The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About102 E Division St_PWD3104_2026 Complete package constitutes all items. Only complete submittals will be accepted. Civil - Submittal Requirements, Type I: ï² Complete Application; ï² Construction Plans including cut / fill quantities; ï‚§ 2 full size plan sets 22â€ x 34â€ ï‚§ PDF file of the complete plan set ï‚§ 2 full size set of landscape plans 22â€ x 34â€ ï² Marysville Utility plans, if applicable (2 sets); ï² Drainage Analysis including calculations and downstream analysis (2 sets) and (PDF file); refer to Stormwater Drainage Requirements; ï² Geotechnical Report (2 sets) and (PDF file); ï² SEPA is required if 500 or more cubic yards of cut / fill is proposed (not required if included with a Land Use Permit); ï² Grading cut / fill quantity: _______________________________;750CY Cut / 600CY Fill ï² Design Vehicle â€“ demonstrate turning radius include 45â€™ Fire truck, dual axle, 256 inch wheel base; ï² Complete Streets Checklist ï² Drafts of easement(s) dedication(s), and/or CAPE(s) for review; ï² Flood Hazard Permit Application and required documentation if project is within 100 year flood plain; refer to Flood Hazard guidance documents; ï² Construction Calculation Worksheet; ï² NPDES Permit (if required); See Storm Water Drainage Report, New or Redevelopment Flowcharts; ï² Assurance Device will be required prior to Permit Issuance (Bond or Assignment of Funds); ï² Permit Fee due at time of permit submittal. Grading / Paving / Drainage Submittal Requirements, Type II: ï² Complete Application; ï² Construction Plans including import/export quantities; ï‚§ 2 full size plan sets 22â€ x 34â€ ï‚§ PDF file of the complete plan set ï² Drainage Analysis including calculations and downstream analysis (2 sets) and (PDF file); refer to Stormwater Drainage Requirements; ï² Geotechnical Report (2 sets) and (PDF file); ï² SEPA is required if 500 or more cubic yards of cut/fill is proposed (not required if included with a Land Use Permit); ï² Grading cut / fill quantity: _______________________________; ï² Construction Calculation Worksheet; ï² NPDES Permit (if required); See Storm Water Drainage Report, New or Redevelopment Flowcharts; ï² Permit fee due at time of permit submittal. Right of Way Submittal Requirements, Type III: ï² Complete Application; ï² Construction Plans; ï² Traffic Control Plan; ï² Road Closure Request; ï² Temporary Erosion & Sediment Control (TESC) Plan; ï² Certificate of Insurance with the City of Arlington named as Additional Insured; ï² Assurance Device will be required prior to Permit Issuance (Bond or Assignment of Funds); ï² Engineers Estimated Cost of Construction; $______________________________________; ï² Permit fee due at time of permit issuance. Page 2 of 2 COMPLETE STREETS CHECKLIST Community & Economic Development City of Arlington â€¢ 18204 59th Avenue NE â€¢ Arlington, WA 98223 â€¢ Phone (360) 403-3551 Project Name: Email: Project Manager/Owner: Phone No.: Description of Scope: Roadway Classification: ï² Principal ï² Minor ï² Collector ï² Non-Arterial ï² Boulevard ï² Alley Cross Connection Type: ï² Downtown ï² Urban Center Connector ï² Neighborhood Yield ï² Downtown Neighborhood ï² Industrial Access ï² Mixed Use Overlay ï² Urban Village Main ï² Neighborhood Corridor ï² Smokey Point Corridor ï² Urban Village Neighborhood ï² Neighborhood Curbless Page 1 of 7 Revised 8/18 1. CHANNELIZATION Average Daily Trips: Should re-channelization Contact Public Works 360-403-3512 be considered in the project scope? Speed Limit: Current image or typical existing cross-section of street in project area (showing lane configuration): 2. PAVEMENT CONDITIONS Does the existing road maintain the minimum Overall Condition Index (OCI) as set ï² Yes ï² No forth in the Transportation Benefit District? Contact Public Works for current OCI and Standards 360-403-3512. Has the installation of traffic circles been considered? ï² Yes ï² No Is this project on the cityâ€™s Transportation Improvement Plan? ï² Yes ï² No Should pavement repair be considered through this project? ï² Yes ï² No If yes, please explain. 3. PEDESTRIAN INFRASTRUCTURE Is this area identified in the City of Arlington Pedestrian Improvement Plan? If so, ï² Yes ï² No have the recommendations been met? Explain how or why not. People walking or using a mobility device: Is the project fully served by sidewalks, ï² Yes ï² No accessible curb ramps, and safe crosswalks? If not, are new/repaired sidewalks, curb ramps, and crosswalks included in the project? Page 2 of 7 Revised 8/18 Explain how or why not. Are existing sidewalk in good condition? ï² Yes ï² No Has an initial assessment of trees and sidewalk conditions been conducted with ï² Yes ï² No and engineer and arborist/landscape architect? Are there missing sidewalk in the project area? ï² Yes ï² No If yes, explain how this will be corrected? Crossing Width (number of lanes) _______________ Controlled Stop Spacing ______________________________ Does the project propose mid-block crossings to reduce distance between ï² Yes ï² No crossings? Is there pedestrian refuge or flashing beacons in the project area? ï² Yes ï² No Explain pedestrian existing crossing convenience, visibility and safety; does the project target improvements to accessibility? Have the addition of curb bulb outs been considered to slow traffic and reduce ï² Yes ï² No crossing width? Describe how the building(s) have been oriented to address the adjacent roadway with visible connected sidewalks that encourage and enhance pedestrian circulation. Describe pedestrian facilities added such as benches, trash receptacles, visual interest, shade and plantings. Page 3 of 7 Revised 8/18 4. BICYCLE INFRASTRUCTURE Is this area identified in the City of Arlington Bicycle Improvement Plan? ï² Yes ï² No If so, have the recommendations been met? Explain how or why not. Is the project site fully served by bicycle facilities? If not, are new bicycle facilities ï² Yes ï² No included in the project? Explain how or why not. Does this project meet the needs of a variety of bicycle users? ï² Yes ï² No (Family vs. Commuter) How? Describe how the building(s) serve and invite bicycle traffic, e.g. covered bike racks, visual interest, smooth transitions, bicycle focused travel ways. 5. TRANSIT INFRASTRUCTURE Transit Classification: ï² Major Transit Route ï² Minor Transit Route Is the project identified on the City of Arlington Transit Expansion Plan? ï² Yes ï² No ï‚· Are there bus stops on the project area? ï² Yes ï² No ï‚· Are all bus stops in the project area within close proximity to a controlled ï² Yes ï² No crossing? ï‚· Average distance between bus stops in/adjacent to project area? ï‚· If bus stops are less than 0.2 miles (1056 ft.) apart, can stops be consolidated? Explain: Page 4 of 7 Revised 8/18 Does the stop provide cover and seating? ï² Yes ï² No How or why not. Does the project add visual interest, shading, lighting, plantings, or traffic buffers? ï² Yes ï² No Explain how the project improves transit usersâ€™ comfort and convenience. Is the transit stop ADA accessible? If not, how does the project propose to provide ï² Yes ï² No accessibility? How or why not. 6. FREIGHT INFRASTRUCTURE Is the project on an identified City of Arlington Freight Route? ï² Yes ï² No Does the project area meet the curb radius and clearance standards? ï² Yes ï² No Are there spot improvements needed for the project area? (pavement depth) ï² Yes ï² No 7. STREET TREES AND LANDSCAPING Describe any existing street trees and landscaping assets within the project limits that warrant project investment to sustain (e.g. preservation of street trees): Is there an opportunity to plant trees or expand landscape? ï² Yes ï² No Page 5 of 7 Revised 8/18 Will there be long-term street tree and landscaping maintenance required for this ï² Yes ï² No project? How will the maintenance of plants be addressed? Are street median planting proposed in the project area? ï² Yes ï² No Does the project include any environmental elements? E.g.: street trees, reduced ï² Yes ï² No pavement, bio-infiltration, vegetated bump outs, native/drought tolerant vegetation, or other environmental improvements to be implemented with the project? Explain how or why not. 8. URBAN DESIGN AND PLANNING If an adopted subarea or action plan applies to this project, has its ï² Yes ï² No recommendations relevant to improved streets/ROW been met? Explain how or why not. Has connectivity been improved for all modes of travel? ï² Yes ï² No Explain specifically for each mode of travel. Is there an opportunity to implement artistic elements (e.g. sidewalk inlays, ï² Yes ï² No creative street furniture, or bollards or planters, creative bicycle racks etc.) in the project area? Explain how. Page 6 of 7 Revised 8/18 Describe Public Art or Art Opportunities: ï² Yes ï² No Arlington Art Council may be a resource 360-435-3778 or arlingtonartscouncil.net CITY USE ONLY Approval Determination ï² This project meets or exceeds the City of Arlington Complete Streets Standards. ï² This project will meet the City of Arlington Complete Street Standards with the following changes. ï² This project does not meet the City of Arlington Complete Street Standards. Please revisit the following sections and resubmit. Variance Determination ï² This project does not meet the City of Arlington Complete Street Standards. Project proponent has applied for a variance through the variance process and variance has been approved. ï² The variance has been denied, please revisit the following sections and resubmit. Page 7 of 7 Revised 8/18 CONTRUCTION PLAN REVIEW & INSPECTION FEE WORKSHEET Community & Economic Development Department City of Arlington ï€ ï€ ï€ ï€ ï€ ï¬ 18204 59th Avenue NE ï¬ Arlington WA 98223 ï¬ (360) 403-3551 This form is to be completed and submitted with Type I , Type II Type III Construction Permit Application. 1) Based on permit type requested (Type I, Type II or Type III), complete the form as follows: ï¬ï€ Type I permits complete all sections. ï¬ Type II permits complete as follows: - Grading Only - Complete Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control (TESC). - Stormwater Drainage Only - Complete the Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control and Stormwater Drainage Section for Public or Private ï¬ï€ Type III permits complete the Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control (TESC). 2) The developer shall enter the quantities shown on the construction drawings into the Construction Calculation Worksheet. This document is used to determine the amount of plan reivew and inspection fees due to the city. 3) Excel will auto-calculate the relevant fields and subtotals throughout the document. Only the 'Quantity' columns should be completed. 4) The summary page calculates the fees due at intake for Civil and Stormwater Drainage construction permits only. This does not include fees for Grading or those required by other departments or agencies. Grading fees are based on Cubic Yard Quantity and shall be calculated at time of permit submittal. Grading fees shall be paid at permit submittal. 5) If an item that is part of your project does not exist in the spreadsheet complete the Write-In-Items section with the item, quantity and associated unit cost. There are a few unit prices that are blank, please complete them accordingly. 6) Inspection fees shall be calculated for Private Development during the review process and shall be paid upon permit issuance. PROJECT COSTS PUBLIC TOTAL PRIVATE TOTAL TOTAL PROJECT COST $ 172,479.38 $ 107,506.25 $ 279,985.63 OK PLAN REVIEW & INSPECTION FEES PLAN REVIEW & INSPECTION FEE (6% of Project Value) $ - GRADING FEE (4) (Cubic Yard ) $ - Review fees due at time of submittal Total Review Fees Due $ - An Assurance Device such as a Performance Bond or Assignment of Funds needs to be on file with the City of Arlington prior to permit issuance. The Assurance Device shall be 150% of the Construction Calculation Worksheet which are as follows: ï¬ Road and Alley (Public) ï¬ Stormwater Drainage and Grading (Public) ï¬ Utilities (Public) ï¬ Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control (Public and Private) ASSURANCE DEVICE Base Calculation of Performance Device $ 172,479.38 PERFORMANCE DEVICE 150% Amount Due $ 258,719.06 Base Calculation of Maintenance Device $ 168,491.25 MAINTENANCE DEVICE 20% Amount Due $ 33,698.25 1 Rev 7/2017 CONSTRUCTION CALCULATION WORKSHEET TEMPORARY EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL Include Public Improvements & Private Development Description Unit Price Unit Quantity Cost Reference # Backfill & compaction-embankment $ 6.50 CY $ - Check dams $ 78.00 EACH $ - BMP C207 Catch Basin Protection $ 35.50 EACH 11 $ 390.50 Crushed surfacing 1 1/4" minus $ 18.00 TON $ - WSDOT 9-03.9(3) Ditching $ 8.00 CY $ - Excavation-bulk $ 3.00 CY $ - Fence, silt $ 2.00 LF 500 $ 1,000.00 BMP C233 Fence, Temporary (NGPA) $ 2.00 LF $ - Geotextile Fabric $ 2.50 SY $ - Hay Bale Silt Trap $ 0.50 EACH $ - Hydroseeding $ 4,200.00 ACRE $ - BMP C120 Interceptor Swale / Dike $ 1.00 LF $ - Jute Mesh $ 2.00 SY $ - BMP C122 Level Spreader $ 1.75 LF $ - Mulch, by hand, straw, 3" deep $ 3.00 SY $ - BMP C121 Mulch, by machine, straw, 2" deep $ 1.00 SY $ - BMP C121 Piping, temporary, CPP, 6" $ 12.50 LF $ - Piping, temporary, CPP, 8" $ 19.00 LF $ - Piping, temporary, CPP, 12" $ 24.00 LF $ - Plastic covering, 6mm thick, sandbagged $ 3.00 SY $ - BMP C123 Rip Rap, machine placed; slopes $ 50.00 CY $ - WSDOT 9-13.1(2) Rock Construction Entrance, 50'x15'x1' $ 1,800.00 EACH 1 $ 1,800.00 BMP C105 Rock Construction Entrance, 100'x15'x1' $ 3,600.00 EACH $ - BMP C105 Sediment pond riser assembly $ 3,050.00 EACH $ - BMP C241 Sediment trap, 5' high berm $ 21.00 LF $ - BMP C240 Sed. trap, 5' high, riprapped spillway berm section $ 79.00 LF $ - BMP C240 Seeding, by hand $ 1.00 SY $ - BMP C120 Sodding, 1" deep, level ground $ 8.00 SY $ - BMP C120 Sodding, 1" deep, sloped ground $ 9.50 SY $ - BMP C120 TESC Supervisor $ 84.00 HR $ - Water truck, dust control $ 130.00 HR $ - BMP C140 WRITE-IN-ITEMS $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - SUBTOTAL (TESC Only): $ 3,190.50 MOBILIZATION 10%: $ 319.05 CONTINGENCY 15%: $ 478.58 TOTAL: $ 3,988.13 Rev 7/2017 CONSTRUCTION CALCULATION WORKSHEET STORMWATER DRAINAGE Public Private Public Improvements Private Development Description Unit Price Unit Quantity Cost Quantity Cost Access Road, Retention / Detention $ 26.00 SY $ - $ - * (CBs include frame and lid) Beehive $ 90.00 EACH $ - $ - CB Type I $ 1,650.00 EACH $ - $ - CB Type IL $ 1,850.00 EACH 4 $ 7,400.00 2 $ 3,700.00 CB Type II, 48" Dia $ 2,550.00 EACH $ - $ - for additional depth over 4' $ 650.00 FT $ - $ - CB Type II, 54" Dia $ 2,700.00 EACH $ - $ - for additional depth over 4' $ 600.00 FT $ - $ - CB Type II, 60" Dia $ 2,900.00 EACH $ - $ - for additional depth over 4' $ 750.00 FT $ - $ - CB Type II, 72" Dia $ 4,000.00 EACH $ - $ - for additional depth over 4' $ 900.00 FT $ - $ - Through-curb Inlet Framework (Add) $ 550.00 EACH $ - $ - Cleanout, PVC, 4" $ 200.00 EACH $ - $ - Cleanout, PVC, 6" $ 250.00 EACH 2 $ 500.00 $ - Cleanout, PVC, 8" $ 300.00 EACH 1 $ 300.00 $ - Culvert, Box __ ft x __ ft $ - LS $ - $ - Culvert, PVC, 4" $ 12.00 LF $ - $ - Culvert, PVC, 6" $ 17.00 LF $ - $ - Culvert, PVC, 8" $ 19.00 LF $ - $ - Culvert, PVC, 12" $ 30.00 LF $ - $ - Culvert, CMP, 8" $ 23.00 LF $ - $ - Culvert, CMP, 12" $ 35.00 LF $ - $ - Culvert, CMP, 15" $ 42.00 LF $ - $ - Culvert, CMP, 18" $ 47.00 LF $ - $ - Culvert, CMP, 24" $ 69.00 LF $ - $ - Culvert, CMP, 30" $ 100.00 LF $ - $ - Culvert, CMP, 36" $ 150.00 LF $ - $ - Culvert, CMP, 48" $ 194.00 LF $ - $ - Culvert, CMP, 60" $ 310.00 LF $ - $ - Culvert, CMP, 72" $ 400.00 LF $ - $ - Culvert, Concrete, 8" $ 36.00 LF $ - $ - Culvert, Concrete, 12" $ 43.00 LF $ - $ - Culvert, Concrete, 15" $ 52.00 LF $ - $ - Culvert, Concrete, 18" $ 55.00 LF $ - $ - Culvert, Concrete, 24" $ 85.00 LF $ - $ - Culvert, Concrete, 30" $ 136.00 LF $ - $ - Culvert, Concrete, 36" $ 165.00 LF $ - $ - Culvert, Concrete, 42" $ 196.00 LF $ - $ - Culvert, Concrete, 48" $ 210.00 LF $ - $ - Culvert, CPP, 6" $ 16.00 LF 200 $ 3,200.00 100 $ 1,600.00 Culvert, CPP, 8" $ 22.00 LF 66 $ 1,452.00 $ - Culvert, CPP, 12" $ 28.00 LF $ - $ - Culvert, CPP, 15" $ 34.00 LF $ - $ - Culvert, CPP, 18" $ 39.00 LF $ - $ - Rev 7/2017 CONSTRUCTION CALCULATION WORKSHEET Culvert, CPP, 24" $ 49.00 LF $ - $ - Culvert, CPP, 30" $ 62.00 LF $ - $ - Culvert, CPP, 36" $ 69.00 LF $ - $ - Ditching 12.00$ CY $ - $ - Flow Dispersal Trench (1,436 base+) $ 40.00 LF $ - $ - French Drain (3' depth) $ 39.00 LF $ - $ - Geotextile, laid in trench, polypropylene $ 5.00 SY 471 $ 2,355.00 $ - Infiltration pond testing $ 125.00 HR $ - $ - Mid-tank Access Riser, 48" dia, 6' deep $ 2,025.00 EACH $ - $ - Pipe, High Density Water Pipe (HDWP) $ 160.00 LF $ - $ - Pipe, C900 $ 90.00 LF $ - $ - Pond Overflow Spillway $ 18.00 SY $ - $ - Restrictor/Oil Separator, 12" $ 1,500.00 EACH 4 $ 6,000.00 2 $ 3,000.00 Restrictor/Oil Separator, 15" $ 1,550.00 EACH $ - $ - Restrictor/Oil Separator, 18" $ 1,680.00 EACH $ - $ - Riprap, placed $ 52.00 CY $ - $ - Tank End Reducer (36" Dia) $ 1,280.00 EACH $ - $ - Thru-Inlet at CB $ 150.00 EACH $ - $ - Trash Rack, 12" $ 320.00 EACH $ - $ - Trash Rack, 15" $ 325.00 EACH $ - $ - Trash Rack, 18" $ 350.00 EACH $ - $ - Trash Rack, 21" $ 375.00 EACH $ - $ - WRITE-IN-ITEMS $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - SUBTOTAL: $ 21,207.00 $ 8,300.00 MOBILIZATION 10%: $ 2,120.70 CONTINGENCY 15%: $ 3,181.05 TOTAL: $ 26,508.75 $ 8,300.00 Rev 7/2017 CONSTRUCTION CALCULATION WORKSHEET GENERAL ITEMS Public Improvements Private Development Description Unit Price Unit Quantity Cost Quantity Cost Backfill & Compaction- embankment $ 8.00 CY $ - $ - Backfill & Compaction- trench $ 11.00 CY $ - $ - Clear/Remove Brush, by hand (acre) $ 2,363.00 ACRE $ - $ - Bollards - fixed $ 325.00 EACH $ - $ - Bollards - removable $ 600.00 EACH $ - $ - Clearing/Grubbing/Tree Removal $ 6,000.00 ACRE $ - $ - Excavation - bulk $ 2.50 CY 250 $ 625.00 500 $ 1,250.00 Excavation - Trench $ 5.00 CY $ - $ - Fencing, cedar, 6' high $ 25.00 LF $ - $ - Fencing, chain link, 4' $ 19.50 LF $ - $ - Fencing, chain link, vinyl coated, 6' high $ 18.00 LF $ - $ - Fencing, chain link, gate, vinyl coated, 2 $ 1,563.00 EACH $ - $ - Fencing, split rail, 3' high $ 14.00 LF $ - $ - Fill & compact - common barrow $ 27.00 CY $ - $ - Fill & compact - gravel base $ 30.00 CY $ - $ - Fill & compact - screened topsoil $ 45.00 CY $ - $ - Gabion, 12" deep, stone filled mesh $ 62.00 SY $ - $ - Gabion, 18" deep, stone filled mesh $ 86.00 SY $ - $ - Gabion, 36" deep, stone filled mesh $ 152.00 SY $ - $ - Grading, fine, by hand $ 2.00 SY $ - $ - Grading, fine, with grader $ 1.25 SY $ - $ - Guard Post $ 90.00 EACH $ - $ - Monuments $ 104.00 EACH $ - $ - Sensitive Areas Sign $ 20.00 EACH $ - $ - Sodding, 1" deep, sloped ground $ 10.00 SY $ - $ - Topsoil Type A (imported) $ 30.00 CY $ - $ - Traffic control crew ( 2 flaggers ) $ 98.00 HR $ - $ - Trail, 4" chipped wood $ 9.00 SY $ - $ - Trail, 4" crushed cinder $ 10.00 SY $ - $ - Trail, 4" top course $ 9.50 SY $ - $ - Wall, retaining, concrete $ 66.00 SF $ - $ - Wall, rockery $ 13.00 SF $ - $ - WRITE-IN-ITEMS Fill - Suitable onsite material $ 5.00 CY 50 $ 250.00 550 $ 2,750.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Subtotal $ 875.00 Subtotal $ 4,000.00 Rev 7/2017 CONSTRUCTION CALCULATION WORKSHEET STREET IMPROVEMENT Public Improvements Private Development Description Unit Price Unit Quantity Cost Quantity Cost AC Grinding, 4' wide machine < 1000sy $ 35.00 SY $ - $ - AC Grinding, 4' wide machine 1000-2000$ 8.50 SY $ - $ - AC Grinding, 4' wide machine > 2000sy $ 2.50 SY $ - $ - AC Removal/Disposal/Repair $ 60.00 SY 536 $ 32,160.00 251 $ 15,060.00 Barricade, Type I $ 36.00 LF $ - $ - Barricade Type II $ 25.00 LF $ - $ - Barricade, Type III ( Permanent ) $ 55.00 LF $ - $ - Conduit, 2" $ 5.00 LF $ - $ - Curb & Gutter, rolled $ 20.00 LF $ - $ - Curb & Gutter, vertical $ 15.00 LF 283 $ 4,245.00 $ - Curb and Gutter, demolition and disposa $ 20.00 LF $ - $ - Curb, extruded asphalt $ 5.00 LF $ - $ - Curb, extruded concrete $ 4.50 LF 235 $ 1,057.50 68 $ 306.00 Guard Rail $ 30.00 LF $ - $ - Sawcut, asphalt, 3" depth $ 3.50 LF 85 $ 297.50 28 $ 98.00 Sawcut, concrete, per 1" depth $ 3.00 LF 60 $ 180.00 $ - Sealant, asphalt $ 2.00 LF $ - $ - Shoulder, gravel, 4" thick $ 11.00 SY $ - $ - Sidewalk, 4" thick $ 40.00 SY 193 $ 7,720.00 67 $ 2,680.00 Sidewalk, 4" thick, demolition and dispos $ 36.00 SY 21 $ 756.00 $ - Sidewalk, 6" thick $ 45.00 SY $ - $ - Sidewalk, 6" thick, demolition and dispos $ 45.00 SY $ - $ - Signs $ - LS $ - $ - Sign, Handicap $ 100.00 EACH $ - 2 $ 200.00 Striping, per stall $ 7.50 EACH 34 $ 255.00 31 $ 232.50 Street Light System $ - LS $ - $ - Traffic Signal $ - LS $ - $ - Traffic Signal Modification $ - LS $ - $ - Striping, thermoplastic, ( for crosswalk ) $ 3.50 SF $ - $ - Striping, 4" reflectorized line $ 0.40 LF $ - $ - AC Patching/Trenching Restoration $ 100.00 TON $ - $ - Controlled Density Fill (CDF) $ 90.00 CY $ - $ - WRITE-IN-ITEMS Extruded Curb demolition and disposal $ 10.00 LF 250 $ 2,500.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Subtotal $ 49,171.00 Subtotal $ 18,576.50 Rev 7/2017 CONSTRUCTION CALCULATION WORKSHEET STREET SURFACING/PAVEMENT Public Improvements Private Development Description Unit Price Unit Quantity Cost Quantity Cost Asphalt Overlay, 1.5" AC $ 12.00 SY $ - $ - Asphalt Overlay, 2" AC $ 15.00 SY $ - $ - Asphalt Road 2", First 2500 SY $ 10.00 SY $ - $ - Asphalt Road 2", Qty. over 2500SY $ 9.00 SY $ - $ - Asphalt Road 3", First 2500 SY $ 15.00 SY $ - $ - Asphalt Road 3", Qty. over 2500 SY $ 13.00 SY $ - $ - Asphalt Road 5", First 2500 SY $ 22.00 SY $ - $ - Asphalt Road 5", Qty. Over 2500 SY $ 22.00 SY $ - $ - Asphalt Road 6", First 2500 SY $ 25.00 SY $ - $ - Asphalt Road 6", Qty. Over 2500 SY $ 24.00 SY $ - $ - Asphalt Treated Base, 4" thick $ 14.00 SY $ - $ - Gravel Base Course 2" $ 7.50 SY $ - $ - Gravel Base Course 4" $ 15.00 SY $ - $ - Gravel Base Course 6" $ 22.50 SY 1048 $ 23,580.00 1069 $ 24,052.50 Gravel Road, 4" rock, First 2500 SY $ 15.00 SY $ - $ - Gravel Road, 4" rock, Qty. over 2500 SY $ 11.00 SY $ - $ - Concrete Road, 5", no base, over 2500 S$ 22.00 SY $ - $ - Concrete Road, 6", no base, over 2500 $ 32.00 SY $ - $ - Thickened Edge $ 11.00 LF $ - 135 $ 1,485.00 WRITE-IN-ITEMS Asphalt Road 4" $ 18.00 SY 365 $ 6,570.00 433 $ 7,794.00 Asphalt Road 2.5" $ 12.00 SY 683 $ 8,196.00 636 $ 7,632.00 $ - $ - $ - Subtotal $ 38,346.00 Subtotal $ 40,963.50 Rev 7/2017 CONSTRUCTION CALCULATION WORKSHEET WATER SYSTEM Public Improvements Private Development Description Unit Price Unit Quantity Cost Quantity Cost Blowoff $ 1,800.00 EACH $ - $ - Connection to Existing Water Main $ 2,000.00 EACH $ - 2 $ 4,000.00 Ductile Iron Watermain, CL 52, 6 Inch Dia $ 65.00 LF $ - 121 $ 7,865.00 Ductile Iron Watermain, CL 52, 8 Inch Dia $ 85.00 LF $ - $ - Ductile Iron Watermain, CL 52, 10 Inch Dia $ 103.00 LF $ - $ - Ductile Iron Watermain, CL 52, 12 Inch Dia. $ 125.00 LF $ - $ - Gate Valve, 6 inch Dia $ 250.00 EACH $ - $ - Gate Valve, 8 Inch Dia $ 380.00 EACH $ - $ - Gate Valve, 10 Inch Dia $ 425.00 EACH $ - $ - Gate Valve, 12 Inch Dia $ 500.00 EACH $ - $ - Fire Hydrant Assembly, with Guard Posts $ 3,000.00 EACH $ - $ - Fire Hydrant Assembly, without Guard Posts $ 2,500.00 EACH 1 $ 2,500.00 $ - Air-Vac, 8 Inch Dia $ 6,000.00 EACH $ - $ - Air-Vac,10 Inch Dia $ 7,500.00 EACH $ - $ - Air-Vac, 12 Inch Dia $ 12,000.00 EACH $ - $ - Pressure Reducing Valve Assembly, 8 In. Dia $ 3,800.00 EACH $ - $ - Pressure Reducing Valve Assembly, 10 In. D $ 4,200.00 EACH $ - $ - Pressure Reducing Valve Assembly, 12 In. D $ 5,000.00 EACH $ - $ - Valve Marker Post $ 350.00 EACH $ - $ - WRITE-IN-ITEMS $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Subtotal $ 2,500.00 Subtotal $ 11,865.00 Rev 7/2017 CONSTRUCTION CALCULATION WORKSHEET SANITARY SEWER Public Improvements Private Development Description Unit Price Unit Quantity Cost Quantity Cost Connection to Existing Sewer Main $ - EACH $ - 2 $ - Clean Outs $ 500.00 EACH $ - 3 $ 1,500.00 Grease Interceptor, 500 gallon $ 6,000.00 EACH $ - $ - Grease Interceptor, 1000 gallon $ 10,000.00 EACH $ - $ - Grease Interceptor, 1500 gallon $ 15,000.00 EACH $ - $ - Side Sewer Pipe, PVC. 4 Inch Dia $ 8.00 LF $ - $ - Side Sewer Pipe, PVC. 6 Inch Dia $ 12.00 LF $ - 205 $ 2,460.00 Sewer Pipe, PVC, 8 inch Dia $ 33.00 LF 62 $ 2,046.00 $ - Sewer Pipe, PVC, 12 Inch Dia $ 41.00 LF $ - $ - Sewer Pipe, PVC, ____ Inch Dia $ - LF $ - $ - Lift Station (Entire System) $ - LS $ - $ - Manhole, 48 Inch Dia $ 3,000.00 EACH 3 $ 9,000.00 $ - for additional depth over 4 feet/per fo $ 532.00 FEET 14 $ 7,448.00 $ - Manhole, 54 Inch Dia $ 3,500.00 EACH $ - $ - for additional depth over 4 feet/per fo $ 532.00 FEET $ - $ - Manhole, 60 Inch Dia $ 3,700.00 EACH $ - $ - for additional depth over 4 feet/per fo $ 532.00 FEET $ - $ - Manhole, 72 Inch Dia $ 4,000.00 EACH $ - $ - for additional depth over 4 feet/per fo $ 625.00 FEET $ - $ - Manhole, 96 Inch Dia $ 5,000.00 EACH $ - $ - for additional depth over 4 feet/per foo $ 625.00 FEET $ - $ - Outside Drop $ - LS $ - $ - Inside Drop $ - LS $ - $ - Pipe, C-900 $ 90.00 LF $ - $ - Pipe, High Density Water Pipe (HDWP) $ 160.00 LF $ - $ - WRITE-IN-ITEMS $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Subtotal $ 18,494.00 Subtotal $ 3,960.00 Rev 7/2017 CONSTRUCTION CALCULATION WORKSHEET LANDSCAPING & VEGETATION Include Public Improvements & Private Development Description Unit Price Unit Quantity Cost Street Trees $ 500.00 EACH 4 $ 2,000.00 Root Barrier $ 50.00 EACH 4 $ 200.00 Median Landscaping $ - LS $ - Right-of-Way Landscaping $ - LS $ - Wetland Landscaping $ - LS $ - Private Landscaping $ - LS $ - WRITE-IN-ITEMS Trees $ 250.00 EACH 8 $ 2,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - Subtotal $ 4,200.00 $ - $ - (INCLUDES GENERAL, STREET, SURFACING, WATER, PUBLIC PRIVATE SEWER, LANDSCAPING) SUBTOTAL $ 113,586.00 $ 79,365.00 MOBILIZATION 10%: $ 11,358.60 $ 7,936.50 CONTINGENCY 15%: $ 17,037.90 $ 11,904.75 GRANDTOTAL: $ 141,982.50 $ 99,206.25 Rev 7/2017 Paisley Lofts Project #22923 Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................. 3 Decision Tree ............................................................................................................................................ 4 Drainage Information Summary Form ..................................................................................................... 5 Vicinity Map ............................................................................................................................................. 6 MR #1 Stormwater Site Plan Narrative .................................................................................................... 7 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................................... 