HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-27-2014
City of Arlington
Council Agenda Bill
Item:
WS #1
Attachment
A
COUNCIL MEETING DATE:
January 27, 2014
SUBJECT:
Change Order #5 to the 67th Ave Final Phase construction contract
ATTACHMENTS:
- CO #5 Summary of Costs and Authorization Form
DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN
Public Works – Jim Kelly
EXPENDITURES REQUESTED: $162,338.50
BUDGET CATEGORY: TIB Grant and Transportation Improvement Fund
LEGAL REVIEW: Pending final approval by the City Attorney
DESCRIPTION:
Change Order #5 to the 67th Ave Final Phase construction contract.
HISTORY:
The 67th Ave Construction documents, prepared by HDR Engineers, omitted required ADA ramps and
intersection signalization at the 67th Ave-204th St intersection. In addition, the HDR prepared contract
documents failed to include a pay item for the resurfacing of the 67th Ave-204th St intersection. This change
order addresses those deficiencies and adds additional work for resurfacing of 125-ft on Cemetery Rd and
resurfacing of the 67th Ave Lebanon St intersection. A detailed cost breakout is attached to this CAB and a
summary of all change orders to date is below:
Phase Amount Comments
Original Contract $ 5,982,984.00 Original contract for 67th Ave Construction
CO#1 $ 13,830.00 CO-01 (6” gate valve, decommission wells)
CO#2 $ 3,950.11 CO-02 (water service revisions)
CO#3 $ 292,516.50 CO-03 (69th Avenue Culvert work)
CO#4 $ (3,037.02) CO-4 (Misc Construction Changes)
CO#5 $ 162,338.50 CO-5 (204th Intersection)
Total $ 6,452,582.09 Revised Contract Price
ALTERNATIVES
- Table for further discussion
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Discussion only. At Council’s request, this issue will be brought to Feb 3rd Council meeting with the following
recommended motion, “I move to approve Change Order #5 to the 67th Ave Final Phase project and authorize
the mayor to sign the change order, pending final review by the City Attorney.
Revised Change Order #5 – The revised SOW includes the necessary ADA improvements and traffic
signal work omitted from HDR design, however, this revised CO #5 mills 2” of asphalt wearing surface
and replaces it with a new 2” wearing surface. In addition, additional work was added to resurface 125
feet of Cemetery Rd, to resurface the Lebanon/67th intersection, and to install curb-gutter in front of
Twin City Foods and Nelson Petroleum to control drainage.
Change Order Item Cost Comments
1. ADD pedestrian ramps and new sidewalk/curb for
ADA access at south corners of 204th/67th
intersection, HDR omitted item from design and bid
form.
$ 18,333 Exiting ramps are either too narrow, missing
truncated domes or do not have adequately sized
landings. ADA compliance is required by law.
2. ADD Pedestrian ADA crossing signalization and
traffic loop detectors, HDR omitted item from
design documents and from bid form.
$ 57,100 Project omitted all intersection traffic loops
($1,000/loop x 27 ea), pedestrian buttons and
controllers at SE & SW corners, and misc.
signalization equipment.
3. ADD 2” asphalt milling at 204th/67th intersection,
HDR included item in design documents but
omitted it from bid form. (NOTE #1)
$ 35,375 Due to high costs and extended traffic impacts
associated with full intersection replacement, we are
proposing to do the original scheduled work of mill
and overlay. This price includes traffic control
(flaggers and uniformed police officers). Est is 10,000
sq. ft. Unit price per SY is $40.49, above normal
pricing due to difficulty of having to work within
active 2-way intersection.
4. ADD 2” asphalt overlay at 204th/67th intersection,
HDR included item in design documents but
omitted it from bid form.
$ 18,500
5. ADD 2” asphalt milling and overlay on Cemetery Rd
approx. 120’ to new county paved section. New
Work - not included in original project design scope
of work.
$ 14,030 This was not included in the contract, however
Cemetery road is in poor shape. This paving section
will extend to the end of the recent county paved
road section. Unit price per SY is $22.16 (good price).
6. Add 2” asphalt milling and overlay at Lebanon/67th
intersection, additional work item to replace aging
asphalt. New Work - not included in original project
design scope of work.
$ 12,000 This was not included in the contract, however it will
add to the overall project completion and appearance
by having intersections at either end of the project
resurfaced. Unit price per SY is $26.67 (avg price).
7. ADD Paving and curbing at Twin City Foods to
prevent roadway runoff from flowing onto Twin City
Foods property. New Work - not included in original
project design scope of work.
