Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout16910 59TH AVE NE_046204_2026 U 1 'INSPECTION REPORT iiIN ?' Permit No.: hy Zoy Lot#: /r 5 Address: �'U 9 1 o 15 1t 0Contractor:Owner:' Date: W.,,A,PPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. Inspect Date. / � 7'�.S TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in RL Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation 0 Other: INSPECTION REPORT 4ti1N GTD permit No.: �f'C�''1�Il�Lot Q' Address: 4i- 71e_' r 579 Contractor: O Owner: G -- IN � Date: " ( ,APPROVAL Cl PARTIAL APPROVAL �'❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. Inspector: Date: TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in g Final /fl,/" ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: q: /3 � INSPECTION REPORT 4ti1N G?'o Permit No.:C'�f ���/Lot#: F' Address: Contractor: '^` 4 Owner: '� 7- f ` �y- s 7 NV Date: ILIl � ❑ APPROVAL MARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. Inspector: Date: ��— TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in KAY Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: i 2YF Q. INSPECTION REPORT ii A PermitNo.: C)v toZ-- Lot#: Address: r 6c to :IContractor: DOwner: Lj Date: /O- z'7 ,-0r- ❑ APPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION &,CORRECTION REQUESTED Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. RAJ<S i�F L% �tSLV AV-17 5 14eT_ If je3 r ew— f us C!", ,�•�...e+z Go�.rt�..7 �it''�.. . �ar`Z 1 O :5LA /T-IJ� / D / CoLu +c 4,oA u 1.STYL1�u. r`�sJ to Inspector: �—�cT Date: i e) —-.2-7—z 9- TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in Jir Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation 0 Other: INSPECTION REPORT ¢ti1N GrO Permit No.: 0y &L c,% Lot#: --� Address: 161, to 5 cl jo r� Contractor: 43<<s qs� G,�4 Owner: (Aj N Date: is --2-6--Or APPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ IOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. 14y S++v z v iaaj rJ is&4 Ld_.- 'C� Inspector: � — Date: %O- L-6:2 TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork g Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation 0 Other: 17St "NSPECTION REPORT JIN OPermit No.: o 1l (o "-g Lot#: I Address: 16 .q ro CS e D I— ZContractor: 1) ic-�oOwner: 14O Date: /o- Zy-ate ;C1.APPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION -24 hour notice required. Inspector: Date:,_ TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in �L Final ?"Z ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: �tN INSPECTION REPORT iiIN ?' PermitNo.: 01f 62, Lot#:Address: /ro 5i0 5 �Contractor: /)/�sOwner: � C'' Date: /0 -/,9 -a 5� ,APPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION -24 hour notice required. Inspector: Date: 7e—/9-09— TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing JEL Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: INSPECTION REPORT 4y1N Gr0 Permit No.: o9 Lot #: Q Address: i to li Contractor: is 5 O Owner: 4--` �IIN G Date: i0-i -7- �E ❑ APPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. Inspector: Date: l0—/ 7-OS TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor A Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage Insulation ❑ Other: ,INSPECTION REPORT 1;i PermitNo.: og �zoy Lot#: Address: t (o 9/OContractor: —��O Owner:Date: /C :ZkAPPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. J Inspector: Date: /o/y-0S TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: INSPECTION REPORT y1N G T Permit No.: 4 Address: / 7�C' r y C% Z Contractor: _ -Y Owner: Ly SDI N GAO Date: f C' APPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. i G i 5T Inspector: Date: TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry P/411� ❑ rainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: j" INSPECTION REPORT ti1N G r0 Permit No.:C Lot#: 4 �. Address: !�A ���' ` ; �' • • S� Z Contractor: -7 �O Owner: '" ZINC' A Date: � ❑ APPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION 5Z--CcORRECTION REQUESTED Af'6errections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ZCLL 43 -0674 R RE-INSPECTION -24jhour notice required. T Z' Inspector: =f� Date: TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in Pi Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: INSPECTION REPORT ¢ti1N G?'0 Permit No.: ©4 (bz"4 Lot#: Q' z Address: / to C, / 0 � Z Contractor: 13 K_ s O Owner: q- �S�IN G� Date: ❑ APPROVAL PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. Inspector: Date: / ~� TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical 259 Grid L--"168 y ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: 3 3 L Q INSPECTION REPORT i N Gr Permit No.: t)•t ra Z:,� Lot#: Address: 0 b rx i s S�, n Contractor: O Owner: -1-T- IINO Date: C1 -- i - -s ❑ APPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION MCCORRECTION REQUESTED Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. L.T7Lw L�//L_ ,lrir i4PP(L.aVON-,— Inspector: Date: TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical A Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: INSPECTION REPORT 1;i G T Permit No.: C�1 G2.c''d Lot#: Address: i f„� i CContractor: 0K__S O Owner: -i G� Date: — I ci Oq APPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. Z'*j� Inspector: Date: TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical g Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation 0 Other: PECTION REPORT Q ii Permit No.: 0 V 6L d�t Lot #: Address: l (o(or-, /O 6"� 0Contractor: i` .SO Owner:� Date: jr_a�✓ ❑ APPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. M t%A-f /,-J 444 62 �Q{J PfLcsk7o y s r ZOO r=o"r' I AJ �F-c a n�5 �✓� icy � Inspector: S�-� Date: 9 TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork Mechanical /LO Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: S I 91j' INSPECTION REPORT _., 1;4 ?'OPermit No.: o g tozocf Lot #: Address: i6 � ro 5 g D!2-.Contractor: � D)" Owner: —�Date: 'I— as� ❑ APPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION y CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. Inspector: Date: gF—&-DS TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas_Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical X Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation 0 Other: =i L `INSPECTION REPORT N G TQ Permit No.: r`t u_`oy Lot#: Q - Address: 1 L 9 r o 57 It a/L- Contractor: +C S Owner: IN C' Date: 9 ❑ APPROVAL XPARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. Inspector: Date: TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing W.Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: r 2� INSPECTION REPORT ¢y1N G?'O Permit No.: o `f Z Lot #: 4 Address: I Contractor: `h V__s O Owner: 4 INO� Date: 8-30--0S, ,,APPROVAL XPARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. i Z�O Gw arm_ S�h4T7'� ER nA 2 o� Sp rz.t..i c-Yr 0'" Ort�. .,✓�tiL Inspector: ` — Date: lB -3O ram TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing vL Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: „— INSPECTION REPORT ¢ti1N G rO Permit No.: c 4 62.oy Lot#: Q Address: I be t o S4, 6_vLF__ Contractor: �'4S IN��O Owner: Date: 8•-3 i—0 5” ❑ APPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION -24 hour notice required. Inspector: Date: TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing - ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing 9,Drywall, Nailing +4.�❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: 3 Y(O INSPECTION REPORT �s 4titN G rO Permit No.: a&i 6-La'4 Lot#: Q' Address: I V1 c 0 li�?g 0 fZ � z Contractor: Mi It S O Owner: `-f-T I N Cs� Date: 19 -Z'tv-a6- ❑ APPROVAL ,PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. p<7"V ri O F-- l 7t L`}�L 04t.c-s5 r Z" 0 1 Gv s324 �JT�rS ��YL �—v tiv'I O.^J LyJ Inspector: Date: S— "Dr- TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ,kFraming ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: 3q1 INSPECTION REPORT ii ?' Permit No.: o"l 6LOq LotAddress: t b9 to S9 02-Contractor:O Owner:G� Date: ❑ APPROVAL XPARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. �i�PR.ayr� or-.I Inspector: Date: —Zlo�Ql^ TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing RLDrywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: 351 INSPECTION REPORT ¢ti1N G?-O Permit No.: z 'f Lot #: Address: [6q 10 511 Contractor: ni-L-S 9s, ,SO Owner: -� IN Date: 6 -Z5-oS ❑ APPROVAL PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. ia"IL 7 .1 r�.n A,-- ' Inspector: t Date: -Z5-OS' TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing .Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork Hit ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: INSPECTION REPORT V N G To Permit No.: Q q I62,0(4 Lot #: 7W Address: I 6-cl 10 Contractor: 0 X-S �o Owner: —T SIN O Date: S 7-4-CtS® ❑ APPROVALPARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. /o Inspector: Date: ��' TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage OK Insulation ❑ Other: �— IN -PECTION REPORT ZN G ¢1j ?, Permit No.: o�6f 6 2aq Lot #: Q Address: I to 6-9 Ar-vtf- Contractor: 1) K-5 � Z 0 Owner: I N O Date: A m-"Za--�S_ ❑ APPROVAL 0,FARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. ...t� F fty kte PX-Y mac_ Inspector: �.-G� Date: TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor 0 Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: INSPECTION REPORT 4ti1N G To Permit No.: ®�_6c�01 Lot#: Q" Address: J6"/ !z2 ve - Contractor: y O Owner: ING� Date: -- APPROVAL APARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. Inspector: Dato:�_ TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing M�Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: �, INSPECTION REPORT ¢S.IN G l0 Permit No.: O Y b"%4 Lot #: e' Address: ( lo`i to 1511 VA_t_ = Contractor: -1 K.S `!s, �O Owner: L(i N Date: ❑ APPROVAL APARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. Q' Inspector: Date: TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor 61' Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing 2CDrywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stoves ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: �d`I jNSPECTION REPORT ii r permitNo.: Z)q 6ZoIL/ Lot #, Address: 1 (og10 59 O-�Contractor: b i�S Owner: y Css Date: —�l-off ❑ APPROVAL A� PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION %?CORRECTION REQUESTED Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. /n3S TX" 4_ z P t-x_� o 'j Inspector: Date: S- TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: INSPECTION REPORT iIN NG T Permit No.: c �4 2cy Lot#: Address: 1b9 to 51 Contractor: K SOwner: Date: e r ❑ APPROVAL ,2f,PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. .� r°PP-4 ! `TT i $ Inspector: Date: —ds TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing 0 Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: IINSPECTION REPORT 1;i TPermit No.� G -ot#: Address: Contractor: O Owner:� Date: ❑ APPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION Via,CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. Z� / Inspector: /'� Date: TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Draina ❑ Insulation ❑ /_ Other: Z � ��` I INSPECTION REPORT ii r Permit No.:d ��a�Lot #: Address: Z69elo - sC1 ��e Contractor: Owner: O Date: ❑ APPROVAL PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. 44 1 nspector: DateZ- TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage � Insulation ❑ Other: ��'/ 2-3o INSPECTION REPORT 4y1N GrO Permit No.: oq (67-oef Lot #: Q' Address: a an r o C. Contractor: _h iL-s Owner: �j - `r,qI N�� Date: I-cr 0 APPROVAL ,PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION D CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION -24 hour notice required. r Inspector: Date: -Z-d�_ TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor pi Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: 3 it 'NSPECTION REPORT N G r0 Permit No.: O `I &ZQ'-1 Lot#: Address: 1�d g f g s q fh-vi' Contractor: p i`-5 �N GAO Owner: Date: 7 - Z1-05 -. ❑ APPROVAL PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION D CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. f S'4 L _J T-C'�L�7✓ _ FTT f'I l�y'�'�i O�i 1 CS i &_j c.s v4 e.t S Inspector: Date: TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage A&Insulation ❑ Other: INSPECTION REPORT iDate: GPermitNo.: a4 tcZ-oq Lot#: OAddress: IG9 10 C59 ►A ✓%-Contractor: � (-5 ,SOOwner: 4f-Ni `7-Ll?-c5' ❑ APPROVAL E&PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. ^� i11D A-PP�cio�� ✓l,/�F-z_`cc4�-i7/-�y� -Sr0C Inspector: `— Date: TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor 5d Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: 2-Z.q NSPECTION REPORT 1;i r PermitNo.: y4 tcZ04 Lot#: Address: I &,9 t o �9 A-y'=Contractor: 'b i--S 0 Owner: � -f -T Date: t9 --3V- o ❑ APPROVAL *,11PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. VC'M CS'�^7 c_ S vt a0 i i/ '►��K LI Cam.7'��k�drL Ov rrL �A !J a?7ltC G � Q/�!t�✓1 A'L aL1'n?Rctirr7 Date: 6 3 cD TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation 7 Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation �I INSPECTION REPORT ¢ti1N G?'O Permit No.: Lot #: Q' Address: /&9 /O — S 7 00,r Z Contractor: c o 0 Owner: SIN C' Date: OL, PPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION -24 hour notice required. �v � d Inspector: Date: TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping YC,Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid 0 Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: INSPECTION REPORT 4y1N GTO Permit No.: os (020'-1 Lot #: Address: _ 1 4�6I l o Contractor: 1�1� 9�41T.-I ,t� Owner: 4 G Date: ?7 l ❑ APPROVAL PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION -24 hour notice required. Inspector: Date: TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation 0 Other: C,[ INSPECTION REPORT G ¢tiIN G To Permit NO.:���-� C`f Lot #: Q' Address: 16 �?/6?_ S G/ r • ,fix s Contractor: er. 6Y IN�' OwnDate: ❑ APPROVAL �I' RTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION -24 hour notice required. % CA 17 Inspector: Date: TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping 6 Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation 0 Other: INSPECTION REPORT ¢ti1�G1'O Permit No.: ID L z,�Ll Lot #: Q' Address: i 6'1 to CS-1 'O�z Contractor: `D ' -S O Owner: 9`s�INO� Date: 0'7- /,,APPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. /LOYaJ,AGu'-'rZA<_ (."m 6 dv C) A-C 35 J 7 a •!- Inspector: �Z Date: TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing (z_X. (Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation 0 Other: INSPECTION REPORT r iii Permit No.: y. y LotAddress:Contractor:Owner:O� Date: d'D C ❑ APPROVAL XPARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. O'z�'ai7J11 LIMt Cl Gi2,o aLl_z3 4.-/./ o- �2-y 4xio Q.5 -t— e— L=- /'4- rU i5 5 fi�PlLcw--� Inspector: �:.. Date: r�s' TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation 6�Foundation mac/ ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final * Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation INSPECTION REPORT ¢y1N G rO Permit No.: o S' c,. ,L( Lot#: Q Address: ► i a 5 ci pt.'- Z Contractor: k__S Owner: 67 A-c,t N C' Date: I S ❑ APPROVAL /PARTIAL APPROVAL El VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. ` J Inspector: Date: TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: INSPECTION REPORT.-' I;; Permit No.: T Lot #: Address: Q`1/0 ��7�'Contractor: b/4SOwner: �T �-w-Date: ❑ APPROVAL A PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. 1%i f3-AO/Lg3s ip^./ -5 i'-67 )-� 7 A Li NC I r S 7 u 2'l U Y+- 7 0 8.5 Inspector: Sc Date: 3-1-07 -off TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork Mechanical ❑ Grid Cuct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: INSPECTION REPORT tAwitj �y1N GrO Permit No.A Lot#: Q' iAddress: l� 4f z� �` r'✓ &*,c ,tom Contractor: k 9s, ,SO Owner:_Gede' 1-ns�ZlmJ �c./�7 �j N C' Date: '9 ❑ APPROVAL PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION -24 hour notice required. Inspector: 0 N 4 — Date: TYPE OF II SPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: 2.2q gNSPECTION REPORT iIN NG?' Permit No.: v4 (ozo�d Lot#: Address: 1 U 0 59Contractor: 'b iL-SOwner: dw 4 -7^ O Date: (v '-3fl-- c; ❑ APPROVAL OARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. 00*%0-sr�c.� U a 03�-'t , 11-5 -L- -- Inspector: - Date: 6-3 a .,D-5-- TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove A-Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: T CX -rNe "F= 6=1FZL- X "C3-rE3M 4--C)I%J E;-T FR LJ -IF X C3 P4 VD0 E=-FR M X -r F=ff I=-FR M X -IF P-4 C3 10 Art- C3;E-i 10-C+ 44-'t T NL:�Own er Z+T E,j -CF-:- 0 2-V.,01-.2,0'T-a 1 AD 3-1-55 -7 Qj- Value of Work: 51 2"82, 30s Describe Work.- C-3 N R U ' W W,.q Proposed Use i F F.1. E RRE— H Legal Description: Job Address: 4-'ES 9 10 5 S, N D !'Q E Contractor' s Name Type Address License# 10,12, &,7-' H AVE NHE x- TOTALS Fee 5 224 1.. 3 6 71,ate i",ee 5-10 4. 02 SIGNATURE TOTAL FEE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $67, 760. 11 T F1,-, REBY r E R­ V i. r� ; 4ND' N-ED PAYMENTS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $10, 954. 00 K N1 0 W -74 ME B,E LE R RECT ALL f-DROV1E, TOTAL DUE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $56, 806. 11 117 � YPE Or" L L B W,0 R P7 -R� R E.-C-`E I P V--7 BV6A NG OF' AL MunicipalArlington Airport Memo Toe Building Division Fnxm Dale Carman,Airport Coordinator Dmm 11/23/2004 Rs Gale Insulation Building Permit We have reviewed the building permit application and submit the following comments: 1. Because of the site's proximity to the Airport we require the contractor to supply markings for any tall construction equipment such as cranes that may be used. The markings supplied should be flags, minimum size 3' x 3' in dimension with an intemational orange and white checkerboard pattern utilizing 1'x 1'squares. The flags need to be placed on the highest part of the equipment to serve as a visual waming to pilots. Any equipment such as cranes needs to be lowered at night. 2. Because the site is adjacent to the airport we do have an existing avigation easement limiting the height of structures on the property. The FAA based on the following information provided by the developer and/or architect has approved the Gale Insulation Building. a. Gale Building: Finished Floor Elevation=130',West End Building Height=26.75' If either the planned finished floor elevation or the planned building height changes for the building as the building design progresses we need to be notified immediately and the applicant will need to submit a modified 7460(Notice of Construction)Form to the FAA. One other issue concerning the heights of objects on the property relates to the landscaping plan_ Due to the proximity of the site to the airport,we do not want any trees planted on the site that exceed a height of 20'at maturity. 1 i �. t �} V� 1� Z RECEIVED� � City of Arlington 0 � 28 2W4 Building Department utilities Div Nq�qn",' REQUEST FOR REVIEW FORM NAME: BP #: 04- DATE: RETURN THIS FORM BY: PROJECT SUMMARY: RESPONDING DEPARTMENTS: ❑ TOM C., FIRE U KAREN L., UTILITIES ❑ BILL B., NATURAL RESOURCE ❑ YVONNE P., PLANNING © GREGG E., ENGINEERING ❑ JIM T., CONSULTANT ❑ CHUCK W., CONSULTANT SUBMITTAL INFORMATION IS ATTACHED. Please review the information and return this form and your comments, either on the drawings or in memo form, to the Building Department. If you have no comments, please return the form with the "No Comments" box checked. PLEASE MARK ONE BOX, SIGN, DATE, AND RETURN THIS FORM TO LINDA. �OMMENTS FOR THIS REVIEW ARE IN ATTACHED MEMO ❑ NO COMMENTS FOR THIS REVIEW, OKAY TO ISSUE PERMIT ❑ COMMENTS REVIEWED BY DATE - r — i City of Arlington Public WorksDivision Memo To: David Anderson, Building Official From: Reta Shepard, Utilities Specialist CC: Gus Tararan, Ken Renfro Date: 11-16-04 Re: Utility Review, BP#04-6204, Gale Insulation, 16910 Wh Ave NE Your construction documents submitted with building permit#04-6204 have been reviewed for compliance with Utilities Division regulations. Comments are as follows: 1. The drawings show 2 water meters and that the building is divided into two units. Please provide a breakdown for the square footage and business use per unit for each meter. 2. The legal description on sheet 1 is incorrect if this building is on lot 1. 3. Sheet 1 note 18 calls for 1 Y2 or 2"water service lines.Will you require a 1'/z or 2"meter to each unit? 4. Sheet 4 shows a SSMH, this needs to be shown as a Monitoring MH, per City of Arlington standards,for multiple units. To comply with State of Washington Health Department regulations you will need to install the type of backflow assemblies required below, and provide the requested information. These comments are for the shell building only. Individual businesses must go through a Utilities Division review before occupancy will be granted. 1. A Reduced Pressure Backflow Assembly (RPBA) shall be installed per City of Arlington standards immediately after each of the water meters and before any branch connections; provide sufficient freeze protection. Alternatively, the RPBA may be installed inside the building in a mechanical room if adequate room is provided for testing, maintenance, repair, and drainage (see spacing requirements for the vault installation). If branch connections are present between the water meter and the RPBA they must have a backflow preventer installed; the City of Arlington Water Department will determine the type of backflow preventer needed for the commensurate degree of hazard. 2. For a fire sprinkler system with chemical addition install a Reduced Pressure Detector Assembly (RPDA). For a fire system without chemical addition install a Double Check Detector Assembly (DCDA). You may install the DCDA or RPDA in a vault outside per City of Arlington Standard, or inside the mechanical room if adequate space is provided for testing, maintenance and repair. I 3 For an irrigation system a separate metered service must be installed. A Double Check Valve assembly (DCVA) shall be installed after the meter per City of Arlington standards W-13. Please state the size of meter required. 4. All the backflow assemblies shall appear on the State of Washington Department of Health list of approved assembly. 5. All the backflow assemblies shall be tested by a State of Washington certified Backflow Assembly Tester, at owner's expenses. 6. The City of Arlington Water Department shall inspect the backflow assemblies after they have been tested. Provide a copy of the test report prior to calling for inspection. 7. Call for inspection at the following points of construction. a. Prior to covering interior piping b. Prior to covering underground piping. c. Prior to requesting final inspection by the Building Department. 8. Applicant must complete and return a City of Arlington Cross Connection Survey and Industrial /Commercial Waste Discharge Permit Applications. Please provide the requested information so we may finish processing your construction application review I can be contacted at 360-403-3524 to answer any questions you may have. 0 Page 2 Al • City of Arlington Building Department REQUEST FOR REVIEW FORM NAME: ` c97� BP #: 04- 7' DATE: �� RETURN THIS FORM BY: `/ L PROJECT SUMMARY: RESPONDING DEPARTMENTS: ❑ TOM C., FIRE ❑ KAREN L., UTILITIES ❑ BILL B., NATURAL RESOURCE ❑ YVONNE P., PLANNING Ll GREGG E., ENGINEERING ❑ JIM T., CONSULTANT ❑ CHUCK W., CONSULTANT SUBMITTAL INFORMATION IS ATTACHED. Please review the information and return this form and your comments, either on the drawings or in memo form, to the Building Department. If you have no comments, please return the form with the"No Comments" box checked. PLEASE MARK ONE BOX, SIGN, DATE, AND RETURN THIS FORM TO LINDA. © COMMENTS FOR THIS REVIEW AREINEM-0- fi-3eL`&-`D ❑ NO COMMENTS FOR THIS REVIEW, OKAY TO ISSUE PERMIT ❑ COMMENTS REVIEWED BY DATE 2-8©c/nd- City of Arlington Building Department REQUEST FOR REVIEW FORM NAME:,- A—)(1 BP #:_04- DATE: f 7)/ 2-� RETURN THIS FORM BY: !/ PROJECT SUMMARY: RESPONDING DEPARTMENTS: ❑ TOM C., FIRE ❑ KAREN L., UTILITIES BILL B., NATURAL RESOURCE ❑ YVONNE P., PLANNING ❑ GREGG E., ENGINEERING ❑ JIM T., CONSULTANT ❑ CHUCK W., CONSULTANT SUBMITTAL INFORMATION IS ATTACHED. Please review the information and return this form and your comments, either on the drawings or in memo form, to the Building Department. If you have no comments, please return the form with the"No Comments" box checked. PLEASE MARK ONE BOX, SIGN, DATE, AND RETURN THIS FORM TO LINDA. ❑ COMMENTS FOR THIS REVIEW ARE IN ATTACHED MEMO ❑ NO COMMENTS FOR THIS REVIEW, OKAY TO ISSUE PERMIT COMMENTS 4V� ko-o ar f rOvc,J �1 �fri.r�vy(_ �GS S n w t y 6." REVIEWED BY_ DATE r1 G1�Y - `y � City Of Arlington Development Services �lING�� Natural Resource Division Memorandum TO: Building Department FROM: Bill Blake CC: DATE: November 8, 2004 SUBJECT: 4 T Development AL IV Confirm that Engineering has approved the final drainage design with sufficient separation as not to effect neighboring lots. With the need to build up the lots for separation it is important to confirm that the groundwater won't leak out the sides of the fill on to neighboring lots. BB Page 1 of 1 i . ,_ :. , } ,&1,6 1! City of Arlington 4qjW- Building Department REQUEST FOR REVIEW FORM NAME: BP #: 04- (_ DATE: _�C7�c�-� RETURN THIS FORM BY: 1 2.. PROJECT SUMMARY: } RESPONDING DEPARTMENTS: u - ❑ TOM C., FIRE _ ❑ KAREN L., UTILITIES ❑ BILL B., NATURAL RESOURCE LYVONNE P., PLANNING GREGG E., ENGINEERING ❑ JIM T., CONSULTANT ❑ CHUCK W., CONSULTANT SUBMITTAL INFORMATION IS ATTACHED. Please review the information and return this form and your comments, either on the drawings or in memo form, to the Building Department. If you have no comments, please return the form with the"No Comments" box checked. PLEASE MARK ONE BOX, SIGN, DATE, AND RETURN THIS FORM TO LINDA. COMMENTS FOR THIS REVIEW ARE IN ATTACHED MEMO ❑ NO COMMENTS FOR THIS REVIEW, OKAY TO ISSUE PERMIT ❑ COMMENTS REVIEWED BY DATF_. ' City of Arlington Development Services Planning Division jNG�° MEMO TO: Building Division CC: Gregg Eaton, Engineering Division FROM: Yvonne Page, Senior Planner DATE: November 10, 2004 RE: Gale Insulation Warehouse (BP#04-6204) The following conditions must be met prior to issuance of the building permit: 1. All development shall be in substantial conformance with the approved land use development site plan received August 10, 2004, subject to any conditions or modifications that may be required as part of the site civil drawing review process. 2. The developer shall submit payment of the following estimated City of Arlington impact fees (based on approximately 58,000 square foot warehouse/manufacturing building): Traffic at $1,038.00 per p.m.-peak-hour trip, which is 28, or$29,064.00 3. The developer shall pay transportation impact fees to Snohomish County and WSDOT, and the developer shall submit to the City of Arlington proof of payment of the required fees. 4. The developer shall dedicate to the City of Arlington a Critical Area Protection Easement (CAPE) per the approved mitigation plan by Hydro Terra dated June 25, 2004, received by the City of Arlington on July 7, 2004. The signed CAPE shall be submitted to the City of Arlington to be recorded prior to issuance of a building permit. No development shall occur within said buffer. 5 The developer shall clear all outstanding Planning Division land use and Engineering Division permit-processing accounts with the City. (As of this date, there is sufficient balance in the Planning Division account to allow the developer to clear the account.) In addition, all of the conditions of the Premier Pacific Properties Special Use Permit (File S-04- 023) shall apply to the development of the property. Yvon Page • �. +I I - f Y DF DEVELOPER OBLIGATIONS GATION OF IMPACTS TO THE ROAD SYSTEM [30.66B.070] ember ARLINGTON SNOHOMISH COUNTY 1PREMIER PROPERTIES/S-04-023 PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT SERVICES (425)388-3311 ve is the property legally described in the subject case file; REG-RECEIPT:4486-63151 CASHIER ID : scdsls Apr 20 2005 :d in 1979 a Snohomish County Code (SCC) Title 2613, Date Printed:4/20/2005 14:04:42 5602-Arlington Interloc $19,897.39 )y Amended Ordinance No. 95-039, effective July 13, effective July 24, 1995, and by Amended Ordinance No. SubTotal $19,897.39 d by Amended Ordinance No. 01-011, 01-012, 01-013, 01- Sales Tax $0.00 101; and by Amended Ordinance no. 02-006, effective April NC-Sales Tax $0.00 )64, effective February 1, 2003 at which time the TOTAL DUE $19,897.39 ato the Uniform Development Code (UDC) in section ........................ RECEIVED FROM : 4T Development, LLC -d that the impact of a developing property upon its road CHECK $19,897,39 ;r; and, ------------------------------- 1 is located in Transportation Services Area (TSA) TOTAL TENDERED $19,897.39 ---------------- ........ nent is based upon fulfillment of the following condition CHANGE DUE $0.00 Road System Impact Fee: [30.66B.055] All developments shall mitigate their impact upon the future capacity of the road system by paying a road system imp Type of Development: ICOMM Size of Development �8,000 SQ FT Number of Trips: 7.92. Impact Fee L_ $19,697.39 PDS Transaction Code: 5602 Right-of-Way Requirements: [30.66B.520] N/A WSDOT Requirements: [30.66B.710] $0.00 1 PDS Tran Code: INIA Transportation Demand Management Payment: [30.66B.610] $o.00 Fund No. N/A Payment of the above shall be paid prior to recording and shall be administered in accordance with Section 30.6613.350 SCC. -- — 9A,&r/V 1. Land Development Analyst, Assoc. for Peter E. Hahn, Director of Public Works I 1 • City of Arlington Building Department REQUEST FOR REVIEW FORM NAME: T d'?A-i BP #: 04- LOP. DATE: RETURN THIS FORM BY: /l Z PROJECT SUMMARY: ! �lit�w /Q�1 RESPONDING DEPARTMENTS: ❑ TOM C., FIRE ❑ KAREN L., UTILITIES RECEIVED ❑ BILL B., NATURAL RESOURCE iCC ❑ YVONNE P., PLANNING OCT 2 8 2004 ❑ GREGG E., ENGINEERING El T., CONSULTANT COA BUILDING DEPT ❑ CHUCK W., CONSULTANT SUBMITTAL INFORMATION IS ATTACHED. Please review the information and return this form and your comments, either on the drawings or in memo form, to the Building Department. If you have no comments, please return the form with the"No Comments" box checked. PLEASE MARK ONE BOX, SIGN, DATE, AND RETURN THIS FORM TO LINDA. COMMENTS FOR THIS REVIEW ARE IN ATTACHED MEMO ❑ NO COMMENTS FOR THIS REVIEW, OKAY TO ISSUE PERMIT ❑ COMMENTS REVIEWED BY / DATE /0 �-�/ To: Building Department From: Tom Cooper Date: October 28,2004 Ref: 04-6204 1. Automatic Fire Sprinkler and Monitoring required. Sprinkler system design to match or exceed intended usage of building. (IE, high piled storage) 2. Site Civil Plans are not approved at this time. Configuration of fire hydrants shall be that of approved site civil and may not match as submitted on this plan. 3. Fire extinguisher will be required, Fire Department will conduct a site visit at time of near completion. Final placement and total number will be determined at that time. 4. Approved address required. 5. Knox Box required, contact Fire Department. I 41 1 -`A, �t(nl ,.Il!' . ..� =a.,pigIIIIa LfLr i n_I,•n. I ' n ::: I� II1 ICI I]Il 1 '. Illh.� In n}I �• `A 11 it •lIJ1 1 I� I N7 Ip L •��i'��i ll�a�f13 I J l!I I _ i - J .1• s c;rit�trn h,tl u t r A . I F IJ -,III' I,IL I I - , �u � ,ti i I-• P P I J,t+tn I,r �••- • I I j nit" l IIi�N' I!� �r nl� 1r'I JAk'1I 6 t.g 1I• �� 1r �'.•L'I�l$rt I - �1nr nr I. i, I rum � I ' �iElff•Ifh rf• r i.IP� . � ._.y'�. .ry jig �f11• I I ••y'1J� L J'•' .1 1.:. 1 �r. Apr 25-05 01:32pm From-THOMCO COV-'RUCTION 4253779135 T-929 P-01/02 F-508 4T Development,LLC 13700—40 St. NE ** Lake Stevens,WA 98258 phone(425)377-9130"*Fax(425)377-9135 "An Equal Opportunity Employer" DATE' 4/25/O5 COMPANY: City of Arlington ATTENTION. Linda F. FAX: (3fi0}�4 1II6 = 63` 3J-1 Re: Crown Park LLC Sewer Recovery Contract WSSAGE-, Dear Linda, Here is a copy of receipt that WSDOT gave me on 4 T Development Lot 1 (Masco Building). Please call if you have any questions. THANK YOU, Sent by- Edmund M Thomas - THE INFORMATION CONTAINED Iti THIS FACSIMILE COMMUNICATION IS PRTVEWEDANWOR CONFIDENTM INFORMATION ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIWIDUAL OR ENTTIT NAMED ABOVE IF THE READER OF THIS COVER PAGE IS NOT THE INTENDED RWRIENT,YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMIN4TION, DISTRIBUTION OR COPYING OF THIS COUrvIUNICATION OR TUE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS CQ1*jN 1ICATION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU RECXrwW THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE IMMEDIATELY NOTWy US BY TRL vuoNE AND RRTURN THIS FACSIMILE TO US AT TILE ABOVE ADDRESS VIA THE U.S.POSTAL.SERVICE- THANK YOU- PAGLS: 2 INCLUUMG COVER SHEET A4452 e.2m Rrg@MOG CO 7Rzma 457791e E§§ EQd| F-§ ^ ( / CA k m k � ( k \ ® 3 r n \ � � 2 > z \ 0 57— -IF « � � j / § rn $ j I CA f § 0 o . k k m 0 I � 0 9 � m . � z � \ LN _ C3 � � a -- C) CD r r d o r ° r-L g m rd i \ _,• \ Z Z O v „* [ .� d •• 1-4 `;. rrio0 M �] U) Z � � x 7 � z � y J � ,�'� x tnri Z :/ z y v r ° t� N O r Z z � Z d or o rt o It r o C� � Z r � , f Ism od � Or Z d O r f p0-4 n - r C tt ►� ° It c� z cl� z i R O � r 8N1-4 ° ~ Y z n ' \ N O� FP n � r o \� f� r M z n go" �;�;' .�let.�ruuh'riAm wacacaarrn. mz �; -' s .a' � (t11l. �' a+_ •t 1� '• 'i ....�._._ �__. 1 /l �, 11 1� SYtuly 11` 7 fll '�. .��„ow n...>�(,,, .� `tiillU•`qtp �\ �y�nN+.... tdr� ,yC{ y� /:75' 1�� t~ '�.T- i?+�1 1�( 1. `•� ?[tRlallofcncaAmcm.�Asw..i .. p`tct(Coviaww79�'avNx<mr6uvamnroxva'f07oPL` ('�oa0�2tmam\nma:mm��v»�_�i � x x a � y � s.. . :1 rri trl (D N x r Y I U) � � � '} °z zo o ' H z o o \�o °° O x d U-, M r�.400 rri d CtTl aj o a z > N U) L > n o > x t°y . , t y O r On rr O H i It z r trJ R° y r cZn p°, a LZ7 ¢ py Cd rn zH: o � yd ' z � z 1-4 � �o o n m rl a u, O ( [ o 0 z n x Y' ''' `"' ►� 4 . .. tiYGrvuutn r••.v,my•^mwlpRWriaxuWatiru44at... Yiaaml➢41xtN�iYudu.viGdeaWN�fOG'LmWGuu3a�xrdn....n..,r�yut(.iram mw.rA -vv.n,•• w.svuittwsval-�.i..�• •,\1_��/' _�� v\�+�.,,,m±�'F3^f�S-`�%� �'�'g".?cn��.�"L"�'�� � q��Am,�./ J�-�`�?.�++mvmotl= �k �,•• � „„I M1' S•. P,. 1 I � 111 i � Y O l, City of Arlington Development Services �r Temporary Use Permit 0 February 10, 2004 Gale Insulation T-04-004 A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND REQUEST The applicant requests a temporary use permit for parking of Gale Insulation company trucks and employee cars for approximately 12 months. The property is a portion of approximately 10 acres located at the southwest corner of the Arlington Airport, on the parking area of the old Flight Structures Incorporated (FSI) site, which is vacant. (NOTE: If the vacant building is leased, requiring the parking stalls, the temporary use permit shall become null and void upon the building being occupied and the applicant will be required to immediately discontinue use of the site.) Access will be from 172"d Street NE/SR 531. The site is zoned Business Park. B. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Applicant: Jake Abuhl, PO Box 387, Arlington, WA 98223. 2. Contact Person: Bob and Linda Olson, Gale Insulation, PO Box 225, Marysville, WA 98270. 3. Owner: Arlington Municipal Airport, 18204 59th Drive NE, Arlington, WA 98223. 4. General Location: The site is located at the northeast corner of 172nd Street NE/SR 531 and 43rd Avenue NE at a portion of the FSI site, which is at the southwest corner of the Arlington Airport, in Section 21, Township 31 N, Range 5 E, WM. 5. Address of Property: 4407 172"d Street NE/SR 531, Arlington, WA. 6. Description t of Proposal: Parking of Gale Insulation company trucks and employee cars for approximately 12 months. 7. Acreage: Approximately 10 acres (total FSI site). 8. Public Notification: Per City of Arlington Land Use Code (LUC) 20.04.130.b, temporary use permits that are categorically exempt under Chapter 43.21 C RCW (SEPA) are exempt from publication. C. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The proposal was categorically exempt under Chapter 43.21C RCW (SEPA). \\Engineering\Planning User Documents\ypage\Gale Insulation T04-003\Gale permit.doc yjp;2/10/04 Page 1 of 5 T I r Temporary Use Permit February 10, 2004 Gale Insulation T-04-004 D. BACKGROUND The temporary use permit application was received by the City of Arlington on January 19, 2004, and the application was deemed complete on February 5, 2004. E. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Application Process: The temporary use permit application was received by the City of Arlington on January 19, 2004. The application was deemed complete on February 5, 2004. Per LUC 20.16.104, a temporary use permit is issued by the Planning Manager after an administrative review process. 2. Comprehensive Plan Zoning. and Permissible Uses: The City of Arlington Comprehensive Plan identifies this area as being General Commercial. However, the subject property is zoned Business Park per LUC 20.36 Part II, zoning map. Parking of trucks and cars in the parking lot of a vacant building is a permitted use per LUC Table 20.40-2, Permissible Uses, under Storage and Parking 10.100. Pursuant to Western Washington Growth Hearings Board case Citizens v Mount Vernon, 133 W.2d 861 (1997), the zoning code prevails where there is an inconsistency between it and the Comprehensive Plan. 3. Density and Dimensional Standards: This section is not applicable as no structures will be constructed; the trucks and cars will be parked on a small portion of an existing site on an existing parking lot. 4 Non-residential Performance Standards: Per LUC 20.44 Part III, the proposed temporary use must comply with the performance/operation standards for noise, vibration, odors, smoke and air pollution, disposal of liquid and hazardous wastes, water consumption, electrical disturbance or interference, lighting, and site and building maintenance. 5. Design: Per LUC 20.16.104, temporary use permits are not subject to LUC 20.46, Design Guidelines. 6. Transportation: Per LUC 20.16.104, temporary use permits are not subject to LUC 20.56.170, Right-of-way Improvements, or LUC 20.90, Concurrency and Impact Fees, if the use lasts less than 6 months. This request is for 12 months, therefore LUC 20.90 Part I, Transportation Impact Fees, shall apply to this temporary use. However, since the building on the site is vacant and therefore not generating vehicle trips, and since not all the parking spaces are being used for the trucks and employee cars, and since the temporary use permit will be discontinued immediately upon the vacant building being reoccupied, it can be presumed that no new or additional p.m.