Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout17316 SMOKEY POINT BLVD_035400_2026 An INSPECTION REPORT V" n IN G T �� � 4y O Permit No.: Lot#: Q' 'j" Address: 17.31b Z Contractor: _/ � /C_ , �O Owner: u 67�T LINO Date: s- S`D3 X*J-APPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. Inspector: Date: `, PE OF INSP CTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork chanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: INSPECTION REPORT • �-qo(: ¢1•tN G?'Q Permit No.: Mwe Lot#: Q Address: r -7 3 1 L- • e Contractor: 9 O Owner: Z-t::�L.4 r-D S10ING� Date: ❑ APPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION MCORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. L Inspector: Date: ''��`�%j TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing WGas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork Cr Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: 'n n INSPECTION REPORT 3�3k YV ' 4ti1N G � Permit No.:i 02 Lot #: Q' Address: 1-7,3144"l 5V 16 Contractor: Iv u'�E2 6 S � 4 Owner: ,eVA 9sII I N G Date: -� Ok APPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. Inspector: Date: TYPE O INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in Fin I ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: INSPECTION REPORT y ZD ¢1,ZN G rO Permit No.: 04)-r Sl l Lot 1 Q' Address: F7 3IL417 3 Contractor: _ �_? �� w pSr �S �O Owner: SIN O Date: �� 3 ❑ APPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL VIOLATION 6�,CORRECTION REQUESTED tf�actions listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. Inspector: Date: TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid 9 Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove 9Rough-in j.ned Final ❑ Masonry Mason LI Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: a INSPECTION REPORT ¢titN Gr0 Permit No.: dZ 5iti i Lot#: Addr('Ss: . 1.7 3 1 b S",ri fry. oT • • O Contractor: "t' r---T L."—ff f 9�, Owner: �I N iG Date: of -1,8-- O APPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. Inspector: Date: ' ' T'YPE OF INS CTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation '.Other: - 8 Az- n*�-i s.�,c l k -- INSPECTION REPORT 3 y 4N G rG Permit No.:6�__S7NI Lot /#: Address: 7 1 Contractor: S O Owner: i N G Date: ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL >_(APPROVAL VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. Inspector: 15"[ Date: TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ;Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry :1 Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: INSPECTION REPORT ZZ(v NG Permit No.: 2 51* LoJtt #: l Address: Contractor: C,SO Owner: �y I N Date: o2� — APPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. f-p p z'SVi-v Inspector: S Date: 3 TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage Xpsulation 0 Other: -- INSPECTION REPORT ZNGT 4ti Permit �l� e it No.. JAI Lot #: 17 / 6J Contractor: � l�h Owner: z 7T IN LO Date: Address: APPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ IOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION -24 hour notice required. �I1ZN t'v iq-i ;N T Inspector: Date: TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry :1 Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: INSPECTION REPORT 4tiZN G TO Permit No.:Vg Lot#: 7� Q' Address: I • • Contractor: u46 O Owner: �S�INO� Date: ❑ APPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. r Ci—l4—�' '`i �S '�._ ��.�C � �`Z.f t� 'v �.'s c•'-y ZS�fib`^`' Inspector: Date: TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing AC3 Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation A Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: pk INSPECTION REPORT i401ft ¢ti1N Gr0 Permit No.: " Lot Q' Address: 1 Contractor: Owner: TtXa LD SING Date: �4) -6 3 APPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. or 14 Inspector: Date: TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping AFooting ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: INSPECTION REPORT 4V N G J�O Permit No.: �5 Lot #: Address: 3 • t.LJC� Z Contractor: 9s �O Owner: co j N Date: APPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. Inspector: Date: PE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation Other: INSPECTION REPORT 41�LN G?'� Permit No.: 51ql Lot #:IT, Address: 7 31l. c5i_ • UL-6 T � Z Contractor: _ -Y O Owner: 22 611 ING� Date: QI-APPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. i a Inspector: Date: ' PE OF INS ECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping Afooting ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final asonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation Other: INSPECTION REPORT ¢ti1N G TO Permit No.: 0� i cj I Lot #: Q' AddTess: ' t -z 3 1 � 3 5 A__Vc Z Contractor: �<a '9s, Owner: �z.Q SIN i Date: 3 -c 3 b-A,PPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION -24 hour notice required. loon Inspector: Date:-3— r C 3 APE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: INSPECTION REPORT i1N NG TOPermitNo.: cL 5i6; I Lot#: Address: ' 17316 3Contractor: �K c s--� ;ej`-sr- ��O Owner: 7�� � Date: 3- Li - 03 I' APPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION 0 GQRRF=G=N PrEQUESTED corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. IA' Inspector: Date: ?, YPE OF 11464P2ECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: "—�oL-a%^ti 1:7--�- "'WG 5 INSPECTION REPORT 11N G 1'O Permit No.: 0;51 I l Lot #: / Q" Address: 31 LP 3 /► P111 6/6 Contractor: r ,-0 Owner: Co 10I N G Date: APPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. Inspector: Date:44 PE OF INS CTION REQUESTED ❑ Under floor �� ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footi g L,� ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation oundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation \�^ INSPECTION REPORT 4tiiiv G?'o Permit No.: V)51 Lot#: l Address: 1 / H Contractor: O Owner: 1 (Gt ICJ 9`r141I N G� — Date: APPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. Inspector: Date:,, PE OF I PECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation oundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: ^� INSPECTION REPORT 7= 2,3 �,�IN G?'O Permit No.. 111 Lot#: Address: ?� to �5,--n • �,Q���� � Contractor: Owner:9s1�I N O�0 V Date: ❑ APPROVAL PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. QK=1 Inspector: ��-�' Date: TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ""fFoundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation 0 Other: ^� INSPECTION REPORT 1r � � ti1N G I'O Permit No.: Oa ,5/ " / Lot #: l 7 3IAddress: v3S i -H • Contractor: Lk�ET Owner: �I N O Date: A,APPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. Inspector: Date: 3 0— O PE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping �_Foundation Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation 0 Other: INSPECTION REPORT 41,1N G TO Permit No.:© S Lot#: _ Address: Contractor: �T qs, �4 Owner: TeKa UD ASS IN C' Date: ❑ APPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION /CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION -24 hour notice required. i 1 Inspector: Date: YPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation , ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: C I TY OF A RL I M(B-rU I CONS-" HUGT I ON PE ISM I T FEE Ft I T IVO_ go3-5400 Owner: PUGET WEST CORP 11807 7TH ST HE LAKE STEVENS 98258 Value of Work: $12, 000. 00 Tax ID: 31052002401400 Phone: 425. 359. 4487 Describe Work: INSTALL HVAC UNIT/EXHAUST FAN FOR RESTROOM Proposed Use: EXPRESS LUBE Legal Description: Job Address: 17316 SMOKEY PT BLVD Contractor's Name Type Address License# OLYMPIC MECHANICAL MEC PO BOX 5326 OLYMPMI1700 PUGET WEST CORPORATION GEN P. O. BOX 3535 PUGETWC187KG P E R N I T F E E S Equipment and Fixtures Number Fee Total Charge ----------------------------------------- ------ -------- ------------ VENTILATION FANS 3 $7. 00 $21. 00 GAS PIPING 1-4 OUTLETS 1 06. 00 $6. 00 AIR HANDLING UNIT 1 $11. 00 $11. 00 S U B T O T A L. . . . . . $38.00 TOTALS Fee Equipment $38. 00 s n Mech Permit $24. 00 'IA �J SIGNATURE: TOTAL FEE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $62. 00 I HE BY C TIFY HAT I HAVE READ AND MIN THI APPLICATION AND PAYMENTS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $0. 00 KNO T E SAME TO E TRUE AND COR- REC A L PROVISI S OF LAWS AND TOTAL DUE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $62. 00 OR N NCE GOVER NG IS TYPE OF W ILL P14N CP IED WITH WHETHER E IEDR DATE RECEIPT # 7 UI DING OFFICIAL a � )S 1 1 i :1-r9g: 1 ) -1,jaWil .tu qu1sV :n"j j q £ l c r,"u l EiUW 1. AA u4yl' `.Ymsm •, TWX i.q how .fnumQ l kIpA 69CJTTA ' . -. i m IHI 93V HAZI 1NA ±`'1'iR;tl1YA`( CNA 'i .d !MAc AK - ,.,ii NN .N :' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .AA it_we.._' QulQVPF4 jjA i A . X• _ 11 tmiV ;,:£W; ...jil o "� r`) Nl ...i)�. . . . . . . . . ..°. UO JA !'4 iT (� r - NOU-04-2002 09:43 FROM: TO:3E g'3906 P.002.003 CWA CONSULTANTS STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING BUILDING CODE CONSULTANTS 22421 N.E.20th Strcct.Sammamish.WA 98074 (425)836-2833 FAX:(425)836-3707 F-Mail:chuck.ma(gwerizon.net November 1, 2002 Texaco Xpress Lube -#02-519 1997 Uniform Building Codes Type of Construction: V-N Occupancy—S3 Stories: 1 Seismic Zane: 3 Wind Speed: 80 RF David W. Anderson Wind Exposure: C C'EI V E� Building Official Nov City of Arlington 238 N. Olympic Avenue Arlington,WA 98223 q F R[lN� Dear Mr. Anderson: 7-0A1 We have completed our review of the Texaco Xpress Lube and Car Wash. The plans have been reviewed for compliance to the 1997 Uniform Building Code. For questions regarding this review contact CWA Consultants. Please provide two complete sets of the plans with the resubmittal. NONSTRUCTURAL 1. Information necessary to classify the building(s) must be provided on the plans including occupancy, actual/allowable areas, type of construction. 2. References to the City of Marysville should be revised to reflect this submittal. 3. Energy calculations for the envelope and lighting budget should be submitted for waiting area of the lube building 4. Vehicle exhaust ventilation should be provided in accordance with Section 1202.2.4. 5. The water heater must be anchored to resist earthquake forces. 6. Your Fire Department should review the storage and disposal of the petroleum products per the UFC. 7, A minimum 36" landing must be provided at the exterior of the exit doors. ■ ■ ■ � � ■ ■ '■ 1 1 1. 1 1 i � . . . � - . . �■ ' �r��r ' �.T : 7 . . '� ' ` 1 .. 7� '' � :. � ' 1 r. NOU-04-2002 09:43 FROM: TO:3( ')53906 P.003/003 8. Details must be provided for installation of the suspended ceiling system in the waiting area including the requirements for the compression struts. 9. All doors in the building which have a latch set or lock set should have lever-type operating hardware. Section 1106.3.1 10. Door thresholds should be shown as no higher than 1/2". The edges should be beveled at 1 vertical : 2 horizontal, with a maximum edge height of 1/4". Sections 1106.10.4, 1106.6 STRUCTURAL 1. For your information, "Special Inspection" is required for: Masonry construction Anchor bolts Metal decking Structural steel welding High strength bolting 2_ There were no calculations submitted for the lube building. The plans must reflect the actual construction and not merely a generic building. 3. The vehicle loading used for the design must be posted. The design must consider the concentrated load wheel loads for the vertical loads. Based on the door dimension, I would have to assume that relatively heavy vehicles would use this area. 4. Regardless of the size the Espresso building must comply with the conventional framing requirement for lateral purposes or be provided with calculations. Please instruct the designer to indicate on a separate letter which sheet or detail the corrections may be found and to REVISE AND RESUBMIT THE PLANS. Please feel free to contact me if there are any questions, Sincerely, Chuck Williams SE CWA Consultants cc: Finley Architects P.O. Box 1008 Everett,WA 98201 ■ EM 101MILMOCEE:ILJNMMLrlmmL:Aut 0 NO 0 ■ ■ ■ No 696Am9rmL7 1 ■ EMEMME ■ ■ ■ ro :., 0 IMEMA NO MENE ' ■ MEEM P ■ 7AN ■ ■ MEMO PEP ■ 1 ■ ■ L ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ NO ■ w 7 ■ ■ ■ ro ■ ■ 11 Mb■J ■S ■ ` 7'F.9'F: 1 NOU-04-2002 09:43 FROM: TO:3E 33906 P.001/003 FAX Transmittal DATE: �/- FROM Chuck Williams CWA Consultants 22421 NE 20th Street Sammamish, WA 98074 Phone (425) 836-2833 Fax# (425) 836-3707 TO FAX # No. Pages 3 (include cover Sheet) Message � ,� � � c.�> -W 02--,5-/ P ■ ■ ■ � I ON ■ kip I L ■ 1 r ■ 1 1 e r� 1 1 � " City of Arhy `on • Development Services 0 238 N. Olympic•Arlington, WA 98223 DATEJOB No. /.�. ❑Administration l l$uilding ❑Engineering ATTENTION El Planning ❑UtilitiesTO RE: WE ARE SENDING YOU 0-A1'tached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order n COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ As rgquested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints IG)`For review and comment Cl ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 20 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS COP SIGNED: If enclosures are not as noted,kindly notify us at once. f a. _ _ - : - �(' i, ii ice,�!•:'� ��� fsr City of Arlington Building Dept FIRE DEPARTMENT CHECKLIST 1 PERMIT# DATE: ! (/ -✓ l ' w NAME: ieia G ADDRESS: T W LEGAL: ON&) & BUILDING USE: ` C k r ( OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION: A B E F H 1 1 2 12.1131 4 1 1 2 1. 3 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 6 7 I M R S U 1.1 1 1.2 [TT 3 1 1 3 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION I II III 1V V F.R. F.R. I ONE-HOUR N ONE-HOUR N H.T. ONE-HOUR N RECEIVED Item inspected&completed Signature & Date: Site Plan: Approved Denied OCT 11 2002 Access Requirements: GITy OF A R1 W TON Required: Fire lane: aJLc� G��v sy-✓��nG,/ 2Fy�./�E-�f /"Ad r7&-y G L N w f�iz 1-J �a.�i Sprinkler system: � Sr P Alarm system: Ufa ��y��r4� ��✓ Knox Box: �,.. - ✓ .S w u%cv v� Fire extinquishers: Hydrant: # of hydrants required: 'T Location of Hydrant: Low m / 7 3 X h /+ ,4� 15 T 4 Location of Knox Box: ,,j t, 7 �,��/rF..�c• // Location of Fire Extinquishers:I-rEfj���f�j/i..,i.s.[� Fire Flow requirements: /3�D& Location of address on building: FIRE DEPT: ]` Date: 4� oStature RECEIVED Build\fomi\fdchecklist ..} ...� r - -- ti 1 h - ` � � 1 .r � � - - �I - �. • I � I I I I - I _ 1 1. _ I - - � 1 I - I - � . I I II I I I I .'I I I �I'• I I _ I � I�1 II I I I I I I J - _ � I I _ I J I I I -, I ! _ I _I II 1 I f� I-� I I �/ wJ � '.Vl\I �1 � '-1_i. .V� -�' S' �h,T .] � ,} r\_l � V' Js �- J,J r 1 � � I I • 4 �� }� -1r�T V �' '~' 1' �- �.I � � .n �1 �+..� s:i�t �� �. I. -I � t I•� ��� City of Arlington Building Dept FIRE DEPARTMENT CHECKLIST PERMIT # l�-'u 19 I DATE: ~3 NAME: )_ ADDRESS: f P3 LEGAL: o � 640 BUILDING USE: OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION: A B E F H 1 2 12.1131 4 1 1 2 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 7 I M R S U 1.1 1 1.2 2 1 3 1 1 1 3 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION I II III 1V V F.R. F.R. ONE-HOUR N ONE-HOUR N H.T. ONE-HOUR N Item inspected &completed Signature & Date: Site Plan: Approved Denied Access Requirements: Required: Fire lane: Sprinkler system: Alarm system: Knox Box: Fire extinquishers: Hydrant: # of hydrants required: Location of Hydrant: Location of Knox Box: Location of Fire Extinquishers: Fire Flow requirements: Location of address on building: FIRE DEPT: Date: Signature BuildZormtdchecklist ;TX0 . � • . � ,_. •- • _� • o � � � '1 ._ r CWA CONSULTANTS STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING BUILDING CODE CONSULTANTS 22421 N.E.20th Street,Sammamish. WA 98074 (425)836-2833 FAX:(425)836-3707 E-Mail:chuck.MaCverizon.net November 1, 2002 Texaco Xpress Lube -#02- 519 1997 Uniform Building Codes Type of Construction: V-N Occupancy— S3 Stories: 1 Seismic Zone: 3 kEF Wind Speed: 80 �FQ Wind Exposure: C Nov 06 Zora David W. AndersonBuil fficial C/Ty � City dof Aring lington O�A�C,NC"T011l 238 N. Olympic Avenue Arlington, WA 98223 Dear Mr. Anderson: We have completed our review of the Texaco Xpress Lube and Car Wash. The plans have been reviewed for compliance to the 1997 Uniform Building Code. For questions regarding this review contact CWA Consultants. Please provide two complete sets of the plans with the resubmittal. NONSTRUCTURAL 1. Information necessary to classify the building(s) must be provided on the plans including occupancy, actual/allowable areas, type of construction. 2. References to the City of Marysville should be revised to reflect this submittal. 3. Energy calculations for the envelope and lighting budget should be submitted for waiting area of the lube building 4. Vehicle exhaust ventilation should be provided in accordance with Section 1202.2.4. 5. The water heater must be anchored to resist earthquake forces. 6. Your Fire Department should review the storage and disposal of the petroleum products per the UFC. 7. A minimum 36" landing must be provided at the exterior of the exit doors. CWA 8. Details must be provided for installation of the suspended ceiling system in the waiting area including the requirements for the compression struts. 9. All doors in the building which have a latch set or lock set should have lever-type operating hardware. Section 1106.3.1 10. Door thresholds should be shown as no higher than 1/2". The edges should be beveled at 1 vertical : 2 horizontal, with a maximum edge height of 1/4". Sections 1106.10.4, 1106.6 STRUCTURAL 1. For your information, "Special Inspection" is required for: Masonry construction Anchor bolts Metal decking Structural steel welding High strength bolting 2. There were no calculations submitted for the lube building. The plans must reflect the actual construction and not merely a generic building. 3. The vehicle loading used for the design must be posted. The design must consider the concentrated load wheel loads for the vertical loads. Based on the door dimension, I would have to assume that relatively heavy vehicles would use this area. 4. Regardless of the size the Espresso building must comply with the conventional framing requirement for lateral purposes or be provided with calculations. Please instruct the designer to indicate on a separate letter which sheet or detail the corrections may be found and to REVISE AND RESUBMIT THE PLANS. Please feel free to contact me if there are any questions. Sincerely, Chuck Williams SE CWA Consultants cc: Finley Architects P.O. Box 1008 Everett,WA 98201 ti e 41 City of Arlington Building Department REQUEST FOR REVIEW FORM PROJECT NAME: l-eKaCc) PROJECT ADDRESS: BP #: 0 PROJECT MANAGER: David Anderson, Building Official DATE OF CIRCULATION: RETURN THIS FORM BY: TYPE OF PROPOSAL: PROJECT SUMMARY: RESPONDING DEPARTMENTS: IJ TOM C., FIRE IJ JIM T., GALE & GALE F3 TERRY C., KAREN L., UTILITIES PLANNING DEPARTMENT �?��'� �0�' IJ SHARREE L., GENERAL SERVICES GREGG E., ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL INFORMATION IS ATTACHED. Please review the information and return this form and your comments, either on the drawings or in memo form,to the Building Department. If you have no comments, please return the form with the"No Comments"box checked. PLEASE MARK ONE BOX, SIGN, DATE,AND RETURN THIS FORM TO LINDA. IJ MORE TIME REQUESTED, WILL SUBMIT ON IJ COMMENTS FOR THIS REVIEW ARE ON ATTACHED DRAWING �I 1 COMMENTS FOR THIS REVIEW ARE IN ATTACHED MEMO NO COMMENTS FOR THIS REVIEW, OKAY TO ISSUE PERMIT REVIEWED BY DATE /ILrD2- 2011 Washincton St;aLp Ucinresidenlial Ener Co e Com Banc F Lighting Surnmary 2001 Wash.ngton State NnnresWenhal Energy C000 Conloanco Forms First EC,tlon.June 2001 Project Info Protect Address Date i For Building DepaA 1`enLuf`V E D Applicant Name: D ��,� `� 2002 Applicant Address: L U Applicant Phone: 2� _ 9 CITY OF ARLINGTOnI Project Description New Building ❑ Addition ❑ Alteration ❑Plans Included If plans not included,refer to WSEC Section 1513 for controls and commissioning requirements. Compliance Option 0 Prescriptive Lighting Power Allowance 0 Systems Analysis (See Qualification Checklist(over).Indicate Prescriptive&LPA spaces clearly on plans.) Alteration Exceptions ❑ No changes are being made to the lighting (check appropriate box) ❑ Less than 60%of the fixtures are new,and installed lighting wattage is not being increased Maximum Allowed Lighting Wattage (Interior) Location Allowed (floor/room no.) Occupancy Description Watts per ft2" Area in ft2 Allowed x Area L. -S 3 e- I.,T to x G! 4ow QJ&#k /.r i If F7 z 130 "From Table 15-1 (over)-document all exceptions on form LTG-LPA Total Allowed Watts Z �� Notes: 1.Use manufacturer's listed maximum input wattage. For hard-wired ballasts only,the default table in the NREC Technical Reference Manual may also be used 2.Include exit lights unless less than 5 watts per fixture. Proposed Lighting Wattage (Interior)"'all fixtures.For exempt lighting,not exception and leave Watts/Fixture blank. Location Number of Watts/ Watts (floor/room no.) Fixture Description Fixtures Fixture Proposed f4 y F 1 K P/ K IT 9 Ph ZXG! 3 r - fr 4s- YCT Total Proposed Watts may not exceed Total Allowed Watts for Interior Total Proposed Watts 3 3 q Maximum Allowed Lighting Wattage (Exterior) Allowed Watts Area in ft2 Allowed Watts Location Description per ft2 or per If (or If for perimeter) x ft2(or x If) Covered Parking (standard paint) 0.2 W/ft2 Covered Parking (reflective paint) 0.3 W/ft2 Open Parking 0.2 W/ft2 Outdoor Areas 7 0.2 W/ft2 L b Bldg.(by facade) 0.25 W/ft2 Bldg.(by pedm) a Awl13/ 7.5 W/If 35. z c.N 7 Note:for building exterior,choose either the facade area or the perimeter method,but not both) Total Allowed Watts L Use mfgr listed maximum input wattage.For fixtures with hard-wired ballasts only, Proposed Lighting Wattage (Exterior) the default table in the NREC Technical Reference Manual may also be used. Number of Watts/ Watts Location Fixture Description Fixtures Fixture Proposed L40(/ f - > 1 S( 4 3 7(, Total Proposed Watts may not exceed Total Allowed Watts for Exterior Total Proposed Watts 20 sh' t Sate Qnre%4ential Ener Code Co Banc F rm Lighting Summary (back) LTG-SUM� 2001 Washington State Nonresidantlat Energy Code Comphance Forms Firnt Edition-June 2001 Prescriptive Spaces Occupancy: O Warehouses,storage areas or aircraft storage hangers 0 Other Qualification Checklist Lighting Fixtures: ❑ Check here if at least 95%of fixtures in the space meet all four criteria: Note:If occupancy type is"Other"and fixture answer is checked,the number of fixtures in 1.Fixtures are fluorescent,non-lensed,with only one or two lamps,and the space is not I mited by Code. Clearly ind sate these spaces on plans. If not 2.Lamps are T-1,T-2,T-4,T-5,T-6,T-8 3.Lamps are 5-50 Watts,and qualified,do LPA Calculations. 4.Ballasts are electronic ballasts 5.Exit lights<5 watts/fIxlure 6.Screw-in compact fluorescent fixtures do not qualify TABLE 15-1 Unit Lighting Power Allowance(LPA Use' LPA' Use' LPA Imnl W/s Painting,welding,ca!pentry,machine shops 2.3 Police and fire stations' 1.5 Barber shops,beautv shops 2.0 Atria atriums 1.0 Hotel banquet/conference/exhibition hall`4 2.0 Assembly spaces',auditoriums,gymnasia',heaters 1.0 Laboratories 2.0 Group R-1 common areas 1.0 Aircraft repair hangars 1.5 Process plants 1.0 Cafeterias.fast food establishments" 1.5 1 Restaurants/bars' 1.0 Factories,workshops,handlinq areas 1.5 1 Locker and/or shower facilities 0.8 Gas stations,auto repair shops" 1.5 Warehouses'',storage areas 0.5 Institutions 1.5 Aircraft storage hangars 0.4 Libraries' 1.5 Retail1U,retail banking 1 5 Nursing homes and hotel/motel guest rooms 1.5 Parking garages Sao Section 1532 Wholesale stores(pallet rack shelving) 1.5 Mall Concourses 1.4 Plans Submitted for Common Areas Only' Schools buildings(Group E occupancy only), 1.35 Main floor building lobbies"(except mall 1.2 schuel classrooms,day care centers concourses) Laundries 1.3 Common areas,corridors,toilet facilities and 0.8 washrooms,elevator lobbies Office buildings,office/administrative areas in 1.2 facilities of other use types(including but not limited to scltuuls�hospitals,institutions,museums,banks, churches) '' Footnotes for Table 15-1 1) In cases in which a general use and a specific use are listed,the sper-.ifir-.Lisa shall apply. In cases in which a tifie is not I,rentiutted Specirivally,)lie Unit Puwei Allowance shall be determined by the building official.This determination shell be based upon the most comparable use specified in the table.See Section 1512 for exempt areas. 2) The watts per square foot may be increased,by two percent per foot of ceiling height above twenty foot,unless specifically directed otherwise by subsequent footnotes. 3) Watts per square foot of room may be increased by two percent per foot of ceiling height above twelve feet. 4) For all other spaces,such as seating and common areas,use the Unit Light Power Allowance for assembly. 5) Watts per square foot of room may be increased by two percent per foot of ceiling height above nine feet. 6) Includes pump area under canopy. 7) In cases in which a lighting plan is submitted for only a portion of a floor,a Unit Lighting Power Allowance of 1.35 may be used for usable office floor area and 0.80 watts per square foot shall be used for the common areas,which may include elevator space,lobby area and rest rooms.Common areas,as herein defined do not include mall concourses. 8) For the fire engine room,the Unit Lighting Power Allowance is 1.0 watts per square foot. 9) For indoor sport tournament courts with adjacent spectator seating,the Unit Lighting Power Allowance for the court area is 2.6 watts per square foot. 10) Display wlndow Illumination Installed within 2 feet of the winduw,lighting fur free-standing display where the lighting moves with the display,and building showcase illumination where the lighting is enclosed within the showcase are exempt. An additional 1.5 w/flz of merchandise display luminaires are exempt provided that they comply with all three of the following: a) located on ceiling-mounted track or directly on or recessed into the ceiling itself(not on the wall). b) adjustable in both the horizontal and vertical axes(vertical axis only is acceptable for fluorescent and other fixtures with two points of track attachment). c) fitted with tungsten halogen,fluorescent,or high intensity discharge lamps. This additional lighting power is allowed only if the lighting is actually installed. 