HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-12-2016 Council WorkshopSPECIAL ACCOMMODATIONS: The City of Arlington strives to provide accessible meetings for people with disabilities. Please contact the ADA
coordinator at (360) 403-3441 or 1-800-833-8388 (TDD only) prior to the meeting date if special accommodations are required.
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Barb Tolbert
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
Mayor Barb Tolbert - Deana
APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
Mayor Pro Tem Debora Nelson
INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS
WORKSHOP ITEMS – NO FINAL ACTION WILL BE TAKEN
1. Ordinance Adopting 2016 Budget Amendments ATTACHMENT A
Staff Presentation: Kristin Garcia
Council Liaison: Mayor Pro Tem Debora Nelson
2. Acceptance of Grant Funds from Cascade Valley Hospital Foundation ATTACHMENT B
for Glidescopes
Staff Presentation: Tom Cooper
Council Liaison: Jesica Stickles/Marilyn Oertle
3. Acceptance of Grant Funds from Hope Unlimited in partnership ATTACHMENT C
with Cascade Valley Hospital Foundation on behalf of
Arlington Fire Department
Staff Presentation: Tom Cooper
Council Liaison: Jesica Stickles/Marilyn Oertle
4. Resolution Adopting a Revised Fee Schedule ATTACHMENT D
Staff Presentation: Kristin Banfield
Council Liaison: Mayor Pro Tem Debora Nelson
5. Sole Source Purchase Resolution - Scout Video Collection Unit ATTACHMENT E
Staff Presentation: Eric Scott
Council Liaison: Mike Hopson
Arlington City Council Workshop
Monday, December 12, 2016 at 7:00 p.m.
City Council Chambers – 110 E Third St
SPECIAL ACCOMMODATIONS: The City of Arlington strives to provide accessible meetings for people with disabilities. Please contact the ADA
coordinator at (360) 403-3441 or 1-800-833-8388 (TDD only) prior to the meeting date if special accommodations are required.
6. Classification and Compensation Study Discussion ATTACHMENT F
Staff Presentation: Paul Ellis/Heather Logan
Council Liaison: Mayor Pro Tem Debora Nelson
7. City Administrator Contract Review ATTACHMENT G
Staff Presentation: Heather Logan
Council Liaison: Mayor Pro Tem Debora Nelson
8. 2017 Planning Commission Work Plan ATTACHMENT H
Staff Presentation: Chris Young
Council Liaison: Jesica Stickles/Chris Raezer
9. Lodging Tax Distributions for 2017 ATTACHMENT I
Staff Presentation: Kristin Garcia
Council Liaison: Mayor Pro Tem Debora Nelson
10. Miscellaneous Council Items
EXECUTIVE SESSION
RECONVENE
PUBLIC COMMENT
For members of the public who wish to speak to the Council. Please limit your remarks to three minutes.
ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Barb Tolbert
To open all attachments, click here
City of Arlington
Council Agenda Bill
Item:
WS #1
Attachment
A
COUNCIL MEETING DATE:
December 12, 2016
SUBJECT:
2016 Budget Amendments
ATTACHMENTS:
Ordinance 2016 - XXX and Exhibit “A”
DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN
Finance Department, Kristin Garcia – Finance Director
EXPENDITURES REQUESTED: $2,781,789
BUDGET CATEGORY: Fund breakdown attached
LEGAL REVIEW:
DESCRIPTION:
Each year budget amendments are proposed to reflect unforeseen expenditures that have
occurred since the original budget was adopted. A total of $2,781,789 in budget amendments are
being proposed for council approval.
For the 2016 budget, 44% percent of the amendments are for inter-fund transfers to reserve funds
or for cash flow purposes pending grant reimbursement. 19% of the amendments are for loan
payments, with the majority being the loan repayment for the EMS Fund. 5% of the amendments
are for expenditures which are offset by grant awards and the remaining 32% is due to
unexpected expenditure activity, the majority of which is offset by an increase in revenues or
paid for by previously accumulated capital reserve funds.
The proposed budget amendments represent 5.5% of the city’s total budget with only 1.7% of
that amount representing unexpected expenditure activity, which means the city is managing its
budget very well.
HISTORY:
Council has been aware of the expenditure activity and has reviewed and approved the
expenditures throughout 2016.
ALTERNATIVES
State law requires budget amendments be approved prior to the end of the fiscal year. If the
budget amendments are not approved by year end, the City will be out of compliance with state
law.
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Workshop; discussion only. At the December 19, 2016 meeting the motion will read; “I move to
adopt Ordinance No. 2016-XXX, amending the 2016 budget per attached Exhibit “A”.
1
ORDINANCE NO. 2016—XXX
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE 2016 ANNUAL BUDGET OF THE
CITY OF ARLINGTON BY PROVIDING SUPPLEMENT THERETO;
PROVIDING TRANSFER AND ADJUSTMENT AUTHORITY AND
DECLARING AN EMERGENCY
WHEREAS, staff has identified the need to make certain revisions to the 2016
Annual Budget that were not foreseen when Ordinance No. 2015-027 was adopted on
November 2nd, 2015, and
WHEREAS, this ordinance was introduced with proper notice and citizens given the
opportunity to comment, and
WHEREAS, because this will require increasing the appropriation level in one or
more funds, an amendment is needed, NOW THEREFORE,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARLINGTON WASHINGTON
AS FOLLOWS;
Section 1. Pursuant to RCW 35A.33.090, an emergency is declared to exist and the 2016 Budget is
hereby amended to provide for adjustments to expenditures, and by providing authority for any
necessary transfers of money within or between funds as indicated in the “Changes” column on the
attached Exhibit “A”.
Section 2. That the attached is a summary of the amended budget for the year 2016 for the City of
Arlington and that copies of the detailed amended budget are available to any interested taxpayer at
the Finance Department, City Hall, Arlington, Washington.
Section 3. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect after its passage, and publication according
to law.
Passed by the City Council and APPROVED by the Mayor this 19th day of December, 2016.
CITY OF ARLINGTON
_______________________________
Barbara Tolbert, Mayor
ATTEST:
__________________________________
Kristin Banfield, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
____________________________________
Steven J. Peiffle, City Attorney
City of Arlington
Council Agenda Bill
Item:
WS #2
Attachment
B
COUNCIL MEETING DATE:
December 12, 2016
SUBJECT:
Acceptance of grant funds from Cascade Valley Hospital Foundation for glidescopes
ATTACHMENTS:
Letter announcing grant award from Cascade Valley Hospital Foundation
DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN
Fire
EXPENDITURES REQUESTED: $28,430.00
BUDGET CATEGORY: N/A
LEGAL REVIEW:
DESCRIPTION:
Staff is requesting that Council accept funds from the Cascade Valley Hospital
Foundation for the purchase of two glidescopes to be placed on our medic units. A
glidescope is a video laryngoscope used to assist in intubation of patients. It is the most
effective and safe method currently available for patient intubations. The procurement
of these scopes will enhance patient care and reduce liability to the City.
HISTORY:
The Fire Department submitted a grant request to the Cascade Valley Hospital
Foundation in October 2016 for the glidescopes.
ALTERNATIVES
Do not accept the funds from the Cascade Valley Hospital Foundation.
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Workshop; discussion only. At the December 19, 2016 Council meeting the proposed
motion will be “I move to accept the $28,430 in grant funding from the Cascade Valley
Hospital Foundation for the purchase of two glidescopes.”
Date: October 22nd, 2016
From: Matt Hickman, Arlington Fire Department
To: Cascade Valley Hospital Foundation
Subject: Request for Funds
Members of the Cascade Valley Hospital Foundation,
The following is a request for funds to purchase two video laryngoscopes. The intent of this
proposal is to give your members a brief overview of our department and the services we
provide, describe the utility and purpose of this exciting technology, and identify the citizens in
our community who stand to benefit from these funds.
Background
The Arlington Fire Department (AFD) proudly performs a multitude of life-safety functions, the
largest of which is the provision of emergency medical services (EMS). We are one part of a
complex county-wide EMS system comprised of dozens of agencies that provide pre-hospital
care. Our system operates under a criteria-based dispatch structure designed with the goal of
sending the appropriate level of care to the patient based on acuity by using BLS (Basic Life
Support) and ALS (Advanced Life Support) units.
The two ALS (Paramedic) units in the City of Arlington respond from our Downtown and
Smokey Point locations. They are staffed 24 hours a day, 7 days per week and are tasked with
caring for our most critically-ill or injured patients. In addition to protecting the citizens of
Arlington City, they are the primary ALS units for the areas of Arlington Heights, Silvana, Oso,
and Darrington for a total population served of 34,079.
As a region, we are consistently recognized as innovators and leaders in the field of EMS. For
example, Snohomish County ranks among the highest in the world in out-of-hospital cardiac
arrest save rates. Each of our paramedics has completed a rigorous training program that
prepares them for a wide range of patient presentations. Snohomish County paramedics
operate under an extremely progressive set of protocols - giving them the latitude to practice
pre-hospital medicine at its highest level. This aggressive stance on the delivery of
paramedicine extends to all areas of our practice, including airway management.
Traditional Airway Management in EMS
Airway management is a core component of pre-hospital medicine. While many patients
require only basic interventions such as supplemental oxygen, others demand more definitive
treatment. At the paramedic level of care, our providers are trained and equipped to perform
several more-invasive airway procedures including the placement of a breathing tube in the
trachea, or endotracheal intubation.
The process of endotracheal intubation is quite simple in theory, but requires years of training
and experience to master. In a typical intubation, the paramedic uses a device called a
laryngoscope to visualize the vocal cords (the opening to the trachea or windpipe). Once the
cords are visualized the paramedic is then able to slide the endotracheal tube through the vocal
cords and into the trachea. A small balloon is then inflated within the trachea, preventing the
escape of air from the lungs. This balloon has the added benefit of preventing aspiration (the
introduction of blood or vomit into the lungs). After the endotracheal tube is successfully
placed the provider is able to breathe for the patient using an oxygen reservoir connected to a
bag (bag valve mask) or a machine called a ventilator. Endotracheal intubation is the most
preferred and definitive means of airway management available.
There are two types of endotracheal intubation; traditional (without medications) and drug
assisted (with medications). For patients who are unconscious and no longer spontaneously
breathing, the intubation can usually be performed without medications as the patient no
longer has a gag reflex. However, there are times when a patient is no longer breathing
adequately or able to “protect their airway”, but is still conscious. Examples of this include
severe respiratory ailment, major trauma, drug or alcohol overdose, burns, and many
others. These patients can be intubated by the paramedic using a procedure called drug-
assisted intubation, or DAI. Essentially, the patient is given a potent sedative followed by a
paralytic which renders the patient unconscious and without a gag reflex, allowing the provider
to place the endotracheal tube.
Importantly, DAI is not a procedure performed by most paramedics in the United States. As
previously mentioned, the protocols in our region are particularly advanced, and DAI is a
prime example.
Most intubations are performed without difficulty. However, there are times when the
intubation can be complicated by issues such as obesity, blood and vomit in the mouth, trauma
to the face, anatomical anomalies, or swelling from burns. This situation is referred to as a
difficult airway and if managed incorrectly can lead to rapid deterioration of the patient due to
a lack of oxygen.
Currently, both types of intubations at our agency are performed using a traditional, non-video
laryngoscope. Although there are several methods available to increase our chances of success
when a difficult airway is encountered, there are times when the paramedic is simply unable to
intubate. This reality results in a less ideal form of airway management, and can ultimately lead
to a poor patient outcome. For this reason, video laryngoscopy is a much needed and crucial
addition to our airway management protocol.
Management of the Difficult Airway using Video Laryngoscopy
As previously mentioned, endotracheal intubation typically requires the paramedic to visualize
the vocal cords to successfully place the tube. This presents quite an issue in the setting of the
difficult airway when only a traditional (non-video) laryngoscope is available and visualization
is limited or non-existent. Video laryngoscopy allows the paramedic to achieve this
visualization using a state-of-the-art fiber optic camera connected to a video screen. The
endotracheal tube can then be placed by watching the tube pass through the cords on the
screen.
Video laryngoscopy has quickly become the standard of care for airway management in most
healthcare settings, and is especially critical in pre-hospital EMS. Many of our patients require
intubation in less than ideal settings such as limited space or light, a stark contrast to most in-
hospital intubations where such variables can be controlled.
How we arrived at the Glidescope ®
The popularity of this technology in recent years has resulted in several video laryngoscope
models. Each have pros and cons, but few are purpose-built for out-of-hospital environments.
The Glidescope ® Ranger was chosen primarily for this reason, as it has been rigorously field
tested for a wide range of applications, including extensive use by our military.
