible technoi- transmission and distribution facilities. However, in cir- ogy or control methods. Any such variance or renewal cumstances where such sounds impact EDNA Class A thereof shall be granted only for the minimum time pe- environments and complaints are received, the director riod found to be necessary under the facts and or his designee may take action to abate by application , circumstan«s. of EDNA Class C source limits to the facility under the (2) An implementation schedule for achieving compli- requirements of WAC 173-b0-050(5). ana-with this chapter shall be incorporated--into any (6) Nothing in these exemptions is intended to pre- variance issued- elude the department from requiring installation of the (3) Variances shall be issued only upon application in best available noise abatement technology consistent Ming and after providing such information'as may be with economic feasibility. The establishment of any such requested- No variance'shall be issued- for a period of requitement shall be subject to the provisions of the Ad- more than-30 days cxexpt upon due notice to the public ministmtive-procedure Act, chapter 34.04 RCW. (Scat- with opportunity to comment Public hearings may be utory Authority: Chapter 70.107 RCW. 83-15-046- held. when- substantial public interest'is shown, at the (Order DE 82�2), § 173-b0-O50, filed 7/19/83: Order scon, DE 77-1, § 173-60•-050• filed 6/2/77; Order 75-18, § di reti of the issuing agency. jM<173-40 WAC—p 31 (3/4/a7) 173-60--080 Maximum Environmental Noise Lem (4) Sources of noise, subject to this chapter, upon Order 74-32, § 173--60-110, filed 4/22/75, effective which construction begins after the effective date hereof 9/1/75.1 shall immediately comply with the requirements of this chapter, except in extraordinary circumstances where WAC 173-60-120 Effective date. This chapter shall overriding considerations of public interest dictate the become effective on September 1, 1975. It is the inten- issuance of a variance. [Order 74-32, § 173-60-080, Lion of the dcpurtniciit to periudically review the provi- filed 4/22/75, effective 9/1/75.1 sions hereof as new information becomes available for the of WAC 173-60-090 Enforcement poficy. Noise meas- der p7-3? § making 73-60-1 0 a filed /22/75 rieffectiive uremcnt for the purposes of enforcing the provisions of 9/1/75.1 WAC 173-060-040 shall be measured in with a sound level meter with the point of measurement being at any point within the receiving property. Such en- forczment shall. be undertaken only upon receipt of a complaint made by a person who resides. owns property, or is employed.in the area affected by the noise com- plained of, Excmvr for parks, recreational. areas, and wildlife sanctuaries- For enforcement purposes pursuant to RCW 70.107.050,-each day, defined as the 24-hour period beginning at.12.01 a-m., in which violation of the noise control regulations (chapter 173-60 WAC) occurs, shall constitute a separate violation. [Order DE 76-5, § 173-60-090, filed,2/5/76; Order 74-32. § 173-60-090, filed 4/22/75, effective 9/1/75.1 WAC 173-60-100 Appeals.-Any person aggrieved by any decision of the department in relation to the en- forcemcut of the maximum permissible noise levels pro- vided for herein,.the granting or denial of a variance or the approval or disapproval of a local resolution or ordi- nance-for noisuabatcment and control may appeal to the pollution control hearings board pursuant to chapter 43- .21 B RCW under the procedures of chapter 371-08 WAC. [Order 74-32. § 173-60-100, filed 4/22/75, ef- fective 9/1/75.1 WAC 173-60-110 Cooperation with local govern_ meat (1) ThcAcpartment conceives the function of noise abatement and-control: to be primarily the role of local government and.intends_actively to encourage local gov- ernmcnt.to adopt. measures.for noise...abatement and control_ Whercwer.such.measures are made.effeetivt,and are being actively enforced, the department does not in- tend to engage directly in enforcement activities_- (2) No ordinance or resolution.of any local-govern- ment which imposes.noise control requirements differing from those,adopted by the department shall.be effective unless and until approved by the director. If approval is denied,the department, following submission of such.lo- cal ordinance or resolution to the department.,shall de- lver its statement or order of denial, designating in detail.the.specire provision(s) found to be objectionable and the precise grounds upon which the denial is based.- and shall_submiZ to the local government. the depart- ment's suggestedmodilication_, r (3) The department shall encourage all local,govern- meats eaforcmg;noise.ordinance& pumuant.to chic chap_ ter to consider~noise-criteria and land use.planning and zoning_ (Statutory Authorit)- Chaptcr-: 70.107 RCW. 87-0"56 (Order 86-40), § 173-60 1 10. filed 3/4/87; [C1173-ii.WAC--p 41 (3/4/87) Chapter 173-58 WAC UREidIENT PROCEDURES SOUND LEVEL NMAS (6) 'Impulse sound' means either a single pressure WAC 173-5&410 (ntroductiom peak or a single burst of multiple pressure peaks which 173-5&420 Defininocu occur for a duration of less than one second as measured 173-5"30 Immwmeant G- on a peak unweighted sound level meter. 173-59-040 Ambit mx"tjOQ1 (7) 'Local government' means county or city govern- 173-5&450 Mom'eq-Pa=t D nL1D°and uta 173-5&.M �pw=t Twanm`BOWIDC went or any combination i the two. 173-58-070 Eunroo�d0m meusnrem�t Vr°Ced"re' (8) 'Noise' means the intensity, duration and char- 173-5"0 Close PO7�"t'C7h"m symm saund i�mmsure- actor of sounds, from any and all sources. awnprociedare._ (9) 'Operator' means any person who is in actual 173-5 -M watff=ft fob kvd mm°remeni procedure. physical or electronic control of a powered watercraft, motor vehicle,aircraft, off highway vehicle, or any'othcr WAC 173-58-010 Introduction. (1) Authority. engine driven vehicle. Statutory authority for the guidance and direction con- (10) 'Person" means any individual, corporation. rained in these procedures is authorized by chapter 70- partnership, association, governmental body, state agency, or other entity whatsoever. 107 RCW, the Noise Control Act of 1974. age11) 'Property means the surveyed line at (2) Purpose. The purpose of these rules is to establish ( boundary' the real ro err standardized procedures for the measurement of sound ground surface, which separates. �op • from levels of sources regulated by the department of ecology, owned. rented, or leased by one or more pe including, but not limited to, environmental noise, wa- that owned-rented. or leased by one or more other per- tercraft, motor racing. vehicles, construction, float sons, and its vertical extension. planes, railroads,and aircraft engine testing. (I".) 'Racing event' means any motor vehicle compe- (3) Personnel. For the purposes of enforcement, per- tition conducted under a permit issued by a governmen- sonnel shall have received training in the use of equip- tal authority having jurisdiction or, if such permit is not went and proper site selection. Certification of required. then under the auspices of a recognized sanc- compctence in the use of the sound level measurement tioning body. ro within procedures established in this chapter shall be provided (13) 'Receiving property" means real property by the department of ecology upon a showing that the which the maximum permissible noise levels spec' ied in enforcement personnel can perform these procedures to WAC 173-60-O W shall not be exceeded from sources the satisfaction-of the-department. Certification is not outside such property intersection of required for enforcement-personnel to use thelin interse a procedures (14) 'Shore e' means the existing permanent, of described in this chapter, however trainingmay givenwater with the ground surface or with any only by persons certified by the department. shore-connected facility. (4) These regulations will be amended as needed to (15) 'Sound level meter' means a device use levelsces and include any new instrumentation, equipment, or prove• tion of deviczs which measures sound p dares which the departme nt shall deem-necessary to ac- conforms to Type 1, Type 2, or Type 3 standards as curately measure sound•leveis for enforcement purposes. �Fication 51.4-1971 the 1.. Anampulse sound-levcl Institute meter (Statutory Authority. Ch4pter 70.107 RCW. 79--04-033 ted sound level meter (Order DE 78-19); § 173-59410, filed 3/22/79.1 shall be a peak or impulse. u . . rp ulse sound in con- which is capable of measuring specifications of formance with the Type I or Type 2 WAC 173-5"20~ Definition. As used in this ANSI S1.4-1971. 16) "watercraft' means any contrivance, excluding ( chapter, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise: being used as a means of (1) 'Background sound level' means the level of all aircraft., used,or capable of sounds in a given-environment, independent of the spe- transportation or recreation on water. A new,watercraft is any watercraft with an internal or external combus- cific source bring measured- (2) 'dBA' mem the sound pressure level-in decibels tion: engine which has. been manufactured after mound-using Decemberthe-'A' weighting network on'a soundDecember31. 1979 and for which the equitable or legal title has neverbema transferred to a person,who, in good level•meter: or engine for (3) 'Department' means the department of ecology. faith, purchases the new watercraft and/ B means-the director of the department purposes-.other-than resale- (Statutory,Authority: Chap- (4) 'Director' of ecology. ter 70.107 RCW. 79-0"33 (Order DE 78-19), § (5) 'EDNA" means the environmental designation for 58420, filed-3/22/79.J noise-abatement, being an area or zone (environment) within which maximum permissible noise-levels are established. JCL 173-58 WAC—r tl (3/22M) 173-58-030 Sound Level Measurement Proced .s WAC 173-58--030 Instrumentation. The following logarithmically subtract the background level from the instrumentation and equipment shall be used for the measured source's sound level. (Statutory Authority: measurement procedures established in this chapter. Chapter 70.107 RCW. 79-04-033 (Order DE 78-19), § (1) Sound level meter. The sound level meter shall 173-58-4040, filed 3/22/79.] meet the Type 1, Type 2, or Type 3 requirements of ANSI S 1.4-1971. The meter weighting and response mode will be set as required in the specific procedure WAC 173-58-050 Measurement equipment pre pa- used. The sound level meter shall be returned to the radon and use. (1) Battery check. A battery check shall manufacturer or a qualified laboratory at least once a be conducted on all instruments before field calibration year; to be calibrated to standards traceable to the Na- and measurement. tional Bureau of Standards. (2) Calibration. Sound level meters shall be field cali- Type 1. Type 2, or Type 3 sound level meters shall be brated (using procedures described in the manufacturer's used for any initial inspection procedures, but only Type instruction manual) at the beginning and.end.of each I or Type 2 sound level meters shall be used for the measurement ri pe od, and at intervals not exceeding two measurement of sound levels for enforcement purposes, hours when the instrument is used for more than a two- (2) Sound:level-calibrator. An acoustically coupled hour period. calibrator shall be ased periodically to assure the accu- (3) Microphone orientation. The microphone shall be racy of the sound level meter and microphone. The tali- oriented with respect to the sound source as described in brator shall be returned to the manufacturer or a the manufacturer's instruction manual. [Statutory Au- qualified laboratory at least once a year to be calibrated thority: Chapter 70.107 RCW. 79-04-033 (Order DE to standards traceable to the National Bureau of 78-19), § 173-58-050, filed 3/22/79.1 Standards. (3) Tachometer.The tachometer shall be either one of two types: electric or vibrating reed. The electric ta- WAC 173-5&460. Equipment, chometer shall be an inductive pickup type for easy at_ rasurem nt sites Due to unavoidable variations in measurement sites and tachmcnt to any spark plug cable, contain its own test instruments, the following allowances-shall be made internal power supply, and shall meet SAE J 197 spccifi- for the respective sound level meters: cations for off road electric tachometers. The vibrating f 1 dBA reed.tachometer shall be designed for use on any inter- for Type 1 sound lever meters nail combustion engine. Calibration accuracy for both t 2 dBA for Type 2 sound level meters types-of tachometers shall be at least f 3 percent of frill This tolerance:value shall be applied,,after all neces- scale reading. All tachometers shall be calibrated at sary calculations have been made, to the.final reported least once a year in accordance with the manufacturer's sound level for the measured sound source.. [Statutory calibration procedures. Authority: Chapter 70.107 RCW. 79-0"33 (Order (4) Windscreen:-A windscreen of open cell foam, DE 78-19), § 173-5"0, filed 3/22/79.]._ cloth, or other acoustically invisible material as shall be provided by the manufacturer, shall be placed over the microphone to protect it from moisture, exhaust gases WAC 173-58-070 EnvieonmeataL noise measure- and wind effects.• meat procedure_ (reserved) [Statutory Authority: Chap- (5) Anemometer: An anemometer shall be used pen- ter 70.107 RCW. 79-0"33 (Order DE 78-19), § 173- odically during measurements to test the wind speed. 58-070, filed 3/22/79.] (Statutory Authority. Chapter 70.107 RCW. 79-04433 (Order DE 78-19). § 173-58-030, filed 3/22/79.1 WAC 173- 58-080 Close: proximity exlatttst. system SOUnd.level measarrmeat.proeedum.This section estab- WAC 173-58-040,. Ambient condldom-The follow- isbm Specific piocedures for the measurement of sound ing ambient conditions shall be observed-during mea- levels from exhaust systems at a distance-of 20 inches surements and shall determine whether testing is to (0.5 meter) from the exhaust outlet. The procedures of occur or not: subsections (3), (4) and (5) of this section shall not be (1) Wind. Sound level measurements.shall not be used for exhaust.systems which utilize:the introduction made when-the wind speed is in excess of of water to the exhaust gas flow for the purpose of muf- (a) 20 mph 32 km/ ) proximity hr for the close test, fling the exhaust noise levels, or systetna,which exhaust WAC 173-8-080; ty the gas flow directly into water. (b) 12 mtplT(19 km/hr) for all other tests. (1) For the purposes.of this section.,!vehicle' means (2) Precipitation..Sound level measurements shall not any motor driven contrivance,used-as a-means of trans- be made mlicn precipitation is falling in such a way as to portation or recreation off of public.highways-_ affect theequipmenr or the measurement readings_ (2) Initial inspection. An initial inspection of the ve- (3) Background,sound level. Sound. lever. measure- hicle exhaust system shalL be coaducted;to determine if mentr3hs.11tnm-be-made-when the difference: bctween- the.following.defecu or modifica dorm cxistc . the background.sound- level and the level of the mea- tea) The-absence of a muffler, sired sound soiree is less. than (0 dBA,- unless; the- (b) The prcumcr,of. a muffler cut-out, bypass, or measurement personnel are technically Qualified, to Similar device:which.is not,standard or.normal equip- ment for the exhaust System.being inspected;. la I73-0 WAC—.p 21 (3/22/79) Sound Leye! Measurement Procedures 173-5g-090 (c) Defects in the exhaust system including, but not that no vibrations from the vehicle shall be transmitted limited to, pinched outlets. and holes or rusted through i° the(4) instrument- Vehi le operation. The vehicle shall be operated as areas of the muffler or pipes: (d) The presence of equipment which will produce ex- follows: cessive or unusual noise from the exhaust system. (a) Controlled ignition vehicles. The engine shall be If the above defects are observed and are a violation operated at a normal operating temperature with trans- of the muffler integrity standards established for the mission in park or neutral. Sound level measurements tg. ype of vehicle which is being inspected, then a citation shall be made at three-fourths (75 percent) of the RPM shall be issued in accordance with the enforcement sec- for athorsepowerles with motorcycle 00 Mg°n�e ter one shall tion of the applicable regulation. An evaluation of the vehicle sound level shall also be be operated at norm operating temperatures with the al made by the enforcement officer, using the human car tra nunshicle ion in neutral.p �there neutral is provided,e -rear the vor as a sensing device the - If the exhaust noise is discernibly louder than the en- grouelsnd, or with thedrive chain centimeters) removed. The gine noise, or if any of the defects or modifications de- gro scribed above exist but are not violations of applicable sound level measurement shall be made with the engine regulations. the enforcement officer shall request the ve- speed stabilized at one of the following values: hicie operator to submit the vehicle to any measurement (i) If the engine data is available, test the vehicle at procedures described in this chapter which are applica- one-half (50 percent) of the RPM for maximum rated ble to the type of vehicle being inspected. If the operator horsepower f 100 RPM. refuses to submit the vehicle to these measurement pro- hi le)�tatachometer showing thehe engine data is not �tnanufacturer se, and if erec- cedures. he shall be in violation of this chapter. (3) Test site and instrumentation set up. The test site the endede maxum percent of the speed e(*Red L RPM,, 100 test and instrumentation shall be set up as follows: (a) The test site shall be a flat, open area free of RPM. large, sound-reflecting surfaces (other than the surface (iii) If the engine data and red line-RPM are not on which the vehicle is resting), such as signboards... . available;:test the vehicle at:. buildings, large docks. hillsides,or other vehicles, located (A) 3500 f 100 RPM for engines with total cylinder within a 16-foot (5-meter) radius of the vehicle being displacement between 0--950 cc (0-58 in.'). tested and the location of the microphone. The vehicle (B) 2800 RPM t- 100 RPM for engines with total shall not be on a hoist, rack, or over a pit. Testing shall cylinder displacement greater than 950 ce shall be o er- not occur within a shop or building. Nobody shall sand (c) Diesel engine vehictingles. Thrattt engine emission in the measurement area, except the observer and the d at or neutral.ira�Sonn level measurements shall be vehicle operator. in (b) The microphone shall be at the same height as the made at the vehicle's maximum governed no--load spa et if possible, but no closer to If the engine is not provided with a governor, the vehicle canter of the exhaust outl any surface than 8 inches (0.2 meter). The microphone- shall be operated in the same manner'as a vehicle with a shall be positioned with its longitudinal axis parallel to controlled ignition. (5) Measurement The exhaust, system sound level the ground. 