11) Provided that a floor plan,indicating rack location and height,is submitted,the square footage for a warehouse may be defined,for computing the interior Unit Lighting Power Allowance,as the floor area not covered by racks plus the vertical face area(access side only)of the racks.The height allowance defined in footnote 2 applies only to the floor area not covered by racks. r n nr i t n I 1.1-ighting Power Allowance Adjustrqents , 2001 Washington Slae Nonresidential Enargy Code Compliance Forms First Eddione.Juno 2001 Project Address Date Use this form if you are claiming any ceiling height adjustments for your Lighting Power Allowances for interior lighting. The Occupancy Description should agree with the"Use"listed on Code Table 15-1 Identify the appropriate Ceiling Height Limit(9 feet,12 feet or 20 feet) on which the adjustment is based. The Adjusted LPA is calculated from this number and from the Allowed Watts per ftz. Carry the Adjusted LPA to the corresponding"Allowed Watts per ft2i location on LTG-SUM. Adjusted Li&hting Power Allowances (Interior) Location Allowed Ceiling Height Ceiling Height limit Adjusted LPA (floor/room no.) Occupancy Description Watts per ft2" for this room for this exception" Watts per ftz '"From Table 15-1 based on exceptions listed in footnotes Lighting Permit Plans 200I WunlOnytuo 8tutu Nwvuaideit6ul Euuiyy Cudu Cumyliancn Fuwis First 123t(on•June 2001 Project Address Date 173— — Lo - Zt 2 The following information is necessary to check a lighting permit application for compliance with the lighting requirements in the 1994 Washington State Nonresidential Energy Code. Applicability Code Location Building Department (yes,no,n.a.) Section Component Intonnation Required on Plans Notes LIGHTING CONTROLS (Section 1513) no n/a 1513.1 Local control/access Schedule with type,Indicate locations 3V no n/a 1513.2 Area controls Maximum limit per switch yes no In, 1513.3 Daylight zone control Schedule with type and features,indicate locations no n/a vertical glazing Indicate vertical glazing on plans _ yes no <!gA overhead glazing Indicate overhead glazing on plans yes no n 1513.4 Display/exhib/special Indicate separate controls .29> no n/a 1513.5 Exterior shut-off Schedule with type and features,indicate location yes no (!2> (a)timer w/backup Indicate location +n no n/a (b)photocell. Indicate location I -oil won. no n/a 1513.6 Inter.auto shut-off Indicate location yea no 1613.6.1 (a) occup.sonsore Schedule with type and locations yes no /a 1513.6.2 (b) auto.switches Schedule with type and features(back-up,override capability); Indicate size of zone on plans CY no n/a 1513.7 Commissioning Indicate requirements for lighting controls commissioning no n/a Lighting Sum.Form Completed and attached. yea no n/a Schedule with fixture types, yes no n/a lamps,ballasts,watts per fixture - yea no Eloc motor efficiency MECH-MOT or Equipment Schedule with hp,rpm,efficiency If"no" is circled for any question, provide explanation: • • Permit Plans Checklist LTG-CHK' 2001 Washinglon Salto NonresWenhal Energy Code Compliance Forms First Edilioe-June 2001 Lighting - General Requirements 1513.5 Automatic Shut-Off Controls,Exterior:Exterior 1513 Lighting Controls. Lighting, lighting not intended for 24-hour continuous use shall be g g g g,including exempt lighting in automatically switched by timer,photocell,or a combination of Section 1512,shall comply with this section.Where occupancy timer and photocell.Automatic time switches must also have sensors are cited,they shall have the features listed in Section program back-up capabilities,which prevent the loss of 1513.6.1.Where automatic time switches are cited,they shall program and time settings for at least 10 hours,if power is have the features listed in Section 1513.6.2. interrupted. 1513.1 Local Control and Accessibility:Each space, 1513.6 Automatic Shut-Off Controls,Interior:Office enclosed by walls or ceiling-height partitions,shall be provided buildings greater than 5,000 sq.ft.and all school classrooms with lighting controls located within that space.The lighting shall be equipped with separate automatic controls to shut off controls,whether one or more,shall be capable of turning off the lighting during unoccupied hours.Automatic controls may all lights within the space.The controls shall be readily be an occupancy sensor,time switch,or other device capable accessible,at the point of entry/exit,to personnel occupying or of automatically shutting off lighting. using the space. EXCEPTIONS: EXCEPTIONS:The following lighting controls may be 1. Areas that must be continuously illuminated,or centralized in remote locations: illuminated in a manner requiring manual 1. Lighting controls for spaces which must be used operation of the lighting. as a whole. 2. Emergency lighting systems. 2. Automatic controls. 3. Switching for industrial or manufacturing process 3. Controls requiring trained operators. facilities as may be required for production. 4. Controls for safety hazards and security. 1513.6.1 Occupancy Sensors:Occupancy sensors shall be 1513.2 Area Controls:The maximum lighting power that may capable of automatically turning off all the lights in an area,no be controlled from a single switch or automatic control shall not more than 30 minutes after the area has been vacated. exceed that which is provided by a twenty ampere circuit loaded to not more than eighty percent.A master control may 1513.6.2 Automatic Time Switches:Automatic time switches be installed provided the individual switches retain their shall have a minimum 7 day clock and be capable of being set capability to function independently.Circuit breakers may not for 7 different day types per week and incorporate an automatic be used as the sole means of switching. holiday"shut-off'feature,which turns off all loads for at least EXCEPTIONS: 24 hours and then resumes normally scheduled operations. 1. Industrial or manufacturing process areas,as Automatic time switches shall also have program back-up may be required for production. capabilities,which prevent the loss of program and time 2. Areas less than five percent of footprint for settings for at least 10 hours,if power is interrupted. footprints over 100,000 square feet. Automatic time switches shall incorporate an over-ride 1513.3 Daylight Zone Control:All daylighted zones,as switching device which: defined in Chapter 2,both under overhead glazing and a) is readily accessible; adjacent to vertical glazing,shall be provided with individual b) is located so that a person using the device can see the controls,or daylight-or occupant-sensing automatic controls, lights or the areas controlled by the switch,or so that the which control the lights independent of general area lighting. area being illuminated is annunciated;and Contiguous daylight zones adjacent to vertical glazing are c) is manually operated; allowed to be controlled by a single controlling device provided d) allows the lighting to remain on for no more than two hours that they do not include zones facing more than two adjacent when an over-ride is initiated;ande) controls an area not exceeding 5,000 square feet or 5 cardinal orientations(i.e.north,east,south,west).Daylight percent of footprint for footprints over 100,000 square feet, zones under overhead glazing more than 15 feet from the whichever is greater. perimeter shall be controlled separately from daylight zones adjacent to vertical glazing. 1513.7 Commissioning Requirements:For lighting controls EXCEPTION: which include daylight or occupant sensing automatic controls, automatic shut-off controls,occupancy sensors,or automatic Daylight spaces enclosed by walls or ceiling time switches,the lighting controls shall be tested to ensure height partitions and containing 2 or fewer light that control devices,components,equipment and systems are fixtures are not required to have a separate switch for calibrated,adjusted and operate in accordance with approved general area lighting. plans and specifications.Sequences of operation shall be 1513.4 Display,Exhibition,and Specialty Lighting functionally tested to ensure they operate in accordance with Controls:All display,exhibition,or specialty lighting shall be approved plans and specifications.A complete report of test controlled independently of general area lighting. procedures and results shall be prepared and filed with the owner.Drawing notes shall require commissioning in accordance with this paragraph. FROM :CITY OF ARLINGTON FAX NO. :3G04353906 Apr. 22 2003 12:49PM TESC/STORE][ DjtA.ZN/RQA.D Gil y a LANDSCAPING INSPECTION -� Addra�sfl.ot NA*REPORT � Permit No: Date. �� r't Contractor: r��1 . Owner: !� Supervisor. (� `- 1 Pl y A.ppreval Correction Required Corrections listed 1410W MUST 13E MADE before work can be approved a, yy�p Plone contact insp.-mox Was not able to perform inspection Call 360.435.06741°or re-inspection--24 hour notice required .-- cam tlll►' I C G 6 me Dv ITE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED OI AI DKr1irJRQAD IN Slit F'ema Flpe Sub-mde Irrigation Check Dam CatchBasia(s) Twe Frotecdon Matihole(s) Curb&Grater Fertilizer Temp.Sod. Oil Separaror(s) Sidewalk ldark Sheeting DownSpour(s) Approach(s) Plants Trash RacklOverflow Sub-grade 'flees Seeding Restrictor Rock Root garners Final Level Spreader ATB Play Equipment Treatment Cl.B Asphalt Final Infiltration Striping Pond Signing Final Final ii I` 1 '■ I 'J ■ MEN 0 Mill " ■ ■ imm MoNlimi ■ imom RE ■ ■ Ii; ■ ■ 11MIN A ■ ■ ■ i ■ ' ■ FROM CITY OF ARLINGTON FAX NO. :3604353906 Ma e17 2003 07::39AM P1 x'ESC/.STO DRAIN/ROAD LA NDS CA PING INSp.ECr_'x PORT o,�t Pc[ritiCNo:Q Date:.._ 5' G3 Address/1 of No: --, contractors it 7 t�5T Owner. .�S 4►�d� s — Supervlsor, naval Correction Required C Cron$fisted below MUST BE MADE before work can be Pl a contact inspector �PProved of able to perform inspecdon C0 ? 360.435,0674 for re-lrls,pecdon,24 hour notice required Insp c r /�` Date:, ( 0 TYPE OF INSPECTxON REQ -- Nf D I ti Check ri Pipe �`- Sub-glade Catch$asin(s) Rock Imgattq° "rIet? o 'coon Manholes) Curb&Gutter Oil Separator(s) Sidewalk F4rdlize Sl:eecl Down Spout(s) Approach(s) Stl^tW Trash Rack/ow low 5ulrgr2* Plants seadin Restrictor Trees Final Rack R Level Spreader q'rB Q%B an'Itrs Treatment Cl,$ Asphalt aIpment Infiltration SCriping Final Pond Signing r Final Final t V - 1 7 ' ■ ` ■ 7 ■ ' ■ 90 ■ ' '■ L r ■ ■ ' ■ ■ } 7 7 rA r■ La mi r ■.r1 r I I r ■ ■ WlCASCADE TESTII LABORATORY, INC. TESTING&INSPECTOOI NGINEERS PREVIOUS 114509 12919 N.E. 126TH PLACE REPORT No. No. KIRKLAND,WASHINGTON 98034 (425)823-9800 EVERETT (425)259-0817 DATE F C 6 r var`' CERT.NO. - FI ELD REPORT '� "�3 PROJECT LOCATION d sn r4 , TO: Lj AF 1 BLOB.PERMIT NO. OWNER WEATHER TEMP. AT AM AT PM ENGINEER , 1 ARCHITECT ATTN: CONTRACTOpl-p INSPECTION PERFORMED r �i( ITEMS INSPECTED _ FOUNDATIONS _ RESTEEUCONCRETE _ RESTEEL ONLY - rn� 77 _ FOOTINGS _ SLAB RESTEELIMASONRY _ STR.STlWELDING 4 2U�J _ AUGER CAST PILES _ COLUMNS OTHER — STR.STIBOLf1Al(a`®FARLING1'p — DRILLED PIERS WALLS C^ � — BEAMS e II f (LOCATION(AREAS) �����1�c�el 1� �' L LS� F- � 1 E�CONCRETFJ� MIX NO. DESIGN STRENGTH(f'c) D SUPPLIER L C''r 1 &v- TOTAL CU.YD.PLACED I L/ SLUMP(INCHES) SPECIMENS CAST AIR CONTENT(%) SEE CYLINDER REPORT NO. _"ES—NO—ITEMS INSPECTED WERE IN CONFORMANCE WITH BLDG.DEPT.APPROVED PLANS 1 1 � I 1 REMARKS: �It lnC. +r ^, w� l lC� IN �.0 l_F, 62c! ---t u F t� o 4x 0 � a'y IS L TEST RESULTS APPLY ONLY THE ITEMS HEREIN TESTED.THIS REPORT SHALL NOT INSPECTOR(S),NAME(S)PRINTED BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL;WITH- OUT THE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY,INC. INSPECTOR SIGNATURE REVISED a= SIGNED BY COPIES TO: t�1 ` l'� . a .-,. ,� . . . CASCADE TESTII�� LABORATORY, INC. _ 113362 TESTING &INSPECTIOP NGINEERS PREVIOUS 12919 N.E. 126TH PLACE REPORT No. ...ram No. KIRKLAND.WASHINGTON 98034 (425)823-9800 EVERETT (425)259-0817 DATE CERT.NO. r D FI E L D REPORT PROJECT v 1�77s z LOCATION TO: 3/ , BLDG.PERMIT NO. OWN WEATHER c, �R TEMP. A 7� t'/vk�.�I� ro A P M ENGINEER ARCHITECT ATTN: /V /CONTRACTOR' (2) (3) INSPECTION PERFORMED ITEMS INSPECTED OUNDAT!ONS -V/RESTEELICONCRETE _ RESTEEL ONLY SZOOFOOTINGS VSLAB RESTEELlMASONRY _ STR.STIWELDING _ AUGER CAST PILES — COLUMNS —OTHER _ STR.ST/BOLTING — DRILLED PIERS — WALLS BEAMS (LOCATION(AREAS)���/� /��� / �T s_- ^0,, C—/YTP 1-f CONCRETEIMASONRY MIX NO. x DESIGN STRENGTH(f'c, SUPPLIER r TOTAL CU.YD.PLAC �N T Z ,S _ SLUMP(INCHES) ,� SPECIMENS CAST� AIR CONTENT(%) �� SEE CYLINDER REPORT NO. _L YES_NO_ITEMS INSPECTED WERE IN CONFORMANCE WITH BLDG.DEPT.APPROVED PLANS REMARKS: �1/NCT� Lf�I`f �2�Ce,,f_/' IA4 s TEST RESULTS APPLY ONLY TO THE ITEMS HEREIN TESTED.THIS REPORT SHALL NOT INSPECTOR(S),NAME(S)PRI DIV �`�l�G/�•� BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL,WITH- OUT THE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY,INC. INSPECTOR SIG E REVISED 8/00 SIGNED BY COPIES TO: K � 1 40 1 • � 1 1 • 1 _ u �i ► _ _ _ram 1 � � _ _ _ _ � � � -• 1 FIELD q CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY, INC. REPORT No. /1 A ,s g / NO. 49656 TESTING& INSPECTION/ENGINEERS DATE I,_ 12919 N.E. 126TH PLACE F"s Y`tr 7 CERT.NO. KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON 9803A (425)823-9800 2 d�j EVERETT IA25)259-0817 PROJECT, COMPRESSION REPORT L C TION �� n S� f TO: BLDG.PERMIT NO. OWNE L _^' VVV777—a WEATHER a ` ` TEMP. AT AM nn LA �_— �. 1 �r ENGINEER T P 1' ATTN: ARCHITECT r THE FOLLOWING WAS NOTED: C F_a CONTRACTOR FIELD TEST DATA WE-J Q Qu f7ATCH ATAFOR °6 ADJUSTED TRUCK SAMPLED O TRUCK TICKET NO. Z C3 7 �7 MIX iVO. �Ic�7 Q Yo WEIGHTS MOIST WEIGHTS TIME SLUMP a�,AIR WEIGHT YIELD CEMENT TEMP. CEMENT t� ASTM C-143 ASTM C-138 FACTOR ASTM C-1064 FLY ASH —► CONC AIR - ` 5 AAGG. D O D AIR TEST METHOD: ❑PRESSURE ASTM C-231 OR ❑VOLUME ASTM C-173 EQUIPMENT USED I.D. all 0, Y 5 SLUMP CONE CSLCOO�� THERMOMETER CCOTHO 6D AIRMETER CCOAIO — OTHER TYPE OF BREAK: (A)Cone (C)Cone and Shear (b)Cone and Split (d)Shear (e)Columnar COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH CYLINDER DATE DATE AGE AREA TOTAL STRENGTH TYPE NUMBER MADE TESTED DAYS SIZE (SQ.IN) LOAD PSI BREAK 7 2— AdT5 CONCRETE COMPRESSION MACHINE I.D.#CCOCOOO ❑ASTM C-1231 SAMPLING IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAMPLE P/U DATE TEST METHOD ❑ASTM C-617 APPLICABLE CODES&SPECS. SUPPLIER �Q�_)r�1( CEMENT TYPE CU.YARDS PLACED Q EA 6dvo ,� NVIV - //�a DMIX. CAC1z s F, alp = 6� �GN STRENGTH PLACEMENT AREA&NOTES CA Mw>,4 0, TEST RESULTS APPLY ONLY TO THE ITEMS HEREIN TESTED.THIS REPORT SHALL NOT INSPECTOR(S),NAME(S)PRINTED �/►/_,l BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL,WITH- OUT THE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF CASCADE cz TESTING LABORATORY,INC. INSPECTOR SIGNATUR REVISED 1/02 SIGNED BY COPIES TO:� nJ y1 u S ,�' � I • - I I 1 1 {1 .. I I . 1 - - _ • 1 - I �. _ +1 r� � r 1 .- 1 � FIELD CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY, INC. REPORT Nu.-a33 47- No. 4 9 5 8 8 TESTING & INSPECTION/ENGINEERS DATE CERT.NO. 12919 N.E. 126TH PLACE KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON 9e034 (425) 823-9e00 r r. zip EVERETT (425) 259.0 17 PROJECT COMPRESSION REPORT AW&I9EOCATION /6 d/ L G.PERMIT NO, 9 OW ER TO-, WEATHER TEM A P ENGINEER �ie/ =T. ARCHITECT ATTN: THE FOLLOWING WAS NOTED CONTRALTO FIELD TEST DATA TRUCK SAMPLED - TRUCK TICKET NO. MIXNO. /OD tf DATA FOR DESIGN % ADJUSTED CU.VD WEIGHTS MOIST. WEIGHTS SLUMP UNIT CEMENT TEMP. C MENT s' TIME ASTM C-143 %AIR WEIGHT YIELD FACTOR ASTM C-1064 FLY ASH ASTM C-138 CONC AIR 574 sc Sa CA. K G 6 C.A. C.A. AIR TEST METHOD: ❑PRESSURE ASTM C-231 OR ❑VOLUME ASTM C-173 FINE AGG. EQUIPMENT USED I.D. WATER Q SLUMP CONE CSLCOO THERMOMETER CCOTHO ITOTAL AIRMETER CCOAIO OTHER TYPE OF BREAK: (A)Cone (C)Cone and Shear (b)Cone and Split (d)Shear (e)Columnar COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH CYLINDER DATE DATE AGE AREA TOTAL STRENGTH TYPE NUMBER MADE TESTED DAYS SIZE (SO.IN) LOAD PSI BREAK 1 -G 2-w 7 f 11� 3 0-5 rr CONCRETE COMPRESSION MACHINE I.D.#CCOCOOO ❑ASTM C-1231 SAMPLING IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAMPLE P/U DA-TE TEST METHOD ❑ASTM C-617 APPLICABLE CODES&SPECS. SUPPLIER ram! �f` _ CEMENT TYPE � CU.YARDS PLACED AEA ADMIX.//..0 T 7.�/ C�A/C11�2 '— - % DESIGN STRENGTH ��� PLACEMENT AREA&NOTES ��� % �_d TEST RESULTS APPLY ONLY TO THE ITEMS HEREIN TESTED.THIS REPORT SHALL NOT INSPECTOR(S),NAME(S)PRINTED f .Y BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL,WITH- OUT THE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY,INC. INSPECTOR SIGNATUR REVISED 1/02 SIGNED BY COPIES TO: 2 u ti - - , � - _ .- - - � -. _ _ _ � � _ - •- Message Page 1 of 1 �l David Anderson From: Rick Fletcher[rick@pugetwest.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 7:27 AM To: danderson@ci.arlington.wa.us Subject: Permit application#5191, Texaco Express lube carwash, etc. Dave, This project has a basement under the lube bays. Because of high water table in the area,we are hoping to be able to excavate and build the pit now, as the water table is at the lowest point at this time of the year. Is there any way that a foundation permit can be issued to allow us to do this? As you know, having to dewater and fight the water table can become expensive for the owner. Any assistance would be appreciated. Rick Fletcher PugetWest 10/16/02 i Fi;fx 1.1c), 360 Fyz 1,931 Jar,, 27 2003 09:33P[l PI SKY VALLEY TESTING � � .� _ � l P.O.BOX 835 MONROE, WA 98272 0 W,TE TIME TITLE OF _/T"STS TOTAL NUMBER or pAc!ta 01CG,VDNIC THIS PACE A A 4 16 NOTU; . , •�.,. _ � , i t - I r r.v,i Z V - P2 FA,h Ho. 3r+@ �1E�5 h:s1 .,i.�.i�. 27 c�_��^,? 1 33; SKY VALLEY TI STx?' G r'4AVEUPREP TWE P. 0. Box 8u� Monroe,WA 99272 �ctvwir� � C� M"S' (560) 794A555 TRIG QF7'S�2?•. pp�� �j PAGE '�"-----�---.". WEAMU f p W I QF I .DAILY FIELD REPORT 4-�'�7 ,LL�j�Y1Q'QR�$lR —p� � � IiE,FGRTSEQ u i �N65 1 QA CCCA71ON S /• �J �,} .,�/ ,�y�-/�� / , 0AYOF WECK t.ar`1d ic" _____...r'-�lG�+."1 „7///% T /�! /416.��� ✓z'��/�i' v ,�✓'r '� j �,e C8t i n e I � KM point � a^il1 Eirv, Mossiure L � 1►-1�x. ©r}r ��reent No. Reptb R. Cnntknt Density Density C..pactiorr 2-5 % per Pat 1 QJLL'S: I ! 7� � � ..... �`---dam- t._r�—_���~L..�S./ /�•UC�.:. W '�.._ LAI �,y _ . - ---f• . , . ., N'J, ,.7r_,Ea C.,�f.•. .L H_..... —�-jam. U1z3 ,74FM {'':.• M0J-5tk;CQ DQnSity Relationship Curve NQ._.... ...�. raTs Jo& _,._...._,_ J . ouRve xo. UlSMkIFTION iNATEAIAL, 14 & IAlwi CAM H O. WT IT, SOIL ORY c TARS / IT. OF x0jS7uHF.- 10 141L , � .r r �^....� �� fir- .�i:►X:. gGl6TVR£ TZAT' I'URCENT Qf DAY I jar.. 2( 'LOO,5 U:O;jQlm r14 zap ZA::.PF/76 Al 7r::57- f' s 1 FIELD CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY, INC. REPORT No. `�s r` -- NO. _ ;J � TESTING& INSPECTiON / ENGINEERS rDATE 'CERT.NO. — 1iRKL N.E. 126 I PLACE, ��, - —1 i,� � 1 K2919NO. WASHH PGTONLACE 4e034 Id251 823-9800 ^�—u`} (�� EVERETT IA25j259-0817 PROJECT COMPRESSION REPORT �'�' LOCATION r /LOG.PERMIT N R — y 6 WEATHER TEMP. ATOr 10T IEN NEER X14" ITECT ATTN: — —_�— -- THE FOLLOWING WAS NOTED: C TRAM FIELD TEST DATA Ir ,r J nArAFOR DESIGN % ADJUSTED I �j MIX NO.�j�� CU.Yo— WEIGHTS_ MOIST. _—WEIGHTS TRUCK SAMPLED TRUCK TICKET NO. r SLUMP UNIT CEMENT TEMP, C)NENT TIME %AIR WEIGHT YIELD ASTMC-1064 FLY ASH I ASTM C-143 ASTM C-138 FACTOR CONC AIR ,r _- Ste, C, C.A. C.A. C.A. AIR TEST METHOD: [PRESSURE ASTM C-231 OR E]VOLUME ASTM C-173 FINE AGG. 97 EQUIPMENT USED I.D. WATER [3 SLUMP CONE CSLCOO THERMOMETER CCOTHO TOTAL AIRMETER CCOAIO OTHER TYPE OF BREAK: (A)Cone . (C)Cone and Shear (b)Cone and Split (d)Shear (a)Columnar. COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH CYLINDER DATE DATE AGE AREA TOTAL STRENGTH TYPE NUMBER MADE TESTED -}DAYS SIZE (SO.IN) LOAD _t PSI BREAK 21 CONCRETE COMPRESSION MACHINE I,D.#CCOCOOO E1 ASTM C-1231 �ASTM C-g17 SAMPLING IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAMPLE P/U DATE— TEST METHOD__ ------ APPLICABLE CODES&SPECS, SUPPLIER �A -- -�»'=ll CEMENT TYPE _ CU.YARDS PLACED . _ AEA ADMIX.r_T Z��IV, CAC1 Z _r _ % � DESIGN STRENGTH PLACEMENT AREA&NOTES 1;r 2/2 TEST RESULTS APPLY ONLY TO THE ITEMS HEREIN TESTED,THIS REPORT SHALL NOT INSPECTOR(S),NAME(S)PRINTED BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL,WITH- OUT THE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY,INC. INSPECTOR SIGNATURE _ REVISED I/02 SIGNED BY _- COPIES TO: --- —— -- CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY, INC. TESTING&INSPECTION/ENGINEERS 1 1.3 3 6 2 PREVIOUS , �. 1 12979 N E. 126rH PLACE REPORT No_ No. KIRKLAND,WASHINGTON 98034 (425)823-9800 CERT.N0. EVERETT (425)259-0817 DATE FIELD REPCaRT � , ..W 2 ROJE T .o '� el' A LOCATION r TO: f f 'BLDG.PERMIT NO. OWNER- 7/ WEATHER TEMP. AT-rj Jd rVL(--:-i t 4a - U AT V PM ENGINEER ..I ARCHITECT ATTN: TRACTOR (2) Z INSPECTION PERFORMED ITEMS INSPECTED FOUNDATIONS , , RESTEELICONCRETE _ RESTEEL ONLY FOOTINGS SLAB — RESTEEUMASONRY — STR.STlWELDING AUGER CAST PILES _ COLUMNS --OTHER ---_ STR.ST/BOLTING — DRILLED PIERS — WALLS — BEAMS (LOCATION(AREAS) lJ7"i.ticr CONCRETEIMASONRY MIX NO. ` 1 rrz DESIGN STRENGTH(f'c).11 SUPPLIER "'~ �� G TOTAL CU.YD.PLACEQ p r SLUMP(INCHES) SPECIMENS CAST,_ AIR CONTENT(%) SEE CYLINDER REPORT NO. � ES—NO_ITEMS INSPECTED WERE IN CONFORMANCE WITH BLDG.DEPT.APPROVED PLANS REMARKS: a24xfa,L __ /.f/9�/� /& !ii/l�/��- R (� c_. �.✓03—f i ,4444 TEST RESULTS APPLY ONLY TO THE LITEMS OT I HEREIN TESTED,TH15 EPROAT SHALL NOT INSPECTOR(S),NAME(S)PRffy$I:yD 8E REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL, WITH- (f OUT THE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF CASCADE / TESTING LABORATORY,INC. INSPECTOR SIGRE_ REVISED 8100 SIGNED BY ��•._ COPIES TO' 11 I Message Page 1 of 2 David Anderson From: David Anderson [danderson@ci.arlington.wa.us] Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 10:02 AM To: rick@pugetwest.com Subject: RE: Permit application#5191, Texaco Express lube carwash, etc. Rick, Great, here are some additional comments that need to be addressed on the drawings. The energy code calculations have been submitted and have been reviewed for compliance. I don't typically have Mr. Williams review these requirements. they are done in house. 1. Sheets Al the detail callouts for detail H, N and the North Elevation are not shown. 2. On sheet A2 there are two detail callouts not shown on floor plan detail. 3. The revisions of the stairs and storage room need be be shown on revised drawings. Sheet SUS833RH-1 on the floor plan detail callout the revisions on sheets A2 and ST2. Sheet ST2 has not been submitted. 4. Sheet SUS833RH-1 shows the downspouts draining onto the asphalt. A note needs to be added stating they shall be connected to an approved storm drainage system. The site civil drawings are on the 3rd review. I'm told from Gregg Eaton that this should be the final review and that mylars would be requested for signing. Kelly Wriggs at Cascade Surveying is currently working on the final revisions. You will need to submit revised drawings on the comments from CWA and the above mention comments. Eight sets of drawings are required for resubmittal. If you have any questions please call me or e-mail may be the best way to reach me. Dave David W. Anderson (360)403-3432 Building Official City of Arlington danderson@ci.arlington.wa.us -----Original Message----- From: Rick Fletcher [mailto:rick@pugetwest.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 5:05 PM To: danderson@email.ci.arlington.wa.us Subject: FW: Permit application # 5191, Texaco Express lube carwash, etc. Dave, Got the plan review letter: Item 3, the energy calculations were resubmitted on the revised form on October 17th. Are these wrong or did CWA not receive them? Please let me know so we can respond if need be. Thanks Rick Fletcher -----Original Message----- From: Rick Fletcher [mailto:rick@pugetwest.com] 11/21/02 .: V Message Page 2 of 2 Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 8:52 AM To: 'David Anderson' Subject: RE: Permit application # 5191,Texaco Express lube carwash, etc. Dave, Please let me know the progress of plan review. Thanks Rick Fletcher -----Original Message----- From: David Anderson [mailto:danderson@email.ci.arlington.wa.us] Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 10:58 AM To: rick@pugetwest.com Subject: RE: Permit application # 5191,Texaco Express lube carwash, etc. The policy on foundation permits is we do not issue these types of permits. The review of your project is progressing as quickly as it can. the site civil mylars are being reviewed for completeness and the building review is half way completed. I anticipate to issue your project within the next two weeks. Please call if you have any questions. David W. Anderson (360)403-3432 Building Official City of Arlington danderson@ci.arlington.wa.us -----Original Message----- From: Rick Fletcher [mailto:rick@pugetwest.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 7:27 AM To: danderson@ci.arlington.wa.us Subject: Permit application # 5191,Texaco Express lube carwash, etc. Dave, This project has a basement under the lube bays. Because of high water table in the area, we are hoping to be able to excavate and build the pit now, as the water table is at the lowest point at this time of the year. Is there any way that a foundation permit can be issued to allow us to do this? As you know, having to dewater and fight the water table can become expensive for the owner. Any assistance would be appreciated. Rick Fletcher PugetWest 11/21/02 � .. I 400' � 1� YCity of Arlington Development Services 7Planning Division 1N , V MEMO TO: Building Division CC: Gregg Eaton, Engineering Division FROM: Yvonne Page, Senior Planner DATE: November 8, 2002 RE: Texaco Xpress Lube (BP#02-5191) The following conditions must be met prior to issuance of the building permit: • The construction must conform to the approved site civil drawings. • The landscape plan must conform to the approved plan (see attached); the submitted plan does not. • The access on Smokey Point Boulevard must be limited to right-in, right-out only. • The existing property line on 173rd Place NE must be used until such time as the vacation has been approved through the City of Arlington right-of-way vacation process. • The developer must pay the following estimated City of Arlington impact fees (based on 3,325 square feet of buildings): Traffic at $1,038.00 per p.m.-peak-hour trip, which is 33, or $34,254.00. (NOTE: Actual impact fees due are those as set by resolution at the time the fees are paid. These amounts are provided here as an estimate. They may either increase or decrease by the time they are paid.) (NOTE: Because the project was categorically exempt from SEPA, the project is not subject to WSDOT or Snohomish County transportation mitigation fees.) In addition, all of the conditions of the Texaco Xpress Lube Minor Development Permit (File MN- 02-025) shall apply to the development of the property. Yv ne Page hment r. r i I li • • I DI • 7r 2001 Washington State Nonresidential Energy Code Compliance Forms First Edition,June 2001 Project Info Project Address _ J.JDate J. 2 _ For Building Department Use Applicant Name: Applicant Address: /. Applicant Phone: Project Description New Building ❑Addition ❑Alteration ❑Change of Use Prescriptive ❑Component Performance ❑ ENVSTD 2.1 ❑Systems Compliance Option lee Decision Flowchart(over)for qualifications) (4.0 not acceptable) Analysis Space Heat Type O Electric resistance 1 All other (see over for definitions) Total Glazing Area Electronic version: these values are automatically taken from ENV-UA-1. Glazing Area Calculation (rough opening) Gross Exterior Note:Below grade walls may be included in the (vertical&overhd) divided by W all Area times 100 equals %Glazing Gross Exterior Wall Area if they are insulated to the level required for opaque walls. ` 1 Z _ Cc 0 C, X 100 0 yes Check here if using this option and if project meets all requirements for the Concrete/Masonry Concrete,Masonry Option Option. See Decision Flowchart(over)for qualifications. Enter requirements for each qualifying 4 no assembly below. Envelope Requirements(enter values as applicable) Opaque Concrete/Masonry Wall Requirements Fully heated/cooled space Insulation on interior-maximum U-factor is 0.19 Minimum Insulation R-values Insulation on exterior or integral-maximum U-factor is 0.25 Roofs Over Attic If project qualifies for Concrete/Masonry Option,list walls Z ' with HC>_9.0 Btu/ft'•°F below(other walls must meet All Other Roofs Opaque Wall requirements). Use descriptions and values Opaque Walls' from Table 20-5b in the Code. Below Grade Walls Wall Description U-factor Floors Over Unconditioned Space (including insulation R-value&position) Slabs-on-Grade a —(IQ Radiant Floors Maximum U-factors Opaque Doors Vertical Glazing . 