Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
07-03-17 Council Meeting
SPECIAL ACCOMMODATIONS: The City of Arlington strives to provide accessible meetings for people with disabilities. Please contact the ADA coordinator at (360) 403‐3441 or 1‐800‐833‐8388 (TDD only) prior to the meeting date if special accommodations are required. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Barb Tolbert PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL Mayor Barb Tolbert – Kristin APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA Mayor Pro Tem Debora Nelson INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS SWEARING IN Police – Officers Donchez, Fekkes, and Hamel Chief Ventura/Steve Peiffle Fire – Deputy Chief Kraski, Captain Normand, Firefighter/EMT Johnston Chief Stedman/Steve Peiffle PROCLAMATIONS PUBLIC COMMENT For members of the public who wish to speak to the Council about any matter not on the Public Hearing portion of the meeting. Please limit remarks to three minutes. CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Pro Tem Debora Nelson 1.Minutes of the June 19 and June 26, 2017 Council Meetings ATTACHMENT A 2.Accounts Payable 3.Ordinance approving Villas at Arlington Rezone ATTACHMENT B 4.Ordinance Denying Stewart Rezone ATTACHMENT C 5.Ordinance amending AMC Chapter 10.54 regarding parking ATTACHMENT D 6.Ordinance repealing International Plumbing Code ATTACHMENT E PUBLIC HEARING Arlington City Council Meeting Monday, July 3, 2017 at 7:00 pm City Council Chambers – 110 E 3rd Street SPECIAL ACCOMMODATIONS: The City of Arlington strives to provide accessible meetings for people with disabilities. Please contact the ADA coordinator at (360) 403‐3441 or 1‐800‐833‐8388 (TDD only) prior to the meeting date if special accommodations are required. NEW BUSINESS 1. Riar Family Rezone ATTACHMENT F Staff Presentation: Marc Hayes Council Liaison: Mike Hopson/Jan Schuette 2. EMS Equipment Replacement Change Order ATTACHMENT G Staff Presentation: Bruce Stedman Council Liaison: Jesica Stickles/Marilyn Oertle DISCUSSION ITEMS INFORMATION ADMINISTRATOR & STAFF REPORTS MAYOR’S REPORT COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS – OPTIONAL EXECUTIVE SESSION RECONVENE ADJOURNMENT Mayor Barb Tolbert DRAFT Page 1 of 3 Council Chambers 110 East Third St June 19, 2017 Council Members Present: Mike Hopson, Jan Schuette, Chris Raezer, Sue Weiss, Jesica Stickles, and Marilyn Oertle. Council Members Absent: Debora Nelson (excused) City Staff Present: Mayor Barbara Tolbert, Paul Ellis, Kristin Garcia, Heather Logan, Deana Dean, Sheri Amundson, Bruce Stedman, Stephanie Shook, Tom Cooper, Jason Brisson, Hunter Day, Tom Jackson, Dave Kraski, Nich Sacha, Steve Daggett, Megan Nunemaker, Anna Trenouth, Joseph Wakefield, Scott Hillis, Craig Monson, Jonathan Ventura, and City Attorney Steve Peiffle. Also Known to be Present: Maxine Jenft, Holly Sloan‐Buchanan, Jennifer Holocker, Cindy Hillis, Craig Christianson, Sandie Cooper, Doug Buell, Laurie Jacobson, Dean Jenkin, Kari Ilonummi Mayor Barbara Tolbert called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm, and the pledge of allegiance followed. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA Councilmember Raezer moved to approve the agenda as presented. Councilmember Oertle seconded the motion, which passed with a unanimous vote. INTRODUCTIONS OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS Fire Chief Bruce Stedman spoke to Deputy Chief Tom Cooper’s career at Arlington Fire, presented him with his helmet and badge, and thanked him for his service to the community. PROCLAMATIONS Councilmember Schuette read the Proclamation for General Aviation Appreciation Month. PUBLIC COMMENT CONSENT AGENDA Councilmember Raezer moved to approve the Consent Agenda. Councilmember Nelson seconded the motion which was carried. 1. Minutes of the June 5 and June 12, 2017 Council Meetings. Minutes of the Arlington City Council Meeting Minutes of the City of Arlington City Council Meeting June 19, 2017 Page 2 of 3 2. Accounts Payable: Approval of EFT Payments and Claims Checks #91037 through #91164 dated June 6, 2017 through June 19, 2017 for $523,857.87; and Approval of EFT Payments and Payroll Checks #29165 through #29174 dated May 1, 2017 through May 22, 2017 for $1,300,586.47. 3. Resolution declaring property as surplus 4. Professional Services Agreement with Katy Isaksen & Associates 5. City Council regional meeting reimbursement protocol PUBLIC HEARING None. NEW BUSINESS Contract for financial management software Finance Director Kristin Garcia requested council contract with Caselle for the City’s new financial management software. Councilmember Raezer moved and Councilmember Oertle seconded the motion to approve the contract with Caselle for financial management software with a project budget not to exceed $170,000 and authorize the Mayor to sign the contract. The motion was approved by a unanimous vote. Resolution to approve Social Services Fund Policy Administrative Services Director Heather Logan requested council adopt the resolution to approve the Social Services Fund Policy. Council questions followed. Councilmember Raezer moved and Councilmember Stickles seconded the motion to approve the resolution adopting the Social Services Fund policy. The motion was approved by majority with the dissenting vote cast by Councilmember Weiss. ADMINISTRATOR & STAFF REPORTS City Administrator Paul Ellis noted that Karen Reed’s report would be reviewed next week at the RFA meeting on June 29, 2017 at 5:00 pm at Marysville City Hall. COUNCILMEMBER REPORTS Councilmembers Oertle, Raezer, and Schuette gave brief reports, while Councilmember Stickles, Weiss, and Hopson had nothing to report at this time. MAYOR’S REPORT None. EXECUTIVE SESSION None. Minutes of the City of Arlington City Council Meeting June 19, 2017 Page 3 of 3 ADJOURNMENT With no further business to come before the Council, the meeting was adjourned at 7:29 p.m. ____________________________ Barbara Tolbert, Mayor DRAFT Page 1 of 4 Council Chambers 110 East Third Street June 26, 2017 Councilmembers Present: Mike Hopson, Jan Schuette, Debora Nelson, Chris Raezer, Sue Weiss, Jesica Stickles, and Marilyn Oertle. Council Members Absent: None Staff Present: Mayor Barbara Tolbert, Paul Ellis, Heather Logan, Kristin Banfield, Kristin Garcia, Dan Cone, Marc Hayes, Amy Rusko, Bruce Stedman and City Attorney Steve Peiffle. Also Known to be Present: Steve Maisch, Frank Barden, John Branthoover, Gary Whitley, Sarah Arney, Scott Tomkins, Shar Qualley‐Johnson, Dianna & Robert Cameron, Craig Christianson, Curt Hecla, and Cristy Brubaker. Mayor Tolbert called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm, and the pledge of allegiance followed. Mayor Pro Tem Debora Nelson moved to approve the agenda. Councilmember Chris Raezer seconded the motion, which passed with a unanimous vote. Introduction of Special Guests and Presentations Mayor Tolbert announced that due to a family emergency, Mr. Ketchel, Interim Administrator of the Snohomish Health District, will not be presenting tonight. His presentation has been rescheduled for September. WORKSHOP ITEMS – NO ACTION WAS TAKEN Riar Family Rezone Community and Economic Development Director Marc Hayes reviewed the proposed Riar Family Rezone, including the process for a rezone request, the public testimony received on the proposed rezone, and the Planning Commission Public Hearing. The Planning Commission did not make a recommendation to the Council on the rezone request. City Attorney Steve Peiffle briefly reviewed the two draft ordinances prepared for this item and noted that the findings included in the drafts can be adjusted by the Council. Council discussion followed. Mayor Tolbert then opened the floor for public comments on the Riar Family rezone. Shar Qualley‐Johnson, PO Box 495, Snohomish, stated she is a Snohomish City resident. She believes that Snohomish County is a desirable place to be. Minutes of the Arlington City Council Workshop Minutes of the City of Arlington City Council Workshop June 26, 2017 Page 2 of 4 Gary Whitley, 17830 Oxford Drive, Arlington, stated that he opposes the rezone. Scott Tomkins, 17812 Oxford Drive, Arlington, stated that he believes the proposed rezone is a spot rezone. Traffic on 172nd St NE is untenable at peak hours. Arlington already has large, dense developments planned at Highway 9 and 172nd St NE. He is concerned about the lack of planning for improvements on 172nd St NE between 67th and Highway 9 by the Washington State Department of Transportation. Robert Cameron, 17407 73rd Ave NE, Arlington, thanked the City Council and the Mayor for their work. Mr. Cameron noted that he is the president of the homeowners association for The Crossing at Edgecomb and is representing the residents of the neighborhood. He requested that the Council listen to the concerns of the neighbors and respect the neighborhoods already established in the area. Judy Castanares, 17506 72nd Drive NE, Arlington, shared some prepared notes from local residents, Dwan and Bruce Kinney who could not attend. In her notes, Ms. Kinney requested the council consider the impact the proposed rezone will have on all residents living in the corridor. She requested that an environmental analysis be done for all the properties included in the rezone. The Kinneys do not want to be included in the rezone. Ms. Castanares then shared her own thoughts that if the rezone is approved, her once quiet neighborhood will be surrounded by townhomes and traffic. She opposes the rezone. Don Castanares, 17506 72nd Drive NE, Arlington, provided the City Clerk with five graphics to be shared with the Council on 172nd St NE traffic concerns. He stated that the Washington State Patrol Collision Analysis tool shows a 140+% increase in collisions on 172nd St NE between 2014 and 2016. With the development already planned in the area, there is likely to be an additional 500 vehicles on the corridor with no improvements until 2021. Sandra Matthews, 17323 74th Drive NE, Arlington, knows that growth is coming to the area. She would like the Council to consider the impacts on the entire area before making a decision on the rezone. Ward Brien, 7130 Eaglefield Drive, Arlington, thanked the City Council for their efforts. He expressed his concern for the growth coming to Arlington and requested that the Council keep the current zoning. John Branthoover, 7208 Eaglefield Drive, Arlington, shared his comments as president of the Gleneagle Homeowners Association. He expressed his belief that the proposal is a spot rezone. He noted the cost of housing is increasing and homes in the area are moving quickly for at or above asking price. He has concerns about traffic on 172nd St NE, specifically in the area between 67th Ave NE and Highway 9, which is not on the list for WSDOT to look at until 2024. He believes that the proposed development will have more than 2.3 people per household and has a concern for fire safety. Bill Wilbur, 18430 Newport Drive, Arlington, has concerns about fire department access to the proposed rezone. He also noted that services for the proposed rezone, such as groceries and other amenities, are not within walking distance. Minutes of the City of Arlington City Council Workshop June 26, 2017 Page 3 of 4 Rebecca Mariano, 17611 Topper Court, Arlington, stated she understands the difficult situation the city is in for providing more housing. She expressed concerns of drainage and water storage on the property. She also has concerns about whether the local schools can handle the additional students. She stated there is limited bus service in the area and no sidewalks. Everett Lewis, Arlington, expressed concerns of traffic on 59th and SR 530 and speeding on Division between Olympic and French. Ordinance Approving Villas at Arlington Rezone Community and Economic Development Director Marc Hayes reviewed the proposed ordinance approving the Villas at Arlington rezone request, heard before the Planning Commission on April 18, 2017 and reviewed and approved by the City Council on June 5, 2017. Adopting the ordinance and publishing will formally put the rezone into effect. The Council requested this item be placed on the consent agenda for the July 3, 2017 meeting. Ordinance Denying the Stewart Rezone Community and Economic Development Director Marc Hayes reviewed the proposed ordinance denying the Stewart rezone request, heard before the Planning Commission on April 18, 2017 and reviewed and denied by the City Council on June 5, 2017. Adopting the ordinance and publishing will formally deny the rezone request. The Council requested this item be placed on the consent agenda for the July 3, 2017 meeting. Ordinance Amending AMC Chapter 10.54 regarding parking City Attorney Steve Peiffle reviewed