The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About16607 SMOKEY PT BLVD_014388_2026 \tiI\ INSPECTION REPORT N G TD Permit No.: ''f� Lot#: Q" Address: v • Z Contractor: O Owner: �S JC[I w�� 9`s ING� Date: % - --)� ^c) ❑ APPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approveG ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. V r Inspector: Date: TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: INSPECTION REPORT �r I 4y�N O�O Permit No.: T kY Lot#: Q' Address: Contractor: O Owner: I N c'� Date: n - _C)1 ❑ APPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approveG ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. 1 YUU Inspector: Date: TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-ininal ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: INSPECTION REPORT + �1IN G rO Permit No.: �r Lot #• Q' Address: b;ted 7 Contractor: ^ U� O Owner: SCGI?u1a� IN C'� Date: ,-a APPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. �oa� 1o�j Inspector: Date: TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in Final ❑ Masonry pp ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation Other: CC-ADO i ,INSPECTION REPOitT 4�tN G rO Permit No.: 3�r Lot Q' Address: tct ! Contractor: 1 O LQS S�h�1ato � Owner: �IN G Date: — i � _� c I APPROVAL El PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. Inspector: i ' 7 Date: TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in Final ❑ Masonry {� ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: �^(ti17,( -��^ INSPECTION REPORT N G?'0 Permit No.: Q Address: Contractor: ' Owner: �� III N O Date: .-F'APPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. I j _ r Inspector: Date: TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ,*Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation Other: ." INSPECTION REPORT r Gr7�P Arq&�- CC4'j;�o ?' Permit No.: 3�d LotOAddress:Contractor:OOwner:Date: el — 7 --of APPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approveG ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. OF DD w4 vv1 r�SSt.��e fi Inspector: Date: TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing X Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: - U4S INSPECTION REPORT N G?'O Permit No.: Lot#: Q Address: Contractor: 4I,e g- 9s, ,SO Owner: LP S S C_h L,c )01�_9 ZING Date: XAPPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0 74 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. L r Inspector: Date: ` TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: INSPECTION REPORT NG¢v1 :O?'O Permit No.. ��V Lot#: _ Q" Address: c"l.Lc — '1- Contractor: qs, .t0 Owner: -5 1�a�� IINO Date: ROYAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ V10 ION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. Inspector: Date: TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ,Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: INSPECTION REPORT 4C, titN G Permit No.: Lot #: QAddress: /4Co 7 shirY�> B/t/,�Contractor: qO Owner: �cs S iv�13 4 j N G Date: 4416 2 ❑ APPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION I(CORRECTION REQUESTED Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. �( Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. /> /d;PO!//OC °�i4 S_,emu l�T a stJEiN lr G�•e f�L,l.�S 1 iO /,cJ Ti!<<= n�� ,ui•u<= -cJ2.Ci�¢C� �cs o r�. Inspector: xI - ,J y/ Date: TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation Other: _;7orz �/,-[�� I SPECTION REPORT N G I'O Permit No.: Lot F' Address: /d Contractor: F-1 5 " O Owner: s 9`SF�IN C'� Date: PPROVAL El PARTIAL APPROVAL ElVI TION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. Inspector: % Date: TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation 0 Other: INSPECTION REPORT ��titN GT Permit No.: Lot #: Q� Address: Contractor: 9s, ,S4 Owner: IN O Date: �� f `�- PROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. LI ) Inspector: 9 Date: ay Q TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor .naming-4LC1'"❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing 'Ll Drywall, Nailing 0 Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: INSPECTION REPORT 1-5 N G?'O Permit No.: Lot#: Q" Address: c Contractor: O Owner: IN Date: /*APPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL /CJ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION -24 hour notice required. y� _c, Inspector: Date: � Y�l PE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ugh-in j ZK4 ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ DrainageT-1 ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: INSPECTION REPORT ¢1.1x G?'Q Permit No.: Lot#: Address: G G Ud, Contractor: �. Owner: _ A.(' IN Date: ❑ APPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION -24 hour notice required. NJ V D IVA_P Inspector: Date: TYI I OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: INSPECTION REPORT �` ti1O -- Lot#:14 N G Permit No.: Address:Contractor- -ys, ,SO Owner: IN Date: d 1 ❑ APPROVAL P-,PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. Cx-Vw c.L cl_ Inspector: A Date: - _o -KYPE OF IN ECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage Insulation ❑ Other: INSPECTION REPORT 1,LN G I,, Permit No.: 1' Lot#: Q' Address: Contractor: -y3, ,S0 Owner: �I N G Date: ❑ APPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. r V W ) Aj Inspector: ate: TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation 0 Other: INSPECTION REPORT ¢titN G TO Permit No.: 43O D Lot#: Address: P(Q©mi l fill— Contractor: 5 'S'pnS q O Owner: te s " ],A-(, SHIN G� Date: P_/`0 ,g-APPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL D VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION -24 hour notice required. rl . - - Inspector: Date: PE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: INSPECTION REPORT ¢yIN G r0 Permit No.: n" Lot#: Q' ~ Address: G 7 Z Contractor: i -y O Owner: �,�n� `r41N O`t Date: 0-7 PPR VAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. v 'VU v `C� Inspector: Date: TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage.,,�/ ❑ Ins'ulatiin 0 Other: l i� ��/ L ''�l (� INSPECTION REPORT ¢ti1N G rO Permit No.: 43W Lot#: F Address: S Z Contractor: vYl. 4 Owner: Z_0 ) �D �s IN G� Date: ca "� APPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. 1.1 Inspector: Date: TY 71bF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: INSPECTION REPORT CS IN G '_ ti ?'O Permit No.: Lot#: Q' Address: Z Contractor: ) Owner: � �I N O Date: ' aq— -1 U 1 APPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ LATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. L Inspector: Zn I&A 9 f2 Date: TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry Cl Drainage ❑ Insulation ,� ❑ Other: - � C \j C � e-,+A Yl� � r � P,� INSPECTION REPORT 4titN G?'Q Permit No.O.-4 Lot#: Q' Address: Q I'YIO Contractor: hSkft Lcyt 4 Owner: ''Cht w0.40 IN G� Date: -"'L&-0 APPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. L-le— cayLy p J S' IE K U I y Inspector: Date: TY OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear.Nailing Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove '11-Zough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation 11 Other: INSPECTION REPORT 4ti1N G rO Permit No.: 0/- � �' Lot#: F' Address: /G O -7 s/��y yr Contractor: 2!! s =,� d- 4 Owner:l-G=S ScAlkr.4a 7-1,f4% I N G( Date: 6 — Z,L' — 0 / ❑ APPROVAL *PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. T=%/r!4 ri C— S"9-IL 4 zyz-) LZ /itl�/"� /-//'c.- L> `��/ L U L/xy — /S u fr A S/ Inspector: Date: TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ,�' Other: A-Z"- v s rA.7c r�s o,� vvo !Wc.P-�AAO INSPECTION REPORT Gi ¢tiIN GTO Permit No.:�r `-f Lot#: Address: ��" Contractor:' Fi,5At yO cSA ,SO Owner: C' SG� Gua-1J �I N O tj Date: (l' �l c 'L / APPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ IOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. Inspector: Date: j6 'tjb'_ TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: INSPECTION REPORT 0 ji l?' PermitNo.: 388 Lot #: Address: /GLContractor: isoOwner:O Date: ❑ APPROVAL ' PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION -24 hour notice required. 9 i dcod sVAI IIC-2 lyw / zl/w 4 A1__ Levi 4'0"Al e .f vD XZZ, .9- Gvl��2�0 /L.T. .F �srs�,ous t7A_TC�, 141, Inspector: Date: G TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ;W Other: .4y,—,o",417Cr INSPECTION REPORT 4tiIN G�'O Permit No.: w Lout: Address: ()__� Islu Contractor:/ Owner:j NG Date: PPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. T�cd 4_ 3 C- Lncl 14 // G Inspector: � ' Date: (� TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: INSPECTION REPORT N G?'O Permit No.: ��`� Lot #: Address: 1 91,( O Contractor: - S c 1 O,S Owner: LO-5 S�C� w� IN Date: D �l -C) I CPPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION -24 hour notice required. � h f jj�: h ! iG 0_70 2c a k 32 .c. V Inspector: Date: C OF INSPECTION REQUESTED EL Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: INSPECTION REPORT tiZN G?'Q Permit No.: 43& Lot# 4' Address: S Z Contractor: 5 O Owner:- IN G� Date: PPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. /v ) Inspector: Date: TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: INSPECTION REPORT 41iLN GrO Permit No.: �� Lot* Q' Address: I U if L'7 Contractor: qs, ,�0 Owner: �IN Date: XK,APPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. Cl Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ 435-0674 FOR RE-IN ECTION -,24 hour notice required. 7 .S I. •sL� � - Y ecLs 011,c Inspector: '' Date: -� - /,--) ' Q TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing_ ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove- �ough-in ❑ Final Masonry, ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: 4mer INSPECTION REPORT 1` l.e.g Sa. - ti1N GrO Permit No.: Lot #: Q' Address: o1p0117�r- Contractor: 'VrnrC _— O Owner: IN U Date: ❑ APPROVAL 12'fARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. Inspector: Date:4 TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other:c .�,,,�� v� �► wkz`tr 'tNN C)%NSPECTION REPORT 1;4 ?'OPermit No.: � " �� Lot#: Address:Contractor: SSOwner:,SO Date: APPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. Inspector: Date: TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping Footing—jwoAZ ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: INSPECTION REPORT ¢ti1N G 1'O Permit No.: ) )_ _/3 J, Lot It: Address: / J ` 5 /1I • �s� 5 � Z Contractor: O Owner: Lames IN�� Date: _,�-- RPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. 1 : 3 :1nspect or: Date. , TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ��/ p, .plation tl/l � ❑ Other: �`t��2 �_ n l `ey INSPECTION REPORT N GT® Permit No.: 3& Lot#: Address: S m k- ice. Contractor: 9s �o Owner: Les Sohv�� SIN O Date: ❑ APPROVAL DE -PA i_TIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. di 'i__ / 04 U1 S--z� ,v- szoy_ IELI— 3- Inspector: Date: TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: INSPECTION REPORT t.IN G?'O Permit No.: C) v`�J Lot #: Address: L LLL n s 1,�tl,' Y-f ZContractor:y]. C1 4 Owner: ( P_ S S h UJ aAO 9sIn N G� Date: U ROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLA ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. Inspector: / l Date: TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stovers _ ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry l�-t sCd' Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: P �� INSPECTION REPORT ¢ti1N G T� Permit No.: Lot #: Address: -1 S,VLt.� Contractor: V- a (11� 9s, O Owner: �5 SC_ IN G Date: APPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. Inspector: A Date:46 TYPkjo INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing A Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove X Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: INSPECTION REPORT 1;i TPermit No.: Lot #: Address: J �(�d�Contractlor:^'�15��A �r�Owner: �G� Date: ❑ APPROVAL �RTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION -24 hour notice required. 74 O e c c, Inspector: Date: E OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: INSPECTION REPORT ¢ti1N GTO Permit No.: Lot #: Address: I LQ UO-7 S41 IL Pi AL Z Contractor: E S�u O Owner: 1--Q-, 5c-h web Date: —C) APPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION -24 hour notice required. I oC) C)G),kV ID 10 41 r 1 Inspector: Date: PE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping noting ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: INSPECTION REPORT 4titN G rO Permit No.: LM Y Lot#: Address: Contractor: Owner: IN O Date: I APPROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - hour notice required. y, Inspector: Date: TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping :�l Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation ❑ Foundation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry n ❑ D ainage ❑ Insulation �❑ Other: INSPECTION REPORT ¢ti1N G 1'O Permit No.: v) ' L Lot #: �-- 4' Address: • • 5 �� Z Contractor: j � -� O Owner: (,e ` 'ALO= SDI N GAS Date: 5 �S 1�24P'PROVAL ❑ PARTIAL APPROVAL ❑ VIOLATION ❑ CORRECTION REQUESTED ❑ Corrections listed below MUST BE MADE before work can be approved. ❑ Please contact inspector. ❑ Was not able to perform inspection. ❑ CALL 435-0674 FOR RE-INSPECTION - 24 hour notice required. Inspector: 2 Date: TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUESTED ❑ Under-floor ❑ Framing ❑ Gas Piping ❑ Footing ❑ Drywall, Nailing ❑ Consultation -€mot ndation ❑ Shear Nailing ❑ Groundwork ❑ Mechanical ❑ Grid ❑ Struct. Slab ❑ Wood Stove ❑ Rough-in ❑ Final ❑ Masonry ❑ Drainage ❑ Insulation ❑ Other: C I T Y OP A RI_ I N S T O N CONSTRUCTION P E R M I T PERM I T NO_ 0 1 —43E36 Owner: LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER P 0 BOX 667 PRINEVILLE 97754 Value of Mork: $934,000.00 Tax ID: 283105-0-043-001 Phone: 541 416 5162 Describe Work: CONSTRUCT NEW TIRE RETAIL FACILITY Proposed Use: TIRE STORE Legal Description: Job Address: 16607 SMOKEY POINT BLVD Contractor's Name Type Address License# LS CONSTRUCTION OWN P 0 BOX 667 LSCOKC110FC P E R MI Ti� F E E S � -- - Equipment and Fixtures Number Fee Total Gharge -- ------ ------ -------- —-- PLUMBING FIXTURES 20' $10.00 $200.00 SUBTOTAL...... $2OO.90 TOTALS Fee Permit Fee $5, 295. 25 Fixture $200.00 Plan Fee $3, 441.91 Park Mitigation $3,963.69 Plumb Permit $25.00 State fee $4. 50 Traffic Mitigation $23,874.00 (r..�, `�(1 ! / l rr rr TOTAL FEE... ..... ..... .. .. $36,804.35 IGNATBYE Ek'i'IF' �THA �I�'H�VE REAf) AND E AMINED THIS APPLICATION AND PAYMENTS............. ..... $3,441.91 KNO HE SAME TO BE TRUE AND COR- REC LL PRO 1S10N ' OF LAWS AND TOTAL DUE... . . .......... .. $33,362.44 ORD N NCESPBONP ERNI T S TYPE OF W ILL ED TH WHETHER 5 E FIED NO' DATE RECEIPT # - DING 0 T L / l�y �� .ir 11 rl i 1 - )SrF t EI_ ' r t -t : 1 { �.t'=1 {' l ► ft l 1 1 ' tl l . - _.. _ "'• :' •n' r•-India • :Iltf i !ff f I:1135C{ {til)9.{ 1 1 '•Is,snda E o lu" •,.Pnv {r.r w bnN llt!•.mq LuPJ ! —1 z TO � . . i'Lt »; . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..SAY .,iAlUl AA _ 1r:i• - `� _^f, +H ,•C• , r1' . i hi• .�.•'' • . . . . . . . . . . . .,.i'4fa�EYh°1 :q: u;. .�,ai. ,E'G= . . . . . .AUU jA ru i i r Ott „ _ ttr r t • S I._ � .I��Y`.,. �' 1f`'rS a. .: � .. ..., � •`P h �iSS' rr3z r , o\ i�~...�s�..s.�t`u "�'rr"•.,� ��'t.a....ruu.4 � �''j�,.Yms.:v �*�.� � ,r ...��__.,,,,� S' a'a°tiumsv.,�,py� �. C�t;� �.c�'y,G� QW'r`'''-�t�'' y!:� � iir� �t � ~ ..�--.,.;,. ' ,,t;,/jw5'" »>w•ar�it '.\ t � I ' � .1Y ynr., ... , .. .� ,. YIMaK+t.� .nnn .. , vm .. ...n � •. 3 N. ganwi. <.. gaooVixa. �.... mn.�v.mmaoxcn-n;?ca nm+nanwrrmnnm+'nm?m tawn...mxm•m... +rmra �. _i.V, = �- � H rororz Ln b y H rD : . K V m as fD u, n o °` CD r V D Z rD !D O t7l _ C) O m rH�+ � r�l�• 1, .Ln -o H to z p H > O o ci � z (� r� O o [ Z o H bd C� R� o IT] _ ,�• a n > x H G) n Z CIQ r) E ..., Z M r O d ¢. '� � o o y In O V y l C� � ` 1 n y ID Z 1= zr, En z z H �' 00 {. y 00 z n y N !ti r 1 !-� >ti� !.+au•',,,v„�t,,:.�,<,•axvt. .,::.>wuo,�urrkw ,.,hoq•�ix u.uv,-�:uv�iarm:.:.>Bv.. -uvo' »mviru�u�ntaxooaw�m.�u..,una»;axooi�w,;um�ai�aaiiuwm'v,+u+nn� Y � '�S , .•�� A '^ s�„a.c c�' ...••.,._,•.."'"�' M',�"�•4•�• of ..'' �� ^.. � } ,. t� f I 09/18[�p01 18 FAX 3607574OU FISHER & SONS 001 1 625 Fisher Lane/PO Box 534 BurGogteo, NVA 98233 Fisher&Bogs (360)7574094 ()fiice N c G N i G N n R (360) 757400S Fax _. Fmc To: Cj�2 f;nr From: Tom Cavartaugli Attention-- '�''� - Pages: Date: jg R,: v'U ` C: Z ! — ❑ C�rbei►t For Review ❑ Ylivue,ConunME-' Pleasse Reply ❑ Please Recycle • Comments: '�� sa6.,.—.�.r.a...rRr �5✓ QC.i6S�i'Cs-Y��...—�G��_ , I Jr� 1 1 � � ' N:' � II I I I ■I I J ICJ l ��r I I : 1 +o«.J � r �- -•L J J I I Jam,! I I ' 06..-A X7, J ' . 09/18/2001 16:13 FCT 3607574005 FISHER & SONS 10 002 ;ENT 9Y: SNYDER IHOU87AIAL RC 415-380-0588; 8EP 11136AM; PAGE i sN"m o INDUvanum la RWMNCx ram,-p- p 1 415 315t) IL 41S Z03 z2t GCl N.California 0 orstlorn B�C�IFbmie Oporotiun 775 E.allthoaalo Ava.,&tOd 7351 Walnut Ave. Mill Valley,CA�K941 AN EaUAL OPPORTUNITY iMPLOYFR fLone Park,CA 90620 411b 9>:u•ya4u 714W4•5608 Pax 415 390-8638 ue.nas rf maw FM 4714 990-500e 1.' ► L '1 1 � _�ki1L_I — I I 1 l I _ a I - I r _ I -11 - I - J _I 1 1 _�1,_J � �� f � II I- �•� rl l�� mil. �_ Ll _ 1 r • T r 17 �• L J -1 - - r r 1 I _ I r I _ . � I 1■1111 II 1 1 ► I ■ ` 1 J 1 1 1 I - -- - ♦ 1~ 1 �� I ' 09/18/2001 16:14 FAX 3807574 FISHER & SUNS 12003 MT BY: SNYDER MUST'RIAL R0, 415.30-8538i GEP- II :WAM; PAGE V4 a -- r..• ..,..,� rv,+. Ono ears �+ ['41pEldi(Lti SSeteaa �t1pP i - T Y IC80 Evaluation Service, _Inc. lipA soWdraryc>7. rwionofthe Intemational Conference of Building Officials f. EVALUATION REPORT Report Na.4896 Capyrliv 47 1 s93 E1�ekadm Jarvktw na. Ma}; IS93 Ig11me Ca mory:ROOF I±OMMIa AND ROOF Ogg GONjTflXMx—flaot Catldl fig IZjQ) p� iYSTl�13 LYU9lAir *FOAM PLAOTIC ROOF C.Ideetlprdian:Cc�lntrsot Ird u xWis CM"nWI ui identified by ��N6 rxrmWy n mL Product tietfgn4 4n,compomint da- EW6nYS71NS IMG. ,unden+rrtOtr Llbor>ga►tes tna, MM A.403).�PA&Lrotttl QLLWNY qe are T{ T13WI451 =In morom ward rhea I'aap evaleadon report 1.5�411*F9B�2g080fwedP*onftfFWnPlukP dOuvoring f .bAdIries9400111:RWr%61t taCXWxWlneccondimcowith U.S.C.SbM%ftN"'22#7 usd 42-1,dtscrtotiva IMormation Ind a oil- II. couriptimc A. BomfoL. Poi W'0 5ysfrmt Ina, PSI M is a W ontrof manual. Solar-applied WhIluk t wAUutt eppled to root ftb ad c:Ovetld with i roof oding,The instdaWnis deitwwd as a two-canpnaeat tigldd F'ietdbW PoWilbna The und1wtaisar 1&W in PSI MO-25 W PSI BWN0 deeierstlow.Who iA••pbce dtrnsbw of U and 3.0 pet reapWTtW y. AL MAW,trul the P$1 tCtOY 8prfr►el PotyurlOana Foam Ptaalio Roth onrthan&t at a 2-Inch sswdrnum dddngs haws a Horne 4pmw Yea f O Cumerkt Sl►danse daxt� IN Ou ad t repitt wnpfy with The 1491 tfan 75 and a pnmkMtuaWptd rana0 omeeding 4,9a.'gw Iauid IM0411• ikdlart0 Idlt�tng.C:otdo,4116jed to the kilataing eon oas.: ilone=Oetwu hm ask-rwoathdioNlikvwstnrlaataMmpriwr 1. The mal=uedittirotsmI@loMbdbpappueatarsapprowedhy of gaff.to", rdyftw 3aterrts,Irtt:. Real covering bysterns are doWlsed 1P Table No.I. 2. The root opulaoWj#M 14 applied in swordams; with 11110 B,ApppMkis:The building WWW may mqulre trtalmlltflle of a vapor rued etul the WANUtAototltt 111O txb M. b"All u6str> m must beckon UW brae of moiatm,00,ffre K W 9. W1e/5 Illso eta OVUM M IN halal 04MM at top maletenanea cons.In#dlr1,firm and debde.fie pdlyan ftio bath pt�c fa epolled 4f e9 r as r eye� MO w�, 2+uquwly protetttd to by si Ameous s np 011he two eorwpoaents In a 1i M ndo by Yvi- more or"WO-1 umeinfayars'/yk=h icic.UWmarntatedforatleattamin11A116 01 bN to atop hw4nif a maximum b2sic wind appCr�tionaoynoaequantl4yyeerrs�.Urdfgtrte�pdoatfonieprahl6lladwttra xpead of 0 rapb, bcpatam 0,an meet not 4baaadlao 40lam moftm Is vramd at ar¢lclpatad. 11m unWW tewpuzium dwbtp One graft appkotilan wstbooraWn nof&fi WtMvduAISatdmeaftlpplka- 0. All M n lialk wnlpowk era/raduwd at a COM111g 1y Plop! don txrrno i el4eead 20 mho p4r Mw.Adeitwe vAnd tatrtrro w nedM lecatad sa 1111011,T1M 111111 aaelAy 21sw m lospec)tote by when WkA ve100Met tt>MW 10 Mo"Par boa FW Rm t op detft.intied ratl1tr3 LabaraYrics lea.(MMO 400)• F7ptua No.1.Roof casUpt am applied In Ial O MI MM the WA no 1t ! JeRlenl Is lM(J.O.C,:ThPo repast Is unafleded bythe aupple- tealuAecWW&tnsirtlettona 104 ke MOlttlbalu MW Me rtoW In T9W No I.Atlems 30-tadnute coring pwW is r4 trd forfhe tctvlm prior to OWL eppltodtae er 11a caging. To Mlion to si111'I d to to•exualwtlen In oil year TAKS NQ.1>.ilaoP vaVaRIMfo$Y$TN s rrAt w vw MU t cNtaat �r saaaia x a DeW car mw t s et �12 A P61: 30 3d.90 3 Gone rat 9a0Y,35 1 r �M�rrra � i t i sect 1113 r• Top tM F51320n-30 U P03133 I I 3 Ca�Cnrl� rM l2w2s 1 3j Do*or p�. J%V= 1 e d0t10111 cm t:l2 B Plpaeedr M9eJ00,T0 3a BRa I or Irili 1 0 TOP seas CsMau� if44'"i x 2,3 Dw ssuuu 1 9 atauemCM :.•t: 6 �� Too C" !1lwmd t F'St 3Z06,30 3,0 1SIh379f �� t 9 I t rgrwmd aTmN ie telN+ers I�.Mieh.shklc ylr++ood Mt:hme MniMl wYb a�ior�us.h oodeitall w Ia111Wd Ea swordseea wish5eedw 171:,lei 3 of ihr code. errs rtparrs r�leaoE.rtarfae Srn�Gor.Iie.f�*trr,flrarctr c.�,frtdrr�.r.tdaran rw a�nw'n�nynl+�Myl�!!C'eo,rria`Jwt rheaft.vat.ir�or ny..�v� r'I ewttir.air.rrrda+fyRrf/or:�Mr�N Meerut re•V•��1�ltfQ Prf/�e�.7Ai�J{Rr q.f u��.�7�7t1�q0�4 KR I71f17T/A/�te►rr{M.•�.tn• dOWN Ar up 4rry aruar WO&N. +:'.:7A.,.dhm-ad.tp•nteiifJepd/AelmM+etrataxlodriueri,tirrrli!•µv*.'Ifr-!T7WM.14G-&MW1++rler+''')-.r�ti+ �ltalla$kaertwrdrhe 1rs.— 4-ra+eardC.M.Now+ce-06.0-aw"marjo>warm ..itrr,.:rPtn..rrr�[r�tLwl�rirnarwirrtinRYil+lir7Vbrva�dewba•i...:+�_ .,•.� or4nMtd.attocRr'1° "�reidur�redtrleelrrrwrvwt� anrwlhbtrngwralWtGrdaiwu>•uulNwherinyrawa?a�IaMtrca.karrua: Peso I of. _ II IL L�. 01_I � 1 1 1 a I - micI ' •.'■ n11,. fIr ■, r- ■W4/0 T4�— �P- I dim wL I I Moll WE N. 4 ■!■11 � �I fflAMOMP XM Wy■.4NAMM MM raj PEIR I rT rlr ti*I 1 TI-t1� S ' uLimmisimmis A4- -� . �r■� mo - 1= aAwFMmft■r::i u 1 .Pwwmm,IL_ ■■•ram f r 1:9 1 V,Ir;Q�' 1 PT-14 =74"m ML L, 0 dW=Wb dWWt m~W% r-'rN•i F-�'■■I i!r �u■■1.?i�.+ Jn�■-��y J� (fir ■ I■O Add VrJLW IT-10101- ��+—��•�■1 f� lgjwjq Nor SIX WIN = I L■ ■ CIM941xr�O!! - �► .wp~1 pb""RN-9!d'L M J J �_!�1� t!�i1.7� M ft-Ar�■nI■'11� I mml 17 Fliftwmi t:T "TI —IF I I - r I loft I �i- I■■■rl I i��i■�■■ka_��r� � NEW — I I I 1 *. —,I r a 1 TI �r ■ I ONE L- ILZ I II milmomil■ /1L - d4M k� 1-En TOPMI- nmmJ:---Q* = NINE ■•► r- - - ■ - I■lim-WI L +-NOL— ■i _ ■ r _.+y r� y � r ��..I+ia� + I 1 --- ■�� I WIEMNim■ irk I-.�r■�■�_ fir-- ■+ --a��-�— '�.�-=�fr �� on 09/18/2001 16:14 FAR.96075741 FISHER & SONS a 004 SENT BY: SNYDER INDUSTRIAL RC'- , 415-360-0538; SEP 11 :36AM; PAGE 314 _ r • P&p 2 of 3 R"It No.4NO L . -�6wE�01117q - IdrLRtl1►WVBFOAIiR ' KrXLMAV ! rtA4Q� T,iLL�l6 tAA7� rDAM I IIlII o� fA«oP pa GR%AK* Foom.9"DOW Foam d"D*tdl•hobwd IdQM Exlinsq GWNf.`aA1'l11G K►rf Of PAWRA r 2 rder ++ow i`wtv at;fv4 f-Sa•r M+ikTr CA�/�AOR Errs."ACK PON1 C F Mvj muCA'a 06ATIMa- �/�' Won pff *:Akf PCIAM a1100Mt OOMITIIRI )6 Lag �iN.(lt Oar W90p NFW C?R DtIT►dF 0 FISWUV At Pampoit Wall GeV F;"kmg P1P6 Vsnt tolam Fowls NO.I—Tvp C"PLASMM om .S i I TT— l - - — ■1 ri JL LI��t � 1 rr ■ NONE a. ■ —1 r' I„M,,. Uh.- ` I JJII '■ I1 . l 1� r I } 1 - LMLimOr - L drilbVillIM tomeNo"mil Mai -%M I AM 1 I JI �I � �- i I I r r �.J�a r� 1 • 1 I r II I�`I• I ■ �1� � 11� � � � I I I+1 � f.�-I-1Y r1wi ■�� Idd ri �■� T�* �Tf- 'A09/18/2001 14:09 FAX 360757400",-, FISHER & SONS 2001 625 Fisher LanefPO Box 534 Burlington, OVA 98233 Fisher&Sons (60) 7574094 Office I N C O F P O F A f F o (360) 7574005 Fax F Aoix - V " . To: �l7Y of �I�J%'�� From: Tom Cavanaugh A.lteution: 0,4c_,c- 4 r c h.�ti.7- Pages: 3 Fax: Date: �. / --�----- 11 Re: L25- �',woiceX -"roan . ❑ Urgent 4-k-or ftevie;w Cl Plezue Comment U Please Reply ❑ Please Rccycle • Co�ttimeclts: A#AG�iesl 1S-_ ,..-_,.G.R.�Y..-----•Q!c___� ,--/_�Y�fO/. _,, 1csr� �� e w� I f�•. - I� ��I 1 !� � .1 �./ I M/18/2001 14:10 FAX 3607574005 FISHER & SONS [a002 y Sent By: BLA DEVELOPMENT, INC.; 3608630500; Bep -*� -` 10;16AM; Page 2/3 Mmkindmomm �.� PO WXWWW INVOICE a.S57Z mWdm m66wm ftmwva%o OR 763-31T F90ERAL IQ M-1140M I]AM ampbm d 07.zm F0 tt. BILL TO: MAR DEWAMMEW JOB SITE: U S-SCMWAST RE stow P.4 8=12=8• 1S W8MQWrP0WT''MK)LE MLL GFWK wig som ARUNGTOK WA GUST Its 7' ". J013 im'P11 AM •t. � I�M7Ta ~• 'a >:" `� �' ".fir ',ri;. � ,_,. �,, - OK"ATEf48�N lCR VACM07RUCC AND C>RW TM 12&00 MR 7�48i 4i1�41f1�t 4.t�6t'i011�K t q1� h k e �1b W Sub1'btal: Sales Tbx: 007.00 Total Due: 8.2% 80.93 10d7,93 7kaKk TERMS:Azemmis in exacmq cX10 drys suhjma in•PfNANC.E CHARGE of 1 S%per manlh which i.5 [9%per annum_ s WP ke 1 1 _ 1 1 ■ II 1 qL _ EL -L I LF1 F7mmEft EL, fl■ ■'■ i ■ r■PN 11 1 I WE New I IN MINE �1 1■ 1 1 I 1111 ONE Orltql�� ;r _ 7 I_ ■w + I - I � L ' ■ dW I�1 _ ID i I I I � 1 I n ' ti _ no ■ 7 O9/18/2001 14:10 FAX 36075741111 FISHER & SONS ,- • 2003 uy -Ln UC;VtLUt•ML1N I 1NC, ��088�eCJ00. • ,_ ____�� 10:16AM; Page 3/3 Do TWO- + 'IQ�\�N„ryry•.•i.�N,l�.•.�•.�\h::'�C,(.._�M"}'��Y�f'{{iK\�W�f.A..-..9V� .�� .'•j',..•. !"•• J,'."•; \ ' '. � .. •�ft' 'y;�. �`- •.'F�', � „�.,.i.� � .� ��,�y �t 'i+u��• G 5��•ii•� H"'• %i:Ys141S.a'aG . .. ... + •e• "'- f�4�•'�' '.d:tY„ .I�;�y:,.�:•,>' t tk? n I w l� 'Cam �;:-•t .r. .�,, YPi3i hr7 td 141 77 -• ..wL-�..!Nr'4�::7..ii•ryi G:r` '� '•;i:..C.C.-'Li.:.; ��. "1•.. ••} ;v4;:::relaF.Y: ' tv �- \� �.: w1 ...,,> �:�Isrf-��3'•. •vyi:.^2 �� '�'"'�..:rv�,rM -jC.•�{y.�v!1.� —INK -�.. i fE Iglu T a. 44,,4e* Lb 1 'figNAT Lb , I' 92WA CL 55 2 SOIL DINGED BY .TO G.99 'tali �`�vh,:�� `':''S�:' °C�.d^ , j11;i•;'•>- t!�1J+,r f r+:i�" ,. > •• • •`��•,t•��..,\\ .:l_;a-r..-'.��'�-' 'i:;T:��''y,•'rti7 �.✓ �J: SJ.� •�/�Lys•1'.. \^' _,.N 3 t • '•� '��'y-e +w6 .. .SF } c. .}.,.:•- '' 'Vti�}rw�Y •,.1 t a+• f3rtw;CY1AE)E�FAa[AC q6 iR M!� W!i7DE t4J�t l�q D.�oya n.~of fill tM�;io airY�+.�ti�.vk d.•.co�rira�l 7f+I+uH*�Wn:a J}tut o.ype�yoiirsewwarwao�. r�w�„ttw.w+r �aawr.l,,,,o.er.�a�w:�nar�T 1ta UhdArr{(jJ11tX1 Ptoo>1r,e3 To I>ay ao aooG,i ,eu rh w as a,.►k air it,COI b� o+q 1+N�bR£ 31IunV%d fexss,6Y�,nt,K/ 1 ,&v any rl!owed '-p� ''O0� �"' '' ylkl Wallb�D IMIION b d Ab r. la t.tl Yrr Ma F�rt�Ff/'Mt,r kMi�Mpua.P�wdM leld A.bNfa�Ca�rfariir<I4 a�tfi radeooxR=noi olt prA wkl+in3Dday�oltlAllvalywdl baar' r� °O"""" !'ar,�woraoabwkn�e.•d.r.d'.,,rt,r.;. wY.ir6ore waa.�rrr<aa.o ,.•�vr�'+.lf> �. ' ./: r.4. �,,.. 1te.c` i'ti .,r ••H•( _ _ti ,r,r yC.. - c1a�rY'�11uru,rtihvsar;?.+C�aAt�T��.�N,wetl:��:%�\• •r7"y' \. A$40.�SaRvirxl Cihalpp atri I-'9-of the Ceeh C110C9i+a mil D�' � �. BY. +, .,,ry.}J.1x'':. AT:. �'•� �, �. cx:kill t,-fumed ckmcha, - ^i• , ~ C 6b3NA1LRE .•. .� r,• •'rcw /{y�A� y, CUSTOMER COP ,r, I 1 ■ _ _ ■ _I — _ _ _T - Aksm MOOO - -ate - _ - - - - - - - - - - --Ii T1L _ J 1 1 I I J I F� 1 I — I _ �1 ■ 1 � I I I ' I I I I ■ _ — _ �___■ r _ - —� Fr �1 ■ ■ _ —' — — �� ! r- ■— _ - _ wit, I MEMO _ r _ ;-7 y Z ■ T= 0000 O`T- i - I ` -~ I �l 09i1Ai2001 18j,5 FAJ .360757_4005, FISHER & SONS 005 3ENT BY: SNYDER INDUSTRIAL RI 4i6-9®0-8536; SEP ii .-WAM; PAGE 414 4- ---- a.. -+ ..... .r... 4%R— rvz7Taui h7stow 11O04 1 V Pape 3 of 3 l9sport No.4896 waawA��poa�w w�►aMroaauvo ttrAIN♦" Cib�Mi�r0 bttrw�+ E7nBQhai CONaa SYS'[M cr0A11twolrll�►+1p�0!! Ic�ttCw.l pc aµ b0CAVDXWW 037%V t oPbRAN e= a�w+awo ss�wvesA+�w *UCCNR ac MM rowums wa �waQs � rlkwors umcm#4 '+OO' MAW PAW . �aet�c LL rF�npRoaw pAgyW�►6 R�11�[lIM 6E c f�Rf6.'�1 NMI 6 W P.WW r,WAY 06 MWMOd IICCQiigIN4 A1Qrs lF�l1 ELI9►0101ur 1t aQ0Y11�E0 AG00/1Di+VG lU IDQ�L QJ01 ON 111Ei STVOOi9 isK� TO 6MAL 0=4 ON P""GrANIUVA Pf iM TMplad Rion!Dndn Pot+Typ►PAol Drain FMRE NO.i TYPICAL F4r4s OMR DUA1Lia-4CAAMWOM A� AW Lea - A bo d ObS V-Pqwhm �- 1 lob 1 I I '� Ie I 1 I - rm I End 1 40 w4w Elm 1 I FFIM : Fisher&Sons, Inc. FAX NO. : 209 226 1300 Dep. 10 2001 11:01AM P1 1 Fisher&SY o FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION SHEET TRANSMISSION DATE: � �-'� (Com n )�"- L (Fax Number) FROW Frank Del Gaudio, Superintendent Fisher& Suns, Inc. P.Q. Box 634/628 Fisher Lane � �� Burlington, A 98233 ��IA Phone: (360) 757-4094 Fax: (360) 757.4006 TOTAL WAGES TRANSMITTED JINDLUDING THIS PAGE): REFERENCE, MESSAGE Please advise if any page in this tranmission ;s not legible or has not been received. Thar►k you � ,4� �"'Q1 'R-`C � 3 t SS'wiv[�at �v��%+..d .`-7G'�.3�a"t_e-:L`^..w... ��;'1.• .ST_. .C....�....:-r......jt,,,'r.,y-.�°M'h .,•�:$� .- '--�--5��-kla�. _ ,7i�'�►�::.1�i4' GS�1 lldrW.L" �,..�d'+.�iiC^�`.!'"w"�`?^,^.'"J �.,r:A4:�'�.ti'�'1e?�i�:a4{:.t'%ay..:tvN b. ,. � _ I 1 I oneon 1 � - _■ a . aq � _ , n.ln - ■ — NNIN Inl I��Iq S .■■iwl ■ �. . 1 1 1 _ � ti r J 1 r� 1 t_ ■+�T �1 r 1 1 1 L I ■ar, I 1 j = r - L I 1 1 JtjI 1 ■■1 I f ai pf il l b% jp ■ 1- 1 Nix 0.4-9 IN. m64rJCL— IN IN pI - ' I L _ LI N m — — 11 I 1 i - ,r ■ 11 i — j— — , Ll — JJ 1 I II ■1 1 1 I + - '- 1 ■ — - 1 -7 _ N 1 IN - - - - - I - _ IN II 1 . _ - - _ - -' - I' �- FROM : Fisher&SonS, Inc. FAX NO. : 208 226 1300 pep. 10 2001 11:02AM P2 � 4 SUPERSUCKER TIME LOG JC78 S,^ L S ^ tt SHIFT. Job DESCRSFTION: �,Ia M C CIP J�TO�c �8u p HOSZri�hAN:� �,��!_ HOSEr+t1AN: II RUCK ��.1=CU1P VE-�iC #'� �'�?a F1, : TIME BREAKDOWN: (ArA or P!V1) Clock Out Job Leave Return Clock Job Slte: To 5:�op:�T put_ �. 1 I j { Clean j O;smn 5tana' Omer -- i Start I Stop iTG 1s� Shoc I I raveJI set-ua ali Ut I T revel,Durno' Lumc� By /Q y (Desc)I xl �T! -ro -'cad! I i To To , TO -- - TG I TO TO TO TOTALS: I CONSUMED HOSE&F"NOS. c Ftax Hcsa: ----- -- -- DUMP&LANDFILL INFCRMA71ON.' oR: Arnount(sli, ;Circe One):A=ur1t/Ca3h SIGN OFF e Ltad vpb Ti1V1E: s3ar: I Q � SIGN OFF-Slte 5une T>ME: visor (Adftor,9l carmen on raveme s'sde r - 01666 i■F�.kM W-, ■ T M P L ■ _ - _ - - J - - _ _■� - L _ � A■UL It. S9 �r .1� E A R T H A� T E C M No. iOO6417 A tgco INTERNATIONNAAL LTD.COMPANY B 10800 N.E. 8"'Street, 7"' Floor / Daily Inspection Report Bellevue, WA 98004 J (425) 455-9494/453-9470 Fax Project No. Date: � -K-e,) I Weather: AM PM Owner: L(, �1 WC--�)D Project: S m „ t Contractor: �G,�,�y Foreman/Supt: Subcontractors: Le Daily Activity (work in progress, discussions, decisions, etc.): 1ez �ei� �'J��` J�.r C't 1 < �1" n'c�. I I,t ,rL I c1 ,t4j .641 }c&t r'rcn ( 1 e X 1 r .. ff r t. f.k J C. r c. .rce, '1. ( l e ,clef r 1.S , , I ecef-� r �...,; �' , I�Lur�. S 5;d�L�t,Ik� r`�0 ►l1�Ir (IQ gef r->0 Change Order/Additional Work: i Equipment: Labor: Signature: DAILY INSPECTION REPORT.DOC REV.8/03/98 r _ � I I I . ;.• .I I I I 1 siroq,oil nei:rnagisN1 %*MaG I I 1 II I- I n -I 1' - ■11 wF II 1 _ 1 I- to 01 - ` � ■ - IL _ _ J _II J II ■ - 8 ' ILA- -r' Y - 1 _ � r I ■ _ _ _ A _� _ y 1�_ _ r _n1 _ _ I 1 c ai 1 E A R T H `J T E C H No. A tyCO INTERNATIONAL LTD COMPANY 1080v0ue, E. 8" St04t, 71hFloor Daily Inspection Report Belle(425) 455-9494/453-9470 Fax Project No. Date: Weather: AM PM Owner: Project: Contractor: Foreman/Supt: Subcontractors: Daily Activity (work in progress, discussions, decisions, etc.): ' I I� I Change Order/Additional Work: Equipment: Labor: Signature: DAILY INSPECTION REPORT.DOC REV 8/03/98 Mfrtr`t".1ri141kiiV1"1'a>`ab"i.N?%LuI IC • I .� In, tion?o D ...Build On SFOKAK t3!VIS:OCv Gnghwe" • COiflOUMV ° ro*Mg (5091 535-3511 FAX 150.71535-126' ui : � SEAITLBDIVIS1nN EASTST13F.DIVISION TACGMAD1VISICN PORTLANDDIVISTON YIEN!D:SULnDl�'1!iSC)'V (206)282-fi666 FAX(206)282-0710 (425)485-4244 rAX 4!5)43 461: (253)589-1804 f'AX(253)18e-2136 o'w)254-R418 FAX(563)2w2-5605 13601 297-8821 FA:(kF'717 /e le- t y�} F(�fEFT NO' 1AI.U. it .r Ovid CH ��YJ7,T�./.,'� V�Y -+mow • )°/��a 1'SMfM��ly77a •,r� •—Jl? .��"d^„y f / WORK DESCRIPTION INPLACE DENSITY TEST RESULTS TEST LOCATION DEPTH DE yaN m% � COMP to% P/IF r p �� r .t '' � 'y / ti r yl ;✓ a� �y, ti ti i *�3.! I. ' Or ? , ire o « _ EQUIPMENT IDENTIFICATION AND SN# 1 t l��•�� 7�C� � � ' . SAMPLE I.D. i v PROCTOR VALU � J �` S GAUGE STANDARD: MS( 4, ' DS 2S '2. SAMPLEORVALUE LAS METHOD: IVD1557 ❑D686 ❑Rice r1 OTHER *3. SAMPLE I.D. PROCTOR VALUE ASTM TEST METHOD AS APPLICABLE) 022(SOILS) 3017(MOISTURE) D?950(ARPHAL D1 SS6(SAND CONE) OTHER GQPlES TO: MAILED: IN PECTOR: DATE , ' t <s :'� I?t MS INSPECTA ', TA s�:anl� OWNER CONTRACTOR +; NFb11M�fE > FitI.D CONTACT:! DATEO I ENGINEER BUILDING DEPT. ' ARCHITECT SUPPLIER ' KION� NFQ"NO LJ ' .' ' Tula report is provided for the information of the cliont only.The"aprcduction nt!his report,by any melhod,and Its "ON OFF,•- ST OT MILE3 !ransmittal to a Fnird party by any means,except in lull,without trip lull permissiDn-of Professiena,Service Industries. ,no. is prohiWad! "This certification 116sls to the accuracy of the results ovainad from the actual test perteeema anwor observet!onS TOTAL HOURS .a�.�sz,r�r-.�- !!R }-_ �• /T'� City of Arlington Building Dept d C _q3' — TIRE. DEPARTMENT CHECKLIST PERMIT DATE: 'p NAME: ADDRESS: LEGAL: BUILDING USE: I�T �t 1�p�l.t I� OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION: A B E F H 1-1 2 12.1131 4 1 1 2 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 7 I M R S U 1.1 1 1.2 1 2 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION I II III 1V V F.R. F.R. ONE-HOUR N ONE HOUR N H.T. ONE-HOUR N Item inspected&completed Signature & Date: Site Plan: Approved Denied Access Requirements: Required: Fire lane: Sprinkler system: Alarm system: Knox Box: Fire extinquishers: Hydrant: # of hydrants required: Location of Hydrant: Location of Knox Box: Location of Fire Extinquishers: Fire Flow requirements: Location of address on building: .FIRE DEPT: Date: Signature BuildTbrm\fdchecklist jr. 1 ■ ■n I l•1■ oil in ■ 1 ■ � f T ■ �� i�l 7 1 ' 1I I - ■ i 1- ■ ■I T I - I I I.. it I I IIrl I'1 � A JET . I ■ i i PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION CWA CONSULrANrs 22421 NE 20'h Street Redmond, WA 98053 Phone (425) 836 2833 Fax(425) 836 3707 JURISDICTION INFORMATION .' o ( /► ll r / 1. Location: 4 t �+1 5 G^� 2. Permit Number. w-� (n)' s6er 3. Code Official Name: �GIv,D A--�1,4ei s6 N 4 Address: a3e, N Uwym pie- 5. Phone Fax(- 1 1135- 3 9t-Y- 6. Alternate Contact Person: Phone: ( ) Fax( ) PROJECT INFORMATION 1. Name of Project: ffWA-T3 -tt ae, c:..t--�4Tj�Z 2. Address:l A+ i:`IVD 1jac):1 -Sw,0kA,1 Please review.plans under the following edition of the Uniform Building Code: ( ) 94 Edition (�1 7 Edition ( ) r. (please specify) r/Full Review Structural Only Non-Structural Only 3. Please also review plans for compliance with the following codes: Edition: _U.M.C( ) _ Energy( ) _U.P.C( )_N.E.C( ) ) Other( Specify 4. Enclosed are: .`Gcopy structural calculations Oset of plan (copy energy calculations 1 copy specificationsVoll&2 1 copy soil report 1 set 5. Soil Bearing Capacity: 4 6. Seismic Zone No.: �. 7. Basic Wind Speed: 6 8. Wind Exposure o 9. Frost Line: v 10. Ground/Roof Snow Load: 2 S 11. Valuation: Comments: Code Official's Signature: Date: PROJECT CONTACT INFORMATION(Optiona4 �� `� 1. Contact Person: 2. Address: 3. Phone: ( ) Fax( ) 4. Copy of review comments to contact person: yes no -- Y --_ I �1 } 11 CITY OFAR,1,TNGT(-__- D AqT!�FNT0FC0-yMMUNITY DEV,_.�OP%dENT 238 N. 01y:ipic, Adiogtnn, WA 98223 DATE NO. �0on* (2O6) 4�0�D24 F�� (206) 43�'3�06 TO > /\ VVE ARE SENDING YOU ��Attuchnd El Under separate cover via thefoUmwing items | | O Shop drawings O Prints O Plans O Samples O Specifications / | O Copy,fletter O Change order O COPIES DATE NO, DESCRIPTION THESE ARE TRANSMITTED ao checked below: O For approval O Approved ausubmitted O Rnsubmit-------_oopiouforapprova| O For your use O Approved asnoted O Submit-copies for distribution O As requested O Returned for corrections O Rotum-------_conected prints | � � For review and comment O \ O FORBIDS DUE lg -----_-_ O PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN T0U8 REMARKS COPY TO o,"m,w.^o��LsoP�psn'Post-Consumer S|GNE ff enclosures are not oo noted,kindly notify uoatonce. ' ~ \ - - 1 I I • I ,1 I I I y 1' _ I •I 1 LJ I � I JU =' ll Mill _ 1 I - :•.r. - _ III1111 jJ r+{J ■ II 1■ 1 1 fl 1 r -I - I I I I I I I 11 City of Arlington Building Dept PUBLIC WORKS CHECKLIST PERMIT # DATES -� A LEGAL .� Plat Lot Tax ID# NAME ADDRESS c—:;Y1h L-p 14 e v BUILDING USE 1' # of BUILDING UNITS Existing Required Signature Date Water Meter Fire Hydrant Side Sewer Permit Monitoring Manhole Cross-Connection Control Sewer: Off site On site ,Q Water: Off site n On site Pretreatment Discharge Permit Water/Sewer Fees Date received vZ Date Yellow returned Date Pink returned City of Arlington Building Dept PUBLIC WORKS CHECKLIST i PERMIT# DATE . f ' LEGAL '' ` ':', t.` " - Plat Lot Tax ID# NAME '' c' ADDRESS U, 'R S VIA �,1 BUILDING USE (�, 0 j ��-1,v . IL # of BUILDING UNITS Existing Required Signature Date Water Meter Fire Hydrant Side Sewer Permit Monitoring Manhole Cross-Connection Control mot LUC- ujm-m Sewer: Off site On site Water: Off site On site Pretreatment Discharge Permit Water/Sewer Fees Date received a o� Date Yellow returned Date Pink returned Z`�� City of Arlington Building Dept PUBLIC WORKS CHECKLIST PERMIT# C) DATE Z -7 /d LEGAL Z ,31O --Q__-04l -C)O I Plat Lot Tax ID# NAME TI P-eS ADDRESS WA b—1 P1, 61 V I\ nn -- BUILDING USE Y'Q � S c_-��-S afla l IGr # of BUILDING UNITS Existing Required Signature Date Water Meter Fire Hydrant Side Sewer Permit Monitoring Manhole Cross-Connection Control Sewer: Off site On site Water: Off site On site Pretreatment Discharge Permit Water/Sewer Fees Date received Date Yellow returned Date Pink returned 8 1 1 1 ' t 1 � I 1 ` 1 'I I 1 ■ 11 I 411 1 1 `,-nLA .I ,,! ■� . -L,! 1�{I ■ 1 -1,, 1 r a �i �!i i`: V�11 1ti ti •J - I 1 II _ tt I 1U 1 ' ■■I ; n II11 n III In ■ I Ilr o4i -I I I T I I11 ► I 7 J 1 111_ • 1 -1 h 1�{'tl-rl 1 1 1� I I I •, 1 I I 1 ' r ■ 1 ' 1 -1 T 1I In 1 I ILI I I I I f1 CITY OF ARLING L[ECTCTn OF CTIBIR M0DUML DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY D .1OPMENT 238 N. Olympic, Arlington, WA 9$223 _.. DATE r �—�� JOB Building 1-1 Engineering ❑ Planning / L Phone (206) 435-0724 FAX (206) 435.3906 ATTENTION RE: F TO I P WE ARE SENDING YOU Attached ❑ Under separate cover via _the following items: ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION �(v, THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment "D1� �I(htV 1 i'1 fir'+-►r' t^ - ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS COPY TO ��A 1 40%Pre-Consumer Content •10%Post-Consumer Content SIG N ED: j ;, ,l I f i If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. f (I jJ .. 1. .�_' :'t ,..�: S ( 0 N Z 0 Date: March 16, 2001 To: David W.Anderson Its City of Arlington i i ,, 238 N. Olympic Avenue r? Arlington,WA 98223 From:Al Stancikas IVED 44-A L L S TA 0 m Sconzo/HallstrorT Architects PSC ARCHITECTS, P.S.C. 919124`h Ave#101 MAR 2 0 2001 Bellevue,WA 98005 RE: Les Schwab Tire Center CITY OF ARLINGTO ARCHITECTURE We have received and reviewed you letter concerning compliance with the 1997 Uniform Building Code(with Washington State Amendments), 1997 Uniform Mechanical Code, 1998 Washington Energy Code, and 1998 Washington State Accessibility Code for the Les Schwab Smokey Point location. We have clarified and complied with the concerns as follows: PLANNING Nonstructural 1. `The sprinkler system should be designed considering "High-Piled Combustible Stock"and tire storage per the Fire Code. Your Fire Department should review INTERIORS these requirements." The Sprinkler system is designed considering"High-Piled Combustible Stock"and shall be routed to the Fire Department for review. 2. 'The construction joints at the top of the walls that require protected openings (occupancy separations)should be listed construction assemblies. The listing number(UL,ICBO, etc.) ................: The details on sheet A8 should be justified." Refer to revised details 3&4,sheet A8 and revised section 3,sheet A4.4. 3. "Details should be provided for protection of all the through penetrations and membrane penetrations of all fire resistive wall and floor assemblies. Section 710. These should be listed assemblies with the listing numberprovided." Refer to revised details 6&10,sheet A8 for corrections. 4. The one-hour protection of the steel truss at the occupancy separation wall(Sheet A4)must be a listed assembly. The listing detail should be Indicated on the plans." Refer to revised section A,sheet A4 and revised section 3 sheet A4.4. 5. The truss top cord at the steel truss/occupancy separation penetrates the one-hour fire resistive assembly.A detail indicating a method of protecting the penetrations that is acceptable to you should be provided on the plans." Refer to revised section 3, sheet A4.4 for correction. 6. "Sheet A2.2 indicates that a 1-hour roll-down shutter is required over window N while the window schedule indicates a 1—%hour assembly. Only a one-hour assembly is required." Refer to the window schedule, sheet A5.0 for revision to the window note. 919 124TH AVE N.E. SUITE 101 BELLEVUE,WA 98005 425.45S.3203 425.455.9351 (FAX) www.sconzohallstrom.com �- � .� _. .� _ :,; I I I I $ACRAMENTO SAN FRANCISCO LOS ANGELES PORTLAND SEATTLE MADRID I N T E R N A T I O N A L 1DMarch 13, 2001 'k Sconzo-Hallstrom Architects r ►�'' 919 124th Avenue NE, Suite 101 Bellevue, WA 98005 E� Attention: Al Stancikas MJ\R 2 ESQ®1 Subject: Les Schwab Tire Center Smokey Point(Arlington) Plan Check Comments �I Dear Al: The following are the mechanical responses to the plan check comments by the City of Arlington, dated March 4, 2001. The drawings have been clouded with a"Delta 1"to show the changed items. Plan Review Comments: NONSTRUCTURAL Item#7 Section 1202.2.6 allows the deletion of the mechanical ventilation for the service bays if you determine that the door openings are sufficient. Note that this Section requires unobstructed openings. Response: Section 1202.2.6 requires that the openings area be greater than 1/20� of the floor area. The minimum required opening area is I I I sq.ft. for each service bay area. Each area has four 12'xl2' (576 sq.ft.) of openings.The owner operates their stores with these doors fully open during business hours. MECHANICAL Item #1 Details should be provided for seismic bracing of the unit and IR heater in the service bays. Otherwise the mechanical plans are acceptable as submitted. Response: Refer to Sheet M-3. The details have been revise to show seismic sway bracing. 1998 WASHINGTON STATE RESIDENTIAL ENERGY CODE(WAC 51) Item #1 The designer should note on the plans that all glazing shall be certified and labeled with its U- factor and solar heat gain coefficient by an independent agency licensed by the NFRC. Section 1312.1. Response: The architect shall provide this noting as requested. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL ACOUSTICAL ENERGY TELECOMMUNICATIONS 10419 Old Placerville Road •SUITE 250 /SACRAMENTO CA 95827 /TEL 916.362.9394 • FAx 916.362.3306 • �. �' r4 �. F.ti �A I Item#2 Calculations should be provided to justify the 0.25 U factor used for the exterior masonry walls. The default value from the NREC is 0.40, which will result in Target UA to be greater than the Proposed UA. Response: Refer to revised calculations and calc sheet justifying the 0.25 U-factor. The masonry walls are 8" CMU concrete block with the cores partial insulated. Item#3 No slab edge insulation is required assuming that comment 2 can be resolved. Response: Refer to the revised calculations. The slab edge insulation has been removed. Should you have any questions,please call. Sincerely, GLUMAC INTERNATIONAL Larry N. Ol7i � , CIPE/CPD Mechanical Associate LNO/amc Cc: file CONSULTING ENGINEERS/ MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL ACOUSTICAL ENERGY TELECOMMUNICATIONS 10419 Old Placerville Road •SUITE 250/SACRAMENTO CA 95627/TEL 946.362.9394 • FAx 916.362:3306 1997 Washington State Nonresidential Energy Code Compliance Form Envelop • Washington State Nonres,dentiat Energy Code Compliance FOmu first E7 bon,June 199e Project Info Project Address LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER Date 3/13/2001 SMOKEY POINT WA For Building Department Use Applicant Name: LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER Applicant Address PRINEvILLE, CA Applicant Phone: 541.416.5633 ject Description 0 New Building ❑Addition ❑Alteration ❑Change of Use Pro F(Se riptive ❑ Component Performance ❑ENVSTD ❑Systems Compliance Optioncision Flowchart(over)for qualifications) Analysis Space Heat Type p Electric resistance Qi All other (see over for definitions) Total Glazing Area Electronic version: these values are automatically taken from ENV-UA-1. Glazing Area Calculation (rough opening) Gross Exterior Note:Below grade walls may be included in the (vertical 8 overhd) divided by Wall Area times 100 equals %Glazing Gross Exterior Wall Area N they are insulated to the level required for opaque walls. 