20 f 1 inches (0.5 meter) from the edge of the exhaust outlet.and 45 f 10 degrees from the axis of shall be measured as .allows: the outlet For exhaust outlets located inboard from the . (a) The sound level meter shall be set for slow re- vehicle body, the microphone shall be located at the spon.fi sound level meter d an the 'A' weightin hall be observed during the e above specified angle and at least 8 inches (0.2 meter)from the nearest part of the vehicle. full cycle of engine acceleration-deceleration. The re- For vehicles provided with exhaust outlets spaced corded sound level-shall be-the highest vat speciobtai ed ed an more than 12 inches (0.3 meta t) apart. measurements the appropriate:- constant engineper' shall be made for each outlet as if it were the only one. subsection (4) of this section. and shall exclude peaks and the highest level shall be recorded. If the exhaust. due to unrelated,ambient noise, engines noise. or extra- outlets are less than twelve inches (0.3 meta) apart, a nexus impulsive--type noise. and.the single measurement shall be made for any one of the ceporteedt least;soun level measurements he��8e-of.he two outlets. which are-within one+ dBA of each For vehicles with a vertical exhaust, the microphone• higher readings: Chapter 70.107 RCW. 79- shall be placed at a height of 48 f 2 inches (1.2 meter). other. [Statntury Authority § 173-58-080, filed Its axis shall be vertical and oriented upwards. It shall. 04-033 (Order DE 79-19), be placed at a distance of 20 t 1 inches (0.5 meter)-- 3/22/79.1 from the side of the vehicle nearest the exhaust outlet. For vehicles with the exhaust system outlet near the WAC 173-5a-090- Watermft sot ad`leM �s"n' engine, the engine hood (if one exists) should be closed. ^pi ecedu -This won establishes spedfic proce- ss much as possible to reduce engine noise. dures for the measurement of watercraft sound,levels. If a measuring-devi= is attached to the exhaust outlet (1) Wtial• inspection-- An initial,inspection may be and the microphone to maintain proper distance, insure made to determine if the watercraft shall be required to ICk6 173-0 wAc--p al (3/22M) 173-58-090 Sound Level Measurement Procedtb..j undergo the pass-by measurement described in subsec- tions (2). (3), and {4) of this section. (c) The sound level. for each side of the watercraft shall be the average of the two highest readings which (a) A Type 3 or better sound level meter shall be used are within 1 dBA of each other, rounded to the nearest to measure the sound level of any watercraft. The mi- 0.5 dBA. The reported sound level shall be that of the crophone shall belocated in a boat or on a dock and no loudest side of the watercraft. closer than 2 feet from any surface of the boat or dock_ (b) The-watercraft shall be measured as it passes at a s (5) New watercraft shall be tested according to the distance not less than SO Ea p t from the microphone. specifications of the SAE J34 measurement procedure. (c) The enforcement-officer shall require the water- (Order DE78 119)t§ 173a-5t8-0901 filed 3 22/79�33 craft operator to submit to a pass-by or exhaust system sound level,measurement-if the initial inspection level is within 2 dBA of, or greater than, the levels established in WAC 173-70-040(3). (2) Test site and insuumentation set-up. The test site and instrumentation-shall be set up as follows: (a) The test site.shall be a calm body of water, large enough to allow=full-speed.pass-bys. The area around the microphone and boat shall be free of large obstruc- tions, other than:the deck.or platform on which the mi- crophone is standing,. such as buildings, boats. hills. large piers, breakwater, etc- for a minimum distance of 100 feet (30 m). Three maskers (buoys or posts) shall be placed in line, 50 feet•(15 m) apart, to mark the course the boat is to follow-while:being tested_ . (b) The sound level meter.shall be a Type 2 or better. The microphone shall be placed 50 feet (15 m) from the line determined by-the threw markers, normal to the line and opposite.the center-marker.:It shall also be placed,, 4--5 feet' (I.2-1S. m) above the water-surface and no Closer than 2.feet (0.6 m) from the surface of the deck or platform on.which the microphone stands, as near to the end of the dock or platform as possible or overhang-, ing the end of the deck or-platfornL (3) Watercraft=operation..The watercraft shall.,pass:; within 1-3 feet.(0.3-0.9 meter) an the far side of all three markcta, on a straight course. (a) Watercraft-which.weigh less than 7,000 lbs. grosq weight s hall,be:operated-according to the following pro-. cedurr. The watercraft shall approach the first marker at idle.- spcc&.:.Wben the bow is even with the first marker, the engine shalL_be immediately accelerated to its full throtdc.-RPM range_The watercraft shall con- tinue to acceicrate.until:its bow passes the third marker. (b) Watcrcrafr•which-.weigh 7,000 lbs.-or more gross:. weight shall be=openucd-.at the midpoint of the manu- facturer's recommended.. maximum continuous.. (or 'cruise'} RPM range.f 100 RPM. The watercraft shall be at this speed whew it passes the first marker, and shall continued to operam at this speed until its.bow pas ses the thud marker. W-Measu��The watercraft sound level shall be: measured-as follows: - (a);The.soundr+leyd meter shall be set.for fast re-, spouse and,on.thc.'.N weighting scale. (b) The meter: shall be•observed during the entire- passby. The applicable reading shall be the-sound level.., obtained as the stern of the watercraft passes the middle. marker. Peaks: due_to unrelated ambient noise; water,- noise-from-wavea•or vrakm propellor cavitation noise, or cxU_a=ur tmpu.lsivo_.type noise-shall be:excluded- At k=-rRo`measurements-shall be made for each side.of the watercraft_All values shall be recorded- ICL 173-0 WAC-p 41 (3/22/79) Chapter 70.107 RCW NOISE CONTROL Sections to the control of noise generated by all such sources of 70.107.010 Purpose. the noise or the products. 70.107.020 Definitions. (2) At anv time after the adoption of maximum noise 70.107.030 Powers and duties of department. 70.107.040 Technical advisory committee. levels under subsection (I) of this section the department 70.107.050 Civil penalties. shall. in consultation with state agencies and local gov- 70.107.060 Other rights.remedies,powers,duties and rune- crnmcnts expressing an interest therein, adopt rules. Lions—Local regulation—Approval— consistent with the Federal- Noise Control Act of 1972 Procedure. (86 Stat. 1234; 42 U.S.C. Sec. 4901-4918 and 49 70.107.070 Rules relating to motor vehicles—Violations— Penalty. U.S.C. Sec. 1431). for noise abatement and control in 70.107.080 Exemptions. the state designed to achieve compliance with the noise 70.107.900 Construction---Severability-1974 ex.s.c 193. level adopted in subsection (1) of this section. including 70.107.910 Short title. reasonable implementation schedules where appropriate. RCW 70.107.010 Purpose.The legislature finds that to insure that the maximum noise levels are not ex- inadequately controlled noise adversely affects the ceeded and that application of the best practicable noise health, safety and welfare of the people, the value of control technology and practice is provided. These rules property, and the quality of the environment. Antinoise may include, but shall not be limited to: measures of the past have not adequately protected (a) Performance standards setting allowable noise against the invasion of these interests by noise. There is limits for the operation of products which produce noise; a need. therefore, for an expansion of efforts state-wide (b) Use standards regulating,as to time and place, the directed toward the abatement and control of noise, operation of individual products which produce noise considering the social and economic impact upon the above specified levels considering frequency spectrum community and the state. The purpose of this chapter is and duration: Provides, The rules shall provide for tem- to provide authority for such an expansion of efforts, porarily exceeding those standards for stated_purposes; supplementing existing programs in the field. [1974 ex.s. and e 183 § 1.1 (c) Public information requirements dealing with dis- closure of levels and characteristics of noisy produced by RCW!70.107.020, Definitions.-As used in this chap- products. _ ter, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise: (3) The department may, as desirable in the-perform- (1) "Department." means the department of ecology. once of its duties under this chapter, conduct surveys, (2) "Director" means director of the department of studies and public education programs, and enter into ecology. contracts. (3) "Local government" means county or city govern- (4) The department is authorized to apply for and ac- mcnt or any combination of the two. cept moneys from the federal government, and other (4) 'Noise' means the intensity, duration and char- sources to assist in the implementation of this chapter. acter of sounds from any and all sources. (5) The legislature recognizes that the-operation of (5) "Person" means any individual, corporation, part- motor vehicles on public highways as defined in:RCW nership, association, governmental body, state, or other 46.09.020 contributes significantly to environmental entity whatsoever. (1974 ex.s. c 183 § 2.] noise levels and directs the department, in exercising the rule-making authority under the provisions.of this scc- RCW­70.107.030� Powers and duties of department. tion, to give first priority to the adoption of motor vehi- The department is empowered as follows: cle noise performance standards. (1) The department_ after consultation with state (6) Noise levels and rules adopted by the=department agencies expressing an interest therein, shall adopt; by pursuant to this chapter shall not be effective prior to rule, maximum noise levels permissible in identified en- March 31, 1975. [1974 cx s.c 183 § 3.1 vironmcnis in order to protect against adverse affects of noise on the health,safety and welfare of the people. the RCW`70.107.040- Technical-advisory committee.The value of property, and the quality of environment: Pro- director shall name a technical advisory committee to vided. That in so doing the department shall take also assist.the department in the implementation of this into account the-economic and practical benefits to be chapter. Committee-members shall be entitled to reim- derived from the use of various products in each such bursement for travel expenses as provided,in.RCW 43- environment, whether the source of the noise or the use .03.050 and 43.03.060. as now existing or hereafter of such products in each environment is permanent or amended.. [1975-'76 2nd cx.s. c 34 § 164;.-1974 cx.s. c temporary in nature. and the state of technology relative 183 1.4.1 (1997 Laws) lCk.70.107RCW=--p 11 70.107.040 Noise Control Effective dale-4everability-1975-"76 2nd ex.s. c .14: 'ice testimony, and oral argument as the hearings board in notes following RCW 2.08.115. its discretion may require. The department dctcrmina- RCW 70.107.050 Civil penalties. (1) Any person tion of whether to grant approval shall depend on the who violates any rule adopted by the department under reasonableness and practicability of compliance. Partic- this chapter shall be subject to a civil penalty not to ex- ular attention shall be given to stationary sources located near jurisdictional boundaries, and temporary noise pro- teed one hundred• dollars imposed by local government doting operations which may operate across one or more pursuant to this section. An action under this section Jurisdictional boundaries. shall not preclude enforcement of any provisions of the local government noise ordinance. (4)- In carrying out the rule-making authority pro- Penalties shall become due and payable thirty days vidcd in this chapter, the department shall follow the From the date of receipt of a notice of penalty unless procedures of the administrative procesdtrre act, chapter within such time said notice is appealed in accordance 34.04 RCW, and shad take care that no rules adopted purport to exercise any powers preempted by the United with the administrative procedures of the local govern- States ment, or if it has no such administrative appeal, to the under federal law. [1987 c 103 § l; L974 aces. c pollution- control hearings board pursuant to the provi- sions of chapter 43.218 RCW and procedural rules RCW 70.107.070 Rules relating to motor vehi- adopted thereunder. In cases in-which appeals are timely cL- y;Wadou*---pe=k,- Any rule adopted under filed, penalties sustained by the local administrative this chapter relating to, the operatioR of motor vehicles agency or the pollution control hearings board- shall be- on public highways shall be administered according to come due and payable on the issuance of said agency or testing and inspection procedures adapted by rule by the board's final order in the appeal. state patrol. Violation of any motor vehicle performance (2) Whenever penalties incurred pursuant to this sec- standard adopted pursuant to this chapter shall be a tion have become due and payable but remain unpaid, misdemeanor, enforced by such authorities-and in such the attorney for the local government may bring an ac- manner as violations of chapter 46.37 RCW. Violations tion in the superior court of the county in which the vio- subject to the provisions of this section shall be exempt lation occurred for recovery of penalties incurred. In all from the provisions of RCW 70.107.050. [1987 c 330 § such actions the procedures and rules of evidence shall 749; 1974 ex.s. c 183 § 7.1 be the same as in any other civil action. [1987 c 103 § 2; 1974 exs. c 183 § 5.] Co.st.*rrief—Aht'�tiaar at r—I�g7 c 330:See noto following RCW 28B.12.050. RCW 70.107.060. -Otber- rights, retwed-res, pourers, RCW 70.107.090 Exengdien& The department duties- all&i ilntetions—Local, reguistion--Ap- shall, in the- exercise of ruke-making power tinder this prow (1) Nothing in this chapter shall chapter, provida exemption'or spatially limited regula- be construed to deny;-abridge 4 or alter alternative rights lion of action or remedies in equity or under common law or lions relating to recreational shooting and emergency or law enforcement equipment where appropriate in the in- statutory law, criminal or civil. tere public safety. (2) Nothing in this chapter shall deny, abridge or al- e ter any powers,: duties and functions relating to noise Thhee department in the development of rules under this abatement and control now or hereafter vested in any chapter, shall consult and take into consideration the state agency, nor shall••the chapter be construed as land use policies and programs of local government. granting jurisdiction- over,the industrial safety and [f974 aces. c 183 § 8.j health of employees-in work places of the state, as now RCW-70.107.900-• Constnecti Hty— or .hereafter vested• in the department of labor and 1974 ex.& c 193. (1) This chapter shall be liberally con- industries- to carry out its broad purposes. (3) Standards and other control measures adopted by (2) If any provision of this chapter, or its application the.department under this chapter shall be exclusive ex- to any person-or circumstance is held invalid, the re- cept as hereinafter provided. A local government may mainder of the chapter,or the application of the provi- impose limits or control sources differing from those sion to other persons or circumstances-is not affected. adopted or controllc&by the department upon a finding [1974'ex.s.c 183 § 11.1 that such requirements are necessitated by special con- ditions. Noise limiting requirements of local government RCW 70,107.910 Sbort-title: This chapter. shall- be which differ from those adopted or controlled by the de- known and may be cited as the "Noise Control Act of partment shall be invalid-unless first approved by the 1974'. [1974 ex.s. c 183 § 12.1 department-. If the department of ecoiogy fails to ap. prove or dhcapprove•standards-submitted-..by kx:tl.gov- ernmental jurisdiction,within ninety days of-submittal.. such standards shall be-deemed approved- If' disap- proved, the local government-may appeal.the-decision to the pollution control hearings board which shall decide the appeal on the basis of the provisions of this chapter, and the applicable regulations. together with such briefs, [Cb:70.107 RCW—y21 (1987 Laws) 1i —21-96 O3 OLPM PPOM PAPTA TPCJ/' 1J,UVT TO 9/136O4H'1'944 PUUlilllc i F A G S I M I L 1Fs. i t 1 TO: Date: To:— Pax ''Ext#: Location: BTLI.EWE Sending From Fax#. Project k (206)453-9470 subject a Comments: e,</" --� LL �N'� C�-•t-� l.�lrfi"I�G.rria arL 7 1L►�7oYr o� f��v�.��ct=ac.r.� �. G+,a eTji /tom 4Tv,)Ai — i;bv.. Rj�/ ��� ��.✓ .�+C ,iL.�'wl/ /7?i,s�/Gt/�,�' GVTT1.l�. �r..—r—' G If vvu dv not icccivc_pages(including cover pa9c), please cat us as soon as possible (206)455-9494. A A T H T ! G N Formerly Barrett Consulting afoul) 1 f' 1 � •.a 1 _ f • �� u r+ 1 �54 � - 1 r.i - —JUN 24 '96 0 pple Builders Int. 18705- 67th Ave. N.E. •AAington, WA 9822 • 658 • FAX: (360) 435-6079 FA CSIMILE TRANSI IISSIOlY CO VER SHEET ,r0 `mac; \\\ nA PAGES (Including Cover Page) TM C- 1. �Q\ c� FROM TO FAX A REPLY,PLEASE DIAL(360)435-6079 6 1 L�� � I -J �Y] - �� 1 ` 1 11 1 , 1 Ir � I � � ►�� � I �� 'y I �� . • _ �I - 1 Toole NOISIA3d i-1V�d #9NIMVdO L9a8-S64 (903) XVd BZL99 VM 'NOIDNIIUV j 46/01/B 'i 0 &L99-96i (903) '3'N '3AV 44L9 039K �' 6%U 119 NM1TD ONI VM 'NOIJNIIaV Slonaodd 1331S I NVId 1VId IOH si:mMd I331S I O H S-T-Zz'J3S .0'00I =.I = 3"IVOS IUAllln'ON1013 0.61 N �i n N ]A d H 1..9 _ - - - - - o .00'00v o r5'n6 _ r--- -- -- -- -- I -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - -- -- -- -- - -- 3AING.0VEP3AW Oil1 o I S30VdS 91- ONINHVd I ---- m l o i 301d30 3mnlnd i I CDI S30VdS 01-MAWI S3JVdS OZ-9WAyd I 1 VI 1 I A I v N - G L009 z 001 I AiIlI0V3 ONwn10V3nNVW 10 H ONIISIX3 g 4 A11�10V3 9Nlanl'JV3nIVVW 10 H M3N I 0 I rn I AVI3AM.9C m I 1 -�I I v o z L� 1 rn�e AVM 30 iH0I2! Ll WilD1S 031V7013i!_ o o .00'0 c OVO�I�Id�J Na-�Hi�JON NOI JNI76ne AVM 30 1HEMS d�Y JUL-GI-2002 N-N, 10:29 FM E_D,F,&C FAX V0, 360 606G P. C1 Wey, 1jd", peiff e, &Weld, RS. Fiunily Iaw Business,Commercial&Corporate Personal Ir> to Real Estato&Land Use Construction Liens Wills,Trusts&Probate Chock out our web site for more on,the services we offer: "-w'snolaw.com July 1,2002 F g/,Kri ti Remle/Paul Richart ingtontle Our File No: 27-179 No. of Pages to Follow: -11- Rard Copy: Retained 1F YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL PAGES,PLEASE PHONE IMMEDIATELY P.O.Box 188 Arlington,Washington 98223 Phone(360)435-2168 FAX(360)435-6060 Copy of proposed ea.Scrt.eilt follows. It is, little different thali standP.;d,which niay be explained by the fact that it's Mitzel getting from Woodland ILidge,but the form is generally acceptable. I have not looked at this legal descriptions. Do you have any comments? PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL This fncsimile message is Attorney;�'ivileFcd and confidential and 1s intended S,Icly forthr us of the individual t,a:ncd sboye, if you arc not the intended rc�ipieji-,or the p6T,=responsible to deliver it to the prubi it d.