the proposed ordinance which fixes a glitch in our municipal code that occurred after the repeal of the City’s traffic violations bureau in April 2017. The AMC still refers to the traffic violations bureau in Title 10.54, which means an amendment is required. Allowing the City Finance Department to administer parking offenses is cost‐effective for the city and is consistent with how other departments at Marysville Municipal Court (Marysville, Lake Stevens) handle parking infractions. Sending all of our parking violations to the Marysville Municipal Court costs $46.92 per infraction. Our infraction is $50, meaning for the time that staff works to resolve a parking violation, we collect $3.08. This will allow the violator to pay through the Finance department at significant savings to the City and to the violator. Discussion followed. The Council requested this item be placed on the consent agenda for the July 3, 2017 meeting. Ordinance Repealing the International Plumbing Code and Adopting the Uniform Plumbing Code City Attorney Steve Peiffle reviewed the proposed ordinance to change from the International Plumbing Code to the Uniform Plumbing Code. The City adopted the International Plumbing Code in January 2015. Though there are many similarities, the Uniform Plumbing Code is the official Plumbing Code adopted by the State Building Codes Council. The City recently received correspondence on behalf of the Washington State Association of United Association of Plumbers and Pipefitters requesting the adoption of the proper code. Discussion followed. The Council requested this item be placed on the consent agenda for the July 3, 2017 meeting. Minutes of the City of Arlington City Council Workshop June 26, 2017 Page 4 of 4 EMS Equipment Replacement Change Order Fire Chief Bruce Stedman reviewed the requested change order to the current bid to mount the aid unit box on a new chassis. The bid came in over the budgeted authority of $140,000. With changes to the bid as requested by staff that will increase firefighter safety and overall patient care, the remount will cost an additional $20,439.42, including tax. The EMS fund has placed adequate funds in the Equipment Replacement Fund to cover this increased cost. Discussion followed. The Council requested this item be placed on the agenda under New Business for the July 3, 2017 meeting. May Financial Report Finance Director Kristin Garcia reviewed the financial report from May 2017 and answered Council questions. Miscellaneous Council Items None. Public Comment No additional public comments were received. Executive Session None. With no further business to be discussed, the meeting was adjourned at 8:12 p.m. ____________________________ Barbara Tolbert, Mayor City of Arlington Council Agenda Bill Item: CA #3 Attachment B COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 3, 2017 SUBJECT: Ordinance Approving Villas at Arlington – Rezone from current RMD to RHD ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance # 2017‐XXX DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN Community & Economic Development; Marc Hayes 360‐403‐3457 EXPENDITURES REQUESTED: ‐0‐ BUDGET CATEGORY: n/a BUDGETED AMOUNT: LEGAL REVIEW: DESCRIPTION: Ordinance approving the Villas at Arlington request for a Land Use Map Amendment and Concurrent Rezone (PLN# 129) HISTORY: This was a request from applicant, AVS Communities for an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan, Land Use Map with a concurrent amendment to the City’s Official Zoning Map that would change the land‐use designation and zoning classification from Residential Moderate Density to Residential High Density on their single lot. The rezone was heard at a Public Hearing on April 18, 2017, with no public comment received. The rezone was heard by City Council at a regular meeting on June 5, 2017 where it received approval. ALTERNATIVES Approve/deny the proposed ordinance. RECOMMENDED MOTION: I move to approve the Villas at Arlington Land Use Map Amendment and Concurrent rezone ordinance, and authorize the Mayor to sign the ordinance. ORDINANCE NO. 2015-XXX 1 ORDINANCE NO. 2017--XXX AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ARLINGTON, WASHINGTON, APPROVING THE VILLAS AT ARLINGTON LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT AND CONCURRENT REZONE (PLN #129) WHEREAS, the City of Arlington has the authority to regulate land uses within the City, and is in the process of its periodic annual review and update of the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, included in the review of the Comprehensive Plan was a series of proposed amendments to the City of Arlington Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map; and WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission considered the proposed Villas at Arlington Land Use Map amendment and Concurrent Rezone (PLN #313) and conducted an open record public hearing on April 18, 2017 and recommended approval to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council considered the same at a workshop held on May 22, 2017, and considered them along with the Planning Commission recommendations, at their public hearing conducted on June 5, 2017; and the City Council having determined approving said amendment was in the best interest of the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the proposed comprehensive plan amendments and finds those to be consistent with city and state law and in the best interests of the citizens; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Arlington do hereby ordain as follows: Section 1. Findings. The City Council adopts the following findings as required by AMC Chapter 20.96: a. The subject property is suitable for development in general conformance with adjacent land use and the surrounding development pattern, and with zoning standards under the potential zoning classifications. b. The proposed amendment is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the comprehensive plan; c. The proposed amendment is consistent with the scope and purpose of the city's zoning ordinances and the description and purpose of the zone classification applied for; d. Circumstances have changed substantially since the establishment of the current zoning map or district to warrant the proposed amendment; e. The proposed zoning is consistent and compatible with the uses and zoning of surrounding property; ORDINANCE NO. 2017-XXX 2 f. The property that is the subject of the amendment is suited for the uses allowed in the proposed zoning classification; and g. Adequate public services can be made available to serve the full range of proposed uses in that zone. Section 2. The City Council approves the Villas at Arlington Land Use Map and Concurrent Rezone (PLN #313). The comprehensive plan designation and Land Use Map for the Property identified on Exhibit “A” shall be modified from RMD (Residential Moderate Density) to RHD (Residential High Density) and the City’s official zoning map shall be amended to reflect this change as depicted on the attached Exhibit “B”. Section 3. Severability. If any provision, section, or part of this ordinance shall be adjudged to be invalid or unconstitutional, such adjudication shall not affect the validity of the ordinance as a whole or any section, provision or part thereof not adjudged invalid or unconstitutional. Section 4. Effective Date. The title of this Ordinance, which summarizes the contents of this ordinance, shall be published in the official newspaper of the City. The Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force five (5) days after the date of publication. PASSED BY the City Council and APPROVED by the Mayor this _______ day of ___________, 2017. CITY OF ARLINGTON ______________________________ Barbara Tolbert, Mayor Attest: ______________________________ Kristin Banfield, City Clerk Approved as to form: ______________________________ Steven J. Peiffle City Attorney City of Arlington Council Agenda Bill Item: CA #4 Attachment C COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 3, 2017 SUBJECT: Ordinance Denying Rezone for Greg Stewart – Rezone from current RMD to RHD ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance # 2017 ‐XXX DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN Community & Economic Development; Marc Hayes 360‐403‐3457 EXPENDITURES REQUESTED: ‐0‐ BUDGET CATEGORY: n/a BUDGETED AMOUNT: LEGAL REVIEW: DESCRIPTION: Ordinance Denying the Greg Stewart request for a Land Use Map Amendment and Concurrent Rezone (PLN#313). HISTORY: This was a privately initiated request from applicant, Greg Stewart for an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan, Land Use Map with a concurrent amendment to the City’s Official Zoning Map that would change the land‐use designation and zoning classification from a split zone of Residential Moderate Density / Residential High Density to Residential High Density on his single lot. The City recommended additional parcels to be included with this rezone, as neighboring parcels have the same split zoning as the Applicant’s property. The rezone was heard at a Public Hearing on April 18, 2017 with numerous public comments recorded. The proposed rezone received a “no recommendation” from Planning Commission at the April 18th meeting. The rezone was considered by City Council, at a regular meeting, on June 5, 2017 where it received a denial of approval. ALTERNATIVES Approve/deny the proposed ordinance. RECOMMENDED MOTION: I move to approve the ordinance denying the Proposed Stewart Comprehensive Land Use Map Amendment and Concurrent Rezone, and authorize the Mayor to sign the ordinance. ORDINANCE NO. 2017-XXX 1 ORDINANCE NO. 2017-XXX AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ARLINGTON, WASHINGTON DENYING THE PROPOSED STEWART COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT AND CONCURRENT REZONE (PLN #274) WHEREAS, Applicant Greg Stewart requested that the City amend its comprehensive plan and rezone his property; and WHEREAS, the proposal known as the Stewart Land Use Map Amendment and Concurrent Rezone Request (PLN#274) was properly docketed and approved for consideration by the Council; and WHEREAS, the Arlington Planning Commission held an open record hearing on April 18, 2017, and on May 20 forwarded the proposal to the City Council without recommendation; and WHEREAS, the City Council considered the record and the testimony and considered additional public input given on June 5, 2017; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Arlington does hereby ordain as follows: Section 1. The Stewart Land Use Map Amendment and Concurrent Rezone Request (PLN#274) shall be and hereby is denied, based on the criteria in Arlington Municipal Code sections 20.96.026 and AMC 20.96.070. Section 2. The title of this ordinance which summarizes the contents shall be published in the official newspaper of the City. The ordinance shall take effect and be in full force five (5) days after the date of publication. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Arlington and APPROVED by the Mayor this _____ day of ________________, 2017. CITY OF ARLINGTON ____________________________________ Barbara Tolbert, Mayor ORDINANCE NO. 2017-XXX 2 ATTEST: ___________________________________ Kristin Banfield, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ___________________________________ Steven J. Peiffle, City Attorney City of Arlington Council Agenda Bill Item: CA #5 Attachment D COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 3, 2017 SUBJECT: Ordinance Amending AMC 10.54 regarding parking ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance Amending AMC 10.54 regarding parking DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN Police Department EXPENDITURES REQUESTED: BUDGET CATEGORY: BUDGETED AMOUNT: LEGAL REVIEW: DESCRIPTION: The Council recently repealed the traffic violations bureau. The AMC still refers to the traffic violations bureau in Title 10.54, which means an amendment is required. Allowing the City Finance Department to administer parking offenses is cost‐effective for the city and is consistent with how other departments at Marysville Municipal Court (Marysville, Lake Stevens) handle parking infractions. Sending all of our parking violations to the Marysville Municipal Court costs $46.92 per infraction. Our infraction is $50, meaning for the time that staff works to resolve a parking violation, we collect $3.08. This will allow the violator to pay through the finance department at significant savings to the City and to the violator. HISTORY: The City repealed the traffic violations bureau on April 3, 2017. This “glitch” was discovered shortly thereafter. ALTERNATIVES: Do not amend the AMC and have the Municipal Court administer. RECOMMENDED MOTION: I move to approve the ordinance amending AMC Chapter 10.54 regarding parking. ORDINANCE NO. 2017-XXX 1 ORDINANCE NO. 2017--XXX AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ARLINGTON, WASHINGTON AMENDING ARLINGTON MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 10.54 REGARDING PARKING WHEREAS, the City of Arlington, Washington has the authority to enact laws to promote the efficient administration of business within the City; and WHEREAS, provisions of the Arlington Municipal Code relating to parking infractiosn require amendment due to an ordinance which abolished the City’s traffic violations bureau; and WHEREAS, the City Council believes that fines relating to parking activities can be more efficiently hanled by the City’s Finance Department; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Arlington do hereby ordain as follows: Section 1. Arlington Municipal Code Chapter 10.54.060 shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 10.54.060 - Violation—Infraction. A person violating any provision of this chapter commits an infraction, for the violation of which they shall pay a civil penalty in a sum to be set by city resolution, plus court fees, where applicable. (a) Parking infractions shall be paid at the City of Arlington Violations BureauFinance Department at city hall, 238 N. Olympic Avenue, Arlington in person or by mail within fifteen (15) days of issuance. (b) The fine for all parking infractions paid on the city's next full business day after the citation is given shall be reduced by one-half the fine amount. (c) For payments made by mail, a postmark shall serve as the date the payment is made. (d) A parking infraction may be contested by notifying the violations bureauFinance Department within fifteen days of issuance and requesting a hearing. (e) Requests to contest infractions must be made in writing and signed by the owner of the vehicle. (f) When a request for a contested hearing is made, the police finance department will forward a notice of infraction to the municipal court for a hearing. (g) The fine for parking infractions that are neither contested nor paid within fifteen days of issuance shall be doubled. (h) Failure to remit the fine within fifteen days of receiving a reminder notice from the municipal court that the fine is due will result in the inability to ORDINANCE NO. 20152017-XXX 2 renew the vehicle registration without remitting the fine. (i) If no response or payment is made within fifteen calendar days from the date of issuance of the notice of parking violation, the penalty for each violation may be referred to a collection agency thirty days from the due date, or fifteen days after the penalty is due, pursuant to RCW 3.02.045 and 19.16.500. The violator may be liable for any and all collection costs. (j) For all infractions that are neither contested nor paid within fifteen days of issuance, the municipal court shall send the vehicle owner a reminder notice stating that payment has not been made and describing the consequences of non-payment set forth in subsections (g) through (i). Section 2. Severability. If any provision, section, or part of this ordinance shall be adjudged to be invalid or unconstitutional, such adjudication shall not affect the validity of the ordinance as a whole or any section, provision or part thereof not adjudged invalid or unconstitutional. Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective five days from its adoption and publication as required by law. PASSED BY the City Council and APPROVED by the Mayor this _____ day of _______________, 2017. CITY OF ARLINGTON Barbara Tolbert, Mayor ORDINANCE NO. 2017-XXX 3 Attest: Kristin Banfield, City Clerk Approved as to form: Steven J. Peiffle City Attorney City of Arlington Council Agenda Bill Item: CA #6 Attachment E COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 3, 2017 SUBJECT: Ordinance Repealing the International Plumbing Code and Adopting the Uniform Plumbing Code ATTACHMENTS: Draft Ordinance Repealing the International Plumbing Code and Adopting the Uniform Plumbing Code DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN Planning Department EXPENDITURES REQUESTED: BUDGET CATEGORY: BUDGETED AMOUNT: LEGAL REVIEW: DESCRIPTION: The Council adopted the International Plumbing Code in January, 2015. In April, 2017 the Council received correspondence from an attorney representing the Washington State Association of United Association of Plumbers and Pipefitters and requesting that the Council repeal the adoption of the International Plumbing Code and adopt the Uniform Plumbing Code instead. HISTORY: The City previously had adopted the Uniform Plumbing Code and adopted the IPC in 2015. Though there are many similarities, the UPC is the Plumbing Code adopted by the State Building Codes Council. ALTERNATIVES: Do not amend the AMC and retain the IPC. RECOMMENDED MOTION: I move to approve the ordinance repealing the International Plumbing Code and Adopting the Uniform Plumbing Code. ORDINANCE NO. 2017‐XXX 1 ORDINANCE NO. 2017‐‐XXX AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ARLINGTON, WASHINGTON REPEALING THE INTERNATIONAL PLUMBING CODE, ADOPTING THE UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE, AND AMENDING ARLINGTON MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 16.36 WHEREAS, the City of Arlington is authorized to adopt ordinances for the general welfare of its citizens; and WHEREAS, the City is further authorized to adopt and enforce building codes and to adopt and amend provisions of the state building codes under chapter 19.27 of the Revised Code of Washington; and WHEREAS, the City Council deems adoption of this ordinance to be in the best interests of its citizens; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Arlington, Washington does hereby ordain as follows: Section 1. Arlington Municipal Code section 16.36.020 is hereby amended to read as follows: 16.36.020 Document Adopted by Reference. (a) The 2015 edition of the Uniform Plumbing Code, including appendices A, B and I, published by the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials, as set forth in Washington Administrative Code Chapter 51‐56 under the provisions of RCW 19.27.031 and 19.27.074 is hereby adopted by reference as the City’s plumbing code with the additions, deletions and exceptions set forth in WAC 51‐56‐003. (b) All plumbing permit and other fees shall be set by separate resolution of the City. Section 2. Effective Date. The title of this ordinance which summarizes the contents shall be published in the official newspaper of the City. The ordinance shall take effect and be in full force five (5) days after the date of publication. ORDINANCE NO. 2017‐XXX 2 PASSED BY the City Council and APPROVED by the Mayor this _____ day of ______________________, 2017. CITY OF ARLINGTON _______________________________ Barbara Tolbert, Mayor Attest: __________________________ Kristin Banfield, City Clerk Approved as to form: __________________________ Steven J. Peiffle City Attorney City of Arlington Council Agenda Bill Item: NB #1 Attachment F COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 3, 2017 SUBJECT: Riar Family Rezone from current RLMD to RHD ATTACHMENTS: Staff Report, Planning Commission Findings of Fact, Summary of Public Testimony, Comments received from Public Comment Period, Comp Plan Goals & Policies, Ordinances pending outcome of Council Action DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN Community & Economic Development; Marc Hayes 360‐403‐3457 EXPENDITURES REQUESTED: ‐0‐ BUDGET CATEGORY: n/a BUDGETED AMOUNT: LEGAL REVIEW: DESCRIPTION: Riar Family Rezone request for a Land Use Map Amendment and Concurrent Rezone (PLN#313). HISTORY: This is a privately initiated request from Applicant, Supinder Gill for an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan, Land Use Map with a concurrent amendment to the City’s Official Zoning Map that would change the land‐use designation and zoning classification of Residential Low/Moderate Density to Residential High Density on multiple lots. The rezone was to be heard at a Public Hearing on April 18, 2017 but was continued until June 20th in order for staff to conduct additional review of the requested amendment and rezone, in response to inquiries from the public. The Public Hearing was reopened on June 20th for public testimony to occur, of which a substantial amount of public testimony was heard. The proposed rezone received a “no recommendation” from Planning Commission at the June 20, meeting. ALTERNATIVES Approve/deny the proposed ordinance. RECOMMENDED MOTION: I move to approve/deny the Riar Family Land Use Map Amendment and Concurrent Rezone Ordinance, and authorize the Mayor to sign the ordinance. Staff Report & Recommendation Riar Family Land Use Map Amendment & Concurrent Rezone – PLN#292 Page 1 of 5 Community and Economic Development Planning Division 18204 59th Avenue NE, Arlington, WA 98223 STAFF REPORT & RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Minor Land‐Use Map Amendment & Concurrent Rezone Riar Family Rezone – PLN#292 Report Prepared By: Amy Rusko, Associate Planner Report Issued: March 28, 2017 A. APPLICATION DESCRIPTION This is a request from Applicant, Supinder Gill for an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan, Land Use Map with a concurrent amendment to the City’s Official Zoning Map that would change the land‐use designation and zoning classification from Residential Low/Moderate Density to Residential High Density on multiple lots. The City recommended additional parcels to be included with this rezone, as neighboring parcels have the same split zoning as the Applicant’s property (see Exhibit I). B. SITE AND SITUATION The subject 7.23 acre lots (APN 31052300301700, 31052300301400 and 31052300301800) are located at 7103, 7115 and 7127 172nd Street NE. The additional parcels are located at 6905, 7019, 7023 and 7027 172nd Street NE, with associated parcel numbers: 31052300300900, 31052300301900, 31052300302200, 31052300302300 and 31052300302400. The topography generally slopes from the northeast to the southwest, ranging in elevation from approximately 190 to 280 feet above sea level. The soils on site and in the vicinity consist of Tokul gravelly medial loam, 0 to 8 percent (northern 61.8% of the property), Tokul gravelly medial loam, 15 to 30 percent (southwest 35.4% of the property), and Tokul‐Winston gravelly loams, 25 to 65 percent (small southeast portion), which has a drainage class that is moderately well drained and is suitable for urban development according to the USDA Soil Survey of Snohomish County. The parcels are considered under‐developed, based on the size of the parcels and the current use of single family residences (see Exhibit II) and there are currently no active land‐use or development proposals on file with the City for these properties. The parcels are situated on the north side of 172nd Street, just west of the intersection of 67th Avenue and 172nd Street intersection. Direct access will be taken from 172nd Street NE, which is an unimproved arterial. The subject lot is currently zoned Residential Low/Moderate Density and is one of eight parcels within the rezone area. Lots to the north, east and west are zoned Residential Low/Moderate Density, with lots to the south located within Snohomish County jurisdiction. Staff Report & Recommendation Riar Family Land Use Map Amendment & Concurrent Rezone – PLN#292 Page 2 of 5 Residential properties to the north, east and west are developed with single family dwellings. A church is also located to the west of the subject parcel. Residential properties to the south are located within unincorporated Snohomish County and developed with single family dwellings. C. APPLICATION REVIEW PROCESS Arlington Municipal Code allows for any person to petition the Planning Commission and City Council to amend the City’s Comprehensive Plan and/or Land Use Code. The City’s requirements for proposing amendments are found in Arlington Municipal Code (AMC) Chapter 20.96 (Amendments). The Future Land Use Map is a required element of the City’s Comprehensive Plan (see RCW 36.70A.070). The Future Land Use Map shows the City’s desired land use patterns by geographical area within both City limits and in unincorporated Urban Growth Areas. The City’s Official Zoning Map is based off of the Future Land Use Map found in the City’s Comprehensive Plan. Since the City’s Comprehensive Plan serves as the foundation for the City’s Land Use Code (Title 20), inclusive of the City’s Official Zoning Map, State law requires that the City’s Land Use Code be consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan (see RCW 36.70A.130(1)(d)). If a proposed amendment to the City’s Land Use Code is not consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan, the proposal must either be denied or the Comprehensive Plan must also be concurrently amended to preserve consistency between the Comprehensive Plan and the Land Use Code. State and City regulations prohibit the Comprehensive Plan from being amended more frequently than once per year; therefore, the City has established a docketing process so that all proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan can be considered concurrently(see RCW 36.70A.130 and AMC 20.96.010(d)). The proposal will be made to the 2017 annual update to the City’s Comprehensive Plan, all proposed amendments are being considered as part of the City’s annual docketing procedures. This will ensure that amendments to the Comprehensive Plan only occur once in 2017. Amendment proposals to the City’s Comprehensive Plan may be initiated by the City or private party. Applications for Comprehensive Plan Amendments (CPAs) are due by the last working day of January to be considered that year. During the year staff reviews the proposed amendments for compatibility with the Comprehensive Plan and conformance with the requirements of AMC Chapter 20.96 and presents their findings and recommendations to the Planning Commission at an open record public hearing as required by AMC Section 20.96.030(a). The Planning Commission’s recommendation is then forwarded to the City Council which then takes final action at a closed record hearing. Staff Report & Recommendation Riar Family Land Use Map Amendment & Concurrent Rezone – PLN#292 Page 3 of 5 D. STAFF ANALYSIS The Applicant submitted their application requesting a rezone on December 7, 2016, meeting the January 31, 2017 deadline for consideration. Because this rezone request is inconsistent with the Future Land‐Use Map contained within the Comprehensive Plan, an amendment to the Future Land‐ Use Map is necessary if the rezone request is to be approved. AMC Section §20.96.024 establishes criteria that an amendment proposal must meet in order to be considered. AMC Section §20.96.024(a)(1) states: “If the proposed amendment is site specific, the subject property is suitable for development in general conformance with adjacent land use and the surrounding development pattern, and with zoning standards under the potential zoning classifications.” Staff found that the proposed Future Land‐Use Map amendment and concurrent rezone request meet this requirement and have included it for consideration as part of the 2017 annual Comprehensive Plan update. 1. CRITERIA OF AMC 20.96.060. In deciding whether to approve any amendment to the City’s Comprehensive Plan, the approval body must base its decision solely on whether the proposed amendment advances the public health, safety, or welfare. All other arguments relating to the proposed amendment are irrelevant according to AMC §20.96.060. a. Public Health With regards to public health, a change in the Future Land‐Use Map for the subject property from Residential Low/Moderate Density designation to a Residential High Density designation would advance the public health by allowing for the development of higher residential densities within close proximity and walking distance from residences to future commercial businesses located along 67th Avenue and to the current Centennial Trail. Easy access from residences to commercial businesses and recreation activities, promotes walking, social interaction, and community support of businesses. b. Public Safety With regards to public safety, a change in the Future Land‐Use Map for the subject property from a split Residential Low/Moderate Density designation to a Residential High Density designation would advance the public safety by allowing for the development of higher residential densities, making the potential residents more accessible to the police and fire departments. Residents of a multi‐family development can provide safety to their neighbors by being “the eyes on the street” to protect personal property. c. Public Welfare With regards to public welfare, a change in the Future Land‐Use Map for the subject property from a split Residential Low/Moderate Density designation to a Residential High Density designation would advance the public welfare by providing the potential of diverse housing options that would be available for a wide range of individuals. Staff Report & Recommendation Riar Family Land Use Map Amendment & Concurrent Rezone – PLN#292 Page 4 of 5 2. CRITERIA OF AMC 20.96.026. In deciding whether to approve, modify, defer, or deny any proposed amendment to the City’s Official Zoning Map, the City Council shall base their decision on the following criteria (see 20.96.026): a. The proposed amendment is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The Future Land Use Map in the Comprehensive Plan would need to be amended to change the land use designation from Residential Low/Moderate Density to Residential High Density for the rezone of the subject parcels from Residential Low/Moderate Density to Residential High Density to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The City has many goals and policies directly related to the re‐designation/rezoning of properties to Residential High Density in the 2015 Comprehensive Plan. The Goals and Policies that support this amendment; GO‐3, GH‐1, GH‐5, GH‐8, GL‐4, GL‐7, GT‐5, PO‐6.1, PH‐2.1, PH‐4.2, PH‐5.1, PH‐8.1, PL‐1.4, PL‐4.3, PL‐4.8, PL‐7.2, PL‐8.1. b. The proposed amendment is consistent with the scope and purpose of the city's zoning ordinances and the description and purpose of the zone classification applied for. Zone descriptions and purposes are outlined in AMC Chapter 20.36 and the Comprehensive Plan. The description and purpose of the Residential High Density zone as listed in AMC Chapter 20.36 is “… to accommodate higher density multi‐family developments and recreational, quasi‐public, and public uses that customarily serve residential development in areas served by public sewer and water facilities.” The description and purpose of the Residential Low/Moderate Density zone as listed in AMC Chapter 20.36 is “…to accommodate detached single‐family residential development and recreational, quasi‐public, and public uses that customarily serve residential development in areas served by public sewer and water facilities. Some types of two‐family residences are allowed in this district on larger lots.” The proposed amendment (rezone) to the Zoning Map is consistent with the description and purpose of the Residential High Density zone provided the Future Land Use Map is amended to designate the subject lot as Residential High Density. c. Circumstances have changed substantially since the establishment of the current zoning map or district to warrant the proposed amendment. Circumstances have changed since the establishment of the current zoning map. The City has a need for providing a diverse housing stock to the citizens. The City needs to comply with Vision 2040 and the Buildable Lands Analysis per Snohomish County Ordinance 16‐ 077. The City has insufficient land capacity to accommodate the 2035 population estimates. The AHA Housing Profile for Arlington indicated a deficiency in the amount of diversified and multi‐family housing available in the City. Staff Report & Recommendation Riar Family Land Use Map Amendment & Concurrent Rezone – PLN#292 Page 5 of 5 d. The proposed zoning is consistent and compatible with the uses and zoning of surrounding property. The proposed zoning is consistent and compatible with the uses and zoning of surrounding property. The subject parcels are adjacent to Residential Low/Moderate Density zoned land to the north, east, west and south. Due to the topography of the site and the proximity to a Horizontal Mixed Use development to the west, the rezone would be compatible to the surrounding area. For a comparison of allowed uses between the Residential Low/Moderate Density zone and the Residential High Density zone, see Exhibit III. e. The property that is the subject of the amendment is suited for the uses allowed in the proposed zoning classification. The subject parcels are suitable for the allowed uses in the Residential High Density zone because of its site and situation. f. Adequate public services could be made available to serve the full range of proposed uses in that zone. Adequate public services are available to serve the full range of allowable uses in the Residential High Density zone on this site. E. STAFF CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATION 1. Staff concludes that this proposal meets the criterion of the Comprehensive Plan and Arlington Municipal Code for re‐designation and rezoning of the subject lot from Residential Low/Moderate Density to Residential High Density and recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the proposed amendment to the City Council. Distributed to the following parties: 1. Gill Riar Family, LLP, Applicant 2. The City Planning Commission 3. Marc Hayes, CED Director 4. Katie Heim, GIS Analyst 5. Jim Kelly, Public Works Director EXHIBIT I 176TH PL NE TROONCT HILLSIDE CT TOPPER CT 72ND DR NE 73RD AVE NE WCOUNTRY CLUB DR HIGHLAND VIEW DR 172ND ST NE SR 531 UPLAND DR 73RD DR NE 73RDDRNE 67TH AVE NE GI NC RLMD GC City of Arlington Maps and GIS data are distributed “AS-IS” without warranties of any kind, either express or implied,including but not limited to warranties of suitability for a particular purpose or use. Map data are compiledfrom a variety of sources which may contain errors and users who rely upon the information do so at theirown risk. Users agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City of Arlington for any and all liabilityof any nature arising out of or resulting from the lack of accuracy or correctness of the data, or the use ofthe data presented in the maps. ± kdh RiarFamilyRezone11x17_16 12/15/2016 Scale: Date: File: Cartographer: Legend Proposed Rezone Area Public Roads Private Roads Assessor Parcels Riar Family Rezone 0 230 460115 Feet RHD rezone area NC = Neighborhood Commercial GC = General Commercial GI = General Industrial RLMD = Low to Moderate Density Residential EXHIBIT II EXHIBIT III Permissible Use RHD RLMD 1.000 RESIDENTIAL 1.100 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES 1.110 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED, ONE DWELLING UNIT PER LOT RHD RLMD 1.111 Site-Built & Modular Structures RHD RLMD 1.112 Class A Mobile Home1 RHD RLMD 1.113 Class B Mobile Home1 RHD RLMD 1.120 SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED DETACHED, MORE THAN ONE DWELLING UNIT PER LOT 1.121 Mobile Home Park RLMD 1.122 Cottage Housing RHD RLMD 1.200 TWO-FAMILY RESIDENCES 1.210 Two-Family Conversion2 RHD RLMD 1.220 Accessory Dwelling Unit2,12 RHD RLMD 1.230 Duplex2 RHD RLMD 1.300 MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENCES 1.310 Multi-Family Conversions RHD 1.320 Multi-Family Townhouses RHD 1.330 Multi-Family Apartments RHD 1.400 HOMES EMPHASIZING SPECIAL SERVICES, TREATMENT OR SUPERVISION 1.410 LOCATED IN A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 1.411 Homes for Handicapped or Infirm7 RHD RLMD 1.412 Nursing Care, Intermediate Care Homes7 RHD RLMD 1.413 Special Needs Child Care Homes7 RHD RLMD 1.414 Halfway Houses7 RHD RLMD 1.415 Adult Family Homes (6 or fewer adults) RHD RLMD 1.420 LOCATED IN A MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENCE (OCCUPYING SINGLE OR MULTIPLE DWELLING UNITS) 1.421 Homes for Handicapped or Infirm7 RHD 1.422 Nursing Care, Intermediate Care Homes7 RHD 1.423 Special Needs Child Care Homes7 RHD 1.424 Halfway Houses7 RHD 1.425 Adult Family Homes (6 or fewer adults) RHD RLMD 1.500 MISCELLANEOUS, ROOMS FOR RENT SITUATIONS 1.510 Rooming Houses or Boarding Houses RHD RLMD 1.520 Tourist Homes and Other Temporary Residences Rented By the Day or Week RHD RLMD 1.600 IN-HOME CHILD DAY CARE RHD RLMD 2.000 SALES AND RENTAL OF GOODS, MERCHANDISE AND EQUIPMENT 2.300 Transient Merchant Sales (vending carts, food and ice cream trucks, mobile delivery, peddlers)3 RHD RLMD 5.000 EDUCATIONAL, CULTURAL, RELIGIOUS, PHILANTHROPIC, SOCIAL OR FRATURAL USES 5.100 SCHOOLS 5.110 Elementary and Secondary Schools (including associated grounds, athletic and other facilities)18 RHD RLMD 5.120 Trade or Vocational Schools RHD 5.130 Colleges, Universities, Community Colleges (included associated facilities such as dormitories, office buildings athletic fields17 RHD RLMD 5.200 Religious Assembly as Principle On-Site Use (including associated residential structures for religious personnel and associated buildings but not including elementary school or secondary school buildings)17 RHD RLMD 5.210 Religious Assembly Accessory to an Existing On-Site Non-Religious Principle Use RHD RLMD 5.300 LIBRARIES, MUSEUMS, ART GALLERIES, ART CENTERS AND