Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout19023 47TH AVE NE_066993_2026 fi INSPECTION REPORT ¢ti1N G?'O Permit No.: Lot#: t- Q" Address: �1 ��" 2 Contractor: qs �O Owner: ec a SIN O Date: APPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION -24 hour notice required. ei,/ 4:-z- 4Z g.1!2 44vavpw Xl 7 Inspector: Date: TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in 9Vr:Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: I 1 Li r T 1 1 J L 1 t - 11 I 1 1 1 I _ I 1 I � I ot ti r 1 - - P I.- E' INSPECTION REPORT 4ti1N G?'® Permit No.: 1 < c Lot #: Address: i 95z-► y'? Contractor: C xc-3; -j..� Owner: LINO Date: �. -i-7 cL ❑ APPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION 4-CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. Cl Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. ® QCc�S5 Inspector: Date: TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in A Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: .� s c�y 'NSPECTION REPORT ¢ti1N G?'O Permit No.: oc, C. SCi 3 Lot#: Q' Address: i g 5 z-i 4 -7 ✓1 � Z Contractor: qs, ,S0 Owner: IN Date: /c ❑ APPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION p4 CORRECTION REQUESTED Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. Inspector: ? Date: /D—/6—0 4, TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in 0(Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: J 34f INSPECTION REPORT 1N G T¢ti Permit No.. o bto 99 3 Lot#: 4' Address: (9 5-z► Z Contractor: C4Ver5 T' 4 Owner: co-PA-mg- IN Date: 9- i S'- oc� ❑ APPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION -24 hour notice required. r—I Inspector: c Date: TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in JK Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: 33! INSPECTION REPORT N G?'O Permit No.: ot. f699 3 Lot#: Q" Address: i 9 5-7-1 4 11 A„�� Z Contractor: Lis O Owner: Co PAtx- INC'� Date: 9 - 3 -off ❑ APPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION -24 hour notice required. Inspector: 1<q4gr Date: TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork 2( Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: .r... a��N�a:3.;�Tii1�C.ili�`��� ==���Tiiit■ ►"SPECTION REPORT 1�34 1' Permit No.: M 6953 Lot#: Address: 117S"Z,IContractor: G�3r— Adr.J 0 Owner: G Date: X APPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. Inspector: Date: TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing , Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork A Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: l ' ' I r' „r��..w.. �� '-'�""-.�tiy"Y---`'�—_.. .^.IR ..�::T6S:_rc� 'sf4}��`�i �iC`' INSPECTION REPORT 4ti1N G?'O Permit No.: Q(, 69 13 Lot#: Q Address: i 9S' z► '-f-7 Z Contractor: GK-t-3 I Owner: Gc> SING Date: 9-z9 APPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION -24 hour notice required. Inspector: Date: 6-Z 9-®(o TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing 64f Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: :► .h�BTtti.k Yftaw��. .�.. -.. w .:+?• °'-':wi'S`adi —. r C L'�L! 2 2-%f INSPECTION REPORT Ni G r0 Permit No.: O G (69 q 3 Lot #: Address: Contractor: d-e-L--5r- ,SO Owner: Co iIN Date: 8-ZZ-�� XAPPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. AA ZLJ-! /'-L44nert tii h � f/V k. "4Tl 4) M�Lli VJ O N Inspector: Date: TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor 4 Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork A Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage Insulation ❑ Other: 1 w •PW LU — f y • ■ ■ Or. L1 ■ I t a ■ ■ ■drmm vriim ■ . 1 . 1 . ` ■ ■ `I ANN L { . I To I - •'■ -00 • • • . . . IN_ r ■-■ " - ` 1 _1 L NO■TF ■ I _ 1 11 ti ■ mrommom . 1 a ■ ■ ' • � . 17 F : . ! `i.aILZ . t� . ■ y i I Iifa�llCitirT �Ud. K )Z _1I!!7.Siii"� II !�f111IeaI� 2i-r�!���Yl��f!!! 1 �~1�h � l�+r!R J INSPECTION REPORT Z34 �ti1N G?'O Permit No.: ate (c99 3 Lot#: Q' Address: 14 5z_% 41 e • Contractor: 1,.L w 9s,�j �'0 Owner: G� P^yZ'T- I N Date: 8-8 —o(, APPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. Inspector: Date: TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing X(_G.R t A ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: _� - - r • NMI 110lad c J 3 V CULL , �� [ lUieAll� M !a---m.39PA§wftmAAMlMlCft qd9 INSPECTION REPORT 1;4 TPermit No.: o& 6193 Lot #: Address: tgSz-i �t-7 ✓ -ve- Contractor: 6&,ersT .c/wOwner:Date: Q,APPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. Inspector: ,c Date: 7-Le3-j7G TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: C.. .. � .uvw.�irierwNK�.c:. �.. �� •. Kt:��� �I�il��i�-..rr.■�r'�a.r INSPECTION REPORT ii J. Permit No.: ors GQg 3 Lot#: Address: r'rS2-1 LE Z Vkv6 Contractor:O Owner: �G� Date: -r -7-oco APPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. 7�bT 7-z5- Inspector: ,,: Date: TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing a Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: I '_ � t ■ ■ - - - '1 ' - - - - - - - - - - i ■ r o � ■ Zt - ■ i - ■ i A - ' ■ - Ji - i - mmm ■ 1 ` INSPECTION REPORT 4titN G?'� Permit No.:ors G9 0b Lot#: Address: 141-z-i q 7 •� ' � z Contractor: �� Owner: IN O Date: APPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. Inspector: Date: TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ela<Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: . ■ ■ ■ ■ NO � . 09 060 ■ ■ MEN ■ 1 1♦■ -1 ■ ME mom ■ MEN ' ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ME : ■ 1 1 0 . 1 Lw rh 1p% or -W" R ■ ■ ■ ' ■ u ,r =L JI ■ ` •■ ■ ■ • ■ ■ 1 "j9PE1 rrr MTI ■ 0 = rr = ■: NO INEENE r .L ` •r •■4i.1 • ■ ON • - WMN- • ■ s Jam ■ mm • ■ - — ■ 1• ` . ME - 00 ME • _ ■ 1• Mom • ■ • ME 1 • - ,k, r %Ike ■a ft" u w 04-6.0& L - d& - INSPECTION REPORT 4y1N G?'O Permit No.: oG �b908 Lot #: Q' Address: ��5 7- i y 7 • s Z Contractor: Owner: �`�'�I rI 1Cs'S Date: r —t'7— ❑ APPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ,4 CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. Inspector: Date: lG l r TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in Q°Final ,wd6,L45.' ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: I t - 3t� INSPECTION REPORT 4ti1N G1'o Permit No.: ou m00% Lot#: Address: t`i z w y ✓k..�� Z Contractor: C.✓L4!=S T 93, ,SO Owner: Cc,,ar:4ri �I N O Date: G -i S=y Lp ❑ APPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ACORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. 7 Aru'A-rU rum )gj=�. Inspector: Date: '//S`-06 TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in WFinal ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: -`4W2 �.c-ii ";w�^ �ii:•�Vd TiIC �g3 eta INSPECTION REPORT 1;i 1' Permit No.: Dc. b9 o8 Lot #: Address: 14S 2-iContractor:� cJ Owner: ,RoN-,�C' Date: 8^ 21-ol, ,.APPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. An f�rr7zJ�TY -L jtl , L j4-_nj tiJ /N f. w1DL�c�ciSavr ✓A?�d yt B t`YL.' Q3y C.C74c.N+ 54vat—' - -$•Ary' G clK= I/ r( Yl AA r s j 7t V I�O2 �'TyLIl.a stiytj/4/ Inspector: Date: &-2,i-o C, TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove .a Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: S77-x�c?- z - a �1 r. ..:w.�__�. _ �l.A►1!��/�CyJ`!a►t c 4 C, °� MI UFACTURED /MC ,1LE HOME 7� o PERMIT APPLICATION ��NG� Department of Community Development City of Arlington • 238 N Olympic Ave. •Arlington, WA 98223 • Phone (360) 403 3431 • FAX (360)403 3447 yoxyo mcc ,j Location of Installation: p Client's Name Capo'4 In C - + Phone Number: /W-7iZ - Z�1 S Address: 7/��� &5:ae z Cea L, D/C City:C ��1-�<<� State: Zip Code: /415�y Lot number: When acting as the general contractor for installing Manufactured Homes/Mobile Homes, the following requirements must be met per the Washington Administrative Codes. WAC 296-15OM-0630-Who may install a manufactured home? 1. A manufactured home may be installed by: W r� • Homeowner 41X • A certified installer • An individual who is supervised by an on-site certified installer;or • A specialty trades person,for certain aspects of installation. , . 2. A certified installer must betja'1 registered contractor or his or her employee, or an employee of a registered dealership. Contractor's Name: CrtA k)04k jes-Y Phone#: 36/r,-651 - /r r Address: J p0 .5►7 e,,, L . "l% LJ A S �j L&I Number: City Business License#: CK-ES - 1 - tom-osK - Z.. ( r '. 4/�3y503� I he certify the above info ation is correct and that the construction on, and thL occupancy and the use of the above described operty will be accordance h the laws, rules and regulations of the State of Washington. The applicant will be responsible for providing a method of safel ccessin o or i lion. o ignature Date Installer's Name: yV V004%%' � C��S �°�'"^ Phone#: 366,65t -/I 11 Address: C� gnoke 13} NA 0 9YZ l l L& I Number: pp 8'9,'7_36- City Business License#: CK-CS T- W'US 3- K 7- FOR STAFF USE ONLY VWV1 _ I, ae_I.O` U� Permit# Accepted By Amount Received Receipt# Date Received WEB Form-70 Page 1 of 1 6/05 dwa C I T-'f O F F?L I P-4 t3 T O M COtVST FRUCT- I Ot-,I F-:0EF?M I T F>E_ FR M I -F h1 C-3 _ = 0 C=P ---- 6 9 e3 �3 ONner: COPAP.T AUTO AUCTIONS 16701 513T AVE NE ARLI:NGTON Value of Work: Tax ID . Phone- 7� Describe Work: 1600 SOFT BLDG 40' X 40' Proposed Use: AUTOMOBILE PARKING STORAGE SITE Legal Description: Job Address: 19521 47TH AVE NE ARL Contractor's Name Type Address License* CREST NORTHWEST CCNSTRUCTION SEE 15310 SMOKEY PT- BLVD #D C RESTIN, 66 _ ' P E R H I T F E E S Equipment and Fixtures Number Fee 'Total Uharge FURNACE/UNIT HEATER l $16. 00 S18, 00 S U B T O T A 1 L. . . . . . $18. 00 { TOTALS Fee Equipment $16. 00 Mech Permit $25. 00 Permit Fee $1, 191. 70 Plan Fee $774, 61 Plumb Permit $55. 00 State fee $4, 50 S`' TOTAL FEE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $2, 068. B1 ] :T I HAVE READ APPLICATION AND PAYMENTS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $0_ 00 rHE SAME TO BE -PUE AND CC;I- LAWS AMD TOTAL DUE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $2, O643.81 "aC•E' HIS TYPE u: Lam. _ WITH WHE°'NER DATE RECEIPT �3 I L,.I Y G OF**�' -C � A L �J t i A Owner: Valut-- of Work I)e. Wn�ck -- propus:c-d Legal Job Addreiss: C o n't,r t,:1 c t C,r S-, N am e T_ape A d.d s 'I'D T A 1- JR 11 A- -are i �310 d`r s SO i i I I co W r- L q cn N� EWE q Q WWoo p � � zco R" O � 0UZ OD P4 W 4k Ln i-i rn aw •vw M04 HU) xw wz waW zoa LZ W 0 HUH zOCCf) H U Pow 0 '7 oG4 WMfx W G� U W U r-I RECE!vEa 0 '4AY 0 � 2006 N OVA_PERMIT ANT - . Post-itu Fax Note 7671 Date 317 d paw► To �grr $r►,1e From t co/Dept. I Co. Phone a (Phone x �(r0—t(03 `3SMO Fax# 364-I5,— 4 2 0 t=ax r Department of Community Development Special Use Permit JNG January 26, 2006 Copart S-05-058 A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND REQUEST This is a request for a special use permit for the development of a 1,440 square foot building and automobile parking/storage site. The site is located near the southeast comer of 47'h Avenue NE and 196"' Place NE. The site will be used to process intact insurance damaged vehicles. The vehicles will be parked/stored on the site pending insurance company examination, after which the cars will be sold on Copart's auction-style website. Cars will then be transported from the site by the successful bidder. No vehicle dismantling, crushing, or sale of parts will occur on-site. The existing 50-75 foot mature landscape/tree buffer along the street frontage (west property line) and the north property line will remain. An 8 foot earth-tone security fence will be installed on the inside of the buffer. The applicant proposes stormwater detention facilities, parking, and landscaping in accordance with City of Arlington standards. The project will be served with water and sewer from the City of Arlington. The site is approximately 28 acres and is zoned Light Industrial. B. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Applicant: Copart, Inc, 4665 Business Center Drive, Fairfield, CA 94534. 2. Owner: City of Arlington, 238 N Olympic Avenue, Arlington, VVA 98223, 3. Contact Person. Joe Carroll, 2176 The Alameda, San Jose, CA 95126. 4. General Location: The site is located on the east side of 47h Avenue NE and south of the residences on the south side of 1961h Place NE, in Section 16, Township 31 E, Range 05, WM. 5. Address of Property: No address has been assigned; the access will be from the existing driveway on 47 h Avenue NE. 6. Description of Proposal: Development of a 1,440 square foot building and automobile storage site. 7. Acreage: Approximately 28 acres. llCoaddminllPlanningNypagelCopart S-O5-0581Copart permit,doC 1/26106 — Page 1 of 4 0 ° MAX 5ELIN t�t%Y 19 is e• Itr"y��tl�,i �. Ls Ci�tt�!t Special Use Permit January 26, 2006 Copart S-05-058 8. Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designations, Zoning Designation and Existing Land Uses of the Site and Surrounding Area: AREA LAND USE DESIGNATION ZONING EXISTING USE Project Site Airoort Industrial Light Industrial Vacant Airport Industrial North of Site Medium Density Residential Low Single-family Residential Residential Moderate Density South of Site Airport Industrial Light Industrial Vacant Airport Industrial East of Site Airport Industrial Li ht Industrial Vacant Airport Industrial West of Site SnoCo Urban Low Density SnoCo R-7,200 & Single-family Residential Residential PRD-9.600 9_ Public Utilities and Services Provided by: Water: City of Arlington I Gas: Cascade Natural Gas I Sewer: City of Arlin ton Cable TV: Comcast Garba e: Waste Management Northwest Police: City of Arlington Storm Water. On-site Fire: City of Arlington Telephone: Verizon School: Lakewood School District Electricity: Snohomish County PUD #1 Hospital: Cascade Valley Hospital 10. Public Notification: A Notice of Application was published, posted, and mailed on October-26, 2005, and a Notice of Public Hearing was published, posted, and mailed on December 13, 2005. C. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW A Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) was issued on January 18, 2006, with no comment period. D. BACKGROUND The subject special use permit application was received by the City of Arlington on October 5, 2005, and the application was deemed complete on October 21, 2005. A Notice of Application was published, posted, and mailed on October 26, 2005.-During plan review, additionallrevised information was requested on November 30. 2005, and was received on December 2,2005. A Notice of Public Hearing was published, posted, and mailed on December 13, 2005, and a public hearing was held on December 28, 2005. A Post-rearing Order from the Hearing Examiner remanded the request for a revised environmental threshold determination on January 6, 2006. A DNS was issued on January 18, 2005 and provided with supporting documentation to the Hearing Examiner that day. The Hearing Exar-Iner's decision was received on January 25, 2006. 11CosedminllPlanninglypagelCoper<s-o"mCopart permlt.doc 1126106 Page 2 of 4 Special Use Permit January 26, 2006 Copart S-05-058 E. FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS, AND CONDITIONS The findings, conclusions, and conditions were made by the Hearing Examiner and were based on the project description and compliance with Arlington Municipal Code Title 20, Land Use Code. See attached Exhibit 1, which is the Hearing Examiner's Decision dated January 24, 2006. F. HEARING EXAMINER DECISION On December 28, 2005, the Hearing Examiner held the public hearing for the Copart Special Use Permit (S-05-058). She approved the special use permit based on the findings of fact, conclusions, conditions, and recommendation of the staff analysis dated December 22, 2005_ Her decision is dated January 24, 2006. (See attached Exhibit 1.) G. APPEALS Per AMC §20.20.010 and AMC §20.98.210, to appeal this decision or the SEPA threshold determination, an appeal application must be filed, with all required fees, within 14 days of the date of issuance of this permit. The City Council would hear the appeal of the pen-nit and their decision would be considered the City's final decision on the underlying governmental action. H. DECISION The special use permit is hereby APPROVED subiect to the conditions aporoved by the Hearing Examiner. 1. EXHIBITS 1. Hearing Examiner's Decision dated January 24, 2006. 2. Site develcpment plan received by the City of Arlington on October 5, 2005. 3. Staff analysis for special use permit dated December 22, 2005 (on file at City Hall). _ 4. File S-05-058 (Copart) (on file at City Hall). ORDERED THIS 26TH DAY OF JANUARY 2006. Cliff Yrong, Plag Manager 0 , 11CoaadminlWlanninglypagelCopart 5-05-0581Copart pertnit.doc 1125106 Page 3 of 4 i Special Use Permit January 26, 2006 Copart S-05-058 Distributed to the Following Parties: • Copart, Inc, 4665 Business Center Drive, Fairfield, CA 94534 • Joe Carroll, 2176 The Alameda, San Jose, CA 95126 • Arlington Municipal Airport, clo 238 N Olympic Avenue, Arlington, WA 98223 Joette Marsh, 19220 46`h Drive NE, Arlington, WA 98223 • Rich Saddler,4509 193'd Place NE, Arlington,WA 98223 • Virginia Whiteley, 19304 46'h Drive NE, Arlington, WA 98223 • Henry and Vera J. Berghuis, 19227 46" Drive NE, Arlington,WA 98223 • Sandra L. Saddler, 4513 193r° Place NE, Arlington, WA 98223 • Del Billings, 16701 51" Drive NE, Arlington,WA 98223 • Bob Morrison, 19102 46`" Drive NE,.Arlington, WA 98223 • Jason Morrison, 4612 145'" Street NE, Arlington, WA 98223 • Engineering File/Gregg Eaton, Engineering Technician, Public Works, Engineering Division • Karen Latimer, Utilities Manager, Public Works, Utilities Division • Dave Anderson, Building Official, Community Development, Building Division • Kerry Wentz, Plans Examiner, Community Development, Building Division • Bill Blake, Natural Resources Manager • Dale Carman, Airport Coordinator, Arlington Airport 11Coaadminl%PlanniN%ypagelCopart 5-05-0581Copart permit.doc 1/26106 Page 4 or 4 BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMiNER FOR THE CiTY OF ARLINGTON In the Matter of the Application of ) NO. S-05-0-58 Copart ) Copart SUP } FiNDINGS. CONCLUSIONS, For a Special Use Permit ) AND DECISION SUMMARY OF DECISION The request for approval of a special use permit to develop a 1.440 square foot administrative office building and a 1,600 square foot warellouse!scrvice building in association with a sterage site for approximately 5,000 insurance damaged automobiles on 28.35 acres located nearthe intersection of 47"'Avenue NF. and 196"' Place NE in Arlington. Washington is _APPROVED. subject to conditions. SUMMARY OF RECORD Request Copart (the Applicant) requests approval of a special use permit to develop a 1.440 square foot administrative office building and a 1.600 square foot warehouse/service building in association with a.storage site for insurance damaC7ed automobiles on 28.35 acres located near the intersection of 47"' Avenue NE and 1961h Place NE in Arlington, Washington. Hearing Date An open record public hearing on the request was held before the City of Arlington Hearing Examiner on December 18, 2005. During deliberations, the Hearing Examiner determined that additional environmental review was necessary and remanded the matter for further environmental review by order on January 9. 2006. The City conducted additional review under the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA). The City's SEPA Determination of Non- Signiiicanee and supporting documents were submitted for the record. Testimony At the open record hearing, the following individuals presented testimony under oath: Cliff Strong.Planning Manager Max Selin, City Engineer. Joe Carroll, Representative of Copart Dem. Billings Robert Morrison Jason Morrison RECEIVED City gfArlingtonIleoring Examiner JAN 2 5 2005 Findings, Conclusions, and Decision Copart S eciol Use Permit. S-OS-058 P !EPT Exhibits Tile Following exhibits were admitted as part of the record of this proceeding: Exhibit 1 Development Services Staff Report dated December 22. 2005 with the following attachments: a. Snohomish County Online Property information Aerial View b. City of Arlington Code Requirements c. Narrative Summary of Copart Operations, dated received October 5, 2005 d. Email from Joette Marsh, dated November 1. 2005 e. Letter from Rich Saddler, dated received November 9. 2005 f. Letter from Virginia Whiteley, dated received November 9, 2005 a_ Vicinity Map ll. Reduced copy of Site Plan. dated received October 5, 2005 Exhibit 2 Full size Site Plan dated received October 5. 2005 1=xhibit 3 Nand drawn site plan depicting drive aisles. parking areas. and location of existing fire hydrants. submitted for illustrative purposes— not to scale (Hand Drawn Conceptual illustration) Exhibit 4 Performance Specifications for Ceram-A-Star 950. the proposed finish for the proposed steel fence Exhibit 5 Memorandum from Bill Blake. dated October 18. 2005. regardine stormwater Exhibit 6' Determination of Non-Si gnificance (DNS), issued January 17. 2006 Exhibit 7 Environmental Checklist Exhibit 8 Letter from Paul Styler, General Counsel to the .Applicant. to the Planning Manager, dated .January 12, 2006 Exhibit 9 Copart Auto Auctions Training Outline for Emergency Spill Response, prrpared by Environmental Chemical Solutions. Inc. Upon consideration of the testimony and exhibits submitted in evidence, the Hearing Examiner enters the following Findings and Conclusions: FINDINGS 1. The Applicant requests approval of a special use pen-nit (SUP) to develop a 1,440 square foot administrative office building and a 1.600 square foot warehouse/service building in association with a 23-acre storage site for up to 5.000 insurance damaged automobiles. The subject property is owned by the City and would be leased to the Applicant. The site, which has a Light Industrial zoning designation, was formerly used as a log storage yard. It bnrders residential development on two sides. 'rhe property is located near the intersection of 47"' Exhibits 6 through 8 were submitted after the hearing date in response to the Hearing Examiner's January 9.2006 .Order on Remand for further environmental review. Cir) of Arlinglon Hearing Examiner Findings, Conclur inns, and Decision Copart.Special Use Permit, .S-OS-OJ8 page Z of!� Avenue NE and 196°i Place NE in Arlington.Washington.' Exhibit 1, Staff Report,pager 1- 2: Testimony nf'R1r. Carroll; Testimony of_Wr. Slrong: Exhibit d, DNS. 2. The City of Arlington received the SUP application on October 5, 2005. The application was deemed complete on October 21, 2005. Notice of the application was published,posted. and mailed on October 26, 2005. Pursuant to Arlington Municipal Code (AMC)20.16.140,the Planning Manager makes administrative decisions on SUPs unless an interested party requests a hearing. T1ie City received three written requests for a public hearing on the application. Exhibit 1, Attachment d Marsh email; Exhibit 1, Attachment e. ,Saddler letter: Exhibit 1, Attachment g, Whiteley Letter. Notice of the hearing was published, posted,and mailed consistent with the requirements of the Arlington Municipal Code (AMC) on December 13,2005_ The City's Land Use Hearing Examiner conducted a public Bearing on December 29,2005. Exhibit 1, Staff Report. page 2: Testimony of�wr. Strong. 3. Approximately half of the subject property (the western half) is paved, while the remainder of the site has an existing gravel surface. Due to disuse.both the pavement and ;ravel surfaces have developed vegetation in the form of shrubs and grasses that have grown up through cracks and bare spots. An cNistira vegetated buffer of coniferous trees ranging from 50 to 75 feet in width would be retained along the west and north project boundaries. The Applicant proposes to use the existing stomiwater facilities that remain in tact from the previous on-site industrial use. Existing structures in the northwest corner of the site would not be retained. Testimony nf.Wr- Carroll: F_vhibit 1, SMIT Report,page 2; Frhibit 2.Site Pla►7. 4. The Applicant,Copart,brokers cars that have been deemed "total loss'by insurance companies(herein called salvage vehicles). It is a publicly traced corroration with facilities in several states handling approximately 60%of all insurance-to.�aed vehicles in the nation. At Copart facilities, salvage vehicles are stored for internet auction on Copart's internet auction website. Bids are placed by wholesale salvage vehicle dealers either on-line or in person at the facility. Cars arc sold to the highest wholesale bidder.typically in lame lots. The average length of stay for salvage vehicles at Copart facilities is 60 to 70 days. During storage, vehicle ownership changes twice: from the owner at the time of accident to the insurance company, and from the insurance company to the wholesale purchaser. At no tnr,e does Copart own the vehicles stored at its facilities. Testimony of I fr. Carroll; Exhibit I. Attachment c, Narrative Summary. - 5. Proposed improvements include a 100.000 square foot parking lot and truck loading area in the north,, est corner of the site. The remainder of the 28.35-acre site would be used as salvage vehicle storage area. A 1,440-square foot modular office building would be located adj acent to parking lot in the northwest corner. A. second, 1,600 square foot building is proposed to be located inside the salvage vehicle storage area, east of the parking lot. Exhibit 2. Site Plan. The 1.600 square foot building would be used as a vr-arehousc for forklifts and 2 The legal description of the site is a portion of Section 16,Township 31 East, Ran_-e 5,W.M.. Exhibit 1,Staff Report,page 1. City of Arlington Nearing Examiner Findings, Conclusions, and Decision Copart Special Use Pei-mil, S-05-058 page j°f l a as a service area for the removal of automotive fluids from cars on an as needed basis. Te.slimonjr ref Mr. Carroll. The Applicant proposes to install an eight-foot solid steel lencc around the perimeter of the vehicle storage area. A new eight-foot chain link fence with a Bate would be installed around the parking lot and truck loading area. The City Planning Staff requested that the steel security fence be painted an earth-tone color to minimize visual impacts on adjacent rights-of-way and residential uses. All proposed fencing would be installed inside the existing vegetated buffer along the north and west site boundaries. No trees would be removed from the buffer. Prior to the commencement of operations,the Applicant proposes to repair the pavement and supplement the existing gravel surface as needed within the proposed vehicle storage area. Exhibit 2. Site P1a77: Testimony of Hr. Carroll. 6. Salvaec vehicles delivered to the proposed storage facility would enter into the truck loading area in the northwest corner of the site. They would be taken from the delivery trucks and into the storage area by forklift through an electric rate in the steel security fence. Inventory would not be stacked,but rather would be stored in rows, arranged "Ilead to toe,"bet%vccn 30-foot wide drive aisles. No repair_ demolition. dismantling, crashing. Or parts sales would occur on-site. Testimrnty of,blr. Carroll: Echihit 1, Ancrchmew c. Narrative Sumn7aly: Exhibit 2. Site Pk777: Exhibit 3. Nund DrCM777 COncepttlnl Ilhlstration. 7. The subject property has a Comprehensive Plan Land Use designation of Airport Industrial, as do adjacent properties to the south and east. Adjacent properties to the north and west have residential land use designations: Medium Density Residential to the north and SnoCo Urban Low Density Residential to the west. Exhibit 1. Staff Report, page 2. Abutting properties to the south and east share the site's Light Industrial (LI) zoning desi_natinn. Properties north cf the site are zoned Residential Low :Moderate Density and developed with single-family residences. Adjacent properties to the %vest have zoning designations of SnoCo R-7.200 and PRD-9,600 and are developed with single-family residences. Flhihit 1.Staf Rel-)ort. page 2. S. The City classified the proposed use as Permissible Use 10,100. ''automobile parkin;earanes or parking lots not located on a lot on which there is another principal use to which the parking is related." AIVC 20.40-2, Table of Pe7 n7is.sinlc� Uses- Use 10.100 is a permitted in Light Industrial zoning districts upon SUP approval. Exhibit 1. SlaffReport. large 2: Testimony q f it fr. .Strong. A WC 20.40-2. - 9. At hearing,there was testimony opposing placement of a salvage vehicle storage yard adjacent to residential development- Testimo7ty oflc7.sorr c?f Robert Morrison. Two comment letters received by the City opposed the placement of a"junk yard" or"auto wrecking yard"adjacent to residential properties. Exhibit 1. Attachment e, Sadler Letter: Exhibit 1, Atlachn7el7t.f Whiteley Letter. 