1697.0 — 9760.0 X 100 = 17.4% O yes Check here if using this option and U project meets all requirements for the Concrete/Masonry Option. Concrete/1VIasoIiry Option See Decision Flowchart(over)for qualifications Enter requirements for each qualifying assembly Q no below. Envelope Requirements(enter values as applicable) Opaque Concrete/Masonry Wall Requirements Fully heated/cooled space Insulation on interior-maximum U-factor is 0.19 Minimum Insulation R-values Insulation on exterior or integral-maximum U-factor is 0.25 Roofs Over Attic If project qualifies for Concrete/Masonry Option,list walls with HC 2 9.0 Btu/ft-'F below(other walls must meet All Other Roofs, 34.0 Opaque Wall requirements). Use descriptions and values Opaque Walls from Table 20-5b in the Code. Below Grade Walls Wall Description U-factor Floors Over Unconditioned Space (including Insulation R-value&position) Slabs-on-Grade rxTERIOR 0.250 Radiant Floors Maximum U-fadors Opaque Doors 0.086 Vertical Glazing 0.600 Overhead Glazing Maximum SHGC(or SC) Vertical/Overhead Glazing 1.000 Semi-heated space` Minimum Insulation R-values Roofs Over Semi-Heated Spaces' 'Refer to Section 1310 for qualifications and requirements Notes, Ii 1 I 1997 Washington State Nonresidential Energy Code Compliance Form Envelo, • • Zone I ENV-SUM, 1997 Washington State Nonresidential Energy Code Compiance Forms First Edition,June 1999 Decision Flowchart Use this flowchart to determine if project qualifies for the optional Prescriptive Option. for Prescriptive Option If not,either the Component Performance or Systems Analysis Options must be used. 1702 Space Heat Type:For the purpose of determining building envelope _ Electric Resistance:Space healing systems which use electric resistance requirements,the following two categories comprise all space heating types: elements as the primary heating system including baseboard,radiant,and Other.All other space heating systems including gas,solid fuel,oil,and Start forced air units where the total electric resistance heat capacity exceeds 1.0 propane space heating systems and those systems listed in the exception to I - We of the gross conditioned floor area. Exception:Heat pumps and electric resistance (continued at right) terminal electric resistance heating in variable air volume distribution systems. 8edI1C F 851eck — n0 �') yE I At All vdISR11 1 OiteriaOQ r I OiteiaC} . VdISR19 ralabb no (boon) yes I,a yes (boar) no 'taia>icr(1 ,Y am \or '> azi a� to Oaa no ro � nott�?i yeS, yes yes I yes r At Insulation IrEtallecl? At ireJationirt4dlec?? I Al lralatimlrEW]ed? Al IreJadcnInEtal1ed? C�.ieV&I,&s�t�11 q3agxVvills 11 Zp _e_ WFs FJ19 ,QPPeVWlS K19 i Edowgade"dls(ed) R10 �%dls(irt) U0.19 U0.19 lboNgada%�dls(od) R10 WOWgradewdis(dT)R11 t a9MvJls(dher) UO.25 Masxryvells(dJ12r) Ua25 Bdavegradewdls(dt )R19 jFtdsooe-atti s R30 8dowgadeMls(e,Q) R10 'BdONgad Vals(e2) R10 Fbofs over atbcs R3B AId erroofs R21 8cd06vgaJevdlS(d R11 IBdo✓vgadeMls(otMR19 Aldharoofs R30 RoasoAerumrldsz R19 Rxysouatlics R30 Rbofsooerattics R38 Roosmerumxd R30 I9atasorrgraJ2 Rio Al other roofs R21 A)dherroofs R30 9alsaxrade R10 IRxiat floors Rio RoasojeruwdE t R19 Roorsojerulmnd R30 Rd art floors Rio Cpaquedcas U0.60 9absongade R10 9absax3racie Rio QM4eduas UQ60 R3dat floors R10 Rad art floors Rio GazirgOiteriaW? QMQUE!doas U060 Qmquedoos U0.6D GazirgCliteiaMV \kit CH Gazing Oitaia M30 Gazing Oitaia Mgt? aJ, Atm°e U U S'{G Area U U 9{3C 00.15,E Q90 1.45 1.00 erg ONT6 040 Q80 t00 1520°.6 Q75 1.40 1.00 Area°T U U &cam Area' U U &W aB30/o 06D 1.30 Q65 OD•10% 0.90 1.45 1.00 002016 G40 Q80 1.OD yes rO 304(Pi6 Q50 1.25 045 10•1% (175 1.40 1.00 t5,2019 0.65 1.30 08D yes no, no yes 2025% 0.60 1.30 Q65 ro y� L �ned QYTporleri�forrrlrtce Q 9,dtrsAnety sFbq iced Concrete/Masonry Option* Wall Heat Capacity(HC) w the area weighted heat Assembly Description Assy.Tag 116 Area(so HC x Area capacity(HC)of taro timat. .70 10586.0 176786.2 the total above grade wall is a HEM >i HEM WALL 1.00 minimum of 9.0. the Concrete Masonry Option may be used. "For framed walls,assume HC=1.0 unless calculalions are provided:for all other walls,use Totals 10586.0 176786.2 Section 2009. Area weighted HC:divide total of(HC x area)by Total Are 16.70 .t . i L i - - - it I 1994 Washington State Nonresidential Energy Code Compliance Form ,Envelope ` Calculations Climate Zonel ` �99:'',vaet,ngton Stale":cnrosidenbal Energy Code Compliance Fortes First Eaition,June 1999 Project Address LES scawAs TIRE CENTER Date 3/13/2001 Space Heat Type p Electric resistance QQ All other For Building Department Use Glazing Area as%gross exterior wall area 17.4% Prop. 40.OB Max.Target Concrete/Masonry Option O Yes Q No Notes: If glazing area exceeds maximum allowed in Table,then calculate adjusted areas on back(over). If Concrete/Masonry Option is used,Target U-factors,SHGC and Glazing%will be different than shown below. Refer to Table 13-1 for correct values. Building Component Proposed UA Target UA List components by assembly ID&page# U-factor x Area(A) =UA(U x A) U-factor x Area(A) =UA(U x A) U= Plan ID: 0.600 1697.0 1018.2 0.750 1697.0 1272.8 U= Plan ID: Glazing% Electric Resist Other Heating o, U= Plan ID: 0-15% 0.40 0.90 N U= Plan ID: >15-20% 0,40 0.75 > 0 U= "'.Plan ID: >20-30% not allowed 0.60 U= Plan ID: >30-40% not allowed 0.50 U= Plan ID: (see Table 13-1 for Conc/Masonry values) u U= Plan ID: 03 Q U= Plan ID: Glazing% Electric Resist. Other Healing N > U= Plan ID: 0-15% 0.80 1.45 O D U= Plan ID: >15-20% 0.80 1.40 v w yr U= Plan ID: >20-30% not allowed 1.30 .0 w °o U= Plan ID: >30-40% not allowed 1.25 O �_ r U= Plan ID: (see Table 13-1 for ConGMasonry values) O U= Plan ID: w U= PlanlD:sscxxoNAL 0.086 706.0 60.7 0.600 847.0 508.2 `o U= Plan ID:Nm DooR 0.067 141.0 9.4 Electric Resist. Other Heating O U= Plan ID: 0.60 0.60 c u R= Plan ID:ROOF 0.028 13224.0 370.3 0.036 13224.0 476.1 0 O R= Plan ID: ElecWc-,eslsl Other Heating` '1` •ail �'+i• rA R= Plan ID: R- Plan ID: r g R= Plan ID: 4*;'vg'' Elmc T� i er• a R= Plan ID: �-� pia.,._ • +x _ R= PlanID:HAscma 0.250 ?216.0 2804.0 0.400 7216.0 2886.4 R= Plan ID: e1 R= Plan ID: m - Plan ID: ' c es'VR tr''? ION m R= Plan ID:47 rdii�7`€ O R= Plan ID: fe ( R= Plan ID: aL'o2 + r " 1 0 19 -Note:sum of Target Areas here should equal Target Opaque Wall Area see back .:,0.25 a R= Plan ID: 3 R= Plan ID: tsf``"Ot1lir a n i m m R= Plan IDDr�fr0' 2 0.14, •t- t? Note:if insulated to levels required for opaque walls;list above with opaque wallsetet o In R= Plan ID: c R= Plan ID: r ,EWc&6f.1esist. Other Heating" c g R= Plan ID: 0,029 0.056 a � R= Plan ID: c, R= PlanID:sraa rrcoR 621.0 0.540 621.0 335.3 R= Plan ID: Electric Resist. Other Heating ED rn R= Plan ID: F=0.54 F=0.54 (see Table 13-1 for radiant Floor values R= Plan ID: (.s ) .For CMU walls,indicate core insulation material. Totals 23605.0 3262.E Totals 23605.0 5478.8 For compliance: 1)Proposed Total Area shall equal Targ o rea,ano 2)Proposed UA shall not exceeo I argel r i I� i' I 1994 Washington State Nonresidential Energy Code Compliance Form Climate Zone I ENV-SHGC 1997 Washington State Nonresidential Energy Code Compliance Forms t sl Edition.June 1998 Glazing Proposed SHGC Target SHGC List components by assembly ID&page# SHGC' x Area(A) =SHGC x A SHGC x Area(A) =SHGC x A ID: 1.000 1697.0 1697.0 1.000 1697.0 1697.0 ID: Glazing%. Electric Resist.. Other Heating .N ID: 0-20% 1.00 1.00 1d ID: >20-30% not allowed 0.65 C7 ID: >30740%. _ not allowed 0.45 ID: (see Table 13-1 for ConctMasonry values) 'Note:Manufacturers SC may be used in lieu of SHGC. Totals 1697.0 1697.0 Totals 1697.0 1697.0 For compliance:Proposed total SHGC x A shall not exceed Target total SHGC x A NOTE: 1997 NREC revisions allow SHGC compliance for vertical and overhead glazing to be calculated together. The 1994 Forms required separate calculations for vertical and overhead glazing. r TargetArea Adjustment Calculations If the total amount of glazing area as a%of gross exterior wall area(calculated on ENV-SUM 1)exceeds the maximum allowed in Table 13-1. then this calculation must be submitted Use the resulting areas in the Target UA and SHGC calculations above. Proposed Areas: Numbered values are used in calculations below. Roofs over Attics Other Roofs Walls Glazin Area OG 1697.0 Note: g = OG= VG= OG=overhead glazing Opaque Areal- 13224.0 7216.0 VG=vertical glazing Gross Exterior Wall Max Glazing Area Maximum Target Area (Table 13-1) Glazing Area 9760.0 X 40.06 - 100 = 3904.0 Target OG Area in Roofs over Attics Target OG Area in Other Roofs Max OG Remaining Target VG Area For Target OG'a,the 3904.0 — lesser - 3904.0 — _ ::. 69 0 lesser values are II lesser , „ used both here and 1> 3904.0 3.904.'O ;. below. Proposed Opaque Area Proposed OG Area Target OG Area Target Opaque Area Roofs over Attics 13224.0 } Other Roofs + Proposed Opaque Area Proposed VG Area Target VG Area Target Opaque Area Wdia 7216.0 + 1697.0 — 1697.0 - 26 01a>.: Target Areas OK Note: If there is more than one type of wall,the Target VG Area maybe distributed among them,and separate Target Opaque Areas found. If the Target Areas for Opaque walls 9sted on the front must equal the total calculated here. ' Target values in shaded boxes are used in the applicable Target UA calculations on the front. Target VG Area and Total Target OG Area are also used in the applicable Target SHGC calculations above. ' 1997 Washington State Nonresidential Energy Code Compliance Form Building 1997 Washington State Nonresidential Energy Code Complm.�ce Forms First Edition,Juno 1999 Project Address LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER Date 3/13/2001 The following information is necessary to check a building permit application for compliance with the building envelope requirements in the Washington State Nonresidential Energy Code. Applicability Code �on ocation Building Department (yes,no, n.a.) Section Component Information Required Plans Notes GENERAL REQUIREMENTS (Sections 1301-1314) 1301 Scope Unconditioned spaces identified on plans if allowed 1302 Space heat type: If"Other', indicate on plans that electric resistance heat is not allowed 1310.2 Semi-heated spaces Semi-heated spaces identified on plans if allowed 1311 Insulation 1311.1 Insul.installation Indicate densities and clearances 1311.2 Roof/ceiling insul. Indicate R-value on roof sections for attics and other roofs; Indicate clearances for attic insulation; Indicate baffles if eave vents installed; Indicate face stapling of faced batts 1311.3 Wall insulation Indicate R-value on wall sections; Indicate face stapling of faced batts; Indicate above grade exterior insulation is protected; Indicate loose-fill core insulation for masonry walls as necess; Indicate heat capacity of masonry walls if masonry option is used or if credit taken in ENVSTD; 1311.4 Floor insulation Indicate R-value on floor sections; Indicate substantial contact with surface; Indicate supports not more than 24"o.c.; Indicate that insulation does not block airflow through foundation vents 1311.5 Slab-on-grade floor Indicate R-value on wall section or foundation detail; Indicate slab insulation extends down vertically 24"from top; Indicate above grade exterior insulation is protected 1311.6 Radiant floor Indicate R-value on wall section or foundation detail; Indicate slab insulation extends.down vertically 36"from the top; Indicate above grade exterior insulation is protected; Indicate insulation also under entire slab where 'd.by Official 1312 Glazing and doors Provide calculation of glazing area(including both vertical vertical and overheats)as percent of gross wall area 1312.1 U-factors Indicate glazing and door U-factors on glazing and door schedule(provide area-weighted calculations as necessary); Indicate if values are NFRC or default,If values are default then specify frame type,glazing layers,gapwidth,low-e coatings,gas rillings 1312.2 SHGC&SC Indicate glazing solar heat gain eoefrrclent or shading coefficient on glazing schedule(provide area-weighted calculations as necessary) 1313 Moisture control 1313.1 'Vapor retarders Indicate vapor retarders on warm side 1313.2 RooUceiling vap.ret. Indicate vapor retarder on roof section; Indicate vap•retard.with sealed seams for non-wood struc. 1313.3 Wall vapor retarder Indicate vapor retarder on wall section 1313.4 Floor vapor retarder Indicate vapor retarder on floor section 1313.5 Crawl space vap.ret Indicate six mil black polyethylene overlapped 12"on ground 1314 fur leakage 1314.1 Bldg;envel.sealing Indicate sealing,caulking,gasketing,and weatherstripping 1314.2 Glazing/door sealing Indicate weatherstripping 1314.3 A0.ssemb.as ducts Indicate sealing,caulking and gasketing PRESCRIPTIVEICOMPONENT PERFORMANCE (Sections 1320-23 or 1330-34) Envelope Sum.Form Completed and attached. Provide component performance worksheet if necessary Provide ENVSTD screen 1 output if necessary If"no"Is shown for any question,provide explanation: .; �, r •�, J I r, I - - - � � - ,, j - - - - j - - - � - ' t � - - � _ _ � I' �, ' 1997 Washington State Nonresidential Energy Code Compliance Form Building Plans 1997 wastungton State Energy Code Compliance Forms F,rst Edition,June 199t3 nve ope - cienerai Requirements 1311 Insulation Product samples used for 1-1-factor determinations shall be production line units or representative of units as purchased by 1311.1 Installation Requirements: An insulation materials the consumer or contractor. Unlabeled glazing and doors shall shall be installed according to the manufacturer's instructions be assigned the default U-factor in Section 2006. to achieve proper densities,maintain clearances, and maintain 1312.2 Solar Heat Gain Coefficient and Shading uniform R-values. To the maximum extent possible, insulation Coefficient:Solar Heat Gain Coefficient(SHGC), shall be shall extend over the fun component area to the intended R- determined, certified and labeled in accordance with the, value. National Fenestration Rating Council(NFRC) Standard by a 1311.2 Roof/Ceiling Insulation:Open-blown or poured loose- certified, independent agency, licensed by the NFRC. fill insulation may be used in attic spaces where the slope of Exception: Shading coefficients(SC)shall be an the ceiling is not more than 3/12 and there is at least thirty acceptable alternate for compliance with solar heat inches of clear distance from the top of the bottom chord of the gain coefficient requirements. Shading coefficients truss or ceiling joist to the underside of the sheathing at the for glazing shall be taken from Chapter 27 of roof ridge When eave vents are instaled, baffling of the vent Standard RS-27 or from the manufacturer's test data openings shall be provided so as to deflect the incoming air above the surface of the insulation 1313 Moisture Control Where lighting fixtures are recessed into a suspended or 1313.1 Vapor Retarders:Vapor retarders shall be installed on exposed grid ceiling,the roof/ceiling assembly shall be the warm side(in winter) of insulation as required by this insulated in a location other than directly on the suspended section ceiling Exception:Vapor retarder installed with not more Exception: Type IC rated recessed lighting fixtures. than 1/3 of the nominal R-value between it and the Where installed in wood framing,faced batt insulation conditioned space shall be face stapled 1313.2 Roof/Ceiling Assemblies:Roof/ceiling assemblies 1311.3 Wall Insulation:Exterior wall cavities isolated during where the ventilation space above the insulation is less than framing shall be fully insulated to the levels ofthe surrounding an average of twelve inches shall be provided with a vapor walls.When installed in wood framing,faced bait insulation retarder. Roof/ceiling assemblies without a vented airspace, shall be face stapled where neither the roof deck nor the roof structure are made of wood, provide a continuous vapor retarder with taped Above grade exterior insulation shall be protected 1311.4 Floor Insulation: Floor insulation shall be installed in Exception: Vapor retarders need not be provided a permanent manner in substantial contact with the surface where all of the insulation is installed between the being insulated. Insulation supports shall be installed so roof membrane and the structural roof deck spacing is not more than twenty-four inches o1 center. Installed insulation shall not dock the airflowthrough 1313.3 WaIIs:Walts separating conditioned space from foundation waits. unconditioned space shall be provided with a vapor retarder. 1311.5 Slab-On-Grade Floor: Slab-on-grade insulation 1313.4 Floors:Floors separating conditioned space from installed inside the foundation wall shall extend downward from unconditioned space shall be provided with a vapor retarder. the top of the slab a minimum distance of twenty-four inches or 1313.5 Crawl Spaces:A ground cover of six mil(0.006 inch to the top of the footing whichever is less. Insulation installed thick)black polyethylene or approved equal shall be laid over outside the foundation shall extend downward a minimum of the ground within crawl spaces.The ground cover shall be twenty-four inches or to the frost ine,whichever is greater. overlapped twelve inches minimum at thejoirts and shall Above grade insulation shall be protected extend to the foundafion wait Exception:For monolithic slabs,the insulation shall Exception:The ground cover may be omitted in extend downward from the top of the slab to the crawl spaces If the crawl space has a concrete slab bottom of the footing floor with a minimum thickness of three and one-half 1311.6 Radiiant Floors(on or below grade): Slab-on-grade inches. insulation shall extend downward from the top of the slab a 1314 Air Leakage minimum distance of thirty-six inches or downward to the top of 1314.1 Building Envelope:The requirements of this section the footing and horizontal for an aggregate of not less than shall apply to building elements separating conditioned from thirty-six inches. unconditioned spaces. Exterior joints around windows and If required by the building official where sal conditions door frames,openings between walls and foundation between warrant such insulation, the entire area of a radiant floor shall walls and roof and wall panels-,openings at penetrations of be thermally isolated from the soil- Where a sot gas control utility services through walls,floors,and roofs; and all other system is provided below the radiant floor,which results in openings in the building envelope shall be sealed caulked, increased convective flow below the radiant floor,the radiant gasketed, or weatherstripped to limit air leakage floor shall be thermally isolated from the sub-floor gravel layer. 1314.2 Glazing and Doors:Doors and operable glazing 1312 Glazing and Doors separating conditioned from unconditioned space shall be 1312.1 Standard Procedure for Determination of Glazing weatherstripped. Fixed windows shall be tight fitting with glass and Door U-Factors: I_Vactos for glazing and doors shall be retained by stops with sealant or caulking all around determ ined, certified and labeled in accordance with Standard Exception: Openings that are required to be fire RS-31 by a certified independent agency licensed by the resistant National Fenestration Rating Council(NFRC). Compliance 1314.3 Building Assemblies Used as Ducts or Plenums: shall be based on the Residential or the Nonresidential Model Building assemblies used as duds or plenums shall be sealed, Size caulked, and gasketed to limit air leakage. PROPOSED MASONRY WALL ASSEMBLY ENV-3 DATE PROJECT NAME LE- L C' 1�/�Q - ��sE�/ �T� �j 13 'C•l COMPONENT DESCRIPTION 1 ASSEMBLY NAME DESCRIPTION OFljSSEMBLY =SA _ (og W W 0 0 1 Z SKETCH OF ASSEMBLY WALL R-VALUE and HEAT CAPACITY �If WALL UNIT THICKNESS NOMINAL INCHES MATERIAL TYPE I ,W LM (LW CMU,MW CMU,NW CMU,CLAY UNIT,CLAY BRICK,CONCRETE.) CORE TREATMENT �PrR�-T. ,-1SSJ�� (SOLID,GROUTED,EMPTY,INSULATED,NA) WALL R-VALUE Rw(FROM TABLE B-4 or B-5) WALL HEAT CAPACITY ( �'O HC(FROM TABLE B-4 or B-5) FURRING/INSULATION LAYER (INSIDE and/or OUTSIDE IF ANY) FURRING FRAMING MATERIAL (WOOD,METAL,NONE) FURRING FRAMING SIZE NOMINAL INCHES ACTUAL INCHES TYPE R-VALUE FURRING SPACE INSULATION EXTERIOR INSULATING AREA TYPE R-VALUE INSULATION LAYER FURRING ASSEMBLY EFFECTIVE R-VALUE EXTERIOR INSULATING LAYER R-VALUE R-VALUE + Rf (FROM TABLE B 7) (FROM MANUFACTURER) WALL ASSEMBLY R-VALUE and U-VALUE INSULATION LAYER WALL R-VALUE WALL ASSEMBLY R-VALUE WALL ASSEMBLY U-VALUE R-VALUE �j c 3.�c -+ I r Z� '" -9`� :J 11Rt Rf Rw R t November 1998 Nonresidential Compliance Form Les Schwab Tire Center Arlington, Washington SEPA Environmental Checklist Prepared for. City of Arlington Public Works Arlington, WA BUILDINU Prepared by: DEPT, KPFF Consulting Engineers ! 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 .. Seattle, WA 98101 KPFF Project No. 99194.2 RECEIVED October 9, 2000 JAN 16 2001 CITY OF ARLINGTON o � � y3� Les Schwab Tire Center SEPA Environmental Checklist Arlington, Washington KPFF Consulting Engineers TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Les Schwab Tire Center 2. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. This project involves the construction of a 16,234-square foot Les Schwab Tire Center on an undeveloped 1.82-acre site. The entire property will be developed, 87 percent of which will be an impervious surface (building or parking lot), and the remainder will be landscaped and drainage facilities. 3. Name of applicant: KPFF Consulting Engineers,Inc.,for LS Construction Company 4. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: KPFF Consulting Engineer LS Construction Company 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 646 N. Madras Highway Seattle, WA 98101 Prineville, OR 97754 Phone: (206) 622-5822 Phone: (541) 416-5162 Contact: Mark R. Steepy Contact: Greg McDonald 5. Date checklist prepared: August 25, 2000 6. Agency requesting checklist: City of Arlington 7. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Plans for commercial development of the site are expected to be submitted during the fall of 2000. Construction will occur in one phase commencing at plan approval. Anticipated construction to begin in winter of 2001 and last for 4 months. October 9, 2000 Page 1 Les Schwab Tire Center SEPA Environmental Checklist Arlington, Washington KPFF Consulting Engineers 8. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No. 9. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared or will be prepared directly related to this proposal. PSI, Inc., has prepared a Geotechnical Investigation Report, dated November 25, 1998. A copy has been attached for review. PSI, Inc. has prepared a Field Infiltration Analyses And Subsurface Exploration Report, dated May 18, 1999. A copy has been attached for review. 10. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None. 11. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. The only known permits required will be Building/Grading Permits issued by the City of Arlington. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The site is bordered by 166th Place to the south, Smokey Point Blvd to the west. The site is located in the northwest quarter of Section 28, Township 31N, Range 5E, W.H. in Snohomish County, Washington. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (underline one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? The site is flat with no slope greater than 5 percent. October 9, 2000 Page 2 i Les Schwab Tire Center SEPA Environmental Checklist Arlington, Washington KPFF Consulting Engineers c. What general types• of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. The top layer is sandy gravel underlain by a medium dense silty sand layer. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. None known. e. Describe the purpose, type and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Approximately 2,500 cubic yards of fill is required to provide positive surface drainage. The source of fill is unknown at this time, but will be provided from an approved list of borrow pits. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction or use? If so, generally describe? As the existing area adjacent to the site is extremely flat, erosion will not occur. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 87 percent. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: The applicant will implement a Temporary Erosion/Sedimentation Control (TESC) Plan during construction. After construction, all exposed soils will be protected with landscaping. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors,...industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any;generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Vehicular exhaust emissions to the air will occur from machinery and trucks during construction, but should be negligible. October 9, 2000 Page 3 Les Schwab Tire Center SEPA Environmental Checklist Arlington, Washington KPFF Consulting Engineers b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may effect your proposals? If so, generally describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Vehicle exhaust emissions are controlled by State and Federal Regulations. Dust during construction will be controlled through compliance with other State Regulations. 3. Water a. Surface 1) Is there any surface.water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-around and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No. 2) Will the project require any work over, in or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. N/A 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. N/A 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. October 9, 2000 Page 4 Les Schwab Tire Center SEPA Environmental Checklist Arlington, Washington KPFF Consulting Engineers 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. An infiltration pond will be used to detain and discharge runoff into the ground at a rate of 0.85 inches per minute. The pond was designed to detain storm events up to the 100 year/24-hour with a storage volume of 3,735 cf Floatables will be trapped via oil/water separators prior to discharging into pond. Some stormwater runoff from landscaping areas may infiltrate into the groundwater as well. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. N/A c. Water Runoff(including stormwater) 1) Describe the source of runoff (including stormwater) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. The developed 1.82-acre project site will constitute 0.33 acres for building space, 1.25 acres for parking lot, and 0.24 acres for landscaping and frontage improvements. The proposed drainage system will involve catch basins collecting on-site stormwater runoff, convey the runoff through a series of PVC pipes and discharge into an oil/water separator. ,From the oil/water separator, the runoff is directed into an infiltration pond where it is detained and discharged into the ground. Excess runoff above the 100 year storm volume is conveyed through an emergency spillway pipe and released into the existing storm drainage system under 166th Place. October 9, 2000 Page 5 Les Schwab Tire Center SEPA Environmental Checklist Arlington, Washington KPFF Consulting Engineers 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? Is so, generally describe. Pollutants from rooftops, parking surfaces, and landscape fertilizers could enter ground or surface waters, but is not anticipated. d. Proposed measured to reduce or control surface, ground and runoff water impacts, if any: A TESC plan will be implemented during construction. Post-development drainage facilities will be designed to limit peak runoff to existing flow rates and will incorporate water quality improvement measures. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other: X evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other X shrubs X grass X pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other: water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other: other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Dense brush and grass cover the entire property surface with two individual trees standing at the northern border line and within the northern middle portion of the property, respectively. The two trees will either be relocated or removed and the remainder of the site stripped for the development. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None are.known. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation.on the site, if any: A landscaping plan will be prepared to landscape the site in accordance with City regulations. October 9, 2000 Page 6 Les Schwab Tire Center SEPA Environmental Checklist Arlington, Washington KPFF Consulting Engineers 5. Animals a. Underline any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None are known. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity and natural gas. Gas may be used for heating. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds -of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: The structures will be built in conformance with the Washington State Energy Code. October 9, 2000 Page 7 Les Schwab Tire Center SEPA Environmental Checklist Arlington, Washington KPFF Consulting Engineers 7. Environmental Health . a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. The construction of a building will increase the possibility of fire at the site. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Police and aid service requirements will increase. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Fire suppression system and security monitoring. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Traffic on Smokey Point Blvd. and Interstate S are the dominant sources of noise at and near the project site. However, this noise would not affect our project. 2) What types and level of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Sources of noise identified for the development and operation of a Les Schwab Tire Center on site are as follows: Construction-related noise for approximately 4 months,from 7:00 am to S:00 pm, S days per week. After construction, typical tire changing operations may be heard in the immediate vicinity 7 days per week, 7 am to 6 pm. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: The generated noise during construction will be limited to normal business hours. Operational noise should not affect adjacent businesses. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Currently, the site is vacant and consists of dense brush and grass. October 9, 2000 Page 8 Les Schwab Tire Center SEPA Environmental Checklist Arlington, Washington KPFF Consulting Engineers b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Not known. c. Describe any structures on the site. None exist. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? HC(highway commercial). f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? HC(highway commercial). g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. i. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. j. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed area? 20 people. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any. The project is consistent with City of Arlington zoning and will be designed in accordance with City standards. October 9, 2000 Page 9 e M mom IF ■ K Les Schwab Tire Center SERA Environmental Checklist Arlington, Washington KPFF Consulting Engineers 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. N/A b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. N/A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building materials(s) proposed? The tallest building height is 24 feet above the finished floor elevation. The exterior building materials will be CMU(masonry) b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: An integrated landscaping plan will be developed to screen building and parking areas from adjacent streets and properties. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposals produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? New sources of light and glare will be incidental lights from building lights, parking lot lighting, signs and potential glare from building windows. Light impacts would occur during nighttime hours and glare from windows could occur during daylight hours, particularly on sunny days, but should be negligible. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. October 9, 2000 Page 10 ��. s d� ; i .,. i - �. �•� _ .�. :3 1 - - w� A��• ��r. i LL - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - � - - - - - - - w� I _ 1 Les Schwab Tire Center SEPA Environmental Checklist Arlington, Washington KPFF Consulting Engineers 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The site is bordered by parking lot to the north, 166th Place to the south, and Smokey Point Blvd. to the west. Two driveways will access 166th Place. b. Is site currently served by the public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Snohomish County Community Transit serves Smokey Point Blvd.. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? No parking stalls will.be eliminated-48 will be provided (2 handicapped stalls). d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Daily: 358 one-way trips per day (179 trips inbound and 179 trips outbound). PM Peak Hours Between 4:00 p.m. and 6 p.m.: 59 one-way trips per hour (25 trips inbound and 34 trips outbound). g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: October 9, 2000 Page 12 �1 ■ (i arown L mom J ■ Xmmm ■m % i160, i . T Les Schwab Tire Center SEPA Environmental Checklist Arlington, Washington KPFF Consulting Engineers c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any. Parking lot lighting will be directed downward using low cut-off luminaires. 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None are known in the immediate area. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: N/A 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. None are known. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any. N/A October 9, 2000 Page 11 I Les Schwab Tire Center SEPA Environmental Checklist Arlington, Washington KPFF Consulting Engineers 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Fire and police protection may increase slightly as the currently vacant site would now become a business. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. All new buildings will be constructed to meet the applicable codes relating to fire prevention and suppression. 16. Utilities a. Underline utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utilities providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. All needed utilities are located within the 166th Place right-of-way. Typical utility trenching will occur from the existing line to the building. The providers are: Electricity: Snohomish County PUD Natural Gas: Cascade Water: City of Marysville Refuse Service: Waste Management Northwest Telephone: GTE(Verizon) Sanitary Sewer, City of Marysville C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the City i o t m t ake its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: October 9, 2000 Page 13 Les Schwab Tires Smokey Point, WA Structural Calculations 1. L -0, J• �", J Pi• j ti Jl� �r�IGT LPL\ ///Ok/ EXPIRES 09-24-01- 3 U I L07" 1146 U� k DEPT. Leonard Engineering Services rn. 1411 Fourth Avenue, Suite 1240 Seattle, WA 98101 RECEIVED JAN 16 2001 September 2000 CITY OF ARLINGTON w e. i -Z if A, . � �� t r�� i s �` . r �. 1 `.� ', . _ l LEONARD Desg��a� ENGINEERING SERVICES 1411 FOURTH AVENUE, SUITE 1240 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 PHONE 206 624.9393•FAX 206 624 9645 Design Criteria 1997 Uniform Building Code Seismic Zone 3 80 mph Wind, Exposure "B" Allowable Soil Bearing Pressure=2500 psf Wind Load P=CeCgQsl Ce=0.67 Cq=1 .3 for primary system 1 .5 for wall corners 1 .3 for roof elements Qs= 16.4 psf 1= 1 .0 For primary system: P=0.67xl.3xl 6.4xl .0=14.3 psf Seismic Load V=2.5Cal xW Ca=0.36 R 1= 1 .0 R= 4.5 for primary wall system 4 for diaphragm For primary wall system: V=(2.5x0.36xl .0)/4.5 xW=0.20W (Ultimate load) For diaphragm: V=(2.5x0.36xl .0)/4xW=0.225W (Ultimate load) z� Grovily framing Wind Uplift Roof Dead Load: Framing 5 psf 2 psf Decking 2.5 2 Ceiling 2.5 1 Roofing 3 -- Insulation 1 -- Misc. 1 1 Tota 1 15 psf 6 psf Roof Live Load/Snow Load=25 psf Shearwall and Diaphragm Design I Innovative NARO Structural LEODesign � ENGINEERING SERVICES 1411 FOURTH AVENUE, SUITE 1240 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 fruS U Y11 E P_D UT E P PcT fli/Yi n z = CtP I t x L�l l ,' 048 * _-T1 5 (cvorL� n 114 -k ZY AF 8 � y 7� ox��sL L 2�, 8 n ;� r' _ _ I J - I � � � ■ Vnnor°iive �� ONARD Desig LEDesign ENGINEERING SERVICES _ 1411 FOURTH AVENUE, SUITE 1240 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 \ = As �, o�z -�-�2n - O,�1- a — 3 2 m A5j j z !Z 1015. WALL. OIJ I. 7-0 L�l 20 * is all 0 P S i k-4 4 T � 4 I Inm*clve 'el ARD Structurcl IEONDasign ENGINEERING SERVICES 1411 FOURTH AVENUE, SUITE 1240 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 Soo + sno t (&4-ZD (y/ _ / 77& l-t _ Z a = -7 Lo �isiJ l� �G�06t,9 ff 46 ' COZ I I role SS i V� LESS zoX-1z = 9s G Q9 r Z, 53 Fa- � _ z (2' z Fa- Gff�G� lJi I /7-Y vac Q 10 sc LD El ill � I ��.."'i / .`� �, C l \mil I i �� I Er�fl I D Inn aural LEONAR Structural C Li ' � "� Design I�Es ,�, � J-n �� lit-v ENGiN'_ERiNG SERVICES 1411 FOURTH AVENUE, SUITE 1240 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 �j . Vino I � - Z-J, SZ � C ; _ _ u i Innorofive 1Y Structural _ LEONARD Design �� ENGINEERING SERVICES ��S :-'��; 1411 FOURTH AVENUE, SUITE 12d0 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 �C `^' • l�'}� _ I -,il j �� _. %'.,� �, 'r ! f-? k'_� � /F�. � !. "i-' -. `✓�� '' u/r'- Imo. 5Fv ,� N+A, I I� 'Sr• /� ..r ��ICJ r � � .�� l�� l 1�'1-l� r " J I V z- I ,/ ��• � '� MLo _r i 1z lu ' Toy/-Y A � � !� .:. I Innovorive D/ r 5h-uctur [EONARD Design ENGINEERING SERVICES 1411 FOURTH AVENUE, SUITE 1240 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 7-1 Aj 1/7 (zl l ` _ r J I �yt I _ ��t I . .. I lnnovctive ON De�gn -7-1 ENGINEERING SERVICES 1411 FOURTH AVENUE, SUITE 12,10 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 9810) 7— /J I . ZL 1 _G7 S Yuja v v z I zi;� -7 r-v I ot J p. _I) ti IEONARD -D t esigntu ral JP. E, I I2E-J ENGINEERING SERVICES 1411 FOURTH AVENUE, SUITE 12AO SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 I `0, -3 G i -7 347 InnaraHve INNARO Structural LE L� 4' � ' '-' 5 I IZ.E J / Design E�rGNEERING SERVICES 1411 FOURTH AVENUE, SUITE 1240 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 1-7 Q,G-5 L _ Y ! 7r 0/U Iz-y I & s Qv 0 Innovative ' HARD structural LEODesign ENGINEERING SERVICES _ � ��/ 1411 FOURTH AVENUE, SUITE 1240 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 S��c IZIOAZ �o`v 7�1� fir` EL icy G�J Ids �o 0, 0007 P WLIV1 = o - oo z �02 �� m 0P7 Ho21E. � v"p- E , iv TO 2c.e m n f3 � � 0 . 0017 s Wiz'' f-for i 01001 00I 3 + . 00 -7 = o, , ooZ -4c 5 C-' z4'' Vrer LEONARD .5 ructufive Strvdun �-ral � rL ; /esig ENGINEERING SERVICES loll FOURTH AVENUE, SUITE 1240 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 I N TE f E /J -5 1 ,l CC 7- _ r c ►,� i IV 84 % L zZ C�� C = 33 i9 1 `� ?--• l Roof Framing and Column Design i h I I z-7 I '' ►. I I7 1I I I ► I . I I l LI I : I I I-27 I I 1 2 I I 127 I I � Y 1 II II � 1 � ■ � � � 1 1 1 I ' 1 1 �� e s�„ctural LEONARDDesign — y ENGINEERING SERVICES 1411 FOURTH AVENUE, SUITE 1240 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 �f - COO F 90 l�T 1 J v �' f� r �IEONARD ° °�0he Sww�►°1 LDS �Guv�Y' Ti�e�-S Design ENGINEERING SERVICES 1411 FOURTH AVENUE, SUITE 1240 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 ��vE ��1�� ► (LI� � IC 40 �1� C9 !o�1aL pPr�=40 ,ZI � i � . � . Innovative • Structural Title: Job# INNARD Design Dsgnr: Date: 3:24PM, 5 SEP 00 ENGINEERING SERVICES Description 1411 FOURTH AVENUE, SUITE 1240 Scope SEATtLE, WASHINGTON 98101 Rev:e0e001 Steel Beam Design Page 1 .� Description Les Schwab Tires, B-1 M e General Information Steel Section : W14X22 Fy 50.00ksi Pinned-Pinned Load Duration Factor 1.00 Center Span 17.33 ft Bm Wt.Added to Loads Elastic Modulus 29,000.Oksi Left Cant. 0.00 ft LL&ST Don't Act Together Right Cant 0.00 ft Lu : Unbraced Length 0.00 ft Distributed Loads #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 D L 0.400 k/ft LL 1.000 k/ft ST k/ft Start Location ft End Location ft Summary Beam OK Using:W14X22 section,Span=17.33ft, Fy=50 Oksi End Fixity= Pinned-Pinned, Lu=0.00ft, LDF=1.000 Actual Allowable Moment 53.385 k-ft 79.658 k-ft Max. Deflection -0.500 in fb : Bending Stress 22.116 ksi 33.000 ksi Length/DL Defl 1,401.2 : 1 fb/Fb 0.670 : 1 Length/(DL+LL Defl) 415.9 : 1 Shear 12.322 k 63.204 k fv: Shear Stress 3.899 ksi 20.000 ksi fv/Fv 0.195 : 1 Force & Stress Summary <- These columns are Dead + Live Load placed as noted--» DL LL LL+ST LL LL+ST Maximum Only a Center a Center a Cants a Cants Max. M + 53.39 k-ft 15.84 53.39 k-ft Max. M- k-ft Max. M @ Left k-ft Max. M @ Right k-ft Shear @ Left 12.32 k 3.66 12.32 k Shear @ Right 12.32 k 3.66 12.32 k Center Defl. -0.500 in -0.148 -0.500 -0.148 0.000 0.000 in Left Cant Defl 0.000 in 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 in Right Cant Defl 0.000 in 0.000 0.000 0.000 0,000 0.000 in ...Query Defl @ 0.000 ft 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0,000 in Reaction @ Left 12.32 3.66 12.32 3.66 k Reaction @ Rt 12.32 3.66 12.32 366 k Fa catc'd per 1.5-1, K"L/r<Cc Section Properties W14X22 Depth 13.740 in ?ig 22.04 #/ft r-xx 5.537 in Width 5.000 in I-xx 199.00 in4 r-yy 1.039 in Web Thick 0.230 in I-yy 7.00 in4 Rt 1.250 in Flange Thickness 0.335 in S-xx 28.967 in3 Area 6.49 in2 S-yy 2.800 in3 (c) 1983-98 ENERCALC KW-0603311,Ver 5.0.6, 15-Jul-1998,Win32 ■ or ■ '■ ■ ■ ' 1 1 Miw ■' ,.AM ` J 0 ■ ■ S. ME ME MEN ME ■ ' 1 ■ ■ _ ME ■ ■ ■ MN_ ■ J ■ ME ■ MENEM ■ MEN ■ ■ ■ ■ ME ■ ■ ■ ME ■ ■ 1 ME • ■ ME ■ 1 ■ 1 Ai ml ,4 ME MEN NOMINEE! 0 MEN NE■■ ■ 1 1 ■ MIME . Z` 1 L. ■lm .Elm ' ME . 1 ■ ■ _ _ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ME ■ ME 0-0 V I G�B'FORMLOK NORMAL WEIGHT CONCRETE (145 pcf) TOTAL : , ; • . . . . : . . . . SLAB 1 GALVANIZED OR PHOSPHATIZED/PAINTED DEPTH I YZ >ri 4 or•7 WELDS ALLOWABLE SUPERIMPOSED LOADS (Lbs./Sq. Ft.), DIAPHRAGM SHEAR VALUES (q) (Lbs./L.F.) AND FLEXIBILITY FACTORS (F) NUMBER TOTAL SLAB DEPTH DECK GAGE OF SPANS SPAN &CONCRETE WT. psf &WT.psf q4 q7 6'-0' I 6 r-6" 7'-0" 7'-6" 8'-0 8'-6" 9'-0' 9'-6' 10'-0" 10'-6" 11'-0" F 1 232 199 173 151 132 117 104 92 82 74 66 2 261 228 202 151 132 117 104 92 82 74 66 22 3 261 228 202 151 132 117 104 92 82 74 66 q4 1825 1785 1755 1725 1700 1680 1660 1640 1625 1610 1600 1 9 F4 A5 46 47 48 48 49 50 50 51 51 52 q7 2035 1980 1935 1895 1855 1825 1800 1775 1750 1730 1715 F7 4 .43 p 1 275 240 183 160 141 124 110 98 88 79 71 2 275 240 212 189 170 124 110 98 88 79 71 3 ��" 20 3 275 840 805 1 89775 1 70745 715 695 98 88 79 71 ' q4 1890 1845 1805 1775 1745 1715 1695 1670 1655 1635 1620 2 3 F4 .40 .41 42 42 43 44 44 45 45 46 46 q7 2145 2080 2020 1975 1930 1895 1860 1830 '1605 1780 1760 1 298 261 230 205 184 137 122 108 97 87 78 2 298 261 230 205 184 167 152 108 97 87 78 3 0.5 $ 3 298 261 230 205 184 167 152 138 127 87 78 q4 2045 1985 1930 1885 1845 1810 1780 1750 1725 1705 1685 2 9 F4 32 33 34 35 35 36 37 37 38 38 39 q7 238 22295 2220 2155 2095 2050 2005 1965 1930 1895 1865 75 1 298 260 230 205 184 166 151 108 96 86 78 2 298 260 230 205 184 166 151 138 127 86 78 1 6 3 298 260 230 205 184 166 151 138 127 117 108 q4 2215 2140 2070 2015 1965 1920 1880 1845 1815 1785 1760 3.5 F4 26 27 28 29 .30 30 .31 .32 .32 33 33 q7 2635 2525 2430 2350 2280 2215 2160 2110 2065 2025 1990 F7 .22 1 .23 .24 .25 1 26 .26 7 28 28 4 1 1 269 231. 