-Uient, ou aro hereby oclviscd ill-,it ary'ds,:_mination.distntution or copying or this communication i, prohibited. if;ou h.v:rctc ivtd this in error,ple+tke i,nmcdiatciy notify the tender by telephone avid rctum the original fu mesi%Lc to the sender by U.S. ltlaIl. JUL-01-2002 PION 10:29 FN p�P,&0 FAX N0, 360'-&'�5 6060 F. 02 %©6126/2002 12:08 425r*_ _.,206 0EN STEFHVG K� a PACE- 02 �r G O>:N �W5){53-G106 V STEP N S LINGE UP °�"" ex WA N C 11M PA t�4 ; ATTDAti iY5 nT !, n'W 21a1 [l7IH AVZ.N 2,4F,sun't 11Q DEA vtTc,WASH NT'GTDN Pao64"Z lunc 26,2002 Via Facsimile Steven 1. PeiMe City Attorney for City of AtliVon BCey,buskin&Pciffle P.O. Box 'lab Arlington,Wasbington 98223 Eagle Helgbts Plat,City Of ArUngton Sewer FaseTnant oven taAeneaglc to be Dedicated to the City Dear Sava: The Eagle Heights Plat being developed by Dan Nlitzal and Jobn Raby has been required to obtain a sewer eascmctat over the Gad thesewir to er caseme'1t�u proper be dezi �tedt rsassQgned e the to the Clty system. once construe , City. Please find enclosed a draft Sewer Easement Agreement Mth the Glcneagle developer for Your review to ensure that the farm rnc:ts all City requircments. Plcasc contact me if you have auy questiaus. Z appreeiste your prompt review of this casement to keep this proiect on schedule, Sincerely, GROF,N s'fBl.mm &KLm[GE LLP Charles A.Klinge cklin cg'Q ' nliaacorn CAIC;Iv,h Attachment a,�yJCoRlFd41e Itr 16.dec cc; ,Dau Mittel,Ea„lo Heights L.L,C, John Raby and Joanne Pfeil ,JUL-01-2002 MON 10:30 PM B,�D-,,F,&C FAX 10. 360 4L15 606C P. 03 Ob/2h/20a2 12:e9 az54_ ,tab GPOE`I STiPHENS Kl. PAGE 83 Return Address: Dan vi;tzel Ntihei &Associates Burlington.WA —M3 pjea3t rux oetype tararmidoe WASERNGTON STATE RI~.CORDEWS Cover Sheet RC'N 61,a4) Document Tme(s)(or triwao io319 (111 areas applicable to your document "be filled in) 1I rMer t Avrcerne-n_t2. -- 3. 4. — Reference NUmber(s) of Documents assiped or released-, Addidouil refeccac a tl'a on page of document �Tl. t'(9� (1. oodland Ridge,a Joittt Veldt= 2. AdditionAl nRmcl en page—Of docottlattt. Grantee(3) (Last name first,then first name and initials) t.Fagan Heights L.L.C.,a Washington limited liability company Additional natneq on psge._ —of dooumaot. Legal description(abbrev ated: i.c.lot,block,platot scctien,township,rartye) GRANTOR:TRACT H,GI.r-:�AGLE GOLF COURSE,V 61,P 209 GRANTLE,LOT 2 OF CITY OF ARUNOTO`N SHORT PLAT SF*NO.MN-01-058-1"SP,RECORDED UNDER SNaFIO SH COU.\TX AUDITOR'S RECORDNO NO.200111205004. Additional legal is on paPS 7--8 of doe=cnt. Av4essor's Property Tax Parcel/Account Number [XI Assessor Tax#not yet assigned Grantor W8574-001-000-00 For Ckantea Thc AuditWRDCVrL-r will rely an the information providcd do the form. Xbe 613f will not reed 6t cunr'n td VoTify the jccurzcX of co letentss of the index=* information provided leetein, _ Sewer Bason-=#Armemaut Page 1 of 10 JUL-01,-2002 MON 10;31 PM B-`�,F,&0 FFX NO, 360--`5 6060 F. 04 96/26/2Q02 12:89 42G4.._.,2©5 GROEN STEPHENS KL_ PAGE ©1 SEWEREASE1MEI>'T AGRTENIENI' THIS SL-WER E.gSEME\'T AGREEMENT is made by and between Woodland Ridge, a Joint Venture(hereinafter r:ferrcd to as"Woodland Ridge")and Eagle He ton Heights LL,C.,a Wasbing Limited Liability, (hereinafter referred to as"Eagle Heights"). RECITALS A. Woodland Ridge is the owner of certain real property located in the City of Arlington, County of snohomisb,Washington,and legally described on Exhibit"A"attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference- B. Eagle Heights is the owner of certain rral property, adjacent to the Woodland Ridge property, and legally described on Exhibit"$"attached hereto and incorporatod herLin by ibis reference. C. Woodland kidgc; agrtmes to grant Eagle Heights a sewer easement over a portion of its property logalty described and depicted on Exhibit"C", attached hereto and in.co-porated hcrcin by'this reference; subject to t`le tv-Ins and conditions described below. AGREEMENT NOW TnREI^ORE,in and for the mutual covenants set forth in this Agreement,and outer good and valuable consideration,the receipt and sufficiency of which are aclMowledged,Woodland Ridgc and Eagle Heights agree as follows: Z, c,rant of Easement Woodland Ridge hereby grants and conveys to Eagle Heights an casement for sanitary sewer purposcS over,upon, under and through that portion.of Woodland Ridge's property described and depicted on Exhibit C attached. 1be scope of this easement is intended to accommodate all sanitary sewerage ftom the future subdivision and development of the property owncd by Eagle Heights,or sanitary sf. erage from any other source required by the City of Arlington or its suoccssor. 2, Easement io Rna W1th the Lind. The casement and all rights g;aated under this Agre=ent and duties sat tortb in this Agreement shall run with the land,and bind and be obligatory upon, and shill inure to the benefit of the parties to this,Agreemcnt and their respective successors and assigns. Specifically,Woodland Ridge recognizes that Eagle Heights intends to dedicate or otherwise assign the sewer easerent to the City of Arlington. Woodland Ridge agrees to such dedication or assignment,and agrees to execute any documents necessary to accomplish that dedication or assig m.=t Including signing the finial plat document ifrequired, gowcr)Eeacmont Agr44M6nt Page 2 of 10 ,JUL-01-2002 MOti 10:31 FM B-D.,F,&C FP,X 140, 360�-)5 606C F. J5 661�5f2002 12;88 4%5c, _�2a6 GROEN STEPHENS K- a PF,CyE 05 ?, >tililrttenaoce os Eas2men� Fagla heights shO have fne 14"t to enter WOodlind PUge's property for all purposes related to permitting,constnicting,and rnaintainittg the sewer pipes and facilities. Bagle Heights shall have Full responsibility for all costs related to the sewer easement, and shall restora the property after construction or maintenance. Woodland Ridge recognizes that this intent is fOt"he City of Arlington to take over maintenance and shall have these s=e rights and obligations to enter the property for maintenance and to restore the Ito oa necessary, 4. Indemnity. Eagle Heights shall not cause harm to the property(excepting the i-nitallat!.on and maitttetivcc o£the sanitary sewer) and Eagle Heights shall indemnify, defend wid hold harmless from and�gai,nst any and all claims,demands,loss or liability arising out ofBoje lIeights' e^cercisa of the easement rights until such time as the easement area is dodic9cd or otherwise assiSned to the City of.Arlington. S, pj$puje,. In the avent of any controversy,claim,or dispute rolating to this Agreem=t or its breach, the parties agree to cocperatc to resolve the dispute and will participate in mediation.before commencing court action. It is a.g eed that this Aswerrrcat shall be .0,,=04 by,cowtrued, and er'.foreed in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. r 6. Vie, , Any notice provided for or concerning Ws Agreement shall be in writing and be deemed sufficiently given when sent by certifi_d or registered moil if sent to tale address of each party below or such other address provided to the other party, Woodland Ridge,a Joint Venture Attu:George H.Brown.Jr. P,Q,Box 3466 Arlington,WA 98223 Eagle Heights L.L.C. Attu,]fan N itzel 1369 Pacific place Burlington,WA 96233 7. Modlocation of Agreement. Any modification of this Agreement or additional obligation assumed by either party ira connection with this agreement shal!be binding only if evidenced in v z-iting signed by each party oc an autborized Representative of each pay. a, Cou t�ernnrts. This Agr=ert may be executed in counterparts,each of which shall be deemed to be an original but all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument. Sower Pasemeat Agtecmenl Page 9 of 10 ,J'JL-01-2002 MON 10:32 PM F,&r FAX N0, 36q—�?5 606G p 0E 06/26/2002 12:08 425, -6205 GROEH STMENS K� a PAGE 06 EXK03rrS A-C attached to this Agreement are inwrporated herein by this rcr=nce, DNf-W THIS day of .2002 EAGLE HEIGHTS L.L.C.,a WwWngt=limited liability ootnP911y By.Daniel Mitzol,us Managing M mbar WOODLAND RIDOE,a Joint Venture By; ARLINGTON COUNTRY CLUB,D;C,,a'Washington C0*0Tati0n,Partner By George H.Brown,Jr. Its President By', KAJIN fA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION,a 3)eiawarc corporation,?mtner By Ross Adachi Its Project Manager s ower$aFemem Atteomant Page 4 of 10 ,JUL-01-2002 LION 10:32 PM P-`-, FAO FAX NO, 360-95 6060 P, 0 r 06/26/2002 12:08 4254z..0206 (�OEN STEph'�NS KL_..,a FACE 07 STATE Or WASMNG'TON ) )ss. COUNTY Or, � On this day Ixrsonally appe&red before me GEORGE Id.BRO",N,JR.,known to me to be the president of AP11NGTON COUNTRY CLUB,INC,,a Washington corporatior', acting as Farmer of Woodland Ridge,a Joint VePtwa,that executed the within and foregoing irtsuument and acknowledged that instruneent to be the face and oyes the etli mt t ary act and and on oath s staoratted that partner of Woodland Ridge for the use4 and pure they ante authorized to execute said instrtuncnt or' bdhalf of Woodland Ridge. G1VJ✓N UNDER MY SAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL tivs day of 2002. Print Namc: NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington residing in STATE OF }ss. COUNTY OF pa this day personally appeared before me ROSS ADACT-0,known to me to be the Project Manager of the"0A 1) VELOPi\IENT CORPOPATION, a Delaware corporation, acting a*Partner of Woodland Ridge, a Joint Venture, that executed the w.aCt and foregoing a instrument and acknowledged that in=ment to be the free and voluntary ocporation as Partner of woodland Ridge for the uses and purposes therein mentioDed,and kin oath stated that they Were auihori"d to execute said iustmm=t on behalf of woodland Ridge. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL this d4y of 2002. Print Namel NOTARY pUBLIC in and for the State of Washingtonrosiding in ------- Pages of to 5erwnr�asernent A�rormCnt JUL-01-2002 1'10Ii 10: � F,&C FAX N10, 361P- 95 606�; 36 PAGE 06/26/2002 12:08 A25,..--6205 GR'�EN 57EPi NS Its_. G 03 S'fATP,OF WASM40TON ) �s. COUNTY OF ) On this day perso:tally appeared before me D.ANIEL MITZEL,knowst to me to be the xnaraging member of the EAGLE HEIGHTS UL•C., F,Washington limited liability company, that exccut;d the witbin and fcrcgoing instru r Mt and ackno-Medgcd that instrumcnt to be the frce end voluntary act and deod of the limited Iiabiht)•company for the uscs and purposes therein runtioned,and on oath stated that they were authorizmd to execute said instrument on behalf of said Iimitod liability cQnV=Y. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SPAT.tlus day of _2002. Print Name, NOTARY PUBLIC in mid for thb State of Washington reading in My appoinftettt cxpxres• _— Page 6 of 10 sewer pavemcm Agreement .JUL-01-2002 MON 10;34 FM B�F,&0 FAX NO, '60 6 606C F, Og 06/29/2002 12;05 4254�.0206 GROEN STEPWENS PAGE 09 EXHIBIT A LE Al,DESCAIPT `' N DG O TV TRACT H,GLENIEAGLE C.i{)LF COURSE, ACCORDLNG TO THE PLAT TMEWREOF RECORDED UN WER SNOHOMISH COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 96()6145004, RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY,WASHTNGTON, Situate in the County of Snohomish.St&te of Washiugton. Sewer Eaae=W Apecmant Pam 7 of 10 JUL-0,1-2002 1`l0i�l 10 PM '-��F,&C FAR 40. 36P135 6060 P, 10 eS/26/2002 12:0S GPOEN STEPrNS KL- .G PAGE 10 EXHIBIT B LEGAT,DFSCRIPTIOv: EAGLE H 1GHTSP&QEERTY LOT 2 OF CITY OF ARLTNGTON SIFORT PLAT SP NO.MN-01-058-FSP,RECORDED ZJtti'U1 R SNOHOMISH COUNTY AUDITOR'S RLCORDIh'G T0, 200111295004 BEING A PORTION OF THE SOU i F WEST QUARTER OF SECTION 24 TOW NSHB 31 NORTH, RANGE S EAST. Situato in the County of Snohomish,State of Washiugt0n- Sewer Easement Agreement Page 8 of 10 JUL-0]-2002 PION 10�: . i g—'',P,&C FAX N0, 36V1�5 606C F. 11 06/2b/200� 12;0B 4?54u.0205 CRIJEN STEPHENS KL-,,,G PAGE 11 EXHIBIT C F AI D>ESC U W .NTENT A, 15 foot Easement across Tract"IT' in the Plat Of G10"ca6le Golf Course, as recorded under Auditors file no. 9606143004,records of Snohomish County Washington,being in a portion of the Northwest Q=rter Of Section 24 and the Northeast Quota of Section 23, ail in Township 31 North,Range 5 East,W.M.,being 7.50 feet wide on both lidos of the following described actliezl�r>,a: COmmereing st the Souilwest corner of the Northwest Quarto of said Section 24;Thence South 891 06' 43"East along the South line of said Northwest Quarter, a distance of 7.72 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of this centerline description; thence North 2= 16' 54"East 15.25 feet; Thence North 39` 17' 11,,West 40,11 feet;Thence North 51 29, 31"west 61.73 feet; 'Bence North 900 00, 00:' Wost 6.00 feet to the East line of Tract" ' as slwwn on the Plat of Gleneaglc Se,-tor I11 S as recorded under Auditors file no.9711255004,records of Snohomish County Washington and the tenninus of said centerline dmr'iption. The sidobnes of said Basement shall be extended or tried so w to form a continuous line across the grantors ownership. Situate in the County of Snohomish, State of Washington. Sower)Ba9eMill A$re=oMt Psoc 9 of 10 STEPH�NS FAX N0, 36L'K�-• 5 606C P, 12 JLJL-O GP.0�1i 1-2002 MON 10:35 PM P',P,&0 FAW- iz 06125/2082 12t09 42a4`j.,206 [Put diagram 110re] Page 1 of 10 5ewcr aser�ant A gteemcnt BAILEY, DUSKIN, PEIFFLE & CANFIELD A PROFESSIONAL SERVICE CORPORATION ATTORNEYS STEVEN J.PEIFFLE 22422 SR 9 NE PHONE(360)435-2168 Steve@snolaw.com POST OFFICE BOX 188 FAX (360)435-6060 ARLINGTON,WA 98223-0188 July 9, 2002 Cop BAILEY DUSKl/°Ur"�')lrJt t- PEIFF -`��� n L� Mr. Charles A. Klinge �p 8Y°X t!$t�A ElrLO Groen Stephens &Klinge '��ln�son WA i88 2101-1121 Avenue NE, Suite 110 _ (36p�4,'� 2 9822. Bellevue, WA 98004-2944 Re: Raby v. City of Arlington Our File No. 27-179B J U L 10 2002 ; Dear Mr. Klinger - i bs c In response to your letter dated July 2, 2002, I reviewed the Eagle Heights inspection fees which you referenced in your letter. My understanding from talking to the City staff is that your client is being charged a fee of$200 per lot for construction permits and inspection of all improvements x 118 lots for a total of$23,600. In addition,the City charges 2.5% of the engineer's cost estimate for offsite improvements. At present, my under-standing is that the fees for offsite inspection would be not more than$5,000, and probably something less. Your client has made a$2,000 deposit towards consultant fees. I am enclosing for your information copies of the following: City Ordinance No. 1063 dated August 16, 1993,which originally adopted the fees that your client is objecting to; City Ordinance No. 1119 which adopted the City's Unified Development Code (you already have copies of this); and Resolution No. 585. I am also enclosing for your information copies of council minutes from 1993. Also enclosed for your information is a copy of a lengthy memo prepared in March of 1993 regarding the City's then increase in land use application fees,the explanation for derivation of the charges,and the like. These fees have not been changed in the City of Arlington since 1993. No one at the City of Arlington is aware of any documents which are responsive to your request for information about other objections to the fees. I have been the City Attorney since 1988 and am aware of no formal protests ever made concerning these fees. Appeals of decisions of the City regarding fees are presumably governed by the Unified Development Code, Section XII (G). I am enclosing a copy of that section for your information. Mr. Charles Klinge July 9, 2002 Page Two I will be out of my office until July 16. Hopefully, this is responsive to your request. If,however,you require additional information, do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, BAILEY,DUSKIN,PEIFFLE&CANFIELD,P.S. MAILED WITHOUT SIGNATURE TO AVOID DELAY Steven J. Peiffle SJP/pb Encl. cc: Paul Richart, City Engineer(w/o encl.) Cliff Strong, Planning Dept.(w/o Kristin Banfield, City Administrator (w/o encl.) Mike Walter(w/encl.) W a C O F- (1) U cu C 0 M L O fOn LO L _ CL cu ~ C CD cn CC O C C > C ` Q > a 0 cu a Q cu �coO U) L Mn LO a3 (U cn E o o L c cu U) L U p L � _0 a) F- +, C E scn Q) > c +, aci o +, O (nn 3 N m C 0 > o E p Z = cuuoi '� o Z -� N > O L) a) r 3 L O n > m o .S M 3 N > m `° a co c Q- Q c Co 0 3o Y p (n o rn � 0 3 m o c a cn Q > U) m U � c a) w 3 Q o ca i t > w - fn o cu � cn a) N' 42 L d C O O U > U co (n co w >' o ,� > m -0 o O cn a) O o m m :3 O t (n >, c -°a > 'n cu cn c cd oC c6Ln o ° o rn n L E r C 3 U) c rn On _ c N ° p Oi CO ti F- c O Bch c 0) Qo QO n a) ug a CY) d 0 O� CO N I 30 �- > U L� C a) :5 T Q Y 0 ?N! N C O 6 0 (n O (Yp a) a) cn O N v o uo-i E a v � � cC t t U � c umi � '� > E - U m L O +, o c o N N C cu N 2: U C CCL t a) >, N O 0 -0 a4-, 7 E N L Y N L C O L +L. ` C p)F- Q N Q) C O o � E ° vt (n cu O L �' 'ro N 4 C Y 0 O fA O N co (n c0 ° 3 7 c cn 0 > to � E O L 0 04.1 (U a) N co L N +, Y N O cn U (0 (U u>. cn O 0 E �. o a) E a 0) m . O)_ c 00 N L SON U � >O cn ° -O m E � L O ` m 7 c: Q E O a) o r: rn c a) 3 >, 0 � L �° N ° r, c 2 ` _ C F- o Y _ r o m ca c: c cn c c v w ° c o v o 0 o Q H >�w o O a) E 2 L �!, C M (0 C Z' L L `� (n U 4- O C O O O 0 a c0 N Q+� a) Fo c0 'n W O (� N N E >: o m � c) � ..rn a)O' n c ° W O >,3 E o a) N c a) > > N `° � W N >; a) w DI, o a) o c o Q E N .� rn a) a'z F- ca j j E 0 ° � M cn a�'i m gErOoE � �' a) �' m cum aE >' U o }' o � t C 7 c0 7 O a) ;i N C .N a CO Q) C N C O N _ = Y N N ca 7 O x N Y H U o- � io > 1 -v a) a) rn c) rn c o o cn E i C 7 ca .? a) o o m 0 v r c Y m +� o E c c 0 m U o L) °°, v H m a cn � tr cn cn F- Q Z (!) w c) F- cu Mn '� t L N c a c fn coo c) a) Y - O 3 ° Y N o C 0 aC z Y (p m Q 7 Q U in F— ` O (n - > fn 00 a ` a) o i � N H V Vf z a �: Q .? a F- z 0 a ` IL N F- V fn Page 1 of 2 Kris Remle From: Kortum, Sandra [KortumS @ WSDOT.WA.GOV] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 12:47 PM To: 'Neal Moore' Cc: Kristi Remle (E-mail); Chambers, George Subject: RE: Eagle Heights Subdivision, MP 9.7 SR 531 Neal, Please review the Channelization Checklist on the attached web site: http�ww_WSDQT.wa.gov/regions/northwest/snohomish/Developer_Serv_ices/DeveloperServicesHome.htm You (the developer) needs to submit the following to WSDOT for our review and approval: pavement sections channelization plans striping plans traffic control for any work within the state right of way drainage plans and hydraulic report for any property that abuts the state highway TESC (Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control) and SSP (Stormwater Site Plan)for any widening that is being done to SR 531 As I stated in my phone message, the City of Arlington does not have jurisdiction over the pavement section approval for the state highway. That jurisdiction lays with the WSDOT, and we do not approve of Class E ACP for wearing course. Please contact me if you have any further questions. Also, you will need to allow 3-4 weeks for review of the submitted plans. Thank-you, Sandra Kortum (206) 440-4911 WSDOT Northwest Region, Snohomish Area Development Services P.S. Kristi, Please forward this message to the other city officials that need to know this information. Thanks, Sandra -----Original Message----- From: Neal Moore [mailto:neal@sdg-Ilc.