10. In response to these concerns, City Planning Staff testified that ✓`•lien a proposed use does not exactly match any of the uses listed in the Permissible Uses Table, planners rely on professional judgment to determine »vhich use is the most similar. In the present case,City City of Arlington Nearing Ecarniner Findings. Co)rchrsions, and Decision Cnparl Special Use Permit, S-OS-08 page t of!� Planning Staff determined that the most similar use was a parking lot. Staff testified that the proposed facility does not meet the definition of ajunkyard or automobile graveyard (Use 11.000) because the Applicant proposes no dismantling.crushing, or parts sales on-site. Testi777017y or,l.lr. Strong. 11. The Light Industrial zone requires a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet and a minimum lot width of 70 feet. Structures in the Light industrial zone ii,ust be set back at least 25 feet from. rights-of-way and five feet from all lot boundaries_ The maximum permitted building height is 50 feet and the maximum lot coverage is 100%. AMC Table 20.48-4. As proposed, the development would be consistent with dimensional and setback requirements in the underlying zoning district. Exhibit 2, Site Plan: Exhibit 1, Stgf Report, page 3; Testi�r7nr7y of Mr. Strong. 12. Copart operates a 40-acre facility elsev here in Arlington at-which it maintains its local headquarters. The proposed 28-acre facility would serve as additional storage for Copart in the region. The 1,440-square foot modular office building would serve only on-site operations. The General Manager of Copart's existing Arlin ton facility testified that hours of operation are typically Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.,with occasional Saturday office hours of approximately 9:00 to noon. Copart is closed Sundays and holidays. The kpplicant representative testified that the proposed facility would have two to eight employees on-site at one time. Testimony of 11r. Carroll: Testimony of Wr. Billings. 13. Pursuant to the Arlington Municipal Code (AMC) 20.44, Part III, the proposed facility must comply with non-residential performance,loperation standards for noise, vibration, odors. smoke and air pollution.disposal of liquid and hazardous wastes,water consumption, electrical disturbance or interference,lighting, and site and building maintenance. Exhibit 1. Staff Report, puge 3: Testimony of.,fr. Strong. Noise generated by the proposed facility would be from fork lifts, delivery and pick-up vehicles,and employee vehicles. The Applicant does not propose any outdoor lighting for the facility. Testimony of Afr. Curroil: Testimony of,Vr. Billings. 14. Development in the Light Industrial district is subject to the City's Design Guidelines per AMC 20.24.010. Due to the existing 50- to 75-foot buffer of mature trees to he retained and the addition of the proposed earth-tone eight-foot solid steel perimeter fence,the proposed use would not be visible from the right-of-way and would result in minimal visual impacts. City Planning Staff determined that design review would most appropriately be handled administratively. Exhibit 1, Staff Report,page 3; Testimony of Mr. Strong. 15. The proposed use does not require off-street parking. _4,11C Table 29.72-6. Despite this.the applicant proposes six off-street payed parking spaces in the north-west corner of the site to address employee and visitor parking needs. As proposed. one of the six spaces would be ADA accessible. Exhibit 1, Sluff Report, page 3. Exhibit 2. Site Plan. 16. The project would use the existing access point on 47'h Avenue NE near the intersection at 196`h Place NE. Before a permit can be issued for the use of the subject property, the site's City of Arlington Hearing F-Yaminer Findings, Conch+sinns, and Decision Copart Special Use Permit,.S-OS-0�8 page 5 of Id frontage on 47'h Avenue NE must be improved consistent with the City's half street standards for the street type. (0IC 20.56.170(a). The Arlington ;Municipal Airport is liable for the frontage improvements. Based on an understanding with the Airport that the frontage improvements will be installed in the winter of 2006, the City EnZI gineer has deemed that the frontage improvement requirement of AMC 20.56.170(b)(3) is satisfied. Exhibit 1. Staff Report, pace 4: Testimony of,,Wv. Selin. 17, The project is anticipated to generate six PM peak hour trips within the City's overall transportation system. The Applicant must pay an impact fee to mitigate the anticipated impacts. A.W 20.90.040. The current impact fee is S 1,038.00 per PM peak hour trip. The Applicant would be required to pay the fee in effect at the time of payment. Fees must he paid prior to building permit issuance. Exhibit 1, Staff Report, page 4 Testimony of jvfs. Selir,_ 18. The Arlington Municipal Code establishes the types of screening required between the proposed use and the adjacent rights-of-way and other uses. A minimtim of ten feet of intermittent screen is required along.: 47th Avenue N-E. Fix--e Feet of opaque screening is required adjacent to residential uses. No screening is required between industrial uses. 111C Table 20.76-9. The existing 50- to 75-foot hide treed buffer, which would be retained. exceeds the maximum screening required. The Applicants final landscape plan, depicting landscaping for the new parking area and dumpsters, must be consistent with the requirements of AMC Chapter 20.76. Exhibit 1, Stc?1f Report, pages 3-4, Testimony (f_ur. Strong. 19. New development is required to retain or replace significant trees at a ratio of three to one. A;WC 20.76. 170. No significant trees are expected to be removed for the project. The Applicant would be required to replace any significant trees that are removed Testimony of vfr•. Strong_ The Applicant representative testified that if installation of the steel fence required grading of the hummocky portions of the site, the Applicant would install the fence far enough away from the significant trees in the existing landscaped buffer to allow adequate protection for the roots of the existing trees in the buffer. Testimony of I;r. C'arrall. 20. The Applicant proposes to use the existing on-site stormwater facilities, which include two detention ponds and a pipe conveyance system from the western, paved portion of the site. The City Engineer reviewed the existing system and determined that the Applicant's plan to tise it is conceptually feasible. A detailed drainage review would occur during the site civil construction process. The final drainage plan must comply with AMC Chapter 13.28. Stormwater Management,and the Department of Ecology's Stormwater Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin(The Technical Manual). Exhibit 1. Staff Report, page 4: Testimony of Afs. Selin; Exhibit 2, Site Plan. Significant trees are deciduous trees that measure eisht inches or greater in diameter(25 inches or greater in circumference)or evergreen trees that measures 12 inches or greater in diameter(37 inches or greater in circumference)at the height of one foot above the root crown. .4AfC 20.08, Defrnirionc. City ofArlb?gton Nearing E-raminer Findings, Conclu.ciona, and Decision Copart.Special use Permit, 5-05-058 page 6 of 1 f 21. The City of Arlington would provide water. sewer, police. and fire services to the site. Electricity would be provided by Snohomish County PUn 41. and garbage service would be provided by Waste Management Northwest. Exhibit 1, Stuff Report,page 2_ Fire hvdr�uits and fire protection are required and would be reviewed at civil plan review. The Arlington Fire Department submitted comments expressing concerns about reserving adequate drive lanes between the stored vehicles to ensure emergency access. The Fire Department required the following conditions: that drive lanes at least 20 feet wide be provided throughout the site; that adequate fire hydrant access be provided, which could require installation of new hvdrants or relocation of existing hydrants; and,,that the Fire Department have the right to inspect the site. Exhibit 1, Staff Report, pace .i. The proposed drive aisles between rows of stored vehicles would be '0 feet wide. Testimony of Afr. Carroll: Exhibit 3, Hand DrutiriT Conceptual Illuctralion. 22. The Stillaguamish Tribe expressed concerns about potential significant cultural resources that may exist within the site. City Planning Staff recommended that approval of the SUP be conditioned on notification of the State Historical Preservation Officer, the Stillaguamish Tribe. and the City of Arlington in the event that cultural resources are discovered, and suggested that preservation measures be required to preserve any materials discovered on- site. Exhibit 1, .51ciff Report.Ixrge 5. 23. Salvage vehicles stored on-site could contain typical automotive fluids such as gasoline. motor oil, antifreeze,transmission and break fluids, etc. The Applicant representative testified that salvage vehicles typically do not leak, but that vehicles with evidence of leaking could be taken to the service building on site to have fluids removed and properly disposed of. Testimony of'_Lfr. Carroll. The record contains a memorandum from City Natural Resources Staff indicating that stonnwater runoff from the proposed facility could contain automotive related wastes, including at a minimum "hydrocarbons, lead, zinc, and components of anti-freeze."Exhibit 5. Blake ,11emorandtrm. dated October 18, 200.i, 24. At hearing,the entire project site was determined to be within an Aquifer Recharge Area. City of Arlington Com m lyrehense Plan Figure ATF-2 "100 }'ear Flood Zone and.�gvirer Recharge Area. " The groundwater in the vicinity of the site is a"primary source of municipal and domestic potable water supply in [lie Arlington area." Exhibit 1. Staff Reporl, page 5. The City defines'Aquifer Recharge Areas as environmentally critical areas. Ildc .20,88, Part IX. Development activities within aquifer recharge areas are subject to the City's environmental protection regulations. New commercial uses that store or handle hazardous waste products are required to submit a Best Management Practices Plan with the application materials. Such uses may also be required to submit a mitigation plan. AMC 20.88.910, et seq.: A,LIC Table 20.88-14. 25. The Applicant submitted an emergency spill response plan outlining the Applicant's proposed Best Management Practices for addressing automotive fluid spills that could potentially occur at the facility. The plan addresses small and large spills on both paved and gravel surfaces and emphasizes the importance of preventing potential leaks from entering City ofArli»glop Hearing E-raininer Findings, Conclusions, and Decision Copart Special Use Permit. S-05-058 page 7 of 14 the stomiwater facilities or from running off-site. Exhibit 9, CoparrAum Auctions Trairii,7g Owline for Emerger7cy Spill Response. 26. The Applicant and the City reached an agreement pertaining to initial and ongoing site monitorinj for the protection of the groundwater. Prior to commencement of on-site operations, the Applicant agreed to take a total of eight soil samples to test for back-round levels of soil contamination. The eight soil testing locations would be identified by photograph for future reference_ Water samples would be taken from the existing stormwaler ponds at the inlet to the detention pond, at the outlet from pond 42, and from both ponds to measure background levels of contaminants from previous uses. All samples would be tested for hydrocarbons and metals associated with auto wrecking facilities- Ongoing water sampling would occur in the spring and fall cif the first year of operations and every fall thereafter during the Applicant's occupancy of the site. Exhibit(3, Letter from Pattl Styler, General Counsel to the Applicant. to the planning .1fanager, dared January 12, 2006. 27. Initially, City Planning Staff determined the proposal to be categorically exempt from review Ior compliance with the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). Tile City cited AMC 20.98.090(a)(3) as the basis of categorical exemption_ Te,ui717017y of VJr. Strong. That section States as follows: 20 98 090 Flexible Thresholds for Catenorical Exemptions (a) The City establishes the following levels for minor new construction under WAG 197-11-800(1)(b) based on local conditions: (3) For office, school, commercial, recreational, service. or storage buildings...: Up to 4,000 square feet and up to 20 parking spaces. Staff determined that the project was categorically exempt because the proposed structures Nould total 3,040 square feet. Testimor�v of Wr. ,Strong. However, during initial deliberations, the Examiner found that the Citv's classification of the proposed use as i.?se 10.100 (parking lot) oil a 28 acre site to be inconsistent with a determination that the proiect satisfied the categorical exemption requirements of AMC 20.98.090(a)(3), which specifically exempts minor construction with "up to 20 parking spaces." On January 9, 2006.the matter was remanded to the City Planning Staff for further environmental review. 28. The City of Arlington was designated as the lead agency for review of die project pursuant to SEPA. Upon review of a completed Environmental Checklist(submitted October 5,2005) and other information on file with the lead agency, the City detemnined that compliance witli state and local regulations would mitigate any probable significant adverse environmental impacts to a point of non-significance. A Determination of Non-Significance(DNS)was issued on January 17, 2006. Exhibit 6, DNS. City gfArlii gtoa Nearing Examiner Findings. Conclusions, and Decision Copart Special Use Pernpit.S-OS-OS8 page 8 al'i4 CONCLUSIONS Jurisdiction The Hearing Examiner is granted the authority to hear and decide this application pursuant to Chapter 35.63 of the Revised Code of Washington (RCW) and Chapters 20.16.140(b) and 20.20.030 of the Arlington Municipal Code (AMC). Criteria for Special Use Permit Under AMC 20.16.140(c), approval of a Special Use Permit requires consistency with the following criteria: 1. The requested permit is within its jurisdiction according to the Table of Permitted Uses in AMC 20.40.010; 2. The application is complete; 3. if completed as proposed in the application. the development will comply with the requirements of this title (AMC 20.16 1, Zoning, Special Use, and Conditional Use Permits); 4. The proposed project complies with the SE-PA; and 5. The proposed project conforms to the Comprehensive Plan. Transportation Plan,or other adopted plans, regulations,and policies. Even if the Hearing Examiner finds that the application for a Special Use Permit complies with all other provisions of AMC 20.16,the Hearin_Examiner may still deny the perrni.t if he concludes.based on the information submitted at the hearing, that the prop= sed development, more probably than not: 1. Will materially endanger the public health and safety,or 2. Will harm adjoining or abutting property. or 3. In terms of design and use. will not be compatible with the area in which it is located. Conclusions Based Findings 1. The requested use its allowed in the underlying Liabt Tndustrial Zone by special use permit. Findhigs Nos. 1, 7, and 8. 2. The application was submitted on October 5, 2005 and was deemed complete on October 21, 2005. Finding No. 2. 3. The proposed use and improvements would be consistent with the permitted uses and developrrcnt standards for the Light Industrial Zoning district. The project would be required to comply with non-residential performance standards or be subject to code enforcement action. Compliance with Desisin Guidelines would be ensured throu;li an administrative review process. The project would provide six off-street parking spaces City of Arlington Nearing Eirominer Findings. Conclusions, and Decision Copan Special Use Permit, S-03-058 page of l� for employees and visitors, exceeding the number of spaces required for the use. The existing 50-to 75-foot wide buffer of mature coniferous trees retained along the site's west and north boundaries would provide screening acliacent residential development in excess of the screening required by Code. A condition of approval would ensure that all significant trees on-site would be retained or replaced. The site's frontage along 47`h Avenue NE would be improved consistent with City standards by the Arlington Municipal Airport, as approved by the City Engineer. Stormwater runoff would be managed consistent with City and state requirements. Adequate water, sewer,police, and fire service would be provided by the City of Arlington. A condition of approval would ensure that adequate provision is made for fire and emergency access. Conditions would also ensure that the underlying Aquifer Recharge Area is protected through compliance with City Ordinances, ongoing monitoring and testing for contamination of stormwater runoff(Exhibit 8),and the use of the best management practices for spill prevention and response(Exhibit 9). Findings Nos. 3. 11, 13, 14. 15, 16. 18. 19, 20. 21, 23. 4, 25, and 26. 4. The proposed use was reviewed for compliance xvith the requirements of SEPA and a DNS was issued on January 17, 2006. Findings Nos- 27 and 28. 5. The proposed use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan land use designation for the site. Frontage improvements would be provided by the Airport. A condition of approval would ensure that impacts to the surrounding transportation network are mitigated through the payment of traffic impact fees. Findings Nos. 7. 16, (Ind 17. DECISION Rased upon the preceding Findings and Conclusions- the request for approval of a special use permit to develop a 1.440 square foot administrative office building and a 17600 square foot warehouse/service building in association with a storage site for approximately 5,000 sah-age vehicles on 28.35 acres located near the intersection of 47"' Avenue NE and 196`h Place NF in Arlinoon. Washington is APPROVED.subject to the following conditions: 1. All development shall be in substantial conformance �vith the approved sitei'landscape plan received October 5.2005. as modified herein and through civil construction plan review. 2. The Applicant shall file a drainage plan. site civil construction plans, and a Final landscape plan consistent with all requirements of the Land Use Code, International Building Code, Uniform Fire Code.and Public Works Construction Standards and Specifications for review and approval prior to building permit issuance. 3. The Applicant shall meet all local, state, and federal code requirements. Attached to this permit is a list of code requirements that are specifically called to the Applicant's attention. 1t is in no way intended to be a complete list of code requirements but instead is a general checklist of major steps and issues. The Applicant shall refer to the AMC for a complete list of code requirements for the present project. City of Arlington Hearing Examiner Findings. Conchfsions. and Decision Copart Special Use Permit. S-0-0 3 page 10 of 14 4. No significant trees shall be rcmeved from the existing vegetated buffer along the site's west and north boundaries. .Any significant trees rerno\ed from the interior of the sire because their retention would unreasonably burden development shall be replaced�;;ith 5- vallon-sized native species at a ratio of 3:1. 5. The Arlington Airport is liable for frontage improvements on 47`h , venue' �,hich must be done in accordance with the Public works construction standards or as modified by the City Engineer. Improvements satisfyinu this requirement shall be shown on the site civil construction plans. (Thesc improvements are to be constructed in the winter of 2006 by the Airport.) 6. Tl,e vehicle parking/storage plan,which provides 30-foot ride drive aisles ?nd "bich may be modified through the site civil construction review process, shall be follo"ved. Adequate access to fire hydrants shall be provided. which may mean that existing fire Ilvdrants must be relocated and/or additional fire hydrants installed. The Fire Department S. site to ensure compliance with the approved vehicle h111 ha�c the right to inspect tl,e parking/storage plan. 7. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit. the Applicant shall Submit payment of City of Arlington traffic impact fees estimated at $1.038.00 per p.m.-peak-hour trip for ;ix trips. or$6.228.00.('NOTE: The amount of the actual impact fee due will be that established by resolution at the time of payment. The amount provided above is an estimate.The fee may either increase or decrease before the tithe it is paid.) 8. The security fencing to be installed on the property shall be an earth-tone color. The security fence shall be located far enough away from tl,e existing vegetated l--lifferalono the sites west and north boundaries to I sect the mots of the existing trees. NO 7c:s shall be removed from the buffer for installation of the security fence. 9. Prior to commencement of operations on-site. the Applicant shall initiate soil andwatcr testing per the agreement outlined in Exhibit $ to provide bas.line inFomration on hvdrocarbort and metal contaminants, in the first year of operations,on-site water testing shall be performed, and the results reported to the Community Development Depanment. in the spring and fall as specified in Exhibit 8. in fellowing }ears,on-site water testing shall be performed, and the results reported to the Community Development Department. as outlined in Exhibit S. 10. The Applicant shall apply Best Manag:ment Practices for spill prevention and response as outlined in Exhibit 9 for the protection of the Aquifer Recharge Arca and groundwater resource underlying the site. 11. If any archaeological materials are discovered on the site. the Applicant shall contact the State Historical Preservation Officer,the Stillaguamish Tribe, and the City of Arlin;vn and take measures to preserve the materials and the site. Cirh of Arlington Heartng Examiner Findings, Conclusions, and Decision page 11 of» Copart Special Use Permit, S-05-058 12. Prior to issuance of a building permit. the Applicant shall clear all outstanding Planning Division permit-processing accounts with the City. 0. Per AMC §20.16.220, this special use permit shall expire automatically one year,rcrn the below date of approval if the use is not commenc:d or if less than 10 percent of the:oral construction cost has been spent. DECIDED this 24th day of January 2006. DRISCOLL & HUNTER City of Arlington Hearing Examiners By: R Sharon A_ Rice i I City of AHi»gion Hearing Exaniiner 1 Findings, Conclusions, and Decision page 12 of 12 Coporl.Speciol use Permit, S-Oj-OM i 4�'`TY ��' COMMERCIAL APPLICATION 7 o SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST �jNG� Department of Community Development City of Arlington • 238 N Olympic Ave. •Arlington,WA 98223 • Phone (360) 403 3431 • FAX(360)403 3447 The following minimum information is required for your Commercial/Multi-Family Building Permit Application. Mark each box to designate that the information has been provided. Please submit this checklist as part of your submittal documents. Incomplete applications will not be accepted. n One (1) City of Arlington Commercial/Multi-Family Permit Application (one permit application per building or structure is required) One (1) City of Arlington Commercial/Multi-Family Submittal Requirements Form ❑ Eight(8) Site Plans Eight(8) Architectural Drawings Eight(8) Structural Drawings Four(4) Structural Calculations ❑ Four(4) Geotechnical Engineering Reports ❑ Two (2) Project Specification Manuals (if applicable) ❑ Four(4) NREC Code Compliance Forms ❑ Two (2) Special Inspection Requirements Forms ❑ Two (2) Occupant's Statement of Intended Use Form NiA p One (1) Copy of current Washington State Contractor License ❑ One(1) Letter of Verification of Water and Sewer Availability from City of Ma sville (if applicable.) Two (2) copies of approved Land Use Permit ❑ Two (2) copies of City of Arlington Design Review Permit Drawings shall be BOUND SEPARATELY BY TYPE, architectural, structural and landscape, and then ROLLED TOGETHER IN COMPLETE SETS> An intake appointment is required for all new Commercial or Multi-Family Building Permit Applications. To schedule an appointment please contact the City of Arlington Permit Center at(360) 403 3431 or by email to Pre App Appointment Request. I ac wledge that all items designated above are included as part of this application. VE Applic t' " rra Date MAY ; a 2006 CCU PERMIT Ct NCR Web Forms— 04 Page 1 of 2 5/05 dwa Y � Y o�' NEV COMMERCIAL/Ml ,TIFAMILY PERMIT APPLICATION ,t4 l � Department of Community Development City of Arlington • 238 N Olympic Ave. •Arlington, WA 98223 • Phone(360) 403 3431 • FAX (360)403 3447 THIS APPLICATION TO BE USED FOR NEW COMMERCIAL STRUCTURES AND RESIDENTIAL DWELLINGS UNITS CONTAINING TOWNHOUSES OR THREE OR MORE UNITS. THIS APPLICATION MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY EIGHT(8)SETS OF CONSTRUCTION DRAWING,EIGHT(S)SETS OF STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS AND CALCULATIONS,EIGHT(B)SETS OF SITE PLANS, EIGHT(8)SETS OF SPECIFICATIONS IF APPLICABLE, THREE(3) SETS OF ENERGY CODE CALCULATIONS, THREE(3)SETS OF GEOTECH REPORT. TWO(2) SETS OF THE APPROVED LAND USE PERMIT. Name of Project: 5`� nCLW_ or9_\_ Project Address: �95a1 q7 AL, Ar LA N?xs Parcel ID#: SICFACDL106961 Legal Description R,o5 J Owner: A A,yttp Phone Number: 36�'�03 3�t56 Address: City: ,\; State: (Ak Zip Code: ')11Z3 Architect: Ile Qw,� Phone Number: cl72-3%' 6W Cell Phone: J Fax: E-mail.- Address: 1L(f5o lion 'L f5F5 City: State: Zip Code: '7�i25L Engineer: C (er .rc� pi: Phone Number: Cell Phone: Fax: E-mail: Address: -7gA3 WtoQ r'-J:�c DZ City: State: Zip Code: 77o5S 1 General Contractor: (_rc5y Phone Number: N-651-11 t`c Cell Phone: gX5'345'03aL Fax: )6o`01-I1Zv E-mail_ Oby"*sbi� Cr«�nar .��5�-•c�w. Address: �S3Iy 5"�K`� P� Ruck gu,I< 13 City: �`"'�'S"'1,<� State: -�— Zip Code: 92�a7 1 Contractor's License Number: 12-�5 1 PC Q53 K Z Expiration: Contact Person: ►-J��� ���"`�K Phone Number: 2 Cell Phone: Fax: f>,/-_o-651-)1 Zo E-mail: J�5lti.o•t-t,��t�. C c w, Address: AIWS� �l'�t 66 b SW,�� O�i�J s�, &v: "?� ��� State: LiA Zip Code: 9d'� 7/ Proposed Scope of Work:r��� Ls� u°r ��'° �`� �'����a Estimated Project Value, Building Footprint: Occupancy Classification: Type of Construction: P /nd` Number of Stories: t' Total Square Footage: /400 Square/Footage per Floor /(0 Parking Spaces Provided: Barrier Free Spaces: I hereby certify tha a above information is correct and that the construction on, and the occupancy and the use of the above- /described property wi be in nce with the laws, rules and regulation of the State of Washington. e-E. plicants Signature bate ,y, _,I ;i �r rint Applicants Name TWA r-r � J�L FOR STAFF USE ONLY �& / Permit# Accepted By Amount Received Receipt# Date Received WEB Forms—07 Page 1 of 1 5/05 dwa Gt�Y Or, City of Arlington 7 Community Development tING"t0 Building Division Memorandum Date: March 16, 2006 To: Sonya Blacker, Permit Tech CC: From: David W. Anderson, Building Official Subjec Permit 06-6993 Copart Metal Building •1 A detailed site plan showing the-parking requirements, all accessibility parking requirements, fffe-pretection requirements for the building and the storage site as per the findings, conclusions and decision of the Hearing Examiner Report Dated January 26.2006. i There are two buildings mention, which will require an additional permit for the administration office and one for the repair garage. If the building is to be heated or insulated as shown on sheet MEP-1, energy calculations are required to be submitted for compliance with the Washington State Non- Residential Energy Code. °' LA 3' W..1+ A geo-tech report needs to be submitted to determine the bearing capacity for both uildings. The construction type of Type II-B should be shown on the drawings for both buildings &' T �e occupancy classification of S-2 should be shown on the drawings. 