7 METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................................ 7 EXISTING CONDITIONS ................................................................................................................... 7 DEVELOPED CONDITIONS .............................................................................................................. 8 UPSTREAM ANALYSIS ..................................................................................................................... 8 DOWNSTREAM ANALYSIS .............................................................................................................. 8 FLOW CONTROL ................................................................................................................................ 9 RUNOFF TREATMENT ...................................................................................................................... 9 MR #2 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Narrative ........................................................................ 9 MR #3 Water Pollution Source Control ................................................................................................... 9 MR #4 Preservation of Natural Drainage Patterns ................................................................................... 9 MR #5 On-Site Stormwater Management ................................................................................................ 9 MR #6 Runoff Treatment ....................................................................................................................... 10 MR #7 Flow Control ............................................................................................................................... 10 MR #8 Wetland Protection ..................................................................................................................... 10 MR #9 Operations & Maintenance ......................................................................................................... 10 Appendix ................................................................................................................................................. 11 Cascade Surveying & Engineering Inc. 2 Paisley Lofts Project #22923 Executive Summary The 0.39-acre site will have a new four-story building constructed along with paved parking areas. The site currently has a building and the remaining property is gravel. Frontage improvements are required on E. Division St. consisting of angled parking, curb, gutter and sidewalk. As part of the proposed projectâ€™s construction, the alleys on both sides of Centennial Trail, west of the site, will be improved to include additional parking spaces. The project will implement a design to meet the minimum requirements as outlined below: Compliance with Minimum Requirements: Prepare Stormwater 1 A stormwater site plan report is presented in this document. Site Plan 2 SWPPP A SWPPP is submitted separate to this report. Water Pollution 3 BMPs for source control will be noted in the SWPPP. Source Control Preserve Natural All stormwater runoff from the proposed development will be fully 4 Drainage infiltrated given the existing well-drained soils on-site. On-site Stormwater All stormwater runoff from the proposed development will be 5 Management collected and fully infiltrated. Runoff treatment for the proposed parking lot areas will be provided 6 Runoff Treatment through water quality infiltration trenches. Flow control for the proposed development will be met using 7 Flow Control infiltration trenches to fully infiltrate all runoff. Stormwater There are no known wetlands existing within the area of disturbance 8 Discharge to or on-site. Wetland Inspection, Stormwater facilities will be regularly inspected and maintained. The 9 Operation and Operation & Maintenance Manual can be found in the Appendix. Maintenance Cascade Surveying & Engineering Inc. 3 Paisley Lofts Project #22923 Decision Tree Copy ` Figure 1 - Decision Tree (DOE Stormwater Management Manual for Western Wash. 2019) Cascade Surveying & Engineering Inc. 4 Paisley Lofts Project #22923 Drainage Information Summary Form Project Total Area: 0.77 Â± acres Area of Disturbance: 0.77 Â± acres Number of Lots (if applies): N/A Table 1 - Drainage Information Summary Individual Basin Information Drainage Basin Information Site Drainage Basin On & Off-Site Sub-Basin Area (acres) 0.70 Type of Storage Proposed N/A Approx. Dead Storage Vol (cf) N/A Approx. Live Storage Vol (cf) N/A Soil Type(s) (Natural Resource Conservation Service) Everett very gravelly sandy loam Pre-developed Discharge Rates Q (cfs.) 2 yr. 0.001 10 yr. 0.002 50 yr./ 100 yr. 0.009/0.014 Redevelopment Area (acres) Post-development Runoff Rates (w/o quantity controls) Q (cfs.) 2 yr. 0.362 10 yr. 0.580 50 yr./ 100 yr. 0.808/0.916 Post-development Runoff Rates (with quantity controls) Q (cfs.) 2 yr. 0 10 yr. 0 50 yr. 0 Offsite Upstream Area Number of acres 0 Offsite Downstream Flow Q(cfs) 50 yr. 0 Cascade Surveying & Engineering Inc. 5 Paisley Lofts Project #22923 Vicinity Map PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The project site is located in a portion of Section 2, Township 31 North, Range 05 East W.M. More specifically the site lies at 540 N. Olympic Avenue, Arlington, WA 98223. The property is identified by tax parcels #00529900900101 and #00529900900300 and is shown below in Figure 1, highlighted in red. Source PDS Map Portal Figure 2: Vicinity Map. Not to scale. Cascade Surveying & Engineering Inc. 6 Paisley Lofts Project #22923 MR #1 Stormwater Site Plan Narrative PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposal is to remove the existing building on site, construct a four-story multi-use building, and pave the parking lot. The main floor of the proposed building will be for commercial use while the remaining floors will contain 2 one-bedroom units and 44 studio units. A 2,500 sf courtyard is located on the third floor. Offsite improvements will include diagonal parking, curb, gutter, and sidewalk along E. Division St. frontage, and improvements to the alleys on both sides of Centennial Trail to create additional parking. METHODOLOGY Drainage calculations for the on-site area have been prepared using the 2019 Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington (DOE SMMWW). The site drainage design meets Low Impact Development (LID) standards by fully infiltrating all stormwater runoff on-site. The infiltration trenches were sized using the 2012 Western Washington Hydrology Model (WWHM). Given the total proposed new+replaced impervious surface for the project is over 5,000 sf, the development will be required to meet minimum requirements (MRs) 1-9 according to Volume I of the DOE SMMWW. EXISTING CONDITIONS The 0.39-acre site is located in the Old Town Business District 2 zone of the City of Arlington. The site has an existing 1,520 sf building with asphalt for parking along the south and west of the building. The remaining site is gravel that is used as a parking lot. With the existing conditions of the site being more than 35% impervious, the project is characterized a redevelopment. A subsurface exploration was carried out by GeoTest on October 22, 2021 (see separate report). There were six exploration test pits, the majority of which were advanced to a depth between 10 and 12 ft below ground surface. The test pit located in the area west of Centennial Trail was advanced to a depth of 5 ft. Four test pits were located in the vicinity of the proposed building and a test pit was located in the alley on either side of Centennial Trail. Historic fill was encountered in TP-1,TP-2, and TP-4 between 2 and 8 ft deep over native Arlington gravel member. TP-3, TP-5, and TP-6 encountered topsoil or surficial fill soils associated with the parking lot for depths of 1 to 1.5 ft over native Arlington gravel member. Geotest provided an infiltration rate of 8 in/hr for this Arlington gravel member. Refer to separate report for more detail. According to the NRCS (see Appendix A), the entire site is comprised of Everett very gravelly sandy loam. This soil is described as being very deep, somewhat excessively drained soil found on terraces and outwash plains. Permeability of the soil is rapid and available water capacity is low. The top 6 inches is typically a dark brown gravelly sandy loam. The subsoil is about 12 inches thick and is dark brown very gravelly sandy loam. Below these layers the substratum is brown very gravelly loam for about 5 inches and then dark brown extremely gravely sand to a depth of 60 inches or more. It is categorized as hydrologic soils group A. Cascade Surveying & Engineering Inc. 7 Paisley Lofts Project #22923 DEVELOPED CONDITIONS The proposed redevelopment will remove the existing structure on-site as well as the existing asphalt and gravel areas and replace them with a four-story building, new asphalt parking lot areas, concrete walkways, and landscaped areas. The offsite improvements include diagonal back-in parking, curb, gutter, and sidewalk along E. Division St. frontage, and improvements to the alleys on both sides of Centennial Trail to create additional parking. The existing driveway entrance on N. Olympic Avenue will be expanded north 10 feet to align with the proposed drive aisle. The proposed areas are outlined in Table 2 and Table 3 below. Table 2: Onsite Areas Proposed Areas Area Description Area (square feet) Building 9,760 Asphalt Parking/Drive 6,701 Dumpster Pad 160 Landscape areas 328 Total 16,949 Table 3: Offsite Areas Proposed Areas Area Description Area (square feet) E. Division St Frontage: Asphalt Parking/Drive 3,930 Concrete sidewalk 1,823 Landscape areas 1,076 Alley East of Centennial: Asphalt 4,700 Alley West of Centennial: Asphalt 1,760 Total 13,289 Given total proposed new+replaced impervious surface for the project is over 5,000 sf, the development will be required to meet MRs 1-9 according to Volume I of the DOE SMMWW. UPSTREAM ANALYSIS Due to the developed surrounding properties, there is no upstream area that contributes flow to the subject site. DOWNSTREAM ANALYSIS Currently the runoff from the siteâ€™s existing conditions flow towards the northwest of the property. Runoff from the existing gravel parking lot flows onto E. Division St. at the entrance east of the existing building where it enters the existing catch basin located on E. Division St west of the property. The proposed development is not anticipated to have any downstream impact as all the siteâ€™s stormwater runoff will be collected and fully infiltrated Cascade Surveying & Engineering Inc. 8 Paisley Lofts Project #22923 on-site. Fully infiltrating all runoff is anticipated to meet or lower the siteâ€™s runoff from its predeveloped, native forested condition. FLOW CONTROL Flow control will be provided by fully infiltrating all runoff on-site through the use of infiltration trenches. The infiltration trenches were sized for 100% infiltration of 8% of the 2-year peak flow through the full 50-year peak flow using the 2012 Western Washington Hydrology Model (WWHM). Specifics about the proposed flow control trenches are further discussed in MR 7. RUNOFF TREATMENT The infiltration trenches have 1.5â€™ of soil amended to have a cation exchange capacity (CEC) of 5 milliequivalents CEC/100g of dry soil or better. This will provide runoff treatment for the pollution generating hard surfaces. The trench was sized for 100% infiltration so all stormwater runoff will pass through the amended soils. Specifics about the proposed water quality trench are further discussed in MR 6. MR #2 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Narrative See Separate Report. MR #3 Water Pollution Source Control No known pollution generating activities described in volume IV, chapters 3 and 4 of the Snohomish County Drainage Manual will be performed on-site during construction or are proposed for the developed site following construction. Any sources of pollution that may result from the construction activity will be controlled according to SWPPP Element #9, Control Pollutants. MR #4 Preservation of Natural Drainage Patterns The natural drainage patterns identified in the drainage report under MR #1 and on the stormwater site plan will be maintained during construction and post development. The natural drainage sheetflows offsite to the northwest of the property and enters the existing catch basin on E. Division St. west of the property. The site is designed to fully infiltrate runoff and will reduce the previously unmitigated discharge downstream. MR #5 On-Site Stormwater Management The proposed development will meet Low Impact Development (LID) and flow control requirements per Sections I-2.5.5 and I-2.5.7 of the 2019 Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington (SMMWW). The post-developed conditions will have flow rates meeting 8% of the 2-year peak flow through the full 50-year peak flow. Cascade Surveying & Engineering Inc. 9 Paisley Lofts Project #22923 Three infiltration trenches will be located within the project site: 1. Trench A is located beneath the parking in the alley to mitigate runoff from onsite impervious areas and the alley east of Centennial Trail. 2. Trench B is located in the E. Division St. frontage to mitigate runoff from E. Division St. frontage improvements. 3. Trench C is located under the proposed parking in the alley west of Centennial Trail to mitigate for the proposed parking west of Centennial Trail. The infiltration rate of 8 in/hr used in the calculations was measured by Geotest. All proposed impervious surfaces will be conveyed to one of the above trenches. The size of each trench can be seen in WWHM (Appendix B) and the construction plans. BMP T5.13 Post Construction Soil Quality and Depth: Post Construction Soil Quality and Depth will be used on site to recondition those areas that were impacted due to construction activities. Those areas to be reconditioned have been identified on the construction plans as landscape areas. The existing on-site topsoil will be tilled, and compost added to the soil prior to final seeding. The intent of this BMP is to restore the pre-developed drainage characteristics of the soil. MR #6 Runoff Treatment Runoff treatment for the proposed parking lot and driveway areas will be provided through water quality infiltration trenches. These trenches will have 1.5â€™ of soil amended to have a cation exchange capacity (CEC) of 5 milliequivalents CEC/100g of dry soil or better. The water quality trenches are sized by achieving 100% infiltration using WWHM. Details on the proposed trench are outlined in the WWHM report provided in Appendix B and the construction plans. MR #7 Flow Control Flow control will be provided for the impervious areas onsite through the use of infiltration trenches. These infiltration trenches are designed using WWHM to detain all runoff from 8% of the 2-year storm through the full 50-year storm until it fully infiltrates. Details on the proposed trenches are outlined in the WWHM report provided in Appendix B. MR #8 Wetland Protection There are no wetlands on site or within the area of disturbance. MR #9 Operations & Maintenance An operation and maintenance manual has been included in Appendix C. Cascade Surveying & Engineering Inc. 10 Paisley Lofts Project #22923 Appendix Appendix A - NRCS SOILS REPORT Appendix B - WWHM REPORT Appendix C - OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL Cascade Surveying & Engineering Inc. 11 APPENDIX A â€“ NRCS SOILS REPORT United States A product of the National Custom Soil Resource Department of Cooperative Soil Survey, Agriculture a joint effort of the United Report for States Department of Agriculture and other Snohomish County Federal agencies, State Natural agencies including the Resources Agricultural Experiment Area, Washington Conservation Stations, and local Service participants October 22, 2021 Preface Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas. They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers. Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand, protect, or enhance the environment. Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions. The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations. Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/ portal/nrcs/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center (https://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nrcs) or your NRCS State Soil Scientist (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/contactus/? cid=nrcs142p2_053951). Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to basements or underground installations. The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey. Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require 2 alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. 3 Contents Preface....................................................................................................................2 How Soil Surveys Are Made..................................................................................5 Soil Map..................................................................................................................8 Soil Map................................................................................................................9 Legend................................................................................................................10 Map Unit Legend................................................................................................ 11 Map Unit Descriptions.........................................................................................11 Snohomish County Area, Washington............................................................13 17â€”Everett very gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 8 percent slopes.....................13 References............................................................................................................15 4 How Soil Surveys Are Made Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length, and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other biological activity. Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA. The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a specific location on the landscape. Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented by an understanding of the soil-vegetation-landscape relationship, are sufficient to verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries. Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units). Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil 5 Custom Soil Resource Report scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and research. The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas. Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map. The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape, and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the soil-landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at specific locations. Once the soil-landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded. These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color, depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil typically vary from one point to another across the landscape. Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other properties. While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field-observed characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management. Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same kinds of soil. Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example, soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date. After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and 6 Custom Soil Resource Report identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings, fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately. 7 Soil Map The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit. 8 Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Map 122Â° 7' 37'' W 122Â° 7' 34'' W 564859 564865 564871 564877 564883 564889 564895 564901 564907 564913 564919 48Â° 11' 54'' N 48Â° 11' 54'' N 5338731 5338731 5338725 5338725 5338719 5338719 5338713 5338713 5338707 5338707 5338701 5338701 5338695 Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. 5338695 48Â° 11' 53'' N 48Â° 11' 53'' N 564859 564865 564871 564877 564883 564889 564895 564901 564907 564913 564919 Map Scale: 1:285 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet. Meters 122Â° 7' 37'' WN 0 4 8 16 24 122Â° 7' 34'' W Feet 0 10 20 40 60 Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 10N WGS84 9 Custom Soil Resource Report MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest (AOI) Spoil Area The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at Area of Interest (AOI) 1:24,000. Stony Spot Soils Very Stony Spot Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Soil Map Unit Polygons Wet Spot Soil Map Unit Lines Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause Other Soil Map Unit Points misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil Special Line Features line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of Special Point Features contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed Blowout Water Features scale. Streams and Canals Borrow Pit Transportation Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map Clay Spot Rails measurements. Closed Depression Interstate Highways Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Gravel Pit US Routes Web Soil Survey URL: Gravelly Spot Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Major Roads Landfill Local Roads Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator Lava Flow projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts Background distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Marsh or swamp Aerial Photography Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. Mine or Quarry Miscellaneous Water This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as Perennial Water of the version date(s) listed below. Rock Outcrop Soil Survey Area: Snohomish County Area, Washington Saline Spot Survey Area Data: Version 23, Aug 31, 2021 Sandy Spot Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales Severely Eroded Spot 1:50,000 or larger. Sinkhole Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Sep 26, 2018â€”Oct Slide or Slip 16, 2018 Sodic Spot The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. 10 Custom Soil Resource Report Map Unit Legend Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 17 Everett very gravelly sandy 0.4 100.0% loam, 0 to 8 percent slopes Totals for Area of Interest 0.4 100.0% Map Unit Descriptions The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit. A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class. Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils. Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and miscellaneous areas on the landscape. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however, onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas. 11 Custom Soil Resource Report An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions. Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil properties and qualities. Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement. Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness, salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series. Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas. These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups. A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar in all areas. Alpha-Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example. An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar. Alpha-Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example. An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example. Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example. 12 Custom Soil Resource Report Snohomish County Area, Washington 17â€”Everett very gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 8 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 2t629 Elevation: 30 to 900 feet Mean annual precipitation: 35 to 91 inches Mean annual air temperature: 48 to 52 degrees F Frost-free period: 180 to 240 days Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance Map Unit Composition Everett and similar soils: 80 percent Minor components: 20 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Everett Setting Landform: Kames, moraines, eskers Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve, crest Down-slope shape: Convex Across-slope shape: Convex Parent material: Sandy and gravelly glacial outwash Typical profile Oi - 0 to 1 inches: slightly decomposed plant material A - 1 to 3 inches: very gravelly sandy loam Bw - 3 to 24 inches: very gravelly sandy loam C1 - 24 to 35 inches: very gravelly loamy sand C2 - 35 to 60 inches: extremely cobbly coarse sand Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 8 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Drainage class: Somewhat excessively drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 3.2 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4s Hydrologic Soil Group: A Ecological site: F002XA004WA - Puget Lowlands Forest Forage suitability group: Droughty Soils (G002XN402WA), Droughty Soils (G002XF403WA), Droughty Soils (G002XS401WA) Other vegetative classification: Droughty Soils (G002XN402WA), Droughty Soils (G002XF403WA), Droughty Soils (G002XS401WA) Hydric soil rating: No 13 Custom Soil Resource Report Minor Components Indianola Percent of map unit: 10 percent Landform: Terraces, kames, eskers Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Hydric soil rating: No Alderwood Percent of map unit: 10 percent Landform: Hills, ridges Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest, talf Down-slope shape: Convex, linear Across-slope shape: Convex Hydric soil rating: No 14 References American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling and testing. 24th edition. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00. Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deep-water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service FWS/OBS-79/31. Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States. Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States. Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric soils in the United States. National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries. Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/ nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_054262 Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http:// www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053577 Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http:// www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053580 Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands Section. United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical Report Y-87-1. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National forestry manual. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/ home/?cid=nrcs142p2_053374 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/ detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb1043084 15 Custom Soil Resource Report United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/ nrcs/detail/soils/scientists/?cid=nrcs142p2_054242 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 296. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/? cid=nrcs142p2_053624 United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http:// www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_052290.pdf 16 APPENDIX B â€“ WWHM REPORT WWHM2012 PROJECT REPORT General Model Information Project Name: 98223 INFILTRATION REV2 Site Name: PAISLEY LOFTS Site Address: 102 E. DIVISION ST. City: ARLINGTON 98223 Report Date: 12/1/2021 Gage: Everett Data Start: 1948/10/01 Data End: 2009/09/30 Timestep: 15 Minute Precip Scale: 1.200 Version Date: 2021/08/18 Version: 4.2.18 POC Thresholds Low Flow Threshold for POC1: 50 Percent of the 2 Year High Flow Threshold for POC1: 50 Year 98223 INFILTRATION REV2 12/1/2021 9:05:51 AM Page 2 Landuse Basin Data Predeveloped Land Use ONSITE BASIN Bypass: No GroundWater: No Pervious Land Use acre A B, Forest, Flat 0.264 A B, Forest, Mod 0.089 A B, Forest, Steep 0.035 Pervious Total 0.388 Impervious Land Use acre Impervious Total 0 Basin Total 0.388 Element Flows To: Surface Interflow Groundwater 98223 INFILTRATION REV2 12/1/2021 9:05:51 AM Page 3 DIVISION FRONTAGE Bypass: No GroundWater: No Pervious Land Use acre A B, Forest, Flat 0.046 A B, Forest, Mod 0.067 A B, Forest, Steep 0.041 Pervious Total 0.154 Impervious Land Use acre Impervious Total 0 Basin Total 0.154 Element Flows To: Surface Interflow Groundwater 98223 INFILTRATION REV2 12/1/2021 9:05:51 AM Page 4 WEST OF CENTENNIAL TRAIL Bypass: No GroundWater: No Pervious Land Use acre A B, Forest, Flat 0.036 Pervious Total 0.036 Impervious Land Use acre Impervious Total 0 Basin Total 0.036 Element Flows To: Surface Interflow Groundwater 98223 INFILTRATION REV2 12/1/2021 9:05:51 AM Page 5 ALLEY AREA Bypass: No GroundWater: No Pervious Land Use acre A B, Forest, Flat 0.089 A B, Forest, Mod 0.024 A B, Forest, Steep 0.012 Pervious Total 0.125 Impervious Land Use acre Impervious Total 0 Basin Total 0.125 Element Flows To: Surface Interflow Groundwater 98223 INFILTRATION REV2 12/1/2021 9:05:51 AM Page 6 Mitigated Land Use ONSITE BASIN Bypass: No GroundWater: No Pervious Land Use acre A B, Lawn, Flat 0.008 Pervious Total 0.008 Impervious Land Use acre ROADS FLAT 0.133 ROADS MOD 0.02 ROOF TOPS FLAT 0.224 SIDEWALKS FLAT 0.004 Impervious Total 0.381 Basin Total 0.389 Element Flows To: Surface Interflow Groundwater Gravel Trench Bed 1 Gravel Trench Bed 1 98223 INFILTRATION REV2 12/1/2021 9:05:51 AM Page 7 DIVISION FRONTAGE Bypass: No GroundWater: No Pervious Land Use acre A B, Lawn, Flat 0.018 Pervious Total 0.018 Impervious Land Use acre ROADS FLAT 0.086 SIDEWALKS FLAT 0.049 Impervious Total 0.135 Basin Total 0.153 Element Flows To: Surface Interflow Groundwater Gravel Trench Bed 3 Gravel Trench Bed 3 98223 INFILTRATION REV2 12/1/2021 9:05:51 AM Page 8 WEST OF CENTENNIAL TRAIL Bypass: No GroundWater: No Pervious Land Use acre Pervious Total 0 Impervious Land Use acre ROADS FLAT 0.036 Impervious Total 0.036 Basin Total 0.036 Element Flows To: Surface Interflow Groundwater Gravel Trench Bed 2 Gravel Trench Bed 2 98223 INFILTRATION REV2 12/1/2021 9:05:51 AM Page 9 ALLEY AREA Bypass: No GroundWater: No Pervious Land Use acre Pervious Total 0 Impervious Land Use acre ROADS FLAT 0.124 Impervious Total 0.124 Basin Total 0.124 Element Flows To: Surface Interflow Groundwater Gravel Trench Bed 1 Gravel Trench Bed 1 98223 INFILTRATION REV2 12/1/2021 9:05:51 AM Page 10 Routing Elements Predeveloped Routing 98223 INFILTRATION REV2 12/1/2021 9:05:52 AM Page 11 Mitigated Routing Gravel Trench Bed 1 Bottom Length: 120.00 ft. Bottom Width: 10.00 ft. Trench bottom slope 1: 0 To 1 Trench Left side slope 0: 0 To 1 Trench right side slope 2: 0 To 1 Material thickness of first layer: 1.5 Pour Space of material for first layer: 0.3 Material thickness of second layer: 1.5 Pour Space of material for second layer: 0.3 Material thickness of third layer: 0 Pour Space of material for third layer: 0 Infiltration On Infiltration rate: 8 Infiltration safety factor: 1 Total Volume Infiltrated (ac-ft.): 97.407 Total Volume Through Riser (ac-ft.): 0.003 Total Volume Through Facility (ac-ft.): 97.41 Percent Infiltrated: 100 Total Precip Applied to Facility: 0 Total Evap From Facility: 0 Discharge Structure Riser Height: 2.9 ft. Riser Diameter: 50 in. Element Flows To: Outlet 1 Outlet 2 Gravel Trench Bed Hydraulic Table Stage(feet) Area(ac.) Volume(ac-ft.) Discharge(cfs) Infilt(cfs) 0.0000 0.027 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0333 0.027 0.000 0.000 0.222 0.0667 0.027 0.000 0.000 0.222 0.1000 0.027 0.000 0.000 0.222 0.1333 0.027 0.001 0.000 0.222 0.1667 0.027 0.001 0.000 0.222 0.2000 0.027 0.001 0.000 0.222 0.2333 0.027 0.001 0.000 0.222 0.2667 0.027 0.002 0.000 0.222 0.3000 0.027 0.002 0.000 0.222 0.3333 0.027 0.002 0.000 0.222 0.3667 0.027 0.003 0.000 0.222 0.4000 0.027 0.003 0.000 0.222 0.4333 0.027 0.003 0.000 0.222 0.4667 0.027 0.003 0.000 0.222 0.5000 0.027 0.004 0.000 0.222 0.5333 0.027 0.004 0.000 0.222 0.5667 0.027 0.004 0.000 0.222 0.6000 0.027 0.005 0.000 0.222 0.6333 0.027 0.005 0.000 0.222 0.6667 0.027 0.005 0.000 0.222 0.7000 0.027 0.005 0.000 0.222 0.7333 0.027 0.006 0.000 0.222 0.7667 0.027 0.006 0.000 0.222 98223 INFILTRATION REV2 12/1/2021 9:05:52 AM Page 12 0.8000 0.027 0.006 0.000 0.222 0.8333 0.027 0.006 0.000 0.222 0.8667 0.027 0.007 0.000 0.222 0.9000 0.027 0.007 0.000 0.222 0.9333 0.027 0.007 0.000 0.222 0.9667 0.027 0.008 0.000 0.222 1.0000 0.027 0.008 0.000 0.222 1.0333 0.027 0.008 0.000 0.222 1.0667 0.027 0.008 0.000 0.222 1.1000 0.027 0.009 0.000 0.222 1.1333 0.027 0.009 0.000 0.222 1.1667 0.027 0.009 0.000 0.222 1.2000 0.027 0.009 0.000 0.222 1.2333 0.027 0.010 0.000 0.222 1.2667 0.027 0.010 0.000 0.222 1.3000 0.027 0.010 0.000 0.222 1.3333 0.027 0.011 0.000 0.222 1.3667 0.027 0.011 0.000 0.222 1.4000 0.027 0.011 0.000 0.222 1.4333 0.027 0.011 0.000 0.222 1.4667 0.027 0.012 0.000 0.222 1.5000 0.027 0.012 0.000 0.222 1.5333 0.027 0.012 0.000 0.222 1.5667 0.027 0.012 0.000 0.222 1.6000 0.027 0.013 0.000 0.222 1.6333 0.027 0.013 0.000 0.222 1.6667 0.027 0.013 0.000 0.222 1.7000 0.027 0.014 0.000 0.222 1.7333 0.027 0.014 0.000 0.222 1.7667 0.027 0.014 0.000 0.222 1.8000 0.027 0.014 0.000 0.222 1.8333 0.027 0.015 0.000 0.222 1.8667 0.027 0.015 0.000 0.222 1.9000 0.027 0.015 0.000 0.222 1.9333 0.027 0.016 0.000 0.222 1.9667 0.027 0.016 0.000 0.222 2.0000 0.027 0.016 0.000 0.222 2.0333 0.027 0.016 0.000 0.222 2.0667 0.027 0.017 0.000 0.222 2.1000 0.027 0.017 0.000 0.222 2.1333 0.027 0.017 0.000 0.222 2.1667 0.027 0.017 0.000 0.222 2.2000 0.027 0.018 0.000 0.222 2.2333 0.027 0.018 0.000 0.222 2.2667 0.027 0.018 0.000 0.222 2.3000 0.027 0.019 0.000 0.222 2.3333 0.027 0.019 0.000 0.222 2.3667 0.027 0.019 0.000 0.222 2.4000 0.027 0.019 0.000 0.222 2.4333 0.027 0.020 0.000 0.222 2.4667 0.027 0.020 0.000 0.222 2.5000 0.027 0.020 0.000 0.222 2.5333 0.027 0.020 0.000 0.222 2.5667 0.027 0.021 0.000 0.222 2.6000 0.027 0.021 0.000 0.222 2.6333 0.027 0.021 0.000 0.222 2.6667 0.027 0.022 0.000 0.222 2.7000 0.027 0.022 0.000 0.222 98223 INFILTRATION REV2 12/1/2021 9:05:52 AM Page 13 2.7333 0.027 0.022 0.000 0.222 2.7667 0.027 0.022 0.000 0.222 2.8000 0.027 0.023 0.000 0.222 2.8333 0.027 0.023 0.000 0.222 2.8667 0.027 0.023 0.000 0.222 2.9000 0.027 0.024 0.000 0.222 2.9333 0.027 0.024 0.269 0.222 2.9667 0.027 0.024 0.761 0.222 3.0000 0.027 0.024 1.397 0.222 98223 INFILTRATION REV2 12/1/2021 9:05:52 AM Page 14 Gravel Trench Bed 2 Bottom Length: 42.00 ft. Bottom Width: 2.00 ft. Trench bottom slope 1: 0 To 1 Trench Left side slope 0: 0 To 1 Trench right side slope 2: 0 To 1 Material thickness of first layer: 1.5 Pour Space of material for first layer: 0.3 Material thickness of second layer: 1.5 Pour Space of material for second layer: 0.3 Material thickness of third layer: 0 Pour Space of material for third layer: 0 Infiltration On Infiltration rate: 8 Infiltration safety factor: 1 Total Volume Infiltrated (ac-ft.): 6.606 Total Volume Through Riser (ac-ft.): 0 Total Volume Through Facility (ac-ft.): 6.606 Percent Infiltrated: 100 Total Precip Applied to Facility: 0 Total Evap From Facility: 0 Discharge Structure Riser Height: 2.9 ft. Riser Diameter: 50 in. Element Flows To: Outlet 1 Outlet 2 Gravel Trench Bed Hydraulic Table Stage(feet) Area(ac.) Volume(ac-ft.) Discharge(cfs) Infilt(cfs) 0.0000 0.001928 0.000000 0.000 0.000 0.0333 0.001928 0.000019 0.000 0.015 0.0667 0.001928 0.000039 0.000 0.015 0.1000 0.001928 0.000058 0.000 0.015 0.1333 0.001928 0.000077 0.000 0.015 0.1667 0.001928 0.000096 0.000 0.015 0.2000 0.001928 0.000116 0.000 0.015 0.2333 0.001928 0.000135 0.000 0.015 0.2667 0.001928 0.000154 0.000 0.015 0.3000 0.001928 0.000174 0.000 0.015 0.3333 0.001928 0.000193 0.000 0.015 0.3667 0.001928 0.000212 0.000 0.015 0.4000 0.001928 0.000231 0.000 0.015 0.4333 0.001928 0.000251 0.000 0.015 0.4667 0.001928 0.000270 0.000 0.015 0.5000 0.001928 0.000289 0.000 0.015 0.5333 0.001928 0.000309 0.000 0.015 0.5667 0.001928 0.000328 0.000 0.015 0.6000 0.001928 0.000347 0.000 0.015 0.6333 0.001928 0.000366 0.000 0.015 0.6667 0.001928 0.000386 0.000 0.015 0.7000 0.001928 0.000405 0.000 0.015 0.7333 0.001928 0.000424 0.000 0.015 0.7667 0.001928 0.000444 0.000 0.015 0.8000 0.001928 0.000463 0.000 0.015 0.8333 0.001928 0.000482 0.000 0.015 98223 INFILTRATION REV2 12/1/2021 9:05:52 AM Page 15 0.8667 0.001928 0.000501 0.000 0.015 0.9000 0.001928 0.000521 0.000 0.015 0.9333 0.001928 0.000540 0.000 0.015 0.9667 0.001928 0.000559 0.000 0.015 1.0000 0.001928 0.000579 0.000 0.015 1.0333 0.001928 0.000598 0.000 0.015 1.0667 0.001928 0.000617 0.000 0.015 1.1000 0.001928 0.000636 0.000 0.015 1.1333 0.001928 0.000656 0.000 0.015 1.1667 0.001928 0.000675 0.000 0.015 1.2000 0.001928 0.000694 0.000 0.015 1.2333 0.001928 0.000713 0.000 0.015 1.2667 0.001928 0.000733 0.000 0.015 1.3000 0.001928 0.000752 0.000 0.015 1.3333 0.001928 0.000771 0.000 0.015 1.3667 0.001928 0.000791 0.000 0.015 1.4000 0.001928 0.000810 0.000 0.015 1.4333 0.001928 0.000829 0.000 0.015 1.4667 0.001928 0.000848 0.000 0.015 1.5000 0.001928 0.000868 0.000 0.015 1.5333 0.001928 0.000887 0.000 0.015 1.5667 0.001928 0.000906 0.000 0.015 1.6000 0.001928 0.000926 0.000 0.015 1.6333 0.001928 0.000945 0.000 0.015 1.6667 0.001928 0.000964 0.000 0.015 1.7000 0.001928 0.000983 0.000 0.015 1.7333 0.001928 0.001003 0.000 0.015 1.7667 0.001928 0.001022 0.000 0.015 1.8000 0.001928 0.001041 0.000 0.015 1.8333 0.001928 0.001061 0.000 0.015 1.8667 0.001928 0.001080 0.000 0.015 1.9000 0.001928 0.001099 0.000 0.015 1.9333 0.001928 0.001118 0.000 0.015 1.9667 0.001928 0.001138 0.000 0.015 2.0000 0.001928 0.001157 0.000 0.015 2.0333 0.001928 0.001176 0.000 0.015 2.0667 0.001928 0.001196 0.000 0.015 2.1000 0.001928 0.001215 0.000 0.015 2.1333 0.001928 0.001234 0.000 0.015 2.1667 0.001928 0.001253 0.000 0.015 2.2000 0.001928 0.001273 0.000 0.015 2.2333 0.001928 0.001292 0.000 0.015 2.2667 0.001928 0.001311 0.000 0.015 2.3000 0.001928 0.001331 0.000 0.015 2.3333 0.001928 0.001350 0.000 0.015 2.3667 0.001928 0.001369 0.000 0.015 2.4000 0.001928 0.001388 0.000 0.015 2.4333 0.001928 0.001408 0.000 0.015 2.4667 0.001928 0.001427 0.000 0.015 2.5000 0.001928 0.001446 0.000 0.015 2.5333 0.001928 0.001466 0.000 0.015 2.5667 0.001928 0.001485 0.000 0.015 2.6000 0.001928 0.001504 0.000 0.015 2.6333 0.001928 0.001523 0.000 0.015 2.6667 0.001928 0.001543 0.000 0.015 2.7000 0.001928 0.001562 0.000 0.015 2.7333 0.001928 0.001581 0.000 0.015 2.7667 0.001928 0.001601 0.000 0.015 98223 INFILTRATION REV2 12/1/2021 9:05:52 AM Page 16 2.8000 0.001928 0.001620 0.000 0.015 2.8333 0.001928 0.001639 0.000 0.015 2.8667 0.001928 0.001658 0.000 0.015 2.9000 0.001928 0.001678 0.000 0.015 2.9333 0.001928 0.001697 0.269 0.015 2.9667 0.001928 0.001716 0.761 0.015 3.0000 0.001928 0.001736 1.397 0.015 98223 INFILTRATION REV2 12/1/2021 9:05:52 AM Page 17 Gravel Trench Bed 3 Bottom Length: 40.00 ft. Bottom Width: 8.00 ft. Trench bottom slope 1: 0 To 1 Trench Left side slope 0: 0 To 1 Trench right side slope 2: 0 To 1 Material thickness of first layer: 1.5 Pour Space of material for first layer: 0.3 Material thickness of second layer: 1.5 Pour Space of material for second layer: 0.3 Material thickness of third layer: 0 Pour Space of material for third layer: 0 Infiltration On Infiltration rate: 8 Infiltration safety factor: 1 Total Volume Infiltrated (ac-ft.): 25.759 Total Volume Through Riser (ac-ft.): 0.001 Total Volume Through Facility (ac-ft.): 25.759 Percent Infiltrated: 100 Total Precip Applied to Facility: 0 Total Evap From Facility: 0 Discharge Structure Riser Height: 2.9 ft. Riser Diameter: 50 in. Element Flows To: Outlet 1 Outlet 2 Gravel Trench Bed Hydraulic Table Stage(feet) Area(ac.) Volume(ac-ft.) Discharge(cfs) Infilt(cfs) 0.0000 0.007 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0333 0.007 0.000 0.000 0.059 0.0667 0.007 0.000 0.000 0.059 0.1000 0.007 0.000 0.000 0.059 0.1333 0.007 0.000 0.000 0.059 0.1667 0.007 0.000 0.000 0.059 0.2000 0.007 0.000 0.000 0.059 0.2333 0.007 0.000 0.000 0.059 0.2667 0.007 0.000 0.000 0.059 0.3000 0.007 0.000 0.000 0.059 0.3333 0.007 0.000 0.000 0.059 0.3667 0.007 0.000 0.000 0.059 0.4000 0.007 0.000 0.000 0.059 0.4333 0.007 0.001 0.000 0.059 0.4667 0.007 0.001 0.000 0.059 0.5000 0.007 0.001 0.000 0.059 0.5333 0.007 0.001 0.000 0.059 0.5667 0.007 0.001 0.000 0.059 0.6000 0.007 0.001 0.000 0.059 0.6333 0.007 0.001 0.000 0.059 0.6667 0.007 0.001 0.000 0.059 0.7000 0.007 0.001 0.000 0.059 0.7333 0.007 0.001 0.000 0.059 0.7667 0.007 0.001 0.000 0.059 0.8000 0.007 0.001 0.000 0.059 0.8333 0.007 0.001 0.000 0.059 98223 INFILTRATION REV2 12/1/2021 9:05:52 AM Page 18 0.8667 0.007 0.001 0.000 0.059 0.9000 0.007 0.002 0.000 0.059 0.9333 0.007 0.002 0.000 0.059 0.9667 0.007 0.002 0.000 0.059 1.0000 0.007 0.002 0.000 0.059 1.0333 0.007 0.002 0.000 0.059 1.0667 0.007 0.002 0.000 0.059 1.1000 0.007 0.002 0.000 0.059 1.1333 0.007 0.002 0.000 0.059 1.1667 0.007 0.002 0.000 0.059 1.2000 0.007 0.002 0.000 0.059 1.2333 0.007 0.002 0.000 0.059 1.2667 0.007 0.002 0.000 0.059 1.3000 0.007 0.002 0.000 0.059 1.3333 0.007 0.002 0.000 0.059 1.3667 0.007 0.003 0.000 0.059 1.4000 0.007 0.003 0.000 0.059 1.4333 0.007 0.003 0.000 0.059 1.4667 0.007 0.003 0.000 0.059 1.5000 0.007 0.003 0.000 0.059 1.5333 0.007 0.003 0.000 0.059 1.5667 0.007 0.003 0.000 0.059 1.6000 0.007 0.003 0.000 0.059 1.6333 0.007 0.003 0.000 0.059 1.6667 0.007 0.003 0.000 0.059 1.7000 0.007 0.003 0.000 0.059 1.7333 0.007 0.003 0.000 0.059 1.7667 0.007 0.003 0.000 0.059 1.8000 0.007 0.004 0.000 0.059 1.8333 0.007 0.004 0.000 0.059 1.8667 0.007 0.004 0.000 0.059 1.9000 0.007 0.004 0.000 0.059 1.9333 0.007 0.004 0.000 0.059 1.9667 0.007 0.004 0.000 0.059 2.0000 0.007 0.004 0.000 0.059 2.0333 0.007 0.004 0.000 0.059 2.0667 0.007 0.004 0.000 0.059 2.1000 0.007 0.004 0.000 0.059 2.1333 0.007 0.004 0.000 0.059 2.1667 0.007 0.004 0.000 0.059 2.2000 0.007 0.004 0.000 0.059 2.2333 0.007 0.004 0.000 0.059 2.2667 0.007 0.005 0.000 0.059 2.3000 0.007 0.005 0.000 0.059 2.3333 0.007 0.005 0.000 0.059 2.3667 0.007 0.005 0.000 0.059 2.4000 0.007 0.005 0.000 0.059 2.4333 0.007 0.005 0.000 0.059 2.4667 0.007 0.005 0.000 0.059 2.5000 0.007 0.005 0.000 0.059 2.5333 0.007 0.005 0.000 0.059 2.5667 0.007 0.005 0.000 0.059 2.6000 0.007 0.005 0.000 0.059 2.6333 0.007 0.005 0.000 0.059 2.6667 0.007 0.005 0.000 0.059 2.7000 0.007 0.006 0.000 0.059 2.7333 0.007 0.006 0.000 0.059 2.7667 0.007 0.006 0.000 0.059 98223 INFILTRATION REV2 12/1/2021 9:05:52 AM Page 19 2.8000 0.007 0.006 0.000 0.059 2.8333 0.007 0.006 0.000 0.059 2.8667 0.007 0.006 0.000 0.059 2.9000 0.007 0.006 0.000 0.059 2.9333 0.007 0.006 0.269 0.059 2.9667 0.007 0.006 0.761 0.059 3.0000 0.007 0.006 1.397 0.059 98223 INFILTRATION REV2 12/1/2021 9:05:52 AM Page 20 Analysis Results POC 1 + Predeveloped x Mitigated Predeveloped Landuse Totals for POC #1 Total Pervious Area: 0.703 Total Impervious Area: 0 Mitigated Landuse Totals for POC #1 Total Pervious Area: 0.026 Total Impervious Area: 0.676 Flow Frequency Method: Log Pearson Type III 17B Flow Frequency Return Periods for Predeveloped. POC #1 Return Period Flow(cfs) 2 year 0.000856 5 year 0.001967 10 year 0.003268 25 year 0.005949 50 year 0.009049 100 year 0.013494 Flow Frequency Return Periods for Mitigated. POC #1 Return Period Flow(cfs) 2 year 0 5 year 0 10 year 0 25 year 0 50 year 0 100 year 0 Annual Peaks 98223 INFILTRATION REV2 12/1/2021 9:05:52 AM Page 21 Annual Peaks for Predeveloped and Mitigated. POC #1 Year Predeveloped Mitigated 1949 0.001 0.000 1950 0.002 0.000 1951 0.001 0.000 1952 0.001 0.000 1953 0.001 0.000 1954 0.005 0.000 1955 0.003 0.000 1956 0.001 0.000 1957 0.001 0.000 1958 0.001 0.000 1959 0.001 0.000 1960 0.001 0.000 1961 0.003 0.097 1962 0.001 0.000 1963 0.001 0.000 1964 0.002 0.000 1965 0.001 0.000 1966 0.001 0.000 1967 0.001 0.000 1968 0.001 0.000 1969 0.001 0.000 1970 0.001 0.000 1971 0.003 0.000 1972 0.001 0.000 1973 0.001 0.000 1974 0.002 0.000 1975 0.001 0.000 1976 0.002 0.000 1977 0.001 0.000 1978 0.001 0.000 1979 0.001 0.000 1980 0.001 0.000 1981 0.001 0.000 1982 0.001 0.000 1983 0.001 0.000 1984 0.001 0.000 1985 0.001 0.000 1986 0.006 0.000 1987 0.004 0.000 1988 0.001 0.000 1989 0.001 0.000 1990 0.001 0.000 1991 0.001 0.000 1992 0.001 0.000 1993 0.001 0.000 1994 0.001 0.000 1995 0.001 0.000 1996 0.008 0.000 1997 0.020 0.000 1998 0.001 0.000 1999 0.001 0.000 2000 0.001 0.000 2001 0.000 0.000 2002 0.001 0.000 2003 0.000 0.000 2004 0.001 0.000 98223 INFILTRATION REV2 12/1/2021 9:08:44 AM Page 22 2005 0.001 0.000 2006 0.022 0.000 2007 0.001 0.000 2008 0.001 0.000 2009 0.001 0.000 Ranked Annual Peaks Ranked Annual Peaks for Predeveloped and Mitigated. POC #1 Rank Predeveloped Mitigated 1 0.0221 0.0966 2 0.0198 0.0000 3 0.0079 0.0000 4 0.0059 0.0000 5 0.0046 0.0000 6 0.0039 0.0000 7 0.0034 0.0000 8 0.0032 0.0000 9 0.0031 0.0000 10 0.0021 0.0000 11 0.0020 0.0000 12 0.0018 0.0000 13 0.0015 0.0000 14 0.0015 0.0000 15 0.0014 0.0000 16 0.0014 0.0000 17 0.0013 0.0000 18 0.0012 0.0000 19 0.0012 0.0000 20 0.0011 0.0000 21 0.0010 0.0000 22 0.0010 0.0000 23 0.0008 0.0000 24 0.0006 0.0000 25 0.0006 0.0000 26 0.0006 0.0000 27 0.0006 0.0000 28 0.0006 0.0000 29 0.0006 0.0000 30 0.0006 0.0000 31 0.0006 0.0000 32 0.0006 0.0000 33 0.0006 0.0000 34 0.0006 0.0000 35 0.0006 0.0000 36 0.0006 0.0000 37 0.0006 0.0000 38 0.0006 0.0000 39 0.0006 0.0000 40 0.0006 0.0000 41 0.0006 0.0000 42 0.0006 0.0000 43 0.0006 0.0000 44 0.0006 0.0000 45 0.0006 0.0000 46 0.0006 0.0000 47 0.0006 0.0000 48 0.0006 0.0000 49 0.0006 0.0000 98223 INFILTRATION REV2 12/1/2021 9:08:44 AM Page 23 50 0.0006 0.0000 51 0.0006 0.0000 52 0.0006 0.0000 53 0.0006 0.0000 54 0.0006 0.0000 55 0.0005 0.0000 56 0.0005 0.0000 57 0.0005 0.0000 58 0.0005 0.0000 59 0.0005 0.0000 60 0.0005 0.0000 61 0.0004 0.0000 98223 INFILTRATION REV2 12/1/2021 9:08:44 AM Page 24 LID Duration Flows The Facility PASSED Flow(cfs) Predev Mit Percentage Pass/Fail 0.0001 27399 2 0 Pass 0.0001 26180 2 0 Pass 0.0001 25239 2 0 Pass 0.0001 24105 2 0 Pass 0.0001 23185 2 0 Pass 0.0001 22351 2 0 Pass 0.0001 21496 2 0 Pass 0.0001 21025 2 0 Pass 0.0001 20384 2 0 Pass 0.0001 19860 2 0 Pass 0.0001 19447 2 0 Pass 0.0001 18925 2 0 Pass 0.0001 18431 2 0 Pass 0.0001 18080 2 0 Pass 0.0001 17635 2 0 Pass 0.0001 17314 2 0 Pass 0.0001 16906 2 0 Pass 0.0001 16461 2 0 Pass 0.0001 16106 2 0 Pass 0.0001 15644 2 0 Pass 0.0001 15190 2 0 Pass 0.0001 14822 2 0 Pass 0.0001 14380 2 0 Pass 0.0002 13963 2 0 Pass 0.0002 13663 2 0 Pass 0.0002 13285 2 0 Pass 0.0002 12955 2 0 Pass 0.0002 12549 2 0 Pass 0.0002 12207 2 0 Pass 0.0002 11903 2 0 Pass 0.0002 11573 2 0 Pass 0.0002 11255 2 0 Pass 0.0002 11049 2 0 Pass 0.0002 10769 2 0 Pass 0.0002 10532 2 0 Pass 0.0002 10262 2 0 Pass 0.0002 10001 2 0 Pass 0.0002 9835 2 0 Pass 0.0002 9621 2 0 Pass 0.0002 9409 2 0 Pass 0.0002 9261 2 0 Pass 0.0002 9086 2 0 Pass 0.0002 8846 2 0 Pass 0.0002 8680 2 0 Pass 0.0002 8493 2 0 Pass 0.0002 8365 2 0 Pass 0.0002 8181 2 0 Pass 0.0002 7993 2 0 Pass 0.0002 7884 2 0 Pass 0.0002 7732 2 0 Pass 0.0003 7572 2 0 Pass 0.0003 7460 2 0 Pass 0.0003 7304 2 0 Pass 98223 INFILTRATION REV2 12/1/2021 9:08:44 AM Page 25 0.0003 7193 2 0 Pass 0.0003 7039 2 0 Pass 0.0003 6889 2 0 Pass 0.0003 6782 2 0 Pass 0.0003 6579 2 0 Pass 0.0003 6417 2 0 Pass 0.0003 6282 2 0 Pass 0.0003 6074 2 0 Pass 0.0003 5873 2 0 Pass 0.0003 5709 2 0 Pass 0.0003 5533 2 0 Pass 0.0003 5358 2 0 Pass 0.0003 5153 2 0 Pass 0.0003 4962 2 0 Pass 0.0003 4855 2 0 Pass 0.0003 4697 2 0 Pass 0.0003 4554 2 0 Pass 0.0003 4453 2 0 Pass 0.0003 4297 2 0 Pass 0.0003 4211 2 0 Pass 0.0003 4070 2 0 Pass 0.0003 3953 2 0 Pass 0.0003 3865 2 0 Pass 0.0003 3724 2 0 Pass 0.0003 3583 2 0 Pass 0.0004 3491 2 0 Pass 0.0004 3358 2 0 Pass 0.0004 3230 2 0 Pass 0.0004 3161 2 0 Pass 0.0004 3067 2 0 Pass 0.0004 3005 2 0 Pass 0.0004 2920 2 0 Pass 0.0004 2845 2 0 Pass 0.0004 2793 2 0 Pass 0.0004 2731 2 0 Pass 0.0004 2661 2 0 Pass 0.0004 2609 2 0 Pass 0.0004 2537 2 0 Pass 0.0004 2488 2 0 Pass 0.0004 2421 2 0 Pass 0.0004 2346 2 0 Pass 0.0004 2299 2 0 Pass 0.0004 2216 2 0 Pass 0.0004 2150 2 0 Pass 0.0004 2115 2 0 Pass 0.0004 2061 2 0 Pass 0.0004 1999 2 0 Pass 98223 INFILTRATION REV2 12/1/2021 9:08:44 AM Page 26 Duration Flows The Facility PASSED Flow(cfs) Predev Mit Percentage Pass/Fail 0.0004 1999 2 0 Pass 0.0005 797 2 0 Pass 0.0006 142 2 1 Pass 0.0007 119 2 1 Pass 0.0008 109 2 1 Pass 0.0009 94 2 2 Pass 0.0010 79 2 2 Pass 0.0010 68 2 2 Pass 0.0011 61 2 3 Pass 0.0012 59 2 3 Pass 0.0013 54 2 3 Pass 0.0014 51 2 3 Pass 0.0015 49 2 4 Pass 0.0016 47 2 4 Pass 0.0016 43 2 4 Pass 0.0017 40 2 5 Pass 0.0018 36 2 5 Pass 0.0019 36 2 5 Pass 0.0020 31 2 6 Pass 0.0021 31 2 6 Pass 0.0022 29 2 6 Pass 0.0023 29 2 6 Pass 0.0023 29 2 6 Pass 0.0024 26 2 7 Pass 0.0025 26 2 7 Pass 0.0026 26 2 7 Pass 0.0027 25 2 8 Pass 0.0028 23 2 8 Pass 0.0029 23 2 8 Pass 0.0030 23 2 8 Pass 0.0030 23 2 8 Pass 0.0031 22 2 9 Pass 0.0032 20 2 10 Pass 0.0033 19 2 10 Pass 0.0034 17 2 11 Pass 0.0035 16 2 12 Pass 0.0036 16 2 12 Pass 0.0036 15 2 13 Pass 0.0037 15 2 13 Pass 0.0038 15 2 13 Pass 0.0039 15 2 13 Pass 0.0040 13 2 15 Pass 0.0041 13 2 15 Pass 0.0042 13 2 15 Pass 0.0043 13 2 15 Pass 0.0043 13 2 15 Pass 0.0044 13 2 15 Pass 0.0045 13 2 15 Pass 0.0046 11 2 18 Pass 0.0047 11 2 18 Pass 0.0048 11 2 18 Pass 0.0049 11 2 18 Pass 0.0050 11 2 18 Pass 98223 INFILTRATION REV2 12/1/2021 9:09:29 AM Page 27 0.0050 11 2 18 Pass 0.0051 11 2 18 Pass 0.0052 11 2 18 Pass 0.0053 11 2 18 Pass 0.0054 11 2 18 Pass 0.0055 11 2 18 Pass 0.0056 11 2 18 Pass 0.0057 11 2 18 Pass 0.0057 11 2 18 Pass 0.0058 11 2 18 Pass 0.0059 9 2 22 Pass 0.0060 9 2 22 Pass 0.0061 9 2 22 Pass 0.0062 9 2 22 Pass 0.0063 9 2 22 Pass 0.0063 9 2 22 Pass 0.0064 9 2 22 Pass 0.0065 8 2 25 Pass 0.0066 8 2 25 Pass 0.0067 8 2 25 Pass 0.0068 8 2 25 Pass 0.0069 8 2 25 Pass 0.0070 7 2 28 Pass 0.0070 7 2 28 Pass 0.0071 7 2 28 Pass 0.0072 7 2 28 Pass 0.0073 7 2 28 Pass 0.0074 7 2 28 Pass 0.0075 7 2 28 Pass 0.0076 7 2 28 Pass 0.0077 7 2 28 Pass 0.0077 7 2 28 Pass 0.0078 7 2 28 Pass 0.0079 7 2 28 Pass 0.0080 6 2 33 Pass 0.0081 6 2 33 Pass 0.0082 6 2 33 Pass 0.0083 6 2 33 Pass 0.0084 6 2 33 Pass 0.0084 6 2 33 Pass 0.0085 6 2 33 Pass 0.0086 6 2 33 Pass 0.0087 6 2 33 Pass 0.0088 5 2 40 Pass 0.0089 5 2 40 Pass 0.0090 5 2 40 Pass 0.0090 5 2 40 Pass 98223 INFILTRATION REV2 12/1/2021 9:09:29 AM Page 28 Water Quality Water Quality BMP Flow and Volume for POC #1 On-line facility volume: 0 acre-feet On-line facility target flow: 0 cfs. Adjusted for 15 min: 0 cfs. Off-line facility target flow: 0 cfs. Adjusted for 15 min: 0 cfs. 98223 INFILTRATION REV2 12/1/2021 9:09:29 AM Page 29 LID Report 98223 INFILTRATION REV2 12/1/2021 9:09:29 AM Page 30 Model Default Modifications Total of 0 changes have been made. PERLND Changes No PERLND changes have been made. IMPLND Changes No IMPLND changes have been made. 98223 INFILTRATION REV2 12/1/2021 9:09:36 AM Page 31 Appendix Predeveloped Schematic 98223 INFILTRATION REV2 12/1/2021 9:09:36 AM Page 32 Mitigated Schematic 98223 INFILTRATION REV2 12/1/2021 9:09:36 AM Page 33 APPENDIX C â€“ OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL STORMWATER FACILITY MAINTENANCE MANUAL FOR PUBLIC & PRIVATELY OWNED STORMWATER FACILITIES PREPARED BY: CASCADE SURVEYING & ENGINEERING, INC. December 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................. 2 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................ 3 CATCH BASIN ........................................................................................................................................... 4 CATCH BASIN INSERT ............................................................................................................................. 7 CONVEYANCE STORMWATER PIPE ...................................................................................................... 9 OIL WATER SEPORATOR CATCH BASIN ............................................................................................ 10 INFILTRATION TRENCH ......................................................................................................................... 12 YARD DRAIN & CLEANOUT ................................................................................................................... 