$ 7,000 This will add concrete curb and gutter with sidewalk
in front of Twin City Foods/Nelson Petroleum to
prevent runoff from roadway from flowing onto
private property. I figure we prevent another HCI by
taking care of our own water.
TOTAL CO#5 $ 162,338
We have a commitment from TIB for reimbursement
of 80% of eligible costs, this would be $129,868 from
TIB and $32,467 from Transportation Improvement
Fund.
It includes the necessary ADA improvements and traffic signal work omitted from HDR design and bid
form.
Schedule: Curb & Gutter work and signal underground work will occur first. Milling & Filling postponed to
the end of project with final lift paving. During mill and fill work there will be full intersection movement
with lane control by flaggers.
1 of 4 P-04 (Rev. 6/11)
CHANGE ORDER 5
Change Order Title: Prairie Creek Culvert at 69th Avenue Date: 1/14/2014
Project Name: 67th Ave, Phase III Reconstruction Project No: P02.341
Contractor: Marshbank Construction, Inc. Federal Aid No: STPUS‐2699(001)
Owner: City of Arlington
The Contract is Modified as Follows:
Contractor is hereby directed to, upon receipt of an approved copy of this change order, make changes in the
Contract Documents and execute the work as detailed herein. The work covered by the Change Order shall be
performed under the same terms and conditions as those included in the original Contract, unless otherwise
described herein. The payment and/or additional time specified and agreed to in this Change Order constitutes full
adjustment for, and settlement of, all costs and time relating to the performance of the Work described herein.
Original Contract Amount: $ 5,982,984.00
Current Contract Amount: $ 6,290,243.59
Amount of this Change: $162,338.50
Revised Contract Amount: $6,452,582.09
Contract time is: Unchanged Increased Decreased by 0 Work Days Cal. Days
New Contract Duration: 271 Work Days Calendar Days
Approvals (Not valid until signed by Agency)
Approval Recommended – KBA
Paul Garrett, Resident Engineer ___________________________________ ______________
Signature Date
Contractor
Mark Fuglevand, Project Manager ___________________________________ ______________
Signature Date
Reviewed
Eric Scott, City Engineer ___________________________________ ______________
Signature Date
Reviewed
Kris Wallace, Executive Administrator ___________________________________ ______________
Signature Date
Approved by Agency
Allen Johnson, City Administrator ___________________________________ ______________
Signature Date
Approved by WSDOT Local Programs Engineer (CA Agency)
Ed Conyers, Local Programs Engineer ___________________________________ ______________
Signature Date
CHANGE ORDER 5, CONT.
2 of 4 P-04 (Rev. 6/11)
Change Order Description Summary:
This change order includes the 204th and 67th intersection improvements, Lebanon Street and 67th intersection
resurfacing and new curbing and price adjustment of Bid Item A‐56 Planing Bituminous Pavement.
204th & 67th Intersection Improvements
The contract plans, as shown on Sheet 20, show planing and overlaying the 204th intersection.
“Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requires that local governments ensure that persons with disabilities have
access to the pedestrian routes in the public right of way. An important part of this requirement is the obligation whenever
streets, roadways, or highways are altered to provide curb ramps where street level pedestrian walkways cross
curbs.2 …Alterations of streets, roads, or highways include activities such as reconstruction, rehabilitation, resurfacing,
widening, and projects of similar scale and effect.4 “. Department of Justice/Department of Transportation Joint Technical
Assistance1 on the Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act Requirements to Provide Curb Ramps when Streets, Roads, or Highways are
Altered through Resurfacing http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/civilrights/programs/doj_fhwa_ta.cfm
As a result of this planned resurfacing, all four corners of the intersection require updated curb ramps and
consequently, pedestrian crosswalk signal push buttons. The “As‐bid” plan set and Proposal Form did not
provide new updated accessible curb ramps on the south west and south east corners. Designed curb and
gutter, sidewalks and curb ramps will be installed on the south east and south west corner as will new
pedestrian push buttons.
As part of the resurfacing of the intersection, the existing traffic induction loops will be destroyed; the contract
plans and Proposal Form did not include installing new traffic loops. The plans were revised to add induction
loops to the 204th / 67th signal system.
Additional planing and HMA is being added to cover the new traffic loops on the west, east and south legs of the
intersection.
The planing and the HMA quantities on the original plan location as shown on Sheet 20 were added after the
Engineer’s Estimate was completed. Hence, these quantities are being added to this change order. As a result of
the additional planing and paving, the quantities for associated channelization have been increased to account
for the added striping.