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 11:12 AM To: Kortum, Sandra Subject: Eagle Heights Subdivision, MP 9.7 SR 531 Sandra, The city of Arlington commented on the pavement section for the 172ND Street (SR 531) widening. They referenced "Cl. E per WSDOT". I looked in the Design Manual and Standard Specs but did not find much on pavement sections. Could you give me any input on this? Neal Moore, EIT 7/2/02 Page 2 of 2 Sound Development Group (360) 404-2010 Fax (360) 404-2008 7/2/02 JUL-16-2002 TUE 04:43 PM P,&C FAX N0, 36r'-"'b 6060 P. Vo RK BAILEY, DUSKYN & PEIFFLE A PROFES;ZfONAL SLI V CE CORPORATION ATTORNEYS STEVErr 1 PRIFFLE 22422 SR 9 NE (360)431.71(09 8(ryPn@)rmdnw.e0m POST OFFICE:BOX IS FAX060)435-6060 ARLING ON,WA 98223-0188 July 16,2002 To: Cliff Strong and Peel Richart,Planning Department (SO2) Arid To; Teny Castle, Public Works Department (S05) From: Steven J. Peiffle Ike: Itaby/City of Arlington Our Tile#; 27-179B of Pages to Follow:x •--I 1 Hard Copy: Retained It you experiw•mee problems receiving this 'fax, or if you do not receive the number of pages indicated, please call our office at(360)435-2168. P'RiVJLEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL.ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT/ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATIONS This fiwsin,ile message is attorney ttrivileged and confidential ettd is intanded solely for the use of the individual named above. If yvu are not the uttendad recipient,or the person responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient,you arc hereby advised that any dissemination,distribution or copying of this communication i,prohibited. Ifyou have received this fax In er.or,please immediately notify the sender by tolephnne and return the original,`ax message to the sender by U.S.Mail. Message: Letter from Mitzel's attorney follows. Please see the starred language on page 1 of the letter and advise whether Klinge's assertions axe correct. With the exception of chan64ng the term "sewer easdlrment"in paragraph 2 to"storm drainage easelnent".I have no objections to the form of the easement. Let mo know your tboughts w,d concenas. Faxed By Dato Time JUL-16-2002 TUE 04:44 PM r P,&0 FAX N0, 36r 5 6060 P, 02/12 07116I2002 15:02 4254526209 GROEN STEPHENS KL.Ir4d PACE 91 453-6206 5���&K1,1NQF 1� A.*.� �, n T? O It E Y 5 A T L A w MAtdA M' HlD.� omf (4x5)453.6224 z101 112TH AvDM M,SUrrK 110 WLEv«,WAstt OTON 9M,2944 FAC.SDU LE FAX. RECEIVED July 16,2002 JUL 16 2002 TO: Steven 1,1'cit le. Ci 304ti'{Until,pelt�"orttd ty Attomey fos City of Ailing) FAX No.: (360)435-6060 FROM€ CWes A.Klinge SUBJECT: Eagle Mcights Plat—Easements and Inspection Fees TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER.. _ L Original sent via U.S.Mail Yea No Commcnti Please see attached feLter daU d,uly ) ,2002 and attar ent. PLEASE NOTIFY US IMIMWDFATELY FF YOU DO NOT RRCEOT R1WTa W 7l'B,A,NSMLSSION. THE INFORMATION CONTAMD IN TPiIS FAX MAY EE PWILIGED ANWOR COWDRWTIAL INFORMATrON I14TRNDED ONLY r0,1k THE USE Ott'T IIVDrjTWAL OR$1V1M NAMED: IP'THE RENDER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTUNDEA RECIPIENT, YOU ARE FM1RXXY NQOTWMD THAT ANY DrSSEMINATION. DISTRIBUTION, OR COPYING OF TES FAX IS SYY'RICTZ,Y P1;toMR1TED. tF YOU HAVE RECEW9 D THB FAX IN ERROR,PLEASE NOTIFY US BY pRONgE AND RETURN THE 01UG1NAI,Mj rSSAGE TO US VIA U.S.POSTAL SERVICE. '!'HANK YOU, JUL-16-2002 TUE 04:44 PM ' P,&0 FAX N0, 361 `5 6060 R 03/12 07/16/2002 M 02 4254526206 GROEN STEPHENS KANO PAGE 02 S%PHENs KLINGE IEP CHARM A.XU"I A T T o ai N a 7 9 T L A W bIANA M,ILIft"WA( FAt93MM (4%5;453 621g 2101 112TtH AVttIIA NE,StM 110 �.u'A�'1-@tG7C7;-1981N142444 July 16,2002 via x'adRIMile Steven I Peiffle City Attorney for City of Arlln&)a . Bailey,Duskin&PeifFle P,O.Box 188 Arlington,Washington 98223 RE: Eagle Heights flat Easementtt and bspectioxt)Files Dear Mr.Peifli]e: Tlrrluk you again for responding and approving our form far a sewer eascm.ent. We also arc obtaining a Storm Drainage Easement over die Casperson property for dw Flagle Heights Plat. I used similar language, but l would prefaz to give you an opportunity to review that easeme.nr ass well to emUrc that we have no probim s in the futiuc. Please find a draft Ca4person Storm Train age Easement attached For your review and appmvgd, With respect to insl)cction fees, tbank you for clarifying-that the$20U per lot fee covers constructioli perm its and inspection of all improvements. Apparently there was some confusion on the part of my clients in their conversation with City staff as to the whether the charge of 2.5% of,improvements applied to all improvements of just off-silo improvements, We appreciate Your clarification tfiet the 2,5%applies only to off-site impmvemetats in tho City right-of-way. My client's understanding after talking to staff'is that off-she improvements Would include only wor a in the 172"d Street right-of-way, and not include the entrancc road being constructed from 172 Street to the ltornes since that land is privately owned by Eagle Hcfghts as an easement, PK With these uriderstzndings,my client, bave no objection to the fees and withdraw our protest. You should be w are that staff member Terry Castle approved preliminary drawuags with a standard eight inch water l.irae. However, City staff subsequently requested oversi;dng of the ivateT line from eight inch to thvelve inch to accommodate the comzncscial property southeast of the Eagle Heights FL-A. The twelve-inch line is not necessary for the Eagle Heights Plat. Phase explain the procedure for obtaining reimbursement from the City for the additional cost of the water line, The Washington Supreme Court decisions last%felt in Benchmark and Isla Verde make it clear that the City is responsible for paying for this type of.improvement that is not JUL-16-2002 TUE 04:46 PM r P,&0 FAX N0, 36r,-,�5 6060 P. 04/12 e7f16/2082 15:02 4254526206 GROEN STMENS K6-ika PAGE 62 Steven J.Peiftle City'AttOtriey fot City of Arlington July 16,2002 Paget GROEN STEPHENS & KLINGE LLP "reasonably necessary As a direct result of the pz+oposed development."RCW 82.02 020, My clients recognize that the City wants the larger water line installed and that it should be done now, My client is willing to acoommodate the City's request,but the City needs t&o responsibility for the additional cost. 1 took forwwd to your review of tho easement sod your response on the reimbursement issue. Thank you. si><accrely, GROEN STEPHENS&KLINGE LLP Charles A.Klh)p �tlinge _,GSKonline.cona CAK:loh Attachment RAby(coryfieng ltr 17.dac cc: Dan Mittel,Nagle Heights L..L,C, John Raby JUL-16-2002 TUE 04,45 PM P,&0 FAX N0, 36 35 6060 P. 05/12 07J16J2802 15;02 4254F262Q6 GMEN STEPHENS KLING PAGE 04 ., Retort~Address;%: Dan Mit wl - Mitml&Alssoeign 1369 Pacific Place Burlington.WA 98233 Flotw print or type iutorwetIch WASHINGTON STATE RECORDER'S Cover Sheet (ACw as,o4? Aoeumeut T t e(s)(or trattsactimi contained therein):(au%areas 8001imble TO your document vald 6o Oled En) 1. Storm Dralntup Easa rent Agreement -2. 3. 4, Reference Number(s)of Doatrments a$$igned or relicased: Additional reference O's on page of document Grantor($) (Last netne,Brat name,initials) 1,Cmmredrt.Kenneth 2.Ca8par3orL Ar�,estc Additional names on page of document. Grantees) (Last nama first,than first n me and initials) i,Eagle•THeighta L.L.C._ ,a Washington limited liabliiliW E2!n Y a. _.-- A,ddltiaral names on page_... ofdoalarnent. Legal description(abbreviated: i.e.lot,block,plat or sectlon,townships range) GRANTOP-1 SEC 24 TWP 31 RGE 05 R7.'-12-)BFQr SW COX SEC TH N$60 n TH R 610 FT TH S 060 FT Tif W TO Pba GRAN7i M LOT 2 OF CITY OF ARLINGTON SHORT PLATS?NO,MN-01-058-FSP,RECORDED iTNi�8R SNOHOMISH COtn4Ty ALJDITOX'S RECQRTAINQ NO.20011129S004. A(lditienal legal is on p$gea SW6 of doeumeat. Assessors Property Tax PareeVAccount Number [X] Assessor Tax#not yet assigned antor:3.10524-003.004-00_ Por Grantee 71io Auditor/Recorder will rely oe the information provided an a foam. Tho etnff wi11 not read the document to Voft die accuracy or completer cm of tlje indexing information provided herein.. I ant requesting an crnergenoy nonstandard recording for ari addiHan®l foe as provided mi CW 36.18.010. 1 understatd that the recording processing requirements may cover up or atherwlse bbsoure some put of the text of the original document. Signature of Requesting Party Storm DMInAga E040ment Page i of a JUL-16-2002 TUE 04:46 PM " P,&C FAX N0, 36 15 6060 P. 06/12 07/16/2002 15:02 4254526205 GROEN STEPHENS KLINa PAGE M STORM DRAINAGX EA,SIEMENT AG.REErdFNT THIS EASEMENT ACrREEMEN1"is made by and betweeQ Kenneth Casperson Find.Vlene Casperson,husband and wife(hereinafter referred io as"Casperson"I and Eagle liciglsts L.L,C„ A Washington Limited Liability,(hereinafter referred to as"Eagle if %gltta"), RECITALS A. Casperson is oNvncr of certain real property located at 9419 172"d Street NE,Arlington Washington 98223, and legally described on Exhibit"A"attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. aB. Eagle Heights is the awrior of car'tWA vacant real property legally described on Exhibit "B"attached hereto and hicorporated herein by this reference, C, C2Spersoa agadds to grant Eagle Heights a storm drainage eas4errent over a portion of their property as depicted on Exhibit"C"attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. NOW TFIEREFORE,TN AND FOR MUTUAL COVENANTS I3MIN AND OTHER GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION WMCH HAS BEEN ACKNOWLPMGED AND RECEIVED,THE PARTIES AGRE$AS FOLLOWS: AGREEMENT 1. Grant of E:asem mt, Casperson hereby grants and corav'eys to EaSig Heights an easement for storm drai.-zagc purposes over,upon,under and through that portion of Casperson's property depicted on Fxlubit C attached. The scope of this easement is intended to accommodate all storm drainage from the future subdivision and development of the property owned by FAgle Heights. a. Easetanftt to Run With the Land. The casement and all rights garnted under this Agreement=d duties se►forth in this Agreement shall run with the land,and bind and be obligatory upon,and shall blurt to the benefit of the parties to this Agmemont and their respective successors and assigns. Specifcaily,Ca9perscn recognizes that Eagle Heights , intends to dedicate or otherwise assign the scwej eaSernent to the City of Arlington. Caspersorr agrees to auch dedication or ass gment,and agrees to execute any documents necessary to accomplish that dedication or assignment including signing the final plat document,if required, 3, Maintenance of Easetment, Eagle H6ghts stall have the right to enter Casperson's property fiir all purposes related to peTmitting.constnr,cting, and maintaining the storm drainage outfall from the Eaglc Heights property, Eagle Heights shall have full Storm,DrainAge F'tisetnanr Page 2 tit a JUL-116-2002 TUE 04:47 PM ,P,&C FAX N0, 36, 35 6060 P. 07/12 07116/2002 Z5:02 4254526206 6ROEN STEPHENS KLING PAGE 06 r awla, responsibility for all costs related to the storm drainage outfall, Casperson recognizes that the intent is for the City of Arlltagton to take over maintenance and shall have these same rights and obligations to enter the property for maintenance and to restore tho site as necessary, 4. Indemnity. Eagle Heights shall not cause harm to the Casperson property beyond flowage of additional storm water and Eagle Heights shall indemnify, defend and hold Casperson harrAless from,and against any and all clauus,demands, loss or liability arising out of Eagle hcights' exercise of the easement rights until suede tune as the easement is dedicated or otherwise assigned to the City of Arlington. 5. bss utca. In the event of any coutrovcrsy,claim,or dispute relating to Us Agmment or its breach, the pti ties agree to cooperate to resolve the dispute and will participate la medLation before commencing court action. It is agreed that this Agreement shall be governed by,construed,and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. 6. tiottces, Any notice provided for Of cencerning this Ayovmcnt shall be in writing and be deemed sufficiently given when seat by certified or registered mail if sent to the addrms of each party below: KOnndffi and Arlene CoAperson 9419 1721d Street ATUngtan,WA 98233 Eagle Heigbts L.L.C. Attn:Dan Mitzel 1369 Pacific Place Burlington,WA 98233 7. Modification,_of Aarrcment. Any modification of this Agreement or additional obligation assumed by either party In corinection wit).Us AgsEsment shall be binding only if evidenced in writing signed by each party or an authorized representative of cacIl pay. DATED IRIS__day of 2002 Kenneth Casperson V Arlene Casperscm, EAGLE HEIM'S L.L.C.,a WMbingtata limilted liability company Hy:Di_t el Mitzel,Its Mftagiq Member Storm Or+sinage Emement Page 3 of 9 JUL-16-2002 TUE 04:47 FN " FX FAX N0, 3V F 6060 P. 08/12 07/16/2002 15t02 4254526206 GRQEH STEPWENS KLING PAGE 07 STATE OF WASMNGTON ) )ss. COUNTY OF ) On this day personally appeared before me KEIv'NiaTH CASPERSON AND A1¢LENE CASPERSON to mo known to be the individuals described in and who execrated,five within,and fatrcgoing Instrument;*his and her free and voluntary act and deed,for the uses and purposes tharcin mentioned, 2002. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL this -day of Print Name: _ NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington residing in STATE OF WASIFIINGTON ) )ss. COMTY OF ) On this day personally appeared before the X7ALlIEL MITZi L.,knolmi to me to be the Manapiog Member of the L'AGLE HEIGHTS L.L.C.,a'Washington limited liability company, ihat executed the NAithin and foregoing instrwnent and acknowledged that instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of the limited liability company for the u9es and purposes therein rnentio=4, and on oath stated that they were auhorized to execute said instrument on behalf of said limite+d'iabilhy eornpany. 2002, GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL this day of Pei at Name: NOTARY PUBLIC in and For the State of Washington residing in My appointment expires: atoms Drainage Lamment Page 4 of 8 JUL-16-2002 TUE 04;48 PM ,P,&C FAX NO, 3� 35 6060 P. 09/12 GROEN STEPHENS KLINS PAGE 08 07J16J2902 15;02 4�5452E�206 EXJBI`P A LECAI.DESCRI[P'�YON: CASPER40IV 1PROFJ�$-T Being a pordon of the 9outhwcst Quarter of 8 C010n 24,Township 31 North,RAUF 5 East,WA dzscribed as folio'A's; l3oginning at the Soulinvest comer of the Southwest Quarter of Said Section 24: Thence North 2° 16' O8" )✓ast along the West line thereof a distance of 860.00 feet,Thencc South 99° 15' 10" East 630.00 feet; Thence South 21 t6' 08"West 860.00 feet to the South line of said Southwcst Quarter,;Whence Notch 89° 15' 10" 'west 630.00 feet to the Point of Beginning; Fxcept Road Right-of-Way along South find thereof, Situate in County of Snehowisb,State of Washington. Swrwn DTalrnaga E-aaament Page 5 of S JUL-16-2002 TUE 04:48 FM( ~JAC FAX NO. 3 5 6060 P, 10/12 EPHEN$ KLIM PAGE 0° 07/1Ef2002 15:82 4254526206 GROEN STf.�, EXIMIT 0 LEG AII SCRIP'1TON: LE E ET Is F Ty LOT 2 OF CITY or ARLINGTON SHORT PLAT SP NO.MN-0I-058-FSP,RECORDED UNDER SNOHOMISH COUNTY AUDITOR'S RECORDING NQ 200111295C04 MNO A PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 24 TOWNSHIP 31 NORTH, RANGE 5 WT. Situate In the Couaty of 5nohom46h,State of WasWngtan. Storm Dminage Sascmwt Page 6 of a FAX NO. 3E 35 6060 F. 1111 JUL-16-2002 TUE 04:49 PM �P,&C PAGE 1a GRl7EN STE]PHEWS KLING 0711512002 IS:e2 4254526206 r EXHIBIT C LEGAL HESCWTION:STORM DRAINAGE EASEMZ NT T11at portion of the Southwest Quarter of Section 24,TowrtsUP 31 North,Rarsge 5 East WM described m follows: Commencing at the Southwest comes of said Southwest Quarter of Section 24; Thence North 2` 16' 33"East along the West line thereof, a distance of 960.00 feet to the Southwest corner of Lot 2 of the city of Arlington's Short Plat No.N1,i-OI-058-FSP recorded under Auditors'MI-No, 200111295004 and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNTNG;Thence South 2' 16' 33"'Nest along the Test line of said Southwest Quarter a distance of 11,67 fc,et more or less to a point on the left bank of an existing cmzlc and a point hereinafter referred to as Point"A".11'Emce returning to the true point of begianing and heading So•,,zth 89' 15' 29"East along the South line of the aforesaid Lot 2 a distance of 79.06 feet; Thence South 21°0` 06"East 43.06 feet,'Thence South 68' 56' 54"Wcst 54.20 feet,more or less to the left bank of the aforesaid creek,Thence the foLowing courses along said left batik,North 2'37' 39"West 42.27 feet; Thence North 72' 14' 27"West 30.99 feet to the afore mentioned Point"A"and the end of this desctiiPtion Situate ill the County of 5nohotmigh,State of Rrmbinpn. storm Drainage 6asoment Page 7 of 8 JUL-16-2002 TUE 04:50 PM ,P,&C FAX M. 3E 35 6060 P 12/12 07/16/2002 15:02 42545262El6 GROEN STEPFFNS KLING PAGE I I]RAINAGE EASWEN`C I'O"ON 0 I SW 1/4 OF SECTION 24, T.31 N., R.5 E. WW , I 23 1 \ � 1 I � I PLAT OF EAGLE HEIGHTS DETENTION POND I I R I EASEMENT AREA ot PROPOSED CASPERSON PLAT � 1 ° Sound Development GrouP G. SURV"NG & LAM OE'VFLWIENT S MMCES Sga10 1" 50 ft 71SURY.DRU 5-27—D� DJA Stood rftkago Easement Page 8 of I 07f18f2602 1E:13 425452r206 GROEN STEPHENS 1�-�Nu taut °1 tom+M.caoeN �I.�rllor>b -GRGEN l,=j&=M,sr� UNS (4z5)4-U-6zo6 �TEPHENS&KLINGE UP A.1 �E nuw+M. 1 ((425)453.6224 ATS0ANET8 AT LAW 2t01 112TFI AV"uvUE NE,SUITE 110 BELLEVUE,WASrENUMN 98OC4-2944 FACSIMILE July 18,2002 TO: Krigti Retake,City of Arlington Planting Dept.,(360)435-3906 AND TO: Janice R.Larlge, SuohoUush County Assessor's Office,(360)388-3961 FROM: Charles A.Kim Boundary Line Adjustment Correction Recording 09901.210286 �J EC'x'. Casp=son,'Zalliadnik TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER: 7 Original sent via U.S.Mail Yes ❑ No 7, r�ominenta: Please seeett lcr ate Ju y 18, 2002 arld 1 asperson form ralnagc asement Agreement. PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ENTIRE TRANSMISSION. THE I-,TORMATION CONTAINED IN THJS FAX MAY BE PRIN'H.EGED AINDlOR CONFIDENTIAL WFORMATION INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE MTIVIDUAL OR ENTITY NAMED. IF THE RLAAER OF THIS MESSAGE I5 NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY" NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSE-NUNAT'ION, DISTRIBUTION, OR COPYING OF THIS FAX IS STRICTLY PROWBITED. OR7G[?`AL MIrSSAGIv TO US THIS FAX 5 POSTAL RNCE.ETHANIC YOU. PT�IOi"lF.AND 4711812002 15:13 42E452�,266 GRUEN STEPHENS KING r-Mar- "` �� ,o ,GRoEN rumaAn04, , h M.srn�+et� f�}�1453,62d6 TEPHENS&KLINGE UP A. �rivor: FAcsn S JC n�ANA M.Pl�HHSThA (425)5)453a5224 1� n TToANtys AT LAW riot 1.tt-rzi AVEPM NE.SUM [ro BELIEVLJF,WMV49 oN 9W,Z944 July 18,2002 Via Facsimile and. U.S. Mail Kristi.Rem14, Associate Planner Janice R.Lange Department of Planning and Contrtunity hand Segregation.Technician Development Snohornish County Assessor's Office City of Arlington NUS 4510 238 N. Olympic,A,venuE 3000 Rockefeller Avenue Arlington,Washington 98223 Everett,Washington 98201-4046 Re: Boundary Line Adjw.9twcut Correction Recording 0"0121.0286 Casperson/Zahradnik Dear Ms. Remle and Ms.Lange: This letter responds to Ms. Lange's letter dated March 27,2002, indicatiug errors Ln the Boundary Line Adjustment between Mr. and 1vIrs. Casperson and Ms. Zahradnik. The BLA is numbered 81-83 and recorded in 1999 under recording number 9901210286. Subsequently, a Quit Claim Deed was recorded to transfer the conveyance parcel under rxording nu:-nber 200112030309, My client Lagle Heights L.L.C.purchased Lot 2 of the Short Plat from AIs. Zahradnik- and is responsible for facilitating this correction(City of�V- lington SP No. Mn-01- 058-fsp, recording no. 200111295004). Ms. Zahradnik's attorney Tom 14ausen at Oseran Hahn Spring 8 Watts P.S., (425)455-3900, is responsible for correcting the legal description on the Short Plat. With respect to the Boundary Line Adjustment,wee propose re-recording the Boundary Lino Adjustment with proper legal descriptions for the conveyance parcel and the Wv parcels. A rz-- recerd to correct the legal descriptions seems very appropriate here since the diagram was clear and the legal descriptions are being changed to supply clarify the obvious intent of the parties. 