7. The building must comply with the provisions of Section 406.6 of the international uilding Code and Section 2211 of the International Fire Code. Portable fire extinguishers are required in both building per Section 906.1 of the International Fire Code. the building has areas containing the storage of lead-acid batteries an approved a tomatic smoke detection system is required throughout the building. Sec 907.2.23 .1 . A flammable gas detection system shall be provided in repair garages for vehicles fueled, by nonodorized gases in accordance with Section 406.6.6. Section 908.5 20 � 11. Exits signs are required over the required exits. Section 1011. 11UN 2106 T. Colo-lV11 I3 12. Accessible means of egress is required throughout the building. Section 1007. 'ps_ _. p 13. Means of egress doors shall comply with Section 1008.1 through 1008.1.1. J,�/Buildings and structures, temporary or permanent, including their associated sites and f ilities, shall be accessible to persons with physical disabilities. Section 1103.1 Accessible routes within the site shall be provided from public transportation stops, accessible parking and accessible passenger loading zones and public streets or ss ewalks to the accessible building entrance served. Section 1104.1 One accessible parking stall is required which is required to be van accessible. Table 06.1 T . ADA signage is required to be in compliance with Section 1110. 1 A soil investigation report is required to determine the bearing capacity. Section 1802.6 19 The drawings should show the load bearing values per section 1804. he re-lite in the exit door is required to be safety glazing. 91. The structural drawings need to be stamped by a professional engineer licensed in the State Washington, not Louisiana. I ' �`3"1 I�l �l s�I - . - -r _ :V 2One set of structural drawings are required to be wet stamped. Photo copies are not permitted. 1.`; L `3 tY City of Arlington I• ' Division Z "fNG"'O O Memo To: Permit Center From: Reta Shepard, Utilities Specialist CC: Ken Renfro,Virgil Renfroe,Earl Anderson,Gus Tararan Date: May 12,2006 Re: Copart 40x40 building, Building Permit#06-6993 The construction documents submitted with building permit #05-6993 have been reviewed for compliance with City of Arlington Utilities Division regulations Comments are as follows: 1. At this point we do not have as-built drawings for this site.They are currently being worked on by Cascade Surveying on behalf of the property owner, the Arlington Airport- Until we get the as-builts to determine the exact location of all of the existing utilities in relation to the proposed buildings, both temporary and permanent, some issues will remain as follows. 2 The drawings show a restroom in the building but do not show how they propose to serve the building with water and sewer. The as-built i construction drawings do not show water and sewer to the 40x40 building either. a). The existing 2" domestic service to the property will be the source of supply to all buildings constructed on this site. That 2" domestic service line must be disconnected and abandoned immediately beyond the furthest connection from the existing meter. This building is assumed to be the second of three buildings. It will be served from the existing 2"line and will need its own shutoff valve and PRV. b). Show the proposed method of sanitary sewer connection to the proposed building, this is required to be a 6"extension out of the monitoring SSMH. 3. A RPBA must be installed immediately after the existing domestic water meter. It must have freeze protection.The RPBA must appear on the State of Washington Department of Health list of approved assemblies and must be tested by a State of Washington certified Backflow Assembly Tester.The City of Arlington must inspect the installation and a copy of the State test report must be provided. No N_ J 7_ A .J C� I I • `err •- C''S O Z J O L z o J w H Z p li O LL- 4 � w '- O ul U cn u1 W0 J 0 V Z — aw `-' w ra a o °C aQ o -,' To: Building Department From: Tom Cooper Date: May 11,2006 Ref: 06-6993 1. Provide an approved fire extinguisher at each exit. Provide "Knox" access to control gate. L Crest NorthwestCONSTRUCTION, INC. Permit 06-6993 COPART Metal Building 1) See Drawing 2) Building permit numbers now specified on site plan 3) See Architectural R-19 lid R-11 walls 4) See Attached 5) See drawing 6) See drawing 7) Will be provided at exit doors along with no more than 75' walking distance and 5' off floor. provision 406.6 and 2211 (see architectural) 8) Portable fire extinguishers will be installed in both buildings per Section 906.1(see architectural) 9) The building will be outfitted with approved automatic smoke detection Sec.907.2.23 (see architectural) 10)No Fueling will take place inside of building 11)Exit signs will be provided over required exits Sec 1011 (see architectural) 12)Accessible means of egress will be provided throughout the building Sec 1007 see drawing 13)Egress doors and hardware will comply with Sec 100 8.1 through 1008.1.1 see drawing E D y F 14)All structures will be ADA accessible Sec 1103.1 J11u__r� 27 logs 15)Pedestrian walk will be painted on site. ��R^_U` 0113 16)See drawing 17)ADA signage will be provided-see drawing RE6��VISEVA 15310 Smokey Point Blvd. Suite D, Marysville, WA 98271 - (360) 651-1118 - FAX 651-1120 E-mail: davep@crestnorthwest.com- License# CR-ES-T NC-053-K2 Crest NorthwestCONSTRUCTION, INC. 18)See#4 19)See attached Engineered foundation done by Nick Lehtinen 20)Re-Lite in exit door will have safety glazing 21)See updated structural drawing 22)See updated structural drawing Water& Sewer comments were addressed 6/23/06 Tom Cooper Comments: 1)An approved fire extinguisher will be provided at each exit. (see architectural drawing) 2)A knox box will be provided at the entrance gate(see site plan) 15310 Smokey Point Blvd. Suite D, Marysville, WA 98271 - (360) 651-1118 - FAX 651-1120 E-mail: davep@crestnorthwest.com- License#CR-ES-T NC-053-K2 FROM N.LEHTINEN Engineering PHONE NO. 206+252+2373 Apr. 28 2006 03:06PM P1 HN]L,ehtinen By - Date Engineering Pau No. of 4120 Hoyt Ave, Everett,'WA 98203 (423)252-2373 \ J A J N w 3( PZ-A 2'w _ T �. JUN 2.7 2006 FROM N.LEHTINEN Engineering PHONE NO. 206+252+2373 Apr. 28 2006 03:07PM P2 HNLehtioen By Date Engineering , Page No. of 4120 Hoyt.Ave. L'vemtt,WA 98203 (423)252-2373 246 v1=Rr , f I=R A t FRAME . GRAC /--HAIRPIN PAIR /�� l2)#5 TOP ANO BOTTOM AT' +Daps oP rely FTG. 8E:'ONO it GRAcDE 3�/�,M DOWELS !N FTGSP 21—Q dtz 7�4le.IC��J�� , 5 FOOTING SECTION CONTROL JOINT (CONTRACTORS OPTION) �w CUT JOINT x 7' OP. LL WITH NAS11C 1 1" CONT, KEY COIUSTR�'OEN* E S L 6xSi0/10wWmJ VOTE SLAB JOINTS ARF- TO SE LOCATED V THE CONTRACTOR. ►.7 JOINT SECTION JOINTS SFiAi1. @E LAID OUT IN A RECTANGULAR PATTERN NOT MORE T}IAN:. 25 FEET IN ANY D!REC11ON WITH A MAXIMUM' OgCWSE7 ARFA OF 400 SQUARE FELL. 11 I AI 27 f)Ml' OL4- I L-L COMPACTION TEST REPORT 139 1 I I1 N1 Curve No. I zAv SpG 6282 I I 2.68 asu I I I 17f 71 Test Specification: 134 � I I I I I I ? I I I I I I ASTM D 1557-00 Method C Modified I I I I I Oversize correction applied to each point I l l I I I N1 I I w i I I Hammer Wt.: 10 lb. 129 I I I t I Hammer Drop: 18 in. T I I I Number of Layers: five p Layer:Blows La er: 56 c 3 Z ( i I I I ( I I Mold Size: .075 cu.ft. a 124 I I I I i l l I l l I I I I I Test Performed on Material Passing 3/4 in. Sieve I ( I I I I 1 Soil Data 119 I ( I I I NM Sp.G. 2.68 asu LL PI I I %>3/4 in. 21.4 %<#200 I ll 114 I 44- I 11 11 I I I 11 I 1 1 USCS AASHTO 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Water content, TESTING DATA 1 2 3 4 5 6 WM+WS 23 .24 .23.41 23.52 24 .21 24 .32 I 24 .58 WM 13. 97 13.97 ( 13.97 13. 97 I 13.97 13. 97 W+T#1 526.90 514 .80 I 516.00 525. 30 503.10 501.50 W WD+T#1 510 . 60 494 .40 493.80 494 .70 I 469.90 454 .50 TARE#1 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 I 0.00 0.00 WW+T#2 WD+T#2 TARE#2 1 1 ! MOISTURE 2.5 3.2 3.5 4 . 9 5 . 6 8 .1 DRY DENSITY 1 127 .5 128 .5 I 129 . 4 I 135 . 3 135 . 6 1 13S.0 ROCK CORRECTED TEST RESULTS I UNCORRECTED Material Description Dark Brown Native Silty Sand with Organics Maximum dry density= li 5.6 pcf 129.0 pcf and Gravel Optimum moisture = 5.3 6 7 % Dated 4-07-06 Project No. 0604-11E Client: CrestNW Remarks: Project: Copart Project • Source: Sample No.: 6282 L® CASCADE TESTING 1-4E30F;ATOR`(, INC. TESTII`:G 6 INSPE--fICN;ENGI`JE=S 92999 N.E.126TH PL�Cc K]RKUaNC.WASHINGTCN 9E4734 [2C5 02a-56C0 I i GL�UL4- LIL COMPACTION TEST REPORT 139 I t Curve No. ZAV SpG 62$2 ( I 2.68 asu 134 I I I I I I I Test Specification: I l l I I I I I I ASTM D 1557-00 Method C Modified ( ( I I I I I I Oversize correction applied to each point NJ II Hammer Wt.: 10 lb. a 129 Hammer Drop: 18 in. w_ I Number of Layers: five Blows per Layer: 56 i', I1 1 1 1 I I ( I I Mold Size: .075 cu.R. p 124 1 1 1 t I I I I I I Test Performed on Material I I I I I Passing 3/4 in. Sieve I II1 1 I C I ( I I I I I Soil Data 119 I I I I I ( I ( NM Sp.G. 2.68 asu LL PI I t I %>3/4 in. 21.4 %<#200 I I I I I I 114 1 1 ( I I I I I I I 1 I I USCS AASHTO 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Water content, % I TESTING DATA 1 2 3 4 5 6 WM+WSI 23.24 23.41 23.52 24 .21 24.32 1 24 .58 WMI 13. 97 13. 97 I 13.97 I 13 .97 13. 97 I 13 .97 WW+T#1I 526.90 514.80 I 516.00 I 525 .30 I 503.10 501.50 WD+T#1 510.60 494.40 f 493.80 494 .70 I 469.90 454 .50 TARE#1 0 .00 0 .00 I 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0.00 WW+T#2 WD+T#2 ( I II TARE#2 1 MOISTURE I 2 .5 3.2 I 3.5 I 4 . 9 5. 6 8 .1 DRY DENSITY I 127 .5 128 .5 I 129 .4 1 135_3 135 . 6 135.0 ROCK CORRECTED TEST RESULTS UNCORRECTED Material Description Dark Brown Native Silty Sand with Organics Maximum dry density= 135.6 pcf 129.0 pcf and Gravel Optimum moisture = 5.3 6 7 % Dated 4-07-06 Project No. 0604-11E Client: CrestNW Remark rr.v7IVED Project: Copart Project A- .�. Y 1.� • Source: Sample No.: 6282 PCCASCADE TESTING LABCRATCRY, INC. A }����['(n■���{j J�LR TESTING 6 INSPE=C J/ENG:I`JEEES 12S IS N.E.^.25 A TH PLCE K]RKLAN0. 4VA0HIN=.CN SS034 [2CS:223-S80C I r+ U�c/4- tiL COMPACTION TEST REPORT 138 I I l i I i Curve No. I I I I ZAV SpG ! I I I I I I I I 2.68 asu 6283 I l i I Test Specification: 136 I I I I I I I I I I I II I I I I I l I I I I I I ASTM D 1557-00 Method C Modified I I I I Oversize correction applied to each point I I I I I Hammer Wt.: 10 lb. Q 134 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Hammer Drop: 18 in. I I I I I I I Number of Layers: five I I ! I I I I I I Blows per Layer: 56 I I I I I I I I I I I ? I I I I I ! I I I Mold Size: .075 cu.ft. 0 132 I I I ! I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I Test Performed on Material I I I I I Passing 3/4 in. Sieve II , III I I 130 1 1 1 1I I I I Soil Data I 1 1 I I I I I I 1 NM Sp.G. 2.68 asu I I I I I I I I I I LL PI II lil I I III II I I I I I I I I I I I l i %>314 in. 15.1 %<#200 128 I I I I I I I I I I I I I USCS AASHTO 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Water content, % TESTING DATA 1 2 ( 3 4 5 6 WM+WS 24 .09 24.23 ( 24 .35 24 .45 WM 13 . 97 13.97 13. 97 13. 97 WW+T#1 509.20 531.00 515.30 509.30 WD+T#1 1 493.10 509. 60 492.70 481.40 TARE#1 0 . 00 0.00 0 .00 0_00 WW+T#2 WD+T#21 TARE#2 i MOISTURE j 2.8 I 3 . 6 I 3 . 9 4 . 9 DRY DENSITY I 135 .1 135 .7 1 136. 6 136. 4 ROCK CORRECTED TEST RESULTS UNCORRECTED Material Description Maximum dry density = 137.0 pcf 132.7 pcf Brown Sand with Gravel Dated 4-07-06 Optimum moisture=4.2 % 4.9 % Project No. 0604-I lE Client: CrestNW Remarks: r, ,. �� �.. . Project: Copart Project • Source: Sample No.: 6283 JUN 27' 2:i3 CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY, INC. 7ES71l14G F-INSPECTICMV ENGNEERS .'- 12S19 N.E^.2e rH Flt1C'c ICIRKLANG.WASH1Nv CN 9BC34 12C5�823- BCC t Page 1 of 1 Sonya Blacker From: Reta Shepard Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 2:47 PM To: #CD-Permits Cc: Linda Taylor; Terry Castle; Virgil Renfroe; Earl Anderson Subject: Copart JerOLBrisbin was just in and paid sewer connection fees for the 40x40 building at the Copart project(BP#06- He said they are not putting in the temporary office but instead are going ahead and will be submitting for a building permit for the 2,600 SF modular building. I asked him if the temporary office permit(#06-6908) has been voided, and he said that the permit center was going to use that number for the new building when he submits. I gave him the Cross Connection survey and waste discharge form to submit with that building permit, and let him know he will need to pay sewer connection fees to the 2,600 SF building after we receive the permit application. Reta Shepard, 'Utilities Specialist Public Works,Utilities Division 360-403-3524 rshepard@cLarlington.wa.us 6/28/2006 0 °� COMMERCIAL PLUMBING z PERMIT APPLICATION �'l1NG"t0 Department of Community Development City of Arlington • 238 N Olympic Ave. • Arlington, WA 98223 • Phone (360)403 3431 • FAX (360)403 3447 THIS APPLICATION MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY FOUR(4) SETS OF CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS,AND EIGHT (8) SETS OF FIXTURE SPECIFICATIONS (CUT SHEETS). CALCULATIONS ARE REQUIRED FOR GREASE INTERCEPTOR IF APPLICABLE. Type of Permit: ( ) Commercial ( ) Commercial Addition/Alteration i 9�dz 3 /o 5/ cx� Project Address: `1 ` N-_ Parcel ID#: Lot#: Subdivision: Project Description: Owner: � G� Inc Phone Number. Address: \.s`..�s< ce"L . 17K City: State: L �� Zip Code: 9y'33y Contact Person: :l, Phone Number. Cell Phone: 5,2370 - 6`3ilz/ Fax: E-mail: ��,r• ;Ei �PCY�sI norLt-w�s�.ca:.� Address: Sin�k�_. pl• Rl.� City: ,s�.//c State: WA Zip Code: 4'k.271 Please List quantity of fixtures Below: I WATER CLOSET BATH TUB SHOWERS LAVATORIES CLOTHES WASHER LAUNDRY TUBS FLOOR DRAINS FLOOR SINKS SINKS URINALS SUMPS DISHWASHERS WATER HEATERS ROOF DRAINS WATER PIPING DWV ALTER/REPAIR LAWN SPRINKLERS DRINKING FOUNTAINS MISC PLUMB FIXTURE GREASE INTERCEPTOR GREASE TRAP Contractor: Cr`s5 1V Phone Number: 4,- i53Io S,,,LK�h �� �JU�.s�,u� Zip 9�aa3 Address: City: State: p Code: Contractor's License Number ►- ItiC -05.1-L Z Expiration: I hereb i that th above information is correct and that the construction on, and the occupancy and the use of the above- d ribed property will a in ac with the laws, rules and regulation of the State of Washington. ' D/Z 9/V6 icants bigrrature Date rh Print A I nts Name FOR STAFF USE ONLY Permit# Accepted By Amount Received Receipt# Date Received WEB Forms-10 Page 1 of 1 5/05 dwa /•.: �y„ 'ASS�'.. -'� _ � � - S > y . ., gPFlApIryJtB]m-Ipi� Y tri m [-, o f i Ise m C7 r�J z C c� En p s a O00 n0 Ul z g c ON U) x C y a rTj m z �+ I zD n R" n'z `— Z H t�rJ Syr z° rr-' � \ ! mr z y Z r r-i n rt R O d ✓i p y c -i > rt r L m E a O dd G)D m m O N� crQ It y 5 (; L t=irD ql .. tTj n `C p P. /I /p1 ( z r M 4 1 M r > (D 0-0n m / 3 Z C CD CD o D o O j yea 1� o C7 r � r z =ii 'f m z ON Ul C� 1 — v� ,_es:w,•••,..;sysv:flY.slQn i50t7i"rornr m'srroc_. r..,>.....,.ox...,- .. .. .. ;w��.u7m.a.�w�w'tovmmoAa�:m�am¢�xamsc�,.uswoxn�rn;�.rmna rm�i6;mrura =t. �` I�rty 2006 i TItUCTION INC. -T C EN!" T VN)TEST CONS CY co�►sTxuct►o C4MP ANY . :�: wA�1•��ssl-i��a 6 . ti 53tO Stnd�Y vl` 'tip CJ`� 'FAN TROSMITTAL SHEET August 11,2006 FAXNUMaER: 364,403.�3447 pA�; Friday,Augu 2 NUMBER OF SHEETS(INCLUDING TRpNSMiTTAL)'. To. Arlington Building Department 364-403-3431 ATTENTION: Dave Anderson RE: Ema#62 Mr, Anderson, Berry Brisbin from our office asked me to send this in ASAP: 1 each: Ramp Detail for permit#6908,Copart bui.Iding if you need additional information or I may help in any way,please let me know- ___ _� r• Thank you,Patrick a Patrick Kolanda—Pre ect Mana¢er Crest Northwest Construction,Irac_ FAX A EI- 1160)651-1120 If you have arty difficulty receiving this trBRS rr 1, please calf ��at(360)65 1-11]8. ` jt I ski Fit 4 ` t I wE.�A -t,F-16-d OR"212 ttt RESUN LEASING INCORPORATED J FAX TRANSMITTAL Date: 7/31106 Fax# 360-403-3447 Number of Sheets: 2 ine cover Attn: Sonya or Dave Anderson RE.. Permanent Modular building Any questions pleas i act: ."-4ePw,M. B in - VP O tion Cre oft est Fsbin. crestnorthw•est.com 360-651-1118—Q 425-345-0326—C 360-651-1120—F =44. oil Qom 1 LL zs iu;A. All AUG ol PERMIT CENTER Department of Labor and Industries Paid don Gotumn — thk pn.__... ...... Factory Assembled Structures 4# 1 �j� �� o� ) - /_ 31.80` F I'd Box 44430 7 7 Olympia WA 985044430 NOTIFICATION TO LOCAL ENFORCEMENT AGENCY www.wa.gov/k"AS/ Date (case sensitive) 5/18/06 M397 i The Factory-Built unit identified below requires completion work at the Mfg site as specified. W_HITLEY EVERGREEN ownes'snanw jRESUN-COPART Mfgrsserial no. 0306-122-A/D DelisenalO°��� Instaliatioat address Type of cottstYuctiao® ETA at site 19521 47TH AVE N.E. Vg 'B City ARLINGTON 'WA'' 98223 _ CO=�SNOHOMISH 'a'"`�` Installation site is in: City zi County DESCRIBE ITEMS RE UMING COMPLETION WORK AT THE SITE BUILDING DEPARTMENT ELECTRICAL DEPARTMENT www.wabo.org/ www.wa.govfti/electrica,U INSERT NAME AND ADDRESS IN SHADED AREA INSERT NAME AND ADDRESS IN SHADED AREA CITY OF ARLINGTON DEPT OF L&I y IINSP. CHIEF PLUMB 729 00TH ST. S.E. 238 N.-0LYMPIC AVE. PO BOX/MAIL STOP TB 26 ARLINGTON, WA. 98223 EVERETT, WA 98208-5459- 1. FOUNDATION SYSTEM &TIE DOWNS 1. ELECTRICAL SERVICE CONNECTIONS i 2. SKIRTING, DECK AND RAMPS 2. ELECTRICAL CROSSOVERS 3. MATELINE CONNECTIONS AND TRIM 3. HVAC STARTUP AND TESTING 4. PLUMBING SUPPLY/WASTE CONNECTIONS ,5. HVAC COMMISIONING 1 Itupectoi' (prmt/type) Phone:(8 am to 5 pm) Manufactu ds name(print/type) Office location ('=:c -- - Manuf signs A6 For Dept Rec d I File By v White-Olympia office Use ONLY / / Green-Electrical section Canary-Inspector F623-013-M (PDF)notification to local enforcement agency I 1-00 Pink-Building department 1 i:,Y' _ .4 •�• �..r. �•-••=-� ice••' '� .,i-'ram"• � `���.. :�••• _�.i'�� •:�...>.�t i•Ca a. '2-�►.'.�?�'�.tZ���:Pl���. ':I r t��'.R13�;� 'Y�:.. .t�r5'('�R�:.• '` F ' ir_ :1. �t - :J , _ i•f }` r r..- • Plrr'wr►�" .'� - n�•..161 �k�'-''�•rit 1�� Sir r ii.:� -F` ':.. X0 do Ole ••. . , . r �,;:• �`��,��,'• •ls.. Yr�. � -' � LIB. :a, .-6 •, _• , • ... _ .. .• 's y. �;•`� .,, _ _ Lit •/,•. N[E�EV • • • _r' �• is � �i•��- -�� . r�:ire --=�, ��� .:.: _ •'• 2 :A - t- ;r• .t•• i il. •iT• ' •1 y r•i ...t' 'r .- .._-... ...• i.. .. _ ..t;•I• � •r•Y� _ .. .. -rt'r���.• �.•���j'.I•.:.:]�Vit�.�t,. _ - .•�' -,•- �!I i••• "i _ H!oo£m _ 31 GQ bR S�Riy,,o'miS�oQ� 3 ee33 i A c 13'-lD- �a��� �^�m N n n sm ----------- - t-IT �� 1VP. O ; Oct Z ryr m O i x � I 1 1 Om OO +� ; 1 - 1 ' 1 0 oA Qn�i �� 4-1 O I 1 g O I C D � r ax x x o� � 1 0 1 1 m 1 1 1 O a C 1 zs 1 G 1 G G 1 0 x 1 1 I � ao ng C. a 1 y D➢N Z O N O 1 ; m i m O m Z r A r 1 i O j�v ' ;� ® o � e P Z �_ _-__-____ : x m g g o o --------- x ' A O D all B� #C$ �YGu S^ A ;18. xm sW� con . J rs 4 k F iS 9 Iql "� "3� Q A 1�y 5C0 c g g R 5 ��t ? n21to A ug pm� r�~ g o hem Zm # P Nmm a 0 z g A n TITLE: DRAWN BY: DATE: JOB NO: FOUNDATION PLAN I PEV M1-1 RESUN LEASING INCORPORATED /13/0e zoos-M2m SCALE: DRA'MNG N0: .CIA OFFICE 3701 E. 68TH AVENUE, COMMERCE CITY, COLORADO 80022 I/$•.�•_D• 1 Page 1 of 1 Sonya Blacker From: Reta Shepard Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 2:47 PM To: #CD-Permits Cc: Linda Taylor; Terry Castle; Virgil Renfroe; Earl Anderson Subject: Copart Jerry Brisbin was just in and paid sewer connection fees for the 40x40 building at the Copart project(BP#06- 6993). He said they are not putting in the temporary office but instead are going ahead and will be submitting for a building permit for the 2,600 SF modular building. I asked him if the temporary office permit (#06-6908) has been voided, and he said that the permit center was going to use that number for the new building when he submits. gave him the Cross Connection survey and waste discharge form to submit with that building permit, and let him know he will need to pay sewer connection fees to the 2,600 SF building after we receive the permit application. Reta Shepard, Utidties Speciafist Public Works,Utilities Division 360-403-3524 rshepard@ci.arlington.wa.us 6/28/2006 4w Crest NorthWCA CONSTRUCTION, INC. FAX TRA.NSNUTTA.L )dates 7/19106 Fox# 360-403-3447 Number of Sheets: 2 inc cover Attu: Brenda&Dave RE: COPART Permanent building - Any questions p se contact! J KB ' VP Ope ons Crest rthwest (�f e-o jbrisbin ,crestnorthwest.com 360-651-11,18—425-345-0326�-C 360-651-1120—F 1 15310 Smokey Point Blvd. Suite D, Marysville, WA 98271 - (360)651-1118 - FAX 651-1120 E-mail;davep@crestnorthwest.com- License#CR-ES-T NC-053-K2 C, °r MAI JFACTU.RED /MO:_,.� LE HOME 7 o PERMIT APPLICATION lING� Department of Community Development City of Arlington • 238 N Olympic Ave. • Arlington, WA 98223 • Phone (360) 403 3431 • FAX (360)403 3447 Location of Installation: Client's Name Phone Number: 9/6-712-er715 Address: '165 city: p Code: 3YState: T Zi Lot number: When acting as the general contractor for installing Manufactured Homes/Mobile Homes, the following requirements must be met per the Washington Administrative Codes. WAC 296-15OM-0630—Who may install a manufactured home? 1. A manufactured home may be installed by: • Homeowner • A certified installer • An individual who is supervised by an on-site certified installer; or • A specialty trades person,for certain aspects of installation. 2. A certified installer must be a registered contractor or his or her employee, or an employee of a registered dealership. Contractor's Name: C>r45 00 ��`"��'�'� � Phone#: Address: /531e? Sm-� P� �I 5,.; rj �'llcj W A 99271 L& I Number: �e�,T,36-66 City Business License#: I hereby certify the above information is correct and that the construction on, and the occupancy and the use of the above described property will-be--accordance with the laws, rules and regulations of the State of Washington. The applicant will be responsible for providing a method of safely accessing roof for inspection. /5z___,77 g-z-v 6 actor's Signature Date (� Installer's Name: Address: D USX G +U�'s t,s `l�'S 32 % l� L& I Number: City Business Licensees ( � C\v AR U ot q CO PERMIT CENTER FOR STAFF USE ONLY Permit# A pte By Amount Received Receipt# Date Received WEB Form—70 Page 1 of 1 6/05 dwa City of Arlington AUG o 4 20061 Development Services =k Permit Center REQUEST FOR REVIEW NAME:,`C A BP #: 06- 1J(� DATE: — RETURN THIS FORM BY: CA PROJECT SUMMARY: RESPONDING DEPARTMENTS T Givi C., riiRE DA'V/F A%. BUILDING RETA S., UTILITIES KERRY W., BUILDING DERYL T., MARYSVILLE UTIL SCOTT B., BUILDING BILL B., NATURAL RESOURCE NATE H., PLANNING MARC H., ENGINEERING CWA., CONSULTANT SHERRI PHELPS, BUS LIC JIM T., CONSULTANT SUBMITTAL INFORMATION IS ATTACHED. Please review Ehe information and return this form-,and yc::r comments in memo form. If you have no comments, please return the form with the "No Comments' box checked PLEASE MARK ONE BOX, SIGN, DATE, AND RETURN THIS FORM TO PC ❑ COMMENTS FOR THIS REVIEW ARE IN ATTACHED MEMO f _ NO COMMENTS FOR THIS REVIEW, OKAY TO ISSUE PERMIT lam,✓ F-l T--d.6- ❑ COMMENTS REVIEWED BY DATE f NED _ AUG 15 2665 IV IT CENJEll JO4 City of Arlington Community Development 0 Building Division Memorandum Date: 8-08-06 To: Permit Center From: Kerry Wentz Subject: Permit# 06-6908 The revised drawings for the ADA ramp do not include construction information. Please submit details showing how the ramp will be constructed. The floor plan provided does not include dimensions for the ramp; please include these on the plans. A 60" x60" level landing is required for a change in direction on the ramp, please include this with the revised drawings. A minimum of two (2) sets of plans is needed for review. J City of Arlington '�'`�36° &S1-11ZO 7 Community Development 4 j U0 Building Division Memorandum Date: 07-21-06 To: Permit Center From: Kerry Wentz Subject: Permit# 06-6908 Please show how ADA access will be provided to the building. If a ramp will be used submit construction details showing compliance with ADA requirements and revise the site plan to show location. A minimum of two (2) sets of plans need to be submitted for review. r D(O. 1y � � BET City of Arlington CO AU Development Services COA Permit Center d REQUEST FOR REVIEW NAME: L� dy-� BP #: 06- �D�D DATE: RETURN THIS FORM BY: PROJECT SUMMARY: u RESPONDING DEPARTMENTS TOM C., FIRE RETA S., UTILITIES KERRY W., BUILD_ DERYL T., MARYSVILLE UTIL SCOTT B., BUILDING BILL B., NATURAL RESOURCE NATE H., PLANNING MARC H., ENGINEERING CWA., CONSULTANT SHERRI PHELPS, BUS LIC JIM T., CONSULTANT SUBMITTAL INFORMATION IS ATTACHED. Please review the information and return this form and your comments in memo form. If you have no comments, please return the form with the "No Comments" box checked. PLEASE MARK ONE BOX, SIGN, DATE, AND RETURN THIS FORM TO PC COMMENTS FOR THIS REVIEW ARE IN ATTACHED MEMO ❑ NO COMMENTS FOR THIS REVIEW, OKAY TO ISSUE PERMIT ❑ COMMENTS REVIEWED BY DATE 7-2 r�6 RECEIVED JUL 21 2006 COrAl PERMITCENTER 1IY O City of Arlington .� Community Development �lING�0 Building Division Memorandum Date: 07-21-06 To: Permit Center From: Kerry Wentz Subject: Permit# 06-6908 Please show how ADA access will be provided to the building. If a ramp will be used submit construction details showing compliance with ADA requirements and revise the site plan to show location. A minimum of two (2) sets of plans need to be submitted for review. City of Arlington • Development Services Permit Center 19 d REQUEST FOR REVIEW (1 y-- NAME: _ ,,` '� I BP #: 06— 1� DATE: J l��'� RETURN THIS FORM BY: ? PROJECT SUMMARY: — RESPONDING DEPARTMENTS TGIViLC. r DP.VE A. BUILDING RETA S., UTILITIES KERRY W., BUILDING DERYL T., MARYSVILLE UTIL SCOTT B., BUILDING BILL B., NATURAL RESOURCE NATE H., PLANNING MARC H., ENGINEERING CWA., CONSULTANT SHERRI PHELPS, BUS LIC JIM T., CONSULTANT SUBMITTAL INFORMATION IS ATTACHED. Please review the information and return this form and your comments in memo form. If you have no comments, please return the form with the "No Comments" box checked. PLEASE MARK ONE BOX, SIGN, DATE, AND RETURN THIS FORM TO PC ❑ COMMENTS FOR THIS REVIEW ARE IN ATTACHED MEMO ❑ NO COMMENTS FOR THIS REVIEW, OKAY TO ISSUE PERMIT COMMENTS I `42cr - `s `'`'` ''' s -�.