-peak-hour trip trips are being generated by the proposed temporary use. 7. Off-street Parking: Per LUC 20.16.104, temporary use permits are not subject to LUC 20.72.060, Parking Area Surfaces. In addition, off-street parking is not applicable as an existing parking lot at a vacant building will be used to park the trucks and cars. \\Engineering\Planning User Documents\ypage\Gale Insulation T04-003\Gale permit.doc yjp; 2/10/04 Page 2 of 5 i i I Temporary Use Permit February 10, 2004 Gale Insulation T-04-004 8. Screening and Trees: Per LUC 20.16.104, temporary use permits are not subject to LUC 20.76, Screening and Trees. 9. Stormwater Management: This section is not applicable as the trucks and cars will be placed on existing asphalt. 10. Environmentally Critical Areas: Per LUC 20.88, the site does not lie within any known environmentally critical areas. 11. Groundwater Resources: The property is within an aquifer recharge area. Best Management Practices shall be used for the protection of the groundwater resources underlying this site. 12. Potential Cultural Resources: The Stillaguamish Tribe has expressed concern about potential cultural resources in the area where the proposed project will occur. If any archaeological materials are discovered on the site, the State Historical Preservation Officer, the Stillaguamish Tribe, and the City of Arlington shall be contacted and measures taken to preserve the materials and the site. 13. Airport Management: The Arlington Municipal Airport requires that street lamps or light poles located on the property be down-shielded as to avoid interfering with flight operations. 14. Water and Sanitary Sewer: This section is not applicable as no water or sewer service will be used. F. CONCLUSIONS 1 The City of Arlington Comprehensive Plan identifies this area as being General Commercial. However, the subject property is zoned Business Park per LUC 20.36 Part II, zoning map. Parking of trucks and cars in the parking lot of a vacant building is a permitted use per LUC Table 20.40-2, Permissible Uses, under Storage and Parking 10.100. Pursuant to Western Washington Growth Hearings Board case Citizens v Mount Vernon, 133 W.2d 861 (1997), the zoning code prevails where there is an inconsistency between it and the Comprehensive Plan. Therefore, the proposed temporary use as noted and conditioned is consistent with applicable policies governing those types of uses and is allowed in that zoning district.. 2. The requested temporary use permit, as conditioned, is consistent with all LUC requirements for temporary use permits, permit processing procedures, and all other applicable codes. 3. The temporary use permit should be approved subject to conditions noted below. \\Engineering\Planning User Documents\ypage\Gale Insulation T04-003\Gale permit.doc yjp;2/10/04 Page 3 of 5 T .. ' .;. Temporary Use Permit February 10, 2004 Gale Insulation T-04-004 G. CONDITIONS The applicant shall meet the following required conditions in order to receive approval for the temporary use. 1. The proposed use shall be in substantial conformance with the temporary use permit application received January 19, 2004, subject to any conditions or modifications that may be required as part of the temporary use permit and construction plan review, if required. 2. Best Management Practices shall be used for the protection of the aquifer recharge area underlying this site. 3. If any archaeological materials are discovered on the site, the State Historical Preservation Officer, the Stillaguamish Tribe, and the City of Arlington shall be contacted and measures taken to preserve the materials and the site. 4. The developer shall down-shield all exterior lighting, including streetlights. 5. The temporary use permit is valid for a maximum of 12 months from the date of approval below and shall become null and void at that time unless an extension is requested pursuant to LUC 20.16.220, Expiration of Permits, EXCEPT THAT, if the vacant building on the site is leased, requiring the parking stalls, the temporary use permit shall become null and void upon the building being occupied and the applicant will immediately discontinue use of the site. H. APPEALS Per LUC 20.20.010, to appeal this decision, an appeal application must be filed, with all required fees, within 14 working days of the date of issuance of this permit. The Hearing Examiner would hear the appeal of the permit and his/her decision would be considered the City's final decision on the underlying governmental action. I. DECISION The temporary use permit is hereby APPROVED, subject to the conditions specified in Section G above. J. EXHIBITS 1. Approved site plan received by the City of Arlington on January 13, 2004. 2. File T-04-004 (Gale Insulation Temporary Use Permit) (on file at City Hall). ORDERED THIS 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2004. Cli trong, Planning Ma er (, R sp nsible Official \\zgering,,Planning User Documents\ypage\Gale Insulation T04-003\Gale permit.doc yjp;2/10/04 Page 4of5 i Temporary Use Permit February 10, 2004 Gale Insulation T-04-004 Distributed to the Following Party of Record: • Jake Abuhl, PO Box 387, Arlington, WA 98223 • Bob and Linda Olson, Gale Insulation, PO Box 225, Marysville, WA 98270 • Arlington Municipal Airport, 18204 591h Avenue NE, Arlington, WA 98223 • Paul Richart, City Engineer/Gregg Eaton, Engineering Technician, Development Services, Engineering Division • Marc Hayes, Code Compliance, Development Services, Engineering Division • Dave Anderson, Building Official, Development Services, Building Division • Kerry Wentz, Plans Examiner, Development Services, Building Division • Bill Blake, Natural Resources Manager • Karen Latimer, Utilities Manager, Development Services, Utilities Division • Dale Carman, Airport Coordinator, Arlington Airport \\Engineering\Planning User Documents\ypage\Gale Insulation T04-003\Gale permit.doc yjp;2/10/04 Page 5 of 5 - , I � _ I , ' .. »: Exhcby`T Q003 ovT-� IU�_ 0.( r�r�Ew1 IPA,g J I ' It 41 lit- 14 1 • , 1------ " - -BCD i •:e® , .. .` ,, ,. - •" _ 1 P• � � � ; � z -, ti � 1 III !a APPR i :I by VLA h e— on Fe, r 0 , 20 S ' { of repr ta0m of ft Fbrml , No Is an arf Ik,�it t®tfie perrr�tt. Plane refer wy+�;*,�;.w.• 2n t fors Nit of any cpP!icr-jc:oRrudfi of lipI i i v 1, s: eo Gl,Y �Al City of Arlington Development Services Zoning Permit IN Gip July 13, 2004 4T Development Preliminary Short Plat Z-04-025-SP A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND REQUEST The applicant requests preliminary short plat approval for the development of a 4-lot commercial subdivision. The property is located at 5800 172nd Street NE/SR 531 on approximately 11.68 acres. The plat will be served with water and sewer from the City of Arlington. Access will be from 59 h Avenue NE via 172nd Street NE/SR 531. The property is zoned Light Industrial and General Commercial. B. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Applicant/Owner: Ed Thomas, 4 T Development, LLC, 13700 44th Street NE, Lake Stevens, WA 98258. 2. Contact Person: Thomas Barry, Metron & Associates, Inc, 307 N Olympic Avenue Suite 205, Arlington, WA 98223. 3. General Location: The site is located at 5800 172nd Street NE/SR 531, on the southwest corner of 591h Avenue NE and 172nd Street NE/SR 531, in Section 27, Township 31 N, Range 5 E, WM (Tax ID No. 310527-002-001-00). 4. Address of Property: 5800 1172"d Street NE/SR 531. 5. Description of Proposal: Development of a 4-lot commercial subdivision. 6. Acreage: Approximately 11.68 acres or 508,905 square feet. 7. Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designations, Zoning Designation and Existing Land Uses of the Site and Surrounding Area: AREA LAND USE DESIGNATION ZONING EXISTING USE Project Site Airport Restricted and General Commercial and 1 vacant SFR Airport Industrial Light Industrial (TBR) North of Site Airport Restricted and Airport Flightline Airport Airport Industrial South of Site Airport Industrial Light Industrial Vacant East of Site Airport Industrial Light Industrial Crown Distribution West of Site Airport Restricted and General Commercial and Commercial and Airport Industrial Liqht Industrial Residential \\Engineering\Planning User DocumentsUvemle\Premier Properties Z-04-025-SP\Premier Pacific Prop permit.doc kjr;7/13/04 Page 1 of 7 i y Zoning Permit July 13, 2004 4 T Development Preliminary Short Plat Z-04-025-SP 8. Public Utilities and Services Provided by: Water: Citv of Arlinqton Gas: Cascade Natural Gas Sewer: Citv of Arlington Cable TV: Comcast Garbage: Waste Management Northwest Police: City of Arlington Storm Water: City of Arlington Fire: City of Arlington Telephone: Verizon School: Arlinqton School District Electricity: Snohomish County PUD#1 1 Hospital: I Cascade Valley Hospital 9. Public Notification: Per City of Arlington Municipal Code (AMC) §20.04.130.b, zoning permits that are categorically exempt under Chapter 43.21 C RCW (SEPA) are exempt from publication. However, per AMC §20.16.100.e, on July 1, 2004, written Notice of Pending Final Action of the short subdivision was mailed to all property owners within 500 feet. C. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The proposal was categorically exempt under Chapter 43.21 C RCW (SEPA). D. BACKGROUND The subject application was received by the City of Arlington on April 28,• 2004, and the application was deemed complete on May 10, 2004. A Notice of Pending Final Action was mailed on July 1, 2004. E. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Application Process: The zoning permit application was received by the City of Arlington on April 28, 2004. The application was deemed complete on May 10, 2004. Per AMC §20.16.100, the Planning Manager issues the permit after an administrative review process. Per AMC §20.16.140, the Planning Manager's decision may be appealed to the Hearing Examiner. 2. ComDrehensive Plan, Zoning—and Permissible Uses: The City of Arlington Comprehensive Plan identifies this area as Airport Restricted and Airport Industrial. However, the subject property is zoned General Commercial and Light Industrial per AMC §20.36.100 (zoning map). Per AMC Table 20.40-2, Permissible Uses, a subdivision of property (Use 28.200, short subdivision) is a permitted use. Pursuant to Western Washington Growth Hearings Board case Citizens v Mount Vernon, 133 W.2d 861 (1997), the zoning code prevails where there is an inconsistency between it and the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan shall be revised to reflect the commercial development that exists in the area. 3. Density and Dimensional Standards: Per AMC Table 20.48-4, Density and Dimensional Standards, the proposed development complies with the following standards for the General Commercial zone: minimum parcel size (N/A) and width (70 feet) and for the Light Industrial zone: minimum parcel size (10,000 square feet) and width (70 feet). When development occurs, commercial buildings constructed under the current AMC must comply with the following \\Engineering\Pianning User DocumentsWemle\Premier Properties Z-04-025-SP\Premier Pacific Prop permit.doc kjr;7/13104 Page 2 of 7 i l • - I Zoning,Permit July 13, 2004 4 T Development Preliminary_ Short Plat Z-04-025-SP standards: parking, open space, screening, maximum lot coverage, setbacks, etc. 4. Design: Per AMC Chapter 20.46, subdivision of property is not subject to the design review guidelines (it is not listed as being subject to the guidelines). 5. Screeninq and Trees: Per AMC §20.76.110, when a subdivision has created, widened, or improved streets that are constructed in accordance with the public street standards set forth in AMC Chapter 20.56 (Streets and Sidewalks), the developer shall install street trees to be planted along both sides of all public streets. The developer shall either plant or retain sufficient trees so that within the landscape strip there is for every 30 feet of street frontage at least an average of one deciduous tree. A note shall be placed on the face of the final plat stating that all screening and shading elements located within public rights- of-way shall be maintained by the abutting property owner. In addition, per AMC §20.76.120, every development shall retain all existing significant stands of trees unless the retention of such trees would unreasonably burden the development. Any significant trees removed because their retention would unreasonably burden a development shall be replaced with 5-gallon-sized native species at a ratio of 3:1. If the trees are to be planted on building lots, the developer shall provide adequate protection from damage during construction or planting shall occur after construction, in which case a planting plan and security shall be provided to ensure their planting. 6. Streets and Sidewalks: The proposed development fronts on 172nd Street NE/SR 531. The site will be accessed off of 172nd Street NE/SR 531 via 59th Avenue NE. Improvements satisfying this requirement shall be shown on the site civil construction drawings. Full frontage improvements (including curb, gutter, sidewalk, asphalt, landscaping and drainage) shall be installed per City of Arlington construction standards on 591h Avenue NE and 172nd Street NE/SR 531. In addition, Ordinance No. 1208 requires the developer to pay transportation impact fees in effect at the time of payment to mitigate for off-site impacts. (NOTE: The current transportation impact fee is $1,038.00 for each p.m.-peak-hour trip, but this may change.) However, because this is a subdivision of commercial property, transportation impact and mitigation fees shall be paid prior to development of each lot. 7. Stormwater Management: Per AMC §20.64.300, all stormwater systems shall be in compliance with AMC Chapter 13.28, Stormwater Management, and the Department of Ecology's Stormwater Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin (The Technical Manual). A preliminary review of the system indicates that they have a conceptually feasible plan. A detailed drainage review will occur during the site civil construction review process. 8. Environmentally Critical Areas: There is a portion of a 150-foot buffer that lies in the southeast corner of the site. To mitigate potential impacts to the wetland and prevent future impact, no development shall occur within this wetland or its identified buffer. The dedication shall be on the face of the final plat. \\Engineering\Planning User DocumentsWemle\Premier Properties Z-04-025-SP\Premier Pacific Prop permit.doc kjr;7/13/04 Page 3 of 7 ,: Y. Zoning Permit. July 13, 2004 Premier Properties Preliminary Short Plat Z-04-025-SP 9. Groundwater Resources: The site lies within the Arlington Aquifer Recharge Area. The groundwater in this area is the primary source of municipal and domestic potable water supply in the Arlington area. Locations of municipal wells for the City of Arlington and aquifer recharge areas are shown on Figure NF-2 of the Comprehensive Plan. The applicant will apply Best Management Practices for the protection of the aquifer recharge area that adequately protects the groundwater resource in the Arlington Planning Area. 10. Potential Cultural Resources: The Stillaguamish Tribe has expressed concern about potential cultural resources in the area where the proposed project will occur. If any archaeological materials are discovered on the site, the State Historical Preservation Officer, the Stillaguamish Tribe, and the City of Arlington shall be contacted and measures taken to preserve the materials and the site. 11. Airport Management: The Arlington Municipal Airport requires that street lamps or light poles located on the property be down-shielded as to avoid interfering with flight operations. An Avigation Easement and a notice will be on the face of the plat map that states that this property is in the influence of the Arlington Municipal Airport. 12. Water and Sanitary Sewer: Adequate water and sewer service is available to the site from the City of Arlington; utility services, fire hydrants and fire protection are required and will be reviewed when site civil construction drawings are submitted. All existing and planned utilities shall be shown on the site civil construction drawings. All fees shall be paid before connection is made to the water or sanitary sewer utilities. All utilities shall be operational prior to building occupancy. 13. The property is physically suited for the uses allowed in the proposed zoning classification. 14. The project is consistent and compatible with the uses and zoning of the surrounding properties as indicated in this report. F. CONCLUSIONS 1. The City of Arlington Comprehensive Plan identifies this area as Airport Restricted and Airport Industrial. However, the subject property is zoned General Commercial and Light Industrial. Per AMC Table 20.40-2, Permissible Uses, a subdivision of property (Use 28.200, short subdivision) is a permitted use. Pursuant to Western Washington Growth Hearings Board case Citizens v Mount Vernon, 133 W.2d 861 (1997), the zoning code prevails where there is an inconsistency between it and the Comprehensive Plan. Therefore, the proposed development as noted and conditioned is consistent with policies governing those types of uses and is allowed in those zoning districts. 2. The requested zoning permit, as conditioned, is consistent with all AMC Title 20 requirements; permit processing procedures, and all other applicable codes. 3. The zoning permit should be approved subject to conditions noted below. \\Engineering\Planning User Documents\kremle\Premier Properties Z-04-025-SP\Premier Pacific Prop permit.doc kjr;7/13/04 Page 4 of 7 i I Zoning Permit July 13, 2004 Premier Properties Preliminary Short Plat Z-04-025-SP G. CONDITIONS The applicant shall meet the following required conditions in order to receive approval for the zoning permit. 1. All development shall be in substantial conformance with the approved site plan received April 28, 2004, subject to any conditions or modifications that may be required as part of the permit and construction plan review. 2. Prior to any construction activities the applicant shall file and receive approval of site civil construction plans which comply with all requirements of the Land Use Code, Uniform Building Code, Uniform Fire Code and Public Works Construction Standards and Specifications. Said plans shall address all site improvements, either required or voluntarily provided. 3. The developer shall meet all local, state, or federal code requirements. Attached is a list of code requirements that are specifically called to the developer's attention. It is in no way intended to be a complete list of code requirements, but a general checklist of major steps and issues. Please refer to the AMC for a complete list of code requirements for your particular project type. 4. The developer shall install frontage improvements along 172nd Street NE/SR 531 and 59th Avenue NE per Public Works construction standards and specifications for an arterial street and a local access street, respectively. 5. Prior to submittal of the final plat, the applicant shall complete all required or voluntary improvements unless otherwise secured and authorized by the City Engineer. 6. Prior to submittal of the final plat, any significant trees removed because their retention would unreasonably burden a development shall be replaced with 5- gallon-sized native species at a ratio of 3:1. 7. Prior to submittal of the final plat, the applicant shall provide a Critical Area Protection Easement (CAPE) for the wetland located on the south end of the site and its designated buffers on the face of the final plat. The Natural Resources Manager shall approve all critical areas and their buffers. 8. Prior to recordation of the final plat, an Avigation Easement shall be included on the face of the plat to protect the Airport's imaginary airspace from any future development that could protrude into it. The Avigation Easement we are requiring shall start at 287' Mean Sea Level (MSL) and extend upward. The easement is based on Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Part 77: Objects Affecting Navigable Airspace. 9. Prior to submittal of the final plat, the area in which the plat is being proposed is within the Airport's Traffic Pattern Zone. Because of the site's location with the Traffic Pattern Zone, the applicant needs to be aware that aircraft will be flying over the area frequently. Therefore, a notice shall be included on the face of the plat that reads: \\Engineering\Planning User DocumentsUvemle\Premier Properties Z-04-025-SP\Premier Pacific Prop permit.doc kjr;7/13/04 Page 5 of 7 i i Zoning Permit July 13, 2004 Premier Properties Preliminary Short Plat Z=04-025-SP a. "This land is within the influence of the Arlington Municipal Airport, on which aeronautical activities as defined in RCW Chapter 14.08 and Arlington Municipal Code Title 14 are and may be conducted, including over flight activities creating noise impacts on the property." b. "Since aircraft will be flying over the proposed area, any outdoor lighting shall be downshielded as to reduce any type of glare which could interfere with flight operations." C. "No use may be made of the premises which can or does interfere with use of the airport by aircraft by reason of electrical, electronic, or smoke emanations, lighting conditions, height of any structure or appurtenance, or any use which may attract birds." 10. Best Management Practices shall be applied for the protection of the aquifer recharge area that adequately protects the groundwater resource in the Arlington planning area. 11. If any archaeological materials are discovered on the site, the State Historical Preservation Officer, the Stillaguamish Tribe, and the City of Arlington shall be contacted and measures taken to preserve the materials and the site. 12. The developer shall clear all outstanding Planning Division and Engineering Division permit-processing accounts with the'City within 60 days of issuance of this permit. 13. Pursuant to AMC §20.16.220 and state law, this permit shall expire five years after date of issuance. H. APPEALS Per AMC §20.20.010, to appeal this decision, an appeal application must be filed, with all required fees, within 14 days of the date of issuance of this permit. The Hearing Examiner would hear the appeal of the permit and the Hearing Examiner's decision would be considered the City's final decision on the underlying governmental action. I. DECISION The zoning permit is hereby APPROVED, subject to the conditions specified in Section G above. J. EXHIBITS 1. Approved drawings received by the City of Arlington on April 28, 2004. 2. File Z-04-025-SP (Premier Properties Preliminary Short Plat) (on file at City Hall). ORDERED THIS 13TH DAY OF JULY 2004. CI* trong, Planning ager s onsible Official nn ' eering\Planning User Documents\kremle\Premier Properties Z-04-025-SP\Premier Pacific Prop perrnit.doc kjr;7/13/04 Page 6 of 7 i Zoning Permit July 13, 2004 Premier Properties Preliminary Short Plat Z-04-025-SP Distributed to the Following Party of Record: • Ed Thomas, 4T Development, LLC, 13700 44th Street NE, Arlington, WA 98223 • Thomas Barry, Metron &Associates, Inc, 307 N. Olympic Avenue, Arlington; WA 98223 • Gregg Eaton, Engineering Technician, Development Services, Engineering Division • Marc Hayes, Code Compliance, Development Services, Engineering Division • Dave Anderson, Building Official, Development Services, Building Division • Kerry Wentz, Plans Examiner, Development Services, Building Division • Karen Latimer, Utilities Manager, Development Services, Utilities Division • Bill Blake, Natural Resources Manager • Sarah Hegge, Recreation Coordinator • Dale Carman, Airport Coordinator, Arlington Airport \\Engineering\Planning User DocumentsUvemle\P rem ier Properties Z-04-025-SP\Premier Pacific Prop permit.doc kjr;7/13/04 Page 7 of 7 i *. �� wayw G1�Y Community Development 7 Zoning Permit January 6, 2005 4T Development Final Short Plat Z-04-062-FSP A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND REQUEST The applicant requests final short plat approval of a 4-lot commercial subdivision. The plat is located at 5800 172nd Street NE/SR 531 on approximately 11.68 acres and is served with water and sewer from the City of Arlington. Access will be from 59th Avenue NE via 172nd Street NE/SR 531. The property is zoned Light Industrial and General Commercial. B. GENERAL INFORMATION 1 . Applicant/Owner: Ed Thomas, 4 T Development, LLC, 13700 44th Street NE, Lake Stevens, WA 98258. 2 Contact Person: Thomas Barry, Metron & Associates, Inc., 307 N Olympic Avenue Suite 205, Arlington, WA 98223. 3. General Location: The site is located on the southwest corner of 59'h Avenue NE and 172nd Street NE/SR 531, in Section 27, Township 31 N, Range 5 E, WM (Tax ID No. 310527-002-001-00). 4. Address of Property: 5800 1172nd Street NE. 5. Description of Proposal: 4-lot commercial subdivision. 6. Acreage: Approximately 11.68 acres or 508,905 square feet. 7. Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designations, Zoning Designation and Existing Land Uses of the Site and Surrounding Area: AREA LAND USE DESIGNATION ZONING EXISTING USE Project Site Airport Restricted and General Commercial and 1 vacant SFR Airport Industrial Light Industrial (TBR) North of Site Airport Restricted and Airport Flightline Airport Airport Industrial South of Site Airport Industrial Light Industrial Vacant East of Site Airport Industrial Light Industrial Crown Distribution West of Site Airport Restricted and General Commercial and Commercial and Airport Industrial Light Industrial Residential \\Engineering\Planning User Documents\ypage\4T Development FSP Z-04-062-FSP\4T FSP permit.doc yjp; 1/06/05 Page 1 of 6 1 Zoning Permit January 6. 2005 4T Development Final Short Plat Z-04-062-FSP 8. Public Utilities and Services Provided by: Water: City of Arlington Gas: Cascade Natural Gas Sewer: Citv of Arlinqton Cable TV: Comcast Garbaqe: Waste Management Northwest Police: Citv of Arlinqton Storm Water: City of Arlington Fire: City of Arlinqton Telephone: Verizon School: Arlinqton School District Electricitv: Snohomish County PUD #1 Hospital: Cascade Valley Hospital 9 Public Notification: Per City of Arlington Municipal Code (AMC) §20.04.130.b, zoning permits that are categorically exempt under Chapter 43.21 C RCW (SEPA) are exempt from publication. C. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The proposal was categorically exempt under Chapter 43.21 C RCW (SEPA) D. BACKGROUND The subject application was received by the City of Arlington on November 16, 2004, and the application was deemed complete on December 10, 2004. Additional/revised information was requested on December 23, 2004, and was received on January 5, 2005. The Preliminary Plat of 4T Development (Z-04-025-SP) received a zoning permit on July 13, 2004. The applicant has submitted a Documentation of Compliance letter dated November 16, 2004, which states how they have met or mitigated for all conditions of the zoning permit dated July 13, 2004. E. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Application Process: In accordance with AMC Title 20 and with the Revised Code of Washington (RCW), the zoning permit application was received by the City of Arlington on November 16, 2004. The application was deemed complete on December 10, 2004. Per AMC §20.16.100, the Planning Manager issues the permit after an administrative review process. Per AMC §20.16.140, the Planning Manager's decision may be appealed to the Hearing Examiner. 2. Comprehensive Plan, Zoninq, and Permissible Uses: The City of Arlington Comprehensive Plan identifies this area as Airport Restricted and Airport Industrial. However, the subject property is zoned General Commercial and Light Industrial per AMC §20.36.100 (zoning map). Per AMC Table 20.40-2, Permissible Uses, a subdivision of property (Use 28.200, short subdivision) is a permitted use. Pursuant to Western Washington Growth Hearings Board case Citizens v Mount Vernon, 133 W.2d 861 (1997), the zoning code prevails where there is an inconsistency between it and the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan shall be revised to reflect the commercial development that exists in the area. 3. Density and Dimensional Standards: Per AMC Table 20.48-4, Density and Dimensional Standards, the proposed development complies with the following standards for the General Commercial zone: minimum parcel size (N/A) and width (70 feet) and for the Light Industrial zone: minimum parcel size (10,000 \\Engineering\Planning User Documents\ypage\4T Development FSP Z-04-062-FSP\4T FSP permit doc yjp; 1/06/05 Page 2 of 6 Zoning Permit January 6. 2005 4T Develooment Final Short Plat Z-04-062-FSP square feet) and width (70 feet). When development occurs, buildings constructed under the current AMC must comply with the following standards: minimum street setback and lot boundary setbacks, maximum building height and lot coverage as well as parking, open space, screening and shading, etc. 4. Design: Per AMC Chapter 20.46, subdivision of property is not subject to the design review guidelines (it is not listed as being subject to the guidelines). 5. Performance and Maintenance Bonds: The developer has submitted bonds to the Public Works Department, Engineering Division; all bonds have been approved. All improvements have been completed and/or bonded to the satisfaction of the Engineering Division. 6 Screening and Trees: Per AMC §20.76.110, when a subdivision has created, widened, or improved streets that are constructed in accordance with the public street standards set forth in AMC Chapter 20.56 (Streets and Sidewalks), the developer shall install street trees to be planted along both sides of all public streets. All improvements have been completed and/or bonded to the satisfaction of the Engineering Division. In addition, per AMC §20.76.120, every development shall retain all existing significant stands of trees unless the retention of such trees would unreasonably burden the development. Any significant trees removed because their retention would unreasonably burden a development shall be replaced with 5-gallon-sized native species at a ratio of 3:1. If the trees are to be planted on building lots, the developer shall provide adequate protection from damage during construction or planting shall occur after construction, in which case a planting plan and security shall be provided to ensure their planting. 7. Streets and Sidewalks: The proposed development fronts on 172nd Street NE/SR 531 and 59 Avenue NE. The site will be accessed off of 591h Avenue NE. Pursuant to Ordinance 1213, full frontage improvements (including curb, gutter, sidewalk, asphalt, landscaping and drainage) have been installed and/or bonded for per City of Arlington construction standards on 172nd Street NE/SR 531 and 59th Avenue NE. In addition, pursuant to Ordinance No. 1208, the developer is required to mitigate impacts to the street system created by new average weekday daily vehicular trips, including new p.m.-peak-hour trips, and pedestrian and bicycle trips at the transportation impact fees in effect at the time of payment to mitigate for off-site impacts. (NOTE: The current transportation impact fee is $1,038.00 for each p.m.-peak-hour trip, but this may change.) However, because this is a subdivision of commercial property, transportation impact and mitigation fees shall be determined and paid for prior to development of each lot. The dedication of the required right-of-way is on the face of the final plat. 8 Stormwater Management: The City has adopted storm drainage requirements per Arlington Municipal Code Chapter 13.28, Stormwater Management, and the Department of Ecology's Stormwater Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin (The Technical Manual). All stormwater systems have been installed and/or bonded for per plans and specifications. Notes have been placed on the faced of the final plat stating that the drainage systems are shared between the various lots. \\Engi nee ring\Planning User Documents\ypage\4T Development FSP Z-04-062-FSP\4T FSP permit.doc yjp; 1/06/05 Page 3 of 6 i X� Zoning Permit January 6 2005 4T Development Final Short Plat Z-04-062-FSP 9. Environmentally Critical Areas: There is a portion of a 150-foot buffer that lies in the southeast corner of the site. To mitigate potential impacts to the wetland and prevent future impact, no development shall occur within this wetland or its identified buffer. The dedication of the Critical Area Protection Easement is on the face of the final plat. 10. Groundwater Resources: The site lies within the Arlington Aquifer Recharge Area. The groundwater in this area is the primary source of municipal and domestic potable water supply in the Arlington area. Locations of municipal wells for the City of Arlington and aquifer recharge areas are shown on Figure NF-2 of the Comprehensive Plan. The applicant will apply Best Management Practices for the protection of the aquifer recharge area that adequately protects the groundwater resource in the Arlington Planning Area. 11. Potential Cultural Resources: The Stillaguamish Tribe has expressed concern about potential cultural resources in the area where the proposed project will occur. If any archaeological materials are discovered on the site, the State Historical Preservation Officer, the Stillaguamish Tribe, and the City of Arlington shall be contacted and measures taken to preserve the materials and the site. 12. Airport Management: The Arlington Municipal Airport requires that street lamps or light poles located on the property be down-shielded as to avoid interfering with flight operations and that an Avigation Easement and a notice be on the face of the plat map that states that this property is in the influence of the Arlington Municipal Airport. The dedication and notice is on the face of the final plat. 13. Water and Sanitary Sewer: Adequate City water and sanitary sewer service is available to the site from the City of Arlington. All utilities have been installed and are operational and/or have been bonded for. All fees shall be paid before connection is made to the water or sanitary sewer utilities. All utilities shall be operational prior to building occupancy. 14. The property is physically suited for the uses allowed in the proposed zoning classification. 15. The project is consistent and compatible with the uses and zoning of the surrounding properties as indicated in this report. F. CONCLUSIONS 1. The City of Arlington Comprehensive Plan identifies this area as Airport Restricted and Airport Industrial. However, the subject property is zoned General Commercial and Light Industrial. Per AMC Table 20.40-2, Permissible Uses, a subdivision of property (Use 28.200, short subdivision) is a permitted use. Pursuant to Western Washington Growth Hearings Board case Citizens v Mount Vernon, 133 W.2d 861 (1997), the zoning code prevails where there is an inconsistency between it and the Comprehensive Plan. Therefore, the proposed development as noted and conditioned is consistent with policies governing those types of uses and is allowed in those zoning districts. \\Engineering\Planning User Documents\ypage\4T Development FSP Z-04-062-FSP\4T FSP permit doc yjp; 1/06/05 Page 4 of 6 i Zoning Permit January 6 2005 4T Development Final Short Plat Z-04-062-FSP 2. The requested zoning permit, as conditioned, is consistent with all AMC Title 20 requirements; permit processing procedures, and all other applicable codes. 3 The zoning permit should be approved subject to conditions noted below. G. CONDITIONS The development has been reviewed and/or inspected by staff from all City departments. The applicant has either met or bonded for all of the conditions of the preliminary plat. ✓1. All development is in substantial conformance with the approved preliminary plat site plan received April 28, 2004, subject to any conditions or modifications that were required as part of the permit and construction plan review. 2. The developer has installed or bonded for frontage improvements along 172r' Street NE/SR 531 and 59th Avenue NE per Public Works construction standards and specifications for an arterial street and a local access street, respectively. /3. Required right-of-way has been dedicated to the City of Arlington on the plat map. A Critical Area Protection Easement (CAPE) has been dedicated to the City of Arlington on the plat map for the wetland located on the south end of the site and its designated buffers. The Natural Resources Manager shall approve all critical areas and their buffers. 5 An Avigation Easement has been dedicated to the City of Arlington on the plat map that starts at 213' (special aviation zone) Mean Sea Level (MSL) and extends upward. The easement is based on Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Part 77: Objects Affecting Navigable Airspace. 6. A note has been placed on the plat map stating that: a. "This land is within the influence of the Arlington Municipal Airport, on which aeronautical activities as defined in RCW Chapter 14.08 and Arlington Municipal Code Title 14 are and may be conducted, including over flight activities creating noise impacts on the property." b "Since aircraft will be flying over the proposed area, any outdoor lighting shall be downshielded as to reduce any type of glare which could interfere with flight operations." C. "No use may be made of the premises which can or does interfere with use of the airport by aircraft by reason of electrical, electronic, or smoke emanations, lighting conditions, height of any structure or appurtenance, or any use which may attract birds." Best Management Practices shall be applied for the protection of the aquifer recharge area that adequately protects the groundwater resource in the Arlington planning area. \\Engineering\Planning User Documents\ypage\4T Development FSP Z-04-062-FSP\4T FSP permit.doc yjp; 1/06/05 Page 5 of 6 Zoning Permit January 6 2005 4T Development Final Short Plat Z-04-062-FSP 8. If any archaeological materials are discovered on the site, the State Historical Preservation Officer, the Stillaguamish Tribe, and the City of Arlington shall be contacted and measures taken to preserve the materials and the site. 9. The developer shall clear all outstanding Planning Division and Engineering Division permit-processing accounts with the City within 60 days of issuance of this permit. 