1 have not had the opportunity to ask the Caspersons if they I;,ave dle original document,-which would be preferred,but a certified copy can be utitizcd. Please find enclosed a proposed connected Boundary Lino Adjustment fOr re-recording with revised legal descriptions by our surveyor Dennis Albright at Sound Development Group L.L.C.,(360) 404-2010. Nit. Albright also talked to the County (I thigh:it was Tonv Peacock in PDS) and conf1rmed that this is really the City's issue; but that PDS would be happy to assist in the review. 07l1B12002 16:13 42545i 2@6 GROEN STEPHE14S NG PA6E Kristi Remle Janice R-Lange July ].S,2a02 Paget GROEN STEPHENS & KLIrrt=,.r; LLP Plecse review the proposed solution and contact me with any questions or concerts. If this approach is acceptable,we can move forward to have Mr. Casperson execute an afl`Idavit and excise tax exemption to re-record the deco. As you: -t see below.', I am copying the Caspersons aLnd Ms. ZahradnW s attorney to enstur--they are aware of this process. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Sincerely, GROEN 5 TEPfIENS &KLINGE LLP Charles A.Klinge ckl ingeA,GSKouline.c om CAK,:Ich Enclosure cc: Cagle Heights L.L.C. Attn:Dan.Mitzel and John Raby Kermeth and Arlene Casp'z5on Tom Hanson,Oseran Hahn Spring&Watts P.S. Attorney for tv,;lyn Zahradnik and Evelyn Zahradnik Family United Partners Steven J.PeifFle Attorney.for City of Arlington Demis Albright, Sound Development Group L.L.C. PU Poirier,Chicago Title 07/18/2002 16:13 425452�i766 GROEN 5TEPHENS KLING PAGE 04 �r's t3ate: tort Ot um�nt fir "Iva Fir FQ�� Return Name and Address. Rr l i nrq o i j.L�-V\- s p0004 9&c o:sg 0 Fleaze riot cx UWorrr4bort i Qm 7 s t, Ca an a Document Titles) r---! I C4 3. 4. Grantors) CT� 2. CM 3, 4. [:1 Additional nernW on page of d=rront. Grantee(s) i-Ke n n e*K CaZPcv-5.'r,,- 2. 3. 4. Additional names on page �of docurnernt. Legal-description(abbreviated: i.e. lot,block, plat OR Section, township. range, gtt.igtr_) $C.�.pitf . o�.vn5h%� A(Jdi?ti nai leggl is on a Qf�oGumvnt Reference Numbor(s);Auditor pile Numbers) of tyOcuments aSsigntd or released: I~ /A Additional numbers on p8ge of dpcument. Assessor s Property Tax count Number -°1.3 dD 5 - -e,e�4 -eece p,oper�f'Tax ParCei io is not yet aesignedof document parcel nu�nDers on page The AucitorlRecorder will rely on the intemation provided on the form. The staff will not reaC Ina document to venfv the accuracv or comOletsngss of the inctexina inforrnation 07118r 2D02 16; 13 42545^5�06 GRDEN STEPHENS KL Tt4G PAGE 05 STANDARD q a? •3 XVJ ttrtN' T W- :Al:1 I NG BrILI MAkY LINE ADJUSTMENT DATF; 3• I_ 4� $$ATV OW WASIMI TON) NO: NNoOOMS10 Received by: --riGwd073i13p , - d IkR3y34p� Alfred aftd €vrl TahTe]drtik -0 � 1 fiSS: 9 t - I72nd Street N.C. Name of Fir$t Farty: yn_ A ington. WA 982�3 ((�� -}}Tr.lephone Ntr: EMI `, N1u1i2ao c-10 oDd Parry: Aenneth and Arlene Cos-"r"n It};}S 9 19 - 172nd Street N.E_ Telephone No: 13SS1A0 i:A\;; A iieoton, VA 50223 +•Z Q RRo2LrS tern lbflfbrrs Of M& Zone: RC -- --------t?m'ND¢nt-PSiw_�Dutltrr. eL1�11 ----------a__----------- 1 , ['t1,`1, nt n.,.tu'rr.1,Y1". Tlo- tlndi-i-migric-d tlrte Lhr, rt3Mjx1lLlve [►Wnerti of Lhi: P„11.'uidl, ,1,;,t rlltrtl 11111't`1'IN III' 1lhir�lll•1+1+(j I"lilt It]'uJll'i'ty lytlll, nel•i.t 1', nt r11 c';1 f'1t [tl Ifr•r7 (0 ) Fi t-SL Var-Ly (Seller); lh-ginn7nq At the Southeast corner of the Southw.tst one-quarter w of the seeth%ast one-quartsr 0.) of Section 84, ToMflhip 31 North, Range S East, M-N,; ,m;n North 1220 feats thiniVihi# 11Y4-rPet td Z St sec ion vne; :.nonce South 430.0 ert; thenca _n:i 630.4 feet; thence Savtn 834 feet', throtrgt 6170.D fact of Ql�oint nF bagnnn+De: LESS;tat■ Road i-A._S1tuAje.In the County of Snohomish. Slate or Washinqton. I I l ul 1 ng ;IIIlIMIC 111ILLLr.l y +� iAcraCe or `y� byq+.r1' 1'r.�-L- I ls) st',-ttntt Party tMirchaser): 11"Unigg nt the SvuthwesIt torner of Saction 24. Toship 31 North. Range S ebsit. N.N.; thence North 9.3D.0 Feet; tArnce last b3n,D fort; then wn ce South 830 fcet•i t!i';rrc irsi—Eo LTia ptiini"Aibeginhi.q. _a 1 01 11 51t„ate to tnn County Snohomish,Ssetc of Washington. 1'I6117:1 iLttl jn;t Lhi'r:rslmuL[;ly J.t twrew ❑r squara" fecL_ ---------------------------------------------------------------- 2. The undersigned are considering the transfer „1' ,tivi, -rni,ip I.r t,irt• rn1 low Inrt portion of tho aiovr. d[Iticrtbecl I ir•ItiL l,a rl v', a+:nt•r-:!tilt Lu the Liocond ?arty; Bcin.azpartion Oflhe 3euthNcst Quarternf Sc--t-.on 24, ,roImhip 31 North,F.:vigc 5 Ea r,W.M.dtscrbod os follows:Commencing I the Sptthaest mmcr of the Snvihn'Ctl Qurtrie-of SSid 5eetion 24•Thence North r.6'08"Fwt alnng the West line-zhmof n dbu-ncc of 830.00 feet to the Northwest Corner of-the Caspcmon parcel and tttc TRUE Pbl;<T OF BEGINNING;Thcncc South 89'13'llr•FIST along said Cwpereon Para,630AD feet to me Northeast corny of t6d peoccl;Thence Notch 2'16'08"Ext 50,00 Md;Thcm Norris 89'15'10"West 630,00 feet to the '`Vest line of said SouthwcV.Qtuulcr,Thc=Scath 2`16'08"West along said line,30,00 fed fn t w TRUE POINT OF BF-GINTVNG.Situtty in Crxtnly of SnOrm01,St,ic of Washington. constituting approximately .44 acres or._18.900 square feet_ I r1• 1 t-1. r I,.,, 1 t I I t11 I ,gmv.41N vonnittoLoly. I mum apay.e lu roqulrv;3, :rII:II•h i.xII':I 11mKote 9 6` x 14". MA,r; ALLaah IL Map druivn Itr :.,•:elr• ,rr a vurrent k%sessor'S Map sltowlng both part'.y'> Ile'„ta.rl v ano indicating existins and proporod lines; Rend ue:f.•; nnel le,aull i.em anrne. I'1.ANNINC DVArLTMf'NT DL•TTRYINATICu 11.i l he• boAir Of Oug representations hereby submitted, 7 conclude•. I ISnt t.:iv IrI•+t;tisse l e'.nnvu`yttncc (would) (wa0d. not_). ctonatit+uate a boundary 1 11tr t'xttmpL From shnrt p13L requiremtnts ,by Suction 20.12.020(4) of 1111• .`inuhetcnir,h County ;iltrlrt SLbditr 131on Code - itlr_ 20. N:unr Date ' API-11t1AVIT I t,l' .'. (IntlI DI ft. A0 cv ,,r vo AL fr 1 IJ GJ Sj 10 07/18/2002 16: 13 4254526620E GROEN STEPHENS 15L TjNG PAGE 06 3. Mottndary Moe Adjustment, it YS the intent of the undersigned that the prcpoged oehveyance would constitute a boundary line adjustment uxompt from the subdivision laws of Snohomish County by virtue o4 Snohomish County Short Subdivision Code Title 28—Sbction 2o.12.0ao(4). Accordingly, it is represented and understood by the undersigned that: (a) The proposed conveyance would not affect access to the above parcels; (b} Na new lot would be created by the proposed Con,veyaoee, but rather the conveyed property together with the second party's existing ownership, described on the precedieg page Would Cdit&titut;e a single lot and ba described now ae tol,lows; Being a portion of the Southwest QurulCr of Section 24,Township 31 North,Range 5 East,WM,dcscxibed as follows:Beginning at the.Southwest rornct of the S3Ud1V-C8t Quarter of&+ d Seclion 24;Thence'North 2"16'08"Last aion,g the West:ino thereof a disttnce of 86C.00 Pact:Thence South 9491,5' 10"Enst 630.00 fax;Thence South 2"16' 03"WCS1 KW.0()feet to the South lire of said Snuth-,rest Quarter;Thence North 8T 15,10"West 630.00 feet to the 1•IMAI of Scginn.ing;Exccp;Road Right-of--Way tJong South lint thereof. Sitttafe in County o,f,Snohomish,Stetc of Washington, (e) The, first party's ownership after the proposed conveyance would not be reduced is .size below the MI"Imuta square footage required by the ;applicable xooine control and would be described as follows: RcinF portion of ilre Sotnhw;st Quanar of Secticm 24,Township a 1 `ortlt,Ranf: ergerihad;i;follows:B34innipg x the Southeaa comer of suid Southwost Quarter; i.i Thence nrtl;1320 fact:The,t c tt`cst 1320 ftet to the%Vot lino of said Soudl wed Quarwr,Thtnoc Sznuth 190 fact;Thatee E.1at 630 fce,;Thence South M feet Thence F.,rR 69.0 fctt to rho Point of RcFinnirtp;F-Ixocpt Steto Robd l-A;Fa;ca7t thin portion of said Southksst Qusner described Ns fciiow5:11cginning ar tar Snuthw�*t comor of the Soup�thwest Quartcr of Said Saction 24:Thence North 2°16'08"B*4 along the W4*t lint thcraof a di3tunce of E60.00 feet:Thence South 896 15'i 0"FAltt G30-0 feet;Theme cot1Jt 2`16'08•'West 860.00 feet to the Soudh line of Said Southwest Quener•Thence Noah 99.1 S•1iT'West 690.00 fact to the Point of BegimLig Situatt m CoLrtty of Snnhomtsti,Statc of Wactirglon. Pi rst Party' { szgnattee uate Alfred and Evelyn 2ahrodnik Typed or Printed SU1sSCRr13Et1 anct, 611b$N to before pre this �� day of H�9� NOTARY P`JELI5: t� v the State af. a residloW at A ++ Y j4pe t?rr•�rnt4 J•'arly: � 1 r, of �: Si{;raturc r yna Krnrtgt'h and Arltrtt CAWrlon Typed or Printed SUASCRIBL—D and SWORN to before me this 3�•- day of t It 1st /r- 'p�9r�1HS(., -� Y n •�p,aa It the Stets c.f 47 ;b residing at��'� tr`.J In p�:• gib�u+il�;,t•' . ArrAUAVIT f of 2 07/18/2002 15: 13 42545?1�0E GRUEN 5TEPHEN5 PAGE 07 - + .rn. Ad 'AUG 9 t9g3 `r c+11Sti h ° �oMUrvf7YrEt�PJa�z AI ` aNag•OG"Gib"IY 2�Go.s9• A161 .I a o h �k '4 •�' n U h p, Edl�Gb G so 4 nI a �o I Sd f3?4 CID ' T6 44 6! 00 Gamic mts, NlJ9'/4'�+T"fV 4,9/¢' f.,�D�/yl�cl�"YlJryE d�tras7.4tsyr D 0 12 1028 14-07-200 1 :Al PM AND S i EPHr7VS I 42SLS36224 , � ( RoE.N aura M,M10a s (425)453-6206 STEPI FENS KLINGE UP Cwulyj A.KLZNGE rACWJLI A T T o R N H Y S A T LAW w (425)45-1 6224 2101 112TS AVe4M NE,SUrM 110 BELLEVUE WASH]II*rCN 98004.2044 FACSMLE September 7,2000 TO: Cliff Strong/Kristi RerWe,City of Arlington Planning Dept. FAX NUMBER: (360) 435-3906 FROM. Charles A.K.linge SUBJECT, Zahradnik Plat MJ-98-0026-LP TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER: 2 Original sent via U.S- Mail Yes No Comments: Please see lert.Ar dated September 7, 2000. I I I ` I PLEASE NOTIFY US LMMEDIATELY IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ENTIRE TRANSMISSION, THE INFORMATION CONTAINED Lti THIS FAX N1AY BE PRIVILEGED ANN'D/OR CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY NAMED. IF TffE READER OF THIS MESSAGE iS NOT THE UNTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEWNI ATION, DISTRIBUTION. OR COPYING OF THIS FAX IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU RAVE RECEIVED THIS FAX IN ERROR,PLEASE NOTIFY US BY PHONE AND RETURN THE ORIGINAL MESSAGE TO US VIA U.S.POSTAI.SERVICE. THANK YOU, g-J�7-200 1 .42PM FRCt! -DEN .AND STEPHENS 1 d25d53622d P. 2 GROFN (423)453-5206 STEP_HENS&KLTNGE LLP a'"'�'""a°CS MCSDAU (425)453-6224 ATTORNEYS A7 LAV 2101 JIM AVFNVE NE, "UM 110 BELLF&T,WASF-RZMN 96004.2944 September 7,2000 Via Facsimile and U.S. Mail Cliff Strong,Planning Manager L-L)� SE UKrisd Rcmle,Associate PlannerDepamnent of Plannin a�u3 Community Development — J 2000City of Arlington 238 I\. Olympic Avenue Arlinngton,Washington 9822.3 RLIrV TON Re: Zahradnik Preliimiunry Plat MJ-9"26-L p Dear Mr. Strong and Ms.Remle. I want to clarify a couple issues for the record on the above preliminary plat application. Tk:e preliminary plat shows an emergency vehicle access tract with crash gate to SR 9. The precise location is shown on page 2 of 13 off of plat road 2 between proposed not s ob e ts 112 and 113. This the need access was shown at the request of the City. As you know,the app J r for any emergency access since a divided boulevard configuraticu is proposed for road lA to meet the City's two access requirement However, if the emergency access requirement is upheld,t}:e applicant wants to clarify two points. First, as you noted in our telephone conversation the other day and in the new staff' report,the emergency access to SR 9 is only one of many possible emergency access routes. For example,the three road ends to the west and south pro-lde opportunities for emergency access. Second,the emergency access mad would only be necessary until the roads opened to the future plats to the west and south. The applicant wants to clarify that the emel`„eney access should not be a separate tract and should be proposed as an easement which would revert to the adjacent properties once the access was closed. ThW&you for adding this letter to the application file. Sincerely, GROEN STEPHENS&KLINGE LLP Charles A.Klinge cc: John Baby 9-�-07-200 1 :41PM F", GROEN AND STEPHENS 14254536224: P. 1 s pm M.OILM MEMONE RoEN ''(( RKMARO K MIRE I.S (425)453 6206 STF-PHF-Ns( KLINGE l,.l p CKARLg A. KUNGE W,9 uluz ATTORNBY3 Al LAW (4Z5)453.6224 2101 112TH AVEMM N$SUrM 110 RBU.EVUE.WASKD40TON 9900h-2044 FACSIMILE September 7,2000 TO: Cliff Strong/Kristi Remle,City of Arlington Planninb Dept. FAX NUMBER: (360)435-3906 FROM: Charles A.Klinge SUBJECT: Zahradnik Plat MJ-98-0026-LP TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER: 2 Original sent via U.S. Mail Yes No Comments: Please see letter dated September 7, 2000. f i I PLEASE NOTIFY US lMNXDIATELY IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ENTIRE TRANSMISSION. THE INFORMATION CONTAINED Lti THIS FAX MA'Y PRIVILEGED A\'DOOR CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION INTENDED ONLY FOR THF,USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY NAMLD. IF TI E READER; Of THIS MESSAGE iS .NOT THE ''WEN'DED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE tMREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEWNATION, DI5TRIBUTTON, OR COPYING OF TFILS FAX IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. TF VOL HAVE RECEIVED THTS FAX IN ERROR,PLEASE NOTIFY US BY PHONE AND RETURN THE ORIGINAL MESSAGE TO US VIA U.S.POST.A,L SERVICE. THANK YOU. 9-07-200 1 :42PM FRCK4,GROEN AND STEPHENS 14264636224 P. 2 GGROEN Aw U.am ��zsrxor�a Y S PHEN S&KLINGE 1.1 P C: 'A. c42L 453.6Zo6 A r r o A N F r s A " L A V �(425j 453.6224 2101 112TH AVEM N9,VJM 110 BEU E`✓UE,WASMiG ON 960D+-2%4 September 7,2000 Via Facsimile and U.S. Mail Cliff Strong,Planning Manager Kristi Remle,Associate Planner r y C Department of Planning and Community Development City of Arlington SEP l 238 N. Olympic Avenue z000 Arlington, Washington 99223 CITY 0,C A Re: Zahradnilr Preliminary Plat MJ-98-0026-LP Sear Mr. Strong and Ms.Remle. I want to clarify a couple issues for the record on the above preliminary plat application. The prelivainary plat shows an emergency vehicle access tract with crash gate to 5R 9. The precise location is shown on page 2 of 13 off of plat road 2 between proposed lots 112 and 113. This access was shown at the request of the City. As you know,the applicant is objecting to the need for any emergency access since a divided boulevard configuration is proposed for road 1A to meet the City's two access requirement However, if the emergency access requirement is upheld,the applicant wants to clarify two points. First,as you doted in our telephone conversation the other day and in the new staff report, the emergency access to SR 9 is only one of man} possible emergency access routes. For example, the three road ends to the west and south provide opportunities for emergency access.. Second,the emergency access road would only be necessary,until the roads opened to the future plats to the west and south. The applicant Nvants to clarify that the emergency access should not be a separate tract and should be proposed as an easement which would revert to.the adjacent properties once the access was closed. Thank you for adding this letter to the application file. Sincerely, GROEN STEPHENS&KLINGE LLP Charles A. K]inge cc: John Raby JOHN M.GROEN TELEPHONE C`j S RICHARD M. STEPHENS (425) 453-6206 GROEN _KLINGE LLP CHARLES AGE FACSIMILE S SGRoEN TEPE (425) 453-6224 ATTORNEYS AT L A W 2101 112TH AVENUE NE,SUITE 110 BEUEVUE,WASHNGTON 98004-2944 September 7,2000 Via Facsimile and U.S. Mail Cliff Strong,Planning Manager Kristi Remle, Associate Planner Development Department of Planning and Community p City of Arlington 238 N. Olympic Avenue Arlington, Washington 98223 Re: Zahradnik Preliminary Plat MJ-98-0026-LP Dear Mr. Strong and Ms. Remle: I want to clarify a couple issues for the record on the above preliminary plat application. The ess tract preliminary plat shows an emergency vehicle acc witho crash gate to SR 9.posed lots 112 and 113 pThise location is shown on page 2 of 13 off of plat road 2 between ou know,the applicant is objecting to the need access was shown at the request of the City. As y oration is proposed for road lA to for any emergency access since.a divided boulevard configuration P P meet the City's two access requirement. However, if the emergency access requirement is upheld,the applicant wants to clarify two points. First,as you noted in our telephone conversation moss ble emergencyccess roe other day and in the new utes. For p one of many p report,the emergencyaccess to SR 9 is only example,the three road ends to the west and south provide or for emergency access. Second, the emergency access road would only be necessary until the roads opened to the future plats to the west and south. The applicant wants to clarify that the emergency access should not be a separate tract and should be proposed as an easement which would revert to the adjacent properties once the access was closed. Thank you for adding this letter to the application file. Sincerely, GROEN STEPHENS &KLINGE LLP Charles A.Klinge Rab �J cc: John y SEP 8 2000 CITY (fir ran,l_��,.':, '.