200 175 153 135 120 107 95 85 76 2 300 266 200 175 153 135 120 107 95 85 76 2 2 3 300 266 200 175 153 135 120 107 95 a5 76 q4 2065 2025 1995 1965 1940 1915 1900 1880 1865 1850 1835 1.9 F4 40 41 .41 42 42 43 43 44 44 45 45 q7 2215 2220 2170 260 2095 2065 2035 2015 1990 1970 1950 e 1 1 300 244 212 185 163 144 127 113 101 91 8 1 2 300 279 247 220 163 144 127 113 101 91 81 4 20 3 300 279 247 220 163 144 127 113 101 91. _8t q4 2130 2085 2045 2010 [2170 980 1955 1930 1910 1890 1875 1860 2 3 F4 35 36 37 37 .38 .38 39 39 40 40 40 q7 2385 2315 2260 2215 2135 2100 2070 2045 2020 1995 F7 4 a5 1 300 300 266 237 178 157 140 125 112 100 90 2 300 300 266 237 213 193 140 125 112 100 90 36.6 18 3 300 300 266 237 213 193 175 160 112 100 90 q4 2285 2225 2170 2125 2085 2050 2020 1990 1965 1945 1925 2 9 F4 29 29 30 31 31 32 32 33 .33 34 34 q7 2620 2530 2460 2395 2335 2285 2240 2205 2165 2135 2105 F7 j 1 300 300 265 236 212 192 138 123 110 99 89 2 300 300 265 236 212 192 174 159 110 99 89 16 3 300 300 265 236 212 192 174 159 146 135 89 q4 2455 2375 2310 2255 2205 2160 2120 2085 2055 2025 2000 3.5 F4 -24 25 25 26 26 .27 27 28 28 29 29 q7 2870 2765 2670 2590 2520 2455 2400 2350 2305 2265 2230 F7 .20 .21 .22 .22 .24 1 .24 5 .26 .2F 1 300 265 '229 200 175 155 137 122 109 97 87 2 300 300 229 200 175 155 137 122 109 97 87 22 3 300 300 229 200 175 155 137 122 109 97 87 q4 2305 2265 2230 2205 2180 2155 2135 2120 2105 2090 2075 1.9 F4 36 -36 37 37 38 38 39 39 39 39 40 q7 2510 2460 2410 2370 2335 2305 2275 2250 2230 2210 2190 F7 d 35 1 S a ( 7 12 1 300 279 242 211 .186 164 146 129 116 103 93 2 300 300 282 211 186 164 146 129 116 103 93 3 300 4 1/2 2 3 30 282 252 16 164 146 129 116 103 93 20 I q4 23770 2325 2285 2250 2220 2195 2170 2150 2130 21115 2100 FS 32 32 33 33 .34 34 .35 35 35 36 36 q7 2620 2555 2500 2450 2410 2370 2340 2310 2280 2260 2235 iilk 1 300 300 300 231 203 180 159 1=2 127 114 103 2 300 300 300 272 244 220 159 142 127 114 103 4 2.7 1 8 q4 2525 2450 24110 2365 2325 22990 2260 2230"" 220 2180 2160 2.9 Fd 26 .26 .27 .28 28 28 .29 .29 .30 30 30 F� 2860 2770 2695 2630 2575 2525 2480 2440 2405 2375 2345 1 300 300 300 270 242 177 158 140 126 112_'.' 101 2 300 300 300 270 242 219 199 140 126 '."112 101 16 3 300 300 300 270 242 219 199 182 167 112_ w10.1_ _ q4 2695 2615 2550 2495 2445 2400 2360 2325 2295 2265 2240 3.5 F4 22 22 23 23 24 24 25 25 25 26 26 q7 3110 3000 2910 2830 2760 2695 2640 2590 2545 2505 2470 F7 .19 .19 .20 .21 .21 1 .22 .22 .22 .23 .23 .24 6 Shoring required In shaded areas VERCO 1 1 •: - 1 1 _ - - � 1 ■ ■ � �1 y � 1 1 1 1 1 3-43 z k IF, = 46ksl COLUMNS '9 ' ' Square structural tubing kips Allowable concentric loads in kips 5 x 5 Nominal Size 4 x 4 3 x 3 z '/e S/+e '/� rev ThlCkness '/x 3/e S/+e 'h �/ie s/+e '/4 �/ie 43 22.37 19.08 15.62 11.97..: Wt./ft 21.63 17.27 14.83 12.21 9.42 10.58 6.81 6.87 1 182 155 127 97.:% 0 176 140 120 99 76 86 71 56 2 168 134 115 95 73 80 67 53 0 159 136 111 86 ` {S 3 162 130 112 92 71 77 64 50 3 153 131 108 83' }` 4 156 126 108 89 69 73 61 48 6 148 127 104 81j 5 150 121 104 86 67 68 57 45 8 142 122 100 7TAt. , 8 143 115 100 83 64 63 53 42 9 135 116 96 74 7 135 110 95 79 61 57 49 39 8 126 103 90 75 58 51 44 35 0 129 111 92 71.✓ "'- r^•ro 9 117 97 84 70 55 44 38 31 1 122 105 87 67*..J � ;� 10 108 89 78 65 51 37 33 27 1 115 99 82 64 l ;a!� 11 98 82 72 60 47 31 27 22 99 86 72 1 1 93 77 60;?i_ � 12 87 74 65 55 43 26 23 19 99 56� . 13 75 65 58 49 39 22 19 16 14 65 57 51 43 35 19 17 14 7 90 79 66 15 57 49 44 38 30 16 15 12 82 72 60 47- 73 64 54 �`'43;:. ;,`,,. 16 50 43 39 33 27 14 13 11 j 3 65 58 49 .'39 17 44 38 34 29 24 13 11 9 59 52 44 35 18 39 34 31 26 21 10 8 n.£ 19 35 31 26 24 19 54 47 40 32', 20 32 28 25 21 17 Y I l 49 43 36 29': 21 29 25 23 19 16 ' 41 36 31 24 22 26 23 21 18 14 35 31 26 21:' 23 24 21 19 16 13 30 27 22 19" - :" 24 19 17 15 12 26 23 20 15 25 14 11 25 1 22 18 . 14 • ; r' i� 17 .14 W- I sY, _ �1 Properties i 6.58 5.61 . 6.36 5.08 4.36 359 277 311 2.59 2.02 .,A(In. ) 0 45 )22.8 2 . 6S3 (n 12.3 10.7 9.58 6.22 6.59 3.58 3.16 2.60 1.86 1A 1.92 1.95 "f(in.) 1.39 1.45 1.48 1.51 1.54 1.07 1.10 1.13 0.722 0.699 0.677 0.658 .I 3l6ending 1.04 0.949 0.910 0.874 0.840 1.30 1.23 1.17 factor 3.39 2.99 2.52 2.00 is -ill 0, 1.83 1.59 1.43 1.22 0.983 0.533 0.470 0.387 Note:Heavy line indicates KUr of 200. AMERIG`i INSTTNTE OF STEEL CONSTAOCTiON l ION ■ ` . ., . -. •0 ON , -lL i OIL No if . •. - , ON No Ir ro IN EN 0 ` - 1 - . . ON ON .F •. . ■ ■ No ■ 1• • ■ ON ■ — ON ON 16 1- i. ■ , � . � . — ■ 1 1 ON - 1 J1 � ■ 1 Innovative 5/ HARD Structural INIDesign ENGINEERING SERVICES 1411 FOURTH AVENUE, SUITE 1240 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 q -7 4- -7 5) Its OD 3 J Mom, = iIzk F' - A - � - � i�►. ... Innovative Z q LEONARD De 9ural L�cJ -c, w r, Ti e.e 5 ENGINEERING SERVICES 1411 FOURTH AVENUE, SUITE 1240 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 Sl`)AJ � L T,1` .S (fr/"J 5 = b 8) 59 `7 > Z7 q o 4- -C-i 2* u.� hL - �- z Z { 5 5 Z )� 1 Z - i i � i • n � - ' - - - - - — — - -_ i - - 1 Innovative NARO Design Structural [EO Designn �S u�C,•}-�'.l� �,rj ��s z 5/ ENGINEERINr,SERVICES 1411 FOURTH AVENUE, SUITE 1240 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 zo ' l �j4xIco" i D = /4 717 ZOO f4 08ZOz- zo L z g z g 4 9 Z 7 /0 /00 X l r L LD,Ll— 0 03 I to -7 4 i _ x r. - i i� ,I Inno,wlive LEONARODesign aural �— S �A w f'r-, ENGINEERING SERVICES 1411 FOURTH AVENUE, SUITE 1240 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON Q8101 0 •l 12-Y F) -C I G 1\4 CO rj T JE T I� I� I � o /Z -7 v , I � � r � 500 Z �-�- �- I 6.z � - i � c V _ - - - - _ i Innova tive Structural Design ICES 1411 FOURTH AVENUE, SUITE 1240 SEATTIE, WASHINGTON 98101 7 pa- � z ,� r^� COI 59 li (, r 5 Lv 4 PLA Pa r-,1 j. 2 _ + 0 Z 7— = o, Z3 x 7411 7 j y :#� �, 'i � ~. i i Innovativeaural _ 2G�/ Structural LEONARD / Design ENGINEERING SERVICES 1411 FOURTH AVENUE, SUITE 12d0 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 MP3 Zo ` = zfl 13, ! x- 14, 7 = ►q 3 PP L _ /4, 7 - 79 7 4— /-51, ILA Iz/o " e _ j 13 7DZ �i I .-7Lo _ .3, 0144 Vz- ijr) 44-55 a .ff �:E .� HARD in Structural Design ENGINEERING SERVICES 1411 FOURTH AVENUE, SUITE 1240 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 11 _ z O, c�oz8 = 0 , 31 � OJQ I VVA . � �r: V LOLEsInnovative 30/ E NARDDesign ra1 �z E ENG�NEERiNGSERVICES 1411 FOURTH AVENUE, SUITE 1240 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 Ax. � At� toJ4 Pr r — � ZJ Z,-7 7-7 Zo ,-yQti q ray; � � ■ _ 31 Foundation Design 9 rar. -1.1a 0m1 . 0 1 7 Innovative structural :. LEONAR D Design r" li j1411 FOURTH AVENUE,SUITE 1240 : SEATTLE. WASHINGTON T J EJ I I i cr l S" �. I - � �N U-1 i u- I PA ) 1 V_I 1' - a innovative / S,Nu�rol Design lEONMiRD 1411 FOURTH AVENUE, SUITE 1240 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 "� � r JJ � �.✓�=%I - � --d CPS� �l L� ��-oei^:J la PLC 0) L 21 i'� f o F- 7 1 ' e-'.9 rs 4- I CIi C J 1 Innovotive Title 7, INNARD Design Descri Date: 8 36AM,J7 SEP 00 ENGINEERING SERVICES Description 1411 FOURTH AVENUE, SUITE 1240 Scope SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 Rev 508001 Square Footing Design Page 1 Description F3.5 F-General Information T Dead Load 28.500 k Footing Dimension 3.500 ft Live Load 0.000 k Thickness 12.00 in Short Term Load 0.000 k #of Bars 3 Seismic Zone 3 Bar Size 4 Overburden Weight 0.000 psf Rebar Cover 3.250 Concrete Weight 145.00 pcf fc 3,000.0 psi LL&ST Act Separately Fy 60,000.0 psi Load Duration Factor 1.000 Column Dimension 4.00 in Allowable Soil Bearing 2,500.00 psf General - - - - Rebar Requirement Actual Rebar"d"depth used 8.500 in As to USE per foot of Width 0.153 in2 200/Fy 0.0033 Total As Req'd 0.535 in2 As Req'd by Analysis 0.0011 in2 Min Allow% Reinf 0.0014 Min. Reinf%to Req'd 0.0015 % Summary I Footing OK 3.50ft square x 12.Oin thick with 3-#4 bars Max. Static Soil Pressure 2,471.53 psf Vu : Actual One-Way 29.68 psi Allow Static Soil Pressure 2,500.00 psf Vn`Phi :Allow One-Way 93.11 psi Max. Short Term Soil Pressure 2,471.53 psf Vu :Actual Two-Way 90.90 psi Allow Short Term Soil Pressure 2,500.00 psf Vn'Phi :Allow Two-Way 186.23 psi Alternate Rebar Selections... Mu :Actual 4.34 k-ft 3 #4's 2 #5's 2 #6's Mn'Phi : Capacity 6.43 k-ft 1 #Ts 1 #8's 1 #9's 1 # 10's (c) 1983-98 ENERCALC T KW-0603311,Ver 5.0.6, 15-Jul-1998,Win32 ■ - ■ Ir 1 ■ I : F ■J lmm ■ 10 =Mimi EMMEM ■ r ■ 1 ■ ■ LL UM4PIM ■A6 1 ■ 1 ter--r- L� ML.J.`m M-A A ■■■■ ■ r■ ■ti -■r ' ■ ■ 11 ■ 1 1 ■ 1 ■ ■ 1 ■ I Innoro6ve HARD Structural Title: Job# IN Desi9 n Dsgnr: Date: 8:39AM, 7 SEP 00 Description ENGINEERING SERVI:E5 1411 FOURTH AVENUE, SUITE 1240 scope: SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 Rev:506001 Square Footing Design Page 1 I Description F4.5 General Information Dead Load 46.000 k Footing Dimension 4.500 ft Live Load 0.000 k Thickness 12.00 in Short Term Load 0.000 k #of Bars 4 Seismic Zone 3 Bar Size 5 Overburden Weight 0.000 psf Rebar Cover 3.250 Concrete Weight 145.00 pcf fc 3,000.0 psi LL&ST Act Separately Fy 60,000.0 psi Load Duration Factor 1.000 Column Dimension 4.00 in Allowable Soil Bearing 2,500.00 psf General Rebar Requirement Actual Rebar"d"depth used 8.438 in As to USE per foot of Width 0.263 in2 200/Fy 0.0033 Total As Req'd 1.185 in2 As Req'd by Analysis 0.0020 in2 Min Allow% Reinf 0.0014 Min. Reinf%to Req'd 0.0026 % Summary Footing OK 4.50ft square x 12.Oin thick with 4-#5 bars Max. Static Soil Pressure 2,416.60 psf Vu :Actual One-Way 46.12 psi Allow Static Soil Pressure 2,500.00 psf Vn'Phi :Allow One-Way 93.11 psi Max. Short Term Soil Pressure 2,416.60 psf Vu :Actual Two-Way 154.55 psi Allow Short Term Soil Pressure 2,500.00 psf Vn`Phi :Allow Two-Way 186.23 psi Alternate Rebar Selections_ Mu :Actual 7.34 k-ft 6 #4's 4 #5's 3 #6's Mn'Phi : Capacity 10.13 k-ft 2 #Ts 2 #8's 2 #9's 1 #10's (c) 1983-98 ENERCALC KW-0603311,Ver 5.0.6, 15-Jul-1998,Win32 1 :� � lac ■ �� Innovative � rural Title: Job# LEONARD De3i Deign Dsgnr: Date: 9:14AM, 7 SEP 00 ENGINEERING SERVICES Description 1411 FOURTH AVENUE, SUITE 1240 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON Q8101 Scope: Rev:Soe001 Square Footing Design Page 1 Description F5.0 General Information Dead Load 70.000 k Footing Dimension 5.500 ft Live Load 0.000 k Thickness 14.00 in Short Term Load 0.000 k #of Bars 6 Seismic Zone 3 Bar Size 5 Overburden Weight 0.000 psf Rebar Cover 3.250 Concrete Weight 145.00 pcf fc 3,000.0 psi LL&ST Act Separately Fy 60,000.0 psi Load Duration Factor 1.000 Column Dimension 4.00 in Allowable Soil Bearing 2,500.00 psf General - Rebar Requirement Actual Rebar"d"depth used 10.438 in As to USE per foot of Width 0.336 in2 200/Fy 0.0033 Total As Req'd 1.851 in2 As Req'd by Analysis 0.0020 in2 Min Allow% Reinf 0.0014 Min. Reinf%to Req'd 0.0027 % Summary Footing OK 5.50ft square x 14.Oin thick with 6-#5 bars Max Static Soil Pressure 2,483.22 psf Vu : Actual One-Way 47.56 psi Allow Static Soil Pressure 2,500.00 psf Vn'Phi :Allow One-Way 93.11 psi Max. Short Term Soil Pressure 2,483.22 psf Vu :Actual Two-Way 166.12 psi Allow Short Term Soil Pressure 2,500.00 psf Vn"Phi :Allow Two-Way 186.23 psi Alternate Rebar Selections... Mu :Actual 11.60 k-ft 10 #4's 6 #5's 5 #6's Mn 'Phi : Capacity 15.38 k ft 4 #Ts 3 #8's 2 #9's 2 # 10's (c) 1983-98 ENERCALC KW-0603311.-Ter 5.0.6, 15-Ju1-1998, Ifin32 + � °..� b f r�• cs; i7�o 710�023Jd0 ULUMA( iNTERNAIiONAL I= Luc U? 1997 Washington State Nonresidential Energy Code Compliance Form 1997 Washington sutc honrw,,j"Eal Enargy C000 comp wc:Fon a F-w earuon,June I y3± Project Info Project Address Las Sc— TIRE CENTft Date 11/22/00 2-ICZY porNT, WA For building Department Use Applicant Name. .LES Scwuma zz= CZMrR Applicant Address. pg�yz� Ca Applicant Phone' Sal.416.3633 Project Description New Building ❑Addmon C]Alteration ❑Change of Use [�]Prescriptive Component Performance ENVSTD Compliance Option ❑ p systems (See Derision Flowchart(over)for qualifications) Analysis Space Heat Type 0 Electric resistance Q All other (sea over for definitions) Total Glaz,ng Area Electronic version: these values are automatically taken from ENV-UA-1 GlazingArea Calculation (rough opening} Gross Exterior Note Below grade walls may be included In Ine (vertical 8 overhd) divided by Wall Area o times 100 equals /a Glazing Gross Exterior Wall Area if they are 1nSUIQt8d to Ine level required for opaque walla. 1697. 0 — 9760.0 X 100 = 17.4-1; Q yes Cneck here if using Ihlo option and If Woiect meets oil requirements for the CencrsI,3Qesorrl Q Option.Concrete/Masortry Option See Decision Flowchart(over)for qualifications. Enter requirements for each qualifying essembly� n0 Dillow. Envelope Requirements(enter values as applicable) 0 paqus Concrete/Masonry Wall Requirement Fully heafod/cooled space Insulation on interior-maximum U-factor is 0.19 Minimum insulation P.•values Insulation on exterior or integral-maximum ll-factor is 0.zs Roors Over Attic If project qualln n for Concrete/Masonry Option,list walls Ail Other Roofs 34.0 with HC a 9.0 Btuift--aF below(other wells must meet Opaque Walls Opaque Wall requirements). Use descriptions and values from Table 20-5b in the Code. Below Grade Walls Wall Description t}factor Floors Over Unconditioned Space (incluoing Insulation R-value 6 position) Slabs-on-Grade zxxttxzole truL 0.250 Radiant Floors Maximum"Ctom Opaque Doors 0.086 Vertical Glazing 0.600 Overhead Glazing Maximum SHGC(or SC) Verticau0verhead Glazing 1.000 [Semi-heated space' Minimum insulation R-values oofs Over Seml-Heated Spaces' 'Refer to Section 1310 for qu3lificaUons and G Notes' � �® � ��'`� JAN 16 2001 DEPT. CITY OF ARLINGTON f� J f h9.!A•rfi a ( - y3WP- JRN-15-2001 09:15 9163623306 98% P.02 `, �u 11P �• i , • � �, Ulr L.7r 1770 � � 71 c>oLc•7Oc uLUi•ir-ice, ,_ r��` �� 1997 Washington State Nonresidential Energy .;Jc COmpliance Form . • • EM, 1007 Wa%h.r•glon StSIO Nonrtiatd•nuei I:nsrgy Code ComoAence Form: t=rste6u.o Jvnc{ate Decision Flowchart =Ifn.t. chart to determine if project qualifies for the optional Prescriptive Option. for Prescriptive Option the Component Performance or Systems Analysis;Options must Do used. 1302 Space Heat type:For the purpose Of determining building envelope _ Electric koWance:space nesting 7yetema which use clecvtc ra:lshance r9Culram0nL•,the following two categories mmp(fse all 30WA heating iypaa' l - 1 elcments as me primary hazing syztan im'WnO Opseboerd.rcdi3rK and Other,All ostler cpace healing system°Including gas,soild fuel,oil,and I 1b.-ed ar units wnsrs the tots)electric resiswca heat capacity 9xeeeds 10 propane space hdeling Systems and those systems Paled in the exception to ne pas on itiuta0 Moor eras lace electricrasistance (continued atngnq writ of l •-- ---/ c p4ion:Hexpumpsand terminal eleotflc resistance healing in vaAaoia Sir Volume distribution sy Jemq Eec>yic \ yes -- r r Al fvbsy\ veilsR•11 � IQihaiaOC� ,----� '), All �aa �� --- - •.t�bil0itp�iaCX��_--:' mdtsRl9\'` irL3,li�Ql�.,ro /, �. ,�doq, r>o\3am yes ira/s�or1?r -04 Ili ro ro`Q�^�j Oaar�i"-.. r Dear ?,r>u ro� "Y)es I At IratabmlrdJleF 7 -Pll r�lah�onin aIW7 l Al lrWaticllrtialtecP � J al lr9Jaicnlrt3alled7 C# 7ev�lls F�11 �- R11' I �y�s--- 1ev�f9-• Fife WG-vgradevAls(eI) RIO v013g(rrt) UQ19 uBilsQrt) UQ19 34o,v 6dovgxievetls(ah)Rii NbM-ryv,Hls(alhe) U0.25 M�Srryvals I 9sdeVAIsed) R10 Rxlsa"attics Fi30 t�owgadeYVJ1s(o� RIO I� l ovgac mts�cih gig Cth1T roofs g vhells(dh)Rt t °N9'�vdl�)R p 8� �Fcicfsovwmcs F38 Rooms, ruuxior- q� 419 cote at6ta R30 BdoNgsdevell5 crMRt9 AI other roofs RIO 9atsargadc Rio l Ail cowrocfy R21 FOotherf-atics R33 facvso�uoond R� cpagedoors U0R10.60 F'oaso`erul¢xi� R19 aoorsaerumxt R30 9'°� R-10 �4� Rio a9tas le R•10 i�q Ears ,60 Fbdart tars R10 Ga&gOite'nal ? Q�Rdoci Cwkdoos s U060 I I - -- _- - U0A0 daang0iteia vt �A-aago U U S>-{ aaartgOItala M3?^-I i -O�rg OitFtia ht daa• -Q-I------- M15%0.90 1.45 1.00 asrt�1 04 C�i�^fit (}f-� Aro°° U U 9-(3C 1520'/o 0.75 1.40 1.00 4>�% U U 9-M 146e°� U U I taw 0 d0 Q 80 1.00 20,V/a Qt0 1.30 Q65 00-10'/a 0.90 145 1,G0 1 00?D°/a 040 0.90 00 I - - %0.50 1.25 0.45 i 10.WA 0.75 1.4o 1.00 -- --- f n0 1520% a65 1.30 Q80 no I l _ 20,2F%o Q60 1.30 0.65 3040 i no _Y Cr Y 9>a>?rsPretys s f£qu red Concrete/Masonry Option` Wall Heat Capacity(HC) 'If the area Assembly Description Ass .Ta HC'• weighted heat y g Area(s0 HC x Area capacity(HC)of c"V WAZL 16.70 10586.0 176786.2 the total above IZ2Xt FRAMWALL1.00 grade wall Is a minimum of 9.0. the Concrete Masonry Option may be used ..For framed walls,assume HC=1.0 unless calculations are provided;for all othor wells,use Totals 10586.0 176786.2 Section 2009. Area weighted HC:divide total of(HC x area)by Total Are 16.70 JAN-15-2001 09:16 9163623306 98% P.03 I Y- bl/toi l7yb GLUMAC F A G E 04 :'Washington State Nonresidential Energy Code Compliance Form e e eZone! t B91 w�sn;ngron Srsla nroNdenfi_ ;•,srgy Ccoe Comu�ancro Fcmu F'Int Edaon.Jun•+59e Project Address LLa acexAB T1R8 esarxnR Date 11/22/00 Space Heat Type Q Electric resistance Q All other For Building Department Use Cilazin Ana as%gross exterior wall area 17.44 Prop. 40.0$ Max.Target Concrete/Masonry Option ()Yes p No Notes:If glazing area exceeds maximum allowed In Table,then calculate adjusted areas on back(over), If ConcreteiMesonry Option is used,Target U-factors,SHGC and Glazing%will be different than shown below. Refer to Table 13-1 for correct values. Building Component Proposed UA Target UA List component6 by assembly ID 8 page# U-factor x Area(A) =UA(U x A) U-factor x Area(A) =UA(U x A) U= Plan 10: 0.600 1697.0 1018.2 0.750 1697.0 1272.8 U= Plan ID: Glazing 0/o Electric Resist. Other Heating r- 'U= Plan ID: 0.15% DAD 0.90 Uo Plan 10: 0.40 0,75 > c7 U= Plan ID: >20.30% not allowed 0.60 U= Plan ID: >30-40% not allowed 0,50 U= Plan ID: (see-Table 13-1 for ConclMasonry values) U= Plan 10: a ° U= Plan ID: c < Glazing:%- Electric Resist. 'Other NeaDng a U= Plan ID: 0 t5% 0.60 1.45 m D 'm U Plan ID: >15-20% 0.80 t,40 £ o U= Plan ID: >20,30% not allowed 1.30 � U= Plan ID: •>30-40%° not allowed 1.25 bU= Plan ID: (See Table 1?r1 for ConciMasohry values) U= Plan ID: 4 UC PlanlD:ssCT1omAL 0.086 706.0 60.7 0.900 847.0 509.2 OQ U= Plan ID:earr Door 0.067 141.0 9.4 Electric Resist. Other Heeling U= Plan ID: 0.60 0.60 c R= Plan10:xoor 0.028 13224.D 370.3 0.036 13224.0 476.1 O R= Plan ID: Electric Ros+¢1. Other Heating R= Plan ID: 0.D31 0.036 R= Plan ID: R= Plan ID. p ,_fr Elec Resist. Other Heating R= Plan ID: 0.034 0.050 R= Plan ID:swsotats 0.250 7216.0 1804.0 0.250 7216.0 1804.0 R= Plan ID: e R= Plan ID: A 3 R= Plan ID: Electric Resist. Other Heating C R= Plan ID: Ordinary 0.067 0.14 v 0 R- Plan ID: Metal stud 0.11 0.14 R= Plan ID: Conc(Int) 0119 0.19 "Note:sum of Target Areas here should equal Target Opaque Well Area(see back) Conc(oth7• 0.25 0.25 � JRa Plan ID: _T 5 R= Plan ID: Electric Resist. Other Heating m R= Plan ID: Ordinary' 0,062 0.14 0 Note.if insulated to levels required for opaque walls,list above with opaque walls Metal stud 0.11 0.14 ac R= Plan 10. O = RC Plan ID: Electric Resist. Other Heating `o 3 R= Plan ID: a 0.029 0.066 'i D R� Plan ID: 4 , R= Plan ID:sLAD rLooR 1 0.730 621.0 453.3 0.540 621.0 335.3 co 11 R= Plan ID! Electrsc Resist. Other Heating R= Plan ID:; F=0.54 F=0,54 R= Plan ID: (sae Table 13-1 for radiant floor values) 'For CMU walls,indicate core Insulation material Totals �, ) 3716.0 Totals 23605.0 4396.4 For compliance: 1)Proposed Total Area shall equal Targe ropo UA shall n ra JAN-15-2001 09:17 9163623306 98x P.04 ■ 1 ■■ ■ ■ 1 ulr c7r J �70 1r OioiGLjlrJo uLUM C 1NlLkNA1lUN-L rr;7L 05 1994 Washington State Nonresidential Energy Code Compliance Form • 1987 Vvaeningtpn Stale Norvea4cnda Energy Coda Compliance Form: Ust E011lon.June tea Glazing Proposed SHGC Target SHGC List components by assembly ID&page>k SHGC• x Area(A) =SHGC x A SHGC x Area(A) =SHGC x A ID: 1.000 1697.0 1697,0 1.000 1697.0 1697.0 ID: Glazing% Electric Resist. Other Heating c 9 10: q 0-20% 1:00 1.00 ID: >2030% not allowed 0.65 ID: >30.40% not altbWed 0.45 10' (see Table 13-1lor'Conc/Masonry values) 'Nola:Manufacturers SC may be used;n lieu of SHGC. Totals 1697.0 1697.0 Totals 1697.0 1697.0 For compliance:Proposed total SHGC x A shall not exceed Target total SHGC x A NOTE: 1997 NREC revisions allow SHGC compliance for vertical and overhead glazing to be calculated together. The 1994 Forms required separate calculations for vertical and overhead glazing. • - A e Proposed Areas, Nurn bored value:are used In calculations below Roars over Attics 0Hier Roars Walls Glazing Are e 00. Gr3= Vg. 1697.0 OpsqueArno 13224.0 7276.0 Gross Exterior wall Mau Glortng Area Merlmum Target Area (Table 13-1) Glazing Area 9760.0 X 40,Oi _ 100 = 390d,0 Z. Target OG Area In Recife ovargttles Target OG Arne rn Otmer Roofs Max OG Remaining Target VG Area 3904.0 — 1;leaser = 3904,0 lesser = 1697.0 3904.0 ~y 3904,0 II Proposed Opaque Arco Proposee OG Area 'argot OG Arbil Torset Opaque Area RSCf:over Allies 13224.0 + Other Roofs + Proposed 009que Area Proposed VG Area Targel VG Arcs Target Opaque Area wolfs 7216.0 .� 1697.0 _ 1697.0 = 7216,0 Targ•t Areas OK Nots: It there is more than one rypa Orwell,the Targef VG Area may be d,strlbuto4 among them,and Sspefal9 Target Opaque Areas round. If the Torycl Areas rot Opaque walls listed on Ins rronl must squat the total calculated more 1. JRN-15-2001 09:17 9163623306 98% P.05 r i� a' _ _ � _ � _ _ � 1 � � � y 1 u�; cor l��o _ r �lc �a_ o �Llf•i 1: INlct` �I lUNh;L r:�iic Do 1994 Washington State Nonresidential Energy Code Compliance Form MAI-741T."I ". E= 1997 Wo3n1VM SISIe MGrvgrdenry EnGMCaCS C —,Wco Forrry FMU Ealqon•June i g 9 e Project Info Project Address Lie SCRW,a slrx C=TFR Date 11/22/00 aMoKEr Ponn w► For Building Dept Use Applicant Name LES SCHw1a TIRE CL1rrZR Applicant Address. P.tIMVILLE, of Applicant Phone: 541.416.5633 Project Description Briefly describe mechanical system lype and features. Compliance Option @)Simple System 0 Complex System O Systems Analysis (See Decision Flowchart(over)for qualKlcations.Use separate MECHSUM for simple 8 com=systems.) Equipment Schedules The following information Is required to be incorporated with the mechanical equipment schedules on the plans. For projects without plans,fill In the required information below. Cooling Equipment Schedule Equip. Capacity' OSA CFM SEER ID Brand Name' Model No,' Btu/h Total CFM or Econo? or EER IPLV' Location kleatin E ui anent Schedule Equip. Capacll/ OSA cfm tD and Name' Model No' etu/h Total CFM or Econo? Input Btuh Output 81uh Efficiency' Fan Equipment Schedule Equip, 10 Brand Name' Model No, CFM SPt HP/8HP Flow Controls Location of Service 'If available. 'As tested according to Table 14-1,14-2 or 14-3. a If required. `COP,HSPF,Combustion Efficiency,orAFUE,as applicable. b Flow Control types:variable air volume(VAV),constant volume(CV),or variable speed(VS). JAN-15-2001 09:18 9163623306 98% P.06 i GLUMAC i"i _.:. 1. i iurJ:L rraGG 07 3Srn1I9t0n State Nonresidential Energy Code Compliance Form • System Description If Heating/Cooling 0 Constant vol? CD Air cooled? [] Packaged Sys? (—] <54,000 lawn See Section 1421 for full description of or Cooling Only: Splits stem? ? or 1900 cfm? Simple System qualifications � y Economizer included. If Heating Only: <5000 cfm? <70%outside air? Decision FlowchaIlt Use this flowchart to determine if project qualifies for Simple System Opilon. if not,either the Complex System or Systems Analysis Options must be used. say l J Y 8gert Type re- _�. ._ �. �anf' no • Cbdect7` :v000drrf� lergloe�1 no es rSEC 1421 ! Y no \ 000 BLIK", $liter no I ��LJt11iJ:a1. [rlbi Guded ! SeG 1423 I ,v4,000 Ekh' -� -- f 0\1900daQ,'ro AS•�� ' ---- - ----�-�--L 9 aim Sec 1420 UM 0XV ex -�Ierrl Sc.1430 CoIIl IeX$ StemS Refer to MECH-COMP Mechanical Complex Systems for assiatance in determining which Complex p y Systems requirements are applicable to this project. JAN-15-2001 09:18 9163623306 98% P.07 1 � 7 � vli 177G _ 716JO23366 ULUMAU INTERNATIONAL FAuE 68 1994 Washington State Nonresidential Energy Code Compliance Form 1997 wrnir„n�n Slate Nonce Gden6at Enw9Y Cade COQIDtten.�VOMq Ftrit G,.M.lwu.104e Project Info Projact Addrpu Las 3C9WAa 2Z= CZNTstt Date 11/22/00 SVOMMY Ponax, WA For 37ding Dept.Us.: ApofcaM Name: LES SCIRWAa TIRE CENISR P nt Address: PRzewxLLs OR nt Phone: 541.416.5633 Project Description Briefly describe mechanical system tyoe and features. Compliance Option Simple System O Complex System 0 Systems Analysis (See Decision Flowchart(over)for qualifications.Use separate MECH-SUM for simple&complex systems) Equipment Schedules The following Information is required to be Incorporated with the mechanical equipment schedules on the plans For projects without plans,fill�n the required Information below Cooling-Equipment Schedule Equip. Capacity= OSA CFM SEER 10 Brand Name' Model No.' Btu/h Total CFM or Econo? or EER IPLV' Location co-1 LEM= L9A120c 123000 4000 ECONO 9.40 otnszDE CV-2 IZ = LSA120C 123000 4000 ECONO 9.40 OUTSIDE; Heating Equipment Schedule Equip' Capacity' OSA cfm N 10 Brandame' Model No,' Btu/h Total CFM or Econo? InpuT Btuh Output Stuh Efficiency' tr-1 MMOT 924-200 190000 4000 ECONO 0.800 F-2 LEiaawc c24-200 160000 4000 ECONO 0.800 MW-1 SPACZ-RAY RSTPISC-N50 150000 LW-2 SPACE-RAY RSCA6-Ne 1 52000 UN-1 RZZNoR PE-ao 40000 Fan Equipment Schedule Equip. 10 Brand Name' Model No CFM Sp+ HP/BHP Flow Controls Location of Service P-L LeNNOX c24-200 4000 0.80 1.50 cv WSIDE lacM PDM r-2 LEMOx G24-200 4000 0.80 1.50 ev INSIDE MCH RCt3S 'If available, 'As tested according to Table 14-1,14-2 or 14-3. 3 If required. `COP,HSPF,Combustlon Efficiency,orAFUE,as applicable. 'Flow control types:variable air volume(VAV),constant volume(CV),or variable speed(VS). JAN-15-2001 09:18 9163623306 98% P.08 I I 710702jidO ui— - rriuG U7 1994 Washington State Nonresidential Energy .. -Je Compliance Form System Description If Headng/Cooling 0 Constant vol? Q Air cooled? (] Packaged sys? 0 <54,000 Stuh See Section 1421 for full description of or Cooling Only: Q Split system? Economizer included? or 1900 drn? Simple System qualifications, If HeatingOnl y 0 <5000 cfm? <70%outside air? Decision Flowchart Use this flowchart to determine if project qualifies for Simple System Option. If not.ailher the Complex System or Systems Analysis Opilons must be used. Sly / *Aem Type M Y ro_.... If Y, no 110.� I R ! ` r stet 1421 no WS •,�, � I1e54,000/1 spit 1 � tltxiudest. �� t �� ..�54,000 Btuti••, l_. SM 1423 or 1900&n7 no Y rrple*gem AIOAed r�ieerce, Sec 1420, t _ - ��ex Fvett�,oe aygan &C 1490 l COm leX S St6mS Refer to MECH-COMP Mechanlcal Complex Systems for assistance in determining which Complex p Systems requirements are applicable to this project. JAN-15-2001 09:19 9163623306 98% P.09 V ■ � E 5 1994 ,Vashington State Nonresidential Energy CooW , c nice Form 7PI.je-ct 9fpn$(?Ip VCrl0.S1pC�NJi Eru:Y Cote CYyy1,2rcc:yrM1; Flat Eatlon•hn�,t 39u dress LES SCHX" TIRE CENTER Date 11/22/00 The following information is necessary to check a mechanical permit application for compliance with the mechanical requlremerrts in the Washington State Nonresidential Energy Code Applicability Code Wcat;on Euiiding Department (yes,no,n.a.) Section Component Information Required on Plans Notes HVAC REQUIREMENTS (Sections 1401-1424) 1411 Equipment performance no td11,d Pkq elec.htg.&cIg List heat pumps on schedule yea 1411.1 Minimum efllciency Equipment schedule with type,Capacity,etFlGency 1d12 HVAC controls you 1412.1 Temperature zones Indicate locallons on plans 1412 2 Deadband control Indicate 5 degree deadband minimum 1411.3 Humltllty control !ndlcata humidistat yes 1412.4 Automatic setback Indicate thermostat with night setback and 7 Off day types YQ= 1412.4.1 Dampers Indicate damper location and automatic controls yes 1412.5 Heat pump control Indicate microprocessor on thermostat schedule 1412.6 Combustion hig. Indicate modulating or staged control yes 14127 Balancing Indicate balancing features on plans 1422 Thermostat interlock Indicate thermostat Interlock on plans 1423 Economizers Equipment Schedule 1413 Air economizers yea 1413.1 Operation Indicate 100%capability on schedule Yes 1413.2 Control Indicate controls able to evaluate outside air Yea '413.3 Integrated operation Indicate capability for parpal cooling 1414 Ducting systems Yes 1414.1 Oucl seating Indicate sealing necessary yea 1414.2 Duct insulation Indicate R-value of Insulation on duct Yes 1415.1 Piping insulation IndiCate R•value of insulation on piping 1424 Separate air Sys Indicate separate systems on plans T_ YQ' Mach.Sum.Form Completed and attached Ecuipment schedule with types, input/output,efficiency,cfm,hp,economizer SERVICE WATER HEATING AND HEATED POOLS(Sections 1440.1454) I"0 Service water iI 1441 Elec.water heater Indicate R-10 insulation under tank 1442 Shut-off controls Indicate automatic shutoff 1450 Heated pools 1452 (reserved) 1453 Pool heater controls Indicato switch and 65 degree control 1454 Pool covers indicate vapor retardant cover 1454 1 Pools 90-degrees Indicate R-12 pool cover no s c rc ed tor any question, provide explanation: JAN-15-2001 09:19 9163623306 98% P.10 Jr. — . ■ ■ ■ ■ �!� owT. ■ CJ.L L.Or 1770 . f ULUMAC IN I Er<NA I IUNAL r Aug 1994 Washington State Nonresidential Energy Code Compliance Form 23= � � s cant'nviNrgton Sotto Nonresdent'si Enna/Ccd•ComP'N a Forms FattEllaert-June.t998 Mechanical -General Requirements 1411.1 General:Equ+pment shall have a minimum performance at the 1413.2 Control: Air seoncmlzers shall be controlled by a control system specified rating conditions not less than the values shown,n Table 14-1 o3P3We d determining 0 outside air can meet part or all of the binding's through 14-3. coMrg bads. 1411.2 Rating Conditions:Cooing equpment shall be rated at ARI test 1413.3 Integrated Operation:Building Heating Energy:Air conditions and procedures when ava,tabic Where no apol'csble procedures economizers shall be capaote of provldi.ng part a.cooling even when eoost,data shall be furnisned by the equipment manufacturer, sddi tonal mechanical cooling,s required to meet the remainder of tttd 1411 3 Combination Spice and Sorvice Water Heating:ForcombnVion Coodng bad, Controls shell not preclude the ecCnom,zzroperation when a patio and 9erViCA Wetar h 99I erwithl:n E w a pCpal fu nCtiOn Or pfovidn mechanical Cooling is required simuitaneoualY. g space heat, the Combined Annual Efficiency(CAE)may be ca:culated try using Exception: Economizers on individual,direct expanslon, ASHRAE St3ndord 124-19a1,Storage water heaters used in combination ccoliig systems with capacities not greater than ys,000 sturn space heat and water heat applications shall have alther an Energy FActor may:n Crude cenlrofs that limit Simultaneous ope,7tion of the (EF)or a CAE of net less than the following. economizer and Machanical cooling for the purpo,-e of prcvcnung ice formation on cooling coils. _ tF CAE 1414 Duetting Systems 50 gal mcrags 0.58 1 0.71 1414.1 Scaling:Oust work which Is designed t0 operalo at pressures 50 10 7o gal storage 0.57 I v.�1 above 112 Inch water column static pressure sh]II be waled,n accordance r 70 gal storage 0.35 0 70 wdh Standard RS-18 Extent of scaling required Is as rolows 1411A Package oc le ea ng an Cooling qu Pi 6 Packaged 1. S3i!c pressures 1/2 rich to 2,nchee seal 1f2nSv6rS6joints. electric equipment providing both heating and cooling win a total Waling 2. Sest?e pressure: 2 incites to 3 inche3:seal all tranaver.c joints capacity greater than 20.000 Etu/h shall be 3 heat pump. and long,tudinal seems Exception:Unstaffce equipment shaelters or cabinets used solely 3. Static pressure: above 3 Inches:seal all transversefointf, for personal wireless service facilities. long tUdlnal seams an d duct wall p enetrallon s 1412 Controls Duct ceps end other pressure sonsitive tape shall not be used as the 1412.1 Temperature Controls:Eacn system shall be provdGd with at least primary sealant who.c ducts are daslg ned to operate at state pressures of one temperature control dcv ce.Each zone shall be conVolled by individual 1 inch W.C.crgreatar thermostats controls responding to temperature within the Lone. Ala 1414.2 insulation:Ducts and plenums Ins(are constructed and function m0imum.each floor or a bu!afhg shall to considored sip a separate zone. :x part of tno building envelope by acpereung Interior space from exterior 1a12,2 Doadband Controls:When used to control both comfort nestirg space.shall meet all applicable roquiromentz of Chaptc.13- Those and cooling,zone thermostats controls shall be cspable of a dcgdband of requirements ilcfude Insulation in sta!lation.moisture control,sir leakage, at least S degrees F wdhin which the supply of heating and cooling energy and bullring envelope insulation I9vele Unnested equlpmont rooms with to the_one is shut off or reduced to a minimum, combustion air louvers must be isolated from the ccnditioned space by Exceptions: insulating 3urf2c0s to a m nlmum o f R-i t and any exterior enveicpc I. Special Occupancy,special usage or code requirements surfaces per Chapter 13 Outside sir duct runs are con:dcred building where dead band controls are not appropriate. envelope unit they 2. Buildings complying with Section 1141 A.If in the proposed a connact to the heating or cooing equipment,or building energy analysis,heating and cooling thermostat b, are 3scisted from the extar:cr with an automatic 3h UDoff damper setpolnts are set to the same temperature between 70 Once outsido or duct.--meet the above listed 0quVsmeMt*,any runs degrees F and 75 degrees F Inclusive,and assumed to be wahln conditioned space most compy,witn T3we ie..5 recuigments. constant throughout the year. Cteerducts and plenums shall be thermally in;ulatcd oar Tsblo 14-5 3, Tftcmlostata that require manwl changeover between Exceptions: healing and cooling modes, 1 Within the HVAC equipment. 1412.3 Humidity Controls:If s syslom IS equipped with a means for 2. Exhaust air ducts not subjectto condensatlon, adding moisture,a humdistat shall ba crovded. 3 Dtposed ductwcrk within a space that serves thatzpacc 1412.4 Setback and Shut-Of1: HVAC systems shall be oqulppod wiln only, Sutomatic controls capable of accomplishing a reduction of energy use t41S Piping Systems through conVcl cetbeck or equipment shutdown during periods of noel-use 1415.1 Insulation: Piping shall be thermally Insulated In accordance with or alternate use of the spaces served by This system.The automatic controls Table 14 6. shall have a minimum seven-day clock and be capatio of being set for seven difoeont day types per week. Exception: Piping nstaded within unkary HVAC equipment. Ex CeptlOna: Water plpea Outside the condticned speCO shall be Insulated in exoroancewith Washington Slate Pklmb,no Code(WAC 51.26) I. Systems serving asps wroth require continuous operation at 1420 SIMPLE SYSTEMS thesametempsr�w se eWo (PACKAGED( ACKAGED UNITARY 2. Equ omens with full load demands of 2 kW(6.326 Blu/h)or EQUIPMENT) less may be controlled by readily acCeet4le manual off-hour 1421 System Type:TO quaky as a simple system,systems shall be one controls. or lh a fctIow ng: 1412A.1 Dampors:Outside sir lnhlKes,exhaust Outlets and relief Outten 1 Air cooled.constant volume packaged equipment,whichorovlde serving condtloned spaces shall be equipped with dampers which C1o3a heating,cooling or both, and require only oxternal eonnecbcr to Automatieagy when the system Is of+or upon power falura. ductwork and energy services Exception@. 2. Air cooled,constant volume split systems,which prov;or 1. Systems serving areas which require continuous operation, hcat4ig,cooling or both,with cooling capacity of 84,000 6tu/h or 2. Combustion sir Intakes lets. 1412.6 Neat Pump Controls: Unitary air cooled hoot pumps ehag Include 3. Heating ony systems which have 3 capacity of less than 5,000 microprocessor controls that minimize suppkmcnt,41 heat usage during cfm or which have a minimum outside sir supply Of less than 70 start-up, set-up,and defrost cond'Aions. Thane controls shall anticipate Pertentof the total air cp'culat,cn need for heat and use compression healing as the first stage of heat. NI cthcr systems shot eompty with Sections 1430 through 1e38 Centrcie shall Indicate when suppirmonisl heating is being used through 1422 Controls. In addition to the control requirements in Seotion 1412, visual moans(e g.,LED indica(ors). where separate he3thg and cooling equipmont serve the same 1412.6 Combustion Hosting Equipment Controls: Combustion heating temperature zone,thorm03tats shad be Snterbcked to prevent couipment with a capacity over 225,000 Btu/h shall have modulating or ilmultanaous heating and cooling.Systcm3which provide heating and staged combustion control, coning slnulianecvsy to a zone ere prohiblted. lititeepdons: 1423 Economizers:Economizes meeting:he requirements of Section 1. Boilers. 1e 13 snit be installed on single package unitary fan-coolIng units having 2. Radiant Heatera. a SupplY capacity Of greater than 1,900 am or a total cooling capacity greatcr than 54.000 Slulh. 1412.7 Sslancinq: Each air supply outlet or airor water terminal device Tnc total capacity of all units without economizers shall not exceed mall have a means for balancing,including bul riot I coded to,dampers, 240,000 Btulh building,or 105; orits aggregate eoolin trmperaturs end pressure test connections and bs:'encing valves pCi �' g(economizer) ,Yaciy wh:unever is greats, t413 Air Economizers ca1424 Separate Air Distribution Systems:Zones with 3PSO16 process 1413.1 Operation: Air economizers shaI"orsutornancailymodulating temperature requirements and/or humidltyrequlrement;Shall baserved outside and return air dampers to provide 130 percent of the design supply by seoarate ai-distributbn;ytems f,am those se!v!ng zones requi6,19 air as outs:da air to reduce or eGminatc the need for mechanical coclrig, ony comfort conditions. JAN-15-2001 09:20 9163623306 98% P. 11 • i ■ ■ T ■ 1997 Washington Sute NOrMIdenUy Cnorgy Cale Compaance Form • LTG rMw►M.^n Mr4w'.M�7r f�+ifJ OSY rrW�Mr�u.r nrr.fKr.A.ne 17ff Project Info 111CIAaa'II1e rie aewuAa Taee eeytT.R Gate 1z/1e/ao wear•orrr, fat For duldN Ocpan,.Icnl USe Appltca I Na.^ta W eeWAS T"M ccw= AppLcanl Addro:S;•na+rrvasa, tr ApyP9CWI Pnon>, ag,ala.3U] ProjectDesulption O No.Building ❑ Addition C] Alttera0on Compliance Option O Preaonpuv3 O U;ht:-,;Powaralawence p Sy_bnu A e4ysls (Sat ouali6eoff"Checklist(Ov7r)Indicate PfWry-yo&LPA swes dearly on pians I .alteration Exceptions ❑ No C7anges we bang made to Ifte Ilghong (crack appropnata 0070 Lass tha,7 6a%or pie 1!xturec are new,and Installed lighting wensgc is not being Incroasea Maxlmum Allowed Li hting Wattage(Interior) LoWuon AllOwca (Odor/room no 1 Occupancy C::ar,ption wall; W fr`r Area in fit Allawod x?raa f near�ow, ur':c satnrce. RA�9L- 1.50 519f.o 7776.0 6. fxoAee orouo O.So 1595.0 797,5 iW UII LA. fear• eEaerMatrY LOCH+ Aauex>r O.BO 1269.0 1014.4 vAA24=21, •AArs-A AOVAn APO Yaesrcwt R1 zm 0.30 2092.0 1046.0 +f�v:c.. aura aeeAxR 1.50 e04.0 6711.0 From TaCla t 5-t(cYff)•cOcmenl all axt6Pbcns on form LTG.LPA TOt91 Adawod yv�lt; ballasts aoty.the defsull table in the NR60 Teef nico Reran 173a� 9 Proposed Lighting Wattage(Interior) alra be u,.ca LOC(1100 0n QOO Numbarof WaUs Wan. orNaOm no 1 Fixture DesalpGan Fixtures Flxlurs Prapasad crowed. orrrrs. Louwee, rtvws Ttoe c .urf 6 190.0 1000.0 raxa,,aA Trre• 10 99.0 990 a raxura rrrs A3 2 63.0 126.0 rnrnat:r..e_1 61 63.0 379.0 rr-y- 2r c at a 63.0 252.0 fre►..,pf rr:nnu rr•e-R 31 63.0 199.0 f t>rrvwc nes.rt 2 63.0 126.0 WALie. 1.0C@e. rrx2V.r SrrLv mar, •auzftawr 6 63.0 379.0 vxcun�R 2 63.0 126.0 acRvace, ,Lacfmur rtwmw rrrc-w 20 290.0 5900.a rr> c ��as 3 63.0 199.0 vAaesruee, eA/t:f rtxrwu ree-si 2 63.0 126.0 r•x:tims rxn-R 12 125.0 1512.0 rsxttrna rr•e-e 10 655.0 a550.0 Tc4y Pr(laafed Walt:may ---ax-Td11 A1lawod.Youa ror Infoncr Taal P.mposcr.v v) 15722.0 Maximum Allowed U tang Wattage(Exterior) Allowed Watts A.99 In le Allowed WIC ILocadcn Dosanotion re a «Ir Caverea Panti Per p (Or p ibr p1560 r) :fY(or R ll) ^9 tewtx autos a.2 wftta 1560.0 312.0 OpenParKrg rnrxa.c Law 02We 17e9.0 OQW00(ArOSS 3�9 8 0 2 Watt 610g (by facaa9l 026 Wnr JUK9(0ypanm) fo:wrlro trcnaa 7.awM 670 0 50a5.0 Neff for ouildlr n7 attenoe.Cr 00!4 4,1hor IN scads arse or the penmM r meubJ,bvl net bcU+) T.tal Auaw•a ly43i 57e6 B only,rho default table In Me NREC Teahnic3l Rakrcne•Mar, . Proposed Lighting Wattage(Exterior) used. NUMber of wytty vva0a Loc3Lon FWuva DoscrIallon Flxtufee Fixture Proposed 17a1(aC cARofr r,rsvt� rant:f 6 290.0 1740.0 ruunre Lar rrtbtenrc rrrr-n 5 290.0 1470.9 a;da rsancrrf rer:.x aase�r 3 170.0 510.0 rerwr rrna 2 60.0 120.0 Total F='08e0 Wan:may rlol exCeed Ttdl A/bww Y',Wm for Ektencr Vial Propo3"V%,apa 3920.0 JAN-15-2001 09:21 9163623306 99% P.12 {• r I � .Y.7 1 � � � ' � . _ � .� �.• - - � - • -,:� . ■ � �y � y Y � is ■ I I 1 G l. G.:i 1 7 70 L i t l7l_UI�•)rtil, l lit l G,"•r-.11 L1P r--Qc- l 1 Y97 We9hInglOn state NOnra•Jden Gal Energy Code Camphance%orm Lig�fing (back), LTG-SUM � late ra.r•'M.•art M.w«e��t F-wr e...ew.w,ar h,.. hP t.rrw,.Jl,n.teoa Prescriptive Spaces CccvPancy 0Weranouses.storage areadofarcran storage hangers QOlhe Qualification Checklist I Ughting Fixtures: ❑ Ch--k her¢It at Isa:t 95%orexturas In Me space meet all tour cntens. Nola:It aoeupaM Iyo.is-Olhoe end mn ura.nc.er t cAeaeo.tr.nw+ac.m 1.Flxturoa site auonsscenL nondan:sd,with only one or two lamps,and m urte in m.saga a not Wo"oy coat. gttary I,ndkat.in.s.apace.on clans.It 2.Lempa are 7.5,T-B,Td or PL and 1 Lamps are 6.60 Wass,and not queur+d,do LOA calculations ♦Belleab are alettfonk D911331a Table 15-1 Unit Lighting Power Allowance(LPA)for Interior Lighting LPA' LPA. Nee, (WMI) lko' (yY)IIIII) rautury.'Naively,capor".rcuzigne srcpt I [s I POIW ananns elAlOnea tf VorOW snCIDs.Dtlauty aterps !la t rnsl Nod Wrqurrcom ta-meo' nonnJl L ,V:ArrLiY spsces'.r,r�,�..,tC,yi tT rttr: uoaaw c rma-s plays 1 fU reps'hangar_ t D RC41JerirWbW Caolonas asif a snrront. 1.a Ri71 A'" sic^as K op-s r.c.19 Sea: 1 a ROV B-'.RGUII Dal" 1 0 uq:radar.,anortpar props' la LOCK?GrOa Sl"PAS e0h09a uo lns4m*ns 1.5 W9.'erOl.s05".O"age arses Q5 U O'd'Is9' 1.5 "Oral a brags haigrs ua Nvrsirgholus t a rarklr94vgief - .—.—. ncatieslaot(W Fa shelviry 15 Maui Goruaturpes 4 Piam Suornin.d 10r common Aress only' iC ! gs.a7 a Yzert.Gay cx..alter: ls7 6atxrun tara%=KKr9,IOtCfes(9Ler any eorcC,. , Ua non as 1.3 as WPUS5 era wmrl=m uo OrftoctaJorps orllvaarmLrgtuoiii il�rntala ouwr use ISPK(uch,db+g out rot Im ted to sc"=I 1.2 tUsoAd!Instib lions,rT1,Soun0,banks,churchc:,11T" o ea of I able 1 rn cases in which a uz is non mordoned.pco I:"!Y,the Wit furs lln-ancc uh%A be let erni,tied by the building oRicrd This dtaermination:hall be bnaed upo,i the mtrer ONroveble use spacirtod in the"bit Sea Secrtcn 1512 feu exempt arena 2 Thr warts per:gttarc foot may be inercu*%L by era pw=A per fax Otcd4ng htegt above twenty fed,unless specirmAlly d.fed d otherwacby%ubsequent(boteoccs 1 W'NITS per SQUafc Iba of roan may be;licmased by two percent per fox of celing height above Lu elv.kcL • Fur all oho•+pane,such y scaling and osmmon Jos,tare the Ur»1JRk PouurAtiourrnav for assembly. 5. Watts per sytore foul of room may be inercased by t..o percent per raa orcciling hc;ght rbuve nine kes S Includes pump area under canopy. 7. h,ascsin lh-ch a 1igka,nq olan Cs>ub,niixd for only a porton its floor,a Ume L.OgttaPower,Uloraacc cr 1 3s may beu:cf far u;abic e0irc floor np and 090,+cos pa squxc fx.slt:.l De used far the mtrunot.neat,rhieh,t.y,,,clues cbrausr�ac4 folby vex sod reslronm, Cameron arans.as herein Ue6nod do eel inctude.nll m,.,a r For the 61c Poem,the Unit U&htin6 Power Allowonct is 10 wpt11 peraqu .rout 9 for i„door spat tournament eotuis with adJaoent Vaaator sestina the Vent Lly;,tiPz Pena Allows=for Lhe court area is 2.6 watt:per tauarc foot 10 For both kxnil Am Naail IL Ii6hL fix OatiVandiny 4hs7(4y,huI(ding.h7.cWe illumination and display vvintlowillueunalion instolita ,within rwo flat ofthc window vc cntmoL Retail A allows a Unit Lighdtig Po..:(NJo,of 10"Ls per Vuora foot Calina mounted etlrusUble tvngsta hatoyrA and hIID memhwtdisc display Illtoninar+e Kra exernpt. Retail OolluwsaVnit Lighting Pawer Allowance of15uVU per squvefoot,indud'o,gallceilingrMinled merd=disedisplay kaninarics 11. Ptohdad that a Poor pion,end,catin6 tacit 1""0'aa,d hatght,is s.tbrt,iT1#J-the Ware Footagp:ar.ranhcwe may be Gab net,for cumyutink:the Inter or Unit L i;hun6 Power Allowsnec,as the Ace'acd not co+acd by nog plus that ortical face area(.x:ess side only) of-h.Aoki.The height all_ar w Scfi n.d i n ferias do 2 app l e s only to d,.decor vo toe co.c.