10, Pursuant to AMC §20.16.220 and state law, this permit shall expire five years after date of approval of the preliminary plat. H. APPEALS Per AMC §20.20.010, to appeal this decision, an appeal application must be filed, with all required fees, within 14 days of the date of issuance of this permit. The Hearing Examiner would hear the appeal of the permit and the Hearing Examiner's decision would be considered the City's final decision on the underlying governmental action. I. DECISION The zoning permit is hereby APPROVED. subject to the conditions specified in Section G above. J. EXHIBITS 1. Final plat maps received by the City of Arlington on January 5, 2005. 2. File Z-04-025-SP (4T/Premier Properties Preliminary Short Plat) (on file at City Hall). 3. File Z-04-062-FSP (4T Development Final Short Plat) (on file at City Hall). ORDERED THIS 6TH DAY OF JANUARY 2005. 'Cliff SAo6g, Planning Mana ��) Res o sible Official Dis i ted to the Following Party of Record: • Ed Thomas, 4T Development, LLC, 13700 44th Street NE, Arlington, WA 98223 • Thomas Barry, Metron & Associates, Inc., 307 N Olympic Avenue Suite 205, Arlington, WA 98223 • Gregg Eaton, Engineering Technician, Development Services, Engineering Division • Dave Anderson, Building Official, Development Services, Building Division • Kerry Wentz, Plans Examiner, Development Services, Building Division • Karen Latimer, Utilities Manager, Development Services, Utilities Division • Bill Blake, Natural Resources Manager • Sarah Hegge, Recreation Coordinator • Dale Carman, Airport Coordinator, Arlington Airport \\Engineering\Planning User Documents\ypage\4T Development FSP Z-04-062-FSP\4T FSP permit doc yip; 1/06/05 Page 6 of 6 b1/1y/21JUb 1I7:.3b 42bI4281:30 GARY PARKINSON ARCHT PAGE 01 AlIdD Gary Parkinson //Arc-hitects July 29, 2005 Bryan..Heard. DKS Inc. 19012 61"Avenue Northeast Suite#5 Arlington WA 98223 Bryan, This letter is written in response to a requested revision to revise the height of some of the stud walls on the 4T development project located on 59'h Avenue in Arlington, WA. It is acceptable to frame the walls up to the ceiling,or to just above the ceiling provided that the tops of the walls are braced as shown on the attached details. If you have any further comments or questions, please feel free to give us a call Sincere) Adam D. Clark Architect 2812 COLEY AVENUE • EVERETT.WASHINGTON 96201 s (425) 262.2153 • FAX: (425) 742-8130• E-MAIL:Admin®GaryPorklnson.com I I' Cif/Z7/LCiUD It]. it) 4ZOf4ZtSl.ib GARY PARKIHSON APCHT PAGE 02 z O dJ Q IL 0 ICI z U 1475 � ® l�L. F- i -"�' -"•�" ��-' ������ UHKY YHKIl1N5UN AKl:HI PAGE 03 N W DL N V -i Q cv �nmo Nv IL U E-- Q � by ROXL BAIT INSULATION 07210 The Better Insulat�o� 09820 ROXUL AFBT"' General Product Information: Description & Common Applications: ROXUL®products are mineral wool fibre insulations ROXUL AFB TM(Acoustical Fire Batt) is a batt made from basalt rock and slag. This combination insulation product designed specifically for application results in a non-combustible product with a melting in wall/floor systems where acoustical performance point of approximately 2150°F(1177°C),which gives it and fire resistance are the primary concerns. This excellent fire resistance properties. ROXUL mineral non-combustible lightweight product has excellent wool is a water repellent yet vapour permeable acoustical dampening properties and is dimensionally material. stable which makes it ideal for friction fit into wall partitions and system applications from party walls to plant/manufacturing walls.The product is chemically inert which means that it will not promote corrosion. The AFB product comes in a number of thicknesses to meet the requirements of both retrofit and new construction applications. Compliance and Performance: CAN/ULC-S702-97 Mineral Fibre Thermal Insulation for Buildings Type 1, Complies CAN/CGSB-51.10-92 Mineral Fibre Board Thermal Insulation Type 2, Class 4, Complies ASTM C 665 Mineral-Fiber Blanket Thermal Insulation Type 1, Class A, Complies ASTM C 553 Mineral Fiber Blanket Thermal Insulation Complies MEA Approval New York City Approval 338-97-M City Of Los Angeles approval RR 25444 ULC Design Nos. U311, W406, W408, W419, W423, W440, W441, W442, W508, W600, Z500 UL Design Nos. U305, U311, U317, U411, U412, U448, U465, V417, V418, V419 Fire Performance: CAN4 S114 Test for Non-Combustibility Non-Combustible ASTM E 136 Behaviour of Materials at 7500C 0 382°F) Non-Combustible CAN/ULC S102 Surface Burning Characteristics Flame Spread = 0 t't Smoke Developed =0 1 ASTM E84 (UL 723) Surface Burning Characteristics Flame Spread =0 Smoke Developed =0 CAN/ULC S 129 Smoulder Resistance 0.09% FMVSS 302 Motor Vehicle Safety Test Method Passed Acoustical Performance: ASTM E 90 Airborne Sound Transmission Loss Tested ASTM E 413 Rating Sound Insulation Tested ASTM C 423 Sound Absorption Coefficients Tested ASTM E 1050 Impedance and Absorption of Acoustical Materials Tested (Please contact us for Rated Wall System Designs) Corrosion Resistance: I ASTM C 665 Corrosiveness Passed I ASTM C 795 * Stainless Steel Stress Corrosion Specification Conforms as per Test Methods C871 and C692: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commision, Reg. Guide #1.36: U.S. Military Specifications f MIL-1-24244(all versions including B and C) f i 1 I� 1 ROXUL AFBTM Thermal Performance: ASTM C 518(C 177) R-value/inch @ 75"F 4.3 hr.ftz.F/Btu RSI value/25.4 mm @ 240C 0.76 m2KNV Acoustical Performance: ASTM C423 CO-EFFICIENTS AT FREQUENCIES Thickness 125 250 5W 1000 2000 4000 NRC Hz Hz Hz Hz Hz Hz 1.0" 0.14 0.25 0.65 0.90 1.01 1.01 0.70 1.5" 0.18 0.44 0.94 1.04 1.02 1.03 0.85 2.0" 0.28 0.60 1.09 1.09 1.05 1.07 0.95 3.0" 0.52 0.96 1.18 1.07 1.05 1.05 1.05 4.0" 0.86 1.11 1.20 1.07 1.08 1.07 1.10 Density: Key Application Qualifiers: Thickness<_ 1.5"(40 mm)= 48 kg/m3 (3.0 Ibs/ft') • Easily cut Thickness>_2.0"(51 mm)= 40 kg/m' (2.5 Ibs/ft3) -Non-combustible -Excellent sound absorbency Dimensions: - Chemically inert • Does not rot or sustain vermin 24"(width)x 48"(length) •Does not promote growth of fungi or mildew 610 mm (width)x 1220 mm(length) • Low moisture sorption •Water resistant 1"through 6"in 1/2" increments(thickness) •CFC and HCFC free product and process - Made from natural&recycled materials For additional sizes, please contact our customer service representatives. Other ROXUL Products: IA%TFD U�Fss F,Fa Please consult ROXUL for all your insulation needs. We have an extensive range of products for all L UL applications from pipe insulation to commercial products to residential Batts. ROXUL invites all inquiries and will act promptly to service all of your requirements. "Provisions for lot testing may be required,consult manufacturer." Note: e As ROXUL Inc.has no control over Installation design and workmanship,accessory materials or application conditions,ROXUL Inc.does not war- ranty the performance or results of any Installation containing ROXUL Inc's.products.ROXUL Inc's,overall liability and the remedies available are limited by the general terms and conditions of sale.This warranty is in lieu of all other warranties and conditions expressed or Implied,Including the warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. ROXUL INC. 551 Harrop Drive, Milton,Ontario L9T 3111­113 Tel:905 878-8474 Fax:905 878-8077 www.roxul.com Sales Office-Tel: 1-800-265-6878, Fax: 1-800-991-0110 Revised:June 1,2002 5upercedes:February 28,2001 1 ,F 1 +i l i ROXULMaterial Safety Data Sheet The Better Insulation Material Name: Mineral Wool Insulation 1. Identification: 1.1 Product Generic Name: Mineral Wool Insulation 1.2 Produce Use: Commercial,Industrial and Residential Insulation 1.3 Products: CavityRockT , ConRoclem,CurtainRockT ,DrainBoardT"',EnerWrap A,Flexibatt®,Noise Stop,RHFT'",RHTT", ROXUL AFBT"',ROXULPlus®,ROXUL D 1200,RXLT",RWTm,SAFE,Safe'n'SoundTm,TechtonTm 1200 1.4 Company Address. Roxul Inc. 551 Harrop Drive Milton,Ontario Canada L9T 3H3 1.5 Web Site: www.roxul.com 1.6 If further information is required,please call or fax Roxul Inc. Telephone: 1-800-265-6878 or 905-878-8474 Fax:905-878-8077 2. Information on Ingredients: In r�dient Nanic CAS Number %s Mineral Fiber RN 65997-17-3 94-99 Cured Urea Extended Phenolic 25104-55-6 1-6 Formaldehyde Binder 3. Hazards Identification: 3.1 Amicaragge and Odor: Grey,green fibrous batt or board. 3.2 Emergency Overview: Acrid smoke may be generated during a fire. Exposure to dust may be irritating to the eyes,nose and throat. 3.3 Potential Health Effects: 3.3.1 Inhalation: Temporary mechanical irritation of the upper respiratory tract(scratchy throat,coughing, congestion)may result from exposures to dusts and fibers in excess of applicable exposure limits, 3.3.2 Skin Contact: Dusts and fibers may cause temporary mechanical irritation(itching)or redness to the skin. 3.3.3 Eve Contact: Dusts and fibers may cause temporary mechanical irritation(itching)or redness to the eyes. ; i 3.3.4 Ingestion: Ingestion of this product is unlikely and not intended under normal conditions of use, { Ingestion of this product may cause gastrointestinal irritation. i 3.3.5 Existing Medical Conditions: Pre-existing chronic eye,skin and respiratory conditions may temporarily ) worsen due to exposure to dusts and fibers. { T i Page 1 of 7 Issue Date:September 3,2002 Replaces Issue:February 25,2002 i 1 I I' I ROXULMaterial Safety Data Sheet The Better Insulation Material Name: Mineral Wool Insulation 4. First-Aid Measures: 4.1 Inhalation: If irritation occurs,remove the affected person to fresh air. Drink water,and blow nose,to clear dusts and fibres from throat and nose, If irritation persists,consult a physician, 4.2 Skin: If irritation occurs,do not rub or scratch.Rinse under running water prior to washing with mild soap and water. Use a washcloth to help remove fibres. If irritation persists,consult a physician. 4.3 es: If irritation occurs,flush eyes with plenty of water for at least 15 minutes,Do not rub the eyes.Consult a physician if irritation persists. 4,4 Ingestion: Ingestion of this product is unlikely and not intended under normal conditions of use. If it does occur,rinse mouth with plenty of water to help remove dust and fibres,and drink plenty of water to help reduce potential gastrointestinal irritation. Do not induce vomiting unless directed to do so by a physician, S. Fire-Fighting Measures: The products are non-combustible and do not pose a fire hazard.However,packaging material may burn, 5.1. Suitable extinguishing media: Water,foam,carbon dioxide or dry powder 5.2 lixtin¢uishing media which must not be used for safety reasons: None 5.3 Combustion products: Carbon dioxide,carbon monoxide and trace gases 5.4 Special protective equipment for fire-fighters: Observe normal fire fighting procedures 5.5 Flash point: None Flash Point Method Used: Not Applicable Upper Flammable Lower Flammable Limit IUFLI: Not Applicable Limit: Not Applicable Autoianition: Not Applicable Explosive Properties: Not Applicable 6. Accidental Release Measures: 6.1 Containment Procedures: Pick up large pieces and scoop up dusts and fibers after they have settled out of air. These materials will disperse and settle along the bottom of waterways and ponds.It cannot easily be removed once it is waterborne,but is considered non-hazardous in water. 6.2 Cleanup Procedures: Use OSHA-recommended work practices and protective equipment as described in Section 8 of this Material Safety Data Sheet. Avoid generating airborne dusts and fibers during cleanup. Do not use compressed air. Vacuum dusts and fibers.Place material in an appropriate container for disposal as non-hazardous waste. 6.3 Response Procedures: Isolate area. Keep unnecessary personnel away. If dry methods or compressed air are used to collect dusts and fibers,all personnel in the area should wear OSHA-approved protective equipment (see Section 8 of this Material Safety Data Sheet). i I 1 i Page 2 of 7 Issue Date:September 3,2002 daces Issue:February 25,2002 I i ROXULMaterial Safety Data Sheet The Better Insulation Material Dame: Mineral Wool Insulation 7. Handling and Storage: 7.1 General Precautions- - Utilize OSHA-recommended work practices and protective equipment when using the products(see Section 8 of this Material Safety Data Sheet). 7.2 HInndhne: Unpack material at application site to avoid unnecessary handling of product. Keep work areas clean.Avoid unnecessary handling of scrap material and debris by placing such materials in suitable containers,which should be kept as close to the work area as possible. Ensure good ventilation.Local exhaust ventilation may be required if the method of use produces dust levels which exceed applicable exposure limits(see Section 8 of this Material Safety Data Sheet). Avoid excessive eye and skin contact with dusts and fibers. - Use recommended cleanup procedures to avoid buildup of dusts and fibers in the work area. 7.3 Storage: Keep material in original packaging until it is to be used. Store material to protect against adverse conditions including precipitation. S. Exposure Controls/Personal Protection: 8.1 SXDQ3Ure Guidelines: 8.1.1 General Product Information: Follow all applicable exposure limits. Local regulations may apply. Roxul recommends that users of the products adhere to the OSHA-recommended PEL of 1 f/ec TWA(fibers longer than 5 µm with diameters less than 3 µm). This recommended PEL,together with recommended work practices and personal protective equipment,were adopted in a Health and Safety Partnership Program(HSPP)agreement in 1999 between OSHA and the North American Insulation Manufacturers Association(NAIMA),of which Roxul is a member. Adherence to the OSHA-recommended PEL,work practices and protective equipment in the HSPP is expected to provide appropriate protection against all inhalation-related health risks that may be associated with exposures to mineral wool fibers(ACGIH 1997;NAIMA 1999;OSHA 1999;National Research Council 2000,IARC 2001),and to minimixe eye and skin irritation. 8.1.2 Component Lxposure Limits: Source Legal or Recommended Exposure Limit Exposure OSHA 1 f/ce TWA(recommended) Synthetic Vitreous Fibers,>S µm length,<3 µm diameter ACGIH 1 f/cc TWA(threshold limit value-TLV) Synthetic Vitreous Fibers,>5 µm length,<3 µm diameter OSHA 15 mg/m3 TWA-PEL(total particulate) Inert dust and particulates not 5 mg/m3 TWA-PEL(respirable particulate) otherwise regulated ACGIH 10 mg/m3 TWA-TLV(inhalable particulate) Particulates not otherwise 3 mg/m3 TWA-TLV(respirable particulate) classified,containing no asbestos and<1%crystalline silica Page 3 of 7 Issue Date:September 3,2002 Replaces issue:February 25,2002 I �. ROXULMaterial Safety Data Sheet The Better Insulation Material Name: Mineral Wool Insulation 8.2 Bouipment and Work Practices: Follow OSHA-recommended equipment and work practices. A complete copy of these practices can be obtained from Roxul Inc.(see Section 1 of this Material Safety Data Sheet),and is avallable on the OSHA webaite(jittp.://www.osha.pov/SLTC/ayntheticmineralfibers/`app-1_html). 8.2.1 Follow OSHA-recommended safe handling practices listed in Section 7.2 above. 8.2.2 Where feasible,general dilution ventilation or local exhaust ventilation should be used as necessary to maintain exposures below applicable exposure limits. Dust collection systems should be used in cutting or machining operations and may be needed when using power tools. 8.2.3 Follow OSHA-recommended work practices when fabricating,installing or removing product. 8,3 Personal Protective Equipment:: 8.3.1 Respiratory: 8.3.1.1 General: If dust levels exceed applicable exposure limits,wear a NIOSH certified dust respirator with an efficiency rating of N95 or higher. Use disposable face masks complying with NIOSH respirator standards,such as a 3M Model 8210(or 8710)(3M Model 9900 in high humidity environments)or equivalent. For exposures up to five times the established exposure limits use a quarter-mask respirator,rated N95 or higher;and for exposures up to ten times the established exposure limits use a half-mask respirator (e.g.MSA's DM-11,Racal's Delta N95,3M's 8210),rated N95 or higher. For exposures up to 50 times the established exposure limits use a full-face respirator,rated N99 or higher, 8.3.1.2 Specific Operations: Wear a NIOSH certified dust respirator with an efficiency rating of N95 or higher,such as a 3M Model 8210(or 8710) (3M Model 9900 in high humidity environments)or equivalent,when fabricating, installing or removing product. 8.3.2 Skin: Wear loose fitting,long sleeved and long-legged clothing to prevent irritation.A head cover is also recommended,especially when working with material overhead.The use of suitable gloves is also recommended.Skin irritation cannot occur if there is no contact with the skin. Do not tape sleeves or pants at wrists or ankles. Remove fioefs i:oi..t:ie work clothes,before leaving work to reduce potential skin irritation.If working in a very dusty environment it is advisable to shower and change clothes 8.3.3 Eyes Face: Wear safety goggles or safety glasses with side shields. 9. Physical and Chemical Properties: 9.1 Aupearance: Grey,green fibrous batt or board 9.2 State: Solid 9.3 Odor: May have slight resin odour 9.4 Boiling point.: n.a. 9.5 Melting point: Approximately 2150°F(1177°C) 9.6 Vapour pressure: n.a. 9.7 Vapour Density: n.a. 9.8 Specific Gravity: n.a. 9.9 }?vaoorsztion Rate: n.a. i 9.10 Frcczing Point: n.a. 9.I1 Viscosity. n.a. 9.12 Solubilitv: Insoluble(H20) 9.13 Partition coefficient: n.a, ) ) n.a.-not applicable t Page 4 of 7 Issue Date:September 3,2002 Replaces Issue:February 25,2002 ROXULMaterial Safety Data Sheet The Better lnSUlatlOTM Material Name: Mineral wool Insulation 10. Stability and Reactivity: 10,1 Stabili : Stable 10.2 Reactivity: Not reactive 10.3 Thermal de ,compositio_n products: Primary combustion products of the cured urea extended phenolic formaldehyde binder,when heated above 390°F(200°C),are carbon monoxide,carbon dioxide,ammonia,water and trace amounts of formaldehyde. Other undetermined compounds could be released in trace quantities.Emission usually only occurs during the first heating.The released gases may be irritating to the eyes,nose and throat during initial heat-up, Use appropriate respirators(air supplied)particularly in tightly confined or poorly ventilated areas during initial heat-up. 10.4 Elazardous Polymerization: Will not occur 10.5 Incompatible Materials: This product reacts with hydrofluoric acid. 11. Toxicological Information: 11.1 Acute Toxicity: Coarse fibers and dust from mineral wool prodcuts can cause temporary mechanical irritation(itching,redness) of the skin,and of the mucous membranes in the eyes and in the upper respiratory tract(nose and throat).The itching and possible inflammation are a mechanical reaction to dust and coarse fibers(of more than about 5 pm in diameter),and are not damaging in the way chemical irritants may be.They generally abate within a short time after the end of exposure. When products are handled continually,the skin itching generally diminishes, 11.2 Chronic Toxicity: 11.2.1 Summary: In October 2001,IARC completed a re-evaluation of respirable mineral wool fibers and classified them in Group 3(not classifiable as to their carcinogenicity to humans). A summary of the most important scientific studies appears below: 11.2.2 Human Data: 11.2.2.1 The possible carcinogenic effects of exposure to mineral wool fibers has been evaluated in a number of epidemiological(human)studies. Most of this research,including large long-tern studies of mineral wool production workers in the U.S.and Europe,has been sponsored or supported by the North American and International thermal insulation industries,including Roxul Inc. Published reports of the early results of these studies identified significantly elevated rates of respiratory cancer in several subcohorts of the worker populations under evaluation(e.g.,Simonato et at. 1987;Enterline et al. 1987). However, the studies had several methodological limitations,including failure to control for confounding exposures to other possible causes of the elevated cancer risk,including tobacco use and occupational exposures to recognized carcinogens such as asbestos. For these reasons,the authors of these reports did not interpret the results as establishing an association between exposure to mineral wool fibers and an increased risk of cancer.Several of these earlier reports formed part of the basis for IARC's previous classification of mineral wool fibers in Group 213(possibly carcinogenic to humans)(IARC 1987). 11.2.2.2 Follow-up studies,including case-control studies designed to exclude the contribution of confounding ) exposures to the cancer experience of the study populations,found no evidence that mineral wool fibers are associated with an increased cancer risk(Marsh et al. 1996;Wong,et al. 1991;Kjaerheim et al.2001). In announcing the new Group 3 classification for mineral wool fibers,IARC stated: "Epidemiologic studies published during the 15 years since the previous IARC Monographs review of E these fibers in 1988 provide no evidence of increased risks of lung cancer or of mesothelioma(cancer of the lining of the body cavities)from occupational exposures during manufacture of these materials" (IARC 2001). 1 11.2.3 Animal Datg: 11.2.3.1 Several studies of intraperitoneal injection of high doses of mineral wool fibers have produced significant increases in the incidence of mesothelioma(IARC 2002). The intraperitoneal injection studies formed part of the basia for IARC's previous(IARC 1987)Group 2B classification for mineral J wool fibers. Leading scientists agree that intraperitoneal injection studies(i.e.,surgical implantation or injection into the chest or abdomen)are the least relevant type of animal study for evaluating potential human risk for fiber exposures,because such studies bypass the animals'natural defense mechanisms and involve a type and pattern of exposure(implantation of a high dose early in life)that Page 5 of 7 Issue Date:September 3,2002 gcplaces Issuc:February 25,2002 c t I 1 i I ROXULMaterial Safety Data Sliest The Better Insulation Material Name: Mineral Wool Insulation does not mimic human patterns of exposure(inhalation of much lower doses over a lifetime)(National Research Council 2000). 11.2,3.2 A well-designed long-term inhalation study in rats exposed to mineral wool fibers found no significant increase in lung tumor incidence,and no mesotheliomas(IARC 2002). Likewise,in two intratracheal instillation studies of mineral wool fibers,no significant increase in the incidence of lung tumors or mesotheliomas was found(IARC 2002). Inhalation studies are regarded as the most relevant type of animal data for evaluating potential human risk,and intratracheal instillation studies,while less relevant,are considered valuable for the initial screening of fibrous compounds(National Research Council 2000). Thus,evaluating all the available animal studies in conjunction with the human data, IARC's most recent review finds"inadequate evidence overall for any cancer risk"from mineral wool fibers(IARC 2001). 11.3 Evaluations of Potential Carcinogenicity: Source Clasaification Description IARC Group 3 Not Classifiable as a Human Carcinogen ACGIH Group A3 Confirmed Animal Carcinogen with Unknown Relevance to humans 12. Ecological Information: 12.1 Ecotoxlcity: No data available for the products. The products are stable,are not expected to cause harm to animals,plants or fish,and have no other known adverse environmental effects, 12.2 Environmental rate: No data available for the products. 13. Disposal Considerations: 13.1 US EPA Waste Number R Descriptions: 13.1.1 General Product Information:The products,as supplied,are not expected to be a characteristic hazardous waste under RCRA if discarded. 13.1.2 EPA Waste Numbers: No EPA Waste Numbers are applicable for this product's components. 13.2 Disposal instnictions: Product is not considered a hazardous waste. Dispose of waste material according to Federal,State,Provincial,and Local environmental regulations. 14. Transport Information: 14.1 Gen r : No special precautions. 14.2 US DOT Information: This product is not classified as a hazardous material for transport. i 15. Regulatory Information: 15.1 U.S.R=lations: 1 I 15.1.1 Toxic Substances Control Act ffSCA): All components in this product are listed,as required,on the US EPA TSCA inventory,or are not required to be listed 15.1,2 CERCLA: Includes mineral fiber emissions from facilities manufacturing or processing glass rock or slag fibers(or other mineral derived fibers)of average diameter 1 micrometer or less;Statutory RQ- 1 pound(.454 kg);no final RQ is being assigned to the generic or broad class(related to Fine mineral fibers). { i 15.1.3 Clean Air Act: Mineral wool fiber appears on the Clean Air Act-1990 Hazardous Air Pollutants List. { i i Page 6 of 7 lesue Datc:September 3,2002 Replaces Issue:February 25,2002 { r3 1 1 s I ROXULMaterial Safety Data Sheet The Better Insulation Material Name: Mineral Wool Insulation 15.2 State and Local Regulations: State, Provincial,and Local regulations not identified in this Material Safety Data Sheet may apply. 15.3 WHMIS: The products have been classified in accordance with the hazard criteria of the Controlled Product Regulations and this Material Safety Data Sheet contains all the information required by the Controlled Product Regulations 15.3.1: WHMIS IDL: No components are listed on the IDL 15.3.2: WHMIS Classification: No components are classified as controlled products. 16. Further Information: 16.1 Potential Health F,ffe(zts: IARC Monograph Man-made Vitreous Fibres,press release October 2001 Safety in the Use of Mineral and Synthetic Fibers,Occupational Safety and Health Series.International Labor Office(ILO). Information about"Health and Safety Research on Rock-and Slag-wool'can be obtained from the North American Insulation Manufacturers Association(NAIMA),44 Canal Center Plaza,Suite 310,Alexandria,VA 22314,USA). Home-page:http://www.nalma.org 16.2 Key/Legend: ACG1H-American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists;CAA-Clean Air Act;CAS-Chemical Abstracts Service;CERCLA=Comprehensive Environmental Response,Compensation and Liability Act;DOT- Department of Transportation;EPA=Environmental Protection Agency;HMIS-Hazardous Material Identification System;HSPP-Health and Safety Partnership Program;IARC-international Agency for Research on Cancer;MSDS-Material Safety Data Sheet;NAIMA=North American Insulation Manufacturers Association;NFPA-National Fire Protection Association;N10SH-National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health;OSHA-Occupational Safety and Health Administration;PEL=Permissible Exposure Limit;RCRA -Resource Conservation and Recovery Act;RQ-Reportable Quantity;SVF-synthetic vitreous fibers;TSCA- Toxic Substanceg Control Act;TWA-time-weighted average;WHMIS=Workplace Hazardous Materials Information System. 16.3 References: Complete citations,or copies,of all references cited in this Material Safety Data Sheet can be obtained from Roxul Inc.(see Section 1). 16.4 Accuracy: The information contained herein is based upon data considered to be accurate.However,no warranty is expressed or implied regarding the accuracy of these data, the results to be obtained from the use thereof,or that any such use will not infringe upon any patent.This information is furnished as a guide only and upon the condition that the person receiving it shall make tests to determine the accuracy and suitability } for his or her own purpose. I i 1 t ( 1 i I ) T t Page 7 of 7 Issue Date:September 3,2002 Replac:c:s Issue:February 25,2002 1t 1 BUILDING VALUATION DATA At the request of numerous building officials,Building Standards" offers the following building valuation data representing average costs for most buildings. Because residential buildings are the most common for many cities, two general classes are considered for these, one for "average" construction and the other for"good."Adjustments should be made for special architectural or structural features and the location of the project. Higher or lower unit costs may often result. The unit costs are intended to comply with the definition of"valuation" in Section 223 of the 1997 Uniform Building Code- and thus include architectural, structural, electrical, plumbing and mechanical work, except as specifically listed below. The unit costs also include the contractor's profit, which should not be omitted. The determination of plan check fees for projects reviewed by the International Conference of Building Officials will be based on valuation computed from these figures, which were established in April 2002. Cost per Square Cost per Square Cost per Square Cost per Square Occupancy and Type Foot,Average Occupancy and Type Foot,Average Occupancy and Type Foot,Average Occupancy and Type Foot,Average 1.APARTMENT HOUSES: 7. DWELLINGS: 13.JAILS: 20. RESTAURANTS: Type I or II F.R.*.......... $88.70 Type V-Masonry........ $75.70 Type I or II F.R............$159.10 Type III-1-Hour......... $97.40 (Good) $109.20 (Good) $96.90 Type III-1-Hour......... 145.50 Type III-N................. 94.10 Type V-Masonry Type V-Wood Frame.. 67.30 Type V-1-Hour.......... 109.10 Type V-1-Hour.......... 89.20 (or Type III)............. 72.40 (Good) $92.40 14. LIBRARIES: Type V-N.................. 85.70 (Good)$88.70 Basements- Type I or II F.R............ 116.40 21. SCHOOLS: Type V-Wood Frame.. 63.80 Semi-Finished........ 20.10 Type II-1-Hour.......... 85.20 Type I or II F.R............ 111.20 (Good)$82.00 (Good) $23.20 Type II-N.................. 81.00 Type II-1-Hour.......... 75.90 Type 1--Basement Garage 37.40 Unfinished.............. 14.60 Type III-1-Hour......... 90.00 Type III-1-Hour......... 81.20 2.AUDITORIUMS: (Good) $17.70 Type III-N................. 85.50 Type 111 --N................. 78.10 Type I or II F.R............ 104.80 8. FIRE STATIONS: Type V-1-Hour.......... 84.50 Type V-1-Hour.......... 76.10 Type II-1-Hour.......... 75.90 Type I or 11 F.R............ 114.40 Type V-N.................. 81.00 Type V-N.................. 72.60 Type II-N.................. 71.80 Type II-1-Hour.......... 75.30 15. MEDICAL OFFICES: 22.SERVICE STATIONS: Type III-1-Hour......... 79.80 Type II-N.................. 71.00 Type I or II F.R. 119.50 Type 11-N.................. 67.20 Type III-N................. 75.70 Type ......... 82.40 YP Type II-1-Hour.......... 92.20 Type III-1-Hour......... 70.10 Type V-1-Hour.......... 76.30 Type III-N................. 78.90 Type 11-N.................. 87.60 Type V-1-Hour.......... 59.70 Type V-N.................. 71.20 Type V-1-Hour.......... 77.30 Type III-1-Hour......... 100.00 Canopies................... 28.00 3. BANKS: Type V-N.................. 73.30 Type III-N................. 93.10 23. STORES: Type I or II FR.*.......... 148.10 9. HOMES FOR THE ELDERLY. Type V-1-Hour.......... 90.20 Type I or II F.R.*.......... 82.40 Type II-1-Hour.......... 109.10 Type I or II FR............ 103.70 Type V-N.................. 87.00 Type II-1-Hour.......... 50.40 Type II-N.................. 105.60 Type II-1-Hour.......... 84.20 16. OFFICES**: Type 11-N.................. 49.30 Type III-1-Hour......... 120.40 Type II-N.................. 80.60 Type I or II F.R.*.......... 106.80 Type III-1-Hour......... 61.30 Type III-N................. 116.10 Type III-1-Hour......... 87.70 Type II-1-Hour.......... 71.50 Type III-N................. 57.50 „ Type V-1-Hour.......... 109.10 Type III-N................. 84.10 Type II-N.................. 68.10 Type V-1-Hour.......... 51.60 Type V-N.................. 104.50 Type V-1-Hour.......... 84.70 Type III-1-Hour......... 77.20 Type V-N.................. 47.70 4. BOWLING ALLEYS: Type V-N.................. 81.80 Type 111-N................. 73.80 24.THEATERS: 51.00 Type II-N Hour..,.....,. 47.60 10. HOSPITALS:Ior 11FR.*.......... 163.20 17. PRIVATE GARAGES:... 68.10 TType ype Ilor N Hour.'........ 180.00 09.80Type V-N Type III-1-Hour......... 55.50 Type III-1-Hour......... 135.10 Type III-N................. 51.90 Type V-1-Hour.......... 128.90 Wood Frame............... 24.30 Type V-1-Hour.......... 75.30 Type V-1-Hour.......... 37.40 11. HOTELS AND MOTELS: Masonry..................... 27.40 Type V-N.................. 71.20 5.CHURCHES: Type I or II F.R.*.......... 101.00 Open Carports............ 16.60 25.WAREHOUSES***: i Type I or 11 F.R............ 99.20 Type III-1-Hour......... 87.50 18. PUBLIC BUILDINGS: Type I or II FR............ 49.40 Type II-1-Hour.......... 74.50 Type III-N................. 83.40 Type I or II F.R.*.......... 123.40 Type II or V-1-Hour... 29.30 Type II-N.................. 70.80 Type V-1-Hour.......... 76.20 Type II-1-Hour.......... 100.00 Type II or V-N........... 27.50 Type III-1-Hour......... 81.00 Type V-N.................. 74.70 Type 11-N.................. 95.60 Type III-1-Hour......... 33.20 Type III-N................. 77.40 12. INDUSTRIAL PLANTS: Type III-1-Hour......... 103.80 Type III-N................. 31.60 Type V-1-Hour.......... 75.70 Type I or II F.R............ 56.90 Type 111-N................. 100.20 EQUIPMENT Type V-N.................. 71.20 Type II-1-Hour.......... 39.60 Type V-1-Hour.......... 95.00 AIR CONDITIONING: 6.CONVALESCENT HOSPITALS: Type II-N.................. 36.40 Type V-N.............. ... 91.60 { YP Y Commercial............ 4.20 Type I or II F.R.*.......... 139.20 Type III-1-Hour......... 43.60 19. PUBLIC GARAGES: Residential............. 3.50 Type II-1-Hour.......... 96.60 Type III-N................. 41.10 Type I or II F.R.*.......... 48.90 SPRINKLER SYSTEMS.. 2.60 Type III-1-Hour......... 99.00 Tilt-up........................ 30.00 Type I or II Open Parking*36.70 �I Type V-1-Hour.......... 93.30 Type V-1-Hour.......... 41.10 Type II-N.................. 28.00 Type V-N.................. 37.60 Type III-1-Hour......... 37.00 Type III-N................. 32.90 Type V-1-Hour.......... 33.70 *Add 0.5 percent to total cost for each story over three. **Deduct 20 percent for shell-only buildings. ***Deduct 11 percent for mini-warehouses. REGIONAL MODIFIERS The following modifiers are recommended for use in conjunction with the building valuation data.Additionally,certain local conditions may require further modifications.To use these modifiers, merely multiply the listed cost per square foot by the appropriate regional modifier. For example,to adjust the cost of a Type III One-hour hotel building of average construction for the Iowa area,select Regional Modifier 0.80 and unit cost from valuation data, $87.50: 0.80 x 87.50=_$70.00(adjusted cost per square foot) Eastern U.S. Modifier Eastern U.S. (cont.) Modifier Central U.S.(cont.)Modifier Western U.S. Modifier Connecticut........................ 1.00 Pennsylvania Kansas............................... 0.87 Alaska................................ 1.20 Delaware............................ 0.93 Philadelphia.................... 1.05 Kentucky............................ 0.83 Arizona............................... 0.87 District of Columbia............. 0.90 Other............................. 0.88 Louisiana............................ 0.78 California Florida............................... 0.80 Rhode Island...................... 0.97 Michigan............................ 0.91 Los Angeles.................... 1.00 Georgia.............................. 0.77 South Carolina.................... 0.77 Minnesota.......................... 0.91 San Francisco Bay Area... 1.16 Maine................................ 0.86 Vermont............................. 0.88 Mississippi.......................... 0.74 Other............................. 0.97 Maryland............................ 0.86 Virginia............................... 0.83 Missouri............................. 0.87 Colorado............................ 0.92 Massachusetts.................... 0.97 West Virginia....................... 0.91 Nebraska............................ 0.83 Hawaii................................ 1.24 New Hampshire.................. 0.86 North Dakota...................... 0.86 Idaho................................. 0.87 New Jersey......................... 1.03 Central U.S. Ohio ................................ 0.87 Montana............................ 0.84 New York Alabama............................. 0.76 Oklahoma........................... 0.78 Nevada.............................. 0.93 New York City.................. 1.20 Arkansas............................ 0.75 South Dakota..................... 0.84 New Mexico........................ 0.79 Other............................. 0.90 Illinois................................ 0.97 Tennessee.......................... 0.79 Oregon............................... 0.94 North Carolina.................... 0.78 Indiana .............................. 0.91 Texas................................. 0.77 Utah ................................ 0.84 Iowa 0.87 Wisconsin........................... 0.92 Washington........................ 0.97 Wyoming............................ 0.84 bui(dingstandards March-AprL 2002 • 25 ,e i � 1 �t �t BUILDING VALUATION DATA At the request of numerous building officials, Building Standards'" offers the following building valuation data representing average costs for most buildings. Because residential buildings are the most common for many cities,two general classes are considered for these,one for"average" construction and the other for"good." Adjustments should be made for special architectural or structural features and the location of the project. Higher or lower unit costs may often result. The unit costs are intended to comply with the definition of "valuation" in Section 223 of the 1997 Uniform Building Code'" and thus include architectural, structural, electrical, plumbing and mechanical work, except as specifically listed below. The unit costs also include the contractor's profit, which should not be omitted. The determination of plan check fees for projects reviewed by the International Conference of Building Officials will be based on valuation computed from these figures,which were established in April 2001. Cost per Square Cost per Square Cost per Square Cost per Square Occupancy and Type Foot,Average Occupancy and Type Foot,Average Occupancy and Type Foot,Average Occupancy and Type Foot,Average 1.APARTMENT HOUSES: 7. DWELLINGS: 13.JAILS: 20. RESTAURANTS: Type I or II F.R.*.......... $87.00 Type V-Masonry........ $74.20 Type I or II FIR............$156.00 Type III-1-Hour......... $95.50 (Good) $107.10 (Good)$95.00 Type III-1-Hour......... 142.70 Type III-N................. 92.30 Type V-Masonry Type V-Wood Frame.. 66.00 Type V-1-Hour.......... 107.00 Type V-1-Hour.......... 87.50 ` (or Type 111)............. 71.00 (Good)$90.60 14. LIBRARIES: Type V-N.................. 84.00 (Good) $87.00 Basements- Type I or II F.R............ 114.10 21. SCHOOLS: Type V-Wood Frame.. 