Several manufacturers were considered including Glidescope ®, Intubrite ® , McGrath ®, and
King Vision ® . Our selection process included in-station demonstrations and a regional survey
of EMS agencies currently using video laryngoscopy. Our paramedics were also given the
chance to evaluate the performance of the Glidescope ® over a trial period of several months on
multiple live intubations - many considered to be difficult airways.
One metric of success in endotracheal intubation is known as first pass success rate. This term
describes the percentage of time the patient is intubated successfully on the first attempt, or first
pass. Since its introduction, video laryngoscopy and particularly the Glidescope ® has been
extensively studied for safety and efficacy. One independent study from the University of
Pittsburgh showed 15% in first-pass success rates. Perhaps more notable, the Glidescope ® was
almost always successful after initial attempts to intubate the patient with a traditional
laryngoscope failed.
“A greater first-attempt success rate was found when using the GlideScope versus direct laryngoscopy.
In addition, the GlideScope was found to be 99% successful for intubation after initial failure of direct
laryngoscopy, helping to reduce the incidence of failed intubation.” Ibinson, et al (2014)
This is particularly significant as it represents our most vulnerable demographic, the patient
who is not able to be intubated with a traditional laryngoscope. Video laryngoscopy would
allow us to successfully intubate and oxygenate these patients when all other methods have
failed, which could mean the difference between life and death.
Several other factors such as equipment familiarity and continuum of care were considered as
well. Cascade Valley and Providence, our two most frequent transport destinations, use
Glidescope ® products. This means that emergency room physicians will be familiar with our
capabilities and equipment, and in-hospital intubation opportunities will offer real-world
experience our paramedics can apply in the field. The Glidescope ® is also endorsed by our
department Medical Control Physician, Dr. Eric Cooper.
The cost of two Glidescope ® Ranger units with all associated accessories is $28,430, which
includes initial on-site training provided by Verathon.
Summary:
The members of Arlington Fire Department are committed to providing world-class pre-
hospital care to the citizens of Arlington and the Stillaguamish Valley. Meeting this high
standard requires us to consistently search for new and inventive methods of improving care,
and the Glidescope ® offers the greatest benefit to meet this end. Because difficult airways can
happen in any patient demographic, we truly feel the addition of the Glidescope ® to our
service has the potential to benefit every patient that we care for.
For a more in-depth understanding of video laryngoscopy, I would greatly appreciate the
opportunity to provide your members with an in-person demonstration. This would allow
them to see first-hand how this technology can save lives.
Thank you in advance for your consideration, and please let me know if I can answer any
questions or provide further information.
Sincerely,
Matthew Hickman, FF/EMT-P - B Shift MSO
City of Arlington Fire Department
6231 188th Street NE Arlington, Washington 98223
Work: 360-403-3600
Cell: 425-308-1999
mhickman@arlingtonwa.gov
Top: Traditional Laryngoscope (currently used by AFD)
Below: Traditional laryngoscope with endotracheal tube
Top: Glidescope Ranger Below: Profile view of Glidescope and view of vocal cords
Verathon Bid (Verathon is the sole distributor of Glidescope ® products)
References
1. Ibinson, J. W. (2014, November 5). Glidescope Use Improves Intubation Success Rates:
An Observational Study Using Propensity Score Matching. BMC Anesthesiology, 2014
(14), 101st
2. Verathon ‐ Video Laryngoscopy and Bladder Scanning Equipment."Verathon. Verathon,
n.d. Web. 17 Oct. 2016.
3. Griesdale, Donald E., MD, David Liu, MD, James McKinney, MD, and Peter T. Choi,
MD. "Glidescope® Video-laryngoscopy versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Endotracheal
Intubation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis." Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia
59th ser. 10.1 (2011): n. pag. Web.
City of Arlington
Council Agenda Bill
Item:
WS #3
Attachment
C
COUNCIL MEETING DATE:
December 12, 2016
SUBJECT:
Acceptance of grant funds from Hope Unlimited in partnership with Cascade Valley
Hospital Foundation on behalf of Arlington Fire Department.
ATTACHMENTS:
None
DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN
Fire
EXPENDITURES REQUESTED: $38,000
BUDGET CATEGORY: N/A
LEGAL REVIEW:
DESCRIPTION:
Staff is requesting that Council accept funds from Hope Unlimited for the backfill cost
of one career firefighter attending medic school.
HISTORY:
Hope Unlimited is the chaplaincy program known as Support 46. They support
Arlington Fire in many capacities. They have accepted a CVH-Foundation grant on our
behalf to assist in the backfill cost of one firefighter to attend paramedic school. Grant
funds will be used to pay the backfill wages of one of our part-paid firefighters for the
ten month time frame.
ALTERNATIVES
Do not accept the funds from Hope Unlimited in partnership with the CVH-
Foundation.
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Workshop; discussion only.
City of Arlington
Council Agenda Bill
Item:
WS #4
Attachment
D
COUNCIL MEETING DATE:
December 12, 2016
SUBJECT:
Resolution adopting an updated Fee Schedule
ATTACHMENTS:
Draft Resolution - Fee Schedule
DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN
City Clerk; Contact Kristin Banfield, 360-403-3444
EXPENDITURES REQUESTED: -0-
BUDGET CATEGORY: N/A
LEGAL REVIEW:
DESCRIPTION:
Staff has prepared an update to the City’s fee schedule. The fees included in the
schedule cover all departments in the city and address items not included in the
Arlington Municipal Code. Staff is recommending updates to the planning, fire, and
recreation fees.
HISTORY:
The Council last updated the City’s fee schedule in July 2015.
ALTERNATIVES
Remand to staff for further revisions
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Workshop; discussion only.
Page 1
RESOLUTION NO. 2016-xxx
A RESOLUTION REPLACING RESOLUTION NO.2015-009,
AND ADOPTING A REVISED FEE SCHEDULE
WHEREAS, the City Council, through ordinance, has adopted regulations requiring certain
actions and services; and,
WHEREAS, these various ordinances set forth that fees shall be set by resolution; and,
WHEREAS, the cost of providing these various services consistent with applicable codes,
regulations, and policies periodically increase or decrease, or certain services or practices are
discontinued and fees are no longer needed; and,
WHEREAS, it is the intent of the City of Arlington to charge appropriate fees and charges
that are consistent with the services provided and to cover the public cost of providing these various
services so that the public is not subsidizing individual benefits derived therefrom;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ARLINGTON AS FOLLOWS:
The following rates, fees, and charges for various services provided, actions performed, or items
sold by the city and/or its contract service providers, and fines levied against code violators, are
hereby adopted:
Section 1. Fees and Charges—General.
1.1 Fees. Fees are intended to cover the normal, recurring costs associated with
providing a given service. Fees are non-refundable.
1.2 Prices. In some instances, the City provides certain goods and merchandise for sale.
Prices for these goods may be included in this resolution.
1.3 Payment Due. Fees are due at the time the action is requested (e.g., at time of
application) or occurs (e.g., prior to a specific action). An applicant may pay all
fees of a multi-phased project in advance; however, doing so does not vest
applicable fees due. Fees due are those in effect at the time the specific action or
phase of an action is requested or occurs.
1.4 Waivers. Upon petition by the applicant, the City Council may waive any of the
fees, or portions thereof, for any non-profit organization or government agency.
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #2016-XXX
Section 2. Land Use Fees. Fees for various services, actions, and permits regarding land use,
as per AMC Title 20 Land Use Code, shall be as listed in Table 1: Land Use Fees
Table 1: Land Use Fees
Action 2016 Fee ($) 2017 Fee ($)
Land Use Permits
req’d)req’d)
Preliminary Plats
Final Plats
Binding Site Plans
Binding Site Plans ≥ 10 lots
Site Plans ≤ 9 lots
Final Binding Site Plan ≥ 10 lots
Final Binding Site Plan ≤ 9 lots
Development Agreements
req’d)req’d)
Master Plan
Design Review
Forest Practices Permits
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #2016-XXX
Action 2016 Fee ($) 2017 Fee ($)
Inspection Fee 127 per hour plus 106 per
acre
150.00 per hour plus
125.00per acre
Appeals
To City Council 212 250.00
To Planning Commission 212 250.00
To Hearing Examiner 582 plus actual cost of
Hearing Examiner
600.00 plus actual cost of
Hearing Examiner
To Shoreline Hearings Board 582 600.00
Reconsideration of Decision by:
Community Development Director
and/or a designee
79 100.00
Planning Commission 106 150.00
Hearing Examiner 212 plus actual cost of
Hearing Examiner
250.00 plus actual cost of
Hearing Examiner
City Council 132 150.00
Permit Extension
Extension 53 200.00
Resubmittal Extension 125.00
Amendment to or Modification of
Permit
Insignificant Design Deviations 53 60.00
Minor Amendment 317 325.00
Major Amendment 1,067 plus cost of Hearing
Examiner (if req’d)
1,100.00 plus actual cost of
Hearing Examiner (if
req’d)
Development Agreement 741 plus actual cost of
Hearing Examiner (if
req’d)
750.00 plus actual cost of
Hearing Examiner (if
req’d)
Boundary Line Adjustment
Boundary Line Adjustment / Lot Line
Elimination
1,664 1,700.00
Land Use Ordinance Amendment
Amendment to Text of Land Use
Ordinance
741 750.00
Amendment to Zoning Map (rezone)
< 5 acres 1,111 1,200.00
> or = 5 acres 1,957 2,000.00
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Minor Amendment (annual cycle) 1,428 1,500.00
Major Amendment (5-year cycle) 2,116 2,200.00
Annexations
Submission of 10% Petition 106 150.00
Submission of 60% Petition 1,058 1,100.00
If it goes to BRB hearing 794 800.00
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #2016-XXX
Action 2016 Fee ($) 2017 Fee ($)
Shoreline Development Permit
(SDP)
SDP in conjunction with a Land Use
Permit
529 550.00
SDP not in conjunction with a Land
Use Permit
1,058 1,100.00
Variance
Administrative 635 700.00
If it goes to hearing (fee in addition to
that paid for Admin. Decision)
1,217 plus actual cost
of Hearing Examiner
1,300.00 plus actual
cost of Hearing Examiner
Miscellaneous Actions/Items
Pre-Application Meetings / General
Information Meeting
1st two hours 0 0.00
Subsequent meetings 317 per meeting 325.00 per meeting
SEPA Review (note: review of
checklist included in Land Use
Permit fee )
SEPA Only (no land use permit
required)
529 550.00
Review of requested studies (i.e.
traffic, wetland, etc.)
159 175.00
Review of requested studies (i.e.
drainage, geo-tech, etc.)
711 750.00
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) 1,058 plus actual cost of
consultant
1,100.00
Deferral of Impact Fee
Application $200.00
Request of Utility Services Outside
City
Single-Family Residence/Duplex 212 225.00
Other Development 635 650.00
Property Tax Exemption Certificate
Processing Fee 500.00
Recording
Recording Fees / Conformed Copies Actual cost paid directly to
the Snohomish County
Auditor
Processing / Technology Fee
Added to all Land Use, Site Civil &
Building Permits
25.00
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #2016-XXX
Section 3. Public Works Fees. Fees for various services, actions and permits shall be as
listed in Tables 2-1: Review Fees, 2-2: Grading Plan Review Fees, 2-3: Grading Permit Fees,
and 2-4: Public Works Labor and Equipment Charges.
Table 2-1: Review Fees
Action 2016 Fee ($) 2017 Fee ($)
Site Civil Review 1
1,E.E.C.C Engineer’s Estimated Cost of Construction-Includes labor, equipment, material, overhead and profit.
Prices shall be from RS Means (latest edition) data adjusted for the Snohomish County area or from local sources if
not included in the RS Means database.
* Simple Site Plan Review - No water or sewer extension - Single family residence with maximum of 2 lots.
* Additional plan review applies when there is a change, addition or revision to the plan.
* Additional plan review fees will be charged at any point in the project when more than 2 reviews are required.
* Inspection Fee - commercial and residential plats (storm drainage, landscape, right-of-way and bond
inspections).
* Outside Consultant Review Fee.
* Water Availability Certificate Fee.
* Engineering Meetings (first 2 hours are no charge).
* Miscellaneous engineering fee - traffic and storm water report/design reviewed in-house.