14 INTRODUCTION Background All residential, commercial, and industrial developments have some form of stormwater drainage facilities. Stormwater facilities generally drain to roadside ditches, underground storm pipe systems, streams, lakes, or to groundwater from infiltration facilities. Stormwater facilities generally consist of pipes, catch basins, swales, ditches, ponds, oil/water separators, underground infiltration trenches, and any other structure that collects, conveys, controls, and treats stormwater. Stormwater facilities are either privately owned or publicly owned. Private stormwater facility owners consist of individual residential property owners, a home ownersâ€™ association, commercial and industrial land owners. Privately owned stormwater facilities are generally installed on private property within the bounds of the private land, in a separate tract, or in an easement on land owned by others. Publicly owned stormwater facilities are usually owned and operated by a city, county, state, or federal entities. In either case, the owner of the system is responsible for operating and maintaining all elements of the facility. Purpose The objective of this manual is to ensure that stormwater control facilities are adequately maintained and operated properly. Storm system maintenance is necessary to protect streams, lakes, wetlands, and groundwater. Proper maintenance assures that storm systems operate as they were designed, and that they are cleaned of pollutants that they trap, such as sediment and oils, so that the storm system is not overwhelmed and becomes a pollutant source. Stormwater System Inspection Schedule The drainage system should be monitored periodically. For the first year after completion of construction, the system should be monitored after every large storm event (> 1-in in 24-hrs), and, during the period Oct. 1- Mar. 31 inspections should be conducted monthly. From April 1- Sept. 30, the facility should be monitored on a quarterly basis. Once the performance characteristics of the facility have been verified, the monitoring schedule can be reduced to an annual basis unless the performance data indicate that a more frequent schedule is required. (CATCH BASIN) Yard Drain & Cleanout What is a Yard Drain? A Yard Drain is similar to a Type 1 Catch Basin but smaller (most are 12 to 18 inches in diameter). ï‚· Currently, the most frequently used type of yard drain is a high density polyethylene (HDPE) pipe: o set vertically on end, o with the bell end up fitted with a grate, and o the bottom end resting on washed drain rock. ï‚· There are older versions which are made of either polyvinylchloride (PVC) or Concrete Pipe. How does a Yard Drain work? Yard Drain systems usually consist of several yard drains and 6â€-8â€ diameter HDPE pipe between them. They are designed for use in private residential or commercial property and not for use in public or private streets and roads. ï‚· They function as an intermediary stormwater conveyance system that connects roof and building foundation footing drains (4â€-6â€ diameter HDPE pipe) to the main stormwater conveyance system of: o Type 1 or 2 Catch Basins, and o 12â€ and larger diameter HDPE pipe. ï‚· Typically, in residential subdivisions these systems can be located along lot lines. ï‚· Yard Drains also have commercial property applications, often being installed to connect building roof and footing drains To the parking area and driveway drainage systems. NOTE: If Yard Drains are not visible, it is possible that Cleanouts were installed as a substitute. This is generally the case when the depth from the top of the Yard Drain grate to what would be the top of the washed drain rock exceeds 42â€. (See drawings below.) Common maintenance needs The most common tool for cleaning Yard Drains or Cleanouts is a yard hose. Cleaning by a vactor truck with its very high pressure and volume washing and vacuum system can destroy both the older Yard Drains or Cleanouts and pipe. It is better to use a low pressure washing system and scoop out by hand any mud and debris collecting in the Yard Drains or Cleanouts. Snohomish County Drainage Facility Maintenance Guide 11 Yard Drain Snohomish County Drainage Facility Maintenance Guide 12 Cleanout Snohomish County Drainage Facility Maintenance Guide 13 Yard Drain & Cleanout Drainage Results expected when system Potential Conditions when maintenance is performed feature defect maintenance is needed or not needed Metal Excessive ï‚· Obstruction Immediately in front of the ï‚· Obstruction removed. Grates accumulation drain grate or covering it is reducing of trash, flow causing ponding or partial flow debris, bypass. sediment and ï‚· Obstructing more than 1/3 of inlet or ï‚· Obstruction removed. vegetation outlet pipe diameter. ï‚· Decaying and generating odors that ï‚· Vegetation removed. could cause complaints or dangerous gases (e.g., methane). Not in place ï‚· Missing or only partially in place. ï‚· Grate in place, repaired or replaced. Damaged ï‚· Broken ï‚· Grate repaired or replaced. Sump Sediment, ï‚· Sediment exceeds 60 percent of the ï‚· Sediment removed. accumulation sump depth. ï‚· Measure from bottom of basin to invert of the lowest, but in no case less than a minimum of 6 inches clearance from the sediment surface to the invert of the lowest pipe. Structure Cracks in wall ï‚· Cracks in wall ï‚· Basin repaired or replaced. ï‚· Pipe is re-grouted and secure at basin wall. Settlement ï‚· Settlement or misalignment ï‚· Basin raised, realigned, repaired or or replaced. misalignment Pollutants in ï‚· Most commonly occurring are herbicides ï‚· Pollutants removed. water or and insecticides. sediment ï‚· Identify and remove source. Snohomish County Drainage Facility Maintenance Guide 14 Construction Stormwater General Permit Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for Paisley Lofts Construction Plans Tax Parcel Numbers: 00529900900101 / 00529900900300 Prepared for: The Washington State Department of Ecology Northwest Region Permittee / Owner Developer Operator / Contractor Grandview North, LLC N/A N/A Certified Erosion and Sediment Control Lead (CESCL) Name Organization Contact Phone Number N/A N/A N/A SWPPP Prepared By Name Organization Contact Phone Number Josh Hogan Cascade Surveying & (360) 435-5551 Engineering SWPPP Preparation Date April 2022 Project Construction Dates Activity / Phase Start Date End Date Civil Construction Application June 1st, 2022 October 1st, 2023 Table of Contents 1 Project Information .............................................................................................................. 4 1.1 Existing Conditions ...................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Proposed Construction Activities .................................................................................. 4 2 Construction Stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs) ........................................... 6 2.1 The 13 Elements .......................................................................................................... 6 2.1.1 Element 1: Preserve Vegetation / Mark Clearing Limits ........................................ 6 2.1.2 Element 2: Establish Construction Access ............................................................ 6 2.1.3 Element 3: Control Flow Rates ............................................................................. 7 2.1.4 Element 4: Install Sediment Controls .................................................................... 7 2.1.5 Element 5: Stabilize Soils ..................................................................................... 8 2.1.6 Element 6: Protect Slopes..................................................................................... 9 2.1.7 Element 7: Protect Drain Inlets ............................................................................. 9 2.1.8 Element 8: Stabilize Channels and Outlets ..........................................................10 2.1.9 Element 9: Control Pollutants ...............................................................................10 2.1.10 Element 10: Control Dewatering ..........................................................................11 2.1.11 Element 11: Maintain BMPs .................................................................................11 2.1.12 Element 12: Manage the Project ..........................................................................13 2.1.13 Element 13: Protect Low Impact Development (LID) BMPs .................................14 3 Pollution Prevention Team .................................................................................................15 4 Monitoring and Sampling Requirements ............................................................................16 4.1 Site Inspection ............................................................................................................16 4.2 Stormwater Quality Sampling ......................................................................................16 4.2.1 Turbidity Sampling ...............................................................................................16 4.2.2 pH Sampling ........................................................................................................16 5 Discharges to 303(d) or Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Waterbodies .........................17 5.1 303(d) Listed Waterbodies ..........................................................................................17 5.2 TMDL Waterbodies .....................................................................................................17 6 Reporting and Record Keeping ..........................................................................................18 6.1 Record Keeping ..........................................................................................................18 6.1.1 Site Log Book ......................................................................................................18 6.1.2 Records Retention ...............................................................................................18 6.1.3 Updating the SWPPP ...........................................................................................18 6.2 Reporting ....................................................................................................................18 6.2.1 Discharge Monitoring Reports ..............................................................................18 6.2.2 Notification of Noncompliance ................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. P a g e | 1 List of Tables Table 1 â€“ Summary of Site Pollutant Constituents ................................................................ 4 Table 2 â€“ Pollutants ................................................................................................................10 Table 3 â€“ pH-Modifying Sources ............................................................................................10 Table 5 â€“ Management ............................................................................................................13 Table 6 â€“ BMP Implementation Schedule ..............................................................................14 Table 7 â€“ Team Information ....................................................................................................15 List of Appendices Appendix/Glossary A. Site Map B. BMP Detail C. Correspondence D. Site Inspection Form E. Construction Stormwater General Permit (CSWGP) F. 303(d) List Waterbodies / TMDL Waterbodies Information G. Contaminated Site Information H. Engineering Calculations P a g e | 2 List of Acronyms and Abbreviations Acronym / Abbreviation Explanation 303(d) Section of the Clean Water Act pertaining to Impaired Waterbodies BFO Bellingham Field Office of the Department of Ecology BMP(s) Best Management Practice(s) CESCL Certified Erosion and Sediment Control Lead CO2 Carbon Dioxide CRO Central Regional Office of the Department of Ecology CSWGP Construction Stormwater General Permit CWA Clean Water Act DMR Discharge Monitoring Report DO Dissolved Oxygen Ecology Washington State Department of Ecology EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency ERO Eastern Regional Office of the Department of Ecology ERTS Environmental Report Tracking System ESC Erosion and Sediment Control GULD General Use Level Designation NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NTU Nephelometric Turbidity Units NWRO Northwest Regional Office of the Department of Ecology pH Power of Hydrogen RCW Revised Code of Washington SPCC Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure su Standard Units SWMMEW Stormwater Management Manual for Eastern Washington SWMMWW Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington SWPPP Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan TESC Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control SWRO Southwest Regional Office of the Department of Ecology TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load VFO Vancouver Field Office of the Department of Ecology WAC Washington Administrative Code WSDOT Washington Department of Transportation WWHM Western Washington Hydrology Model P a g e | 3 1 Project Information Project/Site Name: Paisley Lofts Construction Plans Street/Location: 102 E. Division St. City: Arlington State: WA Zip code: 98223 Subdivision: N/A Receiving waterbody: N/A 1.1 Existing Conditions Total acreage (including support activities such as off-site equipment staging yards, material storage areas, borrow areas). Total acreage: 0.77 acres Disturbed acreage: 0.77 acres Existing structures: One structure Landscape Small shrubs and trees around building topography: Drainage patterns: Site slopes northwest and runoff flows off the site Existing Vegetation: None â€“ fully developed Critical Areas (wetlands, streams, high erosion None onsite risk, steep or difficult to stabilize slopes): List of known impairments for 303(d) listed or Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for the receiving waterbody: N/A Table 1 includes a list of suspected and/or known contaminants associated with the construction activity. Table 1 â€“ Summary of Site Pollutant Constituents Constituent Location Depth Concentration (Pollutant) 1.2 Proposed Construction Activities Description of site development (example: subdivision): Multi Use Development Description of construction activities (example: site preparation, demolition, excavation): Approximate anticipated grading for the site: Cut = 750 cu. yds. Fill = 600 cu. yds. Net (Cut) = 150 cu. yds. P a g e | 4 Description of site drainage including flow from and onto adjacent properties. Must be consistent with Site Map in Appendix A: The site has well-draining soils so no flow from or onto adjacent properties is expected. Description of final stabilization (example: extent of revegetation, paving, landscaping): The site will consist of building, paved parking lot with landscaping area. The landscaping will be amended soils. Contaminated Site Information: Proposed activities regarding contaminated soils or groundwater (example: on-site treatment system, authorized sanitary sewer discharge): N/A P a g e | 5 2 Construction Stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs) The SWPPP is a living document reflecting current conditions and changes throughout the life of the project. These changes may be informal (i.e., hand-written notes and deletions). Update the SWPPP when the CESCL has noted a deficiency in BMPs or deviation from original design. 2.1 The 13 Elements 2.1.1 Element 1: Preserve Vegetation / Mark Clearing Limits To protect adjacent properties and to reduce the area of soil exposed to construction, the limits of construction will be clearly marked before land-disturbing activities begin. Trees that are to be preserved, as well as all sensitive areas and their buffers, shall be clearly delineated, both in the field and on the plans. In general, natural vegetation and native topsoil shall be retained in an undisturbed state to the maximum extent possible. The BMPs relevant to marking the clearing limits that will be applied for this project include: o Preserving Natural Vegetation (BMP C101) o High Visibility Plastic or Metal Fence (BMP C103) BMP C101: Clearing limits will be marked both on the plans and in the field, where natural vegetation is to be protected. BMP C103: High visibility plastic fence will be used to delineate clearing limits and areas of vegetation to be protected. Alternate BMPs for marking clearing limits are included in Appendix C as a quick reference tool for the onsite inspector in the event the BMP(s) listed above are deemed ineffective or inappropriate during construction, the Certified Erosion and Sediment Control Lead will promptly initiate the implementation of one or more of the alternative BMPs listed in Appendix C after the first sign that existing BMPs are ineffective or failing. 2.1.2 Element 2: Establish Construction Access Construction access or activities occurring on unpaved areas shall be minimized, yet where necessary, access points shall be stabilized to minimize the tracking of sediment onto public roads, and wheel washing, street sweeping, and street cleaning shall be employed to prevent sediment from entering state waters. All wash wastewater shall be controlled on site. The specific BMPs related to establishing construction access that will be used on this project include: o Stabilized Construction Entrance (BMP C105) BMP C105: A stabilized construction entrance will be located at the entrance to the site. P a g e | 6 Alternate construction access BMPs are included in Appendix C as a quick reference tool for the onsite inspector in the event the BMP(s) listed above are deemed ineffective or inappropriate during construction, the Certified Erosion and Sediment Control Lead will promptly initiate the implementation of one or more of the alternative BMPs listed in Appendix C after the first sign that existing BMPs are ineffective or failing. 2.1.3 Element 3: Control Flow Rates In order to protect the properties and waterways downstream of the project site, stormwater discharges from the site will be controlled if increased. The specific BMPs for flow control that is being used on this project include: o Silt Fence (BMP C233) Alternate flow control BMPs are included in Appendix C as a quick reference tool for the onsite inspector in the event the BMP(s) listed above are deemed ineffective or inappropriate during construction, the Certified Erosion and Sediment Control Lead will promptly initiate the implementation of one or more of the alternative BMPs listed in Appendix C after the first sign that existing BMPs are ineffective or failing. In general, discharge rates of stormwater from the site will be controlled where increases in impervious area or soil compaction during construction could lead to downstream erosion, or where necessary to meet local agency stormwater discharge requirements (e.g. discharge to combined sewer systems). Will you construct stormwater retention and/or detention facilities? Yes No Will you use permanent infiltration ponds or other low impact development (example: rain gardens, bio-retention, porous pavement) to control flow during construction? Yes No 2.1.4 Element 4: Install Sediment Controls All stormwater runoff from disturbed areas shall pass through an appropriate sediment removal BMP before leaving the construction site or prior to being discharged to an infiltration facility. The specific BMPs to be used for controlling sediment on this project include: o Silt Fence (BMP C233) Alternate sediment control BMPs are included in Appendix C as a quick reference tool for the onsite inspector in the event the BMP(s) listed above are deemed ineffective or inappropriate during construction, the Certified Erosion and Sediment Control Lead will promptly initiate the P a g e | 7 implementation of one or more of the alternative BMPs listed in Appendix C after the first sign that existing BMPs are ineffective or failing. In addition, sediment will be removed from paved areas in and adjacent to construction work areas manually or using mechanical sweepers, as needed, to minimize tracking of sediments on vehicle tires away from the site and to minimize washoff of sediments from adjacent streets in runoff. Whenever possible, sediment laden water shall be discharged into onsite, relatively level, vegetated areas (BMP C240 paragraph 5, page 4-102). 2.1.5 Element 5: Stabilize Soils Exposed and unworked soils shall be stabilized with the application of effective BMPs to prevent erosion throughout the life of the project. The specific BMPs for soil stabilization that shall be used on this project include: o Preserve Natural Vegetation (BMP C101) o Temporary and Permanent Seeding (BMP C120) o Mulching (BMP C121) o Plastic Covering (BMP C123) o Topsoiling/Composting (BMP C125) Alternate soil stabilization BMPs are included in Appendix C as a quick reference tool for the onsite inspector in the event the BMP(s) listed above are deemed ineffective or inappropriate during construction, the Certified Erosion and Sediment Control Lead will promptly initiate the implementation of one or more of the alternative BMPs listed in Appendix C after the first sign that existing BMPs are ineffective or failing. The project site is located west of the Cascade Mountain Crest. As such, no soils shall remain exposed and unworked for more than 7 days during the dry season (May 1 to September 30) and 2 days during the wet season (October 1 to April 30). Regardless of the time of year, all soils shall be stabilized at the end of the shift before a holiday or weekend if needed based on weather forecasts. In general, cut and fill slopes will be stabilized as soon as possible and soil stockpiles will be temporarily covered with plastic sheeting. All stockpiled soils shall be stabilized from erosion, protected with sediment trapping measures, and where possible, be located away from storm drain inlets, waterways, and drainage channels. P a g e | 8 West of the Cascade Mountains Crest Number of Days Soils Can Season Dates be Left Exposed During the Dry Season May 1 â€“ September 30 7 days During the Wet Season October 1 â€“ April 30 2 days Soils must be stabilized at the end of the shift before a holiday or weekend if needed based on the weather forecast. Anticipated project dates: Start date: June 2022 End date: October 2023 Will you construct during the wet season? Yes No Responsible Staff: Scott Wammack 2.1.6 Element 6: Protect Slopes All cut and fill slopes will be designed, constructed, and protected in a manner than minimizes erosion. The following specific BMPs will be used to protect slopes for this project: o Temporary and Permanent Seeding (BMP C120) Alternate slope protection BMPs are included in Appendix C as a quick reference tool for the onsite inspector in the event the BMP(s) listed above are deemed ineffective or inappropriate during construction, the Certified Erosion and Sediment Control Lead will promptly initiate the implementation of one or more of the alternative BMPs listed in Appendix C after the first sign that existing BMPs are ineffective or failing. Will steep slopes be present at the site during construction? Yes No 2.1.7 Element 7: Protect Drain Inlets All storm drain inlets and culverts made operable during construction shall be protected to prevent unfiltered or untreated water from entering the drainage conveyance system. However, the first priority is to keep all access roads clean of sediment and keep street wash water separate from entering storm drains until treatment can be provided. Storm Drain Inlet Protection (BMP C220) will be implemented for all drainage inlets and culverts that could potentially be impacted by sediment-laden runoff on and near the project site. The following inlet protection measures will be applied on this project: o Storm Drain Inlet Protection (BMP C220). P a g e | 9 If the BMP options listed above are deemed ineffective or inappropriate during construction, the Certified Erosion and Sediment Control Lead shall implement one or more of the alternative BMP inlet protection options listed in Appendix C. 2.1.8 Element 8: Stabilize Channels and Outlets There are no outlets proposed on site. 2.1.9 Element 9: Control Pollutants The following pollutants are anticipated to be present on-site: Table 2 â€“ Pollutants Pollutant (List pollutants and source, if applicable) All pollutants, including waste materials and demolition debris, that occur onsite shall be handled and disposed of in a manner that does not cause contamination of stormwater. Good housekeeping and preventative measures will be taken to ensure that the site will be kept clean, well-organized, and free of debris. If required, BMPs to be implemented to control specific sources of pollutants are discussed below. The facility does not require a Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan under the Federal regulations of the Clean Water Act (CWA). Will maintenance, fueling, and/or repair of heavy equipment and vehicles occur on-site? Yes No Will wheel wash or tire bath system BMPs be used during construction? Yes No Will pH-modifying sources be present on-site? Yes No Table 3 â€“ pH-Modifying Sources None Bulk cement Cement kiln dust P a g e | 10 Fly ash Other cementitious materials New concrete washing or curing waters Waste streams generated from concrete grinding and sawing Exposed aggregate processes Dewatering concrete vaults Concrete pumping and mixer washout waters Recycled concrete Recycled concrete stockpiles Other (i.e., calcium lignosulfate) [please describe: ] Concrete trucks must not be washed out onto the ground, or into storm drains, open ditches, streets, or streams. Excess concrete must not be dumped on-site, except in designated concrete washout areas with appropriate BMPs installed. Will uncontaminated water from water-only based shaft drilling for construction of building, road, and bridge foundations be infiltrated provided the wastewater is managed in a way that prohibits discharge to surface waters? Yes No 2.1.10 Element 10: Control Dewatering There will be no dewatering during the duration of the project. 