62.60 Semi-Finished........ 19.70 Type II-1-Hour.......... 83.50 Type I or II FIR............ 109.00 (Good) $80.40 (Good)$22.80 Type II-N.................. 79.40 Type II-1-Hour.......... 74.40 Type F-Basement Garage 36.70 Unfinished.............. 14.30 Type III-1-Hour......... 88.20 Type III-1-Hour......... 79.60 2.AUDITORIUMS: (Good) $17.40 Type III-N................. 83.80 Type 111-N................. 76.60 Type I or If FIR............ 102.80 S. FIRE STATIONS: Type V-1-Hour.......... 82.90 Type V-1-Hour.......... 74.60 Type II-1-Hour.......... 74.40 Type I or II FIR............ 112.20 Type V-N.................. 79.40 Type V-N.................. 71.20 Type II-N.................. 70.40 Type II-1-Hour.......... 73.80 15. MEDICAL OFFICES: 22. SERVICE STATIONS: Type III-1-Hour......... 78.20 Type II-N.................. 69.60 Type I or II FR*.......... 117.20 Type 11-N.................. 65.90 Type III-N................. 74.20 Type III-1-Hour......... 80.80 Type II-1-Hour.......... 90.40 Type III-1-Hour......... 68.70 Type V-1-Hour.......... 74.80 Type III-N................. 77.40 Type II-N.................. 85.90 Type V-1-Hour.......... 58.50 Type V-N.................. 69.80 Type V-1-Hour.......... 75.80 Type III-1-Hour......... 95.20 Canopies................... 27.50 3. BANKS: Type V-N.................. 71.90 Type III-N................. 91.30 23. STORES: Type I or II F.R.*.......... 145.20 9. HOMES FOR THE ELDERLY: Type V-1-Hour.......... 88.40 Type I or II F.R.*.......... 80.80 Type II-1-Hour.......... 107.00 Type I or II F.R............ 101.70 Type V-N.................. 85.30 Type II-1-Hour.......... 49.40 Type II-N.................. 103.50 Type II-1-Hour.......... 82.60 16. OFFICES**: Type 11-N.................. 48.30 Type III-1-Hour......... 118.10 Type II-N.................. 79.00 Type I or II F.R.*.......... 104.70 Type III-1-Hour......... 60.10 Type III-N................. 113.80 Type III-1-Hour......... 86.00 Type II-1-Hour.......... 70.10 Type III-N................. 56.40 Type V-1-Hour.......... 107.00 Type III-N................. 82.50 Type 11-N.................. 66.80 Type V-1-Hour.......... 50.60 Type V-N.................. 102.50 Type V-1-Hour.......... 83.10 Type III-1-Hour......... 75.70 Type V-N.................. 46.80 4. BOWLING ALLEYS: Type V-N.................. 80.20 Type III-N................. 72.40 24.THEATERS: Type II-1-Hour.......... 50.00 10. HOSPITALS: Type V-1-Hour.......... 70.90 Type I or II F.R............ 107.70 Type II-N.................. 46.70 Type I or II F.R.*.......... 160.00 Type V-N.................. 66.80 Type III-1-Hour......... 78.40 Type III-1-Hour......... 54.40 Type III-1-Hour......... 132.50 17. PRIVATE GARAGES: Type III-N................. 74.70 Type III-N................. 50.90 Type V-1-Hour.......... 126.40 Wood Frame............... 23.80 Type V-1-Hour.......... 73.80 Type V-1-Hour.......... 36.70 11. HOTELS AND MOTELS: Masonry..................... 26.90 Type V-N.................. 69.80 5.CHURCHES: Type I or II F.R.*.......... 99.00 Open Carports............ 16.30 25.WAREHOUSES***: Type I or II F.R............ 97.30 Type III-1-Hour......... 85.80 18. PUBLIC BUILDINGS: Type I or II F.R............ 48.40 Type II-1-Hour.......... 73.00 Type III-N................. 81.80 Type I or II F.R.*.......... 121.00 Type II or V-1-Hour... 28.70 Type II-N.................. 69.40 Type V-1-Hour.......... 74.70 Type II-1-Hour.......... 98.00 Type II or V-N........... 27.00 Type III-1-Hour......... 79.40 Type V-N.................. 73.20 Type 11-N.................. 93.70 Type III-1-Hour......... 32.60 Type III-N................. 75.90 12. INDUSTRIAL PLANTS: Type III-1-Hour......... 101.80 Type 111-N................. 31.00 Type V-1-Hour.......... 74.20 Type I or II FR............ 55.80 Type III-N................. 98.20 EQUIPMENT Type V-N.................. 69.80 Type II-1-Hour.......... 38.80 Type V-1-Hour.......... 93.10 AIR CONDITIONING: 6.CONVALESCENT HOSPITALS: Type II-N.................. 35.70 Type V-N.................. 89.80 Commercial............ 4.10 Type I or II F.R.*.......... 136.50 Type III-1-Hour......... 42.80 19. PUBLIC GARAGES: Residential............. 3.40 Type II-1-Hour.......... 94.70 Type III-N................. 40.30 Type I or II F.R.*.......... 48.00 SPRINKLER SYSTEMS.. 2.60 Type III-1-Hour......... 97.10 Tilt-up........................ 29.40 Type I or 11 Open Parking*36.00 Type V-1-Hour.......... 91.50 Type V-1-Hour.......... 40.30 Type II-N.................. 27.50 Type V-N.................. 36.90 Type III-1-Hour......... 36.30 Type III-N................. 32.30 Type V-1-Hour.......... 33.00 *Add 0.5 percent to total cost for each story over three. **Deduct 20 percent for shell-only buildings. ***Deduct 11 percent for mini-warehouses. REGIONAL MODIFIERS The following modifiers are recommended for use in conjunction with the building valuation data.Additionally,certain local conditions may require further modifications.To use these modifiers, merely multiply the listed cost per square foot by the appropriate regional modifier. For example, to adjust the cost of a Type III One-hour hotel building of average construction for the Iowa area,select Regional Modifier 0.80 and unit cost from valuation data,$85.80: 0.80 x 85.80=$68.64(adjusted cost per square foot) Eastern U.S. Modifier Eastern U.S.(cont.) Modifier Central U.S.(cont.)Modifier Western U.S. Modifier Connecticut........................ 0.95 Pennsylvania Kansas............................... 0.74 Alaska................................ 1.30 Delaware............................ 0.84 Philadelphia.................... 0.96 Kentucky............................ 0.77 Arizona............................... 0.82 District of Columbia............. 0.87 Other...............:............. 0.83 Louisiana............................ 0.78 California Florida............................... 0.74 Rhode Island...................... 0.94 Michigan............................ 0.84 Los Angeles.................... ' 1.00 Georgia.............................. 0.68 South Carolina.................... 0.70 Minnesota.......................... 0.86 San Francisco Bay Area... 1.13 Maine................................ 0.81 Vermont............................. 0.80 Mississippi.......................... 0.71 Other............................. 0.94 Maryland............................ 0.79 Virginia............................... 0.73 Missouri............................. 0.78 Colorado............................ 0.81 Massachusetts.................... 0.94 West Virginia....................... 0.82 Nebraska..........................:. 0.75 Hawaii................................ 1.14 New Hampshire.................. 0.82 North Dakota...................... 0.80 Idaho................................. 0.80 New Jersey......................... 0.91 Central U.S. Ohio ................................ 0.80 Montana............................ 0.79 New York Alabama............................. 0.72 Oklahoma........................... 0.71 Nevada.............................. 0.89 New York City.................. 1.16 Arkansas............................ 0.70 South Dakota..................... 0.78 New Mexico........................ 0.76 Other............................. 0.87 Illinois................................ 0.87 Tennessee.......................... 0.72 Oregon............................... 0.83 North Carolina.................... 0.70 Indiana.............................. 0.82 Texas................................. 0.74 Utah ................................ 0.75 Iowa ................................ 0.80 Wisconsin........................... 0.85 Washington........................ 0.88 Wyoming............................ 0.80 bui(dingstandards March-April 2001 9 53 r rho l'T&-!� RESOLUTION NO. 690 A RESOLUTION REPLACING RESOLUTION NO. 663, AND ADOPTING A REVISED FEE SCHEDULE WHEREAS, the City Council, through ordinance, has adopted regulations requiring certain actions and services; and, WHEREAS, these various ordinances set forth that fees shall be set by resolution, and; WHEREAS, the cost of providing these various services consistent with applicable codes, regulations, and policies periodically increase or decrease, or certain services or practices are discontinued and fees are no longer needed; and, WHEREAS, it is the intent of the City of Arlington to charge appropriate fees and charges that are consistent with the services provided and to cover the public cost of providing these various services so that the public is not subsidizing individual benefits derived therefrom; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARLINGTON AS FOLLOWS: The following rates,fees, and deposits for various services provided, actions performed, or items sold by the city and/or its contract service providers, and fines levied against code violators, are hereby adopted: Section 1. Fees, Deposits, and Charges—General A. Fees. Fees are intended to cover the normal, recurring costs associated with providing a given service. Fees are non-refundable. B. Deposits. Deposits are intended to cover the cost of actions that are beyond the normal administrative costs, i.e., those costs that are directly attributable to the action or service being requested. The Department Director at his/her discretion may reduce or increase the amount of deposit required. The City shall hold deposits. Once all City charges are calculated at the close ' of a project/action, any funds remaining in the deposit account shall be refunded to the applicant/petitioner. Any charges in excess of the deposit amount will be charged to the applicant. If during the review process it is apparent that the deposit account will not cover the work remaining to be done by the City, the City may request additional funds. If said funds are not paid promptly, the City may cease work on the action/permit review, and the permit- processing clock is stopped. C. Consultant Charges. Any project that requires the review of outside consultants shall be liable for any charges for said services. These charges may substantially increase the required deposit on any project. D. Impact Fees. Impact fees are intended to pay for system improvements necessitated by the addition of users to a particular system. E. Prices. In some instances,the City provides certain goods and merchandise for sale. Prices for these goods may be included in this resolution. F. Payment Due. Fees and deposits are due at the time the action is requested (e.g., at time of application) or occurs (e.g., prior to a specific action). An applicant may pay all fees and deposits of a multi-phased project in advance; however, doing so does not vest applicable fees and deposits due. Fees and deposits due are those in effect at the time the specific action or phase of an action is requested or occurs. Pagel i I �� �._ I CITY OF ARLINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 690: FEES, DEPOSITS, AND FINES G. Waivers. Upon petition by the applicant,the City Council may waive any of the fees or deposits, rti or poons thereof, for any non-profit organization or government agency. Section 2. Impact Fees. Fees to mitigate various impacts, the levying of which, and the calculation of which, is established by various separate ordinances, shall be as listed in Table 1. Table 1: Impact Fees Fee Type Origin Amount $ Traffic Impact Fee Cha ter 20.90, Part 1 $1,038 per p.m. peak trip Neighborhood/Mini Park In- AMC §20.52.010 Single-family................ $484/unit Lieu Fee Multi-family ................. $436/unit Community Park Impact Fee AMC §20.90.400 Single-family............. $1,662/unit Multi-family ..............$1,497/unit School Impact Fee, Arlington AMC Chapter 20.90, Part 11 Single-family...............$2,310/unit School District Multi-family(1 bedroom)...$2,460 Multi-family 2+ bedroom).$4,037 School Impact Fee, Lakewood Chapter 20.90, Part II Single-family......................$1,116 School District Multi-family(1 bedroom)..........$0 Multi-family 2+ bedroom).$1,752 Page 2 .. ._ ,• I 1 CITY OF ARLINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 690: FEES, DEPOSITS, AND FINES Section 3. Land Use Fees and Deposits Fees and deposits for various services, actions, and permits regarding land use, as per the Unified Development Code,shall be as listed in Table 2: Schedule of Land Use Fees and Deposits. Table 2: Schedule of Land Use Fees and Deposits Action Fee $ Deposit $ Land Use Permits Zoning Permit 100 2,000 Special Use Permit 125 3,000 Conditional Use Permit 150 3,500 Preliminary Plats Conditional Use Permit for a Major Plat 600 6,000 Zoning Permit for a Short Plat 400 2,500 Construction Permits and Inspection of Improvements Major and Short Plats 200/lot Consultant Fees Site Plans & Other 2.5%of estimated Consultant Fees construction costs Septic Review AMC 20.60.120 50 0 Final Plats Major.Plat 400 2,000 Short Plat 250 1,000 Design Review Administrative 50 150 Design Review Board 100 300 Forest Practices Permits Permit Review 100 300 Forest Practices Permit Application Fee 100 100 per acre Review Fee For Conversion Option Harvest Plan Approval 100 100 per acre Review Fee To Lift Moratorium 300 Inspection Fee 50 100 per acre Appeals To City Council 50 150 To Planning Commission 50 150 To Hearing Examiner 50 500 To Shoreline Hearings Board 50 500 Reconsideration of Decision by: Planning Manager/Land Use Administrator 25 50 Zoning Board/Planning Commission 25 75 Hearing Examiner 50 150 City Council 50 75 Permit Extension 20.16.220 50 0 Amendment to or Modification of Permit 20.16.250 Insignificant Deviations 50 0 Minor Design Modifications or Changes 100 200 Boundary Line Adjustment Boundary Line Adjustment 100 1,000 Page 3 _ I I I CITY OF ARLINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 690: FEES, DEPOSITS, AND FINES Action Fee $ Deposit $ Land Use Ordinance Amendment Amendment to text of Land Use Ordinance 100 600 Amendment to Zoning Map (rezone) < 5 acres 250 800 > or= 5 acres 350 1,500 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Minor Amendment (annual cycle) 350 1,000 Major Amendment(5-year cycle) 500 1,500 Annexations Submission of 10% Petition 50 50 Submission of 60% Petition 50 200 If it goes to BRB hearing 250 500 Right-of-Way Construction Permit 2.5%of estimated 0 construction costs Shoreline Development Permit SDP in conjunction with a Land Use Permit 50 250 SDP not in conjunction with a Land Use Permit 50 1,000 Vacations of: Right-of-Way 250 300 Plats 250 300 Variance Administrative 100 500 If it goes to hearing (fee/dep. in addition to that paid for 150 1,000 Admin. Decision) Miscellaneous Actions/Items Public Notice Signs 10 0 Security Administration Fee 100 0 Zoning Interpretation 20.20.040 50 0 Miscellaneous Engineering Review (e.g., storm drainage Staff hourly wage tans for Single-Family Residential & Duplexes) x est'd hours Miscellaneous Research or other staff time Staff hourly wage x est'd hours Pre-Application Meetings 1st two hours 0 0 Subsequent pre-apps 40/staff/hr 0 SEPA Review (note: review of checklist included in Land Use Permit fee & deposit) SEPA Only (no land use permit required) 50 300 Review of requested studies (other than traffic) 25/study 125/study Review of requested traffic studies 25 350 Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) 250 500 Request of Utility Services Outside City Single-Family Residence/Duplex 100 0 Other Development 100 1,000 Page 4 CITY OF ARLINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 690: FEES, DEPOSITS, AND FINES Section 4. Building Permit Fees 4.1 Building Permit Fees Adopted For determining the value of a structure, the most current issue of the Building Safety Journal Magazine, which offers the legacy building valuation data fee schedule as published by the International Code Council, is adopted by reference. 4.1.1 Building fees shall be as listed in Table 3. Table 3: Building Permit Fees Total Valuation 20010 2001 2002 2003 Fee 51,00 to$500.00 E$ 70.65 $ �24.50 $ 25.00 $ 25.50 .00 to$500 $501.00 to$2,000.00 $ 24.50 $ 25 00 S 25.56 for the first S500 plus 3.20 $ 325 $ 3.30 for each additional 51,000,or fraction thereof,to and including52,000 $2001.00 to$25,000.00 72.05 $ 73.50 $ 75.00 for the first$2,000 plus $ 14.30 $ 14.50 $ 14.75 S 15.15 for each additional$1,000,or fraction thereof,to and including$25,000 $25,001.00 to$50,000.00 $ 399.50 $ 407.50 $ 415.75 S 424.00 for the first$25,00-plus $ 10.30 $ 10.50 $ 10.75 S 11.00 for each additional$1,000,orfraction thereof,to and including550.000 $50,000.00 to$100,000.00 $ 656.50 $ 669.75 $ 6 33.15 S 6 66.75 for the first$50,000 plus $ 7.15 $ 7.25 $ 7.50 $ 7.50 for each additional$1,000,or fraction thereof,to and including$100,000 $100,001.00 t $$500,000.00 $ 1,013.65 $ 1,034.00 $ 1,0 44.50 $ 1,0 55,50 for the first$100,000 plus - $ 5.70 $ 5.80 $ 6.00 $ 6.10 for each additional$1,000,or fraction thereof,to and including$500,000 $500,001.00 to$1,000,000.00 $ 3,298.50 $ 3,364.50 $ 3,431.75 T 3,500,25 for the first$500,000 plus - $ 485 $ 5.00 $ 5.05 $ 5.15 for each additional$1,000,or fraction thereof,to and including$1,000,000 $1,000,001.00 and up $ 5,721.00 $ 5,835.25 I$ 5,952.00 $ 6,071.00 for the first$1,000,000 plus $ 3.75 $ 3.80 $ 3.90 $ 3.95 for each additional$1,000 or fraction thereof Total Valuation 2004 2005 2006 2007 Fee $1.00 to$500 00 $ 26.00 $ 26.50 $ 27.00 $ 27.50 .00 to$500 $501.00 to$2,000.00 $ 26.00 $ 26.50 $ 27.00 $ 27,50 for the first$500 plus $ 3.40 $ 3.45 $ 350 $ 355 for each additional$1,000,or fraction thereof,to and including 52,000 $2001.00 to$25,000.00 $ 76.50 $ 78.00 $ 79.50 $ 81.00 for the first$2,000 plus $ 15.50 $ 15.75 $ 16.00 $ 16.25 for each additional$1,000,or fraction thereof,to and including 525,000 $26,001.00 to$50,000.00 $ 432.50 $ 441.25 $ 450.00 $ 459.00 for the first$25.000 plus $ 11.25 $ 11.50 $ 11.60 $ 11.75 for each additional$1,000,or fraction thereof,to and including$50.000 $50,000.00 to$100,000.00 $ 710.75 $ 725.00 $ 739.50 S 754.25 far the first$50,000 plus $ 7.75 $ 7.75 $ 8.00 S 8.25 for each additional$1,000,or fraction thereof,to and including$100.000 $100,001.00 to$500,000.00 $ 1,097.25 $ 1,119.00 $ 1,1 11.50 IT 1,1 44.25 for the first$100,000 plus $ 6.20 $ 6.30 $ 6.40 $ 6 50 for each additional$1,000.or fraction thereof,to and including$500.000 $500,001.00 to$1,000,000.00 $ 3,57025 $ 3,641.75 $ 3.714 50 $ 3,78175 for the first$500.000 plus $ 5 25 $ 5.35 $ 5.45 $ 5.50 for each additional S1,000,or fraction thereof,to and including$1,000.000 $1,000,001.00 and up $ 6,192.50 $ 6,316.25 $ 6,442.75 $ 6,571.50 for the first$1,000,000 plus $ 4.00 $ 4.10 $ 4.20 $ 4.30 for each additional 51,000 or fraction thereof Total Valuation 2008 2009 2010 Fee 51,00 to$500.00 $ 28.00 $ 28.50 $ 29.00 .00 to$500 $501.00 to$2,000.00 $ 28.00 $ 28.50 $ 29.00 for the first$500 plus $ 3.60 $ 3.75 $ 3.75 for each additional 51,000,or fraction thereof,to and including$2,000 $2001.00 to$25,000.00 $ 82.75 $ 84.50 $ 86.00 for the first$2,000 plus $ 16.75 $ 17.00 $ 17.25 for each additional 51,000,or fraction thereof,to and includino$25,000 $25,001.00 to$50,000.00 $ 468.25 $ 477.50 $ 487.00 for the first$25.000 plus $ 12.00 $ 12.25 $ 12.50 for each additional$1.000.or fraction thereof,to and including$50,000 $50,000.00 to$100,000.00 $ 769.50 $ 784.50 $ 800.50 for the first$50,000 plus $ 850 $ 850 $ 870 for each additional$1,000,or fraction thereof,to and including$100.000 $100,001.00 to$500,000.00 $ 1,187.50 $ 1,2 11.25 $ 1,2 55.50 for the first$100,000 plus $ 6.75 $ 6.85 $ 7.00 for each additional$1,000,or fraction thereof,to and including$500,000 $500,001.00 to$1,000,000.00 $ 3,86450 $ 3,942.00 $ 4,020.75 for the first$500,000 plus $ 560 $ 5.75 $ 6.00 for each additional$1,000,or fraction thereof,to and including$1,000,000 $1,000,001.00 and up $ 6,703.00 $ 6,837.00 S 6,973.75 for the first S 1,000,000 plus $ 4.35 $ 4.45 $ 4.50 for each additional 51,000 or fraction thereof Page 5 I 1 CITY OF ARLINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 690: FEES, DEPOSITS, AND FINES Inspection fees not covered by Section 4.1, above, shall be as follows: Table 4: Miscellaneous Building Inspection Fees Action Fee Inspections outside of normal business hours $47.00 per hour minimum charge 1/2 hours Reinspection fees assessed under provisions $47.00 per hour of the current UBC Inspection for which no fee is specifically $47.00 per hour (minimum charge—one-half indicated hour Additional plan review required by changes, $47.00 per hour (minimum charge—one-half additions or revised plans hour For use of outside consultants for plan review Actual costs and inspections, or both. Or the total hourly cost to the jurisdiction, whichever is greatest. This cost shall include supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages, and benefits of the employees involved. z Actual costs include administrative and overhead costs. 4.1.2 Miscellaneous Building Fees. Table 5 is adopted as the fee schedule for permits required under Title 16 of this code. Table 5: Miscellaneous Building Permit Fees Action Fee Change lot after plan review completed $100.00 Change plans during or after plan review. New Plan Review Fee Change or revise plans after issuance of permit. Current hourly rate per UBC or new plan review fee Commercial or Industrial re-roof UBC value or bid amount Demolitions $100.00 Espresso Carts(portable and stand alone $250.00 Fences over 6 feet in height Current hourly rate per UBC for plan review plus$20.00 permit fee Residential hot tub or Spa $20.00 Mobile Homes $500.00 Modular Offices Cob shacks $350.00 Moved Buildings $100.00 prior to moving,together with a building permit fee based on the UBC valuation for new building and cost of moved building. Residential re-roofs $0 if plan review required $50.00 Retaining walls(permit not required under four 4 feet $100.00 or UBC valuation, which is ever greater Signs $20.00 plus$1.00 per square foot,or the UBC valuation,which is ever greater Swimming Pools $150.00 or the UBC valuation, which ever is greateU 4.2 The fee schedules for the following listed reference code shall be as set forth as adopted: 4.2.1 International Mechanical Code 4.2.2 Uniform Swimming Pool, Spa & Hot Tub Code 4.2.3 Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings 4.2.4 Uniform Housing Code 4.2.5 Washington State Energy Code 4.2.6 Washington State Ventilation & Indoor Air Quality Code 4.2.7 Washington State Historic Building Code Page 6 CITY OF ARLINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 690: FEES, DEPOSITS, AND FINES 4.2.8 4.3 Plumbing Fees_ 4.3.1 Plumbing fees shall be as listed in Table 6: Plumbing Fees. Table 6: Plumbing Fees Action Fee PERMIT ISSUANCE For the issuance of each plumbing permit $25.00 For issuing each supplemental permit for which the original permit has not expired. been canceled or finaled $7.00 UNIT FEE SCHEDULE Note: The following do not include ermit-issuingfee. Fixtures and Vents For each plumbing fixture or trap or set of fixtures on one trap(including water,drainage piping and backflow $10.0.0 protection thereo For repair or alteration of drainage or vent piping,each fixture $5.00 Sewers,Disposal Systems and Interceptors For each industrial waste pretreatment interceptor,including its trap and vent,excepting kitchen-type grease $20.00 interceptors functioning as fixture traps Rainwaters stems per drain inside building) $10.00 Water Piping and Water Heaters For installation,alteration,or repair of water piping or water-treating equipment,or both,each $5.00 For each water heater including vent $12.00 Lawn Sprinklers,Vacuum Breakers and Backflow Protection Devices For each lawnsprinkler s stem on any one meter,including backflow protection devices thereof $15.00 For atmospheric-type vacuum breakers or backflow protection devices not included in Item 1: 1 to 5 devices $12.00 Over 5 devices,each $2.00 For each backflow-protection device other than atmospheric-type vacuum breakers: 2 inches 50.8 mm and smaller $12.00 Over 2 inches 50.8 mm $25.00 Swimming Pools For each swimming pool ors a: Public pool $90.00 Public spa $90.00 Private pool $60.00 Private spa $30.00 Miscellaneous For each appliance or piece of equipment regulated by the Plumbing Code but not classed in other appliance $10.00 categories,or for which no other fee is listed in this code OTHER INSPECTIONS AND FEES: Inspections outside of normal business hours,per hour minimum charge-two hours $47.00* Reins ection fees assessed under provisions of Section 109.8,per inspection $47.00* Inspections for which no fee is specifically indicated,per hour minimum charge-one-half hour) $47.00* Additional plan review required by changes,additions or revisions to plans or to plans for which an initial review $47.00* has been completed minimum charge-one-half hour *Or the total hourly cost to the jurisdiction,whichever is the greatest.This cost shall include supervision,overhead, equipment,hourly wages, and fringe benefits of the employees involved. Page 7 ., ,. I I I CITY OF ARLINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 690: FEES, DEPOSITS, AND FINES 4.4 Mechanical Permit Fees. Mechanical permit& inspection shall be as listed in Table 7. Table 7: Mechanical Permit & Inspection Fees Fee PERMIT ISSUANCE AND HEATERS Action For the issuance of each mechanical permit $24.00 For issuing each supplemental permit for which the original permit has not expired, been canceled or Finaled $7.00 UNIT FEE SCHEDULE Note:The following do not include ermit-issuin fee. Furnaces For the installation or relocation of each forced-air or gravity-type furnace or burner,including ducts and vents $15.00 attached to such appliance,up to and including 100,000 Btu/h 29.3 k For the installation or relocation of each forced-air or gravity-type furnace or burner,including ducts and vents $18.00 attached to such appliance over 100,000 Btu/h 29.3 k For the installation or relocation of each floor furnace,including vent $15.00 For the installation or relocation of each suspended heater,recessed wall heater or floor-mounted unit heater $15.00 Appliance Vents For the installation,relocation or replacement of each appliance vent installed and not included in an appliance $7.00 permit Repairs or Additions For the repair of,alteration of,or addition to each heating appliance, refrigeration unit,cooling unit,absorption unit, $14.00 or each heating,cooling,absorption or evaporative cooling system,including installation of controls regulated by the Mechanical code Boilers,Compressors and Absorption Systems For the installation or relocation of each boiler or compressor to and including 3 horsepower(10.6 kW),or each $15.00 absorption system to and including 100,000 Btu/h 29.3 kW For the installation or relocation of each boiler or compressor over 3 horsepower(10.6 kW)to and including 15 $27.00 horsepower(52.7 kW),or each absorption system over 100,000 Btu/h(29.3 kW)to and including 500,000 Btu/h 146.6 k For the installation or relocation of each boiler or compressor over 15 horsepower(52.7 kW)to and including 30 $37.00 horsepower(105.5 kW),or each absorption system over 500,000 Btu/h(146.6 kW)to and including 1,000,000 Btu/h 293.1 k For the installation or relocation of each boiler or compressor over 30 horsepower(105.5 kW)to and including 50 $55.00 horsepower(176 kW),or each absorption system over 1,000,000 Btu/h(293.1 kW)to and including 1,750,000 Btu/h 512.9 kW For the installation or relocation of each boiler or compressor over 50 horsepower(176 kW),or each absorption $93.00 system over 1,750,000 Btu/h 512.9 k Air Handling For each air-handling unit to and including 10,000 cubic feet per minute(cfm)(4719 Us),including ducts attached $11.00 thereto Note:This fee does not apply to an air-handling unit which is a portion of a factory-assembled appliance,cooling unit,evaporative cooler or absorption unit for which a permit is re uired elsewhere in the Mechanical Code. For each air-handling unit over 10,000 cfm(4719 Us) $18.00 Evaporative Coolers For each evaporative cooler other than portable type $11.00 Ventilation and Exhaust For each ventilation fan connected to a single duct $7.00 For each ventilations stem which is not a portion of any heatina or air-conditionin2 system authorized by a permit $11.00 For the installation of each hood which is served by mechanical exhaust,including the ducts for such hood $11.00 Incinerators For the installation or relocation of each domestic-type incinerator $18.00 For the installation or relocation of each commercial or industrial-type incinerator $15.00 Gas Piping Systems Page 8 CITY OF ARLINGTON _ RESOLUTION NO. 690: FEES, DEPOSITS, AND FINES Action Fee Mories, as i in system of one to five outlets additional outlet over five,each $6.00 eous $1.00 appliance or piece of equipment regulated by the Mechanical Code but not classed in other appliance $11.00 s,or for which the fee is listed in the table ections and Fees:s outside of normal business hours,per hour minimum charge-two hours) $47.00* Reins ection fees assessed under provisions of Section 109.8,per inspection * Inspections for which no fee is specifically indicated,per hour minimum char e-one-half hour $47.00 $47.00* Additional plan review required by changes,additions or revisions to plans or to plans for which an initial review $47.00*has been completed minimum char e-one-half hour) *Or the total hourly cost to the jurisdiction,whichever is the greatest.This cost shall include supervision,overhead, e ui ment,hourly wages,and fringe benefits of the employees involved Page 9 CITY OF ARLINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 690: FEES DEPOSITS, AND FINES Section 5. Cemetery Fees 5.1 Cemetery Fees and Merchandise Prices Adopted Fees and prices for various services, actions, and merchandise for cemetery use shall be as listed in Table 8: Cemetery Fees and Prices. Table 8: Cemetery Fees and Prices Action/Service/Product 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Burial Lot $ 525 $ 541 $ 557 $ 573 $ 589 $ 605 $ 621 $ 637 $ 653 $ 669 $ 685 Endowed Care $ 65 $ 67 $ 69 $ 71 $ 73 $ 75 $ 77 $ 79 $ 81 $ 83 $ 85 Cremation Lot/Urn Garden $ 275 $ 283 $ 292 $ 301 $ 310 $ 319 $ 328 $ 337 $ 346 $ 355 $ 364 Babyland/lncludes OCBEC $ 552 $ 552 $ 552 $ 552 $ 552 $ 552 $ 552 $ 552 $ 552 $ 552 $ 552 0&C $ 495 $ 510 $ 525 $ 540 $ 555 $ 570 $ 585 $ 600 $ 615 $ 630 $ 645 Liner $ 550 $ 567 $ 584 $ 601 $ 618 $ 635 $ 652 $ 669 $ 686 $ 703 $ 720 Existin Niche Space $468-488 $ 482 $ 497 $ 512 $ 527 $ 542 $ 557 $ 572 $ 587 $ 602 $ 617 2nd RightBurial $ 260 $ 268 $ 276 $ 284 $ 292 $ 300 $ 308 $ 316 $ 324 $ 332 $ 340 0&C*'UG $ 230 $ 237 $ 244 $ 251 $ 258 $ 265 $ 272 $ 279 $ 286 $ 293 $ 300 Um liner $ 85 $ 88 $ 90 $ 92 $ 94 $ 96 $ 98 $ 100 $ 102 $ 104 $ 106 Vault Handling $ 110 $ 113 $ 117 $ 121 $ 125 $ 129 $ 133 $ 137 $ 141 $ 145 $ 149 Headstone Settin ldbl. $ 165 $ 170 $ 775 $ 180 $ 185 $ 190 $ 195 $ 200 $ 205 $ 210 $ 215 Headstone Settinglsgl. $ 95 $ 98 $ 101 $ 104 $ 107 $ 110 $ 113 $ 116 $ 119 $ 122 $ 125 Resetting fee Resetting fee/Dbl. SaturdayService/AM $ 245 $ 252 $ 260 $ 268 $ 276 $ 284 $ 292 $ 300 $ 308 $ 316 $ 324 Saturday Service/PM $ 490 $ 505 $ 520 $ 535 $ 550 $ 565 $ 580 $ 595 $ 610 $ 625 $ 640 After 3 Charge per hour $ 100 $ 103 $ 106 $ 109 $ 112 $ 115 $ 118 $ 121 $ 1 Double Depth/When available 117 $ 24 $ 127 $ 130 u me ice $ 110 $ 113 $ 121 $ 125 $ 129 $ 133 $ 137 $ 141 $ 145 $ 149 D Disinterment $ 1.500 $ 1,545 $ 1,591 $ 1,637 $ 1,683 $ 1,729 -$ 1,775 $ 1,821 $ 1,867 $ 1,913 $ 1.959 2nd Right Existing Niche $230.244 $ 251 $ 259 $ 267 $ 275 $ 283 $ 291 $ 299 $ 307 $ 315 $ 323 Flower Vases/Niche $ 100 $ 103 $ 106 $ 109 $ 112 $ 115 $ 118 $ 121 $ 124 $ 127 $ 130 Scatter Garden TBD Finallnscription/DOD $ 175 $ 180 $ 186 $ 192 $ 198 $ 204 $ 210 $ 216 $ 222 $ 228 $ 234 Niche lnscriptionlsgl $ 150 $ 154 $ 159 $ 164 $ 169 $ 174 $ 179 $ 184 $ 189 $ 194 $ 199 New Niche Walllsgl/inscription New Niche Walftl.lfnscdption Headstone t "Per Vendor Price Book 167 Page 10 CITY OF ARLINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 690: FEES, DEPOSITS, AND FINES Section 6. Fees and Deposits for the Use of City Owned Facilities Fees and deposits for various services, actions, and permits regarding use of City owned facilities shall be as listed in Table 9: Fees for the Use of City Owned Facilities. Table 9:Fees for the Use of City Owned Facilities U s e/Activity Fee he Arlin ton Communi Youth Center chen three hours $15 er hour ree hours $75 n three hours $20 per hour Over three hours $125 Athletic Fields League Baseball Youth, resident team $7.50 per youth per season Youth, non-resident team $10 per team per use Adult $25per use Softball Youth, resident team $7.50 Per vouth per season Youth, non-resident team $10 er team per use Adult $25 per use Soccer Youth, resident team $7.50 per youth per season Youth, non-resident team $10 per team per use Adult $25 per use Other Youth, resident team $7.50 per youth per season Youth, non-resident team $10 per team per use Adult $25 per use Tournament Baseball Youth, resident team $7.50 per youth per tournament Youth, non-resident team $10 per team per use Adult $25 per use Softball Youth, resident team $7.50 per youth per tournament Youth, non-resident team $10 per team per use Adult Soccer $25 per use Youth, resident team $7.50 per youth per tournament Youth, non-resident team $10 per team per use Adult $25 per use Other Youth, resident team $7.50 per youth per season Youth, non-resident team $10 er team er use Adult $25 er use Lighting Youth $3 per hour Adult $6 Per hour Scheduling Fee for League&Tournament League $15 er team Page 11 i CITY OF ARLINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 690: FEES, DEPOSITS, AND FINES Use/ActivityFee $15 per tournament Co $50 er season $25 per da Section 6.2. Definitions A. "Youth" is defined as any person 18 years of age or younger. B. "Resident' is defined as any team composed of at least 51%Arlington residents. Section 7. Appeal Fees and Deposits for Violations and Abatement Fees and deposits for various services and actions regarding violations and abatement as per Chapter 11.01 of the Arlington Municipal Code, shall be as listed in Table 10: Schedule of Appeal Fees and Deposits for Violations and Abatement. Table 10: Schedule of Fees and Deposits for Violations and Abatement Action Fee ($ Deposit ($) A eals To Hearin Examiner 50 500 Fines Forest Practice Violation Fine AMC 20.80.455 inn Section 8. Repeal of Previous Fee Resolution Resolution 625 is hereby repealed. CITY OF ARLINGTON Margaret Larson, Mayor ATTEST: Kathy Peterson, City Clerk Page 12 KOSNIK ENGINEERING, PC (A Professional Service Corporation) 16300 Mill Creek Blvd., Suite G-2 Mill Creek, WA 98012 (425) 743-7004 (phone) (425) 743-1848 (fax) REVISED GALE INSULATION MEZZANINE EXPANSION & RELOCATION Arlington, WA RECEIVED FEB 10 2005' CO-A BUILDING INEPT Supplemental Structural Calculations for - - � - qinit,Submittal E�l)!'- i'i .t�I T F DATE .Q UNLGfiS !yFF'f.OVLO UY THE <0744 BUILDING INSPECTOR p�,.�'t'C,lc-�fi ��• SSrtJNAL v Project No. 04-028 A&B , EXPIRES 02/01/05 � � � ' .,,t <� P �j t:'� � �♦ ��'. Gale Insulation Mezzanine Expansion &Relocation KE Job. No. 04—028 A&B STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS INDEX Design Criteria 01 Roof&Floor Framing Design 02 Foundation Review 03—04 Steel Column&Wide Flange Beam Review 05—11 Lateral Analysis 12 APPENDIX A Open Web Joist&Girder Tables Al—A2 I I KOSNIK . The►. ENGINEERING Gale Insulation Mezzanine Expansion DESIGN CRITERIA Live Loading: 250 psf at new grade slab 125 psf at mezzanine floor 25 psf snow on roof Foundations: All values are based on the following assumed values: Soil Properties: Fbrg = 2000 psf Rebar: Grade 60 Concrete: fc= 2500 psi Masonry: fm = 1500 psi—grouted solid Seismic Zone: 3/Rw= 4.5 CMU Shear Walls Wind: 85 mph, Exposure B .. ��� .ti I 1 I F"r KOSNIK Project: r� � �. ENGINEERING CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Job No: P 4-02-8 Date I- /?` OS Sht l �a 157 v vV,)VO t�-(T Project:KOSN I K /��. � -- 1 ti� ��_ Q-r, 1:61 ► ENGINEERING CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Job No: Qq--o26 Date I- 12-O $ht 2 C��.�� C, Z�\ S:`�,� S b=T-C Z M ►y Project: M 4-r-L'Ii5� KOSN I ENGINEERING CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Job No: 04 Date Sht �7 ,7 Ic —ram T°r�•,� VL = 557(4j( 1/4 r • +. y I I I� I Ell 1?,, KOSNIK Project: �-�_F �,.��..,�_.,�--rc ENGINEERING CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Job No: Date Sht s (A- CLr`Z-��- w � _ ���z., -�f,r ( :v�n - s e- ICE-/ p�,fk r , c SFc S Hre 7 I32G-6N-20-ld I n 3 I - A Tle: 6,VkC_LA, KOSNIK Dsgnr: � Date: 10:28AM,i 18 AN 5 ( ) Description ENGINEERING SHI--f T 6:1 CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Scope Rev- 580005 User:KW.0604005,Ver5.0.0,1-Dec-2003 Steel Beam Design Page 1 (c)1983.2003 ENERCALC Engineering Software Description floor beam General Information Code Ref:AISC 9th ASD, 1997 UBC,2003 IBC,2003 NFPA 5000 Steel Section : W6X16 Fy 50.00ksi Pinned-Pinned Load Duration Factor 1.00 Center Span 11.00 ft Bm Wt.Added to Loads Elastic Modulus 29,000.0 ksi Left Cant. 0.00 ft LL&ST Act Together Right Cant 0.00 ft Lu: Unbraced Length 1.00 ft 7Using-:.. ry Beam OK Static Load Case Governs Stress 5X16 section,Span=11.00ft, Fy=50.Oksi y= Pinned-Pinned, Lu=1.00ft,LDF=1.000 Actual Allowable Moment 11.539 k-ft 23.512 k-ft Max.Deflection -0.407 in fb:Bending Stress 16.195 ksi 33.000 ksi Length/DL Defl 1,238.2 : 1 fb/Fb 0.491 : 1 Length/(DL+LL Defl) 324.4 : 1 Shear 4.196 k 24.048 k fv:Shear Stress 3.490 ksi 20.000 ksi fv/Fv 0.174 : 1 Force&Stress Summary «_These columns are Dead+Live Load placed as noted-» DL LL LL+ST LL LL+ST Maximum Only A Center A Center Cants Cants Max.M+ 11.54 k-ft 3.02 11.54 k-ft Max.M- k-ft Max.M @ Left k-ft Max.M @ Right k-ft Shear @ Left 4.20 k 1.10 4.20 k Shear @ Right 4.20 k 1.10 4.20 k Center Defl. -0.407 in -0.107 -0.407 -0.407 0.000 0.000 in Left Cant Defl 0.000 in 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 in Right Cant Defl 0.000 in 0.000 0.000 0,000 0.000 0.000 in ...Query Defl @ 0.000 It 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 in Reaction @ Left 4.20 1.10 4.20 4.20 k Reaction @ Rt 4.20 1.10 4.20 4.20 k Fa calc'd per Eq.E2-1,K"Ur<Cc I Beam Passes Table B5.1,Fb per Eq.F1-1,Fb=0.66 Fy KOSNIK Title: r Job# Dsgnr: Date: 10:35AM, 18 JAN 05LA. Description ENGINEERING CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Scope: ��cT 7 Rev: 580005 User:KW 0804005,Ver5.8.0,1-Dec-2003 Steel Beam Design Page 1 (c)1983-2003 ENERCALC Engineering Software Description floor beam General Information Code Ref:AISC 9th ASD, 1997 UBC,2003 IBC,2003 NFPA 5000 Steel Section : W12X16 Fy 50.00ksi Pinned-Pinned Load Duration Factor 1.00 Center Span 9.00 ft Bm Wt.Added to Loads Elastic Modulus 29,000.0 ksi Left Cant. 0.00 ft LL&ST Act Together Right Cant 0.00 ft Lu : Unbraced Length 1.00 ft Point Loads Note!Short Term Loads Are WIND Loads. #1 M #2 Vw #3 _ #4 #5 #6 #7 Dead Load 1.037 0.160 k Live Load 3.163 0.800 k Short Term k Location 4.500 4.500 ft Summary Beam OK Static Load Case Governs Stress Using:W12X16 section,Span=9.00ft, Fy=50.Oksi End Fixity= Pinned-Pinned, Lu=1.00ft,LDF=1.000 Actual Allowable Moment 11.772 k-ft 47.025 k-ft Max.Deflection -0.046 in fb:Bending Stress 8.261 ksi 33.000 ksi Length/DL Defl 9,551.3 : 1 fb/Fb 0.250 : 1 Length/(DL+LL Defl) 2,341.4 : 1 Shear 2.652 k 52.756 k fv:Shear Stress 1.005 ksi 20.000 ksi fv/Fv 0.050 :1 Force&Stress Summary <<-These columns are Dead+Live Load placed as noted-» DL LL LL+ST LL LL+ST Maximum Only Cc`Center n Center Cants Cants Max.M+ 11.77 k-ft 2.86 11.77 k-ft Max.M- k-ft Max.M @ Left k-ft Max. M @ Right k-ft Shear @ Left 2.65 k 0.67 2.65 k Shear @ Right 2.65 k 0.67 2.65 k Center Defl. -0.046 in -0.011 -0.046 -0.046 0.000 0.000 in Left Cant Defl 0.000in 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 in Right Cant Defl 0.000 in 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 in ...Query Defl @ 0.000 ft 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 in Reaction @ Left 2.65 0.67 2.65 2.65 k Reaction @ Rt 2.65 0.67 2.65 2.65 k Fa calc'd per Eq.E2-1,K"Llr<Cc I Beam Passes Table B5,1,Fb per Eq.F1-1,Fb=0.66 Fy Title LAKOSNIK Description Date: 10:42AM,/18 AN 05 ENGINEERING S H c7 g CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Scope Rev: 580007 User.KW-0604005,Ver 5.8.0,1-Dec-2003 Steel Column Page 1 (c)1983-2003 ENERCALC Engineering Software Description grp 1 column General Information Code Ref:AISC 9th ASD, 1997 UBC,2003 IBC,2003 NFPA 5000 Steel Section TS5X5X1/4 Fy 42.00 ksi X-X Sidesway: Restrained Duration Factor 1.000 Y-Y Sidesway: Restrained Column Height 12.000 ft Elastic Modulus 29,000.00 ksi End Fixity Pin-Pin X-X Unbraced 12.000 ft Kxx 1.000 Live&Short Term Loads Combined Y-Y Unbraced 12.000 ft Kyy 1.000 Loads Axial Load... Dead Load 62 50 k Ecc.for X-X Axis Moments 0.000 in Live Load k Ecc.for Y-Y Axis Moments 0.000 in Short Term Load k Summary Column Design OK Section:TS5X5X1/4, Height= 12.00ft,Axial Loads: DL= 62.50, LL= 0.00, ST= 0.00k, Ecc.