4 D Overhead Glazing Maximum SHGC(or SC) Vertical/Overhead Glazing Semi-heated space 2 Minimum Insulation R-values Roofs Over Semi-Heated Spaces2 1.Assemblies with metal framing must comply with overall U-factors 2.Refer to Section 1310 for qualifications and requirements Notes: 21 %Na,-,hinj=jt1 WogrgidentA rr iode C moliance For • • t s 2001 Washington Stale Nonresidential Eneroy Code Cnmplianrn Forms First Edition,June 2001 Decision Flowchaft Use this flowchart to determine if project qualifies for the optional Prescriptive Option. for Prescriptive Option If not,either the Component Performance or Systems Analysis Options must be used. 1302 Space Heat Type:For the purpose of determining building envelope Electric Resistance:Space heating systems which use electric resistance requirements,the following two categories comprise all space heating types: START elements as the primary heating system including baseboard,radiant,and Other.All other space heating systems including gas,solid fuel,oil,and forced air units where the total electric resistance heat capacity exceeds 1.0 propane space heating systems and those systems listed in the exception to W1fl2 of the gross conditioned floor area. Exception:Heal pumps and electric resistance. (continued at right) terminal electric resistance heating in variable air volume distribution systems. El c Yes Heal? All w R-1 MasonrywoN Masonrywall No criteria OK? Yes Yee criteria OK? No All walls R-19 ins ion? (below) (below) insulation? f rat No No < % <25% <20% <20% GI n97 No No Glazing? Glazing? No P 411 No Glazing? s Yu Yes you All Insulating Installed? AN Insulating Installed? All Insulating Installed? All InsulWirp Instailod? Opague Wall R-11 Opague Well R-11 Metal Framed Wall U-0.062 Metal Framed Wall U-0.062 Below Grd Wall(ext) R-10 Masonry Well(int) U-0.19 Other Opaque Wall R-19 Other Opague Wall R-19 Below Grd Walt loth) R-11 Masonry Wall(other) U-0.25 Masonry Wall(int) U-0.19 Below Grd Wall(ext) R-10 Roof Over Attic R-30 Below Grd Wall(ext) R-10 Masonry Wall(other) U-0.25 Below Grd Wall(alh) R-19 All Other Roof R-21 Below Grd Wall loth) R-11 Below Grd Wall(ext) R-10 Roof Over Attic R-38 Raised Floor R-19 Roof Over Attic R-30 Below Grd Wall loth) R-19 All Other Roof R-30 Slab-On-Grade R-10 All Other Roof R-21 Roof Over Attic R-38 Raised Floor R-30 Radiant Floor R-10 Raised Floor R-19 All Other Roof R-30 Slab-On-Grade R-10 Opaque Door U 0.60 Slab-On-Grade R-10 Raised Floor R-30 Radiant Floor R-10 -- Radiant Floor R-10 Slab-On-Grade R-10 O a ue Door U 0.60 Glazing Criteria Met? O ague Door U-0.60 Radiant Floor R-10 Glazing Critorio Mal? Glazing Vert OH Glazing Criteria Met? Opaque Door U-0.60 Area% UVal I.Val SHGC Glazing Criteria Mel? al"lly Veil OH 0-16% 0.00 1.46 1.00 Glazing Vert OH Area% UVal UVal SHGC 15-20% 0.75 1.40 1.00 Area% UVal UVal SHGC Glazing Vert OH 0-20% 0.40 0.80 100 20-30% 0.65 1.30 065 0.10% 0.90 1.45 1.00 Atom% UVal UVal SHGC 30.40% 0.00 1130 0.45 10-15% 0.75 1.40 1.00 0-20% 040 080 100 15-20% 0.65 1.30 0,80 20-25% Of 1.30 0.65 No No Yes NU No Prescriptive Path All Component Performance or Systems Analysis Required Concrete/Masonry Option* Wall Heat Capacity (HC) *If the area weighted heat Assembly Description Assy.Tag HC** Area(so HC x Area capacity(HC)of the total above grade wall is a minimum of 9.0, the Concrete Masonry Option may be used. **Far framed wails,assume HC=1.0 unless calculations are provided;for all other walls,use Totals Section 1009. Area weighted HC:divide total of(HC x area)by Total Area t N nr i ni IEn r o e CDm li n F rm 2001 Washington State Nonresidential Energy Code Compliance Forms First Edition,June 2001 Glazing Proposed SHGC Target SHGC List components by assembly ID&Dage# SHGC' x Area A =SHGC x A SHGC x Area(A) =SHGC x A ID: rn ID: Glazing% Electric Resist. Other Heating R ID: 0-20% 1.00 1.00 S m c� ID: >20-30% not allowed 0.65 ID: >30-40% not allowed 0.45 ID: I (see Table 13-1 for Conc/Masonry values) 'Note:Manufacturer's SC may be used in lieu of SHGC. Totals Totals For compliance:Proposed total SHGC x A shall not exceed Target total SHGC x A NOTE:Since 1997 SHGC compliance for vertical and overhead glazing is allowed to be calculated together. Target Area Adjustment Calculations If the total amount of glazing area as a%of gross exterior wall area(calculated on ENV-SUMt)exceeds the maximum allowed in Table 13-1, then this calculation must be submitted Use the resulting areas in the Target UA and SHGC calculations above. Proposed Areas: Numbered values are used in calculations below. Roofs over Attics Other Roofs Walls Glazing Area OG= OG- VG= Note: OG=overhead glazing Opaque Area VG=vertical glazing Gross Exterior Wall Max Glazing Area Maximum Target Area (Table 13-1) Glazing Area X I — 1 100 1 = Target OG Area in Roofs over Attics Target OG Area in Other Roofs Max OG Remaining Target VG Area For Target OG's,the :?lesser = _ >?lesser = lesser values are used both here and below. Proposed Opa ue Area Proposed OG Area Target OG Area Y Target Opaque A Roofs over Attics + _ Other Roofs +. _ Proposed Opaque Area + Proposed VG Area Target VG Area Target Opaque Are Target Areas OK a Walls — - Note: If there is more than one type of wall,the Target VG Area may be distributed among them,and separate Target Opaque Areas found. If the Target Areas for Opaque Walls listed on the front must equal the total calculated here. Target values in shaded boxes are used in the applicable Target UA calculations on the front. Target VG Area and Total Target OG Area are also used In the applicable Target SHGC calculations above. 001 1Nnqhinnfnn qt te, Nonr .i t' I nPr rle i' m li r 2001 WasNngton State Nonresidendal Enerqy Code Compliance Forms First Edition,Juno 2001 Project Address _ 91-.J Date 1 0 _Z j _ O.Z Space Heat Type O Electric resistance (YAll other For Building Department Use Glazing Area as%gross exterior wall area 12-3 C. Prop. I fS.oo Max.Target Concrete/Masonry Option O Yes QQ No Notes:If glazing area exceeds maximum allowed in Table,then calculate adjusted areas on back(over). If Concrete/Masonry Option is used,Target U-factors,SHGC and Glazing%will be different than shown below. Refer to Table 13-1 for correct values. Building Component Proposed UA Target UA List components by assembly ID&page# U-factor x Area(A) =UA(U x A) U-factor x Area(A) =UA(U x A) U= ,a o Plan ID: U= Plan ID: 3 4 Z Glazing% Electric Resist. Other-Heating rn U= Plan ID: 0-15% c U= Plan ID: >15-20% 0.40 0.75 > 0 U= Plan ID: >20-30% not allowed 0.60 U= Plan ID: >30-40% not allowed 0.50 U= Plan ID: (see Table 13-1 for Conc/Masonry values) 0 U= Plan ID: U= Plan ID: Glazing% Electric Resist. Other Heating m U= Plan ID: 0-15s/o 0,00 1.45 O U= Plan ID: >15-20% 0.80 1.40 t w U= Plan ID: >20-30% not allowed 1.30 U= Plan ID: >30-40% not allowed 1.25 0 U= Plan ID: (see Table 13-1 for Conc/Masonry values) 0 U= Plan ID: N y U= Plan ID: a $ U= Plan ID: Electric Resist. Other Heating 0 U= Plan ID: 0.60 0.60 R= Plan ID: C O>' a R= Plan ID: Electric Resist. Other Heating R= Plan ID: 0.031 0.036 ar w R= Plan ID: L R= Plan ID: Electric Resist. Other Heating 0 W R= Plan ID: 0.034 0.050 R= Plan ID: ** R= Plan ID: ** H m R= Plan ID: ** 3 R= Plan ID: Electric Resist. Other Heating d 'v R= Plan ID: Ordinary 0.062 0.14 R= Plan ID: Conc(int) 0.19 0.19 R= Plan ID: Conc(oth) 0.25 0.25 **Note:sum of Target Areas here should equal Target Opaque Wall Area(see back) R- Plan ID: nR= Plan ID: Electric Resist. Other Heating c7 3 R= Plan ID: 0.062 0.14 Note:if insulated to levels required for opaque walls,list above with opaque walls 6 R= Plan ID: n o R= Plan ID: Electric Resist. Other Heating 3 ? U. Plan ID: 0.029 0.056 R= Plan ID: 5 R= Plan ID: rn e R= Plan ID: Electric Resist. Other Heating o R= Plan ID: F=0.54 F=0.54 R= Plan ID: (see Table 13-1 for radiant floor values) *For CMU walls,indicate core insulation material. Totals Totals u For compliance: �Tean U • . ( 1)Proposed Total Area shall equal Target o aropos o shall not excee arge 01al UA. Plans 2001 Washngton Stain Nonresidential Energy Code Compliance Forms First Edition,June 2001 Envelope - General Requirements 1311 Insulation Product samples used for U-factor determinations shall be 1311.1 Installation Requirements: All insulation materials production line units or representative of units as purchased by shall be installed according to the manufacturer's instructions the consumer or contractor.Unlabeled glazing and doors shall be assigned the default U factor in Section 2006. to achieve proper densities,maintain clearances,and maintain uniform R-values.To the maximum extent possible,insulation 1312.2 Solar Heat Gain Coefficient and Shading shall extend over the full component area to the intended R- Coefficient:Solar Heat Gain Coefficient(SHGC),shall be value. determined,certified and labeled in accordance with the 1311.2 Roof/Ceiling Insulation:Open-blown or poured loose- National Fenestration Rating Council(NFRC)Standard by a certified,independent agency,licensed by the NFRC. fill insulation may be used in attic spaces where the slope of the ceiling is not more than 3/12 and there is at least thirty Exception: Shading coefficients(SC)shall be an inches of clear distance from the top of the bottom chord of the acceptable alternate for compliance with solar heat truss or ceiling joist to the underside of the sheathing at the gain coefficient requirements. Shading coefficients roof ridge.When eave vents are installed,baffling of the vent for glazing shall be taken from Chapter 27 of openings shall be provided so as to deflect the incoming air Standard RS-27 or from the manufacturer's test data. above the surface of the insulation. 1313 Moisture Control Where lighting fixtures are recessed into a suspended or 1313.1 Vapor Retarders:Vapor retarders shall be installed on exposed grid ceiling,the roof/ceiling assembly shall be the warm side(in winter)of insulation as required by this insulated in a location other than directly on the suspended section. ceiling. Exception:Vapor retarder installed with not more Exception: Type IC rated recessed lighting fixtures. than 113 of the nominal R-value between it and the Where installed in wood framing,faced batt insulation conditioned space. shall be face stapled. 1313.2 Roof/Ceiling Assemblies:Roof/ceiling assemblies 1311.3 Wall Insulation: Exterior wall cavities isolated during where the ventilation space above the insulation is less than framing shall be fully insulated to the levels of the surrounding an average of twelve inches shall be provided with a vapor walls.When installed in wood framing,faced batt insulation retarder.Roof/ceiling assemblies without a vented airspace, shall be face stapled. where neither the roof deck nor the roof structure are m ade of Above grade exterior insulation shall be protected. wood,shall provide a continuous vapor retarder with taped seams. 1311.4 Floor Insulation: Floor insulation shall be installed in Exception:Vapor retarders need not be provided a permanent manner in substantial contact with the surface where all of the insulation is installed between the being insulated. Insulation supports shall be installed so roof membrane and the structural roof deck. spacing is not more than twenty-four inches on center. Installed insulation shall not block the airflow through 1313.3 Walls:Walls separating conditioned space from foundation vents. unconditioned space shall be provided with a vapor retarder. 1311.5 Slab-On-Grade Floor: Slab-on-grade insulation 1313.4 Floors: Floors separating conditioned space from installed inside the foundation wall shall extend downward from unconditioned space shall be provided with a vapor retarder. the top of the stab a minimum distance of twenty-four inches or 1313.5 Crawl Spaces:A ground cover of six mil(0.006 inch to the top of the footing,whichever is less. Insulation installed thick)black polyethylene or approved equal shall be laid over outside the foundation shall extend downward a minimum of the ground within crawl spaces.The ground cover shall be twenty-four inches or to the frostline,whichever is greater. overlapped twelve inches minimum at the joints and shall Above grade insulation shall be protected. extend to the foundation wall. Exception:For monolithic slabs,the insulation shall Exception: The ground cover may be omitted in extend downward from the top of the slab to the crawl spaces if the crawl space has a concrete slab bottom of the footing. floor with a minimum thickness of three and one-half 1311.6 Radiant Floors(on or below grade): Slab-on-grade inches. insulation shall extend downward from the top of the slab a 1314 Air Leakage minimum distance of thirty-six inches or downward to the top of 1314.1 Building Envelope:The requirements of this section the footing and horizontal for an aggregate of not less than shall apply to building elements separating conditioned from thirty-six inches. unconditioned spaces.Exterior joints around windows and If required by the building official where soil conditions door frames,openings between walls and foundation,between warrant such insulation,the entire area of a radiant floor shall walls and roof and wall panels;openings at penetrations of be thermally isolated from the soil. Where a soil gas control utility services through walls,floors,and roofs;and all other system is provided below the radiant floor,which results in openings in the building envelope shall be sealed,caulked, increased convective flow below the radiant floor,the radiant gasketed,or weatherstripped to limit air leakage. floor shall be thermally isolated from the sub-floor gravel layer. 1314.2 Glazing and Doors:Doors and operable glazing 1312 Glazing and Doors separating conditioned from unconditioned space shall be 1312.1 Standard Procedure for Determination of Glazing weatherstripped.Fixed windows shall be tight fitting with glass and Door U-Factors:U-f actors for glazing and doors shall be retained by stops with sealant or caulking all around. determined,certified and labeled in accordance with Standard Exception: Openings that are required to be fire RS-31 by a certified independent agency licensed by the resistant. National Fenestration Rating Council(NFRC). Compliance 1314.3 Building Assemblies Used as Ducts or Plenums: shall be based on the Residential or the Nonresidential Model Building assemblies used as ducts or plenums shall be sealed, Size. caulked, and gasketed to limit air leakage. f suilding Permit Plans 2001 Washington State Nonresidential Energy Code Compliance Forrns First FrIilinn,June 2001 Project Address Date The following information is necessary to check a building permit application for compliance with the building envelope requirements in the Washington State Nonr sidential Energy Code. Applicability Code Location Building Department (yes,no,n.a.) Section Component Information Required on Plans Notes GENERAL REWREMENTS Sections 1301-1314 no n/a 1301 Scope Unconditioned spaces identified on plans if allowed a j no n/a 1302 Space heat types�5 �i if"Other", Indlcate on plans that electric resistance heal I$hot allowed ' Q gee no 1310.2 Semi-heated spaces Semi-heated spaces identified on plans if allowed 1311 Insulation e ,no n/a 1311.1 Insul.installation Indicate densities and clearances Z no n/a 1311.2 Roof/ceiling insul. Indicate R-value on roof sections for attics and other roofs; h -Z' Indicate clearances for attic insulation; Indicate baffles if save vents installed; Indicate face stapling of faced baits Z g no n/a 1311.3 Wall insulation Indicate R-value on wall sections; 12_1 1 Indicate face stapling of faced belts; Indicate above grade exterior insulation is protected; hldivale luuse-flll cure Insulation for masonry walls as neCeSs; Indicate heat capacity of masonry walls if masonry option is used or if credit taken in ENVSTD' yes no qi 1311.4 Floor insulation Indicate R-value on floor sections; Indicate substantial contact with surface; Indicate supports not more than 24"o.c.; Indicate that insulation does not block airflow through foundation vents fer3 no n/a 1311.5 Slab-on-grade floor Indicate R-value on wall section or foundation detail; Ile.0 Indicate slab insulation extends down vertically 24"from top; Indicate above grade exterior insulation is protected 's yes no 1311.6 Radiant floor ndicate R-value on wall section or foundation detail; Indicate slab insulation extends down vertically 36"from the top; Indicate above grade exterior insulation is protected; Indicate insulation also under entire slab where read.by Official y e� no n/a 1312 Glazing and duuis Pwvide caluulaliun of ylaciny area(Including both vertical vertical and overhead)as percent of gross wall area — 3 no n/a 1312.1 U-factors 'Indicate glazing and door U-factors on glazing and door b U schedule(provide area-weighted calculations as necessary); Indicate if values are NFRC or default,if values are default then specify frame type,glazing layers,gapwidlh,low-e coatings,qas fillings yes no !f�7 1312.2 SHGC&SC Indicate glazing solar heat gain coefficient or shading coefficient on glazing schedule(provide area-weighted calculations as necessary) 1313 Moisture control r8� no n/a 1313.1 Vapor retarders Indicate vapor retarders on warm side no n/a 1313.2 Roof/ceiling vap.ret. Indicate vapor retarder on roof section; y p 0. VVa Indicate vs .relard.with sealed seams for non-wuuJ sliuc. G5 e no n/a 1313.3 Wall vapor retarder Indicate vapor retarder on wall section r vea. no n/a 1313.4 Floor vapor retarder Indicate vapor retarder on floor section yes no 1313.5 Crawl space vap.ret. Indicate six mil black polyethylene overlapped 12"on ground yea no Va / 1314 Air leakage YtW no n/a 1314.1 Bldg.envel.sealing Indicate sealing,caulking,gasketing,and weatherstripping 3 no n/a 1314.2 Glazing/door sealing Indicate weatherstripping gee no f 1314.3 Assemb,as ducts Indicais sealing,caulking and gasketing PRESCRIPTIVEMOMPON ENT PERFORMANCE(Sections 1320-23 or 1330-34) yes no n/a Envelope Sum.Form Completed and attached. Provide component performance worksheet if necessary Provide ENVSTD 2.1 screen 1 output if necessary If "no" is shown for any question, provide explanation: RECEIVED OCT 212002 CITY OF ARLINGTON " Mechanical Summary MECH-SUM 2G0 1 Wahington State Nonresidential Energy Code Compliance Forms First Ed Lion•June 2001 Project Info Project Adress __ Sma be 0.6 k, r Date For Building Dept,Use Applicant Nam f s Applicant Address[Applicant ACT 2 1 20 z plicant Phone `! O TON Project Description Briefly describe mechanical system type and features. ❑Includes Plans Include documentation requiring compliance with commissioning requirements,Section 1416.n Compliance Option Simple System Q Complex System O Systems Analysis (See Decision Flowchart(over)for qualifications.Use separate MECH-SUM for simple&complex systems.) Equipment Schedules The following information is required to be incorporated with the mechanical equipment schedules on the plans. For projects without plans,fill In the required information below. Cooling Equipment Schedule Equip. CapacIV C1E ID Brand Name' Model No.' Btu/h Total CFM or Econo? or EER IPLV3 Location P- O y Clta Heating Equipment Schedule Equip. Capacity2 c ID Brand Name' Model No.' Btu/h Total CFM or Ecocono? Input Btuh Output Btuh Efficiency° 14W a3 h C. �� wo y Fan Equipment Schedule Equip. ID Brand Name' Model No.' CFM SP' HP/BHP Flow Controls Location of Service JE,";F— -96 P 2 D • $ }' C v @-$ A.,1& 61W 379- Gd z z •L.T Ica 'If available. 2 As tested according to Table 14-1,14-2 or 14-3. 3 If required. 4 COP,HSPF,Combustion Efficiency,or AFUE,as applicable. 9 Flow control types:variable air volume(VAV),constant volume(CV),or variable speed(VS). Mechanical Summary (back) MECH-SUM 2001 Washington State Nonresidential Energy Code Compliance Forms First Edition-June 2001 System Description If Heating/Cooling ❑ Constant vol? ❑Air cooled? ❑ Packaged Sys? ❑ <54,000 Btuh See Section 1421 for full description of or Cooling Only: ❑ Split system? ❑Economizer included? or 1900 cfm? Simple System qualifications. If Heating Only: ❑ <5000 cfm? ❑<70%outside air? Decision Flowchart Use this flowchart to determine if project qualifies for Simple System Option. If not,either the Complex System or Systems Analysis Options must be used. START Healin Syst oo Ingle No or Coaling Only Heating Only <#> Yes Reference Section 1421 No <70%OSA Yes► No <54, >Btuh Split No or 19 C Sys —Na \Yes Ys Reference Econo Yes Section 1423 <54.000 Bluh No Included? or 1900 dm? No Simple System Yes No Allowed Reference Section 142 Use Complex Reference Systems Section 1430 Complex Systems Refer to MECH-COMP Mechanical Complex Systems for assistance in determining which Complex p y Systems requirements are applicable to this project. -,, © r3 - 5191 CASCADE TES- AG LABORATORY, INC. TESTING &INSPECTION/ENGINEERS PREVIOUS 4 4 01 12919 N.E. 176TH PLACE REPORT No. No. KWKLAND, WASHINGTON 98034 (425)823-9BOD EVEREIT (425)259-0817 DATE CERT. NO. _ r ).-7"0 'q' (FIELD REPORT PROJECT j LOCATION 1 -7 TO: _ BLDG.PERMIT NO. OWNER �+ WEATHER TEMP. AT AM �L R--0- S'r AT PM ENGINEER ARCHITECT ATTN: -- CONTRACTOR (2) (3) INSPECTION PERFORMED ITEMS INSPECTED ... FOUNDATIONS RESTEELJCONCRETE — RESTEEL ONLY FOOTINGS T SLAB 015 RESTEELIMASONRY .,,_, STR.ST/WELDING AUGER CAST PILES — COLUMNS OTHER .— STR.STBOLTING — DRILLED PIERS v WALLS — BEAMS L 4 A/G LOCATION(AREAS) _ '( '� 10 ��D i 1 A,,6,5 2 — t . J�G1 — r ('lc%(0NCRETgVASONRY MIX NO. 31 00 DESIGN STRENGTH(f'c) 3 SUPPLIER— G A C'z Z&(Z TOTAL CU.YD.PLACED 3 ' .J SLUMP(INCHES)_ SPECIMENS CAST 3 _ xS AIR CONTENT(°/a) — SEE CYLINDER REPORT NO. YES _NO ITEMS INSPECTED WERE IN CONFORMANCE WITH BLDG.DEPT,APPROVED PLANS r r REMARKS: 012. •Al ,,.5, A `9 �C�']�1*&)6 ^ �.>��•�- y?c C EP f+5 F;2- / ;Dj)1'r, ji 4 ^ T, r c_ ;D�_ SC...Z. . !3 c) o.5 A C Y 1 K/ 1`�j<�ri e % r� T. t0A/0?-F 7`C r TEST RESULTS APPLY ONLY TO THE ITEMS HEREIN TESTED,THIS REPORT SHALL NOT INSPECTOR(S„NAME(S) PRINTED BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL, WITH- OUT THE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF CASOADE rG � TESTING LABORATORY,INC. INSPECTOR SIGNATURE -- REVISED 8/00 SIGNED BY a. COPIES TO: �� 1 r � I a FIELD CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY, INC. REPORT No. � � _� No. 48911 TESTING&INSPECTION / ENGONEERS DATE CERT NOO. N.E. I 26TH PLACE r ?—� - KIRKLIRKLAND, WASHINGTON 98rJ3I (42,:) 82.3-4P00 r� J� ���� r�75 � C� EVERETT (A251 259.0817 PROJECT COMPRESSION REPORT LOCATION 173 fb Z V D BLDG.PERMIT NO. TOWNER ---- ---- ?- '5 -_ .. WEATHER TEMR AT AM - --- ENGINEER. ATTN: i ARCHITECT THE FOLLOWING WAS NOTED: CONTRACTOR FIELD TEST DATA — an i• ATA ro—a-r DESIGN % ADJUSTED TRUCK SAMPLED TRUCK TICKET NO, '� 7 MIX NO. I nu.vo WEIGHTS MOIST. WEIGHTS SLUMP UNIT TEMP. CEMENT TIME ASTM C 143 %AIR WEIGHT YIELD CEMENT -ASTMC-1064 ASTM 0.138 FACTOR FLY ASH CONC AIR ()73. �/� -- I �- -_ - J 7 .3,? C.A. !1 !'7C2oe-7 C.A. CA, AIR TEST METHOD: ❑PRESSURE ASTM C-231 OR L-1 VOLUME ASTM 0-173 FINE AGG. 'i 1 / 3 4c> EQUIPMENT USED I.D. ;WATER g'7'.,- SLUMPCONE CSLCOO T t THERMOMETER CCOTHO 1 ( TOTAL AIRMETER CCOAIO OTHER TYPE OF BREAK: (A)Cone (C)Cone and Shear (b)Cone and Split (d)Shear (a)Columnar COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH CYLINDER DATE DATE AGE AREA TOTAL STRENGTH TYPE NUMBER MADE TESTED DAYS SIZE (80 IN) LOAD PSI BREAK 03-4-'i 03 -7 x � I CONCRETE COMPRESSION MACHINE I.D.#CCOCOOO_ ASTM C•1231 ^, SAMPLING SAMPLE P/U DATE TEST METHOD - � ❑ASTM C-617 DAN E WITH r J APPLICABLE CODES &SPECS. SUPPLIER _C +� r- _� CEMENT TYPE —1 J _ CU.YARDS PLACED 3 5 AEA. ADMIX. CAGr 2_ % DESIGN STRENGTH PLACEMENTAREA&NOTES J • L L11 r3 1�7 3 . Cal A�OJ 7 GA I- TEST RESULTS APPLY ONLY TO THE ITEMS 'R d HEREIN TESTED.THIS REPORT SHALL NOT INSPECTOR(S),NAME(S)PRINTED BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL,WITH- CUT THE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY,INC. INSPECTOR SIGNATURE REVISED 1102 SIGNED BY COPIES TO: :x 1a � ti •' fMISS [i:.'.mruGu�r,. . ,.••�! r_.v�••+ y„'ta., b'm �, , fit ti l i { '.- ,�. .mna,. n,ran,a. m__ ....,,.,:ot., n. - n,n,n:.re -�.:..:... :.n:..�» o,nr.»� »,».»»...,.w .... .wn,,,to. . nxnnuvrmnna+.mayexo7�.rt•nnnr.em,ma w.x R I L pip tri ti7 x O x � y C� cn U) r.� x > a a C� C� m f Y CAI) Ul r O Z \ .w •!s. - O 00I ma Ln ^� x CD �Lylz n �] y O w r c It oz o r dtTj R° d d d z L tt rH n M J It ® d t Z < t.� ZO ZtTl KD n tT' '� y '� � n z � � ' n� '� �d od d d �o ml r O n I'D - r z d n MCD C. M O ��, \ �' N :a o n c) z n `z `. Y+, t1l �-•1 t ;»+w.. ••savrr r c •-' ` ^m«u,,SN�-:-'' \`R°�°��p�� ,mr,_ �. �;��� ��.sss'�n+.mRv!�..- ��'thR� s� �� 7 .- 'TY OF ARLINGTON FAX NO. :3604353906 May. 06 2003 07:28AM P2 TES CIS TORIVI DRAZN/ROA-D `- G� o� LANDSCAPING INSPECTION REPORT Permit No: 51 i Date: Address/Lot No: 7 3/ jN G � Contractor: Pw Q Owner:_ — Supervisor- Approval Correction Required Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved 'lease contact inspector Was not able to perform inspection ",.11360,435.0674 for re-inspection—24 hour notice required ��s cctor. Date: TYPE OF INSUCTZON REQUES f D Silt nee Pipe RBI Su RAW �bMgrade PING chcckDam CatchBasin(s) Rock Qr- `, c;~�ctection Matthole(s) Curb&Gutter Scd. oil Separator(s) Sidewalk Fertilizer Sark Down Spout(.$) Approach(s) plant Trash Rack/Overf1my Sub-gade a Trees ccding Restrictor Rock Final Level Spreader ATB Root Barriers Treattuent CI.B As halt I i`ly Equipment InFltr4on Striping P F'ir,1l Pond Signing n Final Final `7 �. • �: • � - t ... .'� .. ,. .. .s L � CASCADE TEST G LABORATORY, INC. 114 7 7 0 TESTING&INSPECTII !ENGINEERS PREVIOUS ` 12919 N.E. 126TH PLACE REPORT No. No. KIRKLAND,WASHINGTON 98034 (425)823-9800 EVERETT (425)259-08I7 DATE n O COERT.NO�.� FIELD REPORT PROD o qA'ce-ss LOCATION C To: Q\v7�tY�D�. �S t� BLDG.PERMIT NO. ZWNER 0,2 �l WEATHER TEMP. AT AM AT PM ENGINEER ARCHITECT ATTN: CONT VAOR (2) (3) U INSPECTION PERFORMED ITEMS INSPECTED _ FOUNDATIONS _ RESTEELICONCRETE _ gk�TEELONLY _ FOOTINGS _ SLAB _ RESTEELIMASONRY ✓/ TIWELDING _ AUGER CAST PILES _ COLUMNS OTHER — STR.STIBOLTING — DRILLED PIERS — WALLS BEAMS LOCATION(AR AS) JaDo CL'� A c ��'c CIA ",J l,^,ad �(e (5) CONCRETEIMASONRY MIX NO. DESIGN STRENGTH(f'c) SUPPLIER TOTAL CU.YD.PLACED SLUMP(INCHES) SPECIMENS CAST AIR RCCON NT(%) SEE CYLINDER REPORT NO. v Y NO_ITEMS INSPECTED WERE IN CONFORMANCE WITH BLDG.DEPT.APPROVED PLANS REMARKS: n,4_ VAC\ .Q� Ne3LS� GCS S�J vk an c\No-ov e AVV �d.�.., tea. 