-;N FG-Sl GROEN joHNRICH M. M.ST TELEPHONE tuc[�ARD M.sTEPIIENs (425) 453-6206 STEPHENS&KLINGE LLP CHARLES A.KLINGE FACSIMILE ATTORNEYS AT LAW (425)453-6224 2101 112TH AVENUE NE, SUITE 110 BELLEVUE,WASHAIGTON 98004-2944 September 7, 2000 Via Facsimile and U.S. Mail ��II Cliff Strong, Planning Manager �� It Kristi Remle, Associate Planner 4� Department of Planning and Community Development City of Arlington 23 8 N. Olympic Avenue` 1 Arlington,Washington 98223 Re: Zahradnik Preliminary Plat MJ-98-0026-LP Dear Mr. Strong and Ms. Remle: I want to clarify a couple issues for the record on the above preliminary plat application. The preliminary plat shows an emergency vehicle access tract with crash gate to SR 9. The precise location is shown on page 2 of 13 off of plat road 2 between proposed lots 112 and 113. This access was shown at the request of the City. As you know,the applicant is objecting to the need for any emergency access since a divided boulevard configuration is proposed for road 1 A to meet the City's two access requirement. However, if the emergency access requirement is upheld,the applicant wants to clarify two points. First, as you noted in our telephone conversation the other day and in the new staff report, the emergency access to SR 9 is only one of many possible emergency access routes. For example,the three road ends to the west and south provide opportunities for emergency access. Second,the emergency access road would only be necessary until the roads opened to the future plats to the west and south. The applicant-%vants to clarify that the emergency access should not be a separate tract and should be proposed as an easement which would revert to the adjacent properties once the access was closed. Thank you for adding this letter to the application file. Sincerely, GROEN STEPHENS &KLINGE LLP Charles A. Klinge ; cc: John Raby 1 ' SEP 8 2000 11 i 8-24-200 6:02PM FRaW-,-gROEN AND STEPHENS 14264636224 P. 1 s R, NSA IN cr a�'M 4s3.6zo� ST ICE KL GE t, p A. �,��,�,E A T 1 0 1 1: fi Y S AT _L A V (425)453,6224 2101 1IrM AVENUE NE.SUrM 110 )BEUXVLM WA6 M49TON W04-2944 FACSIMILE August 24,2000 TO: Cliff`Strong/Kristi Remle,City of Arlington Planning Dept FAX NCJMER: (360)435-3906 FROM: Charles A.Klinge SUBJECT: Zabodnik flat W-98-0026-LP TOTAL NYJl1"IBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER: 3 Original sent via U.S.Mail Yes ❑ No Comments: Please see letter date August 24,2000. l I PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ENTIRE TRANSMISSION. THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN TIIIS FAX MAY BE PRIVILEGED A 4DIOR CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF TIME MIVIDUAL OR ENTITY NAMED. IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE.HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR COPYING OF THIS FAX IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF'YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS FAX IN ERROR,.PLEASE NOTIF"X US BY PHONE AND RETURN THE ORIGINAL MESSAGE TO US VIA U.S.POSTAL SERVICE. THANK YOU. F'D t- WED AUG 2 5 2000 CITY OFARLINGTON 8-24-200 5:03PM FROI� 7,ROEN AND STEPHENS 1 4254536224 P. 2 V70701 �7 dEN , (` `5)453-6M STEPHENS&KLINGE LLP CHAKE FACM U ATTORNETS A Y L A W (425)453.4224 2101 112TH AVFNM NE,SUM 110 BMIZVUE,WASHZr=N 98004�2044 August 24,2000 Via Facsimile and U..S, Mail Cliff Strong,planning Manager Knish Remle,Associate Planner Department of planning and Community Development City of Arlington 238 N. Olympic Avenue Arlington,Washington 98223 Re: Zahradnik PreliiminM Plat 1VMJ-9"025-LP Dear lklr. Strong and Ms. Remle: As you know, this firm represents the applicant,John.C.Raby&Associates,for the above referenced plat. The purpose of this letter is to oat]i ae in writing,the points we made at the hearing before the Planning Commission held August 15d'and to assist you in preparing for the continued hearing set for September 7,2000. Land-scape Tract. Condition No, 13, requires the landscape strip. The applicant does not object to the landscape strip requirement, but the applicant does object to putting the strip in a separate tract and excluding the area from density calculations. 1 located nothing in the code indicating the need for a separate tract. Also, the code defines lot area to mean the area within lot lines (UDC, page 1V-29) so a landscape buffer or easement would not be excluded from that definition. Thus, the applicant objects to the second sentence in Condition No. 13_ Access. The applicant proposes to construct a boulevard access to 172"d Street NE with two �� $T lanes divided by a median.. The applicant contends that the boulevard complies with the two eel access requirement for plats of 25 lots or more(UDC Section IX.A.I.c(19),page IX-4). This configuration meets the intent of the code which is to provide a second access in case one access �'�� a e•►,�i is blocked. Therefore, we do not believe Condition No. 14 is necessary. The applicant fully /ssupports providing emergency access to SR 9,but if W 5Dd'r decides not to grant the emergency access, the entire plat should be allowed to go forward with just the boulevard. Vesting of City Impact Pees. As you know, state law provides that preliminary plat applications shall be reviewed under the subdivision, zoning or other land use control ordinances in etfbct on the lewd at the time a fully completed application is received R.CW 58.1 T033. The City determined that the application was complete April 21, 1999. The applicant's position is f 8-24-200 5-03PM FRaO-GROEN AND STEPHENS 14254536224 P. 3 Cliff Strong,Planning Manager Kristi Remle, Staff Planner Department of PIanning and Community Development August 24,2000 page? OROEN STEPHENS & KLINGF- LLP that the preliminary plat is subject to the impact fee amounts in effect when the application was complete. You represented that the school fee was already $2,000 per house at that time,and based on that we have no objection, However, the park fee appears to have been$100 per house— at I 1 that time rather than:$1000 per house. Also,the City did not adopt its traffic mitigation fee vn-p4cy f'z ordinance until the October 18, 1999, so that fee should not be imposed (Ord.No. 1209). The /.opo applicant recognizes that the City's position rs that impact fees do not vet pursuant to Nei q`-e,{.� Castle Im,estments v. City of La Center,98 Wn. App_ 224 (1999). Thy applicant raises this point `7 c � to preserve an objection to the City's position. However. it should be noted that tho New Castle case involved only traffic irnpact f6c s and not park fees which are imposed as a part of the Unified Development Code and for the purpose of"controlling the use wad development of property"(Ordinance No. 1223), i.e. a land use control subject to vesting tinder RCW 58.17,033, See also Ord.No. 1208 (same). Finally,the applicant does not waive any rights granted by statute or ordinance to seek adjustments or appeal at the time of payment. Interlocal Agreement Fees. The Interlocal Agreement specifically applied to plats with complete applications after September 1999 so the Interlocal Agreement fees do not apply to this plat. Therefore, SEPA Condition No. Lb.really should be removed although the applicant's position is that the Agreement can be complied with by paying no fee. It should also be noted that this condition(SEPA Condition No. 1_b.)along with SEPA Condition No.2 noted in the staff report were not part of the MDNS and should not be added at this time. Timing of Impacts Fees, Condition No. 8 states that mitigation fees shall be paid at the tune of feral plat approval, and SEPA Condition No. 2 states that school fees shall be paid prior to recordation of final plat. UDC Section XI.B.6. states that park fees shall be paid at the time of issuance of building pennits. UDC Section X1.A.3.h. allows a plat to avoid the need to pay school fees at recordation by placing a covenant on the face of the plat. These clarifications should be made to Condition No. 8 and SEPA Condition No. 2, I believe this summarizes the points raised by the applicant at the hearing. Thank you for careful consideration of this matter and please contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, GROEN STEPHENS&KLINGE LLP Charles A. Klinge cc, John Raby 4. GROEN M.JOHN GROEN TELEPHONE S A. �,EENS (425) 453-6206 STEPHENS&KLINGE LLP CHARM A T T O R N E Y S A T L A\V FACSIMILE (425) 453-6224 2101 112TH AVENUE NE,SUITE 110 BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON 98004-2944 1.1 l August 24, 2000 j� !S AUG 2 8 2000 Via Facsimile and U.S. Mail ITY QFRLINTON Cliff Strong, Planning Manager Kristi Remle, Associate Planner Department of Planning and Community Development City of Arlington 238 N. Olympic Avenue Arlington, Washington 98223 Re: Zahradnik Preliminary Plat MJ-98-0026-LP Dear Mr. Strong and Ms. Remle: As you know, this firm represents the applicant, John C. Raby &Associates, for the above referenced plat. The purpose of this letter is to outline in writing the points we made at the hearing before the Planning Commission held August 15t'and to assist you in preparing for the continued hearing set for September 7, 2000. Landscape Tract. Condition No. 13 requires the landscape strip. The applicant does not object to the landscape strip requirement, but the applicant does object to putting the strip in a separate tract and excluding the area from density calculations. I located nothing in the code indicating the need for a separate tract. Also, the code defines lot area to mean the area within lot lines (UDC,page IV-29) so a landscape buffer or easement would not be excluded from that definition. Thus,the applicant objects to the second sentence in Condition No. 13. Access. The applicant proposes to construct a boulevard access to 172nd Street NE with two lanes divided by a median. The applicant contends that the boulevard complies with the two access requirement for plats of 25 lots or more(UDC Section IX.A.Lc(19),page IX-4). This configuration meets the intent of the code which is to provide a second access in case one access is blocked. Therefore, we do not believe Condition No. 14 is necessary. The applicant fully supports providing emergency access to SR 9, but if WSDOT decides not to grant the emergency access, the entire plat should be allowed to go forward with just the boulevard. Vesting of City Impact Fees. As you know, state law provides that preliminary plat applications shall be reviewed under the subdivision, zoning or other land use control ordinances in effect on the land at the time a fully completed application is received. RCW 58.17.033. The City determined that the application was complete April 21, 1999. The applicant's position is Cliff Strong, Planning Manager Kristi Remle, Staff Planner Department of Planning and Community Development August 24, 2000 Page GROEN STEPHENS & KLINGE LLP that the preliminary plat is subject to the impact fee amounts in effect when the application was complete. You represented that the school fee was already $2,000 per house at that time, and based on that we have no objection. However,the park fee appears to have been$100 per house at that time rather than$1000 per house. Also,the City did not adopt its traffic mitigation fee ordinance until the October 18, 1999, so that fee should not be imposed(Ord.No. 1208). The applicant recognizes that the City's position is that impact fees do not vest pursuant to New Castle Investments v. City of La Center, 98 Wn. App. 224 (1999). The applicant raises this point to preserve an objection to the City's position. However, it should be noted that the New Castle case involved only traffic impact fees and not park fees which are imposed as a part of the Unified Development Code and for the purpose of"controlling the use and development of property" (Ordinance No. 1223), i.e. a land use control subject to vesting under RCW 58.17.033. See also Ord.No. 1208 (same). Finally,the applicant does not waive any rights granted by statute or ordinance to seek adjustments or appeal at the time of payment. Interlocal Agreement Fees. The Interlocal Agreement specifically applied to plats with complete applications after September 1999 so the Interlocal Agreement fees do not apply to this plat. Therefore, SEPA Condition No. Lb. really should be removed although the applicant's position is that the Agreement can be complied with by paying no fee. It should also be noted that this condition(SEPA Condition No. Lb.) along with SEPA Condition No. 2 noted in the staff report were not part of the MDNS and should not be added at this time. Timing of Impacts Fees. Condition No. 8 states that mitigation fees shall be paid at the time of final plat approval, and SEPA Condition No. 2 states that school fees shall be paid prior to ' recordation of final plat. UDC Section XI.B.6. states that park fees shall be paid at the time of issuance of building permits. UDC Section XI.A.3.h. allows a plat to avoid the need to pay ` school fees at recordation by placing a covenant on the face of the plat. These clarifications should be made to Condition No. 8 and SEPA Condition No. 2. I believe this summarizes the points raised by the applicant at the hearing. Thank you for careful consideration of this matter and please contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, GROEN STEPHENS &KLINGE LLP Charles A. Klinge cc: John Raby AUG-14-00 09 :26 AM SLUEPfiIN7 CO 360 428 3622 P. 01 The Blueprint Company 909 Riverside Drive Mount Vemon,WA 98273 360.428-5655 Fax: 360.428.3622 faxt r a n s m i t t a l to: fax: from: The Bluepritlt Cat PtV date: re: pages: i1160ding Coicr Shcct. Tr;�nstnittcd no Bhicprint Compaii3. AUG-14-00 09 :26 AM T115 BLUEPRINT CO 360 428 3622 P. 02 r 1== John C. Raby & Assoc., Inc. Mr. Cliff Strong Planning Manage-r; City of Arlington Department of Planning & Development 238 North OlympiC Avenue Arlington, WA 98223 Subject; Staff Report for !Manning commission Request for Preliminary Plat Approval Zahradnik Subdivision Dear Cliff; For the Zahradnik Subdivision file record, please note that I disagree with the staff on the ,following point. ITEM IV. BACKGROUND, where it states that "Due to disputes between the property owner etc . . . . . . . . . . the proposed plat ! was on hold until June 19,2000" . I I contend. that "most" of the delays the project experienced were either d-Lrectly or indirectly caused by The City of Arlington. Sincerely, John C. Raby P.E. i I l i 1 E P.O.Box 505,53 North Clark sL • Republic,WA 99166 • (509)775-2552 office + (509)486-0195 Hm •(509)669-5591 Mobile Washington State Northwest Regiorgnohomish Area 15700 Dayton Avenue North Department of Transportation P.O. Box 330310 Sid Morrison Seattle,WA 98133-9710 Secretary of Transportation (206)440-4000 August 7, 2000 Mr. Cliff Strong Planning Manager; City of Arlington _ Department of Planning& Community Development 238 North Olympic Avenue L5 U Arlington, WA 98223 In FJAWUG 9 20 Subject: SR 531 + 9.74 Vic. CS 3129 Crash Gate Access from SR 9 CITY OF A R LI N GTO N Zahradnik Plat City File No.: MJ-98-026-1p Dear Mr. Strong: The applicant seeks approval to develop a 111-lot subdivision for single family homes. The location of this proposed development is north of SR 531 and west or SR 9. This letter being provided per the conversation today between Ms. Kristi Remle and Ms. Sandra Kortum about the crash gate access to SR 9. SR 9 is a Class 1 controlled access highway from SR 96 (Lowell-Larimer Road)to SR 530 (Division Street). Any break in the controlled access Either will have to be approved by the City of Arlington or the developer e Access Management Team at the Olympia Service Center. may apply for the access to SR 9. The appl and theyon d be submittedwill forward t tot e Access Management o Snohomish Area Developer Services for review of completeness Team. However, a letter giving the justification for a break in the controlled access will need to accompany the application in addition to the standard documentation. Enclosed is an instruction sheet for applying for an access permit. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact Mr. Ramin Pazooki (206) 440-4916 or Ms. Sandra Kortum(206) 440-4911 of my Developer Services section. Sincerely, Klara A. Fabry,P.E. Snohomish Area Administrator KAF:shk �'`��l\ Enclosure: I SR 531 MP 9 74 doc cc: File WSDOT Northwest Region Telephone No. (206) 440-491 Developer Services, MS-221 15700 Dayton Ave. N. P.O. Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 Reg uirements and Procedures for an Access Connection Permit to the State Hi hwa • You are required by RCW 47.50 Laws of Washington State, pmplement this po aproved permit loY to constructing an access connection to a State Highway. WAC 468-51 and 468 52 consist of Applications may be obtained at the address listed above. Submitted applications on as outlined -- the backt the • s de of the completed application form, a site plan, additional informa application form, and the appropriate fee. In addition to the information as required on the application and its reverse side,please indicate if there • are any contiguous parcels under the same ownership. Be sure to mark your proposed access connection location(flagging, would stake, .helpful. The e. In addition to marking the location,photographs submitted with the application ess connection application will be field reviewed. of A performance bond or an assignment of escrow is required on llf escrow will be sent wi minimum the u,000 as ed a starting base. The form for obtaining a bond or an assignment permits for signature. The amount of bond will be noted in the provisions of the permit. Permits must be signed and returned within 30 days or a second review and fee may be required. When the Grantee receives a signed permit, the Grantee will be required to contact the local WSDOT Maintenance office to establish a time for a pre-construction conference. Work on onfe enc on the eroach may not be started until the Grantee receives a signed permit and has p Construction must begin within 90 days of the effective date of the Ift.is necessary, anwritten request to shall be completed within 120 days_of the issuance of the permit. f an extension the Region office must be made or your permit may be nullified. When the access is complete,the Grantee must request a final inspection from the local WSDOT Maintenance office. If the access meets all requirements of the t permit, he then released.ocallf theSD aOccess is not Maintenance office will send a letter to the Region office to have installed correctly or is not totally completed as required,then the bond will not be released. The Grantee is responsible for the construction, operation, and maintenance the of the access of the owner and Any future patching(pot holes), or drainage problems (culverts) must be taken care of by the owner. -Continued On Reverse Side- The following is for information- purposes. The state has implemented a- access control classification r system consisting of five classes. (This access control classification system does not include highways or portions thereof that have been established as limited access highways pursuant to chapter 47.52 RCW.) The classes are arranged from the most restrictive, class one to the least restrictive, class five. The following is a brief outline/summary of these classes for private direct access : (Refer to WAC 468-52 for actual classification details.) Class 1 Access shall not be permitted except when the property has no other reasonable access to the general street system. • Access connection shall continue until such time that other reasonable access to the general street system becomes available and is permitted. • The minimum distance to another public or private connection shall be 1,320 feet. • No more than one connection shall be provided to an individual parcel or to contiguous parcels under the same ownership. • No additional access connections to the state highway shall be provided for newly created parcel_s resulting from property divisions. All access for such parcels shall be provided by internal road networks. Class 2 • Access shall not be permitted except when the property has no other reasonable access to the general street system. • Access connection shall continue until such time that other reasonable access to the general street system becomes available and is permitted. • The minimum distance to another public or private connection shall be 660 feet.* • No more than one connection shall be provided to an individual parcel or to contiguous parcels under the same ownership. • No additional access connections to the state highway shall be provided for newly created parcels resulting from property divisions. All access for such parcels shall be provided by internal road networks. Class 3 • The minimum distance to another public or private connection shall be 330 feet.* • No more than one connection shall be provided to an individual parcel or to contiguous parcels under the same ownership. Class 4 • The minimum distance to another public or private connection shall be 250 feet.