= 0.000in Unbraced Lengths: X-X= 12.00ft, Y-Y= 12.00ft Combined Stress Ratios Dead Live DL+LL DL+ST+(LL if Chosen) AISC Formula H1 -1 0.7660 0.7660 0.7660 AISC Formula H1 -2 0.5403 0.5403 0.5403 AISC Formula H1 -3 XX Axis : Fa calc'd per Eq.E2.1,K*L/r<Cc YY Axis Fa c c'd per Ea.E2- <Cc _ Stresses Allowable&Actual Stresses Dead Live DL+LL DL+Short Fa:Allowable 17.78 ksi 0.00 ksi 17.78 ksi 17.78 ksi fa:Actual 13.62 ksi 0.00 ksi 13.62 ksi 13.62 ksi Fb:xx:Allow[F1-6] 25.20 ksi 0.00 ksi 25.20 ksi 25.20 ksi Fb:xx:Allow[F1-7]&[F1-8] 25.20 ksi 0.00 ksi 25.20 ksi 25.20 ksi fb:xx Actual 0.00 ksi 0.00 ksi 0.00 ksi 0.00 ksi Fb:yy:Allow[F1-6] 25.20 ksi 0.00 ksi 25.20 ksi 25.20 ksi Fb:yy:Allow[F1-7]&[F1-8] 25.20 ksi 0.00 ksi 25.20 ksi 25.20 ksi fb:yy Actual 0.00 ksi 0.00 ksi 0.00 ksi 0.00 ksi Analysis Values F'ex:DL+LL 26,516 psi Cm:x DL+LL 0.60 Cb:x DL+LL 1.00 F'ey:DL+LL 26,516 psi Cm:y DL+LL 0.60 Cb:y DL+LL 1.00 F'ex:DL+LL+ST 26,516 psi Cm:x DL+LL+ST 0.60 Cb:x DL+LL+ST 1.00 F'ey:DL+LL+ST 26,516 psi Cm:y DL+LL+ST 0.60 Cb:y DL+LL+ST 1.00 Max X-X Axis Deflection 0.000 in at 0.000 ft Max Y-Y Axis Deflection 0.000 in at 0.000 ft KOSNIK Dsgnr: Date: 10:42AM,J016 AN 5 �(/1- � — Description: ~ � ENGINEERING sty, -r CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Scope: Rev: 58=7 User.KW-0604005,Ver5.B.0,I-Deo2003 Steel Column Page 2 (01983-2003 ENERCALC Engineering Software Description grp 1 column Section Properties TS5X5X1/4 Depth 5.000 in Weight 15.59#/ft Values for LRFD Design.... Thickness 0.250 in Ixx 16.900 in4 J 27.400 in4 Width 5.000 in lyy 16.900 in4 0.00 Sxx 6.780 in3 Zx 8.070 in3 Area 4.59 in2 Syy 6.780 in3 Zy 8.070 in3 Rt 2.500 in Rxx 1.920 in 0.000 Ryy 1.920 in Section Type=TS-Square r Title: ( t«� Job# LAKOSNIK Description : Date: 10:43AM, 18 JAN 05 i ENGINEERING }r /� CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Scope Rev. 580007 i User.Kw-0604005,Ver5.B.0,1-Deo-2003 Steel Column Page 1 W1983.2003 ENERCALC Engineering Software Description grp 2 3 4 column General information Code Ref:AISC 9th ASD, 1997 UBC,2003 IBC,2003 NFPA 5000 Steel Section TS8X8X5/16 Fy 42.00 ksi X-X Sidesway: Restrained Duration Factor 1.000 Y-Y Sidesway,, Restrained Column Height 12.000 ft Elastic Modulus 29,000.00 ksi End Fixity Pin-Pin X-X Unbraced 12.000 ft Kxx 1.000 Live&Short Term Loads Combined Y-Y Unbraced 12.000 ft Kyy 1.000 Loads Axial Load... Dead Load 152.00 k Ecc.for X-X Axis Moments 0.000 in Live Load k Ecc.for Y-Y Axis Moments 0.000 in Short Term Load k Summary Column Design OK Section:TS8XBX5/16, Height= 12.00ft,Axial Loads: DL=152.00, LL= 0.00, ST= 0.00k, Ecc.= 0.000in Unbraced Lengths: X-X= 12.00ft, Y-Y= 12.00ft Combined Stress Ratios Dead Live DL+LL DL+ST+ (l-L if Chosen, AISC Formula H1 -1 0.7582 0.7582 0.7582 AISC Formula H1 -2 0.6444 0.6444 0.6444 AISC Formula H1 -3 XX Axis:Fa calc'd per Eq.E2-1,K*Llr<Cc YY 'i a calc'd per Ea.E2-11. <C_c .Stresses Allowable&Actual Stresses Dead Live DL+LL DL+Short Fa:Allowable 21.42 ksi 0.00 ksi 21.42 ksi 21.42 ksi fa:Actual 16.24 ksi 0.00 ksi 16.24 ksi 16.24 ksi Fb:xx:Allow[F1-6] 25.20 ksi 0.00 ksi 25.20 ksi 25.20 ksi Fb:xx:Allow[F1-7]&[F1-8] 25.20 ksi 0.00 ksi 25.20 ksi 25.20 ksi fb:xx Actual 0.00 ksi 0.00 ksi 0.00 ksi 0.00 ksi Fb:yy:Allow[F1-6] 25.20 ksi 0.00 ksi 25.20 ksi 25.20 ksi Fb:yy:Allow[F1-7]&[F1-B] 25.20 ksi 0.00 ksi 25.20 ksi 25.20 ksi fb yy Actual 0.00 ksi 0.00 ksi 0.00 ksi 0.00 ksi Analysis Values - --�-t-- - -- -- - - F'ex:DL+LL 69,938 psi Cm:x DL+LL 0.60 Cb:x DL+LL 1.00 F'ey:DL+LL 69,938 psi Cm:y DL+LL 0.60 Cb:y DL+LL 1.00 F'ex:DL+LL+ST 69,938 psi Cm:x DL+LL+ST 0.60 Cb:x DL+LL+ST 1.00 F'ey:DL+LL+ST 69,938 psi Cm:y DL+LL+ST 0.60 Cb:y DL+LL+ST 1.00 Max X-X Axis Deflection 0.000 in at 0.000 ft Max Y-Y Axis Deflection 0.000 in at 0.000 ft r: s •. KOSNIK Title: Job N t J . Dsgnr: Date: 10:43AM, 18 AN 05 Description ENGINEERING T CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Scope: [ Rev: 580007 User:KW-D604005,Ver5.8.0,1-Deo-2003 Steel Column Page 2 (c)1983-2003 ENERCALC Engineering Software Description grp 2 3 4 column Section Properties TS8X8X5/16 Depth 8.000 in Weight 31.79#/ft Values for LRFD Design.... Thickness 0.313 in box 90.900 in4 J 145.000 in4 Width 8.000 in lyy 90.900 in4 0.00 Sxx 22.700 in3 Zx 26.700 in3 Area 9.36 in2 Syy 22.700 in3 Zy 26.700 in3 Rt 4.000 in Rxx 3.120 in 0.000 Ryy 3.120 in Section Type=TS-Square ' Project:_ KOSNIK .Ellkq ENGINEERING CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Job No: 24 Date,2--%—n:J Sht Z ,�cFcr )4C�•?-r�t fs� T>z �A -- (zkv Ns sz+�•2- Az lod Z- 4� , 6;,097 -kL- r— �N 2-) -'s, -:5 6 + 70 00,,� )A .! 5 I APPENDIX A Open Web Joist & Girder Tables STANDARDLOAD TABLE ' LONGSPAN STEEL JOISTS, LH-SERIES Based on a Maximum Allowable Tensile Stress of 30 ksi Adopted by the Steel Joist Institute May 25, 1983; ( Revised to May 1, 2000 - Effective August 1, 2002 l The black figures in the following table give the TOTAL Where the joist span is in the RED SHADED area of safe uniformly distributed load-carrying capacities, in the load table, the row of bridging nearest the midspan pounds per linear foot, of LH-Series joists.The weight of shall be diagonal bridging with bolted connections at DEAD loads, including the joists, must in all cases be chords and intersection. Hoisting cables shall not be deducted to determine the LIVE load-carrying capacities released until this row of bolted diagonal bridging is com- of the joists, The approximate DEAD load of the joists pletely installed. may be determined from the weights per linear foot Where the joist span is in the BLUE SHADED area of shown in the tables. the load table,all rows of bridging shall be diagonal bridg- 3 The RED figures in this load table are the LIVE loads per ing with bolted connections at chords and intersection. linear foot of joist which will produce an approximate Hoisting cables shall not be released until the two rows of deflection of 1/3w of the span. LIVE loads which will bridging nearest the third points are completely installed. produce a deflection of Y2eo of the span may be obtained The approximate moment of inertia of the joist,in inches'is; by multiplying the RED figures by 1.5. In no case shall the TOTAL load capacity of the joists be exceeded. I —Load Table, an 3)(10(c where n + . 7 RED figure in tie Load Table, and L=(clear span + .67) in feet. This load table applies to joists with either parallel chords When holes are required in top or bottom chords, the or standard pitched top chords. When top chords are carrying capacities must be reduced in proportion to pitched, the carrying capacities are determined by the the reduction of chord areas. nominal depth of the joists at the center of the span. Standard top chord pitch is t/6 inch per foot. If pitch The top chords are considered as being stayed laterally exceeds this standard, the load table does not apply. by floor slab or roof deck. Sloped parallel-chord joists shall use span as defined by The approximate joist weights per linear foot shown in the length along the slope. these tables do not include accessories. rinLbs. rox.WI Depth SAFE LOAD- Joist Per in in Lbs. CLEAR SPAN IN FEET Designationear Ft inches between (Joists only) 21-24 25 1 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 1 33 1 34 1 35 1 36 1 1 1 181-1-102 10 18 12000 468 442 418 391 367 345 324 306 289 273 259 245 313 284 259 234 212 193 175 160 147 135 .124 f14 18LH03 11 18 13300 521 493 1 467 438 409F44 359 337 317 299 283 267 348 317 289 262 236 194 177 161 148 136 124 18LH04 12 16 15500 604 571 535 500 469 413 388 365 344 325 308 403 367 329 296 266 219 200 182 t397 67 153 141 18LH05 15 18 17500 684 648 614 5111 543 508 476 448 421 375 355 454 414 378 345 311 282 256 233 21295 179 164 18LH06 15 18 20700 526 469 419 377 96 340 307 280 259 2322 195 380 181-1-107 17 18 21500 8401 809 780 726 678 635 595 559 526 496 469 444 553 513 476 428 386 349 317 288 264 241 222 204 18LH08 19 18 22400 876 843 812 784 758 717 680 641 604 571 540 512 577 534 496 462 427 3117 351 320 292 267 246 226 18LH09 21 18 24000 936 901 868 838 810 783 759 713 671 633 598 566 616 571 527 491 458 418 380 346 316 289 266 245 22-24 25 26 27 28 1 29 1 30 1 31 32 1 33 34 35 36 1 37 J 38 39 40 20LHO2 10 20 11300 442 437 431 410 388 365 344 325 907 291 275 ' 262 249 237 225 215 306 303 298 274 250 228 208 190 174 160 147 136 126 117 108 101 20LH03 11 20 12000 469 463 458 452 434 414 395 372 352 333 316 299 283 269 255 243 337 333 317 302 280 . 258 238 218 200 184 169 156 143 133 123 114 20LHO4 12 20 14700 574 566 558 528 496 467 440 416 393 372 353 335 318 303 289 275 428 406 386 352 320 291 265 243 1 223 205 189 174 161 149 139 129 20LHO5 14 20 15800 616 609 602 595 571 544 513 484 458 434 411 390 371 353 336 321 459 437 416 1 395 1 366 337 308 281 258 238 219 202 187 173 161 150 20LHO6 15 20 21100 822 791 763 723 679 635 596 560 527 497 469 1444 421 399 379 361 561 521 477 427 386 351 320 292 267 246 226 209 192 178 165 20LH07 17 20 22500 4878 ,845 814 786 760 711 667 627 590 556 526 497 471 447 425 404 647 599 556 518 484 438 398 362 331 303 278 256 236 218 202 187 20LHO8 19 20 23200 '-9T8 873 842 813 785 760 722 687 654 621 588 558 530 503 479 457 669 619 575 536 500 468 428 395 1 365 336 309 285 262 242 225 209 20LH09 21 20 25400 990 953 918 886 856 828 802 778 1 755 1712 673 636 603 572 544 517 _ 729 675 626 581 542 507 475 437 399 366 336 309 285 264 244 227 20LH10 23 20 27400 1068 1028 991 956 924 894 865 839 814 791 748 707 670 636 604 575 786 724 673 626 585 545 510 479 1 448 411 377 346 320 296 1 274 1 254 73 JUIJ I UNUEHS DESIGN GUIDE WEIGHT TABLE FOR JOIST GIRDERS A7- Joist Girder Weight—Pounds Per Linear Foot PANEL POINT LOAD(THE GIRDER SELF-WEIGHT SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE PANEL POINT LOAD) No.of Depth Span Joist !i�) 4K 5K 6K 7K 8K 9K 10K 11K 12K 13K 14K 15K 16K 17K 18K 19K 20K Spaces 20 13 13 14 16 17 20 22 23 25 27 29 30 31 34 36 39 40 3N@6.67' 24 13 14 14 14 15 17 19 21 22 24 25 25 29 29 30 32 33 20'0" 28 13 14 14 14 15 17 17 17 21 22 23 24 24 26 27 30 31 20 14 14 15 17 18 21 23 24 26 28 31 33 34 37 38 41 43 4N@5.0' 24 14 15 15 15 16 18 20 22 23 25 27 28 32' 32 32 34 35 28 14 15 15 15 16 18 18 18 22 23 25 26 26 28 29 32 33 20 17 17 17 18 20 23 24 27 28 30 33 34 39 40 43 46 46 22'0" 4N@5.5' 24 17 17 17 17 18 19 21 23 24 27 29 29 33 34 34 40 40 28 17 17 17 17 17 1 18 19 20 21 24 25 27 28 29 30 34 35 20 15 15 17 19 22 24 26 29 32 34 36 37 41 45 46 49 51 4N@6.0' 24 15 15 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 30 31 33 34 37 38 40 43 28 15 15 15 16 17 18 21 24 24 26 28 29 31 33 34 35 37 24'0" 32 15 15 15 16 16 19 19 22 22 25 25 27 29 30 31 31 34 20 17 18 18 23 26 28 29 33 39 39 42 45 49 52 52 56 60 Il 5N@4.8' 24 17 17 18 19 20 24 26 29 30 34 34 40 40 43 47 47 50 28 17 17 18 18 19 21 24 25 28 29 31 34 35 38 41 41 45 32 18 18 18 18 18 19 20 22 25 26 29 31 32 33 37 37 43 II 20 16 16 18 20 22 25 27 31 32 35 37 39 42 44 46 48 52 4N@6.25' 24 15 15 17 17 20 22 24 26 27 30 32 34 35 38 40 42 45 i- 28 15 15 15 16 18 20 22 23 26 28 28 31 33 34 35 37 39 25'0" 32 15 15 16 16 17 19 20 22 24 25 27 28 29 31 33 34 35 l � 20 18 18 22 25 27 31 33 36 40 43 45 48 52 55 57 60 63 5N@5.0' 24 16 16 19 21 24 26 29 32 34 37 40 41 44 47 50 53 55 28 15 15 17 19 21 24 27 28 31 33 34 38 39 42 44 46 48 32 15 15 16 19 20 22 24 26 28 29 32 34 34 37 40 42 44 t 20 16 16 19 22 24 26 29 32 33 37 39 42 44 47 50 52 53 4N@6.5' 24 15 15 16 19 21 22 25 27 30 32 33 35 38 40 41 43 45 28 15 15 15 17 18 20 23 24 27 28 30 33 33 35 36 38 40 f1 26,0„ 32 15 15 16 16 17 18 20 23 24 26 27 28 31 33 34 35 36 I 20 19 19 21 25 28 31 36 39 42 43 48 50 55 58 61 65 68 5N @ 5.20' 24 16 16 19 22 26 27 31 32 35 38 41 42 46 48 50 53 56 28 15 15 17 19 21 24 27 29 32 33 36 38 40 43 45 47 49 32 15 15 17 19 20 23 24 28 28 31 33 34 36 38 40 43 45 I 20 17 17 20 22 25 29 31 34 37 39 j 44 44 47 50 52 55 58 ` 24 16 16 17 21 22 25 26 29 32 33 35 38 41 43 44 47 49 4N@7.0' 28 15 15 17 17 20 22 24 27 27 30 33 33 36 37 39 42 45 32 15 15 15 17 18 20 22 24 25 27 28 31 33 34 34 37 40 36 16 16 16 16 18 19 20 23 24 25 29 29 29 31 33 34 35 i 20 20 20 24 27 30 36 39 1 42 44 48 52 55 59 62 65 67 70 i 24 18 18 21 23 26 29 32 36 37 41 42 46 49 53 56 58 60 28'0" 5N@5.6' 28 17 17 19 21 23 26 29 31 33 37 37 40 43 45 47 49 51 { 32 16 16 17 19 22 24 27 28 30 33 34 38 38 41 44 46 48 11 36 16 16 16 19 20 23 25 27 28 31 33 33 36 38 41 42 43 f 20 20 23 28 29 35 38 44 47 51 55 58 64 68 73 76 80 85 24 18 19 23 26 29 33 36 39 42 45 52 52 56 59 63 66 74 J 6N@4.67' 28 17 18 20 23 27 29 30 34 39 40 43 47 50 53 57 58 61 S 32 17 18 19 20 24 27 29 31 35 35 41 41 45 49 49 52 55 (. 36 18 18 19 1 19 22 25 26 30 32 32 37 39 43 44 47 50 50 24 18 19 22 25 28 31 34 37 39 42 45 48 52 55 58 61 63 28 17 17 19 22 26 28 31 32 36 37 40 43 46 48 50 54 57 5N@6.0' 32 17 17 17 21 22 25 28 30 32 34 37 38 41 43 45 48 51 36 16 16 18 20 22 23 27 28 31 33 33 35 39 40 42 44 46 ` I 30'0" 40 16 16 17 18 20 24 24 27 29 30 31 34 35 36 41 42 44 11 24 17 20 23 28 32 35 38 41 45 51 52 58 59 65 66 68 76 28 17 18 20 24 27 30 34 39 39 43 46 49 53 56 60 61 6N@5.0' 32 17 18 19 21 25 28 29 33 35 40 40 44 48 50 54 55 68 36 18 18 19 20 24 26 29 30 32 35 38 42 43 46 49 49 40 18 18 19 1 20 21 25 27 30 1 32 33 1 36 38 43 44 45 47 50 24 20 20 24 25 30 33 36 39 42 45 48 52 55 59 63 67 70 28 18 16 21 24 26 30 31 36 37 40 43 46 49 51 54 57 60 5N @ 6.4' 32 17 17 19 21 24 27 30 32 34 36 37 41 43 46 49 52 54 36 16 16 18 20 22 26 28 30 33 33 35 38 39 42 45 47 49 32'0" 40 16 16 18 19 1 22 24 1 26 28 30 32 33 35 39 41 43 44 46 24 22 22 26 30 34 37 42 45 48 52 55 59 63 67 70 76 8o 28 20 20 22 26 30 33 37 40 43 46 49 52 56 60 64 67 69 6N@5.33' 32 19 19 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 47 51 53 56 58 61 36 18 18 20 24 26 29 32 34 37 38 40 43 48 50 51 55 58 + 40 17 17 19 22 25 28 29 32 35 35 39 41 43 46 49 51 53 24 20 20M 29 30 36 39 42 45 48 52 55 61 64 68 71 74 28 20 2024 28 31 33 37 39 42 46 49 49 52 56 60 64. 34'0" 5N@6.8' 32 17 1721 26 28 31 34 36 37 42 43 47 49 50 54 57 36 17 1721 24 26 29 31 32 35 38 40 43 45 48 50 52 40 16 1620 23 26 27 29 32 33 35 38 39 41 44 47 49 Iw'' NOTE:Contact Canam if the panel point load exceeds the table. s` 86 e s _ F � I k i 1 I t PAN Gary Parkinson //Architects February 11, 2005 Mr. Dave Anderson REVISED Building Official RECEIVED City of Arlington 238 N. Olympic Avenue FEB 10 2005, Arlington, WA 98223 RE: Permit Application 04-6204 Gale Insulation COA BUILDING DEPTov—(je;?6�/ Dave, This submittal is intended to answer the comments to your letter dated January 06, 2004. We have made some revisions to the building since your review. The main revision that was made includes the build out and relocation of the entire mezzanine. With this revision,we have included an elevator as well as some minor revisions related to the entry and exiting of the mezzanine. All of the necessary drawings and calculations are included with this submittal for your review. Responses to your comments are as follows: Non-Structural 1. The guardrail in question is at locations where the grade change is less than 30". The design should be acceptable as shown. 2. Notes have been added to the section drawings to reflect this comment. See drawings A5, A6 and A7. 3. The revised plans have no locations on the interior where doors are within 24" of a window, see drawing A3. The safety glazing on the exterior is noted on the exterior elevation drawing A4. 2000 Washington State Non-residential Energy Code 1. This will be taken care of as part of the electrical permit submittal. The electrical subcontractor will handle that submittal. 2. Same as above. Barrier Free Design 1. This note has been added. See drawing A9. 2. This note has been added. See drawing A9. Structural 1. Noted. 2. The mezzanine loading has been revised. See revised structural drawings and calculations. 2812 COLBY AVENUE • EVERETT, WASHINGTON 98201 9 (425) 252-2153 • FAX: (425) 742-8130 • E-MAIL:AdminGGaryParkinson.com � J IcMCA .f 1 � L •■ r NO . _ ■ EMEN 0 NEENom NE 0 `'� ■ Z :� TY ON %, 0 NO JqTL 0 1ILL li M Iiflll' 7� . ■ - — 1 � 7 ?600 NO 0 0 ml _ I••l ■ 0 0 go ■ 1 oil r- - - � ' SOMMENIM ME ` ■ ti ■ 7 ■ - JZY_ `Z' Ilmovow ON 0 _ mommommomm mmol . ION 1.■ 'WIN ■ .6 1 - no E r IN ■ ■ 1 NO 1 ■ 3. Soils report attached. 4. This has been revised with the mezzanine revision. See revised structural drawings and calculations. 5. See revised structural drawings and calculations. Airport Corrections 1. Noted. 2. Noted. 3. Noted. 4. Noted. Fire SQ l 1. The building criteria on drawing Al has been modified to include this information. 2. Noted. 3. Noted. Utilities x 0�4. The area breakdown is as follows. The southern portion of the building will house SL"1 32,500 SF of warehouse and 12,000 SF of office space. The northern portion of the building in intended to house 16,500 SF of warehouse and 6,000 SF of office space. 2. See the attached revised civil drawings. 3. See the attached revised civil drawings. 4. See the attached revised civil drawings. Health Department 1. See the attached revised civil drawings. 2. The fire sprinkler riser and DCDA will be located in the Fire Sprinkler room located in the northwest corner of the building. 3. See the attached revised civil drawings. 4. Noted. 5. Noted. 6. Noted. 7. Noted. 8. Noted. We hope that the above is enough information to satisfy the corrections as noted. Please feel free to give us a call if you need further additional information. Sinter , Adam B. Clark Architect Cc: Ed Thomas—4T Development _ _ ■ ■ ME MIN M6 ma WE go- No :101 so so L — ■ ■ ■ ■ _ _ . _ ■ _ — ■ _ _ ■ — _ ■ ■ _ ■ _ ■ ■ ■ . _ L. 1 ■ , ■ ■ 1 I I . 77 mmoL: Ln rrm ■ i11M ■� -_-_ - I - I ■ ■ _ di I - - - — . � TI ■ ' ■ — ■ — • ■ ■ — — — ■ — — — — :I — _ ■ - I-E 1 _ 1Ell 0 0 mom 0 0 - I 1 %=-mmmIm -L -e-.0-W .0mr3 .p .-.i rMi M .--1 -1 V, 0. OMIE:M 0 0 r6% I - 1� ' ■ . .4-7m MR ■ ■ 1 . . J - � City of Arlington Community Development y 238 N. Olympic Avenue Arlington, WA 98223 frl I N G`S January 6, 2005 RECEIVED ]AN U 7 2005 4 T Development 'MpMcQCUNSI'.,XNG. 13700 44`�' St NE Lake Stevens, Wa 98258 RE: Permit Application 04-6204 Gale Insulation Dear Ed, The submitted drawings have been reviewed for compliance with the 2003 Edition of the International Building Codes. The following applicable code data corrections and/or additional requirements are necessary before the permit can be issued. NONSTRUCTURAL 1. Details 1 and 5 on sheet A8 show a non-complying guardrail at the lower portion of the stairs. This is acceptable if the distance from the grade to the top of the stairs is <=30"maximum distance. 2. The facing of the insulation that is exposed to the interior of the building must have a maximum flame spread rating of 25. 3. Safety glazing is required within 24" of either side of a door. See Detail 4/Al for typical interior glazing. - 2000 WASHINGTON STAT NON-RESIDENTIAL ENERGY CODE 1. For areas using the Component Performance Lighting Option, the designer should provide calculations showing compliance with Section 1531 and Table 15-1. 2. For the exterior lighting, the designer should provide calculations showing that the amount of exterior lighting is within the exterior lighting power allowance per Section 1522 or Section 1532. BARRIER-FREE DESIGN 1. All doors in the building which have a latch set or lock set should have lever-type operating hardware. Building Division 360.403.3431 •_ Planning Division 360.403.3434 • Natural Resources 360.403.3440 • Code Enforcememt 360.403.3457 i 2. Door thresholds should be shown as no higher than %2". The edges should be beveled at 1 vertical: 2 horizontal, with a maximum edge height of/4". STRUCTURAL 1. For your information, "Special Inspection"is required for: a. Steel deck welding b. Concrete'Construction(=>3000 psi) c. Anchor Bolts d. Structural Steel Welding 2. The design storage live load of 125 psf should be posted in the mezzanine area. 3. The design is based on a soil bearing of 2000 psf. You should verify this in the soil,report. 4: Page B-5 of the calculations appears to require 4x4x3/16 TS columns for the braced frames. 5. The footings beneath the braced frame columns at Line 11 should be 6' sq with 7##5 bars each way,top and bottom. AIRPORT 1. Because of the site's proximity to the Airport we require the contractor to supply markings for any tall construction equipment such as cranes that may be used. The markings supplied should be flags, minimum size 3' x 3' in dimension with an international orange and white checkerboard pattern utilizing 1' x V squares. The flags need to be placed on the highest part of the equipment to serve as a visual warning to pilots. Any equipment such as cranes needs to be lowered at night. 2. Because the site is aajacent to the airport -we do have an existing avigation- - easement limiting the height of structures on the property. The FAA based on the following information provided by the developer and/or architect has-approved the Gale Insulation Building. a. Gale Building: Finished Floor Elevation = 130', West End Building Height=26.75' 3. If either the planned finished floor elevation or the planned building height changes for the building as the building.design progresses we need to be notified immediately and the applicant will need to.submit modified 7460 (Notice of Construction) Form to the FAA. 4. Due to the-proximity of the site to the Airport, we do not want any trees planted on the site that exceed a height of 20' at maturity. PLANNING 1. The developer shall pay transportation impact fees to Snohomish County and WSDOT, and the developer shall submit to the City of Arlington proof of payment of the required fees. 2. The developer shall dedicate to the City of Arlington a Critical Area Protection Easement(CAPE)pr the approved mitigation plan by Hydro Terra dated June 25, 2004, received by the City of Arlington on July 7, 2004. the signed CAPE shall be submitted to the City of Arlington to be recorded prior to issuance of a building permit. No development sh-,tll occtir-% FIRE 1. Automatic Fire Sprinkler and Monitoring required. 2. Fire extinguishers will be required. Fire Department will conduct a site visit at time of near completion; final placement and total number will be determined at that time. 3. Knox Box required, contact Fire Department at(360) 403-3607 UTILITIES 1,. The drawings show 2 water meters and that the building is divided into two units. Please provide a breakdown for the square footage and business use per unit for, each meter. 2. The legal description on sheet 1 is incorrect if this building is on lot 1. 3. Sheet 1 note 18 calls for 1 Yz or 2"water service lines. Will you require a 1 1/2 or 2" meter to each unit? 4. Sheet 4 shows a SSMH,-this needs to be shown as a Monitoring MH,per City of Arlington standards, for multiple units. To comply with State"of Washington Health Department regulations you will need to install the type of backflow assemblies required below,and provide the requested information. These comments are for the shell building only. Individual businesses must:go through a Utilities Division review before occupancy will be granted. 1. A Reduced Pressure Backflow Assembly(RPBA) shall be installed per City of Arlington standards immediately after each of the water meters and before any branch connections; provide sufficient freeze protection. Alternatively, the RPBA may be installed inside,the building in a mechanical room if adequate room is provided for testing, maintenance, repair, and drainage (see spacing requirements for the vault installation). If branch connections are present between the water 1 I meter and the RPBA they must have a backflow preventer installed; the City of Arlington Water Department will determine the type of backflow preventer needed for the commensurate degree of hazard. 2. For a fire sprinkler system with chemical addition install a Reduced Pressure Detector Assembly (RPDA). For a fire system without chemical addition install a Double Check Detector Assembly(DCDA). You may install the DCDA or RPDA in a vault outside per City of Arlington Standard, or inside the mechanical room if adequate space is provided for testing, maintenance and repair. 3. For an irrigation system a separate metered service must be installed. A Double Check Valve assembly (DCVA) shall be installed after the meter per City of Arlington standards W-13. Please state the size of meter required. 4. All the backflow assemblies shall appear on the State of Washington Department of Health list of approved assembly. 5. All the backflow assemblies sha l be bested by a State of Washington certified Backflow Assembly Tester, at owner's expenses. 6. The City of Arlington Water Department shall inspect the backflow assemblies after they have been tested. Provide a copy of the test report prior to calling for inspection. 7. Call for inspection at the following points of construction. a. Prior to covering interior piping.. b. Prior to covering underground piping. c. Prior to requesting final inspection by the Building Department. 8. Applicant must complete and return a City of Arlington Cross Connection Survey and Industrial/Commercial Waste Discharge Permit Applications. The drawings should be revised to indicate the revisions by showing the revisions by a cloud on the drawings along with a written narrative indicating the specific locations of the corrections and/or revisions. 8 complete sets of drawings and/or calculations are required at the time of re-submittal. If you have any question please give me a call. T a k you, dol avid W. Anderson Building Official 360.403.3432 danderson@ci.arlington.wa.us �y�� Wff �1�a,� �; ,�� �Irj/J'':i� ��r� �Pr� Fe16-10-05 04:20pm From-THOMCO CONSTRUCTION 4253779185 T-833 P 02/17 F-901 Western Geotechnical Cousultants, Inc. 4183 Saltsprings Dr.,Ferndale,WA 98248 Phone/FAX(360)380-2507 February 5, 2004 Thoraco Construction, Inc. 13700—44`h St. NE Lake Stevens, WA 98258 ATTN- Mr. Edmund Thomas Re: Report—Geotechnical Investigation Cornehl Property Thomeo Commercial&Lipt Industrial Site SW of Intersection of 172° St.NE and 67`h Ave.NE Snohomish County,WA western Geotechnicat Consultants,Inc. is pleased to present me results of our geotechnical engineering investigation conducted at the above referenced property. On January 29, 2004&geotechnical engineer from our firm oversaw the excavation of 7 test pits at the approximate locations shown on the attached Site Plan,Figure 1. Our site investigation was supplemented with subsurface soil and groundwater information developed by Cascade Surveying and Engineering, Inc_ and a site plan with a proposed 59,000 square foot concrete tilt-up building footprint(2 phases), developed by Gary Parkinson Architects, dated October 15,2003. The site is made up of two rectangular portions, one to be developed as three commercial lots and the other to be developed with a 2-story concrete tilt-up building and two light industrial lots (see Figure 1). Stormwater generated on the site will be controlled with detention/infiltration facilities if favorable site conditions are present. The purpose of our investigation was to characterize and evaluate subsurface soil and groundwater conditions at the site with respect to stormwater control,foundation design for the proposed concrete tilt-up building,and other geotechnical issues affecting the proposed development. The specific scope of our investigation for the site included the following services: • Excavating a total of 7 test pits at the site to obtain representative subsurface soil and groundwater information and to obtain soil samples to characterize the site. Piezometers were installed in all of the test pits for future groundwater monitoring. • Developing tabulated logs for each test pit as ro the thickness and depth of each soil unit and describing the soils encountered in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS)_ I * Performing field and laboratory testing, as required,for use in our engineering evaluation of the site. i Fab-10-05 04:20pm From-THOMCO CONSTRUCTION 4253779135 T-833 P.03/17 F-901 WFSTERN GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS.INC. (;eota hnual Investig:g,on 004 I4! Tnvmco Construedon,Inc..Cornehl PropertY �^ SW of lnrenccaon of 172"4 St NE and 67"'Ave.NE Snohomish Co.,WA Februtuy 5.2004 (page 2 of 16) Preparing an engineering report including a summary of work performed, a description of the subsurface conditions encountered, and our recommendations for: Stormwater detention design parameter information. General site development criteria including stripping and grubbing recommendations. Cutting and structural fill criteria including the suitability of on site materials for use as structural fill. • Drainage considerations. . Recommendations for groundwater monitoring. ISite Conditions I Surface Conditions The site is an irregular shaped parcel compos+ld of 2 rectangular pieces(see Figure 1). The property is relatively flat pasrure land that is for the most part grass covered- The I property is approximately 9.68 acres in size with the three commercial sites occupying 2.75 acres of the property and the two light industrial sites and concrete tilt up building occupying the remainder of the site. I Subsurface Conditions 29,2004 Subsurface soil and groundwater conditions at the site were explored on January Iusing a rubber fire mounted,4-wheel drive John Deer 310-1�backhoe with a 1-1/2-wide bucket. A total of 7 test pits were excavated to a maximum depth of S.Q feet.The locations of the test pits are shown on the attached Site Plan,Figure l- A Geotechnical Engineer from our office continuously logged and classified the soils encountered in the test pits using the Unified Soils Classification System(USCS),and the obtained representative soil samples for further analyses and testing. Edited,tabulated test pit logs are included with This report along with a USCS Chart explaining soil descriptions. The test pits were loosely baclt#"illed upon completion of the explorations. Our subsurface investigation revealed a relatively similar subsurface soil profile across the property. The subsurface profile consists of about a foot of sandy organic rich SILT I to silty SAND and roots (OLLSM by USCS) (topsoil), which is underlain by 1b to 2 feet of slightly silty fine to medium SAND (SP/SM by USCS):This soil unit is underlain by fine to medium SAND and gravelly fine to coarse SAND (SP by USCS). The USDA"Soil Conservation Service(SCS)"Soil Survey of Snohomish County Area, Washington"has mapped Norma loam across the site. Norma loam is very deep poorly drained soil located in depressional areas on outwash plains and fill plains. Norma soils are classified in Hydrologic Group D. The near surface soils encountered in our test pits are consistent with the SCS soil description loam. Fab-10-05 04:21pm From-THOMCO CONSTRUCTION 4253779135 T-833 P.04/17 F-901 IWESTEpN G1=0TECHN1CAl-CONSULTANTS,INC. Geotaclimcal investigation iiO4 141 T OOTWo consuvct,on,lac •CQntohl Yroperty SW of intersection of 172"0 St.NI3 and 67`'Ave NE Snoltonuslt Co.,WA Fedrum-Y 5,2004 (page 3 of 16) Groun dwaterng from 2 to 7- Groundwater seepage was encountered in a1129 the Lestpits iezometers Wer t installed in all feet at the time of our investigation (JanuaryiezOme of the test pits and on 02/04/04 the a water toble was test pit melogasure Thelwat r�tablepwill be ters at 2.45' to 5.91'below the ground surface monitored throughout the winter season documented undeeterrriine the r eparate report-th of tile � high water I table. Water level measurements Conclusions and Recommendations General The plan is to develop the site with a 1 to 2 story,tilt-up concrete buildi5 o and ev lop liater ght industrial properties and 3 commercial5utheastasegment of hees sites (see tproperly. Our investigation control facilities are planned for the focused on obtaining soil and groundwater information across the site to aid in sonnwater control facility design,foundation design,and general site development. for Conventional shallow spread and continuous footings will provide adequatepp the proposed concrete building as detailed below_ lnfiltration is Group D. We The SCS has classified the site soils to Hydrologic as belonging g p recommend that the ptezomett:rs be monitored arauon an be n�i wined o allow for seasonal high water table and to determine of adequatep infiltration of storMwater. oundation 5u on for the Concrete Tilt-u Bu 1dinQ technical investigation, the site is suitable for foundation Pried on the results of our geo support using conventional shallow spread footings founded on compact, undisturbed native, non-organic sandy and/or slightly silty sandy soils(SP and Sp/SM by USCS), or on structural fill (defined below in General pevelo meat Recommendations). Bearing soil that is disturbed during foundation excavation should be re compacted or removed and replaced with structural fill. Wall footings and column footings should have re final grade for frost protec ion be ounded a minimum dimensions of 18 and 24 inches, minimum of 18 inches below the lowest adjacentr All footings supported on the properly prepared,compact native non-organic soils (SP and SP/SM by USCS), or imported structural fill, may be proportioned using a net allowable bearing pressure of 2,000 pounds per square foot (PSF). The term net allowable bearing pressure refers to the pressure that can be imposed on the soil at foundation level due to the total f all dead footing, live loads, exclusive of the weight of the footing or any backfill placed above 1 I Feb-10-05 04:21pm From-THOMCO CONSTRUCTION 4253779135 T-833 P 05/17 F-901 WESTERN GEOTECHMCAt-CONSULTANTS,TNCt G.,ot.0,11cal Investiganon Thomco Construction.Inc. C4rnGttl proPcrty Sw of Inters8ction of 172'"'St.NE and 67'"A%e NE Snot►omtstt Co.,WA February 5,2W4 (page 4 of if)) This bearing pressure may be increased by a value of one-third for transient wind or S if significant structural fill will be used to raise grade,t ae e10°echn cal wable seismic loading. g bearing pressure could possibly be increased,subject to re-evaluation y $ engineer ed Inspection of the foundation excavations by a geO1�rif c that foundatioal engineer n soils remld be ain in p a for footings. This is necessary to Y prior to foiiriinD stiff to very stiff state throughout the foundation level, and to verify that foundation soil is in an undisturbed state. e and bearing Settlement of spread footing foundations depends all ch he foundation iz underlying pressure as well as the strength a P bearing soils. is accomplished as recommended above and for the loads Assuming constniction anticipated, we estimate total settlement of the foundation should be less than about one inch and differential settlement bemen[es[imateacMo[ of the eril load settlem ring ll should should be less than about half the total take place relatively rapidly during consiru eotechnition as �aldenginees are P to confirm thaturttd that footing excavations be observed by a g design assumptions are met- General evelo merit Recommendatio s be suitable for Based on our site investigation, We development planned from a g concl�uderh rov deg our recommendationst are a eotechntcstandpoint, w spread followed and good consuucti°ri practices e used.o Conventional sedconcrete tilt-p building should provide adequate foundation support f P P and we anticipate that buildings on the commerci ati and i l light ind are s ial Prop mall if supported on shallowtes,once can be footings provided the f relatively heavy foundation loads are planned eos aril is the boring building loads and locations are known, we recommend that a site p b investigations or additional test pits be excavated to provide information for development of foundation recommendations far heavy structures. t Site Pre oration: All topsoil, organics, soft material,and any other deleterious materials must be striped away from the areas to associated development improvements oJhe och defined d by e proposed structures asthose areas thatwill aupPon e result- of our subsurface vestigation we buildings, parking lots,etc. epth Based on ll be about I foot. It should be verified thatll organic i estimate that thestripping mateals are reimoved during sniping of the site- or other unsuitable 1 F6-10-05 04:21pm From-THOMCO CONSTRUCTION 4253779135 T-933 P.06/17 F-901 Gaotechnical Invesaga{ion WEs7'ERN GPOTF-CIJNICAL CONSULTANT'S.INC Thotneo Consuvedon,htc -Comehl Property #04 14 1 Sw of Intersecnon of t72"°St NP and 67`"Am NF- 5nononustl Co..WA Februa y 5,2004 (Page 5 of 16) The soils below the stripping depth should exhibit no significant shrinkage or swelling with seasonal changes in moisture content. However, the silty sandy soils near the Surface are moisture sensitive and could soften when wet and become disturbed by construction equipment. Therefore,earthwork operations will be easier and less costly if performed during the dry season_ Structural Fill and Compaction: It is possible that structural fill will be required to raise grade. Structural fill is defined as fill supporting buildings,sidewalks,driveways,etc.All structural fill used to replace unsuitable soils or to raise the site grade should be placed and compacted on a horizontal subgrade surface. Structural fill should extend beyond the edge of building foundations a distance equal to the Thickness of the fill beneath the foundation. In general,the suitability of a soil for use as compacted structural fill depends on the gradation and moisture content of the soil when 1t is placed. As the quantity of fines(that porTion finer than the No. 200 sieve)increases,the soils become increasingly sensitive to small changes in moisture content and adequate compaction becomes more difficult to achieve. Soils containing more than about 516 fines cannot be consistently compacted to a dense,noii-yielding condition when the water content is much greater than optimum. Optimum moisture content is the moisture content that results in the greatest dry density_ The on-site sandy and gravelly soils located below 2 to 3 feet will make acceptable structural fill and the overlying silty sated soils could be used as structural fill provided the moisture content is carefully controlled. If for any teason it is necessary to use import structural fill,the structural fill should consist of relatively clean sandy GRAVEL with less than 5%fines (GW by Unified Soils Classification System(USCS). Fill should be placed in maximum 8-to 10-inch loose,horizontal lifts and be thoroughly compacted. Under all building foundations, structural fill should be compacted to a minimum of 95% of maximum dry density as determined by the ASTM D-1557 test procedure. Under parking lots and drive areas,the structural fill should be compacted to a minimum of 921,lo,except for the top 2-feet, which should meet the minimum of 95% criteria. 