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #2016-XXX
Action 2016 Fee ($) 2017 Fee ($)
Right of Way 6% E.E.C.C2 or maximum
1,058 with a minimum
charge of 106 plus
inspection fees
6% E.E.C.C. or maximum
1,100.00 with a minimum
charge of 125.00 plus
inspection fees
Right of Way Vacation 1,058 1,100.00
Miscellaneous Staff Time 127 per hour per person-
1/2 hour minimum
150.00 per hour per person,
½ hour minimum
Engineering Meetings-after 2 hours 317 per meeting 350.00 per meeting
Water Availability Certificate SFR 32 – Non-SFR 106 SFR 50.00
Non-SRF 125.00
Recovery Contract 1,058 plus actual cost 1,100.00 plus actual cost
Table 2-2: Grading Plan Review Fees
50 Cubic Yards or less No fee
51 to 100 cubic yards 25.50
101 to 1,000 cubic yards 40.00
First 1,000 cubic yards
Plus - for each additional 10,000 yards or fraction thereof
53.35
26.50
For the first 100,000 cubic yards
Plus - for each additional 10,000 yards or fraction thereof
292.00
14.40
For the first 200,000 cubic yards
Plus - for each additional 10,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof
435.45
7.85
Other Fees: Additional plan review required by changes, additions or
revisions to approved plans (minimum charge – 1/2 hour)
54.703
Per hour
2 E.E.C.C Engineer’s Estimated Cost of Construction-Includes labor, equipment, material, overhead and profit.
Prices shall be from RS Means (latest edition) data adjusted for the Snohomish County area or from local sources if
not included in the RS Means database.
* Simple Site Plan Review - No water or sewer extension - Single family residence with maximum of 2 lots.
* Additional plan review applies when there is a change, addition or revision to the plan.
* Additional plan review fees will be charged at any point in the project when more than 2 reviews are required.
* Inspection Fee - commercial and residential plats (storm drainage, landscape, right -of-way and bond
inspections).
* Outside Consultant Review Fee.
* Water Availability Certificate Fee.
* Engineering Meetings (first 2 hours are no charge).
* Miscellaneous engineering fee - traffic and storm water report/design reviewed in-house.
3 Or the total hourly cost to the City, whichever is the greatest. This cost shall include superv ision, overhead,
equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of the employees involved.
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #2016-XXX
Table 2-3: Grading Permit Fees
50 cubic yards or less 25.50
51 to 100 cubic yards 40.00
First 100 cubic yards
Plus – for each additional 100 cubic yards or fraction thereof
40.00
18.90
For the first 1,000 cubic yards
Plus - for each additional
1,000 yards or fraction thereof
210.50
15.70
10,001 to 100,000 cubic yards
Plus - for each additional
10,000 yards or fraction thereof
351.80
71.40
For the first 100,000 cubic yards
Plus - for each additional 10,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof
994.80
39.50
Table 2-4: Public Works Labor and Equipment Charges
A. Services and work included in the below schedule will be charged a 15%
administrative/overhead fee for accounting, billing and general City administrative costs.
B. All work or services not included in the below schedule must be mutually agreed upon
prior to the commencement of work.
C. Equipment and machinery that is not explicitly included in the below schedule will be
charged at the rate set forth in the most current Rental Rate Blue Book for Construction
Equipment ("Blue Book"). If the equipment or machinery rate is not available in the Blue
Book, the City will determine an appropriate fee or rate based on the original cost of the
asset plus operating and maintenance cost and/or comparable rates charged by other
organizations.
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #2016-XXX
Item Fee ($)
Labor Rate Cost
Equipment Rate Cost
Section 4. Building Permit Fees. For determining the value of a structure, the most current
issue of the Building Safety Journal Magazine, which offers the legacy building valuation data
fee schedule as published by the International Code Council, is adopted by reference. Fees
shall be as listed in Tables 3-1: Building Permit Fees, 3-2: Building Plan Fees, 3-3:
Miscellaneous Building Inspection Fees and 3-4: Miscellaneous Building Permit Fees.
Table 3-1: Building Permit Fees
1.00 – 500.00 32.00 32.50 33.00 33.50 34.00 0.00 to 500.00
501.00 – 2,000.00 32.00
4.22
32.50
4.31
33.00
4.39
33.50
4.48
34.00
4.57
For the first 500.00
PLUS for each additional
100.00, or fraction thereof,
to and including 2,000.00
2001.00 –
25,000.00
95.30
19.43
95.17
19.81
98.85
20.21
100.70
20.62
102.55
21.03
For the first 2,000.00
PLUS for each additional
1,000.00, or fraction thereof,
to and including 25,000.00
25,001.00 –
50,000.00
542.19
14.08
552.78
14.36
563.68
14.65
574.96
14.94
586.24
15.24
For the first 25,000.00
PLUS for each additional
1,000.00, or fraction thereof,
to and including 50,000.00
50,001.00 –
100,000.00
894.19
9.80
911.78
9.99
929.93
10.19
948.46
10.40
967.24
10.61
For the first 50,000.00
PLUS for each additional
1,000.00, or fraction thereof,
to and including 100,000.00
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #2016-XXX
100,001.00 –
500,000.00
1,384.1
9
7.77
1,411.2
8
7.93
1,439.4
3
8.08
1,468.4
6
8.25
1,497.7
4
8.41
For the first 100,000.00
PLUS for each additional
1,000.00, or fraction thereof,
to and including 500,000.00
500,001.00 –
1,000,000.00
4,492.1
9
6.64
4,583.2
8
6.78
4,671.4
3
6.91
4,768.4
6
7.05
4,861.7
4
7.19
For the first 500,000.00
PLUS for each additional
1,000.00, or fraction thereof,
to and including
1,000,000.00
1,000,001.00 and
up
7,819.1
9
5.0
7
7,973.2
8
5.17
8,126.4
3
5.27
8,293.4
6
5.38
8,456.7
4
5.49
For the first 1,000,000.00
PLUS for each additional
1,000.00, or fraction thereof
Table 3-2: Building Plan Fees
All valuations 65% of
Building
Permit Fee
65% of
Building
Permit Fee
65% of
Building
Permit Fee
65% of
Building
Permit Fee
65% of
Building
Permit Fee
Table 3-3: Miscellaneous Building Inspection Fees
Inspections outside of normal business hours 50.00 per hour4 (minimum charge 1 hour)
Reinspection fees assessed under provisions of the
current IBC
50.00 per hour1
Inspection for which no fee is specifically indicated 50.00 per hour5 (minimum charge—1 hour)
Additional plan review required by changes,
additions or revised plans
50.00 per hour6 (minimum charge—1 hour)
For use of outside consultants for plan review and
inspections, or both.
Actual costs7
Stop work order (working without permit) 8
4 Or the total hourly cost to the City, whichever is greatest. This cost shall include supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages,
and benefits of the employees involved.
Or the total hourly cost to the City, whichever is greatest. This cost shall include supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly
wages, and benefits of the employees involved.
Or the total hourly cost to the City, whichever is greatest. This cost shall include supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly
wages, and benefits of the employees involved.
Actual costs include administrative and overhead costs.
Stop work order (SWO): failure to obtain a valid permit within 48 hour of a SWO will resul t in double permit fees or a fine of
$500 whichever is less. A permit applied for within the 48 hour timeframe may be subject to a fine and/or fee at the discreti on of
the building official.
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #2016-XXX
Table 3-4: Miscellaneous Building Permit Fees
Action Fee ($)
Change lot after plan review completed 100.00
Change plans during or after plan review. New Plan Review Fee
Change or revise plans after issuance of
permit.
Current hourly rate per IBC or new plan review fee
Commercial or industrial re-roof IBC value or bid amount
Demolitions 100.00
Espresso carts (portable and stand alone) 250.00
Fences over 6 feet in height Current hourly rate per IBC for plan review plus 20.00
permit fee
Mobile homes 500.00
Modular offices (job shacks) 350.00
Moved buildings 100.00 prior to moving together with a building permit
fee based on the IBC valuation for new building and
cost of moved building.
Residential re-roofs 0.00
if plan review required 50.00
Retaining walls (permit not required under
four (4) feet
100.00 or IBC valuation, whichever is greater
Signs IBC valuation, using permit fee only
4.2 Plumbing Fees. Plumbing fees shall be as listed in Table 3-4: Plumbing Fees.
Table 3-4: Plumbing Permit Fees
Action Fee ($)
PERMIT ISSUANCE
Plumbing Permit Base Fee 25.00
Medical Gas Systems 100.00
Fixtures and Vents
For each plumbing fixture or trap or set of fixtures on one trap (including water, drainage
piping and backflow protection thereof)
12.00
Sewers, Disposal Systems and Interceptors
For each industrial waste pretreatment interceptor, including its trap and vent, except
kitchen-type grease interceptors functioning as fixture traps
25.00
Water Piping and Water Heaters
For each water heater including vent 25.00
Lawn Sprinklers, Vacuum Breakers and Backflow Protection Devices
For each lawn sprinkler system on any one meter, including backflow protection devices
thereof
25.00
Swimming Pools For each swimming pool or spa:
Public pool 90.00
Public spa 90.00
Private pool 60.00
Private spa 30.00
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #2016--XXX
Action Fee ($)
Miscellaneous
For each appliance or piece of equipment regulated by the Plumbing Code but not
classed in other appliance categories, or for which no other fee is listed in this code
12.00
4.3 Mechanical Permit Fees. Mechanical permit and inspection shall be as listed in Table
3-5: Mechanical Permit and Inspection Fees.
Table 3-5: Mechanical Permit & Inspection Fees
Mechanical Permit Base Fee 25.00
25.00
For the installation, relocation or replacement of each appliance vent installed and not
included in an appliance permit
10.00
25.00
AHU’s and Condensing Units 100.00
25.00
For each ventilation fan connected to a single duct 10.00
50.00
For each gas piping system of 1 to 5 outlets 10.00
For each additional outlet over 5, each 1.00
For each appliance or piece of equipment regulated by the Mechanical Code but not
classed in other appliance categories, or for which the fee is listed in the table
25.00
Table 3-6: Plumbing & Mechanical Plan Review Fees
LESS THAN $500.00 ROUND DOWN TO NEAREST $1,000.
GREATER THAN $500.00 ROUND UP TO NEAREST $1,000.
Total Valuation Fee ($)
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #2016--XXX
Total Valuation Fee ($)
$200,000.00 to $299,999.99 800.00
$300,000.00 to $399,999.99 900.00
$400,000.00 to $499,999.99 1,000.00
$500,000.00 to $599,999.99 1,100.00
$600,000.00 to $699,999.99 1,200.00
$700,000.00 to $799,999.99 1,300.00
$800,000.00 to $899,999.99 1,400.00
$900,000.00 to $999,999.99 1,500.00
$1,000,000.00 to $1,999,999.99 1,600.00
$2,000,000.00 to $2,999,999.99 1,700.00
$3,000,000.00 to $3,999,999.99 1,800.00
$4,000,000.00 to $4,999,999.99 1,900.00
5 Million and Up 2,000.00 for the first $5M plus
$1.00 for each additional
$1,000.00 or fraction thereof
Table 3-7: Fire Permit Fees
Action Fee ($)
Fire Sprinklers
Plan Review Fee 100.00
Permit Fee Based on Valuation
Fire Alarms
Plan Review Fee 100.00
Permit Fee Based on Valuation
Commercial Hoods (Type I & Type II)
Plan Review Fee 100.00
Permit Fee Based on Valuation
Other Fire Safety System
Plan Review Fee 100.00
Permit Fee Based on Valuation
Section 5. Fire Department Life-Safety Inspection Fees. Fees for re-inspections for life-
safety issues conducted by the Fire Department shall be as listed in Table 4: Fire Department
Life-Safety Inspection Fees.
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #2016--XXX
Table 4: Fire Department Life-Safety Inspection Fees
Initial Inspection 0.00
First reinspection for corrections 0.00
Second reinspection for corrections 100.00
Third reinspection for corrections 150.00
Additional inspections to complete life/safety corrections
and attain compliance
250.00
Fireworks Stand Inspection 50.00
Section 6. Fees for the Use of City Owned Facilities. Fees for various services, actions, and
permits regarding use of City owned facilities shall be as listed in Table 6: Fees for the Use
of City Owned Facilities.
Table 5: Fees for the Use of City Owned Facilities
Use/Activity Fee ($)
Hadley Hall at the Arlington Community Youth Center,
Stillaguamish Conference Room* at Public Works
Administration (154 W. Cox).
*This facility does NOT have a kitchen facility available for use.