SIMILAR USES (INCLUDING ASSOCIATED EDUCATIONAL AND INSTUCTIONAL ACTIVITIES 5.310 Located Within a Building Designed and Previously Legally Occupied as a Residence RHD RLMD 5.320 Located Within any Permissible Building RHD RLMD 6.000 RECREATION, AMUSEMENT, ENTERTAINMENT 6.200 ACTIVITIES CONDUCTED PROMARILY OUTSIDE ENCLOSED BUILDINGS OR STRUCTURES 6.210 Privately Owned Outdoor Recreational Facilities (golf and country clubs, swimming or tennis clubs) RHD RLMD 6.220 Publicly Owned and Operated Outdoor Recreational Facilities (athletic fields, golf courses, tennis courts, swimming pools and parks) RHD RLMD 6.230 Golf Driving Ranges not Accessory to Golf Courses, Par 3 Golf Coursed, Miniature Golf, Skateboard Parks and Water Slides17 RHD RLMD 7.000 INSTITUTIONAL RESIDENCE OR CARE OR CONFINEMENT FACILITIES 7.100 Hospitals, Clinics, Other Medical (including mental health)17,18 RHD 7.200 Nursing Care Institutions, Intermediate Care Institutions, Handicapped or Infirm Institutions, Child Care Institutions17,18 RHD RLMD 7.300 Institutions (other than halfway houses) where Mentally Ill Persons are Confined17,18 RHD RLMD 9.000 MOTOR VEHICLE RELATED SALES AND SERVICE OPERATIONS 9.180 Electric Vehicle Infrastructure23 RHD RLMD 13.000 EMERGENCY SERVICES 13.100 Police Stations18 RHD RLMD 13.200 Fire Stations18 RHD RLMD 13.300 Rescue Squad or Ambulance Services18 RHD RLMD 13.400 Civil Defense Operation RHD RLMD 15.000 MISCELLANEOUS PUBLIC OR SEMI-PUBLIC FACILITIES 15.500 Temporary Mobile or Modular Structures Used For Public Services (mobile classrooms, civic services, public health centers, emergency response centers)4 RHD RLMD 17.000 UTILITY FACILITY 17.100 Neighborhood RHD RLMD 17.200 Community or Regional RHD RLMD 18.000 TOWERS AND RELATED STRUCTURES 18.100 NON COMMERCIAL TOWERS 18.110 Towers and Antennas 50 Feet Tall or Less RHD RLMD 18.120 Towers and Antennas More Than 50 Feet Tall and Receive-Only Earth Stations RHD RLMD 18.200 COMMERCIAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS TOWERS & MONOPOLES 18.230 Micro Facilities8 RHD RLMD 18.240 Mini Facilities8 RHD 18.250 Macro Facilities8 RHD 21.100 CEMETERY17 RHD RLMD 22.000 COMMERCIAL NURSERY SCHOOLS OR DAY CARE CENTERS17 RHD RLMD 23.000 NEW OR IMPROVED STREETS RHD RLMD 26.000 SPECIAL EVENTS RHD RLMD 28.000 SUBDIVISIONS AND BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENTS 28.100 Major RHD RLMD 28.200 Short RHD RLMD 28.300 Boundary Line Adjustment RHD RLMD 28.400 Unit Lot RHD 29.000 COMBINATION USES RHD RLMD 32.000 LAND CLEARING, LOGGING IN CONFORMANCE WITH CHAPTER 20.88 (ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREAS) BUT OF MORE THAN 10,000 FT2 OF PROPERTY WITHIN ONE YEAR9 RHD RLMD 33.000 USES PERMISSIBLE IN CRITICAL AREAS (SEE CHAPTER 20.93) RHD RLMD *The highlighted areas are the differences between the Residential High Density (RHD) zone and Residential Low/Moderate Density (RLMD) zone. EXHIBIT IV TYPE 'B' LANDSCAPE SCREEN BASKETBALL COURTS - MAINTAINS CURRENT STATUS TYPE 'B' LANDSCAPE SCREEN 72nd DRIVE NE 17 2 n d S T R E E T N E HI G H W A Y 5 3 1 NEW TURN LANE NEW SIDEWALK NEW EXIT LANE TO EAST BOUND HWY 532 28 8 280 284 274 270 26 4 260 270 28 0 276 274 268 266 264 25 6 252 240 250 260 270 256 266 244 26 0 25 0 24 0 230 224 234 24 6 220 230 240 230 234 224 220 210 200 24 0 21 0 216 20 4 22 0 22 6 214 210 226 234 250 30 ' - 0 " A 7 UNIT B 6 UNIT J 5 UNIT K 4 UNIT N 4 UNIT O 5 UNIT L 4 UNIT M 4 UNIT F 5 UNIT E 5 UNIT G 3 UNIT H 3 UNIT I 4 UNIT T 3 UNIT R 3 UNIT P 5 UNIT S 3 UNIT D 3 UNIT C 3 UNIT U 3 UNIT V 3 UNIT MINI-PARK Q 5 UNIT 50 ' - 0 " 30' - 0 " 50 ' - 0 " 30 ' - 0 " 64'-0" 50 ' - 5 " 20 ' - 0 " 50 ' - 0 " 50 ' - 0 " 60'-0" 50'-0" R30' - 5 " R30' - 5 " 5' - 0 " 15 ' - 0 " 5'-0" 15'-0" 20 ' - 0 " 5' - 0 " MINI-PARK MINI-PARK SITE PLAN SCALE 1" = 80'0'40'80' PROJECT NORTH UNITS 2 BEDROOM UNITS:50 3 BEDROOM UNITS:40 PLAN B TOTAL UNITS:90 MINI-PARKS 2 BEDROOM UNITS, 50(2.2):110 RESIDENTS 3 BEDROOM UNITS, 40(3.2): 128 RESIDENTS TOTAL RESIDENTS: 238 REQ'D MINI-PARK AREA, (65 S.F. PER RESIDENT):15,470 S.F. PROVIDED:22,000 S.F. OPEN SPACE SITE AREA:314,158 S.F. REQ'D OPEN SPACE, 5%:15,708 S.F. PROVIDED:16,403 S.F. PROPOSED AKAL RIDGE 06/12/2017 P E L L E T I E R S C H A A R V i s i o n B a s e d A r c h i t e c t u r e 26911 98th Dr. NW, Suite B ∙ Stanwood, WA 98292 w w w .p e l l e t i e r s c h a a r .c o m ∙ 3 6 0 -6 2 9 -5 3 7 5 © 2017 PELLETIER + SCHAAR, L.L.C. 1.2 Findings of Fact City of Arlington Planning Commission Riar Family Rezone Page 1 of 2 City of Arlington Community and Economic Development Planning Commission 18204 59th Avenue NE, #B Arlin ton, WA 98223 Regarding: Riar Rezone PLN#292 Summary: The Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on June 20, 2017 for the Riar Family Rezone. The Planning Commission transmits the following findings and recommendation to the City Council: Findings: 1. State law (RCW 36.70A.130) allows Cities to amend their Comprehensive Plans once annually. The Council recently updated and clarified the docketing process for review of all proposed amendments as part of an effort to insure that these proposed changes were considered together. 2. In addition, AMC 20.96.024 establishes qualifying criteria for amendments to the Comprehensive Plan that must be met for inclusion on the Docket. 3. Comprehensive Plan amendments can be proposed either by private parties, or by the City. In either case, the proposed amendment is subject to the same docketing procedures. The only exception is for emergency amendments, none of which were proposed for the 2017 docket. 4. The items included on the 2017 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Docket all meet the submission requirements and specific criterial contained in AMC 20.96 sections 010 through 060. 5. During the public hearing on June 20, 2017 considerable opposition to this rezone was expressed by residents living in the area potentially affected by the rezone. 6. During this public hearing, one Commissioner was absent and one recused himself from the deliberation based on appearance of fairness considerations, leaving three Commissioners to vote on the staff recommendation. The chair can neither make nor second a motion. Two opposing motions were sequentially made and each died for lack of a second. Conclusion and Recommendation: Based on the foregoing findings and testimony received at the hearing, the Planning Commission did not successfully bring forward a motion for vote. The Planning Commission, therefore forwards the proposed Riar Family Rezone to Council without a recommendation. Findings of Fact City of Arlington Planning Commission Riar Family Rezone Page 2 of 2 Respectfully submitted through the Department of Community and Economic Development to the City Council this twenty‐first day of June 2017 by: ____________________________________________________ Bruce Angell City of Arlington Planning Commission Chair Staff Summary of the 6/20/2017 Riar Family Rezone Public Hearing Eyleen McCluskey‐Shouman 7607 W. Country Club Drive Referred to her letter that was submitted to the City on April 4, 2017 Not sensible or reasonable area for growth (not within walking distance of shops and no sidewalks) Park 77 location makes sense and also pointed out other areas that would accommodate growth better What is the point of the Public Hearing if they will vote for it anyway? Gary Gibbs 18227 Greywalls Drive Current density fits the current infrastructure Appearance of Fairness Doctrine through the Quasi‐Judicial process (regarding Aaron MacDonald who is a member of the Planning Commission and was a prior architect on the rezone project) Letter written to the Mayor in regards to Aaron MacDonald being the architect on the project and his participation on the Planning Commission. What influence did he have? Did Aaron have any interaction with the Planning Commission regarding the proposal prior to the Public Hearing? Erica Knapp 6829 Bovee Lane Moved to Arlington 11 years ago because it is God’s country and she is watching it slowing disappear. The plan is unsafe for her children due to the increase in traffic Growth is good but should also preserve the natural environment Lynn Luingquist 6918 Upland Drive Moved to Arlington from Marysville 1 ½ years ago Property backs the church property Loves Arlington and is a wonderful place to live but is disappointed with proposed High Density out her back door. Against the High Density rezone Will be directly impacted by the increase in traffic from the additional 90 proposed townhomes Staff Summary of the 6/20/2017 Riar Family Rezone Public Hearing Otis Gulley 6918 Upland Drive Lives next to the church property Lots of wildlife in the area. What will happen to them once the proposed development occurs Concerned with additional water run‐off from the proposal Currently water runs down his backyard from the plat of Glen Eagle and drains at the bottom of the hill along 67th Ave. Traffic from the church driveway is horrible and some days it is difficult to turn out. Traffic along 172nd Street is already bad and this proposed development will only add to it Bob Cameron 17407 73rd Avenue Lives in the Crossing at Edgecomb Creek The basketball court is owned by the home owners association and they pay insurance for the court. The proposed development could add liability to the home owners association The proposed connector road from the proposed development through the Crossing is absurd. No one follows the speed limit already and this will make it worse. No traffic analysis has been done by the City or the developer No drainage analysis has been done for the proposal Referenced the City’s current lawsuit with Glen Eagle and the old HCI building along 67th Avenue Bruce Kinney 7023 172nd Street Owns a house in the middle of the rezone. The City included his property with the rezone request. He agreed with all concerns and comments that have been stated He lives in the Pacific Northwest for the quality of life it provides What is the logic of the rezone if it ruins the quality of life of the surrounding neighbors He gets the need for High Density but doesn’t want it to occur in established neighborhoods Staff Summary of the 6/20/2017 Riar Family Rezone Public Hearing Judy Castanares 17506 72nd Drive Traffic along 172nd is a problem This is considered a spot rezone Not only concerned about the proposed project area of the rezone but the other properties that were included in the rezone. They would be able to develop at a high density in the future should they wish and that would add an additional strain to the infrastructure. The High Density designation will open the door to many other uses that are not currently allowed in the Residential Moderate Density zone. The Developer does not live in Arlington All the neighboring homeowner associations wrote comment letters requesting denial of the proposed rezone. Does not agree with the position of Aaron MacDonald on the Planning Commission and being an architect. She will experience an increase to traffic and noise in front of her house Did the developer approach the city or did the city approach the developer? Dwan Kinney 7023 172nd Street Moved from a farming community in North Dakota to her property 20 years ago They have never thought of subdividing their property but to only to keep it as open space. Just because you can propose a rezone or develop does not mean you should Only the people within 500 feet of subject properties are notified of any proposal and does not agree with this. We all need to help plan correct and positive growth for Arlington 172nd Street from 67th to Highway 9 is not part of WSDOT’s 172nd Street Widening Project The Health, Safety and Public Welfare of the community is not being addressed The location of the proposed round‐about at the intersection of 67th Avenue and 172nd Street is not a good location for a round‐about because of the Centennial Trail location. It is already hard for trail users to navigate the intersection so how will the round‐about make it safer? Want the proposal to be denied and should be shot down prior to moving on to City Council Downhill from this proposal Underground springs Her property has a private well and wetlands There is old growth timber/woods and enjoys the natural environments Staff Summary of the 6/20/2017 Riar Family Rezone Public Hearing Margaret Fee 17015 67th Avenue Lives in unincorporated Snohomish County just south of the 172nd Street and 67th Avenue intersection. She moved here in 1988 from the Kirkland/Bellevue area. Intersection at 67th and 172nd is horrible and there is too much traffic. It can take up to 10 minutes to exit her driveway onto 67th Avenue Concerned with the current crime and drug problem in the area The whole hillside is a spring. There is surface water year round. Does not agree with the