'n o •�. TEST RESULTS APPLY ONLY TO THE ITEMS HEREIN TESTED THIS REPORT SHALL NOT INSPECTOR(S),NAME(S)PRINTED BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL,WITH- OUT THE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY.INC. INSPECTOR SIGNATURE REVISED 8/00 SIGNED BY COPIES TO•f%JNJ I `✓`� :f . , � �ate - �� • -� - � ' , ' V� I FIELD 11q9 CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY, INC. REPORTN- NO. 50405 TESTING&INSPECTION /ENGINEERS DATE CERT,NO. 12919 N.E. 126TH PLACE KIRKLIRKLAND,WASHINGTON 98034 (425) 823-9800 EVERETT (A251259.0817 PR T COMPRESSION REPORT LOCATION / BLDG.PERMIT NO. NER TO: WEATHER TEMP. AT AM ENGIN ER 11 ARCHITECT ATTN: _i /c"v THE FOLLOWING WAS NOTED: CON A OR FIELD TEST DATA H DATA FOR DESIGN % ADJUSTED TRUCK SAMPLED TRUCKTICKET NO O MIX NO Icu.YD WEIGHTS _ MOIST WEIGHTS SLUMP UNIT CEMENT TEMP. CEMENT TIME ASTM C-143 %AIR WEIGHT YIELD FACTOR ASTM C-1064 FLY ASH ASTM C-13B CONC AIR i _ O D C.A. 20 -��c�, C.A. C.A. — — AIR TEST METHOD: ❑PRESSURE ASTM C-231 OR ❑VOLUME ASTM C-173 FINE AGG. EQUIPMENT USED I.D. WATER SLUMP CONE CSLCOO QQ!� THERMOMETER CCOTHO�� TOTAL AIRMETER CCOAIO OTHER TYPE OF BREAK: (A)Cone (C)Cone and Shear (b)Cone and Split (d)Shear (e)Columnar COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH CYLINDER DATE DATE AGE AREA TOTAL STRENGTH TYPE NUMBER MARE TESTED DAYS SIZE (SO.IN) LOAD PSI BREAK '6 b3- 1,z�A /.,v- 771 CONCRETE COMPRESSION MACHINE I.D.#CiCOCiOOO,_ ❑ASTM C-1231 SAMPLING IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAMPLE P/U DATE TEST METHOD ❑A�STMC-617 APPLICABLE CODES&SPECS. R SUPPLIE , � I-'f�(/S CEMENT TYPE = !/ CU.YARDS PLACED AEA. CAC12 % DESIGN STRENGTH�k7 9000 PLACEMENT AREA&NOTES 1:7v 12bow aaJ 67 TEST RESULTS APPLY ONLY TO THE ITEMS HEREIN TESTED.THIS REPORT SHALL NOT INSPECTOR(S),NAMES)PRINTE BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL,WITH- OUT THE WRrrTEN APPROVAL OF CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY,INC. INSPECTOR SIGNATURE REVISED 1/02 [ (� SIGNED BY COPIESTO: A�%p r 1 1 1 _ 1 �Y 1 1 1 1 ti •_� 1 V - _ _ 1 • '7 1 FIELD IcCASCADE TESTING LABORATORY, INC. REPORT No. No. 50401 TESTING&INSPECTION/ ENGINEERS I DATE CERT NO. 12919 N.E. 126TH PLACE l �KO KIRKLAND,WASHINGTON 98034 4251 e23-9e00 �,(/ -"' 73 EVERETT A25 259.0 17 PROJECT COMPRESSION REPORT LOCATION L G.PERMIT N . OWNER TO O/� C W H R TEMP. Al`/� A - � U�2& 1O AT PM ENGINEER ARC I E T ATTN: �G U ARC FOLLOWING WAS NOTED: CONr- CTIOFIELD TEST DATA ,� /� WI-CH DATA FOR DESIGN % ADJUSTED TRUCK SAMPLED TRUCK TICKET NO ©j�l MIX.NO "( =_CU YD WEIGHTS MOIST. V/E!G'jTS SLUMP UNIT CEMENT TEMP. CEMENT TIME ASTM C-14 %AIR WEIGHT YIELD FACTOR ASTM C-1064 FLYASH ASTM C-138 CONC AIR 0 C.A. C.A. C.A. ' AIR TEST METHOD: ❑PRESSURE ASTM C-231 OR ❑VOLUME ASTM C-173 FINE AGG. EQUIPMENT USED I.D. WATER Q SLUMPCONE CSLCOO CSOSTHERMOMETER CCOTHO 00-5 TOTAL AIRMETER CCOAIO OTHER TYPE OF BREAK: (A)Cone (C)Cone and Shear (b)Cone and Split (d)Shear (e)Columnar COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH CYLINDER DATE DATE AGE AREA TOTAL STRENGTH TYPE NUMBER M E TESTED DAYS SIZE (SO.IN) LOAD PSI BREAK 5?5 CONCRETE COMPRESSION MACHINE I.D.#CCOCOOO ❑ASTM C-1231 El ASTM C-617 SAMPLING IN ACCORDANCE WITH�— D SAMPLE P/U DA E_ten T(ESST METHOD (C APPLICABLE CODES&SPEC/S. SUPPLIER CEMENTTYPE CU.YARDS PLACED AEA _ A f�. CAC12 °b DESIGN STRENGTH PLACEMENT AREA&NOTES ��S4 ht-rA4oi-( TEST RESULTS APPLY ONLY TO THE ITEMS S HEREIN TESTED.THIS REPORT SHALL NOT INSPECTOR(S),NAME(S)PRINTED BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL,WITH- OUT THE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF CASCADE _ TESTING LABORATORY,INC. INSPECTOR SIGNATURE REVISED 1/02 SIGNED BY COPIES TO:R-<9/44P-313 J FIELD CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY, INC. REPORT No. It 14*401 NO. 48911 TESTING&INSPECTION%ENGINEERS DATE [CERT.NO. 12919 N.E. 126TH PLACE 1 KIRKLAND,WASHINGTON 99034 (425) 82 •9800 0 J^ � ✓ O `� �`— �.7 EVERETT (4I2 25 -0817 PROJECT C E X*40 pz`�S COMPRESSION REPORT LOCATION TO: rJE V `� ✓p BLDG.PERMIT NO. OWNER o2- S1RI 1 4 WEATHER TEMP. AT AM P� 1 cqj/ AT PM ENGINEER UN 4911;A146;v 0v ARCHITECT ATTN: THE FOLLOWING WAS NOTED: CONTRACTOR ��1Q�T W�Si FIELD TEST DATA Q 9ATCHDATAFOR DESIGN % ADJUSTED TRUCK SAMPLED 18 Q TRUCK TICKET NO. 3 g 4 v 7 MIX NO. 3 (d O cu.vo WEIGHTS MOIST. WEIGHTS UNIT TEMP. CEMENT 4 SLUMP L SS TIME ASTM MP �°AIR WEIGHT YIELD CFACTOREMENT ASTM C-1064 FLY ASH ASTM C-138 CONC AIR C.A. /4 /7000) 73 $ '7 5 .07 39 ., C.A. C.A. AIR TEST METHOD: ❑PRESSURE ASTM C-231 OR ❑VOLUME ASTM C-173 FINE AGG. 3• t 3 3 v EQUIPMENT USED I.D. WATER 8 70 SLUMP CONE CSLCOO I 1 THERMOMETER CCOTHO l( TOTAL AIRMETER CCOAIO OTHER TYPE OF BREAK: (A)Cone (C)Cone and Shear (b)Cone and Split (d)Shear (e)Columnar COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH CYLINDER DATE DATE AGE AREA TOTAL STRENGTH TYPE NUMBER MADE TESTED DAYS SIZE (SQ.IN) LOAD PSI BREAK 4x f2'5CI° 4:54 3 qZ) 2g ✓ 3�b �� 1 - 2$ ✓ CONCRETE COMPRESSION MACHINE I.D.#CCOCOOO L+9 ASTM C-1231 SAMPLING IN ACCORDANCE WITH �^•a�' SAMPLE P/U DATE TEST METHOD 4 ❑ASTM C-617 APPLICABLE CODES&SPECS. — SUPPLIER C9i L AGi CEMENTTYPE —I --j CU.YARDS PLACED2 3 8 • AEA ADMIX. �A1Z/9CT 2t90 �• �ZG�oZ J(�OO o DESIGN STRENGTH_ PLACEMENT AREA&NOTES .L• G 1j'OF FG1G_ OFF 3 . GANOp-�f �DO!ti�YGS �q/ O A PP TEST RESULTS APPLY ONLY TO THE ITEMS HEREIN TESTED.THIS REPORT SHALL NOT INSPECTOR(S),NAME(S)PRINTED BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL,WITH- OUT THE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY,INC. INSPECTOR SIGNATURE REVISED 1102 SIGNED BY COPIES TO: v 10 .-., .. I a� ,. -� _ �� --r I .. � � • �� CASCADE TEST*"G LABORATORY, INC. TESTING&INSPECTII ENGINEERS PREVIOUS 114401 12919 N.E. 126TH PLACE REPORT No. No. KIRKLAND,WASHINGTON 98034 (425)823-9800 EVERETT (425)259-0817 DATE CERT.NO. FIELD REPORT 03-aQ-d3 oa at—�3�- PROJECT er&?( 60 #__ ?C piss ZA1,94F LOCATION TO, 1- -6 16 S,ko��`1 Ap• �3 tva BLDG.PERMIT NO. OWNER d2� S�Q WEATHER TEMP. AT AM dvg7z�+r s AT PM R ENGINEER Cvvi,Va,PA" ARCHITECT ATTN: CONTRACTOR CITY Of pZ1w&--r wFs (2) (3) INSPECTION PERFORMED ITEMS INSPECTED — FOUNDATIONS X RESTEELICONCRETE _ RESTEEL ONLY X FOOTINGS X SLAB RESTEELIMASONRY _ STR.ST/WELDING _ AUGER CAST PILES _ COLUMNS OTHER — STR.ST/BOLTING — DRILLED PIERS — WALLS X OAK D�CK _ BEAMS LOCATION(AREAS) 'L L . ` A KOp y 2• SOa - DFFicF 3 . ?4-ov DEe-A,-- cilaF �sr CONCRET ASONRY MIX NO. 3100 DESIGN STRENGTH(I'c) SUPPLIER GA'ati SP- TOTAL CU.YD. PLACED 3 8•S SLUMP(INCHES) 4 314 SPECIMENS CAST AIR CONTENT(%) ^^ SEE CYLINDER REPORT NO. 4 8 9 t I /` YES_NO_ITEMS INSPECTED WERE IN CONFORMANCE WITH BLDG.DEPT.APPROVED PLANS REMARKS: ?WSi*EL-- !Op^ C*,kj0p Y rC> 7Ti dL5 �141 ;Ms,0-9r-e-fe7Z> &,r coil-vp 7-= A4"'O ww i K cA c t+>r�v 1 �v6 f�r2oP i.t-r,a€�. CovF�s c e-&T3 p 1eo�&__P L`7 5FT• G'OAIC-fZSrtf_ PC-A4FD )N 1p!/M? 4 K,gA-Z- JsS,✓s �z• di�,za-��. TEST RESULTS APPLY ONLY TO THE ITEMS HEREIN TESTED.THIS REPORT SHALL NOT INSPECTOR(S),NAME(S)PRINTED BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL;WITH- OUT THE WRRTEN APPROVAL OF CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY.INC. INSPECTOR SIGNATURE REVISED BJoo SIGNED BY COPIES TO:��s/�Q,t,vt/ �� FIELD CASCADE TEST ING LABORATORY, INC. REPORTN- 14401 No. 48911 TESTING&INSPECTION/ ENGINEERS DATE CERT.NO. ~l 12919 N.E. 126TH PLACE KIRKLAND,WASHINGTON 9e034 (425) 823-9800 o 3 2 �04-- O3 0 xJ 01-• -739' Mc EVERETT (425)259-0917 PROJECT COMPRESSION REPORT &x~ LOCATION 17 3 t 6 .S.` Aal' P7. �js v0 BLDG.PERMIT NO. OWNER TO: p2— Z l q I WEATHER TEMP. AT AM OvE 2�'i4'S%' T PM ENGINEER Coviaofi;o.v ARCHITECT ATTN: THE FOLLOWING WAS NOTED: CONTRACTOR �+ FIELD TEST DATA ADJUSTED TRUCK SAMPLED 18 —1 TRUCK TICKET NO. 3649997 (d O &4TCHDATCU-YA FOR WEIGHS MOESIGN IST. WEIGHTS MIX NO. � cu.vo UNIT TEMP. CEMENT ¢L SS TIME SLUMP %AIR WEIGHT YIELD CEMENT ASTM C-1064 ASTM C-143 ASTM C-138 FACTOR CONC AIR FLY ASH C.A. _14 " /7otx7 73 $ '� 5 5 7 39 c.A. C - - 1 f - - - - - - - C.A. AIR TEST METHOD: ❑PRESSURE ASTM C-231 OR ❑VOLUME ASTM C-173 FINE AGG. 3•I t 3 3 v EQUIPMENT USED I.D. WATER 70 SLUMP CONE CSLCOO I 1 THERMOMETER CCOTHO_ I( TOTAL AIRMETER CCOAIO OTHER TYPE OF BREAK: (A)Cone (C)Cone and Shear (b)Cone and Split (d)Shear (a)Columnar COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH CYLINDER DATE DATE AGE AREA TOTAL STRENGTH TYPE NUMBER MADE TESTED DAYS SIZE (SQ.IN) LOAD PSI BREAK -04-03 0�- -7 4x& Z,.54r _�_ 4:51M 3,51D v I V 1 o14-o` 26 1 -d 28 CONCRETE COMPRESSION MACHINE I.D.#CCOCOOO T+�ASTM C-1231 El C-617 SAMPLING IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAMPLE P/U DATE TEST METHOD APPLICABLE CODES&SPECS. SUPPLIER G AGism CEMENTTYPE I —'II CU.YARDS PLACED 3 8 • AEA ADMIX. �A7U►C� 200 °k 2�02 DESIGN STRENGTH 3oQ Q PLACEMENT AREA&NOTES 4• 2. OF9 CI SOS 3 . GANo�� �'oo,tinrGs lq� TEST RESULTS APPLY ONLY TO THE ITEMS HEREIN TESTED.THIS REPORT SHALL NOT INSPECTOR(S),NAME(S)PRINTED BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL,WITH- OUT THE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY,INC. . INSPECTOR SIGNATURE REVISED 1/02 SIGNED BY COPIES TO:P&IV-c/ ?2"t te ' • - I ' � � - - I •- • - - 1 1 - � � � � I - �-. , ' ,1 � - �- FIELD q CASCADE TES1 ING LABORATORY, INC. REPORT N�,. Dj1 c5 C3 / No, 49656 TESTING&INSPECTION/ ENGINEERS DATE F .i y-7 CERT.NO. 12919 N.E. 126TH PLACE KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON 98034 IA251 823-9800 �'`� z.ao3 lS 73 F_ EVERETT IA25I 259.0817 PROJECT COMPRESSION REPORT TION 41 1 TO: BLDG.PERMIT NO. OWNER � f-�� GtT�d+�` c1L g_�as 3 a t 1 !� p� ^> -� WEATHER I TEMP. AT AM A n c �/ c_3 L re'Y AT PM ENGINEER r t ARCHITECT ATTN: THE FOLLOWING WAS NOTED: £ CONTRACTOR I 91 FIELD TEST DATA i J / p u } sArcN �rAFont °ro ADJUSTED TRUCK SAMPLED ;< O TRUCK TICKET NO. �70ra MIXNO. 3/cJ CUV° WEIGHTS MOIST. WEIGHTS SLUMP UNIT CEMENT TEMP CEMENT A,/Ai TIME ASTM C-143 %AIR WEIGHT YIELD FACTOR ASTM C-1064 FLYASH ASTM C-138 CONC AIR C.A. _ C.A. D Opp C.A. AIR TEST METHOD: ❑PRESSURE ASTM C-231 OR ❑VOLUME ASTM C-173 FINE AGG. EQUIPMENT USED I.D. WATER # %Z6 l b SLUMP CONE CSLCOO__/p THERMOMETER CCOTHO. 6D TOTAL 37 AIRMETER CCOAIO — OTHER TYPE OF BREAK: (A)Cone (C)Cone and Shear (b)Cone and Split (d)Shear (e)Columnar COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH CYLINDER DATE DATE AGE AREA TOTAL STRENGTH TYPE NUMBER MADE TESTED DAYS SIZE (SQ.IN) LOAD PSI BREAK x 2.5 iglqlP 2 3 AD 3 3-1/ 3 3. 3b CONCRETE COMPRESSION MACHINE I.D.#CCOCOOO_ ❑ASTM C-1231 ❑ASTM C-617 SAMPLING IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAMPLE P/U DATE TEST METHOD APPLICABLE CODES&SPECS.— — --1 - 1 SUPPLIER. l Q c-)r L-r CEMENT TYPE —t"^ CU.YARDS PLACED 49 p#z¢jaoo c AEA &DMIX. ^� nn 1 � G,j),s L N STRENGTH b� �rl V PLACEMENT AREA&NOTES a Q l� .g l�Q" L la—+1 r !Q E-A. A. r 1 Q 1 A C,F h s ��n.��ct� . >�L� Y L ) IO i TEST RESULTS APPLY ONLY TO THE ITEMS HEREIN TESTED.THIS REPORT SHALL NOT INSPECTOR(S),NAME(S)PRINTED BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL,WITH- OUT THE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY,INC. INSPECTOR SIGNATUR REVISED 1/02 SIGNED BY COPIES TO:_1R:A, At)1/1 u 31 1 1 - - - -•= 1 1 •' - - � I- - i2._ � = "IN S ^� •t •. r • _ I - JIt 1 C) Y o f City of Arlington Development Services . Y 9 p inor Development Permit 4jN G"� September 20, 200 Texaco Xpress Lube MN-02-025 I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND REQUEST Texaco Xpress Lube requests a minor land use permit for the development of a 1,700 square foot 3-bay Texaco Xpress Lube with connecting 1,475 square foot 4-bay carwash and separate 120 square foot espresso stand. The project will be served with water and sewer from the City of Marysville. The site is zoned Highway Commercial. II. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Owner: Texaco Xpress Lube, ATTN: Tim Kaintz, 11807 7th Street NE, Lake Stevens, WA 98258 2. Applicant/Contact Person: Finley Architects, ATTN: Bill Finley, PO Box 1008, Everett, WA 98206 3. General Location: The site is located at the southwest corner of 173rd Place NE and Smokey Point Boulevard, in Section 20, Township 31, Range 05, W.M. (Tax ID No. 203105-4-014-0000) 4. Address of Property: No address has been assigned to this vacant parcel 5. Description of Proposal: Development of a 3-bay Texaco Xpress Lube, 4-bay carwash, and espresso stand 6. Acreage: Approximately 0.53 acre, or 22,946 square feet 7. Comprehensive Land Use Designations, Zoning Designation and Existing Land Uses of the Site and Surrounding Area: AREA LAND USE DESIGNATION ZONING EXISTING USE Project site Highway Commercial Highway Commercial Commercial North of site Highway Commercial Highway Commercial Commercial South of site Highway Commercial Highway Commercial Commercial East of site Highway Commercial Highway Commercial Commercial West of site Highway Commercial Highway Commercial Commercial EATexaco Xpress Lube MN02-025\Texaco Permit.doc yJp;9/20/02 Page 1 of 8 Y•� � o �.,,. - �,o,. _�� Minor Development Permit September 20, 2002 Texaco Xpress Lube MN-02-025 8. Public Utilities and Services Provided by: Water: City of Marysville Gas: Cascade Natural Gas Sewer: City of Marysville Cable TV: AT&T Broadband Garbage: Waste Management Northwest Police: City of Arlington Storm Water: City of Arlington Fire: City of Arlington Telephone: Verizon School: Lakewood School District Electricity: Snohomish County PUD #1 Hospital: Cascade Valley Hos ital 9. Public Notification: Minor Permits that are categorically exempt under Chapter 32.21 C RCW (SEPA) are exempt from publication (UDC VII.C.5.c. and g. and WAC 197-11-800). III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The proposal was categorically exempt under Chapter 32.21 C RCW (SEPA). IV. BACKGROUND The subject minor development permit review application was received by the City of Arlington on June 18, 2002, and the application was verbally deemed incomplete on July 16, 2002. Additional information was received by the City of Arlington on July 22, 2002, and the application was deemed complete on July 23, 2002. V. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Application Process: The minor development permit application was received by the City of Arlington on June 18, 2002. The application was deemed complete on July 23, 2002. A minor development permit is an administrative review process per City of Arlington Uniform Development Code (UDC) Chapter VII, Sections CA and C.S. 2. Comprehensive Plan and Zoning: The City of Arlington Comprehensive Plan identifies this area as being Highway Commercial, and the subject property is zoned Highway Commercial per UDC Chapter III, zoning map, Page III-2. Automobile Service Stations and Retail Trade Establishments are permitted uses per UDC Chapter V, Section H. 3. Lot Dimensions Density, and Related Requirements: The proposed development complies with the minimum lot dimensions for Automobile Service Stations and Retail Trade Establishments (0.5 acre in size and 100-foot minimum width) and yard setbacks (front 25 feet, rear 25 feet, and each side 25 feet) and with maximum building height (50 feet). Lot coverage is not applicable in the Highway Commercial zone. 4. Non-residential Performance Standards: The proposed development must comply with the standards of performance for noise, lighting, odors and gases, particulate matter, electrical interference, hazardous materials storage, waste disposal, open storage, maintenance and alterations, and hazardous waste facilities per UDC Chapter IX, Section B.2. EATexaco Xpress Lube MN02-025\Texaco Permit.doc Yip:9/20/02 Page 2 of 8 1 - ., I f I Minor Development Permit September 20, 2002 Texaco Xpress Lube MN-02-025 5. Off-Street Parking: Per UDC Chapter IX, Section CA, Parking Requirements, the proposed use requires 12 parking spaces at 3 spaces per service bay for the express lube, which is 3 bays, for 9 spaces; 3.6 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area for the office, which is approximately 430 square feet, for 2 spaces; and 3.3 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area for the espresso stand, which is 120 square feet, for 1 space; plus a dumpster space. No loading spaces are required, and the Planning Manager has determined no parking spaces are required for the 4-bay carwash because it is self-serve. The proposed site plan shows 8 parking spaces plus 3 spaces in front and 3 spaces behind the express lube service bays for a total of 14, plus a dumpster space, which meets the minimum requirements. 7. Landscaping: The final site plan shall comply with the requirements of UDC Chapter IX, Section N, Landscaping. The required landscaping for Automobile Service Stations/Retail Trade Establishments use is category B, which requires 10 feet of Type III landscaping adjacent to all street frontages. The landscape requirement for the parking area is a minimum of 17-1/2 square feet of landscaping for each parking stall for the first 50 spaces and 35 square feet for each parking space over 50 per Chapter IX, Section N.7. The landscape plan reflects sufficient frontage and parking area landscaping to meet the general landscape requirements specified in Chapter IX, Section N.7. Plant material must be guaranteed for one year with any replacements guaranteed for one year also. 8. Transportation: The proposed development is located at the southwest corner of 173 rd Place NE and Smokey Point Boulevard. It is anticipated that this project will add 506 new average weekday daily vehicular trips, which includes 33 p.m.- peak-hour trips, to the street system, as well as pedestrian and bicycle trips. The site will be accessed off of Smokey Point Boulevard and 173rd Place NE. Frontage improvements will be constructed along the site frontage of 173rd Place NE and Smokey Point Boulevard, with access on Smokey Point Boulevard limited to right-in, right-out only. The applicant has requested vacation of unused right-of-way on 173" Place NE, and the drawings reflect the proposed property line. The existing property line must be used until such time as the vacation has been approved through the City of Arlington right-of-way vacation process. In addition, Ordinance No. 1208 requires the developer to pay transportation impact fees for each new p.m.-peak-hour trip at the fee in effect at the time of payment to mitigate for off-site impacts. (NOTE: The current transportation impact fee is $1,038.00 for each p.m.-peak-hour trip, but this may change.) City transportation impact fees shall be paid prior to issuance of any building permits. (NOTE: Because the project was categorically exempt from SEPA, the project is not subject to WSDOT or Snohomish County transportation mitigation fees.) 9. Stormwater Management: The City has adopted storm drainage requirements per Arlington Municipal Code Chapter 13.28, Stormwater Management, and the Department of Ecology's Stormwater Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin (The Technical Manual). A preliminary review of the system indicates that they have a conceptually feasible plan. A detailed drainage review will occur during the site/civil review process. EATexaco Xpress Lube MN02-025\Texaco Permit.doc yjp;9/20/02 Page 3 of 8 v I Minor Development Permit September 20, 2002 Texaco Xpress Lube MN-02-025 10. Critical Areas: There are no critical areas as defined in the City's critical areas regulations on or near the proposed development. 11. Airport Management: The Arlington Municipal Airport requires that street lamps or light poles located on the property be down-shielded as to avoid interfering with flight operations. 12. Water and Sanitary Sewer: Adequate water and sewer service is available to the site from the City of Marysville; utility services to the building and fire hydrants and fire protection as required will be reviewed when construction drawings are submitted. All existing and planned utilities shall be shown on the site plan. 13. Criteria for Approval of an Application and Issuance of a Permit: Per UDC Chapter VII, Section D, Criteria for Approval, the Development Services Department, Planning Division, is required to review for compliance the following criteria before an application can be approved. a. The development is consistent with the dimensional, density requirements and Performance Standards of the UDC and other applicable laws and regulations; and Staff Analysis: As identified above, the development is consistent with the dimensional, density requirements, and Performance Standards of the UDC and other applicable laws and regulations. b. The development as proposed incorporates, to the maximum extent feasible, mitigation measures to substantially lessen or eliminate all adverse environmental impacts of the development; and Staff Analysis: The development as proposed incorporates, to the maximum extend feasible, best management practices to lessen or eliminate all adverse environmental impacts of the development. C. The applicant has presented certification that the applicant has filed and paid all the taxes, penalties and interest, and that the applicant has satisfactorily made agreement to pay the taxes (NOTE: this requirement is only applicable to subdivision plats); and Staff Analysis: This requirement is only applicable to subdivision plats. d. Prior to final approval the applicant has followed all permit processing procedures and paid all applicable land use fees. Staff Analysis: As stated above, all permit processing procedures have been followed and a condition is included that requires that all applicable land use fees be paid prior to final decision. VI. CONCLUSIONS 1. The City of Arlington Comprehensive Plan identifies this area as Highway Commercial, and the subject property is zoned Highway Commercial per UDC Chapter III, zoning map, Page III-2. Automobile Service Stations and Retail Trade Establishments are permitted uses in the Highway Commercial zone per UDC Chapter V, Section H. Therefore, the proposed development as noted and conditioned is consistent with policies governing commercial uses and is allowed in the Highway Commercial zone. EATexaco Xpress Lube MN02-025\Texaco Permit.doc yjp;9/20/02 Page 4 of 8 I Minor Development Permit September 20, 2002 Texaco Xpress Lube MN-02-025 2. The requested minor development permit as conditioned meets all UDC requirements, including Chapter VII, Section D, Criteria for Approval, and all other applicable codes. 3. The minor development permit should be approved subject to conditions noted below. VI I. DECISION The minor development permit is hereby APPROVED, subject to the following conditions: 1. All development shall be in substantial conformance with the approved site plan received June 18, 2002, subject to any conditions or modifications that may be required as part of the minor development permit. 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall file a drainage plan and construction plans, which meet the following conditions, in conjunction with a building permit application. The final site plan shall comply with all requirements of the Unified Development Code, Uniform Building Code, Uniform Fire Code and Public Works Construction Standards and Specifications. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall submit payment of the following estimated City of Arlington impact fees (based on 3,325 square feet of buildings): Traffic at $1,038.00 per p.m.-peak-hour trip, which is 33, or $34,254.00. (NOTE: Actual impact fees due are those as set by resolution at the time the fees are paid. These amounts are provided here as an estimate. They may either increase or decrease by the time they are paid.) 4. The access on Smokey Point Boulevard shall be limited to right-in, right-out only. 5. The existing property line on 173rd Place NE shall be used until such time as the vacation has been approved through the City of Arlington right-of-way vacation process. 6. All exterior lighting, including streetlights, shall be down-shielded. 7. If any archaeological materials are discovered on the site, the State Historical Preservation Officer, the Stillaguamish Tribe, and the City of Arlington shall be contacted and measures taken to preserve the materials and the site. 8. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall clear all outstanding land use permit-processing accounts with the City. 9. The minor development permit shall become null and void if use and reliance is not established within one year of the below date of approval. Vill. CODE REQUIREMENT (NOTE: The following items are not conditions of permit approval, rather certain local, state, or federal code requirements that the applicant needs to be aware of. This is in no way intended to EATexaco Xpress Lube MN02-025\Texaco Permit.doc yjp:9/20/02 Page 5 of 8 Minor Development Permit September 20, 2002 Texaco Xpress Lube MN-02-025 be a complete list of code requirements, but a general checklist of major steps and issues. Please refer to the AMC for a complete list of code requirements for your particular project type.) 1. Code Applicability. This application is subject to the applicable requirements contained in the Arlington Municipal Code, Zoning Code, and Building Code. It is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure compliance with the various provisions contained in these ordinances. 2. Pre-Construction Phase. Prior to commencing any site work, including installing any easement or right-of-way improvements, utility systems, drainage systems, street lights, mailbox structures, emergency facilities, storm water control systems, or any other improvements, improvement plans must be submitted for review and approval by the Department of Development Services, Engineering Division. Said plans shall be in conformance with applicable code and below listed conditions. a. The applicant shall survey and mark all property corners prior to review of any submitted construction plans. b. The applicant will be required to design and install erosion control measures deemed necessary by the City. These measures must be installed and inspected by the City prior to the issuance of any permits. C. No site preparation or other disturbances shall be undertaken within environmentally sensitive areas or their required buffers. d. Submit to the Engineering Division and receive approval of a storm-water run-off and detention plan in conformance with the AMC Chapter 13.28, Stormwater Management, and the Department of Ecology's Stormwater Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin (The Technical Manual) for both the construction phase and a permanent system. All site drainage must be directed through biofiltration swales prior to discharge into wetlands. e. All new utility lines shall be placed underground. f. Provide a temporary rock pad at all points of ingress and egress to the site throughout the construction phase. g. On the construction plans show locations of all required streetlights to be installed as designed. h. A right-of-way permit is required for and prior to any work done in a public right-of-way. i. All lighting shall be low sodium or similar low intensity illumination and placed in a way as to not cause glare on an adjoining property or right-of- way. E:\Texaco Xpress Lube MN02-025\Texaco Permit.doc ylp;9/20/02 Page 6 of 8 I Minor Development Permit September 20, 2002 Texaco Xpress Lube MN-02-025 3. Construction Phase. The following conditions shall apply during construction. a. All applicable noise and other nuisance codes are applicable. b. Mud and dirt shall not be tracked onto public rights-of-way, but if tracked by accident shall be immediately cleaned-up. C. During any site grading or clearing activity, the applicant and contractor shall use all available means of controlling air pollution (dust, ash, and smoke). d. The restrictions of the AMC shall apply to any and all grading. 