Without Kitchen
One to three hours 15.00 per hour
Over three hours 75.00
With Kitchen
One to three hours 20.00 per hour
Over three hours 125.00
Athletic Fields
League
Baseball
Youth, resident team 3.75 per youth per season
Youth, non-resident team 5.00 per team per use
Adult 12.50 per use
Softball
Youth, resident team 3.75 per youth per season
Youth, non-resident team 5.00per team per use
Adult 12.50 per use
Soccer
Youth, resident team 3.75 per youth per season
Youth, non-resident team 5.00 per team per use
Adult 12.50 per use
Other
Youth, resident team 3.75 per youth per season
Youth, non-resident team 5.00 per team per use
Adult 12.50 per use
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #2016--XXX
Tournament
Baseball
Youth, resident team 3.75 per youth per tournament
Youth, non-resident team 5.00 per team per use
Adult 12.50 per use
Softball
Youth, resident team 3.75 per youth per tournament
Youth, non-resident team 5.00 per team per use
Adult 12.50 per use
Soccer
Youth, resident team 3.75 per youth per tournament
Youth, non-resident team 5.00 per team per use
Adult 12.50 per use
Other
Youth, resident team 3.75 per youth per season
Youth, non-resident team 5.00 per team per use
Adult 12.50 per use
Lighting
Youth 3.00 per hour
Adult 6.00 per hour
Scheduling Fee for League and Tournament
League 15.00 per team
Tournament 15.00 per tournament
Concession Sales
League 50.00 per season
Tournament 25.00 per day
6.1 Definitions.
A. “Youth” is defined as any person 18 years of age or younger.
B. “Resident” is defined as any team composed of at least 51% Arlington
residents.
Section 7. Appeal Fees for Violations and Abatement. Fees for various services and actions
regarding violations and abatement as per Chapter 11.01 of the Arlington Municipal Code
shall be as listed in Table 6: Appeal Fees for Violations and Abatement.
Table 6: Appeal Fees for Violations and Abatement
To Hearing Examiner 582.00 plus actual cost of Hearing Examiner
Forest Practice Violation Fine 317.00
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #2016--XXX
Section 8. Licensing Fees. Licensing fees for various licenses issued under various sections
of the Arlington Municipal Code shall be as listed in Table 7:- Licensing Fees.
Table 7: Licensing Fees
New application / renewal business license under AMC Chapter
5.28
60.00
Late payment penalty for business license under AMC Chapter 5.28 120.00
For new applications applied for between October 1 st through
December 31st
45.00
For new applications applied for between January 1st through March
31st
30.00
For new applications applied for April 1st through June 30th (Note:
$15 for the remainder of the current business license year and $60
for the new business license year for a total of $75, making the
business license valid thru June 30th of the following year.)
75.00
Businesses with offices located outside of city limits but conducting
business within city limits (AMC Chapter 5.28)
20.00
Peddlers & Solicitors License under AMC Chapter 5.04 25.00
Vehicles for Hire License under AMC Chapter 5.12
- First vehicle
- Each vehicle thereafter
35.00
15.00
Cabaret License under AMC Chapter 5.16 (annual) 75.00
Section 9. EMS Fees and Charges.
9.1 Fees and Mileage Charges Established. For purposes of AMC Chapter 3.06,
fees and mileage for EMS services shall be set as set forth in Table 8: Emergency
Medical Services Rates and Charges.
9.2 Beginning on January 1, 2013, the rates set forth for the year 2012 shall be
increased annually effective January 1 of each succeeding year by the June reported
percentage increase of the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the Seattle-Tacoma-
Bremerton area for All Urban Consumers, or other measure commonly used by the city
should it change; provided, however, that notwithstanding any reduction in the CPI,
rates shall not decrease.
9.3 EMS Transport Fees. In accordance with the requirements of 42 Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) Parts 410 and 414, which provides that Medicare fees and
charges shall apply to Medicare recipients;
A. Unmet (excess fee) Part B Deductible and Part B coinsurance amounts. In
accordance with the provisions of 42 CFR Parts 410 and 414, the City shall
bill the patient for any unmet or excess fee to the extent authorized by
federal law.
B. Inability to Pay Excess Fee. Individuals who are on fixed or low incomes
or do not have the ability to pay the differential because of financial
difficulties may submit a request to waive the differential to the City with
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #2016--XXX
supporting documentation of the inability to pay.
Table 8: Emergency Medical Services Rates and Charges
Service 2016 Rate ($) 2017 Rate ($)
BLS Non-emergent 558.80 568.86
BLS Emergent 558.80 568.86
ALS Emergent 965.20 982.57
ALS 2 965.20 982.57
ALS Response Fee 277.85 282.85
Specialty Care Transport Fee 965.20 982.57
Mileage (all categories) 16.77 per mile 17.07 per mile
Non-resident transport fee – applies to those transported from
outside of the Arlington EMS service area.
Arlington EMS Service area includes Arlington City limits and the limits of Fire
District 19, Fire District 21 (Arlington Rural), Fire District 24, and Fire District 25
100.00 100.00
Section 10. Dog Licensing Fees.
10.1 Fees for dog licenses as called for in Arlington Municipal Code Chapter 8.09
shall be listed in Table 9: Dog Licensing Fees
10.2 Per RCW 49.60.380, the City of Arlington shall honor a request by a blind
person or hearing impaired person not to be charged a fee to license his or her guide
dog, or a request by a physically disabled person not to be charged a fee to license his
or her service animal.
10.3 All dogs require proof of current Rabies vaccination to be licensed.
10.4 Proof of alteration and micro-chip is required to receive reduced fees
Table 9: Dog Licensing Fees
Dog - unaltered 20.00
Dog – altered 10.00
Dog – altered (senior citizen owner) 5.00
Dog – altered & micro-chipped 5.00
Replacement Tag fee 5.00
Late Fee – for failure to purchase annual license before March 1 10.00
Section 11. Fees for Police Services. Fees for various services, actions, and permits for police
services shall be as listed in Table 10: Fees for Police Services.
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #2016--XXX
Table 10: Police Services
Fingerprinting 20.00
Lamination of Concealed Weapons Permit 4.25
Anti-Harassment Order Service (Includes service, return of
service, mileage & fuel costs)
80.00
Fine for Parking:
1. Fine for parking as described in Arlington Municipal
Code 10.54.060, Prohibited Parking
2. Fine if paid within 24 hours of issuance
3. Fine if not paid within 15 days of issuance
50.00
25.00
100.00
Section 12. Fees for Duplication of Public Records. Fees for various services and actions
for duplication of public records shall be listed in Table 11: Public Records Services.
Table 11: Public Records Services
In house copying of City documents for the public 0.15 per page
In house copying of City documents to PDF when original
document is not in electronic format
0.10 per page
1.00 to copy to CD
2.50 to copy to USB Flash Drive
In house duplication of City documents to CD or USB Flash
Drive, such as Comprehensive Plan, Arlington Municipal Code
Title 20, Design Standards, Engineering Standards,
Development Standards, etc.
10 per CD or USB Flash Drive
Maps (For GIS specific services see below)
18” x 24”
22” x 34”
24” x 36”
30” x 30”
36” x 36”
1.50
2.60
3.00
3.15
4.50
Documents or CD/USB Flash Drive printed by outside party Actual cost to reproduce
Color Photos 0.40
Duplication of all other types of city media (e.g. photographs,
audio/video tapes, blueprints)
Actual cost to reproduce
Certified copy of a public record 5.00 for the first page; 1.00 for
each page thereafter
GIS
Zoning and Land Use Maps 10.00
11x17 5.00
2x3 13.00
3x3 19.00
3x4 25.00
Map CD 26.00
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #2016--XXX
Data CDs/FTP 26.00 per client
Hourly Rate for Custom Work 127.00 per hour, ½ hour minimum
Laminating 3.00/sq ft
Shipping 5.00
Fee 0.00
Section 13. Repeal of Previous Fee Resolution. Resolution 2015-009 is hereby repealed.
Section 14. Effective Date. This resolution will become effective immediately upon
passage.
PASSED by the City Council and APPROVED by the Mayor this _____ day of
______________________ 2016.
CITY OF ARLINGTON
_________________________________
Barbara Tolbert, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________________
Kristin Banfield, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________
Steve Peiffle, City Attorney
Page 1
RESOLUTION NO. 2015-0092016-xxx
A RESOLUTION REPLACING RESOLUTION NO.2015-003009,
AND ADOPTING A REVISED FEE SCHEDULE
WHEREAS, the City Council, through ordinance, has adopted regulations requiring certain
actions and services; and,
WHEREAS, these various ordinances set forth that fees shall be set by resolution; and,
WHEREAS, the cost of providing these various services consistent with applicable codes,
regulations, and policies periodically increase or decrease, or certain services or practices are
discontinued and fees are no longer needed; and,
WHEREAS, it is the intent of the City of Arlington to charge appropriate fees and charges
that are consistent with the services provided and to cover the public cost of providing these various
services so that the public is not subsidizing individual benefits derived therefrom;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ARLINGTON AS FOLLOWS:
The following rates, fees, and charges for various services provided, actions performed, or items
sold by the city and/or its contract service providers, and fines levied against code violators, are
hereby adopted:
Section 1. Fees and Charges—General.
1.1 Fees. Fees are intended to cover the normal, recurring costs associated with
providing a given service. Fees are non-refundable.
1.2 Prices. In some instances, the City provides certain goods and merchandise for sale.
Prices for these goods may be included in this resolution.
1.3 Payment Due. Fees are due at the time the action is requested (e.g., at time of
application) or occurs (e.g., prior to a specific action). An applicant may pay all
fees of a multi-phased project in advance; however, doing so does not vest
applicable fees due. Fees due are those in effect at the time the specific action or
phase of an action is requested or occurs.
1.4 Waivers. Upon petition by the applicant, the City Council may waive any of the
fees, or portions thereof, for any non-profit organization or government agency.
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #20156-XXX-009
Section 2. Land Use Fees. Fees for various services, actions, and permits regarding land use,
as per AMC Title 20 Land Use Code, shall be as listed in Table 1: Land Use Fees
Table 1: Land Use Fees
Action 2016 Fee ($) 2017 Fee ($)
Land Use Permits
req’d)req’d)
Preliminary Plats and Binding Site
Plans
Final Plats and Binding Site Plans
Binding Site Plans
Binding Site Plans ≥ 10 lots
Site Plans ≤ 9 lots
Final Binding Site Plan ≥ 10 lots
Final Binding Site Plan ≤ 9 lots
Development Agreements
req’d)
Development Agreements
req’d)req’d)
Master Plan
Design Review
Forest Practices Permits
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #20156-XXX-009
Action 2016 Fee ($) 2017 Fee ($)
acre
Review Fee for Conversion Option
Harvest Plan Approval
106 plus 106 per acre 125.00 plus 125.00 per
acre
Review Fee To Lift Moratorium 300 300.00
Inspection Fee 127 per hour plus 106 per
acre
150.00 per hour plus
125.00per acre
Appeals
To City Council 212 250.00
To Planning Commission 212 250.00
To Hearing Examiner 582 plus actual cost of
Hearing Examiner
600.00 plus actual cost of
Hearing Examiner
To Shoreline Hearings Board 582 600.00
Reconsideration of Decision by:
Community Development Director
and/or a designee
79 100.00
Planning Commission 106 150.00
Hearing Examiner 212 plus actual cost of
Hearing Examiner
250.00 plus actual cost of
Hearing Examiner
City Council 132 150.00
Permit Extension
Extension 53 200.00
Resubmittal Extension 125.00
Amendment to or Modification of
Permit
Insignificant Design Deviations 53 60.00
Minor Amendment 317 325.00
Major Amendment 1,067 plus cost of Hearing
Examiner (if req’d)
1,100.00 plus actual cost of
Hearing Examiner (if
req’d)
Binding Site Plans
Text and/or Design Deviation 741
Lot Line Adjustment or Changes to
Number of Lots
1,323
Development Agreement 741 plus actual cost of
Hearing Examiner (if
req’d)
750.00 plus actual cost of
Hearing Examiner (if
req’d)
Boundary Line Adjustment
Boundary Line Adjustment / Lot Line
Elimination
1,664 1,700.00
Land Use Ordinance Amendment
Amendment to Text of Land Use
Ordinance
741 750.00
Amendment to Zoning Map (rezone)
< 5 acres 1,111 1,200.00
> or = 5 acres 1,957 2,000.00
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #20156-XXX-009
Action 2016 Fee ($) 2017 Fee ($)
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Minor Amendment (annual cycle) 1,428 1,500.00
Major Amendment (5-year cycle) 2,116 2,200.00
Annexations
Submission of 10% Petition 106 150.00
Submission of 60% Petition 1,058 1,100.00
If it goes to BRB hearing 794 800.00
Shoreline Development Permit
(SDP)
SDP in conjunction with a Land Use
Permit
529 550.00
SDP not in conjunction with a Land
Use Permit
1,058 1,100.00
Variance
Administrative 635 700.00
If it goes to hearing (fee in addition to
that paid for Admin. Decision)
1,217 plus actual cost
of Hearing Examiner
1,300.00 plus actual
cost of Hearing Examiner
Miscellaneous Actions/Items
Zoning Interpretation 106
Pre-Application Meetings / General
Information Meeting
1st two hours 0 0.00
Subsequent meetings 317 per meeting 325.00 per meeting
SEPA Review (note: review of
checklist included in Land Use
Permit fee )
SEPA Only (no land use permit
required)
529 550.00
Review of requested studies (i.e.
traffic, wetland, etc.)