proposed round‐about at the 67th and 172nd intersection The City needs to install the infrastructure first before adding new homes People need houses but infrastructure is needed first Concerned with fish in the stream Her nearest fire hydrant is located by 172nd Street and is a long way from her property Feels she lives in a forgotten area of the City Jean Randles 7011 168th Street Lives in unincorporated Snohomish County on McPherson Hill Likes the character of Arlington We need to grow but should grow intelligently Need to focus on enhancing the character of Downtown and need to keep the integrity and spirit of Arlington 172nd Street and 67th Ave is the entryway to all the surrounding neighborhoods and is very congested The City’s proposed MIC will also increase the amount of traffic on 172nd and the surrounding roads, so there will already be an increase. Concerned with impacts to school and children There are lots of other properties and options that could be used for High Density housing Christine Sudbury 6927 Bovee Lane Grew up in Southern California and moved here with her daughter Moved here for the natural surroundings and to feel safe Likes when kids can walk the neighborhoods and feel safe but recently is aware that it is not as safe anymore This proposal is not a good fit to the area and there are other places this type of development could occur She read an article online about the growth in Snohomish County – stating that is the largest growing county in the country, so understands the need to accommodate growth just not at this location Staff Summary of the 6/20/2017 Riar Family Rezone Public Hearing George Brain 18516 Newport Drive Glen Eagle resident for 4 years – moved from the Seattle area Enjoys the community and is a local real estate agent The proposal is out of tune with this area It is not the right location for this proposal Cramming the area with 90 new units is not the same as single family homes Water needs to percolate in the ground and go somewhere Traffic problem on 67th and 172nd already. No sidewalks, bike trails or stores in this area This is a deterioration of the community There will be an increase to accidents and child safety at this intersection Say no to this development Has the City identified other areas in the city to accommodate for an additional 7,000 people? Does the City have a plan for future growth? Sandra Matthews 17323 74th Drive Lives in the Crossing neighborhood Concerned about the public health of this proposal This proposal will negatively impact the surrounding neighbors and neighborhoods Concerned on the strain of the school district Fire and Police are already strained and have limited staff Public safety is behind growth This proposal will bring 200‐240 additional vehicles through the Crossing at Edgecomb Creek neighborhood. The Crossing is a neighborhood filled with kids. 172nd Street is the only option for entry/exit to the proposed development Traffic currently backs up to the Crossing neighborhood entrance at 73rd Avenue WSDOT will not be widening or making improvements to 172nd until 2021‐2023 Clifton Peterson 7109 172nd Street Property is currently within the proposed rezone area Moved here for the location of his current house and property Does not have any intention of developing his property The Crossing at Edgecomb Creek’s drainage facility is not efficient and his property is affected This rezone will deem his property more developable and his property taxes will increase No infrastructure to support the proposed development Traffic problems Water problems He did not ask for his property to be included with this rezone proposal Why does his property need to be included? He does not want the rezone happen Staff Summary of the 6/20/2017 Riar Family Rezone Public Hearing Anthony Chilelli 8225 172nd Street Do we have to absorb 7,000 people? Or can we put a moratorium on growth? Can the public sewer system handle this? Why can’t we just stop it? Traffic is a problem on this street It takes 20 minutes to drive from Highway 9 to I‐5 Robert Matthews 17323 74th Drive The benefit of Public Health and Public Welfare is not shown What type of neighborhood will this create? What type of diverse community is reasonable to keep the value of our homes? Home value will drop in the surrounding area The developers home prices will need to increase because the 1st proposal had 120 townhome units and now there is a proposal for 90 townhome units. Jessica Burgin 18429 Ballantrae Drive Referred to the letter she submitted on June 8th Works at Skagit Regional Health Helped open Kafé Neo With an increase to traffic at the intersection of 67th and 172nd there will be more accidents An increase to traffic will hinder EMS response time Understands growth but should be in a location like Park 77 or over by the Nutty’s restaurant There is no way to expand 172nd street from 67th to Highway 9 1 Amy Rusko From:Scott Tomkins <pine22@kendra.com> Sent:Thursday, June 15, 2017 6:58 PM To:Amy Rusko Subject:Request to rezone 7.23 acres situated on 3 parcels within the City My name is Scott Tomkins and I reside on the Gleneagle golf course in Arlington. I am also a Board member of the Gleneagle ROMEO Men’s Club with which you may be familiar. At the ROMEO meeting of 6/14/17 the rezone request issue was discussed amongst the members and I must tell you that every single member in the meeting was opposed to the rezone. Therefore, I believe I speak for the vast majority of ROMEO members who oppose this rezone request due to the following reasons: 1. 172nd Street is already blocked with traffic during certain times of the day, from the railway crossing at 67th Ave to Highway 9. Even 67th north and south lanes at the 172nd railway crossing have long back‐ups at the lights there. God forbid, if this rezone is passed, the many new residents of the High Density areas will only add to the present gridlock at the intersection, especially at peak hours. There appears to be no current plan to increase the number of lanes of 172nd from 67th Ave to Highway 9 and it can only lead to exacerbate the present traffic problems. 2. We have yet to see the plans and development schedule for the shops/residences in the NE corner of 67th/172nd. I was informed that one advantage is that the new residents in the rezone would be able to walk to the proposed shops. Since there are no sidewalks on 172nd, it would be suicidal for anyone to venture down the sides of 172nd, especially at peak hours. 3. If this request is passed by the City there will be many Gleneagle residents who would be extremely unhappy and in all probability will let their feelings be known at the next City elections. I would have liked to give my opinion personally at the public meeting on June 20, but regretfully I will unable to attend as I will be in Los Angeles. Respectfully, Scott Tomkins 17812 Oxford Drive Arlington WA 98223 360‐403‐9565 Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies Supporting High Density Development GO‐3 – Work towards promoting and maintaining an urban environment within the City that enhances livability for its residents. PO‐6.1 – Site design and building architecture in residential and commercial developments should be human‐ scaled (i.e., pedestrian friendly) and conducive to social interaction. GH‐1 – Diversify the City’s housing stock. PH‐1.1 – A variety of housing types and densities should be encouraged on lands with a residential land‐use designation. GH‐2 – Ensure the development of new multi‐family housing and small single‐family units occur within close proximity to commercial areas within the City. PH‐2.1 – Multi‐family housing should be located close to commercial and employment centers, transportation facilities, public services, schools, and parks and recreation areas. GH‐5 – Encourage a quality housing stock within the City. GH‐8 – Promote and facilitate the provisions of affordable housing in all areas and zoning districts of the City. PH‐8.1 – The City should work to ensure that housing options for low‐ and moderate‐income households are: (a) dispersed throughout the City to discourage a disproportionate concentration of such housing in any one geographical area of the City; (b) are located near amenities such as commercial and employment areas, transportation facilities, and recreational opportunities and; (c) are inclusive of a variety of housing types. PL‐1.4 – Residential High Density (RHD) – This designation should provide for multi‐family and other high density residential development, with density limited only by development parameters such as‐but not limited to‐ building height, setbacks, paring requirements, screening, open space and compatible uses where a full range of public facilities and services that support urban development exist or can be provided. Generally, this designation is appropriate for land that is located convenient to principle arterials and commercial areas. GL‐4 – Accommodate new development in a manner that supports a growth rate consistent with the goals of the State Growth Management Act but also preserves and enhances Arlington’s quality of life, its natural environment, and its historical and cultural amenities. PL‐4.3 – The City should adopt and maintain development regulations that ensure that growth is consistent with State laws and the Community Vision. PL‐4.8 – The City should plan for a balanced mix of land uses based on land availability and the capacity to provide public services. GL‐7 – Encourage a mix of residential densities throughout the City. PL‐7.1 – All recommended changes in residential densities should be based on the following: (a) The overall impact to surrounding properties; and (b) The general impact to the existing transportation network; and (c) The feasibility of the site and its situation for the proposed density; and (d) The availability/capacity of urban services such as water and sewer to serve the area; and (e) The vacant land supply within the City at the proposed density. PL‐7.2 – Higher density residential uses should be located around commercial areas. PL‐8.1 – The City should develop design standards to ensure the orderly transition and compatibility of adjacent residential densities. GL‐9 – Create pedestrian links between commercial and residential developments. PL‐9.1 – Where commercial and residential areas abut, new development proposals should include the design and construction of walkways and/or sidewalks to integrate and link commercial activities and other neighborhoods within the City. Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies – Bricklin Letter PL‐4.6 – Development patterns should be responsive to environmental critical areas with resulting fragmentation of the built environment minimized to the greatest extent possible. GO‐6 – Preserve and promote Arlington’s “small town” character. PH‐1.6 – Pre‐zoning designations within the City’s unincorporated Urban Growth Area greater than fifity acres and slated for residential development should provide for a mix of housing types and densities. PH‐2.1 – Multi‐family housing should be located close to commercial and employment centers, transportation facilities, public services, schools, and parks and recreation areas. GL‐1 – Work to ensure that the character and location of land uses optimize the economic benefit, enjoyment by residents, and protection of natural resources while minimizing the threat to health, safety and welfare posed by hazards, nuisances, incompatible land uses and environmental degradation through implementation of the following: (a) Growth Management: Manage growth so that the delivery of public facilities and services will occur in a fiscally responsible manner to support development and redevelopment within the City. (b) Economic Development: Attain the highest level of economic well‐being possible for all citizens in Arlington through the achievement of a stable and diversified economy offering a wide variety of employment opportunities. (c) Neighborhood Conservation: Achieve a well‐balanced and well‐organized combination of open space, commercial, industrial, recreation and public uses that are served by an efficient transportation network while protecting the fabric and character of residential neighborhoods. (d) Environmental Preservation and Conservation: Through both preservation and conservation ensure the proper management of the natural environment and resources. GL‐8 – Preserve and promote the character, scale, and quality of existing neighborhoods as new development occurs. PL‐8.1 – The City should develop design standards to ensure the orderly transition and compatibility of adjacent residential densities. GL‐18 – To safeguard communitywide environmental conditions and resources the City will encourage the effective stewardship of