2.1.11 Element 11: Maintain BMPs All temporary and permanent Erosion and Sediment Control (ESC) BMPs shall be maintained and repaired as needed to ensure continued performance of their intended function. Maintenance and repair shall be conducted in accordance with each particular BMP specification (see Volume II of the SWMMWW or Chapter 7 of the SWMMEW). Visual monitoring of all BMPs installed at the site will be conducted at least once every calendar week and within 24 hours of any stormwater or non-stormwater discharge from the site. If the site becomes inactive and is temporarily stabilized, the inspection frequency may be reduced to once every calendar month. All temporary ESC BMPs shall be removed within 30 days after final site stabilization is achieved or after the temporary BMPs are no longer needed. Trapped sediment shall be stabilized on-site or removed. Disturbed soil resulting from removal of either BMPs or vegetation shall be permanently stabilized. P a g e | 11 Additionally, protection must be provided for all BMPs installed for the permanent control of stormwater from sediment and compaction. BMPs that are to remain in place following completion of construction shall be examined and restored to full operating condition. If sediment enters these BMPs during construction, the sediment shall be removed and the facility shall be returned to conditions specified in the construction documents. P a g e | 12 2.1.12 Element 12: Manage the Project The project will be managed based on the following principles: â€¢ Projects will be phased to the maximum extent practicable and seasonal work limitations will be taken into account. â€¢ Inspection and monitoring: o Inspection, maintenance and repair of all BMPs will occur as needed to ensure performance of their intended function. o Site inspections and monitoring will be conducted in accordance with Special Condition S4 of the CSWGP. Sampling locations are indicated on the Site Map. Sampling station(s) are located in accordance with applicable requirements of the CSWGP. â€¢ Maintain an updated SWPPP. o The SWPPP will be updated, maintained, and implemented in accordance with Special Conditions S3, S4, and S9 of the CSWGP. As site work progresses the SWPPP will be modified routinely to reflect changing site conditions. The SWPPP will be reviewed monthly to ensure the content is current. Table 5 â€“ Management Design the project to fit the existing topography, soils, and drainage patterns Emphasize erosion control rather than sediment control Minimize the extent and duration of the area exposed Keep runoff velocities low Retain sediment on-site Thoroughly monitor site and maintain all ESC measures Schedule major earthwork during the dry season Other (please describe) P a g e | 13 Table 6 â€“ BMP Implementation Schedule Phase of Construction Wet/Dry Stormwater BMPs Date Project Season [Insert construction [Insert BMP] [MM/DD/YYYY] [Insert activity] Season] 2.1.13 Element 13: Protect Low Impact Development (LID) BMPs Infiltration will be used to meet the LID flow requirements as outlined in the 2012 Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual. Where grading is required, BMP T5.13 Post Construction Soil Quality and Depth shall be used to return soils to pre-disturbed conditions. All heavy equipment must be kept off existing soils under LID facilities that have been excavated to final grade to retain the infiltration rate of the soils. P a g e | 14 3 Pollution Prevention Team Table 7 â€“ Team Information Title Name(s) Phone Number Certified Erosion and N/A N/A Sediment Control Lead (CESCL) Resident Engineer Kimberly Busteed 360-435-5551 Emergency Ecology Chris Wilson 425-953-3206 Contact Emergency Permittee/ Scott Wammack 360-435-7171 Owner Contact Non-Emergency Owner Scott Wammack 360-435-7171 Contact Monitoring Personnel N/A N/A Ecology Regional Office Washington Northwest Regional Office 425-649-7000 Note: CESCL is not required for this project since the area of disturbance is less than 1 acre. P a g e | 15 4 Monitoring and Sampling Requirements Monitoring includes visual inspection, sampling for water quality parameters of concern, and documentation of the inspection and sampling findings in a site log book. A site log book will be maintained for all on-site construction activities and will include: â€¢ A record of the implementation of the SWPPP and other permit requirements â€¢ Site inspections â€¢ Stormwater sampling data A Construction Stormwater Site Inspection Form File can be found under Appendix D. The site log book must be maintained on-site within reasonable access to the site and be made available upon request to Ecology or the local jurisdiction. Numeric effluent limits may be required for certain discharges to 303(d) listed waterbodies. See CSWGP Special Condition S8 and Section 5 of this template. 4.1 Site Inspection Site inspections are not required for this project. 4.2 Stormwater Quality Sampling 4.2.1 Turbidity Sampling Sampling is not required for this project. 4.2.2 pH Sampling pH monitoring is not required for this project. P a g e | 16 5 Discharges to 303(d) or Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Waterbodies 5.1 303(d) Listed Waterbodies: Is the receiving water 303(d) (Category 5) listed for turbidity, fine sediment, phosphorus, or pH? Yes No 5.2 TMDL Waterbodies Waste Load Allocation for CWSGP discharges: N/A Discharges to TMDL receiving waterbodies will meet in-stream water quality criteria at the point of discharge. The Construction Stormwater General Permit Proposed New Discharge to an Impaired Water Body form is included in Appendix F. P a g e | 17 6 Reporting and Record Keeping 6.1 Record Keeping 6.1.1 Site Log Book Site log book is not required for this project. 6.1.2 Records Retention Records retention is not required for this project. 6.1.3 Updating the SWPPP The SWPPP will be modified if: â€¢ Found ineffective in eliminating or significantly minimizing pollutants in stormwater discharges from the site. â€¢ There is a change in design, construction, operation, or maintenance at the construction site that has, or could have, a significant effect on the discharge of pollutants to waters of the State. The SWPPP will be modified within seven (7) days if inspection(s) or investigation(s) determine additional or modified BMPs are necessary for compliance. An updated timeline for BMP implementation will be prepared. 6.2 Reporting 6.2.1 Discharge Monitoring Reports Cumulative soil disturbance is less than one (1) acre; therefore, Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs) will not be submitted to Ecology because water quality sampling is not being conducted at the site. P a g e | 18 Appendix/Glossary A. Site Map P a g e | 19 B. BMP Detail The following includes a list of possible alternative BMPs for each of the 12 elements not described in the main SWPPP text. This list can be referenced in the event a BMP for a specific element is not functioning as designed and an alternative BMP needs to be implemented. Element #1 â€“ Mark Clearing Limits Buffer Zones (BMP C102) Element #2 â€“ Establish Construction Access Wheel Wash (BMP C106) Element #3 - Control Flow Rates Triangular Silt Dike (BMP C208) Element #4 â€“ Install Sediment Controls Straw Wattles (BMP C235) Element #5 â€“ Stabilize Soils Sodding (BMP C124) Surface Roughening (BMP C130) Element #6 â€“ Protect Slopes Gradient Terrace (BMP C131) Element #7 â€“ Protect Drain Inlets Brush Barrier (BMP C231) Element #8 â€“ Stabilize Channels and Outlets Interceptor Dike and Swale (BMP C200) Element #9 â€“ Control Pollutants Vegetated Strip (BMP C234) P a g e | 20 C. Correspondence Ecology EPA Local Government D. Site Inspection Form The Construction Stormwater Site Inspection Form is attached, and can also be found at the following address; https://ecology.wa.gov/Regulations-Permits/Permits-certifications/Stormwater-general- permits/Construction-stormwater-permit P a g e | 21 E. Construction Stormwater General Permit (CSWGP) Download the CSWGP: http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/wq/stormwater/construction/index.html F. 303(d) List Waterbodies / TMDL Waterbodies Information N/A G. Contaminated Site Information N/A H. Engineering Calculations See Drainage Report P a g e | 22 CITY OF ARLINGTON - PAISLEY LOFTS FILE NO.: PORTION SW1/4, SE1/4, SEC.2, TWP.31N, RGE.5E, W.M. GRAPHIC SCALE DATUM: NAVD 88 CASCADE SURVEYING & Â· ENGINEERING, INC. ING ER E N I G N 0 E 7 & 91 G LEGEND: NI E C Y E N 17.67' 21.33' 6' E. DIVISION STREET V I R S U 8.41' S E D ACSAC 37.27 FT. PATH OF FRONT WHEEL PATH OF REAR WHEEL PATH OF OVERHANG 90Â° C C C C C C C C CENTENNIAL TRAIL PATH OF OVERHANG 6' 21.33' 17.67' PATH OF FRONT WHEEL 89Â° 8.41' PATH OF REAR WHEEL N. OLYMPIC AVENUE 37.27 FT. DATEDATEDATE 37.27 FT. 6' 21.33' DESIGNEDDRAWNCHECKEDFIELD BOOK 17.67' 8.41' PATH OF FRONT WHEEL 89Â° PATH OF OVERHANG PATH OF REAR WHEEL CITY FILE NO.: PAISLEY LOFTS GRANDVIEW NORTH LLC TRUCK TURNING RADIUS CITY OF ARLINGTON 1 OF 1 # 22923 PLANT SCHEDULE S.R. 530 DIVISION STREET SR 530 - DIVISION ST. EXISTING LANDSCAPE BED TO BE TREES CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE 'FRESHENED UP' WITH ALL WEEDS REMOVE EXISTING PLANT REMOVED AND ADDITION OF 2" OF MATERIAL IN THIS AREA. ANY MULCH SO AS TO BE IN A NEWLY AME GRA 2 Amelanchier x grandiflora `Autumn Brilliance` Autumn Brilliance Serviceberry 2" Cal. POT DRO STUMPS TO BE CUT TO BELOW TREE SPECIES TO BE CONFIRMED WITH INSTALLED CONDITION GRADE CITY OF ARLINGTON MASTER STREET TREE PLAN PAR PAR 2 Parrotia persica Persian Parrotia 2" Cal. 21'-0" 30'-7" PYR CLE 5 Pyrus calleryana `Cleveland Select` Chanticleer Callery Pear 2" Cal. 34'-11" 88 sf 88 sf MAH RE4 ZEL GRE 8 Zelkova serrata `Green Vase` Green Vase Sawleaf Zelkova 2" Cal. 5'-0" PIE CA2 ILE GGI SHRUBS CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE 150 sf POL MU2 1961 sf ILE SKY 18'-0" 165 sf POL MU2 HEU B21 NAN LE8 SYR MEY CHA GRA 1 Chamaecyparis obtusa `Gracilis` Slender Hinoki Cypress 5 gal. CHA GRA HEM YH3 CONTRACTOR MAY INSTALL 'TREE CIS COR 6 Cistus corbariensis White Rockrose 2 gal. 6-FOOT PLANTING PIT GATOR' OR EQUAL WATERING BAGS AND MULCH RING ON ALL TREES. CONFIRM WITH 3095 sf AROUND TREES IN LAWN. OWNER. COR KE3 2 Cornus stolonifera `Kelseyi` Kelsey Dogwood 2 gal. 10 DAFFODIL BULBS 13'-8" AROUND EACH TREE ILE SKY 3 Ilex crenata `Sky Pencil` Sky Pencil Japanese Holly 5 gal. C C C C C C C C ILE GGI 10 Ilex glabra `Gem Box` Inkberry Holly 2 gal. 15'-7" CENTENNIAL TRAIL EXISTING LAWN AREA TO HAVE ALL MAH RE4 13 Mahonia repens Creeping Mahonia 2 gal. LOW SPOTS LEVELED WITH TOPSOIL, OLYMPIC AVE. HAND SEEDED, AND FERTILIZED OLYMPIC AVENUE NAN LE8 4 Nandina domestica `Lemon Lime` Lemon Lime Nandina 2 gal. 12'-10" 9'-1" ONE WAY 161 sf ONE WAY 9'-7" PIE CA2 8 Pieris japonica `Cavatine` Lily of the Valley Bush 2 gal. Hybrid Daylily POT DRO 9 Potentilla fruticosa 'Gold Drop' Gold Drop Bush Cinquefoil 2 gal. ZEL GRE 18'-2" 18'-0" SYR MEY 2 Syringa meyeri 'Palibin' Dwarf Korean Lilac 2 gal. 152 sf THU EM2 12 Thuja occidentalis `Emerald` Emerald Arborvitae 5` Ht. CIS COR PAR PAR THU EM2 WEI MID 5 Weigela florida `Midnight Wine` TM Weigela 2 gal. PERENNIALS CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CAR OS2 4 Carex oshimensis `Everoro` Everoro Japanese Sedge 1 gal. HEM YH3 18 Hemerocallis x Hybrid Daylily 1 gal. PLANTING PLAN HEU B21 10 Heuchera x `Black Beauty` Coral Bells 1 gal. 1" = 20'-0" (CHECK SCALE BAR FOR ACCURACY) OPH BLA 3 Ophiopogon japonicus `Black` Black Mondo Grass 1 gal. POL MU2 14 Polystichum munitum Western Sword Fern 1 gal. Landscape Statistics GROUND COVERS CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE S.R. 530 DIVISION STREET TOTAL LANDSCAPE SR 530 - DIVISION ST. ARC UVA 83 Arctostaphylos uva-ursi Kinnikinnick 6" Site 16,949 sf Onsite Landscape 313 sf 1.88% SOD/SEED CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE 2" caliper approved tree GRA ENM 5,135 sf Low Grow Lawn Seed Mix Locally Proven Overseed of existing Lawn Area seed STREET FRONTAGE provided per code. every 30' o.c. required C C C C C C C C PARKING LOT LANDSCAPE 65 STALLS CENTENNIAL TRAIL OLYMPIC AVE. OLYMPIC AVENUE vehicle accommodation area 10,343 SF ONE WAY ONE WAY 793 SF COMBINED shade required (20% VAC) 2,069 SF required 2,491 SF provided Number of trees required 258 SF TYPICAL 13 required 14 provided (1 tree / 5 stalls) VEHICLE ACCOMOMDATION SHADE AREA NO SCALE NORTH one inch 0 20 40 60 80 NO. DATE REVISION BY REV. prepared for: prepared by: ISSUE DATE: 3.21.2022 SCALES: 1 12.22.21 Special Use Submittal pd pd Grandview North eccosDesign Paisley Lofts; project # 918 HORIZONTAL : 1" = 20' DRAWING: 2146 site 2 3.16.22 UPDATED per COA comments pd pd Paisley Lofts LANDSCAPE PLAN Landscape Architecture and Planning VERTICAL : N/A JOB NO.: 2146 Mount Vernon, WA 98273 E. DivisionStreet p. 360.419.7400 DESIGNED: PD SHEET: f. 800.508.2017 contact: Scott Wammack eccosDesignLLC www.eccosdesign.com Arlington, WA DRAWN: PD PL-1 CHECKED: PD GENERAL NOTES SOIL NOTES 1. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED BY PERSONS FAMILIAR WITH THIS KIND OF WORK AND 1. CONTRACTOR MAY STOCKPILE SITE TOPSOIL FOR POSSIBLE RE-USE IN UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF A QUALIFIED FOREMAN. LANDSCAPE BEDS. STOCKPILED TOPSOIL TO BE APPROVED BY OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE. ROAD BASE, GLACIAL TILL, GRAVEL OR CONTAMINATED 2. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SIZES AND QUALITY TO CONFORM TO AMERICAN ASSOC. OF SOILS ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE AND WILL BE REJECTED. NURSERYMEN, AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK, MOST RECENT PUBLISHED. 2. SITE TOPSOIL SHALL HAVE ALL ROCKS, GRASS CLODS AND DEBRIS LARGER 3. PLANT LOCATIONS ON THE PLANS ARE DIAGRAMMATIC AND MAY BE SUBJECT TO THAN 1" WHENEVER VISIBLE ON THE SURFACE ADJUSTMENT IN THE FIELD BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. 3. EXISTING SITE TOPSOIL TO BE AMENDED WITH COMPOST AT A RATIO OF 3:1. 3 4. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE OF NURSERY STOCK AND SHALL BE OF THE TYPE, SIZE UNITS OF EXISTING SOIL TO ONE UNIT OF COMPOST. COMPOST TO BE WSDOT AND CONDITION SPECIFIED. THE PLANT MATERIAL SHALL EXHIBIT NORMAL HABITS OF CERTIFIED. GROWTH FOR THE SPECIES, SHALL HAVE BUDS INTACT AND SHALL BE FREE OF DISEASE, INSECTS, SCARS, BRUISES, BREAKS, SEED AND WEED ROOTS. 4. IN LIEU OF AMENDING SITE TOPSOIL CONTRACTORS MAY CHOOSE TO USE IMPORTED 2-WAY TOPSOIL. 5. SEE NOTES THIS SHEET FOR TOPSOIL DEPTH AND SPECIFICATION. 5. TOPSOIL DEPTHS 6. MEDIUM BARK MULCH IS TO BE INSTALLED AT ALL NEW PLANTING AREAS WITH A MINIMUM OF 2 INCHES. 5.1. TOPSOIL TO BE PLACED AT A MINIMUM OF 9" IN ALL LANDSCAPE BED AREAS AND INCORPORATED INTO EXISTING SUBGRADE. LIGHTLY TAMP 6" LAYERS 8. ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL HAVE PLANTING BACKFILL AMENDED WITH A WETTING OF SOIL BY HAND OR LIGHTLY WITH EXCAVATOR. AGENT (TERAWET OR EQUAL) APPLIED AT MANUFACTURES RECOMMENDED RATE. 5.2. TOPSOIL TO BE PLACE AT AT MINIMUM OF 12" IN ALL TREE-PIT AREAS. SEE 9. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL SITE UTILITIES PRIOR TO DETAIL THIS PAGE. LANDSCAPE IMPLEMENTATION. PLANT LOCATIONS MAY BE ADJUSTED TO AVOID CONFLICT. 5.3. TOPSOIL SHALL NOT BE MOVED, MIXED OR PLACE WHILE SATURATED. 10. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE NECESSARY PRECAUTIONS TO PROTECT EXISTING SITE IMPROVEMENTS, PAVING, WALLS, AND UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. DAMAGE SHALL BE 6. IN ALL INSTANCES, PLACED TOPSOIL TO BE INCOPRPORTED INTO EXISTING REPAIRED TO THE OWNER'S SATISFACTION AND AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. GRADE. 11. PLANT COUNT IS FOR THE CONTRACTOR'S CONVENIENCE; IF THERE IS A DISCREPANCY, THE PLAN SHALL GOVERN. ACTUAL PLANT QUANTITIES TO BE DETERMINED BY REQUIRED PLANT SPACING. 12. ALL AREAS TO BE PLANTED WITH GROUNDCOVER ARE INDICATED ON THE PLAN WITH A HATCH PATTERN. SEE PLANT LIST FOR PLANT TYPE, SIZE, AND SPACING. 13. SUBSTITUTION OF PLANT VARIETIES DUE TO LACK OF AVAILABILITY SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE AND CITY. MAINTENANCE NOTES - 14. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ASSUMED TO BE PARALLEL OR PERPENDICULAR UNLESS 1 COA TREE IN 4X4 GRATE DETAIL 2 COA TREE PLANTING DETAIL OTHERWISE NOTED. 1. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCE ARE STREET TREES TO BE TOPPED OR PRUNED L-2 NO SCALE L-2 NO SCALE 15. ALL SOIL GRADES TO BE A MINIMUM SIX INCHES BELOW ADJACENT FINISH FLOOR WITHOUT PERMISSION OF THE CITY ARBORIST. ELEVATIONS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ALL GRADES ADJACENT TO A BUILDING SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM SLOPE OF 5% 3' FROM FOUNDATION. 2. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCE ARE SHRUBS TO BE SHEARED OR SHAPED WITHOUT EXPLICIT PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER. SHRUBS ARE DESIGNED 16. ALL FINISH GRADES TO BE FLUSH WITH ADJACENT SURFACES, SUCH AS TOP OF CURB. TO FILL AND GROW IN TO A PERMANENT MATURE SIZE. 17. ALL GRADES, DIMENSIONS AND EXISTING CONDITIONS SHALL BE VERIFIED BY THE 3. GROUNDCOVER THAT GROWS 'OUT' OF BEDS AND INTO ADJACENT WALKS OR CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. ANY DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE BROUGHT TO ROADS ARE TO BE CUT-BACK AS NEEDED. GROUNDCOVER PLANT. THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. CUTBACK, PULL OUT AND DISTURB ALL SEE PLANT LIST 4. PERENNIAL AND GRASSES WHICH ARE DECIDUOUS MAY BE CUT BACK AT CIRCLING ROOTS FROM ANY CONTAINER 1. PLANT SHRUB 1/2" HIGHER THAN DEPTH GROWN PLANTS BARK MULCH GROWN AT NURSERY. 18. SUPPLEMENTAL HAND WATERING TO BE DONE DURING FIRST TWO YEARS TO GUARANTEE OWNERS DISCRETION, ONCE PER YEAR, DURING THE MONTHS OF FEBRUARY, 2. FERTILIZE ALL PLANTS WITH APPROVED PLANT ESTABLISHMENT. IF CITY REQUIRES AUTOMATED IRRIGATION SYSTEM THEN MARCH OR APRIL. STARTER FERTILIZER APPLIED AT BIDDER DESIGNED SYSTEM WILL BE PROVIDED. MANUFACTURER'S SUGGESTED RATES 5. LAWN TO BE FERTILIZED ONCE PER YEAR MIN PER PRODUCT INSTRUCTIONS. TOPSOIL DEPTH AND 3. SCARIFY ROOTBALL OF TYPE AS SPECIFIED CONTAINER-GROWN PLANTS. PRIOR TO 19. BASEMAP PROVIDED BY ENGINEERS, CASCADE SURVEYING AND ENGINEERING, INC, BACKFILLING 360-435-5551 6. WEEDS TO BE REMOVED IN A TIMELY MANNER BY MECHANICAL OR CHEMICAL EXISTING MEANS, IN COMPLIANCE WITH ALL LOCAL AND STATE GUIDELINES AND SECTION SUBGRADE REQUIREMENTS. 2" DEPTH BARK MULCH 7. BARK MULCH IN PLANTER BEDS TO BE TOPPED OFF WITH 1" LIFT MIN, ONCE 4" WATERING BASIN PER YEAR IN THE SPRING. SURROUNDING PLANT GROUNDCOVER PLANT EQUAL FINISH GRADE SPACING AS INDICATED DISTANCE ON PLANT LIST (TYPICAL) COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL DISTANCE EDGE OF PLANTER BURLAP, GROWBAG, STRING EQUAL AND FOREIGN MATERIALS 60 FROM THE ROOT BALL. EQUAL DISTANCE PLANTING BACKFILL 1/2 DISTANCE SCARIFY PLANTING PIT WALLS PLAN EXISTING SUBGRADE 2 TIMES SET ROOTBALL ON MOUND OF ROOTBALL DIA. COMPACTED PLANTING BACKFILL MIX 3 TYPICAL PLANTING DETAILS L-2 NO SCALE NORTH one inch 0 20 40 60 80 NO. DATE REVISION BY REV. prepared for: prepared by: ISSUE DATE: 3.21.2022 SCALES: 1 12.22.21 Special Use Submittal pd pd Grandview North eccosDesign Paisley Lofts; project # 918 HORIZONTAL : 1" = 20' DRAWING: 2146 site 2 3.16.22 UPDATED per COA comments pd pd Paisley Lofts LANDSCAPE DETAILS Landscape Architecture and Planning VERTICAL : N/A JOB NO.: 2146 Mount Vernon, WA 98273 E. DivisionStreet p. 360.419.7400 DESIGNED: PD SHEET: f. 800.508.2017 contact: Scott Wammack eccosDesignLLC www.eccosdesign.com Arlington, WA DRAWN: PD AND NOTES L-2 CHECKED: PD 18204 59th Avenue NE REVIEW COMMENT FORM Arlington, WA 98223 360-403-3551 Project Name: Paisley Lofts Permit No.: PWD-3104 Review Date: 6/8/2022 Contact: Randy Devoir Phone No.: 360-435-7171 Review Phase: 1 Report Date: 6/8/2022 Reviewing Dept.: CED Applicant: Scott Wammack DWG Issue Date: # Rev. Dwg. or Addâ€™l Ref. City Comment Response/Resolution Spec. Ref. Approved 1. NEH Put detail for dumpster on civil plans. (there have Dumpster detail is added to sheet C 3.2 been issues with civil contractors building the dumpster enclosure and not following standards) 2. NEH Include information about sidewalk restoration along The two water services on Olympic are now N Olympic at meter changes, etc. identified on sheet C 5.0 to be decommissioned at the main with pavement, curb, gutter and sidewalk restoration 3. NEH Need Pedestrian Plan for construction. Notes have been added to the SWPPP sheet to state that the existing asphalt sidewalk is to remain in place until the proposed sidewalk is constructed. Pedestrians will be redirected to the north side of Division St. at the intersections of Olympic Ave and Centennial Trail. 4. NEH Need to have full curb between parking and building A full curb is now located between the parking sidewalk (south and west) and building on the south side. Grading and details are updated to reflect this. The west parking already had a full curb. 5. NEH Need construction easement from Snohomish County City of Arlington has an interlocal agreement for trail parking area. with Snohomish County which gives the city control and maintenance responsibility. 6. NEH Drainage trench A needs to be on owner property, not Trench A is split into three trenches, Trench city property. A,D, and E. Trench A will mitigate runoff from Centennial Alley. Trench D will mitigate runoff from the courtyard portion of the building and upper portion of the parking (30% onsite impervious). The remaining 70% impervious will be mitigated through Trench E. Page 1 of 3 18204 59th Avenue NE REVIEW COMMENT FORM Arlington, WA 98223 360-403-3551 Project Name: Paisley Lofts Permit No.: PWD-3104 Review Date: 6/8/2022 Contact: Randy Devoir Phone No.: 360-435-7171 Review Phase: 1 Report Date: 6/8/2022 Reviewing Dept.: CED Applicant: Scott Wammack DWG Issue Date: # Rev. Dwg. or Addâ€™l Ref. City Comment Response/Resolution Spec. Ref. Approved 7. NEH Demolition permit required, must alert Public Works A note is added to the cover sheet that a when the water and sewer are to be disconnected. demolition permit is required. Public Works is to be notified when water and sewer are to be disconnected. 8. NEH This property has one water credit, all others are new. Acknowledged â€“ no action required. 9. NEH Please demonstrate that each commercial unit has All commercial units will be accessible from the ADA accessible entry. ADA parking stalls. The sidewalk is less than 2% at the building entrances with an 8% ADA compliant ramp between the building entrances. This will provide ADA access to all commercial units. 10. NEH Signage for the one way A â€˜One way Do not enter sign is now located at the dumpster area and is called out on the sheet C 3.0 with a detail on sheet C 3.2. 11. BG The site plan does not include removing the overhead The note about relocating the power pole on lines from the existing book store going south to the Division St is revised to include removing the pole on the west side of the post office. overhead power lines onsite. See sheet C 2.0 12. BG One way striping is shown on the site plan, but no one A â€˜One way Do not enter sign is now located at way/do not enter signing is shown. the dumpster area and is called out on the sheet C 3.0 with a detail on sheet C 3.2. 13. BG Show saw cuts required in Olympic and division for Saw cuts are shown on the SWPPP. water line work, and new driveways. 14. BG The elevation on division drops as you move west from A detail is added to sheet C 7.0 to better show Olympic. There should be a wall between the building the building along Division Street. The sidewalk and the wall on the west end of the building, but it is and landscape strip will slope up from the road not shown in any of the plans. at 2% to the buildings brick faÃ§ade. The height between the landscaping and buildings finished floor will vary across the length of building. Page 2 of 3 18204 59th Avenue NE REVIEW COMMENT FORM Arlington, WA 98223 360-403-3551 Project Name: Paisley Lofts Permit No.: PWD-3104 Review Date: 6/8/2022 Contact: Randy Devoir Phone No.: 360-435-7171 Review Phase: 1 Report Date: 6/8/2022 Reviewing Dept.: CED Applicant: Scott Wammack DWG Issue Date: # Rev. Dwg. or Addâ€™l Ref. City Comment Response/Resolution Spec. Ref. Approved 15. RM Install 6" cleanout at building on side sewer to Saddle SSCO #4 is now shown on the plans 5 ft off the SSMH #1. building. 16. GT The two services on Olympic are not W-50 and are The two water services on Olympic are now required to be decommissioned at the main. identified on sheet C 5.0 to be decommissioned at the main with pavement, curb, gutter and sidewalk restoration 17. RJ Please resubmit (2) two hard copies of all required documents and submit electronic files to ced@arlingtonwa.gov. 18. 19. 20. Page 3 of 3 PLANT SCHEDULE S.R. 530 DIVISION STREET SR 530 - DIVISION ST. EXISTING LANDSCAPE BED TO BE TREES CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE 'FRESHENED UP' WITH ALL WEEDS REMOVE EXISTING PLANT REMOVED AND ADDITION OF 2" OF MATERIAL IN THIS AREA. ANY MULCH SO AS TO BE IN A NEWLY AME GRA 2 Amelanchier x grandiflora `Autumn Brilliance` Autumn Brilliance Serviceberry 2" Cal. POT DRO STUMPS TO BE CUT TO BELOW TREE SPECIES TO BE CONFIRMED WITH INSTALLED CONDITION GRADE CITY OF ARLINGTON MASTER STREET TREE PLAN PAR PAR 2 Parrotia persica Persian Parrotia 2" Cal. 21'-0" 30'-7" PYR CLE 5 Pyrus calleryana `Cleveland Select` Chanticleer Callery Pear 2" Cal. 34'-11" 88 sf 88 sf MAH RE4 ZEL GRE 8 Zelkova serrata `Green Vase` Green Vase Sawleaf Zelkova 2" Cal. 5'-0" PIE CA2 ILE GGI SHRUBS CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE 150 sf POL MU2 1961 sf ILE SKY 18'-0" 165 sf POL MU2 HEU B21 NAN LE8 SYR MEY CHA GRA 1 Chamaecyparis obtusa `Gracilis` Slender Hinoki Cypress 5 gal. CHA GRA HEM YH3 CONTRACTOR MAY INSTALL 'TREE CIS COR 6 Cistus corbariensis White Rockrose 2 gal. 6-FOOT PLANTING PIT GATOR' OR EQUAL WATERING BAGS AND MULCH RING ON ALL TREES. CONFIRM WITH 3095 sf AROUND TREES IN LAWN. OWNER. COR KE3 2 Cornus stolonifera `Kelseyi` Kelsey Dogwood 2 gal. 10 DAFFODIL BULBS 13'-8" AROUND EACH TREE ILE SKY 3 Ilex crenata `Sky Pencil` Sky Pencil Japanese Holly 5 gal. C C C C C C C C ILE GGI 10 Ilex glabra `Gem Box` Inkberry Holly 2 gal. 15'-7" CENTENNIAL TRAIL EXISTING LAWN AREA TO HAVE ALL MAH RE4 13 Mahonia repens Creeping Mahonia 2 gal. LOW SPOTS LEVELED WITH TOPSOIL, OLYMPIC AVE. HAND SEEDED, AND FERTILIZED OLYMPIC AVENUE NAN LE8 4 Nandina domestica `Lemon Lime` Lemon Lime Nandina 2 gal. 12'-10" 9'-1" ONE WAY 161 sf ONE WAY 9'-7" PIE CA2 8 Pieris japonica `Cavatine` Lily of the Valley Bush 2 gal. Hybrid Daylily POT DRO 9 Potentilla fruticosa 'Gold Drop' Gold Drop Bush Cinquefoil 2 gal. ZEL GRE 18'-2" 18'-0" SYR MEY 2 Syringa meyeri 'Palibin' Dwarf Korean Lilac 2 gal. 152 sf THU EM2 12 Thuja occidentalis `Emerald` Emerald Arborvitae 5` Ht. CIS COR PAR PAR THU EM2 WEI MID 5 Weigela florida `Midnight Wine` TM Weigela 2 gal. PERENNIALS CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CAR OS2 4 Carex oshimensis `Everoro` Everoro Japanese Sedge 1 gal. HEM YH3 18 Hemerocallis x Hybrid Daylily 1 gal. PLANTING PLAN HEU B21 10 Heuchera x `Black Beauty` Coral Bells 1 gal. 1" = 20'-0" (CHECK SCALE BAR FOR ACCURACY) OPH BLA 3 Ophiopogon japonicus `Black` Black Mondo Grass 1 gal. POL MU2 14 Polystichum munitum Western Sword Fern 1 gal. Landscape Statistics GROUND COVERS CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE S.R. 530 DIVISION STREET TOTAL LANDSCAPE SR 530 - DIVISION ST. ARC UVA 83 Arctostaphylos uva-ursi Kinnikinnick 6" Site 16,949 sf Onsite Landscape 313 sf 1.88% SOD/SEED CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE 2" caliper approved tree GRA ENM 5,135 sf Low Grow Lawn Seed Mix Locally Proven Overseed of existing Lawn Area seed STREET FRONTAGE provided per code. every 30' o.c. required C C C C C C C C PARKING LOT LANDSCAPE 65 STALLS CENTENNIAL TRAIL OLYMPIC AVE. OLYMPIC AVENUE vehicle accommodation area 10,343 SF ONE WAY ONE WAY 793 SF COMBINED shade required (20% VAC) 2,069 SF required 2,491 SF provided Number of trees required 258 SF TYPICAL 13 required 14 provided (1 tree / 5 stalls) VEHICLE ACCOMOMDATION SHADE AREA NO SCALE NORTH one inch 0 20 40 60 80 NO. DATE REVISION BY REV. prepared for: prepared by: ISSUE DATE: 3.21.2022 SCALES: 1 12.22.21 Special Use Submittal pd pd Grandview North eccosDesign Paisley Lofts; project # 918 HORIZONTAL : 1" = 20' DRAWING: 2146 site 2 3.16.22 UPDATED per COA comments pd pd Paisley Lofts LANDSCAPE PLAN Landscape Architecture and Planning VERTICAL : N/A JOB NO.: 2146 Mount Vernon, WA 98273 E. DivisionStreet p. 360.419.7400 DESIGNED: PD SHEET: f. 800.508.2017 contact: Scott Wammack eccosDesignLLC www.eccosdesign.com Arlington, WA DRAWN: PD PL-1 CHECKED: PD GENERAL NOTES SOIL NOTES 1. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED BY PERSONS FAMILIAR WITH THIS KIND OF WORK AND 1. CONTRACTOR MAY STOCKPILE SITE TOPSOIL FOR POSSIBLE RE-USE IN UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF A QUALIFIED FOREMAN. LANDSCAPE BEDS. STOCKPILED TOPSOIL TO BE APPROVED BY OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE. ROAD BASE, GLACIAL TILL, GRAVEL OR CONTAMINATED 2. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SIZES AND QUALITY TO CONFORM TO AMERICAN ASSOC. OF SOILS ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE AND WILL BE REJECTED. NURSERYMEN, AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK, MOST RECENT PUBLISHED. 2. SITE TOPSOIL SHALL HAVE ALL ROCKS, GRASS CLODS AND DEBRIS LARGER 3. PLANT LOCATIONS ON THE PLANS ARE DIAGRAMMATIC AND MAY BE SUBJECT TO THAN 1" WHENEVER VISIBLE ON THE SURFACE ADJUSTMENT IN THE FIELD BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. 3. EXISTING SITE TOPSOIL TO BE AMENDED WITH COMPOST AT A RATIO OF 3:1. 3 4. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE OF NURSERY STOCK AND SHALL BE OF THE TYPE, SIZE UNITS OF EXISTING SOIL TO ONE UNIT OF COMPOST. COMPOST TO BE WSDOT AND CONDITION SPECIFIED. THE PLANT MATERIAL SHALL EXHIBIT NORMAL HABITS OF CERTIFIED. GROWTH FOR THE SPECIES, SHALL HAVE BUDS INTACT AND SHALL BE FREE OF DISEASE, INSECTS, SCARS, BRUISES, BREAKS, SEED AND WEED ROOTS. 4. IN LIEU OF AMENDING SITE TOPSOIL CONTRACTORS MAY CHOOSE TO USE IMPORTED 2-WAY TOPSOIL. 5. SEE NOTES THIS SHEET FOR TOPSOIL DEPTH AND SPECIFICATION. 5. TOPSOIL DEPTHS 6. MEDIUM BARK MULCH IS TO BE INSTALLED AT ALL NEW PLANTING AREAS WITH A MINIMUM OF 2 INCHES. 5.1. TOPSOIL TO BE PLACED AT A MINIMUM OF 9" IN ALL LANDSCAPE BED AREAS AND INCORPORATED INTO EXISTING SUBGRADE. LIGHTLY TAMP 6" LAYERS 8. ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL HAVE PLANTING BACKFILL AMENDED WITH A WETTING OF SOIL BY HAND OR LIGHTLY WITH EXCAVATOR. AGENT (TERAWET OR EQUAL) APPLIED AT MANUFACTURES RECOMMENDED RATE. 5.2. TOPSOIL TO BE PLACE AT AT MINIMUM OF 12" IN ALL TREE-PIT AREAS. SEE 9. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL SITE UTILITIES PRIOR TO DETAIL THIS PAGE. LANDSCAPE IMPLEMENTATION. PLANT LOCATIONS MAY BE ADJUSTED TO AVOID CONFLICT. 5.3. TOPSOIL SHALL NOT BE MOVED, MIXED OR PLACE WHILE SATURATED. 10. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE NECESSARY PRECAUTIONS TO PROTECT EXISTING SITE IMPROVEMENTS, PAVING, WALLS, AND UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. DAMAGE SHALL BE 6. IN ALL INSTANCES, PLACED TOPSOIL TO BE INCOPRPORTED INTO EXISTING REPAIRED TO THE OWNER'S SATISFACTION AND AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. GRADE. 11. PLANT COUNT IS FOR THE CONTRACTOR'S CONVENIENCE; IF THERE IS A DISCREPANCY, THE PLAN SHALL GOVERN. ACTUAL PLANT QUANTITIES TO BE DETERMINED BY REQUIRED PLANT SPACING. 12. ALL AREAS TO BE PLANTED WITH GROUNDCOVER ARE INDICATED ON THE PLAN WITH A HATCH PATTERN. SEE PLANT LIST FOR PLANT TYPE, SIZE, AND SPACING. 13. SUBSTITUTION OF PLANT VARIETIES DUE TO LACK OF AVAILABILITY SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE AND CITY. MAINTENANCE NOTES - 14. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ASSUMED TO BE PARALLEL OR PERPENDICULAR UNLESS 1 COA TREE IN 4X4 GRATE DETAIL 2 COA TREE PLANTING DETAIL OTHERWISE NOTED. 1. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCE ARE STREET TREES TO BE TOPPED OR PRUNED L-2 NO SCALE L-2 NO SCALE 15. ALL SOIL GRADES TO BE A MINIMUM SIX INCHES BELOW ADJACENT FINISH FLOOR WITHOUT PERMISSION OF THE CITY ARBORIST. ELEVATIONS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ALL GRADES ADJACENT TO A BUILDING SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM SLOPE OF 5% 3' FROM FOUNDATION. 2. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCE ARE SHRUBS TO BE SHEARED OR SHAPED WITHOUT EXPLICIT PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER. SHRUBS ARE DESIGNED 16. ALL FINISH GRADES TO BE FLUSH WITH ADJACENT SURFACES, SUCH AS TOP OF CURB. TO FILL AND GROW IN TO A PERMANENT MATURE SIZE. 17. ALL GRADES, DIMENSIONS AND EXISTING CONDITIONS SHALL BE VERIFIED BY THE 3. GROUNDCOVER THAT GROWS 'OUT' OF BEDS AND INTO ADJACENT WALKS OR CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. ANY DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE BROUGHT TO ROADS ARE TO BE CUT-BACK AS NEEDED. GROUNDCOVER PLANT. THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. CUTBACK, PULL OUT AND DISTURB ALL SEE PLANT LIST 4. PERENNIAL AND GRASSES WHICH ARE DECIDUOUS MAY BE CUT BACK AT CIRCLING ROOTS FROM ANY CONTAINER 1. PLANT SHRUB 1/2" HIGHER THAN DEPTH GROWN PLANTS BARK MULCH GROWN AT NURSERY. 18. SUPPLEMENTAL HAND WATERING TO BE DONE DURING FIRST TWO YEARS TO GUARANTEE OWNERS DISCRETION, ONCE PER YEAR, DURING THE MONTHS OF FEBRUARY, 2. FERTILIZE ALL PLANTS WITH APPROVED PLANT ESTABLISHMENT. IF CITY REQUIRES AUTOMATED IRRIGATION SYSTEM THEN MARCH OR APRIL. STARTER FERTILIZER APPLIED AT BIDDER DESIGNED SYSTEM WILL BE PROVIDED. MANUFACTURER'S SUGGESTED RATES 5. LAWN TO BE FERTILIZED ONCE PER YEAR MIN PER PRODUCT INSTRUCTIONS. TOPSOIL DEPTH AND 3. SCARIFY ROOTBALL OF TYPE AS SPECIFIED CONTAINER-GROWN PLANTS. PRIOR TO 19. BASEMAP PROVIDED BY ENGINEERS, CASCADE SURVEYING AND ENGINEERING, INC, BACKFILLING 360-435-5551 6. WEEDS TO BE REMOVED IN A TIMELY MANNER BY MECHANICAL OR CHEMICAL EXISTING MEANS, IN COMPLIANCE WITH ALL LOCAL AND STATE GUIDELINES AND SECTION SUBGRADE REQUIREMENTS. 2" DEPTH BARK MULCH 7. BARK MULCH IN PLANTER BEDS TO BE TOPPED OFF WITH 1" LIFT MIN, ONCE 4" WATERING BASIN PER YEAR IN THE SPRING. SURROUNDING PLANT GROUNDCOVER PLANT EQUAL FINISH GRADE SPACING AS INDICATED DISTANCE ON PLANT LIST (TYPICAL) COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL DISTANCE EDGE OF PLANTER BURLAP, GROWBAG, STRING EQUAL AND FOREIGN MATERIALS 60 FROM THE ROOT BALL. EQUAL DISTANCE PLANTING BACKFILL 1/2 DISTANCE SCARIFY PLANTING PIT WALLS PLAN EXISTING SUBGRADE 2 TIMES SET ROOTBALL ON MOUND OF ROOTBALL DIA. COMPACTED PLANTING BACKFILL MIX 3 TYPICAL PLANTING DETAILS L-2 NO SCALE NORTH one inch 0 20 40 60 80 NO. DATE REVISION BY REV. prepared for: prepared by: ISSUE DATE: 3.21.2022 SCALES: 1 12.22.21 Special Use Submittal pd pd Grandview North eccosDesign Paisley Lofts; project # 918 HORIZONTAL : 1" = 20' DRAWING: 2146 site 2 3.16.22 UPDATED per COA comments pd pd Paisley Lofts LANDSCAPE DETAILS Landscape Architecture and Planning VERTICAL : N/A JOB NO.: 2146 Mount Vernon, WA 98273 E. DivisionStreet p. 360.419.7400 DESIGNED: PD SHEET: f. 800.508.2017 contact: Scott Wammack eccosDesignLLC www.eccosdesign.com Arlington, WA DRAWN: PD AND NOTES L-2 CHECKED: PD 18204 59th Avenue NE REVIEW COMMENT FORM Arlington, WA 98223 360-403-3551 Project Name: Paisley Lofts Permit No.: PWD-3104 Review Date: 7/26/2022 Contact: Randy Devoir Phone No.: 360-435-7171 Review Phase: 2 Report Date: 7/26/2022 Reviewing Dept.: CED Applicant: Scott Wammack DWG Issue Date: # Rev. Dwg. or Addâ€™l Ref. City Comment Response/Resolution Spec. Ref. Approved 1. NEH Put detail for dumpster on civil plans. (there have Dumpster detail is added to sheet C 3.2 7/25/2022 been issues with civil contractors building the MH dumpster enclosure and not following standards) 2. NEH Include information about sidewalk restoration along The two water services on Olympic are now 7/25/2022 N Olympic at meter changes, etc. identified on sheet C 5.0 to be decommissioned MH at the main with pavement, curb, gutter and sidewalk restoration 3. NEH Need Pedestrian Plan for construction. Notes have been added to the SWPPP sheet to 7/25/2022 state that the existing asphalt sidewalk is to MH remain in place until the proposed sidewalk is constructed. Pedestrians will be redirected to the north side of Division St. at the intersections of Olympic Ave and Centennial Trail. 4. NEH Need to have full curb between parking and building A full curb is now located between the parking 7/25/2022 sidewalk (south and west) and building on the south side. Grading and MH details are updated to reflect this. The west parking already had a full curb. 5. NEH Need construction easement from Snohomish County City of Arlington has an interlocal agreement 7/25/2022 for trail parking area. with Snohomish County which gives the city MH control and maintenance responsibility. 6. NEH Drainage trench A needs to be on owner property, not Trench A is split into three trenches, Trench 7/25/2022 city property. A,D, and E. Trench A will mitigate runoff from MH Centennial Alley. Trench D will mitigate runoff from the courtyard portion of the building and upper portion of the parking (30% onsite impervious). The remaining 70% impervious will be mitigated through Trench E. Page 1 of 3 18204 59th Avenue NE REVIEW COMMENT FORM Arlington, WA 98223 360-403-3551 Project Name: Paisley Lofts Permit No.: PWD-3104 Review Date: 6/8/2022 Contact: Randy Devoir Phone No.: 360-435-7171 Review Phase: 1 Report Date: 6/8/2022 Reviewing Dept.: CED Applicant: Scott Wammack DWG Issue Date: # Rev. Dwg. or Addâ€™l Ref. City Comment Response/Resolution Spec. Ref. Approved 7. NEH Demolition permit required, must alert Public Works A note is added to the cover sheet that a 7/25/2022 when the water and sewer are to be disconnected. demolition permit is required. Public Works is MH to be notified when water and sewer are to be disconnected. 8. NEH This property has one water credit, all others are new. Acknowledged â€“ no action required. 7/25/2022 MH 9. NEH Please demonstrate that each commercial unit has All commercial units will be accessible from the ADA accessible entry. ADA parking stalls. There are level landings at the building entrances with a 7.88% ADA compliant ramp between the landings. This will provide ADA access to all commercial units. 10. NEH Signage for the one way A â€˜One way Do not enter sign is now located at 7/25/2022 the dumpster area and is called out on the sheet MH C 3.0 with a detail on sheet C 3.2. 11. BG The site plan does not include removing the overhead The note about relocating the power pole on 7/25/2022 lines from the existing book store going south to the Division St is revised to include removing the MH pole on the west side of the post office. overhead power lines onsite. See sheet C 2.0 12. BG One way striping is shown on the site plan, but no one A â€˜One way Do not enter sign is now located at 7/25/2022 way/do not enter signing is shown. the dumpster area and is called out on the sheet MH C 3.0 with a detail on sheet C 3.2. 13. BG Show saw cuts required in Olympic and division for Saw cuts are shown on the SWPPP. 7/25/2022 water line work, and new driveways. MH 14. BG The elevation on division drops as you move west from A detail is added to sheet C 7.0 to better show 7/25/2022 Olympic. There should be a wall between the building the building along Division Street. The sidewalk MH and the wall on the west end of the building, but it is and landscape strip will slope up from the road not shown in any of the plans. at 2% to the buildings brick faÃ§ade. The height between the landscaping and buildings finished floor will vary across the length of building. Page 2 of 3 18204 59th Avenue NE REVIEW COMMENT FORM Arlington, WA 98223 360-403-3551 Project Name: Paisley Lofts Permit No.: PWD-3104 Review Date: 7/26/2022 Contact: Randy Devoir Phone No.: 360-435-7171 Review Phase: 2 Report Date: 7/26/2022 Reviewing Dept.: CED Applicant: Scott Wammack DWG Issue Date: # Rev. Dwg. or Addâ€™l Ref. City Comment Response/Resolution Spec. Ref. Approved 15. RM Install 6" cleanout at building on side sewer to Saddle SSCO #4 is now shown on the plans 5 ft off the 7/25/2022 SSMH #1. building. MH 16. GT The two services on Olympic are not W-50 and are The two water services on Olympic are now 7/25/2022 required to be decommissioned at the main. identified on sheet C 5.0 to be decommissioned MH at the main with pavement, curb, gutter and sidewalk restoration 17. MH C2.0 Relocate construction entrance to west side of project Construction entrance is relocated to access from the to access off alley and not Olympic Ave alley. 18. MH Install silt fence along Olympic Ave and Division St. Silt fence is now shown along the back of sidewalks frontage. Provide wattles along Division when silt fence is along Olympic Ave and Division St. Wattle is located disturbed along Division. 19. MH C3.0 Remove existing curb at full joint and pour new curb The note on sheet C 3.0 is revised to state the curb integral to existing. Batt joint not allowed and gutter is to be connected at nearest full joint and that no butt joints are permitted. 20. MH C7.0 "Back-In Parking Only" signs to be installed by developer Back in parking only signs are now shown on the @ 40' spacing plan at 40 ft spacing and the note is updated to 40â€™ sign spacing. 21. RM C5.0 Both services, Commercial and Residential, on Division Commercial service meter note is revised to be a 2â€ shall be 2" per COA Standard Detail W-050. service. 22. RJ Civil Review Fees Due: $16,824.14 Civil Review Fees are submitted with this A link for payment has been sent to gv@grandviewinc.net resubmittal. 23. RJ Please resubmit (2) two hard copies of all required Two hard copies and electronic copies are documents and submit electronic files to resubmitted ced@arlingtonwa.gov. Page 3 of 3 PLANT SCHEDULE S.R. 530 DIVISION STREET SR 530 - DIVISION ST. EXISTING LANDSCAPE BED TO BE TREES CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE 'FRESHENED UP' WITH ALL WEEDS REMOVE EXISTING PLANT REMOVED AND ADDITION OF 2" OF MATERIAL IN THIS AREA. ANY MULCH SO AS TO BE IN A NEWLY AME GRA 2 Amelanchier x grandiflora `Autumn Brilliance` Autumn Brilliance Serviceberry 2" Cal. POT DRO STUMPS TO BE CUT TO BELOW TREE SPECIES TO BE CONFIRMED WITH INSTALLED CONDITION GRADE CITY OF ARLINGTON MASTER STREET TREE PLAN PAR PAR 2 Parrotia persica Persian Parrotia 2" Cal. 21'-0" 30'-7" PYR CLE 5 Pyrus calleryana `Cleveland Select` Chanticleer Callery Pear 2" Cal. 34'-11" 88 sf 88 sf MAH RE4 ZEL GRE 8 Zelkova serrata `Green Vase` Green Vase Sawleaf Zelkova 2" Cal. 5'-0" PIE CA2 ILE GGI SHRUBS CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE 150 sf POL MU2 1961 sf ILE SKY 18'-0" 165 sf POL MU2 HEU B21 NAN LE8 SYR MEY CHA GRA 1 Chamaecyparis obtusa `Gracilis` Slender Hinoki Cypress 5 gal. CHA GRA HEM YH3 CONTRACTOR MAY INSTALL 'TREE CIS COR 6 Cistus corbariensis White Rockrose 2 gal. 6-FOOT PLANTING PIT GATOR' OR EQUAL WATERING BAGS AND MULCH RING ON ALL TREES. CONFIRM WITH 3095 sf AROUND TREES IN LAWN. OWNER. COR KE3 2 Cornus stolonifera `Kelseyi` Kelsey Dogwood 2 gal. 10 DAFFODIL BULBS 13'-8" AROUND EACH TREE ILE SKY 3 Ilex crenata `Sky Pencil` Sky Pencil Japanese Holly 5 gal. C C C C C C C C ILE GGI 10 Ilex glabra `Gem Box` Inkberry Holly 2 gal. 15'-7" CENTENNIAL TRAIL EXISTING LAWN AREA TO HAVE ALL MAH RE4 13 Mahonia repens Creeping Mahonia 2 gal. LOW SPOTS LEVELED WITH TOPSOIL, OLYMPIC AVE. HAND SEEDED, AND FERTILIZED OLYMPIC AVENUE NAN LE8 4 Nandina domestica `Lemon Lime` Lemon Lime Nandina 2 gal. 12'-10" 9'-1" ONE WAY 161 sf ONE WAY 9'-7" PIE CA2 8 Pieris japonica `Cavatine` Lily of the Valley Bush 2 gal. Hybrid Daylily POT DRO 9 Potentilla fruticosa 'Gold Drop' Gold Drop Bush Cinquefoil 2 gal. ZEL GRE 18'-2" 18'-0" SYR MEY 2 Syringa meyeri 'Palibin' Dwarf Korean Lilac 2 gal. 152 sf THU EM2 12 Thuja occidentalis `Emerald` Emerald Arborvitae 5` Ht. CIS COR PAR PAR THU EM2 WEI MID 5 Weigela florida `Midnight Wine` TM Weigela 2 gal. PERENNIALS CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CAR OS2 4 Carex oshimensis `Everoro` Everoro Japanese Sedge 1 gal. HEM YH3 18 Hemerocallis x Hybrid Daylily 1 gal. PLANTING PLAN HEU B21 10 Heuchera x `Black Beauty` Coral Bells 1 gal. 1" = 20'-0" (CHECK SCALE BAR FOR ACCURACY) OPH BLA 3 Ophiopogon japonicus `Black` Black Mondo Grass 1 gal. POL MU2 14 Polystichum munitum Western Sword Fern 1 gal. Landscape Statistics GROUND COVERS CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE S.R. 530 DIVISION STREET TOTAL LANDSCAPE SR 530 - DIVISION ST. ARC UVA 83 Arctostaphylos uva-ursi Kinnikinnick 6" Site 16,949 sf Onsite Landscape 313 sf 1.88% SOD/SEED CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE 2" caliper approved tree GRA ENM 5,135 sf Low Grow Lawn Seed Mix Locally Proven Overseed of existing Lawn Area seed STREET FRONTAGE provided per code. every 30' o.c. required C C C C C C C C PARKING LOT LANDSCAPE 65 STALLS CENTENNIAL TRAIL OLYMPIC AVE. OLYMPIC AVENUE vehicle accommodation area 10,343 SF ONE WAY ONE WAY 793 SF COMBINED shade required (20% VAC) 2,069 SF required 2,491 SF provided Number of trees required 258 SF TYPICAL 13 required 14 provided (1 tree / 5 stalls) VEHICLE ACCOMOMDATION SHADE AREA NO SCALE NORTH one inch 0 20 40 60 80 NO. DATE REVISION BY REV. prepared for: prepared by: ISSUE DATE: 3.21.2022 SCALES: 1 12.22.21 Special Use Submittal pd pd Grandview North eccosDesign Paisley Lofts; project # 918 HORIZONTAL : 1" = 20' DRAWING: 2146 site 2 3.16.22 UPDATED per COA comments pd pd Paisley Lofts LANDSCAPE PLAN Landscape Architecture and Planning VERTICAL : N/A JOB NO.: 2146 Mount Vernon, WA 98273 E. DivisionStreet p. 360.419.7400 DESIGNED: PD SHEET: f. 800.508.2017 contact: Scott Wammack eccosDesignLLC www.eccosdesign.com Arlington, WA DRAWN: PD PL-1 CHECKED: PD GENERAL NOTES SOIL NOTES 1. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED BY PERSONS FAMILIAR WITH THIS KIND OF WORK AND 1. CONTRACTOR MAY STOCKPILE SITE TOPSOIL FOR POSSIBLE RE-USE IN UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF A QUALIFIED FOREMAN. LANDSCAPE BEDS. STOCKPILED TOPSOIL TO BE APPROVED BY OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE. ROAD BASE, GLACIAL TILL, GRAVEL OR CONTAMINATED 2. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SIZES AND QUALITY TO CONFORM TO AMERICAN ASSOC. OF SOILS ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE AND WILL BE REJECTED. NURSERYMEN, AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK, MOST RECENT PUBLISHED. 2. SITE TOPSOIL SHALL HAVE ALL ROCKS, GRASS CLODS AND DEBRIS LARGER 3. PLANT LOCATIONS ON THE PLANS ARE DIAGRAMMATIC AND MAY BE SUBJECT TO THAN 1" WHENEVER VISIBLE ON THE SURFACE ADJUSTMENT IN THE FIELD BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. 3. EXISTING SITE TOPSOIL TO BE AMENDED WITH COMPOST AT A RATIO OF 3:1. 3 4. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE OF NURSERY STOCK AND SHALL BE OF THE TYPE, SIZE UNITS OF EXISTING SOIL TO ONE UNIT OF COMPOST. COMPOST TO BE WSDOT AND CONDITION SPECIFIED. THE PLANT MATERIAL SHALL EXHIBIT NORMAL HABITS OF CERTIFIED. GROWTH FOR THE SPECIES, SHALL HAVE BUDS INTACT AND SHALL BE FREE OF DISEASE, INSECTS, SCARS, BRUISES, BREAKS, SEED AND WEED ROOTS. 4. IN LIEU OF AMENDING SITE TOPSOIL CONTRACTORS MAY CHOOSE TO USE IMPORTED 2-WAY TOPSOIL. 5. SEE NOTES THIS SHEET FOR TOPSOIL DEPTH AND SPECIFICATION. 5. TOPSOIL DEPTHS 6. MEDIUM BARK MULCH IS TO BE INSTALLED AT ALL NEW PLANTING AREAS WITH A MINIMUM OF 2 INCHES. 5.1. TOPSOIL TO BE PLACED AT A MINIMUM OF 9" IN ALL LANDSCAPE BED AREAS AND INCORPORATED INTO EXISTING SUBGRADE. LIGHTLY TAMP 6" LAYERS 8. ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL HAVE PLANTING BACKFILL AMENDED WITH A WETTING OF SOIL BY HAND OR LIGHTLY WITH EXCAVATOR. AGENT (TERAWET OR EQUAL) APPLIED AT MANUFACTURES RECOMMENDED RATE. 5.2. TOPSOIL TO BE PLACE AT AT MINIMUM OF 12" IN ALL TREE-PIT AREAS. SEE 9. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL SITE UTILITIES PRIOR TO DETAIL THIS PAGE. LANDSCAPE IMPLEMENTATION. PLANT LOCATIONS MAY BE ADJUSTED TO AVOID CONFLICT. 5.3. TOPSOIL SHALL NOT BE MOVED, MIXED OR PLACE WHILE SATURATED. 10. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE NECESSARY PRECAUTIONS TO PROTECT EXISTING SITE IMPROVEMENTS, PAVING, WALLS, AND UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. DAMAGE SHALL BE 6. IN ALL INSTANCES, PLACED TOPSOIL TO BE INCOPRPORTED INTO EXISTING REPAIRED TO THE OWNER'S SATISFACTION AND AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. GRADE. 11. PLANT COUNT IS FOR THE CONTRACTOR'S CONVENIENCE; IF THERE IS A DISCREPANCY, THE PLAN SHALL GOVERN. ACTUAL PLANT QUANTITIES TO BE DETERMINED BY REQUIRED PLANT SPACING. 12. ALL AREAS TO BE PLANTED WITH GROUNDCOVER ARE INDICATED ON THE PLAN WITH A HATCH PATTERN. SEE PLANT LIST FOR PLANT TYPE, SIZE, AND SPACING. 13. SUBSTITUTION OF PLANT VARIETIES DUE TO LACK OF AVAILABILITY SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE AND CITY. MAINTENANCE NOTES - 14. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ASSUMED TO BE PARALLEL OR PERPENDICULAR UNLESS 1 COA TREE IN 4X4 GRATE DETAIL 2 COA TREE PLANTING DETAIL OTHERWISE NOTED. 1. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCE ARE STREET TREES TO BE TOPPED OR PRUNED L-2 NO SCALE L-2 NO SCALE 15. ALL SOIL GRADES TO BE A MINIMUM SIX INCHES BELOW ADJACENT FINISH FLOOR WITHOUT PERMISSION OF THE CITY ARBORIST. ELEVATIONS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ALL GRADES ADJACENT TO A BUILDING SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM SLOPE OF 5% 3' FROM FOUNDATION. 2. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCE ARE SHRUBS TO BE SHEARED OR SHAPED WITHOUT EXPLICIT PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER. SHRUBS ARE DESIGNED 16. ALL FINISH GRADES TO BE FLUSH WITH ADJACENT SURFACES, SUCH AS TOP OF CURB. TO FILL AND GROW IN TO A PERMANENT MATURE SIZE. 17. ALL GRADES, DIMENSIONS AND EXISTING CONDITIONS SHALL BE VERIFIED BY THE 3. GROUNDCOVER THAT GROWS 'OUT' OF BEDS AND INTO ADJACENT WALKS OR CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. ANY DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE BROUGHT TO ROADS ARE TO BE CUT-BACK AS NEEDED. GROUNDCOVER PLANT. THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. CUTBACK, PULL OUT AND DISTURB ALL SEE PLANT LIST 4. PERENNIAL AND GRASSES WHICH ARE DECIDUOUS MAY BE CUT BACK AT CIRCLING ROOTS FROM ANY CONTAINER 1. PLANT SHRUB 1/2" HIGHER THAN DEPTH GROWN PLANTS BARK MULCH GROWN AT NURSERY. 18. SUPPLEMENTAL HAND WATERING TO BE DONE DURING FIRST TWO YEARS TO GUARANTEE OWNERS DISCRETION, ONCE PER YEAR, DURING THE MONTHS OF FEBRUARY, 2. FERTILIZE ALL PLANTS WITH APPROVED PLANT ESTABLISHMENT. IF CITY REQUIRES AUTOMATED IRRIGATION SYSTEM THEN MARCH OR APRIL. STARTER FERTILIZER APPLIED AT BIDDER DESIGNED SYSTEM WILL BE PROVIDED. MANUFACTURER'S SUGGESTED RATES 5. LAWN TO BE FERTILIZED ONCE PER YEAR MIN PER PRODUCT INSTRUCTIONS. TOPSOIL DEPTH AND 3. SCARIFY ROOTBALL OF TYPE AS SPECIFIED CONTAINER-GROWN PLANTS. PRIOR TO 19. BASEMAP PROVIDED BY ENGINEERS, CASCADE SURVEYING AND ENGINEERING, INC, BACKFILLING 360-435-5551 6. WEEDS TO BE REMOVED IN A TIMELY MANNER BY MECHANICAL OR CHEMICAL EXISTING MEANS, IN COMPLIANCE WITH ALL LOCAL AND STATE GUIDELINES AND SECTION SUBGRADE REQUIREMENTS. 2" DEPTH BARK MULCH 7. BARK MULCH IN PLANTER BEDS TO BE TOPPED OFF WITH 1" LIFT MIN, ONCE 4" WATERING BASIN PER YEAR IN THE SPRING. SURROUNDING PLANT GROUNDCOVER PLANT EQUAL FINISH GRADE SPACING AS INDICATED DISTANCE ON PLANT LIST (TYPICAL) COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL DISTANCE EDGE OF PLANTER BURLAP, GROWBAG, STRING EQUAL AND FOREIGN MATERIALS 60 FROM THE ROOT BALL. EQUAL DISTANCE PLANTING BACKFILL 1/2 DISTANCE SCARIFY PLANTING PIT WALLS PLAN EXISTING SUBGRADE 2 TIMES SET ROOTBALL ON MOUND OF ROOTBALL DIA. COMPACTED PLANTING BACKFILL MIX 3 TYPICAL PLANTING DETAILS L-2 NO SCALE NORTH one inch 0 20 40 60 80 NO. DATE REVISION BY REV. prepared for: prepared by: ISSUE DATE: 3.21.2022 SCALES: 1 12.22.21 Special Use Submittal pd pd Grandview North eccosDesign Paisley Lofts; project # 918 HORIZONTAL : 1" = 20' DRAWING: 2146 site 2 3.16.22 UPDATED per COA comments pd pd Paisley Lofts LANDSCAPE DETAILS Landscape Architecture and Planning VERTICAL : N/A JOB NO.: 2146 Mount Vernon, WA 98273 E. DivisionStreet p. 360.419.7400 DESIGNED: PD SHEET: f. 800.508.2017 contact: Scott Wammack eccosDesignLLC www.eccosdesign.com Arlington, WA DRAWN: PD AND NOTES L-2 CHECKED: PD 18204 59th Avenue NE REVIEW COMMENT FORM Arlington, WA 98223 360-403-3551 Project Name: Paisley Lofts Permit No.: PWD-3104 Review Date: 8/26/2022 Contact: Randy Devoir Phone No.: 360-435-7171 Review Phase: 3 Report Date: 8/26/2022 Reviewing Dept.: CED Applicant: Scott Wammack DWG Issue Date: # Rev. Dwg. or Addâ€™l Ref. City Comment Response/Resolution Spec. Ref. Approved 1. NEH Put detail for dumpster on civil plans. (there have Dumpster detail is added to sheet C 3.2 7/25/2022 been issues with civil contractors building the MH dumpster enclosure and not following standards) 2. NEH Include information about sidewalk restoration along The two water services on Olympic are now 7/25/2022 N Olympic at meter changes, etc. identified on sheet C 5.0 to be decommissioned MH at the main with pavement, curb, gutter and sidewalk restoration 3. NEH Need Pedestrian Plan for construction. Notes have been added to the SWPPP sheet to 7/25/2022 state that the existing asphalt sidewalk is to MH remain in place until the proposed sidewalk is constructed. Pedestrians will be redirected to the north side of Division St. at the intersections of Olympic Ave and Centennial Trail. 4. NEH Need to have full curb between parking and building A full curb is now located between the parking 7/25/2022 sidewalk (south and west) and building on the south side. Grading and MH details are updated to reflect this. The west parking already had a full curb. 5. NEH Need construction easement from Snohomish County City of Arlington has an interlocal agreement 7/25/2022 for trail parking area. with Snohomish County which gives the city MH control and maintenance responsibility. 6. NEH Drainage trench A needs to be on owner property, not Trench A is split into three trenches, Trench 7/25/2022 city property. A,D, and E. Trench A will mitigate runoff from MH Centennial Alley. Trench D will mitigate runoff from the courtyard portion of the building and upper portion of the parking (30% onsite impervious). The remaining 70% impervious will be mitigated through Trench E. Page 1 of 3 18204 59th Avenue NE REVIEW COMMENT FORM Arlington, WA 98223 360-403-3551 Project Name: Paisley Lofts Permit No.: PWD-3104 Review Date: 6/8/2022 Contact: Randy Devoir Phone No.: 360-435-7171 Review Phase: 1 Report Date: 6/8/2022 Reviewing Dept.: CED Applicant: Scott Wammack DWG Issue Date: # Rev. Dwg. or Addâ€™l Ref. City Comment Response/Resolution Spec. Ref. Approved 7. NEH Demolition permit required, must alert Public Works A note is added to the cover sheet that a 7/25/2022 when the water and sewer are to be disconnected. demolition permit is required. Public Works is MH to be notified when water and sewer are to be disconnected. 8. NEH This property has one water credit, all others are new. Acknowledged â€“ no action required. 