159 175.00
Review of requested studies (i.e.
drainage, geo-tech, etc.)
711 750.00
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) 1,058 plus actual cost of
consultant
1,100.00
Deferral of Impact Fee
Application $200.00
Request of Utility Services Outside
City
Single-Family Residence/Duplex 212 225.00
Other Development 635 650.00
Property Tax Exemption Certificate
Processing Fee 500.00
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #20156-XXX-009
Action 2016 Fee ($) 2017 Fee ($)
Recording
Recording Fees / Conformed Copies Actual cost paid directly to
the Snohomish County
Auditor
Processing / Technology Fee
Added to all Land Use, Site Civil &
Building Permits
25.00
Section 3. Public Works Fees. Fees for various services, actions and permits shall be as
listed in Tables 2-1: Review Fees, 2-2: Grading Plan Review Fees, 2-3: Grading Permit Fees,
and 2-4: Public Works Labor and Equipment Charges.
Table 2-1: Review Fees
Action 2016 Fee ($) 2017 Fee ($)
Site Civil Review 1
1,E.E.C.C Engineer’s Estimated Cost of Construction -Includes labor, equipment, material, overhead and profit.
Prices shall be from RS Means (latest edition) data adjusted for the Snohomish County area or from local sources if
not included in the RS Means database.
* Simple Site Plan Review - No water or sewer extension - Single family residence with maximum of 2 lots.
* Additional plan review applies when there is a change, addition or revision to the plan.
* Additional plan review fees will be charged at any point in the project when more than 2 reviews are required.
* Inspection Fee - commercial and residential plats (storm drainage, landscape, right-of-way and bond
inspections).
* Outside Consultant Review Fee.
* Water Availability Certificate Fee.
* Engineering Meetings (first 2 hours are no charge).
* Miscellaneous engineering fee - traffic and storm water report/design reviewed in-house.
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #20156-XXX-009
Action 2016 Fee ($) 2017 Fee ($)
Right of Way 6% E.E.C.C2 or maximum
1,058 with a minimum
charge of 106 plus
inspection fees
6% E.E.C.C. or maximum
1,100.00 with a minimum
charge of 125.00 plus
inspection fees
Right of Way Vacation 1,058 1,100.00
Miscellaneous Staff Time 127 per hour per person-
1/2 hour minimum
150.00 per hour per person,
½ hour minimum
Engineering Meetings-after 2 hours 317 per meeting 350.00 per meeting
Water Availability Certificate SFR 32 – Non-SFR 106 SFR 50.00
Non-SRF 125.00
Recovery Contract 1,058 plus actual cost 1,100.00 plus actual cost
Table 2-2: Grading Plan Review Fees
Table 2-2: Grading Plan Review Fees
50 Cubic Yards or less No fee
51 to 100 cubic yards 25.50
101 to 1,000 cubic yards 40.00
First 1,000 cubic yards
Plus - for each additional
10,000 yards or fraction thereof
53.35
26.50
For the first 100,000 cubic yards
Plus - for each additional
10,000 yards or fraction thereof
292.00
14.40
For the first 200,000 cubic yards
Plus - for each additional 10,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof
435.45
7.85
2 E.E.C.C Engineer’s Estimated Cost of Construction -Includes labor, equipment, material, overhead and profit.
Prices shall be from RS Means (latest edition) data adjusted for the Snohomish County area or from local sources if
not included in the RS Means database.
* Simple Site Plan Review - No water or sewer extension - Single family residence with maximum of 2 lots.
* Additional plan review applies when there is a change, addition or revision to the plan.
* Additional plan review fees will be charged at any point in the project when more than 2 reviews are required.
* Inspection Fee - commercial and residential plats (storm drainage, landscape, right -of-way and bond
inspections).
* Outside Consultant Review Fee.
* Water Availability Certificate Fee.
* Engineering Meetings (first 2 hours are no charge).
* Miscellaneous engineering fee - traffic and storm water report/design reviewed in-house.
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #20156-XXX-009
Other Fees: Additional plan review required by changes, additions or
revisions to approved plans (minimum charge – 1/2 hour)
54.703
Per hour
3 Or the total hourly cost to the City, whichever is the greatest. This cost shall include superv ision, overhead,
equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of the employees involved.
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #20156-XXX-009
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #20156-XXX-009
Table 2-3: Grading Permit Fees
50 cubic yards or less 25.50
51 to 100 cubic yards 40.00
First 100 cubic yards
Plus – for each additional 100 cubic yards or fraction thereof
40.00
18.90
For the first 1,000 cubic yards
Plus - for each additional
1,000 yards or fraction thereof
210.50
15.70
10,001 to 100,000 cubic yards
Plus - for each additional
10,000 yards or fraction thereof
351.80
71.40
For the first 100,000 cubic yards
Plus - for each additional 10,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof
994.80
39.50
Table 2-4: Public Works Labor and Equipment Charges
A. Services and work included in the below schedule will be charged a 15%
administrative/overhead fee for accounting, billing and general City administrative costs.
B. All work or services not included in the below schedule must be mutually agreed upon
prior to the commencement of work.
C. Equipment and machinery that is not explicitly included in the below schedule will be
charged at the rate set forth in the most current Rental Rate Blue Book for Construction
Equipment ("Blue Book"). If the equipment or machinery rate is not available in the Blue
Book, the City will determine an appropriate fee or rate based on the original cost of the
asset plus operating and maintenance cost and/or comparable rates charged by other
organizations.
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #20156-XXX-009
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #20156-XXX-009
Item Fee ($)
Labor Rate Cost
Equipment Rate Cost
Section 4. Building Permit Fees. For determining the value of a structure, the most current
issue of the Building Safety Journal Magazine, which offers the legacy building valuation data
fee schedule as published by the International Code Council, is adopted by reference. Fees
shall be as listed in Tables 3-1: Building Permit Fees, 3-2: Building Plan Fees, 3-3:
Miscellaneous Building Inspection Fees and 3-34: Miscellaneous Building Permit Fees.
Table 3-1: Building Permit Fees
1.00 – 500.00 32.00 32.50 33.00 33.50 34.00 0.00 to 500.00
501.00 – 2,000.00 32.00
4.22
32.50
4.31
33.00
4.39
33.50
4.48
34.00
4.57
For the first 500.00 plus
PLUS for each additional
100.00, or fraction thereof,
to and including 2,000.00
2001.00 –
25,000.00
95.30
19.43
95.17
19.81
98.85
20.21
100.70
20.62
102.55
21.03
For the first 2,000.00 plus
PLUS for each additional
1,000.00, or fraction thereof,
to and including 25,000.00
25,001.00 –
50,000.00
542.19
14.08
552.78
14.36
563.68
14.65
574.96
14.94
586.24
15.24
For the first 25,000.00 plus
PLUS for each additional
1,000.00, or fraction thereof,
to and including 50,000.00
50,001.00 –
100,000.00
894.19
9.80
911.78
9.99
929.93
10.19
948.46
10.40
967.24
10.61
For the first 50,000.00 plus
PLUS for each additional
1,000.00, or fraction thereof,
to and including 100,000.00
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #20156-XXX-009
100,001.00 –
500,000.00
1,384.1
9
7.77
1,411.2
8
7.93
1,439.4
3
8.08
1,468.4
6
8.25
1,497.7
4
8.41
For the first 100,000.00 plus
PLUS for each additional
1,000.00, or fraction thereof,
to and including 500,000.00
500,001.00 –
1,000,000.00
4,492.1
9
6.64
4,583.2
8
6.78
4,671.4
3
6.91
4,768.4
6
7.05
4,861.7
4
7.19
For the first 500,000.00 plus
PLUS for each additional
1,000.00, or fraction thereof,
to and including
1,000,000.00
1,000,001.00 and
up
7,819.1
9
5.0
7
7,973.2
8
5.17
8,126.4
3
5.27
8,293.4
6
5.38
8,456.7
4
5.49
For the first 1,000,000.00
plus
PLUS for each additional
1,000.00, or fraction thereof
Total
Valuation($)
Fee ($)
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #20156-XXX-009
Table 3-2: Building Plan Fees
All valuations 65% of
Building
Permit Fee
65% of
Building
Permit Fee
65% of
Building
Permit Fee
65% of
Building
Permit Fee
65% of
Building
Permit Fee
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #20156-XXX-009
Table 3-23: Miscellaneous Building Inspection Fees
Action Fee ($)
4
1
5 —
6 —
7
8
4 Or the total hourly cost to the City, whichever is greatest. This cost shall include supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages,
and benefits of the employees involved.
Or the total hourly cost to the City, whichever is greatest. This cost shall include supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly
wages, and benefits of the employees involved.
Or the total hourly cost to the City, whichever is greatest. This cost shall include supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly
wages, and benefits of the employees involved.
Actual costs include administrative and overhead costs.
Stop work order (SWO): failure to obtain a valid permit within 48 hour of a SWO will result in double permit fees or a fine of
$500 whichever is less. A permit applied for within the 48 hour timeframe may be subject to a fine and/or fee at the discretion of
the building official.
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #20156-XXX-009
Table 3-34: Miscellaneous Building Permit Fees
Action Fee ($)
Change lot after plan review completed 100.00
Change plans during or after plan review. New Plan Review Fee
Change or revise plans after issuance of
permit.
Current hourly rate per IBC or new plan review fee
Action Fee ($)
Commercial or industrial re-roof IBC value or bid amount
Demolitions 100.00
Espresso carts (portable and stand alone) 250.00
Fences over 6 feet in height Current hourly rate per IBC for plan review plus 20.00
permit fee
Mobile homes 500.00
Modular offices (job shacks) 350.00
Moved buildings 100.00 prior to moving together with a building permit
fee based on the IBC valuation for new building and
cost of moved building.
Residential re-roofs 0.00
if plan review required 50.00
Retaining walls (permit not required under
four (4) feet
100.00 or IBC valuation, whichever is greater
Signs IBC valuation, using permit fee only
4.2 Plumbing Fees. Plumbing fees shall be as listed in Table 3-4: Plumbing Fees.
Table 3-4: Plumbing Permit Fees
Action Fee ($)
PERMIT ISSUANCE
Plumbing Permit Base Fee 25.00
Medical Gas Systems 100.00
Fixtures and Vents
For each plumbing fixture or trap or set of fixtures on one trap (including water, drainage
piping and backflow protection thereof)
12.00
Sewers, Disposal Systems and Interceptors
For each industrial waste pretreatment interceptor, including its trap and vent, except
kitchen-type grease interceptors functioning as fixture traps
25.00
Water Piping and Water Heaters
For each water heater including vent 25.00
Lawn Sprinklers, Vacuum Breakers and Backflow Protection Devices
For each lawn sprinkler system on any one meter, including backflow protection devices
thereof
25.00
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #2015-0092016--XXX
Action Fee ($)
Swimming Pools For each swimming pool or spa:
Public pool 90.00
Public spa 90.00
Private pool 60.00
Private spa 30.00
Miscellaneous
For each appliance or piece of equipment regulated by the Plumbing Code but not
classed in other appliance categories, or for which no other fee is listed in this code
12.00
44.3 Mechanical Permit Fees. Mechanical permit and inspection shall be as listed in Table
3-5: Mechanical Permit and Inspection Fees.
Table 3-5: Mechanical Permit & Inspection Fees
Action Fee ($)
PERMIT ISSUANCE AND HEATERS
Furnaces
Appliance Vents
Boilers
AHU’s and Condensing Units
Evaporative Coolers & Heat Pumps
Ventilation and Exhaust
Refrigeration Systems
Miscellaneous
Table 3-6: Plumbing & Mechanical Plan Review Fees
LESS THAN $500.00 ROUND DOWN TO NEAREST $1,000.
GREATER THAN $500.00 ROUND UP TO NEAREST $1,000.