the environment and protect critical areas and conserve land, air, water, and energy resources. GL‐19 – Require site‐sensitive development to protect environmental resources. GL‐20 – Minimize storm water runoff and urban drainage impacts by utilizing the natural drainage system where it is possible to do so without significantly altering the natural drainage ways. ORDINANCE NO. 2015-XXX 1 ORDINANCE NO. 2017--XXX AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ARLINGTON, WASHINGTON, APPROVING THE RIAR FAMILY LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT AND CONCURRENT REZONE (PLN #292) WHEREAS, the City of Arlington has the authority to regulate land uses within the City, and is in the process of its periodic annual review and update of the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, included in the review of the Comprehensive Plan was a series of proposed amendments to the City of Arlington Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map; and WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission considered the proposed Riar Family Land Use Map amendment and Concurrent Rezone (PLN #292) and conducted an open record public hearing on June 20, 2017 and forwarded the same without recommendation to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council considered the same at a workshop held on June 26, 2017, and considered the record along with the Planning Commission findings, at their regular meeting conducted on July 3, 2017; and the City Council having determined approving said amendment was in the best interest of the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the proposed comprehensive plan amendments and finds those to be consistent with city and state law and in the best interests of the citizens; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Arlington do hereby ordain as follows: Section 1. Findings. The City Council adopts the following findings as required by AMC Chapter 20.96: a. The subject property is suitable for development in general conformance with adjacent land use and the surrounding development pattern, and with zoning standards under the potential zoning classifications. b. The proposed amendment is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the comprehensive plan; c. The proposed amendment is consistent with the scope and purpose of the city's zoning ordinances and the description and purpose of the zone classification applied for; d. Circumstances have changed substantially since the establishment of the current zoning map or district to warrant the proposed amendment; e. The proposed zoning is consistent and compatible with the uses and zoning of surrounding property; ORDINANCE NO. 2017-XXX 2 f. The property that is the subject of the amendment is suited for the uses allowed in the proposed zoning classification; and g. Adequate public services can be made available to serve the full range of proposed uses in that zone. Section 2. The City Council approves the Riar Family Land Use Map and Concurrent Rezone (PLN #292). The comprehensive plan designation and Land Use Map for the Property identified on Exhibit “A” shall be modified from RLMD (Residential Low/Moderate Density) to RHD (Residential High Density) and the City’s official zoning map shall be amended to reflect this change as depicted on the attached Exhibit “B”. Section 3. Severability. If any provision, section, or part of this ordinance shall be adjudged to be invalid or unconstitutional, such adjudication shall not affect the validity of the ordinance as a whole or any section, provision or part thereof not adjudged invalid or unconstitutional. Section 4. Effective Date. The title of this Ordinance, which summarizes the contents of this ordinance, shall be published in the official newspaper of the City. The Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force five (5) days after the date of publication. PASSED BY the City Council and APPROVED by the Mayor this _______ day of July, 2017. CITY OF ARLINGTON ______________________________ Barbara Tolbert, Mayor Attest: ______________________________ Kristin Banfield, City Clerk Approved as to form: ______________________________ Steven J. Peiffle City Attorney EXHIBIT A 176TH PL NE TROONCT HILLSIDE CT TOPPER CT 72ND DR NE 73RD AVE NE WCOUNTRY CLUB DR HIGHLAND VIEW DR 172ND ST NE SR 531 UPLAND DR 73RD DR NE 73RDDRNE 67TH AVE NE GI NC RLMD GC City of Arlington Maps and GIS data are distributed “AS-IS” without warranties of any kind, either express or implied,including but not limited to warranties of suitability for a particular purpose or use. Map data are compiledfrom a variety of sources which may contain errors and users who rely upon the information do so at theirown risk. Users agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City of Arlington for any and all liabilityof any nature arising out of or resulting from the lack of accuracy or correctness of the data, or the use ofthe data presented in the maps. ± kdh RiarFamilyRezone11x17_16 12/15/2016 Scale: Date: File: Cartographer: Legend Proposed Rezone Area Public Roads Private Roads Assessor Parcels Riar Family Rezone 0 230 460115 Feet RHD rezone area NC = Neighborhood Commercial GC = General Commercial GI = General Industrial RLMD = Low to Moderate Density Residential EXHIBIT B SR HC BP LI GC HC OTRD GI RHD RLMD GC RMD P/SP RLMD RHD RMD RMD GI RHD P/SP MS P/SP GC P/SP RHD NC RHD GC BP NC RMD RLMD GC P/SP P/SP NC LI OTBD - 1 P/SP RHD GC RHD NC P/SP LI HC RMD P/SP P/SP P/SP P/SP P/SP P/SP P/SP MS RLMD P/SP RLMD RHD RLMD BPRMDBP GC HC RMD RMD GC GI LI GCNC P/SP P/SP P/SP P/SP RHD RLMD RLMD AF OTBD - 2 OTBD - 3 RLMD RLMD RMD RLMD GCSR RLMD P/SP HC RLMD P/SP OTBD - 3 P/SP P/SP OTBD - 2 OTBD - 2 HC RLMD RHD GCSR P/SP GC RHD «5 «3 «2 «1 «2 «4 «3 «3 «1 «2 «4 «4 «2 «3 «3 «3 «1 «2 «1 «2 «5 «3 «D «C «A «B «B «C «C «D «D 1200 ' 850 ' 800 ' ¥¨§5 MPN MPNTDR ?Ó ?Ô ?| ProposedRiar Rezone Pioneer MeadowsContract Rezone GleneagleContract Rezone 199TH ST NE 204TH ST NE 79TH DR NE 35TH AVE NE 168TH ST NE 179TH PL NE SR530 SR 530 ARLINGTON HEIGHTS RD 73RDAVE NE OSPREY RD SR 531 LOISLN 207TH ST NE N FRENCH AVE 168TH ST NE E HIGHLAND DR E 1ST ST W MARION ST CEMETERY RD 171ST 77TH AVE NE 200TH ST NE E 4TH ST 92ND AVENE 19TH DR NE 156TH ST NE SR 9 27TH AVE NE 91ST TOPPER CT 193RD PL NE 89TH 162ND ST NE 176TH PL NE S COBB AVE 101STDRNE 71STDRNE 73RD AVE NE 195TH ST NE 97TH AVE NE SWEST AVE 66THAVENE 208TH ST NE 190TH PLNE 182ND ST NE 74TH AVE NE 101ST AVE NE 196TH ST NE 178TH ST NE 169TH AVE NE 206TH ST NE 174TH PL NE 32ND AVE NE 175TH PL NE 169TH PL NE 178TH PL NE 190TH ST NE 175TH PL NE 191ST PL NE 46TH AVE NE 39TH AVE 59TH AVE NE 188TH ST NE 192ND STNE 66TH AVE NE 51ST DR NE N ALCAZAR AVE WHITEHAWK DR DUNHAM AVE SR 9 192ND ST NE PORTAGE ST 155TH ST NE 97TH AVENE 40TH AVE NE E 5TH ST 186TH PL NE 43RD AVE NE 89TH AVE NE 19TH AVE NE 197TH ST NE WJENSEN ST 195TH ST NE 156TH ST NE E 4TH ST 23RD AVE NE 188TH ST NE 107THAVENE 171ST PL NE 88TH DR NE 11TH AVE NE 176TH PL NE 85TH AVE NE 192ND PL NE 168TH ST NE 89TH AVE NE 33RD AVE NE 162ND STNE 99THDRNE S FRENCH AVE FORTY FIVE RD 173RD PL 103RDAVE NE S MACLEOD AVE 196TH PL NE 166THPL NE 162ND PL NE 160TH ST NE 17TH AVE NE 169TH PL NE 19TH DR NE 15TH AVE NE 103RDDR NE 158TH ST NE 220TH ST NE 27TH AVE NE 11TH AVE NE 35TH AVE NE 59TH DR NE 157TH ST NE 180TH ST NE 23RD DR NE 31ST AVE NE HIGHLAND VIEW DR 182ND ST NE 95TH AVE NE 45THDR NE E 5TH ST 15TH AVE NE WOODBINE DR SCHLOMANRD MORANRD ARLINGTON HEIGHTS RD 152ND ST NE 43RD AVE NE 6THAVENE 40TH DR NE 172ND ST NE 23RD AVE NE I-5 164TH ST NE EAGLEFIELDDR OLDBURNRD 204TH ST NE 67TH AVE NE PIONEER HWY E 234TH ST NE TWIN LAKES AVE 188TH ST NE 236TH ST NE 200TH ST NE I-5 27TH AVE NE SMOKEY POINT BLVD SMOKEY POINT BLVD 31STDR NE176THSTNE 79TH AVE NE S OLYMPIC AVE 82ND DR NE 19TH AVE NE TVEIT RD 59TH AVE NE FIR LN NOBLE DR 71ST AVE NE 51ST AVE NE 81ST DR NE 62ND DR NE 25TH AVE NE 83RD DR NE 47TH AVE NE 91ST AVE NE 42NDDRNE 177THPL NE 226THPLNE REDHAWK DR S CEDARBOUGHLOOP 182ND PL NE 73RDAVENE CHAMPIONSDR 80TH DR NE 190TH PL NE 79TH DR NE 67TH AVE NE VISTA DR VISTA DR HIGH CLOVER BLVD NE 37TH AVE NE 95TH AVE NE OLYMPICPL BURNRD SPRING LANEAVE WCOUNTRY CLUB DR 160TH ST NE E COUNTRYCLUB DR 25TH AVE NE 63RD AVE NE CROWNRIDGEBLVD AIRPORT BLVD DIKERD DIKE RD JORDANRD MCELROY RD MCELROY RD 79TH AVE NE BOVEE LN 62ND AVE NE THIS IS A COPY OF TH E OFFICIAL ZONINGMAP OF THE CITY OF ARLINGTON,PU RSUAN T TO AMC §20.36.100, WHIC H WASADOPTED BY THE C ITY COU NCIL ON 20MARCH 2006 PURSUAN T TO ORDINANCE NO.1389 AN D BECAME EFFECTIVE 27 MARCH2006. ZONINGAB C D City Limits Urban G rowth Area APD Safety Zones APD Subdistricts Barbara TolbertMayor Kristin BanfieldCity Clerk Maps and GIS data are distributed “AS-IS” without warranties of any kind, eitherexpress or implied, including but not limited to warranties of suitability for a particularpurpose or use. Map data are compiled from a variety of sources which may containerrors and users who rely upon the information do so at their own risk. Users agreeto indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City of Arlington for any and all liabilityof any nature arising out of or resulting from the lack of accuracy or correctness ofthe data, or the use of the data presented in the maps. CS Cote Annexation 09/29/2004 CS Newman Annexation 08/01/2005 CS Crawford Annexation 12/12/2005 CS Heartland Annexation 02/27/2006 BC Mulligan Annexation 09/13/2006 BC BC BC Foster Annexation 02/15/2007 Brekhus/Beach Annexation 05/19/2007 Johnston Annexation 06/13/2007 DK DK DK DK DK Bertrand Annexation Island Crossing Annexation Scrivener's Error Zoning Revision Comp Plan Amendment 06/30/2008 11/26/2008 09/25/2010 02/14/2011 04/22/2011 DK DK DK DK Thompson Annexation 07/08/2011 Hilltop Sports Annexation 07/08/2011 Comp Plan Amendment 05/20/2012 Star Annexation 06/27/2012 PE Country Charm Annexation 08/28/2013 CY Comp Plan Adoption 7/06/2015 CY CY Comp Plan Amendment Comp Plan Amendment 7/13/2015 12/12/2016 REV REVISION DATE " 0 1,600 3,200800 Feet RIARRezone_24x36_Dec16.mxd City of ArlingtonZoning Map SR = Sub urban Re si den tial RLMD = Lo w to Mo de ra te De nsity R esid en ti al RMD = Mo de ra te De nsity Re sid en tial RH D = H igh Den sity R eside ntia l OTRD = Old To wn R esid en ti al Di strict NC = Ne igh borho od Co mme rcia l OTBD - 1 = Old To wn Bu si ness Distri ct 1 OTBD - 2 = Old To wn Bu si ness Distri ct 2 OTBD - 3 = Old To wn Bu si ness Distri ct 3 GC = G ene ra l Co mmerci al HC = Hig hw ay Co mmercia l BP = Busin ess Pa rk LI = Lig ht Ind ustria l GI = Gen eral Ind ustria l P/SP = Publ ic/Se mi-Pu blic MS = Me dical Se rvices AF = Avia tion F ligh tline Con tra ct R ezon e MPN - Master Plan ne d Ne igh bo rh oo d Overlay Zon e TDR Ove rl ay Zon e Comme rcia l Co rrido r Overla y Horizon tal Mixed Use Overla y Scale: File: ROW Rail-lineI-5Private R oads Te xt DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. 