7/25/2022 MH 9. NEH Please demonstrate that each commercial unit has All commercial units will be accessible from the 8/25/22 ADA accessible entry. ADA parking stalls. There are level landings at MH the building entrances with a 7.88% ADA compliant ramp between the landings. This will provide ADA access to all commercial units. 10. NEH Signage for the one way A â€˜One way Do not enter sign is now located at 7/25/2022 the dumpster area and is called out on the sheet MH C 3.0 with a detail on sheet C 3.2. 11. BG The site plan does not include removing the overhead The note about relocating the power pole on 7/25/2022 lines from the existing book store going south to the Division St is revised to include removing the MH pole on the west side of the post office. overhead power lines onsite. See sheet C 2.0 12. BG One way striping is shown on the site plan, but no one A â€˜One way Do not enter sign is now located at 7/25/2022 way/do not enter signing is shown. the dumpster area and is called out on the sheet MH C 3.0 with a detail on sheet C 3.2. 13. BG Show saw cuts required in Olympic and division for Saw cuts are shown on the SWPPP. 7/25/2022 water line work, and new driveways. MH 14. BG The elevation on division drops as you move west from A detail is added to sheet C 7.0 to better show 7/25/2022 Olympic. There should be a wall between the building the building along Division Street. The sidewalk MH and the wall on the west end of the building, but it is and landscape strip will slope up from the road not shown in any of the plans. at 2% to the buildings brick faÃ§ade. The height between the landscaping and buildings finished floor will vary across the length of building. Page 2 of 3 18204 59th Avenue NE REVIEW COMMENT FORM Arlington, WA 98223 360-403-3551 Project Name: Paisley Lofts Permit No.: PWD-3104 Review Date: 7/26/2022 Contact: Randy Devoir Phone No.: 360-435-7171 Review Phase: 2 Report Date: 7/26/2022 Reviewing Dept.: CED Applicant: Scott Wammack DWG Issue Date: # Rev. Dwg. or Addâ€™l Ref. City Comment Response/Resolution Spec. Ref. Approved 15. RM Install 6" cleanout at building on side sewer to Saddle SSCO #4 is now shown on the plans 5 ft off the 7/25/2022 SSMH #1. building. MH 16. GT The two services on Olympic are not W-50 and are The two water services on Olympic are now 7/25/2022 required to be decommissioned at the main. identified on sheet C 5.0 to be decommissioned MH at the main with pavement, curb, gutter and sidewalk restoration 17. MH C2.0 Relocate construction entrance to west side of project Construction entrance is relocated to access from the 8/25/22 to access off alley and not Olympic Ave alley. MH 18. MH Install silt fence along Olympic Ave and Division St. Silt fence is now shown along the back of sidewalks 8/25/22 frontage. Provide wattles along Division when silt fence is along Olympic Ave and Division St. Wattle is located MH disturbed along Division. 19. MH C3.0 Remove existing curb at full joint and pour new curb The note on sheet C 3.0 is revised to state the curb 8/25/22 integral to existing. Batt joint not allowed and gutter is to be connected at nearest full joint and MH that no butt joints are permitted. 20. MH C7.0 "Back-In Parking Only" signs to be installed by developer Back in parking only signs are now shown on the 8/25/22 @ 40' spacing plan at 40 ft spacing and the note is updated to 40â€™ MH sign spacing. 21. RM C5.0 Both services, Commercial and Residential, on Division Commercial service meter note is revised to be a 2â€ 8/25/22 shall be 2" per COA Standard Detail W-050. service. MH 22. RJ Civil Review Fees Due: $16,824.14 Civil Review Fees are submitted with this 8/12/22 A link for payment has been sent to gv@grandviewinc.net resubmittal. RJ 23. MH General Remove Nova Heaton signature block and use updated Signature Block is updated on sheets C1.1, C2.1, block on sheets: C1.1, C2.1, C4.1, C4.2 C4.1, and C4.2 https://www.arlingtonwa.gov/DocumentCenter/View/7341/ Construction-Approval-Block-PDF 24. RM Measurements show the existing ADA ramp on the SW SWPP is updated to call for the removal of the corner of Division and Olympic does not meet current existing ADA ramp. Division St. frontage sheet is requirements and needs to be upgraded. The ramp slope is updated to call for installation of perpendicular curb greater than the minimum 8.33%. ramp per WSDOT F-40.15-04 at the SW corner of Division and Olympic. Page 3 of 3 18204 59th Avenue NE REVIEW COMMENT FORM Arlington, WA 98223 360-403-3551 25. RJ Please resubmit (2) two hard copies of all required Two hard copies and electronic copies are documents and submit electronic files to resubmitted ced@arlingtonwa.gov. Page 4 of 3 CITY OF ARLINGTON - PAISLEY LOFTS FILE NO.: PWD 3104 PORTION SW1/4, SE1/4, SEC.2, TWP.31N, RGE.5E, W.M. 2 PARKING CALCULATIONS: SITE INFORMATION: AREAS ONSITE: GRAPHIC SCALE SITE AREAS OFFSITE: DATUM: NAVD 88 CASCADE SR 530 TO 1-5 SURVEYING & ENGINEERING, INC. ING ER E N I G N Â· E 0 RESIDENTIAL UNIT MIX: 7 & 91 G NI E C BIKE RACK CALCULATIONS: Y E N V I R S U VICINITY MAP S E D LEGEND: ACSAC OPEN SPACE CALCULATION: SHADING CALCULATIONS: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: MINI PARKS CALCULATION: BUILDING GRADING QUANTITIES: Â· Â· TAX PARCEL NUMBER: CIVIL ENGINEER: Â· SITE ADDRESS: OWNER/APPLICANT: SURVEYOR: E. DIVISION STREET LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: CONTACT PERSON: GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER: DATEDATEDATE NOTES: DRAWING SHEET INDEX DESIGNEDDRAWNCHECKEDFIELD BOOK SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE C C C C C C C C CENTENNIAL TRAIL ONE WAY N. OLYMPIC AVENUE ONE WAY CITY FILE NO.:PWD-3104 PAISLEY LOFTSCOVER SHEET GRANDVIEW NORTH LLC CALL TWO BUSINESS DAYS CITY OF ARLINGTON BEFORE YOU DIG 1-800-424-5555 C 1.0 # 22923 CITY OF ARLINGTON - PAISLEY LOFTS FILE NO.: PWD 3104 CITY OF ARLINGTON PORTION SW1/4, SE1/4, SEC.2, TWP.31N, RGE.5E, W.M. GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES: CITY OF ARLINGTON CITY OF ARLINGTON CITY OF ARLINGTON SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION NOTES: STORM DRAINAGE NOTES: WATER SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION NOTES: CASCADE SURVEYING & â€™ ENGINEERING, INC. ING ER E N I G N 0 E 7 & 91 G NI E C Y E N V I R S U S E D â€ â€ â€œ â€ ACSAC â€™ â€ â€ â€“ â€ â€œ â€“ â€ â€œ â€ â€œ â€ â€™ â€™ CITY OF ARLINGTON T.E.S.C.P. NOTES: â€™ â€™ â€™ â€™ CITY OF ARLINGTON ADA NOTES: CSE SUPPLEMENTAL NOTES: DATEDATEDATE DESIGNEDDRAWNCHECKEDFIELD BOOK CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE : Â·Â· Â·Â· CITY FILE NO.:PWD-3104 NOTES PAISLEY LOFTS GRANDVIEW NORTH LLC CALL TWO BUSINESS DAYS CITY OF ARLINGTON BEFORE YOU DIG 1-800-424-5555 C 1.1 # 22923 CITY OF ARLINGTON - PAISLEY LOFTS FILE NO.: PWD 3104 PORTION SW1/4, SE1/4, SEC.2, TWP.31N, RGE.5E, W.M. GRAPHIC SCALE DATUM: NAVD 88 E. DIVISION STREET CASCADE NOTES: SURVEYING & ENGINEERING, INC. ING ER E N I G N 0 E 7 & 91 G NI E C Y E N V I R S U S E D ACSAC LEGEND: CENTENNIAL TRAIL N. OLYMPIC AVENUE DATEDATEDATE DESIGNEDDRAWNCHECKEDFIELD BOOK SOIL AMENDED NOTES: KEY NOTES: 1 C 2.1 3 C 2.1 2 C 2.1 CITY FILE NO.:PWD-3104 Â· CALL TWO BUSINESS DAYS 4 C 2.1 BEFORE YOU DIG PAISLEY LOFTS 1-800-424-5555 GRANDVIEW NORTH LLC SWPPP & DEMOLITION PLAN CITY OF ARLINGTON C 2.0 # 22923 CITY OF ARLINGTON - PAISLEY LOFTS FILE NO.: PWD 3104 PORTION SW1/4, SE1/4, SEC.2, TWP.31N, RGE.5E, W.M. RETRIEVAL SYSTEM (TYP.) DRAINAGE GRATE ~ RECTANGULAR GRATE SHOWN CASCADE SURVEYING & OVERFLOW BYPASS (TYP.) BELOW INLET GRATE DEVICE ENGINEERING, INC. ING ER E N I G N 0 E 7 5" MAX. & 91 G NI E C Y DRAINAGE GRATE E N TRIM V I R S U S E D ACSAC GRATE FRAME SEDIMENT AND DEBRIS OVERFLOW BYPASS TYPICAL SPLICE DETAIL BELOW INLET GRATE DEVICE RAILROAD BALLAST FILTERED WATER SILT FENCE NOTES: DETAIL NOTES: SECTION A WSDOT STANDARD PLAN I-80.10-02 WSDOT STANDARD PLAN I-30.15-02 WSDOT STANDARD PLAN I-40.20-00 1 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE (BMP C105) 2 SILT FENCE DETAIL (BMP C233) 3 STORM DRAINAGE INLET PROTECTION (BMP C220) C 2.1 C 2.1 C 2.1 DATEDATEDATE DESIGNEDDRAWNCHECKEDFIELD BOOK WATTLE NOTES: Ã— Ã— CITY FILE NO.:PWD-3104 CALL TWO BUSINESS DAYS WSDOT STANDARD PLAN I-30.30-00 BEFORE YOU DIG PAISLEY LOFTS STRAW WATTLE DETAIL (BMP C235) 1-800-424-5555 SWPPP DETAILS 4 C 2.1 GRANDVIEW NORTH LLC CITY OF ARLINGTON C 2.1 # 22923 CITY OF ARLINGTON - PAISLEY LOFTS FILE NO.: PWD 3104 PORTION SW1/4, SE1/4, SEC.2, TWP.31N, RGE.5E, W.M. GRAPHIC SCALE E. DIVISION STREET GRADING QUANTITIES: 3 DATUM: NAVD 88 2 3 C 7.2 C 7.2 C 7.2 NOTES: 3 C 7.2 CASCADE 6 6 C 7.2 SURVEYING & C 7.2 Â· ENGINEERING, INC. 6 ING ER C 7.2 NE I G N 0 E 7 & 91 G OLYMPIC ENTRANCE LEGEND: NI E C Y E N V I 3 R S U S C 3.1 ED ACSAC C C C C C C C C 3 CENTENNIAL TRAIL C 3.1 SOUTH DRIVE AISLE FLOWLINE 5 2 6 C 3.1 C 3.1 C 3.1 N. OLYMPIC AVENUE 9 5 C 3.1 10 C 3.1 TYPICAL ROAD SECTION C 3.2 N-S 1 N-S 2 5 C 3.1 1 C 3.1 4 C 3.1 DATEDATEDATE 9 C 3.1 DESIGNEDDRAWNCHECKEDFIELD BOOK OLYMPIC - ENTRANCE PROFILE CITY FILE NO.:PWD-3104 N-S 2 PROFILE CALL TWO BUSINESS DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG PAISLEY LOFTS 1-800-424-5555 GRADING PLAN GRANDVIEW NORTH LLC CITY OF ARLINGTON SOUTH DRIVE AISLE FLOWLINE PROFILE C 3.0 N-S 1 PROFILE # 22923 CITY OF ARLINGTON - PAISLEY LOFTS FILE NO.: PWD 3104 PORTION SW1/4, SE1/4, SEC.2, TWP.31N, RGE.5E, W.M. 2 C 3.1 7 C 3.1 CASCADE CITY STANDARD DETAIL R-190 SURVEYING & ASPHALT THICKENED EDGE DETAIL 4 NOTES: ENGINEERING, INC. ING ER E N I G N 0 E 7 & 91 G NI E C Y E N V I R S U S E D ACSAC WSDOT STANDARD PLAN M-17.10-02 6 TWO ACCESSIBLE STALLS Â· Â· WSDOT STANDARD PLAN F-40.12-03 2 ADA ACCESS RAMP 1 WHEEL STOP DETAIL 1 3 WHEEL STOP AND ELEVATED SIDEWALK SECTION DATEDATEDATE DESIGNEDDRAWNCHECKEDFIELD BOOK CITY FILE NO.:PWD-3104 WSDOT STANDARD PLAN F-45.10-02 8 DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE CALL TWO BUSINESS DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG PAISLEY LOFTS 1-800-424-5555 GRADING DETAILS 1 GRANDVIEW NORTH LLC WSDOT SIGN R7-801 CITY STANDARD DETAIL R-220 CITY STANDARD DETAIL R-200 7 RESERVED PARKING SIGN 9 TYPE 1 CEMENT DRIVEWAY APPROACH 5 EXTRUDED CONCRETE CURB DETAIL CITY OF ARLINGTON C 3.1 # 22923 CITY OF ARLINGTON - PAISLEY LOFTS FILE NO.: PWD 3104 PORTION SW1/4, SE1/4, SEC.2, TWP.31N, RGE.5E, W.M. CASCADE SURVEYING & ENGINEERING, INC. ING ER E N I G N 0 E 7 & 91 G NI E C Y E N V I R S U S E D ACSAC PLAN VIEW BACK VIEW 18" X 24" SIGN 10 ONE WAY DO NOT ENTER SIGN 11 DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAIL DATEDATEDATE DESIGNEDDRAWNCHECKEDFIELD BOOK CITY FILE NO.:PWD-3104 CALL TWO BUSINESS DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG PAISLEY LOFTS 1-800-424-5555 GRANDVIEW NORTH LLCGRADING DETAILS 2 CITY OF ARLINGTON C 3.2 # 22923 CITY OF ARLINGTON - PAISLEY LOFTS FILE NO.: PWD 3104GRAPHIC SCALE PORTION SW1/4, SE1/4, SEC.2, TWP.31N, RGE.5E, W.M. DATUM: NAVD 88 E. DIVISION STREET CASCADE SURVEYING & ENGINEERING, INC. ING ER E N I G N 0 E 7 & 91 G NI E C 3 Y E N V I 3 C 4.1 R S U C 4.1 S E D ACSAC 4 6 C 4.2 C 4.2 3 C 4.1 CENTENNIAL TRAIL SOUTH DRIVE AISLE FLOWLINE N. OLYMPIC AVENUE 3 4 6 2 5 6 C 4.1 C 4.2 C 4.2 C 4.1 C 4.2 C 4.2 2 5 6 C 4.1 C 4.2 C 4.2 4 6 LEGEND: C 4.2 C 4.2 DATEDATEDATE DESIGNEDDRAWNCHECKEDFIELD BOOK LEGEND: CITY FILE NO.:PWD-3104 1 PAISLEY LOFTSSEWER PLAN C 4.1 SOUTH DRIVE AISLE FLOWLINE PROFILE GRANDVIEW NORTH LLC 3 C 4.1 CALL TWO BUSINESS DAYS CITY OF ARLINGTON BEFORE YOU DIG 1-800-424-5555 C 4.0 # 22923 CITY OF ARLINGTON - PAISLEY LOFTS FILE NO.: PWD 3104 PORTION SW1/4, SE1/4, SEC.2, TWP.31N, RGE.5E, W.M. CASCADE SURVEYING & ENGINEERING, INC. ING ER E N I G N 0 E 7 & 91 G NI E C Y E N V I R S U S E D ACSAC PLAN SECTION PAVED AREAS NOTES: NOTES: 12" CAST IRON LOCKING RING AND COVER ELEVATION CITY OF ARLINGTON STANDARD DETAIL SS-080 CITY OF ARLINGTON STANDARD DETAIL SS-120 CITY OF ARLINGTON STANDARD DETAIL SS-130 3 SEWER CLEANOUT DETAIL 1 TYPICAL TRENCH SECTION 2 MONITORING MANHOLE C 4.1 C 4.1 C 4.1 DATEDATEDATE DESIGNEDDRAWNCHECKEDFIELD BOOK CITY FILE NO.:PWD-3104 PAISLEY LOFTS SEWER DETAILS GRANDVIEW NORTH LLC CALL TWO BUSINESS DAYS CITY OF ARLINGTON BEFORE YOU DIG C 4.1 1-800-424-5555 # 22923 CITY OF ARLINGTON - PAISLEY LOFTS FILE NO.: PWD 3104 PORTION SW1/4, SE1/4, SEC.2, TWP.31N, RGE.5E, W.M. NOTES: CASCADE NOTES: SURVEYING & ENGINEERING, INC. ING ER E N I G N 0 E 7 & 91 G NI E C Y E N V I R S U S E DA CSAC NOTES: A A PLAN SECTION A-A DATEDATEDATE CITY OF ARLINGTON STANDARD DETAIL SS-020 CITY OF ARLINGTON STANDARD DETAIL SS-010 CITY OF ARLINGTON STANDARD DETAIL SS-030 4 SADDLE MANHOLE 5 SEWER MANHOLE TYPE 1 DETAIL 6 MANHOLE COVER DETAIL C 4.2 C 4.2 C 4.2 DESIGNEDDRAWNCHECKEDFIELD BOOK CITY FILE NO.:PWD-3104 PAISLEY LOFTS SEWER DETAILS 2 GRANDVIEW NORTH LLC CALL TWO BUSINESS DAYS CITY OF ARLINGTON BEFORE YOU DIG 1-800-424-5555 C 4.2 # 22923 CITY OF ARLINGTON - PAISLEY LOFTS FILE NO.: PWD 3104 PORTION SW1/4, SE1/4, SEC.2, TWP.31N, RGE.5E, W.M. GRAPHIC SCALE DATUM: NAVD 88 CASCADE SURVEYING & ENGINEERING, INC. Â· ING ER E N I G N 0 E 7 & 91 G NI E C Y E N V I R S U S E D ACSAC 3 4 5 C 5.1 C 5.1 C 5.1 1 2 11 E. DIVISION STREET C 5.1 C 5.1 C 5.2 3 4 5 C 5.1 C 5.1 C 5.1 1 2 11 7 9 C 5.1 C 5.1 C 5.2 C 5.2 C 5.2 6 10 C 5.1 C 5.2 LEGEND: 12 C 5.2 2 3 5 C 7.2 C 7.2 C 7.2 LEGEND: CENTENNIAL TRAIL DATEDATEDATE N. OLYMPIC AVENUE 8 C 5.2 DESIGNEDDRAWNCHECKEDFIELD BOOK CITY FILE NO.:PWD-3104 PAISLEY LOFTSWATER PLAN GRANDVIEW NORTH LLC CALL TWO BUSINESS DAYS CITY OF ARLINGTON BEFORE YOU DIG 1-800-424-5555 C 5.0 # 22923 CITY OF ARLINGTON - PAISLEY LOFTS FILE NO.: PWD 3104 PORTION SW1/4, SE1/4, SEC.2, TWP.31N, RGE.5E, W.M. CASCADE PLAN PLAN SURVEYING & ENGINEERING, INC. 4 ING ER E C 5.1 N I G N 0 E 7 NOTES AND MATERIALS: & 91 G NI E C Y E N V I R S U S E DA CSAC ELEVATION ELEVATION STEEL FABRICATED EPOXY FABRICATED STAINLESS STEEL COATED TAPPING SLEEVE TAPPING SLEEVE NOTES: CITY OF ARLINGTON STANDARD DETAIL W-050 CITY OF ARLINGTON STANDARD DETAIL W-165 CITY OF ARLINGTON STANDARD DETAIL W-200 THRUST BLOCK DETAIL 1 RESIDENTIAL/COMMERCIAL WATER SERVICE 5 3 TAPPING SLEEVES DETAIL C 5.1 C 5.1 C 5.1 DATEDATEDATE PLAN ELEVATION MATERIAL LIST: DESIGNEDDRAWNCHECKEDFIELD BOOK ELEVATION PLAN NOTES: CITY FILE NO.:PWD-3104 NOTES: CITY OF ARLINGTON STANDARD DETAIL W-030 6 HYDRANT GUARD POST C 5.1 PAISLEY LOFTS WATER DETAILS 1 GRANDVIEW NORTH LLC CITY OF ARLINGTON STANDARD DETAIL W-090 CALL TWO CITY OF ARLINGTON STANDARD DETAIL W-160 BUSINESS DAYS CITY OF ARLINGTON DOUBLE CHECK VALVE ASSEMBLY FOR 2" BEFORE YOU DIG DCVA ASSEMBLY FOR 2" 4 TYPICAL THRUST BLOCK DETAIL C 5.1 2 1-800-424-5555 C 5.1 C 5.1 # 22923 CITY OF ARLINGTON - PAISLEY LOFTS FILE NO.: PWD 3104 PORTION SW1/4, SE1/4, SEC.2, TWP.31N, RGE.5E, W.M. 5' MIN 6" CASCADE SURVEYING & ENGINEERING, INC. ING ER E N I G N 0 E 7 & 91 G NI E C Y E N V I R S U S E D ACSAC MATERIAL LIST: VALVE BOX AND EXTENSION VALVE OPERATING NUT EXTENSION CITY OF ARLINGTON STANDARD DETAIL W-225 FIRE LINE UNDERGROUND NOTES: 9 FLOOR FLANGE DETAIL C 5.2 CITY OF ARLINGTON STANDARD DETAIL W-220 7 FIRE LINE CONNECTION C 5.2 CITY OF ARLINGTON STANDARD DETAIL W-190 VALVE BOX AND 11 OPERATING NUT EXTENSION C 5.2 DATEDATEDATE DESIGNEDDRAWNCHECKEDFIELD BOOK NOTES: UNPAVED AREA PAVED AREA NOTES: CITY FILE NO.:PWD-3104 12 FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION DETAIL PAISLEY LOFTS C 5.2 WATER DETAILS 2 GRANDVIEW NORTH LLC CALL TWO BUSINESS DAYS CITY OF ARLINGTON CITY STANDARD DETAIL W-270 CITY OF ARLINGTON STANDARD DETAIL W-010 BEFORE YOU DIG C 5.2 8 TYPICAL TRENCH DETAIL 10 FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY 1-800-424-5555 C 5.2 C 5.2 # 22923 CITY OF ARLINGTON - PAISLEY LOFTS FILE NO.: PWD 3104 PORTION SW1/4, SE1/4, SEC.2, TWP.31N, RGE.5E, W.M. GRAPHIC SCALE DATUM: NAVD 88 CASCADE SURVEYING & Â· ENGINEERING, INC. ING ER E N I G N 0 E 7 & 91 G NI E C Y E. DIVISION STREET E N V I R S U S E D ACSAC LEGEND: 5 C 6.1 1 C 6.1 LEGEND: 1 C 6.1 CENTENNIAL TRAIL 1 C 6.1 5 C 6.1 1 C 6.1 N. OLYMPIC AVENUE 1 C 6.1 DATEDATEDATE 5 C 6.1 DESIGNEDDRAWNCHECKEDFIELD BOOK NOTES: 2 3 4 C 6.1 C 6.1 C 6.1 6 7 C 6.1 C 6.1 CITY FILE NO.:PWD-3104 PAISLEY LOFTS DRAINAGE PLAN GRANDVIEW NORTH LLC CALL TWO BUSINESS DAYS CITY OF ARLINGTON BEFORE YOU DIG 1-800-424-5555 C 6.0 # 22923 CITY OF ARLINGTON - PAISLEY LOFTS FILE NO.: PWD 3104 PORTION SW1/4, SE1/4, SEC.2, TWP.31N, RGE.5E, W.M. NOTES: NOTE: CASCADE SURVEYING & INFILTRATION TRENCH SECTION ENGINEERING, INC. 1 C 6.1 ING ER E N I G N 0 E 7 & 91 G NI E C Y E N V I R S U S E D ACSAC 6" OR 12" 24" 6" 2' MAX MIN COVER 6" MIN 44" 18" CITY STANDARD DETAIL SD-030 CITY STANDARD DETAIL SD-020 2 CATCH BASIN TYPE 1-L DETAIL 6 CATCH BASIN TYPE 1 DETAIL C 6.1 C 6.1 32" CITY OF ARLINGTON STANDARD DETAIL SD-120 3 STANDARD OIL/WATER SEPARATOR C 6.1 DATEDATEDATE NOTES: DESIGNEDDRAWNCHECKEDFIELD BOOK SECTION B-B PLAN SECTION B-B TOP VIEW NOTE: 12" CAST IRON LOCKING RING AND COVER PAVED AREAS CITY FILE NO.:PWD-3104 NOTES: SECTION A-A CITY OF ARLINGTON STANDARD DETAIL SS-080 SECTION A-A 5 CLEANOUT DETAIL PAISLEY LOFTS C 6.1 GRANDVIEW NORTH LLCDRAINAGE DETAILS CITY STANDARD DETAIL SD-060 4 CATCH BASIN GRATE DETAIL SECTION C-C C 6.1 CITY STANDARD DETAIL SD-080 CALL TWO BUSINESS DAYS CITY OF ARLINGTON 7 CATCH BASIN SOLID COVER DETAIL BEFORE YOU DIG C 6.1 1-800-424-5555 C 6.1 # 22923 CITY OF ARLINGTON - PAISLEY LOFTS FILE NO.: PWD 3104 PORTION SW1/4, SE1/4, SEC.2, TWP.31N, RGE.5E, W.M. GRAPHIC SCALE 3 C 7.2 4 DATUM: NAVD 88 C 7.2 E. DIVISION GUTTERLINE CASCADE SURVEYING & DIVISION BUILDING ENTRANCE ENGINEERING, INC. 3 ING ER E N I C 7.2 G N 0 E 7 & 91 1 G NI E (SEE C 7.1) 2 3 C 7.2 Y C ALLEYWAY CL ALLEY ENTRANCE E N C 7.2 C 7.2 V I R S (SEE C 7.1) U S E D ACSAC E. DIVISION GRADING DETAIL LEGEND: DATEDATEDATE LEGEND: DESIGNEDDRAWNCHECKEDFIELD BOOK E. DIVISION - GUTTERLINE PROFILEE. DIVISION GUTTERLINE PROFILE CITY FILE NO.:PWD-3104 E. DIVISION BUILDING ENTRANCE PROFILEDIVISION - ENTRANCE PROFILE PAISLEY LOFTS GRANDVIEW NORTH LLC FRONTAGE - DIVISION ST. NE CALL TWO BUSINESS DAYS CITY OF ARLINGTON E. DIVISION DETAIL BEFORE YOU DIG C 7.0 1-800-424-5555 # 22923 CITY OF ARLINGTON - PAISLEY LOFTS FILE NO.: PWD 3104 PORTION SW1/4, SE1/4, SEC.2, TWP.31N, RGE.5E, W.M. LEGEND: C C GRAPHIC SCALE CASCADE SURVEYING & DATUM: NAVD 88 ENGINEERING, INC. LEGEND: ALLEY ENTRANCE ING ER E N ALLEYWAY CL I G N 0 E 7 1 & 91 G C 7.1 NI E C Y E N V I R S U S E Â· D ACSAC 1 C 7.2 1 UTILITY POLE ANCHOR DATEDATEDATE C 7.1 DESIGNEDDRAWNCHECKEDFIELD BOOK CITY FILE NO.:PWD-3104 PAISLEY LOFTS ALLEY ENTRANCE PROFILE ALLEYWAY CL PROFILE GRANDVIEW NORTH LLC FRONTAGE - CENTENNIAL ALLEY CALL TWO BUSINESS DAYS CITY OF ARLINGTON BEFORE YOU DIG C 7.1 1-800-424-5555 # 22923 CITY OF ARLINGTON - PAISLEY LOFTS FILE NO.: PWD 3104 PORTION SW1/4, SE1/4, SEC.2, TWP.31N, RGE.5E, W.M. 3 C 7.2 CASCADE TYPICAL SECTION SURVEYING & ENGINEERING, INC. ING ER E N I G N 0 DETAIL A E 7 & 91 G NI E C Y E N V I R S U S E D ACSAC DETAIL B PLAN VIEWS NOTES: NOTES: CITY STANDARD DETAIL R-170 CITY STANDARD DETAIL R-160 2 CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK 6 PEDESTRIAN HANDRAIL DETAILS C 7.2 C 7.2 1 STREET TREE DETAIL C 7.2 EXISTING ASPHALT CONCRETE OVER CEMENT CONCRETE DATEDATEDATE DESIGNEDDRAWNCHECKEDFIELD BOOK TYPICAL SECTION NOTES: EXISTING ASPHALT CONCRETE OVER PREPARED GRADE CITY FILE NO.:PWD-3104 EXISTING CEMENT CONCRETE OVER PREPARED GRADE CITY STANDARD DETAIL R-180 PAISLEY LOFTS NOTES: 3 CEMENT CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER C 7.2 FRONTAGE DETAILS GRANDVIEW NORTH LLC CALL TWO BUSINESS DAYS CITY OF ARLINGTON CITY STANDARD DETAIL R-140 BEFORE YOU DIG 4 BACK IN ANGLED PARKING DETAIL 5 PAVEMENT PATCH 1-800-424-5555 C 7.2 C 7.2 C 7.2 # 22923 From: Ryan Morrison To: Raelynn Jones Cc: Brian Grieve; Joshua Jones Subject: RE: Paisley Lofts ADA Ramp Date: Wednesday, July 20, 2022 3:52:18 PM Attachments: image001.png image002.png Iâ€™ll add it under the PW-Admin review even though it was last completed in May, if thatâ€™s the proper location. Just wanted to make sure it didnâ€™t get missed if PW-Admin was closed out. Thanks! Ryan From: Raelynn Jones <rjones@arlingtonwa.gov> Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2022 15:39 To: Ryan Morrison <RMorrison@arlingtonwa.gov> Cc: Brian Grieve <bgrieve@arlingtonwa.gov>; Joshua Jones <jjones@arlingtonwa.gov> Subject: RE: Paisley Lofts ADA Ramp Hi Ryan, We have not sent out comments as of yet so these would just need entered into iworqs. Thank you! Sincerely, Raelynn Jones | Permit Technician I Phone: 360-403-3436 Email: rjones@arlingtonwa.gov Website: www.arlingtonwa.gov 18204 59th Ave NE, Arlington, WA 98223 From: Ryan Morrison <RMorrison@arlingtonwa.gov> Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2022 3:32 PM To: Raelynn Jones <rjones@arlingtonwa.gov> Cc: Brian Grieve <bgrieve@arlingtonwa.gov>; Joshua Jones <jjones@arlingtonwa.gov> Subject: Paisley Lofts ADA Ramp Hi Raelynn, In the process of measuring the ADA ramps on Division for next yearâ€™s overlay project we found that the ADA ramp on the SW corner of Division and Olympic was not up to current standards, despite it appearing so. The ramp running slope exceeds the required minimum slope. Iâ€™d like to include in the next batch of review comments that the ramp will need to be replaced and upgraded to current standards as part of their frontage improvements. This will also avoid us having to impact their new frontage with construction next year as we would have no choice but to replace it. Thank you, Ryan Ryan R. Morrison, P.E. Deputy PW Director/City Engineer City of Arlington desk: 360-403-3512 fax: 360-435-7944 cell: 360-913-1224 154 W Cox St., Arlington, WA 98223 rmorrison@arlingtonwa.gov www.arlingtonwa.gov PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING AGENDA Community and Economic Development City of Arlington â€¢ 18204 59th Avenue NE â€¢ Arlington, WA 98223 â€¢ Phone (360) 403 3551 Project Name: Paisley Lofts Project No.: PWD#3104 Date: 9/29/2022 Contractor: Grandview North, LLC Superintendent: Scott Benham Ph. No.: 425-422-0250 The purpose of this meeting is to provide the most common inspections and noteworthy information. This meeting is not intended to be all-encompassing. It is the responsibility of the Owner, Developer and Contractor to adhere to the approved plans, verify compliance with the City of Arlington Municipal Code, Public Works Design and Construction Standards, International Code Council (ICC), applicable local, state and federal requirements or any order, proclamation, guidance or decision of the Governor. In addition, construction sites shall adhere to current COVID-19 Jobsite Safety Requirements as per local, state and federal regulations. INSPECTIONS â€¢ INSPECTIONS (360-403-3417) MUST BE CALLED IN BEFORE 3:30 PM TO BE ON THE NEXT BUSINESS DAY INSPECTION SCHEDULE â€¢ Inspections are Monday-Friday with exception of Local, State or Federal Holidays. Building, Storm and Civil Inspections - 8 am to 4:30 pm; Water or Sewer inspections - 8:00 am to 3:30 pm â€¢ To cancel or modify an inspection - Building, Storm or Civil call 360-403-3433; Water or Sewer call 360-403-3526 â€¢ It is the responsibility of the Owner, Developer and Contractor to call and arrange for appropriate inspections. Onsite tailgate meetings are advised with each individual inspector prior to installation of their related facilities with those persons who are actually performing the work. â€¢ Failure to call for inspection may result in work being left exposed and/or removed and reconstructed â€¢ Re-inspections may be charged at $127.00 per hour, Â½ hour minimum for failure to call for inspection. Submittal Documents ï² ïƒ¾ Contractor contacts and 24 hr. emergency numbers: ïƒ¾ Copies of other agency permits or proof that the Scott Benham 425-422-0250 application is in progress: ïƒ¾ Proof of insurance listing the City of Arlington as additional ïƒ¾ One week prior to the pre-construction insured: 164GL0022768-05 Exp. 3/21/2023 meeting. Submittals for all materials and ïƒ¾ subcontractor approvals: DISCUSS AT PRE-CON Performance Bond must be on file: PB#09405870 AS NECESSARY ïƒ¾ Contractorâ€™s License: GEANDNL013K Exp: ïƒ¾ City of Arlington Business License: Current ïƒ¾ Testing Company Name and Contact Information: CESCL Name: N/A ï² MTC 360-755-1990 CESCL#: Exp.: ï² Drafts of easements and dedications must be in for review: ~Need separate legal and exhibit map for City Council Approval â€“ REQUIRED WITH AS-BUILT SUBMITTAL ïƒ¾ Contact State Historical Preservation Officer and Stillaguamish Tribe if required per Land Use Permit Dept. of Archaeology Historic Preservation Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians - THPO@stillaguamish.com 360-586-3065 Kerry Lyste Ph.: 360-572-3072; klyste@stillaguamish,.com Sam Barr Ph.: 360 -622-7055; sbarr@stillaguamish.com ïƒ¾ City of Arlington Design and Construction Standards and Specifications. (Available online) ïƒ¾ Construction Work Hours â€“ Monday â€“ Saturday 7 am to 7pm. No Sundays City recognized or Federal Holidays UPCOMING HOLIDAYS â€“ SEE FULL LIST OF 2022 FEDERAL HOLIDAYS ï² Binders and approved plans shall be kept onsite ïƒ¾ As-built plans will be required â€“ submit contractor redlined plans with as-built submittal MISCELLANEOUS: 1. Bulk Hydrant Use â€“ 360-403-3526 2. Call for Locates 3. Planting schedule and methods 4. Onsite inspection prior to and during planting 5. Inspect final grade for lawn installation (Hydro-seed/sod) 6. Verify root barrier installation 7. Planting methods & before planting mulch installation 8. Staking & top mulch installation GENERAL CIVIL AND STORM DRAINAGE REQUIREMENTS: 9. Keep road clean and overall site. 10. Dust control required. 11. Maintain construction entrance â€“ use railroad ballast â€“ no spawls. 12. Silt fence as needed â€“ contact for tailgate discussion. 13. All grouting shall be inspected inside and out. 14. Sand collars required unless otherwise specified. 15. All risers to be wet set and mudded inside and out. 16. All infiltration areas to be inspected before cover. 17. Provide protection for all infiltrating materials / amended soils, railroad ballast, drain rock 18. ECO Pans required for concrete clean up or approved wash down area with water tight containment. 19. CDF is required in right of way per R-140, up to the bottom of asphalt; no compaction required. Only for trenching within the roadway prism. 20. A Traffic Control Plan shall be submitted and approved prior to any work within the public Right of Way. 21. Landscaping â€“ root barriers are required per Standard Detail R-270. 22. CALL INSPECTION LINES AND NOT INDIVIDUAL CELL PHONES!! 23. Right of Way site plan and TCP is required for any right of way work. WSDOT TCP is acceptable or TCP per MUTCD. GENERAL UTILITY REQUIREMENTS: 24. Do not cover without inspection. 25. Maintain survey staking. 26. All pipe in ground shall be inspected before cover. 27. Take pictures. 28. Call if you have any questions. 29. No pipe received on site without the ends covered; covers will remain in place until installation. 