1 1 i { �i I rob-10-05 04:22pm From-THOMCO CONSTRUCTION 4253779135 T-833 P 07/17 F-901 Geotechpical investigation WESTFRN GEOTECFiNiCAL CONSULTANTS.INC. Tnomco Construction,lnC.-Comeh1 Properly 604 14 1 SW of intersection of 172nd St NE and bV Ave NE Snonurnish Co,wA Fc1)rw4ry 5,2004 (Page 6 of Ib) Floor Slab Support We have assumed that the concrete tilt-up building will have an earth supported floor slab. Preparation of the building areas in a manner described in the previous sections of this report should provide an adequate base for the floor slab support. We recommend that all earth-supported floor slabs be underlain by a minimum of four inches of sand or clean crushed gravel, which will act as a capillary break to prevent moisture wicking to the slab. A vapor barrier, consisting of polyethylene f sheeting, may be placed below the floor slab. t If a vapor barrier is used,it should be covered with a thin layer of clean sand or crushed gravel to protect it during concrete placement and to aid in concrete curing. After the sand or crushed gravel layer is placed, it should be maintained in a relatively dry t condition. Drainaae and Grading_Considerations: We recommend that footing drains be placed around the perimeter of building foundations. The drains should be placed below the base of all foundations. The drains typically consist of a 4-inch diameter perforated pipe p surrounded by washed rock. The footing drains should discharge to the storm drainage system for the property. Roof drainage should be discharged by separate tightline and not be introduced into the footing drain system. The ground surface around buildings should be graded so that storm water I,. runoff is directed away from buildings and foundations. Groundwater Monitoring: We recommend that the piezometers installed in the test pits be monitored throughout the winter months SO as to determine the seasonal high water table on the property. Western Geotechnical Consultants,Inc. will be pleased to provide groundwater monitoring services for the project. Erosion Control Erosion control during construction of the proposed development can be accomplished through placement of proper sedimentation control facilities. We recommend siltation control facilities, consisting of either hay bales or silt fences,be fabricated around the construction area. Typical details for siltation control using either hay bales or silt fences are attached to this report. Siltation devices should be placed downgradient of all construction areas and cleared areas to provide siltation control during construction. All siltation control devices should be maintained during construction,and left in operable condition until the site has been revegetated and siltation.is no longer a threat_ At that time the siltation facilities should be removed. �- I Feb-10-05 04:22pm From-THOMCO CONSTRUCTION 4253779135 T-833 P 08/17 F-901 GeoEachnicai Investigation WESTERN GEOTECtiN1CAL CONSULTANTS,INC Thomco Construction,Inc.-corneh)property #04 14 t Sw of intersection of 172"°St NE and 67'"Ave.ICE Snohomish Co.,WA FCpruary 5.2004 (Page 7 of 16) Closure This report is intended for use by the owner or his representative in the development of the Cornehl property located to the southwest of the intersection of 172i° St. NE and 67"' Ave. NE in Snohomish County,Washington. This report should not be used for any other purposes or other project sites without the specific consent of Western Geotechnical Consultants,Inc. Our test pit logs show subsurface conditions at the dates and locations indicated. The analysis,conclusions, and recommendations contained in our report are based on site conditions to the limited depth of our test pits at the time of our investigation. We assume that the exploratory test pits are representative of the subsurface conditions throughout the site. If during construction,different subsurface conditions from those encountered during our explorations are observed or appear to be present in excavations, we must be advised promptly so that we can review these conditions and reconsider and/or modify our recommendations and conclusions where necessary. We appreciate the opportunity to be of assistance to you on this project. if you have any questions regarding the contents of this report, or if we can be of further assistance, please contact our office. Sincerely, Western Geotechnical Consultants,Inc. Theodore A. Hammer, P.E. Geotechnical Engineer Attachments. Figure 1, Site Plan and Test Pit Locations Unified Soil Classification Chart Tabulated Test Pit Logs �a Typical Erosion Control Facilities Fi1e-04 14 1 I 1 F,eb-10-05 04:23pm From-THOMCO CONSTRUCTION 4253779135 T-833 P.09/17 F-901 �g } Gootecnnicat Wwsdgadon WMERN GBOTPCIiNICAL CONSUI-TANTS,INC Tbornco Construction,Inc.-Cornehl Property 904141 SW of Inrersection of 172"°St.NE ma 67`'Ave NF Snonorrush Co.,WA February S,2004 (Page S of 16) Figure 1 Site Plan & Vest Pit Locations Cornel Property Thomco Commercial & Light Industrial Site Snohomish Co., WA Tf I - l --r'- - n I, f I i i 'Feb-10-05 04:23pm From—THOMCO CONSTRUCTION 4253779135 T-833 P 10/17 F-901 Geozeehnical Investiigaiof� WESTERN GEOTECHNICAI_CONSULTANTS.INC. Thomco Cons[ramon,Inc -Camcw Property #04 14 1 SW of imcrsawn of 172"St.NE and 67'"Ave NE Snohom,sh Cc,WA Fcbruary 5,20114 (Page 9 of 1 6) USCS ClassiflGation Chart & Key to Test Pit Logs 8 d E c C� a Fn4 J EA1 r V"" o $ v 4 a Chu 4V = 07 V, O / 0 O k x34ni A.L1=V10 h i SURs olnlq�-9hN.� �s O � QN' nou,nu�sni wolwoan eoe aaS Alai C7 lip # � u o w L) �s E Ar 7-1 g s ps O a W - -� J I I Feb-10-05 04:23pm From-THOMCO CONSTRUCTION 4253779135 T-833 P 11/17 F-901 i Gcolechnical Investigation WESTERN GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS,INC. Thomeo Construction,lqc.-Cornetii Properry #04 14 1 SW of lnmrsecrion of 172"°St.NE and 67fA Ave.NE Snohomish Co.,WA February 5,2004 (Page 10 of 16) Log of Test Pit File:04.14.1 Test Depth USCS Soil Description Sample Water Pocket Pit Interval Class. No_1 Content Pen. No. (feet) Depth (%) (Kg/sq. (feet) cm) i TP- 0.0-1.0 OL/SM Brown Sandy organic SILT I to silty SAND with numeroas roars (wet, soft) (ra soil) 1.0-2.4 SP/SM Orange brown mortled 1-111.5' 21.8% slightly silty to silty fine to ! medium SAND (very moist,relatively com act) 2,4-5.5 SP Gray fine to medium 1-2/4.0' 8.8% # SAND,trace gravel (moist, relatives com act) 5,5-8,0 SP Gray gravelly fine to coarse 1-317.0' 17.6 SAND (gravel is rounded, 3 " minus)(moist grading wet, relatively compact) • Test Pit terminated on 01/29/04 at 8.0 feet • Test Pit backfilled upon completion • Pimomewr installed to full deprh • Groundwater seepage encountered at 7 feet. Piezometric surface measured at 5.9l'below ground surface on 02/04/04. I � I I, I� Feb-10-05 04:23pm From-THOMCO CONSTRUCTION 4253779135 T-833 P 12/17 F-901 A Ga4trchnicul Invcstigaijon WESTERN GEOTECtiNICAL CONSiJLTANTS,INC Thoinco Construcuon,Inc.-Cornchl Propeny 904 14 1 p"3 SW of Intersection of 172"°St.NE and 67"Avc.NE li Sn01300usll Co„WA Fcbmary 5,2004 (Page 11 of 16) Log of Test Pit N-14.1 Test Depth USCS Soil Description Sample Water Pocket Pit Interval Class- No./ Content Pen. No. (feet) Depth (%p) (Kg/sq. (feet) cm) TP- 0-0-1-3 OL/SM Brown sandy organic SILT 2 to silty SAND With �— numerous Toots (wet, soft) (topsoil) 1.3-2.3 SP/SM Orange brown mottled 2-1/2.0' 31.3% slightly silty to silty fine to _ medium SAND (very wet, relatively compact) 2.3-5.3 SP Gray fine to medium 2-2/4.0' 25.5% SAND, trace gravel (wet grading saturated,relatively compact) (see a e at 4 ft.) 5.3-7.0 SP Gray gravelly fine to coarse 2-3/6.8' 22.7% SAND (gravel is rounded 3 "minus) (saturated, relatively compact) (strong see age at&5-ft., caving) _ • Test Pit terminated on 01/29/04 at TO feet • Test Pit backfilled upon completion • Piezometer installed to full depth • Groundwater seepage encountered at 4-feet(strong seepage at 6.5 feet, r caving). Piezometric surface measured at 3.45'below ground surface on 02104/04, t_ i- �� I I I 5eb-10-05 04:24pm From-THOMCO CONSTRUCTION 4253779135 T-833 P 13/17 F-901 6 Owtccnnical Inves4garjon WFSTERN GEOTFCHNICAL CONSULTANTS,INC. Thomco Comucoon,Inc,-Comehl properry 99 141 'j 5W of Imenuaon of I72n°St.NE and 67"Ave.NJI2 `E I Snonomisn Co,WA ' February 5,2004 (Page 12 of 16) �l Log Of Test Pit RIt:04-14-1 Test Depth 1JS -p CS Sail Description Sample Water Pocket Pit Interval Class. No./ Content Pen. No- (feet) Depth (%) (Kg/sq. (feet) cm) TP- 0.0-1.2 OIJSM. Brown sandy organic SILT 3-1/0.6' 34.1% 3 to silty SAND with numerous roots (wet, soft) (topsoil) 1.2-1.8 SP/SM Orange brown mottled slightly silty to silty fine to medium SAND(very moist,relatively compact) 1-8-5.7 SP Gray fine to medium 3-2/4.0' 24.7% SAND, trace gravel (very moist grading saturated, relatively compact)(seepage at 3.8-ft.) 5.7-7.2 SP Gray gravelly fine to coarse 3-3/7.0' 26.4% SAND (gravel is rounded, 3 "minus) (saturated, relatively compact) (Seepage& Caving at 6-ft,, heavy seepage&caving at 7-ft.) • Test Pit terminated on 01/29/04 at 7.2 feet • Test Pit backfilled upon completion • Pi,ezometer installed to full depth + Groundwater seepage encountered at 3.8 feet(heavy seepage&caving from 6 feet), Piezornetric surface measured at 3.24'below ground surface on 02/04/04, Feb-10-05 04:24pm From-THOMCO CONSTRUCTION 4253779135 T-833 P.14/17 F-901 Geole0nlcal Investigation WESTERN GEOTECHNICAI_CONSULTANTS.INC T7iomao Con MCt1On,Inc.-CornchI Propeny -904 14 1 SW of Intersection of 172ntl St_NE and 67'n Ave NE Snohom,sh Co.,WA Feprusry 5,2004 (Page 13 of 16) it ij Log of Test Pit FAA:04-14-I Test Depth USCS Soil Description Sample Water Pocket Pit Interval Class, No./ Content Pen. No_ (feet) Depth M) (Kg/sq- (feet) cm) TP- 0.0-1.0 aUSM Brown sandy organic SILT 4 to silty SAND with numerous roots (wet, soft) (topsoil) 1.0-32 SP/SM Orange brown mortled 4-1/2.0' 20.2%n slightly silty to silty fine to medium SAND (very moist,relatively compact) a 3.2-6.2 SP Gray fine to medium 4-2/4.8' 37.2% SAND,trace gravel (wet grading saturated,relatively compact) (slightly silty fine sand lense at 5,5-ft_ (SP/SM)) (seepage @ 6-ft.) 6,2-7.5 SP Gray gravelly fine to coarse 4-3/7.0' 20.1% SAND (gravel is rounded, 3 " minus) (wet grading saturated,relatively compact) (seepage& cavity at 7-ft.) r • Test Pit terminated on 01/29/04 at 7.5 feet • Test Pit backfilled upon completion o Piezometer installed to full depth • Groundwater seepage encountered at 6.0 feet (seepage & caving @ 7-feet). Piezometric surface measured at 5.17'below ground surface on 02/04/04. I F6-10-05 04:24pm From-THOMCO CONSTRUCTION 4253779135 T-933 P 15/17 F-901 Gco=llnical invemigarion WESTERN GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS,INC. Thomco Consirucuon,Inc.-Cornehl Propeny OF04 14 1 SW of lnterseccion of 172'0 Sr NE and 67"'Ave NE SnohomfSh Co.,WA February 5,2004 (Page 14 of 16) Log of Test Pit File:u4-14-1 Test Depth USCS Soil Description Sample Water Pocket Pit Interval Class_ No./ Content Pen. No. (feet) Depth (%) (Kg/sg (feet) cm) TP- 0.0-0.9 OL/SM Brown sandy organic SILT 5 to silty SAND with numerous mots (wet, soft) F--- - (to soil) 0.9-2.3 SEISM Orange brown mottled I slightly silty to Silty tine to medium SAND (wet grading saturated,relatively {-- compact)(Slight seepage @ 2-ft.) 2.3-3.2 SP Gray fine to medium. 5-1/3.5' 19.9% SAND,trace gravel (very moist grading wet, relatively compact) (seepage at WT.,heavy caving) 3.2-4.8 SP Gray gravelly fine to coarse 5-2/4.5' 20.1%p SAND (gravel is rounded,3 minus)(wet grading saturated,relatively r, compact) (strong seepage at 3.8-ft_) • Test Pit terminated on 01/29/04 at 4.8 feet due to heavy caving • Test Pit backfilled upon completion • Piezometer installed to full depth « Groundwater seepage encountered at 2 feet(seepage&caving from 3-feet). ' Piezometric surface measured at 2.45'below ground surface on 02/04/04. . .1 t aT. x Feb-10-05 04:24pm From-THOMCO CONSTRUCTION 4253779135 T-633 P 16/17 F-901 Gocivchnical Invesiiganon WESTERN GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS.INC. Thornco Construction,Inc -Cornehl Properly #Oa 14 1 " 5W of Intcrsccnon of 172"0 SG NF-and 67"`Avc,NE Snohom,sh Co-,WA Fepruary 5,2004 (Page 15 of 16) Log of Test Pit Fdc:04.14.1 Test Depth USCS Soil Description Sample Water Pocket Pit Interval Class. No./ Content Pen. No_ (feet) Depth {%) (Kg/sq. (feet) cm) TP- 0.0-1.2 OL.JSM, Brown sandy organic SILT 6 to silty SAND with numerous roots(wet, soft) (t soil) 1.2-32 SP/Slv1 Orange brown mottled 6-1/2.0' 21.8% ' slightly silty to silty fine to medium SAND(very moist,relatively compact) 3.24L SP Gray fine to medium 6-2/3.8' 13_5% SAND, trace gravel (moist grading saturated,relatively compact) (seepage at 4-ft., cavin ) 4.0-6.0 SP Gray gravelly fine to coarse 6-3/5_5' 23.197b SAND (gravel is rounded, 3 " minus)(saturated, relatively compact) (gravelly at 6 ft.,heavy seepage&caving) • Test Pit terminated on 01/29/04 at&0 feet • Test Pit backfilled upon completion 9 Piezometer installed to full depth • Groundwater seepage encountered at 4.0 feet , caving from 4-feet. Piezornetric surface treasured at 2.56'below ground surface on 02/04/04_ I l Feb-10-05 04:25pm From-THOMCO CONSTRUCTION 4258779135 T-883 P.17/17 F-901 Geotechnical Inves[igaiion WESTERN GFOTBCHN1Cg1_CONSULTANTS.INC. y Tnomco Construction,Inc.-Cornehl Property #04 14 1 SW of intersection of 172n4 St NE and 67"'Avc NE Snohomish Co.,WA February 5,2004 (Page 16 of 16) Log of Test Pit Pile 04-14-1 Test iepth USCS Soil Description Sample Water Pocket Pit Interval Class. No./ Content Pen. No, (feet) Depth (%) (Kg/sq. (feet) cm) TP- 60-1.1 GL/SM gown sandy organic SILT 7 to silty SAND with numerous roots (wet, soft) (Topsail) 1.1-10 SP/SM Grange brown mottled slightly silty to silty fine to medium SAND(very moist,relatively com act) 2-0-4.4 SP Gray fine to medium, 7-1/2-5' 19.2% SAND, trace gravel(wet, 7-2/4.4' 18.5% relatively compact) 4.4-6.5 SP Gray gravelly fine to coarse 7-315.8' 17.1% SAND (gravel is rounded, 3 " minus) (wet grading saturated,reladvely compact) (seepage at 6-ft.,caving) • Test Pit terminated on 01/29/04 at 6-5 feet • Test Pit bacicftlled upon completion • Piezometer installed to full depth • Groundwater seepage encountered at 6-feet(caving). Piezometric surface measured at 4-17'below ground surface on 02/04/04. ti I 1T Y �A, City of Arlington (itt Community Development N G�0 Building Division Memorandum Date: January 11, 2006 To: Roxanne Guenzler CC: From: David W. Anderson Subject: Four T Developmen Building Permit Refund. Permit Number 05-6428 does not require a refund as the permit has been voided and no monies has exchanged. Permit Number 04-6204 was issued in error and a refund for the following refund amount is due. Valuation $5,282,130 Permit Fee $23,448.25 Plan Check Fee $15241.36 The correct fee structure is as follows Valuation $4, 915,460 Permit $21,980.25 Plan check Fee $14,287.16 A refund should be issued for the following accounts Permit Fee 001.322.10.00 $1,468.00 Plan Check 001.345.83.00 $ 954.14 r, .: �: .. . . i (xp.)868I-£-6L (S'Z6) ♦ (atrorld)t00L-£bL 71086 VAl ` O-0 IM 'ZJ MnS `pn18 Vd-ID IM 00£91 'I tOOZ-LO-01 8Z0-to 'ON loafoad S3UldX 1 •l YL dh,�o�,�d 1���lurgnS �1ur.�ad soy Y���� .Io f f�. suozlvinolvD 1minjon.ijS 1 80103dSNl nNICIlif1f3 3H1 al7', . 1 ) Ot'-r 31 -4 v 'd�l HN QAIJ(l uf6 S DZrl juauudolanaQ If uoijuinsul alums sd3a IVIa ins Voo r1 +r00Z 100 a3AI3038 JNIU33NI9N3 ` VIor 01 N I NSt]}I1�E�: I I I f I I ,:. _� i� i *� GALE INSULATION 4T DEVELOPMENT, LLC KE Job. No. 04—028 STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS INDEX Sheet i Material Specifications 01 1 Design Criteria 02 1 Roof Framing A2—A5 i Mezzanine Design B 1 —B9 I Foundation Cl —C3 Concrete Tilt-Up Panels D 1 —D71 Lateral Design E 1 —E 10 Canopies F 1 —F3 1 .l J J J � J J J J UKOSNIK Project Name: Gale Insulation ENGINEERING Project No.: 04.028 CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Date: 9i1412004 Sheet No.: 1 MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS STRUCTURAL STEEL Wide Flange Shapes ASTM A992 FY= 50 ksi Structural Angles, Plates, Bars&Miscellaneous ASTM A36 FY= 36 ksi Tubular Steel Columns ASTM A500 Grade B FY= 46 ksi Round Pipe Columns ASTM A53 Grade B FY= 35 ksi Roof Deck, 1 1/2 in. B Deck ASTM A653, SS Gr. 33 FY= 33 ksi Bolts ASTM A307 F,= 20 ksi Anchor Bolts ASTM F1554 Grade 36 Ft= 20 ksi Bolts (as noted on the plans) ASTM A325N Ft= 44 ksi 1 CONCRETE Footings(Design) 1 '�= 2500 psi Footings(Material) F'c= 3000 psi REINFORCING STEEL 1 #5& Larger ASTM A615 Gr. 60 FY= 60 ksi f #4&Smaller ASTM A615 Gr.40 Fy- 40 ksi Welded Wire Fabric ASTM A-185 FOUNDATION 1 Sand, Silty Sand,Clayey Sand,Silty Gravel or Clayey Gravel q= 2000 psf Soil Report By Western Geotechnical Consultants, Inc.#04141 dated 2/5/2004 j j i i 1 I Y q Specs,04.020 Design Loads-v2.4 IBC.xIs UKOSNIK Project Name: Gale Insulation ENGINEERING Project No.: 04.028 CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Date: 9/2104 Sheet No.: 2 DESIGN CRITERIA: International Building Code,2003 Edition Live Loads: Roof Live Load = 20 psf Ponding = No Floor Live Load = 50 psf Storage= 125 psf Corridors, Exits= 100 psf Snow Loads: Ground Snow Load, pf= 25 psf Ce= 1.0 Ct= 1.00 All Other Structures I = 1.0 Flat Roof Snow Load= 25.0 psf (%Included with Seismic,IBC Section 1617.5 1,¶4,ASCE 7-02 Section 9 Drifting Considered: N Snow drifting per Code: IBC Rain Surcharg: Wind: 85 mph, Exposure B Method: Simplified PS = a,I. PS30 h = 32 ft. I, = 1.00 X= 1 [Table 1609.6.2.1(4)] PS30 = 11.5 psf Ps3o uplift= 13.8 psf [Table 1609.6.2.1(1)] PS = 11.5 psf P s uplift= 13.8 psf Seismic: Seismic Use Group: 1 Importance Factor, /E 1.00 Latitude: 48.19575 Longitude: -122.12271 SS= 1.142 S, = 0.321 Sms= Fa Ss= 1.188 Site Class: D Sms = Fv S, = 0.565 Fa= 1.04 SDs= 2/3 Sms = 0,792 Fv= 1.76 SD1 = 2/3 Smt = 0.377 Seismic Design Category: For SDs = 0.792 SDC = D For SD1 = 0.377 SDC = D Simplified Analysis: V= (1.2SDs)W/R= 0.211 W R= 4.5 Use V= V/1.4 = 0.151 W (ASD) Design Loads, 04 028 Design Loads-v2 4 IBC.As E.RKOSNIK Project Name. Gale Insulation ENGINEERING Project No.: 04.028 CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Date: 9i2iO4 Sheet No.: 1 Gravity Loads Dead Loads: Roof Loads Decking/ Item Sheathing Joists Beams Girders Roofing 2.0 Decking 2.1 Insulation 0.5 Sprinklers 1.5 Ceiling 1.8 Joists 2.2 Girders 0.5 Mechanical 0.5 Miscellaneous 0.9 Ii 1 Total: 4.6 6.9 0.5 Accumulative Total: 4.6 11.5 11.5 12.0 i i i i J Roof Loads,04 028 Design Loads-v2.4 IBC As tl T. Project:_ KOSNIK ' ENGINEERING CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Job No: O ®a-v Date ht a Z o 0 0 41-11 I �1 1 . 1 is II Z J �1 1Ir l Project: rf 4 KOSNIK ENGINEERING iCONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Job No: '2 4- 02-o Date�2 p ¢Sht �13 I ` l bf IZ 17 !� 'zt a3 I II' �,' Sra Srti s--4 1 Y hg- � � f 1 0 l � CZ = = 2 Zs0 VIJ.- �,n �/ C-z.�a� 1 c, v 11 O s� 1 fob k = ? LPL _ � � so PT;i E KOSNIK Project: I ®Ils ENGINEERING CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Job No: Da'-y'tw Date �� 1�'j o $ht ✓� I s s 12-4 IL- 13 I z I0.c I _ 1 _ 1 :l ,� KOSNIK Project: � r ld'L ENGINEERING CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Job No: o4-UZ v Date �- 14- $ht L1 1 -t0 Ct rz,iD S -z-2- Tv .-� 1 KOSNIK Project: .5� ENGINEERING CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Job No: oN. b"yz'--., Date $ht II iZ 13 l4 PL ul - � i � 1 1 1 1-DLDy __l z. .' i f.1, /P KOSN I K Project: y � Frg, ENGINEERING CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Job No: Date `� Q $ht .z _p La z W1_ H,55 4-X h = Il -vs (14 IZI � .1 YYlr C � I - llfa S k Iti` u Co J i I I BeamChek v2.4 licensed to:DanielKosnik Reg#7806-1238 �� gALE iNSULATION Prepared by: djk ,Date: 9/10/04 Selection W 16x 31 50 ksi Wide Flange Steel Lateral Support at: Lu= 5.2 ft max. Conditions Actual Size is 5-1/2 x 15-7/8 in., Min Bearing Length R1= 1.1 in. R2= 1.1 in. DL Defl 0.18 in Suggested Camber 0.28 in Data Beam Span 20.0 ft Reaction 1 LL 14100# Reaction 2 LL 14100# Beam Wt per ft 31.0# Reaction 1 TL 17560# Reaction 2 TL 17560# Bm Wt Included 620# Maximum V 17560# 1 Max Moment 116550'# Max V(Reduced) N/A TL Max Defl L/180 TL Actual Defl L/250 LL Max Defl L/240 LL Actual Defl L/309 Attributes Section (in3) Shear(in') TL Defl (in) LL Defl Actual 47.20 4.37 0.96 0.78 Critical 46.62 0.88 1.33 1.00 Status OK OK OK OK Ratio 99% 20% 72% 78% Fb(psi) Fv(psi) E(psi x mil) Values Base Value Fy 50000 50000 29.0 Base Adjusted 30000 20000 29.0 Adjustments YP Factor, Lu 0.60 0.40 ! At Point Loads: Provide these minimum bearing lengths in inches or provide web stiffeners. B = 1.1 C= 1.1 D = 1.1 l __ Loads Point LL Point TL Distance 9400 B= 11500 5.0 9400 C= 11500 10.0 9400 D= 11500 15.0 Pt loads: R1 = 17560 R2= 17560 SPAN=20 FT Uniform and partial uniform loads are Ibs per lineal ft. KOSNIKProject: ��-� ���.�- ®ills ENGINEERING CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Job No: ova Date /7 �� Sht �S"¢ I A rx,.� n a.I ( 7/,� wL•ti� J T ,4 T ,dux l2 17- V, r — ef 4- k , ) I 35 3s vJ ✓J u 5[�72 ry 2•� J -I �2 4 Ir'�'� KOSNIK Project: illis ENGINEERING CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Job No: o�`-� Ze Date 1� a ¢-Sht " S I 6 v✓l��Q ) w-, -� 1 - -2_-y 21 ,5 1 o � _ 1 s ry gas s y 4x 3,��1 I S N I K Project:r-� r - Ivs� �n vN r� Ale ENGINEERING CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Job No: G�� �'�o Date l o O - $ht T�-C� NZ�}ti11 iD I C� �h4 2 .4d - S� 1 AAj iZ VJ I I 1 I l KOSNIK Project Name: Gale Insulation ENGINEERING Project No.: 04.028 CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Date: 9/13/04 Sheet No.: ,'1 ANCHOR BOLT DESIGN r _ ------------------�--il I ♦` , I Anchor Bolt Designation: Mezz Frame at Line 11 No. of Bolts in Tension group= 4 j `�\ ' i E, No. of Bolts in Shear group= 4 I 0........ ...............0 i Bolt Embedment Depth, Le= 8.00 j Y Edge Dist. To Bolt, E1 (Le max) = 8.00 I P............ __..._. .. q Edge Dist.To Bolt, E2 (Le max) = 8.00 I Edge Dist.To Bolt, L1 (Le max) = 8.00 I ,'� �`� I E2 Edge Dist. To Bolt, L2 (Le max)= 8.00 X= 6.00 ----- ---------- ----- \=1 Y= 4.00 I L X L2 Apply Q Factor?, Y/N: N Q= 2.2 Apply Tension Zone Factor?, Y/N N Special Inspection (concrete),Y/N ? Y Bolt dia = 0.75 in. F1554 Gr 36 Concrete Inspection Factor= 1.3 Ab= 0.442 sq.in. fs= 60 ksi Concrete Parameters: fc= 3000 psi ¢ = 0.65 Ap= (X+ L1 + L2)(Y+ E1 + E2)= 440 = 1 or, single bolt, Ap=7r Le = LOADINPUT Wind: Group Load Concrete Steel P„BOLT WIND= 0.00 k x 1.3 x Insp. = 0.00 k 0.00 k V„GROUP 0.00 k x 1.3 x Insp. = 0.00 k 0.00 k Seismic: P„BOLT= 19.20 k x 1.4 x Insp. = 8.74 k 6.72 k V„GROUP= 24.00 k x 1.4 x Insp. = 43.68 k 8.40 k STRENGTH IN TENSION P ss CROUP =.9 x Ab x f,t x(N) = 95.42 k oPc= 0,�[4(Ap)] Vfc= 62.66 k < Pss Ductile failure is not assured STRENGTH IN SHEAR V ss GROUP =.75 x Ab x f t x(N) = 79.52 k 0 Vc= x 800 x Ab x ), x Vf c x(N) = 50.33 k RESULTS UNITY CHECKS: / Load PUC GROUP PUS GROUP PU/PSS PU/CPC VUC GROUP VUS GROUP VU/nV SS VU/(Vc Wind 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 OK Seismic 34.944 26.880 0.282 0.558 1 43.680 8.400 0.549 0.868 OK COMBINED SHEAR AND TENSION: Concrete = 9/ 0 f(P„/P,)513 +(V„/V,)5/3] < 9 Steel= (P„/PSS)2 +(V„/V5")2 _<1 Load Concrete Steel Special Inspection is REQUIRED for Anchor Bolts Wind 0.000 0.000 < 1, OK Seismic 0.692 0.091 < 1, OK * Factored by 0 per Sections 2213.6.2 &2214.4.2 for ordinary moment frames only. Mezz Frame Anchors,04,028 Design Loads-v2.4 IBC.xIs '1-�''11 Project: KOSNIK '��Ille ENGINEERING CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Job No: �' �'"�' Date a `Sht 40 , I V J I 1 f FIp�� KOSNIK Project: ?IL ENGINEERING CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Job No: D 021;? Date ";1 v 1CJ SM h '5-3 � - ► -r'r;� 1 -tl�. d . 1 J J J _1 J J KOSNIK ��--� .� �s �®Ils ENGINEERING Project: CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Job No: �9 �-G'2 Date �'z'�� $ht x 50 x _ Div X ,-o X , ��� _ �S.S K I/l��. 5 �Lo '�4�. � �2�► 6,k �� e-o U IZ 22 1 , v—) 3o%F '^� 1 1z (4 o f sa))L S 14 v J t 9 Q, x ),f " J _ 1 f _J LiC III Project: G,�z-f --a- � IO S N I K ®Ile 00 ENGINEERING CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Job No: � � �2 a Date . b'L Sht F77 12, La 1 fi3 ram- I 1 '►'��'�' Project: -� � +w;- ,-z..o.J Kxu`SNlK ENGINEERING CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Job No' &'� 4' yzv Date Z Sht C.3 Ic vi 1 � V-9 1 k _1 14, 1 .y i 'I7Pllp K Project: ��. OSNIK �/,illgh, ENGINEERING CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Job No: o--4, Date Sht 1 1 IAA H A aI i i �� I I f T l'^���'N KOSNIK Project: 1 � 11 ,19i . ENGINEERING CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Job No: a4-Qz Date q� ^ Sht Z !S A �� � T 5�-4c> lot- VY� C I I 1 1 I J i l 24 THRU 27 J � 51 > THRU <54> KOSNIK Project: r/ ENGINEERING CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Job No: Date `7/ Sht ' ¢ 1 1 `Ar a 1 gg1 _J 1 Project Gale Insulation Panel Mark 24-27, 51-54 pS� MULTIPLIER= 1 ROOF TRIB WIDTH= 5 ft ROOF STRUCTURE UNIFORM LOADS DESIGN STRIP LOADS P1 dl = 12 psf 60.00 plf P1 sl = 25 psf 125.00 plf P1 II = 5 psf 25.00 plf PANEL DL @ MIDHEIGHT P2 dl = 932 plf 932.00 plf LATERAL LOADS W= 11.50 psf 11.50 psf E = 21.50 psf 21.50 psf LOAD COMBINATION 12-5 1.2DL+1.OE+0.75S+1.OL Service Factored P1= 0.210 klf P1u= 0.191 klf P2= 0.932 klf P2u= 1.118 klf W= 0.015 ksf Wu= 0.022 ksf LOAD COMBINATION 9-2 1.05DL+1.3W+1.3S+1.3L Service Factored P1= 0.210 klf P1u= 0.258 klf P2= 0.932 klf P2u= 0.888 klf W= 0.012 ksf Wu= 0.015 ksf i I i TILT-UP WALL PANEL REVIEW Project Gale Insulation Panel Mark 24-27, 51-54 Geometry Design Section typical Height= 23 ft Load Combination Wind Panel Thickness = 5.5 in Design Basis 'D(.,�p d = 2.75 in e = 0 in b = 12 in Material Prop. Concrete f'c= 4 ksi Ec= 3605 ksi Rebar fy= 60 ksi Es= 29000 ksi Ultimate Design Capacity As = 0.2325 in`/ft Pu = 1.146 k/ft n = 8.0 Aseff= 0.25 in` = 0.89 c= 0.44 in Service Loads/Ft. M, = 38,720 in-lb P, = 0.210 k/ft Mr,= 34,512 in-lb P2= 0.932 k/ft, panel weight w= 0.012 ksf Factored Design Moment Factored Loads/Ft. Icr= 11.17 in" Plc= 0.258 k/ft An = 3.00 in ---------- assu Plc = 0.888 k/ft, panel weight Me = 15,300 in-lb wU = 0.015 ksf An = 3.01 in ---------- calc Deflection Limitation UBC Section 1914.8.2 S = 60.5 in P1+P2= 1.142 k fr= 316.2 lb/in` (0.04)f'c(Ac) = 10.56 k Mcr= 19.13 in-k B, = 0.65 see 1910.2.7.3 0.6 p b= 0.0131 Acr= 0.25 in P= 0.0070 As= -1.40 in ---------- assu Ms = 7.5 in-k As = -1.4 in ---------- calc Ase = 1.84 in TILT-UP WALL PANEL REVIEW_ Project Gale Insulation Panel Mark 24-27, 51-54 Geometry Design Section typical Height= 23 ft Load Combination Seismic Panel Thickness = 5.5 in Design Basis 5-7 d = 2.75 in e = 0 in b= 12 in Material Prop. Concrete f'r= 4 ksi Ec= 3605 ksi Rebar fy= 60 ksi Es= 29000 ksi Ultimate Design Capacity As= 0.2325 in`/ft P„ = 1.309 k/ft n = 8.0 Aseff= 0.25 in` = 0.89 c = 0.44 in Service Loads/Ft. Mn = 39,109 in-lb P, = 0.210 k/ft Mn = 34,810 in-lb P2= 0.932 k/ft, panel weight w= 0.015 ksf Factored Design Moment Factored Loads/Ft. Icr= 11.26 in' Plu = 0.191 k/ft An = 4.50 in ---------- assu P2u = 1.118 k/ft, panel weight MU = 22,951 in-lb wu= 0.022 ksf An = 4.49 in ---------- calc Deflection Limitation UBC Section 1914.8.2 S = 60.5 in' P1+P2= 1.142 k fr= 316.2 lb/in` (0.04) f'c(Ac)= 10.56 k Mar= 19.13 in-k B, = 0.65 see 1910.2.7.3 0.6 P b= 0.0131 Acr= 0.25 in P= 0.0070 As = -1.60 in ---------- assu Ms = 10.4 in-k As = -1.6 in ---------- calc Ase = 1.84 in f. 1 sz1 1 THRU 10 < 14 > THRU < 23 KOSNIK Project:_&—*L- — ENGINEERING CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Job No: Date ^.1 $ht 1)-:� _ ( l �`k S l i- v P. S �1 i Project Gale Insulation Panel Mark 1-10, 14-23 MULTIPLIER= 1 ROOF TRIB WIDTH= 25 ft ROOF STRUCTURE UNIFORM LOADS DESIGN STRIP LOADS P1 dl = 12 psf 300.00 plf P1 sl = 25 psf 625.00 plf P1 II = 5 psf 125.00 plf PANEL DL @ MIDHEIGHT P2 dl = 1216 plf 1216.00 plf LATERAL LOADS W= 11.50 psf 11.50 psf E = 21.30 psf 21.30 psf LOAD COMBINATION 12-5 1.2DL+1.OE+0.75S+1.OL Service Factored P1= 1.050 klf P1u= 0.954 klf P2= 1.216 klf P2u= 1.459 klf W= 0.015 ksf Wu= 0.021 ksf LOAD COMBINATION 9-2 1.05DL+1.3W+1.3S+1.3L Service Factored P1= 1.050 klf P1u= 1.290 klf P2= 1.216 klf P2u= 1.158 klf W= 0.012 ksf Wu= 0.015 ksf I TILT-UP WALL PANEL REVIEW Project Gale Insulation Panel Mark 1-10, 14-23 Geometry Design Section typical Height= 21.1 ft Load Combination wind Panel Thickness= 5.5 in Design Basis d = 2.75 in e= 0 in b= 12 in Material Prop. Concrete f'.= 4 ksi Er= 3605 ksi Rebar fy= 60 ksi Es = 29000 ksi Ultimate Desiqn Capacity As= 0.2325 in`/ft P„= 2.448 k/ft n = 8.0 ASeff- 0.27 in` = 0.88 c= 0.47 in Service Loads /Ft. Mn = 41,799 in-lb P, = 1.050 k/ft Mr,= 36,844 in-lb P2= 1.216 k/ft, panel weight w= 0.012 ksf Factored Design Moment Factored Loads / Ft. Icr= 11.82 in' P,u = 1.290 k/ft An = 2.50 in ---------- assu P2U = 1.158 k/ft, panel weight Mu = 16,104 in-lb wU = 0.015 ksf An = 2.52 in ---------- calc Deflection Limitation UBC Section 1914.8.2 S = 60.5 in' P1+P2= 2.266 k f,= 316.2 lb/in` (0.04) f'e(A.) = 10.56 k Mcr= 19.13 in-k B, = 0.65 see 1910.2.7.3 0.6Pb = 0.0131 Acr= 0.21 in P= 0.0070 As= -1.20 in ---------- assu Ms = 5.0 in-k As= -1.2 in ---------- calc Ase = 1.688 in TILT-UP WALL PANEL REVIEW Project Gale Insulation Panel Mark 1-10, 14-23 Geometry Design Section typical Height= 21.1 ft Load Combination seismic Panel Thickness = 5.5 in Design Basis 712 d = 2.75 in e = 0 in b = 12 in Material Prop. Concrete f',= 4 ksi Ec= 3605 ksi Rebar fy= 60 ksi Es = 29000 ksi Ultimate Design Capacity As= 0.2325 in`/ft Pu = 2.413 k/ft n = 8.0 Aseff= 0.27 in` = 0.88 c= 0.47 in Service Loads/Ft. Mn= 41,717 in-lb P, = 1.050 k/ft Mn= 36,783 in-lb P2 = 1.216 k/ft, panel weight w= 0.015 ksf Factored Design Moment Factored Loads/ Ft. Icr= 11.81 in" Plu = 0.954 k/ft An = 3.60 in ---------- assu P2u = 1.459 k/ft, panel weight Mu = 22,911 in-lb wu = 0.021 ksf An = 3.59 in ---------- calc Deflection Limitation UBC Section 1914.8.2 S = 60.5 in' P1+P2= 2.266 k fr= 316.2 Ib/in` (0.04) f'c(Ac) = 10.56 k Mcr= 19.13 in-k B, = 0.65 see 1910.2.7.3 0.6 P b= 0.0131 Air= 0.21 in P= 0.0070 As = -1.70 in ---------- assu Ms = 6.3 in-k AS= -1.7 in ---------- calc Ase = 1.688 in II KOS N I K Project: 14'Idlikk ENGINEERING CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Job No: C ter--c. Date 9 kxl _$ht 913 -74 P f 1 y -t>L- - � � � i RAM Advanse File :equiv moment.AVW Analysis(1st order) Condition:dl=Dead load Date:9/13/2004 10:05:54 AM L Z X - � �-� i ! .4. _1 _1 1 _ 1 Z& RAM Advanse File C:\Documents and Settings\admin\Desktop\typical panel line A\2-2 pier\equiv moment.AVW Units Lb-ft Date 9/13/2004 10:01:55 AM Analysis Results Maximum forces at members Condition:dl=Dead load Axial Shear V2 Shear V3 Torsion M22 M33 [Lb] [Lb] [Lb] [Lb-ft] [Lb"ft] [Lb"ft] MEMBEFI Max 0.00 1131.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 5922.81 Min 0.00 -1072.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 --------------------- ----- ------._...,.-----..----- 1 _ I Pagel •J A Project Gale Insulation (� Panel Mark 1-10, 14-23 MULTIPLIER= 1.67 ROOF TRIB WIDTH= 25 ft ROOF STRUCTURE UNIFORM LOADS DESIGN STRIP LOADS P1 dl = 12 psf 501.00 plf P1 sl = 25 psf 1043.75 plf P1 II = 5 psf 208.75 plf PANEL DL @ MIDHEIGHT P2 dl = 1216 plf 1216.00 plf LATERAL LOADS W= 11.50 psf 19.21 psf E = 20.00 psf 33.40 psf LOAD COMBINATION 12-5 1.2DL+1.OE+0.75S+1.OL Service Factored P 1= 1.754 klf P 1 u= 1.593 klf P2= 1.216 klf P2u= 1.459 klf j W= 0.024 ksf Wu= 0.033 ksf LOAD COMBINATION 9-2 1.05DL+1.3W+1.3S+1.3L Service Factored P1= 1.754 klf P1u= 2.154 klf P2= •1.216 klf P2u= 1.158 klf W= 0.019 ksf Wu= 0.025 ksf _ 1 J J J J J i TILT-UP WALL PANEL REVIEW Project Gale Insulation Panel Mark 1-10, 14-23 Geometry Design Section at door Height= 21 ft Load Combination wind Panel Thickness = 5.5 in Design Basis d = 2.75 in e = 0 in b = 24 in Material Prop. Concrete f',= 4 ksi Ec= 3605 ksi Rebar fy= 60 ksi Es = 29000 ksi Ultimate Design Capacity As = 0.465 in`/ft Pu= 3.312 k/ft n = 8.0 Aseff= 0.52 in` = 0.89 c= 0.45 in Service Loads / Ft. Mn = 79,865 in-lb P, = 1.754 k/ft Mr, = 70,876 in-lb P2= 1.216 k/ft, panel weight w= 0.019 ksf Factored Design Moment Factored Loads/ Ft. Icr= 22.87 in" Piu = 2.154 k/ft An = 1.80 in ---------- assu P2U = 1.158 k/ft, panel weight M„ = 22,478 in-lb wU = 0.025 ksf An = 1.80 in ---------- calc Deflection Limitation UBC Section 1914.8.2 S = 121.0 in' P1+P2= 2.970 k fr= 316.2 Ib/in` (0.04) f'�(Ac) = 21.12 k Mcr= 38.26 in-k B, = 0.65 see 1910.2.7.3 0.6Pb = 0.0131 kr= 0.21 in P= 0.0070 As = -0.90 in ---------- assu Ms = 10.0 in-k 4s — -0.9 in ---------- ca I c Ass = 1.68 in x I TILT-UP WALL PANEL REVIEW Project Gale Insulation Panel Mark 1-10, 14-23 Geometry Design Section at door Height= 21 ft Load Combination seismic Panel Thickness = 5.5 in Design Basis d = 2.75 in e = 0 in b = 24 in Material Prop. Concrete f'c= 4 ksi Ec= 3605 ksi Rebar fy = 60 ksi Es = 29000 ksi Ultimate Design Capacity As = 0.465 in`/ft Pu = 3.052 k/ft n = 8.0 Aseff= 0.52 in` = 0.89 c= 0.45 in Service Loads/Ft. Mn = 79,248 in-lb P, = 1.754 k/ft Mn = 70,407 in-lb P2 = 1.216 k/ft, panel weight w= 0.024 ksf Factored Design Moment Factored Loads/Ft. Icr= 22.74 in" Plu = 1.593 k/ft An = 2.37 in ---------- assu P2u = 1.459 k/ft, panel weight Mu = 29,327 in-lb wu = 0.033 ksf An = 2.37 in ---------- calc Deflection Limitation UBC Section 1914.8.2 S = 121.0 in3 P1+P2= 2.970 k fr= 316.2 lb/in` (0.04) f'�(Ac) = 21.12 k Mir= 38.26 in-k B, = 0.65 see 1910.2.7.3 0.6pb = 0.0131 Acr= 0.21 in P= 0.0070 As = -1.20 in ---------- assu Ms = 12.2 in-k As = -1.2 in ---------- calc Ase= 1.68 in g t I i � f 1 � — e t y 29 THRU 36 42> THRU < 49 M �` KOSN I K Project: ENGINEERING CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Job No: Date Sht -0 j � i'7 Y T(, C-T- 0. -7- cc) i 'ij�''� KOSNIK Project: .iL ENGINEERING CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Job No: Date c 2, Sht FFF � CPN Vic Last— t `�- f' S -1 RAM Advanse File :equiv moment.AVW Analysis(1 st order) Condition:dl=Dead load Date:9/13/2004 11:25:05 AM L .l Z X _ 1 1 l l 1 1 I .l I :+: I &M RAM Advanse File K:\Year 2004\04-028 Gale Insulation\Calcs\Panel calcs\Panels 29-36,42-49\equiv moment.AVW T) Z 3 Units Lb-ft Date 9/13/2004 11:23:42 AM Analysis Results t Maximum forces at members } Condition:dl=Dead load Axial Shear V2 Shear V3 Torsion M22 M33 [Lb] [Lb] [Lb] [Lb"ft] [Lb*ft] [Lb*ft] MEMBEF1 Max 0.00 2571.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 14693.52 Min 0.00 -2295.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Pagel I Project Gale Insulation Panel Mark 29-36, 42-49 MULTIPLIER= 2.88 Z a ROOF TRIB WIDTH= 25 ft ROOF STRUCTURE UNIFORM LOADS DESIGN STRIP LOADS P1 dl = 12 psf 864.00 plf P1 sl = 25 psf 1800.00 plf P1 II = 5 psf 360.00 plf PANEL DL @ MIDHEIGHT P2 dl = 1085 plf 1085.00 plf LATERAL LOADS W= -23.50 psf -67.68 psf E _ -32.00 psf -92.16 psf LOAD COMBINATION 12-5 1.2DL+1.OE+0.75S+1.OL Service Factored P1= 3.024 klf P1u= 2.747 klf P2= 1.085 klf P2u= 1.302 klf W= -0.066 ksf Wu= -0.092 ksf LOAD COMBINATION 9-2 1.05DL+1.3W+1.3S+1.3L Service Factored P1= 3.024 klf P1 u= 3.715 klf P2= 1.085 klf P2u= 1.033 klf W= -0.068 ksf Wu= -0.088 ksf _1 _I 1 TILT-UP WALL PANEL REVIEW Project Gale Insulation Panel Mark 29-36, 42-49 Geometry Design Section 2'-2" leg Height= 23 ft Load Combination Wind Panel Thickness = 6.25 in Design Basis -�a d = 4.5625 in e = 0 in b = 26 in Material Prop. Concrete f'c= 4 ksi Ec= 3605 ksi Rebar fy = 60 ksi Es = 29000 ksi Ultimate Design Capacity As= 0.572 in`/ft Pu = 4.749 k/ft n = 8.0 Aseff= 0.65 in` = 0.89 c= 0.52 in Service Loads/Ft. Mn= 169,617 in-lb P, = 3.024 k/ft Mn = 150,177 in-lb PZ = 1.085 k/ft, panel weight w= -0.068 ksf Factored Design Moment Factored Loads /Ft. lcr= 86.82 in" Plu = 3.715 k/ft An = -2.03 in ---------- assu PZu = 1.033 k/ft, panel weight Mu = -79,455 in-lb wu = -0.088 ksf An = -2.01 in ---------- calc Deflection Limitation UBC Section 1914.8.2 S = 115.9 in P1+P2= 4.109 k fr= 316.2 Ib/in` (0.04)f'c(A.) = 26 k Mcr= 36.66 in-k B, = 0.65 see 1910.2.7.3 0.6Pb = 0.0131 Acr= 0.15 in P= 0.0048 As = 1.40 in ---------- assu Ms= -48.0 in-k As = 1.5 in ---------- calc Ase= 1.84 in TILT-UP WALL PANEL REVIEW Project Gale Insulation Panel Mark 29-36, 42-49 Geometry Design Section 2'-2" leg Height= 23 ft Load Combination Seismic Panel Thickness = 6.25 in Design Basis LCo d = 4.5625 in e = 0 in b = 26 in Material Prop. Concrete V,= 4 ksi Ec= 3605 ksi Rebar fy= 60 ksi Es= 29000 ksi Ultimate Design Capacity As= 0.572 in`/ft P„ = 4.049 k/ft n = 8.0 Aseif= 0.64 in` = 0.89 c= 0.51 in Service Loads/Ft. Mn = 166,731 in-lb P, = 3.024 k/ft Mn = 147,981 in-lb P2 = 1.085 k/ft, panel weight w= -0.066 ksf Factored Design Moment Factored Loads/ Ft. Icr= 85.61 in" Plu= 2.747 k/ft An = -2.10 in ---------- assu P2u = 1.302 k/ft, panel weight MU = -81,631 in-lb wu = -0.092 ksf An = -2.10 in ---------- calc Deflection Limitation UBC Section 1914.8.2 S = 115.9 in P1+P2= 4.109 k fr= 316.2 Ib/in` (0.04) f'c(A.)