•cd by rack JAN-15-2001 09:22 9163623306 98% P. 13 t ■ � ■ ■ ■ - z� ■ ■ 1 � � C]li Lai lb7b LL �1b..:$bZJJU0 ULUMt,� i;,; I LUN,4- r lac 14 1997 Washin ton State Nonresidential Energy Code Comphance Form ri hfin' o sLTG 1597 wozvnpwn Stain NOrUSSId9n1191 Ert"f Coen CompWw*Forms 71(11 EdlWn•Jw-,e.Isse Lighting -General equiremen 1513 Lighting Controls 1513.1 Local Control and Accessibility:Each space, program beck-up capabilities,which prevent the loss of enclosed by walls or ceiling-height partitions,shalt be provided program and time settings for at least 10 hours,if power is with lighting controls located within that space.The lighting interrupted. controls,whether one or more, shall be capable of turning off 1513.6 Automatic Shut-Off Controls,Interior:Office all lights within the space.The controls shall be readily buildings greater than 25,000 ft2 and all school classrooms accessible,at the point of entry/exit, to personnel occupying or shag be equipped with separate automatic controls to shut off using the space. the lighting during unoccupied hours.Automatic controls may Exceptions:The following lighting controls maybe be an occupancy sensor, time switch,or other device capable centralized in remote locations: of automatically shutting off lighting. 1. Lighting controls for spaces which must be used Exceptions: as a whole- 1. Areas that must be continuously illuminated, or 2. Automatic controls. illuminated In a manner requiring manual 3. Controls requiring trained operators. operation of the lighting 4. Controls for safety hazards and security. 2. Emergency lighting systems. 1513.2 Area Controls:The maximum lighting power that may 3. Switching for Industrial or manufacturing process be controlled from a single switch or automatic control shall not facilities as maybe required for production. exceed thatwhich is provided by a twenty ampere circuit 1513.&1 Occupancy Sensors: Occupancy sensors shall be loaded to not more than eighty percent.A mastercontrol may capable of automatically turning off all the lights in an area,no be installed provided the Individual switches retain their more than 30 minutes after the area has been vacated. capability to function Independently. Circuit breakers may not 1513.6.2 Automatic Time Switches:Automatic time switches be used as the sole means of switching shall have a minimum 7 day clock and be capable of bung sst Exceptions: for 7 different day types perweek and incorporate an autcmabc 1. Industrial or manufacturing process areasi as holiday"shut-off"feature,which turns off all loads for at least may be required for production. 24 hours and then resumes normally scheduled operations. Automaft time switches shall also have program back-up 2. Areas less than five percent of the building capabilities.which prevent the loss cf program and time footprint for footprints over 100,000 ft'. settings for at least 10 hours, if power is interrupted. 1513.3 Daylight Zone Control:All daylighted zones, as Automatic time switches shall incorporate an over-ride defined in Chapter 12. both under overhead glazing and switching device which: adjacent to vertical glazing,shall be provided with individual a. is readily accessible; controls,or daylight-or occupantsensing automatic controls, which control the lights independent of general area lighting, b is located so that a person using the device can see 1513.4 Display,Exhibition,and Specialty Lighting the lights or the areas controlled by the switch,or so Controls:All display, e-Aiibition, or specialty lighting shall be that the area being illuminated 1s annunciated; controlled independently of general area lighting. c, is manually operated; 1513.5 Automatic Shut-off Controls, Exterior:Exterior d. allows the lighting to remain on Porno more than two lighting not intended for24-hour continuous use shalt be hours when an over-ride is initiated; and automatically switched by timer, photocell,or a combination of e, controls an area not exceeding 5,000 ftz or 5 percent timer and photocell.Automatic time switches shall also have of footprint for footprints over 100,000 ft?,wh i&ever is greater. JAN-15-2001 09:22 9163623306 98% P. 14 x ■ ■ f ■ ■ �1 1 1; 7 • % moms ■ w m mM-J■ A MR&M PImmW Ql/ L.�� 1'770 LL. .� ._ ,�3oL�.7Uo UL.uPi✓,:,, _ �J +t.o r.;uc _� 1997 Washington State Nonresidential Energy Cody ompl ante Form • • 1997 W;Iv oat"stave NC---dQM J Enapy Coda Ccmpgsr a FOMN Firm Eanan-Jung.I9b9 Project Address rEs SICKWAS Tixs CENTER Date 12/18/00 The following information is necessary to check a lighfing permit application for compliance with the lighting requirements in the 1994 Washington State Nonresidential Energy Code. Applicability Code Location Building Department (yes,no,n.a.) Section Component Information Required on Plans Notes LIGHTING CONTROLS(Section 1513) 1513.1 Local control/access Schedule with type,indicate locations 1513.2 Area controls Maximum limit per switch 1513.3 Daylight zone control Schedule with type and features,indicate locatians vertical glazing Indicate vertical glazing on plans overhead glazing Indicate overhead glazing on plans 1513,4 Display!exhib/special Indicate separate controls 1513.5 Exterior shut-off Schedule with type and features,Indicate location (a)timer w/backup Indicate location (b)photocell. Indicate location 1513.6 Inter.auto shut-off Indicate location 1513.6.1 (a) occup.sensors Schedule with type and locations 1513.6.2 (b) auto.switches Schedule with type and features(back-up,override capability) Indicate size of zone on plans Lighting Sum, Form Completed and attached. Schedule with fixture types, lamps.ballasts,watts per fixture Elec motor efficiency MECH-MOT or Equipment Schedule with hp, rpm,efficiency If"no" is circled for any question, provide explanation: JAN-15-2001 09:23 9163623306 98% P.15 S C 0 N Z 0 Date: March 19, 2001 To: David W. Anderson City of Arlington 238 N. Olympic Avenue Arlington, WA 98223 ls� A-I L L S TA 0 m From: Al Stancikas ARCHITECTS, P.s.c. Sconzo/Hallstrom Architects PSC 919 1241h Ave#101 Bellevue, WA 98005 RE: Les Schwab Tire Center ARCHITECTURE Attached please find: 1) (1)copy of the original plan correction notes by Chuck Williams, CWA Consultants 2) (2)copies of our response letter including response from Mechanical and Structural engineers. PLANNING 3) (4)each: • Architectural sheets: Al Site Plan INTERIORS A2 1st. Floor Plan A2.3 Roof Plan A4 Cross Section A, Cross Section B A4.1 Cross Sections A4.2 Partial Section, Details A4.4 Wall Sections, Stair Details A5 Door, Window, and Room Finish Schedules A6 Door and Window Details A8 Details • Structural sheets: S100 General Notes S200 Foundation Plan S300 Roof Framing Plan S301 Mezzanine Plan & Details S400 Concrete Details S401 Concrete Details S402 Alignment Pit Details S403 Alignment Pit Details S404 Hoist Section & Details S600 Masonry Details MAR S601 Framing details 20200, Cl7y OFARCI►V(7-OM 919 124TH AVE N.E. SUITE 101 BELLEVUE, WA 98005 425.455.3203 425.455.9351 (FAX) www.sconzohaIIstrom.com r II i �� . rt w, • Mechanical sheets: M3 Mechanical details These new sheets are intended to substitute the sheets in the sets that are in your possession. If you have any further questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you, Al Stancikas Project Manager Sconzo/Hallstrom Architects PSC CC:Greg McDonald—LS Construction Bill Walker—Sconzo Hallstrom Architects PSC "s . I _ II ly ,/ _� �:��'� '�'�] �� i 1� � I ■ Innovative ■ LEONARD Structural Design ENGINEERING SERVICES REVISED March 15, 2001 Mr. Al Stancikas RECEIVED Sconzo Hallstrom Architects 919 1241h AVE NE, Suite 101 MAR 2 0 2001 Bellevue, WA 98005 RE: Les Schwab Tire Center/Arlington CITY OF ARLINGTON Response to Building Department Comments ��`r1i�` Y�j Dear Al: This letter is in response to the Structural Comments from the building department. The number of the response corresponds to the comment number. My responses are as follows: 1. The Structural Notes have been modified to indicate what requires Special Inspection. 2. The lap splice schedule has been modified. 3. Refer to the attached calculations. 4. Refer to the attached calculations. 5. Refer to the attached calculations. 6. Refer to detail 9/S600 and attached calculations. 7. Refer to the attached calculations. 8. Refer to the modified foundation plan and attached calculations. Please telephone with questions. Sincerely, P1. LEO& Diana J. Leonard, Principal 25354� � STV EXPIRES 09-24-.00 Attachments ■ 1411 FOURTH AVENUE SUITE 1240 SEATTLE, WA 98101 PHONE 206,624 9393 FAX 206 624 9645 ■ ,� I *`' s: +M,�. � i �: 1 '.� I, ��'y _� �_ �- � � _ �' '� ti � _. I f _ 1 . � - - - Les Schwab Tire Center Smokey Point Supplemental Structural Calculations S. LEpA, NVASy,�'�,p ;e STEM f ,V EXPIRES 09-241ft,- Leonard Engineering Services 1411 Fourth Avenue, Suite 1527 Seattle, WA 98101 Job #00-77 March 2001 I II �1 1 �1 ■ ■ 0 'y Innoaotive / IEDRABO Structural GGG Design ENGINEERINGSERVICfS 1411 FOURTH AVENUE, SUITE 1240 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 C&6.0 I�r5 D�--27- of 3,0 Fto -7 I,t/�a = D, -7L w 7 s V z cueW5 #0G W /Z `��C ' • 1 I 1 1 T � . I Innovative [EDNARO Des g�of ENGINEERING SERVICES 1411 FOURTH AVENUE, SUITE 1240 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 6!::�IViveGT"i0-10 /T ExTE,e�c�2 �v,q� �rc,Cf7s�'!i ivL /� �ENL�/C UG/k31e/ A5�7-,09 5 �SIQU 31/Z I ► v13 C� � �F o, z6 I V) -5 re ct-1,C)0 ID 60 Aro-e G),K- Gr 7 C 1s-.E fi-f.jAG k 6-FwN 0 z 3z I,LCJI.p�d IZA6101L L /40 15 zo 4 1� III _ _ I ' - - i - _ 1 Innovative Structural Design ENGWEERING SERVICES 1411 FOURTH AVENUE, SUITE 1240 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 F7-u>&5AU d # CfD /� 4) /,5 17'lej Iie-S7- 0r-- Ur 0r PZ19lut evxgjL �rC)& ©r gPMeA-4kj1L Af!) �314 7 �- z 4b00 20 p 4-8 (4 7) 11 CG L G EG Z i �� - _ � � Y I Innovative Structural HONKRUDesign ENGINEERING SERVICES 1411 FOURTH AVENUE, SUITE 1240 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 57-'e U7- �C��-G-�C T�2� <f4/viv GAT/DrJ 331 UST 7- fn � DCJ�I� INTO CCU )e- L2Di � I-1-E OJE' LD ON DD v &L E -v 1 D E D I r I L L >r T- C�-1�EC,IL �� rJ r> ►N Ca � N i.t;-M &EP P E O e =; / /, (Z) l� M - Pe - 4 5, 53� (i1 -fib � (' 1, 7 �v,7S� 3la`aQa 4s,goo I �� - - - - � . i - _ � � � I InnovativeStructu / j Design srnl ENGINEERING SERVICES 1411 FOURTH AVENUE, SUITE 1240 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 cJ4,1— Z0, L) = Ce 1 C = i 3 s 421 (� PLI1=► LL)Vr0 s 1" C e 09,5 *-fi( 4� z z � 1 I II _ it _ _ � -■ � � - ■ - - - - � r � • InnovativeStructu HomRoDesignral ENGINEERING SERVICES 1411 FOURTH AVENUE, SUITE 1240 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 Ez-:,/!5;m/C' 611L)ota y L�i4 o 10-,o P -5 k-4-7 * 4S- E Z z 30 z 7a7-c4-L_ Z7) 34Z VCOL l �1 � �7 t)'f /Col- . I I I �� J � I ARDIDesign Innovative� Structural ENGINEERING SERVICES 1411 FOURTH AVENUE, SUITE 1240 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 � - C 4/L)n f CoGv0&x) Fcox t a c Pa)(fal LL' ! 3t Z CI Zo n C SZ� ZO 0. = I-i '5 '! 1 Z+ 1 a� t 53 /4z Z -� ; 1 I '1 I Inn l O� Structural Design ENGINEERING SERVICE S OURTH AV SE T�LE, N, WASH GTON 98101 SEA F� Ro eQ 7q0 S75 = �� f v _ /7, S -7 1 -ZL 13211 PL L, l b 0 -�- , �, ,�: 1 I I 1 '� - - � I • Innorolive Title: Job# / M1K A R Struclurol Dsgnr: Date: 3:32PM, 15 MAR 01 Design Description EN;INEERING SERVICES 1411 FOURTH AVENUE, SUITE 1240 Scope: S TTIE, WASHIN TON 98101 Rev:506001 General Footing Analysis & Design Page 1 Description Canopy Column Footing [General Information Allowable Soil Bearing 2,500.0 psf Dimensions... Short Term Increase 1.330 Width along X-X Axis 6.500 ft Base Pedestal Height 0.000 in Length along Y-Y Axis 6.500 ft Seismic Zone 3 Footing Thickness 16.00 in Overburden Weight 50.00 psf Col Dim.Along X-X Axis 24.00 in Live& Short Term Combined Col Dim.Along Y-Y Axis 24.00 in fc 3,000.0 psi Fy 60,000.0 psi Min Steel % 0.0014 Concrete Weight 145.00 pcf Depth to Rebar 3.00 in 1Loadls Applied Vertical Load... Dead Load 17.600 k ...ecc along X-X Axis 0.000 in Live Load 13.200 k ..ecc along Y-Y Axis 0.000 in Short Term Load k Creates Rotation about Y-Y Axis Creates Rotation about X-X Axis Applied Moments... (pressures @ left& right) (pressures @ top&bot) Dead Load k-ft k-ft Live Load k-ft k-ft Short Term 71.800 k-ft k-ft Creates Rotation about Y-Y Axis Creates Rotation about X-X Axis Applied Shears... (pressures @ left& right) (pressures @ top&bot) Dead Load k k Live Load k k Short Term k k Summary Footing Design OK 6.50ft x 6.50ft Footing, 16.Oin Thick, w/Column Support 24.00 x 24.00in x O.Oin high DL+LL DL+LL+ST Actual Allowable Max Soil Pressure 972.3 2,804.8 psf Max Mu 7,548 k-ft Allowable 2,500.0 3,325.0 psf Required Steel Area 0.218 in2 "X' Ecc, of Resultant 0.000 in 20.973 in "Y' Ecc, of Resultant 0.000 in 0.000 in Shear Stresses.... Vu Vn*Phi 1-Way 24.779 93.113 psi X-X Min. Stability Ratio No Overturning 1.500 :1 2-Way 19.199 186.226 psi Y-Y Min. Stability Ratio 1.850 (c) 1983-98 ENERCALC KW-0603311,Ver 5.0.6, 15-Jul-19K Win32 n I i� ,� - - — - — � �� r ■ � ` _ _ ' i Innouctive Title: Job# //( Structural Dsgnr: Date: 3:32PM, 15 MAR 01 UONARD Design Description P ENGINEERING SERVICES 1411 FOURTH AVENUE, SUITE 1240 Scope SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 Rev:505001 General Footing Analysis & Design Page 2 Description Canopy Column Footing Footing Design Shear Forces ACI 9-1 ACI 9-2 ACI 9-3 Vn*Phi Two-Way Shear 19.20 psi 18.82 psi 7.00 psi 186.23 psi One-Way Shears... Vu @ Left 9.00 psi 24.78 psi 10.28 psi 93.11 psi Vu @ Right 9.00 psi -2.55 psi -1.64 psi 93.11 psi Vu @ Top 9.00 psi 8.26 psi 3.08 psi 93.11 psi Vu @ Bottom 9.00 psi 8.26 psi 3.08 psi 93.11 psi Moments ACI 9-1 ACI 9-2 ACI 9-3 Ru/Phi As Req'd Mu @ Left 2.82 k-ft -0.86 k-ft -0.55 k-ft 18.5 psi 0.22 in2 per ft Mu @ Right 2.82 k-ft 7.55 k-ft 3.12 k-ft 49.6 psi 0 22 in2 per ft Mu @ Top 2.82 k-ft 2.58 k-ft 0.95 k-ft 18.5 psi 0.22 in2 per ft Mu @ Bottom 2.82 k-ft 2.58 k-ft 0.95 k-ft 18.5 psi 0.22 in2 per ft Soil Pressure Summary Service Load Soil Pressures Left Right Top Bottom DL+ ILL 972.33 972.33 972.33 972.33 psf DL+ ILL+ST 0.00 2,804.78 972.33 972.33 psf Factored Load Soil Pressures ACI Eq. 9-1 1,454.99 1,454.99 1,454.99 1,454.99 psf ACI Eq. 9-2 0.00 3,926.70 1,361.26 1,361.26 psf ACI Eq. 9-3 0.00 1,713.20 593.91 593.91 psf ACI Factors (per ACI, applied internally to entered loads) ACI 9-1 &9-2 DL 1.400 ACI 9-2 Group Factor 0.750 UBC 1921.2.7"1.4" Factor 1.400 ACI 9-1 &9-2 ILL 1.700 ACI 9-3 Dead Load Factor 1.400 UBC 1921.2.7"0.9" Factor 0.900 ACI 9-1 &9-2 ST 1.700 ACI 9-3 Short Term Factor 1.400 ....seismic=ST* 1.100 (c) 1983-98 ENERCALC KW-0603311,Ver 5.0.6, 15-Jul-1998,Win32 I it 1 Innaralive �l 6 Structural HONARDIDesign ENGINEERING SERVICES 1411 FOURTH AVENUE, SUITE 1240 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 7 -ft 30. k 16.00 in 7� 6.50 ft I t -- 30. k — — 6.5A ft 6.50 ft _i- i I I I - - - - - - 9y - I I� MAR-04-2001 12:28 FROM: TO:425 455 9351 P.002/005 CWA CONSULTANTS STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING BUILDING CODE CONSULTANTS 22421 N.E.20th Street,Sammamish,WA 98074 (425)836-2833 FAX:(425)836-3707 E-Mail:chuckw@gte.net March 4, 2001 -ILI Les Schwab—01-4300 1997 Uniform Building Codes Type of Construction: V-N sprinklers Occupancy—M/S1/S3 Stories: 1 + mezzanine Seismic Zone: 3 'EcF,v f,D Wind Speed: 80 R Wind Exposure: C AR 0 2pp1 David W. Anderson M 2 Building Official Aa`ttyOTO►rl City of Arlington C1 N 0� 238 N. Olympic Avenue Arlington, WA 98223 Dear Mr. Anderson; 1 G ��_ 7 - We have completed our review of the Les Schwab Tire Center. The plans have been reviewed for compliance to the 1997 Uniform Building Code, 1997 Uniform Mechanical Code, 1998 Washington State Nonresidential Energy Code and 1998 Washington State Accessibility Requirements, NONSTRUCTURAL 1. The sprinkler system should be designed considering "High-Piled Combustible Stock" and tire storage per the Fire Code. Your Fire Department should review these requirements. 2. The construction joints at the top of walls that require protected openings (occupancy separations) should be listed construction joint assemblies. The listing number (UL, ICBO etc) along with construction details should be provided on the plans. The construction joints should be capable of accommodating the required deflection of the adjacent structural members. A detail should be provided where the wall is beneath the metal floor decking (both perpendicular and parallel to flutes) and roof/floor beams. The details on Sheet A8 should be justified. MAR-04-2001 12:14 96% P.02 •�,,.� .� a ^� ��..�r -•. a• I MAR-04-2001 12:28 FROM: TO:425 455 9351 P.003/005 Arlington— Les Schwab Tire Center March 4, 2001 Page 2 of 4 3. Details should be provided for protection of all the through-penetrations and membrane penetrations of all fire resistive wall and floor assemblies. Section 710. These should be listed assemblies with listing number provided. 4 The one-hour protection of the steel truss at the occupancy separation wall (Sheet A4 must be a listed assembly. The listing details should be indicated on the plans. 5. The truss top chord at the steel truss/occupancy separation penetrates the one-hour fire resistive assembly. A detail indicating a method of protecting the penetrations that is acceptable to you should be provided on the plans. 6. Sheet A2.2 indicates that a 1-hour roll-down shutter is required over Window N while the window schedule indicates a 1-1/2 hour assembly. Only a one-hour assembly is required. 7. Section 1202.2.6 allows the deletion of the mechanical ventilation for the service bays if you determine that the door openings are sufficient. Note that this Section / requires unobstructed openings. ✓ 8. Glazing within a 24" arc of either side of a doorway should be safety glazing. This included windows K and L adjacent to the main entry. The location of all safety glazing should be indicated on the plans. 9. You should approve of the roof covering indicated on Sheet A2.3. I am not similar with the spray applied foam insulation with a silicone finish as an approved covering. An ICBO ER should be provided. A minimum Class C rating is required. MECHANICAL I. Details should be provided for seismic bracing of the unit and I heater in the service bays. Otherwise the mechanical plans are acceptable as submitted. 1998 WASHINGTON STATE RESIDENTIAL ENERGY CODE (WAC 51) 1. The designer should note on the plans that all glazing shall be certified and labeled with its U-factor and solar heat gain coefficient by an independent agency licensed by the NFRC. Section 1312.1 2. Calculations should be provided to justify the 0.25 U-factor used for the exterior masonry walls. The default value from the NREC is 0.40, which will result in Target UA to be greater than the Proposed UA. 3. No slab edge insulation is required assuming that comment 2 can be resolved. 1 MAR-04-2001 12:14 96% P.03 MAR-04-2001 12:2e FROM: TO:425 455 9351 P.004/005 Arlington — Les Schwab Tire Center March 4, 2001 Page 3 of 4 1998 WASHINGTON STATE REGULATIONS FOR BARRIER-FREE DESIGN 1. All doors in the building that have a latch set or lock set should have lever-type operating hardware. Section 1106.3.1 2. Door thresholds should be shown as no higher than 1/2". The edges should be beveled at 1 vertical : 2 horizontal, with a maximum edge height of 1/4". Sections 1106.10.4, 1106.6 STRUCTURAL 1. For your information, "Special Inspection" is required for: Masonry construction Anchor bolts (Table 19-F) Steel deck welding Structural steel welding High strength bolting 2. The table provided on Sheet S401 for the development length should be updated to the 1997 UBC. See Section 1912.1. The development length for masonry construction should be based on Section 2107.2.2.3. 3. A subdiaphragm analysis must be provided for the roof diaphragm where the framing is parallel to the wall. The subdiaphragm must be capable of transferring all wall anchorage forces (Section 1633.2.8.1)to the main diaphragm. Section 1633.2.9, item 4. Details 1 and 5, Sheet A601 must be capable of transferring the lateral wall anchorage forces. 4. The wall anchors must comply with all of the requirements of Section 1633.2.8.1. The steel elements (including the subdiaphragm) must have the strength to resist 1.4 times the strength level forces calculated in Section 1633.2.8.1. Since ASD values are used for the seismic forces, the forces must be increased by a factor of 1.4 (strength level) in addition to the 1.4 increase required by item 4. 5. Since the seismic forces calculated by the engineer are based on allowable stress design, when using the seismic force Em (DoEh) the calculations must elevate the forces to strength level by multiplying the actual seismic forces by 1.4 in addition to Do. The actual calculations used for the typical seismic forces are at working stress levels. 6. Drag struts must be provided in line with all shear walls. Drag struts must be capable of transferring all lateral loads from the point of origin to the shear wall itself. Detail 10/S601 must be justified. The only connection appears to be to the perpendicular wall. MAR-04-2001 12:15 96% -� P.04 r r MAR-04-2001 12:29 FROM: TO:425 455 9351 P.005/005 Arlington — Les Schwab Tire Center March 4, 2001 Page 4 of 4 7. All drag struts, splices and their connections must have the strength to resist the maximum anticipated earthquake force Em. Section 1633.2.6. Equations 12-17 and 12-18 should be used for these members, 8. How are the lateral forces for the canopy area resisted? Both wind lateral and uplift forces must be considered. The seismic forces to the cantilevered columns must be based on an R=2.2. The footings must be capable of resisting the overturning and uplift forces. Please instruct the designer to indicate on a separate letter which sheet or detail the corrections may be found and to REVISE AND RESUBMIT THE PLANS. Please feel free to contact me if there are any questions. Sincerely; Chuck Williams SE CWA Consultants CC: Sconzo Hallstrom Fax (425)455-9351 I MAR-04-2001 12:15 95% P.05 Y �� .� I 1� I r, { I I �� - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - ��• ,. I r_ ' - S C O N Z O Date: March 16, 2001 To, David W.Anderson City of Arlington 238 N. Olympic Avenue Arlington, WA 98223 From: AI Stancikas D A A L L S TA 0 m Sconzo/Hallstrorrv.Architects PSC ARCHITECTS, P.S.C. 919124th Ave##101 Bellevue, WA 98005 RE: Les Schwab Tire Center ARCHITECTURE We have received and reviewed you letter concerning compliance with the 1997 Uniform Building Code (with Washington State Amendments), 1997 Uniform Mechanical Code, 1998 Washington Energy Code, and 1998 Washington State Accessibility Code for the Les Schwab Smokey Point location. We have clarified and complied with the concerns as follows: PLANNING Nonstructural 1.J"The sprinkler system should be designed considering "High-Piled Combustible Stock"and tire storage per the Fire Code. Your Fire Department should review INTERIORS these requirements." The Sprinkler system is designed considering"High-Piled Combustible Stock"and shall be routed to the Fire Department for review. 2. "The construction joints at the top of the walls that require protected openings (occupancy separations)should be listed construction assemblies. The listing number(UL, ICBO, etc.) ..`............. The details on sheet A8 should be justified." Refer to revised details 3&4, sheet A8 and revised section 3, sheet A4.4. 3. "Details should be provided for protection of all the through penetrations and membrane penetrations of all fire resistive wall and floor assemblies. Section 710. These should be listed assemblies with the listing number provided." Refer to revised details 6& 10, sheet A8 for corrections. 4. "The one-hour protection of the steel truss at the occupancy separation wall(Sheet A4)must be a listed assembly. The listing detail should be indicated on the plans." Refer to revised section A, sheet A4 and revised section 3 sheet A4.4. 5. "The truss top cord at the steel truss/occupancy separation penetrates the one-hour fire resistive assembly.A detail indicating a method of protecting the penetrations that is acceptable to you should be provided on the plans." Refer to revised section 3, sheet A4.4 for correction. 6. "Sheet A2.2 indicates that a 1-hour roll-down shutter is required over window N while the window schedule indicates a 1—%hour assembly. Only a one-hour assembly is required." Refer to the window schedule, sheet A5.0 for revision to the window note. RECEIVED 919 124TH AVE N.E. MAR 2 O 2001 SUITE 101 BELLEVUE,WA 98005 425.455.32( 3 CITY OFARLING,TON 425.455.935 1 (FAX) www.sconzohallstrom.com F T �'N 7. "Section 1202.2.6 allows the deletion of the mechanical ventilation for the service bays if you determine that the door openings are sufficient. Note that this Section requires unobstructed openings." Refer to sheet A2, 1 sc Floor Plan. 8. "Glazing within 24"arc of either side of a doorway should be safety glazing. This included windows K and L adjacent to the main entry. The location of all safety glazing should be indicated on the plans." Refer to sheet A2, 1 s' Floor Plan. 9. "You should approve of the roof covering indicated on Sheet A2.3. 1 am not....... A minimum Class C rating is required." Refer to sheet A2.3, Roof Plan. Mechanical 1. "Details should be provided for seismic bracing of the unit and IR heater in the service bays. Otherwise the mechanical plans are acceptable as submitted." Refer to the mechanical drawings for revision for the seismic brace required. For additional response comments please refer to response from Glumac International. (Attached) 1998 Washington State Residential Energy code (WAC 51) 1. "The designer should note on the plans that all glazing shall be certified and labeled with its U-factor and solar heat gain coefficient by an independent agency licensed by the NFRC. Section 1312.1" Refer to the mechanical drawings for revision. 2. "Calculations should be provided to justify the 0.25 U-factor used for the exterior masonry walls. The default value from the NREC is 0.40, which will result in Target UA to be greater than the Proposed UA." Refer to the mechanical drawings for revision. 3. "No slab edge insulation is required assuming that comment 2 can be resolved." Refer to the response for#2. For additional response comments please refer to response from Glumac International. (Attached) 1998 Washington State Regulations for Barrier-Free Design 1. "All doors in the building that have a latch set or lock set should have lever-type operating hardware. Section 1106.3.1" Refer to sheet A5 Door schedule notes for revision. 2. "Door thresholds should be shown as no higher than %" The edges should be beveled at 1 vertical.2 horizontal, with a maximum edge height of'4" Section 1106.10.4, 1106.6" Refer to details 10/A6 and revised detail 12/A6 for response. ■ I rd w r I I Structural For structural response comments please refer to response from Leonard Engineering Services. (Attached) If you have any further questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you, a Al Stancikas Project Manager Sconzo/Hallstrom Architects PSC CC:Greg McDonald—LS Construction Bill Walker—Sconzo Hallstrom Architects PSC Diana Leonard—Leonard Engineering Services Larry Oliver—Glumac International I . ' � ' ,{ J G�_ UMA C SACRAMENTO SAN FRANCISCO Los ANGELES PORTLAND SEATTLE MADRID I N T E R N A T 10 N A L March 13, 2001 Sconzo-Hallstrom Architects 919124th Avenue NE, Suite 101 - Bellevue, WA 98005 RECEIVED Attention: Al Stancikas MAR 2 0 2001 Subject: Les Schwab Tire Center CITY OF ARLINGTON Smokey Point(Arlington) I ' Plan Check Comments ( -('`�i Dear Al: The following are the mechanical responses to the plan check comments by the City of Arlington, dated March 4, 2 00 1. The drawings have been clouded with a"Delta 1"to show the changed items. Plan Review Comments: NONSTRUCTURAL Item#7 Section 1202.2.6 allows the deletion of the mechanical ventilation for the service bays if you • determine that the door openings are sufficient. Note that this Section requires unobstructed openings. Response: Section 1202.2.6 requires that the openings area be greater than 1/201h of the floor area. The minimum required opening area is 111 sq.ft. for each service bay area. Each area has four 12'xl2' (576 sq.ft.) of openings. The owner operates their stores with these doors fully open during business hours. MECHANICAL Item#1 Details should be provided for seismic bracing of the unit and IR heater in the service bays. Otherwise the mechanical plans are acceptable as submitted. Response: Refer to Sheet M-3. The details have been revise to show seismic sway bracing. 1998 WASHINGTON STATE RESIDENTIAL ENERGY CODE (WAC 51) Item#1 The designer should note on the plans that all glazing shall be certified and labeled with its U- factor and solar heat gain coefficient by an independent agency licensed by the NFRC. Section 1312.1. Response: The architect shall provide this noting as requested. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL ACOUSTICAL ENERGY TELECOMMUNICATIONS 10419 Old Placerville Road • SUITE 250 / SACRAMENTO CA 95827 /TEL 916.362.9394 • FAx 916.362,3306 Item#2 Calculations should be provided to justify the 0.25 U factor used for the exterior masonry walls. The default value from the NREC is 0.40, which will result in Target UA to be greater than the Proposed UA. Response: Refer to revised calculations and calc sheet justifying the 0.25 U-factor. The masonry walls are 8"CMU concrete block with the cores partial insulated. Item#3 No slab edge insulation is required assuming that comment 2 can be resolved. Response: Refer to the revised calculations. The slab edge insulation has been removed. Should you have any questions,please call. Sincerely, GLUMAC INTERNATIONAL Larry N. O17ier. CIPE/CPD Mechanical Associate LNO/amc Cc: file CONSULTING ENGINEERS / MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL ACOUSTICAL ENERGY TELECOMMUNICATIONS 10419 Old Placerville Road • SUITE 250 / SACRAMENTO CA 95827 /TEL 916.362.9394 • FAx 916.362.3306 V 1997 Washington State Nonresidential Energy Code Compliance Form Envelope Summary Climate Zone 1997 Washington State Nonresidential Energy Code Compliance Forms First Edition,June 1998 Project Info Project Address LEs SCHWAB TIRE CENTER Date 3/13/2001 SMOKEY POINT, WA For Building Department Use Applicant Name: LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER Applicant Address: PRINEVILLE, CA Applicant Phone: 541.416.5633 Project Description New Building ❑Addition ❑Alteration ❑Change of Use Q Prescriptive ❑ Component Performance ❑ENVSTD ❑Systems Compliance Option (See Decision Flowchart(over)for qualifications) Analysis Space Heat Type Q Electric resistance Q All other (see over for definitions) Total Glazing Area Electronic version: these values are automatically taken from ENV-UA-1. Glazing Area Calculation (rough opening) Gross Exterior Note:Below grade walls may be included in the (vertical&overhd) divided by Wall Area times 100 equals %Glazing Gross Exterior Wall Area if they are insulated to the level required for opaque walls. 1697 .0 — 9760. 0 X 100 = 17 .4% Q yes Check here if using this option and if project meets all requirements for the Concrete/Masonry Option. ConcreteAlasonry Option See Decision Flowchart(over)for qualifications. Enter requirements for each qualifying assembly Qno below. Envelope Requirements(enter values as applicable) Opaque Concrete/Masonry Wall Requirements Fully heated/cooled space Insulation on interior-maximum U-factor is 0.19 Minimum Insulation R-values Insulation on exterior or integral-maximum U-factor is 0.25 Roofs Over Attic If project qualifies for Concrete/Masonry Option,list walls with HC>_9.0 Btu/ftl-*F below(other walls must meet All Other Roofs 34.0 Opaque Wall requirements). Use descriptions and values Opaque Walls from Table 20-5b in the Code. Below Grade Walls Wall Description U-factor Floors Over Unconditioned Space (including insulation R-value&position) Slabs-on-Grade EXTERIOR WALL 0.250 Radiant Floors Maximum U-factors Opaque Doors 0.086 Vertical Glazing 0.600 Overhead Glazing Maximum SHGC(or SC) Vertical/Overhead Glazing 1.000, Semi-heated space" Minimum Insulation R-values Roofs Over Semi-Heated Spaces" 'Refer to Section 1310 for qualifications and requirements Notes: 4 1 1 I ME MEN ME 1997 Washington State Nonresidential Energy Code Compliance Form Envelope • Zone 1 ENV-SUM 1997 Washington State Nonresidential Energy Code Compliance Forms First Edition,June 1998 Decision Flowchart Use this flowchart to determine if project qualifies for the optional Prescriptive Option. for Prescriptive Option If not,either the Component Performance or Systems Analysis Options must be used. 1302 Space Heat Type:For the purpose of determining building envelope xr'� Electric Resistance:Space heating systems which use electric resistance requirements,the following two categories comprise all space healing types: elements as the primary heating system including baseboard,radiant,and Other:All other space heating systems including gas,solid fuel,oil,andforced air units where the total electric resistance heat capacity exceeds 1.0 propane space heating systems and those systems listed in the exception toW/ft=of the gross conditioned floor area. Exception:Heal pumps and electric resistance. (continued at right) terminal electric resistance heating in variable air volume distribution systems. s9ar»or Ham? y� F no Al 171y Al v�ellsRll IOitedaGl IDiteria 1/aIISR19 raied ro (be0 yes yes M04 no rasi d yesy )AS `�M� ro no as r1D I'10 � Y All halationIn4alled? All ins ladoninEtalled? All Ins llaticnIrtsalled? All InslatimInstalled? 99augradsvalls(ed) R10 vdis(rt) U0.19 Naxirryvalls(nt) U0.19 Eklowgadevdls(ed) R10 I3davgadevdIs(dhr)R11 Wkaor vdIs(oter) U0.25 Ah9lrymdIs(ot1>er) U0.25 Bdavgrade%dIs(odlr)R19 Ebofsmerattics R30 Wavgadevldls(ed) R10 WowgradavdIs(ed) R10 Ebofsaarattics R38 At other rods R21 Btsavgradeulells(C"R11 BdavgradeMls(dhr)R19 At other roofs R30 �Roasaertrooncispi R19 Fbofso"attics R30 EbofsoRrattics R38 Roorsaeruncord R30 9abscrlgade R10 All olherroofs R21 At otherroofs R30 SabsaWaacie R10 iRdallfloas R10 Rooso,erlrcordsp. R19 Roasaerncord R30 FWartfloas R10 gMciltedolxs U11160 �� Rio S ao Rio �doas UO.60 ��Gaa2ingCiteriaMet? gequedoors U0.60 O)�doors U0.6D Qaarg0teriaMV Area96 U U SHE C3aangCHteriaM ? C3azirlgQiteriaNrt? Area U U SiW 0 OD-150/o 0.90 1.45 1.00 G �� o� 0020% 0.40 0.80 1.00 15-20%0.75 1.40 1.00 '41 n U U S{� Prea U U SH3C. 2DW/o 0.60 1.30 0.65 00-10a/0 0.90 1.45 1.00 00-2179/6 0.40 0.80 1.00 YES no 3040%0.50 1.25 0.45 10.15% 0.75 1.40 1.00 15-20% 0.65 1.30 0.80 yes no no lye, 20-250/6 0.60 1.30 0.65 ro yes pp�h �- an-Po rent NrIbmu-oe r 9�derrsArlalyssFbq fired Concrete/Masonry Option* Wall Heat Capacity (HC) 'If the area weighted heat Assembly Description Assy.Tag HC' Area(sf) HC x Area capacity(HC)of co-ty WALL 16.70 10586.0 176786.2 the total above grade wall is a D.MTAL MAME WALL 1.00 minimum of 9.0, the Concrete Masonry Option may be used. ""For framed walls,assume HC=1.0 unless calculations are provided;for all other walls,use Totals 10586.0 176766.2 Section 2009. Area weighted HC:divide total of(HC x area)by Total Are 16.70 J -- - - - - _ - - �1 . _ - _, �! f V I 1994 Washington State Nonresidential Energy Code Compliance Form Envelope ' Calculations Climate Zonel 1991 Washington State Nonresidential Energy Code Compliance Forms First Edition,June 1998 Project Address LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER Date 3/13/2001 Space Heat Type Q Electric resistance @) All other For Building Department Use Glazing Area as%gross exterior wall area 17.4$ Prop 40.0% Max.Target Concrete/Masonry Option O Yes O No Notes:If glazing area exceeds maximum allowed in Table,then calculate adjusted areas on back(over). If Concrete/Masonry Option is used,Target U-factors,SHGC and Glazing%will be different than shown below. Refer to Table 13-1 for correct values. Building Component Proposed UA Target UA List components by assembly ID&page# U-factor x Area(A) =UA(U x A) U-factor x Area(A) =UA(U x A) U= Plan ID: 0.600 1697.0 1018.2 0.750 1697.0 1272.8 U= Plan ID: Glazing% Electric Resist. Other Heating U= Plan ID: 0-15% 0.40 0.90 'R U= Plan ID: >15-20% 0.40 0.75 > C9 U= Plan ID: >20-30% not allowed 0.60 U= Plan ID: >30-40% not allowed 0.50 U= Plan ID: (see Table 13-1 for Conc/Masonry values) U= Plan ID: m ¢ U= Plan ID: Glazing% Electric Resist Other Heating U= Plan ID: 0-15% 0.80 1.45 O U= Plan ID: >15-20% 0.80 1.40 w U= Plan ID: >20-30% not allowed 1.30 > U= Plan ID: >30-40% not allowed 1.25 t U= Plan ID: (see Table 13-1 for Conc/Masonry values) U= Plan ID: U= PlanID:SECTIONAL 0.086 706.0 60.7 0.600 847.0 508.2 M g U= Plan ID:rmN DOOR 0.067 141.0 9.4 Electric Resist. Other Heating 0 U= Plan ID: 0.60 0.60 w R= PlanID:RODF 0.028 13224.0 370.3 0.036 13224.0 476.1 0 > �° O R= Plan ID: Electric Resist. Other Heating R= Plan ID: 0.031 0.036 R= Plan ID: � w o 0 R= Plan ID: Electric Resist Other Heating R= Plan ID: 0:034 0.050 R= PlanlD:1-%soNRY 0.250 7216.0 1804.0 0.400 7216.0 2886.4 R= Plan ID: m R= Plan ID: R= Plan ID: Electric Resist. Other Heating a R= Plan ID: Ordinary 0.062 014 C R= Plan ID: Metal stud 0.11 0.14 R= Plan ID: Conc(int) 0.19 0.19 ""Note:sum of Target Areas here should equal Target Opaque Wall Area(see back) Conc(oth) 0.25 0.25 N R= Plan ID: o 3: R= Plan ID: Electric Resist. Other Heating m R= Plan ID: Ordinary 0.062 0.14 Note:if insulated to levels required for opaque walls,list above with opaque walls Metal stud 0.11 0.14 a R= Plan ID: > In O 6 R= Plan ID: Electric Resist. Other Heating o u R= Plan ID: 0.029 0.056 C LL D R= Plan ID: c R= PlanID:sLAB FLOOR 621.0 0.540 621.0 335.3 E R= Plan ID: Electric Resist. Other Heating _ rn U) R= Plan ID: F=0.54 F=0.54 R= Plan ID: (see Table 13-1 for radiann `For CMU walls,indicate core insulation material Totals 23605.0 3262.6 Totals 23605.0 For compliance: 1)Proposed Total Area shall equal Targeto UA shall n 1 OEM m - - -.--ram mw--wwr- : -"-% I 1 1994 Washington State Nonresidential Energy Code Compliance Form Climate Zone I ENV-SHGC 1997 Washington Stale Nonresidenuai Energy Code Compliance Forms first Edition,June 1998 Glazing Proposed SHGC Target SHGC List components by assembly ID&page# SHGC' x Area(A) =SHGC x A SHGC x Area(A) =SHGC x A ID: 1.000 1697.0 1697.0 1.000 1697.0 1697.0 ID: Glazing% Electric Resist. Other Heating ID: 0-20% 1.00 1.00 N ID: >20-30% not allowed 0.65 ID: >30-40% not allowed 0.45 ID: (see Table 13-1 for Conc/Masonry values) 'Note:Manufacturer's SC may be used in lieu of SHGC. Totals 1697.0 1697 00 Totals 1697.0 1697.0 For compliance:Proposed total SHGC x A shall not exceed Target total SHGC x A NOTE: 1997 NREC revisions allow SHGC compliance for vertical and overhead glazing to be calculated together. The 1994 Forms required separate calculations for vertical and overhead glazing. TargetArea • Calculations If the total amount of glazing area as a%of gross exterior wall area(calculated on ENV-SUM1)exceeds the maximum allowed in Table 13-1. then this calculation must be submitted Use the resulting areas in the Target UA and SHGC calculations above, Proposed Areas: Numbered values are used in calculations below Roofs over Attics Other Roofs Walls Glazing Area OG= OG- VG= 1697.0 Note: OG=overhead glazing Opaque Area 13224.0 7216.0 VG=vertical glazing Gross Exterior Wall Max Glazing Area Maximum Target Area (Table 13-1) Glazing Area 9760.0 x 40.0% - 100 = 3904.0 Target OG Area in Roofs over Attics Target OG Area in Other Roofs Max OG Remaining Target VG Area For Target OG's,the 3904.0 — Fi:lesser = 3904.0 — = lesser values are ij lesser 1697.0 used both here and �> 3904.0 3904.0 II below. Proposed Opaque Area Proposed OG Area Target OG Areal Target Opaque Area Roofs over Attics 13224.0 d + — = 13224.0 Other Roofs — Proposed Opaque Area Proposed VG Area Target VG Area Target Opaque Area Walls 1 7216.0 + 1697.0 — 1697.0 = 7216.0 Target Areas OK Note: If there is more than one type of wall,the Target VG Area may be distributed among them,and separate Target Opaque Areas found. If the Target Areas for Opaque Walls listed on the front must equal the total calculated here. Target values in shaded boxes are used in the applicable Target UA calculations on the front. Target VG Area and Total Target OG Area are also used in the applicable Target SHGC calculations above. 1997 Washington State Nonresidential Energy Code Compliance Form Building Permit Plans Checklist ENV-CHK 1997 Washington State Nonresidential Energy Code Compliance Forms First Edition,Juno 1998 Project Address LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER Date 3/13/2001 The following information is necessary to check a building permit application for compliance with the building envelope requirements in the Washington State Nonresidential Energy Code. Applicability Code Location Building Department (yes, no, n.a.) Section Component Information Required on Plans Notes GENERAL REQUIREMENTS (Sections 1301-1314) 1301 Scope Unconditioned spaces identified on plans if allowed 1302 Space heat type: If"Other", indicate on plans that electric resistance heat is not allowed 1310.2 Semi-heated spaces Semi-heated spaces identified on plans if allowed 1311 Insulation 1311.1 Insul.installation Indicate densities and clearances 1311.2 Roof/ceiling insul. Indicate R-value on roof sections for attics and other roofs; Indicate clearances for attic insulation; Indicate baffles if eave vents installed; Indicate face stapling of faced batts 1311.3 Wall insulation Indicate R-value on wall sections; Indicate face stapling of faced batts; Indicate above grade exterior insulation is protected; Indicate loose-fill core insulation for masonry walls as necess; Indicate heat capacity of masonry walls if masonry option is used or if credit taken in ENVSTD; 1311.4 Floor insulation Indicate R-value on floor sections; Indicate substantial contact with surface; Indicate supports not more than 24"o.c.; Indicate that insulation does not block airflow through foundation vents 1311.5 Slab-on-grade floor Indicate R-value on wall section or foundation detail; Indicate slab insulation extends down vertically 24"from top; Indicate above grade exterior insulation is protected 1311.6 Radiant floor Indicate R-value on wall section or foundation detail; Indicate slab insulation extends down vertically 36"from the top; Indicate above grade exterior insulation is protected; Indicate insulation also under entire slab where req'd.by Official 1312 Glazing and doors Provide calculation of glazing area(including both vertical vertical and overhead)as percent of gross wall area 1312.1 U-factors Indicate glazing and door U-factors on glazing and door schedule(provide area-weighted calculations as necessary); Indicate if values are NFRC or default,if values are default then specify frame type,glazing layers,gapwidth,low-e coatings,gas fillings 1312.2 SHGC&SC Indicate glazing solar heat gain coefficient or shading coefficient on glazing schedule(provide area-weighted calculations as necessary) 1313 IMoisture control 1313.1 'Vapor retarders Indicate vapor retarders on warm side 1313.2 Roof/ceiling vap.ret Indicate vapor retarder on roof section; Indicate vap.retard.with sealed seams for non-wood struc. 1313.3 Wall vapor retarder Indicate vapor retarder on wall section 1313.4 Floor vapor retarder Indicate vapor retarder on floor section 1313.5 Crawl space vap.ret. indicate six mil black polyethylene overlapped 12"on ground 1314 Air leakage 1314.1 Bldg.envel.sealing Indicate sealing,caulking,gasketing,and weatherstripping 1314.2 Glazing/door sealing Indicate weatherstripping 1314.3 Assemb.as ducts Indicate sealing,caulking and gasketing PRESCRIPTIVEXOMPON ENT PERFORMANCE(Sections 1320-23 or 1330-34) Envelope Sum Form Completed and attached. Provide component performance worksheet if necessary Provide ENVSTD screen 1 output if necessary If"no"is shown for any question,provide explanation: ■ 1 1 1 ■.