3. Installation of Improvements. Prior to receiving a building permit, the applicant shall: a. Install all rights-of-way and access easement improvements on all proposed streets internal and existing streets adjacent to the project per the requirements of UDC Chapter IX.A.1.c.12-20 or City of Arlington Ordinance 1213 adopted November 1, 1999. The applicant shall coordinate with all adjacent developments the final design of the street improvements and/or include the appropriate transition tapers for the street pavement to be included from the property. Improvements shall meet the following classifications: 1. Install frontage improvements along 173rd Place NE to Local Access street standards. 2. Install frontage improvements along Smokey Point Boulevard to Collector Arterial street standards, with access limited to right-in, right-out only. b. Install a potable water system to serve the project per City of Arlington's Engineering Division requirements. Water is to be served by the City of Marysville. C. Install a sanitary sewer system created per Engineering Division requirements. Sanitary sewer is provided by the City of Marysville. d. Relocate any existing water facilities and/or install water services/fire hydrants prior to the required improvements at the expense of the developer. e. Install a permanent storm water control system, per AMC Chapter 13.28. f. In lieu of completing any of the above improvements, the applicant may submit to the Engineering Division a performance security to cover the cost of installing any or all of the improvements within one year of the date of permit approval. However, no Certificates of Occupancy may be issued until all improvements are completed EATexaco Xpress Lube MN02-025\Texaco Permit.doc ylp:9/20/02 Page 7 of 8 Minor Development Permit September 20, 2002 Texaco Xpress Lube MN-02-025 (NOTE: Infrastructure requirements are based on conceptual information as submitted by the applicant. Additional specific requirements may be required upon review of the engineered construction drawings as submitted by the applicant. All improvements are subject to review and approval by the Engineering Division. All utilities shall be constructed underground.) IX. APPEALS To appeal this decision or the SEPA threshold determination, an appeal application must be filed, with all required fees, within 10 working days of the date of issuance of this decision. The City Council (or a Hearing Examiner, if so appointed by the Council) would hear the appeal of the permit and their decision would be considered the City's final decision on the underlying governmental action. X. EXHIBITS 1. Approved drawings received by the City of Arlington received June 18, 2002. 2. File MN-02-025 (Texaco Xpress Lube). ORDERED THIS 20TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2002. Jam-C iffJ Strong, Plannin anager 6 Re possible Official O Distributed to the Following Party of Record: • Texaco Xpress Lube, ATTN: Tim Kaintz, 11807 7th Street NE, Lake Stevens, WA 98258 • Finley Architects, ATTN: Bill Finley, PO Box 1008, Everett, WA 98206 • Paul Richart, City Engineer, Development Services, Engineering Division • Marc Hayes, Code Compliance, Development Services, Engineering Division • Dave Anderson, Building Official, Development Services, Building Division • Kerry Wentz, Plans Examiner/Building Inspector, Development Services, Building Division • Terry Castle, Utilities Superintendent, Development Services, Utilities Division • Bill Blake, Natural Resources Manager • Terri Littlejohn, Parks, General Services • Leroy Mills, Streets, General Services EATexaco Xpress Lube MN02-025\Texaco Permit.doc Ylp;9120/02 Page 8 of 8 I Structural Calculations for 22'-0" x 55'-8" Car Wash Canopy &Roof for Masonry Building Xpress Lube & Car Wash Smokey Point Blvd. &. 173rd Place NE Arlington, Washington Designed for: Bestworth-Rommel, Inc. 19818 74`h Avenue NE Arlington, WA 98223 (360) 435-2927 . ol,%VA I BR#2221 ^c, c� of nr f �.c•2;bfi /S *kt CNI`� a�c 1 4 ,L Z Designed by: Kristi Lewis E � ;S�?1281 Lewis 19229 99`h South Renton,WA 98055 Engineering Phone: (253)520-4120 fax: (206)727-6183 Consultants email: lewisec9@aol.com Job #2201.13 April 12, 2002 4 t i "s C � ksl 4/11/2002 Design Loads on 22.0 ft x 55. 7ft Canopy with 4 columns Gravity Snow Load= 25 psf Deck Dead Load= 3 psf(neglecting beams) Total Load= 28 psf Wind Per 1997 UBC 80 mph Exposure C p= C,Cggsl Ce 1.13 for 20' above grade and less qs 16.4 psf on fascia height of 4.0 ft I= 1.0 On vertical projected area Cq_ 1.3 p= 24.1 psf V= 2.1k short direction V= 5.4k long direction Uplift on elements Cq_ 1.7 p= 31.5 psf Seismic Assume seismic zone 3 (Z=0.3) V= 3.008/R * W Eq 30-11, 1997 UBC Ca= 0.36 Table 16-Q, Soil profile Sd R= 2.2 Table 16-N, Cantilevered column elements W= 3 psf* 55.7ft * 22.Oft + 22plf * 55.7ft * 2 beams + 33plf * 14.Oft * 2 beams + = 7.Ok V= 3.5k p= 2 - 20/(rmax*SQRT(AB)) -=0.29 (rmaz 0.25) use p= 1.00 E= 3.5k (=V*p) for allowable stress design, use E/1.4= 2.5k (UBC 1612.3.1) V max per column= 1.34 kips from wind 0.62 kips from seismic - C2 o E E o o LL o U ry U o L a Cl) V 0 W Q I I 0 I I I I I I I i N c I I uU L_ lV I I a C 3 T J N U O m oa a Nm 4, 3 I I �- I I I I I I I I I I N °4 — — �n I I I I J..- I I I I - I I �- ,—, au�x�o 'e Zx.9V..0 N � U WO LM i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 3 3 I I I O O I I .0,.4 ..0-3,1 .0•.ZZ I^ , ti� I V � 3 ksl 4/11/2002 Deck Design f H Load Case DL+ DL + DL + DL Snow Unbal Snow Uplift W 3 3 + 25 f 3 + 25@ ctr sp f -32+3 (psf) 3 + 10 @ alt spans R1 33 308 248 -319 (pli M+max 462 582 232 (lb-ft) M-max 224 104 479 (I b-ft) 4 @ cant 0.38 =L/127 < L/90 (IV) 4 (g span 0.72 =L/233 < L/180 (in) Use deck properties shown on next page .- f y 1 LOAD TABLES D50 MEGA SPAN 3" Standing Seam Roof Deck �_SLl�2S.4.Il: 718" 3/4" 3" Deep panel, 16" in width, minimum yield strength of 50,000 psi. " 20 gage, Galvanized and Painted,with embossed finish. 16" Conforms to ASTM A653, SQ Grade 50 STANDARD PANEL SECTION PROPERTIES 1 Design WL Positive Bending Negative Bending Deck Thickness Ibslfe +1 +S 4 S In. In'/It In'/ft In4/ft In'/ft BRI32016 0.0356 2.1700 0.6941 0.2820 0.3713 0.2172 �l��� '1Q51b 5�131b Span Span Length,Center to Center of Supports in Feet and Inches Condition Total Uniform Load (Dead + Live) In Pounds per Square Foot 20 psf 25 psf 30 psf 35 psf 40 psf 45 psf 50 psf Simple Span 14' 8" 13,2" ' 12' 0" 11' 1" 10' 4" 9' 9' 9' 3" 2 Span 15' 10" 14'2" 13' 0" 12' 0" 11' 2" 10' 7' 1091. 3 or More Spans 1. Lower figure in shaded areas designates load controlled by deflection, i/180 • - 1 } Beam Design Load Case DL + DL + DL + DL Snow Unbal Snow Uplift W 33+22 308+22 308+22 @ center -319+22 (plf) 170+22 @ ends R1 1.53 9.19 7.27 -8.26 (kips) R2 1.53 9.19 7.27 -8.26 (kips) M @ support 32.0 18.6 28.8 (k-ft) M @ span 0.0 13.4 0.0 (k-ft) A @ cant 1.08 =L/154 < L/90 (in) 0 @ span 0.15 =L/561 < L/180 (in) Use W14x22 continuous brace @ bottom flange braced 10'-0" @ top flange Fy= 50 ksi M gow = 42.0 k-ft i C� ksl 4/11/2002 Crossarm Design T Load Case DL + DL + DL + DL Snow Unbal Snow Uplift W 33 33 33 33 (plfl P1 1.53 -9.19 8.26 (kips) R1 1.89 9.55 7.9 (kips) M @ span 38.5 31.8 (k-ft) 0 @ span 0.77 in =L/342 < L/180 (in) Use W10x33 braced at 22'-0" Fv= 50 ksi M allow = 50.0 k-ft per AISC pg 2-208 r C_ Canopy Column Design by: ksl Mark: date: 4/11/2002 job #: Combined Axial Compression and Bending on Steel Shapes per AISC 9th edition, Chapter H member 24" dia pipe Unbraced Length= 18.Oft strong axis Section Properties: Unbraced Length= 18.Oft weak axis for 24" dia pipe <=USE A= 23.50 sq in Axial Force= 9.2k S= 109.60 sq in Moment= 23.4k-ft =1.3k*18' r= 8.40 sq in strong axis Cc= 112 r= 8.40 sq in weak axis Fy= 46. ksi b/t= 96.00 sq in k= 2 strong axis b/t< 72 to be compact k= 2 weak axis section is not compact strong axis weak axis kL/r= 51.43 kL/r= 51.43 for kL/r<Cc, Fa= 22.5 ksi (Eq. E2-1) <=governs for kL/r<Cc, Fa= 22.5 ksi (Eq. E2-1) for kL/r>Cc, Fa= 56.5 ksi (Eq. E2-2) for kL/r>Cc, Fa-— 56.5 ksi (Eq. E2-2) F'e= 56.5 ksi Cm= 1.00 Fa= 22.50 ksi Fa= 22.50 ksi for non-compact sections Fb= 27.6 ksi (Eq. F1-5) <=governs for any L/rT fa= .39 ksi fb= 2.56 ksi Use Fa- 22.50 ksi Fb= 27.60 ksi fa/Fa= 0.02 for fa/Fa<O.15 ,Eq H I-3;fa/Fa+fb/Fb = 0.02 + 0.09 = 0.11 <1.33 OK I ksl 4/11/2002 Foundation Design Assume Class 4 soils per UBC, Chapter 18 Table 18-I-A Vertical Load = 10.3 kips + footing weight= 17.5 kips Assume: 3.50 ft diameter by 5.00 ft deep footing Allowable Bearing Pressure (gfluoH,) Ballow = 1500 psf+0.2* 1500 per foot of depth d is footing depth Ballow = 2700 psf gaccual = 1430 psf < 2700 psf OK Lateral Stability dZ =4.25*P*h/(S*b) (UBC Eq. 6-2) P*h= 13.90 kip-ft S = 150 * d b= 3.50 4.95 d= 4.83 4.30 round square Use 3.5 ft diameter by 5.00 ft deep footing M(allow)= 15.44 k-ft or 3.5 ft square by 4.00 ft deep footing y I 1 USE REM- JPkl$ (A)PJ Kit fc-1 'royal I I LOAD TABLES D50 MEGA SPAN 3" Standing Seam Roof Deck Description; 718" 3l4" 3" Deep panel, 16" in width, minimum yield strength of T— 50,000 psi. " 20 gage, Galvanized and Painted, with embossed finish. 16" Conforms to ASTM A653, SQ Grade 50 STANDARD PANEL SECTION PROPERTIES Design WL Positive Bending Negative Bending Deck Thickness Ibs./fte +I +S 4 -S In. In`/it In'lft In`lft ln'/ft 6RI.32016 0.0356 2.1700 0.6941 0.2820 0.3713 0.2172 ���1� '1Q51b 5�31b Span Span Length, Center to Center of Supports In Feet and Inches Gondition Total Uniform Load {Dead + Live} In Pounds per Square Foot 20 psf 25 psf 30 psf 35 psf 40 psf 45 psf 50 psf Simple Span 7 :.WL ' r.J .►2� �11G' �, Y.7► %1`��Y 'fS �L� li.�";y� V 2 Span 14' 8" 13'2" 12' 0" 11' 1" 10' 4" 9190 9' 3" 15' 10" 14'2" 13'0" 12' 0" 11'2" 10' 7" 10, 10 3 or More Spans 1. Lower figure in shaded areas designates load controlled by deflection, 1/180 i i! t W 4�� USE Lo I � X3(= i i .............................................................. hJOV-22-200 G 8:1_l0 r PUGET I.,.iEST C1__1NSTRIJCT I 0F1 p,02 From: David Anderson [dnderson@,email.ci.arlington.wa.us] Sent: Thursday,November 21, 2002 10:02 AM To: rick@pugetwest.eom Subject: RE: Permit application# 5191, Texaco Express lube carwash, etc. Rick. Great, here are some additional comments that need to be addressed on the drawings. The energy code calculations have been submitted and have been reviewed for compliance. I don't typically have Mr. Williams review these requirements. they are done in house. 1. Sheets Al the detail callouts for detail H, N and the North Elevation are not shown. 2. On sheet A2 there are two detail callouts not shown on floor plan detail. 3. The revisions of the stairs and storage room need be be shown on revised drawings. Sheet SUS833RH-1 on the floor plan detail callout the revisions on sheets A2 and $T2. Sheet ST2 has not been submitted_ 4. Sheet SUS833RH-1 shows the downspouts draining onto the asphalt. A note needs to be added stating they shall be connected to an approved storm drainage system. The site civil drawings are on the 3rd review. I'm told from Gregg Eaton that this should be the final review and that mylars would be requested for signing. Kelly Wriggs at Cascade Surveying is currently working on the final revisions. You will need to submit revised drawings on the comments from CWA and the above mention comments. Eight sets of drawings are required for resubmittal. If you have any questions please call me or email may be the best way to reach me. Dave David W Anderson (360)403-3432 Building Official City of Arlington danderson&i.ariington.wa.us ,� � �y LIE1 _ [EIM ors UaRM. DMO TRL 1 B12 Hewitt Avenue,Suite A DATE JOB NO. P.O.Box 100E 2-/" - Everett,Washington 9B206 ATTENTION -A MUM (425)25&6471 Fax 25B-6473 RE: c E-mail:finley-architects@msn.com TO iJ,t�-/�--tom-l--�-,>�-E,��:�_C� - G-��-�� . -,��.�•�-`--�-E-�' �' WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via__-— _ -the following items: ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ -- - COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 0 THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US J REMARKS ' 21 /,� -ZZ L_A&_L- i F�E G V - . �A92 OF AFJVN(� 1'0'' COPY TO SIGNED:__-__ If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. IN ME - 1 ■ on i J •:a i Message Page 1 of 2 David Anderson From: David Anderson [danderson@ci.arlington.wa.us] Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 10:02 AM To: rick@pugetwest.com Subject: RE: Permit application #5191, Texaco Express lube carwash, etc. Rick, Great, here are some additional comments that need to be addressed on the drawings. The energy code calculations have been submitted and have been reviewed for compliance. I don't typically have Mr. Williams review these requirements. they are done in house. 1. Sheets Al the detail callouts for detail H, N and the North Elevation are not shown. 2. On sheet A2 there are two detail callouts not shown on floor plan detail. 3. The revisions of the stairs and storage room need be be shown on revised drawings. Sheet SUS833RH-1 on the floor plan detail callout the revisions on sheets A2 and ST2. Sheet ST2 has not been submitted. 4. Sheet SUS833RH-1 shows the downspouts draining onto the asphalt. A note needs to be added stating they shall be connected to an approved storm drainage system. The site civil drawings are on the 3rd review. I'm told from Gregg Eaton that this should be the final review and that mylars would be requested for signing. Kelly Wriggs at Cascade Surveying is currently working on the final revisions. You will need to submit revised drawings on the comments from CWA and the above mention comments. Eight sets of drawings are required for resubmittal. If you have any questions please call me or e-mail may be the best way to reach me. Dave David W. Anderson (360)403-3432 Building Official City of Arlington danderson@ci.arlington.wa.us -----Original Message----- From: Rick Fletcher [ma i Ito:rick@ pugetwest.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 5:05 PM To: danderson@email.ci.arlington.wa.us u Meert-VT Permit app ica ion # 51 ,Texaco Express lube carwash, etc. Dave, Got the plan review letter: Item 3, the energy calculations were resubmitted on the revised form on October 17th. Are these wrong or did CWA not receive them? Please let me know so we can respond if need be. Thanks Rick Fletcher -----Original Message----- From: Rick Fletcher [ma I Ito:rick@ pugetwest.com] 11/25/02 M+ 'a � - .. •,,�., .ey Message Page 2 of 2 ent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 8:52 AM To: 'David Anderson' Subject: RE: Permit application # 5191, Texaco Express lube carwash, etc. Dave, Please let me know the progress of plan review. Thanks Rick Fletcher -------Original Message----- From: David Anderson [mailto:danderson@email.ci.arlington.wa.us] Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 10:58 AM To: rick@pugetwest.com Subject: RE: Permit application # 5191,Texaco Express lube carwash, etc. The policy on foundation permits is we do not issue these types of permits. The review of your project is progressing as quickly as it can. the site civil mylars are being reviewed for completeness and the building review is half way completed. I anticipate to issue your project within the next two weeks. Please call if you have any questions. David W. Anderson (360)403-3432 Building Official City of Arlington danderson@ci.arlington.wa.us -----Original Message----- From: Rick Fletcher [mailto:rick@pugetwest.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 7:27 AM To: danderson@ci.arlington.wa.us Subject: Permit application # 5191,Texaco Express lube carwash, etc. Dave, This project has a basement under the lube bays. Because of high water table in the area, we are hoping to be able to excavate and build the pit now, as the water table is at the lowest point at this time of the year. Is there any way that a foundation permit can be issued to allow us to do this? As you know, having to dewater and fight the water table can become expensive for the owner.Any assistance would be appreciated. Rick Fletcher PugetWest 11/25/02 ww. .� .� . a December 13, 2002 FINLE -- ARCHI S David W. Anderson AI ` Building Official -� City of Arlington 238 N. Olympic Avenue Arlington, WA 98223 Texaco Express Lube - #02-519 ARCHITECTURE — INTERIORS Deaf Mr. Anderson 1C EVEL 0PME �ERVICES Response to CWA Consultants plan review: —j — 1 1 . Information necessary to classify the building(s) must be provided on the plans including occupancy, actual/allowable areas, type of construction. The information has been shown on site plan, Sheet Al. — - 2. References to the City Y of Marysville should be revised to reflect this submittal. References to the City of Marysville are indicated on the civil drawings purposely, as the City of Marysville is the municipality providing verification of utility capacities and availability. 3. Energy calculations for the envelope and lighting budget should be submitted for waiting area of the lube building. Energy calculations have been submitted .( separate from this submittal as confirmed by David Andersons' e-mail to PugetWest 11/21/02 .A.Fi le III. A. .A (enclosed). .� �(�� 1 121 Hewitt Ave. S A r.o. * - ooa 4. Vehicle exhaust ventilation should be provided N A — Everett, , 4982 in accordance with Section 1202.2.4. 'V go _ (206, 258-647 FAX (206) 258-6473 Vehicle exhaust ventilation is provided in accordance with Section 1202.2.4 exception . 5. The water heater must be anchored to resist O earthquake forces. The water heater will be provided with seismic RECEIVED metal strapping; see note on Sheet A-2. DEC 17 2002 CITY OF ARLINGTON ;� �ti ...'� .'� •�� '. . �t . �i s .• ��,� ��� �� M1 / / � .j �. ,, December 13, 2002 Page 2 C6) Your Fire Department should review the storage and disposal of the petroleum products per the UFC. we will respond to City of Arlington Fire Department comments as required. The proposed project is in conformance as submitted because the size and amount of products does not qualify for bulk storage. 0\! 7. a minimum 36" landing must be provided at the exterior of the exit doors. Landings have been shown and dimensioned on Sheets A-2 and SUS833RH-1 . p� 8. Details must be provided for installation of the suspended ceiling system in the waiting area including the requirements for the compression.struts. Compression struts will be provided where required. See detail sheet SUS833RH-2. 9. All doors in the building which have a latch set or lock set should have lever-type operating hardware. Section 1 1-6.3.1 . Hardware will be in accordance with Section 1106.13.1 . See notes on Sheets A-2 and SUS833RH-1 . 10. Door thresholds should be shown as no higher Q than 1/2". The edges should be beveled at 1 vertical; 2 horizontal, with a maximum edge height of 1/4". Sections 1106.10.4, 1106.6. Thresholds will be in accordance with Section 1106.10.4, 1106.6. See notes on Sheets A-2 and SUS833RH-1 . STRUCTURAL 01 For your information, "Special inspection" is required for: Masonry construction Anchor bolts Metal decking �� . .�. � ,'��4 � `, .(M' • •� Z� December 13, 2002 Page Three Structural steel welding High Strength bolting Noted 2. There were no calculations submitted for the lube building. The plans must reflect the actual construction and not merely a generic building. Calculations were submitted however may not have been transmitted to plans reviews. Enclosed with resubmittal plans find structural calculations for carwash canopy, carwash foundations, lube buildings and espresso building. 3. The vehicle loading used for the design must be posted. The design must consider the concentrated load wheel loads for the vehicle loads. Based on the door dimension, I would have to assume that relatively heavy vehicles would use this area. See previously referenced structural notes for floor loading captioned "LOADING CRITERIA FOR FLOOR". Lube storage floor is designed for 2000 lbs. point loads and will be posted as required. Generous door widths are primarily to provide generous approach and departure room for average drivers of average vehicles. 4. Regardless of the size the Espresso building must comply with the conventional framing requirement for lateral purposes or be provided calculations. See #2 above. _ 1 David W. Anderson December 13, 2002 Page Four Responses to additional plan review comments e-mailed to PugetWest 1 1/21/02: 1 . Sheets Al the detail callouts for detail H.N. and the North Elevations are not shown. Detail callouts omitted, not required. 2. On sheet A2 there are two detail callouts shown on floor plan detail. Detail callouts omitted, not required. 3. The revisions of the stairs and storage room need to be shown on revised drawings. Sheet SUS833RH-1 on the floor plan detail callout the revisions on sheets A2 and ST2. Sheet ST2 has not been submitted. The stairs and related information shown as revised have been redrawn to reflect a basic condition , not a revision. Sheet ST2 has been omitted as not applicable to this project. 4. Sheet SUS833RH-1 shows the downspouts draining onto the asphalt. A note needs to be added stating they shall be connected to an approved storm drainage system. Downspouts will be "tight-lined" see notes Sheet SUS833RH-1 . Should you have any questions or comments regarding this resubmittal please contact me. W WAF/dja J l ,� b • i �� �� • �� �• �'{ M i� � ��, -Y • - L � • � 1 �ti ` ��I�`_ r �� ti- . ,�I ` �, 1 i � � � ,r, SINGLE HOUR LOAD CALCULATION OUTPUT Aug 1700h : Express Lube (Express Lube) JOB NAME: Express Lube DATE PREPARED: 03-21-2003 SITE NAME: SEATTLE Washington 60501852 .1 OUTDOOR DB/WB: 81 . 0/ 66 . 0 F INDOOR DB: 75 . 0 F RH: 51 o Zone Loads & System Information Summary pg 1 LOAD COMPONENT SENSIBLE (Btu/hr) LATENT(Btu/hr) - - - - - - - -- - - -- - - - - - - - -_ - - - - - - - --------------- - ---------------- - SOLAR GAIN 5, 401 0 GLASS TRANSMISSION 479 0 WALL TRANSMISSION 954 0 ROOF TRANSMISSION 378 0 TRANS . LOSS TO UNCOND. SPACE 0 0 LIGHTING ( 741 W TOTAL) 2 , 529 0 OTHER ELEC. ( 741 W TOTAL) 2, 529 0 PEOPLE ( 16 PEOPLE TOTAL) 4, 034 3 , 376 MISCELLANEOUS LOADS 1, 000 0 COOLING INFILTRATION 652 321 COOLING SAFETY LOAD 1, 795 370 - - ----- -- --- -- ---- -- - - - - - - - - - -- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - SUB-TOTALS 19, 750 4, 066 NET VENTILATION LOAD ( 329 Cfm) 2 , 173 999 SUPPLY FAN LOAD (BHP= 0 .3) 788 0 ROOF LOAD TO PLENUM 0 0 LIGHTING LOAD TO PLENUM 0 0 - ------------------------ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - -- - - - - - - - - - - - TOTAL COOLING LOADS 22, 711 5, 065 TOTAL COOLING LOAD = 27, 776 Btu/hr or 2 .31 Ton or 213 .4 sqft/ Ton ZONE TOTAL FLOOR AREA = 494 . 00 sqft ZONE OVERALL U-FACTOR = 0 . 084 Btu/hr/sgft/F ************************************************************ Transmission and Solar Gain by Exposure LOAD COMPONENT AREA TRANSMISSION SOLAR GAIN (sqft) (Btu/hr) (Btu/hr) ------------------- -- - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - -- - -- - GLASS LOADS : NE 0 0 0 E 30 99 934 SE 0 0 0 S 40 132 2 , 264 SW 0 0 0 W 75 248 2 , 203 NW 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 H 0 0 0 WALL LOADS : NE 0 0 - SE 360 135 0 0 _ REC EI VED S 245 214 - SW 0 0 - W 315 512 - O� S 2003 NW 0 0 -C1TM L{Su.)N 285 93 - OFAkING'rOh. �� ..' I :. I �, SINGLE HOUR LOAD CALCULATION OUTPUT Aug 1700h : Express •Lube (Express Lube) JOB NAME: Express Lube DATE PREPARED: 03-21-2003 SITE NAME: SEATTLE Washington 60501852 .1 OUTDOOR DB/WB: 81 . 0/ 66'0-F INDOOR DB: 75 . 0 F RH: 51 0 ************************************************************ Coil Selection Parameters pg 2 COIL ENTERING AIR TEMP. (DB/WB) = 77 .2/ 64 .2 deg F COIL LEAVING AIR TEMP. (DB/WB) = 54 .2/ 53 . 6 deg F COIL SENSIBLE LOAD = 22 , 711 Btu/hr COIL TOTAL LOAD = 27, 776 Btu/hr COOLING SUPPLY AIR TEMPERATURE = 55 .0 deg F TOTAL COOLING Cfm = 898 Cfm COOLING Cfm/sgft = 1 . 82 Cfm/sqft RESULTING ROOM REL. HUMIDITY = 51 0 COIL BYPASS FACTOR = 0 . 050 ************************************************************ -� _ ;; ., �� I 1 HEATING LOAD CALCULATION OUTPUT Express Lube (Express Lube) JOB NAME: Express Lube DATE PREPARED: 03-21-2003 SITE NAME: SEATTLE Washington 60501852 .1 WINTER DESIGN DRY BULB: 22 . 0 F INDOOR DB: 70 . 0 F HEATING LOAD SUMMARY Note: Heating load is computed at winter design condition. LOAD COMPONENT LOAD (Btu/hr) --- ---------------- --- - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -------- --------- - - WALL TRANSMISSION 2, 892 ROOF TRANSMISSION 711 GLASS TRANSMISSION 3 , 828 TRANSMISSION LOSS TO UNCOND. SPACES 0 INFILTRATION LOSS 5, 214 SLAB FLOOR 3 , 339 HEATING SAFETY Btu/hr 7, 992 - - - --- - ------- ------------- - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SUB-TOTAL 23 , 976 NET VENTILATION LOSS 17, 380 - --------------------- --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- -- - - - - --- - - - TOTAL HEATING LOAD 41, 356 HEATING SUPPLY Cfm 545 Cfm HEATING SUPPLY AIR TEMPERATURE 110 . 0 deg F HEATING VENTILATION AIR Cfm 329 Cfm HEATING SEASON ROOM DRY BULB TEMP. 70 . 0 deg F ************************************************************ • a :j �ti 1 C SINGLE HOUR LOAD CALCULATION OUTPUT Aug 1700h : Express Lube (Express Lube) JOB NAME: Express Lube DATE PREPARED: 03-2.1-2003 SITE NAME : SEATTLE Washington 60501852 .1 OUTDOOR DB/WB: 81. 0/ 66 . 0 F INDOOR DB: 75 . 0 F RH: 51 o Zone Loads & System Information Summary pg 1 LOAD COMPONENT SENSIBLE (Btu/hr) LATENT(Btu/hr) --- ---- ---- - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- -- - - - - - - SOLAR GAIN 5, 401 0 GLASS TRANSMISSION 479 0 WALL TRANSMISSION 954 0 ROOF TRANSMISSION 378 0 TRANS . LOSS TO UNCOND. SPACE 0 0 LIGHTING ( 741 W TOTAL) 2 , 529 0 OTHER ELEC. ( 741 W TOTAL) 2 , 529 0 PEOPLE ( 16 PEOPLE TOTAL) 4, 034 3 , 376 MISCELLANEOUS LOADS 1, 000 0 COOLING INFILTRATION 652 321 COOLING SAFETY LOAD 1, 795 370 -------- --------- ------ - - - - - - - -- - - - - ------- --- - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - SUB-TOTALS 19, 750 4, 066 NET VENTILATION LOAD ( 329 Cfm) 2, 173 999 SUPPLY FAN LOAD (BHP= 0 . 3) 788 0 ROOF LOAD TO PLENUM 0 0 LIGHTING LOAD TO PLENUM 0 0 TOTAL COOLING LOADS 22 , 711 5, 065 TOTAL COOLING LOAD = 27, 776 Btu/hr or 2 .31 Ton or 213 .4 sqft/ Ton ZONE TOTAL FLOOR AREA = 494 . 00 sqft ZONE OVERALL U-FACTOR = 0 . 084 Btu/hr/sgft/F ************************************************************ A Transmission and Solar Gain by Exposure LOAD COMPONENT AREA TRANSMISSION SOLAR GAIN (sgft) (Btu/hr) (Btu/hr) ---- ------- - -- - - - --- --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - --- - - - GLASS LOADS : NE 0 0 0 E 30 99 934 SE 0 0 0 S 40 132 2 , 264 SW 0 0 0 W 75 248 2, 203 NW 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 H 0 0 0 WALL LOADS : NE 0 0 - E 360 135 - SE 0 0 - RECEIVED S 245 214 - SW a 2 _ 212003 W 315 512 NW 0 0 - 04—, 1(�j N 285 93 -CITY OF ARLINGTON i �. SINGLE HOUR LOAD CALCULATION OUTPUT Aug 1700h : Express Lube (Express Lube) JOB NAME: Express Lube DATE PREPARED: 03-21-2003 SITE NAME: SEATTLE Washington 60501852 . 