* • No more than one connection shall be provided to an individual parcel or to contiguous parcels under the same ownership. Class 5 • The minimum distance to another public or private connection shall be 125 feet.* • No more than one connection shall be provided to an individual parcel or to contiguous parcels under the same ownership. (*A non-conforming connection permit may be issued for parcels whose conditions my preclude issuance of a conforming permit.) i Northwest Region Washington State Snohomish Area 15700 Dayton Avenue North �, Department of Transportation P.O. Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 FACS MI COI(ER SHEET To: Kristi Remle Company: City of Arlington Phone: (360) 403-3435 Fax: (360) 435-3906 From: Sandra Kortum Company: WSDOT—Snohomish Area Developer Services Phone: (206)440-491 1 Fax: (206)440-4806 Date: August 7, 2000 Pages including this cover page: 4 Comments: Kristi, I address the letter to Cliff since it is `signed' by my Area Administrator, Sandee AW Northwest Region rWashington State Snohomish Area Department of Transportation 15700 Dayton Avenue North AfP.O. Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 FACSIMIL COVER SIM" To: Kristi Remle Company: City of Arlington Phone: (360) 403-3435 Fax: (360) 435-3906 From: Sandra Kortum Company: WSDOT—Snohomish Area Developer Services Phone: (206)440-4911 Fax: (206)440-4806 Date: August 7, 2000 Pages including this cover page: 4 Comments: Kristi, I address the letter to Cliff since it is `signed' by my Area Administrator, Sandee AM Northwest Regiorgnohomish Area Washington State 15700 Dayton Avenue North Department of Transportation P.O.Box 330310 Sid Morrison Seattle,WA 98133-9710 Secretary of Transportation (206)440-4000 August 7, 2000 Mr. Cliff Strong Planning Manager; City of Arlington Department of Planning& Community Development r n R� 238 North Olympic Avenue U V Arlington, WA 98223 AU0 _ g 2000 Subject: SR 531 + 9.74 Vic. CS 3129 Crash Gate Access from SR 9 C�TON Zahradnik Plat City File No.: MJ-98-026-lp Dear Mr. Strong: The applicant seeks approval to develop a 111 of SR subdivision and west ogle 9 family homes. The location of this proposed development is north This letter being provided per the conversation today between Ms. Kristi Remle and Ms. Sandra Kortum about the crash gate access to SR 9. SR 9 is a Class 1 controlled access highway from SR 96 (Lowell-Larimer Road)to SR 530 (Division Street). Any break in the controlled Center.access Eithewill r the City of Arlington or the developer e Access Management Team at the Olympia Service may apply for the access to SR 9. The application should be submitted to Snohomish Area Developer Services for review of completeness and they will forward it to the Access Management Team. However, a letter giving the justification for a break in the controlled access will need to accompany the application in addition to the standard documentation. Enclosed is an instruction sheet for applying for an access permit. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact Mr. Ramin Pazooki (206) 440-4916 or Ms. Sandra Kortum (206) 440-4911 of my Developer Services section. Sincerely, PKlara A. Fabry, P.E. Snohomish Area Administrator KAF:shk Enclosure: I SR 531 MP 9 74 doc cc: File CG.."Ula"4 �l�oo WSDOT Northwest Region Telephone No. (206) 440-4911 Developer Services, MS-221 15700 Dayton Ave. N. P.O. Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 Requirements and Procedures for an Access Connection Permit to the State Highway • You are required by RCW 47.50 Laws of Washington State, to have an approved permit prior to constructing an access connection to a State Highway. WAC 468-51 and 468-52 implement this policy. • Applications may be obtained at the address listed above. Submitted applications must consist of the completed application form, a site plan, additional information as outlined on the back side of the application form, and the appropriate fee. • In addition to the information as required on the application and its reverse side, please indicate if there are any contiguous parcels under the same ownership. • Be sure to mark your proposed access connection location (flagging, stake, ..etc.) on site. In addition to marking the location , photographs submitted with the application would be helpful. The access connection application will be field reviewed. • A performance bond or an assignment of escrow is required on all permits, with a minimum of$1,000 as a starting base. The form for obtaining a bond or an assignment of escrow will be sent with the unsigned permits for signature. The amount of bond will be noted in the provisions of the permit. • Permits must be signed and returned within 30 days or a second review and fee may be required. • When the Grantee receives a signed permit, the Grantee will be required to contact the local WSDOT Maintenance office to establish a time for a pre-construction conference. Work on the approach may not be started until the Grantee receives a signed permit and has a pre-construction conference. • Construction must begin within 90 days of the effective date of the permit. Construction shall be completed within 120 days of the issuance of the permit. If an extension is necessary, a written request to the Region office must be made or your permit may be nullified. • When the access is complete, the Grantee must request a final inspection from the local WSDOT Maintenance office. If the access meets all requirements of the permit, then the local WSDOT Maintenance office will send a letter to the Region office to have the bond released. If the access is not installed correctly or is not totally completed as required, then the bond will not be released. • The Grantee is responsible for the construction, operation, and maintenance of the access connection. Any future patching (pot holes), or drainage problems (culverts) are the responsibility of the owner and must be taken care of by the owner. -Continued On Reverse Side- The foli'owing is for informational,arposes. The state has implemented an,-,„ess control classification system consisting of five classes. (This access control classification system does not include highways or portions thereof that have been established as limited access highways pursuant to chapter 47.52 RCW.) The classes are arranged from the most restrictive, class one to the least restrictive, class five. The following is a brief outline/summary of these classes for private direct access : (Refer to WAC 468-52 for actual classification details.) Class 1 • Access shall not be permitted except when the property has no other reasonable access to the general street system. • Access connection shall continue until such time that other reasonable access to the general street system becomes available and is permitted. • The minimum distance to another public or private connection shall be 1,320 feet. • No more than one connection shall be provided to an individual parcel or to contiguous parcels under the, same ownership. - • No additional access connections to the state highway shall be provided for newly created parcels resulting from property divisions. All access for such parcels shall be provided by internal road networks. Class 2 • Access shall not be permitted except when the property has no other reasonable access to the general street system. • Access connection shall continue until such time that other reasonable access to the general street system becomes available and is permitted. • The minimum distance to another public or private connection shall be 660 feet.* • No more than one connection shall be provided to an individual parcel or to contiguous parcels under the same ownership. • No additional access connections to the state highway shall be provided for newly created parcels resulting from property divisions. All access for such parcels shall be provided by internal road networks. Class 3 • The minimum distance to another public or private connection shall be 330 feet.* • No more than one connection shall be provided to an individual parcel or to contiguous parcels under the same ownership. Class 4 • The minimum distance to another public or private connection shall be 250 feet.* • No more than one connection shall be provided to an individual parcel or to contiguous parcels under the same ownership. Class 5 • The minimum distance to another public or private connection shall be 125 feet.* • No more than one connection shall be provided to an individual parcel or to contiguous parcels under the same ownership. (*A non-conforming connection permit may be issued for parcels whose conditions my preclude issuance of a conforming permit.) ti NGT°2 Cityof .Arlington �skI N G~ July 25, 2000 Rodney Lock Novadyne Engineering, Inc 18210 Redmond, WA 98052 Re: Posting Notice - Notice of Public Hearing for Zahradnik Preliminary Plat (MJ-98-0026-LP) Dear Mr. Lock: Enclosed for your records is a copy of the Notice of Public Hearing for the subject project. At our office are additional notice(s) that are ready for posting. Please have your representative pick up the notice(s) from our office and post them on the subject property. The notice(s) may be posted on the posting board(s) that should already be on the site. Please let us know if you need new notice boards. The notice(s) must be posted on or before July 26, 2000. After posting the notice(s), please complete the attached Affidavit of Posting and return it to the Planning and Community Development Department within 5 days of posting. Please note that the location of the notice(s) must be indicated and that the affidavit must be notarized. The staff report should be ready in about a week or so. We will mail you a copy as soon as it is available. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 360-403-3435. Sincerely, v'1 Kristi Remle, Associate Planner Department of Planning and Community Development Enclosure c. John Raby 53 North Clark Republic, WA 99166 A 98223 238 North Olympic Ave. Arlington, W j City of Arlington Planning and Community Development Notice of Public Hearing Major Development Permit for Zahradnik Preliminary Plat The Arlington Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on the below listed project on the below listed date. The purpose of the hearing will be to hear public testimony regarding the preliminary plat project prior to making a recommendation to City Council. HEARING DATE: Tuesday, August 15, 7:00 P.M. HEARING LOCATION: School Board Chambers, Roosevelt Building, 2"d Floor, 315 North French, Arlington, WA PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: Zahradnik Subdivision (MJ-98-0026-LP) PROJECT APPLICANT: John Raby, 53 North Clark, Republic, WA 99166 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Subdivision of approximately 34.30 acres into 114 dwelling units, including public improvements, with a portion of the site set aside for recreation and open space. Access will be from 172 Street NE (SR 531. PROJECT LOCATION:ev to ment and is inThe site is ocated the SW1/a of Secrth of tion Street nd 4, Township 31 North, Range 05 East W south f the Gleneagle Development in Arlington, WA ENVIRONMENTAL THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance issued April 26, 2000 PERMITS REQUIRED: Major Development r it for orthis Preliminary Plat approval; Major Development Permit for any future Final Plat approval; Building mit APPROVAL PROCESS: Major Development Permit - the Planning Commission holds a public hearing and makes a recommendation to the City Council; the Council makes the decision; the decision is appealable to Snohomish Superior Court STAFF CONTACT: Kristi Remle at 360.403.3435 The City invites any interested persons to either testify orally at the hearing or provide written testimony at or prior to the hearing. In order to include your written testimony in the Planning Commission packet, you must send (or drop off) materials in time to be received by staff at least 10 days prior to the date of the hearing. Anyone wishing to review the project file may do so during normal business hours (9 a.m.-5 p.m.) Monday-Friday, at City Hall, 238 North Olympic, Arlington, WA. The staff report will be available to the public 6-7 days prior to the hearing. You may request a copy of the Notice of Decision on the application by calling Sonya Blacker at 360.403.3434. Summary Published: July 26, 2000 For information about the agenda contact Dept. of Planning &Community Development at 360.403.3434. SPECIAL ACCOMMODATIONS: The City of Arlington strives to provide accessible meetings for people with disabilities. Please contact the ADA Coordinator at 360.435.0361 or 1.800.833.8388 JDD only) prior to the meeting date if special accommodations are needed. =r 00 �� �� r F w,�•t. - rtv_ oo F vrc.. licatA � - � I �o J Ono Op LO -Y\ -\c Y 11Pox s :rlcll/i0 oW 17;t-� DETARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 238 N. Olympic, Arlington, WA 98223 JOB No. DATE Building ❑ Engineering ❑ Planning ATTENTIQN Phone (206) 435-0724 FAX (206) 435-3905 RE: TO 2. n'hr11r� 1 > WE ARE SENDING YOU [(Attached ❑ Under separate cover via _the following items: ElShop drawings Prints ❑ Plans ElSamples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order �J DESCRIPTION COPIES DATE NO. THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: El For approval El Approved as submitted ElResubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution > ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS �-- ( (` 1 & 1 , A , COPY TO_ � SIGNED: 40%Pre-Consumer Content•1o%Post-Consumer Content t If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. PROOOCT240 �Inc,GraWn,Masi 01471 �ti1N_�r City of Arlington g z 0 �sxrr N 1 �~ June 27, 2000 Mr. Rodney Lock Novadyne Engineering, Inc. 18120 Redmond Way, Suite 200 Redmond, WA 98052 RE: Comments on Zahradnik Preliminary Plat Project File No. MJ 98-0026-LP Dear Mr. Lock: In response to our telephone conversation on June 26, 2000, regarding the proposed boulevard and the 10-foot landscape buffer from State Highway 9; the Planning Manager/Department has agreed to list the above referenced two items as conditions of the preliminary plat. Planning staff will continue our review of the revised preliminary drawings received by the City of Arlington on June 19, 2000, to verify that all the items listed in my letter dated April 7,2000, have been addressed. The revised drawings have been routed to other departments for their review as well. Based on that review, additional changes may be required and/or listed as conditions of the preliminary plat. To prevent a delay in scheduling a public hearing after the review, we request that you submit a current.list of the names and addresses of the owners and residents of properties within five- hundred (500) feet of the subject property as well as stamped envelopes with addresses for each of those owners and residents but with no return address. If you have any questions, please call me at 360.403.3435. Sincerely, Kristi Remle, Associate Planner Department of.Planning and Community Development. c: Mr. Scott& Evelyn Zahradnik Family Limited Partners 504-East Division Street Arlington, WA, 98223 F:\HOME\I<is\Zahradnik\Conditions of Preliminary Plat approval.DOC ;kjr;6/27/00 238 North Olympic Ave. . Arlington, WA 98223 CIVIL AND STRUCTIJUL ENGINEERS John C. Raby & Assoc., Inc. p ��7 p JUN '2-7 2000 Thursday, June 22, 2000 Paul Richart P.E. (City Engineer ) Terry Castle(Sanitary Sewer Manager) City of Arlington 238 N. Olympic Ave. Arlington, WA 98223 Reference : Zahradnik Subdivision Sanitary Sewer Access Dear Paul It was pleasant to talk to you and Terry Castle today concerning several sanitary sewer issues for access to the sanitary sewer system in the GLENEAGLE subdivision to the North. THE EASEMENT: To reiterate, I asked if the City Of Arlington is willing to assist me and the Zahradnik project engineer in helping to obtain a 10' Sanitary Easement going North of the North West comer of the Zahradnik subdivision, through an existing GLENEAGLE wet land buffer area, to an existing sanitary sewer manhole in GLENEAGLE that will allow a gravity sanitary sewer design. I am requesting this assistance because it seems that when the City of Arlington reviewed the original sanitary sewer design which GLENEAGLE then constructed, there was an apparent error in the required depth of the sanitary sewer stub that was extended to the North Property line of the Zahradnik property. This sewer stub then is basically useless to serve the Zahradnik property in that it is approximately 10ft. to shallow. As I discussed with you. legal council advises me that, if needs be, I have the option to start a "Private Condemnation" proceeding against the GLENEAGLE home owners association to get the required easement. It is my understanding that this procedure is allowed in situations like mine where the public good is served by avoiding an unnecessary lift station. As you know, the upkeep on unnecessary lift stations drain away mitigation fees, and hook up fees, that are rightfully needed in supporting the general gravity sanitary system. It therefore seems that the city has the obligation to preserve these fees for the intended purpose as much as possible. At this point it seems to me that the best way for the City to provide assistance would be to simply support my position in the need for the easement, and join me by writing a city letter to "request" the home owners association to grant the easement. I very much doubt that it would go any further since the City would also require that my project restore the 10ft. easement to a "equal or better condition. Please find enclosed a 81/2 x 11 plan of the needed easement P.O. Box 505,53 North Clark St • Republic,WA 99166 • (509)775-2552 Office • (509)486-0195 Hm • (509)669-5591 Mobile DOWN STREAM SANITARY CAPACITY ANALYSIS: In our conversation you also indicated that my engineer would be required to perform a"down stream sanitary sewer capacity analysis". Concerning this point, it is my understanding that the Growth Management Act requires the City to provide"adequate sanitary capability" to the properties with in the city's jurisdiction- In return the city is allowed to charge mitigation fees to the developer, and hook up fees to the builder, to pay for the infrastructure. In this regard then, if there is a city ordnance or other law that requires the city to charge the developer to analyze the City's system, then please provide me with a copy of that document so that I might arrange to have the work scheduled. Sincerely Yours, lJo Ln C. Raby P.E. WA �O F was y�L Two j EXP[RES `T � 2 00 D NOVA dyne engineering pllc 18290 redmond way suite 200 redmond wa 98052 425 883 8388 June 15 2000 —! U Ms. Kristi Remle, Associate Planner J U N 1 9 2000 City of Arlington _ Department of Planning& Community Development - 238 North Olympic Avenue F ARLINGTON Arlington, WA 98223 Reference: Comments on Zahradnik Preliminary Plat Project File No. MJ 98-0026-LP Dear Kristi: This letter is our response to the City of Arlington's comment letter dated April 7, 2000 regarding the Zahradnik Preliminary Plat. We have restated the City's comments below with our response in bold font. Please note that we are concerned that