■." ■ 1 1 i s i i 1997 Washington State Nonresidential Energ Code Com liance Form Building Permit Plans 1997 Washington State Energy Code Compliance Forms First Edition,June 1, nve ope - neral Kequirements 1311 Insulation Product samples used for U-factor determinations shall be 1311.1 Installation Requirements: All insulation materials production line units or representative of units as purchased by shall be installed according to the manufacturer's instructions the consumer or contractor. Unlabeled glazing and doors shall be assigned the default U-factor in Section 2006. to achieve proper densities,maintain clearances, and maintain uniform R-values. To the maximum extent possible, insulation 1312.2 Solar Heat Gain Coefficient and Shading shall extend over the full component area to the intended R- Coefficient: Solar Heat Gain Coefficient(SHGC), shall be value. determined, certified and labeled in accordance with the 1311.2 Roof/Ceiling Insulation:Open-blown or poured loose National Fenestration Rating Council (NFRC) Standard by a certified, independent agency, licensed by the NFRC. fill insulation may be used in attic spaces where the slope of the ceiling is not more than 3/12 and there is at least thirty Exception: Shading coefficients(SC)shall be an inches of clear distance from the top of the bottom chord of the acceptable alternate for compliance with solar heat truss or ceiling joist to the underside of the sheathing at the gain coefficient requirements. Shading coefficients roof ridge.When eave vents are installed, baffling of the vent for glazing shall betaken from Chapter 27 of openings shall be provided so as to deflect the incoming air Standard RS-27 or from the manufacturer's test data above the surface of the insulation. 1313 Moisture Control Where lighting fixtures are recessed into a suspended or 1313.1 Vapor Retarders:Vapor retarders shall be installed on exposed grid ceiling,the roof/ceiling assembly shall be the warm side(in winter) of insulation as required by this insulated in a location other than directly on the suspended section ceiling. Exception:Vapor retarder installed with not more Exception: Type IC rated recessed lighting fixtures. than 1/3 of the nominal R-value between it and the Where installed in wood framing,faced batt insulation conditioned space shall be face stapled 1313.2 Roof/Ceiling Assemblies:Roof/ceiling assemblies 1311.3 Wall Insulation: Exterior wall cavities isolated during where the ventilation space above the insulation is less than framing shall be fully insulated to the levels of the surrounding an average of twelve inches shall be provided with a vapor walls.When installed in wood fram ing,faced bait insulation retarder. Roof/ceiling assemblies without a vented airspace, shall be face stapled where neither the roof deck nor the roof structure are made of Above grade exterior insulation shall be protected, wood, shall provide a continuous vapor retarder with taped seams. 1311.4 Floor Insulation: Floor insulation shall be installed in Exception: Vapor retarders need not be provided a permanent manner insubstantial contact With the surface where all of the insulation is installed between the being insulated. Insulation supports shall be installed so roof membrane and the structural roof deck spacing is not more than twenty-four inches on center. Installed insulation shall not block the airflowthrough 1313.3 Walls:WalIs separating conditioned space from foundation vents. unconditioned space shall be provided with a vapor retarder. 1311.5 Slab-On�Grade Floor: Slab-on-grade insulation 1313.4 Floors:Floors separating conditioned space from installed inside the foundation wall shall extend downward from unconditioned space shall be provided with a vapor retarder. the top of the slab a minimum distance of twenty-four inches or 1313.5 Crawl Spaces:A ground cover of six mil(0.006 inch to the top of the footing, whichever is less. Insulation installed thick)black polyethylene or approved equal shall be laid over outside the foundation shall extend downward a minimum of the ground within crawl spaces.The ground cover shall be twenty-four inches or to the frostline,whichever is greater. overlapped twelve inches minimum atthejoints and shall Above grade insulation shall be protected. extend to the foundation wall. Exception:For monolithic slabs,the insulation shall Exception:The ground cover may be omitted in extend downward from the top of the slab to the crawl spaces if the crawl space has a concrete slab bottom of the footing. floor with a minimum thickness of three and one-half 1311.6 Radiant Floors(on or below grade): Slab-on-grade inches. insulation shall extend downward from the top of the slab a 1314 Ai r Leakage minimum distance of thirty-six inches or downward to the top of 1314.1 Building Envelope:The requirements of this section the footing and horizontal for an aggregate of not less than shall apply to building elements separating conditioned from thirty-six inches. unconditioned spaces. Extedorjoints around windows and If required by the building official where sal conditions door frames, openings between walls and foundation, between warrant such insulation,the entire area of a radiant floor shall walls and roof and wall panels;openings at penetrations of be thermally isolated from the soil. Where a soil gas control utility services through walls,floors,and roofs; and all other system is provided below the radiant floor, which results in openings in the building envelope shall be sealed, caulked, increased convective flow below the radiant floor,the radiant gasketed, or weatherstripped to limit air leakage. floor shall be thermally isolated from the sub-floor gravel layer. 1314.2 Glazing and Doors:Doors and operable glazing 1312 Glazing and Doors separating conditioned from unconditioned space shall be 1312.1 Standard Procedure for Determination of Glazing weatherstripped. Fixed windows shall be tight fitting with glass and Door LI-Factors: U-factors for glazing and doors shall be retained by stops with sealant or caulking all around determined, certified and labeled in accordance with Standard Exception: Openings that are required to be fire RS-31 by a certified independent agency licensed by the resistant National Fenestration Rating Council(NFRC). Compliance 1314.3 Building Assemblies Used as Ducts or Plenums: shall be based on the Residential or the Nonresidential Model Building assemblies used as ducts or plenums shall be sealed, Size. caulked, and gasketed to limit air leakage. Q c PROPOSED MASONRY WALL ASSEMBLY ENV-3 PROJECT NAME DATE COMPONENT DESCRIPTION ASSEMBLY NAME m pS UJA%—L lDESCRIPTION OF ASSEMBLY e w w Colo = S. 1 0 0 Cf) U) z ' SKETCH OF ASSEMBLY WALL R-VALUE and HEAT CAPACITY �E(WALL UNIT THICKNESS NOMINAL INCHES l 1 MATERIAL TYPE C,f�'E�✓ (LW CMU,MW CMU, NW CMU,CLAY UNIT,CLAY BRICK,CONCRETE.) CORE TREATMENT �yS'LI, ISJ�.►A (SOLID,GROUTED,EMPTY,INSULATED,NA) WALL R-VALUE �. Rw(FROM TABLE B-4 or B-5) WALL HEAT CAPACITY I ( �(' HC (FROM TABLE B-4 or B-5) FURRING/INSULATION LAYER (INSIDE and/or OUTSIDE IF ANY) FURRING FRAMING MATERIAL (WOOD,METAL, NONE) FURRING FRAMING SIZE NOMINAL INCHES ACTUAL INCHES FURRING SPACE INSULATION TYPE R-VALUE EXTERIOR INSULATING AREA TYPE R-VALUE INSULATION LAYER FURRING ASSEMBLY EFFECTIVE R-VALUE EXTERIOR INSULATING LAYER R-VALUE R-VALUE .}. = Rf (FROM TABLE B-7) (FROM MANUFACTURER) WALL ASSEMBLY R-VALUE and U-VALUE INSULATION LAYER WALL R-VALUE WALL ASSEMBLY R-VALUE WALL ASSEMBLY U-VALUE R-VALUE Rf Rw Rt 11Rt Nonresidential Compliance Form November 1998 M_ 7� 1 1 1 1 I� f 1 i! 1 G4--"'T 49 C) City of Arlington Planning and Community Development Minor Development Permit January 10, 2001 Les Schwab Tire Center MN-00-053 I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND REQUEST Les Schwab Tire Centers of Washington, Inc., request development of a 16,234 square foot Les Schwab Tire Center on an undeveloped 1.82 acres site. The entire site will be developed, 87% of which will be impervious surface (building or parking lot) and the remainder will be landscaping and drainage facilities. II. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Applicant/Owner: Les Schwab Tire Centers of Washington, Inc., PO Box 667, Prineville, OR 97754 2. Contact Person: Greg McDonald, PO Box 667, Prineville, OR 97754 3. General Location: The site is bordered by 166th Place to the south and Smokey point Boulevard to the west; in the NW '/4 of Section 28, Township 31 N, Range 5E, W.M. (Tax ID No. 310528-002-043-00 & 310528-002-066-00) 4. Address of the Property: Address will be assigned as development occurs 5. Description of Proposal: Development of a 16,234 square foot Les Schwab Tire Center on an undeveloped site 6. Acreage: Approximately 1.82 acres 7. Comprehensive Land Use Designations, Zoning Designation and Existing Land Uses of the Site and Surrounding Area: AREA LAND USE DESIGNATION ZONING EXISTING USE Project site Highway Commercial Highway Commercial Vacant North of site Highway Commercial Highway Commercial Bank South of site Highway Commercial Highway Commercial Vacant East of site Highway Commercial Highway Commercial Vacant West of site Highway Commercial Hi hwa Commercial I Retail Shopping L r*U 1 6 L i i'ir 1 DEPT, - - - y � � � � � � � � � � 1 � � � � � 1 A�� ,� � � = � �- - � Minor Development Permit January 10, 2001 Les Schwab Tire Center MN-00-053 8. Public Utilities and Services Provided by: Water: City of Marysville Cable TV: TCI Cable Sewer: City of Marysville Police: City of Arlington Garbage: Waste Management Northwest Fire: City of Arlington Storm Water: City of Arlington School: Lakewood School District Telephone: General Telephone Hospital: Cascade Valley Hosp. Dist. #3 Electricity: Snohomish County PUD #1 Gas: Cascade Natural Gas 9. Public Notification: A Notice of Application and Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (MDNS) was published, posted, and mailed on November 15, 2000. III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW An MDNS was issued on November 15, 2000, with a 15-day comment period followed by a 10- day appeal period; no comments were received. IV. BACKGROUND The subject minor development permit review application was received by the City of Arlington on October 11, 2000, and the application was deemed complete on October 16, 2000. Additional information was requested on November 13, 20000, and was received on December 4, 2000. A Notice of Application and Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (MDNS) was published, posted, and mailed on November 15, 2000. V. FINDINGS OF FACT 1 . Application Process: The minor development permit application was received by the City of Arlington on October 11, 2000. The application was deemed complete on October 16, 2000. A minor development permit is an administrative review process per City of Arlington Uniform Development Code (UDC) Chapter VII, Sections CA and C.S. 2. Comprehensive Plan and Zoning: The City of Arlington Comprehensive Plan identifies this area as being Highway Commercial, and the subject property is zoned Highway Commercial per UDC Chapter III, zoning map, Page III-2. Retail Trade Establishments (Automobile Repair and Service Facilities) are a permitted use per UDC Chapter V, Section H. 3. Lot Dimensions, Density and Related Requirements: The proposed development complies with the minimum lot dimensions for Retail Trade Establishments (Automobile Repair and Service Facilities) (0.5 acre in size and 100-foot minimum width) and yard setbacks (front 25 feet, rear 50 feet, and each side 25 feet) and with maximum building height (50 feet). Lot coverage is not applicable in the Highway Commercial zone. 4. Non-residential Performance Standards: The proposed development must comply with the standards of performance for noise, lighting, odors and gases, particular matter, electrical interference, hazardous materials storage, waste HALes Schwab\PERMIT.doc kjr; 1/10/01 Page 2 of 8 I Minor Development Permit January 10, 2001 Les Schwab Tire Center MN-00-053 disposal, open storage, maintenance and alterations, and hazardous waste facilities per UDC Chapter IX, Section B.2. 5. Off-Street Parking: The proposed use as calculated per UDC Chapter IX, Section CA, Parking Requirements, requires 47 parking spaces, at 2.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross interior sales space, which is 16,234 square feet, plus 1.5 per 1,000 square feet of interior storage and exterior display/storage areas (which was not calculated separately), plus 3/service bay, of which there are 2, plus 1 dumpster space. The proposed site plan shows 48 parking spaces, 2 of which are handicap accessible, and 1 dumpster space, which meets the minimum requirements. 6. Landscaping: The final site plan shall comply with the requirements of UDC Chapter IX, Section N, Landscaping. The required landscaping for Retail Trade Establishments (Automobile Repair and Service Facilities) use is category C, which requires 10 feet of Type III landscaping adjacent to all street frontages. The landscape requirement for the parking area is a minimum of 17-1/2 square feet of landscaping for each parking stall for the first 50 spaces and 35 square feet for each parking space over 50 per Chapter IX, Section N.7. The landscape plan reflects sufficient frontage and parking area landscaping to meet the general landscape requirements specified in Chapter IX, Section N.7. Plant material must be guaranteed for one year with any replacements guaranteed for one year also. 7. Transportation: The proposed development is located east of Smokey Point Boulevard and on the north side of 166 h Place. The site will access off of 166th Place NE. It is anticipated to add approximately 230 average weekday daily vehicular trips, which includes 23 p.m.-peak-hour trips, to the street system. Transportation mitigation fees shall be paid the City of Arlington at $1,038.00 for each p.m.-peak-hour trip, or $28,874.00. Because the property participated in the RID for improvements to Smokey Point Boulevard and 172"d it is exempt from Snohomish County traffic mitigation fees. Additionally, the traffic study proposed no transportation mitigation fees to WSDOT to mitigate the traffic impact from this development to state roads; the MDNS was not disputed by WSDOT by the legal deadline, therefore no WSDOT transportation mitigation fees are required. 8. Stormwater Management: The City has adopted storm drainage requirements per Arlington Municipal Code Chapter 16.10, Stormwater Management, and the Department of Ecology's Stormwater Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin (The Technical Manual). Site plan drawings with a proposed drainage system have been submitted. A preliminary review of the system indicates that it will probably work. Per City of Arlington Ordinance 1216, there shall be a payment of storm water system development fees to the City of Arlington at $374.00 per 2,000 square feet of impervious surface area. 9. Critical Areas: The site contains no identified environmentally sensitive areas. 10. Park Mitigation and Impact Fees: The project will employ approximately 20 people, who will use the City's park system. Per UDC Chapter XI, Section B.4, HALes Schwab\PERMIT.doc kjr; 1/10/01 Page 3 of 8 r .■ ' ■ ' ■ � . ■ : ■ ■7 ! ■ hiprr a ! r �■T1 NJ �� bm Jd ■J J z i'� Minor Development Permit January 10, 2001 Les Schwab Tire Center MN-00-053 there shall be a payment of 5 cents ($0.05) per square foot of land per approved site plan. 11. Airport Management: The Arlington Municipal Airport requires that street lamps or light poles located on the property be down shielded as to avoid interfering with flight operations. 12. Water and Sanitary Sewer: Adequate water and sewer service is available to the site from the City of Marysville; utility services to the building and fire hydrants and fire protection as required will be reviewed when construction drawings are submitted. All existing and planned utilities shall be shown on the site plan. 13. Criteria for Approval of an Application and Issuance of a Permit: Per UDC Chapter VII, Section D, Criteria for Approval, the Department of Planning and Community Development is required to review for compliance the following criteria before an application can be approved. a. The development is consistent with the dimensional, density requirements and Performance Standards of the UDC and other applicable laws and regulations; and Staff Analysis: As identified above, the development is consistent with the dimensional, density requirements, and Performance Standards of the UDC and other applicable laws and regulations. b. The development as proposed incorporates, to the maximum extent feasible, mitigation measures to substantially lessen or eliminate all adverse environmental impacts of the development; and Staff Analysis: The development as proposed incorporates, to the maximum extend feasible, best management practices to lessen or eliminate all adverse environmental impacts of the development. C. The applicant has presented certification that the applicant has filed and paid all the taxes, penalties and interest, and that the applicant has satisfactorily made agreement to pay the taxes (NOTE: this requirement is only applicable to subdivision plats); and Staff Analysis: This requirement is only applicable to subdivision plats. d. Prior to final approval the applicant has followed all permit processing procedures and paid all applicable land use fees. Staff Analysis: As stated above,.all permit processing procedures have been followed and a condition is included that requires that all applicable land use fees be paid prior to final decision. VI. CONCLUSIONS 1. The City of Arlington Comprehensive Plan identifies this area as Highway Commercial, and the subject property is zoned Highway Commercial per UDC Chapter III, zoning map, Page III-2. Retail Trade Establishments (Automobile Repair and Service Facilities) are a permitted use in the Highway Commercial zone per UDC Chapter V, Section H. Therefore, the proposed development as noted and conditioned is consistent with policies governing commercial uses and is allowed in the Highway Commercial zone. HALes Schwab\PERMIT.doc kjr; 1/10/01 Page 4 of 8 w m=4Immiwmm'■ ` mommommomm EMiR JPrl&wAmmm mmPLm mom ■ NO I ,.. . ■ ■ ■ ■ 7 •. • - - r - i ■ ■ 1 - M • i i • • . - • ■ ■ - momms i immommimAmbionA z �� ti Minor Development Permit January 10, 2001 Les Schwab Tire Center MN-00-053 2. The requested minor development permit as conditioned meets all UDC requirements, including Chapter VII, Section D, Criteria for Approval, and all other applicable codes. 3. The minor development permit should be approved subject to conditions noted below. VII. DECISION The minor development permit is hereby APPROVED, subject to the following conditions: 1. All development shall be in substantial conformance with the approved preliminary site plan received December 4, 2000, and landscape plan received October 13, 2000, subject to any conditions or modifications that may be required as part of the minor development permit. 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall file a drainage plan and construction plans, meeting the following conditions, in conjunction with a building permit application. The final site plan shall comply with all requirements of the Unified Development Code, Uniform Building Code, Uniform Fire Code and Public Works Construction Standards and Specifications. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall submit proof of payment of all required mitigation payments (transportation mitigation fees to the City of Arlington at $1,038.00 per pm peak hour trip, which is 23, for a total of $23,874.00; and park mitigation fees to the City of Arlington at 5 cents per square foot of land per approved site plan, which is 1.82 acres or 79,279.20 square feet, for a total of $3,963.96). 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall pay storm water system development fees to the City of Arlington at $374.00 per 2,000 square feet of impervious surface area, which is 68,972.90 square feet, for a total of $12,897.93. 5. All exterior lighting, including streetlights, shall be down shielded. 6. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall clear all outstanding land use permit-processing accounts with the City. 7. The minor development permit shall become null and void if use and reliance is not established within one year of the below date of approval. VIII. CODE REQUIREMENTS (NOTE: The following items are not conditions of permit approval, rather certain local, state, or federal code requirements that the applicant needs to be aware of. This is in no way intended to be a complete list of code requirements, but a general checklist of major steps and issues. Please refer to the AMC for a complete list of code requirements for your particular project type. HALes Schwab\PERMIT.doc kj r; 1/10/01 Page 5 of 8 Minor Development Permit January 10, 2001 Les Schwab Tire Center MN-00-053 1. Code Applicability. This application is subject to the applicable requirements contained in the Arlington Municipal Code, Zoning Code, and Building Code. It is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure compliance with the various provisions contained in these ordinances. 2. Pre-Construction Phase. Prior to commencing any site work, including installing any easement or right-of-way improvements, utility systems, drainage systems, street lights, mailbox structures, emergency facilities, storm water control systems, landscaping, or any other improvements, improvement plans must be submitted for review and approval by the Department of Public Works. Said plans shall be in conformance with applicable code and the below listed conditions. a. The applicant shall survey and mark all property corners prior to review of any submitted construction plans. b. The applicant will be required to design and install erosion control measures deemed necessary by the City. These measures must be installed and inspected by the City prior to the issuance of any permits for site work. C. No site preparation or other disturbance shall be undertaken within environmentally sensitive areas or their required buffers. d. Submit to the Director of the Department of Public Works and receive approval of a stormwater run-off and detention plan in conformance with the AMC Chapter 16.10, Stormwater Management, and the Department of Ecology's Stormwater Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin (The Technical Manual) for both the construction phase and a permanent system. All site drainage must be directed through biofiltration swales prior to discharge into wetlands. e. All new utility lines shall be placed underground. f. Provide a temporary rock pad at all points of ingress and egress to the site throughout the construction phase. g. Show locations of all required streetlights on the construction plans. Install them. h. A Right-of-Way Permit is required for and prior to any work done in a public right-of-way. i. All lighting shall be low sodium or similar low intensity illumination and placed in a way as to not cause glare on an adjoining property or right-of- way. 3. Construction Phase. The following conditions shall apply during construction. a. All applicable noise and other nuisance codes are applicable. HALes Schwab\PERMIT.doc kjr; 1/10/01 Page 6 of 8 Minor Development Permit January 10, 2001 Les Schwab Tire Center MN-00-053 b. Mud and dirt shall not be tracked onto public rights-of-way, but if tracked by accident shall be immediately cleaned-up. C. During any site grading or clearing activity, the applicant and contractor shall use all available means of controlling air pollution (dust, ash, and smoke). d. The restrictions of the AMC shall apply to any and all grading. 4. Installation of Improvements. Prior to receiving final plat approval the applicant shall: a. Install a potable water system to serve the project per Department of Public Works requirements. b. Install a sanitary sewer system created per Department of Public Works requirements. C. Install a permanent stormwater control system per AMC Chapter 16.10. d. All exterior boundaries and interior lot corners of proposed lots shall be set by a registered land surveyor using rebar and cap. e. Dedicate to all utilities serving the subject property and their respective successors and assigns a ten-foot easement over, under and upon: (a) the exterior ten feet parallel with and adjoining the street frontage of all lots and common areas; and (b) where any other utility facilities, including electrical, gas, water, sewer, drainage, and/or other utility facilities, cross the property. Verify the appropriate locations with the respective utilities. Include in the dedication document the following language: "These utility easements have been reserved for and granted to all utilities serving the subject property and their respective successors and assigns, under and upon the front ten feet parallel with and adjoining the street frontage of all lots and tracts in which to install, lay, construct, renew, operate and maintain underground conduits, cables, pipes, and wires, together with other necessary facilities and equipment, for the purpose of serving this and other property with utility service, together with the right to enter upon the property at all times for the purposes herein stated. All utility lines shall be placed underground. These easements entered upon for these purposes shall be restored as near as possible to their original condition. These easements shall preclude grading or any recontouring of the land; placement of structures, wells, leach fields, and any other thing; except utility facilities." g. In lieu of completing any of the above improvements, the applicant may submit to the Department of Planning and Community Development a performance security to cover the cost of installing any or all of the improvements within one year of the date of permit approval. However, HALes Schwab\PERMIT.doc kj r; 1/10/01 Page 7 of 8 • MEMMMM T7 1� MOMEMEMENE! rr MOWN I J `` R &JL.Mr■ P.Aic `!7 �`L` I ! go ■ ■ . ' ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ . ■ ■ Minor Development Permit January 10, 2001 Les Schwab Tire Center MN-00-053 no Certificates of Occupancy may be issued until all improvements are completed. (NOTE: Infrastructure requirements are based on conceptual information as submitted by the applicant. Additional specific requirements may be required upon review of the engineered construction drawings as submitted by the applicant. All improvements are subject to review and approval by the Department of Public Works. All utilities shall be constructed underground.) XI. APPEALS To appeal this decision, an appeal application must be filed, with all required fees, within 10 working days of the date of issuance of this decision. The City Council or a Hearing Examiner would hear the appeal of the permit and their decision would be considered the City's final decision on the underlying governmental action. X. EXHIBITS 1. Approved Preliminary Site Plan received December 4, 2000, and Landscape Plan received October 13, 2000 2. File MN-00-053 ORDERED THIS 10TH DAY OF JANUARY 2001. Cliff t ong, Pla I g Manager Responsible O ici I Distributed tot Following Party of Record: • Les Schwab Tire Center of Washington, Inc, c/o Greg McDonald, PO Box, 667, Prineville, OR 97754 • Public Works Department, Paul Richart • Public Works Department, Marc Hayes • Building Department, Dave Anderson • Water and Sewer Department, Terry Castle HALes Schwab\PERMIT.doc kjr; 1/10/01 Page 8 of 8 :� �.� ?a> �7 :� � r !� �.r �� t ■ — ■ — ■ _ a1'�y �Y � �' � �� • GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PROPOSED LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER SMOKEY POINT BOULEVARD AND SMOKEY POINT INDUSTRIAL PARK ROAD SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON Submitted to: LS Construction Company 646 North Madras Highway Prineville, Oregon 97754 Submitted by: PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. 3257 16ffi Avenue West Seattle, Washington 98119-1706 November 25, 1998 PSI Project No. 578-8E032 U I L®INS DEPT, A RecetvE0 JAN l s 1u�8 C17Y OF ARLIIVGTOA1 G �- L/ 3 " PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. Information to Build On LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER PSI Project No. 578-8E032 November 25, 1998 Page 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................1 1.1 GENERAL......... ................................................................................................... 1 1.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION.................................................................................... 1 2.0 SITE CONDITIONS..................................................................................................1 2.1 SURFACE............................................................................................................. 1 2.2 SUBSURFACE .....................................................................................................2 2.3 GROUNDWATER.................................................................................................3 2.4 LABORATORY TESTING.....................................................................................3 3.0 DISCUSSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS..........................................................4 3.1 GENERAL.............................................................................................................4 3.2 SITE PREPARATION AND GENERAL EARTHWORK ........................................4 3.3 STRUCTURAL FILL AND COMPACTION............................................................4 3.4 FOUNDATION ...................................................................................................... 5 3.5 SLAB-ON-GRADE FLOORS ................................. .................6 .............................. 3.6 SEISMIC DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS ...............................................................6 3.7 EXCAVATIONS AND SLOPES ............................................................................7 3.8 SITE DRAINAGE ..................................................................................................7 3.9 PAVEMENTAREAS.............................................................................................7 3.10 UTILITY SUPPORT AND BACKFILL....................................................................8 4.0 LIMITATIONS ..........................................................................................................9 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Vicinity Map Figure 2 Site and Exploration Plan LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A Boring Logs Appendix B Sieve Analyses agwAlq iJ Lih 1 I I PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. Information to Build On LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER PSI Project No. 578-8E032 November 25, 1998 Page 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 General This report presents the results of the geotechnical investigation completed by Professional Service Industries (PSI) for the proposed Les Schwab Tire Center building located at the northeast corner of Smokey Point Boulevard and Smokey Point Industrial Park Road in Snohomish County, Washington. The general location of the site is shown on the Vicinity Map, Figure 1. The purpose of this investigation was to explore the subsurface conditions at the site, and based on the conditions encountered, to develop geotechnical recommendations for the proposed site development. The approximate exploratory locations are shown on the Site and Exploration Plan, Figure 2. 1.2 Project Description We understand the development of the site will consist of constructing a one-story masonry block building with slab-on-grade floors and associated parking. The majority of the building will be occupied by several open service bays that may have a clear span roof system to transfer loads to the perimeter foundations. The remainder of the building will consist of office and tire storage areas. The proposed development will be constructed at or near existing grades. Specific structural design information is not available at this time. However, based on our experience with similar projects, we would anticipate wall loads in the range of 3 to 4 kips per lineal foot, column loads in the range of 24 kips, and slab-on-grade floor loads of 150 pounds per square foot (psf) within the tire storage area. If any of these design criteria are inconsistent or have been changed, we should be informed to review and reevaluate the recommendations addressed in this report. In any case, PSI should be retained to perform a general review of the final design. 2.0 SITE CONDITIONS 2.1 Surface Conditions The subject site is located at the northeast corner of Smokey Point Boulevard and Smokey Point Industrial Park Road in Snohomish County, Washington. This irregularly- shaped property is bordered to the north by Smokey Point Boulevard, and neighbored with Frontier Bank at the eastern border. Smokey Point Industrial Park Road bounds the western border of the property. The southern border of the property is open to an undeveloped land. An overhead electrical power line crosses the middle portion of the property in a north-south direction. Dense brush and grass cover the entire property 1� 10 iris 11 1� m m m limm Md J12A dkA wr awwa Pr' 4 Ow PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. Information to Build On LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER PSI Project No. 578-8E032 November 25, 1998 Page 2 surface with two individual young trees standing at the northern border line and within the northern middle portion of the property, respectively. At the time of our field work, the site surface appeared to be wet with some water in depressions observed near the northwestern corner. In general, the subject site consists of undeveloped lands with relatively level topography. Approximate boring locations were determined by taping from the existing facility stakes. The approximate elevations were determined by locating the subject site on a preliminary topographic map. Approximate locations of these test borings are shown on the Site and Exploration Plan, Figure 2. 2.2 Subsurface Our field exploration was performed on November 18, 1998. Subsurface conditions at the site were explored by drilling three test borings to the depths ranging from 19 to 34 feet. The test borings were completed using a truck-mounted drilling equipment provided by Environmental Drilling, Inc. Continuous-flight, hollow-stem augers were used to advance and support the boreholes during sampling. In each test boring, Standard Penetration Tests (SPT) were performed at selected intervals in general accordance with ASTM Test Designation D-1586. A 2-inch outside diameter split spoon sampler was driven with a 140 pound hammer freely falling 30 inches. The number of blows required to drive the last 12 inches of penetration are called the "N-value". This value is used to characterize the relative density of sandy- soils or consistency of clayey soils. The field exploration was monitored by our geologist who recorded the soil and groundwater conditions encountered, maintained a log of each boring, obtained representative samples, and observed pertinent site features. The test boring logs are presented in Appendix A. The final logs represent our interpretations of the field logs and the results of the laboratory examination and tests of field samples. The stratification lines on the logs represent the approximate boundaries between soil types. The transitions may be more gradual in the field. With the exception of dry brown sandy gravel with some silt encountered in the top 1 foot of the soil profile in test borings B-1 and B-2, the underlying soils generally reveal two distinct strata of uniform, silty sand deposits. The upper stratum contains brown to dark brown, dry to slightly moist, fine-grained silty sand with a trace of gravel. The relative density of these soils appears to increase with depth from a loose to medium dense condition. Underlying the upper soils to the termination depth is a stratum of wet, gray, fine- to coarse-grained silty sand with some scattered gravel inclusions. The t � [m-4 `ti pM tb1eqW11 rlrhw 1ftD6]K [Uu itil b"Iry1R no= rdOF1§Ll■i N16l =Rf E�1�� .�� Irk ii �1 ■ 1 � . PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. Information to Build On LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER PSI Project No. 578-8E032 November 25, 1998 Page 3 relative density of this stratum appears, similarly, to increase from a medium dense to dense condition. The United States Geological Survey (USGS) publication entitled Geologic Map of the Arlington West 7.5 Minute Quadrangle of Snohomish County, Washington, by James P. Minard in 1985, was reviewed for the geologic and soil conditions at the site. Based on the description of the above reference, the site is generally underlain by Marysville Sand Member which consists primarily of free-draining outwash sand with some gravel and sporadic silt or clay deposits. This description generally agrees with the soil conditions encountered in our subsurface exploration. 2.3 Groundwater Groundwater was observed at depths varying from 5.5 to 8.5 feet below existing grade in all three test borings during our subsurface exploration. However, the groundwater seepage level and flow rate are not constant. Fluctuations in the level and rate depend on the season, amount of rainfall, surface water runoff, and other factors. Generally, the groundwater level is higher and the flow rate is greater during the wetter winter months. At the time our field work was completed, the groundwater levels observed likely represent near the seasonal highest point. In our opinion, the groundwater conditions observed are likely the combined effects of active infiltration from substantially persistent rainfall and relatively level topography. The groundwater levels observed are below the elevation of the proposed building foundation. Therefore, we do not anticipate the groundwater levels will significantly affect the construction activities, if the site development starts in drier seasons. 2.4 Laboratory Testing Sieve analyses were conducted on three representative soil samples to evaluate the feasibility of utilizing on-site excavated soils as structural fill or replacement of imported materials during wet weather months. Grain size distribution and gradation curves obtained from the above analyses facilitate the comparison between the recommended gradation criteria and particle size distribution of existing on-site soils. The results of sieve analyses performed on specific samples are presented on the Particle Size Distribution Report plates 1 through 3, Appendix B. It is important to note that these test results of limited samples collected do not reflect all in-situ soil conditions. Our geotechnical recommendations are generally based on our interpretation of the test and accepted geotechnical practice. �� 1 I � � I 1 � � 1 rV � � � � � 1 � � � 1 � 1 1 , Z'. 1 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. Information to Build On LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER PSI Project No. 578-8EO32 November 25, 1998 Page 4 3.0 DISCUSSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 3.1 General Based on the results of our subsurface investigation at the site, the site appears to be suitable for the proposed development from a geotechnical standpoint. The underlying medium dense native sandy soils are suitable for direct support of the building on spread footing foundations, pavements, and slab-on-grade floors. The following sections of this report provide detailed recommendations regarding the above issues and other geotechnical considerations. These recommendations should be incorporated into the project design drawings and specifications. 3.2 Site Preparation and General Earthwork The building and pavement areas should be stripped and cleared of any topsoil or vegetation. Our test borings indicate that the depth of stripping should extend to a depth of at least 6 inches below existing grade. Stripped organic topsoil should be removed from the site and disposed, or used in landscaping areas, as desired. The stripped soils should not be mixed with any materials to be used as structural fill. Following the stripping operation, excavations or fills required to attain site grades can be initiated. Prior to placing fill, we recommend proofrolling all exposed surfaces to determine if any isolated soft and yielding spots are present. Proofrolling should also be performed in cut areas that will provide direct support for new construction. If excessively yielding areas are observed and they can not be stabilized in place by compaction, the affected soils should be excavated to competent bearing grade and restored with structural fill. Floor slabs and pavement areas should be supported on structural fill or competent bearing soils. If any abandoned utilities are present on-site, they should be plugged or removed to ensure that they do not provide a conduit for water and cause soil saturation and stability problems. We recommend a representative from PSI be retained to observe all proofrolling operations and to evaluate the suitability of the bearing subgrade exposed during excavation. 3.3 Structural Fill and Compaction Structural fill is defined as the compacted fill placed under buildings, roadways, slabs, pavements, or any other load-bearing areas. Structural fill placed under footings and floor slabs should be placed in horizontal lifts not exceeding 10 inches in loose thickness and compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of its laboratory maximum dry density, determined in accordance with ASTM D-1557 (Modified Proctor) method. The rf r ■ . S 0 ;=m MEN kn* q 4mmi �F ml `mm� and mum= Wilma ud ■■�� ■ _ - M = - ■ ■ ■ ■ .■ IN 4 ■ I I PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. Information to Build On LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER PSI Project No. 578-8E032 November 25, 1998 Page 5 fill materials should be placed at or near the optimum moisture content. Referring to the same compaction method, fill under pavements and walkways should be placed in horizontal lifts and compacted to 90 percent of maximum dry density, except for the top 10 inches compacted to 95 percent of maximum dry density. During dry weather, on-site soils except topsoil can be used as structural fill. In general, soils with more than 15 percent of fines will make it difficult to compact to achieve the required density if the moisture content increases significantly above optimum. Our subsurface exploration indicates that the on-site native soils contain less than 7 percent of fines passing No. 200 sieve; consequently, they are suitable to be used as structural fill placed under the load-bearing elements. If the on-site soils are exposed to excessive moisture and cannot be adequately compacted, then it may be necessary to import free-draining granular fill. This imported fill to be placed during wet weather conditions should consist of granular organic-free materials. The grading requirements for the imported fill are showed on the following table. IMPORTED FILL CRITERIA U.S. Standard Sieve Size Percent Passing by Dry Weight 3 inch 100 % inch 50 -100 No. 4 25 - 65 No. 10 10 - 50 No. 40 0 - 20 No. 200 5 Maximum 3.4 Foundation In our opinion, the proposed building can be supported on conventional spread footing foundations bearing on the competent, native soils or on structural fill placed over these soils. With the foundation support established as described, an allowable bearing capacity of 2,500 pounds per square foot (psf for on-site grade soils can be used for design. We recommend that continuous footings have a minimum width of 16 inches and individual footings a minimum width of 24 inches. All exterior footings shall be placed a minimum of 24 inches below finished grade. A one-third increase in allowable bearing capacity may be utilized for short-term loads such as in the event of seismic or wind effects. Considering the free-draining nature of 1 ......... ; INNIti � _ ■ . - _ _ INN 0 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. Information to Build On LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER PSI Project No. 578-8E032 November 25, 1998 Page 6 the on-site subgrade deposits and the bearing stress applied, the majority of total foundation settlement should occur during construction. Horizontal foundation loads can be resisted by friction between the foundation base and the supporting soils, and by passive earth pressure acting on the face of the embedded portion of the foundation. For the latter, the foundation must be poured "neat" against the competent native soils or backfilled with structural fill. For frictional resistance, a coefficient of 0.4 can be used. For passive earth pressure, the available resistance can be computed using an equivalent fluid pressure of 230 pcf. These lateral resistance values include a factor of safety of 1.5. All footing excavations should be examined by a representative from PSI, prior to placing forms or rebar, to verify that subgrade conditions are as anticipated in this report. 