� y REVIEWED BY / L DATE 1� l Page 1 of 1 \ �r: WC ._ 1J� - Brenda Fecht 1 From: Reta Shepard Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 2:47 PM To: #CD-Permits Cc: Linda Taylor; Terry Castle; Virgil Renfroe; Earl Anderson Subject: Copart Jerry Brisbin was just in and paid sewer connection fees for the 40x40 building at the Copart project(BP#06- 6993). He said they are not putting in the temporary office but instead are-going ahead and will be submitting for a building permit for the , 00 SF modular building. I as e im if the temporary office permit(#06-6908) has been voided, and he said that the permit center was going to use that number for the new building when he submits. I gave him the Cross Connection survey and waste discharge form to submit with that building permit, and let him know he will need to pay sewer connection fees to the 2,600 SF building after we receive the permit application. Reta Shepard, Utiftties Speciaftst Public Works,Utilities Division 360-403-3524 rshepard@ci.artington.wa.us 6/29/2006 1 �``Y MAID'' IFACTURED /MOF LE HOME PERMIT APPLICATION 7+41NG'_� Department of Community Development City of Arlington • 238 N Olympic Ave. • Arlington, WA 98223 • Phone (360) 403 3431 • FAX (360)403 3447 Location of Installation: Client's Name �r-.' T I - Phone Number. /�6 -7iZg27`�/ 5 Address: �lt/�6 -Le s5 Cal, 0 K City:Co=.oZ L'l State: Zip Code: Lot number: When acting as the general contractor for installing Manufactured Homes/Mobile Homes, the following requirements must be met per the Washington Administrative Codes. WAC 296-15OM-0630-Who may install a manufactured home? 1. A manufactured home may be installed by: ,-i•• • Homeowner _ .: fi^ • A certified installer " 11 • An individual who is supervised by an on site certified installer; or • A specialty trades person,for certain aspects of installation. 2. A certified installer must be a registered contractor or his or her employee, or an employee of a registered dealership. Contractor's Name: i=5� �'�C���' �' S� CL A Phone#: Address: `�-, J rc �,< !�l �. i) i` •� /� 1� 1, �� L & I Number: 9 3 • ��t 4`' City Business License#: Cy,' -i-S 1 - IMC S K Z 1 hereby certify the above info ation is correct and that the construction on, and the occupancy and the use of the above described ,,property will be accordance with the laws, rules and regulations of the State of Washington. The applicant will be responsible for providing a method of safely accessing o or i ction. �� �ayf ctor gnature Date C � Cr Phone�� `i-,rr7'i� C, .�4_��.0. #: Installer's Name: Address: ', u -1 ..l; 11 s�"�, j'c ir► iY"-Ii L & I Number: City Business License#: Cz-I5 I- h%G -G7 S- k_L FOR STAFF USE ONLY Permit# Accepted By Amount Received Receipt# Date Received WEB Form-70 Page 1 of 1 6/05 dwa -•t:• 't. aJ f• •..�•+•-.�.. .+y��r, J _ T_ � •"•----..._�� ••*1�7�"r'.;.T f-+. .1���1ye.. r. •3•: ••1 '� ,.• .•l; i ••i _ .. - .� 1 •t`Fl ter 4T ?`T '. TRi3.41 '�h �..�_u,.�.�) ;,: �tti: `i:r-fib ,,�� ..�.�:� °•r����t�i��::�����- _ � . ;V .,. .](•�+�r": ':�Y: 1 : ., J� f Y". fi •1 :i �y1 :i%l ;`.,.4}�: ?iZ+s .;��::. • '"t 1 .. i • Imo. 1 ':.f ' �Y - •�yy" _ t••` ':3 •3• 5 1 ' )r •fl. 3 1 ) S ,_ <^'f' `'`�li+ ;�� � i I` •,3 ,r .X .. +���---max +� •3 �r.' 1'/'; Ak •• - ' �i^ �is i ` �_�� .. � ! '� l' �: ; .'•r ro silo VIA ooz 1 •:4Y'ti Y:)��€�'• '� ~.` \:• Zoo .� - •-• :CI _ •L• T• _ K _ 5 S•••.•mot•Y .•�ti�i• \\•i\�� wY \• 11 F--lot LI �? e �r o rrt V ' I• Y� Orly t _ +�- �� } II t �9 • City of Arlington Development Services Permit Center REQUEST FOR REVIEW NAME: Cv�'� BP #: 06— 122 DATE: RETURN THIS FORM BY: PROJECT SUMMARY: '� - -' �— (� ff iX 6- 2-RESPONDING DEPARTMENTS TOM C., FIRE DAVE A. BU!L DING RETA S., UTILITIES KERRY W., BUILDING DERYL T., MARYSVILLE UTIL SCOTT B., BUILDING BILL B., NATURAL RESOURCE TE H. PLANNING MARC H., ENGINEERING WA., CO c� I Gv �S SHERRI PHELPS, BUS LIC JIM T., CONSULTANT coyu„v�� SUBMITTAL INFORMATION IS ATTACHED. Please review the information and return this form and your comments in memo form. If you have no comments, please return the form with the "No Comments" box checked. PLEASE MARK ONE BOX, SIGN, DATE, AND RETURN THIS FORM TO PC COMMENTS FOR THIS REVIEW ARE IN ATTACHED MEMO ❑ NO COMMENTS FOR THIS REVIEW, OKAY TO ISSUE PERMIT ❑ COMMENTS REVIEWED BY Z�517 DATE RECEIVED RECE'_",12D JUL 1 9 2006 ���Y MANOIFACTURED WOLF HOME PERMIT APPLICATION 'P��NG,�OO Department of Community Development City of Arlington • 238 N Olympic Ave. •Arlington, WA 98223 • Phone (360) 403 3431 • FAX (360)403 3447 11 y —,Q& Location of Installation: 1 Client's Name C T I n -- Phone Number: /p 16 -71Zc- 2-1/ S Address: (&_6 ,s,c us 1t� 11� City:! � X il,,� State: Zip Code: /Y5>L:/ Lot number: When acting as the general contractor for installing Manufactured Homes/Mobile Homes, the following requirements must be met per the Washington Administrative Codes. WAC 296-15OM-0630—Who may install a manufactured home? �. 1. A manufactured home may be installed by: • Homeowner • A certified installer = "" • An individual who is supervised by an on-site certified installer, or • A specialty trades person, for certain aspects of installation. 2. A certified installer must be a registered contractor or his or her employee, or an employee of a registered dealership. Contractor's Name L�� �IvC �� 5 T L:— Phone#: `r 6 Address: /`s 31:' _5►L' Pc �f �> > /� t v T� \ / L 8 I Number: 3 • 7�t � City Business License#: I hereby certify the above info f ation is correct and that the construction on, and the occupancy and the use of the above described property will be accordance Wit the laws, rules and regulations of the State of Washington. The applicant will be responsible for providing a method of safety 4ccessi7 o or tCtion. 1 / PqTit , ctor`5 Signature Date l Z," ` Installer's Name: L``� �' ``' 15 _N..a Phone#: 3L� Address: �1 .. l; 11 ,�"�•� ,.i'c tr�,1 iV�l t L& I Number: w�- City Business License#: CtZ-E5 t- kZG 'OS S - K 7- FOR STAFF USE ONLY V1R/Vl Permit# Accepted By Amount Received Receipt# Date Received WEB Form—70 Page 1 of 1 6/05 dwa ��.iZ���i:Ph'��• :; �A' - :�ST._ti'r1• T�R .IAlI � .. PST Y•� '� is•.q�i Y t• •iT�iAiY•'p,•j`j.,F ��i!'►'Y: t' 'R��ei'�1�•°' .. • „_ / 1 i, r.- r .� - Y\•• •t Ott. ID ZL�Q Ila s \ •,• .. fir• J� �� ��� is I t SNP p - ' ! . . . .• - ••f •t.- SFµ ��G��E. _ .. . Y 07 �s 1" •i' t. - t.. -.. s. .. •'�.�-`;�` �•^�. •.ti .i••-..r.i � _l.r fir.-.=`' __ -_ ', �'•i-_ _ r.L 7r►br Did LY-�' J ® N rd Fr rn Q � f pp / `>> Y U f • Memorandum 7 Department of Community Development Planning Division Date: 1 August 2006 To: Permit Center From: Nate Hudson, Assistant Planner Re: Copart Modular (BP #06-6908) All of the comments from the memo dated March 8, 2006, from Cliff Strong, Planning Manager shall be addressed prior to issuance of the building permit. Please see attached memo. • City of Arlington Development Services Permit Center REQUEST FOR REVIEW NAMEA- A - - �(�(1,����a}. BP #: 06- DATE: Z1� OlD RETURN THIS FORM BY: PROJECT SUMMARY: RESPONDING DEPARTMENTS TOM C., FIRE DAVE A. BUILDING KAREN L., UTILITIES KERRY W., BUILDING DERYL T., MARYSVILLE UTIL SCOTT B., BUILDING BILL B., NATURAL RESOURCE YVONNE P., PLANNING GREGG E., ENGINEERING CWA., CONSULTANT SHERRI PHELPS, BUS LIC JIM T., CONSULTANT SUBMITTAL INFORMATION IS ATTACHED. Please review the information and return this form and your comments in memo form. If you have no comments, please return the form with the"No Comments"box checked. PLEASE MARK ONE BOX, SIGN, DATE,AND RETURN THIS FORM TO PC COMMENTS FOR THIS REVIEW ARE IN ATTACHED MEMO ❑ NO COMMENTS FOR THIS REVIEW, OKAY TO ISSUE PERMIT ❑ COMMENTS REVIEWED BY DATF Gl� Y • Memorandum `y Department of Community Development �L �� N G Planning Division j Date: 8 March 2006 To: Permit Center From: Cliff Strong, Planning Manager Re: Copart Modular (BP #06-6908) We should not issue this permit, as the applicant has not even gone through the site civil review phase, nor completed the other conditions of land use permit S-05-058 (iterated below): 1. All development shall be in substantial conformance with the approved site/landscape plan received October 5, 2005, as modified herein or through civil construction plan review. 2. The applicant shall file a drainage plan, site civil construction plans, and a final landscape plan consistent with all the requirements of the Land Use Code, International Building Code, Uniform Fire Code, and Public Works Construction Standards and Specifications for review and approval prior to building permit issuance. 3. The applicant shall meet all local, state, or federal code requirements. Attached is a list of code requirements that are specifically called to the developer's attention. It is in no way intended to be a complete list of code requirements but instead is a general checklist of major steps and issues. Please refer to the AMC for a complete list of code requirements for your particular project type. 4. No significant trees shall be removed from the existing vegetated buffer along the site's west and north boundaries. Any significant trees removed from the interior of the site because their retention would unreasonably burden a development shall be replaced with 5-gallon-sized native species at a ratio of 3:1. 5. The Arlington Airport is liable for frontage improvements on 47th Avenue NE, which must be done in accordance with the Public Works construction standards, or as modified by the City Engineer. Improvements satisfying this requirement shall be shown on the site civil construction plans. (The Airport shall construct these improvements in the winter of 2006.) 6. The vehicle parking/storage plan, which provides 30-foot wide drive aisles and which may be modified through the site civil construction review process, shall be followed. Adequate access to fire hydrants shall be provided, which may mean that existing fire hydrants must be relocated and/or additional fire hydrants be installed. The Fire Department shall have the right to inspect the site to ensure that the approved vehicle parking/storage plan. 7. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the applicant shall submit payment of City of Arlington impact fees estimated at $1,038.00 per PM-peak- hour trip for six trips, or $6,228.00. (NOTE: The amount of the actual impact fee due will be that established by resolution at the time of payment. The amount provided above is an estimate. They may either increase or decrease before the time it is paid.) 8. The security fencing to be installed on the property shall be earth-toned. The security fence shall be located far enough away from the existing vegetated buffer along the site's west and north boundaries to protect the roots of the existing trees. No trees shall be removed from the buffer for installation of the security fence. 9. Prior to commencement of operations on-site, the Applicant shall initiate soil and water testing per the agreement outlined in Exhibit 8 (see land use file) to provide baseline information on hydrocarbon and metal contaminants. In the first year of operations, on-site water testing shall be performed, and the results reported to the Community Development Committee, in the spring and fall as specified in Exhibit 8. In following years, on-site water testing shall be performed, and the results reported to the Community Development Committee, as outlined in Exhibit 8. 10. The applicant shall apply Best Management Practices for spill protection and response as outlined in Exhibit 9 (see land use file) for the protection of the aquifer recharge area and groundwater resource underlying this site. 11. If any archaeological materials are discovered on the site, the applicant shall contact the State Historical Preservation Officer, the Stillaguamish Tribe, and the City of Arlington and take measures to preserve the materials and the site. 12. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall clear all outstanding Planning Division permit-processing accounts with the City. 13. Per AMC §20.16.220, this special use permit shall expire automatically one year of the below date of approval if the use is not commenced or if less than 10 percent of the total construction cost has been spent. • City of Arlington • Development Services Permit Center Y REQUEST FOR REVIEW NAME: BP #: 06- .I DATE: �- C'� li� RETURN THIS FORM BY: -7 PROJECT SUMMARY: P`' 4�90- ' J, - -- RESPONDING DEPARTMENTS (�:T01MC., FIRE DAVE A. BUILDING -ALZBETA S., UTILITIES rC AV KERRY W., BUILDING DERYL T., MARYSVILLE UTIL SCOTT B., BUILDING BILL B., NATURAL RESOURCE NATE H., PLANNING MARCH., ENGINEERING O�r �SULTANT ERRI PHELPS, BUS LIC SULTANT SUBMITTAL INFORMATION IS ATTAC`'" `f s form and your comments in memo form. If you have n, I i imments" box checked. PLEASE MARK ONE BOX, S U f�" PC 6 ❑ COMMENTS FOR THIS R, ' ❑ NO COMMENTS FOR THIS Ply/ ❑ COMMENTS 5 REVIEWED BY DATE *Ala sen!Inn 9001 61 lnr City of Arlington • Development Services q3 All 3 3 111 Permit Center � �� s D- (1p, ,6 REQUEST FOR REVIEW NAME: C_,6- glr- " BP #: 06- ll DATE: �- �� ;� RETURN THIS FORM BY: PROJECT SUMMARY- �Z, r RESPONDING DEPARTMENTS T OM C., FIRE D:?VE A. BUILDING RETA S., UTILITIES KERRY W., BUILDING DERYL T., MARYSVILLE UTIL SCOTT B., BUILDING BILL B., NATURAL RESOURCE NATE H., PLANNING MARC H., ENGINEERING CWA., CONSULTANT SHERRI PHELPS, BUS LIC JIM T., CONSULTANT SUBMITTAL INFORMATION IS ATTACHED. Please review the information and return this form and your comments in memo form. If you have no comments, please return the form with the "No Comments" box checked PLEASE MARK ONE BOX, SIGN, DATE, AND RETURN THIS FORM TO PC ❑ COMMENTS FOR THIS REVIEW ARE IN ATTACHED MEMO NO COMMENTS FOR THIS REVIEW, OKAY TO ISSUE PERMIT ❑ COMMENTS REVIEWED BY DATE ! - - _ - �l- 1 City of Arlington • Development Services Permit Center REQUEST FOR REVIEW NAME: Co BP #: 06- 0 DATE: RETURN THIS FORM BY: 2 D� PROJECT SUMMARY: - -�wlsd - hod I - 4�� RESKONDING DEPARTMENTS TOM C., ;=1 RE J r t tkj SLI,tk� RETA S., UTILITIES DERYL T., MARYSVILLE UTIL BILL B., NATURAL RESOURCE 7= J J Y1Jt r P K-MARC H., ENGINEERING SHERRI PHELPS, BUS LIC SUBMITTAL INFORMATION IS ATTACHED. Piease )ur comments in memo form. If you have no comments, f / '� cf,eckec+. PLEASE MARK ONE BOX. SIGN, DATt, Afu KC I UKIV 1 "IJ rUKIVI I r". ❑ COMMENTS FOR THIS REVIEW ARE IN ATTACHED MEMO NO COMMENTS FOR THIS REVIEW, OKAY TO ISSUE PERMIT ❑ COMMENTS b REVIEWED BY qtw DATE 4� Ca kk d c.kA--(-- Page 1 of 1 Sonya Blacker From: Marc Hayes Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2006 9:51 AM To: Sonya Blacker Subject: RE: Copart Modular Building Permit, can I issue it yet? Sonya, The issuance of the permit for the modular is contingent on the completion of several other construction elements on the site. I am drafting a letter to Crest Northwest that will detail the items to be completed before any permits may be issued. I will provide a copy to the permit center when I'm done. Marc. Marc Hayes Code Enforcement Officer City of Arlington 360.403.3457 mhayes@ci.arlington.wa.us www.ci.arlington.wa.us -----Original Message----- From: Sonya Blacker Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 2:26 PM To: Marc Hayes Subject: Copart Modular Building Permit, can I issue it yet? Can I issue the Copart Modular building permit yet? It's ready, but on hold until you and other staff are okay with it. Sonya Blacker, Permit Coordinator City of Arlington 238 N. Olympic Arlington,WA 98223 36o•403.3434 sblacker@ci.arlington.wa.us 4/26/2006 • City of Arlington • Development Services Permit Center gne( REQUEST FOR REVIEW NAME: BP #: 06- DATE: RETURN THIS FORM BY: 7 PROJECT SUMMARY: S/ RESPONDING DEPARTMENTS TOM C., FIRE DAVE A. BUILDING RETA S., UTILITIES KERRY W., BUILDING DERYL T., MARYSVILLE UTIL SCOTT B., BUILDING BILL B., NATURAL RESOURCE NATE H., PLANNING MARC H., ENGINEERING � 1 Tim CWA., CONSULTANT SHERRI PHELPS, BUS LIC JIM T., CONSULTANT SUBMITTAL INFORMATION IS ATTACHED. Please review the information and return this form and your comments in memo form. If you have no comments, please return the form with the "No Comments" box checked. PLEASE MARK ONE BOX, SIGN, DATE, AND RETURN THIS FORM TO PC ❑ COMMENTS FOR THIS REVIEW ARE IN ATTACHED MEMO t3- NO COMMENTS FOR THIS REVIEW, OKAY TO ISSUE PERMIT ❑ COMMENTS REVIEWED BY DATE ae, ti•J 41 City of Arlington Development Services BfL0 NG Permit Center Ij)t� REQUEST FOR REVIEW NAME: l BP #: 06- ��� DATE- fjl3l 1 RETURN THIS FORM BY: 3 �� ct} �1�+ PROJECT SUMMARY: RESPONDING DEPARTMENTS TOM C., FIRE ' 40L DAVE A. BUILDING KAREN L. UTILITIES 5� 0144 r O K RRY W., BUILDING / MARYSVILLE UTIL "A ��S SCOTT B., BUILDING DERYL T., 1 Aj O BILL B., NATURAL RESOURCE od, 4h p YVONNE P., PLANNING rr K 0 C1�'VA., CONSULTANT GREGG E., ENGINEERING �t0 SHERRI PHELPS, BUS LIC be7' M T., CONSULTANT SUBMITTAL INFORMATION IS ATTACHED. Please review the information and return this form and your comments in memo form. If you have no comments, please return the form with the"No Comments" box checked. PLEASE MARK ONE BOX, SIGN, DATE, AND RETURN THIS FORM TO PC ❑ COMMENTS FOR THIS REVIEW ARE IN ATTACHED MEMO NO COMME ' T F I IEW, OKAY TO ISSUE PERMIT , ❑ COMMENTS REVIEWED BY DATE ,n 1 City of Arlington Development Services Permit Center REQUEST FOR REVIEW NAME: 1 BP #: 06- 09 01K DATE: 3�31 C�l� RETURN THIS FORM BY: PROJECT SUMMARY: c ' d RESPONDING DEPARTMENTS TOM C., FIRE DAVE A. BUILDING KAREN L., UTILITIES KERRY W., BUILDING DERYL T., MARYSVILLE UTIL SCOTT B., BUILDING BILL B., NATURAL RESOURCE YVONNE P., PLANNING GREGG E., ENGINEERING CWA., CONSULTANT SHERRI PHELPS, BUS LIC JIM T., CONSULTANT SUBMITTAL INFORMATION IS ATTACHED. Please review the information and return this form and your comments in memo form. If you have no comments, please return the form with the "No Comments' box checked. PLEASE MARK ONE BOX, SIGN,DATE, AND RETURN THIS FORM TO PC COMMENTS FOR THIS REVIEW ARE IN ATTACHED MEMO NO COMMENTS FOR THIS REVIEW, OKAY TO ISSUE PERMIT nil III REVIEWED BY� ( D``�� �� � lulCASCADE TESTING LABORATORY, INC. TESTING &INSPECTION PREVIOUS 12919 N.E. 126TH PLACE REPORT NO. NO_ KIRKLAND,WASHINGTON 98034 (425)823-9800 EVERETT (425)259-0817 DATE 2 CUT,NO.��- C FIELD REPORT PROJECT (x�V LOCATION TO: BLDG PERMIT NO. OWNER �J U Z � ^ WEATHER TEMP. AT AM a 1 WO�� /�I�JL> ! L I AT PM ENGINEER ARCHITECT ATTN: CONTRACTORC, (2) (3) INSPECTION PERFORMED ITEMS INSPECTED _ FOUNDATIONS — RESTEEUCONCRETE — RESTEEL ONLY FOOTINGS _ SLAB — RESTEEL/MASONRY — ST TIWELDING — AUGER CAST PILES _ COLUMNS OTHER — STR.STIBOLTING — DRILLED PIERS — WALLS — BEAMS (LOCATION(AREAS) �� (5) CONCRETEIMASONRY MIX NO. DESIGN STRENGTH(f'c) SUPPLIER TOTAL CU.YD.PLACED SLUMP(INCHES) SPECIMENS CAST AIR CON ENT(%) SEE CYLINDER REPORT NO. _YES_NO_ITEMS INSPECTED WERE IN CONFORMANCE WITH BLDG.DEPT.APPROVED PLANS REMARKS: TEST RESULTS APPLY ONLY TO THE ITEMS HEREIN TESTED.THIS REPORT SHALL NOT INSPECTOR(S),NAME(S)PRINTED BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL, WITH- OUT THE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY,INC. INSPECTOR SIGNATURE REVISED 7105 p SIGNED BY COPIES TO: 1 City of Arlington • Development Services Permit Center REQUEST FOR REVIEW C NAME: ) BP #: 06- C DATE: (D �-c'1 —U RETURN THIS FORM BY: 711c3 PROJECT SUMMARY: — �3L RESPONDING DEPARTMENTS TOM C., FIRE DAVE A. BUILDING RETA S., UTILITIES KERRY W., BUILDING DERYL T., MARYSVILLE UTIL SCOTT B., BUILDING BILL B., NATURAL RESOURCE NATE H., PLANNING ARC H., ENGINEERING CWA., CONSULTANT SHERRIPI ELPS, BUS LIC JIM T., CONSULTANT SUBMITTAL INFORMATION IS ATTACHED. Please review the information and return this form and your comments in memo form. If you have no comments, please return the form with the "No Comments" box checked. PLEASE MARK ONE BOX, SIGN, DATE, AND RETURN THIS FORM TO PC ❑ COMMENTS FOR THIS REVIEW ARE IN ATTACHED MEMO NO COMMENTS FOR THIS REVIEW, OKAY TO ISSUE PERMIT ❑ COMMENTS REVIEWED BY ——— DATE — JUL I , 1006 lVlip, GXT Y O� — City of Arlington Community Development SLING Building Division Memorandum Date: March 16, 2006 To: Sonya Blacker, Permit Tech CC: From: David W. Anderson, Building Official Subject: Permit 06-6993 Copart Metal Building 1. A detailed site plan showing the parking requirements, all accessibility parking requirements, fire protection requirements for the building and the storage site as per the findings, conclusions and decision of the Hearing Examiner Report Dated January 26.2006. 2. There are two buildings mention, which will require an additional permit for the administration office and one for the repair garage. 3. If the building is to be heated or insulated as shown on sheet MEP-1, energy calculations are required to be submitted for compliance with the Washington State Non-Residential Energy Code. 4. A geo-tech report needs to be submitted to determine the bearing capacity for both buildings. 5. The construction type of Type II-B should be shown on the drawings for both buildings 6. The occupancy classification of S-2 should be shown on the drawings. 7. The building must comply with the provisions of Section 406.6 of the international Building Code and Section 2211 of the International Fire Code. 8. Portable fire extinguishers are required in both building per Section 906.1 of the International Fire Code. 9. If the building has areas containing the storage of lead-acid batteries an approved automatic smoke detection system is required throughout the building. Sec 907.2.23 10.A flammable gas detection system shall be provided in repair garages for vehicles fueled by nonodorized gases in accordance with Section 406.6.6. Section 908.5 11. Exits signs are required over the required exits. Section 1011. 12.Accessible means of egress is required throughout the building. Section 1007. 13. Means of egress doors shall comply with Section 1008.1 thro gh 1008.1.1. 14. Buildings and structures, temporary or permanent, including their associated sites and facilities, shall be accessible to persons with physical disabilities. Section 1103.1 15.Accessible routes within the site shall be provided from public transportation stops, accessible parking and accessible passenger loading zones and public streets or sidewalks to the accessible building entrance served. Section 1104.1 16. One accessible parking stall is required which is required to be van accessible. Table 1106.1 17.ADA signage is required to be in compliance with Section 1110. 18.A soil investigation report is required to determine the bearing capacity. Section 1802.6 19.The drawings should show the load bearing values per section 1804. 20.The re-lite in the exit door is required to be safety glazing. 21.The structural drawings need to be stamped by a professional engineer licensed in the State Washington, not Louisiana. 22. One set of structural drawings are required to be wet stamped. Photo copies are not permitted. Y O f City of Arlington 7 � Community Development �LING�O Building Division Memorandum Date: March 16, 2006 To: Sonya Blacker, Permit Tech CC: From: David W. Anderson, Building Official Subject:,, Permit 06-6993 Copart Metal Building A detailed site plan showing the-parking-requirements, all accessibility parking requirements, f4epfeteetion requirements for the building and the storage site as per the findings, conclusions and decision of the Hearing Examiner Report Dated January 26.2006. �G��I i There are two buildings mention, which will require an additional permit for the �,�h� administration office and one for the repair garage. ��,� �j�/��u A���"'"' If the building is to be heated or insulated as shown on sheet MEP-1, energy calculations are required to be submitted for compliance with the Washington State Non- Residential Energy Code. IVO NR67C t" eoj,� f A geo-tech report reeds to be submitted dtK7 to determine the bearing capacity fo both n� uildings.//&lM 4X7?. /-El,�' - — /�T 6�W10AC1-�Y( /`" J/ The construction type of Type II-B should be shown on the drawings for both buildings 6/Tile occupancy classification of S-2 should be shown on the drawings. i'! The building must comply with the provisions of Section 406.6 of the international uilding Code and Section 2211 of the International Fire Code. Portable fire extinguishers are required in both building per Section 906.1 of the International Fire Code. If the building has areas containing the storage of lead-acid batteries an approved �,. a tomatic smoke detection system is required throughout the building. Sec 907.2.23 1 . A flammable gas detection system shall be provided in repair garages for vehicles fueled y` by nonodorized gases in accordance with Section 406.6.6. Section 908.5 �-V111. Exits signs are required over the required exits. Section 1011. J U N 2 7 20 6 2. Accessible means of egress is required throughout the building. Section 1007. �3. Means of egress doors shall comply with Section 1008.1 through 1008.1.1. �0� '. / nnnt, ascaed �'es and ,jd Buildings and structures, tArnnC?r Or efma sri f ilities, shall be accessible to persons with physical disabilities. Section 1103.1 Accessible routes within the site shall be provided from public transportation stops, h accessible parking and accessible passenger loading zones and public streets or s* ewalks to the accessible building entrance served. Section 1104.1 One accessible parking stall is required which is required to be van accessible. Table 106.1 ADA signage is required to be in compliance with Section 1110. 1 . A soil investigation report is required to determine the bearing capacity. Section 1802.6 9 The drawings should show the load bearing values per section 1804. e re-lite in the exit door is required to be safety glazing. 1. The structural drawings need to be stamped by a professional engineer licensed in the State Washington, not Louisiana. ILi �l Y22: One set of structural drawings are required to be wet stamped. Photo copies are not permitted. L SY City of Arlington • Division 2 N G�0 D *Memo To: Permit Center From: Reta Shepard, Utilities Specialist CC: Ken Renfro,Virgil Renfroe,Earl Anderson,Gus Tararan Date: May 12.2006 Re: Copart 40x40 building, Building Permit#06-6993- The construction documents submitted with building permit #05-6993 have been reviewed for compliance with City of Arlington Utilities Division regulations. Comments are as follows: 1- At this point we do not have as-built drawings for this site.They are currently being worked on by Cascade Surveying on behalf of the property owner, the Arlington Airport. Until we get the as-guilts to determine the exact location of all of the existing utilities in relation to the proposed buildings, both temporary and permanent, some issues will remain as follows. 2 The drawings show a restroom in the building but do not show how they propose to serve the building with water and sewer. The as-built i construction drawings do not show water and sewer to the 40x40 building either. a). The existing 2" domestic service to the property will be the source of supply to all buildings constructed on this site. That 2" domestic service line must be disconnected and abandoned immediately beyond the furthest connection from the existing meter. This building is assumed to be the second of three buildings. It will be served from the existing 2"line and will need its own shutoff valve and PRV. b). Show the proposed method of sanitary sewer connection to the proposed building, this is required to be a 6"extension out of the monitoring SSMH. 3. A RPBA must be installed immediately after the existing domestic water meter. It must have freeze protection.The RPBA must appear on the State of Washington Department of Health list of approved assemblies and must be: tested by a State of Washington certified Backflow Assembly Tester_The City of Arlington must inspect the installation and a copy of the State test report must be provided. N w 1 o s o Z o O J w ��-- cr- Cf) Z O li 0 LL- LL- W ,, _ _ F :3 �- U Ul W W J 0 Z a_ LU Cr- J Q O � F- Q 0 , To: Building Department From: Tom Cooper Date: May 11,2006 Ref: 06-6993 1. Provide an approved fire extinguisher at each exit. Provide "Knox" access to control gate. o" 1. I • City of Arlington Development Services Permit Center REQUEST FOR REVIEW NAME:'v � BP #: 06-kjl� DATE: S RETURN THIS FORM BY: PROJECT SUMMARY: RESPONDING DEPARTMENTS TOM C., FIRE `VDAVE A. BUILDING KAREN L., UTILITIES KERRY W., BUILDING DERYL T., MARYSVILLE UTIL SCOTT B., BUILDING \ V BILL B. NATURAL RESOURCE \YVONNE P., PLANNING �GREGG E., ENGINEERING CWA., CONSULTANT SHERRI PHELPS, BUS LIC JIM T., CONSULTANT SUBMITTAL INFORMATION IS ATTACHED. Please review the information and return this form and your comments in memo form. If you have no comments, please return the form with the"No Comments'box checked. PLEASE MARK ONE BOX, SIGN, DATE,AND RETURN THIS FORM TO PC c-�MMENTS FOR THIS REVIEW ARE IN ATTACHED MEMO ❑ NO COMMENTS FOR THIS REVIEW, OKAY TO ISSUE PERMIT ❑ COMMENTS REVIEWED BY--) DATE c ECEIVED 2006 COA PERMIT CENTER Post-ite Fax Note 7671 .;ate 6I7 d �v3�s► To Je.rr sv:41 �n From ICo. Co.IDept. l (Phone x 36o-Y43 -3S'na Phone N Fext 366-451- It20 i�axk );C�'V Y 04 Department of Community Development Special Use Permit 1NG January 26, 2006 Copart 5-05-058 A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND REQUEST This is a request for a special use permit for the development of a 1,440 square foot building and automobile parking/storage site. The site is located near the southeast comer of 47"' Avenue NE and 196"' Place NE_ The site will be used to process intact insurance damaged vehicles. The vehicles will be parkedlstored on the site pending insurance company examination, after which the cars will be sold on Cepart's auction-style website. Cars will then be transported from the site by the successful bidder. No vehicle dismantling, crushing, or sale of parts will occur on-site. The existing 50-75 foot mature landscape/tree buffer along the street frontage (west property line) and the north property line will remain. An 8 foot earth-tone security fence will be installed on the inside of the buffer. The applicant proposes stormwater detention facilities, parking, and landscaping in accordance with City of Arlington standards. The project will be served with water and sewer from the City of Arlington. The site is approximately 28 acres and is zoned Light Industrial. B. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Applicant: Copart, Inc, 4665 Business Center Drive, Fairfield, CA 94534. 2. Owner: City of Arlington, 238 N Olympic Avenue, Arlington, WA 98223. 3. Contact Person: Joe Carroll, 2176 The Alameda, San Jose, CA 95126. 4. General Location: The site is located on the east side of 47h Avenue NE and south of the residences on the south side of 1961h Place NE, in Section 16, Township 31 E, Range 05, Wf111. 5. Address of Property: No address has been assigned; the access will be from the existing driveway on 47"'Avenue NE. 6. Description of Proposal: Development of a 1,440 square foot building and automobile storage site. 7. Acreage: Approximately 28 acres. �'' ;s ' \1COaadminllPlanninglypage\Copan S-OS-0581CopaA permit,doc �.; �r .41 1126106 — Page 1 cf 4 MAX SELIN Ikon 0 f5 Special Use Permit January 26, 2006 Copart S-05-058 8. Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designations, Zoning Designation and Existing Land Uses of the Site and Surrounding Area: AREA LAND USE DESIGNATION ZONING EXISTING USE Proiect Site Airport Industrial Light Industrial Vacant Airport Industrial North of Site Medium Density Residential Low Single-family Residential Residential Moderate Densi South of Site Airport Industrial Light Industrial Vacant Airport Industrial East of Site Airport Industrial Li ht Industrial Vacant Airport Industrial West of Site SnoCo Urban Low Density SnoCo R-7,200 & Single-family Residential Residential PRD-9.600 9_ Public Utilities and Services Provided by: Water: City of Arlington Gas: Cascade Natural Gas I Sewer: City of Arlington 1 Cable TV: Comcast Garbage: Waste Management Northwest Police: City of Arlington Storm Water: On-site Fire: City of Arlington Telephone: Verizon School: Lakewood School District Electricity: Snohomish County PUD #1 Hospital: Cascade Valley Hospital 10. Public Notification: A Notice of Application was published, posted, and mailed on October-26, 2005, and a Notice of Public Hearing was published, posted, and mailed on December 13, 2005. C. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW A Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) was issued on January 18, 2006, with no comment period. D. BACKGROUND The subject special use permit application was received by the City of Arlington on October 5, 2005, and the application was deemed complete on October 21, 2005. A Notice of Application was published, posted, and mailed on October 26, 2005.-During plan review, additional/revised information was requested on November 30, 2005, and was received on December 2, 2005. A Notice of Public Hearing was published, posted, and mailed on December 13, 2005, and a public hearing was held on December 28, 2005. A Post-hearing Order from the Hearing Examiner remanded the request for a revised environmental threshold determination on January 6, 2006. A DNS was issued on January 18, 2005 and provided with s-inporting documentation to the Hearing Examiner that day. The Hearing Examiner's decision was received on January 25, 2006. 11CoaedminI Planninglypage\Copert S-05 $Knpart permlt.doc 1/26/06 Page 2 of 4 Special Use Permit January 26, 2006 Copart S-05-058 Distributed to the Following Parties: • Copart, Inc, 4665 Business Center Drive, Fairfield, CA 94534 • Joe Carroll, 2176 The Alameda, San Jose, CA 95126 • Arlington Municipal Airport, clo 238 N Olympic Avenue, Arlington, WA 98223 • Joette Marsh, 19220 461h Drive NE, Arlington, WA 98223 • Rich Saddler,4509 193Id Place NE, Arlington, WA 98223 • Virginia Whiteley, 19304 461h Drive NE, Arlington, WA 98223 • Henry and Vera J. Berghuis, 19227 461h Drive NE, Arlington, WA 98223 • Sandra L Saddler, 4513 193r° Place NE, Arlington, WA 98223 • Del Billings, 16701 51'' Drive NE, Arlington, WA 98223 • Bob Morrison, 19102 46d' Drive NE,.Arlington, WA 98223 • Jason Morrison, 4612 145" Street NE, Arlington, WA 98223 • Engineering File/Gregg Eaton, Engineering Technician, Public Works, Engineering Division • Karen Latimer, Utilities Manager, Public Works, Utilities Division • Dave Anderson, Building Official, Community Development, Building Division • Kerry Wentz, Plans Examiner, Community Development, Building Division IN Bill Blake, Natural Resources Manager • Dale Carman, Airport Coordinator, Arlington Airport 1\Coaadminl%Planninglypage\Copart 5-05-0581Copert permit.doc 1126106 Page;4 of 4 Special Use Permit January 26, 2006 Copart S-05-058 E. FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS, AND CONDITIONS The findings, conclusions, and conditions were made by the Hearing Examiner and were based on the project description and compliance with Arlington Municipal Code Title 20, Land Use Code. See attached Exhibit 1, which is the Hearing Examiner's Decision dated January 24, 2006. F. HEARING EXAMINER DECISION On December 28, 2005, the Hearing Examiner held the public hearing for the Copart Special Use Permit (S-05-058). She approved the special use permit based on the findings of fact, conclusions, conditions, and recommendation of the staff analysis dated December 22, 2005_ Her decision is dated January 24, 2006. (See attached Exhibit 1.) G. APPEALS Per AMC §20.20.010 and AMC §20.98.210, to appeal this decision or the SEPA threshold delerminaticn, an appeal application must be filed, with all re u red fees, within 14 days of the date of issuance of this permit. The City Council would hear the appeal of the permit and their decision would be considered the City's final decision on the underlying governmental action. H. DECISION The special use permit is hereby APPROVED subiect to the condlttons approved by the Hearing Examiner. 1. EXHIBITS 1. Hearing Examiner's Decision dated January 24, 2006. 2- Site development plan received by the City of Arlington on October 5, 2005, 3. Staff analysis for special use permit dated December 22. 2005 (on file at City Hall). _ 4. File S-05-058 (Copart)'(on file at City Hall). ORDERED THIS 26TH DAY OF JANUARY 2006. Cliff ong, Pla g Manager I1CoaadminlTlanninglypagelCopart s-05-ou\Copart parmit.doc 1/26/05 Page 3 of 4 BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THE CITY OF ARLINGTON In the Matter of the Application of ) NO. S-05-058 Copart ) Copart SUP FINDINGS. CONCLUSIONS, For a Special Use Permit ) AND DECISION SUMMARY OF DECISION The request for approval of a special use permit to develop a 1.440 square foot administrative office building and a 1,600 square foot warehouselscrvice building in association with a sterage site for approximately 5,000 insurance damaged automobiles on 28.35 acres located ncarthe intersection of 471h Avenue NF, and 196"' Place NE in Arlington. Washin_tort is APPROVED. subject to conditions. SUINIMARY OF RECORD Request Copart (the Applicant) requests approval of a special use permit to develop a 1..440 square foot administrative office building and a 1.600 square foot warehouse/service building in association with a storage site for insurance damaged automobiles on 28.35 acres located near the intersection of 47"'Avenue NE and 196`h Place NE in Arlington, Washington. Hearing Date An open record public hearing on the request was held before the City of Arlington Hcarin_ Examiner on December 18, 2005. Daring deliberations, the Hearing Examiner determined that additional environmental review was necessary and remanded the rnatter for further environmental review by order on January 9, 2006. The City conducted additional review under the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA). The City's SEPA Determination of Non- Signil icance and supporting documents were submitted for the record. Testimony At the open record hearing, the following individuals presented testimony under oath: Cliff Strong. Planning Manager Max Selin. City Engineer. Joe Carroll, Representative of Copart Dem, Billings Robert Morrison Jason Morrison RECEIVED City ofArlingfon Peoring Examiner JAN 2 5 2005 Finding. Conclusions, and Decision Copart Special Use Permit. SOS-058 p°Q4 i ��iE ���3 'KEPT Exhibits The Following exhibits were admitted as part of the record of this proceeding: Exhibit 1 Development Services Staff Report dated December 22. 2005 with the following attachments: a. Snohomish County Online Property Information Aerial View b. City of Arlington Code Requirements c. Narrative Summary of Copart Operations, dated received October 5, 2005 d. Email from Joette Marsh, dated November 1. 2005 e. Letter from Rich Saddler, dated received November 9. 2005 f. Letter From Virginia Whiteley, dated received November 9, 2005 e_ Vicinity Map h. Reduced copy of Site Plan. dated received October 5, 2005 Exhibit 2 Full size Site Plan dated received October 5. 2005 Exhibit 3 Hand drawn site plan depicting drive aisles. parkin; areas. and location of existing fire hydrants.submitted For illustrative purposes— not to scale (Hand Dra-wn.Conceptual illustration) Exhibit F Performance Specifications for Ceram-A-Star 950. the proposed finish For the proposed steel fence Exhibit 5 Memorandum from Bill Blake, dated October 18. 2005. regarding stormwater Z Exhibit 6' Determination of Non-Significance (DNS), issued January17. 2006 Exhibit 7 Environmental Checklist Exhibit 4 Letter from Paul. Styler, General Counsel to the Applicant, to the Planning Manager, dated .January 12, 2006 Exhibit 9 Copart Auto auctions Training Outline for Emergency Spill Response, prepared by Environmental Cher iical Solutions. Inc. L'pon considcraticn of the testimony and era:ibits submitted in cvidence, the Hearing Examiner enters the follo% 'na Findings and Conclusions- FINDINGS 1. The Applicant requests approval of a special use perinit (SUP) to develop a 1,440 square foot administrative office building and a 1.600 square foot warel=se/service building in association w-ith a 28-acre storage site for up to 5.000 insurance damaged automobiles. The subject property is owned by the City and would be leased to the Applicant. The site, which has a Light Industrial zoning designation, vvas formerly used as a log storage yard. it borders residential development on two sides. 1rhe property is located near the intersection of 17"' Exhibits 6 through s were submitted after the hearing date in response to the Hcaring FxaminWs January 9.2006 ,Order on Remand for funlier environmental review. City ofArlinglon Nearing Frcminer Findings, Conchisinnc, and Decision Copart.Speciol Use Permit. S-05-058 page Z of l� City g of Arlington PZAf✓ ✓ ��¢, 6 • s Development Service�TA-�-� _ 4. 5t;� z Permit Center - a v' REQUEST FOR REVIEW © �� f BP #: 0 NAME: ;��9-Tl 6 DATE: _RETURN THIS FORM PROJECT SUMMARY: -�'�� �� rv`�,L� 1�• y RESPONDING DEPARTME" TOM C., FIRE 7'� KAREN L., UTILITIES DERYL T., MARYSVILLE UTIL BILL B., NATURAL RESOURCE GREGG E., ENGINEERING 4 5 . SHERRI PHELPS, BUS LIC SUBMITTAL INFORMATION IS ATTACHED. Please review the in comments in memo form. If you have no comments, please return checked. PLEASE MARK ONE BOX, SIGN, DATE, AND RETURN THIS FORM TO PC ❑ COMMENTS FOR THIS REVIEW ARE IN ATTACHED MEMO T.0 NO COMMENTS FOR THIS REVIEW, OKAY TO ISSUE PERMIT ❑ COMMENTS REVIEWED BYf DATE Avenue NE and 196"' Place NE in Arlington,Washington.' Exhibit 1, S►aff Report,pages I- 2; Testimony nf'Hr. Carroll; Testimony of_19r. .5ir-ong; Exhibit d, DNS. 2. The City of Arlington received the SUP application on October 5, 2005. The application was deemed complete on October 21, 2005. Notice of the application was published, posted, and mailed on October 26, 2005. Pursuant to Arlington Municipal Code (AMC)20.16.140,the Planning Manager makes administrative decisions on SUPs unless an interested party requests a hearing. The City received three written requests for a public hearing on the application. Exhibit 1, Attachment d. iWarsh email; Exhibit 1, Attachment e. ,Saddler letter; Exhibit 1, Atiachment g, Whiteley Letter. Notice of the hearing was published, posted,and mailed consistent with the requirements of the Arlington Municipal Code (AMC) on December 13,2005_ The City's Land Use Hearing Examiner conducted a public hearing on December 28,2005. Exhibit 1, Etaff•Report. page 2; Tevhi mny of Mr. Strong. 3. Approximately half of the subject property(the western half) is paved,while the remainder of the site has an existing gravel surface. Due to disuse.both the pavement and ;ravel surfaces have developed vegetation in the form of shrubs and grasses that have _grown up through cracks and bare spots. An existing vegetated buffer of coniferous trees ranging from 50 to 75 feet in width would be retained along the west and north project boundaries. The Applicant proposes to use the existing stormwater facilities that remain in tact from the previous on-site industrial use. Existing structures in the northwest comer of the site would not be retained. Te.stiniony nfMr. Carroll; F,cTribit 1, Staff Rel)mit, page ?; Frhihit 2.Site Plan. 4. The Applicant, Copart, brokers cars that have been deemed "total loss"by insurance companies(herein called salvage vehicles)_ It is a publicly traded corporation with facilities in several states handling approximately 60% of all insurance-totaled vehicles in the nation. At Copart facilities, salvage vehicles are stored for internet auction on Copart-s internet auction r%-ebsite. Bids are placed by wholesale salvage vehicle dealers either on-line or in person at the facility. Cars arc sold to the highest wholesale bidder. typically in large lots. The average length of stay for salvage vehicles at Copart facilities is 60 to 70 days. During storage, vehicle ownership changes twice: from the oti\•ner at the time of accident to uhe insurance companv, and from the insurance company to the wholesale purchaser. Atno time does Copart own the vehicles stored at its facilities. Testlmmny of,Vfr. Carroll; Exhibit 1. Attachment c, Narrative Summary. - 5. Proposed improvements include a 100.000 square foot parking lot and truck loadin;area in the northwest comer of the site. The remainder of the 28.35-acre site would be used as salvage vehicle stora-e area. A 1,440-square foot modular office building would be located adjacent to parking lot in the northwest corner. A, second, 1,600 square foot building is proposed to be located inside the salvage vehicle storage area, east of the parking lot. Exhibit 2, Site Plan. The 1.600 square foot building would be used as a warehouse for forklifts and The legal description of the site is a portion of section 16,Township 31 East, Range 5,W.M.- Exhibit I,Siaff Report,page 1. City ofArlinglnn hearing F—Yaminer Findings, Conclusions, and Decision Copart Spacial Use Permil, S-05-038 pa,�e 3 of 1 a as a service area for the removal of automotive fluids from cars on.an as needed basis. Tes imonj,of Mr. Carroll. The Applicant proposes to install an eight-foot solid steel ('once around the perimeter of the vehicle storage area. A new eight-foot chain link fence with a sate would be installed around the parking lot and truck loading area. The City Planning Staff requested that the steel security fence be painted an earth-tone color to minimize visual impacts on adjacent rights-of-way and residential uses. All proposed Fencing would be installed inside the existing vegetated buffer along the north and west site boundaries. No trees would be removed from the buffer. Prior to the commencement of operations,the Applicant proposes to repair the pavement and supplement the existing gravel surface as needed within the proposed vehicle storage area. Exhibit 2. Site Plan,- Testimony of Mr. Carroll. 6. Salvage vehicles delivered to the proposed storage facility would enter into the trek loadin, area in the northwest corner of the site. They would be taken from the delivery trucks and into the storage area by forklift through an electric rate in the steel security fence. Inventory would not be stacked, but rather would be stored in rows. arranged "head to toe." betwccn ,0-foot wide drive aisles. No repair. demolition. dismantling, cnishin� or parts sales would occur on-site. Testin7ony of;hlr. Carroll; F-Yhihil 1. Anctchment c. Nari-cuive Surnn7ary.- Exhihit 2. Site Pk177; Exhibit 3. Nctnd Drawn Cancept7tn11111tslrcniolt. 7. The subject property has a Comprehensive Plan Land Use designation of Airport Industrial, as do adjacent properties to the south and east. Adjacent properties to the north and west have residential land use designations: Medium Density Residential to the north and SnoCo Urban Low Density Residential to the west. Exhibit L Staff Report, Doge 2. Abutting properties to the south and east share the site's Light Industrial (LI) zoning designation. Properties north of the site are zoned Residential Low 'Moderate Density and developed with sine le-family residences. Adjacent properties to tl-e Xcst hale zonin? designations of SnoCo R-7.200 and PRD-9,600 and are developed with single-Family residences. F-rhihif 1.Etgtf Report. puke 2. 4. The City classified the proposed use as Permissible Use 10.100. "automobile parkin, garages or parking lots not located on a lot on which there is another principal use to which the parking is related." AJVC 20-40-2, rarle ofPern7►.v.Sinle USeS• USc 10.100 is a permitted in Light Industrial zoning districts upon SUP approval. Exhibit 1. Siq)T Rel7orl. page 2, Testimony of,Vfr- .Strom: AjWC 20.40-2. - 9. At hearing,there was testimony opposing placement of a salvage vehicle storage yard adjacent to residential development. Testimony ofJoTon Morrison Testimo+ry of Rahcrt Mnrrison. Two comment letters received by the City opposed the placement of a`°junk yard" or"auto wrecking yard"adjacent to residential properties. Exhibit 1. Attachment e, Sadler Letter; Exhibit 1, Attachment., Whiteley Letter. 10. Jn response to these concerns, City Planning Staff testified that when a proposed use does not exactly match any of the uses listed in the Permissible Uses 7-able, planners rely on professional judgment to determine .which use is the most similar. In the present case,City City of Arlinglan Nearing E-Caininer Findings. Condn.sinns, and Decision Cnrart.Special Use Permit, S-0-UDR page t of t� Planning Staff determined that the most similar use was a parking lot. Staff testified that the proposed facility does not rneet the detinition of a junkyard or automobile graveyard(Erse 11.000) because the Applicant proposes no dismantling.crushing, or parts sales on-site. Testi177017y gf,11r. Strol7g. 11. The Light Industrial zone requires a minimum lot size of 10.000 square feet and a minimum lot width of 70 feet. Structures in the Light Tndustrial zone must be set back at least 25 feet from rights-of-way and Five feet from all lot boundaries. The maximum permitted building heiuht is 50 feet and the maximum lot coverage is 100%. A.VC Tame 20. :s proposed, the development would be consistent with dimensional and setback requirements in the underlying zoning district. Exhibit 2. ,Site Plan: Txhihit 1, Stcrff Report. page 3: Testimrtr y of A-fr. Strong. 12. Copart operates a 40-acre facility else-,khere in Arlington at which it maintains its local headquarters. The proposed=S-acre facility would serve as additional storage for Copart in the region. The 1.440-square foot modular office building would serve only on-site operations. T1ze Gcneral Manager of Copan';, existing Arlin ton facility testified that?:curs of operation are typically Monday through Friday. 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., with occasional Saturday off-ice hours of approximately 9:00 to noon. Copart is closed Sundays and holidays_ The Applicant representative testified that the proposed facility would have two to eight employees on-site at one time. Testimony of a1r. Carroll; Testimony of Mr. Blllrr7La"C. 13. Pursuant to the Arlington Municipal Code (AMC) 20.44, Part 111. the proposed facility must comply with non-residential performanceloperation standards for noise, vibration. odors. smoke and air pollution.disposal of liquid and hazardous wastes,water consumption, electrical disturbance or interference, lighting, and site and building maintenance. Exhibit 1. Staff Report,pure 3; Testimony of Mr. S tror7g. Noise generated by the proposed facility would be from fork lifts, delivery and pick-up vehicles, and emplovee vehicles. The Applicant does not propose any outdoor lighting for the facility. Testirr7017y of I r. Carroll: Testinionyof,Wn Billings. 14. Development in the Light Industrial district is subject to the City s Design Guidelines per AMC 20.24.010. Due to the existing 50-to 75-foot buffer of mature trees to be retained and the addition of the proposed earth-tone eight-foot solid steel perimeter fence, the proposed use would not be visible from the right-of-way and would result in minimal visual impacts. City Planning Staff determined that design review would most appropriately be h0ndled administratively. Exhibit 1, Staff Report.page 3: Testimony of Mr. .Slroylg. 15. The proposed use does not require off-street parkin?. A,IfC Table 20.72-6. Despite this.the Applicant proposes six off street paved parking spaces in the northwest corn:.r of the site to address employee and visitor parking needs. As proposed, one of the six spaces would be ADA accessible. Exhibit 1, Staff Report,page 3; Exhibit 2. Site Plan. 16. The project would use the existing access point on 47'h Avenue NE near the intersection at 196`h Place NE. Before a permit can be issued for the use of the subject property,the site's City of Arlington Nearing Eruminer Findings, Conchainns, and Decision page 5 of 14 Copa,•t special Use Permit, S-05-0 158 frontage on 47'h Avenue NE must be improved consistent with the City's half street standards for the street type. .1111C 20.56.1 i0(a). The Arlington Municipal Airport is liable for the frontage improvements. Based on an understanding with the Airport that the frontage improvements will be installed in the winter of 2006. the City Engineer has deemed that the frontage improvement requirement of AMC 20.56.170(b)(3) is satisfied. Exhibit I.. Staff Report, pace 4: Testimony of.1/s. Selin. 17. The project is anticipated to generate six PM peak hour trips within the City's overall transportation system. The !-Applicant must pay an impact fee to mitigate the anticipated impacts. AMC 20.90.0-40. The current impact fee is S 1,038.00 per PM peak hour trip. The Applicant would be required to pay the fee in effect at the time of payment. Fees must be paid prior to building permit issuance. Exhibit 1, StnffReport, page 4: Testimony ofNfs. Selin_ 1 S. The Arlington Municipal Code establishes the types of screening required between the proposed use and the adjacent rights-of-way and other uses. A minimum often feet of intermittent Screen is required alon.,47th Avenue '` l - Five feet of opaque screening is required adjacent to residential uses. No screening is required between industrial uses. .1111C Table 20.76-9. The existing 50- to 75-foot wide treed buffer. which would be retained. exceeds the maximum screening required. The Applicant's final landscape plan, depicting landscaping for the new parking area and dumpsters. must be consistent with the requirenicntsof AMC Chapter20.76. Exhibit 1, ,Staft'Report. pages 3-4: Testimony of_Lfi-. Strang. 19. New development is required to retain or replace significant trees at a ratio of three to one.3 ,LWC 20.76. 120. No significant trees are expected to be removed for the project. The Applicant would be required to replace any significant trees that are removed. Testimony of 11r•. Swong. The Applicant representative testified that if installation of the steel fence required grading of the hummocky portions of the site. the Applicant would install the fence far enough away from the significant trees in the existing landscaped buffer to allow adequate protection for the roots of the existing trees in the buffer. Testimon nf.lfr. Carroll. 20. The Applicant proposes to use the existing on-site stormwater facilities. which include two detention ponds and a pipe conveyance system from the western, paved portion of the site. The City Engineer reviewed the existing system and determined that the Applicant's plan to use it is conceptually feasible. A.detailed drainage review would occur during the site civil construction process. The final drainage plan must comply with AMC Chapter 13.28, Storsnwater Management,and the Department of Ecology's Stormwater Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin(The Technical Manual). Exhibit 1. Staff Report, page 4: Testimony of Ms. Selin, Exhibit 2, ,Site Plan. Significant trees are deciduous trees that measure eight inches or,greater in diameter(25 inches or greater in circumference)or evergreen trees that measures 12 inches or greater in diameter(37 inches or.neater in circumference)at the height of one foot above the root crown. .4AfC 20.08, Definitions. City ofAriirrgton Hearing Examiner Findings, Concivsions, and Decision Copan Special Use Permit, S-05-058 page 1 °f 14 21.The City of Arlington would provide water_ sewer, police. and fire services to the site. Electricity would be provided by Snohomish County PUD 41. and garbage service would be provided by Waste Management Northwest. Exhibit 1, Stuff Report.pace 2_ Fire hvdr.,uits and fire protection are required and would be reviewed at civil plan review. The Arlington Fire Department submitted comments expressing concerns about reserving adequate drive lanes betwween the stored vehicles to ensure emergency access. The Fire Department required the following conditions: that drive lanes at least 20 feet wide be provided throughout the site; that adequate fire hydrant access be provided, which could require installation of new hvdrants or relocation of existing hydrants; and,,that the Fire Department have the right to inspect the site. Exhibit 1, Staff Report, pace 5. The proposed drive aisles between rows of stored vehicles would be 30 feet wide. Testimony of,Vr_ Carroll: Exhibit 3, Hand Drat,n Concept teal Illustration. 22. The Stillaguamish Tribe expressed concerns about potential significant cultural resources that may exist within the site. City Planning Staff recommended that approval of the SUP be conditioned on notification of the State Historical Preservation Officer, the Stillaguamish Tribe. and the City of Arlington in the event that cultural resources are discovered_ and suggested that preservation measures be required to preserve any materials discovered on- site. Exhibit 1, .Staff Report. puge 5. 