Total Valuation Fee ($)
Less than $1,000.00 150.00
$1,000.00 to $9,999.99 200.00
$10,000 to $19,999.99 250.00
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #2015-0092016--XXX
Total Valuation Fee ($)
$20,000.00 to $29,999.99 300.00
$30,000.00 to $39,999.99 350.00
$40,000.00 to $49,999.99 400.00
$50,000.00 to $59,999.99 450.00
$60,000.00 to $69,999.99 500.00
$70,000.00 to $79,999.99 550.00
$80,000.00 to $89,999.99 600.00
$90,000.00 to $99,999.99 650.00
$100,000.00 to $199,999.99 700.00
$200,000.00 to $299,999.99 800.00
$300,000.00 to $399,999.99 900.00
$400,000.00 to $499,999.99 1,000.00
$500,000.00 to $599,999.99 1,100.00
$600,000.00 to $699,999.99 1,200.00
$700,000.00 to $799,999.99 1,300.00
$800,000.00 to $899,999.99 1,400.00
$900,000.00 to $999,999.99 1,500.00
$1,000,000.00 to $1,999,999.99 1,600.00
$2,000,000.00 to $2,999,999.99 1,700.00
$3,000,000.00 to $3,999,999.99 1,800.00
$4,000,000.00 to $4,999,999.99 1,900.00
5 Million and Up 2,000.00 for the first $5M plus
$1.00 for each additional
$1,000.00 or fraction thereof
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #2015-0092016--XXX
Table 3-7: Fire Permit Fees
Action Fee ($)
Fire Sprinklers
Plan Review Fee 100.00
Permit Fee Based on Valuation
Fire Alarms
Plan Review Fee 100.00
Permit Fee Based on Valuation
Commercial Hoods (Type I & Type II)
Plan Review Fee 100.00
Permit Fee Based on Valuation
Other Fire Safety System
Plan Review Fee 100.00
Permit Fee Based on Valuation
Section 5. Fire Department Life-Safety Inspection Fees. Fees for re-inspections for life-
safety issues conducted by the Fire Department shall be as listed in Table 4: Fire Department
Life-Safety Inspection Fees.
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #2015-0092016--XXX
Table 4: Fire Department Life-Safety Inspection Fees
Action Fee ($)
Life / Safety Inspections of Businesses
Section 6. Cemetery Fees. Fees and prices for various services, actions, and merchandise for
cemetery use shall be as listed in Table 5: Cemetery Fees and Prices.
Table 5: Cemetery Fees and Prices
Burial Lot $1,200
Burial Lot Endowment Fee $300
Opening & Closing (during business hours) $1,000
Opening & Closing (after business hours) $1,500
Concrete Grave Liner $800
Wilbert Bronze $18,395
Bronze Triune $4,895
Copper Triune $4,695
Monticello / Salute $1,295
Continental $1,595
Venetian $2,395
Cameo Rose / SST Triune / Veteran $2,695
Wilbert Way Saturday Service fee $325
Bronze Triune $950
Copper Triune $950
Cameo Rose / SST Triune / Veteran $850
Venetian $750
Monticello $650
Universal $450
Tribute $295
Regal $295
Commented [KB1]: Cemetery fees and charges adopted
under separate resolution. Resolution #2016-009
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #2015-0092016--XXX
Urn Garden $520
Urn Garden Endowment Fee $130
Second Right Inurnment $400
Second Right Inurnment Endowment Fee $100
Opening & Closing (during business hours) $445
Opening & Closing (after business hours) $695
Concrete Urn Liner $310
Childrens Garden
Children’s Garden Lot $317
Children’s Garden Lot Endowment Fee $80
Opening & Closing (all times) $488
Children’s Garden Liner $396
Niche
Niche Wall II, rows 4-6 bottom half $750
Niche Wall II, rows 4-6 bottom half Endowment Fee $150
Niche Wall III, rows 1-3 top half $1,019
Niche Wall III, rows 1-3 top half Endowment Fee $250
Niche Wall III, rows 4-6 bottom half $869
Niche Wall III, rows 4-6 bottom half Endowment Fee $220
Opening & Closing (during business hours) $445
Opening & Closing (after business hours) $695
Second Right Niche Wall $436
Second Right Niche Wall Endowment Fee $109
Tent and Chairs for Inurnment $163
Flower Vase for Niche Wall $195
Replacement Flower Vase (vase only) $20
Inscriptions
Niche Inscription – Single $363
Niche Inscription – Double (both names and 1st DOD, 2nd DOD later) $563
Flat Marker Final DOD Inscription & Re-Installation (off-site) $495
Flat Marker Final DOD Inscription (on site) $363
Monument or Slant “single” Final DOD Inscription (off-site) $550
Monument or Slant “companion” Final DOD Inscription (off site) $550
Monument or Slant Final DOD Inscription (on site) $363
Headstones & Monuments
Various Headstones, Memorials, Monuments, Benches, Pillows, Slants, etc. Call for Pricing
Installation Fees (includes inspection fee)
Flat Markers
Flat Marker– Children’s Garden (up to 24” x 12”) $175
Flat Marker– 30” x 18” or smaller $275
Flat Marker – 28” x 34” or larger $375
Flat Marker Re-Installation Fee – All sizes $175
Upright Monuments, Slants, Pillows and Benches
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #2015-0092016--XXX
Standard Size “Individual” & Foundation $575
Standard Size “Companion” & Foundation $675
Standard Bench $575
Monubench $675
Other Company’s Mechandise Call for Quote
Miscellaneous Fees
Standard Inspection Fee (headstone, bench, vault, liner, etc.) $100
Administration Service Fee $50
Temporary Marker $30
Other Services
Memorial Tree w/ garden marker $800
Disinterment / Traditional Burial $1,995
Disinterment / Cremation $650
Pressure Washing $ 40 for first headstone
$ 25 for each additional
headstone
Section 76. Fees for the Use of City Owned Facilities. Fees for various services, actions,
and permits regarding use of City owned facilities shall be as listed in Table 6: Fees for the
Use of City Owned Facilities.
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #2015-0092016--XXX
Table 65: Fees for the Use of City Owned Facilities
Use/Activity Fee ($)
Hadley Hall at the Arlington Community Youth Center,
Stillaguamish Conference Room* at Public Works
Administration (154 W. Cox).
*Please note that the Stillaguamish Conference Room does This facility
does NOT have a kitchen facility available for use.
Without Kitchen
One to three hours 15.00 per hour
Over three hours 75.00
With Kitchen
One to three hours 20.00 per hour
Over three hours 125.00
Athletic Fields
League
Baseball
Youth, resident team 7.50 3.75 per youth per season
Youth, non-resident team 10 5.00 per team per use
Adult 25 12.50 per use
Softball
Youth, resident team 7.503.75 per youth per season
Youth, non-resident team 10 5.00per team per use
Adult 25 12.50 per use
Soccer
Youth, resident team 7.503.75 per youth per season
Youth, non-resident team 10 5.00 per team per use
Adult 25 12.50 per use
Other
Youth, resident team 7.503.75 per youth per season
Youth, non-resident team 10 5.00 per team per use
Adult 25 12.50 per use
Tournament
Baseball
Youth, resident team 7.503.75 per youth per tournament
Youth, non-resident team 10 5.00 per team per use
Adult 25 12.50 per use
Softball
Youth, resident team 7.503.75 per youth per tournament
Youth, non-resident team 10 5.00 per team per use
Adult 25 12.50 per use
Soccer
Youth, resident team 7.503.75 per youth per tournament
Youth, non-resident team 10 5.00 per team per use
Adult 25 12.50 per use
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #2015-0092016--XXX
Other
Youth, resident team 7.503.75 per youth per season
Youth, non-resident team 10 5.00 per team per use
Adult 25 12.50 per use
Lighting
Youth 3.00 per hour
Adult 6.00 per hour
Scheduling Fee for League and Tournament
League 15.00 per team
Tournament 15.00 per tournament
Concession Sales
League 50.00 per season
Tournament 25.00 per day
76.1 Definitions.
A. “Youth” is defined as any person 18 years of age or younger.
B. “Resident” is defined as any team composed of at least 51% Arlington
residents.
Section 78. Appeal Fees for Violations and Abatement. Fees for various services and
actions regarding violations and abatement as per Chapter 11.01 of the Arlington Municipal
Code shall be as listed in Table 76: Appeal Fees for Violations and Abatement.
Table 76: Appeal Fees for Violations and Abatement
Action Fee ($)
Appeals
To Hearing Examiner 582.00 plus actual cost of Hearing Examiner
Fines
Forest Practice Violation Fine 317.00
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #2015-0092016--XXX
Section 98. Licensing Fees. Licensing fees for various licenses issued under various sections
of the Arlington Municipal Code shall be as listed in Table 87:- Licensing Fees.
Table 87: Licensing Fees
License/Activity Fee ($)
st
st
st
st
st th
th
Section 109. EMS Fees and Charges.
109.1 Fees and Mileage Charges Established. For purposes of AMC Chapter 3.06,
fees and mileage for EMS services shall be set as set forth in Table 98: Emergency
Medical Services Rates and Charges.
109.2 Beginning on January 1, 2013, the rates set forth for the year 2012 shall be
increased annually effective January 1 of each succeeding year by the June reported
percentage increase of the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the Seattle-Tacoma-
Bremerton area for All Urban Consumers, or other measure commonly used by the city
should it change; provided, however, that notwithstanding any reduction in the CPI,
rates shall not decrease.
109.3 EMS Transport Fees. In accordance with the requirements of 42 Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) Parts 410 and 414, which provides that Medicare fees and
charges shall apply to Medicare recipients;
A. Unmet (excess fee) Part B Deductible and Part B coinsurance amounts. In
accordance with the provisions of 42 CFR Parts 410 and 414, the City shall
bill the patient for any unmet or excess fee to the extent authorized by
federal law.
B. Inability to Pay Excess Fee. Individuals who are on fixed or low incomes
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #2015-0092016--XXX
or do not have the ability to pay the differential because of financial
difficulties may submit a request to waive the differential to the City with
supporting documentation of the inability to pay.
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #2015-0092016--XXX
Table 98: Emergency Medical Services Rates and Charges
Service 2016 Rate ($) 2017 Rate
($)2011 Rate
($)
BLS Non-emergent 558.80 568.86476.00
BLS Emergent 558.80 568.86476.00
ALS Emergent 965.20 982.57741.00
ALS 2 965.20 982.57846.00
ALS Response Fee 277.85 282.85265.00
Specialty Care Transport Fee 965.20 982.57846.00
Mileage (all categories) 16.77 per mile 17.07 per
mile16.00 per
mile
Non-resident transport fee – applies to those transported from
outside of the Arlington EMS service area.
Arlington EMS Service area includes Arlington City limits and the limits of Fire
District 19, Fire District 21 (Arlington Rural), Fire District 24, and Fire District 25
100.00 100.00
Section 1110. Dog Licensing Fees.
1110.1 Fees for dog licenses as called for in Arlington Municipal Code Chapter 8.09
shall be listed in Table 109: Dog Licensing Fees
1110.2 Per RCW 49.60.380, the City of Arlington shall honor a request by a blind
person or hearing impaired person not to be charged a fee to license his or her guide
dog, or a request by a physically disabled person not to be charged a fee to license his
or her service animal.
1110.3 All dogs require proof of current Rabies vaccination to be licensed.
1110.4 Proof of alteration and micro-chip is required to receive reduced fees
Table 109: Dog Licensing Fees
License Annual Fee ($)
–
–
–
–
Section 1211. Fees for the Police Services. Fees for various services, actions, and permits
for police services shall be as listed in Table 1110: Fees for Police Services.
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #2015-0092016--XXX
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #2015-0092016--XXX
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #2015-0092016--XXX
Table 1110: Police Services
Action / Service / License Fee ($)
10.54.060
Section 1312. Fees for Duplication of Public Records. Fees for various services and
actions for duplication of public records shall be listed in Table 11: Public Records Services.
Table 1211: Public Records Services
Action / Service Annual Fee ($)
18” x 24”
22” x 34”
24” x 36”
30” x 30”
36” x 36”
CITY OF ARLINGTON FEE SCHEDULE RESOLUTION #2015-0092016--XXX
3x4 25.00
Map CD 26.00
Data CDs/FTP 26.00 per client
Hourly Rate for Custom Work 127.00 per hour, ½ hour minimum
Laminating 3.00/sq ft
Shipping 5.00
Fee none0.00
Section 1413. Repeal of Previous Fee Resolution. Resolution 2015-003 009 is hereby
repealed.
Section 1514. Effective Date. This resolution will become effective immediately upon
passage.
PASSED by the City Council and APPROVED by the Mayor this _____ day of
______________________ 20152016.
CITY OF ARLINGTON
_________________________________
Barbara Tolbert, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________________
Kristin Banfield, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________
Steve Peiffle, City Attorney
City of Arlington
Council Agenda Bill
Item:
WS #5
Attachment
E
COUNCIL MEETING DATE:
December 12, 2016
SUBJECT:
Sole Source Traffic Monitoring Equipment and Grant Acceptance
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution for Sole Source Equipment Purchase
Stillaguamish Tribe Grant Notification Letter
Product Brochure
Product Estimate
Sole Source Letter
DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN
Public Works – Eric Scott
EXPENDITURES REQUESTED: $6,685.00
BUDGET CATEGORY: Stillaguamish Community Grant
LEGAL REVIEW:
DESCRIPTION:
Acceptance of a Stillaguamish Tribe Community Contribution Grant for the purchase of a “Scout
Video Collection Unit” and adoption of a Sole Source Resolution for the purchase of the “Scout
Video Collection Unit”.
