Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout17309 40th Ave NE_BLD2018_2025 ADHESIVE ANCHOR INSPECTION REPORT PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street NE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: AA001 PERMIT #: BLD-2018 DATE: 5/16/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 2 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Tim Martin Item(s) Inspected Location Threaded Rod Anchor Bolts for HDU5 Holdowns Slab Sections 1, 2, 3, 5 & 6 (Areas in Progress) Reference Drawing(s): RFI #2 Item(s) Inspected Comments Base Material Condition Satisfactory, Dry Concrete, 53º Drill Bit Type Drilled Prior Hole Diameter/Depth 3/4", 9 to 10" Hole Cleanliness Blown, Brushed, Blown Anchor Spacing/Edge Distance Per Plan Anchor Type Galvanized All-Thread Anchor Diameter/Length 5/8", 14" Anchor Embedment 9 to 10" Adhesive Type Simpson Set XP Adhesive Expiration Date 1/20/20 Adhesive ICC-ES Report 2508 Other The above items were conforming Nonconforming Items (see below) Comments: Geotest was on site as requested to inspect the above items. The bolts were installed as recommended by the manufacturer’s published instructions. Many bolts were not installed due to little embedment. The contractor marked these locations and planned to drill to the correct depth. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amwahousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. ADHESIVE ANCHOR INSPECTION REPORT PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: AA001 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 2 of 2 ADHESIVE ANCHOR INSPECTION REPORT PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street NE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: AA002 PERMIT #: BLD-2018 DATE: 6/18/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 1 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Dan Weaver Item(s) Inspected Location 5/8" X 14" All Thread Anchors for HDU-5 Hold Down 8-10 & A-H At Framed Shear Walls Reference Drawing(s): RFI #2 Item(s) Inspected Comments Base Material Condition Dry & Sound Concrete Drill Bit Type Hilti Roto Hammer 3/4" Bit Hole Diameter/Depth 3/4" X 9" Hole Cleanliness Blow, Brush & Blow Anchor Spacing/Edge Distance Per Plan Anchor Type All Thread Anchor Diameter/Length 5/8" X 14" Anchor Embedment 9" Adhesive Type Simpson Set XP Adhesive Expiration Date 11-2020 Adhesive ICC-ES Report 2508 Other The above items were conforming Nonconforming Items (see below) Comments: GeoTest was on site to perform a special inspection for the above post-installed anchor bolts. The hold-down anchors were installed in accordance with the engineer’s details and the manufacturers published instructions. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amwahousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. Hot Mix Asphalt Compaction Report PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street NE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: AC001 PERMIT #: BLD-2018 DATE: 5/8/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 3 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Anna Sigel HMA Class: 1" 3/8" Source Plan Depth, in. 2 3/4" Other Leveling Wearing Base Rice Density, pcf 157.4 1/2" Weather Correlation Factor 1.000 Gauge Make/Model/Serial #:Troxler/3440P/62856 Calibration Date/Source: 08-30-18/NWTS M/D Standard Count #: 593/2192 Test Method: T355/Backscatter Lot # Quantity, tons Beginning Sta. Ending Sta. Lot Length, ft. Lot Width, ft. Lane HMA Test Temp., °F 1 500 Lt. EB NB Other 306 Rt. WB SB Test Density Corrected Compaction % No. pcf Density, pcf Attained Required 1 Test #1, See Figure 1 147.5 147.5 93.7 91.0 2 Test #2, See Figure 1 145.7 145.7 92.6 91.0 3 Test #3, See Figure 1 148.3 148.3 94.2 91.0 4 Test #4, See Figure 1 148.1 148.1 94.1 91.0 5 Test #5, See Figure 1 149.9 149.9 95.2 0.0 Lot # Quantity, tons Beginning Sta. Ending Sta. Lot Length, ft. Lot Width, ft. Lane HMA Test Temp., °F 2 440 Lt. EB NB Other 275 Rt. WB SB Test Density Corrected Compaction % No. pcf Density, pcf Attained Required 1 Test # 6, See Figure 1 151.8 151.8 96.4 91.0 2 Test #7, See Figure 1 149.6 149.6 95.0 91.0 3 Test #8, See Figure 1 154.2 154.2 98.0 91.0 4 Test #9, See Figure 1 150.3 150.3 95.5 91.0 5 Test #10, See Figure 1 147.4 147.4 93.6 0.0 Comments: GeoTest was on-site as requested to provide in-place density testing on one 2-inch lift of 1/2" hot-mix asphalt(HMA)for the Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments parking lots. All locations are approximate. Asphalt was placed using a BOMAG 814-2 paver and a PF-5510 paver. Compaction was accomplished using an HYSTER C766 roller and two BOMAG 120AD rollers with dual-drum vibrators. A plate compactor and hand tools were used to compact asphalt edges. All tests met compaction requirements. The rice density value used is an average of the rice values attained from two samples collected on 5/8/19. See Figures 1 through 4. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amwahousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. The above test results relate only to the sample (or location) tested. Hot Mix Asphalt Compaction Report PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: AC001 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 2 of 3 Figure 1: Approximate asphalt test locations. Figure 2: A photo of the contractor placing and rolling asphalt in the parking lot south of the building footprint. The photo was taken facing southeast. Hot Mix Asphalt Compaction Report PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: AC001 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 3 of 3 Figure 3: A photo of the contractor using the HYSTER C766 and the BOMAG 120AD rollers to compact the soil. The photo was taken in the southeast corner of the site and facing northwest. Figure 4: A photo of the placed and compacted asphalt for the parking lot north of the building footprint. The photo was taken in the northeast corner and facing west. 741 Marine Drive, Bellingham, WA 98225 www.geotest-inc.com 20611 67th Ave. NE. Unit A. Arlington, WA 98223 phone: (360) 733.7318 toll free: (888) 251.5276 fax: (360) 733.7418 Concrete Inspection & Compressive Strength Test Report PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street SE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: CB001 PERMIT #: BLDG-2018 DATE: 1/7/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 2 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Tristan Coragiulo Placement Location: Northern Site Perimeter CMU Wall Footing Sample Location: First Truck, Mid-Pour, Directly From Chute, Northeastern Corner of Site Field Data: Eq. No. Supplier Miles Sand and Gravel Company Slump, in. (C143) 3.50 9 Mix # 025006C Air Content, % (C231) NT Mix Description 5.0 Sk, 7/8", Pea, MB Poly 997 Unit Weight, pcf (C138) NT Truck/Ticket # C185 / 216970 Air/Mix Temp.,°F (C1064) 42 / 64 TC02 Strength Required 3000 psi at 28 days Field Cure Temperature, °F 42/62 Quantity Placed, cy 40 Cure Method - Initial / Final Container / Water Tank Time Batched 10:25 AM Water Added on Job, gals 0 Time Sampled 11:25 AM Water Requested by Laboratory Data: Lab Test Age Test Total Load Avg.D Area Compressive No. (Days) Date (lbs) (in) (in²) Strength (psi) 90946 7 01-14 54280 4.01 12.63 4300 TYPE 2: 90947 28 02-04 66900 4.00 12.57 5320 TYPE 2: 90948 28 02-04 65720 4.00 12.57 5230 TYPE 2: 90949 28 02-04 67190 4.00 12.57 5350 TYPE 2: 90950 Hold 00-00 0 0.00 0.00 0 Reinforcement Inspection NT n/a: not applicable Specimen Size 4" X 8" Reinforcement Conforms NT n/t: not tested Test Reference ASTM C31/C39/C1231 Comments: GeoTest was on-site as requested to provide concrete testing and placement inspection. Concrete was placed directly from the truck chute, mechanically consolidated, and was hand finished. For the concrete reinforcement inspection, please refer to GeoTest’s Inspection report IR001. GeoTest will return for further inspection and observation as requested. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amcalhousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. The above test results relate to the sample (or location) tested. 741 Marine Drive, Bellingham, WA 98225 www.geotest-inc.com 20611 67th Ave. NE. Unit A. Arlington, WA 98223 phone: (360) 733.7318 toll free: (888) 251.5276 fax: (360) 733.7418 Concrete Inspection & Compressive Strength Test Report PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: CB001 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 2 of 2 Figure 1. The concrete placement and finishing process for the perimeter wall footing (looking northwest). 741 Marine Drive, Bellingham, WA 98225 www.geotest-inc.com 20611 67th Ave. NE. Unit A. Arlington, WA 98223 phone: (360) 733.7318 toll free: (888) 251.5276 fax: (360) 733.7418 Concrete Inspection & Compressive Strength Test Report PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street SE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: CB002 PERMIT #: BLD2018 DATE: 1/10/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 2 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Joel Morder Placement Location: CMU Wall Footing on East Perimeter of Site Sample Location: NE Section of Footing Field Data: Eq. No. Supplier Miles Sand and Gravel Company Slump, in. (C143) 6.00 15 Mix # 025006C Air Content, % (C231) NT Mix Description Winter Performance Unit Weight, pcf (C138) NT Truck/Ticket # C143 / 614884 Air/Mix Temp.,°F (C1064) 48 / 59 JM2 Strength Required 3000 psi at 28 days Field Cure Temperature, °F NT Quantity Placed, cy 20 Cure Method - Initial / Final Container / Moist Room Time Batched 10:27 AM Water Added on Job, gals 10 Time Sampled 11:15 AM Water Requested by Contractor Laboratory Data: Lab Test Age Test Total Load Avg.D Area Compressive No. (Days) Date (lbs) (in) (in²) Strength (psi) 91090 7 01-17 43850 4.01 12.63 3470 TYPE 2: 91091 28 02-07 53010 4.01 12.63 4200 TYPE 2: 91092 28 02-07 55130 4.01 12.63 4370 TYPE 2: 91093 28 02-07 53980 4.01 12.63 4270 TYPE 2: 91094 Hold 00-00 0 0.00 0.00 0 Reinforcement Inspection Yes n/a: not applicable Specimen Size 4" X 8" Reinforcement Conforms Yes n/t: not tested Test Reference ASTM C31/C39/C1231 Comments: GeoTest representative on site for inspection of the CMU wall footing located on the east perimeter of the site. Approximately 50’ from the SE corner was not yet built. Reinforcing steel was placed in accordance with details 4/CS-4 and 5/CS-1. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amcalhousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. The above test results relate to the sample (or location) tested. 741 Marine Drive, Bellingham, WA 98225 www.geotest-inc.com 20611 67th Ave. NE. Unit A. Arlington, WA 98223 phone: (360) 733.7318 toll free: (888) 251.5276 fax: (360) 733.7418 Concrete Inspection & Compressive Strength Test Report PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: CB002 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 2 of 2 Concrete Placement and Consolidation Finished Concrete Footing 741 Marine Drive, Bellingham, WA 98225 www.geotest-inc.com 20611 67th Ave. NE. Unit A. Arlington, WA 98223 phone: (360) 733.7318 toll free: (888) 251.5276 fax: (360) 733.7418 Concrete Inspection & Compressive Strength Test Report PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street SE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: CB003 PERMIT #: BLDG-2018 DATE: 1/15/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 2 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Brandon Defibaugh Placement Location: Southern CMU Wall Footing Sample Location: Beginning of First Load Field Data: Eq. No. Supplier Miles Sand and Gravel Company Slump, in. (C143) 5.00 6 Mix # 025006C Air Content, % (C231) NT Mix Description 5 Sk, 7/8" Agg., MB Poly 997 Unit Weight, pcf (C138) NT Truck/Ticket # C115 / 614952 Air/Mix Temp.,°F (C1064) 46 / 64 BD12 Strength Required 3000 psi at 28 days Field Cure Temperature, °F 40/62 Quantity Placed, cy ~20 Cure Method - Initial / Final Container / Water Tank Time Batched 12:48 PM Water Added on Job, gals 8 Time Sampled 1:41 PM Water Requested by Miles Laboratory Data: Lab Test Age Test Total Load Avg.D Area Compressive No. (Days) Date (lbs) (in) (in²) Strength (psi) 91339 7 01-22 47270 4.01 12.63 3740 TYPE 2: 91340 28 02-12 0 0.00 0.00 0 91341 28 02-12 0 0.00 0.00 0 91342 28 02-12 0 0.00 0.00 0 91343 Hold 00-00 0 0.00 0.00 0 Reinforcement Inspection Yes n/a: not applicable Specimen Size 4" X 8" Reinforcement Conforms Yes n/t: not tested Test Reference ASTM C31/C39/C1231 Comments: GeoTest was on-site as requested to provide special inspection of the reinforcement and to test the concrete placed today. Concrete was via chute, mechanically consolidated, and was hand finished. Reinforcement was found to conform to detail 5 on CS-1. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amcalhousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. The above test results relate to the sample (or location) tested. 741 Marine Drive, Bellingham, WA 98225 www.geotest-inc.com 20611 67th Ave. NE. Unit A. Arlington, WA 98223 phone: (360) 733.7318 toll free: (888) 251.5276 fax: (360) 733.7418 Concrete Inspection & Compressive Strength Test Report PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: CB003 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 2 of 2 Figure 1: Footing reinforcement at the time of inspection. Picture facing east. 741 Marine Drive, Bellingham, WA 98225 www.geotest-inc.com 20611 67th Ave. NE. Unit A. Arlington, WA 98223 phone: (360) 733.7318 toll free: (888) 251.5276 fax: (360) 733.7418 Concrete Inspection & Compressive Strength Test Report PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street SE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: CB004 PERMIT #: BLD-2018 DATE: 2/21/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 2 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Tim Martin Placement Location: Elevator #1 and 2# Base Slabs With Sumps and A Section of Continuous CMU Wall Footing at Southern 80 Feet of East Site Wall Sample Location: 1st Load, Placed at Elevator Slabs Field Data: Eq. No. Supplier Miles Sand and Gravel Company Slump, in. (C143) 3.50 19 Mix # 025006C Air Content, % (C231) NT Mix Description 5.5sk., 7/8", WRA Unit Weight, pcf (C138) NT Truck/Ticket # C114 / 615087 Air/Mix Temp.,°F (C1064) 44 / 63 TM03 Strength Required 3000 psi at 28 days Field Cure Temperature, °F Quantity Placed, cy 13.5 Cure Method - Initial / Final Container / Water Tank Time Batched 1:13 P.M Water Added on Job, gals 20 Time Sampled 2:06 P.M Water Requested by Concrete Contrac Laboratory Data: Lab Test Age Test Total Load Avg.D Area Compressive No. (Days) Date (lbs) (in) (in²) Strength (psi) 92338 7 02-28 61620 4.01 12.63 4880 TYPE 2: 92339 28 03-21 74860 4.01 12.63 5930 TYPE 2: 92340 28 03-21 79230 4.01 12.63 6270 TYPE 2: 92341 28 03-21 77630 4.01 12.63 6150 TYPE 2: 92342 Hold 00-00 0 0.00 0.00 0 Reinforcement Inspection Yes n/a: not applicable Specimen Size 4" X 8" Reinforcement Conforms Yes n/t: not tested Test Reference ASTM C31/C39/C1231 Comments: GeoTest was on site as requested to inspect the concrete placement at the above-mentioned locations. The reinforcing steel was in place and was found to conform with CS-1, 7 on S4.1 and typical notes and schedules. The concrete was placed directly from the mixer’s chute and was mechanically consolidated. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amwahousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. The above test results relate to the sample (or location) tested. 741 Marine Drive, Bellingham, WA 98225 www.geotest-inc.com 20611 67th Ave. NE. Unit A. Arlington, WA 98223 phone: (360) 733.7318 toll free: (888) 251.5276 fax: (360) 733.7418 Concrete Inspection & Compressive Strength Test Report PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: CB004 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 2 of 2 Photo of the contractor pouring and consolidating the concrete at the site wall foundation. This area was poured without the Xypex waterproofing admixture used at both elevator slabs. Photo of the contractor pouring elevator #1 base slab. 741 Marine Drive, Bellingham, WA 98225 www.geotest-inc.com 20527 67th Ave NE, Arlington, WA 98223 phone: (360) 733.7318 toll free: (888) 251.5276 fax: (360) 733.7418 Concrete Inspection & Compressive Strength Test Report PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street SE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: CB005 PERMIT #: BLD-2018 DATE: 2/25/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 1 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Dan Weaver Placement Location: Elevator #1 & 2 Walls at 9-10 & F.4-F.8, & 14.6-15 & A.5-B Sample Location: 7.5 Cubic Yard Load Field Data: Eq. No. Supplier Miles Sand and Gravel Company Slump, in. (C143) 5.50 25 Mix # 025006C Air Content, % (C231) N/T Mix Description 5Sk, MB Poly 997, Hot Water & 7/8" Aggregate Unit Weight, pcf (C138) N/T Truck/Ticket # C137 / 615212 Air/Mix Temp.,°F (C1064) 44 / 61 DW02 Strength Required 3000 psi at 28 days Field Cure Temperature, °F 34 / 80 Quantity Placed, cy 7.5 Cure Method - Initial / Final Container / Water Tank Time Batched 1:43 PM Water Added on Job, gals 7 Time Sampled 2:40 PM Water Requested by Miles Laboratory Data: Lab Test Age Test Total Load Avg.D Area Compressive No. (Days) Date (lbs) (in) (in²) Strength (psi) 92435 7 03-04 52540 4.01 12.63 4160 TYPE 2: 92436 28 03-25 66170 4.02 12.69 5210 TYPE 2: 92437 28 03-25 70630 4.02 12.69 5570 TYPE 2: 92438 28 03-25 68800 4.02 12.69 5420 TYPE 2: 92439 Hold 00-00 0 0.00 0.00 0 Reinforcement Inspection Yes n/a: not applicable Specimen Size 4" X 8" Reinforcement Conforms Yes n/t: not tested Test Reference ASTM C31/C39/C1231 Comments: GeoTest was on site perform reinforced special inspection at the above location. Wall reinforcing steel for both elevators was in place and was found to conform with detail #6 on S4.1. Concrete was placed via boom pump and was internally vibrated. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amwahousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. The above test results relate to the sample (or location) tested. Concrete Inspection & Compressive Strength Test Report PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street SE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: CB006 PERMIT #: BLDG-2018 DATE: 3/11/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 3 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Joel Morder Placement Location: Mat Slab, Pour 1, Grids A-H15.5-18 Sample Location: Grid A/15.8, Middle of the Truck Field Data: Eq. No. Supplier Miles Sand and Gravel Company Slump, in. (C143) 5.00 15 Mix # 0260A6C Air Content, % (C231) 4.0 18 Mix Description 7/8" Aggregate, Air Unit Weight, pcf (C138) NT Truck/Ticket # C059 / 218782 Air/Mix Temp.,°F (C1064) 32 / 63 JM4 Strength Required 4000 psi at 28 days Field Cure Temperature, °F 42-59 Quantity Placed, cy 520 Cure Method - Initial / Final Container / Water Tank Time Batched 6:10 AM Water Added on Job, gals 0 Time Sampled 6:50 AM Water Requested by Laboratory Data: Lab Test Age Test Total Load Avg.D Area Compressive No. (Days) Date (lbs) (in) (in²) Strength (psi) 92981 7 03-18 77650 4.01 12.63 6150 TYPE 2: 92982 28 04-08 96140 4.01 12.63 7610 TYPE 2: 92983 28 04-08 92530 4.01 12.63 7330 TYPE 3: 92984 28 04-08 94470 4.01 12.63 7480 TYPE 3: 92985 Hold 00-00 0 0.00 0.00 0 Reinforcement Inspection NT n/a: not applicable Specimen Size 4" X 8" Reinforcement Conforms NT n/t: not tested Test Reference ASTM C31/C39/C1231 Comments: GeoTest on site for inspection of concrete placed for the above-referenced locations. Verified final clearances and debris removal prior to concrete placement. Items inspected were in conformance with approved plans and drawings. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amwahousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. The above test results relate to the sample (or location) tested. Concrete Compressive Strength Test Report * Continuation PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: CB006 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 2 of 3 Sample Location: Grid C/17, Middle of Truck Field Data: Truck/Ticket # C054 / 218799 Slump, in. (C143) 5.50 Time Batched 7:56 AM Air Content, % (C231) 4.5 Time Sampled 8:32 AM Unit Weight, pcf (C138) NT Air Temperature,°F 35 Water Added on Job, gals 0 Mix Temp.°F(C1064) 61 Water Requested by Laboratory Data: Lab Test Age Test Total Load Avg.D Area Compressive No. (Days) Date (lbs) (in) (in²) Strength (psi) 92986 7 03-18 72810 4.01 12.63 5760 TYPE 2: 92987 28 04-08 88580 4.01 12.63 7010 TYPE 2: 92988 28 04-08 89060 4.01 12.63 7050 TYPE 2: 92989 28 04-08 88090 4.01 12.63 6970 TYPE 2: 92990 Hold 00-00 0 0.00 0.00 0 Comments: Sample Location: Grid E/16.2, Middle of Truck Field Data: Truck/Ticket # C061 / 218830 Slump, in. (C143) 5.00 Time Batched 10:03 AM Air Content, % (C231) 4.4 Time Sampled 10:45 AM Unit Weight, pcf (C138) NT Air Temperature,°F 38 Water Added on Job, gals 0 Mix Temp.°F(C1064) 70 Water Requested by Laboratory Data: Lab Test Age Test Total Load Avg.D Area Compressive No. (Days) Date (lbs) (in) (in²) Strength (psi) 92991 7 03-18 75620 4.01 12.63 5990 TYPE 2: 92992 28 04-08 84880 4.01 12.63 6720 TYPE 3: 92993 28 04-08 87110 4.01 12.63 6900 TYPE 2: 92994 28 04-08 91150 4.01 12.63 7220 TYPE 3: 92995 Hold 00-00 0 0.00 0.00 0 Concrete Compressive Strength Test Report * Continuation PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: CB006 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 3 of 3 Sample Location: Grid G/17.8, Middle of Truck Field Data: Truck/Ticket # C057 / 218844 Slump, in. (C143) 5.00 Time Batched 11:15 AM Air Content, % (C231) 5.0 Time Sampled 12:00 PM Unit Weight, pcf (C138) NT Air Temperature,°F 40 Water Added on Job, gals 0 Mix Temp.°F(C1064) 71 Water Requested by Laboratory Data: Lab Test Age Test Total Load Avg.D Area Compressive No. (Days) Date (lbs) (in) (in²) Strength (psi) 92996 7 03-18 67140 4.01 12.63 5320 TYPE 2: 92997 28 04-08 80400 4.01 12.63 6370 TYPE 3: 92998 28 04-08 82500 4.01 12.63 6530 TYPE 2: 92999 28 04-08 85400 4.01 12.63 6760 TYPE 2: 93000 Hold 00-00 0 0.00 0.00 0 Comments: Sample Location: Field Data: Truck/Ticket # / Slump, in. (C143) Time Batched Air Content, % (C231) Time Sampled Unit Weight, pcf (C138) Air Temperature,°F Water Added on Job, gals Mix Temp.°F(C1064) Water Requested by Laboratory Data: Lab Test Age Test Total Load Avg.D Area Compressive No. (Days) Date (lbs) (in) (in²) Strength (psi) Concrete Inspection & Compressive Strength Test Report PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street SE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: CB007 PERMIT #: BLD-2018 DATE: 3/14/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 4 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Tim Martin Placement Location: Section 3 Mat Foundation Sample Location: 2nd Load at the Mixer Chute, Placed at Line E to F.5/15 to 15.5 Field Data: Eq. No. Supplier Miles Sand and Gravel Company Slump, in. (C143) 6.25 19 Mix # 026A6G Air Content, % (C231) 4.9 2 Mix Description 6sk, 7/8", HRWR, WRA, AEA, 1% NC Accel, 100% HW Unit Weight, pcf (C138) NT Truck/Ticket # C185 / 218973 Air/Mix Temp.,°F (C1064) 35 / 68 TM06 Strength Required 4000 psi at 28 days Field Cure Temperature, °F TM06 Quantity Placed, cy 451 Cure Method - Initial / Final Container / Water Tank Time Batched 6:02 A.M Water Added on Job, gals 8 Time Sampled 6:42 A.M Water Requested by Miles QC Laboratory Data: Lab Test Age Test Total Load Avg.D Area Compressive No. (Days) Date (lbs) (in) (in²) Strength (psi) 93166 7 03-21 71100 4.01 12.63 5630 TYPE 2: 93167 28 04-11 82470 4.01 12.63 6530 TYPE 2: 93168 28 04-11 84770 4.01 12.63 6710 TYPE 2: 93169 28 04-11 81730 4.01 12.63 6470 TYPE 3: 93170 Hold 00-00 0 0.00 0.00 0 Reinforcement Inspection Yes n/a: not applicable Specimen Size 4" X 8" Reinforcement Conforms Yes n/t: not tested Test Reference ASTM C31/C39/C1231 Comments: GeoTest was on site as requested to inspect the concrete placement at the above locations. The reinforcing steel was inspected on 3/13/19 and was found placed as detailed in the project structural drawings. The concrete was placed using a boom pump and was consolidated with two backpack vibrators. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amwahousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. The above test results relate to the sample (or location) tested. Concrete Compressive Strength Test Report * Continuation PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: CB007 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 2 of 4 Sample Location: 14th Load (146.5 CY Placed), Line E.8 to G/13 to 14 Field Data: Truck/Ticket # C186 / 218988 Slump, in. (C143) 6.75 Time Batched 7:36 A.M Air Content, % (C231) 4.8 Time Sampled 8:14 A.M Unit Weight, pcf (C138) NT Air Temperature,°F 38 Water Added on Job, gals 8 Mix Temp.°F(C1064) 68 Water Requested by Supplier’s QC Laboratory Data: Lab Test Age Test Total Load Avg.D Area Compressive No. (Days) Date (lbs) (in) (in²) Strength (psi) 93205 7 03-21 68680 4.01 12.63 5440 TYPE 2: 93206 28 04-11 79760 4.01 12.63 6320 TYPE 3: 93207 28 04-11 84870 4.01 12.63 6720 TYPE 3: 93208 28 04-11 82230 4.01 12.63 6510 TYPE 3: 93209 Hold 00-00 0 0.00 0.00 0 Comments: Sample Location: 30th Load (304 CY Placed), Line E.75 to F.75/10 to 11 Field Data: Truck/Ticket # CO59 / 219887 Slump, in. (C143) 6.25 Time Batched 9:37 A.M Air Content, % (C231) 4.7 Time Sampled 10:07 A.M Unit Weight, pcf (C138) NT Air Temperature,°F 39 Water Added on Job, gals 0 Mix Temp.°F(C1064) 71 Water Requested by Laboratory Data: Lab Test Age Test Total Load Avg.D Area Compressive No. (Days) Date (lbs) (in) (in²) Strength (psi) 93210 7 03-21 72290 4.01 12.63 5720 TYPE 2: 93211 28 04-11 96530 4.01 12.63 7640 TYPE 2: 93212 28 04-11 92110 4.01 12.63 7290 TYPE 2: 93213 28 04-11 86390 4.01 12.63 6840 TYPE 2: 93214 Hold 00-00 0 0.00 0.00 0 Concrete Compressive Strength Test Report * Continuation PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: CB007 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 3 of 4 Sample Location: 40th Load (409 CY Placed) F to G/9 to 9.5 Field Data: Truck/Ticket # CO11 / 219020 Slump, in. (C143) 6.75 Time Batched 10:49 A.M Air Content, % (C231) 4.8 Time Sampled 11:20 A.M Unit Weight, pcf (C138) NT Air Temperature,°F 42 Water Added on Job, gals 8 Mix Temp.°F(C1064) 69 Water Requested by Supplier’s QC Laboratory Data: Lab Test Age Test Total Load Avg.D Area Compressive No. (Days) Date (lbs) (in) (in²) Strength (psi) 93215 7 03-21 67590 4.01 12.63 5350 TYPE 2: 93216 28 04-11 84500 4.01 12.63 6690 TYPE 3: 93217 28 04-11 83990 4.01 12.63 6650 TYPE 2: 93218 28 04-11 86640 4.01 12.63 6860 TYPE 2: 93219 Hold 00-00 0 0.00 0.00 0 Comments: Sample Location: Field Data: Truck/Ticket # / Slump, in. (C143) Time Batched Air Content, % (C231) Time Sampled Unit Weight, pcf (C138) Air Temperature,°F Water Added on Job, gals Mix Temp.°F(C1064) Water Requested by Laboratory Data: Lab Test Age Test Total Load Avg.D Area Compressive No. (Days) Date (lbs) (in) (in²) Strength (psi) Concrete Compressive Strength Test Report * Continuation PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: CB007 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 4 of 4 Contractor placing the concrete in the middle of section 3 looking southeast. Contractor placing the concrete. Concrete Inspection & Compressive Strength Test Report PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street NE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: CB008 PERMIT #: BLD-2018 DATE: 3/21/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 2 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Kevin Richardson Placement Location: Elevator Pit #3 Foundation Sample Location: Truck Chute Mid Load Field Data: Eq. No. Supplier Miles Sand and Gravel Company Slump, in. (C143) 3.25 9 Mix # 025506C Air Content, % (C231) NT Mix Description 5.5 SK, 7/8" Agg., Pea, Poly 997, Zypex Unit Weight, pcf (C138) NT Truck/Ticket # C060 / 615493 Air/Mix Temp.,°F (C1064) 48 / 64 KR4 Strength Required 3000 psi at 28 days Field Cure Temperature, °F Quantity Placed, cy 10 Cure Method - Initial / Final Container / Water Tank Time Batched 7:24 AM Water Added on Job, gals 5 Time Sampled 8:23 AM Water Requested by Contractor Laboratory Data: Lab Test Age Test Total Load Avg.D Area Compressive No. (Days) Date (lbs) (in) (in²) Strength (psi) 93428 7 03-28 63790 4.02 12.69 5030 TYPE 2: 93429 28 04-18 72930 4.01 12.63 5770 TYPE 2: 93430 28 04-18 76150 4.01 12.63 6030 TYPE 2: 93431 28 04-18 76990 4.01 12.63 6100 TYPE 3: 93432 Hold 00-00 0 0.00 0.00 0 Reinforcement Inspection Yes n/a: not applicable Specimen Size 4" X 8" Reinforcement Conforms Yes n/t: not tested Test Reference ASTM C31/C39/C1231 Comments: Geotest was on site as requested to perform special inspection for the elevator pit number 3 foundation. Work was found to conform with detail 6 on S4.1 and note on S2.1.2. The contractor was notified of our results prior to departing the site. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amwahousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. The above test results relate to the sample (or location) tested. Concrete Inspection & Compressive Strength Test Report PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: CB008 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 2 of 2 Elevator #3. Trim bar was added around sump prior to the pour. Left side of photo shows #5 verts at each face per note on S2.1.2. Concrete Inspection & Compressive Strength Test Report PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street NE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: CB009 PERMIT #: BLD.2018 DATE: 3/26/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 4 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Tim Martin Placement Location: Mat Foundation Slab at Line A to C.7/9 to 16 Sample Location: 1st Truck at Mixer Chute, B to C.7/15 to 16 Field Data: Eq. No. Supplier Miles Sand and Gravel Company Slump, in. (C143) 5.75 19 Mix # 0260A6C Air Content, % (C231) 5.0 2 Mix Description 6sk. 7/8", Pea. HRWR, WRA, AEA, 1/2% NC, 100% HW Unit Weight, pcf (C138) NT Truck/Ticket # C114 / 219554 Air/Mix Temp.,°F (C1064) 45 / 68 TM06 Strength Required 4000 psi at 28 days Field Cure Temperature, °F 48 / 77 Quantity Placed, cy 496.5 Cure Method - Initial / Final Container / Water Tank Time Batched 6:09 AM Water Added on Job, gals 8 Time Sampled 6:50 AM Water Requested by Concrete Contrac Laboratory Data: Lab Test Age Test Total Load Avg.D Area Compressive No. (Days) Date (lbs) (in) (in²) Strength (psi) 93630 7 04-02 59730 4.01 12.63 4730 TYPE 2: 93631 28 04-23 77990 4.01 12.63 6170 TYPE 2: 93632 28 04-23 81290 4.01 12.63 6440 TYPE 2: 93633 28 04-23 78860 4.01 12.63 6240 TYPE 2: 93634 Hold 00-00 0 0.00 0.00 0 Reinforcement Inspection Yes n/a: not applicable Specimen Size 4" X 8" Reinforcement Conforms Yes n/t: not tested Test Reference ASTM C31/C39/C1231 Comments: GeoTest was on site as requested to inspect the concrete placement at the above locations. The reinforcing steel was inspected prior and was found to be in conformance with the project drawings. The concrete was placed using a boom pump and was mechanically consolidated. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, michael.craig@gravelpits.com, rbergquist@amwahousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. The above test results relate to the sample (or location) tested. Concrete Compressive Strength Test Report * Continuation PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: CB009 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 2 of 4 Sample Location: The 12th Load was Sampled, 125.5 Yards Placed 12.5 to 13.5/A to B.5 Field Data: Truck/Ticket # C114 / 219569 Slump, in. (C143) 6.25 Time Batched 7:36 AM Air Content, % (C231) 4.2 Time Sampled 8:15 AM Unit Weight, pcf (C138) NT Air Temperature,°F 47 Water Added on Job, gals 12 Mix Temp.°F(C1064) 76 Water Requested by Supplier’s QC Laboratory Data: Lab Test Age Test Total Load Avg.D Area Compressive No. (Days) Date (lbs) (in) (in²) Strength (psi) 93635 7 04-02 74670 4.01 12.63 5910 TYPE 2: 93636 28 04-23 91430 4.01 12.63 7240 TYPE 2: 93637 28 04-23 87920 4.01 12.63 6960 TYPE 2: 93638 28 04-23 88150 4.01 12.63 6980 TYPE 2: 93639 Hold 00-00 0 0.00 0.00 0 Comments: Sample Location: Load 25 (261.5 Yards) A.5 to C/12 to 12.5 Field Data: Truck/Ticket # CO55 / 219592 Slump, in. (C143) 6.50 Time Batched 9:31 AM Air Content, % (C231) 5.6 Time Sampled 10:12 AM Unit Weight, pcf (C138) NT Air Temperature,°F 51 Water Added on Job, gals 12 Mix Temp.°F(C1064) 68 Water Requested by Supplier’s QC Laboratory Data: Lab Test Age Test Total Load Avg.D Area Compressive No. (Days) Date (lbs) (in) (in²) Strength (psi) 93640 7 04-02 69570 4.01 12.63 5510 TYPE 2: 93641 28 04-23 84260 4.01 12.63 6670 TYPE 2: 93642 28 04-23 79300 4.01 12.63 6280 TYPE 2: 93643 28 04-23 79250 4.01 12.63 6270 TYPE 2: 93644 Hold 00-00 0 0.00 0.00 0 Concrete Compressive Strength Test Report * Continuation PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: CB009 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 3 of 4 Sample Location: 33rd Load (345.5 Yards) Line B to C.7/10.5 to 11 Field Data: Truck/Ticket # CO56 / 219606 Slump, in. (C143) 6.00 Time Batched 10:45 AM Air Content, % (C231) 6.0 Time Sampled 11:20 AM Unit Weight, pcf (C138) NT Air Temperature,°F 50 Water Added on Job, gals 10 Mix Temp.°F(C1064) 67 Water Requested by Supplier’s QC Laboratory Data: Lab Test Age Test Total Load Avg.D Area Compressive No. (Days) Date (lbs) (in) (in²) Strength (psi) 93663 7 04-02 65160 4.01 12.63 5160 TYPE 2: 93664 28 04-23 82430 4.01 12.63 6530 TYPE 2: 93665 28 04-23 78650 4.01 12.63 6230 TYPE 2: 93666 28 04-23 79630 4.01 12.63 6300 TYPE 2: 93667 Hold 00-00 0 0.00 0.00 0 Comments: Sample Location: Field Data: Truck/Ticket # / Slump, in. (C143) Time Batched Air Content, % (C231) Time Sampled Unit Weight, pcf (C138) Air Temperature,°F Water Added on Job, gals Mix Temp.°F(C1064) Water Requested by Laboratory Data: Lab Test Age Test Total Load Avg.D Area Compressive No. (Days) Date (lbs) (in) (in²) Strength (psi) Concrete Compressive Strength Test Report * Continuation PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: CB009 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 4 of 4 Placing Concrete Concrete Inspection & Compressive Strength Test Report PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street SE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: CB010 PERMIT #: BLD-2018 DATE: 4/4/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 4 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Tim Martin Placement Location: Mat Foundation at 1 to 3/A to J Sample Location: 21 Yards Placed at A to A.5/2 to 3 Field Data: Eq. No. Supplier Miles Sand and Gravel Company Slump, in. (C143) 7.50 19 Mix # 026A6C Air Content, % (C231) 5.8 2 Mix Description 6 Sack, 7/8", Pea. WRA, HRWR, AEA Unit Weight, pcf (C138) NT Truck/Ticket # C185 / 220140 Air/Mix Temp.,°F (C1064) 40 / 59 TM06 Strength Required 4000 psi at 28 days Field Cure Temperature, °F NT Quantity Placed, cy 565 Cure Method - Initial / Final Container / Moist Room Time Batched 6:07 AM Water Added on Job, gals 0 Time Sampled 7:25 AM Water Requested by Laboratory Data: Lab Test Age Test Total Load Avg.D Area Compressive No. (Days) Date (lbs) (in) (in²) Strength (psi) 94030 7 04-11 61960 4.01 12.63 4910 TYPE 2: 94031 28 05-02 0 0.00 0.00 0 94032 28 05-02 0 0.00 0.00 0 94033 28 05-02 0 0.00 0.00 0 94034 Hold 00-00 0 0.00 0.00 0 Reinforcement Inspection Yes n/a: not applicable Specimen Size 4" X 8" Reinforcement Conforms Yes n/t: not tested Test Reference ASTM C31/C39/C1231 Comments: Geotest was on site as requested to inspect the concrete placement at the above locations. The reinforcing steel was inspected prior to today’s pour and was found to have been in place as detailed in the structural drawings. The concrete was placed using a boom pump and was mechanically consolidated. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amwahousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. The above test results relate to the sample (or location) tested. Concrete Compressive Strength Test Report * Continuation PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: CB010 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 2 of 4 Sample Location: 147 Yards Placed, C to C.5/1 to 2 Field Data: Truck/Ticket # CO84 / 220152 Slump, in. (C143) 7.25 Time Batched 7:10 AM Air Content, % (C231) 6.0 Time Sampled 7:48 AM Unit Weight, pcf (C138) NT Air Temperature,°F 46 Water Added on Job, gals 5 Mix Temp.°F(C1064) 58 Water Requested by Supplier’s QC Laboratory Data: Lab Test Age Test Total Load Avg.D Area Compressive No. (Days) Date (lbs) (in) (in²) Strength (psi) 94035 7 04-11 59480 4.01 12.63 4710 TYPE 2: 94036 28 05-02 0 0.00 0.00 0 94037 28 05-02 0 0.00 0.00 0 94038 28 05-02 0 0.00 0.00 0 94039 Hold 00-00 0 0.00 0.00 0 Comments: Starting with load #3, the supplier added 1% NC Accelerator to each load. Sample Location: 262 Yards Placed, D.5 to E/1.5 to 2.5 Field Data: Truck/Ticket # C115 / 220166 Slump, in. (C143) 6.25 Time Batched 8:15 AM Air Content, % (C231) 5.6 Time Sampled 8:43 AM Unit Weight, pcf (C138) NT Air Temperature,°F 50 Water Added on Job, gals 0 Mix Temp.°F(C1064) 59 Water Requested by Laboratory Data: Lab Test Age Test Total Load Avg.D Area Compressive No. (Days) Date (lbs) (in) (in²) Strength (psi) 94040 7 04-11 64120 4.01 12.63 5080 TYPE 2: 94041 28 05-02 0 0.00 0.00 0 94042 28 05-02 0 0.00 0.00 0 94043 28 05-02 0 0.00 0.00 0 94044 Hold 00-00 0 0.00 0.00 0 Concrete Compressive Strength Test Report * Continuation PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: CB010 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 3 of 4 Sample Location: 367.5 Yards Placed, D.75 to E.25/2 to 3 Field Data: Truck/Ticket # C185 / 220175 Slump, in. (C143) 6.50 Time Batched 9:05 AM Air Content, % (C231) 4.9 Time Sampled 9:42 AM Unit Weight, pcf (C138) NT Air Temperature,°F 52 Water Added on Job, gals 0 Mix Temp.°F(C1064) 58 Water Requested by Laboratory Data: Lab Test Age Test Total Load Avg.D Area Compressive No. (Days) Date (lbs) (in) (in²) Strength (psi) 94045 7 04-11 70800 4.01 12.63 5610 TYPE 3: 94046 28 05-02 0 0.00 0.00 0 94047 28 05-02 0 0.00 0.00 0 94048 28 05-02 0 0.00 0.00 0 94049 Hold 00-00 0 0.00 0.00 0 Comments: Sample Location: 481.5 Yards Placed, G to G.5/1 to 2 Field Data: Truck/Ticket # C185 / 220193 Slump, in. (C143) 6.75 Time Batched 10:25 AM Air Content, % (C231) 5.3 Time Sampled 11:04 AM Unit Weight, pcf (C138) NT Air Temperature,°F 53 Water Added on Job, gals 0 Mix Temp.°F(C1064) 62 Water Requested by Laboratory Data: Lab Test Age Test Total Load Avg.D Area Compressive No. (Days) Date (lbs) (in) (in²) Strength (psi) 94050 7 04-11 67240 4.01 12.63 5320 TYPE 2: 94051 28 05-02 0 0.00 0.00 0 94052 28 05-02 0 0.00 0.00 0 94053 28 05-02 0 0.00 0.00 0 94054 Hold 00-00 0 0.00 0.00 0 Concrete Compressive Strength Test Report * Continuation PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: CB010 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 4 of 4 South End of Pour Concrete Inspection & Compressive Strength Test Report PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street NE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: CB011 PERMIT #: BLD-2018 DATE: 4/12/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 3 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Erik Fulmer Placement Location: Mat Foundation Section 6, GL 3-7.3/GL E.5-J Sample Location: 4th Truck, Mid Load at Approximately 35 Cubic Yards Field Data: Eq. No. Supplier Miles Sand and Gravel Company Slump, in. (C143) 6.00 20 Mix # 0260A6C Air Content, % (C231) 4.9 14 Mix Description 6sk. 7/8", Pea. HRWR, WRA, AEA, 1/2% NC, 100% HW Unit Weight, pcf (C138) NT NA Truck/Ticket # C6062 / 76508 Air/Mix Temp.,°F (C1064) 46 / 60 EF3 Strength Required 4000 psi at 28 days Field Cure Temperature, °F 46/75 EF3 Quantity Placed, cy 340 Cure Method - Initial / Final Container / Water Tank Time Batched 6:23 AM Water Added on Job, gals 0 Time Sampled 7:19 AM Water Requested by NA Laboratory Data: Lab Test Age Test Total Load Avg.D Area Compressive No. (Days) Date (lbs) (in) (in²) Strength (psi) 94378 7 04-19 53030 4.01 12.63 4200 TYPE 2: 94379 28 05-10 66510 4.01 12.63 5270 TYPE 2: 94380 28 05-10 68030 4.01 12.63 5390 TYPE 2: 94381 28 05-10 67350 4.01 12.63 5330 TYPE 3: 94382 Hold 00-00 0 0.00 0.00 0 Reinforcement Inspection Yes n/a: not applicable Specimen Size 4" X 8" Reinforcement Conforms Yes n/t: not tested Test Reference ASTM C31/C39/C1231 Comments: GeoTest was on site as requested to provide sampling and testing of concrete placed for the above location. The reinforcing steel was inspected prior to the pour and was found to be in conformance with the project drawings. The concrete was placed using a boom pump and was mechanically consolidated. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, michael.craig@gravelpits.com, rbergquist@amwahousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. The above test results relate to the sample (or location) tested. Concrete Compressive Strength Test Report * Continuation PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: CB011 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 2 of 3 Sample Location: 17th Truck, Mid Load at Approximately 165 Yards Field Data: Truck/Ticket # C137 / 220684 Slump, in. (C143) 6.25 Time Batched 9:07 AM Air Content, % (C231) 4.9 Time Sampled 9:35 AM Unit Weight, pcf (C138) NT Air Temperature,°F 49 Water Added on Job, gals 6 Mix Temp.°F(C1064) 57 Water Requested by Miles S&G QC Laboratory Data: Lab Test Age Test Total Load Avg.D Area Compressive No. (Days) Date (lbs) (in) (in²) Strength (psi) 94390 7 04-19 60860 4.01 12.63 4820 TYPE 2: 94391 28 05-10 78520 4.01 12.63 6220 TYPE 3: 94392 28 05-10 78210 4.01 12.63 6190 TYPE 2: 94393 28 05-10 73840 4.01 12.63 5850 TYPE 3: 94394 Hold 00-00 0 0.00 0.00 0 Comments: Sample Location: 31st Truck, Mid Load at Approximately 300 Cubic Yards Field Data: Truck/Ticket # C114 / 220708 Slump, in. (C143) 7.50 Time Batched 10:42 AM Air Content, % (C231) 5.5 Time Sampled 11:15 AM Unit Weight, pcf (C138) NT Air Temperature,°F 50 Water Added on Job, gals 10 Mix Temp.°F(C1064) 58 Water Requested by Miles S&G QC Laboratory Data: Lab Test Age Test Total Load Avg.D Area Compressive No. (Days) Date (lbs) (in) (in²) Strength (psi) 94400 7 04-19 60540 4.01 12.63 4790 TYPE 2: 94401 28 05-10 72060 4.01 12.63 5710 TYPE 3: 94402 28 05-10 77470 4.01 12.63 6130 TYPE 2: 94403 28 05-10 73500 4.01 12.63 5820 TYPE 2: 94404 Hold 00-00 0 0.00 0.00 0 Concrete Compressive Strength Test Report * Continuation PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: CB011 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 3 of 3 Figure 1: Placement of concrete. The photo was taken looking north. Concrete Inspection & Compressive Strength Test Report PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street NE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: CB012 PERMIT #: BLD-2018 DATE: 4/17/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 2 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Sean Rogerson Placement Location: Footings For Porte Cochere & Deck Posts (See Image Below) Sample Location: Southeast Porte Cochere Footing, First Load Field Data: Eq. No. Supplier Miles Sand and Gravel Company Slump, in. (C143) 4.00 17 Mix # 25006C Air Content, % (C231) NT Mix Description 5 Sack, 7/8", 3/8", MRWR Unit Weight, pcf (C138) NT Truck/Ticket # 116 / 615792 Air/Mix Temp.,°F (C1064) 55 / 61 sdr2 Strength Required 3000 psi at 28 days Field Cure Temperature, °F 52.8/73.4 Quantity Placed, cy 14 Cure Method - Initial / Final Water Immersed / Water Tank Time Batched 11:25 am Water Added on Job, gals 5 Time Sampled 12:15 pm Water Requested by Contractor Laboratory Data: Lab Test Age Test Total Load Avg.D Area Compressive No. (Days) Date (lbs) (in) (in²) Strength (psi) 94588 7 04-24 54890 4.01 12.63 4350 TYPE 2: 94589 28 05-15 68500 4.00 12.57 5450 TYPE 2: 94590 28 05-15 68390 4.00 12.57 5440 TYPE 2: 94591 28 05-15 69220 4.00 12.57 5510 TYPE 2: 94592 Hold 00-00 0 0.00 0.00 0 Reinforcement Inspection Yes n/a: not applicable Specimen Size 4" X 8" Reinforcement Conforms Yes n/t: not tested Test Reference ASTM C31/C39/C1231 Comments: GeoTest was on site to provide special inspection of reinforced concrete. Reinforcement was inspected immediately prior to concrete placement and was found to be in conformance with the approved structural drawings. Concrete was placed via boom pump and was internally vibrated. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, michael.craig@gravelpits.com, rbergquist@amwahousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. The above test results relate to the sample (or location) tested. Concrete Inspection & Compressive Strength Test Report PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: CB012 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 2 of 2 Image indicating the locations where concrete was placed on this date highlighted in yellow. Also placed were the deck support footings along the north side of the building. Concrete Inspection & Compressive Strength Test Report PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street NE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: CB013 PERMIT #: BLD-2018 DATE: 4/26/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 3 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Suzie Miller Placement Location: Mat Foundation at 3 to 7.3/A to B Sample Location: Beginning of First Truck, Via Truck Chute Field Data: Eq. No. Supplier Miles Sand and Gravel Company Slump, in. (C143) 6.50 21 Mix # 0260A6C Air Content, % (C231) 6.5 15 Mix Description 6 Sack, 7/8" Agg., MB Poly 997, MBAE90, Glenium Unit Weight, pcf (C138) NT Truck/Ticket # C115 / 221426 Air/Mix Temp.,°F (C1064) 44.0 / 60.0 SM4 Strength Required 4000 psi at 28 days Field Cure Temperature, °F 50.0/66.7 Quantity Placed, cy 334 Cure Method - Initial / Final Container / Water Tank Time Batched 6:53 AM Water Added on Job, gals 10 Time Sampled 7:36 AM Water Requested by Pump Operator Laboratory Data: Lab Test Age Test Total Load Avg.D Area Compressive No. (Days) Date (lbs) (in) (in²) Strength (psi) 95122 7 05-03 56540 4.01 12.63 4480 TYPE 2: Set 1 95123 28 05-24 66410 4.00 12.57 5280 TYPE 3: Set 1 95124 28 05-24 67300 4.00 12.57 5350 TYPE 2: Set 1 95125 28 05-24 66450 4.00 12.57 5290 TYPE 2: Set 1 95126 Hold 00-00 0 0.00 0.00 0 Set 1 Reinforcement Inspection Yes n/a: not applicable Specimen Size 4" X 8" Reinforcement Conforms Yes n/t: not tested Test Reference ASTM C31/C39/C1231 Comments: GeoTest was onsite, as requested to sample and test concrete placed at the above location. The reinforcement was previously inspected and was found to conform to plans. The concrete was placed via pump truck, mechanically consolidated and was hand finished. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, michael.craig@gravelpits.com, rbergquist@amwahousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. The above test results relate to the sample (or location) tested. Concrete Compressive Strength Test Report * Continuation PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: CB013 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 2 of 3 Sample Location: Halfway Through Load, Via Truck Chute Field Data: Truck/Ticket # C055 / 221443 Slump, in. (C143) 8.25 Time Batched 8:27 AM Air Content, % (C231) 6.0 Time Sampled 9:03 AM Unit Weight, pcf (C138) NT Air Temperature,°F 55.5 Water Added on Job, gals 15 Mix Temp.°F(C1064) 60.8 Water Requested by QC Laboratory Data: Lab Test Age Test Total Load Avg.D Area Compressive No. (Days) Date (lbs) (in) (in²) Strength (psi) 95127 7 05-03 61780 4.01 12.63 4890 TYPE 2: Set 2 95128 28 05-24 73490 4.00 12.57 5850 TYPE 2: Set 2 95129 28 05-24 73570 4.00 12.57 5850 TYPE 2: Set 2 95130 28 05-24 76410 4.00 12.57 6080 TYPE 2: Set 2 95131 Hold 00-00 0 0.00 0.00 0 Set 2 Comments: Sample Location: Field Data: Truck/Ticket # C058 / 221462 Slump, in. (C143) 5.50 Time Batched 10:04 AM Air Content, % (C231) 5.9 Time Sampled 10:43 AM Unit Weight, pcf (C138) NT Air Temperature,°F 64.4 Water Added on Job, gals 12 Mix Temp.°F(C1064) 62.7 Water Requested by QC Laboratory Data: Lab Test Age Test Total Load Avg.D Area Compressive No. (Days) Date (lbs) (in) (in²) Strength (psi) 95132 7 05-03 58510 4.01 12.63 4630 TYPE 2: Set 3 95133 28 05-24 76070 4.00 12.57 6050 TYPE 2: Set 3 95134 28 05-24 72220 4.00 12.57 5750 TYPE 2: Set 3 95135 28 05-24 71640 4.00 12.57 5700 TYPE 2: Set 3 95136 Hold 00-00 0 0.00 0.00 0 Set 3 Concrete Compressive Strength Test Report * Continuation PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: CB013 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 3 of 3 Figure 1 - Placement of concrete. Concrete Inspection & Compressive Strength Test Report PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street NE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: CB014 PERMIT #: BLD-2018 DATE: 5/2/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 2 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Tristan Coragiulo Placement Location: Western Site Perimeter CMU Wall Footings Sample Location: First Truck, Mid-Pour, Directly From Chute, Southwestern Corner of Site Field Data: Eq. No. Supplier Miles Sand and Gravel Company Slump, in. (C143) 3.50 9 Mix # 025006C Air Content, % (C231) NT Mix Description 5 SK, 7/8" Agg, Pea Agg, 28 oz MB Poly 997, Hot Water Unit Weight, pcf (C138) NT Truck/Ticket # C114 / 221797 Air/Mix Temp.,°F (C1064) 47 / 61 TC5 Strength Required 3000 psi at 28 days Field Cure Temperature, °F 49/72 Quantity Placed, cy 20 Cure Method - Initial / Final Container / Water Tank Time Batched 6:25 AM Water Added on Job, gals 5 Time Sampled 7:10 AM Water Requested by Contractor Laboratory Data: Lab Test Age Test Total Load Avg.D Area Compressive No. (Days) Date (lbs) (in) (in²) Strength (psi) 95341 7 05-09 51430 4.01 12.63 4070 TYPE 3: 95342 28 05-30 67030 4.01 12.63 5310 TYPE 2: 95343 28 05-30 66140 4.01 12.63 5240 TYPE 2: 95344 28 05-30 66030 4.01 12.63 5230 TYPE 2: 95345 Hold 00-00 0 0.00 0.00 0 Reinforcement Inspection NT n/a: not applicable Specimen Size 4" X 8" Reinforcement Conforms NT n/t: not tested Test Reference ASTM C31/C39/C1231 Comments: GeoTest was on site as requested to provide concrete placement observation and testing services. All locations are approximate and were provided by the contractor. All concrete was placed directly from the truck chute, mechanically consolidated, and hand finished (Figure 1). For our reinforcement inspection, please refer to report IR009. GeoTest will return for further observation and inspection as requested. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, michael.craig@gravelpits.com, rbergquist@amwahousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. The above test results relate to the sample (or location) tested. Concrete Inspection & Compressive Strength Test Report PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: CB014 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 2 of 2 Figure 1. Placement and consolidation of CMU footing concrete (looking south). Concrete Inspection & Compressive Strength Test Report PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street NE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: CB015 PERMIT #: BLD-2018 DATE: 5/22/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 2 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Tristan Coragiulo Placement Location: Eastern Courtyard Sidewalks and Western Landscaping Wall Benches/Sonotubes Sample Location: First Truck, Mid-Load, Directly from Truck Chute, Sidewalk Field Data: Eq. No. Supplier Miles Sand and Gravel Company Slump, in. (C143) 7.00 9 Mix # 0255A6C Air Content, % (C231) 5.2 1 Mix Description 5.3 sk, 7/8" Agg, Pea Agg, 30 oz MB Poly 997, 3 oz MBAE90 Unit Weight, pcf (C138) NT Truck/Ticket # C116 / 616241 Air/Mix Temp.,°F (C1064) 57 / 65 TC3 Strength Required 3000 psi at 28 days Field Cure Temperature, °F 70-87 Quantity Placed, cy 21 Cure Method - Initial / Final Container / Water Tank Time Batched 11:22 AM Water Added on Job, gals 20 Time Sampled 12:15 PM Water Requested by Contractor Laboratory Data: Lab Test Age Test Total Load Avg.D Area Compressive No. (Days) Date (lbs) (in) (in²) Strength (psi) 96416 7 05-29 49660 4.00 12.57 3950 TYPE 2: 96417 28 06-19 55180 4.00 12.57 4390 TYPE 3: 96418 28 06-19 59380 4.00 12.57 4720 TYPE 2: 96419 28 06-19 58590 4.00 12.57 4660 TYPE 2: 96420 Hold 00-00 0 0.00 0.00 0 Reinforcement Inspection Yes n/a: not applicable Specimen Size 4" X 8" Reinforcement Conforms Yes n/t: not tested Test Reference ASTM C31/C39/C1231 Comments: GeoTest was on site as requested to provide in-place density testing at the above locations. All locations are approximate and were provided by the contractor. All concrete was placed via pump truck, mechanically consolidated, and hand finished (Figures 1 & 2). Per GeoTest inspector Sean Rogerson, all reinforcement was found to be in conformance with specified drawings. GeoTest will return for further inspection and testing as requested. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, michael.craig@gravelpits.com, rbergquist@amwahousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. The above test results relate to the sample (or location) tested. Concrete Inspection & Compressive Strength Test Report PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: CB015 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 2 of 2 Figure 1. Placement and finishing process of eastern courtyard sidewalks (looking southeast). Figure 2. Placement, consolidation, and hand finishing of western courtyard wall bench footings (looking southeast). Concrete Inspection & Compressive Strength Test Report PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street NE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: CB016 PERMIT #: BLD-2018 DATE: 5/30/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 4 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Tristan Coragiulo Placement Location: Mat Slab on Grade (Section 4/Grid 7.3 - 9.0) Sample Location: Third Truck, Mid-Load, Directly From Truck Chute, SE Corner of Poured Slab Field Data: Eq. No. Supplier Miles Sand and Gravel Company Slump, in. (C143) 6.50 9 Mix # 0260A6C Air Content, % (C231) 6.0 1 Mix Description 6 sk, 7/8" agg, Pea Agg, MB Poly 997, MBAE 90, Glenium Unit Weight, pcf (C138) NT Truck/Ticket # C139 / 223383 Air/Mix Temp.,°F (C1064) 50 / 64 TC04 Strength Required 4000 psi at 28 days Field Cure Temperature, °F NA Quantity Placed, cy 480 Cure Method - Initial / Final Container / Water Tank Time Batched 6:57 AM Water Added on Job, gals 12 Time Sampled 7:30 AM Water Requested by Miles Laboratory Data: Lab Test Age Test Total Load Avg.D Area Compressive No. (Days) Date (lbs) (in) (in²) Strength (psi) 96770 7 06-06 57400 4.01 12.63 4540 TYPE 2: 96771 28 06-27 70910 4.00 12.57 5640 TYPE 2: 96772 28 06-27 68780 4.00 12.57 5470 TYPE 2: 96773 28 06-27 70940 4.00 12.57 5640 TYPE 2: 96774 Hold 00-00 0 0.00 0.00 0 Reinforcement Inspection Yes n/a: not applicable Specimen Size 4" X 8" Reinforcement Conforms Yes n/t: not tested Test Reference ASTM C31/C39/C1231 Comments: GeoTest was on site as requested to provide concrete placement inspection and testing services. All locations are approximate and were provided by the contractor. All concrete was placed via boom truck, mechanically consolidated, and hand finished (Figure 1). For our reinforcement inspection, please refer to report IR010, dated 5/29/2019. Missing hold downs were properly in place prior to our arrival on this date (Figure 2). GeoTest will return for further inspection and observation as requested. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, michael.craig@gravelpits.com, rbergquist@amwahousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. The above test results relate to the sample (or location) tested. Concrete Compressive Strength Test Report * Continuation PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: CB016 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 2 of 4 Sample Location: Fifteenth Truck, Mid-Load, Directly from Truck Chute Field Data: Truck/Ticket # C143 / 223397 Slump, in. (C143) 6.00 Time Batched 8:28 AM Air Content, % (C231) 7.5 Time Sampled 9:00 AM Unit Weight, pcf (C138) NT Air Temperature,°F 52 Water Added on Job, gals 5 Mix Temp.°F(C1064) 66 Water Requested by Miles Laboratory Data: Lab Test Age Test Total Load Avg.D Area Compressive No. (Days) Date (lbs) (in) (in²) Strength (psi) 96775 7 06-06 54540 4.01 12.63 4320 TYPE 2: 96776 28 06-27 68588 4.00 12.57 5460 TYPE 3: 96777 28 06-27 65580 4.00 12.57 5220 TYPE 5: 96778 28 06-27 68440 4.00 12.57 5440 TYPE 2: 96779 Hold 00-00 0 0.00 0.00 0 Comments: Sample Location: Thirtieth Truck, Mid-Load, Directly from Truck Chute Field Data: Truck/Ticket # C143 / 223419 Slump, in. (C143) 6.00 Time Batched 9:50 AM Air Content, % (C231) 6.5 Time Sampled 10:30 AM Unit Weight, pcf (C138) NT Air Temperature,°F 59 Water Added on Job, gals 7 Mix Temp.