1 OUTDOOR DB/WB: 81 . 0/ 66 . 0 F INDOOR DB: 75 .0 F RH: 51 Coil Selection Parameters pg 2 COIL ENTERING AIR TEMP. (DB/WB) = 77 .2/ 64 .2 deg F COIL LEAVING AIR TEMP. (DB/WB) = 54 .2/ 53 .6 deg F COIL SENSIBLE LOAD = 22, 711 Btu/hr COIL TOTAL LOAD = 27, 776 Btu/hr COOLING SUPPLY AIR TEMPERATURE = 55 .0 deg F TOTAL COOLING Cfm = 898 Cfm COOLING Cfm/sqf t = 1 . 82 Cfm/sqf t RESULTING ROOM REL. HUMIDITY = 51 °s COIL BYPASS FACTOR = 0 . 050 ************************************************************ -:� - I HEATING LOAD CALCULATION OUTPUT Express Lube (Express Lube) JOB NAME: Express Lube DATE PREPARED: 03-21-2003 SITE NAME: SEATTLE Washington 60501852 . 1 WINTER DESIGN DRY BULB: 22 .0 F INDOOR DB: 70 . 0 F HEATING LOAD SUMMARY Note: Heating load is computed at winter design condition. LOAD COMPONENT LOAD (Btu/hr) - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WALL TRANSMISSION 2 , 892 ROOF TRANSMISSION 711 GLASS TRANSMISSION 3 , 828 TRANSMISSION LOSS TO UNCOND. SPACES 0 INFILTRATION LOSS 5, 214 SLAB FLOOR 3, 339 HEATING SAFETY Btu/hr 7, 992 - - - -- -- - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - -- - ---- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - -- -- - -- ---- - SUB-TOTAL 23 , 976 NET VENTILATION LOSS 17, 380 - - - ------------ ---- -- --- - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - --- - -- -- - -- - TOTAL HEATING LOAD 41, 356 HEATING SUPPLY Cfm 545 Cfm HEATING SUPPLY AIR TEMPERATURE 110 . 0 deg F HEATING VENTILATION AIR Cfm 329 Cfm HEATING SEASON ROOM DRY BULB TEMP. 70 . 0 deg F ************************************************************ ^. �I Structural Design Associates North Star Building 2210 Hewitt Ave., Suite 401 Everett, WA. 98201 Phone: (425) 339-0293 Fax: (425) 252-0916 Structural Calculation SDA Ref. #308, #500, #781 W COVI�, EXPIRES 1/3/ XPRESSLUBE SMOKEY POINT, WASIUNGTON 12/10/2002 I I I I r=pyJ\.I�tDo�.c c��L�-t lof w C14Z = s&5�)fbf- T 6 0((a) www w w w 000 PT n -Z Vcll �V V Ci N C4 CI RV H 1Z �-t � r '� A-C,`7-'��.� �F`�e���LUG-��• =� S '�G� (�'Vlyl�� s O 1 L- Cam"P, Z;q�O P; Sv�i M.�1.- �o v'vh• C_ vS TP- G a .C_ � C.� mod, * S V,'T �}- - C - 1 I I � ! 1 1 � t t. 1 I I I To:sspecify your title block on Title: Job# these five lines, use the SETTINGS Dsgnr: Date: 10:12AM, 7 JUN 01 Description selection on the main menu and enter your title block information Scope will be printed on each page. Rn' 510300 Page 1. Uccr:r.W-0603169.Vcr5.1.3,22-Jun-1999,Win32 Cantilevered Retaining Wall Design - I<)1963-99 ENERCALC Description Criteria Soil Data Footing Strengths 8r Dimensions Retained Height = 8.00 ft Allow Soil Bearing = 2,000.0 psf fc = "/o 2,500 psi Fy = 40,000 psi Wall height above soil = 0.50 ft Equivalent Fluid Pressure Method Min.As _ 0.0012 Heel Active Pressure 35.0 Toe Width - 2.25 ft Slope Behind Wall = 0.00:1 Toe Active Pressure = 35.0 = Heel Width 1.33 Height of Soil over Toe = 4.00 in Passive Pressure = 300.0 Total Footing Width Soil Density = 110.00 pcf Water height over heel = 0.0 ft Footing Thickness = 12.00 in FootingIlSoil Friction = 0.300 _ Wind on Stem = 0.0 psf Soil height to ignore Key Width _ 0.00 in 0.00 in for passive pressure = 0.00 in Key Depth - Key Distance from Toe 0.00 ft Cover @ Top = 3.00 in @ Btm.= 3.00 in Design Summary stem Construction � Top stem - s '�-` > :mtlS9R;r"+ rewrlr'�rr Stem OK Total Bearing Load = 2,420 Ibs Design height ft= 0.00 ...resultant ecc. = 10.33 in Wall Material Above"Ht" = Concrete Soil Pressure @ Toe = 1,736 psf OK Thickness 8.00 Soil Pressure @ Heel = 0 psf OK Rebar Size - # 5 Rebar Spacing 15.00 2,000 Allowable = psf Rebar Placed at Edge Soil Pressure Less Than Allowable Design Data - ACI Factored @ Toe = 2,034 psf fb/FB+fa/Fa = 0.772 ACI Factored @ Heel = 0 psf Total Force @Section Ibs= 1,900.7 Footing Shear @ Toe = 18.3 psi OK Moment....Actual ft_#= 5,077.0 Footing Shear @ Heel = 16.0 psi OK Moment.....Allowable = 6,578.7 Allowable = 85.0 psi Shear.....Actual psi= 25.6 Wall Stability Ratios Overturning = 1.53 OK Shear.....Allowable psi= 85.0 Sliding = 0.70 UNSTABLE! Bar Develop ABOVE Ht. in= 23.40 Sliding Calcs Slab Resists All Sliding! Bar Lap/Hook BELOW Ht. in= 8.01 Lateral Sliding Force = 1,386.4 Ibs Wall Weight = 96.7 Rebar Depth 'd' in= 6.19 Masonry Data f m psi= Fs psi= Solid Grouting = Special Inspection = Footing Design Results ModularRatio'n' Toe Heel Short Term Factor = Factored Pressure = 2,034 0 psf Equiv.Solid Thick. _ Mu':Upward = 3,763 0 ft_# Masonry Block Type= Medium Weight Mu':Downward = 662 763 ft-# Concrete Data Mu: Design = 3,102 763 ft-# fc psi= 2,500.0 Actual 1-Way Shear = 18.29 15.96 psi Fy psi= 60,000.0 Allow 1-Way Shear = 85.00 85.00 psi Other Acceptable Sixes&Spacing. Toe Reinforcing = None Spec'd Toe: #4@ 14.75 In,#5@ 22.75 in,#6@•32.50 in,#7@ 44.00 in,#8@ 48.25 in,#9@ 4 Heel Reinforcing = None Spec'd Heel: Not req'd,Mu<S`Fr Key Reinforcing = None Spec'd Key: No key defined 1 I I I � To specify your title block on Title: Job# Dsgnr: Date: 10:12AM, 7 JUN 01 these five lines, use the SETTINGS Description selection on the main menu and J enter your title block information Scope will be printed on each page. S1 Cantilevered Retaining Wall Design Page z % � 5 -06003M3169.Vc+51.3,22-Jun-1999,Win32 CFc)I"p 'g9[NlRWALC Description Lm Sum of Overturnin 8�Resisting Forces& Moments nssmrl tmcsameaiar:naw+ _tlnrxK wsnrr+-nrtr..n.:.:.:een.snrcawloaxca,wc:tnnxc:nca-t�.•r_auaza�..�'+n+as..Y�s.«n�nx:.:rrna-fr :........., OVERTURNING..... .....RESISTING..... Force Distance Moment Force Distance Moment Item Ibs ft ft-# Ibs ft ft-# Heel Active Pressure = 1,417.5 3.00 4,252.5 Soil Over Heel = 583.7 3.25 1,896.2 Toe Active Pressure = -31.1 0.44 -13.8 Sloped Soil Over Heel = Surcharge Over Toe = Surcharge Over Heel = Adjacent Footing Load = Adjacent Footing Load = Added Lateral Load = Axial Dead Load on Stem = 0.00 Load @ Stem Above Soil = Soil Over Toe = 82.5 1.13 92.8 Seismict-oad = Surcharge Over Toe = Stem Weight(s) = 821.7 2.58 2,122.6 Total = 1,386.4 O.T.M. = 4,238.7 Earth @ Stem Transitions = ResistingfOvertuming Ratio = 1.53 Footing Weight = 537.0 1.79 961.2 Weight = Vertical Loads used for Soil Pressure= 2,420.0 Ibs Vert.Key Weig eig Component _ P - 395.1 3.58 1,414.3 Vertical component of active pressure used for soil pressure Total= 2,420.0 Ibs R.M.= 6,487.2 I I I I 8.00005in Cone wl#5 @ 15.in o/c — — — — 5" i IN :N ul•i;i� 1 3/4° • i • 8'-0" • • • • 3" Sliding Peslrainl • 1 1 0" #OGa)O.in i @toe Designer select #Oq)O.in 3` 1 4' all horiz,rcinf. @ heel See Appendix A T_7" i Structural Design Associates Job# • North Star Building Date r/6—per 2210 Hewitt Ave., Suite 201 Design ____G_le Everett, WA. 98201 (425) 339-0293 P ROJ EC1`NAM E LOCATION CODE CRITERIA Building codes........................ 1997 Uniform Building Code Building Department................. Seismic Zone.......................... #3 Wind Zone............................. 80 mph Exposure'Q' SOILS CRITERIA Soils Consultant....................... Report#................................. Bearing Pressure....................... 2000psf(assumed) Bearing Depths........................ 18"Below Finished Grade Other.................................... MATERIALS CRITERIA Concrete(28 Day Strength) Foundations & slab on grade..... F'c=2500psi Structural Slab..................... F'c=2500psi Walls................................ F'c=2500psi Columns............................ Other................................ Reinforcing Steel—ASTM A-615 Grade 60 Grade 40 (Field bent and all welded Reinforcement) Masonry(Hollow Conc. Units—Grade N) F'm= 1500psi Solid Grouted F'm= 1500psi Inspected?❑ Yes ❑No Structural Steel Astm A- Connectors ASTM A-36 Fy=36ksi Weld Electrodes E70 Fs=21 ksi Wood _ Sawn timber grades Joists............... Purlins............. Beams............. Posts............... Glu-lam lumber grade combination(24f-V4)simple span& (24f V8)for cantilevers or continuous beams Plywood grade and/or index .......APA Rated Roof. 15/32 cdx—PI=24/0 Floor: 3 /4 T&G cdx—PI=48/24 I 1 f WWW WWW (2 / Zn(7)u) moo N N'If r ram-Iz cclf. Y r i 2 _ 4 7-7 x <�f'3 � _ 3�' a 1� /#s' i i f Td specify your title block on Title: Job# %9/15 1 these five lines, use the SETTINGS Dsgnr: Date: 10:49AM, 16 MAY 02 Description main menu selection, choose the Printing &Title Block tab,and ent Scope: your title block information. �Rev: 550100 L4or:KW-06931b9,4or5.5.0,2S-S�►•2001 Masonry Wall Design (c)1093-2001 EMERCALCE.gin...i"5-Ftua.o -,-_ - Page Description car wash General Information Calculations are designed to 1997 UBC Requirements Wall Height t3.00 ft Seismic Factor 0.3300 fm 11500.0 psi Parapet Height 0.00 ft Calc of Em=fm" 750.00 Fs 24,000.0 psi Duration Factor 1.330 No Special Inspection Thickness 8.0 in Wall Wt Mult. 1.000 Grout @ Rebar Only Rebar Size 5 Medium Weight Block Rebar Spacing 48 in Equivalent Depth to Rebar 3.810 in @ Center Solid Thickness 4.600 in Uniform Load Concentric Axial Load Wind Load 16.800 psf Dead Load 0.000#/ft Dead Load 0.000#/ft Live Load 0.000#/ft Live Load 0.000#/ft Load Eccentricity 0.000 in Roof Load Roof Load Design Values E 1,125,000 psi Rebar Area 0.078 in2 np 0.04370 i 0.91495 n: Es/Em 25.778 Radius of Gyration 2.535 in k 0.25514 2/kj 8.56756 Wall Weight 49.000 psf Moment of Inertia 354.810 in4 Max Allow Axial Stress=0.25 fm(1-(h/140r)A2)'Spinsp 173.78 psi Allow Masonry Bending Stress=0.33 fm"Spinsp= 247.50 psi Allow Steel Bending Stress= 24,000.00 psi - Load Combination &Stress Details Summary Axial Bending Stresses Axial Maximum: Moment Load Steel Masonry Compression fb/Fb+fa/Fa Top of Wall in-# Ibs psi psi psi fsws DL+LL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0000 DL+LL+Wind 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0000 DL+LL+Seismic 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0000 Between Base&Top of Wall DL+LL 0.0 196.0 0.0 0.0 3.55 0.0204 DL+LL+Wind 1,612.8 196.0 5,969.7 79.3 3.55 0.3409 DL+LL+Seismic 1,552.3 196.0 5,745.9 76.3 3.55 0.3289 Summary Wall Design OK 8.00ft high wall with 0.00ft-parapet, Med Wt Block w/8.00in wall wl#5 bars at 48.00ino.c. at center Governing Load Combination is.... Dead + Live +Wind Between Top & Bottom Masonry Bending Stress 79.32 psi Steel Bending Stress 5,969.72 psi Masonry Axial Stress 3.55 psi Combined Stress Ratio 0.3409 < 1.3300 (allowable) Final Loads & Moments Wall Weight moment @ Mid Ht 196.00 IbsT� Wind Moment @ Mid Ht 1,612,80 in4 Seismic Moment @ Mid Ht 1,552.32 in4 Dead Load Moment @ Top of Wall 0.00 in4 Dead Load Moment @ Mid Ht 0.00 in# Total Dead Load 0.00 Ibs Total Live Load 0.00 Ibs Live Load Moment @ Top of Wall 0.00 in4 Livel-oad Moment @ Mid Ht 0 00 in4 Maximum Allow Moment for Applied Axial Load= 5,032.10 in4 Maximum Allow Axial Load for Applied Moment= 9,592.87 lbs i I Tu specify your title block on Title: Job# 7 8l 8 3 these five lines, use the SETTINGS Dsgnr: Date: 11:12AM, 16 MAY 02 main menu selection, choose the Description: Printing &Title Block tab, and ent Scope your title block information. Rev: ssotoo 4 Page._ 1. Urar:K54-4b03769,Var5.5.4,25-SsP-z44, General Footing Analysis & Design [c)1983-2941 Er1ERCALC En�in..rin�$ofkuara Description car wash General Information Calculations are designed to ACI 318-95 and 1997 UBC Requirements r Allowable Soil Bearing 1,500.0 psf Dimensions... Short Term Increase 1.330 Width along X-X Axis 1.167 ft Seismic Zone 3 Length along Y-Y Axis 1.167 ft Footing Thickness 12.00 in Live&Short Term Combined Col Dim.Along X-X Axis 0.00 in fc 2,500.0 psi Col Dim.Along Y-Y Axis 0.00 in Fy 60,000.0 psi Base Pedestal Height 0.000 in Concrete Weight 145.00 pcf Min Steel% 0.0014 Overburden Weight 0.00 psf Reber Center To Edge Distance 3.50 in Loads Applied Vertical Load... Dead Load 0.672 k ...ecc along X-X Axis 0.000 in Live Load k ...ecc along Y-Y Axis 0.000 in Short Term Load k Creates Rotation about Y-Y Axis Creates Rotation about X-X Axis Applied Moments... (pressures @ left&right) (pressures @ top&bot) Dead Load k-ft k-ft Live Load k-ft k-ft Short Term k-ft 0.134 k-ft Creates Rotation about Y-Y Axis Creates Rotation about X-X Axis Applied Shears... (pressures @ left&right) (pressures @ top&bot) Dead Load k k Live Load k k Short Term k k Surnmary Footing Design OK 1.17ft x 1.17ft Footing, 12.Oin Thick, w/Column Support 0.00 x O.00in x O.Oin high DL+LL DL+LL+ST Actual 'Allowable Max Soil Pressure 638.4 1,144.3 psf Max Mu 0.200 k-ft per ft Allowable 1,500.0 1,995.0 psf Required Steel Area 0,143 in2 per ft 'X'Ecc,of Resultant 0.000 in 0.000 in Shear Stres$es... Vu Vn'Phi "Y'Ecc,of Resultant 0.000 in 1.849 in 1-Way 0.000 85,000 psi X-X Min.Stability Ratio 3.786 1.500 :1 2-Way 2.056 170.000 psi Y-Y Min.Stability Ratio No Overturning Footing Design Shear Forces ACI 9-1 ACI 9-2 ACI 9-3 Vn'Phi .. Two-Way Shear 2.06 psi 2.06 psi 1.32 psi 170.00 psi One-Way Shears... Vu @ Left 0.00 psi 0.00 psi 0.00 psi 85.00 psi Vu @ Right 0.00 psi 0.00 psi 0.00 psi 85.00 psi Vu @ Top 0.00 psi 0.00 psi 0.00 psi 85.00 psi Vu @ Bottom 0.00 psi 0.00 psi 0.00 psi 85.00 psi Moments ACI 9-1- ACI 9-2 ACI 9-3 Ru/Phi As Req'd Mu @ Left 0.12 k-ft 0.12 k-ft 0.08 k-ft 1.8 psi 0.14 in2 per ft Mu @ Right 0.12 k-ft 0.12 k-ft 0.08 k-ft 1.6 psi 0.14 in2 per ft Mu @ Top 0.12 k-ft 0.20 k-ft 0.13 k-ft 3.1 psi 0.14 in2 per ft Mu @ Bottom 0.12 k-ft 0.04 k-ft 0.02 k-ft 1.8 psi 0.14 in2 per ft 1 Job# w� a C --TV specify your title block on Title: Date: 11:12AM, 16 MAY 02 Description: these five lines, use the SETTINGS Dription main menu selection, choose the _ Printing &Title Block tab,and ent Scope your title block information. _ Rev: 550100 Page 2 Wsr-KW05031 N,Ver 5.5.0.25-5..-Zoo+ General Footing Analysis & Design fa1983-2001 EHERCAIC Enoinaeriea Saftu+r. - --:--. ------,.---•--r-�---"'- - - I Description car wash Soil Pressure Summary .-- - Service Load Soil Pressures Left Right To Bottom DL+LL 638.43 638.43 638.43 638.43 psf DL+LL+ST 638.43 638.43 1,144.31 132.56 psf Factored Load Soil Pressures ACI Eq.9-1 893.81 893.81 893.81 893.81 psf ACI Eq.9-2 893.81 893.81 1,602.03 185.58 psf ACI Eq.9-3 574.59 574.59 1,029.88 119.30 psf aCtOfS (per ACI,applied intemally to entered loads) 4 " ACI F T.I.:':R:�3ISi'..71fiTeT1'f'A4'1lR'..:"�7�'TTriR7SiF+YtT�`78IR::T{S:SY•^•:.- ..._...`.. . . TTi^ :^s7f3:71t1��"r,:' 77:^.:i:ti:':7:5:^,Z^.t^.^.f%!4: ACI 9-1 &9-2 DL 1.400 ACI 9-2 Group Factor 0.900 UBC 1921.2.7 1.4"Factor 1.400 ACI 9-1 &9-2 LL 1-700 ACI 9-3 Dead Load Factor 0.90D UBC 1921.2.7"0.9"Factor 0.900 ACI 9-1 &9-2 ST 1.700 ACI 9-3 Short Term Factor 1.300 ....seismic=ST": 1.100 Y I I (nU)U) W W W 000 Lnoo �- N NNN �e f i 73 4,,,- x aJG t ` IP7 lee 3 OV �P S'� -4/� x ° x /2 �� i I r ,� cJa6 7R l J3 6 (nNEn �� _ _ �- of 3 w Uj�; W W W 3, 3'� xxx wIn(n 000 / to o 0 N N N N 4Y I_' o N NqN ' 6 �` a � L Cs d71' /��� 9, 6 i`i - l0 // 401 /oc'z z -'�6--� Gam•- w�-� I Jo 6 -* 78 y w(nI WWW (n(n� tnoo N C K R N N N N N N Q �Q i i i I Structural Design Associates Job# 21330 North Star Building Date 7-7A-D( 2210 Hewitt Ave., Suite 401 Design Everett, WA. 98201 (425)339-0293 PROJECT NAME LOCATION CODE CRITERIA Building codes........................ 1997 Uniform Building Code Building Department................. L✓r=(Z(-T7 ) I,JA Seismic Zone.......................... #3 Wind Zone............................. 80 mph Exposure 'g ' SOILS CRITERIA Soils Consultant....................... Report#................................. Bearing Pressure...... . . .............. 2000psf(assumed) Bearing Depths.............. ... ...... 18"Below Finished Grade Other.................................... MATERIALS CRITERIA Concrete(28 Day Strength) Foundations& slab on grade..... F'c=2500psi Structural Slab..................... F'c=2500psi Walls................................ F'c=2500psi Columns............................ Other................................ Reinforcing Steel—ASTM A-615 Grade 60 Grade 40 (Field bent and all welded , Reinforcement) Masonry (Hollow Couc. Units—Grade N) F'm= 1500psi Solid Grouted Fin= 1500psi Inspected?0 Yes 0 No Structural Steel Astnn A- Connectors ASTM A-36 Fy=36ksi Weld Electrodes E70 Fs=21ksi Wood Sawn timber grades Joists............... Purl ins............. Beams............. Posts............... Glu-lam lumber grade combination(24f-V4)simple span& (24f-V8) for cantilevers or continuous beams Plywood grade and/or index .......APA Rated Roof. 15/32 cdx—PI=24/0 Floor: 3 /4 T&G cdx—PI=48/24 Structural Design Associates Job # Z1330 North Star Building Date -7-29-01 2210 Hewitt Ave., Suite 401 Design Everett, WA. 98201 (425) 339-0293 LOADING CRITERIA FOR ROOF AND/OR CEILING Main Roof Area Canopy or Mansard Roof ❑ Ceiling Only ❑ Other Item Material Load psf Roofing Membrane Coating 0.5 Sheathing or Decking 21 Ga. Steel Decking 1.9 Insulation _ P Rigid Insulation 1.5 Ceiling Fixtures —Mech., 4.5 Electrical, Misc. Framing Open Web Steel J st. 11.6 TOTAL DEAD LOAD = 10.0 PSF Live Loads /Snow Load—30 psf—non reduceable ❑ Ceiling Only— 10 psf X'Increase in Fb and Fv of 15% allowed for duration of load 1 I 4 Structural Design Associates Job # 21330 North Star Building Date 7-2,1-o1 2210 Hewitt Ave., Suite 401 Design ESC� Everett, WA. 98201 (425) 339-0293 LOADING CRITERIA FOR FLOOR Item Material Load psf Floor Covering 5" Conc. Slab 60.4 Floor Sheathing 22 Ga. Steel Decking 1.8 Ceiling - - Fixtures - Mech., 6.8 Elect., & Misc Framing Beams SteelI-.Beams 6.0 TOTAL DEAD LOAD = 75 :PSF Live Loads XGarage - 100psf(reducible) OR 2000# pf. load ❑ Office - 50psf(reducible) ❑ Assembly- 100psf(non-reducible) Corridors and Exits - 100psf(reducible) ❑ Other Where allowed, live load is reduced by 0.08% per square foot for areas greater than 150sf to a maximum reduction of 40% for members receiving load from one level only and 60% for other members. R= 0.08 ( A- 150 ) I I 16k s 7-Z4-o 1 2-I 3 3 o L I Ati�,,L�SIS 04�- 1-S7v2y MASOKIRY C>API-AGE W/ CMG. R-Yt5fC-At 1JT LOCaTE'D /N vE2LTT t..SA LA70 . - Vtkl-�cA-t-- P-r G. 22 t''� (O-IG,) NM 6•1 FV F `• z x F-yA I P c-A(Z nu to ru 1".A on M to on • 000 #'f C"V lY a (27)(-7)((3.22) ISM (� (ZvNE 3) (AVD) poi -f5 P� v= �2• S C,_T Iq3 bi IL-) e SF) + (�32 w�!rc)(J6�s)(5S PLF) f 700 ,(p.214)= I s,G52 RHO G6tZ..C— 1 � p LCD t3o �I Z, z�r��r4NT �v; 1D, q 34- I� 21330 600 I B (07) 20U Lo = 2 PcF �3 � �3o►`1D 'I'�6-� i.33(24crn�� Ill zsu w �� u, ' a^ _ = 2�d'' = 2( 3e<l)(z1 i2)Z = 2.OZ x 10 <uq er ca cr CM fV Ci -�n, O.U1�? (1 = D•cb7(1/a 112_) = I. 34 rk Of _ Z --� vr�c.��F-r I•s Fz2 �cK 2U8 P L F ); Lb�CL� L�YiEl2 rc� c✓l4ZL jJ 7%. i i i, �, _9T �,.01-,5 �^ C A-,I ATT ll'-.L -O• OI „n-.F L2 n� id S N. iI I I I -� n - - 7 —1 ao a via •{l Z r vx ix m� r JJ N w H 1 LLU W ._ O Oa Oc o(✓k I LLw F t J ,1 Q $arc V1 vwa '• haw i� 4'�� ¢ �- W lad .l _0 Yi { 91 w V �J Co z t w _ wi o J a� 0 Avg L -- - - Cl. .9-,► 7�W .u-.91 N I ,g-,► I I (1'dAl> Q 300S 113AO0 0_.L I J a a V CL w 'l _ o O 9 � u l �r a qe 4 � ! r s., Ix n N - Us-.9 .9-.k V-.z DNIN3d0 8OOl3 .9-,11 -9-,6 \ 7 o _ \ o ,+ -O-,Z .Z/I b-b-.f .Z 1 1-.IZ �\ '_ it 1 i To specify your title block on Title: Job# these five lines,use the SETTINGS Dsgnr: Date: 11:55AM; 1 AUG 01 main menu selection, choose the Description Printing&Title Block tab,and ent Scope: your title block information. _ - - ------ -- R. S10301 Page 1 U%.r.Kw•060.3169.Vnr5 Masonry Pier Analysis & Design (c(1963.99 CNCRCALC ..... .. -._-__ ., gK�n.ni.-�Ki.i.�i Ti: i ..mR NM rn w-�.«-'�1'..�•rn. N.nl • .-�1.������_ - -. •_ - - --.- „err. ..... n,.. , Description FRONT ELEVATION General Information Calculations are designed to 1997 UBC Requirements _.._;cm,,m^i�..7sa%%ii'1T�R'%1it'nF*'�81FR•n,-zT,.•.,e-�...3S-w� ,o ,<. ,,.,: IT 1�'T�n�T,:--- Total Lateral Force 5.22 k Moduli: Em=I'm` 750.00 Seismic Zone 3 Moduli: Ev=Em" 0.40 Load Duration Factor 1.33 Shear Pier Data Pier#1 Pier#2 Pier#3 Pier#4 Pier#5 Pier Height 16.00 ft 16.00 ft 16.00 it 16.00 it 16.00 ft Pier Length 4.67 ft 3.33 ft 3.33 ft 5.25 ft 2.67 ft Wall Thickness 8 in 8 in 8 in 8 in 8 in 'j":Depth Mutt. 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Pier Fixity Fix-Fix Fix-Fix Fix-Fix Fix-Fix Fix-Fix fm 1,500psi 1,500psi 1,500psi 1,500psi 1,500psi Fs 24,000 psi 24,000 psi 24,000 psi 24,000 psi 24,000 psi Sp Insp Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Grout Spacing 32 in 32 in 32 in 32 in 32 in [Analysis Data Pier#1 Pier#2 -Pier#3 Pier#4 Pier#5 Height/Length 3.4283 4.6005 4.8005 3.0476 5.9993 (H/L)113 40.2946 ##.#### ##.lkfal# 28.3062 ##.#### ReL Defl 5.6200 13.8918 13.8918 4.1610 25.9908 Sum Rigidity 600.71 ' Rigidity=-001/Defl 177.938 71.985 71.985 240.326 38.475 %Force to Pier 0.30 0.12 0.12 0.40 0.06 Shear to Pier 1.546 k 0.626 k 0.626 k 2,088 k 0.334 k Relative Dell"10115 0.00 in 0.00 in 0.00 in 0.00 in 0.00 In M/(V"Depth) 1.714 2.400 2.400 1.524 3.000 Summary �.g.,,race ..�sar:,.na, •cek:cmc I Shear Reinforcing... Pier#1 Pier#2 Pier#3 ` Pier#4 Pier 95 fv=V/(12"est jd) 9.39 psi 5.32 psi 5.32 psi J 11.28 psi 3.55 psi Fv:w/o Reinf. 46.55 psi 46.55 psi 46.55 psi 46.55 psi 46.55 psi Fv:w/Reinf. 77.27 psi 77.27 psi 77.27 psi 77.27 psi 77.27 psi Horiz.Shear Av Req'd Not Req'd in^2/ft Not Req'd in^2/ft Not Req'd in^2/ft Not Req'd inA2/ft Not Req'd inA2/ft Bending Reinforcing... Moment Q End 12.37 k-ft 5.00 k-it 5.00 k-ft 16.71 k-ft 2.67 k-ft "d"to tension As 4.20 ft 3.00 ft 3.00 ft 4.72 ft 2.40 ft Bending As Req'd 0.09 in2 0.05 in2 0.05 in2 0.11 in2 0.09 in2 i i l-S 1 o specify your title block on Title: Job# these five lines, use the SETTINGS Dsgnr: Date: 11:57AM. 1 AUG 01 main menu selection, choose the Description: Printing &Title Block tab,and ent Scope: your title block information. F•v 510302 -- -- - ---' v� P us••rMAWA5U'.1Bb,V.:r5.11�OJum149e w1.r2 age Masonry r'�J Q �°q {c)19'r,3-99ENERCnLC Mason j Pier Analysis & Design I Description REAR ELEVATION General Infor�mTation Calculations are designed to 1997 UBC Regwrements� Total Lateral Force 5.22 k Moduli: Em=fm ' 750,00 Seismic Zone 3 Moduli: Ev=Em' 0.40 Load Duration Factor 1.33 Shear PierData -, Pier#1 Pier#2 Pier#3 Pier#4 Pier#5 Pier Height 16.00 ft 16.00 ft 16.00 ft 16.00 ft 16.00 ft Pier Length 13.33 ft 4.58 ft 3.33 ft 3.33 ft 4.67 ft Wall Thickness 8 in 8 in 8 in 8 in 8 in "j":Depth Mult. 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Pier Fixity Fix-Fix Fix-Fix Fix-Fix Fix-Fix Fix-Fix fm 1,500 psi 1,500 psi 1,500 psi 1,500 psi 1,500 psi Fs 24,000 psi 24,000 psi 24,000 psi 24,000 psi 24,000 psi Sp Insp Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Grout Spacing 32 in 32 in 32 in 32 in 32 in Analysis Data - -- - Pier#1 r Pier#2 Pier#3 Pier#4 Pier#5 Height/Length 1.2000 3.4912 4.8005 4.8005 3.4283 (H/L)^3 1.7281 42.5511 ##.#### ##.#### 40.2946 Rel.Dell 0.5920 5.8916 13.8918 13.8918 5.6200 Sum Rigidity 2,180.76 Rigidity=.001/Dell 1,689.120 169.733 71.985 71.985 177.938 %Force to Pier 0.77 0.08 0.03 0.03 0.08 Shear to Pier 4.043 k 0.406 k 0.172 k 0.172 k 0.426 k Relative Deft`10^5 0.00 in 0.00 in 0.00 in 0.00 In 0.00 in M/(V"Depth) 0.600 1.746 2.400 2.400 1.714 Surrrmafy - - - Shear Reinforcing... Pier#1 Pier#2 Pier#3 Pier#4 Pier#5 fv=V/(12"est"jd) 8.60 psi 2.51 psi 1.47 psi 1.47 psi 2.59 psi Fv:w/o Reinf. 58.38 psi 46.55 psi 46.55 psi 46.55 psi 46.55 psi Fv:w/Reinf. 87.57 psi 77.27 psi 77.27 psi 77.27 psi 77.27 psi Horiz.Shear Av Req'd Not Req'd in^2/ft Not Req'd inA2/ft Not Req'd inA2/ft Not Req'd inA2/ft Not Req'd inA2/ft Bending Reinforcing... Moment @ End 32.35 k-ft 3.25 k-ft 1.38 k-ft 1.38 k-ft 3.41 k-ft "d"to tension As 12.00 ft 4.12 ft 3.00 ft 3.00 ft 4.20 ft Bending As Req'd 0.08 in2 0.02 in2 0.01 in2 0.DA-i02 0.08 in2 i L& To specify your title block on Title: Job# these five lines,use the SETTINGS Dsgnr: Date: 12:01 PM, 1 AUG 01 main menu selection,choose the Description Printing&Title Block tab,and ent Scope your title block information. Rn: 570300 _ - (t)19 3-99EN 69 Ve;f7,d2.luu•1099 k� z S$Of1ry0 PIGt' 11SIy5iS $c De�iigrl Page 1 a! (t)19s3-99 rNCRCALC Description RIGHT ELEVATION - - _ Calculations are designed to 1997 UBC `General Information g Requirements Total Lateral Force 5.22 k Moduli: Em=fm' 75000 Seismic Zone 3 Moduli: Ev=Em' 0.40 Load Duration Factor 1.33 Shear Pier Data - - -- Pier 41 Pier#2 Pier Height 16.00 ft 16.00 ft Pier Length 4.00 ft 16.67 ft Wall Thickness 8 in 8 in 'j":Depth Mutt. 0.90 0.90 Pier Fixity Fix-Fix Fix-Fix f m 1,500 psi 1,500 psi Fs 24,000 psi 24,000 psi Sp Insp Yes Yes Grout Spacing 32 in 32 in Analysis Data Pi - , er#1 Pier#2 Height/Length 4.0000 0.9600 (H/L)"3 64.0000 0.8847 Rel.Defl 8.4444 0.4183 Sum Rigidity 2,509.10 Rigidity=.001/Defl 118,421 2,390.676 %Force to Pier 0.05 0.95 Shear to Pier 0.246 k 4.974 k Relative Defl'10^5 0.00 in 0.00 in M/(V'Depth) 2.000 0.480 t;r SUIYU?7afy 1 Shear Reinforcing... Pier#1 Pier#2 fv=V/(12"est jd) 1.75 psi 8.46 psi Fv:w/o Reinf. 46.55 psi 60.44 psi Fv:w/Reinf. 77.27 psi 90.66 psi Horiz.Shear Av Req'd Not Req'd inA2/ft Not Req'd in^2/ft Bending Reinforcing... Moment r@ End 1.97 k-ft 39.79 k-ft "d"to tension As 3.60 ft 15.00 ft Bending As Req'd 0.02 In2 0.08 in2 To specify your title block on Title: Job# L7 these five lines,use the SETTINGS Dsgnr: Date: 12:02PM, 1 AUG 01 main menu selection, choose the Description Printing&Title Block tab,and ent Scope your title block information. 51*3 �i,.:�.,a-�hr.sic.9.v.,si ,aa•, ,•�y�e,' sa Masonp�l Pier Analysis SlS D�'Slg rl Page 1 (i 19L3-79 FJJFRCALC -try �7 Description LEFT ELEVATION General Information Calculations are designed to 1997 UBC Requirements Total Lateral Force 5.22 k Moduli: Em=fm" 750.00 Seismic Zone 3 Moduli: Ev=Em' 0.40 Load Duration Factor 1.33 ktear _.Pier Data - Pier#1 Pier#2 Pier Height 16.00 ft 16.00 it Pier Length 21.25 ft 2.00 ft Wall Thickness Bin 8 in "j":Depth Mult. 0.90 0.90 Pier Fixity Fix-Fix Fix-Fix f m 1,500 psi 1,500 psi Fs 24,000 psi 24,000 psi Sp Insp Yes Yes Grout Spacing 32 in 32 in Analysis Data -- - -- - -- Pier#1 Pier#2 Height/Length 0.7529 8.0000 (HfL)113 0.4269 ##.###fk Rel.Dell 0.2984 59.5556 Sum Rigidity 3,367.90 Rigidity=.001/Deft 3,351.105 16.791 %Force to Pier 1.00 0.00 Shear to Pier 5.194 k 0.026 k Relative Defl"10^5 0.00 in 0.00 in M/(V'Depth) 0.376 4.000 S«rnntary Shear Reinforcing... Pier#1 Pier#2 fv=Vl(12"est`jd) 6.93 psi 0.37 psi Fv:w/o Reinf. 62.22 psi 46.55 psi Fv:w/Reinf. 93.33 psi 77.27 psi Horiz.Shear Av Req'd Not Req'd in^2/ft Not Req'd in^2/ft Bending Reinforcing... Moment @ End 41.55 k-ft 0.21 k-ft "d"to tension As 19.12 ft 1.80 ft Bending As Req'd 0.07 in2 0.00 in2 i �S To specify your title block on Title: Job# these five lines, use the SETTINGS Dsgnr: Date: 11:35AM. 1 AUG 01 main menu selection, choose the Description Printing &Title Block tab, and ent Scope your title block information,- a- slaaoa - ��q -- ...�.. Usk:KN-060'.