3.5 Slab-on-Grade Floors Slab-on-grade floors may be supported on the compacted native subgrade soils or structural fill prepared as discussed in the Site Preparation and General Earthwork section of this report. After subgrade preparation is completed, the slab should be provided with a capillary break consisting of a minimum of 6 inches of clean, free- draining sand or pea gravel. The requirements specified on Table 1 could be substituted for use as capillary break materials except less than 3 percent of fines passing No. 200 sieve. We would also recommend the utilization of a vapor barrier such as a 6-mil plastic membrane to prevent moisture accumulation on the concrete surface. If a vapor barrier is used, at least two inches of clean, moist sand should be placed over the membrane to guard against damage during construction and to aid in curing the concrete. 3.6 Seismic Design Considerations The Smokey Point area is classified as a Seismic Zone 3 by the 1997 Uniform Building Code (UBC). Based on our analysis of on-site explorations, we interpret the subsurface site conditions to correspond to a seismic soil profile SB, as defined by Table 16-J of the 1997 UBC. Soil profile type Ss refers to a rock formation which has shear velocity 2,500 to 5,000 feet per second (fps). Structures are subject to damage from earthquakes due to either direct shaking or foundation soil failure. In our opinion, based on the existing subsurface conditions at this site, the potential for seismic hazards is low. 4 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. Information to Build On LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER PSI Project No. 578-8E032 November 25, 1998 Page 7 3.7 Excavations and Slopes We do not anticipate the need for site excavations other than utility trench excavations. In no case should excavation slopes be greater than the limits specified in local, state and federal safety regulations. Based on the information obtained from our field exploration and laboratory testing, we recommend temporary cuts greater than four feet in height should be sloped at an inclination no steeper than 1.5H:1V. If slopes of this inclination, or flatter, cannot be constructed, temporary shoring may be necessary. This shoring will help protect against slope failure or excavation collapse, and will provide protection to workmen in the excavation. If temporary shoring is required, we will be available to provide shoring design criteria as requested. Supplementary recommendations can then be developed to improve trench wall stability, including flattening of slopes or installation of surface or subsurface drains. 3.8 Site Drainage Groundwater was encountered in all of our test borings at varying depths. Since the building elevations will be at the present grades or slightly lower, we do not expect the site groundwater levels will present any major construction-related problems. The site must be graded such that surface water is directed off the site. Water should not be allowed to stand in any area where buildings, slabs or pavements are to be constructed. During construction, loose and exposed surfaces should be adequately compacted to reduce the potential for moisture infiltration into the soils. Final site grades must allow for drainage away from the building foundations. We recommend that the ground be sloped at a gradient of 3 percent for a distance of at least ten feet away from the buildings, except in paved areas which can be sloped at a gradient of 1 percent. If final site grades are completed as recommended above, footing drains should not be necessary. If footing drains are utilized, roof downspouts should not be tied into the footing drain system, and must be separately tightlined to discharge. Cleanouts should be installed at strategic locations to allow for periodic maintenance of the footing drain and downspout tightline systems. 3.9 Pavement Areas The adequacy of site pavements is related to the conditions of the underlying subgrade. To provide a properly prepared subgrade for site pavements, we recommend that all pavements areas be supported on dense native soils or on a minimum of 10 inches of structural fill meeting the criteria established on Table 1. The structural fill should be compacted to 95 percent of the maximum dry density. The base of the excavated w t . . . _ . . - 1 ■ . . . 0 0 ■ - - 11 ■ - ■ Sol . ti 4ra&p a �� g �■ r��r r In monq ■ ml ,bid m A bhm n �I ,mwdm+l. and od aim PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. Information to Build On LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER PSI Project No. 578-8E032 November 25, 1998 Page 8 pavement areas should be treated and prepared as described in the Site Preparation and General Earthwork section of this report. This means that excavation base should be compacted to 90 percent of the maximum dry density per ASTM D-1557. It is possible that some localized areas of soft, wet or unstable subgrade may still exist after this process. Therefore, a greater thickness of structural fill or crushed rock may be needed to stabilize these localized areas. The following pavement section for lightly-loaded areas can be used: Two inches of Asphalt Concrete (AC) over four inches of Crushed Rock Base (CRB) material, or • Two inches of AC over three inches of Asphalt Treated Base (ATB) material. Heavier truck-traffic areas will require thicker sections depending upon site usage, pavement life, and traffic loads. As a general rule, we recommend the following pavement sections be used for truck-trafficked areas: • Three inches of AC over six inches of CRB, or • Three inches of AC over four inches of ATB. We will be pleased to assist you in developing appropriate pavement sections for heavy traffic zones, if required. 3.10 Utility Support and Backfill Based on the soil conditions encountered, the soils expected to be exposed by utility excavations should provide adequate support for utilities. Utility trench backfill is a major concern in preventing settlement along utility alignments, particularly in pavement areas. It is important that each section of utility line be adequately supported in the bedding material. The material should be hand tamped to ensure support is provided around the pipe haunches. Fill should be carefully placed and hand tamped to about 12 inches above the crown of the pipe before any heavy compaction equipment is brought into use. The remainder of the trench backfill should be placed in lifts having a loose lift of less than 10 inches and compacted to 90 percent of the maximum dry density per ASTM D-1557 (Modified Proctor) for the portion no less than two feet beneath the ground surface. The upper two feet of backfill should be compacted to 95 percent of the maximum dry density in accordance with the same procedure. I PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. Information to Build On LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER PSI Project No. 578-8E032 November 25, 1998 Page 9 4.0 LIMITATIONS This report has been prepared to assist in the evaluation of the site. Our conclusions and recommendations have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices. We make no other warranty, either expressed or implied. Our conclusions are based on the results of the field exploration and on our interpretation of surface and subsurface conditions. If conditions are encountered that appear to be different than those described in this report, we should be notified so that we may review and verify or modify our recommendations. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Les Schwab Tire Centers and their contractors for the specific application to the proposed project. The reproduction of this report, except in full, by any method and its transmittal by any means to a third party without the written permission of PSI, is prohibited. This report, in its entirety, should be included in the project contract documents for the information of the contractor. Respectfully Submitted, PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. Reviewed by: Jim Niehoff, P.E., Senior Author Geotechnical Service :IS OF WAS,y! G 0 z 35226 �x L�x�s 12/29i a000 G1r Joseph Wu, P.E. Paul Elliott Project Engineer Geotechnical Services Manager �� ' � � � '1 � � � � f� � �� • � - r- � - � . _ ti � - - �- y I 71\ 100 I6 - ---- ' ' . ........ Area low Z ` Res\.. 1 ii •1,` \. �� -� Area 1 •q• 'ry/• 'tle...... p aMI • v ��ftt ^rg .... _q ' l CD• -- ��.�•• O RLINGTON MUNICIPAL C:) •• :�� AIR ORT © � C .n O • 1 S: i • i till• I BM a N 2O r 2;; �—------ — — — 21 '� / 130 � � .;I• •gin II ,I ..� ;-�......:�1� T•—II . • ii aai III I I l Mooiie fn If I Pa�_�, ,r I BMt I Smoke}*Point b ," 1191 r" 1 ..d• 121 o......:�•4 • • • II II bll - \ Camplgluntl I• N r' n� ROAD n 10 •d• .:, � o SN,�.� 'SITE h nllllllll� �� (Mobile Home y p`'•%os��. .-QO Park 27 ... .• •�� Reservoir cam,• 1 i0 I •` BM �•. �l u • 04 B •■ �' ° it / j, I Mobile ryome u Park •' u •I u n rCS" ■ '1 COX I! F' ROA u• Source: USGS Topographic Map, 7.5 Minute Quandrangle,Arlingtion West, WA. FIGURE 1 —VICINITY MAP Professional Service Industries, Inc. Proposed Les Schwab Tire Center-Smokey Point Northeast Comer of Smokey Point Boulevard and 3257 16th Avenue West, Seattle,WA 98119-1706 Smokey Point Industrial Park Road Smokey Point,Washington 206-282-0666 PSI Project No.578-8E032 • 1 f■1 T. 1 I I 1 loom J • 1 � _ 1 1 1 1 I 1 � '2 > M 0 CL E iL 168th Street Northeast Frontier Bank r 4 Subject Property 0 8-3 B-1 40 Undeveloped Property '71 B-2 Greg Rairdon Chrysler Dealership Smokey Point Industrial Park Road Affordable Auto (RentaUSales) A., LEGEND B-2 Approximate Boring Location 0 Not to Scale VY FIGURE 2—SITE and EXPLORATION PLAN Proposed Les Schwab Tire Center-Smokey Point Professional service Industries, Inc. Northeast Comer of Smokey Point Boulevard and Smokey Point Industrial Park Road 3257 16th Avenue West, Seattle, WA 98119-1706 Smokey Point,Washington 206-282-0666 PSI Project No.578-8EO32 7 r R ■� ..l yo 31 r ' J6.j 1 J f� 1 ■ . 1 i Appendix A Boring Logs �� - - - �1 I BORING LOG Psi No.: 578-8E032 Client: LS Construction Company Project: Proposed Les Schwab Tire Center Smokey Point,Washington Boring No.: B-1 (1 of 1) Total 34.0' Elev: t 115 I Location: Center of Parcel Type of Boring: Hollow Stem Auger Started: 11/18/98 Completed: 11/18/98 1 Driller. DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS 'Sample Sample N VALUE(bpt) c Elevation Depth Blows Depth PL %MC LL N N.0 (Classification) (Feet)REC/RQD ) rn 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1.0 Brown, dry, sandy gravel some silt. (GW) 1.0 1 I 1 I I 1 I I I Med. dense, brown, dry,silty sand;trace 1 12 I gravel, fine to med. sand. (SM) 2.5 I I 1 I I I I I 1 Slightly moist. 12 4.0 1 I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I 1 I I I I I I 7.0 1 1 Med. dense, gray, wet, silty sand; some 7.5 gravel, med. to coarse sand. (SM) I8 Groundwater observed @ 8 ft. 9.0 1 I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 I I I I I I 12.5 1 I 1 1 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 I 26 1 1 I I I I I I I 14.0 1 1 1 I I I I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 i I I I I I I - --1 -1--r-7--1--1-- r-T - I I 1 I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 I I I 17.5 1 I I I I 1 I I I I 1 I Fine sand. ' ( I I I I I 1 18 19.0 I 1 1 1 I I 1 ! I I I I I I 1 ( I I I I I I __1__H_i _I__---- 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I t 1 I I I I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I I 22.5 I 1 I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I Fine to med. sand. I 1 16 24.0 I 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I - I _L_ _ _ ' _ ____1 I - /--I- I I 1 1 I 1 I I I I 1 1 I I I I I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I I I 27.5 I I I I I 1 I Moist, fine sand. 25 1 I I I 1 I I I 29.0 I I I I -r--I- ,--;-;----,--;- - a I 1 1 1 1 1 1 r 1 T 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 32.5 Moist to wet, fine to med. sand. 32 34.0 1 I Total depth @ 34 ft. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 y I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1J 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 I J I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I ] 1 1 I 1 1 1 ( 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 "Number of blows required for a 140 lb hammer dropping 30"to drive 2"O.D., 1.375"I.D.sampler a total of 18 inches in three 6"increments. The sum of the last two increments of penetration is termed the standard penetration resistance, N. -- a I � � � � � � � � � r � � � � � � � ► t '� 1 1 I " I I � �� 1 r�l `� y 1 1 7.� 1 BORING LOG PSI No.: 578-8E032 Client: LS Construction Company Project: Proposed Les Schwab Tire Center Smokey Point,Washington Boring No.: B-2 (1 of 1) Total 19.0' Mew t 115 Location: 70 ft Southwest from Center Type of Boring: Hollow Stem Auger Started: 11/18/98 Completed: 11/18/98 1 Driller: 'Sample Sample N VALUE(bp0 A o �, DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS Blows p PL %MC LL > Elevation Depth Depth N (Classification) a REC/RQD ��t) 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1.0 Brown,dry,silty sand-sandy gravel; somesilt_((:L Loose to med. dense brown dry, silty ' 2.5 sand; fine sand.(SM) 1 , , 1 I I Slightly moist. 9 4.0 , I 1 I I 1 I I 1 J--I-- L- - 1 1 1 I I 1 I I I 1 i 1 I 1 1 I I I 7.0 1 I I 1 Med. dense, gray, wet,silty sand; some 7•5 gravel, med. to coarse sand. (SM) 15 Groundwater observed @ 8.5 ft. 9.0 1 , 1 I I I I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 12.5 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 Dense. 35 1 1 1 14.1 t , 1 I 1 1 1 I I • I 1 1 i 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 I I I I I 1 1 1 I I I I I I 17.5 1 I 1 I I I I I 1 1 � 1 I 1 I I I Med.dense, little gravel, fine to coarse 23 19.0 11 sand. , 1 Total depth @ 19 ft. 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • 1 1 1 / 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 'Number of blows required for a 140 lb hammer dropping 30"to drive 2"O.D., 1.375"I.D.sampler a total of 18 inches in three 6"increments. The sum of the last two increments of penetration is termed the standard penetration resistance, N. T `' ■ r ■ MEN • • 0 0 ME ME 1 ■ ■ r . . - 1 MENEM . . _ a . . 1 . J or1.mmom . • ■ ■ ■ MEN MEN ■ ■ ■ s i } 1 � i i `BORING LOG Psi No.: 578-8E032 Client: LS Construction Company Project: Proposed Les Schwab Tire Center Smokey Point,Washington Boring No.: B-3 (1 of 1) De th 19.0' Elew t 115 Location: 85 ft Northwest from Center Type of Boring: Hollow Stem Auger Started: 11/18/98 Completed: 11/18/98 1 Driller. Sample Sample N VALUE(bp0 A o y DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS Blows p PL %MC LL o > Elevation Depth Depth N r, v (Classification) REC/R D (Feet) `n Q 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Dark brown,dry,silty sand; fine sand. (SM) Alyj� 2.5 I ( I I I I I Loose to med. dense,brown, dry to 9 moist. 4.0 ' 4.5 I I I I Groundwater observed @ 5.5 ft. ' 7.5 I , Med. dense, gray, wet,silty sand; some 12 gravel, med. to coarse sand. (SM) 9.0 - --,--, --,--I--� -;- I 1 1 I I I I I 12.5 I • q I I I I is 14.0 , , 17.5 Dense. ' 1 46 19.0 Total depth @ 19 ft. , i , 1 , 1 1 1 • 'Number of blows required for a 140 lb hammer dropping 30"to dnve 2"O.D., 1.375"I.D.sampler a total of 18 inches in three 6"increments. The sum of the last two increments of penetration is termed the standard penetration resistance,N. — �� ,. I � �+ I Appendix B Sieve Analyses •,, �� I I I Particle Size Distribution Report 100 i. 90- 70 LU 60-- Z LL Z 50 LU UJ 40 CL 30 20 10 0 M 500 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE- mm COBBLES %GRAVEL %SAND %SILT �LAY 0.0 11.1 85.8 3.1 EVE PERCENT SPEC.' PASS? Soil Description S,ME FINER P ERCENT (X-NO) GREY BROWN SAND TRACE GRAVEL 5/8 in. 100.0 1/2 in. 97.1 3/8 in. 95.4 1/4 in. 93.0 Atterberg Limits #4 88.9 PL= LL= Pl= #8 80.3 #16 69.8 Coefficients #30 147.6 #50 5.5 D85= 3.55 D60= 0.824 D50= 0.633 #100 4.7 D30= 0.419 D15= 0.296 D10= 0.245 #200 3.1 Cu= 3.37 Cc= 0.87 Classification USCS= AASHTO= Remarks BORING SAMPLE B3-S,4 (no specification provided) Sample No.: FR1275 B Source of Sample: BORING SAMPLES Date: 11/13/98 Location: SMOKEY PT BLVD&SMOKEY PT.INDUSTRIAL PK.RD. ElevJDepth: 17.5'-19.0' Client: LS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES Project: LES SC14WAB TIRE CENTER Project No: 578-813032 Plate K 4r ■ 11 I ■ - ^ , ■ ti 1M , I I Particle Size Distribution Report 100 3 9 7 It I i 80 j E 70 E i i i Q:' lil i i i i E 7 Z u_ Z 50 i 3 W U ' W 40 d i E 30 1 *1 A 20 I j 10 t 0 IE I E E I ' 500 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE - mm %COBBLES %GRAVEL %SAND %SILT %CLAY 0.0 5.6 90.4 4.0 SIEVE PERCENT SPEC.' I PASS? Soil Description SIZE FINER PERCENT I (X=NO) GREY BROWN SAND TRACE SILT&GRAVEL 5/8 in. 100.0 1/2 in. 99.1 #4 94.4 #10 90.9 Atterbery Limits #20 83.5 PL= LL= P1= #30 76.1 #50 36.5 Coefficients #100 4.0 D 0.961 D 0.436 D 0 372 #200 4.0 85= 60= 50= D30= 0.268 D15= 0.192 D10= 0.163 Cu= 2.67 Cc= 1.01 Classification USCS= AASHTO= Remarks FR1275 C,BORING SAMPLE B2-S2 @ 7.5'-9.0' (no Spc cation provided) Sample No.: FR1275 C Source of Sample: BORING SAMPLES Date: 11/13/98 Location: SMOKEY PT.BLVD.& SMOKEY PT.INDUST.PK.RD ElevJDepth: 7.5'-9.0' Client: LS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES Project: LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER Project No: 578-8E032 Plate 2 - - - - �--- - - - �I r<Orr r l I I 1 1 milt _ ' I 1 I Particle Size Distribution Report m t t r � � C � i � � fi i ■ 8 z C 100 Jlw;� 90 I�I I I 70 IE I I? E II U.I 60 Z 5 W W 40 a s0 ICI l 20 10 III I' it :III IIIIi 500 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE-mm %COBBLES %GRAVEL %SAND %SILT %CLAY 0.0 0.0 93.8 6.2 SIEVE PERCENT SPEC.' I PASS? Soil Description SIZE FINER PERCENT (X-NO) #4 100.0 GRAY FINE SILTY SAND #10 99.7 #20 99.2 #30 98.4 Atterbem Limits #40 94.7 PL= LL= P1= #50 80.2 #100 24.9 Coefficients #200 6.2 D85= 0.326 D60= 0.231 D50= 0.207 D30= 0.162 D1 5= 0.122 D1 0= 0.101 Cu= 2.29 Cc= 1.12 Classification USCS= AASHTO= Remarks FR#1275 A, BORING SAMPLE B1-58 @ 32.5'-34.0' (no specification provided) Sample No.: FRI275 A Source of Sample: BORING SAMPLES Date: 11/13/98 Location: SMOKEY PT.BOULEVARD AND& SMOKEY PT.IND.PK. ElevJDepth: 32.5'-34.0' Client: LS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES Project: LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER Project No: 578-8E032 Plate 3 I' I � I i ■ r � 7�It1� I �� 7+ ' jaiYam!' ='1 ■AL L i -, LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER—SMOKEY POINT PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING WEDNESDAY, May 9, 2001 @ 2:30 P.M. ATTENDANCE Please print legibly. TITLE PHONE# & NAME COMPANY E-MAIL ADDRESS 3(00— 1 — 6crC Qf. G ZS 25 . 2�07 �LV R 11i Y')7,, !pn► 2n/= A L l wit l 't c,r C 2e G.i✓ q z— e c 1, e J\ tOM CAVANAUGH J FRANK DEL GAUDIO Vice President Project Superintendent Fisher&SOns Fisher.Sons r iNC0nPORATE0 I N C 0 R P 0 R A 1 E fl Tel:360-757-5679 P.O.xBox 534 �005 Tel:360-757-4094 • Fax:360-757-4005 625 Fisher Lane • 31p(� 625 Fisher Lane P.O.Box 534 Burlington,WA 98233 Burlington,WA 98233 wwwfishersons.com l'C www.fishersons.com email:tec@fishersons.com Job Phone �.�"��, 7' ?y "� ,� y, 7%a s CID l -Ll 3 Sir, 4ti1N G�O- L City of Arl;�- Fire Departm �f �jI N G August 3, 1999 To: Viking Automatic o c Sprinkler Com. 3245 NW Front Ave Portland, Oregon 97210 ATTENTION: Al Chabre, Project M r PROJECT: Les Schwab Tire Center New Retail Store Smokey Point/Arlington, WA Dear Mr. Chabre, We have reviewed your proposed Fire Protection Plan for the new Les Schwab Tire Center at Smokey Point/Arlington and have the following comments: 1. The required design criteria for rubber tire storage is NFPA 231D ( 1998 Edition). If you are unable to meet the required sprinkler density for the proposed storage height, we suggest that you consider augmenting the sprinkler system with high expansion foam as described in section 4-2. 2. Use of an approved Fire Pump may also be considered. 3. NFPA 13, does not address Special Occupancy Hazards. (See Section 1-4.7.4, 1996 Edition). The section on Miscellaneous Tire Storage limits the pile height to 5 feet on double row racks. We trust that you will find this information helpful. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me at(360) 435-3818. Dean T. Olsen Chief DTO:bb cc: Dave Anderson, City of Arlington File 137 N. McLeod . Arlington, WA 98223 360-435-3818 360-403-9267 fax �Y • A041 ■ ■ 1 RELATED FIRE FLOW MFQRIViATIQN DATE TIME WEATHER C� Jct. No. (or description of location from a Jot. No. Address —}.] -55-7- .. 5,� � -� 8�✓�, c: c� _ Reservoir Level _ Pump Status CIF Pump Rate so/zo,d 660S T99 092 Md -insw do J,l I a VG:T T 000Z-ET--1nf r ti • . m Lol M •. • i ' s 1 T SIT Tr 7lmmmmmr rr.. . . 7 JLL-19-2000 11:54 CITY OF MSUL PW 360 651 5099 P.03105 31 I � 1 f w . ( LT�__L L EF] � -1 � - . LLD ts 4Z G F-17 l IL a. cy^� u < 6:5 J I f u III Ya ' hod ' rry � � . �. Q U CD l+� t17 �' n7 r^� 71 z<0 I t� 112 I _ - - I ■ � 1■ 1 I -I � 1 1 1 I � I I 1 ■1 1 � � �� I 1 1 _ 1 1 � Jr 1 I �� 1 I I - - 1 I , � - � 1 1 I 1 I 1 • - - � - - 1 ' 1 I 1 I I 1 �� - _ - - .- 1 - 1 1 1 , I 1 - . I 1 I ■ _ _ - � _� _ ' � I I I � � _ �� _ 1 - - - t RELATED FIRE FLOW INFORMATION DATE (� TIME WEATHER Jot. No. (or description of location from a Jot. No. Address 17 J_ Reservoir Level Pump Status_ c. 3 — 4 �i Pump Rate AZ aem GO/170,d EEOS TS9 09€ Md -rsw .do Al I:) SS::T 000Z-6T--Pf S0'd -1bi0i of , ' E. P SI y g o o n; cc -�1 1 j cooll ol LU L I I1 cof` r t Q ? SO/S0'c 660S IS9 09( 7 j 1 v ` 1 1 I II 1 -� 1 r I J _93;26i2001 09:55 FAX 541 416 5190 LS CONSTRUCTION Z 001 A Division of Les Schwab Tire Centers of Oregon Inc. OWN LAO CONSTRUCTION CO. P.t]_Box 667 Nwev3lle, Oregon 97-754 t��4i6-5162 5133 "I*p n Rag.1 61280 wasi�,Mau#LSCCNC'11QPC TLLEFAX TRANSMITTAL Date: March 26, 2001 To; Paul Richart Company/Dept.: City of Arlington, Public Works Dept. Telefax no: (360) 435-3906 Pages: 2 From: Greg McDonald r.e.: New Les Schwab Smokey Point Comments: See attached letter. 0 LI ?�w � f 03/26/2001 09:56 F.42 541 416 5133 LS CONSTRUCTION z 002 4 Divislon of Lem Schwab Tire Centers of Oregon Inc, LES SCiiW� CONSTRUCTION CO. P.O. Box 667 Prineville, Oregon 97754 (541)416-5162 Oregon Reg,#61280 Wash.Rep.#L.SCONS'110PC FAX 416.3133 March 26, 2001 City of Arlington Dept. of Planning & Community Devlopment 238 North Olympic Ave. Arlington, WA 98223 Attn: Paul Richart Public Works Dept. r.e.: Storm Water Systems Development Charge Les SchwabTire Center Arlington (Smokey Point), WA 98223-8409 Project File No. MN-OM53 Les Schwab Tire Centers hereby requests a waiver of the Storm Water Systems Development Charge,as requested in the comments letter, dated Nov. 13, 2000, Item#I.K,due to the fact that the governing ordinance has been revoked. Greg McDonald Project-1 er • t; • � �L ii i� i _ r � CWA CONSULTANTS STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING BUILDING CODE CONSULTANTS 22421 N.E. 20th Street, Sammamish,WA 98074 (425)836-2833 FAX:(425)836-3707 E-Mail: chuckw@gte.net March 4, 2001 Les Schwab —01-4300 1997 Uniform Building Codes Type of Construction: V-N sprinklers Occupancy —M/S1/S3 Stories: 1 + mezzanine Seismic Zone: 3 Wind Speed: 80 Wind Exposure: C David W. Anderson Building Official City of Arlington 238 N. Olympic Avenue Arlington, WA 98223 Dear Mr. Anderson; We have completed our review of the Les Schwab Tire Center. The plans have been reviewed for compliance to the 1997 Uniform Building Code, 1997 Uniform Mechanical Code, 1998 Washington State Nonresidential Energy Code and 1998 Washington State Accessibility Requirements. NONSTRUCTURAL 1. The sprinkler system should be designed considering "High-Piled Combustible Stock" and tire storage per the Fire Code. Your Fire Department should review these requirements. 2. The construction joints at the top of walls that require protected openings (occupancy separations) should be listed construction joint assemblies. The listing number (UL, ICBO etc) along with construction details should be provided on the plans. The construction joints should be capable of accommodating the required deflection of the adjacent structural members. A detail should be provided where the wall is beneath the metal floor decking (both perpendicular and parallel to flutes) and roof/floor beams. The details on Sheet A8 should be justified. RECEIVED MAR 8 2001 CITY OF ARLINGTON 4� � Arlington — Les Schwab fire Center March 4, 2001 Page 2 of 4 3. Details should be provided for protection of all the through-penetrations and membrane penetrations of all fire resistive wall and floor assemblies. Section 710. These should be listed assemblies with listing number provided. 4. The one-hour protection of the steel truss at the occupancy separation wall (Sheet A4 must be a listed assembly. The listing details should be indicated on the plans. 5. The truss top chord at the steel truss/occupancy separation penetrates the one-hour fire resistive assembly. A detail indicating a method of protecting the penetrations that is acceptable to you should be provided on the plans. 6. Sheet A2.2 indicates that a 1-hour roll-down shutter is required over Window N while the window schedule indicates a 1-1/2 hour assembly. Only a one-hour assembly is required. 7. Section 1202.2.6 allows the deletion of the mechanical ventilation for the service bays if you determine that the door openings are sufficient. Note that this Section requires unobstructed openings. 8. Glazing within a 24" arc of either side of a doorway should be safety glazing. This included windows K and L adjacent to the main entry. The location of all safety glazing should be indicated on the plans. 9. You should approve of the roof covering indicated on Sheet A2.3. I am not similar with the spray applied foam insulation with a silicone finish as an approved covering. An ICBO ER should be provided. A minimum Class C rating is required. MECHANICAL 1. Details should be provided for seismic bracing of the unit and IR heater in the service bays. Otherwise the mechanical plans are acceptable as submitted. 1998 WASHINGTON STATE RESIDENTIAL ENERGY CODE (WAC 51) 1. The designer should note on the plans that all glazing shall be certified and labeled with its U-factor and solar heat gain coefficient by an independent agency licensed by the NFRC. Section 1312.1 2. Calculations should be provided to justify the 0.25 U-factor used for the exterior masonry walls. The default value from the NREC is 0.40, which will result in Target UA to be greater than the Proposed UA. 3. No slab edge insulation is required assuming that comment 2 can be resolved. lu �a �� u ■u� i ay.�v.� �a!�aa�uiy kuiw�� 1 I i Arlington — Les Schwab fire Center March 4, 2001 Page 3 of 4 1998 WASHINGTON STATE REGULATIONS FOR BARRIER-FREE DESIGN 1. All doors in the building that have a latch set or lock set should have lever-type operating hardware. Section 1106.3.1 2. Door thresholds should be shown as no higher than 1/2". The edges should be beveled at 1 vertical : 2 horizontal, with a maximum edge height of 1/4". Sections 1106.10.4, 1106.6 STRUCTURAL 1. For your information, "Special Inspection" is required for: Masonry construction Anchor bolts (Table 19-F) Steel deck welding Structural steel welding High strength bolting 2. The table provided on Sheet S401 for the development length should be updated to the 1997 UBC. See Section 1912.1. The development length for masonry construction should be based on Section 2107.2.2.3. 3. A subdiaphragm analysis must be provided for the roof diaphragm where the framing is parallel to the wall. The subdiaphragm must be capable of transferring all wall anchorage forces (Section 1633.2.8.1) to the main diaphragm. Section 1633.2.9, item 4. Details 1 and 5, Sheet A601 must be capable of transferring the lateral wall anchorage forces. 4. The wall anchors must comply with all of the requirements of Section 1633.2.8.1. The steel elements (including the subdiaphragm) must have the strength to resist 1.4 times the strength level forces calculated in Section 1633.2.8.1. Since ASD values are used for the seismic forces, the forces must be increased by a factor of 1.4 (strength level) in addition to the 1.4 increase required by item 4. 5. Since the seismic forces calculated by the engineer are based on allowable stress design, when using the seismic force Em (QoEh) the calculations must elevate the forces to strength level by multiplying the actual seismic forces by 1.4 in addition to Q0. The actual calculations used for the typical seismic forces are at working stress levels. 6. Drag struts must be provided in line with all shear walls. Drag struts must be capable of transferring all lateral loads from the point of origin to the shear wall itself. Detail 10/S601 must be justified. The only connection appears to be to the perpendicular wall. J • IO-PIT AF�-wv1 ----,A i vjRj�;m JJLJ l qwl�mm MIN gowq URa I y�"�'=pw ju" PmEqLpmw am Emm oul r. I `Z Arlington — Les Schwab i`ire Center March 4, 2001 Page 4 of 4 7. All drag struts, splices and their connections must have the strength to resist the maximum anticipated earthquake force Em. Section 1633.2.6. Equations 12-17 and 12-18 should be used for these members. 8. How are the lateral forces for the canopy area resisted? Both wind lateral and uplift forces must be considered. The seismic forces to the cantilevered columns must be based on an R=2.2. The footings must be capable of resisting the overturning and uplift forces. Please instruct the designer to indicate on a separate letter which sheet or detail the corrections may be found and to REVISE AND RESUBMIT THE PLANS. Please feel free to contact me if there are any questions. Sincerely; Chuck Williams SE CWA Consultants CC: Sconzo Hallstrom Fax (425) 455-9351 �. �� ,: I I I I City of Arlington Building Department FAX Date: March 8, 2001 Number of pages to follow: 4 Response needed Yes As requested FYI TO: Greg McDonald FIRM: Les Schwab FAX #: (541) 416-5133 FROM: Linda Friddle, City of Arlington Building Department RE: Plan review, comments from CWA Consultants Additional Comments: 238 N Olympic Ave Arlington WA 98223 Ph. (360) 435-0724 FAX (360) 435-3906 RLING TON ARLcj.'4GT0N FIRE DEPARTMh,-IT ON 137 North McLeod Avenue FIRE DrPT Arlington,Washington 98223 F)flE DEP" (360)435-3818 Fax 403-9267 Received: 02-09-01 lZettiriml:10. 2-20-01 bb TO: Dave Anderson FROM: TOM COOPER"/—C SUBJECT: PLAN REVIEWS DATE: 2-20-01 PLAN REVIEW/ PERMIT NO: 01-4388 TITLE: Les Schwab Tire Center COMMENTS: I do not have enough information to calculate the fire flows on this building. The site plan also does not show the fire hydrant placements. 1. What is the construction type? 2. What is the square footage of the building? 3. 1 assume it is one story building. Please forward the information to me and I will respond with the calculations. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. SCEIVED FEB 21 2001 GoO , JFARLINGTON Plan Review Frm.12/96 Y 7- r■i ti . a ■ riii L , ■ II II City of Arlington Building Dept FIRE DEPARTMENT CHECKLIST' p PERMIT DATE: NAME: ADDRESS: W O LEGAL: BUILDING USE: �t, a-'I K- OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION: A B -F E F H 1 1 2 12.113 1 4 1 2 1 3 1 1 2 1 2 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 7 I M R. S U 1.1 1.2 2 1 3 1 3 1172 3 4 5 1 2 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION I II III 1V V F.R. F.R. ONE-HOUR N ONE-HOUR N H.T. ONE-HOUR N Item inspected&completed Signature &Date: Site Plan: Approved Denied Access Requirements: Required: Fire lane: Sprinkler system: Alarm system: `l—►S Knox Box: Fire extinquishers: ,S Hydrant: # of hydrants required: L4AI4,Vow — Location of Hydrant: Location of Knox Box: A.44J Location of Fire Extinquishers: Y;(� Lem L,1,2L6!J.,U&6 Fire Flow requirements: C.t V e"-4-- Location of address on building: WC-3 7' 5!DLL o-71"�( �Y� '� Swr� 1 i I�le lb FIRE DEPT: 1 OL Date: Z S� SigMture BuildZortnUchecklist i � t tl f- r. ,��•,tip;``�,a,�� -/1 V i �.. a1Na �. ■ Innovative ■ LEONARD Structural Design ENGINEERING SERVICES MAR 2 0 2001 CITY OF ARLING ON March 15, 2001 Mr. Al Stancikas ( + I Sconzo Hallstrom Architects 919 124'h AVE NE, Suite 101 4rG+' Bellevue, WA 98005 RE: Les Schwab Tire Center/Arlington Response to Building Department Comments Dear Al: This letter is in response to the Structural Comments from the building department. The number of the response corresponds to the comment number. My responses are as follows: 1. The Structural Notes have been modified to indicate what requires Special Inspection. 2. The lap splice schedule has been modified. 3. Refer to the attached calculations. 4. Refer to the attached calculations. 5. Refer to the attached calculations. 6. .Refer to detail 9/S600 and attached calculations 7. Refe_r to fhe`attached calculations. r� 8. Refer to the modified foundation'plan and attached calculations. Please telephone with questions Sincerely, j:LEpN %S CG�'�Gt ��E�L"C%C�/ � � ,' tic• O • r Z Diana J. Le Aa Y Principal % 25854 � �FGISTE� EXPIRES 09-2�'.-,,©Z Attachments 0 1411 FOURTH AVENUE SUITE 1240 SEATTLE, WA 98101 PHONE 206.624.9393 FAX 206 624.9645 ■ ■ x _ .J., I I " - - - NEW - n ■ ME MEN � � _ ■ ■ immomm ■ ■ ■ ■ INEENE ■ ■ mom _ _lpommom ■ � 1 ■ ■ . ■ _ M ' ■ ■ ■ ■ . 00 ■ '■ ■ ' Les Schwab Tire Center Smokey Point Supplemental Structural Calculations \\'ASy�� G'. G EXPIRES Leonard Engineering -Services 1411 Fourth Avenue, Suite 1527 Seattle, WA 98101 Job #00-77 March 2001 •1 � iai . _ ■ r . -4 ■ 114 - rmirmi1r ■ ■, ■ ��- ■ rw _M 0 r 1 ■ J - NO ON MEN ME ■ _ ■ ■ INEENE NO ME ■ ' ■ ■ ME ON I I i Innovative ARD HONIDesin Igral ENGINEERING SERVICES 1411 FOURTH AVENUE, SUITE 1240 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 OF 14�ZI�IV457 W P Yr Fri � zo P 5/ = 5/0 z T��• ��' el o . PG116x xC,L-4T ■ i ■ Y M. on. ■ ■ ■ - ■ ■ ■ - Innovative IEONARODesignStructural ENGINEERING SERVICES 1411 FOURTH AVENUE, SUITE 1240 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 C�4 G&e 6:�)/li��/�G T/O�J �T Ex 7Ee/0 2 (15k1917711V4 Pete Pe UDIC UG13le) PPEovn ) Pvc� m T 6 �? = �Z (4W-z = J-mil 1V13 L� L F b I' nsre Urn 6,�-L) p60 W61,D A?- o� G4 7 z ' � I P 7-1115 15 YJN 01,7"1M/9TE L')1fil9l� 11K kono 15 7 5 zo �8� � gl � 1 0 aL 40,94W 1 � 1 MILL 1 ` 1 I� ■ I I e is- wctc. L�0NARD D t Design Structural I ENGINEERING 1411 FOURTH AVENUE, SUITE 1240 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 6 7-6 le iT;//t./E OR H e) STE t) 7- ��)09 07-e B-E 77,0&eA) OoT- or 1)Z191Ut //v MAL11Y 1,)IH, 4 45-t 3-s9 X -4-7' CO �6+4 -He7 Vi� JL Z,b A, -rnax7&7 �z ---------- maw -1, YII 1„ 1 ► P6 R y. I 4igm ■ ■ . . F 1 ■ 1 ; - . . 1 ■ . . MEMO! a Awl 11 ME 0 ■ ■ MEN ■ ■ ■ � LEI1� - ■ ■ � 1 . � Innovative `v HONARO Structural Design ENGINEERING SERVICES 1411 FOURTH AVENUE, SUITE 1240 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 d [�C DEC �T,�UT CCOLLEC-Tl�2J CO�v�vE�7-j0� �S 339 # ULT, Sl �Cf3f2 TQ bG COI cow � I WELD ON � 9 6 C*V(, L- 84 N 19 11J I N Fran &EP P E Z C C� �� = S , 3� ! PS`� --s/goo I - 1 i 1 I [WHARD Innovative Structural Design ENGINEERING SERVICES 1411 FOURTH AVENUE, SUITE 1240 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 y C'o�UGiJ/C/ . ; V TlitJ� f�� c�i'`rTL Ce =.Co Z C'e C� q s % C _ 113 Ar& z Z J9 �o Ce ��_, s s c e O&Z 8 &Iqo GOL "�8eS � `�� 15) OfQ I A VC0411 • All • 9 .1.5p rp6 91- 0- x u ■ �i Innovolive Wj UONARD Desgnrol ENGINEERING SERVICES 1411 FOURTH AVENUE, SUITE 1240 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 Z z T TL Z7) 34Z . V - 0( 1 2-7, 3g2 �3, 3g8 i ---p eftiS D vc-e l,�itir L f 7-E L U = 1 -3 3� � = 7P5$ Cap coy l! . T I ■ 1 46 i 1 . - .I 1 �1 ' Innovative "/ ' AROStructural ((( Design ENGINEERING SERVICES 141-FOURTH AVENUE, SUITE 1240 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 l i'C C 4/V o p e Pa x t a 7bO '�axr�I /7I 57� rTiT bC, pay,tal LL 215C 4 = r 31zil CH66L G-1 x 24 t t � c.0 M AJ d = ze" U = Z411 As io e - . �:7,5 ZD G-'1 n - 25,15 + Zno Y] f 5 67zi b� k� 2,1 - AZ As / ,g y e&,& 2 a = 1- ,5-1 ► + 13,zI � 5.3 Pst� Z�z 1 Z b 9A5 F5�� t 4�v z PO L _ � ll 1 �� . Innovative Design EN�,iNEERiNG SER VICES 1411 TLE W VENUE, SUITE 1240 SEATTLE, ASHINGTON 981101 c� Fb �1�E �oOTi�C 111571 - ,, # --� fie. a��Gu�d �c►z.�,t ca I� � i �' ,y � ' �� ■ _ _ � I �� ■ - - - - - + � � .� �i Innovative Title: Job# 9 Structural Dsgnr: Date: 3:32PM, 15 MAR 01 Y 1f ONARD 9 Desi n Description EN;INEERINu SERVICES 1, 1 FOURTH AVENUE, SUITE 1240 Scope: �C�LA.Std1 G-T-QIQ 8101 General Footing Analysis & Design Page 1 I L Description Canopy Column Footing [General Information Allowable Soil Bearing 2,500.0 psf Dimensions... Short Term Increase 1.330 Width along X-X Axis 6.500 ft Base Pedestal Height 0.000 in Length along Y-Y Axis 6.500 ft Seismic Zone 3 Footing Thickness 16.00 in Overburden Weight 50.00 psf Col Dim.Along X-X Axis 24.00 in Live& Short Term Combined Col Dim.Along Y-Y Axis 24.00 in fc 3,000.0 psi Fy 60,000.0 psi Min Steel% 0.0014 Concrete Weight 145.00 pcf Depth to Rebar 3.00 in Loads — -- - - - Applied Vertical Load... Dead Load 17.600 k ...ecc along X-X Axis 0.000 in Live Load 13.200 k ...ecc along Y-Y Axis 0.000 in Short Term Load k Creates Rotation about Y-Y Axis Creates Rotation about X-X Axis Applied Moments... (pressures @ left&right) (pressures @ top&bot) Dead Load k-ft k-ft Live Load k-ft k-ft Short Term 71.800 k-ft k-ft Creates Rotation about Y-Y Axis Creates Rotation about X-X Axis Applied Shears... (pressures @ left&right) (pressures @ top&bot) Dead Load k k Live Load k k Short Term k k Summary `yfe,� Footing'Design OK 6.50ft x 6.50ft Footing, 16.Oin Thick, w/Column Support 24.00 x 24.00in x O.Oin high DL+LL DL+LL+ST Actual Allowable Max Soil Pressure 972.3 2,804.8 psf Max Mu 7.548 k-ft Allowable 2,500.0 3,325.0 psf Required Steel Area 0.218 in2 "X'Ecc, of Resultant 0.000 in 20.973 in "Y'Ecc,of Resultant 0.000 in 0.000 in Shear Stresses.... Vu Vn" Phi 1-Way 24.779 93.113 psi X-X Min. Stability Ratio No Overturning 1.500 :1 2-Way 19.199 186.226 psi Y-Y Min. Stability Ratio 1.850 (c)1983-98 ENERCALC KW-0603311,Ver 5.0.6, 15-Jul-1998,Win32 - I - I I 1 1 momm—. �y � % . � 1 . ass■''-ram - - - - - Innovolive Title: Job# NARD Slrucrurol Dsgnr: Date: 3:32PM, 15 MAR 01 LEO Design Description ENGINEERING SERVICES 1411 FOURTH AVENUE, SUITE 1240 Scope SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 Rev:506001 General Footing Analysis & Design Page 2 Description Canopy Column Footing Footing Design Shear Forces ACI 9-1 ACI 9-2 ACI 9-3 Vn'Phi Two-Way Shear 19.20 psi 18.82 psi 7.00 psi 186.23 psi One-Way Shears... Vu @ Left 9.00 psi 24.78 psi 10.28 psi 93.11 psi Vu @ Right 9.00 psi -2.55 psi -1.64 psi 93.11 psi Vu @ Top 9.00 psi 8.26 psi 3.08 psi 93.11 psi Vu @ Bottom 9.00 psi 8.26 psi 3.08 psi 93.11 psi Moments ACI 9-1 ACI 9-2 ACI 9-3 Ru/Phi As Req'd Mu @ Left 2.82 k-ft -0.86 k-ft -0.55 k-ft 18.5 psi 0.22 in2 per ft Mu @ Right 2.82 k-ft 7.55 k-ft 3.12 k-ft 49.6 psi 0.22 in2 per ft Mu @ Top 2.82 k-ft 2.58 k-ft 0.95 k-ft 18.5 psi 0.22 in2 per ft Mu @ Bottom 2.82 k-ft 2.58 k-ft 0.95 k-ft 18.5 psi 0.22 in2 per ft Soil Pressure Summary Service Load Soil Pressures Left Right Top Bottom DL+ LL 972.33 972.33 972.33 972.33 psf DL+ LL+ ST 0.00 2,804.78 972.33 972.33 psf Factored Load Soil Pressures ACI Eq. 9-1 1,454.99 1,454.99 1,454.99 1,454.99 psf ACI Eq.9-2 0.00 3,926.70 1,361.26 1,361.26 psf ACI Eq. 9-3 0.00 1,713.20 593.91 593.91 psf ACI Factors (per ACI,applied internally to entered loads) ACI 9-1 &9-2 DL 1.400 ACI 9-2 Group Factor 0.750 UBC 1921.2.7"1.4"Factor 1.400 ACI 9-1 &9-2 LL` 1.700 'ACI 9-3 Dead'Load Factor 1A00 _` UBC 1921.2.7"0.9"Factor 0.900 ACI 9-1 &9-2 ;ST 1.700 ACI 9-3 Short Term Factor 1.400 ....seismic=ST': 1.100 (c)1983-98 ENERCALC KW-0603311,Ver 5.0.6,15-Jul-1998,Win32 1 InnovativeSiruct LEONARDIDesign ral ENGINEERING SERVICES 1411 FOURTH AVENUE, SUITE 1240 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 7 -ft 30. It 16,00 in ay. •' I � 6.50 ft I l I t-- I a� t i�y,.3°s30. k�4,-Xr.l T� I 6.50 ft i r 6.50 ft S - ♦ r I I I 7. "Section 1202.2.6 allows the deletion of the mechanical ventilation for the service bays if you determine that the door openings are sufficient Note that this Section requires unobstructed openings." Refer to sheet A2, Vt Floor Plan. 8. "Glazing within 24"arc of either side of a doorway should be safety glazing. This included windows K and L adjacent to the main entry. The location of all safety glazing should be indicated on the plans." Refer to sheet A2, 1 sc Floor Plan. 9. "You should approve of the roof covering indicated on Sheet A2.3. I am not.......A minimum Class C rating is required." Refer to sheet A2.3, Roof Plan. Mechanical 1. "Details should be provided for seismic bracing of the unit and IR heater in the service bays. Otherwise the mechanical plans are acceptable as submitted." Refer to the mechanical drawings for revision for the seismic brace required. For additional response comments please refer to response from Glumac International. (Attached) 1998 Washington State Residential Energy code(WAC 51) 1. "The designer should note on the plans that all glazing shall be certified and labeled with its U-factor and solar heat gain coefficient by an independent agency licensed by the NFRC. Section 1312.1" Refer to the mechanical drawings for revision. 2. "Calculations should be provided to justify the 0.25 U-factor used for the exterior masonry walls. The default value from the NREC is 0.40, which will result in Target UA to be greater than the Proposed UA." Refer to the mechanical drawings for revision. 3. "No slab edge insulation is required assuming that comment 2 can be resolved." Refer to the response for#2. For additional response comments please refer to response from Glumac International. (Attached) 1998 Washington State Regulations for Barrier-Free Design 1. "All doors in the building that have a latch set or lock set should have lever-type operating hardware. Section 1106.3.1" Refer to sheet A5 Door schedule notes for revision. 2. "Door thresholds should be shown as no higher than%" The edges should be beveled at 1 vertical:2 horizontal, with a maximum edge height of%" Section 1106.10.4, 1106.6" Refer to details 10/A6 and revised detail 12/A6 for response. i i Structural For structural response comments please refer to response from Leonard Engineering Services. (Attached) If you have any further questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you, Al Stancikas Project Manager Sconzo/Hallstrom Architects PSC CC:Greg McDonald—LS Construction Bill Walker—Sconzo Hallstrom Architects PSC Diana Leonard—Leonard Engineering Services Larry Oliver—Glumac International f 1 I y G4--"'T 49 C) City of Arlington Planning and Community Development Minor Development Permit January 10, 2001 Les Schwab Tire Center MN-00-053 I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND REQUEST Les Schwab Tire Centers of Washington, Inc., request development of a 16,234 square foot Les Schwab Tire Center on an undeveloped 1.82 acres site. The entire site will be developed, 87% of which will be impervious surface (building or parking lot) and the remainder will be landscaping and drainage facilities. II. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Applicant/Owner: Les Schwab Tire Centers of Washington, Inc., PO Box 667, Prineville, OR 97754 2. Contact Person: Greg McDonald, PO Box 667, Prineville, OR 97754 3. General Location: The site is bordered by 166th Place to the south and Smokey point Boulevard to the west; in the NW '/4 of Section 28, Township 31 N, Range 5E, W.M. (Tax ID No. 310528-002-043-00 & 310528-002-066-00) 4. Address of the Property: Address will be assigned as development occurs 5. Description of Proposal: Development of a 16,234 square foot Les Schwab Tire Center on an undeveloped site 6. Acreage: Approximately 1.82 acres 7. Comprehensive Land Use Designations, Zoning Designation and Existing Land Uses of the Site and Surrounding Area: AREA LAND USE DESIGNATION ZONING EXISTING USE Project site Highway Commercial Highway Commercial Vacant North of site Highway Commercial Highway Commercial Bank South of site Highway Commercial Highway Commercial Vacant East of site Highway Commercial Highway Commercial Vacant West of site Highway Commercial Hi hwa Commercial I Retail Shopping L r*U 1 6 L i i'ir 1 DEPT, - - - y � � � � � � � � � � 1 � � � � � 1 A�� ,� � � = � �- - � Minor Development Permit January 10, 2001 Les Schwab Tire Center MN-00-053 8. Public Utilities and Services Provided by: Water: City of Marysville Cable TV: TCI Cable Sewer: City of Marysville Police: City of Arlington Garbage: Waste Management Northwest Fire: City of Arlington Storm Water: City of Arlington School: Lakewood School District Telephone: General Telephone Hospital: Cascade Valley Hosp. Dist. #3 Electricity: Snohomish County PUD #1 Gas: Cascade Natural Gas 9. Public Notification: A Notice of Application and Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (MDNS) was published, posted, and mailed on November 15, 2000. III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW An MDNS was issued on November 15, 2000, with a 15-day comment period followed by a 10- day appeal period; no comments were received. IV. BACKGROUND The subject minor development permit review application was received by the City of Arlington on October 11, 2000, and the application was deemed complete on October 16, 2000. Additional information was requested on November 13, 20000, and was received on December 4, 2000. A Notice of Application and Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (MDNS) was published, posted, and mailed on November 15, 2000. V. FINDINGS OF FACT 1 . Application Process: The minor development permit application was received by the City of Arlington on October 11, 2000. The application was deemed complete on October 16, 2000. A minor development permit is an administrative review process per City of Arlington Uniform Development Code (UDC) Chapter VII, Sections CA and C.S. 2. Comprehensive Plan and Zoning: The City of Arlington Comprehensive Plan identifies this area as being Highway Commercial, and the subject property is zoned Highway Commercial per UDC Chapter III, zoning map, Page III-2. Retail Trade Establishments (Automobile Repair and Service Facilities) are a permitted use per UDC Chapter V, Section H. 3. Lot Dimensions, Density and Related Requirements: The proposed development complies with the minimum lot dimensions for Retail Trade Establishments (Automobile Repair and Service Facilities) (0.5 acre in size and 100-foot minimum width) and yard setbacks (front 25 feet, rear 50 feet, and each side 25 feet) and with maximum building height (50 feet). Lot coverage is not applicable in the Highway Commercial zone. 4. Non-residential Performance Standards: The proposed development must comply with the standards of performance for noise, lighting, odors and gases, particular matter, electrical interference, hazardous materials storage, waste HALes Schwab\PERMIT.doc kjr; 1/10/01 Page 2 of 8 I Minor Development Permit January 10, 2001 Les Schwab Tire Center MN-00-053 disposal, open storage, maintenance and alterations, and hazardous waste facilities per UDC Chapter IX, Section B.2. 5. Off-Street Parking: The proposed use as calculated per UDC Chapter IX, Section CA, Parking Requirements, requires 47 parking spaces, at 2.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross interior sales space, which is 16,234 square feet, plus 1.5 per 1,000 square feet of interior storage and exterior display/storage areas (which was not calculated separately), plus 3/service bay, of which there are 2, plus 1 dumpster space. The proposed site plan shows 48 parking spaces, 2 of which are handicap accessible, and 1 dumpster space, which meets the minimum requirements. 6. Landscaping: The final site plan shall comply with the requirements of UDC Chapter IX, Section N, Landscaping. The required landscaping for Retail Trade Establishments (Automobile Repair and Service Facilities) use is category C, which requires 10 feet of Type III landscaping adjacent to all street frontages. The landscape requirement for the parking area is a minimum of 17-1/2 square feet of landscaping for each parking stall for the first 50 spaces and 35 square feet for each parking space over 50 per Chapter IX, Section N.7. The landscape plan reflects sufficient frontage and parking area landscaping to meet the general landscape requirements specified in Chapter IX, Section N.7. Plant material must be guaranteed for one year with any replacements guaranteed for one year also. 7. Transportation: The proposed development is located east of Smokey Point Boulevard and on the north side of 166 h Place. The site will access off of 166th Place NE. It is anticipated to add approximately 230 average weekday daily vehicular trips, which includes 23 p.m.-peak-hour trips, to the street system. Transportation mitigation fees shall be paid the City of Arlington at $1,038.00 for each p.m.-peak-hour trip, or $28,874.00. Because the property participated in the RID for improvements to Smokey Point Boulevard and 172"d it is exempt from Snohomish County traffic mitigation fees. Additionally, the traffic study proposed no transportation mitigation fees to WSDOT to mitigate the traffic impact from this development to state roads; the MDNS was not disputed by WSDOT by the legal deadline, therefore no WSDOT transportation mitigation fees are required. 8. Stormwater Management: The City has adopted storm drainage requirements per Arlington Municipal Code Chapter 16.10, Stormwater Management, and the Department of Ecology's Stormwater Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin (The Technical Manual). Site plan drawings with a proposed drainage system have been submitted. A preliminary review of the system indicates that it will probably work. Per City of Arlington Ordinance 1216, there shall be a payment of storm water system development fees to the City of Arlington at $374.00 per 2,000 square feet of impervious surface area. 9. Critical Areas: The site contains no identified environmentally sensitive areas. 10. Park Mitigation and Impact Fees: The project will employ approximately 20 people, who will use the City's park system. Per UDC Chapter XI, Section B.4, HALes Schwab\PERMIT.doc kjr; 1/10/01 Page 3 of 8 r .■ ' ■ ' ■ � . ■ : ■ ■7 ! ■ hiprr a ! r �■T1 NJ �� bm Jd ■J J z i'� Minor Development Permit January 10, 2001 Les Schwab Tire Center MN-00-053 there shall be a payment of 5 cents ($0.05) per square foot of land per approved site plan. 11. Airport Management: The Arlington Municipal Airport requires that street lamps or light poles located on the property be down shielded as to avoid interfering with flight operations. 12. Water and Sanitary Sewer: Adequate water and sewer service is available to the site from the City of Marysville; utility services to the building and fire hydrants and fire protection as required will be reviewed when construction drawings are submitted. All existing and planned utilities shall be shown on the site plan. 13. Criteria for Approval of an Application and Issuance of a Permit: Per UDC Chapter VII, Section D, Criteria for Approval, the Department of Planning and Community Development is required to review for compliance the following criteria before an application can be approved. a. The development is consistent with the dimensional, density requirements and Performance Standards of the UDC and other applicable laws and regulations; and Staff Analysis: As identified above, the development is consistent with the dimensional, density requirements, and Performance Standards of the UDC and other applicable laws and regulations. b. The development as proposed incorporates, to the maximum extent feasible, mitigation measures to substantially lessen or eliminate all adverse environmental impacts of the development; and Staff Analysis: The development as proposed incorporates, to the maximum extend feasible, best management practices to lessen or eliminate all adverse environmental impacts of the development. C. The applicant has presented certification that the applicant has filed and paid all the taxes, penalties and interest, and that the applicant has satisfactorily made agreement to pay the taxes (NOTE: this requirement is only applicable to subdivision plats); and Staff Analysis: This requirement is only applicable to subdivision plats. d. Prior to final approval the applicant has followed all permit processing procedures and paid all applicable land use fees. Staff Analysis: As stated above,.all permit processing procedures have been followed and a condition is included that requires that all applicable land use fees be paid prior to final decision. VI. CONCLUSIONS 1. The City of Arlington Comprehensive Plan identifies this area as Highway Commercial, and the subject property is zoned Highway Commercial per UDC Chapter III, zoning map, Page III-2. Retail Trade Establishments (Automobile Repair and Service Facilities) are a permitted use in the Highway Commercial zone per UDC Chapter V, Section H. Therefore, the proposed development as noted and conditioned is consistent with policies governing commercial uses and is allowed in the Highway Commercial zone. HALes Schwab\PERMIT.doc kjr; 1/10/01 Page 4 of 8 w m=4Immiwmm'■ ` mommommomm EMiR JPrl&wAmmm mmPLm mom ■ NO I ,.. . ■ ■ ■ ■ 7 •. • - - r - i ■ ■ 1 - M • i i • • . - • ■ ■ - momms i immommimAmbionA z �� ti Minor Development Permit January 10, 2001 Les Schwab Tire Center MN-00-053 2. The requested minor development permit as conditioned meets all UDC requirements, including Chapter VII, Section D, Criteria for Approval, and all other applicable codes. 3. The minor development permit should be approved subject to conditions noted below. VII. DECISION The minor development permit is hereby APPROVED, subject to the following conditions: 1. All development shall be in substantial conformance with the approved preliminary site plan received December 4, 2000, and landscape plan received October 13, 2000, subject to any conditions or modifications that may be required as part of the minor development permit. 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall file a drainage plan and construction plans, meeting the following conditions, in conjunction with a building permit application. The final site plan shall comply with all requirements of the Unified Development Code, Uniform Building Code, Uniform Fire Code and Public Works Construction Standards and Specifications. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall submit proof of payment of all required mitigation payments (transportation mitigation fees to the City of Arlington at $1,038.00 per pm peak hour trip, which is 23, for a total of $23,874.00; and park mitigation fees to the City of Arlington at 5 cents per square foot of land per approved site plan, which is 1.82 acres or 79,279.20 square feet, for a total of $3,963.96). 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall pay storm water system development fees to the City of Arlington at $374.00 per 2,000 square feet of impervious surface area, which is 68,972.90 square feet, for a total of $12,897.93. 5. All exterior lighting, including streetlights, shall be down shielded. 6. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall clear all outstanding land use permit-processing accounts with the City. 7. The minor development permit shall become null and void if use and reliance is not established within one year of the below date of approval. VIII. CODE REQUIREMENTS (NOTE: The following items are not conditions of permit approval, rather certain local, state, or federal code requirements that the applicant needs to be aware of. This is in no way intended to be a complete list of code requirements, but a general checklist of major steps and issues. Please refer to the AMC for a complete list of code requirements for your particular project type. HALes Schwab\PERMIT.doc kj r; 1/10/01 Page 5 of 8 Minor Development Permit January 10, 2001 Les Schwab Tire Center MN-00-053 1. Code Applicability. This application is subject to the applicable requirements contained in the Arlington Municipal Code, Zoning Code, and Building Code. It is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure compliance with the various provisions contained in these ordinances. 2. Pre-Construction Phase. Prior to commencing any site work, including installing any easement or right-of-way improvements, utility systems, drainage systems, street lights, mailbox structures, emergency facilities, storm water control systems, landscaping, or any other improvements, improvement plans must be submitted for review and approval by the Department of Public Works. Said plans shall be in conformance with applicable code and the below listed conditions. a. The applicant shall survey and mark all property corners prior to review of any submitted construction plans. b. The applicant will be required to design and install erosion control measures deemed necessary by the City. These measures must be installed and inspected by the City prior to the issuance of any permits for site work. C. No site preparation or other disturbance shall be undertaken within environmentally sensitive areas or their required buffers. d. Submit to the Director of the Department of Public Works and receive approval of a stormwater run-off and detention plan in conformance with the AMC Chapter 16.10, Stormwater Management, and the Department of Ecology's Stormwater Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin (The Technical Manual) for both the construction phase and a permanent system. All site drainage must be directed through biofiltration swales prior to discharge into wetlands. e. All new utility lines shall be placed underground. f. Provide a temporary rock pad at all points of ingress and egress to the site throughout the construction phase. g. Show locations of all required streetlights on the construction plans. Install them. h. A Right-of-Way Permit is required for and prior to any work done in a public right-of-way. i. All lighting shall be low sodium or similar low intensity illumination and placed in a way as to not cause glare on an adjoining property or right-of- way. 3. Construction Phase. The following conditions shall apply during construction. a. All applicable noise and other nuisance codes are applicable. HALes Schwab\PERMIT.doc kjr; 1/10/01 Page 6 of 8 Minor Development Permit January 10, 2001 Les Schwab Tire Center MN-00-053 b. Mud and dirt shall not be tracked onto public rights-of-way, but if tracked by accident shall be immediately cleaned-up. C. During any site grading or clearing activity, the applicant and contractor shall use all available means of controlling air pollution (dust, ash, and smoke). d. The restrictions of the AMC shall apply to any and all grading. 4. Installation of Improvements. Prior to receiving final plat approval the applicant shall: a. Install a potable water system to serve the project per Department of Public Works requirements. b. Install a sanitary sewer system created per Department of Public Works requirements. C. Install a permanent stormwater control system per AMC Chapter 16.10. d. All exterior boundaries and interior lot corners of proposed lots shall be set by a registered land surveyor using rebar and cap. e. Dedicate to all utilities serving the subject property and their respective successors and assigns a ten-foot easement over, under and upon: (a) the exterior ten feet parallel with and adjoining the street frontage of all lots and common areas; and (b) where any other utility facilities, including electrical, gas, water, sewer, drainage, and/or other utility facilities, cross the property. Verify the appropriate locations with the respective utilities. Include in the dedication document the following language: "These utility easements have been reserved for and granted to all utilities serving the subject property and their respective successors and assigns, under and upon the front ten feet parallel with and adjoining the street frontage of all lots and tracts in which to install, lay, construct, renew, operate and maintain underground conduits, cables, pipes, and wires, together with other necessary facilities and equipment, for the purpose of serving this and other property with utility service, together with the right to enter upon the property at all times for the purposes herein stated. All utility lines shall be placed underground. These easements entered upon for these purposes shall be restored as near as possible to their original condition. These easements shall preclude grading or any recontouring of the land; placement of structures, wells, leach fields, and any other thing; except utility facilities." g. In lieu of completing any of the above improvements, the applicant may submit to the Department of Planning and Community Development a performance security to cover the cost of installing any or all of the improvements within one year of the date of permit approval. However, HALes Schwab\PERMIT.doc kj r; 1/10/01 Page 7 of 8 • MEMMMM T7 1� MOMEMEMENE! rr MOWN I J `` R &JL.Mr■ P.Aic `!7 �`L` I ! go ■ ■ . ' ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ . ■ ■ Minor Development Permit January 10, 2001 Les Schwab Tire Center MN-00-053 no Certificates of Occupancy may be issued until all improvements are completed. (NOTE: Infrastructure requirements are based on conceptual information as submitted by the applicant. Additional specific requirements may be required upon review of the engineered construction drawings as submitted by the applicant. All improvements are subject to review and approval by the Department of Public Works. All utilities shall be constructed underground.) XI. APPEALS To appeal this decision, an appeal application must be filed, with all required fees, within 10 working days of the date of issuance of this decision. The City Council or a Hearing Examiner would hear the appeal of the permit and their decision would be considered the City's final decision on the underlying governmental action. X. EXHIBITS 1. Approved Preliminary Site Plan received December 4, 2000, and Landscape Plan received October 13, 2000 2. File MN-00-053 ORDERED THIS 10TH DAY OF JANUARY 2001. Cliff t ong, Pla I g Manager Responsible O ici I Distributed tot Following Party of Record: • Les Schwab Tire Center of Washington, Inc, c/o Greg McDonald, PO Box, 667, Prineville, OR 97754 • Public Works Department, Paul Richart • Public Works Department, Marc Hayes • Building Department, Dave Anderson • Water and Sewer Department, Terry Castle HALes Schwab\PERMIT.doc kjr; 1/10/01 Page 8 of 8 :� �.� ?a> �7 :� � r !� �.r �� t ■ — ■ — ■ _ a1'�y �Y � �' � �� • GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PROPOSED LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER SMOKEY POINT BOULEVARD AND SMOKEY POINT INDUSTRIAL PARK ROAD SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON Submitted to: LS Construction Company 646 North Madras Highway Prineville, Oregon 97754 Submitted by: PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. 3257 16ffi Avenue West Seattle, Washington 98119-1706 November 25, 1998 PSI Project No. 578-8E032 U I L®INS DEPT, A RecetvE0 JAN l s 1u�8 C17Y OF ARLIIVGTOA1 G �- L/ 3 " PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. Information to Build On LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER PSI Project No. 578-8E032 November 25, 1998 Page 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................1 1.1 GENERAL......... ................................................................................................... 1 1.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION.................................................................................... 1 2.0 SITE CONDITIONS..................................................................................................1 2.1 SURFACE............................................................................................................. 1 2.2 SUBSURFACE .....................................................................................................2 2.3 GROUNDWATER.................................................................................................3 2.4 LABORATORY TESTING.....................................................................................3 3.0 DISCUSSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS..........................................................4 3.1 GENERAL.............................................................................................................4 3.2 SITE PREPARATION AND GENERAL EARTHWORK ........................................4 3.3 STRUCTURAL FILL AND COMPACTION............................................................4 3.4 FOUNDATION ...................................................................................................... 5 3.5 SLAB-ON-GRADE FLOORS ................................. .................6 .............................. 3.6 SEISMIC DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS ...............................................................6 3.7 EXCAVATIONS AND SLOPES ............................................................................7 3.8 SITE DRAINAGE ..................................................................................................7 3.9 PAVEMENTAREAS.............................................................................................7 3.10 UTILITY SUPPORT AND BACKFILL....................................................................8 4.0 LIMITATIONS ..........................................................................................................9 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Vicinity Map Figure 2 Site and Exploration Plan LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A Boring Logs Appendix B Sieve Analyses agwAlq iJ Lih 1 I I PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. Information to Build On LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER PSI Project No. 578-8E032 November 25, 1998 Page 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 General This report presents the results of the geotechnical investigation completed by Professional Service Industries (PSI) for the proposed Les Schwab Tire Center building located at the northeast corner of Smokey Point Boulevard and Smokey Point Industrial Park Road in Snohomish County, Washington. The general location of the site is shown on the Vicinity Map, Figure 1. The purpose of this investigation was to explore the subsurface conditions at the site, and based on the conditions encountered, to develop geotechnical recommendations for the proposed site development. The approximate exploratory locations are shown on the Site and Exploration Plan, Figure 2. 1.2 Project Description We understand the development of the site will consist of constructing a one-story masonry block building with slab-on-grade floors and associated parking. The majority of the building will be occupied by several open service bays that may have a clear span roof system to transfer loads to the perimeter foundations. The remainder of the building will consist of office and tire storage areas. The proposed development will be constructed at or near existing grades. Specific structural design information is not available at this time. However, based on our experience with similar projects, we would anticipate wall loads in the range of 3 to 4 kips per lineal foot, column loads in the range of 24 kips, and slab-on-grade floor loads of 150 pounds per square foot (psf) within the tire storage area. If any of these design criteria are inconsistent or have been changed, we should be informed to review and reevaluate the recommendations addressed in this report. In any case, PSI should be retained to perform a general review of the final design. 2.0 SITE CONDITIONS 2.1 Surface Conditions The subject site is located at the northeast corner of Smokey Point Boulevard and Smokey Point Industrial Park Road in Snohomish County, Washington. This irregularly- shaped property is bordered to the north by Smokey Point Boulevard, and neighbored with Frontier Bank at the eastern border. Smokey Point Industrial Park Road bounds the western border of the property. The southern border of the property is open to an undeveloped land. An overhead electrical power line crosses the middle portion of the property in a north-south direction. Dense brush and grass cover the entire property 1� 10 iris 11 1� m m m limm Md J12A dkA wr awwa Pr' 4 Ow PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. Information to Build On LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER PSI Project No. 578-8E032 November 25, 1998 Page 2 surface with two individual young trees standing at the northern border line and within the northern middle portion of the property, respectively. At the time of our field work, the site surface appeared to be wet with some water in depressions observed near the northwestern corner. In general, the subject site consists of undeveloped lands with relatively level topography. Approximate boring locations were determined by taping from the existing facility stakes. The approximate elevations were determined by locating the subject site on a preliminary topographic map. Approximate locations of these test borings are shown on the Site and Exploration Plan, Figure 2. 2.2 Subsurface Our field exploration was performed on November 18, 1998. Subsurface conditions at the site were explored by drilling three test borings to the depths ranging from 19 to 34 feet. The test borings were completed using a truck-mounted drilling equipment provided by Environmental Drilling, Inc. Continuous-flight, hollow-stem augers were used to advance and support the boreholes during sampling. In each test boring, Standard Penetration Tests (SPT) were performed at selected intervals in general accordance with ASTM Test Designation D-1586. A 2-inch outside diameter split spoon sampler was driven with a 140 pound hammer freely falling 30 inches. The number of blows required to drive the last 12 inches of penetration are called the "N-value". This value is used to characterize the relative density of sandy- soils or consistency of clayey soils. The field exploration was monitored by our geologist who recorded the soil and groundwater conditions encountered, maintained a log of each boring, obtained representative samples, and observed pertinent site features. The test boring logs are presented in Appendix A. The final logs represent our interpretations of the field logs and the results of the laboratory examination and tests of field samples. The stratification lines on the logs represent the approximate boundaries between soil types. The transitions may be more gradual in the field. With the exception of dry brown sandy gravel with some silt encountered in the top 1 foot of the soil profile in test borings B-1 and B-2, the underlying soils generally reveal two distinct strata of uniform, silty sand deposits. The upper stratum contains brown to dark brown, dry to slightly moist, fine-grained silty sand with a trace of gravel. The relative density of these soils appears to increase with depth from a loose to medium dense condition. Underlying the upper soils to the termination depth is a stratum of wet, gray, fine- to coarse-grained silty sand with some scattered gravel inclusions. The t � [m-4 `ti pM tb1eqW11 rlrhw 1ftD6]K [Uu itil b"Iry1R no= rdOF1§Ll■i N16l =Rf E�1�� .�� Irk ii �1 ■ 1 � . PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. Information to Build On LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER PSI Project No. 578-8E032 November 25, 1998 Page 3 relative density of this stratum appears, similarly, to increase from a medium dense to dense condition. The United States Geological Survey (USGS) publication entitled Geologic Map of the Arlington West 7.5 Minute Quadrangle of Snohomish County, Washington, by James P. Minard in 1985, was reviewed for the geologic and soil conditions at the site. Based on the description of the above reference, the site is generally underlain by Marysville Sand Member which consists primarily of free-draining outwash sand with some gravel and sporadic silt or clay deposits. This description generally agrees with the soil conditions encountered in our subsurface exploration. 2.3 Groundwater Groundwater was observed at depths varying from 5.5 to 8.5 feet below existing grade in all three test borings during our subsurface exploration. However, the groundwater seepage level and flow rate are not constant. Fluctuations in the level and rate depend on the season, amount of rainfall, surface water runoff, and other factors. Generally, the groundwater level is higher and the flow rate is greater during the wetter winter months. At the time our field work was completed, the groundwater levels observed likely represent near the seasonal highest point. In our opinion, the groundwater conditions observed are likely the combined effects of active infiltration from substantially persistent rainfall and relatively level topography. The groundwater levels observed are below the elevation of the proposed building foundation. Therefore, we do not anticipate the groundwater levels will significantly affect the construction activities, if the site development starts in drier seasons. 2.4 Laboratory Testing Sieve analyses were conducted on three representative soil samples to evaluate the feasibility of utilizing on-site excavated soils as structural fill or replacement of imported materials during wet weather months. Grain size distribution and gradation curves obtained from the above analyses facilitate the comparison between the recommended gradation criteria and particle size distribution of existing on-site soils. The results of sieve analyses performed on specific samples are presented on the Particle Size Distribution Report plates 1 through 3, Appendix B. It is important to note that these test results of limited samples collected do not reflect all in-situ soil conditions. Our geotechnical recommendations are generally based on our interpretation of the test and accepted geotechnical practice. �� 1 I � � I 1 � � 1 rV � � � � � 1 � � � 1 � 1 1 , Z'. 1 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. Information to Build On LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER PSI Project No. 578-8EO32 November 25, 1998 Page 4 3.0 DISCUSSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 3.1 General Based on the results of our subsurface investigation at the site, the site appears to be suitable for the proposed development from a geotechnical standpoint. The underlying medium dense native sandy soils are suitable for direct support of the building on spread footing foundations, pavements, and slab-on-grade floors. The following sections of this report provide detailed recommendations regarding the above issues and other geotechnical considerations. These recommendations should be incorporated into the project design drawings and specifications. 3.2 Site Preparation and General Earthwork The building and pavement areas should be stripped and cleared of any topsoil or vegetation. Our test borings indicate that the depth of stripping should extend to a depth of at least 6 inches below existing grade. Stripped organic topsoil should be removed from the site and disposed, or used in landscaping areas, as desired. The stripped soils should not be mixed with any materials to be used as structural fill. Following the stripping operation, excavations or fills required to attain site grades can be initiated. Prior to placing fill, we recommend proofrolling all exposed surfaces to determine if any isolated soft and yielding spots are present. Proofrolling should also be performed in cut areas that will provide direct support for new construction. If excessively yielding areas are observed and they can not be stabilized in place by compaction, the affected soils should be excavated to competent bearing grade and restored with structural fill. Floor slabs and pavement areas should be supported on structural fill or competent bearing soils. If any abandoned utilities are present on-site, they should be plugged or removed to ensure that they do not provide a conduit for water and cause soil saturation and stability problems. We recommend a representative from PSI be retained to observe all proofrolling operations and to evaluate the suitability of the bearing subgrade exposed during excavation. 3.3 Structural Fill and Compaction Structural fill is defined as the compacted fill placed under buildings, roadways, slabs, pavements, or any other load-bearing areas. Structural fill placed under footings and floor slabs should be placed in horizontal lifts not exceeding 10 inches in loose thickness and compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of its laboratory maximum dry density, determined in accordance with ASTM D-1557 (Modified Proctor) method. The rf r ■ . S 0 ;=m MEN kn* q 4mmi �F ml `mm� and mum= Wilma ud ■■�� ■ _ - M = - ■ ■ ■ ■ .■ IN 4 ■ I I PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. Information to Build On LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER PSI Project No. 578-8E032 November 25, 1998 Page 5 fill materials should be placed at or near the optimum moisture content. Referring to the same compaction method, fill under pavements and walkways should be placed in horizontal lifts and compacted to 90 percent of maximum dry density, except for the top 10 inches compacted to 95 percent of maximum dry density. During dry weather, on-site soils except topsoil can be used as structural fill. In general, soils with more than 15 percent of fines will make it difficult to compact to achieve the required density if the moisture content increases significantly above optimum. Our subsurface exploration indicates that the on-site native soils contain less than 7 percent of fines passing No. 200 sieve; consequently, they are suitable to be used as structural fill placed under the load-bearing elements. If the on-site soils are exposed to excessive moisture and cannot be adequately compacted, then it may be necessary to import free-draining granular fill. This imported fill to be placed during wet weather conditions should consist of granular organic-free materials. The grading requirements for the imported fill are showed on the following table. IMPORTED FILL CRITERIA U.S. Standard Sieve Size Percent Passing by Dry Weight 3 inch 100 % inch 50 -100 No. 4 25 - 65 No. 10 10 - 50 No. 40 0 - 20 No. 200 5 Maximum 3.4 Foundation In our opinion, the proposed building can be supported on conventional spread footing foundations bearing on the competent, native soils or on structural fill placed over these soils. With the foundation support established as described, an allowable bearing capacity of 2,500 pounds per square foot (psf for on-site grade soils can be used for design. We recommend that continuous footings have a minimum width of 16 inches and individual footings a minimum width of 24 inches. All exterior footings shall be placed a minimum of 24 inches below finished grade. A one-third increase in allowable bearing capacity may be utilized for short-term loads such as in the event of seismic or wind effects. Considering the free-draining nature of 1 ......... ; INNIti � _ ■ . - _ _ INN 0 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. Information to Build On LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER PSI Project No. 578-8E032 November 25, 1998 Page 6 the on-site subgrade deposits and the bearing stress applied, the majority of total foundation settlement should occur during construction. Horizontal foundation loads can be resisted by friction between the foundation base and the supporting soils, and by passive earth pressure acting on the face of the embedded portion of the foundation. For the latter, the foundation must be poured "neat" against the competent native soils or backfilled with structural fill. For frictional resistance, a coefficient of 0.4 can be used. For passive earth pressure, the available resistance can be computed using an equivalent fluid pressure of 230 pcf. These lateral resistance values include a factor of safety of 1.5. All footing excavations should be examined by a representative from PSI, prior to placing forms or rebar, to verify that subgrade conditions are as anticipated in this report. 3.5 Slab-on-Grade Floors Slab-on-grade floors may be supported on the compacted native subgrade soils or structural fill prepared as discussed in the Site Preparation and General Earthwork section of this report. After subgrade preparation is completed, the slab should be provided with a capillary break consisting of a minimum of 6 inches of clean, free- draining sand or pea gravel. The requirements specified on Table 1 could be substituted for use as capillary break materials except less than 3 percent of fines passing No. 200 sieve. We would also recommend the utilization of a vapor barrier such as a 6-mil plastic membrane to prevent moisture accumulation on the concrete surface. If a vapor barrier is used, at least two inches of clean, moist sand should be placed over the membrane to guard against damage during construction and to aid in curing the concrete. 3.6 Seismic Design Considerations The Smokey Point area is classified as a Seismic Zone 3 by the 1997 Uniform Building Code (UBC). Based on our analysis of on-site explorations, we interpret the subsurface site conditions to correspond to a seismic soil profile SB, as defined by Table 16-J of the 1997 UBC. Soil profile type Ss refers to a rock formation which has shear velocity 2,500 to 5,000 feet per second (fps). Structures are subject to damage from earthquakes due to either direct shaking or foundation soil failure. In our opinion, based on the existing subsurface conditions at this site, the potential for seismic hazards is low. 4 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. Information to Build On LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER PSI Project No. 578-8E032 November 25, 1998 Page 7 3.7 Excavations and Slopes We do not anticipate the need for site excavations other than utility trench excavations. In no case should excavation slopes be greater than the limits specified in local, state and federal safety regulations. Based on the information obtained from our field exploration and laboratory testing, we recommend temporary cuts greater than four feet in height should be sloped at an inclination no steeper than 1.5H:1V. If slopes of this inclination, or flatter, cannot be constructed, temporary shoring may be necessary. This shoring will help protect against slope failure or excavation collapse, and will provide protection to workmen in the excavation. If temporary shoring is required, we will be available to provide shoring design criteria as requested. Supplementary recommendations can then be developed to improve trench wall stability, including flattening of slopes or installation of surface or subsurface drains. 3.8 Site Drainage Groundwater was encountered in all of our test borings at varying depths. Since the building elevations will be at the present grades or slightly lower, we do not expect the site groundwater levels will present any major construction-related problems. The site must be graded such that surface water is directed off the site. Water should not be allowed to stand in any area where buildings, slabs or pavements are to be constructed. During construction, loose and exposed surfaces should be adequately compacted to reduce the potential for moisture infiltration into the soils. Final site grades must allow for drainage away from the building foundations. We recommend that the ground be sloped at a gradient of 3 percent for a distance of at least ten feet away from the buildings, except in paved areas which can be sloped at a gradient of 1 percent. If final site grades are completed as recommended above, footing drains should not be necessary. If footing drains are utilized, roof downspouts should not be tied into the footing drain system, and must be separately tightlined to discharge. Cleanouts should be installed at strategic locations to allow for periodic maintenance of the footing drain and downspout tightline systems. 3.9 Pavement Areas The adequacy of site pavements is related to the conditions of the underlying subgrade. To provide a properly prepared subgrade for site pavements, we recommend that all pavements areas be supported on dense native soils or on a minimum of 10 inches of structural fill meeting the criteria established on Table 1. The structural fill should be compacted to 95 percent of the maximum dry density. The base of the excavated w t . . . _ . . - 1 ■ . . . 0 0 ■ - - 11 ■ - ■ Sol . ti 4ra&p a �� g �■ r��r r In monq ■ ml ,bid m A bhm n �I ,mwdm+l. and od aim PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. Information to Build On LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER PSI Project No. 578-8E032 November 25, 1998 Page 8 pavement areas should be treated and prepared as described in the Site Preparation and General Earthwork section of this report. This means that excavation base should be compacted to 90 percent of the maximum dry density per ASTM D-1557. It is possible that some localized areas of soft, wet or unstable subgrade may still exist after this process. Therefore, a greater thickness of structural fill or crushed rock may be needed to stabilize these localized areas. The following pavement section for lightly-loaded areas can be used: Two inches of Asphalt Concrete (AC) over four inches of Crushed Rock Base (CRB) material, or • Two inches of AC over three inches of Asphalt Treated Base (ATB) material. Heavier truck-traffic areas will require thicker sections depending upon site usage, pavement life, and traffic loads. As a general rule, we recommend the following pavement sections be used for truck-trafficked areas: • Three inches of AC over six inches of CRB, or • Three inches of AC over four inches of ATB. We will be pleased to assist you in developing appropriate pavement sections for heavy traffic zones, if required. 3.10 Utility Support and Backfill Based on the soil conditions encountered, the soils expected to be exposed by utility excavations should provide adequate support for utilities. Utility trench backfill is a major concern in preventing settlement along utility alignments, particularly in pavement areas. It is important that each section of utility line be adequately supported in the bedding material. The material should be hand tamped to ensure support is provided around the pipe haunches. Fill should be carefully placed and hand tamped to about 12 inches above the crown of the pipe before any heavy compaction equipment is brought into use. The remainder of the trench backfill should be placed in lifts having a loose lift of less than 10 inches and compacted to 90 percent of the maximum dry density per ASTM D-1557 (Modified Proctor) for the portion no less than two feet beneath the ground surface. The upper two feet of backfill should be compacted to 95 percent of the maximum dry density in accordance with the same procedure. I PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. Information to Build On LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER PSI Project No. 578-8E032 November 25, 1998 Page 9 4.0 LIMITATIONS This report has been prepared to assist in the evaluation of the site. Our conclusions and recommendations have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices. We make no other warranty, either expressed or implied. Our conclusions are based on the results of the field exploration and on our interpretation of surface and subsurface conditions. If conditions are encountered that appear to be different than those described in this report, we should be notified so that we may review and verify or modify our recommendations. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Les Schwab Tire Centers and their contractors for the specific application to the proposed project. The reproduction of this report, except in full, by any method and its transmittal by any means to a third party without the written permission of PSI, is prohibited. This report, in its entirety, should be included in the project contract documents for the information of the contractor. Respectfully Submitted, PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. Reviewed by: Jim Niehoff, P.E., Senior Author Geotechnical Service :IS OF WAS,y! G 0 z 35226 �x L�x�s 12/29i a000 G1r Joseph Wu, P.E. Paul Elliott Project Engineer Geotechnical Services Manager �� ' � � � '1 � � � � f� � �� • � - r- � - � . _ ti � - - �- y I 71\ 100 I6 - ---- ' ' . ........ Area low Z ` Res\.. 1 ii •1,` \. �� -� Area 1 •q• 'ry/• 'tle...... p aMI • v ��ftt ^rg .... _q ' l CD• -- ��.�•• O RLINGTON MUNICIPAL C:) •• :�� AIR ORT © � C .n O • 1 S: i • i till• I BM a N 2O r 2;; �—------ — — — 21 '� / 130 � � .;I• •gin II ,I ..� ;-�......:�1� T•—II . • ii aai III I I l Mooiie fn If I Pa�_�, ,r I BMt I Smoke}*Point b ," 1191 r" 1 ..d• 121 o......:�•4 • • • II II bll - \ Camplgluntl I• N r' n� ROAD n 10 •d• .:, � o SN,�.� 'SITE h nllllllll� �� (Mobile Home y p`'•%os��. .-QO Park 27 ... .• •�� Reservoir cam,• 1 i0 I •` BM �•. �l u • 04 B •■ �' ° it / j, I Mobile ryome u Park •' u •I u n rCS" ■ '1 COX I! F' ROA u• Source: USGS Topographic Map, 7.5 Minute Quandrangle,Arlingtion West, WA. FIGURE 1 —VICINITY MAP Professional Service Industries, Inc. Proposed Les Schwab Tire Center-Smokey Point Northeast Comer of Smokey Point Boulevard and 3257 16th Avenue West, Seattle,WA 98119-1706 Smokey Point Industrial Park Road Smokey Point,Washington 206-282-0666 PSI Project No.578-8E032 • 1 f■1 T. 1 I I 1 loom J • 1 � _ 1 1 1 1 I 1 � '2 > M 0 CL E iL 168th Street Northeast Frontier Bank r 4 Subject Property 0 8-3 B-1 40 Undeveloped Property '71 B-2 Greg Rairdon Chrysler Dealership Smokey Point Industrial Park Road Affordable Auto (RentaUSales) A., LEGEND B-2 Approximate Boring Location 0 Not to Scale VY FIGURE 2—SITE and EXPLORATION PLAN Proposed Les Schwab Tire Center-Smokey Point Professional service Industries, Inc. Northeast Comer of Smokey Point Boulevard and Smokey Point Industrial Park Road 3257 16th Avenue West, Seattle, WA 98119-1706 Smokey Point,Washington 206-282-0666 PSI Project No.578-8EO32 7 r R ■� ..l yo 31 r ' J6.j 1 J f� 1 ■ . 1 i Appendix A Boring Logs �� - - - �1 I BORING LOG Psi No.: 578-8E032 Client: LS Construction Company Project: Proposed Les Schwab Tire Center Smokey Point,Washington Boring No.: B-1 (1 of 1) Total 34.0' Elev: t 115 I Location: Center of Parcel Type of Boring: Hollow Stem Auger Started: 11/18/98 Completed: 11/18/98 1 Driller. DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS 'Sample Sample N VALUE(bpt) c Elevation Depth Blows Depth PL %MC LL N N.0 (Classification) (Feet)REC/RQD ) rn 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1.0 Brown, dry, sandy gravel some silt. (GW) 1.0 1 I 1 I I 1 I I I Med. dense, brown, dry,silty sand;trace 1 12 I gravel, fine to med. sand. (SM) 2.5 I I 1 I I I I I 1 Slightly moist. 12 4.0 1 I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I 1 I I I I I I 7.0 1 1 Med. dense, gray, wet, silty sand; some 7.5 gravel, med. to coarse sand. (SM) I8 Groundwater observed @ 8 ft. 9.0 1 I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 I I I I I I 12.5 1 I 1 1 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 I 26 1 1 I I I I I I I 14.0 1 1 1 I I I I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 i I I I I I I - --1 -1--r-7--1--1-- r-T - I I 1 I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 I I I 17.5 1 I I I I 1 I I I I 1 I Fine sand. ' ( I I I I I 1 18 19.0 I 1 1 1 I I 1 ! I I I I I I 1 ( I I I I I I __1__H_i _I__---- 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I t 1 I I I I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I I 22.5 I 1 I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I Fine to med. sand. I 1 16 24.0 I 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I - I _L_ _ _ ' _ ____1 I - /--I- I I 1 1 I 1 I I I I 1 1 I I I I I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I I I 27.5 I I I I I 1 I Moist, fine sand. 25 1 I I I 1 I I I 29.0 I I I I -r--I- ,--;-;----,--;- - a I 1 1 1 1 1 1 r 1 T 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 32.5 Moist to wet, fine to med. sand. 32 34.0 1 I Total depth @ 34 ft. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 y I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1J 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 I J I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I ] 1 1 I 1 1 1 ( 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 "Number of blows required for a 140 lb hammer dropping 30"to drive 2"O.D., 1.375"I.D.sampler a total of 18 inches in three 6"increments. The sum of the last two increments of penetration is termed the standard penetration resistance, N. -- a I � � � � � � � � � r � � � � � � � ► t '� 1 1 I " I I � �� 1 r�l `� y 1 1 7.� 1 BORING LOG PSI No.: 578-8E032 Client: LS Construction Company Project: Proposed Les Schwab Tire Center Smokey Point,Washington Boring No.: B-2 (1 of 1) Total 19.0' Mew t 115 Location: 70 ft Southwest from Center Type of Boring: Hollow Stem Auger Started: 11/18/98 Completed: 11/18/98 1 Driller: 'Sample Sample N VALUE(bp0 A o �, DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS Blows p PL %MC LL > Elevation Depth Depth N (Classification) a REC/RQD ��t) 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1.0 Brown,dry,silty sand-sandy gravel; somesilt_((:L Loose to med. dense brown dry, silty ' 2.5 sand; fine sand.(SM) 1 , , 1 I I Slightly moist. 9 4.0 , I 1 I I 1 I I 1 J--I-- L- - 1 1 1 I I 1 I I I 1 i 1 I 1 1 I I I 7.0 1 I I 1 Med. dense, gray, wet,silty sand; some 7•5 gravel, med. to coarse sand. (SM) 15 Groundwater observed @ 8.5 ft. 9.0 1 , 1 I I I I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 12.5 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 Dense. 35 1 1 1 14.1 t , 1 I 1 1 1 I I • I 1 1 i 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 I I I I I 1 1 1 I I I I I I 17.5 1 I 1 I I I I I 1 1 � 1 I 1 I I I Med.dense, little gravel, fine to coarse 23 19.0 11 sand. , 1 Total depth @ 19 ft. 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • 1 1 1 / 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 'Number of blows required for a 140 lb hammer dropping 30"to drive 2"O.D., 1.375"I.D.sampler a total of 18 inches in three 6"increments. The sum of the last two increments of penetration is termed the standard penetration resistance, N. T `' ■ r ■ MEN • • 0 0 ME ME 1 ■ ■ r . . - 1 MENEM . . _ a . . 1 . J or1.mmom . • ■ ■ ■ MEN MEN ■ ■ ■ s i } 1 � i i `BORING LOG Psi No.: 578-8E032 Client: LS Construction Company Project: Proposed Les Schwab Tire Center Smokey Point,Washington Boring No.: B-3 (1 of 1) De th 19.0' Elew t 115 Location: 85 ft Northwest from Center Type of Boring: Hollow Stem Auger Started: 11/18/98 Completed: 11/18/98 1 Driller. Sample Sample N VALUE(bp0 A o y DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS Blows p PL %MC LL o > Elevation Depth Depth N r, v (Classification) REC/R D (Feet) `n Q 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Dark brown,dry,silty sand; fine sand. (SM) Alyj� 2.5 I ( I I I I I Loose to med. dense,brown, dry to 9 moist. 4.0 ' 4.5 I I I I Groundwater observed @ 5.5 ft. ' 7.5 I , Med. dense, gray, wet,silty sand; some 12 gravel, med. to coarse sand. (SM) 9.0 - --,--, --,--I--� -;- I 1 1 I I I I I 12.5 I • q I I I I is 14.0 , , 17.5 Dense. ' 1 46 19.0 Total depth @ 19 ft. , i , 1 , 1 1 1 • 'Number of blows required for a 140 lb hammer dropping 30"to dnve 2"O.D., 1.375"I.D.sampler a total of 18 inches in three 6"increments. The sum of the last two increments of penetration is termed the standard penetration resistance,N. — �� ,. I � �+ I Appendix B Sieve Analyses •,, �� I I I Particle Size Distribution Report 100 i. 90- 70 LU 60-- Z LL Z 50 LU UJ 40 CL 30 20 10 0 M 500 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE- mm COBBLES %GRAVEL %SAND %SILT �LAY 0.0 11.1 85.8 3.1 EVE PERCENT SPEC.' PASS? Soil Description S,ME FINER P ERCENT (X-NO) GREY BROWN SAND TRACE GRAVEL 5/8 in. 100.0 1/2 in. 97.1 3/8 in. 95.4 1/4 in. 93.0 Atterberg Limits #4 88.9 PL= LL= Pl= #8 80.3 #16 69.8 Coefficients #30 147.6 #50 5.5 D85= 3.55 D60= 0.824 D50= 0.633 #100 4.7 D30= 0.419 D15= 0.296 D10= 0.245 #200 3.1 Cu= 3.37 Cc= 0.87 Classification USCS= AASHTO= Remarks BORING SAMPLE B3-S,4 (no specification provided) Sample No.: FR1275 B Source of Sample: BORING SAMPLES Date: 11/13/98 Location: SMOKEY PT BLVD&SMOKEY PT.INDUSTRIAL PK.RD. ElevJDepth: 17.5'-19.0' Client: LS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES Project: LES SC14WAB TIRE CENTER Project No: 578-813032 Plate K 4r ■ 11 I ■ - ^ , ■ ti 1M , I I Particle Size Distribution Report 100 3 9 7 It I i 80 j E 70 E i i i Q:' lil i i i i E 7 Z u_ Z 50 i 3 W U ' W 40 d i E 30 1 *1 A 20 I j 10 t 0 IE I E E I ' 500 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE - mm %COBBLES %GRAVEL %SAND %SILT %CLAY 0.0 5.6 90.4 4.0 SIEVE PERCENT SPEC.' I PASS? Soil Description SIZE FINER PERCENT I (X=NO) GREY BROWN SAND TRACE SILT&GRAVEL 5/8 in. 100.0 1/2 in. 99.1 #4 94.4 #10 90.9 Atterbery Limits #20 83.5 PL= LL= P1= #30 76.1 #50 36.5 Coefficients #100 4.0 D 0.961 D 0.436 D 0 372 #200 4.0 85= 60= 50= D30= 0.268 D15= 0.192 D10= 0.163 Cu= 2.67 Cc= 1.01 Classification USCS= AASHTO= Remarks FR1275 C,BORING SAMPLE B2-S2 @ 7.5'-9.0' (no Spc cation provided) Sample No.: FR1275 C Source of Sample: BORING SAMPLES Date: 11/13/98 Location: SMOKEY PT.BLVD.& SMOKEY PT.INDUST.PK.RD ElevJDepth: 7.5'-9.0' Client: LS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES Project: LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER Project No: 578-8E032 Plate 2 - - - - �--- - - - �I r<Orr r l I I 1 1 milt _ ' I 1 I Particle Size Distribution Report m t t r � � C � i � � fi i ■ 8 z C 100 Jlw;� 90 I�I I I 70 IE I I? E II U.I 60 Z 5 W W 40 a s0 ICI l 20 10 III I' it :III IIIIi 500 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE-mm %COBBLES %GRAVEL %SAND %SILT %CLAY 0.0 0.0 93.8 6.2 SIEVE PERCENT SPEC.' I PASS? Soil Description SIZE FINER PERCENT (X-NO) #4 100.0 GRAY FINE SILTY SAND #10 99.7 #20 99.2 #30 98.4 Atterbem Limits #40 94.7 PL= LL= P1= #50 80.2 #100 24.9 Coefficients #200 6.2 D85= 0.326 D60= 0.231 D50= 0.207 D30= 0.162 D1 5= 0.122 D1 0= 0.101 Cu= 2.29 Cc= 1.12 Classification USCS= AASHTO= Remarks FR#1275 A, BORING SAMPLE B1-58 @ 32.5'-34.0' (no specification provided) Sample No.: FRI275 A Source of Sample: BORING SAMPLES Date: 11/13/98 Location: SMOKEY PT.BOULEVARD AND& SMOKEY PT.IND.PK. ElevJDepth: 32.5'-34.0' Client: LS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES Project: LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER Project No: 578-8E032 Plate 3 I' I � I i ■ r � 7�It1� I �� 7+ ' jaiYam!' ='1 ■AL L i -, LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER—SMOKEY POINT PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING WEDNESDAY, May 9, 2001 @ 2:30 P.M. ATTENDANCE Please print legibly. TITLE PHONE# & NAME COMPANY E-MAIL ADDRESS 3(00— 1 — 6crC Qf. G ZS 25 . 2�07 �LV R 11i Y')7,, !pn► 2n/= A L l wit l 't c,r C 2e G.i✓ q z— e c 1, e J\ tOM CAVANAUGH J FRANK DEL GAUDIO Vice President Project Superintendent Fisher&SOns Fisher.Sons r iNC0nPORATE0 I N C 0 R P 0 R A 1 E fl Tel:360-757-5679 P.O.xBox 534 �005 Tel:360-757-4094 • Fax:360-757-4005 625 Fisher Lane • 31p(� 625 Fisher Lane P.O.Box 534 Burlington,WA 98233 Burlington,WA 98233 wwwfishersons.com l'C www.fishersons.com email:tec@fishersons.com Job Phone �.�"��, 7' ?y "� ,� y, 7%a s CID l -Ll 3 Sir, 4ti1N G�O- L City of Arl;�- Fire Departm �f �jI N G August 3, 1999 To: Viking Automatic o c Sprinkler Com. 3245 NW Front Ave Portland, Oregon 97210 ATTENTION: Al Chabre, Project M r PROJECT: Les Schwab Tire Center New Retail Store Smokey Point/Arlington, WA Dear Mr. Chabre, We have reviewed your proposed Fire Protection Plan for the new Les Schwab Tire Center at Smokey Point/Arlington and have the following comments: 1. The required design criteria for rubber tire storage is NFPA 231D ( 1998 Edition). If you are unable to meet the required sprinkler density for the proposed storage height, we suggest that you consider augmenting the sprinkler system with high expansion foam as described in section 4-2. 2. Use of an approved Fire Pump may also be considered. 3. NFPA 13, does not address Special Occupancy Hazards. (See Section 1-4.7.4, 1996 Edition). The section on Miscellaneous Tire Storage limits the pile height to 5 feet on double row racks. We trust that you will find this information helpful. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me at(360) 435-3818. Dean T. Olsen Chief DTO:bb cc: Dave Anderson, City of Arlington File 137 N. McLeod . Arlington, WA 98223 360-435-3818 360-403-9267 fax �Y • A041 ■ ■ 1 RELATED FIRE FLOW MFQRIViATIQN DATE TIME WEATHER C� Jct. No. (or description of location from a Jot. No. Address —}.] -55-7- .. 5,� � -� 8�✓�, c: c� _ Reservoir Level _ Pump Status CIF Pump Rate so/zo,d 660S T99 092 Md -insw do J,l I a VG:T T 000Z-ET--1nf r ti • . m Lol M •. • i ' s 1 T SIT Tr 7lmmmmmr rr.. . . 7 JLL-19-2000 11:54 CITY OF MSUL PW 360 651 5099 P.03105 31 I � 1 f w . ( LT�__L L EF] � -1 � - . LLD ts 4Z G F-17 l IL a. cy^� u < 6:5 J I f u III Ya ' hod ' rry � � . �. Q U CD l+� t17 �' n7 r^� 71 z<0 I t� 112 I _ - - I ■ � 1■ 1 I -I � 1 1 1 I � I I 1 ■1 1 � � �� I 1 1 _ 1 1 � Jr 1 I �� 1 I I - - 1 I , � - � 1 1 I 1 I 1 • - - � - - 1 ' 1 I 1 I I 1 �� - _ - - .- 1 - 1 1 1 , I 1 - . I 1 I ■ _ _ - � _� _ ' � I I I � � _ �� _ 1 - - - t RELATED FIRE FLOW INFORMATION DATE (� TIME WEATHER Jot. No. (or description of location from a Jot. No. Address 17 J_ Reservoir Level Pump Status_ c. 3 — 4 �i Pump Rate AZ aem GO/170,d EEOS TS9 09€ Md -rsw .do Al I:) SS::T 000Z-6T--Pf ' PRESSURE, PIS m hD d�Y C] Vt O c17 p �,� p n p V7 Ca p U7 _ to -20 _ 1 f N�I 1411 f to NJ 0 ��. � � � �.. LLI-J � LU ll�l .� IEI �I�� I M M i . SO/20'd 660S TS9 092 Md -insw d0 1l1 I� �;:T T OOOZ-6T--Uf 1 v ` 1 1 I II 1 -� 1 r I J _93;26i2001 09:55 FAX 541 416 5190 LS CONSTRUCTION Z 001 A Division of Les Schwab Tire Centers of Oregon Inc. OWN LAO CONSTRUCTION CO. P.t]_Box 667 Nwev3lle, Oregon 97-754 t��4i6-5162 5133 "I*p n Rag.1 61280 wasi�,Mau#LSCCNC'11QPC TLLEFAX TRANSMITTAL Date: March 26, 2001 To; Paul Richart Company/Dept.: City of Arlington, Public Works Dept. Telefax no: (360) 435-3906 Pages: 2 From: Greg McDonald r.e.: New Les Schwab Smokey Point Comments: See attached letter. 0 LI ?�w � f 03/26/2001 09:56 F.42 541 416 5133 LS CONSTRUCTION z 002 4 Divislon of Lem Schwab Tire Centers of Oregon Inc, LES SCiiW� CONSTRUCTION CO. P.O. Box 667 Prineville, Oregon 97754 (541)416-5162 Oregon Reg,#61280 Wash.Rep.#L.SCONS'110PC FAX 416.3133 March 26, 2001 City of Arlington Dept. of Planning & Community Devlopment 238 North Olympic Ave. Arlington, WA 98223 Attn: Paul Richart Public Works Dept. r.e.: Storm Water Systems Development Charge Les SchwabTire Center Arlington (Smokey Point), WA 98223-8409 Project File No. MN-OM53 Les Schwab Tire Centers hereby requests a waiver of the Storm Water Systems Development Charge,as requested in the comments letter, dated Nov. 13, 2000, Item#I.K,due to the fact that the governing ordinance has been revoked. Greg McDonald Project-1 er • t; • � �L ii i� i _ r � CWA CONSULTANTS STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING BUILDING CODE CONSULTANTS 22421 N.E. 20th Street, Sammamish,WA 98074 (425)836-2833 FAX:(425)836-3707 E-Mail: chuckw@gte.net March 4, 2001 Les Schwab —01-4300 1997 Uniform Building Codes Type of Construction: V-N sprinklers Occupancy —M/S1/S3 Stories: 1 + mezzanine Seismic Zone: 3 Wind Speed: 80 Wind Exposure: C David W. Anderson Building Official City of Arlington 238 N. Olympic Avenue Arlington, WA 98223 Dear Mr. Anderson; We have completed our review of the Les Schwab Tire Center. The plans have been reviewed for compliance to the 1997 Uniform Building Code, 1997 Uniform Mechanical Code, 1998 Washington State Nonresidential Energy Code and 1998 Washington State Accessibility Requirements. NONSTRUCTURAL 1. The sprinkler system should be designed considering "High-Piled Combustible Stock" and tire storage per the Fire Code. Your Fire Department should review these requirements. 2. The construction joints at the top of walls that require protected openings (occupancy separations) should be listed construction joint assemblies. The listing number (UL, ICBO etc) along with construction details should be provided on the plans. The construction joints should be capable of accommodating the required deflection of the adjacent structural members. A detail should be provided where the wall is beneath the metal floor decking (both perpendicular and parallel to flutes) and roof/floor beams. The details on Sheet A8 should be justified. RECEIVED MAR 8 2001 CITY OF ARLINGTON 4� � Arlington — Les Schwab fire Center March 4, 2001 Page 2 of 4 3. Details should be provided for protection of all the through-penetrations and membrane penetrations of all fire resistive wall and floor assemblies. Section 710. These should be listed assemblies with listing number provided. 4. The one-hour protection of the steel truss at the occupancy separation wall (Sheet A4 must be a listed assembly. The listing details should be indicated on the plans. 5. The truss top chord at the steel truss/occupancy separation penetrates the one-hour fire resistive assembly. A detail indicating a method of protecting the penetrations that is acceptable to you should be provided on the plans. 6. Sheet A2.2 indicates that a 1-hour roll-down shutter is required over Window N while the window schedule indicates a 1-1/2 hour assembly. Only a one-hour assembly is required. 7. Section 1202.2.6 allows the deletion of the mechanical ventilation for the service bays if you determine that the door openings are sufficient. Note that this Section requires unobstructed openings. 8. Glazing within a 24" arc of either side of a doorway should be safety glazing. This included windows K and L adjacent to the main entry. The location of all safety glazing should be indicated on the plans. 9. You should approve of the roof covering indicated on Sheet A2.3. I am not similar with the spray applied foam insulation with a silicone finish as an approved covering. An ICBO ER should be provided. A minimum Class C rating is required. MECHANICAL 1. Details should be provided for seismic bracing of the unit and IR heater in the service bays. Otherwise the mechanical plans are acceptable as submitted. 1998 WASHINGTON STATE RESIDENTIAL ENERGY CODE (WAC 51) 1. The designer should note on the plans that all glazing shall be certified and labeled with its U-factor and solar heat gain coefficient by an independent agency licensed by the NFRC. Section 1312.1 2. Calculations should be provided to justify the 0.25 U-factor used for the exterior masonry walls. The default value from the NREC is 0.40, which will result in Target UA to be greater than the Proposed UA. 3. No slab edge insulation is required assuming that comment 2 can be resolved. lu �a �� u ■u� i ay.�v.� �a!�aa�uiy kuiw�� 1 I i Arlington — Les Schwab fire Center March 4, 2001 Page 3 of 4 1998 WASHINGTON STATE REGULATIONS FOR BARRIER-FREE DESIGN 1. All doors in the building that have a latch set or lock set should have lever-type operating hardware. Section 1106.3.1 2. Door thresholds should be shown as no higher than 1/2". The edges should be beveled at 1 vertical : 2 horizontal, with a maximum edge height of 1/4". Sections 1106.10.4, 1106.6 STRUCTURAL 1. For your information, "Special Inspection" is required for: Masonry construction Anchor bolts (Table 19-F) Steel deck welding Structural steel welding High strength bolting 2. The table provided on Sheet S401 for the development length should be updated to the 1997 UBC. See Section 1912.1. The development length for masonry construction should be based on Section 2107.2.2.3. 3. A subdiaphragm analysis must be provided for the roof diaphragm where the framing is parallel to the wall. The subdiaphragm must be capable of transferring all wall anchorage forces (Section 1633.2.8.1) to the main diaphragm. Section 1633.2.9, item 4. Details 1 and 5, Sheet A601 must be capable of transferring the lateral wall anchorage forces. 4. The wall anchors must comply with all of the requirements of Section 1633.2.8.1. The steel elements (including the subdiaphragm) must have the strength to resist 1.4 times the strength level forces calculated in Section 1633.2.8.1. Since ASD values are used for the seismic forces, the forces must be increased by a factor of 1.4 (strength level) in addition to the 1.4 increase required by item 4. 5. Since the seismic forces calculated by the engineer are based on allowable stress design, when using the seismic force Em (QoEh) the calculations must elevate the forces to strength level by multiplying the actual seismic forces by 1.4 in addition to Q0. The actual calculations used for the typical seismic forces are at working stress levels. 6. Drag struts must be provided in line with all shear walls. Drag struts must be capable of transferring all lateral loads from the point of origin to the shear wall itself. Detail 10/S601 must be justified. The only connection appears to be to the perpendicular wall. J • IO-PIT AF�-wv1 ----,A i vjRj�;m JJLJ l qwl�mm MIN gowq URa I y�"�'=pw ju" PmEqLpmw am Emm oul r. I `Z Arlington — Les Schwab i`ire Center March 4, 2001 Page 4 of 4 7. All drag struts, splices and their connections must have the strength to resist the maximum anticipated earthquake force Em. Section 1633.2.6. Equations 12-17 and 12-18 should be used for these members. 8. How are the lateral forces for the canopy area resisted? Both wind lateral and uplift forces must be considered. The seismic forces to the cantilevered columns must be based on an R=2.2. The footings must be capable of resisting the overturning and uplift forces. Please instruct the designer to indicate on a separate letter which sheet or detail the corrections may be found and to REVISE AND RESUBMIT THE PLANS. Please feel free to contact me if there are any questions. Sincerely; Chuck Williams SE CWA Consultants CC: Sconzo Hallstrom Fax (425) 455-9351 �. �� ,: I I I I City of Arlington Building Department FAX Date: March 8, 2001 Number of pages to follow: 4 Response needed Yes As requested FYI TO: Greg McDonald FIRM: Les Schwab FAX #: (541) 416-5133 FROM: Linda Friddle, City of Arlington Building Department RE: Plan review, comments from CWA Consultants Additional Comments: 238 N Olympic Ave Arlington WA 98223 Ph. (360) 435-0724 FAX (360) 435-3906 RLING TON ARLcj.'4GT0N FIRE DEPARTMh,-IT ON 137 North McLeod Avenue FIRE DrPT Arlington,Washington 98223 F)flE DEP" (360)435-3818 Fax 403-9267 Received: 02-09-01 lZettiriml:10. 2-20-01 bb TO: Dave Anderson FROM: TOM COOPER"/—C SUBJECT: PLAN REVIEWS DATE: 2-20-01 PLAN REVIEW/ PERMIT NO: 01-4388 TITLE: Les Schwab Tire Center COMMENTS: I do not have enough information to calculate the fire flows on this building. The site plan also does not show the fire hydrant placements. 1. What is the construction type? 2. What is the square footage of the building? 3. 1 assume it is one story building. Please forward the information to me and I will respond with the calculations. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. SCEIVED FEB 21 2001 GoO , JFARLINGTON Plan Review Frm.12/96 Y 7- r■i ti . a ■ riii L , ■ II II City of Arlington Building Dept FIRE DEPARTMENT CHECKLIST' p PERMIT DATE: NAME: ADDRESS: W O LEGAL: BUILDING USE: �t, a-'I K- OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION: A B -F E F H 1 1 2 12.113 1 4 1 2 1 3 1 1 2 1 2 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 7 I M R. S U 1.1 1.2 2 1 3 1 3 1172 3 4 5 1 2 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION I II III 1V V F.R. F.R. ONE-HOUR N ONE-HOUR N H.T. ONE-HOUR N Item inspected&completed Signature &Date: Site Plan: Approved Denied Access Requirements: Required: Fire lane: Sprinkler system: Alarm system: `l—►S Knox Box: Fire extinquishers: ,S Hydrant: # of hydrants required: L4AI4,Vow — Location of Hydrant: Location of Knox Box: A.44J Location of Fire Extinquishers: Y;(� Lem L,1,2L6!J.,U&6 Fire Flow requirements: C.t V e"-4-- Location of address on building: WC-3 7' 5!DLL o-71"�( �Y� '� Swr� 1 i I�le lb FIRE DEPT: 1 OL Date: Z S� SigMture BuildZortnUchecklist i � t tl f- r. ,��•,tip;``�,a,�� -/1 V i �.. a1Na �. ■ Innovative ■ LEONARD Structural Design ENGINEERING SERVICES MAR 2 0 2001 CITY OF ARLING ON March 15, 2001 Mr. Al Stancikas ( + I Sconzo Hallstrom Architects 919 124'h AVE NE, Suite 101 4rG+' Bellevue, WA 98005 RE: Les Schwab Tire Center/Arlington Response to Building Department Comments Dear Al: This letter is in response to the Structural Comments from the building department. The number of the response corresponds to the comment number. My responses are as follows: 1. The Structural Notes have been modified to indicate what requires Special Inspection. 2. The lap splice schedule has been modified. 3. Refer to the attached calculations. 4. Refer to the attached calculations. 5. Refer to the attached calculations. 6. .Refer to detail 9/S600 and attached calculations 7. Refe_r to fhe`attached calculations. r� 8. Refer to the modified foundation'plan and attached calculations. Please telephone with questions Sincerely, j:LEpN %S CG�'�Gt ��E�L"C%C�/ � � ,' tic• O • r Z Diana J. Le Aa Y Principal % 25854 � �FGISTE� EXPIRES 09-2�'.-,,©Z Attachments 0 1411 FOURTH AVENUE SUITE 1240 SEATTLE, WA 98101 PHONE 206.624.9393 FAX 206 624.9645 ■ ■ x _ .J., I I " - - - NEW - n ■ ME MEN � � _ ■ ■ immomm ■ ■ ■ ■ INEENE ■ ■ mom _ _lpommom ■ � 1 ■ ■ . ■ _ M ' ■ ■ ■ ■ . 00 ■ '■ ■ ' Les Schwab Tire Center Smokey Point Supplemental Structural Calculations \\'ASy�� G'. G EXPIRES Leonard Engineering -Services 1411 Fourth Avenue, Suite 1527 Seattle, WA 98101 Job #00-77 March 2001 •1 � iai . _ ■ r . -4 ■ 114 - rmirmi1r ■ ■, ■ ��- ■ rw _M 0 r 1 ■ J - NO ON MEN ME ■ _ ■ ■ INEENE NO ME ■ ' ■ ■ ME ON I I i Innovative ARD HONIDesin Igral ENGINEERING SERVICES 1411 FOURTH AVENUE, SUITE 1240 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 OF 14�ZI�IV457 W P Yr Fri � zo P 5/ = 5/0 z T��• ��' el o . PG116x xC,L-4T ■ i ■ Y M. on. ■ ■ ■ - ■ ■ ■ - Innovative IEONARODesignStructural ENGINEERING SERVICES 1411 FOURTH AVENUE, SUITE 1240 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 C�4 G&e 6:�)/li��/�G T/O�J �T Ex 7Ee/0 2 (15k1917711V4 Pete Pe UDIC UG13le) PPEovn ) Pvc� m T 6 �? = �Z (4W-z = J-mil 1V13 L� L F b I' nsre Urn 6,�-L) p60 W61,D A?- o� G4 7 z ' � I P 7-1115 15 YJN 01,7"1M/9TE L')1fil9l� 11K kono 15 7 5 zo �8� � gl � 1 0 aL 40,94W 1 � 1 MILL 1 ` 1 I� ■ I I e is- wctc. L�0NARD D t Design Structural I ENGINEERING 1411 FOURTH AVENUE, SUITE 1240 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 6 7-6 le iT;//t./E OR H e) STE t) 7- ��)09 07-e B-E 77,0&eA) OoT- or 1)Z191Ut //v MAL11Y 1,)IH, 4 45-t 3-s9 X -4-7' CO �6+4 -He7 Vi� JL Z,b A, -rnax7&7 �z ---------- maw -1, YII 1„ 1 ► P6 R y. I 4igm ■ ■ . . F 1 ■ 1 ; - . . 1 ■ . . MEMO! a Awl 11 ME 0 ■ ■ MEN ■ ■ ■ � LEI1� - ■ ■ � 1 . � Innovative `v HONARO Structural Design ENGINEERING SERVICES 1411 FOURTH AVENUE, SUITE 1240 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 d [�C DEC �T,�UT CCOLLEC-Tl�2J CO�v�vE�7-j0� �S 339 # ULT, Sl �Cf3f2 TQ bG COI cow � I WELD ON � 9 6 C*V(, L- 84 N 19 11J I N Fran &EP P E Z C C� �� = S , 3� ! PS`� --s/goo I - 1 i 1 I [WHARD Innovative Structural Design ENGINEERING SERVICES 1411 FOURTH AVENUE, SUITE 1240 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 y C'o�UGiJ/C/ . ; V TlitJ� f�� c�i'`rTL Ce =.Co Z C'e C� q s % C _ 113 Ar& z Z J9 �o Ce ��_, s s c e O&Z 8 &Iqo GOL "�8eS � `�� 15) OfQ I A VC0411 • All • 9 .1.5p rp6 91- 0- x u ■ �i Innovolive Wj UONARD Desgnrol ENGINEERING SERVICES 1411 FOURTH AVENUE, SUITE 1240 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 Z z T TL Z7) 34Z . V - 0( 1 2-7, 3g2 �3, 3g8 i ---p eftiS D vc-e l,�itir L f 7-E L U = 1 -3 3� � = 7P5$ Cap coy l! . T I ■ 1 46 i 1 . - .I 1 �1 ' Innovative "/ ' AROStructural ((( Design ENGINEERING SERVICES 141-FOURTH AVENUE, SUITE 1240 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 l i'C C 4/V o p e Pa x t a 7bO '�axr�I /7I 57� rTiT bC, pay,tal LL 215C 4 = r 31zil CH66L G-1 x 24 t t � c.0 M AJ d = ze" U = Z411 As io e - . �:7,5 ZD G-'1 n - 25,15 + Zno Y] f 5 67zi b� k� 2,1 - AZ As / ,g y e&,& 2 a = 1- ,5-1 ► + 13,zI � 5.3 Pst� Z�z 1 Z b 9A5 F5�� t 4�v z PO L _ � ll 1 �� . Innovative Design EN�,iNEERiNG SER VICES 1411 TLE W VENUE, SUITE 1240 SEATTLE, ASHINGTON 981101 c� Fb �1�E �oOTi�C 111571 - ,, # --� fie. a��Gu�d �c►z.�,t ca I� � i �' ,y � ' �� ■ _ _ � I �� ■ - - - - - + � � .� �i Innovative Title: Job# 9 Structural Dsgnr: Date: 3:32PM, 15 MAR 01 Y 1f ONARD 9 Desi n Description EN;INEERINu SERVICES 1, 1 FOURTH AVENUE, SUITE 1240 Scope: �C�LA.Std1 G-T-QIQ 8101 General Footing Analysis & Design Page 1 I L Description Canopy Column Footing [General Information Allowable Soil Bearing 2,500.0 psf Dimensions... Short Term Increase 1.330 Width along X-X Axis 6.500 ft Base Pedestal Height 0.000 in Length along Y-Y Axis 6.500 ft Seismic Zone 3 Footing Thickness 16.00 in Overburden Weight 50.00 psf Col Dim.Along X-X Axis 24.00 in Live& Short Term Combined Col Dim.Along Y-Y Axis 24.00 in fc 3,000.0 psi Fy 60,000.0 psi Min Steel% 0.0014 Concrete Weight 145.00 pcf Depth to Rebar 3.00 in Loads — -- - - - Applied Vertical Load... Dead Load 17.600 k ...ecc along X-X Axis 0.000 in Live Load 13.200 k ...ecc along Y-Y Axis 0.000 in Short Term Load k Creates Rotation about Y-Y Axis Creates Rotation about X-X Axis Applied Moments... (pressures @ left&right) (pressures @ top&bot) Dead Load k-ft k-ft Live Load k-ft k-ft Short Term 71.800 k-ft k-ft Creates Rotation about Y-Y Axis Creates Rotation about X-X Axis Applied Shears... (pressures @ left&right) (pressures @ top&bot) Dead Load k k Live Load k k Short Term k k Summary `yfe,� Footing'Design OK 6.50ft x 6.50ft Footing, 16.Oin Thick, w/Column Support 24.00 x 24.00in x O.Oin high DL+LL DL+LL+ST Actual Allowable Max Soil Pressure 972.3 2,804.8 psf Max Mu 7.548 k-ft Allowable 2,500.0 3,325.0 psf Required Steel Area 0.218 in2 "X'Ecc, of Resultant 0.000 in 20.973 in "Y'Ecc,of Resultant 0.000 in 0.000 in Shear Stresses.... Vu Vn" Phi 1-Way 24.779 93.113 psi X-X Min. Stability Ratio No Overturning 1.500 :1 2-Way 19.199 186.226 psi Y-Y Min. Stability Ratio 1.850 (c)1983-98 ENERCALC KW-0603311,Ver 5.0.6, 15-Jul-1998,Win32 - I - I I 1 1 momm—. �y � % . � 1 . ass■''-ram - - - - - Innovolive Title: Job# NARD Slrucrurol Dsgnr: Date: 3:32PM, 15 MAR 01 LEO Design Description ENGINEERING SERVICES 1411 FOURTH AVENUE, SUITE 1240 Scope SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 Rev:506001 General Footing Analysis & Design Page 2 Description Canopy Column Footing Footing Design Shear Forces ACI 9-1 ACI 9-2 ACI 9-3 Vn'Phi Two-Way Shear 19.20 psi 18.82 psi 7.00 psi 186.23 psi One-Way Shears... Vu @ Left 9.00 psi 24.78 psi 10.28 psi 93.11 psi Vu @ Right 9.00 psi -2.55 psi -1.64 psi 93.11 psi Vu @ Top 9.00 psi 8.26 psi 3.08 psi 93.11 psi Vu @ Bottom 9.00 psi 8.26 psi 3.08 psi 93.11 psi Moments ACI 9-1 ACI 9-2 ACI 9-3 Ru/Phi As Req'd Mu @ Left 2.82 k-ft -0.86 k-ft -0.55 k-ft 18.5 psi 0.22 in2 per ft Mu @ Right 2.82 k-ft 7.55 k-ft 3.12 k-ft 49.6 psi 0.22 in2 per ft Mu @ Top 2.82 k-ft 2.58 k-ft 0.95 k-ft 18.5 psi 0.22 in2 per ft Mu @ Bottom 2.82 k-ft 2.58 k-ft 0.95 k-ft 18.5 psi 0.22 in2 per ft Soil Pressure Summary Service Load Soil Pressures Left Right Top Bottom DL+ LL 972.33 972.33 972.33 972.33 psf DL+ LL+ ST 0.00 2,804.78 972.33 972.33 psf Factored Load Soil Pressures ACI Eq. 9-1 1,454.99 1,454.99 1,454.99 1,454.99 psf ACI Eq.9-2 0.00 3,926.70 1,361.26 1,361.26 psf ACI Eq. 9-3 0.00 1,713.20 593.91 593.91 psf ACI Factors (per ACI,applied internally to entered loads) ACI 9-1 &9-2 DL 1.400 ACI 9-2 Group Factor 0.750 UBC 1921.2.7"1.4"Factor 1.400 ACI 9-1 &9-2 LL` 1.700 'ACI 9-3 Dead'Load Factor 1A00 _` UBC 1921.2.7"0.9"Factor 0.900 ACI 9-1 &9-2 ;ST 1.700 ACI 9-3 Short Term Factor 1.400 ....seismic=ST': 1.100 (c)1983-98 ENERCALC KW-0603311,Ver 5.0.6,15-Jul-1998,Win32 1 InnovativeSiruct LEONARDIDesign ral ENGINEERING SERVICES 1411 FOURTH AVENUE, SUITE 1240 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 7 -ft 30. It 16,00 in ay. •' I � 6.50 ft I l I t-- I a� t i�y,.3°s30. k�4,-Xr.l T� I 6.50 ft i r 6.50 ft S - ♦ r I I I 7. "Section 1202.2.6 allows the deletion of the mechanical ventilation for the service bays if you determine that the door openings are sufficient Note that this Section requires unobstructed openings." Refer to sheet A2, Vt Floor Plan. 8. "Glazing within 24"arc of either side of a doorway should be safety glazing. This included windows K and L adjacent to the main entry. The location of all safety glazing should be indicated on the plans." Refer to sheet A2, 1 sc Floor Plan. 9. "You should approve of the roof covering indicated on Sheet A2.3. I am not.......A minimum Class C rating is required." Refer to sheet A2.3, Roof Plan. Mechanical 1. "Details should be provided for seismic bracing of the unit and IR heater in the service bays. Otherwise the mechanical plans are acceptable as submitted." Refer to the mechanical drawings for revision for the seismic brace required. For additional response comments please refer to response from Glumac International. (Attached) 1998 Washington State Residential Energy code(WAC 51) 1. "The designer should note on the plans that all glazing shall be certified and labeled with its U-factor and solar heat gain coefficient by an independent agency licensed by the NFRC. Section 1312.1" Refer to the mechanical drawings for revision. 2. "Calculations should be provided to justify the 0.25 U-factor used for the exterior masonry walls. The default value from the NREC is 0.40, which will result in Target UA to be greater than the Proposed UA." Refer to the mechanical drawings for revision. 3. "No slab edge insulation is required assuming that comment 2 can be resolved." Refer to the response for#2. For additional response comments please refer to response from Glumac International. (Attached) 1998 Washington State Regulations for Barrier-Free Design 1. "All doors in the building that have a latch set or lock set should have lever-type operating hardware. Section 1106.3.1" Refer to sheet A5 Door schedule notes for revision. 2. "Door thresholds should be shown as no higher than%" The edges should be beveled at 1 vertical:2 horizontal, with a maximum edge height of%" Section 1106.10.4, 1106.6" Refer to details 10/A6 and revised detail 12/A6 for response. i i Structural For structural response comments please refer to response from Leonard Engineering Services. (Attached) If you have any further questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you, Al Stancikas Project Manager Sconzo/Hallstrom Architects PSC CC:Greg McDonald—LS Construction Bill Walker—Sconzo Hallstrom Architects PSC Diana Leonard—Leonard Engineering Services Larry Oliver—Glumac International f 1 I y „ref CITY OF ARLINGTON CONSTRUCTION PERMIT ❑ COMBINATION ❑ BUILDING ❑ MECHANICAL dl ❑ PLUMBING ❑ s1cN PERMIT NO. j OWNLR, pp I;Con/, MAIL AODRLSS SFfP lb L_t.%Irl� �o CITY LIP PHONE 'Pa rLc>J�,25 cry RCJ(ITECTOR DESIL,NER MAIL ADDRESS CITY ZIP PHONE ScovZo(,FNLRAI CVNRAC CTQR VR MAIL AOURE55 CITY ZIP PHONE LIC NS / L'S CoNS-[72.uL L-?C 014L I j oYL T10 co. P o. x Ce_o`1 �Q,+.REV((_cr G aSZ of-7 7 Sq �Syl � ��4 5(G Z MI(IIANICAL CONTRACTOR MAIL ADDRESS CITY ZIP PHONE LICENSE / PLUMBING CONTRACTOR MAIL ADDRESS CITY ZIP PHONE LICENSE/ CLASS OF WORK L NI W ❑AUDITION []ALTERATION ❑REPAIR ❑DEMOLI IION ❑BUILDING RELOCATION QVA UA110NOF WORK Z 1 34 ,ago. oo A DESLI110 WORK n rRurUSI U USL Ut BUILDING I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICA- TION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT ALL PROVI- LL f,Al OF�C RIP LION 01 PRUPL R T Y t (5I10wN RE LOW UR AT T ACII TOUR CO SI SIONS OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK J J LUI BLUCk Of WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HERIN OR NOT.THE u GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR � TAX ID NUMBER FROM PROPERTY TAX STATEMENT LOCAL LAW REGULATING CONSTRUCTION OF THE PERFORMANCE OF i �L. (ps' Z.. ?J-- j CONSTRUCTION.PERMIT EXPIRES 1 YEAR FROM ATE OF ISSUANCE. jJOB AUURI SS SIGNATURE f CONTRACTOR OR AVIHORIZ DATE 1!6 (OPPICK USR ONLY) I , PLUMBING LOCI IANICALI No. WPB OP PIXTURB PRO a i FIXTURRS NO. TYPB OP EQUIPM13NT PL'll s':FIXTURUS ATRR CLOSE) ILRf IR COND.UNITS-FI.P. PA. 1 W .list” IA711TU0 lWRI0[%tA710N UNITS-II.P.B/L T d .U'Ki • AVATORY(WASII BASIN) OILRRS-II.P.RA. IIOW[RL AS FIR13D A.C.UNrrS-TONNAOBBA. ITCIIBN SINK A DISPOSAL 7ORCPD AIR SYSMMS-B.T.U. MRA\ ISIIWASIIRR ALL IIRATURS- B.T.U. M JIUNDRYTRAY NITIICATCRS- B.T.U. M .1,OnIPS WASIIBR VAPORATIVBCOOI.MS ATRR 11 rU\TRR ,LOTTIIN DRYERS RINAL RNTILATION PAN r )RINKINO POUNTAIN RANG131100D COMMB$'_IAL 'LOOR DRAIN AIR IIANDLINtl j I CPM ACUUM IIItRAKRRS -TOVL LOOP DRAINS-RAINLRADBRS TTTAI. ACLI d!CIIIMNI?Y 'INK .RRVICR-BAR Mr. A7CR TIR A PII/IN0 u Io S—S3.00,•ddnl. 3.7S vl men( IIIt FAUR be rovlded SUB TOTAL SUB TOTAL PPJEMI'P PPJtMIT TOTAL PBB TOTAL PBB SIDI.YARO LIBALK STRLIASLIBACK REAR YARD SETBACK PLAN CIILCK NUMBER PLAN CHECK FEE ?� J FEE RECEIPT NO. UST /U ��l' LOT ARF A VACANT SITE 4.1b 6t D'YES ONO FEES VALUATION FEE IYPL UI CONS OCCUPANCY GROUP NO.Of DWELLING UNITS PLAN CHECKING NG / -s I -513 SI/L UI BLUU. NO.Of STORII.S MAX.000.LOAD BU'LDING 1 I 2 Pi I IMRING I IRE SPRINKLERS REQUIRED AYES ❑NO MECHANICAL COMMENTS STATE BLDG.CODE ENERGY CODE SURCHARGE PENALTY U.B.C. SEC.)0](s) RECEIVED WATER/SEWER FEES JAN 16 2001 TOTAL 0 l— y(1``o PERMIT VALIDATION CITY OF ARLI NGTON WHEN PROPERLY VALIDATED TIN THIS SPACE) THIS IS YOUR PERMIT 6 RECEIPT PAID CRN BY cc:ASSESSOR,APPLICANT,TREASURER,BLDG DEPT. BUILUING(7ffIC1AL DATE RECORDS COPY u»> n -0 199 Lf.TYPE III PERIMETER LANDSCAPE BB man 8. (35th AVEE.) (HWY. 99) (� y E. 4^i m O m 39 '��7 > >' • 5i w w r r > = r If MY W W ZZn3'ski�R tQ g CF ` �l Z Z Z 0 $`OaP.� � F � r rr- r w I� 5_a A►Q $3�N� I C 1 'vim l" ,� /j .I-/i > s _ In i 1 m n o A �2e ui D n \ � IN p Man w m m �� OC� Cn��Pl.>>�� a 3 � •'� � a � � Ii � 1 I�ij (gN1 <�'■GIDr �f1�2ZZ'�Gi,to ♦ — _ — lIr Ir 0 A N I p�<^n�aNi`PMD p( Orr I.0^n i Y • w !]L1Ll'a( ' co ■ Fi I Y j13 ID ra G m I IZ a I rn10 I "� 1=I i a jr 1 31 Ty N tiw- €I : 3 sl � � � Nlny I •) 1 <?> o S I td " I to U U W u. (•• !r--^ :;�Y-, t,_'''.e :- pV 7 7 �, T ,-a it T F �-�--��-. -- ' .0 N m I w .• - �T - ..•�.�4 z Dr = s I I I J O > I ® � 'z m X I - z 0 I n� I N O I>O I>O > I I • m I I I ZONING:HC I I �,. m DROUGHT TOLERANT NATIVE fF 426 L.F.PERIMETER LANDSCAPE I I m u u !�' U m U I PLANTINGS:MA,AUC d CAD N m rr .. Y �i S p i ,a nl D m m i Y U Sl1 y m n a c (_t}{J a RPaXM y� dot g9 : dI a .i `�� a i 1r 3r oil y n D f gtF2 S aY F L'L' OFF �D. p >� u> , mr ^ D .�i �°p� Z W H g Y u i G� rL O i m� p a Tn <� m I i. vy4 e Z ,. n Z _ G —1 y 0 C. s a w U r V L � pp{ L ➢ '� r �� T a �•� 1y1m �- J o oN )cam �yG .Ill T T :n U• !�' ? Y L Fi �' p7 AL ,m !F a �- C.+Nv 70p� _b fA(��i C .. 8 Il sa�a a g$ a S �� Z 4 � g � ' •�° '°� < o v�� A".1, AU G of 8r; 16 1 e 0 1c"i i o i u � n y�pi, �}�z zio4 tk� Z 1_ yy S f SI ' fk e (n U mp - y mrr wm �%•� m c' `C,-1 mm,n Z o 9 `y 4 by € Z ]TCo To iC 1� M.N. Z Q 6 p e .. R pp C7 A DUuD 1@n ppp Q yU ry pprII = 7.u� W1V pNp c(7�lI In_p_ Y p ci ,�N U F 7C B�7 q ar0 a 29 ^�- m" ` U� OON vpD 1QA m T e,0•.Imo. r 5 B •` { E i cR :i � a U 1� z• Q �A� • m v� cn q Cif R.m Ui A 7C m-R Jwa v m�> Ls u / B� • S� k q 7 )Z8C 4 ams a Cv, .-.r,^y ;T ."� (m1 .08C= '"!I!L•O m�.l �!?n z ' L 11� L I / i y � €' F L 4iL i O tn� m yL: ♦ po 9?.A i �� V � a � Q ■ � � o > w w Q C. � g d yy bN s pia 0 Er ►�-y•1 CC 100""C C-` go 0 Cl Q1 DESIGN BY:HC5 Ir visions - LANDSCAPE PLAN E Ez S LE$`, H S li jtSL&f&lon O. DRAWN BY: MJH ® • I DATE: 9-5-00' A ertt, eg'a 7 54 -416- 5 T99L5133 f j ISSUE DATE: Ilrgca� ldcnr _o�GO INUMDVIDAH° %TI7i TIRE EYI'ERS LOCATED IN': ARLINGT )N, WASHINGTON ... Dealer CCU IFORNIA•MON IANA•NLVADA -- SMOKEY POINT BLVD. N.E. �J - (35th AVE. N.E.) (HWY. 99) w Ad xUX4 CA 'ry IN l�Y D D D D D D D D D D D D D >_ � = I �1 0 �� N f� • •• `I ' a z z t z z z z z z z I I • 1 �/ n n U N n a O O U J U O O D a U O U O TI Q II W N N N N �, O O /J N 11, 0, Z i WL'1 �rlWwu I I 1 1 II ' I -1 � a -, � � - L rn T T. T- m 1 I ( I I I I 1 S' V' D tl- 9 ? In $ .3 IT I i I I I 1 IIII I W W J J J J I• 1 I ,,'.�� I I 1 & aa I3 N N N ta, N W. Y, In ,N7, 11, 1N1, Y, INI, N V, W. V� VI -.-� I xxXXX1Lw � � � D = II I 0 I I I ; I m k ] D • I ° 1 � � I �� . . II � m I ; � 1 '�� '•- - N I I 111 ............. = I - I i I I• 1 . ............................................. . Z� I I 1 . II ti fn O'� r'•; Y 7 AMile . I I I r I t < " I } do :r i - - - — - - -- - - 1 o � me ro O � uuu �� ri-rn'> -cir�_ O ! N „�tZ r ni n' yT'j'rm D� Q 1 X m` q 2g `a r 4� as xvnu t �irr•Pz� 1m 1 •gsd am U" n �� W� � . � > a Oc o Z t- / 2� �i i� ?Z ;vg =S?I►� j"i p_�vpWR(nx_1 U ZZ�8�y -IL D _n L Ti im 4: _LT m2H N 1� ' / iy � >ISY an V ,� a.t °> �iy_ Z `� _pI -1 -� -p1 p m l y _ 7 n- Ll T i -1 (/ ( m pA -O -1 3 r« Z 2 Q $f 2 �^n 1 2 n �N p Ll2 W nZ �b[,VK 1_r N ° ,�,r 1 I Or 4� -1' I ~QAj- f, Orr- ~ f r-_p m �Sj 2 c� t�D C UU ZZ rn1 i 11 U �/1� ter L• Z (�>' .v.IF Z c2 �• '1 iZ '�' 71 U D m -1„ U 5 4� �� UJ A _10 �'� mlt3g7 >� ��' OO yy z r H -w' -1 N v.- -1 C CD v3 O _ �'- Cl O- -i AZ Zr Z 70p DC , r ]] n H,d i wX 1;1 p 7 n (-ri U .'uz A;a °-1M Inr.�m,u Zr -Wi r= m V 1 yi_a 1� C r his y Doi Cy (nx�� G w C b {a0 �O < • r 1 F LL' D Z> m .0 loi", 1•IS D Z arc rf" Z- L 3 l C S �••�••� .�!! ;(t Z ac W6 m m 1 1 So m ° p� ]-y.' ��1 mGZ�'�n_ I"j Z Z 1 Z W Fir, L ZZ J O G Op m O�.« .X O 4� r A x 1 OD �zQ g 1� m , ! �, n ,� �" _ �n mn�Z° R�� g �`d V F g3>6 ��_ $ _ �s _�� >7�Cg �� m m r -, 1 z v Rt�2 1-1 ul, v lP r T C ��11 �- E F A T Ln o O r i p Z W Z� �U R G) � /•+ i _� Fri H7� p N D i0 70 y1 X ' �Y -� �'' W V�f A I► I:1 Z '?r 1•Z Oti m V -11w- � S-Zrwir, 'p1 Z .••y 2 �Y', p1 3 (�' 1F r�y� yf1Q�.�,,'L� 3 �LN � � D 11(" � L7c�� pp 7-1 L" v `••'. FY T .Fn � ,, F; (><) L S Wig 7 Yu,H; �i � 2 m rePY O Zr ,<„L, l,Ca',ti"o p�'' �w (gill '" .]1 (1 t7 •ON f _pI Z m rm V. nFN,2n< - II rr7N m `AIL I< �x mN.D >Dn F CD > Q��Z Z b IL p , rn 051� I1n f� 1VC Vr Z mr < m ,n ZZ Td .✓ }}-�� r'• tt W A..{p- •y 0V >. Vp >�. A(p = 2 0 i52 = ��V?7' u' rn� Z,n °SY nri �p1Nn rCn Z de— i Opp Fu ' > < r� 7r74LLf WiY O � y o� 1 � (R� Yi D O�o nt�11 y- 77pp' 6z -S�i M1 D,�Z 7 N j rSl r>-Z D 'n W S Q Zt<,1g,<� U, A �1 O� F'�7a ; •z �4 tyn !� Z 1'll��" Qr Lt 1w ;1�`�QL1p� �' nFo ;D"' �n Cyi� Dam �:"OI`ii, oy v p o`iy ifRrc�[ Z ~F y r °� ° ° o p 1 LL 7o tymn ,77pp�x Z c n, L 0 W n p W G m 12 A "D4 o_H i l I DESIGNED BY:MG5 IeV1S10J15 I �{ DRAWN BY.- hIGS IRRIGATION PLAN IRES DES scHwAB LS Construction Co. 1-- ® PRINEVILLE,ORECON ' DATE 9-8-00 ,A Northwest's 541-416-9162 541-416.5133 fax ISSUE DATE: A largest ® " WITH TIRE CENTERS LOCATED IN- r �-A- ' Independent� ORE -WASI ANCTON-IDAliO WASHINGTON 1ue iARLINGTON, I au.IFORNIA-MONTavn:NEVADA I Dealer _ ' PRESSURE, PIS m hD d�Y C] Vt O c17 p �,� p n p V7 Ca p U7 _ to -20 _ 1 f N�I 1411 f to NJ 0 ��. � � � �.. LLI-J � LU ll�l .� IEI �I�� I M M i . SO/20'd 660S TS9 092 Md -insw d0 1l1 I� �;:T T OOOZ-6T--Uf