°F(C1064) 67 Water Requested by Miles Laboratory Data: Lab Test Age Test Total Load Avg.D Area Compressive No. (Days) Date (lbs) (in) (in²) Strength (psi) 96780 7 06-06 56140 4.01 12.63 4440 TYPE 2: 96781 28 06-27 66060 4.00 12.57 5260 TYPE 3: 96782 28 06-27 60440 4.00 12.57 4810 TYPE 2: 96783 28 06-27 64170 4.00 12.57 5110 TYPE 3: 96784 Hold 00-00 0 0.00 0.00 0 Concrete Compressive Strength Test Report * Continuation PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: CB016 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 3 of 4 Sample Location: Forty-third Truck, Mid-Load, Directly from Truck Chute, NW Corner of Poured Slab Field Data: Truck/Ticket # C011 / 223443 Slump, in. (C143) 6.00 Time Batched 11:33 AM Air Content, % (C231) 5.5 Time Sampled 12:05 AM Unit Weight, pcf (C138) NT Air Temperature,°F 63 Water Added on Job, gals 5 Mix Temp.°F(C1064) 67 Water Requested by Miles Laboratory Data: Lab Test Age Test Total Load Avg.D Area Compressive No. (Days) Date (lbs) (in) (in²) Strength (psi) 96785 7 06-06 66290 4.01 12.63 5250 TYPE 2: 96786 28 06-27 69480 4.00 12.57 5530 TYPE 3: 96787 28 06-27 71740 4.00 12.57 5710 TYPE 3: 96788 28 06-27 74070 4.00 12.57 5890 TYPE 2: 96789 Hold 00-00 0 0.00 0.00 0 Comments: Sample Location: Field Data: Truck/Ticket # / Slump, in. (C143) Time Batched Air Content, % (C231) Time Sampled Unit Weight, pcf (C138) Air Temperature,°F Water Added on Job, gals Mix Temp.°F(C1064) Water Requested by Laboratory Data: Lab Test Age Test Total Load Avg.D Area Compressive No. (Days) Date (lbs) (in) (in²) Strength (psi) Concrete Compressive Strength Test Report * Continuation PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: CB016 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 4 of 4 Figure 1. The placement and mechanical consolidation process of mat slab concrete (looking north). FIgure 2. 7" hold downs for the framed wall connection prior to concrete placement (looking west). Concrete Inspection & Compressive Strength Test Report PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street NE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: CB017 PERMIT #: BLD-2018 DATE: 9/4/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 2 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Joel Morder Placement Location: 4 Column Piers South of the Structure, in Line With Grids 8 and 9 Sample Location: Middle of the Batch Field Data: Eq. No. Supplier Miles Sand and Gravel Company Slump, in. (C143) 6.00 15 Mix # 025006C Air Content, % (C231) NT Mix Description 7/8" Agg, 5 Sack Unit Weight, pcf (C138) NT Truck/Ticket # C183 / 617875 Air/Mix Temp.,°F (C1064) 71 / 78 JM3 Strength Required 3000 psi at 28 days Field Cure Temperature, °F NT Quantity Placed, cy 4.5 Cure Method - Initial / Final Container / Water Tank Time Batched 2:24 PM Water Added on Job, gals 10 Time Sampled 3:15 PM Water Requested by Contractor Laboratory Data: Lab Test Age Test Total Load Avg.D Area Compressive No. (Days) Date (lbs) (in) (in²) Strength (psi) 27 7 09-11 46870 4.00 12.57 3730 TYPE 2: 28 28 10-02 52260 4.00 12.57 4160 TYPE 3: 29 28 10-02 52500 4.00 12.57 4180 TYPE 3: 30 28 10-02 53120 4.00 12.57 4230 TYPE 2: 31 Hold 00-00 0 0.00 0.00 0 Reinforcement Inspection Yes n/a: not applicable Specimen Size 4" X 8" Reinforcement Conforms Yes n/t: not tested Test Reference ASTM C31/C39/C1231 Comments: GeoTest on site for inspection of the column piers referenced above. Verified that anchor bolts were cast in place as per RFI 10. Concrete was placed by truck chute and consolidated by tapping rubber mallets on the sonotube forms. All elements inspected were in conformance with approved plans and drawings. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, michael.craig@gravelpits.com, rbergquist@amwahousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. The above test results relate to the sample (or location) tested. Concrete Inspection & Compressive Strength Test Report PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: CB017 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 2 of 2 Concrete Placement and Consolidation in Progress EXPANSION ANCHOR INSPECTION REPORT PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street NE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: EA001 PERMIT #: BLD-2018 DATE: 6/26/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 3 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Tristan Coragiulo Item(s) Inspected Location Continuous Wall & Perimeter Foundation Anchors GL A-E.5/9-18 (Wedge Anchors) Interior Steel Column Foundation Anchors GL A.5/1.8 (Screw Anchors) Steel Edge Column Foundation Anchor GL E.5-F.5/5-7 (Screw Anchors) Reference Drawing(s): Details 1-4/S4.1 Item(s) Inspected Comments Base Material Condition Satisfactory, 70º Dry Drill Bit Type 3/4" Roto-Hammer Carbide Tip Hole Diameter/Depth 3/4" X 5" in Concrete, 3/4" X 7" with Framing Hole Cleanliness (If Applicable) Blown with Compressed Air Anchor Type/Name/Dimensions Screw Anchor/Simpson Titen/3/4" X 7", Wedge Anchor/STB2-75812/3/4" X 8.5" Anchor Spacing/Edge Distance NT Anchor Embedment 5" Anchor Torque/Displacement Impact Drill (Screw Anchor), Sledge Hammer (Wedge Anchor) Anchor ICC-ES Report 2713, 3037 Other The above items were conforming Nonconforming Items (see below) Comments: GeoTest was on site to perform a special inspection of galvanized screw and wedge anchors. Both types of anchors met the requirements specified in S4.1 details. Both anchor types were installed in general accordance with the manufacturer’s published installation instructions as well as project specifications. GeoTest will return for further anchor inspection as required. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amwahousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. EXPANSION ANCHOR INSPECTION REPORT PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: EA001 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 2 of 3 Figure 1. 3/4" X 7" Titan heavy duty screw anchor for 5" of concrete embedment. Figure 2. Edge column screw anchor placement via impact driver following the compressed air cleaning at GL E.6/5.6 (looking northeast). EXPANSION ANCHOR INSPECTION REPORT PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: EA001 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 3 of 3 Figure 3. 3/4" by 8.5" wedge anchor and a steel plate for 5" of concrete embedment with wall sill. Figure 4. Wedge anchor placement for wall sills via sledge hammer near GL G/11.3 (looking northeast). EXPANSION ANCHOR INSPECTION REPORT PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street NE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: EA002 PERMIT #: BLD-2018 DATE: 6/27/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 1 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Tristan Coragiulo Item(s) Inspected Location Continuous Wall Foundation Wedge Anchors GL A-E.5/15-18 Reference Drawing(s): Details 1-4/S4.1 Item(s) Inspected Comments Base Material Condition Satisfactory, 65º, Dry Drill Bit Type 3/4" Roto-Hammer Carbide Tip Hole Diameter/Depth 3/4" x 5" in Concrete, 3/4" X 7" with Framing Hole Cleanliness (If Applicable) Blown with Compressed Air Anchor Type/Name/Dimensions Wedge Anchor/STB2-75812/3/4" x 8.5" Anchor Spacing/Edge Distance NT Anchor Embedment 5" Anchor Torque/Displacement Sledge Hammer Anchor ICC-ES Report 3037 Other The above items were conforming Nonconforming Items (see below) Comments: GeoTest was on site to perform a special inspection of galvanized screw and wedge anchors. Both types of anchors met the requirements specified in S4.1 details. Both anchor types were installed in general accordance with the manufacturer’s published installation instructions as well as project specifications. GeoTest will return for further anchor inspection as required. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amwahousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. 741 Marine Drive, Bellingham, WA 98225 www.geotest-inc.com 20611 67th Ave. NE. Unit A. Arlington, WA 98223 phone: (360) 733.7318 toll free: (888) 251.5276 fax: (360) 733.7418 FIELD DENSITY/MOISTURE REPORT Nuclear Gauge * ASTM D6938 PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street SE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: FD001 PERMIT #: BLD2018 DATE: 12/17/2018 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 2 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Zach Click Compaction Of: Structural Fill in Building Pad Area Field Data: Depth/ DT/ Wet Field Dry Compaction Test Location Elev BS Density Moisture Density Lab % Pass/ # (ft) (in) (pcf) (%) (pcf) # Attained Required Fail 1 See Attached Image TOG DT/12 139.8 7.1 130.1 1 99 95 P 2 See Attached Image TOG DT/12 143.6 9.8 130.8 1 99 95 P 3 See Attached Image TOG DT/12 144.7 10.0 131.7 1 100 95 P 4 See Attached Image TOG DT/12 143.6 10.6 129.8 1 98 95 P 5 See Attached Image TOG DT/12 136.9 6.5 128.6 1 97 95 P 6 See Attached Image TOG DT/12 144.4 7.7 134.0 1 102 95 P 7 See Attached Image TOG DT/12 143.7 9.4 131.4 1 100 95 P 8 See Attached Image TOG DT/12 138.3 6.3 130.1 1 99 95 P 9 See Attached Image TOG DT/12 139.2 6.5 130.8 1 99 95 P 10 See Attached Image TOG DT/12 136.5 6.8 127.9 1 97 95 P 11 See Attached Image TOG DT/12 135.9 7.1 126.9 1 96 95 P 12 See Attached Image TOG DT/12 137.6 7.5 128.0 1 97 95 P Lab Max. Dry Optimum Retained Sample Soil Type Source Density Moisture On #4 Test # (pcf) (%) (%) Method 1-4287A Gravel Borrow Smokey Point Concrete 131.9 5.9 23 ASTM D1557/D4718 2- 0.0 None 3- 0.0 None Gauge Make/Model/Serial#: InstroTek/3500/3053 M/D Standard Count: 412/3029 Comments: GeoTest was on site, as requested, to perform in-place soil density testing on gravel borrow placed within the building pad area. The contractor informed GeoTest that approximately 1 to 2 feet of fill was placed within this area of the building pad to reach their subgrade elevation. Locations and elevations are approximate. All tests attained the required level of compaction. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amcalhousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. The above test results relate only to the sample (or location) tested. 741 Marine Drive, Bellingham, WA 98225 www.geotest-inc.com 20611 67th Ave. NE. Unit A. Arlington, WA 98223 phone: (360) 733.7318 toll free: (888) 251.5276 fax: (360) 733.7418 FIELD DENSITY/MOISTURE REPORT Nuclear Gauge * ASTM D6938 PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: FD001 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 2 of 2 Approximate Test Locations 741 Marine Drive, Bellingham, WA 98225 www.geotest-inc.com 20611 67th Ave. NE. Unit A. Arlington, WA 98223 phone: (360) 733.7318 toll free: (888) 251.5276 fax: (360) 733.7418 FIELD DENSITY/MOISTURE REPORT Nuclear Gauge * ASTM D6938 PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street SE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: FD002 PERMIT #: BLD 2018 DATE: 12/28/2018 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 2 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Suzie Miller Compaction Of: CMU Wall Footing Subgrade Field Data: Depth/ DT/ Wet Field Dry Compaction Test Location Elev BS Density Moisture Density Lab % Pass/ # (ft) (in) (pcf) (%) (pcf) # Attained Required Fail 1 See Figure 1 TOG BS 128.4 17.1 109.7 1 101 95 P 2 See Figure 1 TOG DT/2 126.9 18.6 106.9 1 98 95 P 3 See Figure 1 TOG DT/8 116.6 18.9 98.1 1 90 95 F 4 See Figure 1 TOG DT/4 124.7 18.7 105.1 1 97 95 P Lab Max. Dry Optimum Retained Sample Soil Type Source Density Moisture On #4 Test # (pcf) (%) (%) Method 1-4289A Structural Fill Native 108.8 11.8 1 ASTM D1557 2- 0.0 None 3- 0.0 None Gauge Make/Model/Serial#: Instrotek/3500/2082 M/D Standard Count: 410/3166 Comments: TOG - Top of Grade GeoTest was onsite, as requested, to provide in-place density testing at the above location. Prior to GeoTests arrival, the native material used for structural fill was at grade. The material was brought to grade by a combination of cutting it to grade and backfilling. Not all tests met compaction requirements. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amcalhousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. The above test results relate only to the sample (or location) tested. 741 Marine Drive, Bellingham, WA 98225 www.geotest-inc.com 20611 67th Ave. NE. Unit A. Arlington, WA 98223 phone: (360) 733.7318 toll free: (888) 251.5276 fax: (360) 733.7418 FIELD DENSITY/MOISTURE REPORT Nuclear Gauge * ASTM D6938 PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: FD002 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 2 of 2 Figure 1 - Approximate test locations. Figure 2 - Footing wall subgrade, looking east 741 Marine Drive, Bellingham, WA 98225 www.geotest-inc.com 20611 67th Ave. NE. Unit A. Arlington, WA 98223 phone: (360) 733.7318 toll free: (888) 251.5276 fax: (360) 733.7418 FIELD DENSITY/MOISTURE REPORT Nuclear Gauge * ASTM D6938 PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street SE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: FD002 PERMIT #: BLD 2018 DATE: 12/28/2018 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 2 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Suzie Miller Compaction Of: CMU Wall Footing Subgrade Field Data: Depth/ DT/ Wet Field Dry Compaction Test Location Elev BS Density Moisture Density Lab % Pass/ # (ft) (in) (pcf) (%) (pcf) # Attained Required Fail 1 See Figure 1 TOG BS 128.4 17.1 109.7 1 101 95 P 2 See Figure 1 TOG DT/2 126.9 18.6 106.9 1 98 95 P 3 See Figure 1 TOG DT/8 116.6 18.9 98.1 1 90 95 F 4 See Figure 1 TOG DT/4 124.7 18.7 105.1 1 97 95 P Lab Max. Dry Optimum Retained Sample Soil Type Source Density Moisture On #4 Test # (pcf) (%) (%) Method 1-4289A Structural Fill Native 108.8 11.8 1 ASTM D1557 2- 0.0 None 3- 0.0 None Gauge Make/Model/Serial#: Instrotek/3500/2082 M/D Standard Count: 410/3166 Comments: TOG - Top of Grade GeoTest was onsite, as requested, to provide in-place density testing at the above location. Prior to GeoTests arrival, the native material used for structural fill was at grade. The material was brought to grade by a combination of cutting it to grade and backfilling. Not all tests met compaction requirements. AMENDED 1/4/18: Please see FD003 for passing retest results. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amcalhousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. The above test results relate only to the sample (or location) tested. 741 Marine Drive, Bellingham, WA 98225 www.geotest-inc.com 20611 67th Ave. NE. Unit A. Arlington, WA 98223 phone: (360) 733.7318 toll free: (888) 251.5276 fax: (360) 733.7418 FIELD DENSITY/MOISTURE REPORT Nuclear Gauge * ASTM D6938 PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: FD002 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 2 of 2 Figure 1 - Approximate test locations. Figure 2 - Footing wall subgrade, looking east 741 Marine Drive, Bellingham, WA 98225 www.geotest-inc.com 20611 67th Ave. NE. Unit A. Arlington, WA 98223 phone: (360) 733.7318 toll free: (888) 251.5276 fax: (360) 733.7418 FIELD DENSITY/MOISTURE REPORT Nuclear Gauge * ASTM D6938 PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street SE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: FD003 PERMIT #: DATE: 1/2/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 3 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Tristan Coragiulo Compaction Of: CMU Wall Footing Subgrade Field Data: Depth/ DT/ Wet Field Dry Compaction Test Location Elev BS Density Moisture Density Lab % Pass/ # (ft) (in) (pcf) (%) (pcf) # Attained Required Fail 1 See Figure 1 TOG DT/6 123.8 14.2 108.4 1 100 95 P 2 See Figure 1 TOG DT/6 123.5 16.3 106.2 1 98 95 P 3 See Figure 1 TOG DT/6 120.9 12.9 107.1 1 98 95 P 4 See Figure 1 TOG DT/4 119.8 15.7 103.5 1 95 95 P Lab Max. Dry Optimum Retained Sample Soil Type Source Density Moisture On #4 Test # (pcf) (%) (%) Method 1-4289A Structural Fill Native 108.8 11.8 1 ASTM D1557 2- 0.0 None 3- 0.0 None Gauge Make/Model/Serial#: Instro/3500/3052 M/D Standard Count: 427/3121 Comments: Please see page 2 for comments. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amcalhousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. The above test results relate only to the sample (or location) tested. 741 Marine Drive, Bellingham, WA 98225 www.geotest-inc.com 20611 67th Ave. NE. Unit A. Arlington, WA 98223 phone: (360) 733.7318 toll free: (888) 251.5276 fax: (360) 733.7418 FIELD DENSITY/MOISTURE REPORT Nuclear Gauge * ASTM D6938 PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: FD003 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 2 of 3 GeoTest was on-site as requested to provide in-place density testing at the above locations (Figure 1). Prior to our arrival, native material had been cut, graded, and compacted. Compaction was achieved with a single drum vibratory roller (Figure 2). Density tests were taken on this date resolve discrepancy noted in report FD002. GeoTest also observed infiltration trench 2G preparation while on-site (Figure 3). The exposed subgrade consisted of poorly graded sands with some gravel and traces of silt in some areas. These observations are consistent with nearby subgrade observations referenced in the geotechnical engineering report. Propex NTPEP - AASHTO Class M288 C1.3 nonwoven geotextile fabric will be used for the top and the sides of the trenches as specified. The contractor also anticipates using excavated material as backfill above this drainage area within the trenches. This infiltration trench conformed to the specifications provided on C3.2 as well as the typical detail, 6/C3.3. GeoTest will return for further observation and inspection as requested. Figure 1. Map view of in-place density test locations. 741 Marine Drive, Bellingham, WA 98225 www.geotest-inc.com 20611 67th Ave. NE. Unit A. Arlington, WA 98223 phone: (360) 733.7318 toll free: (888) 251.5276 fax: (360) 733.7418 FIELD DENSITY/MOISTURE REPORT Nuclear Gauge * ASTM D6938 PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: FD003 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 3 of 3 Figure 2. The CMU wall footing pad located on the eastern boundary of the site (looking south). Figure 3. Infiltration trench 2G after excavation and geotextile fabric placement (looking east). 741 Marine Drive, Bellingham, WA 98225 www.geotest-inc.com 20611 67th Ave. NE. Unit A. Arlington, WA 98223 phone: (360) 733.7318 toll free: (888) 251.5276 fax: (360) 733.7418 FIELD DENSITY/MOISTURE REPORT Nuclear Gauge * ASTM D6938 PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street SE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: FD004 PERMIT #: DATE: 1/7/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 3 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Tristan Coragiulo Compaction Of: Sanitary Sewer Trench Backfill Field Data: Depth/ DT/ Wet Field Dry Compaction Test Location Elev BS Density Moisture Density Lab % Pass/ # (ft) (in) (pcf) (%) (pcf) # Attained Required Fail 1 See Figure 1 TOE DT/12 117.5 11.2 105.6 1 97 95 P 2 See Figure 1 TOE DT/12 121.0 12.3 107.7 1 99 95 P 3 See Figure 1 TOE DT/12 120.9 11.8 108.1 1 99 95 P 4 See Figure 1 -3 DT/12 117.5 12.8 104.2 1 96 95 P 5 See Figure 1 -3 DT/12 124.7 12.1 111.2 1 102 95 P 6 See Figure 1 -3 DT/12 122.3 11.5 110.0 1 101 95 P 7 Test #4 Location -1 DT/12 121.7 10.5 110.1 1 101 95 P 8 Test #5 Location -1 DT/12 122.4 11.9 109.4 1 101 95 P 9 Test #5 Location TOE DT/12 117.6 10.3 106.6 1 98 95 P 10 Test #6 Location TOE DT/12 121.6 13.6 107.1 1 98 95 P 11 Test #1 Location -3 DT/12 121.0 11.4 108.6 1 100 95 P 12 Test #2 Location -3 DT/12 119.3 11.0 107.5 1 99 95 P Lab Max. Dry Optimum Retained Sample Soil Type Source Density Moisture On #4 Test # (pcf) (%) (%) Method 1-4289A SP with Silt Native 108.8 11.8 1 ASTM D1557 2- 0.0 None 3- 0.0 None Gauge Make/Model/Serial#: Instro/3500/3052 M/D Standard Count: 424/3146 Comments: Please see page 2 for comments. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amcalhousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. The above test results relate only to the sample (or location) tested. 741 Marine Drive, Bellingham, WA 98225 www.geotest-inc.com 20611 67th Ave. NE. Unit A. Arlington, WA 98223 phone: (360) 733.7318 toll free: (888) 251.5276 fax: (360) 733.7418 FIELD DENSITY/MOISTURE REPORT Nuclear Gauge * ASTM D6938 PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: FD004 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 2 of 3 TOE - Top of Existing Grade GeoTest was on-site as requested to provide in-place soil density testing at the above locations. All locations and elevations are approximate and were provided by the contractor (Figure 1). Compaction was achieved via HO-PAC and a single-drum vibratory roller (Figure 2). These tested soils exhibited firm and unyielding conditions with optimum moisture contents. Due to high-density results in the field, sample 4299A was taken for laboratory testing (Figure 3). GeoTest will return for further inspection and observation as requested. Figure 1. A map view of in-place density testing locations. Figure 2. The excavated, backfilled and compacted sanitary sewer trench at 3 feet below existing grade (looking west). 741 Marine Drive, Bellingham, WA 98225 www.geotest-inc.com 20611 67th Ave. NE. Unit A. Arlington, WA 98223 phone: (360) 733.7318 toll free: (888) 251.5276 fax: (360) 733.7418 FIELD DENSITY/MOISTURE REPORT Nuclear Gauge * ASTM D6938 PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: FD004 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 3 of 3 Figure 3. The stockpile of native soils meant for trench backfill in which sample 4299A was taken for laboratory testing (looking east). 741 Marine Drive, Bellingham, WA 98225 www.geotest-inc.com 20611 67th Ave. NE. Unit A. Arlington, WA 98223 phone: (360) 733.7318 toll free: (888) 251.5276 fax: (360) 733.7418 FIELD DENSITY/MOISTURE REPORT Nuclear Gauge * ASTM D6938 PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street SE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: FD005 PERMIT #: DATE: 1/11/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 2 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Lynni Bennett Compaction Of: Eastern Half of Proposed Building Pad Field Data: Depth/ DT/ Wet Field Dry Compaction Test Location Elev BS Density Moisture Density Lab % Pass/ # (ft) (in) (pcf) (%) (pcf) # Attained Required Fail 1 Center of Pad APG DT/8 142.7 10.6 129.0 1 98 95 P 2 NE Quadrant APG DT/8 144.1 11.8 128.8 1 98 95 P 3 SE Quadrant APG DT/8 138.5 8.6 127.4 1 97 95 P Lab Max. Dry Optimum Retained Sample Soil Type Source Density Moisture On #4 Test # (pcf) (%) (%) Method 1-4287A Gravel Borrow Smokey Point Concrete 131.9 5.9 23 ASTM D1557/D4718 2- 0.0 None 3- 0.0 None Gauge Make/Model/Serial#: Troxler/3430/19500 M/D Standard Count: 601/1714 Comments: APG = At Planned Grade GeoTest arrived onsite as requested to test for compaction at the above-referenced location. Compaction of material meets the required 95% per the approved project specifications. The contractor was informed of compaction test results prior to leaving the site. Compaction test locations and elevations are approximate. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amcalhousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. The above test results relate only to the sample (or location) tested. 741 Marine Drive, Bellingham, WA 98225 www.geotest-inc.com 20611 67th Ave. NE. Unit A. Arlington, WA 98223 phone: (360) 733.7318 toll free: (888) 251.5276 fax: (360) 733.7418 FIELD DENSITY/MOISTURE REPORT Nuclear Gauge * ASTM D6938 PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: FD005 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 2 of 2 The pad as prepared upon arrival. Looking northwest. 741 Marine Drive, Bellingham, WA 98225 www.geotest-inc.com 20611 67th Ave. NE. Unit A. Arlington, WA 98223 phone: (360) 733.7318 toll free: (888) 251.5276 fax: (360) 733.7418 FIELD DENSITY/MOISTURE REPORT Nuclear Gauge * ASTM D6938 PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street SE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: FD006 PERMIT #: DATE: 1/17/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 1 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Harrison Simons Compaction Of: Structural Fill - Placed Above Western Infiltration Trench (#1) Field Data: Depth/ DT/ Wet Field Dry Compaction Test Location Elev BS Density Moisture Density Lab % Pass/ # (ft) (in) (pcf) (%) (pcf) # Attained Required Fail 1 Northern End of Trench TOE DT/12 123.5 9.9 112.4 1 95 95 P 2 ~Center of Trench TOE DT/12 114.9 10.0 104.5 2 96 95 P 3 Southern End of Trench TOE DT/12 123.6 8.9 113.5 1 96 95 P Lab Max. Dry Optimum Retained Sample Soil Type Source Density Moisture On #4 Test # (pcf) (%) (%) Method 1-4299A Poorly Graded Sand with Silt Native 118.6 10.0 11 ASTM D1557/D4718 2-4289A Poorly Graded Sand with Silt Native 108.8 11.8 1 ASTM D1557 3- 0.0 None Gauge Make/Model/Serial#: Instrotek / 3500 / 3053 M/D Standard Count: 406/2980 Comments: TOE - Top of Existing Site Grades GeoTest Services was on-site to provide in-place soil density and moisture testing on native structural fill material that had been placed and compacted above Infiltration Trench #1, on the western extent of the site. All structural fill material was firm and unyielding. All compaction testing locations had attained the required compaction. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amcalhousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. The above test results relate only to the sample (or location) tested. 741 Marine Drive, Bellingham, WA 98225 www.geotest-inc.com 20611 67th Ave. NE. Unit A. Arlington, WA 98223 phone: (360) 733.7318 toll free: (888) 251.5276 fax: (360) 733.7418 FIELD DENSITY/MOISTURE REPORT Nuclear Gauge * ASTM D6938 PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street SE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: FD009 PERMIT #: DATE: 3/7/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 2 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Suzie Miller Compaction Of: Building Pad Subgrade Field Data: Depth/ DT/ Wet Field Dry Compaction Test Location Elev BS Density Moisture Density Lab % Pass/ # (ft) (in) (pcf) (%) (pcf) # Attained Required Fail 1 See Figure 1 TOG BS 141.1 8.5 130.0 1 99 95 P 2 See Figure 1 TOG BS 139.2 8.9 127.8 1 97 95 P 3 See Figure 1 TOG BS 136.1 7.1 127.1 1 96 95 P 4 See Figure 1 TOG BS 138.3 8.4 127.5 1 97 95 P 5 See Figure 1 TOG BS 135.3 6.7 126.9 1 96 95 P Lab Max. Dry Optimum Retained Sample Soil Type Source Density Moisture On #4 Test # (pcf) (%) (%) Method 1-4289A Gravel Borrow Smokey Point Concrete 131.9 5.9 23 ASTM D1557/D4718 2- 0.0 None 3- 0.0 None Gauge Make/Model/Serial#: Troxler/3440/29778 M/D Standard Count: 676/1714 Comments: TOG - Top of Grade GeoTest was onsite, as requested to provide density testing on the eastern section of the building pad at the above location. Prior to GeoTest’s arrival, the fill had been placed and compacted. To prevent damage to shallow utilities in the pad, GeoTest performed tests in backscatter. All tests met compaction requirements. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amwahousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. The above test results relate only to the sample (or location) tested. 741 Marine Drive, Bellingham, WA 98225 www.geotest-inc.com 20611 67th Ave. NE. Unit A. Arlington, WA 98223 phone: (360) 733.7318 toll free: (888) 251.5276 fax: (360) 733.7418 FIELD DENSITY/MOISTURE REPORT Nuclear Gauge * ASTM D6938 PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: FD009 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 2 of 2 Figure 1 - Approximate test locations. Figure 2 - Building pad subgrade. 741 Marine Drive, Bellingham, WA 98225 www.geotest-inc.com 20527 67th Ave NE, Arlington, WA 98223 phone: (360) 733.7318 toll free: (888) 251.5276 fax: (360) 733.7418 FIELD DENSITY/MOISTURE REPORT Nuclear Gauge * ASTM D6938 PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street SE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: FD010 PERMIT #: BLD-2018 DATE: 3/29/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 2 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Tristan Coragiulo Compaction Of: Structural Fill - Section 7 (Grid Lines A-J/1-3) Field Data: Depth/ DT/ Wet Field Dry Compaction Test Location Elev BS DensityMoistureDensity Lab % Pass/ # (ft) (in) (pcf) (%) (pcf) # Attained Required Fail 1 See Figure 1 TOG DT/12 128.6 7.1 120.1 1 101 95 P 2 See Figure 1 TOG DT/12 123.3 5.9 116.5 1 98 95 P 3 See Figure 1 TOG DT/12 128.6 8.8 118.2 1 100 95 P 4 See Figure 1 TOG DT/12 122.9 8.3 113.5 1 96 95 P 5 See Figure 1 TOG DT/12 127.9 7.2 119.3 1 101 95 P Lab Max. Dry Optimum Retained Sample Soil Type Source Density Moisture On #4 Test # (pcf) (%) (%) Method 1-4299A SP w/ Silt Native 118.6 10.0 11 ASTM D1557/D4718 2-4289A SP w/ Silt Native 108.8 10.8 1 ASTM D1557 3- 0.0 None Gauge Make/Model/Serial#: Instro/3500/3052 M/D Standard Count: 420/3101 Comments: TOG - Top of Grade GeoTest was on site to provide in-place density testing. All locations and elevations are approximate and were provided by the contractor (Figure 1). Prior to our arrival, this building pad had been compacted via plate compactor and covered with a moisture barrier (Figure 2). GeoTest was not on site during compaction efforts. This material exhibited firm and unyielding conditions with optimum moisture contents. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amwahousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. The above test results relate only to the sample (or location) tested. 741 Marine Drive, Bellingham, WA 98225 www.geotest-inc.com 20527 67th Ave NE, Arlington, WA 98223 phone: (360) 733.7318 toll free: (888) 251.5276 fax: (360) 733.7418 FIELD DENSITY/MOISTURE REPORT Nuclear Gauge * ASTM D6938 PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: FD010 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 2 of 2 Figure 1. Approximate density testing locations. Figure 2. Section 7 after compaction efforts and vapor barrier placement prior to our arrival (looking south). FIELD DENSITY/MOISTURE REPORT Nuclear Gauge * ASTM D6938 PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street SE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: FD011 PERMIT #: DATE: 4/4/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 2 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Tristan Coragiulo Compaction Of: Imported Structural Fill for Courtyard Field Data: Depth/ DT/ Wet Field Dry Compaction Test Location Elev BS DensityMoistureDensity Lab % Pass/ # (ft) (in) (pcf) (%) (pcf) # Attained Required Fail 1 See Figure 1 -1 DT/12 137.6 5.3 130.7 1 99 95 P 2 See Figure 1 -1 DT/12 136.8 6.6 128.3 1 97 95 P Lab Max. Dry Optimum Retained Sample Soil Type Source Density Moisture On #4 Test # (pcf) (%) (%) Method 1-4287A PGS w/ Gravel Smokey Point Concrete 131.9 5.9 23 ASTM D1557/D4718 2- 0.0 None 3- 0.0 None Gauge Make/Model/Serial#: Instro/3500/3052 M/D Standard Count: 421/3078 Comments: GeoTest was on site as requested to provide in-place density testing at the above locations (Figure 1). All locations and elevations are approximate and were provided by the contractor. All elevations are relative to the bottom of pavement within the courtyard. Compaction was achieved via jumping jack with soils exhibiting firm and unyielding conditions, as well as optimum moisture contents (Figure 2). GeoTest will return for further inspection and observation as requested. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amwahousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. The above test results relate only to the sample (or location) tested. FIELD DENSITY/MOISTURE REPORT Nuclear Gauge * ASTM D6938 PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: FD011 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 2 of 2 Figure 1. Approximate density testing locations. Figure 2. Courtyard area in which fill was placed and compacted via jumping jack (looking southeast). FIELD DENSITY/MOISTURE REPORT Nuclear Gauge * ASTM D6938 PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street SE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: FD012 PERMIT #: BLD-2018 DATE: 4/5/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 2 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Devin Murphy Compaction Of: Structural Backfill Field Data: Depth/ DT/ Wet Field Dry Compaction Test Location Elev BS Density Moisture Density Lab % Pass/ # (ft) (in) (pcf) (%) (pcf) # Attained Required Fail 1 See Figure 1 -0.5 DT/6 144.9 7.2 135.2 1 98 95 P 2 See Figure 1 -0.5 DT/6 139.7 6.0 131.7 1 95 95 P 3 See Figure 1 -0.5 DT/6 144.0 6.3 135.4 1 98 95 P 4 See Figure 2 -1 DT/12 115.2 9.9 104.8 2 96 95 P 5 See Figure 2 -1 DT/12 117.0 10.6 106.2 2 98 95 P 6 See Figure 2 -1 DT/12 114.3 6.7 107.1 2 98 95 P Lab Max. Dry Optimum Retained Sample Soil Type Source Density Moisture On #4 Test # (pcf) (%) (%) Method 1-4381A SSG Client 138.2 5.9 20 ASTM D1557/D4718 2-4289A Structural Fill Native 108.8 11.8 1 ASTM D1557/D4718 3- 0.0 None Gauge Make/Model/Serial#: InstroTek/3500/3053 M/D Standard Count: 419/3015 Comments: As requested, GeoTest was onsite to provide soil density testing at the locations shown. The contractor was observed performing compaction via a large hoe-pack. Adequate compaction of at least 95% of the material’s maximum dry density was achieved at the locations tested. All locations and elevations are approximate. All elevations are relative to the top of the adjacent building slab. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amwahousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. The above test results relate only to the sample (or location) tested. FIELD DENSITY/MOISTURE REPORT Nuclear Gauge * ASTM D6938 PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: FD012 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 2 of 2 Figure 1. Image illustrating approximate test locations. Figure 2. Image illustrating approximate test locations. FIELD DENSITY/MOISTURE REPORT Nuclear Gauge * ASTM D6938 PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street NE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: FD013 PERMIT #: BLD-2018 DATE: 4/19/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 2 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Tristan Coragiulo Compaction Of: Structural Fill Field Data: Depth/ DT/ Wet Field Dry Compaction Test Location Elev BS DensityMoistureDensity Lab % Pass/ # (ft) (in) (pcf) (%) (pcf) # Attained Required Fail 1 See Figure 1 TOG DT/12 129.1 7.6 120.0 1 101 95 P 2 See Figure 1 TOG DT/12 122.4 13.1 108.3 2 100 95 P 3 See Figure 1 TOG DT/12 127.3 8.0 117.9 1 99 95 P Lab Max. Dry Optimum Retained Sample Soil Type Source Density Moisture On #4 Test # (pcf) (%) (%) Method 1-4299A PGS w/ Silt Native 118.6 10.0 11 ASTM D1557/D4718 2-4289A PGS w/ Silt Native 108.8 10.8 1 ASTM D1557 3- 0.0 None Gauge Make/Model/Serial#: Instro/3500/3052 M/D Standard Count: 420/3119 Comments: TOG - Top of Grade GeoTest was on site as requested to provide in-place density testing at the above locations. All locations and elevations are approximate. Prior to our arrival, the building pad was compacted via plate compactor and was covered with a moisture barrier (Figure 2). GeoTest was not on site during compaction efforts. This material exhibited firm and unyielding conditions with optimum moisture contents. GeoTest will return for further inspection and observation as requested. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amwahousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. The above test results relate only to the sample (or location) tested. FIELD DENSITY/MOISTURE REPORT Nuclear Gauge * ASTM D6938 PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: FD013 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 2 of 2 Figure 1. Approximate in-place density testing locations. Figure 2. Northwestern building pad area in which in-place density testing took place (looking southwest). FIELD DENSITY/MOISTURE REPORT Nuclear Gauge * ASTM D6938 PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street NE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: FD016 PERMIT #: BLD-2018 DATE: 5/7/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 2 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Suzie Miller Compaction Of: Parking Lot Structural Section Field Data: Depth/ DT/ Wet Field Dry Compaction Test Location Elev BS Density Moisture Density Lab % Pass/ # (ft) (in) (pcf) (%) (pcf) # Attained Required Fail 1 See Figure 1 -0.25 DT/2 124.8 2.6 121.6 1 99 95 P 2 See Figure 1 -0.25 DT/2 126.7 3.1 122.9 1 100 95 P 3 See Figure 1 -0.25 BS 125.3 2.6 122.1 1 100 95 P 4 See Figure 1 -0.25 DT/2 125.8 1.8 123.5 1 101 95 P 5 See Figure 1 -0.25 DT/2 132.4 3.1 128.5 1 105 95 P 6 See Figure 1 -0.25 DT/2 126.6 3.1 117.4 1 96 95 P 7 See Figure 1 -0.25 DT/2 124.2 3.3 120.3 1 98 95 P Lab Max. Dry Optimum Retained Sample Soil Type Source Density Moisture On #4 Test # (pcf) (%) (%) Method 1-4432A CSBC Iron Mountain Quarry 122.6 6.2 72 ASTM D1557/D4718 2- 0.0 None 3- 0.0 None Gauge Make/Model/Serial#: Instrotek/3500/2082 M/D Standard Count: 398/3171 Comments: GeoTest was onsite, as requested to provide in-place density testing at the above location. The CSBC (crushed surfacing base course) was placed in an approximate 6" lift and compacted with a single drum vibrating roller. All tests met compaction requirements. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amwahousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. The above test results relate only to the sample (or location) tested. FIELD DENSITY/MOISTURE REPORT Nuclear Gauge * ASTM D6938 PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: FD016 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 2 of 2 Figure 1 - Approximate test locations. Figure 2 - Compaction of CSBC with roller. FIELD DENSITY/MOISTURE REPORT Nuclear Gauge * ASTM D6938 PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street NE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: FD017 PERMIT #: BLD-2018 DATE: 5/8/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 3 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Anna Sigel Compaction Of: Parking Lot Structural Section Field Data: Depth/ DT/ Wet Field Dry Compaction Test Location Elev BS Density Moisture Density Lab % Pass/ # (ft) (in) (pcf) (%) (pcf) # Attained Required Fail 1 See Figure 1 TOS DT/2 122.3 2.8 118.9 1 97 95 P 2 See Figure 1 TOS DT/2 125.7 2.5 122.6 1 100 95 P 3 See Figure 1 TOS DT/2 124.9 2.8 121.5 1 99 95 P 4 See Figure 1 TOS DT/2 123.7 2.7 120.5 1 98 95 P 5 See Figure 1 TOS DT/2 125.9 3.3 121.9 1 99 95 P 6 See Figure 1 TOS DT/2 123.1 1.9 120.8 1 99 95 P 7 See Figure 1 TOS DT/2 125.6 1.7 123.5 1 101 95 P Lab Max. Dry Optimum Retained Sample Soil Type Source Density Moisture On #4 Test # (pcf) (%) (%) Method 1-4432A CSBC Iron Mountain Quarry 122.6 6.2 72 ASTM D1557/D4718 2- 0.0 None 3- 0.0 None Gauge Make/Model/Serial#: Troxler/3440P/62856 M/D Standard Count: 593/3192 Comments: TOS - Top of Subgrade Geotest was onsite, as requested, to provide in-place density testing at the above location. The crushed surfacing base course (CSBC) was placed in approximately 6" lifts and compacted with a single vibrating roller. Due to local variations in soil, several test results attained over 100% compaction. All tests met compaction requirements. See Figures 1 through 3 for details. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amwahousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. The above test results relate only to the sample (or location) tested. FIELD DENSITY/MOISTURE REPORT Nuclear Gauge * ASTM D6938 PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: FD017 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 2 of 3 Figure 1: Approximate soil density test locations. Figure 2: A photo of the compacted soils in the parking lot north of the building footprint. The photo was taken at approximately test location 2 and facing west. FIELD DENSITY/MOISTURE REPORT Nuclear Gauge * ASTM D6938 PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: FD017 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 3 of 3 Figure 3: A photo of the compacted soils in the parking lot east of the building footprint. The photo was taken at approximately test location 7 and facing north. FIELD DENSITY/MOISTURE REPORT Nuclear Gauge * ASTM D6938 PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street NE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: FD018 PERMIT #: BLD-2018 DATE: 5/22/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 2 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Tristan Coragiulo Compaction Of: Imported and Native Structural Fill Field Data: Depth/ DT/ Wet Field Dry Compaction Test Location Elev BS Density Moisture Density Lab % Pass/ # (ft) (in) (pcf) (%) (pcf) # Attained Required Fail 1 See Figure 1 TOG DT/12 140.4 6.4 132.0 1 100 95 P 2 See Figure 1 TOG DT/12 134.1 5.5 127.1 1 96 95 P 3 See Figure 1 TOG DT/12 134.3 7.1 125.4 1 95 95 P 4 See Figure 1 TOG DT/12 131.3 9.2 120.2 2 101 95 P 5 See Figure 1 TOG DT/12 132.6 7.5 123.3 2 104 95 P Lab Max. Dry Optimum Retained Sample Soil Type Source Density Moisture On #4 Test # (pcf) (%) (%) Method 1-4287A PGS w/ Gravel Smokey Point Concrete 131.9 5.9 23 ASTM D1557/D4718 2-4299A PGS w/ Silt Native 118.6 10.0 11 ASTM D1557/D4718 3- 0.0 None Gauge Make/Model/Serial#: Troxler/3440P/62856 M/D Standard Count: 629/1700 Comments: TOG - Tog of grade GeoTest was on site as requested to provide in-place density testing at the above locations. All locations and elevations are approximate and were provided by the contractor. Compaction was achieved with an excavator mounted HO-PAC as well as a plate compactor. GeoTest will return for further inspection and observation as requested. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amwahousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. The above test results relate only to the sample (or location) tested. FIELD DENSITY/MOISTURE REPORT Nuclear Gauge * ASTM D6938 PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: FD018 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 2 of 2 Figure 1. Approximate in-place density testing locations. Figure 2. Central building pad in which density testing took place (looking south). Figure 3. Eastern courtyard sidewalk subgrade in which density testing took place (looking southwest). FIELD DENSITY/MOISTURE REPORT Nuclear Gauge * ASTM D6938 PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street NE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: FD019 PERMIT #: BLD-2018 DATE: 6/7/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 3 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Anna Sigel Compaction Of: Courtyard Sidewalk Subgrade Field Data: Depth/ DT/ Wet Field Dry Compaction Test Location Elev BS Density Moisture Density Lab % Pass/ # (ft) (in) (pcf) (%) (pcf) # Attained Required Fail 1 See Figure 1 TOS DT/12 140.7 4.5 134.6 1 97 95 P 2 See Figure 1 TOS DT/10 127.2 4.8 133.2 1 96 95 P 3 See Figure 1 TOS DT/10 129.6 6.9 121.2 2 102 95 P 4 See Figure 1 TOS DT/12 128.7 7.2 120.1 2 101 95 P Lab Max. Dry Optimum Retained Sample Soil Type Source Density Moisture On #4 Test # (pcf) (%) (%) Method 1-4381A Gravel Borrow Sampled by Client 138.2 5.9 20 ASTM D1557/D4718 2-4299A Poorly Graded Sand with Silt Native Material 118.6 10.0 11 ASTM D1557/D4718 3- 0.0 None Gauge Make/Model/Serial#: Instrotek/3500/2082 M/D Standard Count: 403/3180 Comments: TOS - Top of Subgrade GeoTest was on-site as requested to provide in-place density testing for the backfill soils underneath the courtyard sidewalks. All locations are approximate. The fill was placed in lifts and compacted prior to GeoTest’s arrival. All tests met compaction requirements. Several tests attained over 100% due to local mixing of import material and native material. The soils were firm during testing. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amwahousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. The above test results relate only to the sample (or location) tested. FIELD DENSITY/MOISTURE REPORT Nuclear Gauge * ASTM D6938 PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: FD019 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 2 of 3 Figure 1: Approximate locations of in-place soil density tests. Figure 2: A photo of the compacted subgrade and test location 2. The photo was taken facing east. FIELD DENSITY/MOISTURE REPORT Nuclear Gauge * ASTM D6938 PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: FD019 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 3 of 3 Figure 3: A photo of the compacted subgrade and test location 3. The photo was taken facing southwest. 741 Marine Drive, Bellingham, WA 98225 www.geotest-inc.com 20611 67th Ave. NE. Unit A. Arlington, WA 98223 phone: (360) 733.7318 toll free: (888) 251.5276 fax: (360) 733.7418 Grout Compressive Strength Test Report PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street SE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: GB001 PERMIT #: BLD-2018 DATE: 2/19/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 2 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Tim Martin Placement Location: 8" CMU Site Wall Along the Site’s East Side (0 to 4’) Field Data: Eq. No. Supplier Smokey Point Concrete / Skagit Read Slump, in. (C143) 8.50 19 Mix # PG70030 Air Content, % (C231) NT Mix Description 7sk. 30% Pea #Gravel, 70% Hot Water Unit Weight, pcf (C138) NT Truck/Ticket # 5011 / Air Temperature,°F 39 Strength Required 2000 psi at 28 days Mix Temperature,°F (C1064) 67 TM02 Quantity Placed, cy 18 Field Cure Temperature, °F 44-55 Time Batched 12:00 P.M Water Added on Job, gals 5 Time Sampled 12:53 P.M Water Requested by Contractor Laboratory Data: Lab Test Age Test Total Load Area Corr. Compressive No. (Days) Date (lbs) (in²) Factor Strength (psi) 92182 7 02-26 49200 11.90 1.00 4130 92183 28 03-19 70690 11.83 1.00 5980 92184 28 03-19 67990 11.97 1.00 5680 92185 Hold 00-00 0 0.00 1.00 0 Reinforcement Inspection Yes n/a: not applicable Specimen Size 4" X 4" X 8" Reinforcement Conforms Yes n/t: not tested Test Reference C1019/C39 Comments: GeoTest was on site as requested to inspect the placement of the coarse masonry grout at the above location. The reinforcing steel was in place and was found to be in conformance with detail 5 on drawing C5.2. All cells of the CMU block wall were fully grouted. See photo on the following page. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amwahousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. The above test results relate to the sample (or location) tested. 741 Marine Drive, Bellingham, WA 98225 www.geotest-inc.com 20611 67th Ave. NE. Unit A. Arlington, WA 98223 phone: (360) 733.7318 toll free: (888) 251.5276 fax: (360) 733.7418 Grout Compressive Strength Test Report PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: GB001 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 2 of 2 Photo of the contractor placing the grout using a line pump and consolidating the placed grout by mechanical vibration. The picture was taken looking north. 741 Marine Drive, Bellingham, WA 98225 www.geotest-inc.com 20611 67th Ave. NE. Unit A. Arlington, WA 98223 phone: (360) 733.7318 toll free: (888) 251.5276 fax: (360) 733.7418 Inspection Report PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street SE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: IR001 PERMIT #: DATE: 1/6/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 1 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Noah Griffin INSPECTION OF: North Site CMU Wall foundation GeoTest was on-site to inspect reinforcing steel for the new north site CMU wall. At the time of our visit, steel reinforcement was in-place per plan, with acceptable clearances and lap lengths. Image 1: Wall footing reinforcement inspected on this date. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amcalhousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. 741 Marine Drive, Bellingham, WA 98225 www.geotest-inc.com 20611 67th Ave. NE. Unit A. Arlington, WA 98223 phone: (360) 733.7318 toll free: (888) 251.5276 fax: (360) 733.7418 Inspection Report PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street SE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: IR002 PERMIT #: BLD2018 DATE: 1/15/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 1 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Dave Bufalini INSPECTION OF: Footing Reinforcement Comments: GeoTest was on-site to observe the reinforcement within the proposed southern footing line. See photo in GeoTest’s Concrete Break Report report CB003 for footing section inspected. At the time of our inspection, the reinforcement was in-place, secure and was found to conform to Detail 5/ CS1. No exceptions noted. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amcalhousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. 741 Marine Drive, Bellingham, WA 98225 www.geotest-inc.com 20611 67th Ave. NE. Unit A. Arlington, WA 98223 phone: (360) 733.7318 toll free: (888) 251.5276 fax: (360) 733.7418 Inspection Report PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street SE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: IR003 PERMIT #: BLDG-2018 DATE: 3/8/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 2 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Joel Morder INSPECTION OF: Pour 1 Mat Slab at Grids A-H/15.5-18 GeoTest on site for inspection of reinforcing steel for the mat slab at the above-referenced location. Reviewed bar size, grade, splicing, and spacing. The bar was in place in accordance with S2.1.1 notes, and detail 4/S4.1. Items inspected this day were in conformance with approved plans and drawings. Reinforcing Steel Grid Layout COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amwahousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. 741 Marine Drive, Bellingham, WA 98225 www.geotest-inc.com 20611 67th Ave. NE. Unit A. Arlington, WA 98223 phone: (360) 733.7318 toll free: (888) 251.5276 fax: (360) 733.7418 Inspection Report PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: IR003 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 2 of 2 Thickened Edge of Mat Slab 741 Marine Drive, Bellingham, WA 98225 www.geotest-inc.com 20611 67th Ave. NE. Unit A. Arlington, WA 98223 phone: (360) 733.7318 toll free: (888) 251.5276 fax: (360) 733.7418 Inspection Report PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street SE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: IR004 PERMIT #: BLD-2018 DATE: 3/13/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 3 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Tim Martin INSPECTION OF: Reinforcing Steel Placement Geotest was on site as requested to inspect the placement of the reinforcing steel at the mat foundation in section 3. The contractor had all reinforcing steel in place prior to our arrival on site. The anchor bolts were being installed at the foundation perimeter. The holes in the vapor barrier membrane were repaired and the required bar clearance was met. The reinforcing steel was found to conform with the project structural drawings. See photos on the following page. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amwahousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. 741 Marine Drive, Bellingham, WA 98225 www.geotest-inc.com 20611 67th Ave. NE. Unit A. Arlington, WA 98223 phone: (360) 733.7318 toll free: (888) 251.5276 fax: (360) 733.7418 Inspection Report PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: IR004 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 2 of 3 The photo was taken looking east across the mat foundation and shows the south edge of the slab. 741 Marine Drive, Bellingham, WA 98225 www.geotest-inc.com 20611 67th Ave. NE. Unit A. Arlington, WA 98223 phone: (360) 733.7318 toll free: (888) 251.5276 fax: (360) 733.7418 Inspection Report PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: IR004 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 3 of 3 Photo of the foundation top mat of reinforcing steel. 741 Marine Drive, Bellingham, WA 98225 www.geotest-inc.com 20527 67th Ave NE, Arlington, WA 98223 phone: (360) 733.7318 toll free: (888) 251.5276 fax: (360) 733.7418 Inspection Report PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street SE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: IR005 PERMIT #: BLD.2018 DATE: 3/25/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 2 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Tim Martin INSPECTION OF: Reinforcing Steel Placement GeoTest was on site as requested to inspect the reinforcing steel for the mat foundation slab at the following locations. Location of reinforcing steel inspection, A to C.7/9 to 16. The reinforcing steel was in place and was found to be in conformance with the project structural drawings. The perimeter holdown and sill plate anchor bolts were in place, see photo. The contractor plans to post-install the interior anchor bolts. Edge Clearances: The contractor met the required clearance at all locations. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amwahousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. 741 Marine Drive, Bellingham, WA 98225 www.geotest-inc.com 20527 67th Ave NE, Arlington, WA 98223 phone: (360) 733.7318 toll free: (888) 251.5276 fax: (360) 733.7418 Inspection Report PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: IR005 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 2 of 2 Overview of Slab Reinforcement: Photo shows an over view of the area inspected. Inspection Report PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street SE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: IR006 PERMIT #: BLD2018 DATE: 4/11/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 2 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Devin Murphy INSPECTION OF: Reinforcing Steel Placement As requested, GeoTest was onsite to provide steel reinforcement inspection of slab reinforcement for section 6. The steel reinforcement was found to conform to approved structural documents. Image of thicken edge reinforcement. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amwahousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. Inspection Report PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: IR006 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 2 of 2 Image of section 6 slab reinforcement. Inspection Report PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street NE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: IR007 PERMIT #: BLD-2018 DATE: 4/17/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 1 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Sean Rogerson INSPECTION OF: Reinforcing Steel for Light Pole Foundations Comments: GeoTest was on site as requested to observe reinforcing bar for the light pole foundations throughout the site. Rebar was inspected and was found to conform to the approved structural drawings. Concrete was placed later on this date but was not tested. GeoTest will test concrete for this application at a later time. The contractor was verbally notified of inspection results. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amwahousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. Inspection Report PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street NE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: IR010 PERMIT #: BLD-2018 DATE: 5/29/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 2 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Sean Rogerson INSPECTION OF: Reinforcing Steel for Mat Slab Foundation GeoTest was on site as requested to observe reinforcing bar for the mat slab on grade from 7.3 line to 9 line. Rebar and 1" anchor rods for hold-downs were inspected and found to conform to the approved structural drawings. Some hold-down rods were missing at the time of the inspection and should be confirmed prior to concrete placement (see image below). The contractor was verbally notified of inspection results. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amwahousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. Inspection Report PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: IR010 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 2 of 2 Image indicating the area where rebar was inspected on this date highlighted in green. Areas with missing hold-down rods are clouded in red. The rod layout was marked but rods had yet to be installed. Inspection Report PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street NE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: IR011 PERMIT #: BLD-2018 DATE: 8/30/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 1 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Tim Martin INSPECTION OF: Reinforcing Steel Placement Comments: GeoTest was on site as requested to inspect the placement of the reinforcing steel at the following locations. 4 - Entry canopy column foundations. The reinforcing steel was in place and was found to conform with Detail (plan view) 2 on S2.1.1 and Detail 7 on S4.1. Note: Column anchor bolts were not in at this time. Bolts will need to be inspected prior to the placement of the concrete. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amwahousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. Inspection Report PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street NE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: IR012 PERMIT #: BLD-2018 DATE: 11/13/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 1 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Dan Weaver INSPECTION OF: Intumescent Fireproofing Paint at Entry Tube Steel 8" X 8" X 1/4" Columns Comments: GeoTest was on site to perform a special inspection for the above fireproofing. The tube steel columns were coated with Carboline Thermo-Sorb intumescent paint. The manufacturer’s product data state for a 1-hour rating the columns require a minimum of 73 mils. The six columns were measured at an average of 75 mils. The entryway columns were found to meet the manufacturer’s requirements for a 1-hour rating. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amwahousing.com, tphillips@safebuilt.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. LATERAL FRAMING INSPECTION REPORT PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street NE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: LF001 PERMIT #: BLD-2018 DATE: 6/5/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 2 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Tim Martin Item(s) Inspected Location Floor Diaphragm: Sheathing Level 2, Line 10 to 18/E to H Reference Drawings: Notes on S1.1 and S2.1, Schedules on S3.1 and Details on S5.1 Items Inspected Comments Lumber grade, species, size Structural panel grade and thickness, glue Rated Sturd-i-Floor, 23/32" , T&G, Exp.1 Shear wall/diaphragm length, location Panel edges bear on framing members Where Required Diaphragm chord, drag strut, braces and related Connection of blocking to wall top plates Gypsum board with wood framing conforms 3" nom. framing in place, nails staggered where shown Foundation plates or sills on concrete are treated Base-plate bolting complies Nail diameter, length, number of lines, spacing Per RFI 26, and Structrural Drawiongs Pneumatic or mechanically driven fasteners conform Nail heads driven flush Satisfactory Hold down, type, location Lag bolts/proper hole size Cold-formed framing-proper size, gage, spacing Screw type, spacing, driven flush Cold-formed welding conforms (AWS D1.1 and D1.3) Other The above items were conforming Nonconforming Items (see below) Comments: See notes on page 2. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amwahousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. LATERAL FRAMING INSPECTION REPORT PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: LF001 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 2 of 2 GeoTest was on site as requested to inspect the above items. The floor diaphragm sheathing and fasteners were found to be in accordance with the project structural drawings and RFI #26 at the above locations. Sheathing Stamp LATERAL FRAMING INSPECTION REPORT PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street NE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: LF002 PERMIT #: BLD-2018 DATE: 7/12/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 1 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Tim Martin Item(s) Inspected Location Shear Wall Sheathing and HD Strapping 1st Level: East Wing Reference Drawings: Structural Drawings Items Inspected Comments Lumber grade, species, size Structural panel grade and thickness, glue Rated Sheathing, 15/32", Exp.1 Shear wall/diaphragm length, location Panel edges bear on framing members SW’s are Fully Blocked Diaphragm chord, drag strut, braces and related Connection of blocking to wall top plates Gypsum board with wood framing conforms 3" nom. framing in place, nails staggered where shown Foundation plates or sills on concrete are treated Base-plate bolting complies Nail diameter, length, number of lines, spacing .148 X 2-1/4", Per Plan Pneumatic or mechanically driven fasteners conform Nail heads driven flush Satisfactory Hold down, type, location MST37 & 48 Floor to Floor Straps Lag bolts/proper hole size Cold-formed framing-proper size, gage, spacing Screw type, spacing, driven flush Cold-formed welding conforms (AWS D1.1 and D1.3) Other The above items were conforming Nonconforming Items (see below) Comments: GeoTest was on-site as requested to inspect the above framing items. A few locations were found which will require a reinspection. These locations were marked and the framer was informed of the issue. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amwahousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. LATERAL FRAMING INSPECTION REPORT PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street NE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: LF003 PERMIT #: BLD-2018 DATE: 7/19/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 1 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Tim Martin Item(s) Inspected Location Floor Diaphragm Sheathing With Blocked Edges 2nd Level at Line 3 to 7/E to J Floor Diaphragm Sheathing 3rd Level at Line 3 to 8/A to D Reference Drawings: Structural Drawings Items Inspected Comments Lumber grade, species, size Structural panel grade and thickness, glue Rated Sturd-i-Floor, 23/32" (SW-15/32") , T&G, Exp.1 Shear wall/diaphragm length, location Panel edges bear on framing members 2nd Level Sheathing was Fully at Above Locations Diaphragm chord, drag strut, braces and related Connection of blocking to wall top plates Gypsum board with wood framing conforms 3" nom. framing in place, nails staggered where shown Foundation plates or sills on concrete are treated Base-plate bolting complies Nail diameter, length, number of lines, spacing Per Framing Notes and RFI #26 Pneumatic or mechanically driven fasteners conform Nail heads driven flush Satisfactory Hold down, type, location Lag bolts/proper hole size Cold-formed framing-proper size, gage, spacing Screw type, spacing, driven flush Cold-formed welding conforms (AWS D1.1 and D1.3) Other The above items were conforming Nonconforming Items (see below) Comments: GeoTest was on site as requested to inspect the items mentioned above. The floor sheathing and fasteners were found to be in conformance at the locations mentioned in this report. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amwahousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. LATERAL FRAMING INSPECTION REPORT PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street NE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: LF004 PERMIT #: BLD-2018 DATE: 8/8/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 3 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Tim Martin Item(s) Inspected Location Diaphragm Sheathing and Fasteners Level 3 Re-Inspection of Shear Wall Sheathing Level 1, Exterior SW Shear Wall Sheathing and HD Straps Level 1 (Straps 1st to 2nd Floors) Reference Drawings: Structural Drawings Items Inspected Comments Lumber grade, species, size Structural panel grade and thickness, glue Rated Sheathing, 15/32", Exp.1 Shear wall/diaphragm length, location Per Plan Panel edges bear on framing members Both Walls and Floor Diaphragm Were Blocked Diaphragm chord, drag strut, braces and related Connection of blocking to wall top plates Gypsum board with wood framing conforms 3" nom. framing in place, nails staggered where shown Foundation plates or sills on concrete are treated Base-plate bolting complies Nail diameter, length, number of lines, spacing .148 X 2-1/4", Per Plan Pneumatic or mechanically driven fasteners conform Nail heads driven flush Satisfactory Hold down, type, location Per RFI Lag bolts/proper hole size Cold-formed framing-proper size, gage, spacing Screw type, spacing, driven flush Cold-formed welding conforms (AWS D1.1 and D1.3) Other The above items were conforming Nonconforming Items (see below) Comments: GeoTest was on site the inspect the above framing items. Some locations will require additional nails; these areas were marked. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amwahousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. LATERAL FRAMING INSPECTION REPORT PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: LF004 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 2 of 3 Floor to Floor Strap: Nailing is in conformance with revised RFI. 148 X 2-1/2" 37 nails minimum at both cord members. LATERAL FRAMING INSPECTION REPORT PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: LF004 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 3 of 3 At a few locations, the straps appear to have bowed at the rim. LATERAL FRAMING INSPECTION REPORT PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street NE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: LF005 PERMIT #: BLD-2018 DATE: 8/14/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 2 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Tim Martin Item(s) Inspected Location Floor Diaphragm: Sheathing (Per Plan) Level 2, Line A to D/7 to 9 Floor Diaphragm: Sheathing (Per Plan) Level 3, Line A to D/3 to 7 Shear Wall Sheathing (See Comments) Level 1 & 2, Line 9 to 18/A to J Reference Drawings: Structural Drawings Items Inspected Comments Lumber grade, species, size Structural panel grade and thickness, glue Rated Sturd-i-Floor, 23/32" (SW-15/32") , T&G, Exp.1 Shear wall/diaphragm length, location Panel edges bear on framing members Where Required Diaphragm chord, drag strut, braces and related Connection of blocking to wall top plates Gypsum board with wood framing conforms 3" nom. framing in place, nails staggered where shown Yes and Yes Foundation plates or sills on concrete are treated Base-plate bolting complies Nail diameter, length, number of lines, spacing .148 x 2-1/4", Per Plan Pneumatic or mechanically driven fasteners conform Nail heads driven flush Satisfactory Hold down, type, location 1st to 2nd Level Straps Per Plan & Revised RFI #26 Lag bolts/proper hole size Cold-formed framing-proper size, gage, spacing Screw type, spacing, driven flush Cold-formed welding conforms (AWS D1.1 and D1.3) Other The above items were conforming Nonconforming Items (see below) Comments: See page 2 for comments. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amwahousing.com, tphillips@safebuilt.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. LATERAL FRAMING INSPECTION REPORT PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: LF005 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 2 of 2 Amended 10/31/19: Please see GeoTest’s Lateral Framing Inspection Report LF024, dated 10/28/19 for passing re-inspection results. GeoTest was on site as requested to inspect the above items. Nonconforming items were marked and listed on a copy of the drawing and provided to the contractor. A reinspection is required. LATERAL FRAMING INSPECTION REPORT PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street NE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: LF006 PERMIT #: BLD-2018 DATE: 8/16/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 2 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Tim Martin Item(s) Inspected Location Shear Wall Sheathing (In-Progress Inspection) Level 3, Exterior Walls East of Line 10 to Line 18 Reference Drawings: Structural Drawings Items Inspected Comments Lumber grade, species, size Structural panel grade and thickness, glue Rated Sheathing, 15/32", Exp.1 Shear wall/diaphragm length, location See Comments Panel edges bear on framing members SW Fully Blocked Diaphragm chord, drag strut, braces and related Connection of blocking to wall top plates Gypsum board with wood framing conforms 3" nom. framing in place, nails staggered where shown See Comments Foundation plates or sills on concrete are treated Base-plate bolting complies Nail diameter, length, number of lines, spacing See Comments Pneumatic or mechanically driven fasteners conform Nail heads driven flush See Comments Hold down, type, location Lag bolts/proper hole size Cold-formed framing-proper size, gage, spacing Screw type, spacing, driven flush Cold-formed welding conforms (AWS D1.1 and D1.3) Other The above items were conforming Nonconforming Items (see below) Comments: See comments on page 2. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amwahousing.com, tphillips@safebuilt.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. LATERAL FRAMING INSPECTION REPORT PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: LF006 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 2 of 2 Amended 10/31/19: Please see GeoTest’s Lateral Framing Inspection Report LF024, dated 10/28/19 for passing re-inspection results. GeoTest was on site to inspect the above items. Due to the height of the walls, the inspection of the shear wall sheathing at exterior of level three is in progress at the building’s eastern half. Reinspection with access is required to complete. LATERAL FRAMING INSPECTION REPORT PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street NE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: LF007 PERMIT #: BLD-2018 DATE: 8/20/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 2 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Tim Martin Item(s) Inspected Location SW Sheathing Re-inspection of SW2, SW3 & SW4 Shear Wall Buildings East Half (A to J/9 to 18 Exterior Walls) Reference Drawings: Structural Drawings Items Inspected Comments Lumber grade, species, size Structural panel grade and thickness, glue Rated Sheathing, 15/32", Exp.1 Shear wall/diaphragm length, location Panel edges bear on framing members SWs Fully Blocked Diaphragm chord, drag strut, braces and related Connection of blocking to wall top plates Gypsum board with wood framing conforms 3" nom. framing in place, nails staggered where shown Yes and Yes Foundation plates or sills on concrete are treated Base-plate bolting complies Nail diameter, length, number of lines, spacing .148 X 2-1/4", Per Plan Pneumatic or mechanically driven fasteners conform Nail heads driven flush Satisfactory Hold down, type, location Lag bolts/proper hole size Cold-formed framing-proper size, gage, spacing Screw type, spacing, driven flush Cold-formed welding conforms (AWS D1.1 and D1.3) Other The above items were conforming Nonconforming Items (see below) Comments: See Comments on page 2. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amwahousing.com, tphillips@safebuilt.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. LATERAL FRAMING INSPECTION REPORT PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: LF007 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 2 of 2 Amended 10/31/19: Please see GeoTest’s Lateral Framing Inspection Report LF024, dated 10/28/19 for passing re-inspection results. GeoTest was on site as requested to inspect the above items. All items found were marked and the contractor was notified. A follow-up inspection is required. LATERAL FRAMING INSPECTION REPORT PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street NE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: LF008 PERMIT #: BLD-2018 DATE: 8/21/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 1 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Tim Martin Item(s) Inspected Location SW Sheathing & Straps Re-Inspection of Outstanding Items Floors 1 to 2, Line 9 to 18/A to J (Repairs in Progress) Interior Framing of SW (Inspection in Progress) Level 1, Line A to J/9 to 18 SW6, Sheathing Level 4, Stair #4 Reference Drawings: Structural Drawings Items Inspected Comments Lumber grade, species, size D-Fir #2, LVL Structural panel grade and thickness, glue Rated Sheathing, 15/32", Exp.1 Shear wall/diaphragm length, location Panel edges bear on framing members SW Fully Blocked Diaphragm chord, drag strut, braces and related Connection of blocking to wall top plates Clips in Progress Gypsum board with wood framing conforms 3" nom. framing in place, nails staggered where shown In Progress Foundation plates or sills on concrete are treated Base-plate bolting complies Nail diameter, length, number of lines, spacing .148 X 2-1/2", Per Plan Pneumatic or mechanically driven fasteners conform Nail heads driven flush Satisfactory Hold down, type, location Lag bolts/proper hole size Cold-formed framing-proper size, gage, spacing Screw type, spacing, driven flush Cold-formed welding conforms (AWS D1.1 and D1.3) Other The above items were conforming Nonconforming Items (see below) Comments: GeoTest was on site as requested to inspect the above items. Above items were found to be in conformance with the project drawings. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amwahousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. LATERAL FRAMING INSPECTION REPORT PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street NE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: LF009 PERMIT #: BLD-2018 DATE: 8/27/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 2 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Tim Martin Item(s) Inspected Location Interior Framing: Shear & Bearing Walls Level 1 Line 9 to 18/G to H Shear Walls: Sheathing & Floor to Floor HD Straps Level 1, 2 & 3 Line 9 to 18/A to H Reference Drawings: RFI #26, Structural Drawings Items Inspected Comments Lumber grade, species, size LVL, D.Fir 2 Structural panel grade and thickness, glue Rated Sheathing, 15/32", Exp.1 Shear wall/diaphragm length, location Per Plan at Above Shear Walls Panel edges bear on framing members SW’s Fully Blocked Diaphragm chord, drag strut, braces and related Connection of blocking to wall top plates Gypsum board with wood framing conforms 3" nom. framing in place, nails staggered where shown Yes & Yes Foundation plates or sills on concrete are treated Base-plate bolting complies Lines 1 to 9 See Comments Nail diameter, length, number of lines, spacing See Comments Pneumatic or mechanically driven fasteners conform Nail heads driven flush Satisfactory Hold down, type, location In Progress Lag bolts/proper hole size Cold-formed framing-proper size, gage, spacing Screw type, spacing, driven flush Cold-formed welding conforms (AWS D1.1 and D1.3) Other The above items were conforming Nonconforming Items (see below) Comments: See comments on page 2. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amwahousing.com, tphillips@safebuilt.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. LATERAL FRAMING INSPECTION REPORT PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: LF009 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 2 of 2 Amended 10/31/19: Please see GeoTest’s Lateral Framing Inspection Report LF024, dated 10/28/19 for passing re-inspection results. GeoTest was on site as requested to inspect the above items. Cripple studs were missing at both sides of the window. This was typical at a few units along with the buildings west side. 1st level Line 9 to 12. Some anchor bolts were missing and were spaced too far apart. Some bearing walls had no anchor bolts. Some built-up holdown members were not nailed together, per detail 3 on S5.1. A few wall intersections were not nailed together per Detail 6 on S5.1. A list of the above items was left with the contractor and each item was marked at the location. LATERAL FRAMING INSPECTION REPORT PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street NE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: LF010 PERMIT #: BLD-2018 DATE: 8/30/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 2 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Tim Martin Item(s) Inspected Location Reinspection of Shear Sheathing and Straps Level 1, 2 and 3 Line 13 to 18/A to H, Line H/9 to 13 Interior Framing Level 1 Line E to F.5/9 to 18 Reference Drawings: Structural Drawings Items Inspected Comments Lumber grade, species, size Structural panel grade and thickness, glue Rated Sheathing, 15/32", Exp.1 Shear wall/diaphragm length, location Per Plan Panel edges bear on framing members SW’s are Fully Blocked Diaphragm chord, drag strut, braces and related Connection of blocking to wall top plates At Locations Noted on Report Gypsum board with wood framing conforms 3" nom. framing in place, nails staggered where shown Yes and Yes Foundation plates or sills on concrete are treated Base-plate bolting complies In Progress Nail diameter, length, number of lines, spacing Per Plan Pneumatic or mechanically driven fasteners conform Nail heads driven flush Satisfactory Hold down, type, location Inspection is in Progress Lag bolts/proper hole size Cold-formed framing-proper size, gage, spacing Screw type, spacing, driven flush Cold-formed welding conforms (AWS D1.1 and D1.3) Other The above items were conforming Nonconforming Items (see below) Comments: See comments on page 2. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amwahousing.com, tphillips@safebuilt.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. LATERAL FRAMING INSPECTION REPORT PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: LF010 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 2 of 2 Amended 10/31/19: Please see GeoTest’s Lateral Framing Inspection Report LF024, dated 10/28/19 for passing re-inspection results. GeoTest was on site as requested to inspect the above items. See below for additional comments. The exterior sheathing and floor to floor straps are now in accordance with the project drawings except a couple of locations at Line A 9 to 13. Interior framing has a few items which will need to be addressed, areas are marked. LATERAL FRAMING INSPECTION REPORT PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street NE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: LF011 PERMIT #: BLD-2018 DATE: 9/6/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 1 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Tim Martin Item(s) Inspected Location Shear Wall Framing 1st Floor Line 16 to 18/A to H Interior Shear Wall Sheathing 1st Floor Line 16 to 18/A to H Reference Drawings: Structural Drawings Items Inspected Comments Lumber grade, species, size D-Fir #2 Structural panel grade and thickness, glue Rated Sheathing, 15/32", Exp.1 Shear wall/diaphragm length, location Per Plan at Above Locations Panel edges bear on framing members SW Fully Blocked Diaphragm chord, drag strut, braces and related Connection of blocking to wall top plates Per Plan at Above Locations Gypsum board with wood framing conforms 3" nom. framing in place, nails staggered where shown Per Plan at Above Locations Foundation plates or sills on concrete are treated Yes Base-plate bolting complies In Progress (Re-Inspect After Trades) Nail diameter, length, number of lines, spacing Per Notes & SW Schedule Pneumatic or mechanically driven fasteners conform Nail heads driven flush Satisfactory at Above Locations Hold down, type, location Per Plan at Above Locations Lag bolts/proper hole size Cold-formed framing-proper size, gage, spacing Screw type, spacing, driven flush Cold-formed welding conforms (AWS D1.1 and D1.3) Other The above items were conforming Nonconforming Items (see below) Comments: GeoTest was on site as requested to inspect the items noted above. The items noted in this report were found to be in conformance with the project drawings. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amwahousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. LATERAL FRAMING INSPECTION REPORT PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street NE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: LF012 PERMIT #: BLD-2018 DATE: 9/9/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 1 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Tim Martin Item(s) Inspected Location Roof Sheathing Line A to H/16 to 18 & E.5 to H/11 to 16 Shear Wall Framing and Interior SW Sheathing Level 1: Line A to D/10 to 18 Reference Drawings: Structural Drawings Items Inspected Comments Lumber grade, species, size Structural panel grade and thickness, glue Rated Sheathing, 15/32"", Exp.1 Shear wall/diaphragm length, location Per Plan at the Above Locations Panel edges bear on framing members Where Required Diaphragm chord, drag strut, braces and related Connection of blocking to wall top plates Gypsum board with wood framing conforms 3" nom. framing in place, nails staggered where shown Yes and Yes Foundation plates or sills on concrete are treated Yes Base-plate bolting complies Nail diameter, length, number of lines, spacing .148 X 2-1/4", Per Plan Pneumatic or mechanically driven fasteners conform Nail heads driven flush Satisfactory Hold down, type, location Floor to Floor Straps Per HD Schedule Lag bolts/proper hole size Cold-formed framing-proper size, gage, spacing Screw type, spacing, driven flush Cold-formed welding conforms (AWS D1.1 and D1.3) Other The above items were conforming Nonconforming Items (see below) Comments: Geotest was on site as requested to inspect the items above. Items were found to be in conformance with the project drawings. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amwahousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. LATERAL FRAMING INSPECTION REPORT PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street NE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: LF013 PERMIT #: BLD-2018 DATE: 9/13/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 1 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Tim Martin Item(s) Inspected Location Interior Framing of Perimeter Shear Walls Level 2: Line E.5 and H/10 to 18 HD Straps at Interior SW6 Shear Walls Level 2: Line E.5 to H/10 to 18 Reference Drawings: Structural Drawings Items Inspected Comments Lumber grade, species, size Structural panel grade and thickness, glue Rated Sheathing, 5/8", Exp.1 Shear wall/diaphragm length, location Panel edges bear on framing members SW’s are Fully Blocked Diaphragm chord, drag strut, braces and related Connection of blocking to wall top plates Sheathing Ran Past Top Plate & Was Fastened to Rim & Top Plate Gypsum board with wood framing conforms 3" nom. framing in place, nails staggered where shown Yes and See Comments Foundation plates or sills on concrete are treated Base-plate bolting complies Nail diameter, length, number of lines, spacing Per Framing Notes and SW Schedule Pneumatic or mechanically driven fasteners conform Nail heads driven flush Hold down, type, location Floor to Floor Straps Per HD Schedule Lag bolts/proper hole size Cold-formed framing-proper size, gage, spacing Screw type, spacing, driven flush Cold-formed welding conforms (AWS D1.1 and D1.3) Other The above items were conforming Nonconforming Items (see below) Comments: GeoTest was on site as requested to inspect the framing of the perimeter shear walls at the above- mentioned locations. The above items were found to be in conformance with the project drawings. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amwahousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. LATERAL FRAMING INSPECTION REPORT PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street NE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: LF014 PERMIT #: BLD-2018 DATE: 9/17/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 1 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Tim Martin Item(s) Inspected Location Perimeter Shear Wall Framing Level 2, East Half of Building Reference Drawings: Structural Drawings Items Inspected Comments Lumber grade, species, size D-Fir #2, LVL Structural panel grade and thickness, glue Shear wall/diaphragm length, location Per Plan Panel edges bear on framing members SW’s are Fully Blocked Diaphragm chord, drag strut, braces and related Connection of blocking to wall top plates Clips are in Per SW Schedule Gypsum board with wood framing conforms 3" nom. framing in place, nails staggered where shown Yes and Yes Foundation plates or sills on concrete are treated Yes Base-plate bolting complies In Progress (Re-Inspect After Trades) Nail diameter, length, number of lines, spacing Per Notes & SW Schedule Pneumatic or mechanically driven fasteners conform Nail heads driven flush Satisfactory Hold down, type, location Straps Were in Per RFI #26 and Plans Lag bolts/proper hole size Cold-formed framing-proper size, gage, spacing Screw type, spacing, driven flush Cold-formed welding conforms (AWS D1.1 and D1.3) Other The above items were conforming Nonconforming Items (see below) Comments: GeoTest was on site as requested to inspect the framing of the perimeter shear walls. A list of items which will need to be addressed was left with the contractor. GeoTest will follow-up on these items during our next visit. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amwahousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. LATERAL FRAMING INSPECTION REPORT PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street NE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: LF015 PERMIT #: BLD-2018 DATE: 9/20/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 1 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Tim Martin Item(s) Inspected Location Roof Sheathing Line 12 to16/B to D Reference Drawings: Structural Drawings Items Inspected Comments Lumber grade, species, size Structural panel grade and thickness, glue Rated Sheathing, 15/32",Exp.1 Shear wall/diaphragm length, location Per Plan at Above Locations Panel edges bear on framing members Where Required Diaphragm chord, drag strut, braces and related Connection of blocking to wall top plates Gypsum board with wood framing conforms 3" nom. framing in place, nails staggered where shown Foundation plates or sills on concrete are treated Base-plate bolting complies Nail diameter, length, number of lines, spacing .148, 2-1/4", 6 and 10" On Center Pneumatic or mechanically driven fasteners conform Nail heads driven flush Satisfactory Hold down, type, location Lag bolts/proper hole size Cold-formed framing-proper size, gage, spacing Screw type, spacing, driven flush Cold-formed welding conforms (AWS D1.1 and D1.3) Other The above items were conforming Nonconforming Items (see below) Comments: GeoTest was on site as requested to inspect the items listed above. At the locations mentioned, the items were found to conform to the project structural drawings. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amwahousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. LATERAL FRAMING INSPECTION REPORT PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street NE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: LF016 PERMIT #: BLD-2018 DATE: 9/26/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 1 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Tim Martin Item(s) Inspected Location Roof Sheathing Line B to D/9 to 18 Reference Drawings: Structural Drawings Items Inspected Comments Lumber grade, species, size Structural panel grade and thickness, glue Rated Sheathing, 15/32", Exp.1 Shear wall/diaphragm length, location Per Plan at Above Locations Panel edges bear on framing members Where Required Diaphragm chord, drag strut, braces and related Connection of blocking to wall top plates Gypsum board with wood framing conforms 3" nom. framing in place, nails staggered where shown Foundation plates or sills on concrete are treated Base-plate bolting complies Nail diameter, length, number of lines, spacing .148 X 2-1/2", 6 & 12" Pneumatic or mechanically driven fasteners conform Nail heads driven flush Satisfactory Hold down, type, location Lag bolts/proper hole size Cold-formed framing-proper size, gage, spacing Screw type, spacing, driven flush Cold-formed welding conforms (AWS D1.1 and D1.3) Other The above items were conforming Nonconforming Items (see below) Comments: GeoTest was on site to inspect the above items. The roof sheathing was found to be in conformance with the project structural drawings. All items found were addressed prior to our leaving the site. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amwahousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. LATERAL FRAMING INSPECTION REPORT PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street NE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: LF017 PERMIT #: BLD-2018 DATE: 9/27/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 1 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Tim Martin Item(s) Inspected Location SW4 Shear Wall Framing Level 3, Line A to H/10 to 18 (Perimeter Walls) Floor to Floor Holdown Straps Levels 2 to 3 & 3 to 4, Line A to H/10 to 18 Reference Drawings: Structural Drawings Items Inspected Comments Lumber grade, species, size Per Plan Structural panel grade and thickness, glue Shear wall/diaphragm length, location As Detailed Panel edges bear on framing members SW Sheathing Fully Blocked Diaphragm chord, drag strut, braces and related Connection of blocking to wall top plates Sheathing Lapped at Rim Gypsum board with wood framing conforms 3" nom. framing in place, nails staggered where shown Yes & Yes Foundation plates or sills on concrete are treated Base-plate bolting complies Nail diameter, length, number of lines, spacing .148" X 2-1/4", 4 & 12" Pneumatic or mechanically driven fasteners conform Nail heads driven flush Satisfactory Hold down, type, location Floor to Floor MST Straps Per Plan Lag bolts/proper hole size Cold-formed framing-proper size, gage, spacing Screw type, spacing, driven flush Cold-formed welding conforms (AWS D1.1 and D1.3) Other The above items were conforming Nonconforming Items (see below) Comments: GeoTest was on site as requested to inspect the above items. The above items were found to conform to the project drawings. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amwahousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. LATERAL FRAMING INSPECTION REPORT PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street NE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: LF018 PERMIT #: BLD-2018 DATE: 10/4/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 1 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Tim Martin Item(s) Inspected Location Roof Diaphragm: Sheathing and Fasteners Line A to J/ 1 to 5 and A to D/ 5 to 9 Reference Drawings: Structural Drawings Items Inspected Comments Lumber grade, species, size Structural panel grade and thickness, glue Rated Sheathing, 15/32", Exp.1 Shear wall/diaphragm length, location Per Plan at the Above Locations Panel edges bear on framing members Where Required Diaphragm chord, drag strut, braces and related Connection of blocking to wall top plates Gypsum board with wood framing conforms 3" nom. framing in place, nails staggered where shown Foundation plates or sills on concrete are treated Base-plate bolting complies Nail diameter, length, number of lines, spacing .148 x 2-1/2", 6 and 12" Pneumatic or mechanically driven fasteners conform Nail heads driven flush Satisfactory Hold down, type, location Lag bolts/proper hole size Cold-formed framing-proper size, gage, spacing Screw type, spacing, driven flush Cold-formed welding conforms (AWS D1.1 and D1.3) Other The above items were conforming Nonconforming Items (see below) Comments: GeoTest was on site as requested to inspect the roof sheathing and fasteners at the locations mentioned above, At the locations mentioned on this report the sheathing was in conformance. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amwahousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. LATERAL FRAMING INSPECTION REPORT PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street NE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: LF019 PERMIT #: BLD-2018 DATE: 10/7/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 2 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Tim Martin Item(s) Inspected Location Exterior Shear Wall Sheathing Level 1, 2 and 3 at Line 1 to 9 Reference Drawings: Structural Drawings Items Inspected Comments Lumber grade, species, size Structural panel grade and thickness, glue APA Rated Sheathing, 15/32", Exp.1 Shear wall/diaphragm length, location Per Plan at Above Shear Walls Panel edges bear on framing members Yes, SW’s Were Fully Blocked Diaphragm chord, drag strut, braces and related Connection of blocking to wall top plates Gypsum board with wood framing conforms 3" nom. framing in place, nails staggered where shown Foundation plates or sills on concrete are treated Base-plate bolting complies Nail diameter, length, number of lines, spacing Per SW Schedule, See Comments Pneumatic or mechanically driven fasteners conform Nail heads driven flush Satisfactory Hold down, type, location One MST Floor to Floor Strap Was Not In. 2nd to 3rd Floor Straps Not Inspected Lag bolts/proper hole size Cold-formed framing-proper size, gage, spacing Screw type, spacing, driven flush Cold-formed welding conforms (AWS D1.1 and D1.3) Other The above items were conforming Nonconforming Items (see below) Comments: GeoTest was on site as requested to inspect the above items. See the following page for additional comments. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amwahousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. LATERAL FRAMING INSPECTION REPORT PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: LF019 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 2 of 2 Except for the items listed below the wall sheathing was in conformance with the project's structural drawings. Some locations were missing nails and one floor to floor (level one to level two) strap had not been installed. All locations were marked and the contractor was informed of these items. We are scheduled to conduct a reinspection on Friday. LATERAL FRAMING INSPECTION REPORT PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street NE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: LF019 PERMIT #: BLD-2018 DATE: 10/7/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 2 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Tim Martin Item(s) Inspected Location Exterior Shear Wall Sheathing Level 1, 2 and 3 at Line 1 to 9 Reference Drawings: Structural Drawings Items Inspected Comments Lumber grade, species, size Structural panel grade and thickness, glue APA Rated Sheathing, 15/32", Exp.1 Shear wall/diaphragm length, location Per Plan at Above Shear Walls Panel edges bear on framing members Yes, SW Fully Blocked Diaphragm chord, drag strut, braces and related Connection of blocking to wall top plates Gypsum board with wood framing conforms 3" nom. framing in place, nails staggered where shown Foundation plates or sills on concrete are treated Base-plate bolting complies Nail diameter, length, number of lines, spacing Per SW Schedule, See Comments Pneumatic or mechanically driven fasteners conform Nail heads driven flush Satisfactory Hold down, type, location MST Floor to Floor Strap not in, 2nd to 3rd Floor Straps not Inspected Lag bolts/proper hole size Cold-formed framing-proper size, gage, spacing Screw type, spacing, driven flush Cold-formed welding conforms (AWS D1.1 and D1.3) Other The above items were conforming Nonconforming Items (see below) Comments: See comments on page 2. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amwahousing.com, tphillips@safebuilt.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. LATERAL FRAMING INSPECTION REPORT PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: LF019 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 2 of 2 Amended 10/31/19: Please see GeoTest’s Lateral Framing Inspection Report LF024, dated 10/28/19 for passing re-inspection results. GeoTest was on site as requested to inspect the above items. Except for the items listed below the wall, sheathing was in conformance with the project structural drawings. Some locations were missing nails and one floor to floor (level one to level two) strap had not been installed. All locations were marked and the contractor was informed of these items. LATERAL FRAMING INSPECTION REPORT PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street NE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: LF020 PERMIT #: BLD-2018 DATE: 10/11/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 1 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Tim Martin Item(s) Inspected Location Roof Sheathing Line E to H/4 to 7.3 Exterior Shear Wall Sheathing Level 1, 2 and 3, Courtyard Side Line 3 to 7.3/C.7 to F Hold Down Floor to Floor Straps Level One to Two, Location is the Same as Above Reference Drawings: SW Schedule Items Inspected Comments Lumber grade, species, size Structural panel grade and thickness, glue APA Rated Sheathing, 15/32", Exp.1 Shear wall/diaphragm length, location Per Plan at Above Shear Walls and Diaphragm Section Panel edges bear on framing members SW Fully Blocked Diaphragm chord, drag strut, braces and related Connection of blocking to wall top plates Gypsum board with wood framing conforms 3" nom. framing in place, nails staggered where shown Yes and Yes Foundation plates or sills on concrete are treated Base-plate bolting complies Nail diameter, length, number of lines, spacing .148" X 2-1/4", 2 and 12" (6 and 12" at Roof) Pneumatic or mechanically driven fasteners conform Nail heads driven flush Satisfactory Hold down, type, location Lag bolts/proper hole size Cold-formed framing-proper size, gage, spacing Screw type, spacing, driven flush Cold-formed welding conforms (AWS D1.1 and D1.3) Other The above items were conforming Nonconforming Items (see below) Comments: GeoTest was on site as requested to inspect the above items. The roof sheathing and HD straps were in conformance. Items found non-conforming at the Shearwalls were marked and were in-progress; a reinspection is required. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amwahousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. LATERAL FRAMING INSPECTION REPORT PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street NE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: LF020 PERMIT #: BLD-2018 DATE: 10/11/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 2 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Tim Martin Item(s) Inspected Location Roof Sheathing Line E to H/4 to 7.3 Exterior Shear Wall Sheathing Level 1, 2 and 3, Courtyard Side Line 3 to 7.3/C.7 to F Hold Down Floor to Floor Straps Level One to Two, Location is Same as Above Reference Drawings: SW Schedule Items Inspected Comments Lumber grade, species, size Structural panel grade and thickness, glue APA Rated Sheathing, 15/32", Exp.1 Shear wall/diaphragm length, location Per Plan at Above Shear Walls and Diaphragm Section Panel edges bear on framing members SW Fully Blocked Diaphragm chord, drag strut, braces and related Connection of blocking to wall top plates Gypsum board with wood framing conforms 3" nom. framing in place, nails staggered where shown Yes and Yes Foundation plates or sills on concrete are treated Base-plate bolting complies Nail diameter, length, number of lines, spacing .148" X 2-1/4", 2 and 12" (6 and 12" at Roof) Pneumatic or mechanically driven fasteners conform Nail heads driven flush Satisfactory Hold down, type, location Lag bolts/proper hole size Cold-formed framing-proper size, gage, spacing Screw type, spacing, driven flush Cold-formed welding conforms (AWS D1.1 and D1.3) Other The above items were conforming Nonconforming Items (see below) Comments: See comments on page 2. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amwahousing.com, tphillips@safebuilt.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. LATERAL FRAMING INSPECTION REPORT PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: LF020 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 2 of 2 Amended 10/31/19: Please see GeoTest’s Lateral Framing Inspection Report LF024, dated 10/28/19 for passing re-inspection results. GeoTest was on site as requested to inspect the above items. The roof sheathing and HD straps were in conformance. Items found non-conforming at the Shearwalls were marked and were in-progress; a reinspection is required. LATERAL FRAMING INSPECTION REPORT PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street NE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: LF021 PERMIT #: BLD-2018 DATE: 10/14/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 1 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Tim Martin Item(s) Inspected Location Roof Sheathing Line E to F/6 to 8 Reference Drawings: Structural Drawings Items Inspected Comments Lumber grade, species, size Structural panel grade and thickness, glue APA Rated Sheathing, 15/32", Exp.1 Shear wall/diaphragm length, location Panel edges bear on framing members Where Required Diaphragm chord, drag strut, braces and related Connection of blocking to wall top plates Gypsum board with wood framing conforms 3" nom. framing in place, nails staggered where shown Foundation plates or sills on concrete are treated Base-plate bolting complies Nail diameter, length, number of lines, spacing .148, 2-1/4", 6 and 12" Pneumatic or mechanically driven fasteners conform Nail heads driven flush Hold down, type, location Lag bolts/proper hole size Cold-formed framing-proper size, gage, spacing Screw type, spacing, driven flush Cold-formed welding conforms (AWS D1.1 and D1.3) Other The above items were conforming Nonconforming Items (see below) Comments: GeoTest was on site as requested to inspect the items mentioned above. The roof sheathing at the above location was in conformance with the project drawings. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amwahousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. LATERAL FRAMING INSPECTION REPORT PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street NE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: LF022 PERMIT #: BLD-2018 DATE: 10/16/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 1 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Tim Martin Item(s) Inspected Location Roof Sheathing Line 7 to 9/C to E Shear Wall Sheathing Level 1, 2 & 3, West Courtyard Walls Reference Drawings: Structural Drawings Items Inspected Comments Lumber grade, species, size Structural panel grade and thickness, glue APA Rated Sheathing, 15/32", Exp.1 Shear wall/diaphragm length, location Panel edges bear on framing members SW’s Were Fully Blocked Diaphragm chord, drag strut, braces and related Connection of blocking to wall top plates Gypsum board with wood framing conforms 3" nom. framing in place, nails staggered where shown Foundation plates or sills on concrete are treated Base-plate bolting complies Nail diameter, length, number of lines, spacing .148" X 2-1/4" Pneumatic or mechanically driven fasteners conform Nail heads driven flush Satisfactory Hold down, type, location Lag bolts/proper hole size Cold-formed framing-proper size, gage, spacing Screw type, spacing, driven flush Cold-formed welding conforms (AWS D1.1 and D1.3) Other The above items were conforming Nonconforming Items (see below) Comments: GeoTest was on site as requested to inspect the above items. The locations where items will need to be addressed were marked at the SW’s. A follow-up inspection is required. Roof sheathing was per plan. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amwahousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. LATERAL FRAMING INSPECTION REPORT PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street NE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: LF022 PERMIT #: BLD-2018 DATE: 10/16/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 2 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Tim Martin Item(s) Inspected Location Roof Sheathing Line 7 to 9/C to E Shear Wall Sheathing Level 1, 2 & 3, West Courtyard Walls Reference Drawings: Structural Drawings Items Inspected Comments Lumber grade, species, size Structural panel grade and thickness, glue APA Rated Sheathing, 15/32", Exp.1 Shear wall/diaphragm length, location Panel edges bear on framing members SW’s Were Fully Blocked Diaphragm chord, drag strut, braces and related Connection of blocking to wall top plates Gypsum board with wood framing conforms 3" nom. framing in place, nails staggered where shown Foundation plates or sills on concrete are treated Base-plate bolting complies Nail diameter, length, number of lines, spacing .148" X 2-1/4" Pneumatic or mechanically driven fasteners conform Nail heads driven flush Satisfactory Hold down, type, location Lag bolts/proper hole size Cold-formed framing-proper size, gage, spacing Screw type, spacing, driven flush Cold-formed welding conforms (AWS D1.1 and D1.3) Other The above items were conforming Nonconforming Items (see below) Comments: See comments on page 2. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amwahousing.com, tphillips@safebuilt.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. LATERAL FRAMING INSPECTION REPORT PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: LF022 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 2 of 2 Amended 10/31/19: Please see GeoTest’s Lateral Framing Inspection Report LF024, dated 10/28/19 for passing re-inspection results. GeoTest was on site as requested to inspect the above items. The locations where items will need to be addressed were marked at the SW. A follow-up inspection is required. Roof sheathing was per plan. LATERAL FRAMING INSPECTION REPORT PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street NE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: LF023 PERMIT #: BLD-2018 DATE: 10/21/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 2 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Tim Martin Item(s) Inspected Location Shear Wall Sheathing and Holdown Straps Level 1, Line 1 to 9 (1st Floor Interior SWs West of Line 9) Reference Drawings: Structural Drawings, RFI #6 Items Inspected Comments Lumber grade, species, size LVL, D-Fir Structural panel grade and thickness, glue APA Rated Sheathing, 15/32", Exp.1 Shear wall/diaphragm length, location Per Plan at Aboue Shear Walls Panel edges bear on framing members Yes, SW Fully Blocked Diaphragm chord, drag strut, braces and related Connection of blocking to wall top plates Gypsum board with wood framing conforms 3" nom. framing in place, nails staggered where shown Yes Foundation plates or sills on concrete are treated Base-plate bolting complies Nail diameter, length, number of lines, spacing .148" X 2-1/4", 3, 4 or 6" & 12" Pneumatic or mechanically driven fasteners conform Nail heads driven flush Satisfactory Hold down, type, location Floor to Floor Straping at Party Walls Per Plan Lag bolts/proper hole size Cold-formed framing-proper size, gage, spacing Screw type, spacing, driven flush Cold-formed welding conforms (AWS D1.1 and D1.3) Other The above items were conforming Nonconforming Items (see below) Comments: GeoTest was on site as requested to inspect the items listed above. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amwahousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. LATERAL FRAMING INSPECTION REPORT PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: LF023 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 2 of 2 The photo shows one of the tall walls. The contractor constructed all walls over ten feet in height from 1-3/4" LVL studs spaced at 16" on center (per framing notes). This was an in-progress inspection, areas that will need to be addressed by the contractor were marked with pink paint and a follow-up inspection will be needed. LATERAL FRAMING INSPECTION REPORT PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street NE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: LF024 PERMIT #: BLD-2018 DATE: 10/28/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 3 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Tim Martin Item(s) Inspected Location Reinspection of Shear Sheathing & Straps Levels 1, 2 & 3, West of Line 9, SW Facing the Courtyard Reinspection of Shear Sheathing & Straps Level 1, Line 1 to 9, Common Area, Party & Corridor Walls Re-inspection of Items Listed as NC on Previous Reports See Prior Reports for Locations Reference Drawings: Structural Drawings Items Inspected Comments Lumber grade, species, size Structural panel grade and thickness, glue Rated Sheathing, 15/31", Exp.1 Shear wall/diaphragm length, location Per Plan at the Above Locations Panel edges bear on framing members Fully Blocked Diaphragm chord, drag strut, braces and related Connection of blocking to wall top plates Sheathing Ran Past Top Plate & Was Fastened to Rim & Top Plate Gypsum board with wood framing conforms 3" nom. framing in place, nails staggered where shown Yes and Yes Foundation plates or sills on concrete are treated Sill Plates Were Treated Base-plate bolting complies Per SW Schedule Nail diameter, length, number of lines, spacing .148 X 2-1/4", Per Plan Pneumatic or mechanically driven fasteners conform Nail heads driven flush Satisfactory at Above Locations Hold down, type, location Per Plan Lag bolts/proper hole size Cold-formed framing-proper size, gage, spacing Screw type, spacing, driven flush Cold-formed welding conforms (AWS D1.1 and D1.3) Other The above items were conforming Nonconforming Items (see below) Comments: GeoTest was on site as requested to inspect the items listed above. The contractor has corrected all items found during GeoTest’s previous inspections. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amwahousing.com, tphillips@safebuilt.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. LATERAL FRAMING INSPECTION REPORT PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: LF024 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 2 of 3 The photo shows a steel column in the middle of a shear wall. The contractor will add blocking and a horizontal strap to each side of this wall just below the wide flange beam. One of the many third floor locations where the edge nailing was spaced too far apart. The contractor has corrected these locations and the nailing is now per the shear wall schedule on sheet S3.1. See the following page for prior reports with non-conformances that have been addressed. LATERAL FRAMING INSPECTION REPORT PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: LF024 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 3 of 3 The following reports were marked as having non-conformances. These items have been reinspected, corrected and are now in conformance with the project structural drawings. LF005 (Dated 8/14/19), LF006 (Dated 8/16/19), LF007 (Dated 8/20/19), LF009 (Dated 8/27/19), LF010 (Dated 8/30/19), LF019 (Dated 10/7/19), LF020 (Dated 10/11/19) and LF022 (Dated 10/16/19) LATERAL FRAMING INSPECTION REPORT PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street NE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: LF025 PERMIT #: BLD-2018 DATE: 11/7/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 1 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Tim Martin Item(s) Inspected Location Final Framing of Shear Walls Level 1, Line E to J/1 to 11 Reference Drawings: Structural Drawings Items Inspected Comments Lumber grade, species, size D.Fir #2, (LSL Framing at Tall Walls) Structural panel grade and thickness, glue Rated Sheathing, 15/32", Exp.1 Shear wall/diaphragm length, location Per Plan at the Above Locations Panel edges bear on framing members SW’s are Fully Blocked Diaphragm chord, drag strut, braces and related Connection of blocking to wall top plates Sheathing Ran Past Top Plate & Was Fastened to Rim & Top Plate or A35’s Gypsum board with wood framing conforms 3" nom. framing in place, nails staggered where shown Per Plan at Above Locations Foundation plates or sills on concrete are treated Yes Base-plate bolting complies See Comments Nail diameter, length, number of lines, spacing Per Framing Notes and SW Schedule Pneumatic or mechanically driven fasteners conform Nail heads driven flush Satisfactory at Above Locations Hold down, type, location See Comments Lag bolts/proper hole size Cold-formed framing-proper size, gage, spacing Screw type, spacing, driven flush Cold-formed welding conforms (AWS D1.1 and D1.3) Other The above items were conforming Nonconforming Items (see below) Comments: GeoTest was on site as requested to conduct a final inspection of the shear wall framing at the above locations. Items that will need to be addressed were added to a punch list. GeoTest will reinspect items prior to cover as not all elements were in conformance. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amwahousing.com, tphillips@safebuilt.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. LATERAL FRAMING INSPECTION REPORT PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street NE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: LF026 PERMIT #: BLD-2018 DATE: 11/8/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 1 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Tim Martin Item(s) Inspected Location Final Framing of Shear Walls Level 1, Line A to E/1 to 11 Reference Drawings: SW Schedule Items Inspected Comments Lumber grade, species, size D-Fir, LSL Structural panel grade and thickness, glue Rated Sheathing, 15/32", Exp.1 Shear wall/diaphragm length, location Per Plan at the Above Locations Panel edges bear on framing members Fully Blocked Diaphragm chord, drag strut, braces and related Connection of blocking to wall top plates Sheathing Ran Past TP & Was Fastened to Rim & TP or A35’s Per Plan Gypsum board with wood framing conforms 3" nom. framing in place, nails staggered where shown Per Plan at Above Locations Foundation plates or sills on concrete are treated Sill Plates Were Treated Base-plate bolting complies See Comments Nail diameter, length, number of lines, spacing Per Framing Notes and SW Schedule Pneumatic or mechanically driven fasteners conform Nail heads driven flush Satisfactory at Above Locations Hold down, type, location See Comments Lag bolts/proper hole size Cold-formed framing-proper size, gage, spacing Screw type, spacing, driven flush Cold-formed welding conforms (AWS D1.1 and D1.3) Other The above items were conforming Nonconforming Items (see below) Comments: GeoTest was on site as requested to conduct a final inspection of the shear wall framing at the above-mentioned locations. Items needing addressing were added to the punch list GeoTest will reinspect prior to cover as not all elements were in conformance. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amwahousing.com, tphillips@safebuilt.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. 741 Marine Drive, Bellingham, WA 98225 www.geotest-inc.com 20611 67th Ave. NE. Unit A. Arlington, WA 98223 phone: (360) 733.7318 toll free: (888) 251.5276 fax: (360) 733.7418 MASONRY INSPECTION REPORT PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street SE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: MI001 PERMIT #: BLD-2018 DATE: 2/20/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 1 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Dan Weaver Item(s) Inspected Location Elevation 8" CMU Walls Site Wall at South Side of Site 200’ Long 0’-4’ Reference Drawings: Detail #5 on C5.2 Items Inspected Comments Weather Conditions Clear 39 Material Conditions Dry & Covered Reinforcement Per Plan Grout Space Mortar Fins Were Removed Grouting Procedures 9 Cubic Yards Placed Mechanical Consolidation Internally Vibrated Test Specimens Periodic Inspection Continuous Inspection The above items were conforming Nonconforming Items (see below) Comments: GeoTest was on site to perform special inspection for the above site masonry walls. All walls were grouted solid via line pump and were internally vibrated. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amcalhousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. Geotest will not be responsible for layout of embeds and/or structure dimensions and locations. 741 Marine Drive, Bellingham, WA 98225 www.geotest-inc.com 20611 67th Ave. NE. Unit A. Arlington, WA 98223 phone: (360) 733.7318 toll free: (888) 251.5276 fax: (360) 733.7418 MASONRY INSPECTION REPORT PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street SE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: MI002 PERMIT #: BLD.2018 DATE: 2/21/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 2 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Tim Martin Item(s) Inspected Location Elevation 8" CMU Site (Screen) Wall: Grout & Reinforcing Steel Project South Side 0 to 4’ Reference Drawings: 5 on C5.2 Items Inspected Comments Weather Conditions Overcast, 44 Degrees Material Conditions Satisfactory Reinforcement Per C5.2 Grout Space Satisfactory Grouting Procedures 11.5 Yards of Mix #PG70030, Ticket #159794 Mechanical Consolidation Yes Test Specimens None Taken Periodic Inspection Continuous Inspection The above items were conforming Nonconforming Items (see below) Comments: GeoTest was on site as requested to inspect the above items. All cells were fully grouted. Wall reinforcement conformed to the project drawings. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amcalhousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. Geotest will not be responsible for layout of embeds and/or structure dimensions and locations. 741 Marine Drive, Bellingham, WA 98225 www.geotest-inc.com 20611 67th Ave. NE. Unit A. Arlington, WA 98223 phone: (360) 733.7318 toll free: (888) 251.5276 fax: (360) 733.7418 MASONRY INSPECTION REPORT PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: MI002 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 2 of 2 Photo shows the contractor placing and consolidating the grout at the west end of the south site wall. 741 Marine Drive, Bellingham, WA 98225 www.geotest-inc.com 20611 67th Ave. NE. Unit A. Arlington, WA 98223 phone: (360) 733.7318 toll free: (888) 251.5276 fax: (360) 733.7418 Soil Observation Report PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street SE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: SO005 PERMIT #: BLDG-2018 DATE: 1/8/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 2 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Tristan Coragiulo OBSERVATION OF: Native CMU Wall Footing Subgrade CMU - Concrete Masonry Unit GeoTest was on-site as requested to provide inspection and observation of over-excavation into native subgrade meant for a CMU wall footing (Figure 1). These 12 to 16-inch over-excavations occurred on the southern half of the eastern portion of the perimeter of the site. Exposed subgrade consisted of tan, orange, and weathered silty sands with some exposed tree roots. GeoTest probed these areas with a 3/8 inch T-probe and reached between 4 to 6 inches of penetration. A proof roll using a large single drum vibratory roller was then observed at the request of the contractor (Figure 2). The proof roll did not exhibit signs of significant yielding. However, it should be noted that this proof roll does not guarantee that these silt-bearing soils are not moisture sensitive. GeoTest will return for further inspection and observation as requested. Figure 1. 12 to 18 inches of over-excavation along the southern half of the eastern side of the site perimeter (looking south). COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amcalhousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. GeoTest's representatives are on-site to observe, test and provide recommendations. The Contractor retains sole responsibility for the methods, operations and sequences of construction, including obtaining approval from the design authority and owner prior to proceeding with any change in the work scope and/or any associated costs. 741 Marine Drive, Bellingham, WA 98225 www.geotest-inc.com 20611 67th Ave. NE. Unit A. Arlington, WA 98223 phone: (360) 733.7318 toll free: (888) 251.5276 fax: (360) 733.7418 Soil Observation Report PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: SO005 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 2 of 2 Figure 2. The observed proof roll over native oxidized silty sands in which significant yielding was not observed (looking northeast). 741 Marine Drive, Bellingham, WA 98225 www.geotest-inc.com 20611 67th Ave. NE. Unit A. Arlington, WA 98223 phone: (360) 733.7318 toll free: (888) 251.5276 fax: (360) 733.7418 Soil Observation Report PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street SE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: SO006 PERMIT #: DATE: 1/11/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 1 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Lynni Bennett OBSERVATION OF: South Perimeter CMU Wall Subgrade GeoTest arrived onsite as requested at the above-referenced location. Subgrade, as prepared, had been stripped of all soft/loose organic or otherwise unsuitable material down to firm and unyielding native tan brown silty sand. Using standard stainless steel pointed T Probe 1 - 2 inches of penetration was experienced with a few localized areas experiencing a maximum of three inches of penetration. It is GeoTest’s opinion that the subgrade is suitably prepared for the planned CMU wall. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amcalhousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. GeoTest's representatives are on-site to observe, test and provide recommendations. The Contractor retains sole responsibility for the methods, operations and sequences of construction, including obtaining approval from the design authority and owner prior to proceeding with any change in the work scope and/or any associated costs. 741 Marine Drive, Bellingham, WA 98225 www.geotest-inc.com 20611 67th Ave. NE. Unit A. Arlington, WA 98223 phone: (360) 733.7318 toll free: (888) 251.5276 fax: (360) 733.7418 Soil Observation Report PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street SE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: SO007 PERMIT #: DATE: 1/30/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 1 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Brandon Defibaugh OBSERVATION OF: Perimeter Footing Subgrade (East half of building) Comments: GeoTest was on site as requested to observe subgrade conditions at the above location. The area observed today was the East half of the building perimeter footings. Soils observed overall were the imported structural fill used throughout the site (poorly graded sand with gravel). The subgrade was inspected using a 1/4 inch pointed steel rod under full body weight, with refusal generally encountered at 1-2 inches. Based on these observations, the native subgrade appears to be in a firm and unyielding condition and suitable for continued construction. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amcalhousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. GeoTest's representatives are on-site to observe, test and provide recommendations. The Contractor retains sole responsibility for the methods, operations and sequences of construction, including obtaining approval from the design authority and owner prior to proceeding with any change in the work scope and/or any associated costs. STRUCTURAL STEEL INSPECTION REPORT PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street NE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: SS001 PERMIT #: BLD-2018 DATE: 5/13/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 1 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Dan Weaver Type of Inspection: Visual Welding at the Fabricator Item(s) Inspected Location 1/4" & 5/16" Fillet Welds on Wide Flange Beams Mark #2AC, 2AD, 2B, 2D, 2H, 2V & 2AA CJP, 1/4" 5/16" Welds on Tube Steel Columns Mark #1V, 1V, 1V, 1V, 1T, 1AA, 1X, 1Z, 1S, 1H, 1P, 1P, 1S, 1S, 1S, 1S CJP, 1/4" 5/16" Welds on Tube Steel Columns Mark #1A, 1A, 1A, 1A, 1K, 1M, 1AA, 1AC, 1AB, 1AC, 1AB, 1A, 1A & 1G Reference Drawing(s): Approved Structural Drawings And Shop Drawing Reference Welders Comments Inspection Code Certification Welders Name/Cert. No. AWS D1.1 IBC WABO Herman B Yazzie #W20915 Expires 1-2020 AWS D1.3 AISC 360, N AWS-SMAW AWS D1.4 AISC 341, J AWS-FCAW AWS D1.8 AWS-GMAW Procedures Reference Type Verification Method Comments Inspection Code IBC ASTM A307 Turn-of-Nut AISC 360, N ASTM A325 Cal. Torque Wrench ASTM A490 Snug-Tight DTI Other Twist-Off The above items were conforming Nonconforming Items (see below) Comments: GeoTest was on site at the fabricator Westweld to perform visual weld special inspection at the above location. The single pass fillet and complete joint penetration groove welds were visually found to conform with the approved plans and table 6.1 of the AWS D1.1. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amwahousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. (05-17-19) STRUCTURAL STEEL INSPECTION REPORT PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street NE, Arlington, WA REPORT #: SS002 PERMIT #: BLD-2018 DATE: 7/19/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 2 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. INSPECTOR: Tim Martin Type of Inspection: Visual Field Welding Item(s) Inspected Location (3) Shear Tabs (Bolt Clips) Fillet Welded to WF Beam Lines 8 and 9 2nd Level (2) GLB Buckets Fillet Welds Lines 8.2 and 7.8 2nd Level Reference Drawing(s): S7.1 Reference Welders Comments Inspection Code Certification Welders Name/Cert. No. AWS D1.1 IBC WABO WABO Certification Verified AWS D1.3 AISC 360, N AWS-SMAW AWS D1.4 AISC 341, J AWS-FCAW AWS D1.8 AWS-GMAW Procedures Reference Type Verification Method Comments Inspection Code IBC ASTM A307 Turn-of-Nut AISC 360, N ASTM A325 Cal. Torque Wrench ASTM A490 Snug-Tight DTI Other Twist-Off The above items were conforming Nonconforming Items (see below) Comments: GeoTest was on site to inspect the field welding at the locations mentioned above. The welds were found to be in conformance with the project structural drawings and were visually acceptable per table 6.1 of the AWS D1.1 code. COPIES: chumphrey@safebuilt.com, dspencer@safebuilt.com, jaredu@cgengineering.com, jblegen@amwahousing.com, Reviewed by kolander@arlingtonwa.gov, lpeterson@arlingtonwa.gov, mburford@AmcalHousing.com, mhayes@arlingtonwa.gov, rbergquist@amwahousing.com This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. (08-08-19) STRUCTURAL STEEL INSPECTION REPORT PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. REPORT #: SS002 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 2 of 2 GLB Bucket Bolt clip fillet welded on both sides to the bottom of the beams top flange and to the beam web. 741 Marine Drive, Bellingham, WA 98225 www.geotest-inc.com 20527 67th Ave. NE, Arlington, WA 98223 phone: (360) 733.7318 toll free: (888) 251.5276 fax: (360) 733.7418 MAXIMUM SPECIFIC GRAVITY OF BITUMINOUS PAVING MIXTURES REPORT PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18-0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street NE REPORT #: AR001 PERMIT #: BLD-2018 DATE: 5/8/2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE #: 1 of 1 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. LAB #: 4438A/4439A HMA Type: ½” HMA HMA Source: Cadman – North Everett Sample Location: Sampled On-Site Test Date: 5/8/2019 Laboratory Test Data: Test Type Test Reference Test Result Maximum Specific Gravity @ 77° F ASTM D2041 2.549 (4438A) Maximum Density @ 77° F ASTM D2041 158.6 pcf (4438A) Maximum Specific Gravity @ 77° F ASTM D2041 2.508 (4439A) Maximum Density @ 77° F ASTM D2041 156.1 pcf (4439A) Type of Container: Vacuum Flask Sample Size: < 1832.1/1854.3 >g Number of Samples: 2 Comments: Two different samples were tested for the asphalt placed on this date: the first sample, 4438A, was sampled at the asphalt plant, while the second sample, 4439A, was obtained onsite. Copies: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. City of Arlington Safe Built Reviewed by This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. (2-15-11) The above test results relate only to the sample (or location) tested. SPECIAL INSPECTION SUMMARY PROJECT: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments JOB #: 18‐0900 ADDRESS: 3905 172nd Street NE, Arlington, WA 98223 DATE: 12‐20‐2019 CLIENT: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PERMIT #: BLD‐2018 CONTRACTOR: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. PAGE: 1 of 1 This letter summarizes our special inspection and testing efforts for the Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments project located in Arlington, Washington. GeoTest’s services took place from November 8, 2018 through December 13, 2019. Our testing and inspections included the following scope of work: TEST/INSPECTION ITEM REFERENCE Field Density‐Moisture Reports FD001 –  Earthwork FD019; Sieve Proctor Reports SP001 – SP005 and Soil Observation Reports SO001 – SO007 Concrete Break Reports CB001 – CB017 and  Reinforced Concrete Inspection Reports IR001 – IR011 Grout Break Report GB001 and Masonry  Structural Masonry Inspection Reports MI001 & MI002 Structural Steel inspection Reports SS001 &  Structural Steel SS002 and Ultra Sonic Testing Report UT001 Lateral Framing Inspection Reports LF001 –  Lateral Framing LF026 Adhesive Anchor Inspection Reports AA001 &  Proprietary Anchors AA002; Expansion Anchor Inspection Reports EA001 & EA002 All work requiring special inspection for the project to date has been completed. To the best of our knowledge the inspected work is in conformance with the approved project plans and specifications and the applicable workmanship provisions of the International Building Code. All related laboratory tests performed by GeoTest have met or exceeded the minimum test requirements. This is GeoTest’s final special inspection and testing submittal for the Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments project. If we can be of further assistance, please contact the undersigned. Copies: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. City of Arlington Safe Built Logan Senrud Technical Director This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc. Sieve Analysis Test Report - ASTM C136/C117 2 in. 1½ in. 1 in. ¾ in. ½ in. 3/8 in. #4 #10 #20 #30 #40 #60 #100 #140 #200 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 PERCENT FINER 30 20 10 0 10 1 0.1 GRAIN SIZE - mm. % Gravel % Sand % Fines % +3" Coarse Fine Coarse Medium Fine Silt 0 5 6 5 21 52 11 SIEVE PERCENT SPEC.* PASS? Material Description SIZE FINER PERCENT (X=NO) Zipper Geo report: Section 3.5.2 Re-Use of Site soils as 1-1/2" 100 Structural Fill 1" 97 poorly graded sand with silt 3/4" 95 Atterberg Limits 5/8" 94 PL= LL= PI= 1/2" 93 3/8" 92 Coefficients #4 89 D90= 5.8433 D85= 2.4747 D60= 0.3964 #10 84 D50= 0.3126 D30= 0.1962 D15= 0.1093 #20 78 D10= Cu= Cc= #40 63 Classification #60 40 USCS= AASHTO= #100 21 #200 11 Remarks Sample appeared free of organic material. * (no specification provided) Location: Native - Sampled site stockpile at the SE corner of site Sample Number: 4299A Date: 1-7-19 Client: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. Project: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments 3905 172nd Street SE, Arlington, WA 98233 This report may not be reproduced, except in full, without the prior written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc.Project No: 18-0900 Figure SP003 Tested By: AH/JP Checked By: BF Moisture-Density (Proctor) Test Report 120 10.0%, 118.6 pcf 118.5 117 Dry density, pcf 115.5 11.1%, 114.6 pcf 114 ZAV for Sp.G. = 2.45 112.5 6 7.5 9 10.5 12 13.5 15 Water content, % - Rock Corrected - Uncorrected Test specification: ASTM D 1557-12 Method A Modified ASTM D4718-15 Oversize Corr. Applied to Each Test Point Elev/ Classification Nat. % > % < Sp.G. LL PI Depth USCS AASHTO Moist. #4 No.200 11 11 ROCK CORRECTED TEST RESULTS UNCORRECTED MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Zipper Geo report: Section 3.5.2 Re-Use of Maximum dry density = 118.6 pcf 114.6 pcf Site soils as Structural Fill Optimum moisture = 10.0 % 11.1 % poorly graded sand with silt Project No. 18-0900 Client: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. Remarks: Project: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments SPG: Assumed 3905 172nd Street SE, Arlington, WA 98233 Date: 1-7-19 Loc.: Native - Sampled site stockpile at the SE corner of site This report may not be reproduced, except in full, without the prior written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc.Figure SP003 Tested By: JP/AH Checked By: BF Sieve Analysis Test Report - ASTM C136/C117 6 in. 3 in. 2 in. 1½ in. 1 in. ¾ in. ½ in. 3/8 in. #4 #10 #20 #30 #40 #60 #100 #140 #200 100 WSDOT-18 9-03.14(1) Gravel Borrow 90 80 70 60 50 40 PERCENT FINER 30 20 10 0 100 10 1 0.1 GRAIN SIZE - mm. % Gravel % Sand % Fines % +3" Coarse Fine Coarse Medium Fine Silt 1 10 9 3 12 33 32 SIEVE PERCENT SPEC.* PASS? Material Description SIZE FINER PERCENT (X=NO) Imported Structural Fill 4" 100 99 - 100 WSDOT 9-03.14(1) Gravel Borrow 2" 97 75 - 100 silty Sand with gravel 1" 91 Atterberg Limits 3/4" 89 PL= LL= PI= 5/8" 88 1/2" 86 Coefficients 3/8" 84 D90= 23.0253 D85= 11.4503 D60= 0.3269 1/4" 82 D50= 0.1995 D30= D15= #4 80 50 - 80 D10= Cu= Cc= #10 77 Classification #20 72 USCS= SM AASHTO= #40 65 0 - 30 X #60 55 Remarks #100 44 Sample does not meet gradation/SE specification. #200 32 0.0 - 7.0 X Sand Equivalent: 20 (Spec: 50 min) * WSDOT-18 9-03.14(1) Gravel Borrow Location: Sampled by Client Sample Number: 4381A Date: 3-26-19 Client: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. Project: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments 3905 172nd Street SE, Arlington, WA 98233 This report may not be reproduced, except in full, without the prior written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc.Project No: 18-0900 Figure SP004 Tested By: AH/JP Checked By: DB Moisture-Density (Proctor) Test Report 145 140 5.9%, 138.2 pcf 135 7.1%, 132.7 pcf Dry density, pcf 130 125 ZAV for Sp.G. = 2.65 120 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Water content, % - Rock Corrected - Uncorrected Test specification: ASTM D 1557-12 Method A Modified ASTM D4718-15 Oversize Corr. Applied to Each Test Point Elev/ Classification Nat. % > % < Sp.G. LL PI Depth USCS AASHTO Moist. #4 No.200 SM 2.65 20 32 ROCK CORRECTED TEST RESULTS UNCORRECTED MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Imported Structural Fill Maximum dry density = 138.2 pcf 132.7 pcf WSDOT 9-03.14(1) Gravel Borrow Optimum moisture = 5.9 % 7.1 % silty Sand with gravel Project No. 18-0900 Client: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. Remarks: Project: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments SPG: Assumed 3905 172nd Street SE, Arlington, WA 98233 Date: 3-26-19 Location: Sampled by Client Sample Number: 4381A This report may not be reproduced, except in full, without the prior written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc.Figure SP004 Tested By: AH Checked By: DB Sieve Analysis Test Report - ASTM C136/C117 1½ in. 1 in. ¾ in. ½ in. 3/8 in. #4 #10 #20 #30 #40 #60 #100 #140 #200 100 WSDOT-16 9-03.9(3) Crushed Surfacing Base Course 90 80 70 60 50 40 PERCENT FINER 30 20 10 0 10 1 0.1 GRAIN SIZE - mm. % Gravel % Sand % Fines Coarse Fine Coarse Medium Fine Silt 11 61 15 8 3 2 SIEVE PERCENT SPEC.* PASS? Material Description SIZE FINER PERCENT (X=NO) 1-1/4" minus crushed rock - CSBC 1-1/4" 100 99 - 100 Structural Fill 1" 99 80 - 100 Well-graded gravel with sand 3/4" 89 Atterberg Limits 5/8" 78 50 - 80 PL= LL= PI= 1/2" 65 3/8" 52 Coefficients #4 28 25 - 45 D90= 19.4887 D85= 17.8718 D60= 11.3948 #10 13 D50= 9.0236 D30= 5.1685 D15= 2.3713 #20 7 D10= 1.4057 Cu= 8.11 Cc= 1.67 #40 5 3 - 18 Classification #60 4 USCS= GW AASHTO= #100 3 #200 2.4 0.0 - 7.5 Remarks Sample meets gradation, SE and fracture specification. Sand Equivalent: 81 (Spec: 40 min) Percent Fracture (Single Face): 100% (Spec: 75% min) * WSDOT-16 9-03.9(3) Crushed Surfacing Base Course Location: Iron Mountain Quarry (D-334) - Sampled from Pit Stockpile Sample Number: 4432A Date: 05-02-19 Client: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. Project: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments 3905 172nd Street SE, Arlington, WA 98233 This report may not be reproduced, except in full, without the prior written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc.Project No: 18-0900 Figure SP005 Tested By: AH Checked By: BF Moisture-Density (Proctor) Test Report 133 128 123 6.2%, 122.6 pcf 6.8%, 118.8 pcf Dry density, pcf 118 113 ZAV for Sp.G. = 2.60 108 2.5 5 7.5 10 12.5 15 17.5 Water content, % - Rock Corrected - Uncorrected Test specification: ASTM D 1557-12 Method C Modified ASTM D4718-15 Oversize Corr. Applied to Each Test Point Elev/ Classification Nat. % > % < Sp.G. LL PI Depth USCS AASHTO Moist. 3/4 in. No.200 GW 11 2.4 ROCK CORRECTED TEST RESULTS UNCORRECTED MATERIAL DESCRIPTION 1-1/4" minus crushed rock - CSBC Maximum dry density = 122.6 pcf 118.8 pcf Structural Fill Optimum moisture = 6.2 % 6.8 % Well-graded gravel with sand Project No. 18-0900 Client: Amcal Enterprises, Inc. Remarks: Project: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments SPG: Assumed 3905 172nd Street SE, Arlington, WA 98233 Date: 05-03-19 Loc.: Iron Mountain Quarry (D-334) - Sampled from Pit Stockpile This report may not be reproduced, except in full, without the prior written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc.Figure SP005 Tested By: AH Checked By: BF AWS Ultrasonic Examination Report 700 Marine Drive | Bellingham, WA 98225 | (360) 650-9151 Report Number: N/A www.mistrasgroup.com 1. Client 2. Work Location 4. Mistras Job No. 6. Date 7. Page Wesweld Corp. Stanwood, WA 40656023 5/14/2019 1 of 1 3. Client Contact 5. Purchase Order No. 8. Client Reference No. Dan Weaver 18-0900 Cedar Point Apartments 9. Code/Specification 10. NDT Procedure 11. Acceptance Criteria 12. UT Instrument Manufacturer & Model AWS D1.1 100-UT-010 Rev.7 Cyclically Loaded Statically Loaded Olympus EPOCH XT 13. UT Instrument S/N 14. UT Calibration Due Date (Annual) 15. Horizontal Linearity Cal Due Date (2 months) 16. Internal Reflections Cal. Date (40 hrs) #060024609 10/1/2019 6/8/2019 5/14/2019 17. Gain Control Cal Due Date (2 months) 18. Material Type 19. Thickness 20. Joint Type/Description 6/8/2019 A36 5/16" CJP Butt-Joint 21. Sides Weld Scanned From 22. Face Scanned From 23. Scans Performed 1 Side 2 Sides A B C Perpendicular to the Weld Parallel to the Weld Straight Beam 24. Item/Component 25. ISO/Drawing 26. Transducers Beams to Flange One.D & One.F GE GAMMA .625" 70°, 60°, 45° SN#026C84 / Technisonic 0° SN#C-208-GP 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. Decibels 34. 35. 36. 37. Distance 38. Indication levelReference levelAttenuation FactorIndication Rating Item No. AcceptReject Location Search Unit AngleLeg¹ a b c d Length Sound pathDepth From "A" SurfaceFrom X From Y Discontinuity Evaluation / Comments S1 to W #1  70° 52.1 Flange to Box Beam Top And Bottom S1 to W #2  70° 52.1 Flange to Box Beam Top And Bottom S1 to W #3  70° 52.1 Flange to Box Beam Top And Bottom S1 to W #4  70° 52.1 Flange to Box Beam Top And Bottom S1 to W #5  70° 52.1 Flange to Box Beam Top And Bottom 1K to W  70° 52.1 Flange to Box Beam Top And Bottom 1M to W  70° 52.1 Flange to Box Beam Top And Bottom 39. Technician, Level, Date 40. Customer Signature (if applicable) 41. Review By (if applicable) Eric Hart Level II 5-14-2019 CERTIFICATE OF INSPECTION, ULTRASONIC EXAMINATION (AWS) 589-UTFORM-001 Rev.2 Sieve Analysis Test Report - ASTM C136/C117 6 in. 3 in. 2 in. 1½ in. 1 in. ¾ in. ½ in. 3/8 in. #4 #10 #20 #30 #40 #60 #100 #140 #200 100 WSDOT 9-03.14(1) Gravel Borrow 90 80 70 60 50 40 PERCENT FINER 30 20 10 0 100 10 1 0.1 GRAIN SIZE - in. % Gravel % Sand % Fines % +3" Coarse Fine Coarse Medium Fine Silt 0 0 38 16 29 10 7 SIEVE PERCENT SPEC.* PASS? Material Description SIZE FINER PERCENT (X=NO) Structural Fill 4" 100 99 - 100 poorly graded sand with silt and gravel 2" 100 75 - 100 1" 100 Atterberg Limits 3/4" 100 PL= LL= PI= 1/2" 93 3/8" 85 Coefficients #4 62 50 - 80 D90= 11.3252 D85= 9.5512 D60= 4.3579 #10 46 D50= 2.5387 D30= 0.8760 D15= 0.3751 #20 29 D10= 0.2243 Cu= 19.43 Cc= 0.79 #40 17 0 - 30 Classification #60 11 USCS= SP-SM AASHTO= #100 8 #200 6.5 0.0 - 7.0 Remarks Sample does not meet SE spec., but meets grad. spec. Sand Equivalent: 36 (Spec: 50 min) * WSDOT 9-03.14(1) Gravel Borrow Location: Granite - Mandan Pit (D-217) - Sampled from Site Stockpile Sample Number: 4721A Date: 10-10-19 Client: Williams Investments Project: Centennial Park 67th Avenue NE and 172nd Street NW This report may not be reproduced, except in full, without the prior written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc.Project No: 19-0659 Figure SP003 Tested By: JC Checked By: BF Moisture-Density (Proctor) Test Report 140 6.0%, 137.6 pcf 137.5 135 6.9%, 133.6 pcf Dry density, pcf 132.5 ZAV for Sp.G. = 2.70 130 127.5 1.5 3 4.5 6 7.5 9 10.5 Water content, % - Rock Corrected - Uncorrected Test specification: ASTM D 1557-12 Method B Modified ASTM D4718-15 Oversize Corr. Applied to Each Test Point Elev/ Classification Nat. % > % < Sp.G. LL PI Depth USCS AASHTO Moist. 3/8 in. No.200 SP-SM 2.65 15 6.5 ROCK CORRECTED TEST RESULTS UNCORRECTED MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Structural Fill Maximum dry density = 137.6 pcf 133.6 pcf poorly graded sand with silt and gravel Optimum moisture = 6.0 % 6.9 % Project No. 19-0659 Client: Williams Investments Remarks: Project: Centennial Park SPG: Assumed 67th Avenue NE and 172nd Street NW Date: 10-10-19 Loc.: Granite - Mandan Pit (D-217) - Sampled from Site Stockpile This report may not be reproduced, except in full, without the prior written approval of GeoTest Services, Inc.Figure SP003 Tested By: JC Checked By: BF ESDS Final Report v3.0 WSHFC - Low Income Housing Tax Credit Program Tax Credit Number: 17-226A Project Name: Cedar Pointe Senior Apartments (originally Smokey Point) Project Address: 3905 172nd Street, Arlington, WA 98223 Organization Name: AMWA Ent Evergreen Coordinator: Katherine Morgan Evergreen Coordinator phone: 206.717.2269 (dir) 206.290.8662 (cell) Evergreen Coordinator email: katherinem@archecology.com Project Type: New Construction If the project includes new construction and rehab, please write a brief description of the scope: Location: Urban Number of units: 255 number of occupants & population type: 254 for seniors, 20% of those with disabilities, 1 manager # of buildings & # of stories 2 buildings, 4 stories Residential square footage: 158,266 sf Rehab projects answer the following: Year the building was built: Space heating type to be replaced: Water heating type to be replaced: Window U Values (if known): Wall, Attic, floor insulation values (if known): ESDS v3.0 Final Report - New Construction ESDS v3.0 Criteria Method used to Satisfy Criterion Instructions Points ? 