23. Salvage vehicles stored on-site could contain typical automotive fluids such as gasoline. motor oil, antifreeze,transmission and break fluids. etc. Tl,e Applicant representative testified that salvage vehicles typically do not leak,but that vehicles with evidence of leaking could be taken to the service building on site to have fluids removed and properly disposed of. Testimony of.ltr. Carroll. The record contains a memorandum from City Natural Resources Staff indicating that stormwater runoff from the proposed facility could contain automotive related wastes, including at a minimum"hydrocarbons, lead, zinc, and components of anti-freeze." Exhibit 5. Make Memorandum. dated October 18, 2005. 24. At hearing,the entire project site was determined to be within an Aquifer Recharge Area. City ofArli►rt?to►7 Comprehensive Plait Figure,JF-2 "100 Year Flood Zone andAgvifer Rechar e A►•ea_ " The groundwater in the vicinity of the site is a"primary source of municipal and domestic potable water supply in the Arlington area." Exhibit I, 51gff Reporl, page 5. The City defines'AquiferRecharge Arcas as environmentally critical areas. ,4111C: 20.88, Part IX. Development activities within aquifer recharge areas are subject to the City's environmental protection regulations. New commercial uses that store or handle hazardous waste products are required to submit a Best Management Practices Plan with the application materials. Such uses may also be required to submit a mitigation plan. AMC 20.88.910, et seq.; AMC Table 20.88-14. 25. The Applicant submitted an emergency spill response plan outlining the Applicant's proposed Best Management Practices for addressing automotive fluid spills that could potentially occur at the facility. The plan addresses small and large spills on both pa�,cd and gravel surfaces and emphasizes the importance of preventing potential leaks from entering City of Arli»gton Hearing EYarniner Findings, Conclusions, and Decision Coport Special Use Permit, S-05-018 page 7 of l l the stomiwater facilities or from running off-site. Exhibit 9, Coparr Aum Aucriun.s Training 0181ine.for Emergency Spill Response. 26. Tlme Applicant and the City reached an agreement pertaining to initial and ongoing site monitoring for time protection of the groundwater_ Prior to commencement of on-site operations,the Applicant agreed to take a total of eight soil samples to test for background levels of soil contamination. The eight soil testing locations would be identified by photograph for future reference_ Water samples would be taken from the existing stormwaie.r ponds at the inlet to the detention pond,at the outlet from pond 42,and from both ponds to measure background levels of contaminants from previous uses. All samples would be tested for hydrocarbons and metals associated with auto wrecking facilities_ Ongoing water sampling would occur in the spring and fall of the first year of operations and every fall thereafter during the Applicant's occupancy of the site. Exhibit 8. Letter from Paul Styler, General Counsel to the Applicant, to the Planning:'Manager, dated January 12, 2006. 27. Initially. City Planning Staff determined the proposal to be categorically exempt from review for compliance with the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). The City cited AMC 20.98.090(a)(3) as the basis of categorical exemption_ Testimony of 111r. Strong. That section states as follows: 20.98.090 Flexible Thresholds For Categorical Exemptions (a)The City establishes the following levels for minor new construction under WAC 197-11-800(1)(b) based on local conditions: (3) For office, school,commercial, recreational, service, or storage buildings...: Up to 4,000 square feet and up to 20 parking spaces. Staff determined that the project was categorically exempt because the proposed structures would total 3,040 square feet. Testimony of,'t/lr. Strong. However. during initial deliberations, the Examiner found that the City's classification of the proposed use asi.ise 10.100 (parking lot) on a 28 acre site to be inconsistent Nvith a deterrnination that the project satisfied the categorical exemption requirements of AMC 20.98.090(a)(3), which specifically exempts minor construction with"up to 20 parking spaces." On January 9, 2006.the matter was remanded to the City Planning StafT for further environmental review. 28. The City of Arlington waS designated as the lead agency for review of the project pursuant to SEPA. Upon review of a completed Environmental Checklist(submitted October 5.2005) and other information on file with the lead agency, the City determined that compliance with state and local regulations would mitigate any probable significant adverse environmental impacts to a point of non-significance. A Determination of Non-Significance(DNS)was issued on January 17,2006. Exhibit 6, DNS. City vrArlilT.gtcm Nearing Exarntiner Findings.Conclusions, and Decision Coport Special Use Perpnii.S-05-058 p°�e 8 of!� CONCLUSIONS Jurisdiction The Hearing Examiner is granted the authority to hear and decide this application pursuant to Chapter 35.63 of the Revised Code of Washington (RCW) and Chapters 20.16.140(b)and 20.20.030 of the Arlington Municipal Code (ANIC). Criteria for Special Use Permit Under AMC 20.16.140(c), approval of a Special Use Permit requires consistency with the following criteria: l. The requested permit is within its jurisdiction according to the Table of Permitted Uses in AMC 20.40.010; 2. The application is complete; 3. if completed as proposed in the application. the development will comply with the requirements of this title (AMC 20.161, Zoning, Special Use. and Conditional Use Permits); 4. The proposed project complies with the SEPA; and 5. The proposed project conforms to the Comprehensive Plan.Transportation Plan.or other adopted plans, regulations, and policies. Evcn if the 14earinu Examiner finds that the application for a Special i_se Pemiit complies with all other provisions of AMC 20.16, the Hearing Examiner may still deny the pemiit if he concludes. based on the information submitted at tl e hearing. that the proposed development, more probably than not: 1. Will materially endanger the public health and safety.or 2. Will harm adjoining or abutting property, or 3. In terms of design and use.will not be compatible with the area in�vhicll it is located. Conclusions Based Findiw4s 1. The requested use is allowed in the underlying Li_bt industrial Zone by special use permit. Findr»Rs Nos. 1, 7, and 3. 2. The application was submitted on October 5,2005 and was deemed complete on October 21, 2005. Fbiding No. 2. 3. The proposed use and improvements would be consistent with the permitted uses and develot mcnt standards for the Light Industrial Zoning district. The project would be required to comply xith non-residential performance standards or be subject to code enforcement action. Compliance with Design Guidelines would be ensured thrm-h an administrative review process. The project would provide six off-street parkin`spaces Ciry ofArlingron Nearing Erm}finer Findings, Conchisions, and Decision Copa Special Use Permit,S-0-058 page of l n for employees and visitors, exceeding the number of spaces required for the use. The existing 50-to 75-foot wide buffer of mature coniferous trees retained alon-the site's west and north boundaries would provide screening acliacent residential development in excess of the screening required by Code. A condition of approval would ensure that all significant trees on-site would be retained or replaced. The site's frontage along 47'h Avenue NE would be improved consistent with City standards by the Arlington Municipal Airport, as approved by the City Engineer. Stormwater runoff would be managed consistent with City and state requirements. Adequate water, sewer,police, and fire service would be provided by the City of Arlin-ton. A condition of approval would ensure that adequate provision is made for fire and emergency access. Conditions would also ensure that the underlying Aquifer Recharge Area is protected through compliance with City Ordinances, ongoing monitoring and testing for contamination of stormwater runoff(Exhibit 8),and the use of the hest management practices for spill prevention and response (Exhibit 9). Findings Nos. 8. 11, 13, 14. 15, 16. 13. 19, 20, 21, 23. 24, 25. and 26. 4. The proposed use was reviewed for compliance with the requirements of SEPA and a DNS was issued on January 17, 2006. Findings Nos. 27 crud 28. 5. The proposed use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan land use designation for the site. Frontage improvements would be provided by the Airport. A condition of approval would ensure that impacts to the surrounding transportation network are mitigated through the payment of traffic impact fees. Findings Nos. 7, 16, and 17. DECISION Based upon the preceding Findings and Conclusions.the request for approval of a special use permit to develop a 1.440 square foot administrative office building and a 1.600 square foot warehouselservice building in association with a storage Site for approximately 5,000 salvage vehicles on 28.35 acres located near the intersection of 47"'Avenue NE and 196'11 Place NF, in Arlinuton. Washington is APPROVED, subject to the following conditions: 1. All development shall be in substantial conformance with the approved site-;'landscape plan received October 5.2005. as modified herein and through civil construction plan review. 2. The Applicant shall file a drainage plan, site civil construction plans, and a final landscape plan consistent with all requirements of the Land Use Code, International Building Code, Uniform Fire Code, and Public Works Construction Standards and Specifications for review and approval prior to building permit issuance. 3. The Applicant shall meet all local, state, and federal code requirements. Attached to this permit is a list of code requirements that are specifically called to the Applicant's attention.. It is in no way intended to be a complete list of code requirements but instead is a general checklist of major steps and issues. The Applicant shall refer to the AMC for a complete list of code requirements for the present project. City of Arlington Hearing Eraminer Findings. Conchesions. aird Decisinn Copan Special Use Permit. S-0-08 page 10 of 14 4. No significant trees shall be removed from the existing vegetated buffer along the site's west and north boundaries. Any significant trees removed from the interior of the site because ti.eir retention would unreasonably burden development shall be replaced with 5- gallon-sized native species at a ratio of 3:1. 5. The Arlington Airport is liable for frontage improvements on 47`h Avenue NE, which must be done in accordance with the Public Works construction standards or as modified by the City Engineer. Improvements satisfying this requirement shall be shown on the site civil construction plans. (These improvements are to be constructed in the winter of 2006 by the Airport.) 6. The vehicle parking/storage plan. , hich provides 30-foot wide drive aisles and which may be modified through the site civil construction review process,shall be followed. Adequate access to fire hydrants shall be provided. which may mean that existing fire hydrants must be relocated and/or additional fire hydrants installed. The Fire Department shall have the right to inspect the site to ensure compliance with the approved vehicle parking/storage plan. 7. Prior to issuance of a grading or building perniit. the Applicant shall submit payment of City of Arlington traffic impact Pees estimated at $1.038.00 per p.m.-peak-hour trip for Six trips. Or$6.228.00.(NOTE: The amount of the actual impact fcc due will he that established by resolution at the time of payment. The amount provided above is an estimate.The fee may either increase or decrease before the tune it is paid.) S. The security fencing to be installed on the property shall be an earth-tone color. The security fence shall be located far enough away from the existing vegetated buffer along the site's west and north boundaries to protect the roots of the existing trees. No trees shall be removed from the buffer for installation of the security fence. 9. Prior to commencement of operations on-site. the Applicant shall initiate soil and water testing per the agreement outlined in Exhibit 8 to provide baseline information on hydrocarbon and metal contaminants. in the first year of operations,on-site water testing shall be performed,and the results reported to the Community Development Department. in the spring and fall as specified in Exhibit 8. In fallowing years,on-site ,,v iter testing shall be performed, and the results reported to the Community Development Department. as outlined in Exhibit S. 10. The Applicant shall apply Best Management Practices for spill prevention and response as outlined in Exhibit 9 for the protection of the Aquifer Recharge Area and groundwater resource underlying the site. 1 l. If any archaeological materials are discovered on the site. the Applicant shall contact the State Historical Preservation Officer,the Stillaguamish Tribe, and the City of Arlin;on and take measures to preserve the materials and the site: Ciry of Arlington Hearing Examiner Findings. Cooci!«Mns, and Decision page I1 of/4 Cnpart Special Use Permit, S-05-058 12, Prior to issuance of a building permit, the Applicant shall clear all outstanding Planning Division permit-processing accounts with the City. 13. Per AM C §20.16.220,this special use permit shall expire automatically one year from the below date of approval if the use is not commenced or if less than 10 percent of the total construction cost has been spent. DECIDED this 24th day of January 2006. DRISCOLL & HUNTER City of Arlington Hearing Examiners By: t .L�C�vtf� Sharon A_ Rice 1 t` I 1 - City of Arlington Hearing Exand ner Findings. Conchrsions, and Decision page /2 of 12 Copart.Special Use Permit, 5-0j-M Crest Northwest cONSTR C T IO_ , I-,z Permit 06-6993 COPART Metal Building 1) See Drawing 2) Building permit numbers now specified on site plan 3) See Architectural R-19 lid R-11 walls 4) See Attached 5) See drawing 6) See drawing 7) Will be provided at exit doors along with no more than 75' walking distance and 5' off floor. provision 406.6 and 2211 (see architectural) 8) Portable fire extinguishers will be installed in both buildings per Section 906.1(see architectural) 9) The building will be outfitted with approved automatic smoke detection Sec.907.2.23 (see architectural) 10)No Fueling will take place inside of building 11)Exit signs will be provided over required exits Sec 1011 (see architectural) 12)Accessible means of egress will be provided throughout the building Sec 1007 see drawing 13)Egress doors and hardware will comply with Sec 1008.1 through 1008.1.1 see drawing 14)All structures will be ADA accessible Sec 1103.1 JUN % 7 "ltilib 15)Pedestrian walk will be painted on site. L90,�3 16)See drawing 17)ADA signage will be provided-see drawing , ,Y, ~ 1. 153 10 Smokey Point Blvd. Suite C, Marysville, 1Iv`A 98271 • 1360) 651-1118 - FAX 651-1120 E-mail: davep@crestnorthwest.com- License # CR-ES-T-NC-053-K2 I ' Crest Northwest coNSTRUCT1oN. INC 18)See#4 19)See attached Engineered foundation done by Nick Lehtinen 20)Re-Lite in exit door will have safety glazing 21)See updated structural drawing 22)See updated structural drawing Water & Sewer comments were addressed 6/23/06 Tom Cooper Comments: 1)An approved fire extinguisher will be provided at each exit. (see architectural drawing) 2)A knox box will be provided at the entrance gate(see site plan) 15310 Smokey Point Blvd. Suite D, Marysville, WA 98271 - (360) 651-1118 - FAX 651-1120 E-mail: davep@crestnorthwest.com- License# CR-ES-T-NC-053-K2 FROM N.LEHTINEN Engineerin, PHONE NO. 206+252+2373 Apr. 28 2006 03:06PM Pi HNLehtinen By Date Engineering PaLye No. of 4120 Hoyt Ave. Everett, WA 98203 (423)252-2373 l A - rC .t cc Jr- H^ p17d 4h, • ��•, 1 � �^ay )2x2�y :: 41 6CS FROM N.LEHTINEN Engineerin5 PHONE NO. 206+252+2373 Apr. 28 2006 03:07PM P2 HNLehtinen ByT� Date ' Engineering Page No. of 4120 Hoyt Ave. Everett, WA 98203 (423)252-2373 LWAS vERIF • - .-- . 24628 R;61� l� FR,L)M � CO C.0 A/ GP.AC — HAIRPIN Q pl-A tJ a aj �; \ /;�\�,• (2)#S 7OP AND 307,OM ,qT ,Dt7OR OP&41MI1 $x2a� 70. 3e'oNo G ,e,--A=- DOWELS !N F GS W. 2'-•(f `w/2-ems �s -miLA 6 �� � FOOTING SECTION CONTROL JOINT (CONTRACTORS aF'TIaN) 1/g' Cur JOINT x 1' OP. ^ALL WITH \0ZnC 1" CONT. KEY coNsrRucnoN JoiNr SP QCUI 5 x B i 0/10 WWM MOTE: SLAB JOINTS ARE TO BE LaGTED BY THE CONTRACTOR. SLAB JOINT SECTION JOINTS SHALL. BE LAID OUT IM A RECTANGULAR PATTERN NOT � , MORE THAN: 25 FEEr IN ANY DIRECTION WRH A MA)MUM SCAM' S' T -0 ENCL,+OSED AREA OF 400 SQUARE FELL. ,'UN 27 Zbblo G(,GL4- l 1L COMPACTION TEST REPORT 139 I ! I I ( l I I I I 1 1 1 Curve No. 1 1 1 I I I I 1 1 zAV S G 1 1 1 1 I I I I I ! I t p 6282 2.68 asu 134 l I I Test Specification: I I ! I I I I ASTti1 D 1 557-00 Method C Modified I I I I { I I ! I ! I t Ni I I I Oversize correction applied to each point Hammer Wt.: 10 lb. 129 l l I I I I I I I I I I I I l l l I I I I I I ! I I I I I Hammer Drop: 18 in. Number of Layers: five 1 1 I I ( I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Blows per Layer: 56 124 Mold Size: _075 cu.ft. I I ( I i I 1 1 1 1 1 I Test Performed on Material I I l I I I I t I I Passing 3/4 in. Sieve i { I 119 1 1 1I I i I I ( I I I I I I I { Soil Data I I 1 1 NM Sp.G. 2.68 asu 1 ! I I I I ! I I ! LL PI I II bill II 1 ! 1i I ! I I I ! I I I l ! I %>314 in. 21.4 %<#200 1141 USCS AASHTO 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Water content, TESTING DATA 1 I 2 I 3 4 5 6 WM +WS 23 .24 1 23.41 I 23.52 24 _21 24 . 32 =='_ .58 ' WMI 13 . 97 1 . 97 _ _ 97 13 . 7 I !3 . 97 13.97 WW+T#1 I 526. 90 514 .30 516.00 525 . 30 503.10 501.50 WD+T#1I 570_ 00 j sas . '0 493 .80 494 . 70 I 469. 90 I -^_---4 . 50 I TARE#1 I 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0-00 0 . 00 I 0.00 WW+T#2I I WD+T#2 TARE#2I MOISTUREI 2 . 5 3.2 3 .5 I 4 . 9 5 . 6 I 3 .1 DRY DENSITY I i27 . 5 I =3 . 129 . 4 135 . 3 135 .E 35.0 ROCK CORRECTED TEST RESULTS I UNCORRECTED Material Description Maximum dry density = 13 5.6 pcf 129.0 pcf Dark Brown:Native Silty Sand with Organics and Gravel Optimum moisture = 5.3 % 6.7 %o Dated 4-07-06 Project No. 0604-11E Client: Crest NW Remarks: Project: Copart Project I Source: Sample No.: 6232 ® Cr.SCACE TE STfNC- LAE-==S R`(, INC. rssrr:G ir� 4sr=_cncN. Eu�:rJe '12S99 rJ.E.^,25'H PLACE K]gKLaNC.WP.SHIN..�i N 9SC34 ;2C5�22==HCC i COMPACTION TEST REPORT 139 I I I I t i l l l i 1 I I t Curve No. ! I ZAV I SpG 2 I I I I I I i 628.. J I I I 1 1 1 2.68 asu I I I ! ! I ! I I I ! Test Specification: 134 ( I I I I I I I I I i { 1 1 ► I l l I ! ! I I I I I ( I I I AISTy1 D 1557-00 Method C Modified J I I I I I I I I I I I ( I I I Oversize correction applied to each point I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Hammer Wt.: 10 lb. IIII III IIII 129 I I I I I I I ' Hammer Drop: 18 in. l i I l I Number of Layers: five Blows per Layer: 56 II I II p 124 I I I I I I I I I I Mold Size: .075 cu.ft. I I I I I I I E I I I I ! Test Performed on Material ! I I ! ( I I ! I ! Passing 3/4 in. Sieve Ills II I I I I I I ! i IIIPF11 ! I 1 ! ! II P l l i l j j 1 1 Soil Data 119 I I I I I NM Sp.G. 3.68 usu I I 71 i 1 ( I I I I I LL PI ,{ ! ! I I ! I I I I I I I I I I l l %>3/4 in. 21 4 %<#200 1 ! II III ! IIII III IIII ! i 114 l I I P l l l USCS AASHTO 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Water content, % i TESTING DATA 1 2 3 ` 4 5 6 WM +WS 23 .24 23 .41 23. 52 24 .21 21 .32 ( 24 .53 WM I 13 . 97 I 13 . 97 13. 97 13 . 97 _ . 97 13- 97 WW+T#1 526. 90 514 .80 I 516.00 525 .30 503-10 f 501.so WD+T#1 5_0 .60 i 94 40 I 493 .80 494 .70 469. 90 454 . 50 TARE#1 I 0_00 I 0 .00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 , 0 .00 WW+T#2I WD+T#2 TARE#2 MOISTURE 2 . 5 3 .2 I 3 .5 4 . 9 5 . 6 3 .1 DRY DENSITY 127 .S I 128 _5 ! 129.4 135 . 3 I 135 -6 135.0 ROCK CORRECTED TEST RESULTS I UNCORRECTED Material Description Dark Brown Native Silty Sand with Orgartics Maximum dry density = 13 5.6 pcf 129.0 pcf and Gravel Optimum moisture = 5.3 6 7 % Dated 4-07-06 Project No. 0604-1 lE Client: Crest NW Remarks: Project: Copart Project • Source: Sample No.: 6282 CASCADE TESTING LABCRA=O Nr,, INC. 7ES7I NLI. i S-n-EPL-.1,CN ENGlIJEEFH r.LE.'.^c5TN FL?.Cc ,Vy ,NC,W.eL HINv CN SEC34 (2C6,223-SECCtT I COMPACTION TEST REPORT 138 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I ! Curve No. ! I I I I I I ZAV SpG 6283 I I I 1 I I 2.68 asu I I I I I I I I ! 136 I f l t I t I I l l l Test Specification: I I I I ' { { ( AST vI D 1557-00 ivlethod C Modified 1 II 'tl 11 I I I I Oversize correction applied to each point ( I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Hammer Wt.: 10 lb. 134 I I 1 I I l I I I l I Hammer Drop: 18 in. 21 I I I I I I I Number of Layers: five I I I I I I I I I I i glows per Layer: 56 III I I I ! II p 132 I I I I ! I I I I I I I Mold Size: _075 cu.ft. I I I I I I I Test Performed on Material I I I I I I I ! I I Passing 3/4 in. Sieve I IIII I II l ! ! ! 1111 I07I II I ! ! ! { 130 Soil Data I I ! l l l l I I I I I I I I I I I I NM Sp.G. 2.68 asu I I I I I I I I I I ( I I LL PI 1 { I 1 1 1 1 I l f l 1 I { { { %>3/4 in. 15.1 %<#200 128 I I ! I I I I I ! 1 V I I USCS AASHTO 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Water content, TESTING DATA 1 1 2 3 1 4 ( 5 6 WM +WS 21 .09 1 2-4_2 3 24 . 35 24 . 45 WMI 13 . 97 1 13. 9i I 13. 97 , 13 . 97 50..-0 531.00 515.30 505. 3C WW+T#1 j WD+T#11 293 . 20 509. 60 492 .70 I 4.91.40 TARE#1 j 0 .00 0.00 0.00 j 0-00 WW+T#71 WD+T#21 TARE#2 MOISTURE( 2.8 I 3. 6 I 3 . 9 4 . 9 DRY DENSITY I 135. 1 135 .7 136. 6 I 136. 4 ROCK CORRECTED TEST RESULTS UNCORRECTED Material Description Maximum dry density = 137.0 pcf 132.7 pcf Brown Sand with CrravelDated 4-07-06 Optimum moisture = 4.2 % 4.9 % Project No. 0604-1 IE Client: CrestNW Remarks: Project: Copart Project Source: Sample No.: 6283 jUN L, ® CASCADE TESTING L-'%ECEATCPY, INC.2SIS :G E.m =_e�sPneN, ENG:rJEE�s 12595 N.E. <n^KL,-,,jo.vv.4SHINJ ON 2a=4 [2CS:223-ESCO 0 • r.. City of ArlingtonSr�o Development Services NRWV Permit Center vY REQUEST FOR REVIEW ll NAME: �,�� �� �� BP #: 06- DATE: C� RETURN THIS FORS'[ BY: PROJECT SUMMARY: RESPONDING DEPARTMENTS TOM C., FiRE — DAVE A. BUILDING KAREN L., UTILITIES KERRY W., BUILDING DERYL T., MARYSVILLE UTIL SCOTT B., BUILDING BILL B., NATURAL RESOURCE YVONNE P., PLANNING GREGG E., ENGINEERING CWA., CONSULTANT SHERRI PHELPS, BUS LIC JIM T., CONSULTANT SUBMITTAL INFORMATION IS ATTACHED. Please review the information and retum this form and your comments in memo form. If you have no comments, please return the form A'!,h the 'No Cornments" pox checked. PLEASE MARK ONE BOX, SIGN, DATE., AND RETURN THIS FORM TO PC ❑ COMMENTS FOR THIS REVIEW ARE IN ATTACHED MEMO ❑� NO COMMENTS FOR THIS REVIEW, OKAY TO ISSUE PERMIT ❑ COMMENTS REVIEWED BY ��— Cir t Irr DATE GAL W IT L.L JUN 3 0 2006 �t _ �ERMIT CENItr Brenda Fecht To: Tom Cooper Subject: re: Copart REsubmittal. 06-6993 Hi Tom. Copart resubmitted their information for their building permit. To help expidite this, I thought a quick heads up email for you would be helpful. I will put a copy of this and their response letter in your bin with copy of plans. They did respond to your concerns page 2 of their letter. 1. T.C. Fire Ext. At each exit. Copart: Fire Ext. will be provided at each exit. (architectural drawings) 2. T. C. Knox Box required. Copart: Knox box will be provided at the entrance gate. (site plan shows) 1 OtINGO"(140 City of Arlington Community Development Building Division Memorandum Date: March 16, 2006 To: Sonya Blacker, Permit Tech CC: From: David W. Anderson, Building Official Subjec Permit 06-6993 Copart Metal Building 1 A detailed site plan showing the-parking-requirements, all accessibility parking requirements. €i¢e-p,-otection requirements for the building and the storage site as per the findings, conclusions and decision of the Hearing Examiner Report Dated January 6,2006. 7ere are two buildings mention, which will require an additional permit for the administration office and one for the repair garage. If the building is to be heated or insulated as shown on sheet MEP-1, energy calculations are required to be submitted for compliance with the Washington State Non- Residential Energy Code. 6" L=,d A geo-tech report needs to be submitted to determine the bearing capacity for both uildings. /The construction type of Type II-B should be shown on the drawings for both buildings 6! T 9 e occupancy classification of S-2 should be shown on the drawings. The building must comply with the provisions of Section 406.6 of the international uiiding Code and Section 2211 of the International Fire Code. — Portable fire extinguishers are required in both building per Section 906.1 of the r� International Fire Code. the building has areas containing the storage of lead-acid batteries an approved A a tomatic smoke detection system is required throughout the building. Sec 907.2.23 1 . A flammable gas detection system shall be provided in repair garages for vehicleld'" by nonodorized gases in accordance with Section 406.6.6. Section 908.5 � � 11. Exits signs are required over the required exits. Section 1011. JUN 27 2006 - 12. Accessible means of egress is required throughout the building. Section 1007. Colo l0`�`�3 � f,fi . A PERM 1 CEN�E� A L�,-13. Means of egress doors shall comply with Section 1008.1 through 1008.1.1. l Buildings and structures, temporary or permanent, including their associated sites and f ilities, shall be accessible to persons with physical disabilities. Section 1103.1 Accessible routes within the site shall be provided from public transportation stops, accessible parking and accessible passenger loading zones and public streets or /One ewalks to the accessible building entrance served. Section 1104.1 accessible parking stall is required which is required to be van accessible. Table 06.1 /ADA signage is required to be in compliance with Section 1110. 1P. Asoil investigation report is required to determine the bearing capacity.ca acit . Section 1802.6 N The drawings should show the load bearing values per section 1804. 7 71 e re-lite in the exit door is required to be safety glazing. /The structural drawings need to be stamped by a professional engineer licensed in the State Washington, not Louisiana. 121- 'a5-, - f42,1 3}7 --63-7 -4 o54 22. One set of structural drawings are required to be wet stamped. Photo copies are not permitted. / 1 b1/4 CST Y U City of Arlington DivisionUtilities +tING'O Memo To: Permit Center From: Reta Shepard, Utilities Specialist CC: Ken Renfro,Virgil Renfroe,Earl Anderson,Gus Tararan Date: May 12,2006 Re: Copart 40x40 building, Building Permit#06-6993 The construction documents submitted with building permit #05-6993 have been reviewed for compliance with City of Arlington Utilities Division regulations Comments are as follows: 1. At this point we do not have as-built drawings for this site.They are currently being worked on by Cascade Surveying on behalf of the property owner, the Arlington Airport. Until we get the as-builts to determine the exact location of all of the existing utilities in relation to the proposed buildings, both temporary and permanent, some issues will remain as follows. 