HISTORY:
Public Works received a Stillaguamish Tribe Community Contribution Grant to help study traffic
problems within the City. The grant is to be used for the purchase of a Scout Video Collection Unit
to remotely collect video data. This data will greatly enhances the City's ability to study traffic and
pedestrian flows to determine if/where corrections are necessary.
The equipment specified in the grant application is a “Scout Video Collection Unit” manufactured
by Miovision, this is specialized equipment that is only offered by the manufacturer. As such,
soliciting multiple bids is not feasible and staff is requesting Council approval for sole source
authorization to purchase the equipment.
ALTERNATIVES
Do not authorize the sole source resolution
Remand to staff for additional discussion
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Workshop; discussion only. At the December 19th council meeting staff will recommend the
following motion, “I move to accept the Stillaguamish Tribe Community Contribution Grant
and adopt the sole source resolution for the purchase of a Scout Video Collection Unit from
Miovision, pending final review by the City Attorney.”
RESOLUTION 2016-XXX 1
RESOLUTION NO. 2016-XXX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ARLINGTON TO WAIVE BIDDING REQUIREMENTS
FOR THE PURCHASE OF A SCOUT VIDEO COLLECTION EQUIPMENT FOR USE BY
THE CITY OF ARLINGTON PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
WHEREAS, the City of Arlington Public Works Department is responsible for
monitoring traffic within the City of Arlington; and
WHEREAS, the Stillaguamish Tribe has awarded the City a Community Contribution
Grant to purchase additional traffic monitoring equipment; and
WHEREAS, the grant was approved by the Tribe for the purchase of a Scout Video
Collection Unit, which is specialized equipment only offered by the manufacturer and not
through any other vendor, so that soliciting multiple bids in accordance with the City’s
purchasing standards is not feasible; and
WHEREAS, RCW 35.23.352(9) permits the waiving of bidding requirements for the
purchase of materials which are clearly and legitimately limited to a single source of supply or
services which are subject to special market conditions;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Arlington,
as follows:
Section 1: The City Council of the City of Arlington finds that the acquisition of
Scout Video Collection Unit approved by the Stillaguamish Tribal Grant clearly limits
the City of Arlington to a single source of supply, justifying the waiver of competitive
bidding requirements.
Section 2: The City Council of the City of Arlington hereby waives the bidding
requirements for the purchase of a Scout Video Collection Unit and related equipment
for use by the City of Arlington Public Works Department.
APPROVED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Arlington this _____ day of
__________________, 201___.
CITY OF ARLINGTON
____________________________________
Barbara Tolbert, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________________
Kristin Banfield, City Clerk
RESOLUTION 2016-XXX 2
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
__________________________________
Steven J. Peiffle, City Attorney
Intersection Count Road Volume Counts Roundabout Count Vehicle Gap Data JunctionCount PathwayCount
148 Manitou Drive, Suite 101, Kitchener, ON, N2C 1L3 • 1.877. 646 .8476 • miovision.com
Count Scout video manually or upload to the Miovision Platform for superior data accuracy.
Scout is the industry leading portable video data collection device,
built for reliable, unattended field operation for days at a time.
scout video collection unit | product overview
bird's eye view
Easily set up Scout for a bird's -eye view
of the roadway or intersection, without
using a ladder or bucket truck.
color LCD screen
Use the user interface to schedule
multiple study recordings, review camera
setup, and watch recorded video.
open-format video
Scout records video in .mp4 format
allowing for spot checking, traffic
observation or manual counting.
portable & durable
Scout is designed, tested, and built to
offer a highly portable device that can
withstand vibrations & drops in the field.all-weather device
Heavily tested for operating temperature
range of -40°C (F) to 60°C (140°F) in
rain, snow, heat, and cold.
Other Videoobstructed view Scout Videounobstructed view
148 Manitou Drive, Suite 101, Kitchener, ON, N2C 1L3 • 1.877. 646 .8476 • miovision.com
warranty
1. One (1) Year Limited Warranty from date of delivery, the Hardware
shall be free from defects in materials and workmanship, and function
substantially in accordance with applicable documentation. At the
date of purchase of the Hardware, the Customer may purchase an
extended warranty for an additional 365 days.
2. The battery provided with the Scout Hardware is not included in or
covered by any warranty of Miovision.
3. If Miovision replaces any piece of Hardware during the term of a
warranty period, the warranty on such replacement piece of Hardware
shall expire at the end of the applicable warranty period for the
original piece of Hardware. Miovision may use refurbished portions of
Hardware in replacement, provided such parts are of equal value and
functionality, as determined by Miovision in its sole discretion.
support
Miovision offers free support on the Scout Hardware during the life of the product through contacting our support team. For more information on support hours of operation, and our Support Case Process, visithelp.miovision.com.
Email: support@miovision.comNorth American Toll-free: 1-855-360-7752
WEIGHT
Control Unit 24 lb (10.89 kg)
Pole Mount 18 lb (8.16 kg)
Power Pack (optional)30.4 lb (13.79 kg)
BATTERY AND POWER
Built-in Battery 12 V, 28 Ah sealed lead acid battery
Battery Life 72 hours (3 days)
Battery Life
(with Power Pack)72 hours + 96 hours (7 days)
Stand-By 2 months
Recharge Time 5-6 hours (typical)
Temperature impact on battery capacity 104°F (40°C) to 102% rated capacity;
77°F (25°C) to 100% rated capacity;
32°F (0°C) to 85% rated capacity;
5°F (-15°C) to 65% rated capacity.
Battery Lifespan Up to 60% capacity after 500 full charge and discharge cycles
Power Adapter 50/60 Hz, 100VAC-240VAC;
European power cord available.
SCOUT DISPLAY
Dimensions 4.5" x 3.375" (114.3 mm x 85.7 mm)
Screen Type Backlit LCD
VIDEO RECORDING
Video Format h264 codec; .mp4 file format
Video File Size 384 kbps (~180 MB/ hour of video)
Resolution 720 x 480
Frame Rate 30 fps
ELECTRICAL AND OPERATING REQUIREMENTS
Operating Ambient Temperature -40°F (°C) to 140°F (60°C)
Maximum Wind Load 50 mph (~80.5 km/h)
Relative Humidity 5% to 95% non condensing
Line Voltage 100 - 240 VAC ~ 1.5A(MAX.)
Frequency 50/60Hz
MEMORY STORAGE
Miovision Ultra SD Card Proprietary, industrial-rated memory card designed for use with Scout.
Ultra SD Expected Life Two (2) Years; approximately 50,000 write/erase cycles
Ultra SD Temperature Range -40°C to +85°C
Memory Type Industrial rated; Ultra MLC (proprietary)
Control Unit Memory Storage Each slot supports up to a 32GB SD/SDHC
card
(7 days of video)
CAMERA
Range Super Wide Dynamic 120° horizontal view
(Wide Lux chip embedded)
Television Lines 600TVL(Day); 650TVL(Night)
Noise Reduction 2D/3DNR
Stabilization Digital Image Stabilizer
Voltage 12VDC
SCOUT SYSTEM PACKAGE CONTENTS
• Scout Control Unit (1) »Lock with Key (2) »Miovision Ultra SD Card (1) »USB SD Card Reader (1) »Universal Charger & Regional Power Cord (1)
• Scout Pole Mount (1)• Accessory Case (1): »Scout Camera (1) »Ratchet Straps (2) »TR30 Screw Driver (1) »Lock with Key (2)
HARDWARE ACCESSORIES (SOLD SEPARATELY)
Power Pack Additional 96 hours of recording time.
Scout Tripod For deployment without street poles.
scout video collection unit | technical specifications
Estimate
Miovision Technologies Inc.
148 Manitou Drive, Suite 101
Kitchener ON N2C 1L3
Tax ID # 831042346
Customer City of Arlington, WA Date 06/14/2016
Currency US Dollar Valid Until 12/11/2016
Start Date Estimate #9324
End Date Sales Rep Tom Schnekenburger
Invoice Codes Hardware & Shipping (HW), Software Service (SW), Setup & Support (SS)
Additional Comments :
-
The Customer hereby agrees to order the products outlined above at the prices indicated, and acknowledges it has read, understands and agrees to
be bound by the terms and conditions outlined at http://miovision.com/terms-and-conditions/
Date: ___________________Name: ___________________Signature: ___________________
PO# (if applicable): ___________________
Select Payment Type:__ Credit Card*__ Check (Net Terms 30d)**__ Purchase Order __ Bank Transfer
*Requires a Credit Card Authorization form ** Requires an approved Credit Application
Bill To Ship To
City of Arlington, WA
Arlington WA 98223
United States
City of Arlington, WA
Arlington WA 98223
United States
Quantity Description Invoice Code Rate Amount
1 Scout Video Collection Unit HW $3,999.00 $3,999.00
1 - Scout Video Control Unit HW $0.00 $0.00
1 - Scout Polemount HW $0.00 $0.00
1 - Charger Cord, NA HW $0.00 $0.00
1 Power Pack and 16GB SD Card HW $749.00 $749.00
1 - Power Pack Package HW $0.00 $0.00
1 - Charger Cord, NA HW $0.00 $0.00
1 Tripod Accessory HW $1,099.00 $1,099.00
1 - Tripod Accessory HW
1 Shipping HW $280.00 $280.00
Subtotal $6,127.00
Tax (%)$0.00
Total $6,127.00
Eric Scott
City Engineer
City of Arlington, Washington Public Works.
154 W. Cox
Arlington, WA 98223
Miovision’s Traffic Data Solution provides transportation professionals with an end-to-end data collection
and management platform. Traffic data is delivered to the Platform by using Miovision’s Video Collection
Units, or by making a request with Traffic Data On Demand, which utilizes locally partnered traffic data firms
to fulfill the request using the Miovision Video Collection Unit. Video on the Miovision Platform is processed
with analysis software that uses specially developed algorithms and systems and is protected by U.S. patent
20080270569.
This letter is to confirm that the automated traffic count system provided and distributed by Miovision
Technologies Inc. is a sole source product. Miovision Technologies, Inc. is the sole manufacturer of software
that will analyze recorded raw video from an intersection, roundabout, highway, or mid-block location and
provide a detailed, tabular report of vehicular counts, movements and classifications. Miovision
Technologies, Inc. is the sole manufacturer and distributor of the portable camera hardware, mounting
equipment, and video collection unit necessary to record video at an intersection, roundabout, highway, or
mid-block location. Miovision Technologies, Inc. is the sole provider of a web site that allows end users to
view their uploaded raw video and accompanying traffic data through a secure username and password and
store it for future observation with sharing capabilities for clients and colleagues.
Miovision Technologies, Inc. is the sole provider and authorized source for support of the Miovision Platform
and the repair of the Miovision Video Collection Unit.
If you desire additional information, please don’t hesitate to contact me at 519-513-2407 ext 206 at any time
or visit our web site at miovision.com.
Manufacturing & Shipping facilities located at:
148 Manitou Drive, Suite 101
Kitchener, Ontario, Canada
N2C 1L6
Sincerely,
Kurtis McBride, CEO
Miovision Technologies, Inc.
148 Manitou Drive, Suite 101, Kitchener, ON, N2C 1L3 • 1.877.646.8476 • miovision.com
City of Arlington
Council Agenda Bill
Item:
WS #6
Attachment
F
COUNCIL MEETING DATE:
December 12, 2016
SUBJECT:
Classification and Compensation Study Discussion
ATTACHMENTS:
None
DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN
Administration – Paul Ellis and Heather Logan
EXPENDITURES REQUESTED:
BUDGET CATEGORY: General Fund
LEGAL REVIEW:
DESCRIPTION:
At the council meeting December 5, 2016, Victoria McGrath, of McGrath Human Resources
Group, presented an overview of methodology, description of how a market-based salary system
works, recommended classification system changes, recommended compression strategies,
recommended salary schedule for non-represented employees, and benefit market review.
HISTORY:
The City of Arlington (City) solicited proposals from interested, highly-qualified, and experienced
consulting firms to design, conduct, and assist in the implementation of a comprehensive
compensation study for the City’s employees. The City received two proposals. Staff reviewed
both proposals and has recommended awarding a contract to McGrath Human Resources Group
to complete the survey. The last full comprehensive compensation plan was completed in the early
2000s.
ALTERNATIVES
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Workshop; discussion only.
City of Arlington
Council Agenda Bill
Item:
WS #7
Attachment
G
COUNCIL MEETING DATE:
December 12, 2016
SUBJECT:
City Administrator Contract Review
ATTACHMENTS:
None
DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN
Administration/Mayor
EXPENDITURES REQUESTED: Budgeted
BUDGET CATEGORY: Executive
LEGAL REVIEW:
DESCRIPTION:
The City Administrator is a contract position appointed by the Mayor and subject to
confirmation by the City Council. The contract is being reviewed.