•169.Yer51a,;F-Jun-1999,Wirv^s2 Masonry Wall Design Page 1 r [�)1969.99CNCRCALC Description WIND/SEISMIC PERP. TO WALL ff General Information n Calculations are designed to 1997 UBC Requirements ' Wall Height 16.00 ft Seismic Factor 0.1430 fm 1,500 0 psi Parapet Height 1.00 ft Calc of Em=fm' 750.00 Fs 24,000.0 psi Duration Factor 1.330 Special Inspection N04- ReV6 Thickness 8.0 in Wall Wt Mult. 1.000 Grout @ Rebar Only Rebar Size 5 Medium Weight Block Rebar Spacing 32 in Equivalent Depth to Rebar 3.810 in @ Center Solid Thickness 3.833 in Loa -17 Uniform Load Concentric Axial Load Wind Load 13.220 psf Dead Load 20.000#/ft Dead Load 0.000#/ft Live Load 60.000#/ft Live Load 0.000#/ft Load Eccentricity 5.000 in Roof Load Roof Load [Design Values E 1,125,000 psi Rebar Area 0.116 in2 np 0.06554 i 0.89920 n: Es/Em 25.778 Radius of Gyration 2.812 in k 0.30240 2/kj 7.35512 Wall Weight 55.000 psf Moment of Inertia 363.660 in4 Max Allow Axial Stress=0.25 fm(1-(h/140r)^2)'Spinsp 285.79 psi Allow Masonry Bending Stress=0.33 fm`Spinsp= 495.00 psi Allow Steel Bending Stress= 24,000.00 psi Load Combinati on&Stress Details Summary Axial Bending Stresses Axial Maximum: Moment Load Stgei Masonry Compression fb/Fb+fa/Fa Top of Wall in-# Ibs psi psi psi f; S DL+LL 400.0 80.0 1,004.4 16.9 1.74 0.0418 DL+LL+Wind 179.3 20.0 450.3 7.6 0.43 0.0188 DL+LL+Seismic 147.2 20.0 369.6 6.2 0.43 0.0154 Between Base&Top of Wall DL+LL 200.0 575.0 502.2 8.4 12.50 0.0608 DL+LL+Wind 5,086.8 515.0 12,772.4 214.8 11.20 0.5322 DL+LL+Seismic 3,046.6 515.0 7,649.6 128.6 11.20 0.3187 Summary Wall Design Obi 16.00ft high wail with 1.00ft parapet, Med Wt Block w/8.00in wall w/#5 bars at 32.00ino.c. at center Governing Load Combination is.... Dead + Live +Wind Between Top& Bottom Masonry Bending Stress 214.79 psi Steel Bending Stress 12,772.39 psi - Masonry Axial Stress 11.20 psi L Combined Stress Ratio 0.5322 < 1.3300 (allowable) Final Loads & Moments - , '71-rrr.-1 7-77M-77-7- 'rn .,........ Wall Weight moment @ Mid Ht 495.00 Ibs Wind Moment @ Mid Ht 5,036.90 ink Seismic Moment @ Mid Ht 2,996.61 ink Dead Load Moment @ Top of Wall 100.00 in-# Dead Load Moment @ Mid Ht 50.00 in-# Total Dead Load 20.00 Ibs Total Live Load 60.00 Ibs Live Load Moment @ Top of Wall 300.00 in-# Livel-oad Moment @ Mid Ht 150.00 in-# Maximum Allow Moment for Applied Axial Load= 9,558.40 ink Maximum Allow Axial Load for Applied Moment= 13,145.30 Ibs i VI TEXACO EXPRESS LUBE MAIN FLOOR FRAMING B1 Date: 7/31/01 BeamChek 2.2 Choice W 8x 18 A36 Wide Flange Steel Lateral Support at: Lc=5.5 ft Max, Conditions Actual Size is 5-1/4 x 8-1/8 in., Min Bearing Length R1=0.8 in. R2=0.8 in. DL Defl 0.09 in Suggested Camber 0.13 in Data Beam Span 12.5 ft Reaction 1 3944# Reaction 1 LL 2186# Beam Wt per ft 18.0# Reaction 2 3944# Reaction 2 LL 2188# Beam Weight 225# Maximum V 3944# Max Moment 12324'# Max V(Reduced) N/A TL Max Defl L/240 TL Actual Defl L/778 LL Max Defl L/360 LL Actual Defl L/>1000 Attributes Section(in') Shear(in2 TL Defl (in) LL Defl Actual 15.20 1.87 0.19 0.11 Critical 6.22 0.27 0.63 0.42 Status OK OK OK OK Ratio 41% 15% 31% 26% Fb(psi) Fv(psi) E(psi x mil) Values Base Value Fy 36000 36000 29.0 Base Adjusted 23760 14400 29.0 Adjustments YP Factor, Lc 0.66 0.40 BeamChek has automatically added the beam self-weight into the calculations. Loads Uniform TL: 613 =A Uniform LL: 350 Uniform Load A R1 =3944 R2=3944 SPAN= 12.5 FT Uniform and partial uniform loads are lbs per lineal ft. i i M vz TEXACO EXPRESS LUBE MAIN FLOOR FRAMING B2 — uidlFoRN t-ogD Date: 7/31/01 BeamChek 2.2 Choice W 8x 18 A36 Wide Flange Steel Lateral Support at: Lc=5.5 ft max. Conditions_ Actual Size is 5-1/4 x 8-1/8 in., Min Bearing Length R1=0.8 in. R2=0.8 in. DL Defl 0.12 in Suggested Camber 0.18 in Data Beam Span 12.5 ft Reaction 1 5581 # Reaction ILL 3125# Beam Wt per ft 18.0# Reaction 2 5581 # Reaction 2 LL 3125# Beam Weight 225# Maximum V 5581 # Max Moment 17441 '# Max V(Reduced) N/A TL Max Defl L/240 TL Actual Defl L/550 LL Max Defl L/360 LL Actual Defl L/982 Attributes Section(in3) Shear(in2) TL Defl(in) LL Defl Actual 15.20 1.87 0.27 0.15 Critical 8.81 0.39 0.63 0.42 Status OK OK OK OK Ratio 58% 21% 44% 37% Fb(psi) Fv(psi) E(psi x mil) Values Base Value Fy 36000 36000 29.0 Base Adjusted 23760 14400 29.0 Adjustments YP Factor, Lc 0.66 0.40 BeamChek has automatically added the beam self-weight into the calculations. Loads Uniform TL: 875 =A Uniform LL: 500 Uniform Load A R1 =5581 R2= 5581 SPAN= 12.5 FT Uniform and partial uniform loads are Ibs per lineal ft. I I I V3 TEXACO EXPRESS LUBE MAIN FLOOR FRAMING B2 @ OPENINGS Date: 7/31/01 BeamChek 2.2 Choice W 8x 18 A36 Wide Flange Steel Lateral Support at: Lc Conditions Actual Size is 5-1/4 x 8-1/8 in., Min Bearing Length R1=.0.8 in. R2=0.8 in. DL Defl 0.09 in Suggested Camber 0.13 in Data Beam Span 12.5 ft Reaction 1 3370# Reaction 1 LL 1862# Beam Wt per ft 18.0# Reaction 2 4467# Reaction 2 LL 2488# Beam Weight 225# Maximum V 4467# Max Moment 12481 '# Max V(Reduced) N/A TL Max Defl L/240 TL Actual Defl L/750 LL Max Defl L/360 LL Actual Defl L/>1000 Attributes Section(W) Shear(w) TL Defl(in) LL Defl Actual 1520 1.87 020 0.11 Critical 6.30 0.31 0.63 0.42 Status OK OK OK OK Ratio 41% 17% 32% 27% Fb(psi) Fv(psi) E(psi x mil) Values Base Value Fy 36000 36000 29.0 Base Adjusted 23760 14400 29.0 Adiustments YP Factor, Lc 0.66 0.40 At Point Loads : Provide these minimum bearing lengths in inches or provide web stiffeners. B=0.8 BeamChek has automatically added the beam self-weight into the calculations. Loads L Point LL Point TL Distance Par Unif LL Par Unif TL Start End 437 B=765 8.0 250 H=438 0 8.0 425 1=744 8.0 12.5 H ' -- Pt load Q _ [B _ J R1 = 3370 R2—4467 SPAN= 12.5 FT Uniform and partial uniform loads are Ibs per lineal ft. I I A TEXACO EXPRESS LUBE MAIN FLOOR FRAMING B2-GIRDER BEAM Date: 7131/01 BeamChek 2.2 Choice W 8x 18 A36 Wide Flange Steel Lateral Support at: Lc=5.5 ft max. Conditions Actual Size is 5-1/4 x 8-1/8 in., Min Bearing Length R1=0.8 in. R2=0.8 in. DL Defl 0.15 in Suggested Camber 0.22 in Data Beam Span 10.0 ft Reaction 1 7684# Reaction 1 LL 4251 # Beam Wt per ft 18.0# Reaction 2 7684# Reaction 2 LL 4251 # Beam Weight 180# Maximum V 7684# Max Moment 29131 '# Max V(Reduced) N/A TL Max Defl L/240 TL Actual Defl L/357 LL Max Defl L/360 LL Actual Defl L/642 Attributes Section in Shear Qnx) TL Defl(in) LL Defl Actual 15.20 1.87 0.34 0.19 Critical I 14.71 0.53 0.50 0.33 Status OK OK OK OK Ratio 97% 28% 67% 56% Fb(psi) Fv(psi) E(psi x mil) Values Base Value Fy 36000 36000 29.0 Base Adjusted 23760 14400 29.0 Adjustments YP Factor, Lc 0.66 0.40 At Point Loads Provide these minimum bearing lengths in inches or provide web stiffeners. B= 0.8 C=0.8 D=0.8 BeamChek has automatically added the beam self-weight into the calculations. Loads Uniform TL: 175 =A Uniform LL: 100 y Point LL Point TL Distance 2188 B=3928 3.25 3125 C=5581 5.0 2188 D= 3928 6.75 Uniform Load A Pt loads: L 1-`Bl C] OD J U Q R1 =7684 R2=7684 SPAN= 10 FT Uniform and partial uniform loads are Ibs per lineal ft. 1 I V5 TEXACO EXPRESS LUBE MAIN FLOOR FRAMING B3 Date: 7/31/01 BeamChek 2.2 Choice L C 8x 11.5 A36 Steel Channel Lateral Support at: Lu=5.1 ft max. Conditions Actual Size is 2-1/4 x 8 in., Min Bearing Length R1=0.9 in. R2=0.9 in. DL Defl<0.01 in. Data Beam Span 3.5 ft Reaction 1 1020# Reaction 1 LL 1000# Beam Wt per ft 11.5# Reaction 2 1020# Reaction 2 LL 1000# Beam Weight 40# Maximum V 1020# Max Moment 1768'# Max V(Reduced) N/A TL Max Defl L/240 TL Actual Defl L 1>1000 LL Max Defl L 1360 LL Actual Defl L/>1000 Attributes _Section(in') __ Shear(inz)_ T_L Defl in) LL Defl Actual 8.14 1.76 0.00 <0.01 Critical 0.98 0.07 0.17 0.12 Status OK OK OK OK Ratio 12% 4% 2% 3% Fb(psi) Fv(psi) E(psi x mil Values Base Value Fy 36000 36000 29.0 Base Adjusted 21600 14400 29.0 _ Adjustments YP Factor, Lu 0.60 0.40 At Point Loads Provide these minimum bearing lengths in inches or provide web stiffeners. B=0.9 BeamChek has automatically added the beam self-weight into the calculations. Loads _ Point LL Point TL Distance 2000 B=2000 1.75 Pt loads B' 1 R1 = 1020 R2= 1020 SPAN= 3.5 FT Uniform and partial uniform loads are Ibs per lineal ft. it vb TEXACO EXPRESS LUBE MAIN FLOOR FRAMING C1 Prepared by: Date: 7/31/01 BeamChek 2.2 Choice 3 x 3 x 114 Structural Tube ASTM A500 Grade B Conditions Actual outside dimensions: 3 x 3 inches Loading is concentric on a primary column member. Maximum KI/r is 200 Data Reaction 15,224 Ibs Column Net Area 2.6 in' Fa 18.7 Actual Height 7 ft Fy Min Yield Stress 46,000 psi Cc 111.5 Unbraced dl 7 ft Weight p/lineal foot 8.81 Ibs r 1.1 Effective Ht D1 84 in K (Buckling Mode) 1.00 E x mil 29 kl/r ksi Area (in') Attributes Actual 76 5.9 2.6 Critical 200 18.7 0.8 Status OK OK OK L _ Ratio 38% 31% 31% i 1 I Chris C. Covington Title- Job# V I North Star Building Dsgnr: Date: 1:49PM, i AUG 01 Description 2210 Hewitt Ave, Suite 401 Everett,WA 98201 Scope: Rev: 510302 •.---- Plate Page N,1 cr .•' Uau 63-99E3169,V5.1.3,22-Jun-1999,Win32 Steel Column Base (<)1963.99 ENERCAIC r..—.m.�._:... ....... .::s:_ .... .. ....... r ... .....::�..,i..:.:_..._s :....'-, .."'°'a1E`w5�:.:�.:::5:;�,..... ..... .,..........r as..._................ .. .r......._... . ...--. Description STEEL COLUMN BASE PL General Information Calculations are designed to AISC 9th Edition ASD and 1997 UBC Requirements Loads Steel Section TS3x3x3116 Axial Load 15.22 k Section Length 3.000 in Section Width 3.000 in X-X Axis Moment 0.00 k-ft Flange Thickness 0.188 in Plate Dimensions Web Thickness 0.188 in Plate Length 10.000 in Allowable Stresses Plate Width 10.000 in Concrete fc 2,500.0 psi Plate Thickness 0.375 in Base Plate Fy 36.00 ksi Load Duration Factor 1.330 Support Pier Size Anchor Bolt Data Pier Length 12.000 in Dist.from Plate Edge 2.000 in Pier Width 12.000 in Bolt Count per Side 4 Tension Capacity 5.500 k Bolt Area 0.307 in2 Summary Baseplate OK Concrete Bearing Stress Bearing Stress OK Actual Bearing Stress 152.2 psi Allow per ACI 10.15 1,785.0 psi Full Bearing:No Bolt Tension Allow per AISC J9 1,396.5 psi Plate Bending Stress Thickness OK Actual tb 33,173.8 psi Max Allow Plate Fb 35,910.0 psi Tension Bolt Force Bolt Tension OK Actual Tension 0.000 k Allowable 5.500 k r i I I Chris C. Covington Title: Job# F I North Star Building Dsgnr: Date: 9:48AM, 1 AUG 01 2210 Hewitt Ave, Suite 401 Description Everett,WA 98201 Scope Re 510303 Page 1 U..,;KW-0603169,V.,5.1.3,22-Jan-1999,Win32 Restrained Retaining Wall Design (c)1963-99 MERV= Description FOUNDATION WALL-- ALL LOADS PRESENT Criteria Soil Data Footing Strengths&Dimensions Retained Height = 8.50 ft Allow Soil Bearing = 2,000.0 psf fc = 2,500 psi Fy = 60,000 psi Wall height above soil = 0.50 ft Equivalent Fluid Pressure Method Min.As% = 0.0014 Total Wall Height = 9.00 ft Heel Active Pressure = 35.0 Toe Width = 4.00 ft Toe Active Pressure = 35.0 Heel Width = 2.33 Passive Pressure = 300.0 Total Footin Width = -6- Top Support Height = 8.00 ft Water height over heel = 0.0 ft g ST Sloe Behind Wall = 0.00:1 = Footing Thickness - 12.00 in p Footing�ISoil Friction 0.300 Height of Soil over Toe = 0.00 in Soil height to ignore Key Width = 0.00 in Soil Density = 110.00 cf g g _ Key Depth = 0.00 in P for passive pressure - 0.00 in _ Key Distance from Toe - 0.00 ft Wind on Stem = 0.0 psf Cover @ Top = 3.00 in @ Btm.= 3.00 in Surcharge Loads i Uniform Lateral Load Applied to Stem (Adjacent Footing Load Surcharge Over Heel = 100.0 psf Lateral Load - 0.0#/ft Adjacent Footing Load = 1,300.0 lbs >>>Used To Resist Sliding&Overturning ,,.Height to Top = 0.00 ft Footing Width = 1.00 ft Surcharge Over Toe = 0.0 psi = Eccentricity = 0.00 in Used for Sliding&Overturning Height to Bottom 0.00 ft ty Wall to Ftg CL Dist 0.50 ft Axial Load Applied to Stem Footing Type Line Load -- . Base Above/Below Soil Axial Dead Load = 1,500.0 lbs at Back of Wall 0.0 ft Axial Live Load - 0.0 lbs Axial Load Eccentricity 0.0 in Design Summary Concrete Stem Construction x t•/t�xxtN04Yfa•! :httirr:r�M:Y .G:K.tau:: �V+/Ai+imW751tY+`.t'J++=:!t{:�.rHtcl.t•ur<-:�rr,� Total Bearing Load = 5127 lbs Thickness = 10.00 in Fy = 60,000 psi ...resultant ecc. = 11.70 in Wall Weight = 125`0 pcf fc = 2,500 psi Soil Pressure @ Toe = 62 psf OK Stem is FIXED to top of footing Soil Pressure @ Heel = 1,557 psf OK Allowable = 2,000 psf Mmax Between Soil Pressure Less Than Allowable @ Top Support Top&Base @ Base of Wall ACI Factored @ Toe = 67 psf Stem OK Stem OK Stem OK ACI Factored @ Heel = 2,180 psf Design height = 8.00 ft 5.72 ft 0.00 ft Footing Shear @ Toe = 21.1 psi OK Rebar Size = # 6 # 6 # 6 Footing Shear @ Heel = 24.8 psi OK Rebar Spacing = 12.00 in 12.00 in 12.00 in Allowable = 85.0 psi Rebar Placed at = Center Center Center Reaction at Top = 2,563.6 lbs Rebar Depth 'd' = 5.00 in 5.00 in 5.00 in Reaction at Bottom = 1,654.0-lbs Design Data - fb/FB+fa/Fa = 0.172 0.223 0.390 Sliding Calcs Slab Resists All Sliding I Mu....Actual = 1,524.1 ft-# 1,978.7 ft-# 3,461.5ft-# Lateral Sliding Force = 1,644.0lbs Mn`Phi.....Allowable = 8,872.0-ft-# 8,872.0 ft-# 8,872.0 ft-# Shear Force @ this height = '0.0 lbs 2,224.7 lbs Shear.....Actual = 0.00 psi 37.08 psi Shear.....Allowable = 85.00 psi 85.00 psi Footing Desie Results Lei Rebar Lap Required = 28.08 in 28.08 in :. ,T.BffREI'P. -oe Rebar embedment into footing - 6.00 in Factored Pressure = 87 2,180 psf Other Acceptable Sizes&Spacings: Mu':Upward = 4,220 0 ft-# Toe:#5 @ 12.00 in -or- #4@ 17.00 in,#5@ 26.25 In,#6@ 37.00 in,#7Q 48. Mu':Downward = 1,680 1,866 ft-# Heel:#5 @ 12.00 in -or- Not req'd,Mu<S`Fr Mu: Design = 2,540 1,866 ft4 Key: No key defined -or- No key defined Actual 1-Way Shear = 21.09 24.83 psi Allow 1-Way Shear = 85.00 85.00 psi 1 Chris C. Covington Title: Job# r2- North Star Building Dsgnr: Date: 9:48AM, 1 AUG 01 2210 Hewitt Ave, Suite 401 Description Everett,WA 98201 Scope: Fit, 510300 Page 2 <cY. . U: W.0603169,V,,5.1.3,22-J--1999.W632 Restrained Retaining Wall Design g (c)1903-99 EM"CAIC Description FOUNDATION WALL— ALL LOADS PRESENT Summa of Forces on Footing : Slab RESISTS sliding, stem is FIXED at footing Forces acting on footing for soil pressure >>>Sliding Forces are restrained by the adjacent slab Load&Moment Summary For Footing:For Soil Pressure Calcs Moment @ Top of Footing Applied from Stem 2,035.2 ft-# Surcharge Over Heel = 150.0 lbs 5.58 ft 837.3 ft-# Axial Dead Load on Stem = 1,500.0 Ibs 4.42 ft 6,625.0 ft-# Soil Over Toe = Ibs ft ft-# Surcharge Over Toe = Ibs ft ft-# Stem Weight = 1,125.Olbs 4.42 It 4,968.8 ft-# Soil Over Heel 1,402.2lbs 5.58 ft 7,828.7 ft-# Footing Weight = 950.0lbs 3.17 ft 3,008.0 ft-# Total Vertical Force = 5,127.1 Ibs Base Moment = 21,232.5 ft-# Soil Pressure Resulting Moment= -4,997.lk-# i i 100.psf tic l's . .,, .in from CL r ti ad=1300.# DL=1500.,LL=0.0005#, Ecc=0.0005n _ 3b �iEE irE�E�i((�f{t 1 EEEfEE'tE E E' ' Lateral Restraint 2564.# �I Sliding Restraint Pp=150.# 1881.6# 61.956psf 1557,2psf i �: rF 0 c n ors " w tij F- (f) 2� 0 �-3 Hcn �j Z C) m Ili �o �� m 0 �u c� m Lk) H (7) (7) �-3 t) Lyl UMH c) >1 H cn > Hm :EC) ti� C) cn j 0 0 2� 10 00 0 Oo#t-tij �u N) -j � 0 op > r r w 3 0 Ln �-A oom m tz) C) CY t:j goy-] �--, �,D 0 F-3 00 0 tij L'i .: . •� r �. i� . , I C I T Y OF A R L I NO T ON CONSTRUCTION PE RM I T PERM I T NO_ : Oa-5 19 1 Owner: PUGET WEST CORP 11807 7TH ST HE LAKE STEVENS 98258 Value of Mork: $231,018.00 Tax ID: 310520-004-014-00 Phone: 425.359.4487 Describe Mork: NEW CONSRUCTION Proposed Use: CAR WASH, QUICK LUBE L ESPRESSO STAND Legal Description: Job Address: 17316 35TH AVE NE Contractor's Rase Type Address License# PUGET WEST CORPORATION GEN P.O. BOX 3535 PUGETWC187XG NORTHWEST PLUMBING PLB 13809 30TH AVE HE NORTHPN0990G OLYMPIC MECHANICAL NEC PO BOX 5326 OLYMPH11700 TOTALS Fee Permit Fee $1,846.50 Plan Fee $1,200.23 State fee $4.50 Traffic Mitigation $34,254.00 SIGNATURE. TOTAL FEE................. $37,395.23 I Uf6REBY CERTIFY THAT-1 HAVE READ AN AMINED THIS APPLICATION AND PAYMERTS.................. $1,650.00 KM W HE SAME TO BE TRUE AND COR- RE T A L PROVISIONS F LAW AND TOTAL DUE................. $35,655.23 Oft INA CES VERMIN THIS YPE OF WO K W LL B MP I WIT WHETHER SP CI IED N I OT. DATE RECEIPT # �`— BUI TMG O IAL 1 I I 5q7 L G � 1 V V T I M R-3q IAO T T D l_.1 N T r M O D _ _C)M -1" I M R Ir4 bc. 'be aI43V3;c 3AAJ 30 12 HTV 7&811 `tiAG) T23W "T,ii]u9 :,renr0 :QI xsT :A.Iov 3o eutnV AOITDUR214LIJ W314 :-17oM edi-mass GMA T G 02232 9L:3 .$ 3 8UJ Y OMW H2AW HAD :9sU besogozq :noilgi7oe9U lspe.l ;nth 3VA HT2 ' c1lt'C1 mewibbA do[, lesnsoi.l see'tbbA sgyT exam s'7o.tos-r.tnoa Od[C813WT3OU9 2Cpa XOH .O.? H3O HOITARO ROD T23W T3OU9 c?WE POK9HTAOV 3K 3VA HT9C 298E-1 RJ9 @RldKUJ9 T23WHTROK GOVIIM9MY.10 KUU XOR O 031Kf JAOTWAHAM OI9MYJO 9e3 2JATOT 92 .am ,L2 3a9 .timleq 99q a1s19 �Z,p2 993 9f8�' 412%; noiJspiJA .oi33szT :3SUTAM12 JAH 3VAH 1 TAHT 'i'di AK 783R4 1 ES.29E.TE* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .334 JATOT 11AA HCI TA3IJ99A c:If!'; (13M 1 NAX3 11,0A -RO') AA 311H T 3a 07 JMAZ 3HT W N ae.wa ate . . . . . . . . . . . . . • .. . .2TM3MyAq 1111A dNAJ 3LT C-340121VOR9 JJA T 3Si IL' 3gYT 21HT UlM.0CM 233MAYlI 10 Cs.eca,ece . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . ..MU JATOT H3HT3HW HTIW 13i.19M0jif 4R .1.lrw R C1W if1l M Q3::9:) 92 N T'9I303R _ -- .1A JmI0.1 HIU CASCADE TESTINg, LABORATORY, INC. TESTING&INSPECTIC ENGINEERS PREVIOUS 122347 12919 N.E. 126TH PLACE REPORT No, No. KIRKLAND,WASHINGTON 98034 (425)823-9800 EVERETT (425)259-0817 DATE CERT.NO. FIELD REPORT PRNWT, 1 LOCATION TO: t BLDG.PERMIT NO. OWNER ggZ_z7 REcErvE�, WEATHER TEMP. AT AM APR //�� V 2 oe AT PM ENGINEER CITY OF�a� 1.�.,,..... /;,1 1%4 1 VIM ARCHIT CTj � ATTN: C9f7ACTOR / INSPECTION PERFORMED ITEMS I SPECTED _ FOUNDATIONS _ RESTEEL/CONCRETE _ RESTEEL ONLY _ FOOTINGS _ SLAB RESTEEL/MASONRY _ STR.ST/WELDING _ AUGER CAST PILES _/COLUMNS OTHER — STR.ST/BOLTING — DRILLED PIERS Y WALLS BEAMS 4 i c C� LOCATION(AREAS) P " r CONCRETE/MASONRY MIX NO. I/ �(J -/ DESIGN STRENGTH(f'c) 2�S/ SUPPLIER Y Y���'_� tPU 1�i l 5 TOTAL CU.YD.PLACED SLUMP(INCHES) SPECIMENS CAST AIR CONTENT(%) SEE CYLINDER REPORT NO. _YES_NO_ITEMS INSPECTED WERE IN CONFORMANCE WITH BLDG.DEPT.APPROVED PLANS REMARKS: 2:n ` Vr Z / G z 3 61 TEST RESULTS APPLY ONLY TO THE ITEMS HEREIN TESTED.THIS REPORT SHALL NOT INSPECTOR(S),NAME(S)PRINTED /u'1►6e otJ BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL,WITH- OUT THE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY,INC. INSPECTOR SIGNATURE REVISED 8= SIGNED BY COPIES TO: ! ��� . �' ^ . - , � � � �1 . u / � �w . . ^ / � ^ - -- � / ' - -- . - / . . . = .^ , � � -- - ! - ^ | . - ~ . � ° - - , / EDCASCADE TESTIJW c3 LABORATORY, INC. 114829 TESTING&INSPECTIC' -NGINEERS PREVIOUS 12919 N.E. 126TH PLACE REPORT NO. No. KIRKLAND,WASHINGTON 96034 (425)823-9800 EVERETT (425)259-0817 DAT CERT. NO. ,L/= 1FI ELD REPORT �� PROJET L ATION TO: B DG.PER NO. / OWNER WEATHER TEMP. AT AM �v� b AT M ENGIN ER G ARC I C ATTN: C NTR CTO (2) (3) a INSPECTION PERFORMED ITEMS INSPECTED — FOUNDATIONS EEUCONCRETE RESTEEL ONLY FOOTINGS — SLAB RESTEEUMASONRY _ STR.STMIELDING _ AUGER CAST PILES — C0 MNS —OTHER — STR.ST/BOLTING — DRILLED PIERS WALLS BEAMS (4) LOCATION(AREAS) r � ( ( / O CONCRETE/MASO Y MI NO. �_ DESIGN STRENGTH(f'c) SUPPLIER TOTAL CU.YD.PLACED SLUMP(INCHES) SPECIMENS CAST AIR CONTENT(%) SEE CYLINDER REPORT NO. YES_NO_ITEMS INSPECTED WERE IN CONFORMANCE WITH BLDG.DEPT.APPROVED PLANS REMARKS: 57 r TEST RESULTS APPLY ONLY TO THE ITEMS �5S HEREIN TESTED.THIS REPORT SHALL NOT INSPECTOR(S),NAME(S)PRINT fi; BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL;WITH- OUT THE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY,INC. INSPECTOR SIGNATURE REVISED a= SIGNED BY COPIES TO:C z<; • �� � r e �: r � _ i - - _ _ � _ ■ I - II I � • - � r � - - • - � — . - CASCADE TEST1-a�3 LABORATORY, INC. TESTING&INSPECTIC ENGINEERS PREVIOUS 114825 12919 N.E. 126TH PLACE REPORT No. No. KIRKLAND,WASHINGTON 98034 (425)823-9800 EVERETT (425)259-0817 DAT CERT.NO. h7l::2,(�2 7� (23n(- 7-3 FIELD REPORT PRO CT LeKqcc 62r� Lu�v_ LOCATION TO. 1472J�6 BLD6.PERMIT NO. OWNER WEAT R SZ TEMP. ATYj�Q® O AT PM INEER / l 5)V ab>A A HI T �- Sev ATTN: `.y CONT CTOR we'�� (2) (3) V INSPECTION PERFORMED ITEMS INSPECTED -. FOUNDATIONS EELCONCRETE _ RESTEEL ONLY _ FOOTINGS _ SLAB RESTEEUMASONRY _ STR.STIWELDING _ AUGER CAST PILES _ CO MNS —OTHER — STR.STIBOLTING — DRILLED PIERS WALLS BEAMS LOCATION(AREAS) �� t w ` \ �CL 6 �G r t t co ,zn� A ` 17 CONCRETE/MASO Yt MIX N . DESIGN STRENGTH(Pc) t SUPPLIER V TOTAL CU.YD.PLACED SLUMP(INCHES) U 1 SPECIMENS CAST AIR CONTENT(%) SEE CYLINDER REPORT NO. 5 qn —YES—NO—ITEMS INSPECTED WERE IN CONFORMANCE WITH BLDG.DEPT.APPROVED PLANS REMARKS: 6zce S (' S a n � 6r_0 C 1/ 126)W& OU,�7IV f TEST RESULTS APPLY ONLY TO THE ITEMS HEREIN TESTED.THIS REPORT SHALL NOT INSPECTOR(S),NAME(S)PRINTE BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL,WITH- OUT THE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF CASCADE J. TESTING LABORATORY,INC. INSPECTOR SIGNATURE REVISED a= SIGNED BY COPIES TO:1'T� �'.". .. �;� _ •- - � . z w•• I � • .. - IcCASCADE TESTY-_, LABORATORY, INC. 122341 TESTING&INSPECTIO INGINEERS PREVIOUS 12919 N.E. 126TH PLACE REPORT No. No. KIRKLAND,WASHINGTON 98034 (425)823-9800 EVERETT (425)259-0817 DATE CERT.NO. _ i / l FIELD REPORT P CT LOCATION �I TO: r 7 BLDG.PERMIT NO. OWNER l�D '43o ),- 96 Zz3 WEATHER TEMP. AT AM 9 AT PM ENGINEER 9 � ARCHIT CT ATTN: 4 L f `L (2) (3) U INSPECTION PERFORMED ITEMS INSPECTED — FOUNDATIONS _ RESTEELICONCRETE _ RESTEEL ONLY _ FOOTINGS _ SLAB -1,—/RESTEEL/MASONRY _ STR.ST/WELDING _ AUGER CAST PILES _ COLUMNS OTHER — STR.ST/BOLTING — DRILLED PIERS WALLS BEAMS (4) LOCATIO N.(AREAS) i CONCRETE/MA,SnAIBY MIX NO. DESIGN STRENGTH(f'c) 7�OD SUPPLIER TOTAL CU.YD.PLACED / �: SLUMP(INCHES) SPECIMENS CAST AIR CONTENT(/o) SEE CYLINDER REPORT NO. r YES—NO ITEMS INSPECTED WERE IN CONFORMANCE WITH BLDG.DEPT.APPROVED PLANS REMARKS: l 7`� r T\ f vc�Q ,�tj lO 1c z a4 Art-v y TEST RESULTS APPLY ONLY TO THE ITEMS HEREIN TESTED.THIS REPORT SHALL NOT INSPECTOR(S),NAME(S)PRINTED BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL,WITH- OUT THE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY,INC. INSPECTOR SIGNATURE REVISED 8W SIGNED BY e �" COPIES TO: . // r t x � �� A� iw f 1 '.1 � � - - - .. - - 1 - �- - - - � • - - i - s ' - � FIELD CASCADE TES1 ING LABORATORY, INC- REPORT Nu.W5 NO. 5 0 4 0 5 TESTING&INSPECTION/ENGINEERS DATE CERT.NO. 12919 N.E. 126TH PLACE KIRKLAND,WASHINGTON 98034 (425) e23-9800 wz_n� 1 EVERETT (423)259.0317 PR T COMPRESSION REPORT LOCATION / I/ d' B D .PERMIT NO. NER TO: WEATHER TEMP. AT AM ENGIN ER C It ARCHITECT ATTN. _i THE FOLLOWING WAS NOTED: CONTRA OR FIELD TEST DATA ("162, agtoH DATA FOR DESIGN % ADJUSTED TRUCK SAMPLED TRUCK TICKET NO O MIX NO cu.YD. WEIGHTS MOIST WEIGHTS SLUMP UNIT CEMENT TEMP. CEMENT TIME ASTM C-143 %AIR WEIGHT YIELD FACTOR ASTM C-1064 FLY ASH ASTM C-138 CONC E AIR 3-70 C.A. C.A. — - AIR TEST METHOD: ❑PRESSURE ASTM C-231 OR ❑VOLUME ASTM C-173 FINE AGG. EQUIPMENT USED I.D. WATER SLUMP CONE CSLCOO QO THERMOMETER CCOTHO OQ5 TOTAL AIRMETER CCOAIO OTHER TYPE OF BREAK: (A)Cone (C)Cone and Shear (b)Cone and Split (d)Shear (a)Columnar COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH CYLINDER DATE DATE AGE AREA TOTAL STRENGTH TYPE NUMBER MA E TESTED DAYS SIZE (SQ.IN) LOAD PSI BREAK 9 -I g CONCRETE COMPRESSION MACHINE I.D.#CCOCOOO ❑ASTM C-1231 ❑ASTM C-617 SAMPLING E ACCORDANCE WITH SAMPLE P/U DATE T.E�STj METHOD /�_ APPLICABLE CODES&SPECS. SUPPLIER �LL� �/ �r�G-lam CEMENT TYPE — CU.YARDS PLACED AEA_ M � CAC12 % DESIGN STRENGTH PLACEMENTAREA&NOTES tzas nlrj(::�d ',61V a2WP TEST RESULTS APPLY ONLY TO THE ITEMS HEREIN TESTED.THIS REPORT SHALL NOT INSPECTOR(S),NAME(S)PRINTE BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL,WITH- OUT THE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY,INC. INSPECTOR SIGNATURE REVISED 1/022 SIGNED BY COPIES TO:/��0" - . e 1 al ► -- i Fes■ , re rot-- -ice - FIELD CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY, INC. REPORT Nu. &YJ L-1— No. 5 0 4 01 MUTESTING&INSPECTION/ ENGINEERS DATE CERT.NO. 12919 N.E. 126 PLACE D ,IRK LAND,WASHINGTON 98034 (425) 923-9e00 73 EVERETT (425)259-0817 PRO1ECT 70 L16(.cc F=K032.-Z L12s, COMPRESSION REPORT LOCATION I Z &O—cz, LG.PERMIT N . OWNER TO: O 1 W H R TEMP. AT f,Tj& � eAL �O AT PM ENGI EER ARC 1 ECT ATTN _ THE FOLLOWING WAS NOTED: \� e CON C R FIELD TEST DATA I�drCH DATA FOR DESIGN % ADJUSTED TRUCK SAMPLED TRUCK TICKET NO O _ MIX NO Cu YD WEIGHTS MOIST. WEIGHTS SLUMP UNIT CEMENT (EMP. CEMENT TIME ASTM C-14 %AIR WEIGHT YIELD FACTOR ASTM C-1064 FLY ASH ASTM C-138 CONC AIR 1 .� — p 0 C.A. 01 C.A. C.A. AIR TEST METHOD: ❑PRESSURE ASTM C-231 OR ❑VOLUME ASTM C-173 FINE AGG. lee EQUIPMENT USED I.D. WATER o SLUMP CONE CSLCOO 0,05'THERMOMETER CCOTHO C-0- TOTAL AIRMETER CCOAlo OTHER_ TYPE OF BREAK: (A)Cone (C)Cone and Shear (b)Cone and Split (d)Shear (e)Columnar COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH CYLINDER DATE DATE AGE AREA TOTAL STRENGTH TYPE NUMBER M E TESTED DAYS SIZE _ (SO.IN) LOAD PSI BREAK Z 6 f6w . Z f#-, CONCRETE COMPRESSION MACHINE I.D.#CCOCOOO ❑ASTM C-1231 ❑ASTM C-617 SAMPLING E ACCORDANCE WITH SAMPLE P/�Zf TEST METHOD_ APPLICABLE CODES&SPECS. (V 1 1 � SUPPLIER CEMENT TYPE CU.YARDS PLACED AEA A 4 CAC12 % DESIGN STRENGTH PLACEMENTAREA&NOTES VaN 4 PUAtO ' TEST RESULTS APPLY ONLY TO THE ITEMS HEREIN TESTED.THIS REPORT SHALL NOT INSPECTOR(S),NAME(S)PRINTED BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL,WITH- OUT THE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY,INC. INSPECTOR SIGNATURE REVISED 1/02 SIGNED BY / COPIES TO:7�,AW 3A ti r _ -�. ��� City of Arlington Development Services Minor Development Permit �P'ti�o September 20, 2002 Texaco Xpress Lube MN-02-025 I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND REQUEST Texaco Xpress Lube requests a minor land use permit for the development of a 1,700 square foot 3-bay Texaco Xpress Lube with connecting 1,475 square foot 4-bay carwash and separate 120 square foot espresso stand. The project will be served with water and sewer from the City of Marysville. The site is zoned Highway Commercial. II. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Owner: Texaco Xpress Lube, ATTN: Tim Kaintz, 11807 7th Street NE, Lake Stevens, WA 98258 2. Applicant/Contact Person: Finley Architects, ATTN: Bill Finley, PO Box 1008, Everett, WA 98206 3. General Location: The site is located at the southwest corner of 173`d Place NE and Smokey Point Boulevard, in Section 20, Township 31, Range 05, W.M. (Tax ID No. 203105-4-014-0000) 4. Address of Property: No address has been assigned to this vacant parcel 5. Description of Proposal: Development of a 3-bay Texaco Xpress Lube, 4-bay carwash, and espresso stand 6. Acreage: Approximately 0.53 acre, or 22,946 square feet 7. Comprehensive Land Use Designations, Zoning Designation and Existing Land Uses of the Site and Surrounding Area: AREA LAND USE DESIGNATION ZONING EXISTING USE Project site Highway Commercial Highway Commercial Commercial North of site Highway Commercial Highway Commercial Commercial South of site Highway Commercial Highway Commercial Commercial East of site Highway Commercial Highway Commercial Commercial West of site Highway Commercial --+Highway Commercial Commercial rt EATexaco Xpress Lube MN02-025\Texaco Permit.doc S FP 24 2002 yjp;9/20/02 Page 1 of 8 u r � � - i i �� �� - _ . . Minor Development Permit September 20, 2002 Texaco Xpress Lube MN-02-025 8. Public Utilities and Services Provided by: Water: City of Marysville Gas: Cascade Natural Gas Sewer: City of Marysville Cable TV: AT&T Broadband Garbage: Waste Management Northwest Police: City of Arlington Storm Water: City of Arlington Fire: City of Arlington Telephone: Verizon School: Lakewood School District Electricity: Snohomish County PUD #1 Hospital: Cascade Valley Hospital 9. Public Notification: Minor Permits that are categorically exempt under Chapter 32.21 C RCW (SEPA) are exempt from publication (UDC VII.C.5.c. and g. and WAC 197-11-800). III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The proposal was categorically exempt under Chapter 32.21 C RCW (SEPA). IV. BACKGROUND The subject minor development permit review application was received by the City of Arlington on June 18, 2002, and the application was verbally deemed incomplete on July 16, 2002. Additional information was received by the City of Arlington on July 22, 2002, and the application was deemed complete on July 23, 2002. V. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Application Process: The minor development permit application was received by the City of Arlington on June 18, 2002. The application was deemed complete on July 23, 2002. A minor development permit is an administrative review process per City of Arlington Uniform Development Code (UDC) Chapter VII, Sections CA and C.S. 2. Comprehensive Plan and Zoning: The City of Arlington Comprehensive Plan identifies this area as being Highway Commercial, and the subject property is zoned Highway Commercial per UDC Chapter III, zoning map, Page III-2. Automobile Service Stations and Retail Trade Establishments are permitted uses per UDC Chapter V, Section H. 3. Lot Dimensions, Density, and Related Requirements: The proposed development complies with the minimum lot dimensions for Automobile Service Stations and Retail Trade Establishments (0.5 acre in size and 100-foot minimum width) and yard setbacks (front 25 feet, rear 25 feet, and each side 25 feet) and with maximum building height (50 feet). Lot coverage is not applicable in the Highway Commercial zone. 4. Non-residential Performance Standards: The proposed development must comply with the standards of performance for noise, lighting, odors and gases, particulate matter, electrical interference, hazardous materials storage, waste disposal, open storage, maintenance and alterations, and hazardous waste facilities per UDC Chapter IX, Section B.2. EATexaco Xpress Lube MN02-025\Texaco Permit.doc yjp;9/20/02 Page 2 of 8 I Minor Development Permit September 20, 2002 Texaco Xpress Lube MN-02-025 5. Off-Street Parking: Per UDC Chapter IX, Section C.4, Parking Requirements, the proposed use requires 12 parking spaces at 3 spaces per service bay for the express lube, which is 3 bays, for 9 spaces; 3.6 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area for the office, which is approximately 430 square feet, for 2 spaces; and 3.3 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area for the espresso stand, which is 120 square feet, for 1 space; plus a dumpster space. No loading spaces are required, and the Planning Manager has determined no parking spaces are required for the 4-bay carwash because it is self-serve. The proposed site plan shows 8 parking spaces plus 3 spaces in front and 3 spaces behind the express lube service bays for a total of 14, plus a dumpster space, which meets the minimum requirements. 7. Landscaping: The final site plan shall comply with the requirements of UDC Chapter IX, Section N, Landscaping. The required landscaping for Automobile Service Stations/Retail Trade Establishments use is category B, which requires 10 feet of Type III landscaping adjacent to all street frontages. The landscape requirement for the parking area is a minimum of 17-1/2 square feet of landscaping for each parking stall for the first 50 spaces and 35 square feet for each parking space over 50 per Chapter IX, Section N.7. The landscape plan reflects sufficient frontage and parking area landscaping to meet the general landscape requirements specified in Chapter IX, Section N.7. Plant material must be guaranteed for one year with any replacements guaranteed for one year also. 8. Transportation: The proposed development is located at the southwest corner of 173`d Place NE and Smokey Point Boulevard. It is anticipated that this project will add 506 new average weekday daily vehicular trips, which includes 33 p.m.- peak-hour trips, to the street system, as well as pedestrian and bicycle trips. The site will be accessed off of Smokey Point Boulevard and 173rd Place NE. Frontage improvements will be constructed along the site frontage of 173rd Place NE and Smokey Point Boulevard, with access on Smokey Point Boulevard limited to right-in, right-out only. The applicant has requested vacation of unused right-of-way on 173" Place NE, and the drawings reflect the proposed property line. The existing property line must be used until such time as the vacation has been approved through the City of Arlington right-of-way vacation process. In addition, Ordinance No. 1208 requires the developer to pay transportation impact fees for each new p.m.-peak-hour trip at the fee in effect at the time of payment to mitigate for off-site impacts. (NOTE: The current transportation impact fee is $1,038.00 for each p.m.-peak-hour trip, but this may change.) City transportation impact fees shall be paid prior to issuance of any building permits. (NOTE: Because the project was categorically exempt from SEPA, the project is not subject to WSDOT or Snohomish County transportation mitigation fees.) 9. Stormwater Management: The City has adopted storm drainage requirements per Arlington Municipal Code Chapter 13.28, Stormwater Management, and the Department of Ecology's Stormwater Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin (The Technical Manual). A preliminary review of the system indicates that they have a conceptually feasible plan. A detailed drainage review will occur during the site/civil review process. EATexaco Xpress Lube MN02-025\Texaco Permit.doc yjp;9/20/02 Page 3 of 8 I Minor Development Permit September 20, 2002 Texaco Xpress Lube MN-02-025 10. Critical Areas: There are no critical areas as defined in the City's critical areas regulations on or near the proposed development. 11. Airport Management: The Arlington Municipal Airport requires that street lamps or light poles located on the property be down-shielded as to avoid interfering with flight operations. 12. Water and Sanitary Sewer: Adequate water and sewer service is available to the site from the City of Marysville; utility services to the building and fire hydrants and fire protection as required will be reviewed when construction drawings are submitted. All existing and planned utilities shall be shown on the site plan. 13. Criteria for Approval of an Application and Issuance of a Permit: Per UDC Chapter VII, Section D, Criteria for Approval, the Development Services Department, Planning Division, is required to review for compliance the following criteria before an application can be approved. a. The development is consistent with the dimensional, density requirements and Performance Standards of the UDC and other applicable laws and regulations; and Staff Analysis: As identified above, the development is consistent with the dimensional, density requirements, and Performance Standards of the UDC and other applicable laws and regulations. b. The development as proposed incorporates, to the maximum extent feasible, mitigation measures to substantially lessen or eliminate all adverse environmental impacts of the development; and Staff Analysis: The development as proposed incorporates, to the maximum extend feasible, best management practices to lessen or eliminate all adverse environmental impacts of the development. C. The applicant has presented certification that the applicant has filed and paid all the taxes, penalties and interest, and that the applicant has satisfactorily made agreement to pay the taxes (NOTE: this requirement is only applicable to subdivision plats); and Staff Analysis: This requirement is only applicable to subdivision plats. d. Prior to final approval the applicant has followed all permit processing procedures and paid all applicable land use fees. Staff Analysis: As stated above, all permit processing procedures have been followed and a condition is included that requires that all applicable land use fees be paid prior to final decision. VI. CONCLUSIONS 1. The City of Arlington Comprehensive Plan identifies this area as Highway Commercial, and the subject property is zoned Highway Commercial per UDC Chapter III, zoning map, Page III-2. Automobile Service Stations and Retail Trade Establishments are permitted uses in the Highway Commercial zone per UDC Chapter V, Section H. Therefore, the proposed development as noted and conditioned is consistent with policies governing commercial uses and is allowed in the Highway Commercial zone. EATexaco Xpress Lube MN02-025\Texaco Permit.doc yip:9/20/02 Page 4 of 8 i Minor Development Permit September 20, 2002 Texaco Xpress Lube MN-02-025 2. The requested minor development permit as conditioned meets all UDC requirements, including Chapter VII, Section D, Criteria for Approval, and all other applicable codes. 3. The minor development permit should be approved subject to conditions noted below. VI I. DECISION The minor development permit is hereby APPROVED, subject to the followinq conditions: 1. All development shall be in substantial conformance with the approved site plan received June 18, 2002, subject to any conditions or modifications that may be required as part of the minor development permit. 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall file a drainage plan and construction plans, which meet the following conditions, in conjunction with a building permit application. The final site plan shall comply with all requirements of the Unified Development Code, Uniform Building Code, Uniform Fire Code and Public Works Construction Standards and Specifications. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall submit payment of the following estimated City of Arlington impact fees (based on 3,325 square feet of buildings): Traffic at $1,038.00 per p.m.-peak-hour trip, which is 33, or $34,254.00. (NOTE: Actual impact fees due are those as set by resolution at the time the fees are paid. These amounts are provided here as an estimate. They may either increase or decrease by the time they are paid.) 4. The access on Smokey Point Boulevard shall be limited to right-in, right-out only. 5. The existing property line on 173rd Place NE shall be used until such time as the vacation has been approved through the City of Arlington right-of-way vacation process. 6. All exterior lighting, including streetlights, shall be down-shielded. 7. If any archaeological materials are discovered on the site, the State Historical Preservation Officer, the Stillaguamish Tribe, and the City of Arlington shall be contacted and measures taken to preserve the materials and the site. 8. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall clear all outstanding land use permit-processing accounts with the City. 9. The minor development permit shall become null and void if use and reliance is not established within one year of the below date of approval. Vill. CODE REQUIREMENT (NOTE: The following items are not conditions of permit approval, rather certain local, state, or federal code requirements that the applicant needs to be aware of. This is in no way intended to EATexaco Xpress Lube MN02-025\Texaco Permit.doc yjp;9/20/02 Page 5 of 8 Minor Development Permit September 20, 2002 Texaco Xpress Lube MN-02-025 be a complete list of code requirements, but a general checklist of major steps and issues. Please refer to the AMC for a complete list of code requirements for your particular project type.) 1. Code Applicability. This application is subject to the applicable requirements contained in the Arlington Municipal Code, Zoning Code, and Building Code. It is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure compliance with the various provisions contained in these ordinances. 2. Pre-Construction Phase. Prior to commencing any site work, including installing any easement or right-of-way improvements, utility systems, drainage systems, street lights, mailbox structures, emergency facilities, storm water control systems, or any other improvements, improvement plans must be submitted for review and approval by the Department of Development Services, Engineering Division. Said plans shall be in conformance with applicable code and below listed conditions. a. The applicant shall survey and mark all property corners prior to review of any submitted construction plans. b. The applicant will be required to design and install erosion control measures deemed necessary by the City. These measures must be installed and inspected by the City prior to the issuance of any permits. C. No site preparation or other disturbances shall be undertaken within environmentally sensitive areas or their required buffers. d. Submit to the Engineering Division and receive approval of a storm-water run-off and detention plan in conformance with the AMC Chapter 13.28, Stormwater Management, and the Department of Ecology's Stormwater Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin (The Technical Manual) for both the construction phase and a permanent system. All site drainage must be directed through biofiltration swales prior to discharge into wetlands. e. All new utility lines shall be placed underground. f. Provide a temporary rock pad at all points of ingress and egress to the site throughout the construction phase. g. On the construction plans show locations of all required streetlights to be installed as designed. h. A right-of-way permit is required for and prior to any work done in a public right-of-way. i. All lighting shall be low sodium or similar low intensity illumination and placed in a way as to not cause glare on an adjoining property or right-of- way. E:\Texaco Xpress Lube MN02-025\Texaco Permit.doc yip; 9/20/02 Page 6 of 8 Minor Development Permit September 20, 2002 Texaco Xpress Lube MN-02-025 3. Construction Phase. The following conditions shall apply during construction. a. All applicable noise and other nuisance codes are applicable. b. Mud and dirt shall not be tracked onto public rights-of-way, but if tracked by accident shall be immediately cleaned-up. C. During any site grading or clearing activity, the applicant and contractor shall use all available means of controlling air pollution (dust, ash, and smoke). d. The restrictions of the AMC shall apply to any-and all grading. 3. Installation of Improvements. Prior to receiving a building permit, the applicant shall: a. Install all rights-of-way and access easement improvements on all proposed streets internal and existing streets adjacent to the project per the requirements of UDC Chapter IX.A.1.c.12-20 or City of Arlington Ordinance 1213 adopted November 1, 1999. The applicant shall coordinate with all adjacent developments the final design of the street improvements and/or include the appropriate transition tapers for the street pavement to be included from the property. Improvements shall meet the following classifications: 1. Install frontage improvements along 173rd Place NE to Local Access street standards. 2. Install frontage improvements along Smokey Point Boulevard to Collector Arterial street standards, with access limited to right-in, right-out only. b. Install a potable water system to serve the project per City of Arlington's Engineering Division requirements. Water is to be served by the City of Marysville. C. Install a sanitary sewer system created per Engineering Division requirements. Sanitary sewer is provided by the City of Marysville. d. Relocate any existing water facilities and/or install water services/fire hydrants prior to the required improvements at the expense of the developer. e. Install a permanent storm water control system, per AMC Chapter 13.28. f. In lieu of completing any of the above improvements, the applicant may submit to the Engineering Division a performance security to cover the cost of installing any or all of the improvements within one year of the date of permit approval. However, no Certificates of Occupancy may be issued until all improvements are completed E:\Texaco Xpress Lube MN02-025\Texaco Permit.doc Ylp:9/20/02 Page 7 of 8 ` - ., ,�, MI Minor Development Permit September 20, 2002 Texaco Xpress Lube MN-02-025 (NOTE: Infrastructure requirements are based on conceptual information as submitted by the applicant. Additional specific requirements may be required upon review of the engineered construction drawings as submitted by the applicant. All improvements are subject to review and approval by the Engineering Division. All utilities shall be constructed underground.) IX. APPEALS To appeal this decision or the SEPA threshold determination, an appeal application must be filed, with all required fees, within 10 working days of the date of issuance of this decision. The City Council (or a Hearing Examiner, if so appointed by the Council) would hear the appeal of the permit and their decision would be considered the City's final decision on the underlying governmental action. X. EXHIBITS 1. Approved drawings received by the City of Arlington received June 18, 2002. 2. File MN-02-025 (Texaco Xpress Lube). ORDERED THIS 20TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2002. C iff Strong, Plannin anager Re �ponsible Official Distributed to the Following Party of Record: • exaco Xpress Lube, ATTN: Tim Kaintz, 11807 7th Street NE, Lake Stevens, WA 98258 • /Finley Architects, ATTN: Bill Finley, PO Box 1008, Everett, WA 98206 • Paul Richart, City Engineer, Development Services, Engineering Division • Marc Hayes, Code Compliance, Development Services, Engineering Division • Dave Anderson, Building Official, Development Services, Building Division • Kerry Wentz, Plans Examiner/Building Inspector, Development Services, Building Division • Terry Castle, Utilities Superintendent, Development Services, Utilities Division • Bill Blake, Natural Resources Manager • Terri Littlejohn, Parks, General Services • Leroy Mills, Streets, General Services EATexaco Xpress Lube MN02-025\Texaco Permit.doc Ylp; 9/20/02 Page 8 of 8 I FIELD �/331(� No. 49588 CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY, INC. REPORT h�. TESTING&INSPECTION/ENGINEERS DATE CERT.N . 12919 N.E. 126TH PLACE KIRKLAND,WASHINGTON 9e034 1425) e23-9:00 i r EVERETT T425) 259-o17 PROJECT COMPRESSION REPORT _ W� 62�?� z EOCATION t7,31& d/ JBILDG.PERMIT NO. 9 IER TO: _ WEATHER TEMP' A j Glie� - v P ENGINEER —Revs AR HiTECT ATTN: THE FOLLOWING WAS NOTED: CONTRALTO 1 FIELD TEST DATA G� 8A DATA FOR DESIGN % ADJUSTED TRUCK SAMPLED � TRUCK TICKET NO. J /�� MIX NO. j 00 CU.YD, WEIGHTS MOIST. WEIGHTS UNIT TEMP. C MENT SLUMP CEMENT TIME ASTM C %AIR WEIGHT YIELD FACTOR ASTM C-1064 FLY ASH ASTM C-138 CONC AIR U r G G C.A. G 6 e S S C.A. C.A. AIR TEST METHOD: ❑PRESSURE ASTM C-231 OR ❑VOLUME ASTM C-173 FINE AGG. EQUIPMENT USED I.D. WATER D SLUMP CONE CSLCOO THERMOMETER CCOTHO TOTAL AIRMETER CCOAIO OTHER TYPE OF BREAK: (A)Cone (C)Cone and Shear (b)Cone and Split (d)Shear (a)Columnar COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH CYLINDER DATE DATE AGE AREA TOTAL STRENGTH TYPE NUMBER MADE TESTED DAYS SIZE (SQ.IN) LOAD PSI BREAK 1 -a 2-its 7 f 14 b 5-,PJ 2,fr T ✓ b0 c ? 0 CONCRETE COMPRESSION MACHINE I.D.#CCOCOOO ❑ASTM C-1231 El ASTM C-617 SAMPLING IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAMPLE PIU DDAAAT�' JEE � / TEST METHOD APPLICABLE CODES&SPECS. ` SUPPLIER e d e/C�x CEMENTTYPE CU.YARDS PLACED AEA ADMIX.I/ T 7 OCIACC112 % DESIGN STRENGTH PLACEMENT AREA&NOTES ri TEST RESULTS APPLY ONLY TO THE ITEMS HEREIN TESTED.THIS REPORT SHALL NOT INSPECTOR(S),NAME(S)PRINTED BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL,WITH- OUT THE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY,INC. INSPECTOR SIGNATURM REVISED 1N2 ' SIGNED BY COPIES TO: ' A ' CITY OF ARLINGTON CONSTRUCTION PERMIT ❑ COMBINATION ❑ BUILDING MECHANICAL ❑ PLUMBING ❑ SIGN PERMIT NO.C4-s�w OWNER MAIL ADDRESS CITY ZIP PHONE fd/ly jz_44 MLALC-1S/c x IfO•130 G/D �4ril STc�/ia�lJ�y,A ���53 ARCHITECT OR DESIGNLR MAIL ADDRESS CITY LIP PHONE GENERAL CUNTRACTOR MAIL ADDRESS CITY ZIP PHONE LICENSE N u6al[✓c35 Gulp. P O. 13011(l�S 3 5A L-IN bToA) gyp ;ga33 <i�S'39a iC 5't MLC►ANICAL CONTRACTOR MAIL ADDRESS CITY 21P PHONE LICENSE/ C X VI*9 D 1C PLUMBING CONTRACTOR MAIL ADDRESS CITY ZIP PHONE LICENSE/ CLASS OF WORK aNI.W Cl AUDITION ❑ALTERATION ❑REPAIR ❑DEMOLITION ❑BUILDING RELOCATION VALUATIONOF WORK s iaojoI DESCRIBE WORK _ 10 IIAC 1 FJ &yg1Tiv,; I 7Aov1J7 LAX �mHficCSl¢ sA i, PROPOSE U USL Of BUILDING I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICA- TION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT ALL PROVI- SIONS OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK LUI BLucK of WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HERIN OR NOT.THE GRANTING OFA PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUMETO GIVEAUTHORITYTO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR TAX ID NUMBER LOCAL LAW REGULATING CONSTRUCTION OF THE PERFORMANCEOF •310 —j a O,U�,)_cl o _ D 0 CONSTRUCTION.PERMIT EXPIRES 1 YEAR FROM DATE OF ISSUANCE. 108ADURLSS SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTOR OR AUTHORIZED AGENT DATE 7 1(- 5/ni;lLIC:'y CiN L✓: k�i��,a 1 C: ' 1 c�.:•'-/ x /' ,-L i 3 (OFFICE USE ONLY) PLUMBING M CHANI AL NO. I TYPE OF FIXTURE AE TYPE OF EQUIPMENT FEE WATER CLOSE] (TOILEI) / AIR COND.UNITS -H.P.EA. B I EI1 UB / REFRIGERATION UNITS-H.P.EA. LAVATURY(WASH BASIN) / BOILERS--H.P.EA SHOWLIX, / / GAS FIRED A.G.UNITS-TONNAGE EA. KI ICIIL'N SINK d UISP. Av / FORCED AIR SYSTEMS-B.T.U. MEA DISHWASHER "-, �, / N WALL HEATERS-B.T.U. M LAUNURY 1 RAY I / UNIT HEATERS-B.T.U. M CLOI IIES WASHER EVAPORAI IVE COOLERS WA I ER IIEATLR CLOTHES DRYERS URINAL / '3 VENTILATICN FAN DRINKING FOUNTAIN ' RANGE FIOOD COMMERCIAL I'LOOR DRAIN / AIR HANDLING UNIT- CPM VACUUMBREAKERS/ STOVE RUUI DRAINS - RAIN A METAL FIREPLACE&CHIMNEY SINK ISERVICE BAR, C. WATER HEATER 3 GAS PIPING a SUBTOTAL S SUBTOTAL 3 PERMIT S PERMIT 3 TOTAL FEE > TOTAL FEE > SIUL YARD SL IBACK STRLL] SL IBACK REAR YARD SETBACK PLAN CHECK NUMBER PLAN CHECK FEE FEE RECEIPT NO. U5I /UNI LOIAKEA VACANT SITE ❑YES ❑NO FEES VALUATION FEE I YPL OF CONS 1. OCCUPANCY GROUP NO.Of DWELLING UNITS PLAN CHECKING VG SI/L UI BLUG. NO.Of STURILS MAX.000.LOAD BUTDING S PLUMBING FIRE SPRINKLERS REQUIRED ❑YES ❑NO MECHANICAL COMMENTS,,,:,� STATE BLDG.CODE R E C E N E[ ENERGY CODE SURCHARGE PENALTY U.B.C. SEC.303(a) MAR 2 3 WATER/SEWER FEES TOTAL CITY ARUNGTON PERMIT VALIDATION WHEN PROPERLY VALIDATED ITN THIS SPACE)THIS IS YOUR PERMIT 6 RECEIPT PAID CRII BY 1=»;'0 ; '2NEI2' 01. 52 43---056?3 PAGE 02 r CITY OF ARLINGTON CONSTRUCTION PERMIT COMBINATION ❑ BUILDING ❑ MECHANICAL ❑ PLUMBING ❑ SIGN fA r � A•1 PERMIT N�. 1 1 j OwfA R MAIL AOOkl,SS Kv ZIP PHONE� ��� � .� _ yes ARCHITECT OR orsiGNER MAIL ADDRESS ITY Zip PHONE -71 GENERAL CON)IRACTOR MAIL ADDRESS CITY Zip PHONE PtiG£7-��LIC.PE G ! -E 3.�"3� G9� -� � �� m72.3 'i��5 -�Zyo ,> MLCIIA ICAL CONTRACTOR MAIL AOORESS ITY zip PHONE LICENSE I PLUMBING CONTRACTOR MAIL ADDRESS TT CITY ZIP PHONE LICENSE I Owm�i�ti � 3S /r/,cv �,�� •/pia/Z l g�;s�•u�` �vr�y /�2u�,�lll l��23 �Xs>;�� CLA SOF WORK NL.W ❑AUDITION ❑ALTERATION Cl REPAIR ❑DEMOLHION ❑BUILDING;RELOCATION vALVATION OF WOR VESLRISE WORK FIEUPOSt DIAL OF AUILDI G I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICA- LLI,AI ULS('RlPrl Of PROPERTY(SHOWN 6ELOW UR ATTACH FOUR COPIES) TION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT All PROVI- SIONS OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK I,l.�r _,BLLyCh of WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HERIN OR NOT.THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITYTO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PROV15IONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR TAX 10 N MOCR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CONSTRUCTION OFTHE PERFORMANCE OF 3 p�� - f_�/�/_b� CONSUCTION.PERMIT E PIRES 1 YEAR FROM BATE OF ISSUANCE. SIG T RACTOR RIZEO AGENT DATE I Uu;z SA (OFFICE USE ONLY) MECHANICAL PLUMBING NO. TYPE OF FIXTURE FEEk / NO. TYPE OF EQUIPMENT FEE A Z WATER CLOSET (TOILET) AIR CONU UNITS -•H,P. EA X / SA I I11 UB L REFRIGCRATION UNITS-H.P. EA , LAVA111RY (WASH BASIN) AIX I BOILERS - H.P.EA yIl(JHLK ' LAS FIRED A.C.UNITS- TONNAGE EA. KI ICIILN SINK 6 UISP. Y FORCED AIR SYSTEMS- B.T;U. MEA UISliWASIILR WALL HEATERS- B.T-U. M OF LAI)NL)RY IRAY UNIT HEATERS- S.T.U. M _ CLUftILSWASIILR EVAPORAl WE COOLERS, 1 WAILFtIIEATER CLOT HE,SDRYERS UKINAL VENTILATICN FAN OK INKINU FOUN I AIN A RANGE HC30D COMMERCIAL FLUOR URAIN AIR HANDLING UNIT _ AP _ VACUUM BRLAK'KS STOVE �T I ROOF DRAINS AI UERS MLTAL FIREPLACE &dw Y SINK ISERVIC Ic.) / WATER HEAT ' GAS PIPING j SUB TOTAL 1 t SUBTOTAL s -- _ PERMIT II / PERMIT f _ TOTAL FEE f TOTAL FEE i SWL VARU SL I HACK STRtt l SL TRACK REAR YARD SETMK PLAN CHECK NUMBER PLAN CHECK FEE D ID ry fE � � RECEIPT NO i151 :UNI LOT ARIA VACANT SITE 5 //// / �2, % � /• rEs ONO FEES VALUATION FEE /Sti ff TtP_�F.0 NZT EKCUPANCYGRpur NO.OFDWEILINGUNITS PLAN CHECKING VG f � lap BU'LOING § �� 51LI 0 111^ NO.Or STORILS MAX,O(;C.LOAD lPLUMBING fIRESPRINKLERSREQUIREI) ❑YES MECHANICAL COMMENTS - STATE BLOC-CODE ENERGY CODE SURCHARGE U.B.C. Ile •.i I;a PENAIn SEC.303(a) WATERISEWER FEES SE? 2 4 2002 TOTAL PERMIT VALIDAnON �/�'•s-'`�`�^"— •�, WHEN PROPERLY VALIOATED IN THIS 5PACE1 THIS IS YOUR PERMIT b RECEIPT cr_- ASSESSOR. APPLICANT TRF'ASIIRCR RLDG OEPT BVILOINGOFFICIAL DATE a zZ vmt7> zn� 7a C( L p ( pR ° o ok « o; � ZN 3 i xod7a m� Jm..'m m c"m �$ ! �cNnDm Ol—N pYP�J< ND�mx3Z ZA rpm m m a6i{ (a N o n m W m m'•X D {n m j O N—O Ap m mmp 'S ciiW mcO9 Am`sm� i ig $ ��{aa�acc� n, z� N c a��S 1 ldd i=n $� 0 Z: f 5'Mal 6qx*�:'mw-r I TI'rm —� I � I I � I III• I II =�_ •� r , ICI i y A � c Al I III II � m VT � • I III I w � ' I to i z iIj N • IQ ' � i i II � I� � �• � �� �� � ; i I I III I 4 vv Al I � r:T$ II cr 19) Hp IMF i �L g �� ram• D � Z , �n0 A m m + � I m o o Q- i O 1" P� Rio �p�pg� �,•4S' � �� z �� �� � � 1{`gp�1� �� � � � t4��= r�� 1 10 N �� �@� �C Z 7�pt 9ID�;1 9+• O � p2� � �f� Y ���hj ��y���� � \ 441VK�Y P't" ISl-vG, '0 0 0 0 o o p o do p I • f t 'IIN �1IY 4 • - - U � III I x • Q � Ili 0 ` a. b.L. L O N o off'PnINT ISLUID. .I - � I � I , y rg 1Y L (�t n � � ��^� �; yyy�� J' °q,� 7� � ���� 7C ��1�` '1���riYP��•Xf-Sz ul 53 Z� 7 'bC �= S ��ZNL O � ' o �up! T �+ _ a � p ► 3 r :I a :r kr s IL I • t I � � �* ! I � I� I I I S I � � o • � � III y� � �` ------- I I i OIL • • j z ICI _ I I 14 � x I III • I � i III I a o 10 Iop n\ f I0 3 Rr l I Qr QQ O.0 O 00 Q O'D —— � __ __ O• �wJ • O �." ��� e$� � 1,\ � Q-�y y cam.,'. KFLUI+•, ��' �� ". � /% T� J `� � �� �L armor �- � ,,�\ / X•by % � a� � ----- ------ — ------- -----� �_ Q; i N z SL � 3 N CK) o n Jo —_ W _ IS } — -- -- � Z o - - - - - ( - - - - IL Q - val CL So z � II -f 01 , 01 I: l o ,$ I � - ul X I AN IIIN � o a w III 111 � - • • � I III i I I � II - . . , , , I 1 ' of I o$ J o N Q2 � �j •� � xO �Q � p� � gr � Q �1� t � r S IN, m } " n 5 f• yyY � 7Ctl ta�rrt m y I ob m Ir JZ I c �to is fl c< 1-1 � I — ---- — - f: I 4 I I I vs ; III i cj � I 3 II I ` II I j I t� �', • II t ~ I t lan I I III I t — - - _— I _- i II gl� I I y a I II i i I I I I I h � ix • �, I -- I IdvxCM•l MW,s --- I r ;ZI''Jsl I 8� I 88�t 3 3 � r 3 i- •a.�-KI