2. The drawings show a restroom in the building but do not show how they propose to serve the building with water and sewer. The as-built/construction drawings do not show water and sewer to the 40x40 building either. a). The existing 2" domestic service to the property will be the source of supply to all buildings constructed on this site. That 2" domestic service line must be disconnected and abandoned immediately beyond the furthest connection from the existing meter. This building is assumed to be the second of three buildings. It will be served from the existing 2"line and will need ifs own shutoff valve and PRV. b). Show the proposed method of sanitary sewer connection to the proposed building, this is required to be a 6"extension out of the monitoring SSMH 3. A RPBA must be installed immediately after the existing domestic water meter. It must have freeze protection. The RPBA must appear on the State of Washington Department of Health list of approved assemblies and must be tested by a State of Washington certified Backflow Assembly Tester. The City of Arlington must inspect the installation and a copy of the State test report must be provided. S N_ J 7_ 1 ?c C « N p (h LL O Z LL J O O `— Z 4 _O J w � Z LL- i O O LL Q � F - U3 O � 1— Z a wZ `, aw oC w J Q Z O �u �= Q 03 To: Building Department From: Tom Cooper Date: May 11,2006 Ref: 06-6993 1. Provide an approved fire extinguisher at each exit. L. Provide "Knox" access to control gate. JI4 City of Arlington Community Development Building Division Memorandum Date: March 16, 2006 To: Sonya Blacker, Permit Tech CC: From: David W. Anderson, Building Official Subject: Permit 06-6993 Copart Metal Building 1. A detailed site plan showing the parking requirements, all accessibility parking requirements, fire protection requirements for the building and the storage site as per the findings, conclusions and decision of the Hearing Examiner Report Dated January 26.2006. 2. There are two buildings mention, which will require an additional permit for the administration office and one for the repair garage. 3. If the building is to be heated or insulated as shown on sheet MEP-1, energy calculations are required to be submitted for compliance with the Washington State Non- Residential Energy Code. 4. A geo-tech report needs to be submitted to determine the bearing capacity for both buildings. 5. The construction type of Type II-B should be shown on the drawings for both buildings 6. The occupancy classification of S-2 should be shown on the drawings. 7. The building must comply with the provisions of Section 406.6 of the international Building Code and Section 2211 of the International Fire Code. 8. Portable fire extinguishers are required in both building per Section 906.1 of the International Fire Code. 9. If the building has areas containing the storage of lead-acid batteries an approved automatic smoke detection system is required throughout the building. Sec 907.2.23 10. A flammable gas detection system shall be provided in repair garages for vehicles fueled by nonodorized gases in accordance with Section 406.6.6. Section 908.5 11. Exits signs are required over the required exits. Section 1011. 12. Accessible means of egress is required throughout the building. Section 1007. 13. Means of egress doors shall comply with Section 1008.1 through 1008.1.1. i 14. Buildings and structures, temporary or permanent, including their associated sites and facilities, shall be accessible to persons with physical disabilities. Section 1103.1 15. Accessible routes within the site shall be provided from public transportation stops, accessible parking and accessible passenger loading zones and public streets or sidewalks to the accessible building entrance served. Section 1104.1 16. One accessible parking stall is required which is required to be van accessible. Table 1106.1 17. ADA signage is required to be in compliance with Section 1110. 18. A soil investigation report is required to determine the bearing capacity. Section 1802.6 19. The drawings should show the load bearing values per section 1804. 20. The re-lite in the exit door is required to be safety glazing. 21. The structural drawings need to be stamped by a professional engineer licensed in the State Washington, not Louisiana. 22. One set of structural drawings are required to be wet stamped. Photo copies are not permitted. N a N_ I � Z a � N p Col) o � L O o F- Z O ..J w d � Z I - I O O t2 in Q �u w,� 5 O F � — � U cn cn 1- OU � z a W Z a. w oC w J a ZR 012 ~ a o � To: Building Department From: Tom Cooper Date: May 11,2006 Ref.- 06-6993 1. Provide an approved fire extinguisher at each exit. 2. Provide"Knox" access to control gate. ��, Coe i L 1 • JUIN ;oar LV Y g t"tles Div. City of Arlin toy � � � Development Services Permit Center REQUEST FOR REVIEW NAME: f BP #: 06- (0 cc3 DATE: P hC( RETURN THIS FORM BY: PROJECT SUMMARY: RESPONDING DEPARTMENTS TOM C., FIRE DAVE A. BUILDING RETA S., UTILITIES KERRY W., BUILDING DERYL T., MARYSVILLE UTIL SCOTT B., BUILDING BILL B., NATURAL RESOURCE NATE H., PLANNING MARC H., ENGINEERING CWA., CONSULTANT SHERRI PHELPS, BUS LIC JIM T., CONSULTANT SUBMITTAL INFORMATION IS ATTACHED. Please review the information and return this form and your comments in memo form. If you have no comments, please return the form with the"No Comments" box checked. PLEASE MARK ONE BOX, SIGN, DATE, AND RETURN THIS FORM TO PC ❑ COMMENTS FOR THIS REVIEW ARE IN ATTACHED MEMO ❑ NO COMMENTS FOR THIS REVIEW, OKAY TO ISSUE PERMIT COMMENTS f1n�P.� 3 � 3 �i,c, s stern rthec� s :UO +i� REVIEWED BY } DATE iE::�����D COP, PERMIT CENTER Y CJ city of • • DivisionUtilities ING Memo To: Permit Center From Reta Shepard, Utilities Specialist CC: Ken Renfro,Virgil Renfroe,Earl Anderson,Gus Tararan Date: May 12,2006 Re: Copart 40x40 building, Building Permit#06-6993 The construction documents submitted with building permit #05-6993 have been reviewed for compliance with City of Arlington Utilities Division regulations. Comments are as follows: 1. At this point we do not have as-built drawings for this site.They are currently being worked on by Cascade Surveying on behalf of the property owner, the Arlington Airport. Until we aet the as-builts to determine the exact location of all of the existing utilities in relation to the proposed buildings, both temporary and permanent, some issues will remain as follows. 2. The drawings show a restroom in thE:building but do not show how they propose to serve the building with water and sewer. The as-built/construction drawings do not show water and sewer to the 40x40 building either. a). The existing 2" domestic service to the property will be the source of supply to all buildings constructed on this site. That 2° domestic service line must be disconnected and abandoned immediately beyond the furthest connection from the existing meter. This building is assumed to be the second of three buildings. It will be served from the existing 2"line and will need its own shutoff valve and PRV_ b). Show the proposed method of sanitary sewer connection to the proposed building, this is required to be a 6"extension out of the monitoring SSMH. 3. A RPBA must be installed immediately after the existing domestic water meter. It must have freeze protection. The RPBA must appear on the State of Washington Department of Health list of approved assemblies and must be tested by a State of Washington certified Backflow Assembly Tester.The City of Arlington must inspect the installation and a copy of the State test report must be provided. �*W/ANrPalm , �r��C CE � E [ V., Cityof Arlington g Utilities Div, Development Services Permit Center REQUEST FOR REVIEW NAME: BP #: 06 ci - DATE: S RETURN THIS FORM BY: J PROJECT SUMMARY: 1 RESPONDING DEPARTMENTS T OM C. FIRE `VDAVE A. BUILDING , V UTILITIES KERRY W., BUILDING 77 SCOTT B., BUILDING \ DERYL T., MARYSVILLE UTIL \ V YVONNE P., PLANNING .BILL B., NATURAL RESOURCE ti VGRE,GG E., ENGINEERING CWA., CONSULTANT SHERRI PHELPS, BUS LIC JIM T., CONSULTANT SUBMITTAL INFORMATION IS ATTACHED. Please review the information and return this form and your comments in memo form. If you have no comments, please return the form with the "No Comments'box checked. PLEASE MARK ONE BOX, SIGN, DATE,AND RETURN THIS FORM TO PC COMMENTS FOR THIS REVIEW ARE IN ATTACHED MEMO 1] NO COMMENTS FOR THIS REVIEW, OKAY TO ISSUE PERMIT ❑ COMMENTS REVIEWED BY DATE RECE6 D � COA PERMIT CENTER , S Y G+� . . City of • • Division�7 Utilities + G tO Memo To: Permit Center From: Reta Shepard, Utilities Specialist CC: Ken Renfro,Virgil Renfroe, Earl Anderson,Gus Tararan Date: May 12,2006 Re: Copart 40x40 building, Building Permit#06-6993 The construction documents submitted with building permit #05-6993 have been reviewed for compliance with City of Arlington Utilities Division regulations. Comments are as follows: 1. At this point we do not have as-built drawings for this site.They are currently being worked on by Cascade Surveying on behalf of the property owner, the Arlington Airport. Until we get the as-builts to determine the exact location of all of the existing utilities in relation to the proposed buildings, both temporary and permanent, some issues will remain as follows. 2. The drawings show a restroom in the building but do not show how they propose to serve the building with water and sewer. The as-built/construction drawings do not show water and sewer to the 40x40 building either. a). The existing 2" domestic service to the property will be the source of supply to all buildings constructed on this site. That 2" domestic service line must be disconnected and abandoned immediately beyond the furthest connection from the existing meter. This building is assumed to be the second of three buildings. It will be served from the existing 2"line and will need it's own shutoff valve and PRV. b). Show the proposed method of sanitary sewer connection to the proposed building, this is required to be a 6"extension out of the monitoring SSMH. 3. A RPBA must be installed immediately after the existing domestic water meter. It must have freeze protection. The RPBA must appear on the State of Washington Department of Health list of approved assemblies and must be tested by a State of Washington certified Backflow Assembly Tester. The City of Arlington must inspect the installation and a copy of the State test report must be provided. N N_ z-'Its � 4 •J C„ I I Z N p ch O Z 0 LL Z O J U Q w Fz W Z 0 0 LL o Q 0 F O^ N U cn co— H" W O U I z T.ELW `. W J Q O � CL Q 0 � • City of Arlington Development Services Permit Center REQUEST FOR REVIEW NAME: BP #: 06- DATE: S RETURN THIS FORM BY: S 1 PROJECT SUMMARY: G2MM ,kp _ RESPONDING DEPARTMENTSNN� 5 PSI0 ,�/3 TOM C., FIRE J -f I D(o� y DAVE A. BUILDING \111 `4 KAREN L., UTILITIES KERRY W., BUILDING DERYL T., MARYSVILLE UTILA SCOTT B., BUILDING 1� �1 BILL B., NATURAL RESOURCE `� �� �° P., PLANNING'0 1\YVONNE3-5�z �G tE66-E., ENGINEERING- C-`� d CWA., CONSULTANT nmGroSS SHERRI PHELPS, BUS LIC JIM T., CONSULTANT SUBMITTAL INFORMATION IS ATTACHED. Please review the information and return this form and your comments in memo form. If you have no comments, please return the form with the"No Comments"box checked_ PLEASE MARK ONE BOX, SIGN, DATE,AND RETURN THIS FORM TO PC ❑ COMMENTS FOR THIS REVIEW ARE IN ATTACHED MEMO ❑ NO COMMENTS FOR THIS REVIEW, OKAY TO ISSUE PERMIT ❑ COMMENTS REVIEWED BY DATE t City of Arlington Development Services Permit Center REQUEST FOR REVIEW NAME: BP #: 06 DATE: SJ4 RETURN THIS FORM B. J PROJECT SUMMARY: RESPONDING DEPARTMENTS TOM C., FIRE `VDAVE A. BUILDING KAREN L., UTILITIES KERRY W., BUILDING DERYL T., MARYSVILLE UTIL SCOTT B., BUILDING �1.BILL B., NATURA L RESOURCE V YVONNE P., PLANNING VGREGG E., ENGINEERING CWA., CONSULTANT SHERRI PHELPS, BUS LIC JIM T., CONSULTANT SUBMITTAL INFORMATION IS ATTACHED. Please review the information and return this form and your comments in memo form. If you have no comments, please return the form with the"No Comments"box checked. PLEASE MARK ONE BOX, SIGN, DATE,AND RETURN THIS FORM TO PC COMMENTS FOR THIS REVIEW ARE IN ATTACHED MEMO NO COMMENTS FOR THIS REVIEW, OKAY TO ISSUE PERMIT (] COMMENTS REVIEWED BY d-` nATe ECD MAY 11 Lie,. CAA PERMIT CENTER To: Building Department From: Tom Cooper Date: May 11,2006 Ref: 06-6993 1. Provide an approved fire extinguisher at each exit. 2. Provide "Knox" access to control gate. • City of Arlington Development Services Permit Center REQUEST FOR REVIEW NAME:' BP #: Q6 DATE: S a RETURN THIS FORM BY: J PROJECT SUMMARY: RESPONDING DEPARTMENTS "TOM C., FIRE `VDAVE A. BUILDING `' KAREN L., UTILITIES KERRY W., BUILDING DERYL T., MARYSVILLE UTIL SCOTT B., BUILDING - v BILL B., NATURAL RESOURCE \YVONNE P., PLANNING ENGINEERING-rjMC ,j CWA., CONSULTANT SHERRI PHELPS, BUS LIC JIM T., CONSULTANT SUBMITTAL INFORMATION IS ATTACHED Please review the information and return this form and your comments in memo form. If you have no comments, please return the form with the"No Comments"box checked. PLEASE MARK ONE BOX, SIGN, DATE,AND RETURN THIS FORM TO PC �] COMMENTS FOR THIS REVIEW ARE IN ATTACHED MEMO NO COMMENTS FOR THIS REVIEW, OKAY TO ISSUE PERMIT ❑ COMMENTS WED BY may, C� DAT /.� �A REVIE -1 RECEIVED MIT CENTER Y p L CITY OF ARLINGTON PUBLIC WORKS 76 ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMO TO: Permit Center FROM: Tim Cross RE: Copart—Commercial Metal Building DATE: May 8, 2006 Please advise applicant the permit for this cannot be issued until their new SEPA and grading permit fees have been settled with the City of Arlington Permit Center. City of Arlington 4io Development Services Permit Center REQUEST FOR REVIEW NAME:' BP #: 06-' `` DATE: S RETURN THIS FORM BY: J I o PROJECT SUMMARY: RESPONDING DEPARTMENTS TOM C., FIRE `VDAVE A. BUILDING KAREN L., UTILITIES KERRY W., BUILDING DERYL T., MARYSVILLE UTIL \ SCOTT B., BUILDING BILL B.,vNATURAL RESOURCE �1 YVONNE P., PLANNING \1GREGG E., ENGINEERING CWA., CONSULTANT SHERRI PHELPS, BUS LIC JIM T., CONSULTANT SUBMITTAL INFORMATION IS ATTACHED. Please review the information and return this form and your comments in memo form. If you have no comments, please return the form with the"No Comments"box checked. PLEASE MARK ONE BOX, SIGN, DATE,AND RETURN THIS FORM TO PC ❑ COMMENTS FOR THIS REVIEW ARE IN ATTACHED MEMO ❑ NO COMMENTS FOR THIS REVIEW, OKAY TO ISSUE PERMIT �- COMMENTS � (�""` . REVIEWED BY l DATE Dr; R E I V E D A�\ City of Arlington r Development Services Permit Center REQUEST FOR REVIEW NAME: BP #: 06- DATE: S RETURN THIS FORM BY: J PROJECT SUMMARY: RESPONDING DEPARTMENTS TOM C., FIRE `VDAVE A. BUILDING KAREN L., UTILITIES KERRY W., BUILDING DERYL T., MARYSVILLE UTIL BILL B., NA ` SCOTT B., BUILDING Nll-�l NATURAL RESOURCE \YVONNE P., PLANNING \1GREGG E., ENGINEERING CWA., CONSULTANT SHERRI PHELPS, BUS LIC JIM T., CONSULTANT SUBMITTAL INFORMATION IS ATTACHED. Please review the information and return this form and your comments in memo form. If you have no comments, please return the form with the"No Comments"box checked. PLEASE MARK ONE BOX, SIGN, DATE,AND RETURN THIS FORM TO PC ❑ C -MENTS FOR THIS REVIEW ARE IN ATTACHED MEMO NO COMMENTS FOR THIS REVIEW, OKAY TO ISSUE PERMIT COMMENTS REVIEWED B DATE R PC'CEIM /31A CCA PERMIT CENTER r �+ DOOR SCHEDULE ` 'ES CODE ANALYSIS MARK CITY. DESCRIPTION COMMENTS GENERAL ' OO- 1pA W/KD HMMI INSUM- Q1Et5OOR7L4UAR(CLR EXTERIOR L NLNBNFACURESSNAL BE BUILTWACCOHDANCEWIIH ACCESMIUTY REOUIRAFMS FOR BARRIER ^ RO:3r x 81-IW FREEAOOMDRAC61-DIN01 THIS STRUCTURE MEETS CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS ATHE TON5150 -MFR.STD KEYED LOCKSET THICKNESS:-8.7/16' ADDITIONAL PREASSURE LUG NEAR STRIKE PLATE SWING:IOQA-RHR & UALL NDERS&RATEPERMITPES HTHERWIS TO SBESIIPPUEDP1811NSTPllF110N SOE BYOTHEAS y MC 2003J,THE2N1031NTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE FOR WASHINGTON OO• UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT(UNIES40TIPAMNSE SPECIFIED) � Ii..� STATE GOLD AND GOLD LABEL INSIGNIAS -MFR STD.HINGES,SWEEP&rHOLD 10DS-LHR DESIGN LOPES: DOOR U=.60 DEFAULT LITE U=80 DEFAULT,LITE SHGC=63 ASHRAE 19 BUILDING TYPE: VB ROOF WE: 25 pr 3'-0'z fA'METAL INSULATED VIEW LITE DOOR(CLR/AIR/CLR) STRUCTURAL p OCCUPANCY GROUP: B PONDING: ra W/NO HM JAMB EXTERIOR 1 WINDOW AND DOORS SHALL HAVE(2)STUDS AT EACH SIDE M(I)BNGSNDAND(I)7RWIMER ^-+1 r BUILDING USE: OFFICE WINDLOAD: 65 mph -MFR STD.KEYED LOCKSET 2 ALLNALINGAND FASTENERS NOTCAUED OUT IN PLW3 SHALL BE PERIBC2304.&INAUNG rA�w BUILDING AREA SBk/f 2,68B SqA EXPOSURE: C ADDRIONAL PREASSURE LUG NEAR STRIKE PLATE THICKNESS-B-7118' SCULL SWING:103-A-LHR rJMR OF OCCUPANTS 27 OFFICE FLOOR RLIVE: psi -MFR STD,HINGES,SWEEP&THOLE PARTITION: 20 MT DOOR U=.BO DEFAULT LITE U=.DEFAULT.LITE SHGC=.93 ASHRAE -� 20091EISMIC SEISMIC DESIGN SUB=IDU BUILDING ENVELOPE 4 ,y II a SEBMICDESIGN CATAGORY=Q7 INTERIOR Y +� IO2 1FA I--FLUSH SC ALPINE OAK DOOR W/TIMELY R0:37-1/4'x8f 1. SPACE HEATTYPE SHALBEPROWDEDBYHFATRW,ELECTRIC RESMANCEHEAPNG IS NOT 100ICOFULOOR MTL FRAME ALLOWED(Al"IXM � �:d �.�� 2000 POUND CONCENTRATED WAIL THK:•4117 FLOOR LOAD ON 3050 -MFRSTD PAS SAGE SET 2 ALL NAAATLYNMATBWSSKILBEINSTALLED PER MANUFACTURES NSTRUC710NS TO MAINTAIN 0 -MFR STD HINGES SWING:102-LH PROPER BOWES,MIINTMAI CLEARANCES.AND OBTAIN FULL R•VALUMMSEC 13112) p � 1; - NOTES: 103-RH 3, ROOF CDUNG INSULATION SHALL BE INSTAU.EDAD MN V CLEAR AR SPACE TO ROOFING MEMBERS OAR-%! �� ' T04 104 LH ABOVE EXCWMRGONSULATIN METALLED BEIIAIN ADM ADAR3RNTFIWHNNLAN � 1.THIS BUILDINGMEETSPATH OPTION FOR CLIMATE REQUIREMENTS TONTINE 705-LH VD MGISPAMMPOTALL&Vn 7ODUWAIROV[ItIWA000FNSMTONM'MCUIIB) NRECPERSCWTME PATHOPTIONFOR CLIMATE ZONEI 108-LH 4 EXTERIOR WALL CAVITIES SHNL BE FULLY INSULATEDTOTE LEVELS OF THE SURROUNDINGWALS -� 2.PROPOSED GLAZING%OF G.WA=8.5% 105 (WSEC 1311.3) 6 (y 3SEE SCHEDULES AND BUILDING SECTION FOR ACTUAL INSTALLED VALUES & FLOORINSULATBN%IALBENSTAMNAPEPMMUNTMNNERINSUBSTANMLCOWACTWMTHE °9+� 108 SURFACEBENGINSULATED INWLOONSUPPORISSHAILBEINSTALLMNOTMORETIAN24V.C. INSULATION SHALL NOTBLOCK FOUNDATIONVF.NnNG(WESC 1311,4) ''a LA I 3'-05�W-r FLUSH SC ALPINE OAK DOOR W/TIMELY MTL FRAME INTERIOR & DOOR AND GLAZINGUFACTOLMS STALL BE OBTAINED RS31(NFRC IABE)OR FROM WSEC TABLE 108 MODULE DESIGN SUMMARY _-� 107 -MFRSTDPRIVACYSET RO:37-1/4'.81' (W'SEc13121)SIIGCSHALBEDETEFMNEO FROM RS31RMLABEL)ORFRCM RS-II-MFR STD HINGES WALLTIHK'4.10 AVOIWTCDFFfXh1R5N(KQ0 uIZ21 A DESIGN CRITERIA:- 'LOB -MFR STD CLOSER SWING:107-FOR 7. VAPCAWIAAD 59LYLSEMTMUDONTHEWARMSIDE(NYAWB)OFINSULATIONASREQUBRED 108-RHR BYWESC.ROOFICDUNGVAPOR&4MPIAYBE0AY UWIENALLNSUTATIONBNST&M SEECDDEANALYSIS BETWEEN ROOF MEABRANEAND ROOF DECKMSEC 13132) B SHEATHING: W ETTERION JOINTS AROUNWINDOWS AND DOOR FRAMES,OPENINGS BERVEFNWAII.S,AMD ALL OTHER 12 NOMINAL wA RATED STRUCTURAL SHEATHING OVER JOISTSIIRUSSES@24V.C. OPENINGS IN THE BUILDWG ENVELOPE SNAIL,BE SEALED,CAUU(ED,G/SWTED,ORWEATHOMRIPPED OKBYNSPECTON WINDOW SCHEDULE TOuETARLEVAGE."ECuI41) C.ROOF JOISTS: ► DOORSADOPSME UL/dvpUPAMTINGCONDRIONED AND UNCONDIIBNE9 SPACE SHALL BE - 1%10 NFY2@24'O.0 W/I.5 VENTS®HIGH SHEAR ZONES MARK CITY. DESCRIPTION COMMENTS WEATHERSTRIPPED,FODDWNDOWS WALL BE i1GMHTTilIGNM NIA5,4fEiA1ED 6Y5TOP81W D:MTEux6BEAM: 48'x 'PHIWPS SLI .CLPJN W SEAUWTNLAR7LLD(SWEC13M2) 45X24 LW BEAM AT MUSLIM OF BOTH MOWLESMOR PREMANUFACTURED GIRDER TRUSS RO:46x39' f0 MADIKASSIDAIM USED AS DUCTS OR PLENUMS SHALL BE SEALED,CAWO:L,AND GASIOiI®TO CONNECTMTELM:BEANS 02VO.C.WIFULL DEPTH TRUSSES OR SIDS I9'7.3'ORTHRU BOLTS, O 10 VINYL W/LOCKS,DELL GLAZING:BUG SCREENS: HEAD HOT:MATCH DOOR UMDNR LEAKAGE(MEG 1314.3) 3T FROM BOTTOM.PROVOEBRACES TO ROOF®COLUMN COMPOSITE OAK LINER&CASING END lP.35 NFRC,SHGC=.33 NFRC E ' LIGHTING (2)2Xe HF STUD(1)PER MODULE AS DITERIOR COLUMNS. O 1 WW,x4fH-STOPPED IN FIXED GLASS PASS NO 36M 48' 1. FACISPACEBXIOSEDBYWAIMORCEUNGHDGHTPARM)MSRALLBEPROVUEDWIIHUGifnNG THRU WINDOW W/PASS SLOT&SPEAK HOLE HEAD HGT:SEE ELEV.-C. CDNIROLS LOCATED WITHIN THAT SPACE THE LIGHTING CONTROLS,WHETHER ONE OR MORE,SHALL BE RFD. SHT.A4 CAPABLE OF TURNING OFF ALL LIGHTS WRHN THE SPACE THE CONTROLS SHALL BE READILY (1)US HFI210 PERROP MODULE P AND AS INTMPERCOLUMNS ACCESSIBLE,AT THE POINT(S)OF ENTRYEXIT.(EXCEPTION:UGHONG CONTROLLED BY AUTOMATIC F.INTEUIEIXATECOLAANS: NOTE: (1)4XBI8S PER MODULEAS I03TOPiCOLUMNS 1.ALL EXTERIOR DOORS AND WINDOWS SHALL BE SEALED,CAUl1(ED,WEATHERSTRIPPED TO PREVENT AIR LEAKAGE roxrlasl(Aaccriut) HASTWRWALPOR(41SOS IMX3TOPANO BOTTOM PER COLUMN 2 THE MAVAJI LODZ POWER THAT MY BE CONTROLLED FROM ASNGLE BATCH OR AUTOMATIC GEXIEBCt WALSN03: COIRROLSKALLNOTEXCEEDI6AMPRES A MASTER CDNTROL MAYBE PROVIDED AS LONG AS THE 2X6HFMW@16'0.C.-OKSY64SPECnON MISC.SCHEDULE 3 T ALL WYLIGIBD ZONES(WRHN20F EDGE TOFGLAMBY19DEFP)SWLY�OWOEDWIINDMDUAL H15132) MTOUSEDTEUNE WALL STUBS SWCIES ORDAYIJGHTI OCCUPANCY SENSING AUROMATIC CONTROLS.)D(CEFIION SPACES WITH HEW' MARK CITY, DESCRIPTION COMMENTS RML HEIGHT WAUS OR PARIRIONS COMMMNG2OR LESS MrURESF CONTIGUOUS DAYUGHT ZONES L HEaoFRS. MY BECONIROUFD BYASINGLE DEVICE PROVIDED THEY DO NOT FACE MORE THAN TWO ADJACENT HFADEAI (3)2X6 HFSTUD,MX SPAN=315Fr. 1{OT CUSTOM PIAM FACED CABINETS WIRLAM COUNTENTOP RM 103 CATDM/i 011£LTIONB(N6ECKWJ MATEUN2 (11K xMHEADAX SPAN=4.15 Fi. Y.f 4 NLF SUMLOMNOTPECIIPEDTO ROM ON 24 HOURS CONTINUOUS,SKAL BE CONTROLLED J MTLNE BFNA SUPPORTHFADFA: NOTUSFD A42 14DT 33WH RECEPTION COUNTER W/GATE(P4A BYA PHOTCELL(N5EC 15135J M COUNTERTOP) BY OTHERS IN PLANT KDECBNS L H'RIM JOIS PROVIDE POWER RECEPS 3TBG RTS:OCNSIEAT9NG(4M0)OVENJOISTS @If O.C. MECHANICAL 1FLOO2HISTS: JOIST(S)ATEACH ADEWISIIPPORIS@BO.G OR FOUNDATION SUPPORT M FLOOR JOISTS: O 2 ADA SIGMGE AS REQUIRED 10&&1j008 MS 1. OUTSIDE AIR INTAKES AND WUUSTOURETS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WIA BACK DRAFT DUPER(GRAVnY 2X12 HF12 FLOGS JOISTS @IfO.0 OR MOTORIZED),DA1PER$SHALLAUTOMTULY CLOSE WHEN SYSTEM IS OFF OR DURING POWER N.DOUBLE R JOISTS SUPPORTING M1EUNE BEVA HEADER PLUMBING SCHEDULE 2. EACHSUPPLYAAIRTER111NAL SHALL HAVE ANADUSTABLE DAMPER TOALLOW FOR BALANCING THE 0.ROOF NOT REEQIRATHING-RED OR FOUNDATION SUPPORT snE+NWAMH Nun II/IgIIM wA RA1ED41RLCH/0.K4GTNNOWUN&aDICDfilCf3 0.0' MARK CITY. DESCRIPTION COMMENTS & HOORMaIFRS9wLSE CAPABLE OFAUTOMATICLYMODuuTNG OUTSIDE AND RETURN AR DAMPERS FROM EACH END.BD@f 0C.@BOUNDARY EDGES,rD.C.PANEL EDO ES AND 1YINiHE FlF1D. WATFROLOSET-ENO FLOPF1203ADAELONG BOWL TOILET TO ALLOW FOR I00%OUTSIDE AIR TO REDUCE OR ELIMINATE THE NEED FOR MECHAICALCDOUNG P DOUBLE TOP PLATE SPLICES: p-1 2 PAPER HUM CONTROLS SHALL ALLOW FOR PARTIAL COOLING RM 1413) GRAPERf•�A15N&PECE If XI41' X/FF 4 HVAC UNITS SERVING TESAME ZONESHALL BE INTELLOCIEDTOPREVEMAMULTANEOUS HEATING I112XBCxOND BRNIWI417DxHEAR EACH SIDE OF 7XB SPLICE d BUILDING FIND)SHORT)WAL�SHFM WALLS: ANDOOOINDWAC1271 LINEAR FEET OF SHFARWALLS: 4367 FT. MFR STD.LAVATORY,WALL HUNG-PROFLOA5181,W X 17' 5. OUCIWOIR9VLL IWEALLTRALSVERSE SEAMS SELEDWI PRESSURE SENSITIVE TAPE PER �1 SHEATHING:7110'P WART PANELSIMGW18DNNLSATfO,C ALONG SIDING EDGES AND 12V.C. O2 FAUCETASSY,- STANDARD RSTFORMS LESS THAN 2 INCH WATER COLUMN STATIC PRESSURE O•ISEC 14141) INTIE FlDD.USE(1)STUDS MR.AT ADJOINING PANEL MGM BLOCK PANEL EDGES. M90-MFR SM 1f IcW(CFNIFAEDOVERLAV.) a ALL DUCTS AND PLENUMS SWVL BE INSULATED TO MINIMUM VALUES SHOWN AWSECTABLE 145 CASED N HOLD GOWNS: (1)IOTITM IlWPBOINWTA•1&tIWAi DOKWML SW.MFR SM 25922,SINGLE BOWL STAINLESS SIEELWI 14122) K 1lIID11G SOEILONGIWAL AF.VtVNRl& CD KITCHEN 7. PIPING SHALL BE INSULATED PER ASK TABLE I4&,COIDWATER PIPESOUTSDE THE CONDITIONED LATARFEETOFSHEARNMLS 24.1 FT. FAUCET,SINGLE HANDLE FROM PFiL-20011J SPACE SHALL BE INSULATED PER WASHINGTNSTATE PLUMBING CODE WAC-51M(WSEC 14151) W SHEATHING:711f LP WART PANEL BOND_ BDNNLSATrQC.ALONG SUNG EDGES AND 1n.C, B. COMNETIONREUUIFNEN"&(WSEC1416) NTE FIELD,USE(1)STUDS MNATADXUMNO PANEL EDGES.BLOCKPANELEDGE& PAL 2 MFR STD.25GAL BMW WATER HEATER WI STD Tw RELIEF RM1N-INCABINET ABVTOIET(-M 8A. DRAWINGS-WnHNDDAYSOFSYSTEMACMKANCEAS&LTRECORDDMWWWWSKALLBE M HOLD DOWNS: 0)2XBWIIH I SIMPSON MSTAIB STRAP AT END OF WALL VALVE120V RMV102-ONWALL@A72- PROVOEDTOTHEBUIU NGOWRER- 82 O&MMABUALS-SHALL BE PROVIDEDTOTHE BULDINGOWNER AND SKILL INCLUDEASAWNAu(, SUBMTTTALS,MNNTANCEMANUAL%NAMEOF SFAVICEAG,ENCY. 61 SYSTEM BALANCING-AR SYSTEMS SHALL BE BALANCED INA NANNENTO MEETTEDESIGN FLOW CONDITIONS)WSEC 14163) BA. SYSTEMCOMWSXXNNG-WAC SYSTEM AND CONTROLS SHALL BE TESTED TO ENSURE THAT CONTROL DEDUCESA D EOUIPMEMARE CALIBRATED AND ADJUSTEDT1OPERATEIN ACCORDANCE WITH RAMS AND SPEORGATIONS 85 DOCUMENTATION-TESTING SHALL BE DOCUMENTED AN CDMMSIONNG RBVRT(S)SHALL BE COMPLETED AND FILED WITH THE BUILDING OMER. COLOR SCHEDULE SURFACE MANUFACTURER COLOR DRAWING INDEX ROOFING MULE HIDE EPDM BLACK HORIZONTAL TRIM PANT COLUMBIA BLUEPRINT SW 4056 N0. SHEET TITLE SIDING CORNER TRIM PANT COLUMBIA BLUEPRINT SW 4058 AO CO'vER SHEET-NOTES-SCHEDULES SDMOWVOON LAY PAWL COLUMBIA BLUEPRINT SW 4056 Al FLOOR PLAN-SCHEDULES SIDING BOTTOM TRIM PAINT COLUMBM BLUEPRINT SW 4056 A2 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SIDING BODY PANT COLUMB[A NICKEL SW PLAN ET.DOOIA&FRAME PARR COLUMBIA BLUEPRINT SW 405E A3 F DAT NUPLBOETARS M NT ELEVATIONIPLBG VINYL WINDOW FRAMES PHIWPS WHITE 31 CROSS SECTION-DETAILS ACOUSTICAL CEILING TILES ARMSTRONG PRESELECTED E LIGHTING POWER-PLAN DRYWALLPANT COLUMBIA SLEEK WHITE LOW SHUN SW 1018 M1 MECH PLAN PRO WAINSCOT-RESTRM MFR.STD. WHITE SHEET VINYL ARMSTRONG CONLON B&701 STONE HANSOR VCT ARMSTRONG EXCELLON 51904 STERLING CARPET NEYLAND TRADEWIND 3045326 OZ. RUBBER BASE ROPPE SILVER GREY P108 WINDOWUNERS PRESELECTED EMBOSSEDOAK RESUN - COPART W1NWWCASING PRESELECTED EMBOSSED OAK " SON - °� WHITLEY EVERGREEN INC. 'DA,E: 4/2,1116 JOB NO: 3872 INTERIOR DOORS PRESELECTED EMBOSSBDOAK Q cusroMERsuelAT7u wo JoBNAAE 56'x 48'MODULAR OFFICE BLDG sN: 0306-122-AID INTERIOR TRIM PRESELECTED EMBOSSED OAK - - COUNTER TOPPIAM WILSONART BLUEJAY D322-60 m LAI SUBMITTAL 6124M MARYSVILOLE,WAO9B2�1 CABINET FACES vItSDNART SHADOW BLUE 021&BO COVER SHEET-NOTES uluwx Av: ALv ELECTRICAL DEVICES LENTO" WHITE (360)6535790 SHEETTTIE qLE 3872-A.DWG (360)659-7735 FAX. THI30FAMWICVOIDT9 REPINDIk4DNTNORIIEWNR1F11 CDMSBNTOFWI6REY EVEACAENSIC, STD PEN W. A'O SIT. OF 4g� Ia•r rdtlr T-71W na 36'd v2• rd I? •4r ra MOUNT HAV TANK @ A b 72•AFF g INSIDE d W2 � 4 !. h WOOD R O O M CABINET 4N ., b N H N P-2 Pd y 107 _ 106 i . WOMEN106 100 ¢: OFFICE 4 107 108 RECEPTION ♦ B w m d e 14• >oh �1 a L L(MISSUE) I t WJ 1� H ! Z� b f � rd 17 ILL I O 4' 105 OFFICE 12)LVL(THISSIDE) —.—_—.—.--- (il LV�(THIS SIDE) �1 105 AIR OPENING .. 101 THRU OPEN OFFICE AREA WALL W/1/4 ♦ GWB(T'P) L 104 F- OFFICE / O o k LLB s O (2)LVL(THISSIDE) }, (I)LVL JH:s SIDE) 03 03- F- ' 103 ?. 2M LUNCH ROOM Q Ou0P 102 MOUNT H W V P3 ♦h I i______ UTILITY p4 TANK@ 7TAFF ON ¢ WALL ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE G`W ROOM FIBRIN EAST WEST RIUTH CDUNG FM k o• b. IK' OESCXIPRON OT W w _ ANT 1NT Y11 MM INT mma MM 6Mf mum a RE®BOM m m m TI► ACT r-11• v0T b TACTOIR *I OADIOFTICE m m m m so r-1r RT M. FACTpR � Isd' � 0r � Sf.;• � Iw URUIY ROOM m TIP m TIP ACT 7'-11' OFT RB FACLORY toomomm m m i57 ACT T-11' YCf RB IF/C10R! IN OFRM m m m m ACI 7,11- RT m FAL7m m m m TT ACT r-71- On Ti I FALWR( amm m m m m ACI r-11• pF Im I mm ADi noel m' m m' m AGf r-11^ N 6N FACTaMT 1pL MEN m' m m' m A0T n11' W w FAC10R7 FLOORS CPT-26 OZ COMMERCIAL LEVEL LOOP CARPET SV-SHEVINYLET CL-ARMLE(50%OFFSET LA FLOOR PLAN VCT- IVINYL COMP.TLE(50%OFFSET LAYOUT-HELD BACK AT MIL FOR N SEAMING BY OTHERS) NBW- OTBYWHITLEY BO-8VOTHERS ` I --- RB-4 RUBBER BASE REF ORB-O'RUBBER BASE WALLS TTP-112'TEXTURED B PAINTED GYPSUM WALL BOARD --4'FRP WIC @ TOILETS W/GREEN GWBBENEATH MARK REWSION �! RESUN - COPART WHITLEY EVERGREEN INC. DA E: 4/21106 CEILING 0 S4roe AaBNeLE 56'x 48'MODULAR OFFICE BLDG 3872 ACT-SUSPENDED ACOUSTICAL CEILING TILE,11T FISSURED Z.4' 1421E SMOKEY POINT BLVD. SN: �30G-�22-AID LAY-IN(INSTALLPER ISO8039.1.16ASTMC6356CMB) 0 LaiwwTTAL MARYSVILLE,WAOB271 FLOORPLAN-SCHEDULES DRAWMDr. ALV (360)8&53 7/35 FAX. FlIE: 3B72-ADWG A.' MCItMM)GVNT.ERPA'AOIE01�14V1 Bt MDOiOYa'81T4FYANIkYBA3Ul®IIIC STD IULI ND: NR. OF T- r 1 X 8 SMART TRIM 45 MIL EPDM(BLACK)ROOFING, 7 RAIN CHANNEL OVER DOOR 1 X B SMART TRIM GLUED TO SUBSTRATE SLOPES V DOWN®HINGE END ` (TYPI Eo Lo I I i I I I .... .__.