HISTORY:
With the December 31, 2014 retirement of City Administrator, Allen Johnson, the
Mayor, in accordance with AMC 2.06.020, recommended the appointment of Paul
Ellis to fill that position beginning January 1, 2015. Paul Ellis has been in that position
since January 1, 2015, and his contract is now being reviewed.
ALTERNATIVES
Approve Staff’s Recommendation with Modifications
Table Staff’s Recommendation
Deny Staff’s Recommendation
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Workshop; discussion only.
City of Arlington
Council Agenda Bill
Item:
WS #8
Attachment
H
COUNCIL MEETING DATE:
December 12, 2016
SUBJECT:
Planning Commission 2017 Work Plan
ATTACHMENTS:
2016 Planning Commission Annual Report, including the Proposed, Adopted and
Completed Work Plan. 2017 Planning Commission Proposed Work Plan.
DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN
Department of Community & Economic Development
EXPENDITURES REQUESTED: -0-
BUDGET CATEGORY: N/A
LEGAL REVIEW:
DESCRIPTION:
Per AMC 2.52 the Planning Commission shall hold an annual joint meeting with City
Council. Staff and Planning Commission will present the 2016 Planning Commission
Annual Report regarding the 2016 Work Plan and present the preliminary 2017 Work
Plan.
HISTORY:
Staff and the Planning Commission developed a work plan process to better identify
and facilitate the workload, which began in 2016. This serves as tool to establish tasks
and identify resources needed to complete the goals, it also assists the city attorney
with forecasting land use tasks and identifies future budget needs for programs. Most
importantly, it will serve as a tool to keep the council advised on Planning
Commission tasks during the year and produce the annual report at the end of each
year.
ALTERNATIVES
N/A
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Workshop; discussion only.
2016 Planning Commission Work Plan
The purpose of the Work Plan is to break down the goal setting process into smaller, more actionable steps. This work plan helps with outlining what is
needed to accomplish each goal (collaboration, resources, due date or frequency, anticipated obstacles and solutions). The goals can be listed first and
then ranked in order of priority in the 1st far left column.
REMEMBER:
Use SMART goal setting: Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Relevant, and Trackable & Time Bound
Established goals are created as fillers for Planning Commission meetings and do not take the place of required development meetings
Track progress made throughout the year to stay on target and bump out as necessary to accommodate development items
WORK PLAN
Rank
#
Goal & Sub Tasks Collaboration
Needs/Process
Resources Needed Date Due
or
Time Line
Anticipated
Obstacle
Solution Progress Made
1.
AMC 20.96
Amendment Process
LUCA Process None
Jan. 2016 None Drafted
2. AMC 20.90
Deferred Impact Fees
LUCA Process None Jan. 2016 None Drafted
3. AMC 20.44
Supplemental Uses
Public Hearing None Feb. 2016 Public Comments Multiple Meetings
4. TDR’s AMC 20.37
PDS/Consultant
LUCA Process
None Feb. 2016
5. Horizontal Mixed Use Docket Process Consultant Services June 2016
6. AMC 20.68
Sign Code
Sub Tasks
Reconvene Sign Code
Committee to formulate
separate work plan and
time line
Sign Code
Committee
Public Hearing
Council
Legal – recent changes
regarding protected
signage.
City Attorney
assistance
Time Line
Required
Public Comments Multiple Meetings
7. WASA
Other Sub-Areas
Sub Tasks
Technical Advisory
Group
Align with Retail Focus
Area Initiative
Align with MIC
Public Hearings
Stakeholders
Council
PSRC
Joint Commissions
Staff Time and
Consultant Services
Time Line
Required
Public Comments
Budget Item
Multiple Meetings
8. Design Review
Guidelines
LUCA Process None
2016 Planning Commission Work Plan
9.
Public Participation
Plan
Sub Task
Identify Platform for
implementation
Council
Budget Item
2017 Budget
Item
10. Comprehensive Plan
On-going clean up
LUCA/Docket
Process
Budget Item
11. MIC
Overlay Language
Consultant Services Budget Item
12. 20.102 Wireless
Facilities
LUCA ‐ Title 20 Drafted
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
2016 Planning Commission Work Plan Report
Title Chapter Status Date
Comprehensive Plan
Amendments
Water and Sewer Completed January 2016
I502 Ordinance
Amendment
AMC 20.40‐1 Completed February 2016
Comprehensive Plan PSRC Work Plan Completed March 2016
Code Amendment
Ordinance Change
AMC 20.96 Completed March 2016
Tax Exemption
Ordinance
ESB 5761 Completed April 2016
2016 Docket Comprehensive Plan Completed May 2016
Eligible Facilities
Modifications / Wireless
Communication
AMC 20.44 & 20.102 Completed July 2016
Critical Areas
Ordinance Change
AMC 20.88 & 20.93 Completed July 2016
Floodplain Regulations
Ordinance Change
AMC 20.64 Completed July 2016
Storage Facilities
Ordinance Change
AMC 20.40‐1 & 20.08 Completed August 2016
Impact Fee Deferral
Ordinance
AMC 20.90 Completed October 2016
Horizontal Mixed Use
Overlay
OLUM Completed December 2016
Other Business Topic
2016 WORK PROGRAM TRACKER
AMC Chapter Title PC
Meeting
Notice of
PH
Published
SEPA
Issued
SEPA CP
End
DOC Sent DOC
End
Public
Hearing
PC F of F Due Council
CAB
Due/Sent
Draft
Ordinance
Due/Received
Council
WS
Council
Vote
Ordinance
Publication
Date
Ordinance
Effective
Date
Notice of
Adoption
Sent to
DOC (10
days)
Appeal
Deadline
Chapter 3.98 ESB 5761
Resolution
4/4 &
4/11
4/18/16 4/6/16 4/11/16 4/18/16 4/25/16
Chapter 3.98 Ordinance 4/20/16 4/25/16 5/2/16 5/9/16
20.96 Amendments 2/2/16 2/16/16 2/16/16 3/1/16 1/29/16 3/12/16 3/1/16 3/3/16 3/17/16 2/19/16 3/21/16 3/28/16 4/4/16 4/5/16
20.102 Wireless 4/19/16 6/6/16 3/10/16 3/24/16 5/2/16 7/5/16 7/5/16 7/12/16 7/6/16 2/19/16 7/11/16 7/18/16 7/25/16 7/28/16
20.44 Wireless 4/19/16 6/6/16 3/10/16 3/24/16 5/2/16 7/5/16 7/5/16 7/12/16 7/6/16 2/19/16 7/11/16 7/18/16 7/25/16 7/28/16
20.88 CAO repeal 5/17/16 6/6/16 4/8/16 4/25/16 4/8/16 6/8/16 6/7/16 6/14/16 6/8/16 3/16 6/13/16 7/18/16 7/25/16 7/28/16
20.93 CAO rewrite 5/17/16 4/11/16 4/8/16 4/25/16 4/8/16 6/8/16 6/7/16 6/14/16 6/8/16 3/16 6/13/16 7/18/16 7/25/16 7/28/16
20.64 Floodplain 5/17/16 4/11/16 4/8/16 4/25/16 4/8/16 6/8/16 6/7/16 6/14/16 6/8/16 4/4/16 6/13/16 7/18/16 7/25/16 7/28/16
20.36 ILA/TDR’s 5/3/16 4/15/16(x)5/15/16 On Hold
20.37 TDR’s 5/3/16 4/15/16(x)5/15/16 On Hold
PSRC Resolution Comp Plan 4/16 3/16 4/11/16 4/18/16 4/25/16 5/3/16
2016 Docket Comp Plan 4/5/16 4/1/16 4/19/16 5/5/16 3/29/16 5/9/16 5/16/16
20.90 Impact Fees 9/8/16 9/6/16 8/1/16 8/15/16 6/30/16 8/29/16 9/20/16 9/22/16 9/22/16 6/1/16 9/26/16 10/3/16 10/10/16 10/11/16
20.36 HMU Overlay 11/1/16 11/1/16 9/14/16 9/28/16 9/8/16 11/7/16 11/15/16 11/22/16 11/22/16 11/22/16 11/28/16 12/5/16 12/12/16
20.40 Permissible
Uses
6/14/16 6/20/16 5/18/16 6/3/16 5/18/16 6/1/16 7/7/16 7/18/16 7/21/16 6/20/16 7/25/16 8/1/16 8/8/16 8/9/16
20.08 Definitions 6/14/16 6/20/16 5/18/16 6/3/16 5/18/16 6/1/16 7/7/16 7/18/16 7/21/16 6/20/16 7/25/16 8/1/16 8/8/16 8/9/16
TBD Multi‐Family
20.44 Supplemental
Uses
20.68 Signs
20.42 WASA
2017 Planning Commission Work Plan
The purpose of the Work Plan is to break down the goal setting process into smaller, more actionable steps. This work plan helps with outlining what is
needed to accomplish each goal (collaboration, resources, due date or frequency, anticipated obstacles and solutions). The goals can be listed first and
then ranked in order of priority in the 1st far left column.
REMEMBER:
Use SMART goal setting: Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Relevant, and Trackable & Time Bound
Established goals are created as fillers for Planning Commission meetings and do not take the place of required development meetings
Track progress made throughout the year to stay on target and bump out as necessary to accommodate development items
WORK PLAN
Rank
#
Goal & Sub Tasks Collaboration
Needs/Process
Resources Needed Date Due
or
Time Line
Anticipated
Obstacle
Solution Progress Made
1.
Comp Plan Amend.
Docket Process
LUCA Process 20.96
ARL-3 items
Consultant Services
June 2017 None
2. Comp Plan Amend.
Docket Process
LUCA Process 20.96
WASA items
Consultant Services June 2017 None
3. Comp Plan Amend.
Docket Process
LUCA Process 20.96
PSRC items
Consultant Services June 2017 None
4. TDR’s AMC 20.37
LUCA Process Consultant Services June 2017 DOC
5. Horizontal Mixed Use
AMC 20.44
Regulating Plan
LUCA Process Public Participation
Meetings
Outreach
June 2017 Document
Publishing
6. Horizontal Mixed Use
Design Development
Regulations
LUCA Process June 2017 Document
Publishing
7. Comp Plan Amend.
MFTE – Urban Centers
LUCA Process June 2017 None
8. Comp Plan Amend.
Private Initiated
Rezones
LUCA Process June 2017
9. Design Review
Guidelines
AMC 20.46
LUCA Process
10. MIC – Planned
Development
Consultant Services
11.
City of Arlington
Council Agenda Bill
Item:
WS #9
Attachment
I
COUNCIL MEETING DATE:
December 12, 2016
SUBJECT:
Lodging Tax Distributions for 2017
ATTACHMENTS:
2017 Lodging Tax Grant Application Worksheet
DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN
Finance; Kristin Garcia - Finance Director 360-403-3431
EXPENDITURES REQUESTED: $146,158
BUDGET CATEGORY: Lodging Tax Fund
LEGAL REVIEW:
DESCRIPTION:
17 applications were received with a total amount requested of $185,335. The amount
budgeted for distribution is $160,000. The lodging tax advisory committee (LTAC) met
on October 12 and November 17 to review and discuss the applications. The
applications were individually scored using the rating criteria included in the
application. The rating criteria consisted of; projects supporting city tourism goals,
length of impact, attracting visitors from more than 50 miles away, a match of at least
33% of total project costs, consideration of partnerships, sustainable future funding and
overnight lodging stays.
Based on the rating criteria, the committee recommends a funding distribution totaling
$146,158 with 8 applications being fully funded, 5 partially funded, 3 were not funded
and 1 application was deemed ineligible to receive funding.
RCW 67.28.1816 requires a local lodging tax committee to review applications and
submit a recommendation to Council for how lodging taxes are to be distributed.
Council’s role is to accept or reject the lodging tax committee’s recommendation for
distribution. The Council may accept all, some or none of the applicants on the
committee’s recommended list.
If the council proposes a change in amount from the committee’s recommendation, the
council shall submit their proposal to the LTAC for review and comment. The LTAC has
a period of 45 days to review and comment on council’s proposal. Comments from the
LTAC are brought back to council and a public hearing is held. The council make take
final action after expiration of the 45 day period.
City of Arlington
Council Agenda Bill
Item:
WS #9
Attachment
I
HISTORY:
On November 28, 2016 council was given the lodging tax committee’s recommendation
for 2017 distributions. On December 5, 2016, the council tabled the item for further
discussion.
ALTERNATIVES
Reject the committee’s recommendations
Take no action
Remit a proposal back to the committee for further review
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Workshop; discussion only.