= 26 k Mcr= 36.66 in-k B, = 0.65 see 1910.2.7.3 0.6pb = 0.0131 Air= 0.15 in P= 0.0048 As= 1.60 in ---------- assu Ms= -45.7 in-k As= 1.6 in ---------- calc Ase = 1.84 in �Z1 t t I � G J i ` J 37 41 50 J _l J J Im K e , r , osN iK LA ENGINEERING CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Job No: —Date -/,-z A� Sht T) 6N, vc7 1 L,-t CYZ-- t 1 R N-Z- . k') T9 4- �Z$ X i I17P N Project: ��..� -- 1 ,•ti ._�,.t- ,�. 1 � ��?' KOSNIK ENGINEERING . CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Job No:_ Date 1-104 $ht r 1 C5_` , r I' f RAM Advanse File :equiv moment.AVW Analysis(1 st order) Condition:dl=Dead load Date: 9/13/2004 1:02:06 PM L z x li �- L 1 1 i {M RAM Advanse 1 File K:\Year 2004\04-028 Gale Insulation\Calcs\Panel calcs\Panels 37,41, 50\center 3-8\equiv moment.AVW Units Lb-ft Date 9/13/2004 1:00:58 PM 1 -� Analysis Results e l Maximum forces at members --i Condition :dl=Dead load IAxial Shear V2 Shear V3 Torsion M22 M33 [Lb] [Lb] [Lb] [Lb"ft] [Lb"ft] [Lb"ft] MEMBEF1 Max 0.00 2664.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 14398.62 Min 0.00 -2034.58 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 _ -- 1 . l I _ 1 .j _1 J Pagel Project Gale Insulation Panel Mark 37, 41, 50 MULTIPLIER= 3.16 ROOF TRIB WIDTH= 25 ft ROOF STRUCTURE UNIFORM LOADS DESIGN STRIP LOADS P1 dl = 12 psf 948.00 plf P1 sl = 25 psf 1975.00 plf P1 II = 5 psf 395.00 plf PANEL DL @ MIDHEIGHT P2 dl = 1287 plf 1287.00 plf LATERAL LOADS W= -24.50 psf -77.42 psf E _ -33.00 psf -104.28 psf LOAD COMBINATION 12-5 1.2DL+1.OE+0.75S+1.OL I Service Factored P1= 3.318 klf P1u= 3.014 klf P2= 1.287 klf P2u= 1.544 klf l W= -0.074 ksf Wu= -0.104 ksf LOAD COMBINATION 9-2 1.05DL+1.3W+1.3S+1.3L Service Factored P1= 3.318 klf P1u= 4.076 klf P2= 1.287 klf P2u= 1.226 klf W= -0.077 ksf Wu= -0.101 ksf _ 1 J J . l J J i TILT-UP WALL PANEL REVIEW Project Gale Insulation Panel Mark 37, 41, 50 Geometry Design Section center Height= 23 ft Load Combination Wind Panel Thickness = 6.25 in Design Basis 'D-3 3 d = 4.6 in e = 0 in b= 44 in Material Prop. Concrete f',,= 4 ksi Ec= 3605 ksi Rebar fy= 60 ksi Es = 29000 ksi Ultimate Design Capacity As = 0.676 in`/ft P„ = 5.302 k/ft n = 8.0 Aseff= 0.76 in` �= 0.89 c= 0.36 in Service Loads/Ft. Mn = 203,936 in-lb P, = 3.318 k/ft M„= 181,576 in-lb P2 = 1.287 k/ft, panel weight w= -0.077 ksf Factored Design Moment Factored Loads/Ft. lar= 111.20 in' Plu = 4.076 k/ft An = -1.77 in ---------- assu P2U = 1.226 k/ft, panel weight MU = -89,247 in-lb wU = -0.101 ksf An= -1.77 in ---------- calc Deflection Limitation UBC Section 1914.8.2 S = 194.6 in' P1+P2= 4.605 k fr= 316.2 Ib/in` (0.04) f'c(Ac)= 44 k Mcr= 61.54 in-k B, = 0.65 see 1910.2.7.3 0.6 P b= 0.0131 Acr= 0.15 in P= 0.0033 AS= 1.70 in ---------- assu Ms= -53.6 in-k As= 1.7 in ---------- calc ASe= 1.84 in TILT-UP WALL PANEL REVIEW Project Gale Insulation Panel Mark 37, 41, 50 Geometry Design Section center Height= 23 ft Load Combination Seismic Panel Thickness = 6.25 in Design Basis d = 4.6 in e = 0 in b= 44 in Material Prop. Concrete f',= 4 ksi Ec= 3605 ksi Rebar fy= 60 ksi Es= 29000 ksi Ultimate Design Capacity As = 0.676 in`/ft Pu = 4.558 k/ft n = 8.0 Aseff= 0.75 in` = 0.89 c= 0.35 in Service Loads I Ft. Mn = 200,740 in-lb P, = 3.318 k/ft Mn = 179,003 in-lb P2= 1.287 k/ft, panel weight w= -0.074 ksf Factored Design Moment Factored Loads/ Ft. Ic�= 109.67 in" Plu = 3.014 k/ft An= -1.84 in ---------- assu P2U= 1.544 k/ft, panel weight Mu = -91,133 in-lb wU = -0.104 ksf An = -1.83 in ---------- calc Deflection Limitation UBC Section 1914.8.2 S = 194.6 in' P1+P2= 4.605 k fr= 316.2 lb/in` (0.04)f'c(Ac)= 44 k Mir= 61.54 in-k B, = 0.65 see 1910.2.7.3 0.6Pb= 0.0131 Acr= 0.15 in P= 0.0033 As = 1.80 in ---------- assu Ms = -50.8 in-k As = 1.8 in ---------- calc A5e= 1.84 in K NIK Project:_��-- �i®lls ENGINEERING CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Job No: Date Q Sht � e ,t 1 ''-Cl"? � � 1 1 • �i'/'Y-A �O r� 'tea ��1��- L"'�- 6�'��-"-�� . �f�� •- ��1?a a� �� �- F�� C.z*,4 V`� v c.w A RAM Advanse File : equiv moment.AVW Analysis(1 st order) Condition:dl=Dead load Date:9/13/2004 1:34:22 PM L Z X 96 0�p� _ 1-1"IT 1T l Ti 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 J i 1 J L S 1 1 J 1 S 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! 1 S S S 1 1 1 1 ' 23,0,0) J J J Viil RAM Advanse File K:\Year 2004\04-028 Gale Insulation\Calcs\Panel calcs\Panels 37,41,50\side 2-2\equiv moment.AVW Units Lb-ft Date 9/13/2004 1:32:39 PM Analysis Results Maximum forces at members �31 Condition:dl=Dead load Axial Shear V2 Shear V3 Torsion M22 M33 [Lb] [Lb] [Lb] [Lb"ft] [Lb"ft] [Lb"ft] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MEMBEF1 Max 0.00 3136.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 16553.09 Min 0.00 -2128.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pagel Project Gale Insulation Panel Mark 37, 41, 50 MULTIPLIER= 3.8 3� ROOF TRIB WIDTH= 25 ft ROOF STRUCTURE UNIFORM LOADS DESIGN STRIP LOADS P1 dl = 12 psf 1140.00 plf P1 sl = 25 psf 2375.00 plf P1 II = 5 psf 475.00 plf PANEL DL @ MIDHEIGHT P2 dl = 1287 plf 1287.00 plf LATERAL LOADS W= -21.50 psf -81.70 psf E _ -34.00 psf -129.20 psf LOAD COMBINATION 12-5 1.2DL+1.OE+0.75S+1.OL Service Factored P1= 3.990 klf P1u= 3.624 klf P2= 1.287 klf P2u= 1.544 klf W= -0.092 ksf Wu= -0.129 ksf LOAD COMBINATION 9-2 1.05DL+1.3W+1.3S+1.3L Service Factored P1= 3.990 klf P1u= 4.902 klf P2= 1:287 klf P2u= 1.226 klf. W= -0.082 ksf Wu= -0.106 ksf TILT-UP WALL PANEL REVIEW _ Project Gale Insulation Panel Mark 37, 41, 50 Geometry Design Section 2'-2" Height= 23 ft Load Combination Wind Panel Thickness = 6.25 in Design Basis T3°I d = 4.6 in e= 0 in b = 26 in Material Prop. Concrete V,,= 4 ksi Ec= 3605 ksi Rebar fy= 60 ksi Es= 29000 ksi Ultimate Design Capacity As= 0.714 in`/ft Pu = 6.128 k/ft n = 8.0 ASeff= 0.82 in` = 0.88 c= 0.65 in Service Loads/Ft. Mn = 211,689 in-lb P, = 3.990 k/ft Mn = 186,529 in-lb P2= 1.287 k/ft, panel weight w= -0.082 ksf Factored Design Moment Factored Loads /Ft. Icr= 104.75 in" Plu = 4.902 k/ft An = -2.03 in ---------- assu P2U = 1.226 k/ft, panel weight Mu = -96,717 in-lb wU = -0.106 ksf An = -2.03 in ---------- calc Deflection Limitation UBC Section 1914.8.2 S = 115.0 in' P1+P2= 5.277 k fr= 316.2 lb/in` (0.04) f'c(Ac) = 26 k Mcr= 36.36 in-k B, = 0.65 see 1910.2.7.3 0.6Pb= 0.0131 Acr= 0.15 in P= 0.0060 As = 1.30 in ---------- assu Ms = -58.0 in-k As = 1.3 in ---------- calc Ase = 1.84 in TILT-UP WALL PANEL REVIEW Project Gale Insulation Panel Mark 37, 41, 50 Geometry Design Section 2'-2" Height= 23 ft Load Combination Seismic Panel Thickness = 6.25 in Design Basis �n d = 4.6 in e = 0 in b= 26 in Material Prop. Concrete f = 4 ksi Ec= 3605 ksi Rebar fy= 60 ksi Es = 29000 ksi Ultimate Design Capacity As= 0.714 in`/ft PU = 5.169 k/ft n = 8.0 Aseff= 0.80 in` = 0.88 c = 0.64 in Service Loads/ Ft. Mn = 207,803 in-lb P, = 3.990 k/ft M, = 183,718 in-lb P2= 1.287 k/ft, panel weight w= -0.092 ksf Factored Design Moment Factored Loads/ Ft. lcr= 103.25 in' Plu = 3.624 k/ft 0n = -2.45 in ---------- assu P2U = 1.544 k/ft, panel weight M„ = -115,183 in-lb wU= -0.129 ksf 4n = -2.46 in ---------- calc Deflection Limitation UBC Section 1914.8.2 S = 115.0 in' P1+P2= 5.277 k fr= 316.2 lb/in` (0.04) f'c(Ac)= 26 k Mcr= 36.36 in-k B, = 0.65 see 1910.2.7.3 0.6 P b= 0.0131 2�cr= 0.15 in P= 0.0060 4s= 1.70 in ---------- assu Ms = -64.3 in-k 4s = 1.7 in ---------- calc Ase = 1.84 in LIF71011p Project:KOSNIK ENGINEERING CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Job No: - Date ". 104--Sht d I VA�--����.-�t ram-= �-�- �� + 3 ��. �� � /� 45 Sty v IV 1 Gam.,�•,.� ��-�S �o ��z..._ �� _ /� �, �--� r-% r- � 1 RAM Advanse File :equiv moment.AVW Analysis(1st order) Condition: dl=Dead load Date:9/13/2004 1:47:59 PM Z Y L Z X 1 1 - I I3,0 o) J J J RAM RAM Advanse File K:\Year 2004\04-028 Gale Insulation\Calcs\Panel calcs\Panels 37,41,50\side 2-2\equiv moment.AVW Units Lb-ft Date 9/13/2004 1:40:05 PM Analysis Results Maximum forces at members Condition :dl=Dead load Axial Shear V2 Shear V3 Torsion M22 M33 [Lb] [Lb] [Lb] [Lb"ft] [Lb"ft] [Lb*ft] MEMBEF1 Max 0.00 1298.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 7461.32 Min 0.00 -1264.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 --- ---------- ------------- — t l 1 Pagel Project Gale Insulation Panel Mark 37, 41, 50 MULTIPLIER= 1.45 U ROOF TRIB WIDTH= 25 ft ROOF STRUCTURE UNIFORM LOADS DESIGN STRIP LOADS P1 dl = 12 psf 435.00 plf P1 sl = 25 psf 906.25 plf P1 II = 5 psf 181.25 plf PANEL DL @ MIDHEIGHT P2 dl = -1287 plf -1287.00 plf LATERAL LOADS W= -25.50 psf -36.98 psf E _ -31.00 psf -44.95 psf LOAD COMBINATION 12-5 1.2DL+1.OE+0.75S+1.OL Service Factored P1= 1.523 klf P1u= 1.383 klf P2= -1.287 klf P2u= -1.544 klf W= -0.032 ksf Wu= -0.045 ksf LOAD COMBINATION 9-2 1.05DL+1.3W+1.3S+1.3L Service Factored P1= 1.523 klf P1u= 1.871 klf P2= -1.287 klf P2u= -1.226 klf W= -0.037 ksf Wu= -0.048 ksf TILT-UP WALL PANEL REVIEW Project Gale Insulation Panel Mark 37, 41, 50 Geometry Design Section side 3-8 Height= 23 ft Load Combination Wind Panel Thickness = 6.25 in Design Basis d = 4.6 in e= 0 in b= 44 in Material Prop. Concrete f = 4 ksi Ec= 3605 ksi Rebar fy= 60 ksi Es = 29000 ksi Ultimate Design Capacity As= 0.507 in`/ft P„ = 0.645 k/ft n = 8.0 Aseff= 0.52 in` = 0.90 c= 0.24 in Service Loads I Ft. Mr, = 139,673 in-lb P, = 1.523 k/ft M, = 125,542 in-lb P2= -1.287 k/ft, panel weight w= -0.037 ksf Factored Design Moment Factored Loads/ Ft. Icr= 79.23 in" Plu= 1.871 k/ft An= -1.08 in ---------- assu P2U = -1.226 k/ft, panel weight MU = -38,838 in-lb wU = -0.048 ksf An = -1.08 in ---------- calc Deflection Limitation UBC Section 1914.8.2 S = 194.6 in P1+P2= 0.236 k fr= 316.2 Ibhn` (0.04) f'.(A.) = 44 k Mcr= 61.54 in-k B, = 0.65 see 1910.2.7.3 0.6Pb= 0.0131 Acr= 0.15 in P= 0.0025 As = 1.60 in ---------- assu Ms = -29.0 in-k As= 1.6 in ---------- calc Ase= 1.84 in TILT-UP WALL PANEL REVIEW Project Gale Insulation Panel Mark 37, 41, 50 Geometry Design Section side 3-8 Height= 23 ft Load Combination Seismic Panel Thickness = 6.25 in Design Basis d = 4.6 in e = 0 in b = 44 in Material Prop. Concrete f'c= 4 ksi Ec= 3605 ksi Rebar fy= 60 ksi Es = 29000 ksi Ultimate Design Capacity As= 0.507 in`/ft P„ = -0.161 k/ft n = 8.0 Aseff= 0.50 in` = 0.90 c= 0.24 in Service Loads / Ft. Mn = 136,129 in-lb P, = 1.523 k/ft Mn = 122,556 in-lb P2 = -1.287 k/ft, panel weight w= -0.032 ksf Factored Design Moment Factored Loads / Ft. Icr= 77.39 in" Plu = 1.383 k/ft An = -1.00 in ---------- assu P2u = -1.544 k/ft, panel weight Mu = -35,506 in-lb wU = -0.045 ksf An = -1.01 in ---------- calc Deflection Limitation UBC Section 1914.8.2 S = 194.6 in' P1+P2= 0.236 k fr= 316.2 Ibhn` (0.04) f'c(Ac) = 44 k Mcr= 61.54 in-k B, = 0.65 see 1910.2.7.3 0.6Pb = 0.0131 Acr= 0.15 in P= 0.0025 As = 1.50 in ---------- assu Ms= -25.1 in-k As= 1.5 in ---------- calc Ase = 1.84 in Lu tdl <38 tY/ '� KOS N I K Project• ENGINEERING CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Job No: c)4 - Date -Sht >�Y r� �I 41 q I 1 I i 1 F, i r '7 KOSNIK Project: iAzS�aA--�-rc �. ENGINEERING CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Job No: aig Date Sht �' � �ec��-^'��� E/�r` Tom•-t.�'��. _ f ��i S'� ��. `e'''G"` 10 rl RAM Advanse File :equiv moment.AVW Analysis(1st order) Condition:dl=Dead load Date:9/13/2004 2:36:10 PM �Y Ly ZX �1 -19500 1 3,0,0) i �J J 1 I L&I'M RAM Advanse File K:\Year 2004\04-028 Gale Insulation\Calcs\Panel calcs\Panels 37,41, 50\side 3-8\equiv moment.AVW Units Lb-ft Date 9/13/2004 2:20:58 PM Analysis Results Maximum forces at members Condition:dl=Dead load Axial Shear V2 Shear V3 Torsion M22 M33 [Lb] [Lb] [Lb] [Lb*ft] [Lb*ft] [Lb*ft] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MEMBEF1 Max 0.00 2239.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 12857.65 Min 0.00 -2123.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Pagel Project Gale Insulation Panel Mark panel 38 S L MULTIPLIER= 2.5 ROOF TRIB WIDTH= 25 ft ROOF STRUCTURE UNIFORM LOADS DESIGN STRIP LOADS P1 dl = 12 psf 750.00 plf P1 sl = 25 psf 1562.50 plf P1 11 = 5 psf 312.50 plf PANEL DL @ MIDHEIGHT P2 dl = 1131 plf 1131.00 plf LATERAL LOADS W= -21.50 psf -53.75 psf E _ -31.00 psf -77.50 psf LOAD COMBINATION 12-5 1.2DL+1.OE+0.75S+1.OL Service Factored P1= 2.625 klf P1u= 2.384 klf P2= 1.131 klf P2u= 1.357 klf iW= -0.055 ksf Wu= -0.078 ksf ILOAD COMBINATION 9-2 1.05DL+1.3W+1.3S+1.3L Service Factored P1= 2.625 klf P1u= 3.225 klf P2= 1.131 klf P2u= 1.077 klf W= -0.054 ksf Wu= -0.070 ksf _ J _1 J TILT-UP WALL PANEL REVIEW Project Gale Insulation Panel Mark panel 38 Geometry Design Section center Height= 23 ft Load Combination Wind Panel Thickness = 6.25 in Design Basis d = 4.6 in e= 0 in b = 48 in Material Prop. Concrete f'c= 4 ksi Ec= 3605 ksi Rebar fy= 60 ksi Es= 29000-ksi Ultimate Design Capacity As= 0.62 in`/ft Pu= 4.302 k/ft n = 8.0 Aseff= 0.69 in` = 0.89 c= 0.30 in Service Loads/Ft. Mn= 185,633 in-lb P, = 2.625 k/ft Mn= 165,738 in-lb P2= 1.131 k/ft, panel weight w= -0.054 ksf Factored Desiqn Moment Factored Loads/Ft. Icr= 103.35 in" Plu = 3.225 k/ft An = -1.30 in ---------- assu P2U= 1.077 k/ft, panel weight Mu= -61,039 in-lb wU= -0.070 ksf An= -1.30 in ---------- calc Deflection Limitation UBC Section 1914.8.2 S = 212.3 in P1+P2= 3.756 k fr= 316.2 Ib/In` (0.04) f'c(Ac)= 48 k Mcr= 67.13 in-k B, = 0.65 see 1910.2.7.3 0.6Pb= 0.0131 Air= 0.15 in P= 0.0028 As= 1.40 in ---------- assu Ms= -37.4 in-k As = 1.4 in ---------- calc Ase= 1.84 in TILT-UP WALL PANEL REVIEW Project Gale Insulation Panel Mark panel 38 Geometry Design Section center Height= 23 ft Load Combination Seismic Panel Thickness = 6.25 in Design Basis -D j Q d = 4.6 in e = 0 in b = 48 in Material Prop. Concrete f'c= 4 ksi Ec= 3605 ksi Rebar fy = 60 ksi Es= 29000 ksi Ultimate Design Capacity As = 0.62 in`/ft P„ = 3.742 k/ft n = 8.0 Aseff= 0.68 in` = 0.89 c= 0.30 in Service Loads/ Ft. Mn = 183,196 in-lb P, = 2.625 k/ft Mn = 163,734 in-lb P2= 1.131 k/ft, panel weight w= -0.055 ksf Factored Design Moment Factored Loads/ Ft. I,= 102.14 in" P,u = 2.384 k/ft An = -1.45 in ---------- assu Plc= 1.357 k/ft, panel weight Mu = -66,922 in-lb wU = -0.078 ksf An = -1.44 in ---------- calc Deflection Limitation UBC Section 1914.8.2 S = 212.3 in' P1+P2= 3.756 k fr= 316.2 lb/in` (0.04)f'.(Ac)= 48 k Mcr= 67.13 in-k B, = 0.65 see 1910.2.7.3 0.6Pb= 0.0131 0.15 in P= 0.0028 As= 1.60 in ---------- assu Ms= -37.9 in-k As = 1.6 in ---------- calc Ase = 1.84 in 11"rZKOSNIK Project: CiA r4 ENGINEERING CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Job No: o2--`-'-, Date Sht S� VA o/ i 1 1 J �1 RAM Advanse File :equiv moment.AVW Analysis(1 st order) Condition:dl=Dead load Date:9/13/2004 3:11:40 PM b lY Ly Z X �l I 1 ll�-1111 RaM RAM Advanse File K:\Year 2004\04-028 Gale Insulation\Calcs\Panel calcs\Panels 37,41,50\side 3-8\equiv moment.AVW Units Lb-ft Date 9/13/2004 2:57:10 PM Analysis Results 1 Maximum forces at members Condition :dl=Dead load Axial Shear V2 Shear V3 Torsion M22 M33 [Lb] [Lb] [Lb] [Lb"ft] [Lb-ft] [Lb*ft] MEMBEFI Max 0.00 1786.85 0.00 0.00 0.00 10233.22 Min 0.00 -1651.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 I 1 _1 1 _1 J _1 ..l J Pagel Y �� 1 • Project Gale Insulation Panel Mark panel 38 MULTIPLIER= 2 ROOF TRIB WIDTH= 25 ft I ROOF STRUCTURE UNIFORM LOADS DESIGN STRIP LOADS P1 dl = 12 psf 600.00 plf P1 sl = 25 psf 1250.00 plf P1 II = 5 psf 250.00 plf PANEL DL @ MIDHEIGHT P2 dl = 1131 plf 1131.00 plf 1 LATERAL LOADS 1 W= -21.50 psf 743.00 psf jE_ -31.00 psf -62.00 psf 1 LOAD COMBINATION 12-5 1.2DL+1.OE+0.75S+1.OL Service Factored P1= 2.100 klf P1u= 1.908 klf P2= 1.131 klf P2u= 1.357 klf W= -0..044 ksf Wu= -0.062 ksf LOAD COMBINATION 9-2 1.05DL+1.3W+1.3S+1.3L Service Factored P1= 2.100 klf P1u= 2:580 klf P2= 1.131 klf P2u= 1.077 klf W= -0.043 ksf Wu= -0.056 ksf _J _I .1 TILT-UP WALL PANEL REVIEW Project Gale Insulation Panel Mark panel 38 Geometry Design Section side Height= 23 ft Load Combination Wind Panel Thickness = 6.25 in Design Basis d = 4.6 in e = 0 in b = 48 in Material Prop. Concrete f'c= 4 ksi Ec= 3605 ksi Rebar fy= 60 ksi Es = 29000 ksi Ultimate Design Capacity As= 0.62 in`/ft Pu = 3.657 k/ft n = 8.0 Aseff= 0.68 in` = 0.89 c= 0.29 in Service Loads / Ft. Mn = 182,829 in-lb P, = 2.100 k/ft Mn = 163,431 in-lb P2 = 1.131 k/ft, panel weight w= -0.043 ksf Factored Design Moment Factored Loads/ Ft. Icr= 101.95 in" Plc = 2.580 k/ft An= -1.04 in ---------- assu Plc = 1.077 k/ft, panel weight Mu = -48,160 in-lb we = -0.056 ksf An = -1.04 in ---------- calc Deflection Limitation UBC Section 1914.8.2 S = 212.3 in' P1+P2= 3.231 k fr= 316.2 lb/in` (0.04) f'c(Ac)= 48 k Mcr= 67.13 in-k B, = 0.65 see 1910.2.7.3 0.6pb= 0.0131 A,= 0.15 in p= 0.0028 As= 1.20 in ---------- assu Ms = -30.2 in-k As = 1.2 in ---------- calc Ase= 1.84 in TILT-UP WALL PANEL REVIEW Project Gale Insulation Panel Mark panel 38 Geometry Design Section side Height= 23 ft Load Combination Seismic Panel Thickness = 6.25 in Design Basis (� d = 4.6 in e = 0 in b= 48 in Material Prop. Concrete f'c= 4 ksi Ec= 3605 ksi Rebar fy= 60 ksi Es= 29000 ksi Ultimate Design Capacity As= 0.62 in`/ft P„ = 3.265 k/ft n = 8.0 Aseff= 0.67 in` = 0.89 c= 0.29 in Service Loads/Ft. Mn = 181,121 in-lb P, = 2.100 k/ft Mn = 162,023 in-lb P2= 1.131 k/ft, panel weight w= -0.044 ksf Factored Design Moment Factored Loads / Ft. Icr= 101.10 in" Plc = 1.908 k/ft An _ -1.15 in ---------- assu Plc = 1.357 k/ft, panel weight Me = -52,951 in-lb we= -0.062 ksf 0n _ -1.15 in ---------- calc Deflection Limitation UBC Section 1914.8.2 S = 212.3 in' P1+P2= 3.231 k fr= 316.2 lb/in` (0.04) f'c(A.)= 48 k Mcr= 67.13 in-k B, = 0.65 see 1910.2.7.3 0.6Pb= 0.0131 Acr= 0.15 in P= 0.0028 As = 1.30 in ---------- assu Ms= -30.9 in-k As = 1.3 in ---------- calc Ase= 1.84 in KOS N I K Project: ®Ile ENGINEERING CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Job No: -0'4 -,-:6 Date!r /� ��`- $ht 7)t, � '� C..c:�1s• I 4 � Q♦—�' lam- i L RL I i 1 l _l . 1 (o'o'sz3 i l . 1 _ 1 XZ . l -1 . 1 Ad £Z:06:£b00Z/£6/6:91e4 peon peal=lp:uogipuoO (japio}s�)sis.CIeuy AAAy}uauaow ninba: alid i i 4a6ed _I _ 1 00,0 000 00'0 00'0 �V90vz- 00'0 ulw 69'90£9 b 000 00'0 00'0 69'9L9Z 00'0 Xew W39MIN [a.ql] [;j.ql] [74.gl] [ql] [ql] [ql] E£w ZZw uolsiol EA Je84S Zn Jea4S lelxv peol pea4=lp: uoi;ipuoO saagwow le se3jo} wnwixew SIIHSBU sIsRIeun wd 9£4ti:6 400Z/£6/6 a;ea #;-ql s;lun may;uawouJ nlnbe\Z-Z\9£hued\soled hued\soled\uoi;elnsul eleJ 9Z0-170\1700Z JIRGA\:>I al!d OSUBAPy W" wda 9A ls� MO'0- =nM ;S� t•LO'0- =M IN LLO'� =nZd P 6E V 1 =Zd A OL8'E =nld AN 096'E =6d paaoped aolmes l£'6+S£'4+M£'wia90'6 Z-6 NOIIVN18WOa (3VOl JsN 660'0- =nM ISN 6L0'0- =M 4N L9E'6 =nZd IIN �E V G =Zd IN 6987 =n6d AN 096'E =ld paao;oe,j aolmas l0l+S9L'0+30l+laZ'6 9-U NOIIVNISWOO GVOl jsd 00'66- Isd 00'EE- = 3 }sd 09'0L- ;sd 09'EZ- =M SOVOl -IV'd3iV-1 j1d 00'4E66 j1d 6E66 = Ip Zd 1HJ13HaIW @7 la l3NVd ;Id 00'9LE 4sd 9 = II 6d ;Id 00'9L86 Isd 9Z = Is 6d did 00'006 ;sd Z4 = Ip 6d SGVOI dINIS NOIS3a SOVOl WNOdINn 3unionNis :mou I :4 9Z =HlaIM 131MI=100N J p,1 8E E =2i31lduinw hued �i1el/V hued uol}elnsul aleO }oafad I _i .� �� I I I I TILT-UP WALL PANEL REVIEW Project Gale Insulation Panel Mark panel 38 GeometrV Design Section panel 2-2 Height= 23 ft Load Combination Wind Panel Thickness = 6.25 in Design Basis d = 4.6 in e = 0 in b = 24 in Material Prop. Concrete f'c= 4 ksi Ec= 3605 ksi Rebar fy= 60 ksi Es = 29000 ksi Ultimate Design CapacitV As = 0.62 in`/ft Pu = 4.947 k/ft n = 8.0 ASeff= 0.70 in` �= 0.88 c= 0.61 in Service Loads/Ft. Mn = 182,992 in-lb P, = 3.150 k/ft M,, = 161,675 in-lb P2 = 1.131 k/ft, panel weight w= -0.071 ksf Factored Design Moment Factored Loads/Ft. lcr= 91.86 in' Ply = 3.870 k/ft An = -1.98 in ---------- assu Plc = 1.077 k/ft, panel weight Mu = -82,520 in-lb wU = 70.092 ksf An = -1.98 in ---------- calc Deflection Limitation UBC Section 1914.8.2 S = 106.1 in' P1+P2= 4.281 k fr= 316.2 lb/in` (0.04) f'.(Ac) = 24 k Mcr= 33.57 in-k B, = 0.65 see 1910.2.7.3 0.6Pb = 0.0131 Acr= 0.15 in P= 0.0056 As = 1.30 in ---------- assu Ms = -50.4 in-k As = 1.3 in ---------- calc Ase = 1.84 in TILT-UP WALL PANEL REVIEW , Project Gale Insulation Panel Mark panel 38 Geometry Design Section panel 2-2 Height= 23 ft Load Combination Seismic Panel Thickness= 6.25 in Design Basis Lo d = 4.6 in e= 0 in b= 24 in Material Prop. Concrete f',= 4 ksi Ec= 3605 ksi Rebar fy= 60 ksi Es= 29000 ksi Ultimate Design Capacity As= 0.62 in`/ft Pu = 4.218 k/ft n = 8.0 Aseff= 0.69 in` = 0.89 c= 0.60 in Service Loads/Ft. Mn = 180,013 in-lb P, = 3.150 k/ft Mn = 159,481 in-lb Pz= 1.131 k/ft, panel weight w= -0.071 ksf Factored Design Moment Factored Loads/Ft. Icr= 90.68 in' Plu= 2.861 k/ft An = -2.12 in ---------- assu P2u= 1.357 k/ft, panel weight MU = -87,500 in-lb wu = -0.099 ksf An = -2.12 in ---------- calc Deflection Limitation UBC Section 1914.8.2 S = 106.1 in3 P1+P2= 4.281 k f,= 316.2 Ibhn` (0.04) f'r(A.)= 24 k Meg= 33.57 in-k B, = 0.65 see 1910.2.7.3 0.6Pb= 0.0131 Acr= 0.15 in P= 0.0056 As= 1.40 in ---------- assu Ms= -50.1 in-k As= 1.4 in ---------- calc Ase= 1.84 In o , ^ 1 1 1 J � J J V - 17 vI J � <40> J J I Irp KOSN I K Project:�tlz�— r� dimlk2 ENGINEERING_ CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Job No: Date Sht 1>G� M 1 1 I emu,,, � — � s• �a( � � +— .—,�- (�a � : � �r� 4 Project Gale Insulation Panel Mark panel 40 MULTIPLIER= 1 ROOF TRIB WIDTH= 25 ft ROOF STRUCTURE UNIFORM LOADS DESIGN STRIP LOADS P1 dl = 12 psf 300.00 plf P1 sl = 25 psf 625.00 plf P1 II = 5 psf 125.00 plf PANEL DL @ MIDHEIGHT P2 dl = 1131 plf 1131.00 plf LATERAL LOADS W= -23.50 psf -23.50 psf E _ -33.00 psf -33.00 psf LOAD COMBINATION 12-5 1.2DL+1.OE+0.75S+1.OL Service Factored P1= 1.050 klf P1u= 0.954 klf P2= 1.131 klf P2u= 1.357 klf I W= -0.024 ksf Wu= -0.033 ksf 1 LOAD COMBINATION 9-2 1.05DL+1.3W+1.3S+1.3L Service Factored P1= 1.050 klf P1u= 1.290 klf P2= 1.131 klf P2u= 1.077 klf W= -0.024 ksf Wu= -0.031 ksf .l J J . l J J TILT-UP WALL PANEL REVIEW Project Gale Insulation Panel Mark panel 40 Geometry Design Section typical Height= 23 ft Load Combination Wind Panel Thickness = 6.25 in Design Basis d = 4.6 in e= 0 in b= 12 in Material Prop. Concrete f',= 4 ksi Ec= 3605 ksi Rebar fy= 60 ksi Es= 29000 ksi Ultimate Design Capacity As= 0.2325 in`/ft Pu = 2.367 k/ft n = 8.0 Aseff= 0.27 in` = 0.88 c= 0.47 in Service Loads /Ft. Mn = 71,796 in-lb P, = 1.050 k/ft Mn = 63,483 in-lb P2= 1.131 k/ft, panel weight w= -0.024 ksf Factored Design Moment Factored Loads/ Ft. Icr= 37.72 in" Plc = 1.290 k/ft An = -1.65 in ---------- assu P2u = 1.077 k/ft, panel weight Mu = -28,147 in-lb wu= -0.031 ksf An= -1.64 in ---------- calc Deflection Limitation UBC Section 1914.8.2 S = 53.1 in P1+P2= 2.181 k fr= 316.2 Ib/in` (0.04) f'c(A.)= 12 k Mcr= 16.78 in-k B1 = 0.65 see 1910.2.7.3 0.6Pb= 0.0131 Acr= 0.15 in P= 0.0042 As= 1.20 in ---------- assu Ms= -16.0 in-k As = 1.2 in ---------- calc Ase= 1.84 in iJ TILT-UP WALL PANEL REVIEW Project Gale Insulation Panel Mark panel 40 Geometry Design Section typical Height= 23 ft Load Combination Seismic Panel Thickness = 6.25 in Design Basis -� d = 4.6 in e = 0in b = 12 in Material Prop. Concrete f'c= 4 ksi Ec= 3605 ksi Rebar fy= 60 ksi Es = 29000 ksi Ultimate Design Capacity As = 0.2325 in`/ft Pu = 2.311 k/ft n = 8.0 Aseti= 0.27 in` = 0.88 c= 0.47 in Service Loads/Ft. Mn= 71,560 in-lb P, = 1.050 k/ft Mn = 63,301 in-lb P2= 1.131 k/ft, panel weight w= -0.024 ksf Factored Design Moment Factored Loads/ Ft. for= 37.62 in" Plu = 0.954 k/ft An = -1.78 in ---------- assu P2u = 1.357 k/ft, panel weight Mu = -30,299 in-lb wu= -0.033 ksf An = -1.77 in ---------- calc Deflection Limitation UBC Section 1914.8.2 S = 53.1 in' P1+P2= 2.181 k fr= 316.2 Ib/in` (0.04) f'c(Ac) = 12 k Mcr= 16.78 in-k B, = 0.65 see 1910.2.7.3 0.6pb = 0.0131 Air= 0.15 in P= 0.0042 As = 1.30 in ---------- assu Ms= -15.9 in-k As= 1.3 in ---------- calc Ass = 1.84 in UKOSNIK 16300 Mill Creek Blvd. Title: Gale Insulation Job#04.028 Suite G-2 Dsgnr: Date: 5:30PM, 27 AUG 04 Description ENGINEERING Mill creek'WA 98012 CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS (P)425.743.7004 Scope: Rev: 580005 USer:KW0604005,Ver5.B.0.1-Dec-2003 gSCE 7-02 Earthquake Load Calculations (c)1983 2003 ENERCALC Engineering Software 04.028 gale insulation-ecw:Calculations Description Gale Insulation Occupancy Category ASCE 7-02 Table 1-1, 2003 IBC Table 1604.5 "II" : All Buildings and other structures except those listed as Category I, III, and I Occupancy Importance Factor = 1.00 ASCE 7-02 9.1.4 Seismic Use Group - I ASCE 7-02 Table 9.1.3 Ground Motion ASCE 7-02 9.4.1.1, 2003 IBC 1615.1 Latitude = 48.207 deg North Longitude = 121.948 deg West Location : Arlington, Snohomish County, WA 98223 Max. Ground Motions, 5% Damping,from USGS 1996 maps : SS - 1.085 g, 0.2 sec response S , = 0.305 g, 1.0 sec response Site Classification ASCE 7-02 Table 9.4.1.2, 2003 IBC Table 16.15.1.1 "D" : Shear Wave Velocity 600 to 1,200 ft/sec = D Site Coefficients Fa & Fv ASCE 7-02 9.4.1.2.4, 2003 IBC 1615.1.2 (using straight-line interpolation from table values) Fa = 1.07 Fv = 1.79 Maximum Considered Eartguake Acceleration ASCE 7-02 Equation 9.4.1.2.4-1 &2, 2003 IBC Equations 16-38 & 16-39 S MS = Fa * Ss 1.156 SM1 = Fv* S1 = 0.546 Design Spectral Acceleration ASCE 7-02 9.4.1.2.5, 2--3 IBC 1615.1.3 S DS= S MS* 2/3 = 0.771 SD1 = S M1* 2/3 = 0.364 Seismic Design Category = D ASCE 7-02 9.4.2.1, 2003 IBC 1616.3 (SDS is most severe) Basic Seismic Force Resisting System ASCE 7-02 Table 9.5.2.2, 2003 IBC Table1617.6.2 NOTE!See ASCE 7-02 for all applicable footnotes. Response Modification Coefficient " R " = 4.00 Building height Limits System Overstrength Factor "Wo " = 2.50 Category"A& B" Limit: No Limit Deflection Amplification Factor " Cd " = 4.00 Category"C" Limit: No Limit Category"D" Limit: Not Premitted Category"E" Limit: Not Premitted Category"F" Limit: Not Premitted 16300 Mill Creek Blvd. Title: Gale Insulation Job#04.028 KOSNIKSuite G-2 Dsgnr: Date: 5:30PM, 27 AUG 04 _1 ENGINEERING Mill creek, WA 98012 Description II : L CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS (P)425.743.7004 Scope Rev: 580005 ASCE 7-02 Earthquake Load Calculations . � User KW-0604005,Ver 5.8.0,1-Dec-2003 ry i (c)1983.2003 ENERCALC Engineering Software `1 04.028 gale Insuiation.em.Calculations Description Gale Insulation Average Floor Area per Level= 25,000 ft2 Reliability Factor" p"= 1.500 User defined Shear Carrying % Ratio= 0.2531 Equivalent Lateral Force Procedure ASCE 7-02 9.5.2.5, 200318C 1617.4 The"Equivalent Lateral Force Procedure"is being used according to the provisions of ASCE7-02 9.5.5 Determine Building Period Use ASCE 9.5.5.3.2 - 1 Structure Type for Building Period Calculation All Other Structural Systems "Ct"value = 0.020 " hn " : Height from base to highest level = 31.00 "x"value = 0.75 "Ta "Approximate fundemental period using Eq. 9.5.5.3.2-1 : Ta =Ct* (I'm ^x) = 0.263 "Cu"factor from Table 9.5.5.3.1 = 1.30 Per ASCE 9.5.5.3.1 the true fundamental Building Period shall not exceed = 0.342 sec Building Period "Ta " Calculated from Approximate Method selected = 0.263 sec " Cs "Response Coefficient ASCE 7-02 9.5.5.2.1 SDS: Short Period Design Spectral Response per 9.4.1.2 = 0.771 " R " : Response Modification Factor from 9.5.2.2 = 4.00 " I " : Occupancy Importance Factor from 9.1.4 = 1.00 From Eq. 9.5.5.2.1-1 : Preliminary Cs = 0.19 From Eq. 9.5.5.2.1-2 Cs need not exceed = 0.35 From Eq. 9.5.5.2.1-3 &4 Cs shall not be less than = 0.03 9.5.5.2.1 : Seismic Response Coefficient = 0.19 Seismic Base Shear ASCE 7-02 9.5.5.2 Cs = 0.1927 from 9.5.5.2.1 p W(see Sum Wi below) = 1,875.00 k },,L= Seismic Base Shear V= Cs *W = 361.40 k Vertical Distribution of Seismic Forces ASCE 7-02 9.5.5.4 " k" : hx exponent based on Ta= 1.00 Table of building Weights by Floor Level... Level# Wi:Weight Hi: Height (Wi*Hi)^k Cvx Fx=Cvx*V Sum Story Shear Sum Story Moment 1 1,875.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,234.91 Sum Wi = 1,875.00 k Total Base Shear= 0.00 k Sum Wi* Hi = 0.0 k-ft Base Moment= 0.0 k-ft Diaphragm Forces : Seismic Desiqn Cate-gory " D ", " E " & " F " ASCE 7-02 9.5.2.6.4.4 Level# Wi Fi Sum Fi Sum Wi Fpx 1 1,875.00 0.00 0.00 1,875.00 578.23 'gy Project: KOSNIK d lidd6k; ENGINEERING CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Job No: Date $ht 4/ ITS SZo o,4 o / � 7a v- � Iv J 1� i r: '1p Project: rf K0SN1K ®lls ENGINEERING CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Job No: dZ- V L- Date b Sht �- z¢ I 2 l l i i •i I I 'i '� KOSNIK Project: �1 was a,� i ENGINEERING CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Job No: d O2-o Date "k z/ d-Sht - S 1 �. 15 Lk C4 = 3.-3 1 i I K.0 S N I K Project: rills ENGINEERING CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Job No• 4/; O Date 4Sht X1S�iLo = 2gr1 e5)f—0 --X- 1 _J J TI) A, ;s �wi L ?ENGINEERINGS N I K Project Name: Gale Insulation Project No.: 04.028 CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Date: 9/8/04 Sheet: -�7 DISTRIBUTION OF HORIZONTAL LOADS IN WALL PIERS Design: fm= 1500 psi Stress Ratio(Insp.) = 0.5 (Inspection=1) Shear Reinforcing, F.= 24000 psi Allow. Stress Inc.: 1.00 (No Insp.=.5) Level: Tvp. Wall Panel Wall: Line A Type: Fixed F, lbs. : 12500 F wall, lbs. : F Total: 12500 x 1.0 12500 lbs. Shear Reinforcing : Number: 1 Size: #4 v, psi Pier Length, ft. Height, ft. to H/L R R/Y-R Force, lbs Actual Eff.Thickness i 2.33 9.00 7.25 3.86 1.05 0.15 1911 12.46 2 4.33 9.00 7.25 2.08 4.77 0.69 8678 28.32 3 2.33 9.00 7.25 3.86 1.05 0.15 1911 12.46 6.87 1.00 12500 II I �1 1 a ._J e J 04.028 Shearwallsxls OKOSNIK Project Name: Gale Insulation ENGINEERING Project No.: 04.028 CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Date: 9i14i2004 Sheet No.: Wall Design Forces(IBC 2003 Ed.) Wind: P= 11.5 psf Seismic: Fp= .4apSDSIP/RP(1 +2 x z/h)Wp ap= 1.00 SDS= 0.792 1 Height: h = 29 Ip= 1 FP= 0.380 x Wp Rp= 2.5 hr= 29 1 Base: h base= 0.00 Wp= 78 Fp= 0.127 x Wp Fp min. =0.3SDSIPWp= 0.238 x Wp I Fp max= 1.6SDSIPWP= 1.267 x WP Avg. = 0.309 x Wp 0.309 x Wp= 24.1 psf (Strength) Fp= Avg FP/1.4 x WP= 0.221 x Wp= 17.2 psf (ASD) Wall Anchorage Forces (Seismic Design Category C or D- Flexible Diaphragm only) Fp= .8 SDs I Wp= 74.1 psf I = 1.5 h parapet= 4.00 ft. Fp/1.4= 52.9 psf (ASD) Anchorage Tributary= (hr+hP)z/2 x hr= 18.78 ft. F a„ch=FP x Tributary= 1392 Ibs /1.4= 994 plf Wall Anchorage Forces (Seismic Design Category C or D-Rigid Diaphragm only) Fp= .4apSDSIP/Rp(1 +2 x z/h)Wp ap= 1.00 (Use ap= 1.0 per 9.5.2.6.3.2) SDs= 0.792 Fp= 0.284 x Wp Ip= 1 RP= 2.5 (Use Rp=2.5 per 9.5.2.6.3.2) Fp min. =0.3SDSIPWP= 0.238 x Wp hr= 12 J WP= 68 Fp max= 1.6SDSIPWP= 1.267 x Wp JUse Fp= 0.284 x Wp 0.284 x Wp= 19.3 psf (Strength) Use FP= Fp/1.4 x WP= 0.203 x Wp= 13.8 psf (ASD) 1 n �: I Ii,��'Ip KOSN I K Project: ��� �- 0 -ram ,9d113 ENGINEERING CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Job No:1!5'd-02 v Date �� °o O Z $ht 5-5 - I I I . l . I . 1 _1 J _ I LAKOSNIK Project Name: Gale Insulation ENGINEERING Project No.: 04.028 CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Date: 9/9/04 Sheet No.: �b 1 ANCHOR BOLT DESIGN _ Anchor Bolt Designation: Joist Seat I � �' I No. of Bolts in Tension group= 6 I `� ,� I E, Bolt Embedment Depth, Le= 5.00 I \ a-------------------------------o'er No.of Bolts in Shear group- 6 I i Edge Dist.To Bolt, E1 (Le max) = 5.00 I Y I Edge Dist.To Bolt, E2 (Le max) = 5.00 i Edge Dist.To Bolt, L1 (Le max)= 5.00 I �'� �`� I E Edge Dist.To Bolt, L2 (Le max) = 5.00 z X= 5.00 ----- -------- ------ r 00 X Apply S2 Factor?,N: N 0= 2.2 Apply Tension Zone Factor?, Y/N N Special Inspection (concrete), Y/N ? Y Bolt dia= 0.63 in. F1554 Gr 36 Concrete Inspection Factor= 1.3 Ab = 0.307 sq.in. fs = 60 ksi Concrete Parameters: fc= 3000 psi = 0.65 Ap= (X+ L1 + 1-2)(Y+ E1 + E2) = 210 = 1 or, single bolt,Ap=Ti Le2= LOADINPUT Wind: Group Load Concrete Steel PU BOLT WIND= 0.00 k x 1.3 x Insp. = 0.00 k 0.00 k VU GROUP- 0.00 k x 1.3 x Insp. = 0.00 k 0.00 k Seismic: PU BOLT= 9.34 k x 1.4 x Insp. = 2.83 k 2.18 k VU GRGUP= 2.50 k x 1.4 x Insp. = 4.55 k 0.58 k STRENGTH IN TENSION P ss GRGUP =.9 x Ab x fUt x(N) = 99.40 k oPc= 0,,[4(Ap)] VPc= 29.91 k < Pss Ductile failure is not assured STRENGTH IN SHEAR V ss GRGUP =.75 x Ab x f Ur x(N) = 82.83 k ¢Vc= ¢ x 800 x Ab x ), x Vf'c x(N) = 52.43 k RESULTS UNITY CHECKS: n, Load PUC GROUP Pus GROUP Pu/Pss Pu/CPC VUC GROUP VUS GROUP Vu/V SS VLI/(Vc Wind 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 OK ,Seismic* 16.995 13.073 0.132 0.568 4.550 0.583 0.055 0.087 OK COMBINED SHEAR AND TENSION: Concrete = I/ ¢ ((PU/P,)513 + (VU/V,)513] < Steel= (PU/Pss)2 + (VU/V55)2 _<I Load Concrete Steel Special Inspection is REQUIRED for Anchor Bolts Wind 0.000 0.000 < 1, OK Seismic* 0.215 0.017 < 1, OK *Factored by S2 per Sections 2213.6.2 &2214.4.2 for ordinary moment frames only. Joist Seal Anchor,04.028 Design Loads-v2.4 IBC.XIS SiV081 b'ZA-Spe0-1 u61Sad 9Z0•170 'Suoljoea�j AdoueC) sql-;;0898 = lxd = IIeM O; IN Sql ZZOZ =aMs sql 0£tib I = H bap qb =ZIJOH W04 l aOEJO sql 0£b4 = 11 d sql 5L6 =MOusd sql 99t7 = Ipd 4 00*9 :l 'u;p!M Adoue(] l 1;00'£b :;e:poddnS We98 afjp3 --► ;sd ££ :MouS + l(] le;Ol p ;sd 9Z :MouS ;Id L l 'we a6p3 d ;sd 9 1(] *;01 ;sd £ 6ulwead ;sd £ .OSIW —► H ;sd £ �IOa(] peol pea(] :speo-I aplS ISe3 `430a 6ulpeo-1 JOAO AdoueO :uoil !josed SNO11OV3N '8 S(IdOI AdONV3 a3N3A31I1NVO 'ON ;a94S b00Z/6/6 :a;e(] Ski33NI!DNR iyun.LonH1S JNIIInSN03 E)NI833NIJN3 8ZO :'ON 4091OJd �IN SON uol;elnsul aleg eO ;auaeN;oafoad JL X-S-7 �X a`�,�'I E' 2 �� "I = IA IVIH FXIIZA SIX•091 b'ZA-speol u6isa0 8Z0.7o'svoyouV Adoued �(Iuo sauaeJI IuawOw/Ueulpjo aol Z'17't76ZZ'8 Z'9'£6ZZ suolloaS aad U Aq pa.Ioloed NO '6 > 000'0 000'0 ,olwslas No '6 > OZO'0 Z90'0 pulM Roe A04ouy.Io;aguinomi sl uolloodsul leloadS IaalS alaJOUO3 peol r> Z(ssn/nA) + z(Ssd/"d) =1001S e > l e5(-,NnA)+ �5(-1d/nd)I 0 /e = araa0u00 :NOISN31 ONV 2IVAHS O3NISWOO >i0 000'0 000'0 000'0 000'0 000'0 000'0 000'0 000'0 olwslos No 696,o 880'0 96Z'6 089'l L9VO E66'0 698'6 OEb'Z pulM Ong/nn SsNnn dnoao snn dnoao 0nA od$/nd ssd/nd dnoao snd dnoao Ond peOl :SN03HO"Nn sl-inSMI (N)x°jN x y x qV x 009 x =DA 0 68'E 6 = (N)x anj x qb x SL' SS n 2JVAHS NI H1ON3211S pa.Insse Iou sl ainllei alllona ssd > � 8 6•b 6 =Ojl�, !(d y)p]y 0 =Od � L9'96 = (N)x ;nd x 9b x 6•= ss d NOISN31 NI H1ONEINIS � 00'0 � 00'0 = -dsul x j7'b x nn � 00'0 � 00'0 = -dsul x 17•b x =11os nd :olwslas 1 � ZZ'6 � 89'6 = dsul x£'6 x � ti6'0 nn � L8'6 � E17'Z = 'dsul x E•6 x N t717•l =ONIMllos nd Iaals alaaouo0 peo-I noaO :pulM 1ndNl CIVO I =Za-I u=dy'Iloq 916uls 'ao 6 = 6L = (Z3 + b3 +).)(Z� + 6-1 +X) = dV 99'0 = Isd 000E =of :saalaweaed 919aou00 ISN 09 =sj ul•bs LOE'0 =qd E'6 =aoloed uolloadsul alaa0uo0 9£a0 17996d ul E9'0 = elp 1108 A � N/A '(alaaouoo) uopedsul IeloadS N N/.l'Za0I0ed auoZ uolsual Ajddy Z'Z =U N :Nbk'UolOed U Ajddy Zl X I 00'0 =A � I-\----- -------- -----�,I 00'0 =X 00'S = (xew a�) Zl 1108 01 'IsI4 a6p3 I � I 00'9 = (xew a�) 4-1 1108 01 'Isla a6p3 \mob..........._.. .......... 00'9 = (xew a�) Z3 `I109 01 'ISICI a6p3 00'9 = (xew 91) b3 1108 of Isla a6p3 i I 00'S = 'gldad Iuawpagw3 IIoe p---------------------------o I =dno�6 Iea ul s o N l �' 4S II 8 Io 'O I dna6 uolsual uI 61109 JO 'ON l9�oea8 Adoue0 :uolleu6lsa4 Ilog JogouV lam/ ------------ NOIS3a 1-108 MOHONb' :'ON IaauS b0/6/6 :alea SH33NIONS iyunionuls'JNwnsNoo 8Z0't0 :'ON}OafO.Id JNla33NIEM uollelnsul ale0 :aweN}Oafoad NINSOM U N January 6, 2005 Al , 4 T Development 13700 44" St NE Lake Stevens, Wa 98258 OA RE: Permit Application 04-6204 Gale Insulation Dear Ed, The submitted drawings have been reviewed for compliance with the 2003 Edition of the International Building Codes. The following applicable code data corrections and/or additional requirements are necessary before the permit can be issued. NONSTRUCTURAL ��•1. Details 1 and 5 on sheet A8 show a non-complying guardrail at the lower portion of the stairs. This is acceptable if the distance from the grade to the top of the stairs is <=30"maximum distance. ®�2. The facing of the insulation that is exposed to the interior of the building must have a maximum flame spread rating of 25. �V3. Safety glazing is required within 24" of either side of a door. See Detail 4/A1 for typical interior glazing. 2000 WASHINGTON STAT NON-RESIDENTIAL ENERGY CODE 1. For areas using the Component Performance Lighting Option, the designer should provide calculations showing compliance with Section 1531 and Table 15-1. 2. For the exterior lighting, the designer should provide calculations showing that the amount of exterior lighting is within the exterior lighting power allowance per Section 1522 or Section 1532. BARRIER-FREE DESIGN 0�1. All doors in the building which have a latch set or lock set should have lever-type operating hardware. 4cp t r i t�-2. Door thresholds should be shown as no higher than '/2". The edges should be beveled at 1 vertical: 2 horizontal, with a maximum edge height of/4". STRUCTURAL 1. For your information, "Special Inspection" is required for: a. Steel deck welding b. Concrete Construction(=>3000 psi) c. Anchor Bolts d. Structural Steel Welding O -2. The design storage live load of 125 psf should be posted in the mezzanine area. OIL3. The design is based on a soil bearing of 2000 psf. You should verify this in the soil report. W4. Page B-5 of the calculations appears to require 4x4x3/16 TS columns for the braced frames. 0-5. The footings beneath the braced frame columns at Line 11 should be 6' sq with 7#5 bars each way, top and bottom. AIRPORT I. Because of the site's proximity to the Airport we require the contractor to supply markings for any tall construction equipment such as cranes that may be used. The markings supplied should be flags, minimum size 3' x 3' in dimension with an international orange and white checkerboard pattern utilizing 1' x 1' squares. The flags need to be placed on the highest part of the equipment to serve as a visual warning to pilots. Any equipment such as cranes needs to be lowered at night. 