___ --- .._ _ NORTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION SKIRTING NOT BY WHITLEY NOTE GUTTER AND DOWNSPOUTS 45 UL EPON IBUCK)ROOFING, MFR STD DRIP RAIL INSTALLED AT SITE NOTOY YMREY / GLUED T051b5TPAlE ABOVE HVAC UNIT(TYP) EXTERIORUGHTTYP 1X4 SMART TRIM @ WINDOWS, CORNERS A M4 INSTALLED AT PLANT 7/16'LP.SMART PANEL W/ GROOVESS'O.C. I a I D - ---------- -- t' f-l.. I IN USE Y pom(Ty1 FLUSH MOUN 305�15'MIN T.FBOX W/WEATHER SOUTH ELEVATION UNDERFLOOR ACCESS \_SN,RiD GH01 BY WNlTIC: WEST ELEVATION PROOFCOVER FOR SIGN UGHT EACH EXTERIOR DOOR(lYP) 1/4"=1'-0" ROOF VENT CALCULATION: EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS ���-MBB eqR =B 98 egflX 149=1290 sq In Sale:1M'=1'-0' 700 RIM RAFTER VENTS PROVIDED: 30'x 3'X 16 VENTS=1440 eq In VENT CALC PER RAFTER BAY: 14125x 17-0'"20B8 sq le 300 =70agln VENT NOTCHES PROVIDED: 5'x 1.12'x 2 NOTCHES PER RAFTER=15 eq In NARK REMDK RESUN - COPART ® 54� WHITLEY EVERGREEN INC. OBIWAE SUN MODULAR OFFICE BLDG DAIS 421106 3672 UmSUINmA1 YUNB 14219 SMOKEYPOINTBLVD SN: 0306-122-A/D DRAWN BY. ALv MARYSVILLE,WA 98271 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS (360)8535790 SNEETTIRE FILE: 3B72ADWG (360)659-7735 FAX MS WW G CANNOT BE REPRODUCED WDHOUTTNE INUDFN CONSENT OF WNREY E4FRCAFFN NC. STO PUN NO: A.2 SHT. OF 8 rs r�• WD.CABINET 11' I6' FORINWTANK 14 TRIM STRIPS_ GRAB I%W,BAR 31rX ® GRABBM 1r1' Ll I I 'R TEMPERED ^'•�� •'�\,R i �. 1-1N', r-At' 1-114',3A'-/1' !\ GLASS IR FROM RFARWALL ® /// FROM REAAWALL "No CASING \ �•,�•� �� �` ' Ar HIGH Flip H 4r HIGH FRP / 250 MFR STO NOWWA'h BY WAINSCOT WAINSCOT J It swou BOWL �. - 24' i/ i SIEBSNt BBfRs &• 0 %f � �,F � STAINLESS f 7 � � Ynr• L'+ 70P OF .. .• raa -- -•• --• 4'BACKSPUSH GF.CL(IYP) a., CPA6 Wt . • - .•• 4'x1P PASSIHRU W/1'RADIUS s 1 7 eYi CORNEAS 1r D.x 36 O COUNTER � / •.�.•�. :• � .: rs f4r rs li rs re I I � I I T4' rr 1 l` l L Ina A WOMENS RM-107 r� MENS RM-108 ��TRANSACTION WINDOW-RM-106 LUNCH ROOM-RM-103 Smb:17=1'4Y K�o Sde:17=1'-0' KY V Sab:1(C•1'4 V Srab:17=1'-0' NOTE PROVIDE BACKING FOR GRAB BARS AND ALL OWNER PROVIDED ITEMS PROVIDE BLOCKING IN WALL FOR GATE 3'4'GATE CYLINDER LOCK CYLNI"LOCI( CYLINDER LOCK 10'X1•CHECK SLOTS 10'X1'CHECK SLOTS 107(1-p1EC1(210T8 217 GROMMETABOVE 2 VT GROMMET ABOVE 2I-GROMMET ABOVE EACH KEYBOARD DRAWER EACH KEYBOARD DRAWER EACH KEYBOARD DRAWER I o ° = 1O \� K *GW t4` f Y-0 S rO�—''d 1T "C I� 7-0 � r-0# 2° I "° "= rr l ra L Tw 11e as L 2ns � ra L SrC L r{\ RECEPTION COUNTER-RM-101 K7 E Scab:12=1'HP w/ rYTR � J iz i i � 1rr / W yr,/• �KITCHEN FAUCET(15) SINK(2) WATERIEATERWI PRESSURE S TEMP. REUEFVALVEPIPE TO EXTERIOROFBLDG 1 W CAPPEDTFOR j FUTURE EXPANSION I W TAM( Rev i -WATEO"NIATIBIWINIESSAII116 TEMP REUEF VALVE PIPE TO rVIR Vr EXTERIOR OF SLOG.CAPPED TFOR 1tr / FINREE PANSIGNTAW i / IR• 10' � r 'IT I1Ir to 1A� W N?n w 31P.O.C.I � r r ur�) S, r FIXTURE UNIT CALCS pIpPOL150'MAX DEVELOPED LENGTH WATER SUPPLY DRAINMASTENENT r' OTY. DESCRIPTION EACH TOTAL QTY. DESCRIPTION EACH TOTAL rca8' 2 WATER CLOSET(TANK) 25 5 2 WATER CLOSET(TANK) 4 B SUPPLY WASTE 2 LAVATORY 1 2 2 LAVATORY 2 4 SCALE:NONE SCALE:NONE 1 KITCHEN FAUCET 1.5 15 1 KITCHEN SINK 2 2 314'METER-3/4'BLDG SUPPLY TOTAL 85 USE WNWN TOTAL 14 MARK REMNON WHITLEY EVERGREEN INC. RESUN - COPART DATE 4/21108 w 3872 0 Bwe JOB NAME 56'x 48'MODULAR OFFICE BLDG Sit 0306-122-AID 14219 MOLE. POINT 911271 w. INTERIOR ELEVATIONS I PLUMBING ld susMmu nvae MARvsvIllE,wa 9B271 IxeawN BY: ALV (360)653-6790 s ETRRE FILE: 3872-P.DWG (360)659-T735 FAX. A.4 11Od°N14GVNDTILRFNONICEDY4DIAl1 GINMf11N.>ISfIROFrifRlYfA1YiFFWK STD PION NO. °R V NOTE- INSTALL ON SITE NSULATIONANDTOP FJOISTS (2)1,/TX 24-LVL®THIS SIDE FOR VENTILATION,DO NOT OF MIL CAMEO TO FOLLOW LIMU)JOIST wwoER ®EACH JOIST BLOCK VENT NOTCHES ROOF SLOPE (1)117X 24•LVL @THIS SIDE 5'k11/T VENT NOTCH (I111,7X 24-LVL Q THIS SIDE ll OF MA.CANTED TO FOLLOW (2f I YTX 20 LVE 0 TNSSIDE WITHIN IT OF END OF OF MIL CANTED TO FOLLOW 3'X 30'VENT SLOT RIM ROOF SLOE- OF Milt CANTED TOFOULOW RAFIER(TYP) ROOFSLOE (2 REO'D)EACH END OF BLDG ROOF SLOPE SEE EAVE VENT DIET,THIS SHT. (1)w0x101ITLONGMBOLT Tx4'BLOCKING WINLIT S WASHERS(6'-0'O.C.) _ ❑A ROOF/CEILING ASSEMBLY •* ..� rPERMV ? � yY -_-'- ~} 1-, 1 } h ` / 1 �t,1 ••`�! �.(1 •45ERULNEMPORT(BLA 1 GLUEDTO SlIBS7RATE;CLASS'A'MUlEHB1E /ERUL REPORT GI3BW 2'OSBS n Ml DETAIL H { — — `y- .._.._-. .._..—'- -- ._.._ _. _L . _..-- _._.._.._ .-.. 2x,6 HF SHEATHING RAFTERS®24 D.D 7 - -- - 1 : ORBEKLUIIE -R30C UNPAGED RAT T INSULATION W/VAPOR BANNER(FS-25) 12Y 6'MB. ( _ -MFR;:FACED A 4'ACOUSTICAL CEILING GRID(PERIBC st sew t••P-0' �A1VIBIASO/EONEGUi O,CM - _ .. i ( 8039.1.1 a ASTM C635306m) - -(SHIP LOOSE:MATERIAL FOR MR.SEAL UP S PIPE BOOTS) I INT.WALL ASSEMBLY SOLID BLOCKING II •t7T GYPSUM WALLBOARD,TFXNRED 6 PAINTED OW ROOFING I SR/CE NONBIARRTG _ _ -2X4HFSTDGBADE STUDS I6'0 C. ^." _ INTERIOR WALLSV#1%/A ' -DOUBLE TOP PLATE,4'-W MIN.LAP JOINTS,SINGLE BOTTOM PLATE X B 46-YAM 12d NA&S,EA ENT, - ; ; I RAI FIBERGLASS INIlT GYPSUM SULATION BATTS @ RESTROOM WALLS ALUMINUM DRIP RAI� _ �PLATE ���AND ,_..__,_--••-•.� i •--- - •4'-0'HGH FRP WNNSCAO®WATER CLOSTWIW/GREENBD. 1xBSMARTTRIMF _ r INTERSECTIONS) BENEATH ) C + C (Bv�oTHVGERRKsj"PLANT rf GYPSUM WALLBOARD,TEXTURED&© EXT.WALLSASSEMBLY r -1 ERM VAPOR HARRIER LAP SEAMS MIN. ITNTED -2%6 HF STD GRADE STUDS I9'0.C. •DOUBLE RMRM=106 PLATE TOP PLATE,40'MIN.LAP JOINTS,SINGLE BOTTOM -BUILDING WRAP -R-19 UNFACED FIBERGLASS INSUL BATTS W/VAPOR BARRIER -7/1 0•LP SMART PANEL SIDING GROOVES 6'O.0 D •4'41`HIGH FRP WAINSCOTT O WATER CLOSET WI GREENBD. 1 BENEATH —-- D FLOC rr 1 COVERINGS(SEEOOBM FINISH SCHEDULE SHT.A.0) ROOF/WALL CONNECTION DETAIL — -T___—_ ......___._.._ ___.�,__ �7 7 ,.._ h� __��—,—�_._.._ - 3.1 b i�r`u�tl�:.?. - .. .. .. .., ii;l)tii_ttlt-'I1(jU�li).N1J�(i-.?✓. , I�ISe}lI,(1h(11 itity , - - -�' _-_---�__ -(HOLD BACK SUBFLOOR AND SHIP LOOSE FILLER STRIP) Sole:1'•1'-0' y -- ..- I -I -SHTWNYL ON RESTROOMS ONLY) !(VCT IN SREMAIM4FAONT RECEIPT AREA(ONLY) -Y4'T&GUMXPLYIMOODSV64LOOR •ffi,2H.F.#2 FLOOR JOIST@ 1S-0 C(TRANSVERSE) DOUBLE 2 X 12 HF B2 RIM JOISTS 1 TRIPLE 2 X 12 HF#2 0 LVL I -R-,9 UNFACED INSULATION SUPPORTED BY POLYCORD AT -FS25 MOBILE FLEX BOTTOM CLOSURE fI FOUNDATION BY OTHERS n CKOSS SECTION GALVTFLASHING Smle:12'=1'-0' SKIRTING BY OTHERS ( I SIMIRM LUS210OR EQUAL V ' - 1Qk 111P'x T(MIN) STEEL BEARING PLATE - MP)�3 FLOOR CONNECTION DETAIL ATTACH KNEE BRACE FROM LVLTORAFTER $.1 SOale:1'=V-0, @ 10'-0'O.C.TOENAIL BRACE TO LVL W/(4)1Bd,FACENAIL BRACE TO RAFTER WI(4)ISd SUPPORT @ EXTERIOR WALLS ON 2x6 H F.STUD TRIMMER WI SINGLE 24 KINGS FA MOD.NAIL 4X6'HF#2 COLUMN IN WALL W/1.1/Tx Tx 5/B•THK TRIMMERS AND KINGS TOGETHER WI16d® BEARING PLATE EACH MOD, 6.O C STAGGERED FACE NAIL LVL TO NOTCHED 4XB W/(4)l6d STRAP LVL TO COLUMN AND COLUMN TO FLOOR STRAP LVL TO COLUMN AND COLUMN TO FLOOR RIM WI(3)MSTA 10 EACH MOD RIM W/(1)MSTA 16 EACH MOD DRIP RAIL lXSSMARTTRIM FASCIA OVER 2%4 SUB FASCIA n V VENT SLOT W/ S UO SCIN5B4 EXT.COLUMN 5 INT.COLUMN IN WALL (1 EAVE VENT DETAIL A, Bcale:,lY,,'-0• A, s�e:,a•=ry — A, Srale:,•=1,4T MARK "" WHITLEY EVERGREEN INC. RESUN - COPART oATe 4l21106 3872 AR JOBMVE SB'x 48'MODULAR OFFICE BLDG sm: 0306-122-AID �� � sNAAe MARY14219 SMLLE,llOKEY 1271NT D. CROSS SECTION-DETAILS ORAWNBY: ALV MARYSVILLE,Wq BB277 (360)963.57(G SHEETTT11E FILE: 3872-XDWG (360)959-7735 FAX THIS MMV CAWT BE lEN6090 MIHWTTHE WRITTEN COHMIT OFNBIIIF/E4FRORFBI NC. 5T0 PLAN NO: 6N, L.F • MOUNT HAW TANK Q *Tr AFF INSIDE OD CABINET EF-1 EF.t 0 F2 OI i WC EN N f06 100 9Fl A4 r • '2 �? ;7 02 • I f6 Fd !' rC Mr Pr zfaa J -4 KX WEJR.NMp MOUNTED FLUSH IN WALL WITHADOBONALD(T RING PROTRUDING INSIDE �? CASEWORK TO LAND CONDUIT FOR POWER CONNECTIONS DATA:4111 W W/EKT.RING FLUSH IN WALL WITH(2) F2 f? DUPLEX FUEF Ill AND RAISING F? u 1-FMC CONDUITS TO ABOVE CEILING METAL OW F7 OFFICE HP-1 105 ELECTRICAL SYMBOLS LEGEND F2 ®� 214'FLUORESCENT LIGHT FIXTURE 11M) F7 -MODEL MRL STANOARD P F2 1 F2 i7 -LAMPS.2)FS2T8 i_ .wu3*t11BBlxd6 OPENOFF AREA1bo Nv.xwP -DIFFUSER PLASMATIC W .t. INCANDESCENT EXTERIOR LUMNHE,®B'AFF 110De1 HP -uwG_WRs 1M F COVER:TMPER RESISTANT-CONIROI:PHOTOCELL ;7 2/ '2 SINGLE8 15AMPPOLESNOTED COERWISE E 16 AMP UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE -MTG HGT.:4B'AFFN N,0) COLOR: F7 1r8 ' $r THREE WAY SWITCH Wl COVER PLATE(16.mp) 15 AMP UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE -MTG HGT.:4B'AFF(U N O) COLOR: •• iN DUPLEX RECEPTACIE WI COVER PLATE(15emp) tt -MOOEL1V0.61NONID -MTG.NOT.:1B'AFFN N.OJ COLOR: _ywrq DUPIE%GRWNO FAULT INTERUPTNG RECEPTACLE(15amp) -MODf1MFR,STANDARD -INSTALL WEATHER PROOF IN USE COVER ,2 F2 F2 F2 T2 AT HGT.:1RwETLOCATAnoNs LIGHTING/POWER BUDGET -MTG.HOT.:1B'AFF(U NO,) COLOR: WSEC LTG BUDGET DEDICATED OUPIFX RECEPTACLE WI COVER PLATE 120emp) Y -MODEI:TAVAANDARO AREA TYPE SOFT, VA150.FT. BUDGET -MTG HGT.:1B•AFFN MOJ COLOR 01 OFFICE 2,536.0 1.2 3,0432 103 11 WEATHER PROOF 24A GF.0 I UNDER FLOOR TOTAL INTERIOR 3,043,2 LUNCHROOM L� ® FORHEATTRACE EXTERIOR 200.0 75 1'560.0 F2 u0p ^ F2 F2 120240 VOLT SINGLE PHASE,MAN BR R DESCRIPTION I CONNECTED CODE I DEMAND F2 n CS ELECTRICAL PANEL VA FACTOR VA SAFETY SWITCH(TYPE 3R OUTDOOR) TNT.LTGITTLNL4 IAOIRR - -MODEL:MFRSTANDARD WSEC 2,2320 1.25 2,790-0 102 -(SEE DRAWING FOR AMPERAGE) EXEMPT 0.0 1.25 00 L SUB-TOTAL 2,232.0 2,7900 1 1WV1 J-BOX FOR FUTURE SIGN LIGHT,FLUSH MOUNTED(1,2WA) EXTERIOR LIGHTING -LOCATEAT EXTERIOR DOORS GAFF NON-EXEMPT 3000 1.25 375.0 -WEATHER PROOF COVER WSEC EXEMPT 0.0 1.25 0.0 T ROSQUAR IN FOR OX DATA RECEPTACLES MT TO ABOVE CEILING RECEPTACLES -SING(EGAHGMUDRING THRU10,000 5220.0 ,.00 5,22D.D LIGHTING-POWER PLAN-MTG HOT.:I'AFF(U N.O.) OVER 10,000 00 0.50 G.0 ROUGH IN FORCOMMUNICATONS MOTORS S.*!114'1'-W - PANEL SCHEDULE °• MOP y -SINGIkREBBGANGMWITH3lGC TOABOVECEILING LARGEST 4,9920 1.25 6,240.0 pL'LOG .SING MTG.HOT:16'AFF(U N.O.) REMAINING 8,1360 1.00 6,136,0 k1 AfM 1rWJN MGm ,K DESCRIPTION KVA B KVP DESCRIPTION C EMERGENCY EGRESS LIGHT WI BATTERY(16 VA) SPACE HEATING 30,000.0 1.00 30,D00.0 1 FFATFI.y y/ A - y 10l KATwllr tf -MODEL MFR STANDARD KITCHEN 2,000.0 1.00 2,000.0 T !I IEl -MOUNBNGHDGHT:MAXS'e AFF(TOTOP) MISC. 19,710.0 1.00 19:710.0 I wc1o01rr Ia L 1nm r Iasr1 u u LwnanAN4 I TOTAL WATTS 72,590,0 74,471.0 _ LIGHTED IO(LTSIGN,LED(10VA1 TOTAL AMP$ �$6 fS� to�7c0F�4 Ll J ALC ICOYA� y `ITT I MOOR:MFR STANDARD -MOUNTING:WALL(SEE PLAN) 10 IFCACtlM1 Ll tf 11 POWER RISER DIAGRAM wet- Ir IIOIOwAYE 11 tl I[<il'-0FP. 11 „MOGTN f1/tW 11 Is FM}It MFAIOI P DOUBLE GANGBOX TANOM DUPLEX ELEC RECEPTACLES DATA SPACE(15amp) TNT EXT pp-J,RD FyIyM 1 rl 019"n➢mom H WTI -MODEL MFROOR(uN I SERVICE ENTRANCE 211MAc/IMOCK W y -MTG HGT.:FLOORN N.O.) 12 -ROUGH IN FOR DATA WITH 31r C TO ABOVE CEILING 2t Atl A� Y MOP F?OT21OV L „ HVAC INTERLOCK I f y y (Hf! 12X12 SCREW CAN WITH RELAYS FOR CONTROLLING 400AMP T y N TWO HEAT PUMPS WITH SINGLE THERMOSTAT SWOLE PHASE \"oG,T nn 1sOFTHEBIDO y cON11114R104I11011INtl tO1NCW5[cT9 K:A PHASE A: 36.3 AMPS 3025 PHASE B: 36,3 BUBPJTAL }20 TOTAL DEMAND KVA ]IS AFPf p`1r I � 17 Ir I« WHITLEY EVERGREEN INC. RESUN - COPART DAM. 40MJO6NAME 56'x 48'MODULAR OFFICE BLDG s'N: 0306-122-A/D3872 wsuom TAL vU1De 1MARVSVMILLLE WA 98271NT VD. DRAWN BY: MDP LIGHTING-POWER PLAN (380)BS&5790 SHEETTIIIE FlLE: 3872-E.DWG E.1 BY-` BroTHIA9 (360)659-7735 FA%. R6 WNl5HIGCWNOTBENIicDV61HDUTTHEWIRRN CIXASDIIOFYMIIIEY EVFRGPFFNNC. STD PI.W NO; &R. OF FF-7 EF-1 I - Of 1 F2 BV �7 F2 M N 1 100 1 W Pic. m X1, IB'O F2 2 F2 F2 4V i F2 ro ro F F2 F2 F2 —^— � utimira xnmtra ro F7 F2 E w%texi" F7 HATCH INDICATES 105 G ON SITE TILE -y AT MATE LINE WOW— F2 F: E TX%IY%1YX F2 AREA G I 104 2 mmi a — � xApna vnmva ro ro �2 :2 ro lr0 fF2 A HVAC SYMBOLS — Fz i F2 12/ IONIZATION TYPE MO%DUCTSE DETECTOR LL I WAM011NTEDE% UWFAN SWRCHIM WAIGHT 103 •SEE WAL EQUIP.E04SDIAE LUNICH ROOM F2 c2 I \/ NALLYOUMHVAC SEE NYAL E➢1iV'11E!lf MDEdAE _ ' HP-HEAT PUMP 102 DEAD BFROGAND UNT THERMOSTAT WfIN NIGHT SET BACK AND 5 DEGREE r i DEAD BANG OAOUm®/S'AF.FJ - G, &124'REN R AIRGN LL I ER 2 AR DIFFUSER WI BALANCINGDMPERAND NO LABOR ODUAR B'O --VVVWV- FLEX DUCT MECH PLAN SUPKY AIR. REDUCT IR-SEEOR $mb:1N'•1'-0' SUPPLY AIR RETURN NR-SEE PLAN FOR SUES HVAC EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE MARK QTY. DESCRIPTION COMMENTS HP-1 2 WALL MOUNTED HEAT PUMP lMI WITH ECWABIONOMISER FORBARD NWHW-A75,4 TON W115 NW HEAT STRIP 47MC000NGBTUH-90EER 100%0 SA 4R000 HEAT BTUH Q 0 COP 12024GV 7 PHASE 1BB5 CFM,HIGH SPEED DRY COIL EF7 BROWIIQOLLI(6WNLFAM 2 170V 1110 VA 4DCFM,TH U WALL BWITCH WITH LIGHT �SEC "�"` REVISION DM. WHITLEY EVERGREEN INC. RESUN - COPART COMMISSIONING SIONI1 ANOTES O 1 REQUIRE DOCUMENTATION OF DATE, 4f21/0fiJOB NO.COMMLSSbNING NOTES ON PIAN DRAWINGS 0B "WE 56'x 48'MODULAR OFFICE BLDG SN: 0306-122-AID 3872 1421E SMEV POINT MECH PLAN M'SEC 171E ALL EQUIPMENT SHALL HAVE I D.AND PREVENTIVE m W SUBMmAL `+2� MARYSVILLLLE,WA 98271 pNWN BD: ALV MAINTENANCE INSTRUCTIONS FURNISHED TO OWNER.REWIRED ACTION SHALL BE STATED ON READILY ACCESSIBLE LABELS (��I 7735 FAX SXEEDTIILE FlLL: 3872-E.DWG M.1 71M71WM17/M'!i LEHPP�gAxeTlRFmnEIWMrtutuavrta lwnn{MXiFPIF[ Pu++ sm. OF - .1 r LENGTH OF UNIT STRUCTURAL NETESI � X � I. DESIGN INFORMATION AND LIVE LOADS USED, Z N o o A. BUILDING CODE, International Building Code, 2003 Edition �, o E B, UNIT DEAD LOAD 35 PSF D,L Q, W ° c C. ROOF LOAD 30 PSF L.L. _i Z " w D. FLOOR LOAD 50 PSF L.L � � � E. WIND LOAD 90 Mph Exposure B ~ \m Q.r COEF. Cate ory D/II, SDS = 1.00 W N €W l 41 F. SEISMIC 9 , 4 G. SOIL BEARING' 1,500 PSF (Provided by Others) N C� TYPICAL UNIT110 ii 2, CONCRETEi SUPPORT BEAMS c A. Strength Used 2,500 PSI, MIN. m a 3. MASONRY, i A. Masonry Units ASTM C-90, Grade N, Fri`=1350 Psi 4, SPECIALTY ITEMS, A. Standard Metal Pier shall be capable of supporting a min, of 4,200# B. Anchors shall be installed at the locations indicated on the drawings PADS & PIERS, NO. REQUIRED PER TABLE A — SEE DETAIL Al & A2/SD1 1'-6" and In accordance with the Manufacturer's recoMendatlons as SPACED EQUALLY approved by the Manufacturer Housing Institute'. If Installed per (/) recommendations the anchor has a minimum allowable holding ANCHOR HOLD—DOWNS, SEE DETAIL 81 & B2/SD1, SPACED EQUALLY BETWEEN CORNERS N � o force of 4,700 pounds, f�--I 0 I� o z z 5. Soil under footings to be undisturbed native materials or structural fill compacted to HMM F N 95% of the Proctor density per ASTM D-698. In LLB a 6. Slope finished grade away from structure at 2%, minimum, for a distance not less than 10 feet SI N GLE WI D E MODULAR FOUNDATION PLAN Q o V 7. Structure to be leveled and modules fully supported prior to installation of the hold—downs. N.T.S. LL L _ Modular units with outriggers extending past transport rail in excess of 30 inches LL_ shall be supported along the perimeter at not more than 4�-0". Shim and block as necessary to interface piers with floor members. ( , Z �'- 8. Provide under floor ventilation of a net area of not less than v I TABLE _A 'J one (1) square foot per 150 square feet of floor area. cover vent MODULE RAIL �� SPACING nin s with corrosion resistant mesh not less than 1/4" nor more !•-�-I m z thanopenings 1g/2" in any dimension. Openings shall be as close to INSTALL PIER/PADS UNDER CHASSIS, SPACED EQUALLY BETWEEN CORNER PIERS H � U) z o corners as possible and shall provide cross-ventilation. The required 'area INSTALL HOLD-DOWNS, SPACED EQUALLY BETWEEN CORNER HOLD-DOWNS r , J w Q o shall be distributed nearly equally along the length of the SOIL BEARING (2,000 asQ lENGTHl OF UE J PADS do PIERS HOLD-DOWN ANCHORS v •• builing on opposing sides. EACH SUPPORT RAIL EA.SIDE EA.END 9. Provide proper clearance between wood joists and exposed ground ��_0• 11 2 1 ^^ . O in accordance with Building Code requirements. Wood a r0i 11 2 1 h—� N o exposed to ground or closer than required clearance shall be i ® `00 �L`IIf�L���.. —0 13uiLOING DEPARTMENT 56'-0" 15 2 1 N pressure treated for resistance to decay. 60'-0' 16 2 1 10. Access to underfloor area shall be provided per the Building Code. APPROVE D 66'-0" 17 2 1 0 -- �_ 11. Space hold—down anchor at corners in the first 3'-0" and nearly equally ///v : vq. ep o l` along the balance of the distance in accordance to the table. T Er. NO C AMY' <.\�Q�CC PRCt(L{�.. ."� vC U7 REVISION BY: UNLESS r- /�i=�.�;�.-.L.fi; �� C`� i Nr �`; , 09/29/2005 DB 13UILQ l OR EGO SHEET /V 5?., F1 2 r EXPIRES' :)91271WP_ 0501 01.1-F12 r c� METAL STRAP OR CABLE WITH TURN-BUCKLE z M TO APPROVED ANCHOR rn ^ c w N 0 ' a MODULE SUPPORT BEAM MODULE W c Z Ao LL. rx4"x6" PT SHIMS Z s ~ m '9'2 C d _ CAP WITH NO MORE THAN `� 2x4 0 4'-0" O.C., TOENAIL T do B W co � '�x (2) 2'x8 x16 PT PLATES W/ (2) 12D ° i5 5 OR (1�4"x6"X16' CMU GALVANIZED MODULE SUPPORT BEAM z I o STEEL STRAP 0 z SKIRTING ,2' a^o p B PER SOIL STRAP CLAMP PER - MATERIAL �, OD a r ANCHOR MANY. 5'-60. SOIL ANCHOR r 2 x 8 PT., CONT. N d 8'x8"x16" CMU MANUFACTURER �I 2x4 TREATED a c N PLATE o 1)-4'x16"x16" CONC. \ \ /\ 32' D.C.MAX., LENGTH AT OR �� \ \\,. DOUBLE'OR SINGLE HELIX DRIVEN INTO THE GROUND (2)-4"x8"x16- CMU "AUGER"-TYPE HOLD DOWN- SOIL ANCHOR "TIE DOWN (44)-Yx6'x16" CMU, ALT.PATTERN ENGINEERING, INC.' OR DETAIL—N O N B E A R I N G � J � CMU PIER g 1 SO IL ANCHOR—ENDWALL AL CJSKIRTING NTS. W w A 1 N.T.S. 0 Q N.T.S. !�� F ~ En � o 0 ANCHOR NOTES: O Q 1. INSTALL ALL COMPONENTS PER SOIL I,NCHOR =O O PER MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIO'IS LL_ 2. SUBSTITUTIONS FOR ANY COMPONENT TO BE STRAP PER SOIL PRIOR APPROVED BY LOCAL AGENCY BOTTOM TRIM Q V) METAL ANCHOR MANUFACTURER Z WITH TURN BUCKLE TO U Z I APPROVED ANCHOR 2x4 0 4'-0" O.C. za m O o MODULE SUPPORT BEAM MODULE 5 z X z O SKIRTING 11 c ? MATERIAL U J 0 p N 2x4 TREATED PRESSURE TREATED, 0 Q PLATE CEDAR OR REDWOOD �'1 1 0 0 PRE-FABRICATED METAL PIER MIS 1x6 ^ Q Ln MODULE SUPPORT B O %\�\ �\ / ANCHOR SAT R (n cV 16"x16" MIN. FTG. PAD, STRAP CLAMP PER 32 O.C. MAX. c CONC, ABS, PT WOOD SOIL ANCHOR 8' LENGTH DRIVEN MANUFACTURER 2 GALVANI STEEL STRAP INTO THE GROUND c PER saL AN MANUF. SKIRTING DETAIL—S "11 R A L C ��(�`� c S$�'+1 r � �r REVISION BY: i 7rI o': \ \ \ \ \ \ \ Yr � ' ' , W AS � 09 29 2005 DB \ \ sue'T, . 12 t DOUBLE OR SINGLE HELIX "AUGER ( f- 0 y J(� j SHEET : 2 OF 2 TYPE HOLD DOWN-SOIL ANCHOR -TIE DOWN ENGINEERING, INC" OR EQUAL ;�; Mti L ANC —SIDEWALL �� G,-TFo�,�F �'�qn gq��G�: �'. y � SD1 PAD & PIER S01 HOR ,? A 2 N.T.S. B 2 N.T.S. \~ `v�. � ` 0501 01.1-501 r --1 [CC/ANSI A117.1 1998 Chapter 4.Accessible Routes ICC/ANSI A117.1-1998 Chapter 4.Accessible Routes T 404.2.7 Door Hardware. Handles, pulls, 60 degrees from the horizontal shall not able 405.2-Allowable Ramp Dimensions for Construction in latches, locks, and other operable parts on ac- be required to meet the 10 inch (255 mm) Existing Sites, Buildings, and Facilities cessible doors shall have a shape that is easy bottom rail height requirement. 1 Maximum Rise to grasp with one hand and does not require 3. Doors which do not extend to within Slope tight grasping, pinching, or twisting of the wrist 10 inches (255 mm) of the floor or Steeper than 1:10 but not steeper than 1:8 3 inches (75 mm) to operate. Such hardware shall be 34 inches ground. inches (1220 mm) Steeper than 1:12 but not steeper than 1:10 6 inches (150 mm) (865 mm) minimum and 48 40 4.2.11 Vision Lites. Doors and sidelites ad- A slope steeper than 1:8 shall not be permitted. maximum above the floor in ground. Where sliding doors are in the fully open position,oper- jacent to doors containing one or more glazing ating hardware shall be exposed and usable panels that permit viewing through the panels 405.3 Cross Slope.Cross slope of ramp runs shall 405.7.5 Doorways.Where doorways are adja- _ shall have the bottom of at least one panel not be steeper than 1:48. cent to a ramp landing, maneuvering clear- from both sides. EXCEPTION: Locks used only for security 43 inches(1090 mm) maximum above the floor ances required by Sections 404.2.4 an or ground. 405.4 Floor or Ground Surfaces. Floor or ground 404.3.2 shall be permitted to overlap the land- purposes and not used for normal operation are permitted in an location. surfaces of ramp runs shall comply with Section ing area. 71 p Y 404.3 Automatic Doors. Automatic doors and 302. 404.2.8 Closing Speed. automatic gates shall comply with Sections 405.8 Handrails. Ramps with a rise greater than 404.3.1 through 404.3.6. Full powered automatic 405.5 Clear Width. The clear width of a ramp run 6 inches (150 mm) shall have handrails complying 404.2.8.1 Door Closers.Door closers shall doors shall comply with ANSI/BHMA A156.10.Low- shall be 36 inches (915 mm) minimum. with Section 505. Handrails shall not reduce the re- be adjusted so that from an open position of energy and power-assisted doors shall comply with quired clearances of a ramp run or landing. 90 degrees, the time required to move the ANSI/BHMA A156.19. 405.E Rise. The rise for any ramp run shall be 30 inches (760 mm) maximum. 405.9 Edge Protection.Edge protection complying door to an open position of 12 degrees shall be 5 seconds minimum. 404.3.1 Clear Opening Width.Doorways shall with Section 405.9.1 or 405.9.2 shall be provided on have a clear opening of 32 inches (815 mm) in 405.7 Landings.Ramps shall have landings at bot- each side of ramp runs and at each side of ramp 404.2.8.2 Spring Hinges. Door spring power-on and power-off mode. The minimum tom and top of each run. Landings shall comply with landings. hinges shall be adjusted so that from the clear width for automatic door systems shall be Sections 405.7.1 through 405.7.5. EXCEPTIONS: open position of 70 degrees,the door shall based on the clear opening provided by all leafs 1. Ramps not required to have handrails where move to the closed position in 1.5 seconds in the open position. 405.7.1 Slope.Landings shall have a slope not sides in comp IY g with Section 406.4 are steeper than 1:48 and shall comply with Section minimum, measured under ambient condi- 404.3.2 Maneuvering Clearances. Clear- 302. provided. tions. 2. Sides of ramp landings serving an adjoining ances at power-assisted doors shall comply 404.2.9 Door-Opening Force.Fire doors shall with Section 404.2.4. 405.7.2 Width.Clear width of landings shall be ramp run or stairway. have the minimum opening force allowable by 404.3.3 Thresholds.Thresholds and changes at least as wide as the widest ramp run leading 3. Sides of ramp landings having a vertical the appropriate administrative authority. The to the landing. drop-off of 1/2 inch (13 mm) maximum within maximum force for pushing open or pulling in level at doorways shall comply with Section 10 inches (255 mm) horizontally of the mini- open doors other than fire doors shall be as 404.2.5. 405.7.3 Length. Landing length shall be mum landing area. follows: 404.3.4 Two Doors in Series. Doors in series 60 inches (1525 mm) minimum clear. 405.9.1 Extended Floor or Ground Surface. 1. Interior hinged door: 5.0 pounds (22.2 N) shall comply with Section 404.2.6. 405.7.4 Change in Direction. Ramps that The floor or ground surface of the ramp run or 2.Sliding or folding door:5.0 pounds (22.2 N) 404.3.5 Control Switches. Control switches change direction at landings shall have a landing shall extend 12 inches(305 mm) mini- shall comply with Section 309. 60 inch (1525 mm) minimum by 60 inch (1525 mum beyond the inside face of a railing comply- These forces do not apply to the force required p Y mm) minimum landing. ing with Section 505. to retract latch bolts or disengage other devices 404.3.6 Signs. Labels and warnings for auto- that hold the door in a closed position. matic doors shall cnrnl.dy with Section 703.4. 60 min 60 min 60 min 404.2.10 Door Surface. Door surfaces within 1525 1525 1525 10 inches (255 mm) of the floor or ground mea- sured vertically shall be a smooth surface on the 405.1 General. Walking surfaces on accessible push side extending the full width of the door. routes with a running sloe steeper than 1:20 are landingramp run landing ramp run F �n Parts creating horizontal or vertical joints in ramps and shall comply with Section 405. landing E Lo such surface shall be within 1/16 inch (1.6 mm) CO of the same plane as the other.Cavities created 405.2 Slope.Ramp runs shall have a running slope at least as wide as ramp run by added kick plates shall be capped. not steeper than 1:12. (a) EXCEPTIONS: EXCEPTION: Ramps in or on existing buildings ramp 1. Sliding doors. or facilities shall be permitted to have slopes run 2. Tempered glass doors without stiles and steeper than 1:12 complying with Table 405.2 having a bottom rail or shoe with the top where such slopes are necessitated by space leading edge tapered at no less than limitations. Fig.4o5.7 _ (b) Ratnp Landings 19 18 r .' l J - � ICC/ANSI A117.1-1998 Chapter 4.Accessible Routes Chapter 4.Accessible Routes ICC/ANSI A117.1-1998 x < 48 x < 1220 EW 12 min 12 min 305 305 c o E a x < 4 cox < 100 planting planting area area (a) Extended Surface (b)Curb or Barrier Fig.405.9 flared sides 1:10 max slope flared sides 1:12 max slope returned curb Ramp Edge Protection (a) (b) (c) Fig.406.4 405.9.2 Curb or Barrier.A curb or barrier shall sides shall have a slope not steeper than 1:12.Curb Sides of Curb Ramps be provided that prevents the passage of a ramps with returned curbs shall be permitted where 4-inch (100 mm) diameter sphere below a pedestrians would not normally walk across the height of 4 inches (100 mm). ramp. 405.10 Outdoor Conditions. Outdoor ramps and 406.5 Width. Curb ramps shall be 36 inches (915 planting approaches to ramps shall be designed so that wa- mm) wide minimum, exclusive of flared sides. area ter will not accumulate on walking surfaces. 406.6 Floor or Ground Surface. Floor or ground 406 Curb Ramps surfaces of curb ramps shall comply with Section 302. ;71 406.1 General. Curb ramps on accessible routes 406.7 Location. Curb ramps and their side flares shall comply with Section 406. shall not protrude into vehicular traffic lanes, park- 48 min 48 min 406.2 Slope. Slopes of curb ramps shall comply ing spaces, or into parking space access aisles. 1220 1220 with Section 405.2. 406.8 Obstructions. Curb ramps shall be located or protected to prevent their obstruction by parked planting 406.3 Counter Slope. Counter slopes of adjoining vehicles. _ area gutters and road surfaces immediately adjacent to 1 the curb ramp or accessible route shall not be steep- 406.9 Handrails.Handrails are not required on curb er than 1:20. Transitions from ramps to walks, gut- ramps. ters or streets shall be at the same level. 406.10 Location at Marked Crossings. Curb (b) 406.4 Sides of Curb Ramps. Where pedestrians ramps at marked crossings shall be whollycon- (a) must walk across a curb ram the ram shall have Fig.4urb P. P tained within the markings, excluding any flared Diagonal Curb Ramps flared sides.Slope of flares shall not be steeperthan sides. 1:10. Where the width of the walking surface at the top of the ramp and parallel to the run of the ramp 406.11 Diagonal Curb Ramps.Diagonal or corner- well-defined edges shall have the edges parallel to ramps at both sides, and a level area 48 inches is less than 48 inches (1220 mm) wide, the flared type curb ramps with returned curbs or other the direction of pedestrian flow. Bottoms of diagonal (1220 mm) long minimum by 36 inches (915 rn curb ramps shall have 48 inches (1220 mm) mini- wide minimum, in the part of the island intersected mum clear space, measured parallel to the running by the crossing. adjoining surface slope. Diagonal curb ramps provided at marked maximum sloe 20 12 curb ram maximum crossings shall provide the minimum clear space p 1 p 407 Elevators 1 slope within the markings. Diagonal curb ramps with I flared sides shall have a segment of straight curb 407.1 General. Elevators required to be accessible 24 inches (610 mm) long minimum on each side of shall comply with Section 407.2. Destination- Now the curb ramp and within the marked crossing. oriented elevators required to be accessible shall 406.3 406.12 Islands. Raised islands in crossings shall comply with Section 407.3. Limited use/limited ap- Fi g be cut through level with the street or have curb plication elevators required to be accessible shall Counter Slope of Surfaces Adjacent to Curb Ramps 21 r,'. 20 ►N , , , a-, 20��