2015-XXX 1 ORDINANCE NO. 2017--XXX AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ARLINGTON, WASHINGTON, DENYING THE RIAR FAMILY LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT AND CONCURRENT REZONE (PLN #292) WHEREAS, the City of Arlington has the authority to regulate land uses within the City, and is in the process of its periodic annual review and update of the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, included in the review of the Comprehensive Plan was a series of proposed amendments to the City of Arlington Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map; and WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission considered the proposed Riar Family Land Use Map amendment and Concurrent Rezone (PLN #292) and conducted an open record public hearing on June 20, 2017 and forwarded the same without recommendation to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council considered the same at a workshop held on June 26, 2017, and considered the record along with the Planning Commission findings, at their regular meeting conducted on July 3, 2017; and the City Council having determined denying said amendment was in the best interest of the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the proposed comprehensive plan amendments and finds those to be consistent with city and state law and in the best interests of the citizens; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Arlington do hereby ordain as follows: Section 1. Findings. The City Council adopts the following findings as required by AMC Chapter 20.96: a. The subject property is not suitable for development in general conformance with adjacent land use and the surrounding development pattern, and with zoning standards under the potential zoning classifications. b. The proposed amendment is not consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the comprehensive plan; c. The proposed amendment is not consistent with the scope and purpose of the city's zoning ordinances and the description and purpose of the zone classification applied for; d. The proposed zoning is not consistent and compatible with the uses and zoning of surrounding property; e. The property that is the subject of the amendment is not suited for the uses allowed in the proposed zoning classification; and ORDINANCE NO. 2017-XXX 2 f. Adequate public services can not presently be made available to serve the full range of proposed uses in that zone. Section 2. The City Council denies the Riar Family Land Use Map and Concurrent Rezone (PLN #292). Section 3. Severability. If any provision, section, or part of this ordinance shall be adjudged to be invalid or unconstitutional, such adjudication shall not affect the validity of the ordinance as a whole or any section, provision or part thereof not adjudged invalid or unconstitutional. Section 4. Effective Date. The title of this Ordinance, which summarizes the contents of this ordinance, shall be published in the official newspaper of the City. The Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force five (5) days after the date of publication. PASSED BY the City Council and APPROVED by the Mayor this _______ day of July, 2017. CITY OF ARLINGTON ______________________________ Barbara Tolbert, Mayor Attest: ______________________________ Kristin Banfield, City Clerk Approved as to form: ______________________________ Steven J. Peiffle City Attorney City of Arlington Council Agenda Bill Item: NB #2 Attachment G COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 3, 2017 SUBJECT: EMS Equipment Replacement Change Order ATTACHMENTS: Prebuild Specifications DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN: Fire Department; Chief Stedman – 360‐403‐3601 EXPENDITURES REQUESTED: $20,430.42 (includes tax) BUDGET CATEGORY: Equipment Replacement Fund/ EMS BUDGETED AMOUNT: $140,000 LEGAL REVIEW: DESCRIPTION: At the preconstruction meeting these were items identified that would enhance and extend the life of the unit. $140,000 was budgeted in the equipment replacement fund. The bid on the base unit was $152,000 plus $8430.42 in change order. HISTORY: The age of the current box is in excess of twelve years. This will be the third chassis the box has been mounted on these changes increases firefighter safety and overall patient care. Changes to the construction of these boxes has occurred over the past decade. ALTERNATIVES: Deny the request and stay with the original bid specs as listed. RECOMMENDED MOTION: I move to approve the EMS Equipment Replacement Change Order in the amount of $20,430.02. 549-R Arlington FD_Prebuild Change Order (01)_06-01-17 (1).xlsx $7,725.00 Yes No 1.1.02.11X AIR HORN X ADD:$100.00 $100.00 Add this section: existing air horns to be removed and returned to customer. 2.1.02.14B SUSPENSION ADD LANGUAGE: Add language for override switch and location of control panel. 3.1.04 USED CHASSIS ADD LANGUAGE: Chassis shall be prepped for return to customer. 4.2.08X EXTERIOR COMPARTMENTS X CHANGE:$3,000.00 $3,000.00 Option to remove battery drawer and modify compartment for below floor storage, adding inside-outside access to lower section of interior cabinet #14. A new door shall be fabricated and painted to match module. Interior shall be painted Light Gray to match existing (SW G8-51748). 5.2.09X MODULE DOORS X ADD:$1,200.00 $1,200.00 Option to change curbside passage door to a left-hinged "suicide" door. 6.2.10X MODULE INTERIOR CABINETS X ADD:$400.00 $400.00 Option to add two stainless steel ramps to inside-outside cabinet below streetside action area. One at floor level and one on interior edge of adjustable shelf. 7.2.10X MODULE INTERIOR CABINETS X ADD:$200.00 $200.00 Option to add one additional stainless steel ramp to cabinet #14, in right front stack are. Shall be installed on adjustable shelf. Prebuild Options - Change Order #1 ARLINGTON FIRE DEPARTMENT ARLINGTON, WA #549-R No Of Veh: • Indicate your choice by placing an "X" in the Yes or No box for each option. • Fill in Information on last page for E-Signature. • Email this form back to our office. • Save the File as PDF. Please: Please return within 5 work days to assist with the timely completion of your vehicle. Thank you! June 1, 2017 Total change order cost for all elected changes: Please enter "X" in the appropriate box.Offered Price/ (Credit)Elected ChangeDescription For 549-R Arlington FD (cld)1 Of 6 Revised (08/12/16) 549-R Arlington FD_Prebuild Change Order (01)_06-01-17 (1).xlsx Yes No No Of Veh: Please enter "X" in the appropriate box.Offered Price/ (Credit)Elected ChangeDescription 8.2.10X MODULE INTERIOR CABINETS ADD LANGUAGE: New inverter status panel to be installed in action area, per section 6.31; new dual USB port to be installed in action area, per section 6.25 9.2.10X MODULE INTERIOR CABINET - Cool Cabinet ADD LANGUAGE: Add details for new cool cabinet, to be installed in right front stack area. See item 21. 10.3.04X COLOR SCHEME (Module) X CHANGE:$0.00 $0.00 Option to change module color from Flame Red to Candy Apple Red #2218, to match current fleet. 11.3.04X COLOR SCHEME - Stripe #3 X CHANGE:$500.00 $500.00 Option to change 12"H black stripe to a painted stripe, paint shall be SW #GLV-56590? 12.3.04.01X CHASSIS COLOR - OPTION ONE CHANGE LANGUAGE: Chassis to be repainted to match current fleet red, per signed proposal. Update with red paint code to Candy Apple Red #2218 13.3.04.01X CHASSIS COLOR - OPTION TWO X CHANGE:($1,400.00)$0.00 Option to delete repainting of chassis. Shall be oem Flame Red (PR4). 14.3.05X LETTERING/DECALS CHANGE LANGUAGE: Correction: Vehicle number shall be "46" 15.3.08A MODULE UPHOLSTERY X CHANGE:$600.00 $600.00 Option to re-upholster streetside and curbside bench seat pads. Shall be charcoal gray. 16.4.08A MODULE WINDOWS ADD LANGUAGE: Update - windows to be transferred are located on rear and side passage doors. X ADD:$300.00 $300.00 Option to add vinyl roll-up window covers for rear passage door windows. 17.4.17X ELECTRIC STEP CHANGE LANGUAGE: Change location of electric step override switch from curbside wall to upper corner of side passage door/doorskin. 549-R Arlington FD (cld)2 Of 6 Revised (08/12/16) 549-R Arlington FD_Prebuild Change Order (01)_06-01-17 (1).xlsx Yes No No Of Veh: Please enter "X" in the appropriate box.Offered Price/ (Credit)Elected ChangeDescription 18.5.12A SUCTION PUMP DELETE LANGUAGE: Delete this section - vehicle has portable suction (no hard plumbed suction unit). 19.5.13A SUCTION COLLECTOR CHANGE LANGUAGE: Update section to show that is a SSCOR VX-2 portable suction charging bracket to be transferred. (Located on action area wall). 20.5.17D MODULE CLIMATE CONTROL SYSTEM ADD LANGUAGE: Add: Remove and discard 110VAC heater below HVAC closeout (Section 6.37 Related). New closeout shall be extended to cover opening. 21.5.28X CUSTOM COOL CABINET CHANGE LANGUAGE: Update with location: to be installed in right-hand side of cabinet #12 in right front stack. Cabinet back shall be modified to allow for install of cooling coils behind unit. Modifications will affect cabinet #12 (radio cabinet). 22.5.34X BENCH RESTRAINT X CHANGE:($400.00)($400.00) Option to delete restraint net. Will transfer existing bench-end bar (at forward end of curbside squad bench). 23.6.05X MODULE POWER CHANGE LANGUAGE: Transfer existing CDR-357. Change timed delay from five minutes to ten minutes. 24.6.09 DRIVER'S CONSOLE ADD LANGUAGE: Update to show the switchplate is customized (to allow install of transferred radio remote head). X ADD:$100.00 $100.00 Console shall be reinforced on forward passenger side, to allow for mounting of transferred Havis mounting bracket and post. X ADD:$100.00 $100.00 Add arm rests 25.6.09 DRIVER'S CONSOLE CHANGE LANGUAGE:$0.00 See item #28 for relocating Firecom from console to behind driver's seat, and for radio information update. 549-R Arlington FD (cld)3 Of 6 Revised (08/12/16) 549-R Arlington FD_Prebuild Change Order (01)_06-01-17 (1).xlsx Yes No No Of Veh: Please enter "X" in the appropriate box.Offered Price/ (Credit)Elected ChangeDescription 26.6.14B ATTENDANT LIGHTING X CHANGE:$200.00 $200.00 Change action area lighting from 'transfer existing' to Install new LED strip light, with ON/OFF switch to be located in attendant panel. Shall be approximately 25"L. X ADD:$200.00 $200.00 PLUS: Extend LED strip light to full length of streetside bench (total length approximately 75"L) X ADD:$400.00 $400.00 Option to add LED strip light above curbside squad bench (shall be installed on underside of overhead cabinets) with an ON/OFF switch located in the action area attendant panel. Shall be approximately 65"L. 27.6.16X MODULE INTERIOR LIGHTING X CHANGE:($300.00)($300.00) Option to reduce the number of new LED dome lights from eleven (11) to seven(7). Remaining four halogen dome lights shall be removed and openings shall be covered by painted aluminum plate(s). 28.6.18A COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT ADD LANGUAGE: Update radio information to show transferred radio includes remote head and speaker (speaker to be mounted behind cab seats, above head). CHANGE LANGUAGE: Change location of Firecom from driver's console to behind cab seat (driver side). ADD LANGUAGE: Transfer existing Sierra Wireless modem, located in radio cabinet. 29.6.19A ANTENNA MOUNTS AND CABLES ADD LANGUAGE: Transferred antenna and mounts includes NMO base(s) located on module roof. 30.6.21B SHORELINE POWER/120VAC ADD LANGUAGE: Update to show new 120VAC in cabinet #12 is for supplying power to IV warmer. Add location of other 12VAC locations (one on the action wall, and two in the right front stack). 31.6.24A BATTERY MODIFICATION ADD LANGUAGE: Update to show that three existing batteries shall remain with old chassis. 32.6.25B 12VDC RECEPTACLES X CHANGE:$0.00 $0.00 Delete two new 12VDC receptacles - change to two new dual USB ports (to be installed one in driver's console and one in action area). 549-R Arlington FD (cld)4 Of 6 Revised (08/12/16) 549-R Arlington FD_Prebuild Change Order (01)_06-01-17 (1).xlsx Yes No No Of Veh: Please enter "X" in the appropriate box.Offered Price/ (Credit)Elected ChangeDescription 33.6.30.05A SPOTLIGHT CHANGE LANGUAGE: GoLight being installed on cab roof, per signed proposal. Update color and model number to black, #2021. Controller to be located on driver's console above cup holders. 34.6.30.08A GRILLE LIGHTS CHANGE LANGUAGE: Correction: existing grille lights are to remain on old chassis. (New grille lights to be installed on new chassis). 35.6.30.09A SIREN ADD LANGUAGE: Add model number of transferred siren (Whelen 295HFSA1). 36.6.31B INVERTER X CHANGE:$600.00 $600.00 Option to change Magnum inverter from 1000 watt to 2000 watts (with 100amp battery charger) 37.6.35B FLUID WARMER CHANGE LANGUAGE: Correction: new IV warmer is 120VAC (dual voltage listed in error). To be installed in left-hand side of cabinet #12 (existing location). 38.6.37X 120VAC HEATER CHANGE LANGUAGE: Change from transfer to remove and discard existing heater. (New HVAC closeout shall be made to cover opening.) 39.6.40X ELECTRIC DOOR LOCKS ADD LANGUAGE: Update: existing electric locks shall be tied to cab doors. 40.6.43X GROUND LIGHTS X ADD:$125.00 $125.00 Option to add and on/off switch for ground lights in the driver's console. Switch shall be labeled "Auto/Off" (lights illuminate automatically when cab door is opening. Lights are disabled with switch is in the "OFF" position). 41.6.46B BACK-UP CAMERA CHANGE LANGUAGE: Update to include camera brand information (Rostra). X ADD:$400.00 $400.00 Add additional camera, to be located on passenger side cab fender, to assist with right hand turns. Shall activate with right-hand turn signal use. 549-R Arlington FD (cld)5 Of 6 Revised (08/12/16) 549-R Arlington FD_Prebuild Change Order (01)_06-01-17 (1).xlsx Yes No No Of Veh: Please enter "X" in the appropriate box.Offered Price/ (Credit)Elected ChangeDescription 42.8.03 EQUIPMENT TO BE RETURNED ADD LANGUAGE: Items to be returned to customer include two Grover air horns and one Vanner inverter. X X X COMPLETE 0 ITEM/S NOTE: THIS PRICING DOES NOT INCLUDE SALES TAX APPROVED BY (Customer): PRODUCED BY (BNW): (Print Name)(Date Stamp) (Title) (Email/Phone Number) By Checking this box I clarify that I have selected either "Yes" or "No" to all options presented on this form. By providing the information below (Printed Name, Email/Phone Number, Title) - I certify that I am the person named below. By Checking this box I certify that I have the authority (approving authority) to commit to the changes selected on behalf of the agency I represent. (E-Signature)(Date Stamp) (Printed Name) 549-R Arlington FD (cld)6 Of 6 Revised (08/12/16)