2. Because the site is adjacent to the airport we do have an existing avigation easement limiting the height of structures on the property. The FAA based on the following information provided by the developer and/or architect has approved the Gale Insulation Building. a. Gale Building: Finished Floor Elevation = 130', West End Building Height=26.75' 3. If either the planned finished floor elevation or the planned building height changes for the building as the building design progresses we need to be notified immediately and the applicant will need to submit modified 7460 (Notice of Construction) Form to the FAA. 4. Due to the proximity of the site to the Airport, we do not want any trees planted on the site that exceed a height of 20' at maturity. r �• ,� '� �T 1•� « �,, ��. PLANNING 1�1. The developer shall pay transportation impact fees to Snohomish County and WSDOT, and the developer shall submit to the City of Arlington proof of payment of the required fees. 2. The developer shall dedicate to the City of Arlington a Critical Area Protection Easement(CAPE)pr the approved mitigation plan by Hydro Terra dated June 25, 2004, received by the City of Arlington on July 7, 2004. the signed CAPE shall be submitted to the City of Arlington to be recorded prior to issuance of a building permit. No development shall occur within said buffer. FIRE OK 1. Automatic Fire Sprinkler and Monitoring required. SP C))� 2. Fire extinguishers will be required. Fire Department will conduct a site visit at time of near completion, final placement and total number will be determined at A4 3 that time. 0)6. Knox Box required, contact Fire Department at(360) 403-3607 D3 UTILITIES 0 C4. The drawings show 2 water meters and that the building is divided into two units. rjG� Please provide a breakdown for the square footage and business use per unit for each meter. OV,22. The legal description on sheet 1 is incorrect if this building is on lot 1. SC, pq . Sheet 1 note 18 calls for 1'/2 or 2"water service lines. Will you require a 11/2 or 2" meter to each unit? OP. Sheet 4 shows a SSMH, this needs to be shown as a Monitoring MH,per City of Arlington standards, for multiple units. SGi To comply with State of Washington Health Department regulations you will need to install the type of backflow assemblies required below, and provide the requested information. These comments are for the shell building only. Individual businesses must go through a Utilities Division review before occupancy will be granted. 01�4. A Reduced Pressure Backflow Assembly (RPBA) shall be installed per City of Arlington standards immediately after each of the water meters and before any branch connections; provide sufficient freeze protection. Alternatively, the RPBA may be installed inside the building in a mechanical room if adequate room is provided for testing, maintenance, repair, and drainage (see spacing requirements for the vault installation). If branch connections are present between the water t 'S« meter and the RPBA they must have a backflow preventer installed; the City of Arlington Water Department will determine the type of backflow preventer needed for the commensurate degree of hazard. 4-2. For a fire sprinkler system with chemical addition install a Reduced Pressure A4- Detector Assembly (RPDA). For a fire system without chemical addition install a Double Check Detector Assembly (DCDA). You may install the DCDA or RPDA in a vault outside per City of Arlington Standard, or inside the mechanical room if adequate space is provided for testing, maintenance and repair. For an irrigation system a separate metered service must be installed. A Double SGA Check Valve assembly (DCVA) shall be installed after the meter per City of Arlington standards W-13. Please state the size of meter required. aY-4. All the backflow assemblies shall appear opp the State of Washington Department of Health list of approved assembly. 5C �D 014,5. All the backflow assemblies shall be tested by a State of Washington certified Backflow Assembly Tester, at owner's expenses.56 ro ()16. The City of Arlington Water Department shall inspect the backflow assemblies after they have been tested. Provide a copy of the test report prior to calling for inspection. SG 6 7. Call for inspection at the following points of construction a. Prior to covering interior piping. SG b. Prior to covering underground piping. c. Prior to requesting final inspection by the Building Department. V8. Applicant must complete and return a City of Arlington Cross Connection Survey and Industrial /Commercial Waste Discharge Permit Applications. The drawings should be revised to indicate the revisions by showing the revisions by a cloud on the drawings along with a written narrative indicating the specific locations of the corrections and/or revisions. 8 complete sets of drawings and/or calculations are required at the time of re-submittal. If you have any question please give me a call. hT you, G av' de on Building Official 360.403.3432 danderson@ci.arlington.wa.us .`' ., rti' �; , ti .'�, , � � ... �b • City of Arlington Building Department � OCT 2 a 2004 REQUEST FOR REVIEW FORM NAME: G ,& 44QL t1 -L-1 BP #: DATE: 2 RETURN THIS FORM BY: PROJECT SUMMARY: RESPONDING DEPARTMENTS: ❑ TOM C., FIRE ❑ KAREN L., UTILITIES ❑ BILL B., NATURAL RESOURCE ❑ YVONNE P., PLANNING ❑ GREGG E., ENGINEERING ❑ JIM T., CONSULTANT ❑ CHUCK W., CONSULTANT SUBMITTAL INFORMATION IS ATTACHED. Please review the information and return this form and your comments, either on the drawings or in memo form, to the Building Department. If you have no comments, please return the form with the "No Comments" box checked PLEASE MARK ONE BOX, SIGN, DATE, AND RETURN THIS FORM TO LINDA. ❑ COMMENTS FOR THIS REVIEW ARE IN ATTACHED MEMO ❑ NO COMMENTS FOR THIS REVIEW, OKAY TO ISSUE PERMIT ❑ COMMENTS REVIEWED BY DATE CWA CONSULTANTS STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING BUILDING CODE CONSULTANTS 22421 N.E.20th Street,Sammamish,WA 98074 (425)836-2833 FAX:(425)836-3707 E-Mail:chuck.cwa@verizon.net November 30, 2004 Permit #: 04-6204 Project: Gale Insulation Warehouse Arlington, Washington Code Info: B/S-1 Occupancy, Sprinklers .V-B, Nonseparated Uses 1-story + Mezzanine Floor Area: -60,880 sf Allowable 82,760 sf 2003 International Building Code Seismic Design Category D Basic Wind Speed: 85 mph Exposure: B David W. Anderson Building Official City of Arlington 238 N. Olympic Avenue Arlington, WA 98223 Dear Mr. Anderson.- We have completed our review of the Gale Insulation Warehouse. The plans are in substantial compliance with the 2003 International Building Code, the WSVIAQ Code. The plans are approved and are being returned with our indication of review on them. Please note the changes to the plans as stated below: NONSTRUCTURAL 1. Details 1 and 5 on Sheet A8 show a non-complying guardrail at the lower portion of the stairs. This is acceptable if the distance from grade to the top of the stairs is <= 30". The details indicate 4 risers at 7", but show 5 risers. I have indicated a 30" maximum distance. 2. The facing of the insulation that is exposed to the interior of the building must have a maximum flame spread rating of 25. 3. Safety glazing is required within 24" of either side of a door. See Detail 4/A1 for typical interior glazing. ?EIVED DEC o 2 2004 BUILDING DEF - ... I 1 City of Arlington - #04-62u4 (Gale Insulation Warehouse) November 30, 2004 Page 2 of 2 2000 WASHINGTON STATE NON-RESIDENTIAL ENERGY CODE 1. For areas using the Component Performance Lighting Option, the designer should provide calculations showing compliance with Section 1531 and Table 15-1. 2. For the exterior lighting, the designer should provide calculations showing that the amount of exterior lighting is within the exterior lighting power allowance per Section 1522 or Section 1532. BARRIER-FREE DESIGN 1. All doors in the building which have a latch set or lock set should have lever-type operating hardware. 2. Door thresholds should be shown as no higher than 1/2". The edges should be beveled at 1 vertical: 2 horizontal, with a maximum edge height of 1/4". STRUCTURAL 1. For your information, "Special Inspection" is required for: a. Steel deck welding b. Concrete Construction (_> 3000 psi) c. Anchor Bolts d. Structural steel welding 2. The design storage live load of 125 psf should be posted in the mezzanine area. I have added a note to the plans. 3. We did not receive a copy of the soil report. The design is based on a soil bearing of 2000 psf. You should verify this in the soil report. 4. Page B-5 of the calculations appears to require 4x4x3/16 TS columns for the braced frames. I have revised Detail VS3 to reflect this. 5. The footings beneath the braced frame columns at Line 11 should be 6' sq with 7#5 bars each way, top and bottom. I have revised the plans. Sincerely, Chuck Williams SE CWA Consultants CITY OF ARLINGTON CONSTRUCTION PERMIT ( -�J ❑ COMBINATION BUILDING ❑ MECHANICAL ❑ PLUMBING ❑ SIGN PERMIT NO. OWNER '>m�0 MAIL LL.0 ADDRESS CITY `4o 7 . IJE, 4)f ��/ jZ,Cj ZIP PHONE /77 � 21Z) ARCHITECT OR SIGNER MAIL ADDRESS ITY ZIP PHONE l Zv( �ueco- 17 f2o GENERAL CONTRACTOR MAIL ADDRESS CITY ZIP PHONE LICIENSE N MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR MAIL ADDRESS CITY ZIP PHONE LICENSE# PLUMBING CONTRACTOR MAIL ADDRESS CITY ZIP PHONE LICENSE 3' CLASS OF WORK XNLW ❑AUDITION ❑ALTERATION ❑REPAIR ❑DEMOLI FION ❑BUILDING RELOCATION -VALUATION OF WORK DES( �r� i L"� Wh3C.ti `�- -L7 �v(L� ti1lIC� PROPOSF D USL Of BUILDINGI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE�� J r� EXAMINED THIS APPLICA- Zvi L y('vV rn y "� `�rJ� TION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BEDT UEDAND CORRECT ALL PROVI- LLGAL DESC'KIPI ION Of PROPERTY(SHOWN BELOW OR ATTALH FOUR COPIES) SIONS OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK LOI--4-- BLOCK - OF WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HERIN OR NOT.THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO C VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR TAX ID NUMBER LOCAL LAW REGULATING CONSTRUCTION OF THE PERFORMANCE OF D Z7 Cad ZOo �00 CONSTRUCTION. IT E IRES 1 YEAR FROM DATE OF ISSUANCE. SIGNAT f OM OR O AUT RIZED AGENT DATE JOB AUURLSS CJ- ) 6 ,7 >v S _�l ��,v� ,cJ. WaAt,,wy_j_ (OFFICE USE ONLY) MECHANICAL PLUMBING NO, TYPE OF FIXTURE FEE NO. TYPE OF EQUIPMENT FEE WATER CLOSET (TOILET) AIR COND.UNITS -H.P EA. BA I II I UB REFRIGERATION UNITS-H.P. EA. LAVATUKY (WASH BASIN) BOILERS- H.P. EA SHOWER C,AS FIRED A.C. UNITS-TONNAGE EA. KI ICHEN SINK& DISP. FORCED AIR SYSTEMS- B.T.0 MEA DISHWASHER WALL HEATERS- B.T.0 M LAUNDRY TRAY UNI1 HEATERS- B.T.U. M CLOIIILS WASHER EVAPORAI IVE COOLERS WAILRHEATER CLOTHES DRYERS URINAL VLNTILATICN FAN DKINKINC,FOUNIAIN RANGE HOOD COMMERCIAL I-LOOK DRAIN AIR HANDLING UNIT- CPM VACUUM BREAKERS STOVE ROOF DRAINS - RAINLEAUERS METAL FIREPLACE &CHIMNEY SINK (SERVICE - BAR,ETC.) WATER HEATER GAS PIPING SUB TOTAL 3 SUBTOTAL 3 PERMIT $ PERMIT $ TOTALFEE 3 TOTALFEE 3 SIDL YARD SL I BACK STRLLT SETBACK REAR YARD SETBACK PLAN CHECK N MBER/ PLAN CHECK FEE EE G RECF?PT NO, LSt /ONF LOT AREA VACANT SITE / VALUATION 11�� FEE []YES ❑NO FEES IYPL OF CONS OCCUPANCY GROUP NO.OF DWELLING UNITS PLAN CHECKING NG BUTDING 3 SIZE Of BLDG. NO.OF STORIES MAX.000.LOAD PLUMBING F IRE SPRINKLERS REQUIRED ❑YES ❑NO MECHANICAL STATE BLDG.CODE COMMENTS ENERGY CODE SURCHARGE PENALTY SEC,303(a) WATER/SEWER FEES RFCEi 4,'ED TOTAL OCT2004 PERMIT VALIDATION U 2 6 WHEN PROPERLY VALIDATED (IN THIS SPACEI THIS IS YOUR PERMIT&RECEIPT PAID CR# BY 13UILDING DEPT BUILDING OFFICIAL DATE Cc:ASSESSOR.APPLICANT,TREASURER.BLDG. DEPT. RECORDS COPY CITY OF ARLINGTON CONSTRUCTION PERMIT ' ❑ COMBINATION )�r BUILDING ❑ MECHANICAL ❑ PLUMBING ❑ SIGN PERMIT NO. OWNER MAIL ADDRESS CITY ZIP PHONE `(" cJ Y�e7`�m�� 1..1 C 13700 `4LIt 1�2 2�377 51�jc7 ARCHITECT OR,145IGNER MAIL ADDRESS ITY ZIP PHONE � ►� Zv( �uec�- t E20 e!; Z3'2 C GENERAL CONTRAC OR MAIL ADDRESS CITY ZIP PHONE LIC NSE 1' MLCIIANICAL CONTRACTOR MAIL ADDRESS CITY ZIP PHONE LICENSE 1 PLUMBING CONTRACTOR MAIL ADDRESS CITY ZIP PHONE LICENSE CLA55OF WORK &Nf W ❑ADDITION ❑ALTERATION ❑REPAIR ❑DEMULI FION ❑BUILDING RELOCATION VALUATION OF WORK , ULS( 54 PRUPOSI U USL UF BUILDING I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICA- I�I ! vl L_V loj& rn r 46 l��{�L t�Lr�`c� TION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT ALL PROVI- LLGAL DESCRIPI ION Of PR LRTY(SHOWN BELOW OR ATTACH FOUR COPIES) SIONS OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK L0I--4—BLIX:K OF WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HERIN OR NOT.THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO 7qc VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR TAX ID NUMBER LOCAL LAW REGULATING CONSTRUCTION OF THE PERFORMANCE OF J� /�/� 7 //� CONSTRU,CTIO . fR IT E FIRES 1 YEAR FROM DATE OF ISSUANCE. J 1 D� Z 7 L/v Zoo I uV SIGNAT f ONTww+tTTORO AUT RIZEDAGENT DATE 108 AUURLSS I CD `l 1 U ���v� . f✓ . (OFFICE USE ONLY) MECHANICAL PLUMBING NO. TYPE OF FIXTURE FEE NO. TYPE OF EQUIPMENT FEE WATER CLOSET (TOILLI) AIR COND.UNITS -H.P EA- BAIIIIUB REFRIGERATION UNITS -H.P.EA. BOILERS- H.P. EA LAVATORY (WASHBASIN) OWER GAS FIRED A.C. UNITS-TONNAGE EA. SH SINK& DISP. FORCED AIR SYSTEMS- B T.U- MEA KI OWLR DISHWASHERICIILNIN WALL HEATERS- B.T.0 M LAUNDRY TRAY UNI1 HEATERS- B.T.U. M CLUI IIES WASHEREVAPURAI IVE COOLERS WA l LK 1IEATLR CLOTHES DR YERS URINAL VLNTILATICN FAN UR UR RANGE FIOODCOMMERCIAL DRINKING INAIR HANDLING UNIT- CPM FLOOR DRAIN FUUNIAIN VACUUM BREAKERS STOVE ROOF DRAINS - KAINLEAUERS METAL FIREPLACE&CHIMNEY SINK ISERVICE - BAR,ETC.) WATER HEATER GAS PIPING SUB TOTAL f SUBTOTAL $ PERMIT $ PERMIT S TOTAL FEE TOTAL FEE $ S PLAN CHECK FEE SIDL YARD SL 1 BACK STRLLI SL TBACK REAR YARD SETBACK PLAN CHECKPFEES USF /ON[ LOT AREA VACANT SITE VALUATION 'lJn` FEE ❑YES ❑NO IYPL OF CONS] OCCUPANCY GROUP NO.OF DWELLING UNITS PLAN CHECK BU'LDING $ SILL 01 BLDG. NO.OF STORILS MAX.OCC.LOAD PLUMBING F IRE SPRINKLERS REQUIRED ❑YES ❑NO MECHANICAL STATE BLDG.CODE COMMENTS ENERGY CODE SURCHARGE U.B.C. PENALTY SEC.303(a) WATER/SEWER FEES ECEI W ED TOTAL PERMIT VALIDATION OCT 2 6 2004 WHEN PROPERLY VALIDATED (IN THIS SPACE)THIS IS YOUR PERMIT a RECEIPT PAID CR# BY h� BUILDING DEf BUILDING OFFICIAL DATE cc:ASSESSOR,APPLICANT,TREASURER,SLOG.DEFT- RECORDS COPY CITY OF ARLINGTON CONSTRUCTION PERMIT AA, ❑ COMBINATION ll�r BUILDING ❑ MECHANICAL ❑ PLUMBING ❑ SIGN PERMIT NO. OWNER %� MAIL ADDRESS CITY ZIP PHONE 4;�-4 -r tt<)em��c✓T' LLC 13? J�00 4l4 �� Y K 5 'jEZq 112_�_377 �I-!�v ARCHITECT OR SIGNER MAIL ADDRESS ITY ZIP PHONE ►� li ti i C �t1ec, 1 Vic'l e5- Z3-2 GENERAL CONTRACTOR MAIL ADDRESS CITY ZIP PHONE L I C_rNSE# MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR MAIL ADDRESS CITY ZIP PHONE LICENSE IF PLUMBING CONTRACTOR MAIL ADDRESS CITY ZIP PHONE LICENSE If CLASS OF WORK �NLW ❑ADDITION ❑ALTERATION ❑REPAIR ❑DEMOLI FION ❑BUILDING RELOCATION VALUATION OF WORK n ^ — �'�li 'fj� jC_tA� \L —:7 PRuPoSt U USL Uf BUILDING (,J��_� t'�t�`i`c__. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICA- TION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT ALL PROVI- LLGAL DESCRIPTION Of PROPERTY(SHOWN BELOW OR ATTACH FOUR COPIES) SIONS OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK LO BLOCK - OF WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HERIN OR NOT.THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUMETO GIVE AUTHORITYTO Sec VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR TAX ID NUMBER LOCAL LAW REGULATING CONSTRUCTION OFTHE PERFORMANCE OF i D Z7 a0 Zoo TOG` CONSTRUCTION. IT EXPIRES 1 YEAR FROM DATE OF ISSUANCE. SIGNAT E F' ONTRACTOR O AUT i(ILEDAGENT DATE 108 AuuRLSs 1,U f Z(ol Coa 16elve- 1-) Fi. . L YJ (OFFICE USE ONLY) MECHANICAL PLUMBING NO. TYPE OF FIXTURE FEE NO. TYPE OF EQUIPMENT FEE WATER CLOSET (TOILET) AIR COND.UNITS - H.P EA. BAIFIIUB REFRIGERATION UNITS -H.P. EA LAVATORY (WASH BASIN) BOILERS- H.P. EA SHOWER GAS FIRED A.C. UNITS-TONNAGE EA. KI ICIIEN SINK& DISP FORCED AIR SYSTEMS- B T.0 MEA DISHWASHERWALL HEATERS-B.T U M LAUNDRY TRAY UNIT HEATERS- B.T.0 M CLOT IILS WASHER EVAPORAI IVE COOLERS WAILRHEATER CLOTHES DRYERS URINAL VENTILATICN FAN DRINKING FOUNTAIN RANGE HOOD COMMERCIAL FLOOR DRAIN AIR HANDLING UNIT- CPM VACUUM BREAKERS STOVE ROOF DRAINS - RAINLEADERS METAL FIREPLACE&CHIMNEY SINK (SERVICE - BAR,ETC.) WATER HEATER GAS PIPING SUBTOTAL S SUB TOTAL f PERMIT $ PERMIT S TOTAL FEE f TOTAL FEE S SIUL YARD SL I BACK STREET SETBACK REAR YARD SETBACK PLAN CHECK N�M BER/ /PLAN CHECK FEE .� `„ EE � �JL[y RECF�P�OUSE /ON[ LOT AREA VACANT SITE !/L/Y// (✓ ` ❑YES ❑NO FEES VALUATION FEE TYPE OF CONS? OCCUPANCY GROUP NO.OF DWELLING UNITS PLAN CHECKING VG BUTDING $ SILL Of BLDG. NO,OF STORILS MAX.OCC.LOAD PLUMBING FIRE SPRINKLERS REQUIRED ❑YES ❑NO MECHANICAL STATE BLDG.CODE COMMENTS ENERGY CODE SURCHARGE U B.0 PENALTY SEC.303(a) WATER/SEWER FEES RECEIVED TOTAL LEE= �004 PERMIT VALIDATION OCT 2 WHEN PROPERLY VALIDATED IIN THIS SPACE)THIS IS YOUR PERMIT&RECEIPT PAID CR# BY '-0A RUILDIIVC DEPT BUILDING OFFICIAL DATE cc:ASSESSOR,APPLICANT,TREASURER,BLDG DEPT. RECORDS COPY CITY OF ARLINGTON CONSTRUCTION PERMIT AA, ❑ COMBINATION fir BUILDING ❑ MECHANICAL ❑ PLUMBING ❑ SIGN PERMIT NO. OWNER MAIL ADDRESS CITY ZIP PHONE 4 `C_ Oto&&e ewm_; i- 1_LC 13100 q4-6-"-j. li L K usy,5 412.�_37;7 5 I'�O ARCHITLCTOR SIGNER MAIL ADDRESS ITY ZIP PHONE -­*j Z6 f 2 Q_� (ffue"';v <f2o y e!;- Z--,5 z GENERAL CONTRACTOR MAIL ADDRESS CITY ZIP PHONE LIC NSE N MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR MAIL ADDRESS CITY ZIP PHONE LICENSE N PLUMBING CONTRACTOR MAIL ADDRESS CITY ZIP PHONE LICENSE N CLASS OF WORK EN�NLW ❑ADDITION ❑ALTERATION ❑REPAIR ❑DEMOLI FION ❑BUILDING RELOCATION -VALUATION OF WORK DES( PKUPUSI U USL Df BUILDING vl���vIJV rn � � I�{�..� ��, I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICA- (U TION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT ALL PROVI- LLGAL DESCRIPI ION UI PR ERTY(SHOWN BELOW OR ATTACH FOUR COPIES) SIONS OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK LOI_�LBLOCK OF WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HERIN OR NOT.THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO r)�C VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR TAX ID NUMBER LOCAL LAW REGULATING CONSTRUCTION OF THE PERFORMANCE OF � Jr Z7 ZOO �� COSiGNNSTRU,O ON. ER A IT UTE RIIRES NTEAR FROM DATE OF ISSUANCE. loe aDURLss � ATE 4' 1 & Cl /U 5 l<e/Ut- 4.fi , uCl'v (OFFICE USE ONLY) MECHANICAL PLUMBING NO. TYPE OF FIXTURE FEE NO. TYPE OF EQUIPMENT FEE WATER CLOSET (TOILET) AIR COND. UNITS —H.P EA. BA I II I UB REFRIGERATION UNITS—H.P.EA. LAVATORY (WASH BASIN) BOILERS- H P. EA SHOWER GAS FIRED A.0 UNITS— TONNAGE EA. KI ICI TEN SINK& DISP. FORCED AIR SYSTEMS— B T.0 MEA UISHWASIIER WALL HEATERS— B.T.0 M LAUNUKY 1KAY UNI1 HEATERS— B.T.U. M CLOTHES WASHER EVAPURAI I`/E COOLERS WATER HEATER CLOTHES DRYERS URINAL VENTILATICN FAN DRINKING FOUNIAIN RANGE HOOD COMMERCIAL I'LOOR DRAIN AIR HANDLING UNIT— CPM VACUUM BREAKERS STOVE ROOF DRAINS - RAINLEADERS METAL FIREPLACE&CHIMNEY SINK(SERVICE — BAR,ETC.) WATER HEATER GAS PIPING SUB TOTAL S SUBTOTAL 3 PERMIT S PERMIT S TOTAL FEE S TOTAL FEE $ PLAN CHECK FEE SOUL Y,\RU SE I BACK STREET SLiBACK REAR YARD SETBACK PLAN CHECK N / EE REC?Pj No USE' /UNI LOT AREA VACANT SITE I{V� VALUATION- II F1•/G) FEE ❑YES ❑NO FEES IYPL OF CONSI. OCCUPANCY GROUP NO.OF DWELLING UNITS PLAN CHECKING VG BU'LDING s SIZL OF BLUG. NO.OF STURIL5 MAX.000.LOAD PLUMBING FIRE SPRINKLERS REQUIRED ❑YES ONO MECHANICAL STATE BLDG.CODE COMMENTS ENERGY CODE SURCHARGE PENALTY SEC.303(a) FPERMITVAUDATIO,N e l E C U i r/r oCT2 6' 2004 DATED TIN THIS SPACE)THIS IS YOUR PERMIT&RECEIPT vCR# BY Co' A BUILDING DEPT BUILDING OFFICIAL DATE cc:ASSESSOR,APPLICANT,TREASURER,BLDG.DEPT. RECORDS COPY CATY Of AFA-P 9TON 4 LOT 5MORT PLAT kbyTM SHOW PLAT NO.Z� W ji?y of Arlhnglu,a"iiA P01IT11 11 OP 7W NtJ�4 NW/4xcTION aT,To►+�►�P el INORT►1 RANre ae lAsr, "'Q E??sE?u`C�(cl(1 4 t' S'��f94SHOHOMI H CAD NTY,STAT!'OP KM*W MN @ LjfN dmr*P `3XZ8 c f tiv2lCERTIFICATE OF OWNER5HIP AND DEDICATION GERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL OF R1BLJO IMPROVEMENT_5I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL STREETS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT ARE WITHINHEREON,WHICH PROPERTY IS LOCATED WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION AGKNOhILEDGMENTS THE CITY OF ARLINGTON PLANNING JW15DIGTION,ALL 5TREETS AND OTHERRE6ULATION.1UR15DIGTION OF THE CITY OF ARLINSTOR THAT HEREBY STATE OF WASHINGTON) PUBLIC IMPROVB-1E7N5 SHOM ON THI5 PLAT HAVE BEEN INSTALLED OR FREELY ADOPT THIS PLAN OF SUBDIVISION AND DEDICATE TO PUBLIC USE )55, COMPLETED TO CITY STANDARDS OR THAT THEIR INSTALLATION OR ALL AREAS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT AS STREETS,ALLEYS,WALK5,PARKS, COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH) COMPLETION(WITHIN 12 MONTHS AFTER THE DATE BELOW HAS BEEN OPEN SPACE AND EASEMENTS,EXCEPT THOSE 5PEGIFIGALLY INDICATED ABED BY THE PO5TIN5 OF A PERFORMANCE BOND OR OTHER AS PRIVATE,AND THAT I WILLMAINTAIN ALL SUCH AREAS UNTIL THE OFFER I CERTIFY THAT I KNOW OR HAVE SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE THAT SUFPIGIENT SURETY,AND THAT THE SUBDIVISION SHOWN ON THIS PLAT 15 IN � nn� OF DEDICATION 15 ACCEPTED BY THE APPROPRIATE PUBLIC,AUTHORITY. _ y , 20 'J' ALL PROPERTY SHOWN ON THIS SHORT PLAT AS DEDICATED FOR PUBLIC IS THE PERSON WHO APPEARHI BNSTRU ME,AND ALL RESPECTS ON COMPLIANCE WITH TITLE 20 OF THE APPRO ED �� SAID PERSON p�THAT HFJ5FIE SIGNED THIS INSTRUMENT,ON MUNICIPAL GODS,AND THERFORE THIS PLOT HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE USE SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE DEDICATED FOR ANY OTHER PUBLIC,USE OATH STATED THAT HE/SHE WAS AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE THE INSTRUMENT CITY ENGINEER. AUTHORIZED BY LAW WHEN SUCH OTHER USE IS APPROVED BY ARLINSTON AND A 401OWLEDSE�ED IT AS THE OF 4T GIN COUNCIL IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST.I SHALL FURTHER UNDERTAKE TO DEVELOPMENT,LLC,,A WASHIN&TON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY,TO BE DEFEND.PAY AND SAVE HARMLESS,ANY 6pV8RN EJNPAL AUTHORITY. THE FREE AND VOLUNTARY AGT OF SUCH PARTY FOR THE USES AND I�Ba Icuft`Y1iN"" INCLUDING THE CITY OF ARLINSTON WiICH MAY BE OCCASIONED TO THE PURPOSES MENTIONED IN THE INSTRUMENT. CITY ENGINEER ADJACENT LAND BY THE ESTABLISHED CONSTRUCTION,DRAINAGE OR to th MAINTENANCE OF SAID RIGHT-OF-NAY OR OTHER AREAS 50 DEDICATED. IS c*8R�llt I�I�(3 �� DATED -�_---,2004. DATE -- - pan*}a(Q Ilea of�Y �o Of IN WITNESS WHEREOF,WE SET OUR HANDS AND SEALS ON THIS_DAY ( SRO M OF ____2004. .""(*I TTIPN IT, Iudq Ohmgm NOTARYI ZdA TITLE._- 4T DEVELOPMENT,LLC GERTIFIGATE OF CITY TREASURER A WASHINSTON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY V� -- � TO BE PRINTED) I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL MONIES AND DEBTS PERTAINING TO THIS (� SUBDIVISION WERE PAID TO THE CITY OF ARLINSTON THE DAY OF RESDINS AT. 200—. _ nTtE,-------- cITY BANK— MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES _ FINANCE DIREGTOR/CITY TREASURER STATE OF WA5HIN6TON) DATE 1,AND 5URVEYOR'5 CERTIFICATE CXX )55. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THI5 MAP DRAWN UNDER MY SUPERVISION FROM NTY OF SNOHOMISH) AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION.A DEED DE50RIPTION I CERTIFY THAT I KNOW OR HAVE SATISFACTORY EVIDEPY..E THAT lr�RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR FILE NER 2002032gIO&5,SNOHOMISH 15 THE PERSON WHO APPEARED BEFORE ME,AND COUNTY RECORDS,THAT EXTERIOR SHORT PLAT BOUhmARY,AND ALL SAID PERSON AGKNOV�THAT HE/SHE 516,1ED THIS INSTRUMENT,ON INTERIOR LOT CORNERS HAVE BEEN SET UNDERMY SUPERVISION U51N6 AUDITOR S CERTIFICATE OATH STATED THAT HE/SH APPROPRIATE PERMANENT MATERIALS,WITH A FIELD TRAVERSE WITH HE/SHE WAS AUTFIORIZED TO EXECUTE THE INSTRUMENT LINEAR CLOSURE OF 1,IOp00 AND CORRESPONDING ANBUAR GL05URE AS AND ACKNOWLED61EDTHE IT A5 THE— FOR FILED FOR RECORD AT THE REST OF THOMAS E.BARRY,ON THIS_ SPECIFIED IN W.A.G.332.130.0'10 AND 332.130A90;THAT ALL STREET CITY BANK TO BE THE FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT ME SUCH PARTY FOR DAY OF 200_ AT^MINUTES PAST_ THE V5E5 AND PURPOSCS MENTIONED IN THE INSTRUMENT. O'GLOGK,AND RECORDED IN VOLUME OF SHORT PLATS,PAGE CENTERLINE MONUMENTS WITHIN THE SHORT PLAT AND ALL INTERSECTIONS A.F.N. �RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WITH EXISTING STREET CENTERLINES HAVE BEEN MONUMENTED WITH DATED _ 2004. WASHINGTON -- CONCRETE MONUMENTS IN CASE OR OTHER PERMANENT MATERIAL APPROVED BY THE CITY;THAT THE 90UNDARIES NOT SURVEYED ARE SHOWN AS BROKEN LINES PLOTTED FROM INFORMATION AS RrFERDv_ED HEREIN;AND THAT THIS MAP WAS PREPARED IN AOCrORDANCE WITH AUDITOR,SNOHOMISH COUNTY PROVISIONS OF RGW W.11.WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE i G IN AND FOR THE T Two REGISTRATION NUMBER AND SEAL THIS DAY OF 2004. P-�) BY. --_---- (� Y — DEPUTY COUNTY AUDITOR _ DATE, — RESIDING AL — THOMAS E.BARRY, PROFE5510NAL LAND SURVEYOR GERTIFIGATE NO,28,061 MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES-- CERTIFICATE OF 5013DIVI510N APPROVAL STATE OF WASHINSTON) I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE SUBDIVISION SHOWN ON THIS SHORT PLAT IS IN )55. ALL RE5PEGT5 IN COMPLIANCE WITH TITLE 30 OF THE ARLIN&TON COUNTY OF SNOHOMISHU MUNICIPAL CODE,AND THEREFOR THIS PLAT HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE PLANNING MANAGER,SUBJECT TO ITS BEING RECORDED IN THE SNOHOMISH I CERTIFY THAT I KNOW OR HAVE SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE THAT COUNTY RESISTER WITHIN&0 DAYS OF THE DATE BELOW. THOMAS E.BARRY 15 THE PERSON WHO APPEARED BEFORE ME,AND SAID PERSON ACKNOW LEPSED THAT HE SIGPEO THIS INSTRUMENT AND AGKNOWLED61ED IT TO BE HIS FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT FOR THE U5E5 AND PURPOSES MENTIONED IN THE INSTRUMENT. PLANNING MANAGER,CITY OF ARLIN6TON 2004. — DATE A.F.N. ———————————————— REV 01 R_v II-Io-04 P� NOTARY PUBLIC IN AM FOR THE STATE OF KA5W!45T� B`$4Qp M E T R O N CITY OF ARLINGTON FILE NO. Z-04025-5P T and ASSOCIATES INC. 4 LOT SHORT PLAT _�_�_"_ (GJ� (NOTARY NAPE TO BE PRJNTEDl LAND SURVEYS, MAPS, AND LAND USE PLANNING "5gTH AVENUE N.E. DEVELOPMENT" D� RESIDING AT: 307 N. OLYMPIC, SUITE 205 FOR 1 I +.,,,,.• ARLINGTON, WASHINGTON 98223 4T DEVELOPMENT, LLG NOV 6(360) 435-3777 FAX (360) 435-4822 MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES__ Law CWViot r--od 70O40=Wb-:old/Wood«,b-1. A PORTION OF THE NF.1/4 N1•U/4 DATE.DULY 200, BY,JS.M. SCALE. --- `+EGTION 21,TOWNSHIP 31 NORTH,RANGE 05 EAST,W.M. SNOHOMISH,COUNTY,STATE OF WASHIN6TON PROJECT NO. 040015P F8. 5-31 BK 36 SHEET I OF 3 CITY OF ARLINGTON C TY Or/VUNOTCM 4 LOT 5HOW PLAT lnl "fp 7�0 SHORT FLAT NO.Z�'.Y E�o�C�><i �� � ��I ����s f SNONOMEH GOIINTY,STAIN OF k0a"I Nlltl'I7N 1_— C1iJ was a athEfRAL NOTES AND RFSTRIGTIONS co o4` l—LLV (U NO PORTION OF A LOT IN T1415 PLAT SHALL BE REDIVIDED AND SOLD EXCEPT IN (v11U SUBJECT TO IE RMS AND CONDITIONS OF A COVENANT TO BEAR PART OR ALL OF THE CONFORMANCE WITH RGW C JAPTER 56JI,AND ALL APPLICABLE ZONING ORDINANCES OF THE COST OF CONSTRICTION OR REPAIR OF EASEMENT GRANTED OVER ADJACENT PROPERTY I b ��,, � � � M nfj cc CITY OF ARLINGTON. FOR AN UNIPJ CAAV WATER PIPE FROM 51ST AVENUE NORTHFJ�5T DRAINAGE DITCH Y -' (IU FOLLOWING THE ORIGINAL REASONABLE GRADING OF ROADS AND WAYS HEREON,HNO RECORDED UNDID AUDITORS FILE NUMBER 2362512. ] (omn AID DRAINAGE WATER ON ANY LOT OR LOTS SHALL BE DIVERTED OR BLOC.Y.F.D FROM ITS 11 LV NATURAL COURSE 50 AS TO OISC.HNR6,E UPON ANY PUBLIC ROAD RIGHTS OF WAY TO HA1.PER CONDITION,HOh-Vr� THAT WHEN PUBLIC WATER BECOMES AVAILABLE AT RATES AND UPON PROPERTY ROAD DRAINAGE. THE OYN9R OF ANY LOT OR LOTS,PRIOR TO MAKING ANY CONDITIONS GOMMJN TO ALL OTHER WATER USERS IN THE VICINITY OF THE 6RANT�S LAND ALTERATION IN THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM AFTER THE RECORD OF THE PLAT,PRIOR TO NOW LYING EAST OF THE THE PREMISES 1 IN-ABOVE FIRST DIESC.RIBED,IF THE GRANTORS ALTERATION IN T DRAINAGE SYSTEM REAFTE D HE PART OF ANY GONAT,PRIOR N ON SAID HAVE NOT ALREMrf INSTALLED A WATER PIPE LINE ON THE SAID EASEMENT,THIS RESERVED C� _ LOT E THE EXISTING DRAINAGE SYSTEM,MUST MAKE APPLICATION ON AND RECEIVE EASEMENT T`�`LL TERMINATE.AND THE GRANTORS,THEIR HEIRS,EXECUTORS, (-'Y' ft ropnwnt�O of /I, ho ft APPROVAL FROM THE CITY OF ARLINGTON,FOR ANY ALTERATION OF OR CONEGTION TO THE CONVEY BY ADMINISTRATORS AND A�IM DEED ALL THEIR SHALL WITHIN RIGHT,TITLE,INTEREST AND ESTATE DAYS AFTER WRITTEN DEMAND ND To S ll ^�"�'���/ EXISTING,DRAINAGE SYSTEM. ANY ENCLOSING OF DRAINAGE WATERS IN CLLVERT5 OR EASE ENT TO ITHE�OWNER OF PREMMISES EIE INABOVE FIRST DESCRIBED.,N AND TO SAID TNs , an� to DRAINS OR REROUTING THEREOF ACROSS ANY LOT AS MAY BE UNDERTAKEN BY OR FOR THE p � ��RA®B9 f�to� OWNER OF ANY LOT 5H41,ll BE DONE BY AND AT THE EXPENSE OF SUCH OWNER (IK)5UB.L-GT TO G<NENANTS,GONDITIO"S,RESTRICTIONS,DEDICATIONS,A6REEMIET16, P^, It for a Hot QE any eppicebla OClxd1 cne d � lIIU ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS IN PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY SHALL 8E MAINTAINED BY THE �`EI ITS• I��`NCE �1510N5 AND NOTES,AS GONTAIN£D IN SNOHOMISH GOIANTY 00 ALL AN THEIR D AREAS AS IN AND MUST BE REDUCED AL ELIMINATED AT THE REQUEST SHORT PLAT NUf BI3Z&2(4-94),RECORDED UNDER,AUDITORS FILE MR43 2 2339564. I�T'ILIC�O}1!l Ti�S��118 8�(�IT.OF THE CITY OF ARLINGTON IF DEEMED NECESSARY FOR ROAD PURPOSES. SAID SHORT PLAT WAS REVISED UNDER AUDITORS FILE NUMBER 6304260231. (Hv)THIS LAND 15 WITHIN THE INFLUENCE OF THE ARUN&TON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT,ON WHICH (x)SUB.FLT TO 154SEMIE4NT CONDEMNED IN SNOHOMISH COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT AND THE AERONNITIGAL ACTIVITIES A5 DEFINEP IN RGW CHAPTER 1406 AND ARL149TON MUNICIPAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF IN FAVOR OF THE CITY OF ARLINSTON,A MUNICIPAL CODE TITLE 14 ARE AND MAY BE CONDUCTED,INGUUOING OVERFJ-I6HT ACTIVITIES AND CORPORATION FCR THE PLW05E OF A PERPETUAL EASEMENT AND R16HT OF WAY, ACTIVITIES CREATING HOME IMPACTS ON THE PROPERTY. APPURTENANT TO 11E AJRL.INSTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT FOR THE UN0135TRUGTEV PA55A6E OF SINGE AIRCRAFT WILL BE FLYING OVER THE PRZV05EV AREA,ANY OUTDOOR LI6HTIN6 SHALL ALL AIRCRAFT iR WIOM150EVBt OWN®AND RY PLANE IN THE AIRSPACE ABOVE BE L70WN�FEILDBN AS TO REDUCE ANY TYPE OF 6LARE WHICH LOUD INTERFERE WITH ` �'U'nlERi2TY'�E AN IMAGINARY PLATE USING AND EXTENDING IN A 6$NERALLY SOOTS+ERLY DIRECTION OVER RE51PO4dNENTS'PROPERTY FOR UN055TRUGTI7N FL16HT OPERATIONS. PA56A6E OF ALL AIRCRAFT OVER TRANSITIONAL.5URPAGES TO THE APPROACH ZONE-UNDER NO USE MAY BE MADE OF THE PREMISES WHICH CAN OR DOES INTERFERE WITH USE OF THE CAUSE NUMBER 64-2-040qq-6. AIRPORT BY AIRCRAFT BY REASON OF ELECTRICAL,ELECTRONIC,OR SMOKE EMANATTON5, (XI)5l9`EGT TO MCTTERS DISCLOSED BY SURVEY RECGORDFSN UNER AUDITORS PILE R*BER L16HTIN9 00NDITION5,IE16HT OF ANY 5TV4JCTURE OR APPURTENANCE,OR ANY USE WHICH MAY 6612315025 CONU321NG AJ TRANSITIONAL SURFACE ELEVATION AND B.)CLEAR ZONE ATTRACT BIRDS. BOUNDARY. (v)CRITICAL AREA PROTECTION EASEMENT,TH15 OPEN SPACE TRACT 15 INTENDED TO DISTRICT RIOTSUBJ 4T TO F13RJM5 MI CONDITIONS OF LE EASEMENT GRANTED NE PUBLIC,UTILITY PROTECT THE STEEP 5LOPE5 AND ITS DESIGNATED BUFFERS-POTENTIAL HABITAT FOR BULL DISTRICT NO. I OF LES5NO AN ISO GGVEtTY FOR ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION LINE FACILITIES TROUT,AND ENDANGERED SPECIES-AND ITS ASSOCIATED METLANDS,AND SHALL PRECLUDE4 CONSISTING NS POLES AND/OR DEED5TR LINER AND/OR FILE NUMBEROUND FACILITIES,OR GRADING OR ANY RECONTOURING OF THE LAID,PLACEMENT OF STRUCTURES,WELLS,LEACH COMBINATIONS THEREOF RECORDED LINER AUDITORS FILE NUMBER g006200021. FIELDS,UTILITY LINES AND/OR EASEMENTS,AND ANY OTHER THING VEHIGLE ACTIVITY; (x110 SUBJECT TO TERMS AND COHDITION5 OF AN EASE MEW GRANTED TO THE OWNER OF LOT I GRAZING;DLJF"NEv;AND THE ADDITION OR REMOVAL OF VEGETATION,EXCEPT THAT FOR INGRESS,E613ES5,REGRESS AND FOR UTILITIES AFFEGTING THE SOUTH 50 FEET OF THE VEGETATION MAY BE SELECTIVELY RB40VW UPON WRITTEN ORDER OF THE CITY'S FIRE NORTH 60 FEET CIF LOT 2 RECORDED LINER AUDITORS FILE N MDER tggqOq220226. CHIEF FOR THE E)(PRESS PURPOSE OF REDUCING AN IDENTIFIED HAZARD:AND EXCEPT THAT (.iv)SUB,ECT TO MATTERS DISCLOSED BY SURVEY RECORDED UNER AUDITORS FILE NUMBER UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES MAY BE PLACED IN THE BUFFER AREAS IN LOCATIONS 20000g265003 APPROVED BY THE CITY"NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGER.IN ADDITION,STREAM RESTORATION ACTIVITIES MAY OGGUR PER A RESTORATION PLAN APPROVED BY THE (xv)SUB.EGT TO T RM5 AND CONDITIONS OF AN EA.SFJ ENT GRNNTID TO GROWN PARK LLC PLANNING,MANAGER. FOR INSRE55,E6-E55 AND UTILITIES OVER THE EASTERLY 62 M!ET RECORDED UHER (vU 5UBJECT TO TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF A COVENANT TO BEAR PART OR ALL OF THE AWITORS FILE 1419 200105150556. COST OF CON51RUI ON OR REPAIR OF EASEMENT GRANTED OVER ADJACENT PROPERTY FOR (xvU SUBJECT TO TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF COV9NANTS RUNNING WITH THE LAND AND RIGHT A DRAINAGE DITCH RECORD®UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 226649. OF WAY A6REEmE14T RECORDED UNER AUDITORS FILE NUMBER 20010315055g. (VIU SUBJECT TO RESERVATIONS GONTAINRD IN D®RESERVING`UNTO THE GRNATOR OF (xvn)AN EASEMEHq FOR STORM DRAINAGE INFILTRATION SYSTEM PURPOSES AND ITS ALL MINERALS,S,OIL AND GAS IN OR UNDER THE DESCRIBED LAND REC49RD137 UNDER APPURTENANCE UNDER AND UPON LOT I A5 SHOWN HEREIN 15 HEREBY GRANTED TO LOT AUDITORS FILE NIIMBEiR.gq`1064. 2.MAINTENANCE 051-19ATIONS AND COST SHALL BE PROPORTIONAL TO THE IMPERVIOUS AREAS DEVELOFW ON SAID LOT 2.THIS EA5EM7@IT 15 BORDERING ON LOT I AND SHALL QUIT CLAIM DEED FOR TRANSFER OF MINERAL RIGHTS AND THE TERMS,CONDITIONS AND ONLY BENEFIT LOT 2 AS SHOWN HEREIN. PROVISIONS RECORDED 1RDER AUDITORS FILE NUMBER,200402240077. A.F.N. _.--------------- REV OI RJD 11-10-04 E 1 I E T R O N CITY OF ARLINOTON FILE NO. Z-04-025-5P ;•�' w`'s�,� and ASSOCIATES INC, 4 LOT SHORT PLAT LAND SURVEYS, MAPS, AND LAND USE PLANNING "54ITH AVENUE N.E. DEVELOPMENT" 307 N. OLYMPIC, SUITE 205 FOR •.°;;;.• ARUkGTON, WASHINGTON 98223 4T DEVELOPMENT, LLG q >� (360) 435-3777 FAX (360) 435-4822 Cvprkjt reMry d 20040 M.Eron mW A"pokl",W. A PORTION OF THE N.E.1/4 N.H.1/4 SECTION YI,TOWNSHIP 31 NORTH,RANGE 05 FAST,W.M. DATE.JULY 200.4 BY,JS.M. ISGALE, --- SNOHOMISH COUNTY,STATE OF WA5HIN6TON PROJECT NO. 0400ISP FB. 5-31 F%--'36 SHEET 2 OF 3 CITY OF AFUN6TON 4 LOT SHORT PLAT - N =I y D ■5c"AVENUE N.E. DEVELOPMENT* �` -� :ArgA Agion SHORT PLAT NO.Z-o4-025-5P 21 �µ6ToH D —1 A PORTION OF THE NPJ/4 KKV4_ _ AhIRQ�? 22 � I I ,{& �iG'C� I"#�.tf3 i:.+f�:1L'1!`IOU!!3�LAiC.'�'Ys0 cibt.�19''�`N).$(!U t n n>< 5EG I�MISH GOUNTY�,STATTEK OF WASFNNBTONT MW STATE ROUTE 531 i"i 2�:i s 6 1✓ 1/E?�Qfw'T�-r(��o �ucxsr� To 1-5 A-IZV 5T NE) VOL 100 O I00 a o g I I IQ i7 the --- �- i SGQIe I" = 100' _� F v-ct< 2O CAS r t� I 28 '^ g 27 - I 3 ' H111 G.A.PH LIFE TABLE `- ' Y ` o It, r1 �i I j N 4 ( L LEN6TH BEARINS p 4 d_ ul �-a a: }~� LI SrOAO NOq'(3•E� °J x pn� " L2 11457 N 79'3079•E VICINITY MAP 111E fbQflDPofi>�MO C QFB h�fl1 d'111�fOdll� fl I i=�=j F�uy I L3 24D5 N 03•15•.1-W SCALEl r=2000' 7 t, �/�� �y (�,.,.,�� !ram,t�q (V N 7< t S F ii11100 N Ul 51 ry LL I 10 N�l S Q I 1 f plan Is c*an IJRI IILIII to It pm Q4 PWW�tD IJlt7 < ..< I en ermit for a list of arty appioable oorldboft d h ' -hirh may Inolude changes to this site Pl8n. 94THi AVENUE N.E. N 02.12'OH'E 1343.4T _ _ -- 462O1' (PUBLIC ROAD) - - - Z N I SOOT 20000•_ —f14S0'— N 02'12'ob-E i26331' 421.04' W I3 I V i- ry Sri �4 1 Via• 252b5'— 0 I F T 64G.0T' 3r� IZ I Ok 3 $ I E q I� Y I Q Row 50001 I soul Zoom' 4 so I s000 $■� o - U. r Ng� 1 3 LLI< y}1 -IN m H102'01.21•E 61 Y3; ���2 �4 � g J x aa I p n p 1� D yWI - f ro W0. C I J Z J O �! 1 _ Q W 3p 0~q, i �J qF� _ TM� a�C "� - ---- -- ILI J-- ------------- ------------- -- 4e N 11ij cka - 1-r—: ---_-- xI <� wag JF_ Fa, e N 02 Ol'21 E h44.96' W t� N __ X<J ■�� xoo°gi H-WYw W �U Ix �F� Cq2 AVIGATON EASEMENT AN AVIGATION EA5EMWT OVER THE PROPERTY STARTING AT 261 FEET MEAN w��$ {�� ' h k SEA LEVEL(MSU MID EXTIE DINS UPWARD 15 HEREBY DEDICATED TO F Y-i y�i� ARLINGTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT UPON THE REGORDIN6 OF THIS PLAT 1`BiREBYj Lit6 'i rl x NO OBJECTS WILL BE CONSTRUCTED THAT W 9 ILL PE K <TRATE THAT 5URF E J p p lgj (BAD ON FEDERAL AVIATION R66ULATION5(FAR)PART TT). K 7 u�( I I V W - - - - - - - - - - - X N-N U, I_EGA' DEC'-PIPTION 5UP.VEYOR'5 FtOM L LOT 2 OF SHORT PLAT NUMBER SP 52(4-74)RECORDED UNDER AUDITORS FILE NO.2539564 1.FOR SUBDIVISION SOLUTION,SEE RECORD OF SURVEYS RECORDED UND92 AFN • SET D/D'X 24'0125AR MTH CAP STAtIFW%b 7H06T AND REVI5ED UNDER AUDITORS FILE NLHMR 830428O23I BEING A PORTION OF THE 200205015004 AND AFN.2001083I5002. �XAL I{/YN9iEiL 9TAl'Pm T.S 2H061' NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST GUARTER OF SECTION 2T,TOWN5HIP 51 NORTH,RANGE 5 EAST,KM,RECORDS OF SNOHOH15H COUNTY,WASHINGTOK 2.DISTANCES SHOWN HEREON ARE GRID DISTANCZ5. GRID DISTANCE/SCALE FACTOR(0.999935)-GROUND DISTANCE. EXCEPT THE EASTERLY 62 FEET TFEIREOF CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF ARLINSTON BY GMT CLAIM D®RECORDED UNDER AUDITORS FILE NIMBER 2004040100B3. 3.AREAS SH01•N HEREON ARE 5RUO AREAS. 6RID AREA/SCALE FACTOR SOLAR®(0.9999H7) 6POUND AREA, SITUATE IN THE COIMTY OF SNOHOMISH,STATE OF WA%IN5TOH1 pc.F-N. ________________ REV OI RJD II-10-04 (Lf-SAL DESCRIPTION PER CHIGA60 TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY SHORT FLAT GERTIFIGATE ORDER NUMBER 5501204E DATED APRIL 13,2004) /I�E �T CITY OF ARLINGTON FILE NO. Z-04-025-5P Lv 1 �I RECORD OF SURVEY A.FN 200205015004 � ♦� `•,'`''•Tv9�' and ASSOCIATES INC. 4 LOT SHORT PLAT RECORD OF SURVEY A.F.N.200105515002 Flan ,,• =AND IptSTRl1NBlTATION ' LAND SURVEYS, MAPS, AND LAND USE PLANNING "5CITH AVENUE N.E. DEVELOPMENT" MELD TRAVERSE.CLOSM GRGl1i FIGD TRAVERSE 307 N. OLYMPIC. SUITE 205 FOR PFSGI510N RATIO.GREATER THAN I PART IN� ♦ 21=1 o Flap .TP24M E 4000 AND sac DUAL rMAIE CC elPs --=1.• ARLINGTON. WASHINGTON 98223 4T DEVELOPMENT, LLG SURVET'PVV-aV1M / tl� (360) 435-3777 FAX (360) 435-4822 STANDA�EIVROR DISTANCE d-2GM A FMV Copr*t re■e od 20040 Matron and Axxlate■,mc. A PORTION OF THE N.E-1/4 NA.I/4 FIELD EMPMENT:LWA RODOIIG TOTAL STATION TGRA M Evolm SECTION 2-7,TOWNSHIP 31 NORTH,RANGE 05 EA5T,W.M. LEAST COUNT AM"I SECOND DATE.JULY 2004 9Y:J5.M. SC (ODI PTJ ALE: I° = 100- SNOHOMISH GOl1NTY,STATE OF WASHINGTON STAOARD l9tRDR DISTAHL�f �/-SMM PROJECT No. 040075P F.B. 5-51 BK 56 SHEET 3 OF 5