1.1a Integrative Process & Green Development Plan Green Development Plan is attached (Mandatory) Attach the Green Development Plan m 1.2 Universal Design (up to 3) State which option was incorporated and list the features 1.3a Performance Verification (Mandatory) State: (1) Which ESDS criterion required Performance Verification. Water fixtures (40) and ventilation flow were verified. (2) Construction documents include the Performance Water flow test confirmed the fixtures comply with the Verification requirements. m credit. (3) The installer has provided written verification that the systems operate as required, available on the jobsite. 1.3b Commissioning (up to 12) State: (1) Which applicable systems were included in the Systems commissioing was based on the Basis of Design and commissioning plan. included: (2) That a final commissioning report is available for HVAC systems and associated controls, inspection upon request. Lighting and daylighting controls, (3) The architect and MEP consultants have developed a 8 Domestic hot water, Basis of Design (BOD) that meets the Owner’s Project Residential HVAC (per 1.3a), and Requirements (at a minimum, the performance metering. The final commissioniong report will be available requirements established in 1.1); on request. (4) Commissioning requirements have been incorporated into the construction documents. 1.4 Socially Sustainable Living Patterns (up to 6) Option #1: attach a description of how the project design teamintentionally developed spaces or featuresthat help residentsdevelop aninclusivesenseofcommunityand cultivate meaningful support networks. Describe the plan that on-site staff will follow to encourage residents to use the spaces as intended. NA Option #2: attach a description for how the resident population will participate in discussions regarding the sustainability of the project. Describe how the advisory board or governance structure will be formed, who will be responsibleformanagingtheprocess,and howtheresident population might participate. ESDS v3.0 Final Report - New Construction 2.1 Sensitive Site Protection (Mandatory) Attach documentation from the local jurisdiction stating the zoning for the property, See attachment noting no critical areas of concern m identification of any known critical areas or resource lands within 300 feet and any resulting development restrictions. 2.2 Connections to Existing (Mandatory for Urban, 2 points for Rural) Attach aclear The property is within the incorporated boundary of Development & and detailed Site & Vicinity Map with explanations. Clearly Arlington WA. Sheet C4.1 shows existing water and sewer in m Infrastructure label and indicate on the map the areas specific to this road criterion. 2.3 Compact Development This is in a "Highway Commercial" zone and the residential (Mandatory) Attach the architect’s density calculation and density at CNT is 2.28 du/acre. The project is providing 63 m statement of correctness. du/acre. 2.4 Maximizing Density This is in a "Highway Commercial" zone and the residential (5 points) Attach the architect’s density calculation and density at CNT is 2.28 du/acre. The project is providing 63 5 statement of correctness. du/acre. 2.5 Access to Services & (Mandatory and option for 5 points) State which option(s) Public Transportation chosen. Option #1: Attach a context map demonstrating that the center of the site is within the required walk Both options are selected. The project is less than a half distances of the required number of services. Google Maps mile walk to transit stops along 172nd Street and Smokey offers a function to demonstrate walk distance. On Google Point with several bus lines stopping. There are 9 diverse Maps, go to “Directions” and select “Walk Directions” to 5 services within a halfmile walk, including a Walmart, obtain this information. Option #2: Attach a context map to Safeway, Starbucks, Banks, Dentist, UW Medicine Urgent demonstrate that the center of the site is within the Care/Clinic and several restaurants required distance of transit options. Google Maps offers a function to demonstrate walk distance. On Google Maps, go to “Directions” and select “Walk Directions” to obtain this information. 2.6 Preservation of & (Mandatory) State the option chosen and how the design Access to Open Space The site area is 121,192 after deducting the building meets the requirement. Attach a clear and detailed Site & footprint of 55,190 sf, and there are two courtyards with Vicinity Map and indicate on the map the areas designated gardening and activity areas that total 14,507 sf, close to m as open space for residents. Open space does not include 12% open space. There is minimal site area outside the streets, roadways, or tenant private outdoor areas, or areas building footprint and parking areas. Site plan is attached. inaccessible to residents. 2.7a Walkable (Mandatory for Urban only) Attach a site map clearly C5.1 Illustrates the new sidewalks and how they connect to neighborhoods-sidewalks & illustrating the existing and proposed sidewalks and all- m the existing sidewalks along 172nd St. pathways weather pathways and where they lead to. ESDS v3.0 Final Report - New Construction 2.8 Improving Connectivity (2 points) State which two measures have been used and to the Community describe the implementation plan. If choosing car-sharing N/A services or bicycle racks/storage, attach a site map identifying the space that will dedicated for the amenities. 2.9 Greyfield, Brownfield or (5 points) Provide a description and explanation that N/A Adaptive Reuse Site confirms the type of site. 2.10 Access to Fresh, Local (3 points) State which option the project provides. Foods Attach a detailed plan of how the requirements have been N/A met. If selecting Options 1a or 1b, attach a site map identifying the growing space. 3.1 Environmental Phase 1 ESA found no issues of concern. (Mandatory) State the conclusion of the ESA Phase 1. m Remediation 3.2 Erosion & See TESC sheets C2.1 & 2.2 show plans, specific measures (Mandatory) State which BMP or local controls have been Sedimentation Control include sediment pond, intercept swales with rock check incorporated into the construction and site development m dams, silt fence around perimeter, and stabilized plans and contracts. The actual erosion measures that have construction entrance. been specifically be used on the site. 3.3a Landscaping (Mandatory) Attach a landscape plan showing native Landscape plan with planting schedule is attached. Species plantings and their relation to the building(s). The map m list includes all native and adaptive species. must clearly show 50% or more of the landscaped area as native and/or adaptive species. 3.3b Landscaping (5 points) Attach a landscape plan showing native plantings and their relation to the building(s). The map must clearly See above 5 show 100% or more of the landscaped area as native and/or adaptive species. 3.4 Efficient Irrigation (Mandatory) State that drip and/or bubbler irrigation system has been used for all landscape planting beds and Drip lines are specified for all irrigation zones and a rain trees. State that turf and each type of bedding area has sensor will control overwatering when not needed. Planting been separately zoned based on watering needs with a m zones reflect beds that may have different requirements due programmed zone manifold and/or timer/controller. State to micro-climate. that a controller designed to eliminate irrigation overwatering has been installed. ESDS v3.0 Final Report - New Construction 3.5 Surface Water (up to 6 points) Attach the precipitation data location used, Management the appropriate rainfall event size, a site plan showing the total generating surfaces and calculated area for the project, and describe design features that have been Please see attached report from the Civil engineer. 4 implemented to meet the requirements, with an affidavit affirming that the design is sized to accommodate the target rainfall event - from the qualified design professional responsible for the design calculations. 3.6 Storm Drain Labels (Mandatory) State that you have labelled all storm drains All stormdrains and inlets have been labelled m and inlets. 4.1a Water-Conserving Selected fixtures have the following specifications: Features Toilets: 1.28 GPF, 600 MaP WaterSense (Mandatory) State the flow rates, WaterSense, and MaP Showerheads: 1.75 gpm WaterSense performance for applicable fixtures that have been Lavatory: 0.5 gpm WaterSense labeled installed. State that a minimum of 15% of units have Kitchen faucets: 1.5 gpm completed performance verification according to the requirements in ESDS 1.3a. Toilets – 1.28 GPF (gallons per flush) or less. WaterSense m labeled with MaP test performance at minimum 500g, Urinals- 0.5 gpf or less, WaterSense labeled, Showerheads – 2.0 GPM (gallons per minute) or less, WaterSense labeled, Bathroom faucets – 1.5 GPM or less, WaterSense labeled, Kitchen faucets – 2.0 GPM or less 4.1b Advanced Water- (up to 6 points) State the flow rates, WaterSense, and MaP Conserving Features performance for applicable fixtures that have been installed. State that a minimum of 15% of units have completed performance verification according to the requirements in ESDS 1.3a. State that the project complies with ESDS 4.4. N/A Toilets – 1.1 GPF (gallons per flush) or less. or a toilet with dual flush, one of the options being less than 1 GPF, 500gWaterSense labeled, Showerheads – 1.75 GPM (gallons per minute) or less, WaterSense labeled, Bathroom faucets – 1 GPM or less, WaterSense labeled, Kitchen faucets – 1.75 GPM or less ESDS v3.0 Final Report - New Construction 4.2 Water Metering (New Construction 2, Rehab 4) Attach a description of how sub-meter data will be tracked, who will be responsible for monitoring it, and how the data will be used (direct billing or back-charging residents for N/A water/sewer costs, providing consumption feedback for conservation assistance, leak detection and isolation, etc.) For rehab only, if metering each dwelling unit is not feasible, attach an optimal measuring proposal. 4.3 Water Reuse (up to 12 points) Option #1: State how the design meets the requirement; how these details have been communicated to the plumbing contractor; and how they have been verified as compliant at construction. Option #2: State the percentage of the project’s water N/A needs that have been supplied by rainwater and/or greywater. Also, attach an explanation of how the project’s total water need was determined and describe the design features (including cistern sizing calculation) that have been implemented to achieve the stated percentage. 4.4 Efficient Plumbing (7 points) State how the design meets the requirement; Layout & Design N/A how the details were communicated to the plumbing contractor: how proper installation has been confirmed. 5.1a Building Performance (Mandatory) Standard - New Multifamily buildings greater than three stories: State the Construction See sheets M5.1, 5.2. UA shows a 21% reduction over target, additional credit chosen from the 2015 WSEC Lighting C406.4 Enhanced digital controls; C406.3 High C406—Additional efficiency package options. OR, Attach m Efficacy Lighting the 2015 WSEC section C407.3—Performance-based compliance cover sheet to demonstrate and additional 4 % reduction in energy use compared to the code. ESDS v3.0 Final Report - New Construction 5.2a Additional Reduction (5-25 points) For the prescriptive energy credits approach, in Energy Use - New attach documentation showing the energy credits used to Construction meet code and the added energy credits to achieve additional energy savings. N/A For the performance based approach, use the analysis methodology required by code. Demonstrate that the proposed design will provide additional % reduction in energy use compared to code and ESDS 5a. 5.3 Shading for South (4 points) Attach documentation that shading devices on Facing Windows the building provides the described solar access and N/A shading. Include an illustration demonstrating shading at the required date and times. 5.4 Energy Star Appliances Energy Star appliances were installed (Mandatory) State that all clothes washers, dishwashers & refrigerators are Energy Star. Do not send in product m literature or spec sheets. 5.5 Central Laundry (3 points) State that the project provides ENERGY STAR- N/A labeled centralized laundry facilities and has not installed in- unit washers or dryers or hook-ups. 5.6 Efficient Lighting - 90% of lighting has been fitted with LED luminaires or lamps (Mandatory) State that 90% of lighting has been fitted with Interior Units LED luminaires or lamps. Do not send in product literature m or spec sheets with the EPP. 5.7a Electricity Meter Individual meters are installed for each unit. See E5.0 (Mandatory) State that individual or a sub-metered electric m meter has been installed for each individual unit. 5.8b Photovoltaic/Solar Hot (1 point) Explain the plan including orientation, Water Ready unobstructed exposure, conduit route and location of terminations. Attach the design and engineering analysis that establishes the parameters of the installation that demonstrate the following: Orient buildings to permit access to sunlight, design and include south facing N/A architectural elements on the roof for PV, reserve unobstructed roof areas where panels can be placed, run conduit from the prospective PV location to a central panel, as part of the general electrical work, and do not install wire inside the conduit until the photovoltaic panels are installed. ESDS v3.0 Final Report - New Construction 5.9 Domestic Water 8 - Natural gas, 100 gallon, 95% AFUE, Standby loss 1348 (Mandatory) State the type of fuel, tank size, energy factor, Heating BTUH and standby loss as applicable. Do not send in product m literature or spec sheets. 6.1 Low/No VOC Paints & All interior paints and primers comply the Low/No VOC (Mandatory) State that all interior paints and primers meet m Primers standard the standard. 6.2 Low/No VOC Adhesives (Mandatory) State that all interior adhesives comply with All interior adhesives and sealants comply the Low/No VOC & Sealants the most recent version of Rule 1168 of the South Coast Air m standard Quality Management District. 6.3 Construction Waste (up to 5 points) State the method chosen and that the Management Commingled recycling was chosen and the materials were construction waste plan was available on the job site sent to United Container Recycling. 95% diversion rate was specifying how reusable/recyclable materials were to be 5 reported. redirected from the landfill and where each material was to go. 6.4 Environmentally (up to 10 points) Attach the list of environmentally Preferable Materials preferable materials that whave been used and note the N/A specification requirement and/or the local production requirement. 6.5a Reduced Heat-Island Energy Star rated white TPO membrane used for all of roof (2 points) State which option was chosen. Also attach roof Effect: Roofing not covered by equipment map showing all roofing areas with the type of roof 2 specified. Clearly label and indicate on the map the areas specific to this criterion. 7.1 Composite Wood All composite woods are NAUF or CARB compliant (Mandatory) State that all particleboard, plywood, OSB, Products: No Added Urea medium density fiberboard, cabinetry and any other Formaldehyde applicable wood products contain no added urea- m formaldehyde and/or will be compliant with CARB Phase 2. 7.2a Healthy Flooring All wet areas have resilient floors, carpet tiles in hall, and (If providing floor coverings, Mandatory) State what floor Materials carpetting in larger unit bedrooms. All flooring products coverings were used and where and that they meet the m including adhesives are FloorScore or CRI Green Label Plus requirements of this criteria. 7.2b Healthy Flooring NA (6 points) State that in all rooms, carpet or flooring Materials containing PVC or chlorine has not been installed. 7.3a Exhaust Fans- Energy Star bathroom fans are continous on with motion (Mandatory) State Energy Star bathroom fans including how Bathroom sensing high speed when whole house fan, otherwise they are controlled. m motion sensing if secondary fan. 7.4a Exhaust Fans-Kitchen Accessible units have Energy Star fans, non-ADA units have (Mandatory) State that Energy Star kitchen fans were m integrated microwave ventilation which is exempt installed and vented to the outside. ESDS v3.0 Final Report - New Construction 7.5 Ventilation Whole house ventilation has been installed according to (Mandatory) State that whole-house ventilation has been Section 403 of WSEC 2015. Fans are max 100CFM, installed according to section 403 of the 2015 WSEC. State determined based on mechanical code. Operation is the size of fan, how the size was determined, the location, m continuous on with motion sensor for higher flow when and how it is controlled. occupied, with delay before returning to low. 7.6 Clothes Dryer Exhaust Clothes dryers are vented directly to outoors using rigid-type (Mandatory) State that clothes dryers are exhausted to the ductwork exterior using rigid-type ductwork (from the connection point to the exterior exhaust), except for condensing and m heat pump dryers, which must be plumbed to a drain. 7.7 Combustion Equipment Water heaters are in a separated space accessible from the (Mandatory) State that there are direct power vented or outside. combustion sealed fossil fuel fired water heaters when in m the conditioned space. 7.8 Mold Prevention: All wet areas have smooth, cleanable, waterproof surfaces (Mandatory) State that there are smooth, durable, m Surfaces cleanable, water-proof surfaces in all wet areas. 7.9 Mold Prevention: Tub & Shower/tub enclosures are both one-piece walk-in showers (Mandatory) State which materials for tub and shower Shower Enclosures and two piece tubs with fiberglass surround. Appropriate enclosures have been used. m backerboard and moisture resistant drywall was used. 7.10 Vapor Barrier BE 0.1 shows 20 mil barrier and 6" capillary break designed, (Mandatory for foundation work) State the vapor barrier m Strategies submittals confirm. strategies that were used in the project. 7.11 Radon Mitigation NA (Mandatory) State whether the project is in a high risk radon county. If so, continue with the following: For New Construction, state the list of radon mitigation measures that have been installed. For Rehabilitation, state that radon testing using the EPA m protocols has been done and state type and duration of test. If radon testing shows 4 pCi/L or higher, state here the radon mitigation measures that were installed. 7.12 Water Drainage All water is diverted away from the building and measures in (Mandatory) State that all water drainage measures listed in this criterion were followed. this criterion have been followed. Note: For rehab, all m measures which apply to the scope of work are required. 7.13a Enhanced Building The windows were installed to minimize the disturbance to (Mandatory) State that the building envelope design makes Envelope Design the building envelope. Some sections may require more it possible to remove and replace windows without m significant removal and replacement of siding to access the compromising the performance of the building envelope. area. ESDS v3.0 Final Report - New Construction 7.13b Enhanced Building Mock up, window water testing, inspection plan BEE (up to 8 points for NC, up to 10 points for Substantial Envelope Design inspected envelope Rehab) State the option(s) chosen and how the objective 8 has been achieved. 7.14 Garage Isolation NA, no garage (Mandatory) State that there is a continuous air tight barrier between the living space and an attached garage, m how it was achieved, and the number of placements of CO monitors as necessary. 7.15 Integrated Pest All penetrations were sealed and screened. (Mandatory) State that sealing of all penetrations was done Management and include what materials were used to prevent pest and m rodent entry. 7.16 Lead-Safe Work na (Mandatory) State the year when the buildings were Practices constructed. For structures built before 1978, state that lead-safe work practices were followed. Also state that the m contractor performing this was Renovation, Repair and Painting certified at a minimum. 7.17 Smoke-Free Building A smoke free policy has been implemented and will be (Mandatory) State that a smoke-free policy (including e- enforced. A copy of the lease addendum, prohibiting cigarettes) in all common and individual living areas, smoking in all interior areas and within 25 feet of building including decks and patios, in unit leases and within 25 feet entries and intakes is added to the Binder. of building entries or ventilation intakes (including operable windows) has been implemented and enforced. Also state m that the lease language prohibits smoking in these locations and that it is a violation of the lease to smoke. Provide a copy of the lease in the on-site binder. 8.1a Building Maintenance A copy of the O&M details have been submitted by vendors. (Mandatory) State that a copy of the Building Maintenance Manual & Unit Turnover A copy of the Building Maintenance Manual and Unit Manual and the Unit Turnover Plan will be submitted to Plan Turnover plan will be submitted to WSHFC as soon as it is Commerce before the project is completed. State the completed. Walk through and hand-over training dates were estimated date of submittal. State the date the walk- as follows: through and orientation will be completed. m 9/11: Fire protection, Fire Alarm, and Plumbing 9/18: Electrical 9/24: Access Control & CCTV 10/16: HVAC 8.1b O&M Instructions for Building operation and maintenance instructions will be (7 points) State that the Building Operations and Maintenance Staff permanently affixed to the building near appropriate Maintenance instructions will be permanently affixed to the equipment. The walk through and orientation was 7 building. State that the requirements regarding the conducted as noted above. location, instructions and walk-through will be followed. ESDS v3.0 Final Report - New Construction 8.2 Emergency An emergency plan is available for review upon request (Mandatory) State that the Emergency Management m Management Plan Manual is available for inpection upon request. 8.3 Resident Manual & The Resident Manual is available for inspection upon (Mandatory) State that the Resident Manual is available for Orientation request. Orientations with new tenants, now and in the inpection upon request. State how the orientations will be m future, are conducted at the lease signing appointment. completed with new tenants and the plan for orientation at turnover. 8.4 Project Data Collection The option to track all metered services was chosen and the (8 points) State which option chosen. State that the utility billing vendor, Conservice, will provide project data property management staff will collect and monitor project updates for a minimum of five years. A Post occupancy performance data on energy, water, and, if possible, 8 evaluation will be conducted in July of 2021 and summary healthy living environments for a minimum of five years. report provided to WSHFC. 8.5 Educational Signage Educational information is provided through placards and (Mandatory) State that educational signage and/or m brochure highlights. educational material is provided onsite. TOTAL 57 0 Jill Blegen Senior Construction Manager AMWA Construction, Inc. 30141 Agoura Rd., Suite 100 Agoura Hills, CA 91301 RE: Cedar Point Senior Apartments, Arlington WA Dear Jill, As the Evergreen Project Coordinator, I am pleased to provide the final Evergreen report and confirm that the Cedar Point project at 3905 172nd Street, Arlington WA has achieved 57 points and complied with the mandatory requirements. The full report with attachments has been provided for submission to Washington State Housing Finance Commission along with the owner’s affidavit. A summary report is also provided (without attachments) to submit to the City of Arlington. Congratulations on a successful project that will provide sustainable, affordable housing for seniors. Please let me know if you need anything further. Sincerely, Katherine Morgan LEED Green Rater Project Manager ArchEcology LLC Phased occupancy plan is Approved, as proposed in accordance with the phasing conditions letter dated 12/4/18 David Spencer CBO Phased occupancy plan is Approved, as proposed in accordance with the phasing conditions letter dated 12/4/18 David Spencer CBO 1621 114th Ave. SE, Suite 219 City of Arlington Bellevue, WA 98004 238 N Olympic Avenue Arlington, WA 98223 December 14, 2018 RE: Conditions for requested Cedar Pointe Phasing-Options 1 & 2 The requirements or the “Plan A” phasing are as follows: A. All required fire/rated separation walls shall be completed, inspected, and approved to adequately protect phased areas for temporary occupancies from other areas. Verification of inspection(s) and approval(s) shall be provided before any temporary occupancy(s) shall be granted or approved. B. All fire sprinkler components within phased areas approved for temporary occupancies shall be operational, inspected, and approved. Verification of inspection(s) and approval(s) shall be provided before any temporary occupancy(s) shall be granted or approved. C. All fire alarm components within phased areas approved for temporary occupancies shall be operational. Verification of inspection(s) and approval(s) shall be provided before any temporary occupancy(s) shall be granted or approved. D. A plan shall be provided for approval showing adequate means of egress from all temporary occupancies. The plan shall be provided for review and approval. Verification of inspection(s) and approval(s) shall be provided before any temporary occupancy(s) shall be granted or approved. E. Fire dept. access shall be approved by Fire Marshal or other official personal designated by the city. Verification of inspection(s) and approval(s) shall be provided before any temporary occupancy(s) shall be granted or approved. The requirements or the “Plan B” phasing are as follows: A. All required fire/rated separation walls shall be completed, inspected, and approved to adequately protect phased areas for temporary occupancies from other areas. Verification of inspection(s) and approval(s) shall be provided before any temporary occupancy(s) shall be granted or approved. i. All areas used for temporary fire/rated separation walls between phases 1 and 2 and/or phases 3 and 4 shall be accomplish through prior approval of AHJ. ii. Any temporary exiting plan shall require prior review and approval by the AHJ. Exiting of occupants from phased approved occupancies shall not pass through non-approved areas for required emergency egress (e.g. construction areas). B. All fire sprinkler components within phased areas approved for temporary occupancies shall be operational, inspected, and approved. Verification of inspection(s) and approval(s) shall be provided before any temporary occupancy(s) shall be granted or approved. C. All fire alarm components within phased areas approved for temporary occupancies shall be operational. Verification of inspection(s) and approval(s) shall be provided before any temporary occupancy(s) shall be granted or approved. D. A plan shall be provided for approval showing adequate means of egress from all temporary occupancies. The plan shall be provided for review and approval. Verification of inspection(s) and approval(s) shall be provided before any temporary occupancy(s) shall be granted or approved. i. Any temporary exiting plan shall require prior approval by the AHJ. Exiting of occupants from phased approved occupancies shall not pass through non-approved areas for required emergency egress (e.g. construction areas). E. Fire dept. access shall be approved by Fire Marshal or other official personal designated by the city. Verification of inspection(s) and approval(s) shall be provided before any temporary occupancy(s) shall be granted or approved. Respectfully, David Spencer CBO Regional Operations Manager/Safebuilt SAFEbuilt Washington Bellevue Office ✓