some departments may not have received our last submittal set based on some of the comments. However, we have addressed each and provide the current changes. I. Streets A. The applicant needs to secure the secondary access across the Hershaw property as soon as possible as this is a condition of the plat and will delay the final platting process if this has not been finalized. We have informed Mr. John Raby (the applicant). B. The storm detention facility needs to be designed during the preliminary platting process. This subdivision must be able to detain and treat the runoff from the site, independent of any other facility. The preliminary engineering calculations for the storm detention facility is revised to reflect the revised set of plans included. C. The proponent shall be required to conduct a down stream analysis to the Portage Creek confluence. We have been informed by the City of Arlington that a down stream analysis to the Portage Creek confluence is not required until Construction Documents. D. Contact with WSDOT will need to be established to address access permitting and frontage requirements. zdyMnik co—ft dx Page 1 of 8 NOVAdyne engineering pllc June 15, 2000 Ms. Kristi Remle, Associate Planner Comments on Zahradnik Preliminary Plat Project File No. MJ 98-0026-LP The City of Arlington has already submitted an information package to the WSDOT to start the review process. Mr. Ramin Poozki, at the WSDOT, has informed us that since the City of Arlington is the lead permit agency that it is the responsibility of the City to start this review process. Novadyne Engineering will incorporate the future frontage improvement requirements in the construction documents after preliminary plat is issued but prior to final plat. IL Police A. The police department is also concerned with a single access from 172nd Street without a second access/egress, or minimally, an emergency backup route into the development. The access road is approximately 900 feet from 172°d to the first residential street. The access also serves a utility easement for the development. In the event that the road should be blocked, there would be no other way to access the community by vehicle. Additionally, the access to the development is at the extreme southeast corner of the City. We have resolved this with Mr. Ed Davis to provide a 60 ft wide road with 10 foot utility easements to the property. In addition, an "emergency crash gate"located near the east property line to SR 9 will be provided. We have received no other direction to date from the City. If any modification to the detail is desired, please note as a condition to the preliminary plat. We request that arrangements be made to allow the applicant to recoup the cost of construction of the proposed road and other utilities by imposing latecomer's fee. B. Access to 172°d may be challenging depending on the exact location of the road. There is a slight uphill grade to the west of the proposed intersection, which could impair vision of vehicles east bound on 172°d. People exiting the development may have difficulty seeing vehicles coming east bound due to the incline and also to the setting sun during summer months. Since 172°d Street (SR531) and SR 9 are State Highways,WSDOT has jurisdiction for highway improvements. Conditions and improvements for 172°d Street (SR 531) and SR 9 will be determined by WSDOT during Construction Document phase. C. The project as all other residential projects result in additional unmitigated resources from the police department including preventative patrol and investigation of criminal Page 2 of 8 NOVAdyne engineering pllc June 15, 2000 Ms. Kristi Remle, Associate Planner Comments on Zahradnik Preliminary Plat Project File No. MJ 98-0026-LP activity at the construction phase, and on going calls for service associated with all residential development. This project and new homeowners will increase the City's tax base, providing fair share additional funds to the City for the police,fire, and other emergency services. IIL General Services A. According to the Environmental Checklist and the vicinity map, there are no plans for recreation as far as a sport court or play lot included in this development. With this development being at the intersection of two major highways, where kids walking to another location would be hazardous, there should be some accommodation within the development for play. Recreational space has been provided near the north property line. I. Engineer A. Has the amount of cash in lieu of park proposal been accepted, and if so how is the amount determined. No. Recreational space has been provided near the north property line. B. Coordination of the proposed access off of SR 531 should include Tom Simpson of WSDOT who is coordinating the access plan for this state route. He may be reached at 440-4715. Approval must be secured from WSDOT for this access. This City has sent the packet to WSDOT and we are coordinating this with Mr. Simpson. C. Is the intent for a walking path between Gleneagle and Zahradnik to be created between lots 111 and 112? Is this to be improved and is coordination required with the adjoining plat? It appears from the adjoining plat that this is a private driveway. Are pedestrians being encouraged to use facilities that have no sidewalks? No. The revised set of plans will show a utility easement located between Lots III and 112. The walking path between Gleneagle and Zahradnik is no longer being considered. D. Sewer connection is proposed along the edge of lot 24 of the adjoining plat rather than the existing stub already provided. Have easements been obtained? A review of the existing sewer system needs to be performed to verify capacity. Page 3 of 8 NOVAdyne engineering plle ne.ddk--b ax June 15, 2000 Ms. Kristi Remle, Associate Planner Comments on Zahradnik Preliminary Plat Project File No. MJ 98-0026-LP The easement will be provided by the Gleneagle Homeowners Association. The City is aware of the downstream system and will apply mitigation fees for any upgrades required. Y" " r -- sez C E. Is the main access an easement or a Right-Of-Way dedication? A dedication is required. A Right-Of-Way dedication. F. The cover letter states that the revised 50 feet street standard is being used. However the details show a 60-foot and an 80-foot cross-section. Where is the 50-foot cross section and where is the 80-foot boulevard cross-section to be used? How many lots will the stubs between lots 59 and 60 and 4 and 5 serve? Provide evidence of coordination with adjoining lot owners, reasonable estimates of maximum development potential, or provide streets to the 60-foot standard. We have clarified this on our revised plans. The street widths are shown as specified by Mr. Ed Davis in our previous meeting with the city. G. Is a second access into SR9 secured? Show that a second access point has been provided and secured for the plat. The proposed secondary access across the Lakhani property needs to be addressed. WSDOT is providing authorization for this. We are awaiting their condition for our Construction Documents. H. Several other items are to be included with preliminary plats including: the preliminary grading plan( are contours shown current or proposed). Both current and proposed are shown 1. We cannot verify that the drainage plan will work without a drainage report per DOE requirements. Include a downstream analysis to the Portage Creek confluence. We have been informed by the City of Arlington that a down stream analysis to the Portage Creek confluence is not required until construction documents. J. How are lots 5, 6, 52, and 53 provided with sanitary sewer service? Show proposal. Individual grinder pumps as specified on the plans. IV. Wetlands Page 4 of 8 NOVAdyne engineering pi- June 15, 2000 Ms. Kristi Remle, Associate Planner Comments on Zahradnik Preliminary Plat Project File No. MJ 98-0026-LP A. No comments or changes are required. Wetlands appear to be shown accurately. Halleluya!! V. Water/Sewer A. The topography of the site and its relationship to existing sanitary sewer lines requires that a pump station be installed according to City of Arlington standards. Gravity flow is preferred by the City, less maintenance cost and greater reliability. We are able to provide gravity flow as shown. B. A downstream analysis of the various potential points of connection of the sanitary sewer system is required by the developer. There are possible points of connection on 670', at Gleneagle IIIC, Crown Ridge and Gleneagle near the golf course maintenance facility. As-built plans of each of the above locations are available from Public Works. We have reviewed these plans and incorporated them in our design. C. The"waste"water system must connect the Gleneagle system from IIIC, a 12-inch line, to the 12 inch line along 172"d with all other lines throughout the plat 8 inch except a 12 inch stub out to the west. (Intended to be"water" system not "waste"water). We have noted a 12 inch water line connection on the plans. D. The highest elevation in the site, including the vacant site at the intersection, is shown as about 420 feet. The water system reservoir elevation is 520 inches, which theoretically produces a static water pressure at the highest ground level elevation of about 40 psi. This pressure meets basic water system requirements but may limit certain uses of some portions of the property without the use of on site booster systems or other means of enhancing fire flows. Noted. We are working with the City for our Construction Documents. E. The sanitary sewer connection to Gleneagle is shown through the wetlands buffer adjacent to lot 24 in Sector M. Assuming that construction will not be allowed in that buffer, an easement through lot 24 would be required. Page 5 of 8 NOVAdyne engineering p11c zahrednik cammeriG Ooc June 15, 2000 Ms. Kristi Remle, Associate Planner Comments on Zahradnik Preliminary Plat Project File No. MJ 98-0026-LP We have been assured by the City that this will be allowed with restoration and protection during construction. This is commonly done especially in cases of reasonable use. F. A downstream analysis of the existing sanitary sewer system through Gleneagle to 67' will be required to verify the adequacy of the system capacity from the proposed point of connection to 67t'. The city is aware of the downstream system and will apply mitigation fees for any upgrades required. VI. Fire A. Per the City of Arlington Unified Development Code Section IX-4 (c) (19), all subdivisions of twenty-five (25) lots or more will have at least two (2)vehicular ingress/egress points. Okay, provided. VII. Building A. The NGPA for the wetland(tracts 1 & 3) is encroaching into the right-of-way of proposed road"2" and the utility easement. Please revise so the NGPA does not impact the right-of-way easement. Modified. VIII. Airport A. We request that a notice be attached to the final plat concerning the airport. That notice should read, "This land is within the influence of the Arlington Municipal Airport, on which aeronautical activities as defined in RCW Chapter 14.08 and Arlington Municipal Code Title 14 are and may be conducted, including overflight activities creating noise impacts on the property." Noted. X. Planning A. The dimensions of the buffers surrounding the wetlands, (Tract 1 —3) needs to be specified. Page 6 of 8 NOVAdyne engineering pllc June 15, 2000 Ms. Kristi Remle, Associate Planner Comments on Zahradnik Preliminary Plat Project File No. MJ 98-0026-LP Done B. Documentation needs to be provided showing the granting of use for the easement lying the north lot 111. Owners will provide. C. A current plat certificate of title needs to be provided, prepared by a title company no more than 30 days prior to the date of the preliminary plat application, showing the names and address of all persons, firms or corporation whose consent is necessary to dedicate land for public usage, as well as any easements or other encumbrances to the land proposed for subdivision. Owners will provide. D. The names of property owners and beneficiaries needs to be shown on the face of the plat map. Done. E. Lot 40 is shown as lot 1, sheet 1 of 13 of the preliminary plat needs to be revised to read lot 40. Done. F. The applicant is proposing three lots as recreational lots located in the northern portion of the site (lots 112, 113 & 114);we would like to have the recreation area be centrally located within the plat(lots 29, 30, & 42 would be ideal). Okay as is per discussions with Cliff Strong G. A ten(10)foot type H landscape buffer is required and needs to be shown along the entire length of the lots where is abuts the right-of-way of SR 9 per Unified Development Code Section IX-104& 109. Done. H. The location of the OHWM from the existing stream and the stream type located at the southern end of the site(south end of storm drainage tract) and the setback from that stream needs to be shown. Done. Page 7 of 8 NOVAdyne engineering pile June 15, 2000 Ms. Kristi Remle, Associate Planner Comments on Zahradnik Preliminary Plat Project File No. MJ 98-0026-LP I. The square footage calculations need to be added to the face of the plat map next to the acreage. Done. J. The road lengths, area and percentage it represents of the total land area need to be shown on the plat map. Done. K. What is the developer proposing for recreation in the proposed recreation area? Play lot, Sport court, picnic area, or other per developer. Noted on plan. L. With regards to the stream located in the southwest corner of the parcel, as of April 15, 2000, the City of Arlington will be requiring a biological assessment to be completed on the site. Biological assessments do not have a vesting and can be required at any time during the permit process. In addition, the biological assessment is to be completed by a licensed biologist. Done, see attached report by Cantrell and Associates,Inc. XI. WA State Department of Transportation A. Mitigation fees as required by DOT will, need to be paid and access approval for SR9 and SR531 will need to be provided. Noted. XH. Additional information or mitigation fees will be required from the following agencies but are not required as part of this submittal. A. WA State Department of Ecology B. Snohomish County Department of Public Works C. WA State Department of Fish and Wildlife. Noted. Page 8 of 8 NOVAdyne engineering p11c CITY OF ARLINGTO' DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVEL—eMENT 238 N. Olympic, Arlington, WA 98223 oATE' , ,C Q JOB NO. ❑ Building ❑ Engineering ❑ Planning V` � Phone (206) 435-0724 FAX (206) 435-3906 ATTENTION RE: � To � n �b�,rr t E 2C��rG ln�l<. WE ARE SENDING YOU / ttached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Shop drawings Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 10 P i G. n, G G( h THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints I > ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FORBIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS I COPY TO �}—� n 4� RECYCLED PAPER: SIGNED: 1:c ` Ikry\�q t @9 Contents:40%Pre-Consumer•10%Post-Consumer if �P\S�DC\G\n �A^lJ�y,n enclosures are not as noted,kindly notify us at once. �[.• City of Arlington g z 0 9skr N G~ April 25, 2000 John C. Raby 53 North Clark Republic, WA 98166 Re: Possible Mitigation Fees for the Zahradnik Subdivision Dear Mr. Raby: Per our telephone conversation on April 25, 2000, you had questions regarding the mitigation fees for the proposed Zahradnik Subdivision. The current fees are as follows: 1. Parks Mitigation - $1,000.00 per single family residence. 2. School Mitigation - $2,000.00 per single family residence. 3. Stormwater Mitigation - $374.00 per single family residence. 4. Traffic Mitigation - $1, 038.00 per single family residence. If you have any additional questions or would like additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 360.403.3435. Sincerely, Kristi Remle, Associate Planner Planning and Community Development Post-it®Fax Note 7671 Date pages From �1S- l Q aVVL Co./Dept. J C o. T G�V e Y► Phone# or iJ n +1 L- Fax# 51� Fax % 238 North Olympic Ave. Arlington, WA 98223 ........ ...... - _ A QF •• ! "n MATCH LINE - SEE AyGE r �, •,l' I• —'� 1.1.1 1 OUT 70 OUT STEEL h <o 1 m ------------ I V y •i '�J' ,� I� \[p A � � U1 { 3 ✓ E p Ii A Z yy, O Z I x• J= I ' 1 • ! N �'�� X C � fl ; 1 P7c i b I � N 3 I O r, a 95 C T p '�FEED 1 N ! Z 2 m e O p V00 V FEEDO I ` AFDO x N V I m Z / x 0 FEED O I\ �� I m I T y \\ 8°mp a 1 FEED A � �a F I O I ! e N _ d m p Z 1 4„SS\ I' i 1 /m ' q 9� V IV Z y I �, W l L I O >0 as W ° m m l OI-I N Oz p g p i I O OZ m z 7 7 " _/ / P �P d m Z O FEED:O —i_ i oI H i A I I ? gip= 8 1A , N rOO TO'FEED E ¢ n f E+ I. 'i I I ti x0� rCa. Jc= '\ FEED11 D _ o SHEAR � j a t L -� FEED � - m - H �, N n m m II ! > m D OO �, NS G� + Z" I � C= ! �� _ �� f � I � m _ � � .IdD it >>A FEEDD0 FC, 7 T 1 2? A I p A I` a ° j z (( i °i j '' I I �a �� m O I ��'j L. I --•_ O J FEED O O I i N' �'1_ 1 1 CS: }� �I y O O �. 'mS�iRl lfjiNR '•t,I y I } O +'' I g I ! I ! ED a� o } {fir I '� r j 1 11JJ i_1 !, m N FEEDOd UmSTORAGE FEED O, Z Ili I ��@ ti !• ! v - 0 m ! j D ammo00 tr A N I FEED f I x FEED{gi I O 1331s ino of ino Q MATCH LINE - SEE ?ELOW 1 j w u n m m K 0 0 a 2 2 V V V V V Z I y N N C) V 9 m Z rm 2 2 2 2 Z 2 rq 2 2 f 2 2 '� z— a h a 4f l' I�1L DID�O❑ '�i❑❑❑❑I❑❑✓]❑'Ole(D-OOOOOOIOC�j00�0'O<�l001�0100�00�0 mm mm N V OI N A 4 M K X K XO > O> FAO''1m > -UICm > OD C; I —' � I I I yti m2 D2 n��yOC) m �Q�O �a m.�-j m7. " X Y 4Imm OD C'�1 Oil'IZ i< SI� A Y nIC 2 N Z O N < A C yl0 = A m N CIO Z'O C .V n V O z_ { v 0 i ma i Oznm �' � ' n r z < m n o y I- c� O z 'o Pir�c o o zlr• c� p o �_ vmi u-rti I.� m- =i In,p A P m o a m0 pm mn CF V� D O Z Om 7 O n O N m FFnn C m OI Dr d D D p O D a r, m D' m D D C) P O m O F (7 \ m m OO VA �rP C-2nm y0 SOV� �� n2 �_ �: C V a O `� y n n V InrI F A mlm n a Z O Vm 2: m jr! m ,Q• '-1 \ D D _ C C 2 �] T] N p F V m \ O Z Z y,V m.� Q n V a V O u9 D N 0 0 c�`'' ti n m Z A N a y a t. a �n A Z n 1 tG+ITNZ I 2N KD Py OVTC_i� p ��>`Im/ZI �Z 'V n� XI.� p f•1 ,T�`j O z O V = O O O N N N N O (11Z M I A +1 V O V z j y 2 m m Z Z p 2 T I N 'Z C 2 O O ; m = 0 N i/f D CI n1 C m 2 m m Z .TI00(� Nm FA.10 C ZAO A m a�aD OUI Zm a-., I+ZI (n O V G p O 3 AID O C G,I-� a IA O D = vy f U � f mim tN/� O OA O / m Frl np VO (nmcm p-+� Vp O m I N m p C m +, a 2 O AnP gvi mZ m2 o Xy y yuNi mC .� n! y O i C 'I.0 F C F m P A yl O 10 Om m A Slp m Ci 2 O K 4 O V Q n m D O T j V'"} I a m V A V C A C S A 2 C7 m A ,Zmj 'V Z G -Z1 T 9 G ; p yO mGj OVl Dp mO 4= m t^.II m� mC ZA p0 V AIA `iD m C .m.I m N O -I F. NI- =77 VD m a _ 2in -I Cm mo tmn� N m z D, v 0 ,u n „ Nlml m m �" AI m ao � pn = ', �O z �, ! D c >< m O 'L V •a C fir? t IP X/'.LXI- N Ui -' N (n N 4 ,n N X U a XII'\O O O X O N XI O O O O XI N 4 j1X X X N N N _ -D 4A V� AAAap > < > AAAAAA AA AAAAA A AAA ARIA PIRA G 2 n m o+ a .n m X oIo 0 0 0 o X o 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 oIo o o 0 0 oIo oA'o 0 0 0 oIo Clio o o 0 0 �'\ P 111111///---\\\IIIILLI- - V1 a N INC.HCI STEEL BUILDING SYSTEMS,a ple A D m Z FABRICATION PLAi'TT �\ Builders Inc. 852 67tn AVE N.E, --= ARLINGTON, WA. 95223 ¢l 18705-67th Ave. N.E. ((360) 435-6658 ph. .. ....-,,..,G0) 435-8871 ,��" Arlington, WA 98223 (360) 435-5079 f�'Tr. .{