30. Signed set of approved construction drawings will be on site. 31. General site maintenance - No garbage in the ditch; no fittings/pipe in the mud; fitting assembly in a clean area. 32. Maintain horizontal and vertical clearance with other utilities. 33. Maximum amount of open trench shall not exceed 100 feet. 34. Dropped and/or damaged pipe will be removed from the site and replaced. 35. High ground water a potential and dewatering plan may be required. De-watering pumps will need to be available and in good working condition if needed. 36. A Red Line copy of the construction drawings will be submitted to the COA at the project completion with the as-built plans. 37. Tracer Tape is required over side sewer pipes, stubs and any undetectable pipe at 24 to 48 inches below finished grade extending the full length. Page 2 of 5 REV6.2021 GENERAL WATER REQUIREMENTS: 38. Irrigation requires a separate tap for irrigation or a variance can be requested; send to Ryan Morrison rmorrison@arlingtonwa.gov. 39. CDF not required but compaction shall be met. 40. Inspectors shall be contacted and pictures will be taken. 41. All service lines shall be 2 inches and reduced at meter. 42. No 2 inches setters will be installed without restraint rods/spacer (Spud) in place. No wood spacers. 43. Pipe handling - Anticipate low water flows for flushing, keep the pipe/fittings clean. Water tight plug shall be used. 44. Once fittings arrive on site they need to be verified that they conform to approved submittals/COA STD. 45. Reduced Pressure Backflow Assembly (RPBA) is required, preferably inside the building. The RPBA must be in line where the water enters the building. Placement of the RPBA is a minimum of 1 foot and a maximum of 5 feet from ground level. 46. Mega Lugs and Field Locks are required. 47. All valves to be in the closed position to prevent debris/water from entering pipe. 48. Heavy plastic (4 mil. min.) on all fittings prior the thrust blocking. 49. Pre-block and post-block inspections are required. An ecology block may be used with crushed rock backfill compacted to 95%, as needed. â€¢ Ecology Â½ block - 2â€™x2â€™x3â€™ (1900 lbs.); or â€¢ Ecology full block â€“ 2â€™x2â€™x6â€™ (3850 lbs.); or â€¢ Per standard detail W-160 thru W-175. 50. All Services will be flushed prior to testing or connecting to the check valve to prevent the check valve from damage. 51. What type of chlorination will you use? Disposal of the Super Chlorinated water? 52. Tie-in connections shall be less than 18 feet and swabbed with a chlorinated water solution of appropriate strength. 53. Water meter will not be set until connection fees have been paid. Contact the Permit Center for or apply online. 360-403-3551 or www.arlingtonwa.gov/254/Construction-Utility-Applications 54. Limited hydrant meters, PUD may supply. GENERAL SANITARY SEWER REQUIREMENTS 55. Inspectors will take pictures. 56. Side sewer pipe and stubs shall be 6 inches. 57. Bedding shall be 3/8 inch clean washed pea gravel or imported clean sand, 6 inches below pipe and 12 inches above pipe. 58. Cleanouts shall be placed 5 feet from the building where each sewer stub exits the building. Cleanouts are required every 100 feet, must be at grade with ring, cover and internal plug, not a cap. If a clean out is not located in a solid surface, it will require a concrete pad. 59. All grouting shall be inspected inside and out. 60. All risers to be wet set and mudded inside and out. Do not use Jet set. 61. Sanitary Sewer Pipe shall be cleaned and tested after backfilling by either exfiltration or low pressure air method. 62. Sewer main will be CCTV and inspector shall be onsite. 63. Clean outs will be a â€œYâ€ at 45Â°. Page 3 of 5 REV6.2021 64. Monitoring manhole (MMH) is required for each commercial use within the city. If multi-tenant, each unit needs to connect separately to a MMH. Maximum of three (3) units may connect to one (1) MMH. Detail SS-130. BUILDING REQUIREMENTS 65. Special Inspections 66. Wall/rockeries separate building permit 67. Field Revisions to Issued Permit â€“ Level 1: Minor changes that Inspectors may add to the approved building permit file. The inspector may also determine that a level 2 requirement is necessary based on the extent and complexity of the changes proposed. â€œMinor Changesâ€ would include small scale changes, such as: â€¢ Updates to floor plan with no increases in footprint, change of uses, or heights. â€¢ Minor structural changes from the engineer and/or designer of record; such as: o basic beam changes, o changes of covered porches, patios, o over framed areas from trusses to stick framed roofs w/50 psf. or less roof snow loads without roof pitch changes, o window changes without egress change, o minor footing/foundation adjustments). â€¢ All changes/modifications should be noted/documented on the permit file and as necessary within the permitting system. 68. Revisions to Issued Permit â€“ Level 2 New applications may be required for minor revisions where staff review is necessary for proposed revisions. Only 1 revision is allowed to any issued building permit. â€¢ Types of potential changes may include but are not limited to: o Reallocation of floor area use if it would include and/or cause an increase in bedroom count(s). o Site plan changes in orientation or location on a site without any structural changes. o Roof pitch changes. o Structural changes and alterations that would then require some type of building plan review. o Slight increases and/or adjustments to previously permitted details and/or features which would increase the area and/or footprint square footage, including, but not limited to: ï‚§ decks, ï‚§ covered porches/decks, ï‚§ existing room(s)/habitable space, ï‚§ garage â€¢ Increases shall not exceed 10% of the existing detail/floor area up to a maximum total of 250 sq. ft. â€¢ Increases and/or adjustments shall not create a nonconforming structure (e.g. setbacks, floodplain, critical area, shoreline, ADU limitations, or would create other type of nonconforming use). 69. Revisions to Issued Permit â€“ Level 3 Requirements for new Permit application and full review of Substantial Changes: Changes in the scope and scale of the structure and/or structural design that would necessitate a new permit. Page 4 of 5 REV6.2021 â€¢ â€œSubstantial Changesâ€ would include changes, such as: o Changing from wood to reinforced concrete or other change in the type of construction. o Changes in occupancy that require extensive changes to the construction and life safety design of the structure. o Altered projects resulting in a totally new configuration/layout. o A completely new design, new elements, and/or features not part of the original prior approved building permit. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: 70. Permit numbers shall be added to all required reports and emailed to the following: â€¢ Marc Hayes â€“ mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov 360-403-3457 â€¢ Kevin Olander â€“ kolander@arlingtonwa.gov 360-403-3433 â€¢ Brian Grieve- bgrieve@arlingtonwa.gov 360-403-3438 / 360-913-1396 (cell) â€¢ Permit Center â€“ ced@arlingtonwa.gov 360-403-3551 71. Utility General Contact Information: 360-403-3526 â€¢ Water Department Contact: o Gus Tararan â€“ gtararan@arlingotnwa.gov 425-754-7438 o Inspections â€“ 360-403-3526 â€¢ Wastewater Department Contact: o Joe Wilson â€“ jwilson@arlingotnwa.gov 425-754-7442 o Inspections â€“ 360-403-3508 72. Plan Revisions shall be submitted via hard copy to CED Department for review. â€¢ Two (2) copies of revised plans shall be required along with an electronic copy Page 5 of 5 REV6.2021 City of Arlington Community & Economic Development 7/26/2022 Grandview North LLC PO Box 159 Arlington, WA 98223 RE: Pre-Construction Requirements Project Name: Paisley Lofts Project Address: 102 E Division St., Arlington, WA 98223 Project No.: PWD-3104 Dear Scott, In order for work to commence at the Paisley Lofts project site, the following items need to be submitted to the City of Arlington: 1. Civil Review Fees Due: $16,824.14 a. A link for payment has been sent to gv@grandviewinc.net 2. A performance bond will need to be on file with the City of Arlington. The City of Arlington Performance Bond form is included. We will require submittal of the original document. This bond is to insure completion of the following and shall be indicated on the security: All included infrastructure relating to water, sanitary sewer, and stormwater drainage systems, any right of way improvements along with any private and public landscaping. Performance Bond Estimated Cost of Construction is $172,479.38 x 150% = $258,719.06 3. Contractor Information: a. License No. and 24 hour emergency contact information b. Contractor must obtain a City of Arlington Business License c. Contractor Proof of Insurance with the City of Arlington named as Additional Insured 4. Project CESCL with current certificate (1 acre or more) 5. Project Testing Company with contact information 6. Material submittals for all proposed water, sewer and stormwater infrastructure shall be 18204 59th Avenue NE, #B - Arlington, WA, 98223 - 360-403-3551 â€“ www.arlingtonwa.gov approved. Allow one (1) weeksâ€™ time for review of material submittals. Once the items above have been received and approved, a pre-construction meeting will be scheduled. Project closeout information The performance bond shall be released when inspection and approval of all work has been completed, as-built plans, easements, dedications, and bills of sale have been approved and a two- year, 20% maintenance bond is on file with the City of Arlington. The City does not have a template for the maintenance bond, however Suretyâ€™s standard form is acceptable and shall consist of following of which shall be indicated on the security. â€œAll included infrastructure relating to the public water, and sanitary sewer systems, right of way improvements along with any private and public landscaping.â€ â€œThe bond shall not be released without written discharge from the City of Arlingtonâ€ Maintenance Bond Estimated Cost of Construction $168,491.25 x 20% = $33,698.25 Should you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me at 360.403.3551 or rjones@arlingtonwa.gov . Sincerely, Raelynn Jones Permit Technician I Community & Economic Development Department of Community & Economic Development CIVIL INSPECTION DAILY REPORT PROJECT INFORMATION REPORT DATE PROJECT NAME PREPARED BY 10/25/2023 Paisley Lofts Brian Grieve WORK PERFORMED Was work performed today? â˜’ - Yes â˜ - No TYPE OF WORK PERFORMED APPROVED APPROVED NOTES PLANS? MATERIALS? Infiltration Trench Yes Yes Crews are installing the parking lot infiltration trench. TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL Was Temporary Traffic Control required? â˜ - Yes â˜’ - No Is the contractor maintaining the traffic control devices? â˜ - Yes â˜ - No â˜’ - N/A CLOSURE TYPE APPROVED NOTES PLAN? N/A TEMPORARY EROSION & SEDIMENT CNTROL Are the contractorâ€™s erosion control measures in place? â˜’ - Yes â˜ - No Is the contractor maintaining erosion control BMPs? â˜’ - Yes â˜ - No â˜ - N/A EROSION CONTROL ISSUE NOTES N/A INSPECTOR COMMENTS None Page 2 Department of Community & Economic Development CIVIL INSPECTION DAILY REPORT PROJECT INFORMATION REPORT DATE PROJECT NAME PREPARED BY 10/26/2023 Paisley Lofts Brian Grieve WORK PERFORMED Was work performed today? â˜’ - Yes â˜ - No TYPE OF WORK PERFORMED APPROVED APPROVED NOTES PLANS? MATERIALS? Utilities Yes N/A Crews are installing utilities to the building. L&I is inspecting that work. TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL Was Temporary Traffic Control required? â˜ - Yes â˜’ - No Is the contractor maintaining the traffic control devices? â˜ - Yes â˜ - No â˜’ - N/A CLOSURE TYPE APPROVED NOTES PLAN? N/A TEMPORARY EROSION & SEDIMENT CNTROL Are the contractorâ€™s erosion control measures in place? â˜’ - Yes â˜ - No Is the contractor maintaining erosion control BMPs? â˜’ - Yes â˜ - No â˜ - N/A EROSION CONTROL ISSUE NOTES N/A INSPECTOR COMMENTS None Page 2 City of Arlington Community & Economic Development March 18, 2024 Grandview North LLC PO Box 159 Arlington, WA 98223 RE: Project Closeout Requirements Project Name: Paisley Lofts Project Address: 102 E Division St Project No.: PWD-3104 Dear Mr. Wammack, Portions of the construction project are nearing completion. Prior to Certificate of Occupancy issuance and performance bond #09405870 release, review and approval of all items related to the project closeout are required. 1. All punch list items shall be completed and approved (punch list attached); it is the responsibility of the Contractor to arrange reinspection of all punch list items. a. For all punch list items except water and sewer; contact Brian Grieve for reinspection: i. 360-913-1396 or bgrieve@arlingtonwa.gov. b. For Water and Sewer Punch list items contact: i. Public Works Department: 360-403-3526 2. As-Built plans: a. Plans shall adhere to the Public Works Design and Construction Standard 1-11. b. Shall include all public and private infrastructure, and right of way improvements c. Submit one (1) full paper set along with the electronic format (PDF) d. AutoCAD files will be required with As-Built plan final approval 3. Easement / Right of Way Dedication: a. A 20-foot easement is required for any public water system on private property. b. Submittal of legal description and exhibit map by a Professional Engineer or Surveyor licensed in the state of Washington i. All text shall be a minimum of 8-point font. ii. Avoid low contract colors and highlighting c. Right of Way Dedications require Council approval, which may extend the project closeout timeline. 4. Maintenance Bond: a. A 2-year maintenance bond is required. i. The City of Arlington maintenance bond form may be used; or ii. An Assignment of Funds iii. The Following shall be indicated on the security: 1. The Bond shall not be released without written discharge from the City of Arlington 2. All items related to on and off site landscaping, public water and sewer systems, public stormwater drainage systems and right of way improvements. b. Maintenance Bond Estimated Cost of Construction $168,491.25 x 20% = $33,698.25 5. Copy of recorded Snohomish County PUD easement. All of the above requested information must be submitted with the as-built plans to be considered a complete submittal for review. Please feel free to reach out should you have any questions at 360- 403-3551 or kfoster@arlingtonwa.gov. Sincerely, Kristin Foster Permit Technician II Community & Economic Development 18204 59th Avenue NE, #B - Arlington, WA, 98223 - 360-403-3551 â€“ www.arlingtonwa.gov Punch List Items: â€¢ Complete Alley Paving â€¢ Seal paving joint between Division St & the new street parking â€¢ Division crosswalk striping at the alley â€¢ Complete Concrete Curb around the new alley and trail parking spaces â€¢ Install Tire Stops â€¢ Dumpster Enclosure Doors â€¢ Division Street Trees & Grates â€¢ Centennial Trail Trees & Bushes â€¢ Parking Lot Landscaping o Contact Brian Grieve about the landscaping where the electrical transformer was installed in the southeast corner of the development o The electrical transformer will need to be wrapped â€¢ Clean up/stabilize the grading between the development and the post office â€¢ Remove temporary erosion & sediment control devices (final item) â€¢ The transformer that was installed in the landscape strip along Olympic will need to be wrapped â€¢ Contact Public Works for Water & Sewer Punch Lists 18204 59th Avenue NE, #B - Arlington, WA, 98223 - 360-403-3551 â€“ www.arlingtonwa.gov City of Arlington Community & Economic Development April 19, 2024 Grandview North LLC PO Box 159 Arlington, WA 98223 RE: Project Closeout Requirements Project Name: Paisley Lofts Project Address: 102 E Division St Project No.: PWD-3104 Dear Mr. Wammack, Portions of the construction project are nearing completion. Prior to Certificate of Occupancy issuance and performance bond #09405870 release, review and approval of all items related to the project closeout are required. 1. All punch list items shall be completed and approved (punch list attached); it is the responsibility of the Contractor to arrange reinspection of all punch list items. a. For all punch list items except water and sewer; contact Brian Grieve for reinspection: i. 360-913-1396 or bgrieve@arlingtonwa.gov. b. For Water and Sewer Punch list items contact: i. Public Works Department: 360-403-3526 2. As-Built plans: a. Plans shall adhere to the Public Works Design and Construction Standard 1-11. b. Shall include all public and private infrastructure, and right of way improvements c. Submit one (1) full paper set along with the electronic format (PDF) d. AutoCAD files will be required with As-Built plan final approval 3. Easement / Right of Way Dedication: a. A 20-foot easement is required for any public water and sewer system on private property. b. Submittal of legal description and exhibit map by a Professional Engineer or Surveyor licensed in the state of Washington i. All text shall be a minimum of 8-point font. ii. Avoid low contract colors and highlighting c. Right of Way Dedications require Council approval, which may extend the project closeout timeline. 4. Maintenance Bond: a. A 2-year maintenance bond is required. i. The City of Arlington maintenance bond form may be used; or ii. An Assignment of Funds iii. The Following shall be indicated on the security: 1. The Bond shall not be released without written discharge from the City of Arlington 2. All items related to on and off site landscaping, public water and sewer systems, public stormwater drainage systems and right of way improvements. b. Maintenance Bond Estimated Cost of Construction $168,491.25 x 20% = $33,698.25 5. Copy of recorded Snohomish County PUD easement. All of the above requested information must be submitted with the as-built plans to be considered a complete submittal for review. Please feel free to reach out should you have any questions at 360- 403-3551 or kfoster@arlingtonwa.gov. Sincerely, Kristin Foster Permit Technician II Community & Economic Development 18204 59th Avenue NE, #B - Arlington, WA, 98223 - 360-403-3551 â€“ www.arlingtonwa.gov Punch List Items: â€¢ Complete Alley Paving â€¢ Seal paving joint between Division St & the new street parking â€¢ Division crosswalk striping at the alley â€¢ Complete Concrete Curb around the new alley and trail parking spaces â€¢ Install Tire Stops â€¢ Dumpster Enclosure Doors â€¢ Division Street Trees & Grates â€¢ Centennial Trail Trees & Bushes â€¢ Parking Lot Landscaping o Contact Brian Grieve about the landscaping where the electrical transformer was installed in the southeast corner of the development o The electrical transformer will need to be wrapped â€¢ Clean up/stabilize the grading between the development and the post office â€¢ Remove temporary erosion & sediment control devices (final item) â€¢ The transformer that was installed in the landscape strip along Olympic will need to be wrapped â€¢ Contact Public Works for Water & Sewer Punch Lists 18204 59th Avenue NE, #B - Arlington, WA, 98223 - 360-403-3551 â€“ www.arlingtonwa.gov STORMWATER DRAINAGE UTILITY 0 BILL OF SALE AND WARRANTY Community and Economic Development City of Arlington â€¢ 18204 59th Avenue NE â€¢ Arlington, WA 98223 â€¢ Phone (360) 403 3551 (Items that will be dedicated to the City of Arlington and will become part of the Public Utility System) Grandview North, LLC, Grantor, does hereby grant, bargain, sell and convey, for a valuable consideration, to the City of Arlington, Washington, a municipal corporation, all of that certain stormwater drainage pipe and appurtenances, situated and described below: QUANTITY SIZE DESCRIPTION CONSTRUCTION COST 8.00 - Z,.Z.. l.f. (tJ inch Pipe $ '2,7 \ 62. l.f. ?ï¿½t<:.ï¿½ ï¿½inch Pipe $ I q I 7: '6,8 - 5 ea. iv?ï¿½ 1L Catch Basin(s) $ VJS-[2..5'0 - ea. inch Manhole(s) $ - 5 ea. Oil Separator( s) $ \SO,,;!>O - ea. Vault(s) $ - l.s. 4-5cy Infiltration Galleries $ \Sr B. ,s - l.s. Pond(s) $ - l.f. Fence(s) $ - ea. - Landscaping $ - 2.. Other* C Le.A t-J o u i ï¿½ $ l+DD-DO - Other* t./-5cy Aï¿½.r:..t--Soe..ï¿½ SC>IL.. $ I l{}Bt,'50 - Total $ ï¿½ ï¿½I /.t-ï¿½lf-,-2.:, *Not Required: Items outside the City's right of way or utility easements. in the development of Paisley Lofts PWD#3104, and more particularly in easements, streets, and public right-of-ways as described and as shown on an as-built drawing of said installation, attached hereto and made a part of this document. The Grantor represents and warrants .that: â€¢all of the expenses in connection with construction and installation of said pipe line and appurtenances have been full paid and the same is free from liens and debts; and â€¢said line and appurtenances were constructed and installed in accordance with City standards and specifications. The Grantor agrees to indemnify and hold the City harmless from: â€¢any lawful claims of any party for labor or materials arising out of construction and installation of said line and appurtenances. â€¢any and all claims for damages arising from defective materials or workmanship for a period of two years from the date of maintenance bond acceptance by the City. AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY ACCEPTED BY CITY OF ARLINGTON Signature: Signature: Print Name: Print Name: Title: Title: PERMIT TECHNICIAN This record was acknowledged before me on ________ _ by Punch list for Paisley Lofts 4/19/24 Ex Saddle manhole-2 *Interior grout all seams, pick holes, risers *Clean ladders and shelf, channel Manhole-1 *Interior grout all seams, pick holes, risers *Clean ladders, shelf, and channel Manhole-3 *Interior grout all seams pick holes, risers *clean ladders, shelf, and channel *Add a ladder rung Cleanouts 1,3,4 are good just bolt down lids. Clean out-3 replace plug with unbroken one. Make sure any hanging ladders are bolted down From: Brian Grieve To: dangroendyk@comcast.net Cc: Kristin Foster; Kevin Olander; Brian Grieve Subject: Paisley Lofts Punch List Date: Friday, April 26, 2024 4:56:30 PM Dan, Hereâ€™s the remaining list for Paisley lofts civil permit. Concrete curb around the alley parking & dumpster enclosure Final lift of pavement Seal joint between the new paving and Division Mulch the planter strip between the alley and the centennial trail Install 4â€™x4â€™ grates on the trees in the sidewalk along the Division parking stalls Thanks, Brian From: Joe Wilson To: Dan Cc: Kristin Foster; Kevin Olander; Brian Grieve Subject: Punch list completed for Paisley Loft Date: Thursday, May 9, 2024 11:54:41 AM Dan, After inspection today your sewer final punch list was completed and sewer looked good for Paisley Lofts. Thanks, Joe Wilson Collection System Specialist lll City of Arlington Phone: 425-754-7442 Fax: 360-403-3514 E-mail: jwilson@arlingtonwa.gov Punch list for Paisley Lofts 4/19/24 Ex Saddle manhole-2 *Interior grout all seams, pick holes, risers *Clean ladders and shelf, channel Manhole-1 *Interior grout all seams, pick holes, risers *Clean ladders, shelf, and channel Manhole-3 *Interior grout all seams pick holes, risers *clean ladders, shelf, and channel *Add a ladder rung Cleanouts 1,3,4 are good just bolt down lids. Clean out-3 replace plug with unbroken one. Make sure any hanging ladders are bolted down From: Brian Grieve To: dangroendyk@comcast.net Cc: Kristin Foster; Kevin Olander; Brian Grieve Subject: Paisley Lofts Punch List Date: Friday, April 26, 2024 4:56:30 PM Dan, Hereâ€™s the remaining list for Paisley lofts civil permit. Concrete curb around the alley parking & dumpster enclosure Final lift of pavement Seal joint between the new paving and Division Mulch the planter strip between the alley and the centennial trail Install 4â€™x4â€™ grates on the trees in the sidewalk along the Division parking stalls Thanks, Brian From: Joe Wilson To: Dan Cc: Kristin Foster; Kevin Olander; Brian Grieve Subject: Punch list completed for Paisley Loft Date: Thursday, May 9, 2024 11:54:41 AM Dan, After inspection today your sewer final punch list was completed and sewer looked good for Paisley Lofts. Thanks, Joe Wilson Collection System Specialist lll City of Arlington Phone: 425-754-7442 Fax: 360-403-3514 E-mail: jwilson@arlingtonwa.gov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`$![Q2a[#$38 `$![Q2a[#$381#V#b 2QR#[R3!$[`3#[\a! cFBDBE, b2QHd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`abcdeeefcecc`cegha`eihjklhmknojopqjhr`stuv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`"a 180"305 #395"3\2 W bIFLFM+ a187c01IG+`SIOY+ d*-((e*. 8AG@fLS@3AE@ cNSIAR@R`T ghijkllkmjnjjgjnophgnqprstpusvwrwxyrpzg{|}~ ACFA`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`a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` aZILbEZ ? 0" ; +3-2%F-+2$2&G%2*+3-%F-$8+3)442)''+3-2%F-+2\*V)&F)3')&F)3')^ ZcIZ=F%5%-&3B93F9Z%2(12+)34*H L LD K L L -85)3T)7Z+3'-2TF-&+3+3-2%F-+2K D K K 12%345&)67+2-89EF+--C%GG%FH K L LM M$<+= +3'-2TF-&+3+3-2%F-+2b<K DD M ZcIZ=F%5%-&3B93F9Z%2(12+)34*H L LD K L L -85)3T)7Z+3'-2TF-&+3+3-2%F-+2%U+2c34T'-2&)'ZIZad DDe K 12%345&)67+2-89EF+--C%GG%FH K L LM M$<+= +3'-2TF-&+3+3-2%F-+2%U+2c34T'-2&)'17I7 e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` %"%' O9 :!J9:!K !99:!P ! !9::! !: 9 9! ! ! !9LM ! 9N ! ##' J :!9! ! >! !a!9 N ! I' J :! !9 9!M : N ! I#' P:! :! !W9!9 !Q 9: K!Ub 9: K !"#!$#!"$%$&!'#()*+,#-'%$*#!"!% . /&!-&0*&! 0&#*+/1!$2-#!0*&! 3 0&#*+ #" J9!W #I J :! !J :! ! 9>>!> ! K J9!W #< J K! ! ! !9 9 J9!W & ! K! !::!> !'!b!"?I!c J9!W ef,)+BB!C, 9 !9 ""<' ghihjhiikglgjiilmnopqhiljnrsktuvwxryyz{|}~y~Â€ <I' ggggjhihkglgjlmhlnopqhiljnpÂx}zrsktuvwxowÂÂ‚sy~Â€ <' ggigiÂƒÂ„ÂƒkglgjlmggnopqhiljnqzÂvÂ‚Â }rsktuvwxowÂÂ‚sy~Â€ && igÂƒjmÂ„Â†Â‡kglgglÂƒgÂƒnhiljnÂˆssu}~!o}zÂ‰vxy~Â€ <& igÂ†Â„Â†Â„Â‡lkhiljnÂŠÂ‹r!ÂŒ}|v}Â!ÂŠ{Â‰Â‰}Â‚xs!z}sy{Â‚s}y~Â€ <& igÂ†Â„Â†Â„Â‡ikggÂƒgh!ÂŠÂˆÂŽÂˆÂ!oÂrÂÂ‘y~Â€ <' igÂ†jlÂƒmhkhiljnpÂx}z!Â’Âx}zvÂw!Â‘uÂ“Â‰vxxÂwsy~Â€ <' igÂ†jlÂƒmlkhiljnÂ‘}Â}z!Â’Âx}zvÂw!Â‘uÂ“Â‰vxxÂwsy~Â€ <' igÂ†jlÂƒmikhiljnÂ‘x{zÂ‰!Â’Âx}zvÂw!Â‘uÂ“Â‰vxxÂwsy~Â€ <" igÂ‡hÂƒlmmkÂŠÂ‹r!ÂŒ}|v}Â!ÂŠ{Â‰Â‰}Â‚xs!ÂŒ}sy{Â‚s}!Â„gÂ†glggy~Â€ <" igÂ‡hÂƒlmÂƒkÂŠÂ‘Â”kggÂƒgh!Â•Â–ÂÂ!Â‘Â”Â—y~Â€ #I iglÂƒmmÂ†ikhilj!ÂŒ}|v}Â!ÂŒÂ”Â‘oÂ‹ÂÂ‘Â”y~Â€ #I iglÂƒmmÂ†gkhiljnÂŠÂ‘Â”kggÂƒghy~Â€ & iiÂ‡Â„Â‡Â„gÂ‡kggÂƒgh!ÂŠ{Â‰yw}x}!Â‘xz}}xs!ÂŠÂ˜}Â™Âšwvsxy~Â€ & iiÂ‡Â„Â‡Â„gÂ„kggÂƒgh!ÂŠ{Â‚sxzuÂ™xv{Â‚!ÂŠÂwÂ™uwÂxv{Â‚!p{zÂšsÂ˜}}xy~Â€ & iiÂ‡Â„Â‡Â„gmkggÂƒgh!qzÂvÂ‚Â }!z}y{zxkÂ™v|vwy~Â€ & iiÂ‡Â„Â‡Â„gÂƒkggÂƒgh!Â‘poooy~Â€ M B%-)i3+F8%&3(&3H%((+6)4jP EZCZZE7$CLI7L1E EZCZZE7$CLEZCLZ D 7+%44&-&+3%(F+GG)3-'P$CLC\LZ DK D %2F`%*)' D \ZEb<\\E7+F+GG)3-'9\ceE$CLI7L1E D D \ZEb<\\E7+F+GG)3-'P$CLEZCLZ D D \ZEb<\\EPk+VV)2')--)2-+U)(+6U*V%''P $CLC\LZ D P)-)2U+='8%((8%5)%=&)6+5)2 $Z\\Z`77 e2&'-&3l+'-)2 K EL<b\ ZI7E$Z\ M DK EL<b\E-+2G6%-)2<&(('+,E%()3))4-+U)F+22)F-)4P'L<T&(-42%6&3B'%2)F+GV()-)%342)%4* %2F`%*)' ,+2'&B3%-T2)U*F&-*)3B&3))2P K EL<b\7+F+GG)3-'P$CLI7L1E M K EL<b\7+F+GG)3-'PiCj $CLEZCLZ M D EL<b\3+F+GG)3-',+2-8&'2)5&)6P $CLC\LZ 1T'