Lebanon Street and 67th Intersection Resurfacing, added Concrete Curb and Gutter and ADA Curb Ramp
After the project started, it was observed that the surface water runoff from this intersection ran onto the
private property on the west side of 67th Ave (Nelson Distributing). To prevent this stormwater runoff from
entering the adjacent property, cement concrete depressed curb and gutter was added to the west side of 67th
from STA. 146+87.18, 13’ left to 147+52, 13’ left. It was also realized that after the installation of the non‐
potable water, the fiber optic conduit and the removal of the existing curb and gutter on the east side of the
intersection (see sheet 89 and 29), that the intersection pavement would benefit from planing and resurfacing.
A new curb ramp will also be added at STA. 147+66, 13.4’ left.
Bid Item A‐56 Planing Bituminous Pavement Renegotiation of Unit Price
The Proposal Form states a Planing Bituminous Pavement quantity of 200 SY. This amount accounts for the
planing on 211th only. This change order will add 2565 SY at 204th intersection and 450 SY to improve the
intersection of Lebanon St and 67th. The City requested a new unit price for all the additional planing.
Marshbank provided and agreed to perform the planing with the new unit price of $13/SY.
CHANGE ORDER 5, CONT.
3 of 4 P-04 (Rev. 6/11)
204th Intersection Improvements Change Order 5 Summary
Bid Item Description Tax Incl. Unit Est. Qty Unit Price Amount (w/ Tax)
A-125 Roadway Survey Y FA 1.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00
A-6 Roadside Cleanup Y FA 1.00 $ 3,500.00 $ 3,500.00
A-18 Removal of Structures and Obstructions Y LS 1.00 $ 3,500.00 $ 3,500.00
A-19 Sawcutting Existing Pavement Y LF 150.00 $ 3.75 $ 562.50
A-42 HMA Cl. 1/2 In. PG 64-22 Y TON 206.00 $ 76.00 $ 15,656.00
A-123 Pre-level HMA Cl. 1/2 In. PG 64-22 Y TON 94.00 $ 90.00 $ 8,460.00
A-51 Crushed Surfacing Base Course Y TON 1.00 $ 18.50 $ 18.50
A-52 Crushed Surfacing Top Course Y TON 35.00 $ 24.00 $ 840.00
A-124 Cement Conc. Curb and Gutter Y LF 175.00 $ 16.00 $ 2,800.00
A-54 Cement Conc. Sidewalk Y SY 143.00 $ 29.00 $ 4,147.00
A-126 Planing Bituminous Pavement Y SY 2565.00 $ 13.00 $ 33,345.00
A-82 Adjust Existing Utility Structure Y EA 5.00 $ 375.00 $ 1,875.00
A-84 Traffic Control Supervisor Y LS 1.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00
A-85 Uniformed Police Officer Y HR 8.00 $ 58.00 $ 464.00
A-86 Temporary Traffic Control Devices Y LS 1.00 $ 4,500.00 $ 4,500.00
A-87 Flaggers and Spotters Y HR 175.00 $ 46.00 $ 8,050.00
A-88 Other Traffic Control Labor Y HR 24.00 $ 46.00 $ 1,104.00
A-89 Pedestrian Control and Protection Y LS 1.00 $ 1,100.00 $ 1,100.00
A-90 Paint Line Y LF 395.00 $ 0.40 $ 158.00
A-91 Painted Wide Line Y LF 700.00 $ 0.60 $ 420.00
A-94 Plastic Traffic Arrow Y EA 8.00 $ 72.00 $ 576.00
A-120 Cement Conc. Pedestrian Curb Y LF 33.00 $ 20.00 $ 660.00
A-121 2 ft Wide Cement Conc. Curb Y LS 1.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00
A-122
Additional Truncated Dome on
Perpendicular Ramp Y EA 2.00 $ 300.00 $ 600.00
C-2 Traffic Signal Modification Y LS 1.00 $ 45,000.00 $ 45,000.00
Total $ 143,336.00
CHANGE ORDER 5, CONT.
4 of 4 P-04 (Rev. 6/11)
Lebanon St. and 67th Ave. Resurfacing, Curb and Gutter and Curb Ramp Change Order 5 Summary
Bid Item Description Tax Incl. Unit Est. Qty Unit Price Amount (w/ Tax)
A-125 Roadway Survey Y FA 1.00 $ 900.00 $ 900.00
A-19 Sawcutting Existing Pavement Y LF 242.00 $ 3.75 $ 907.50
A-42 HMA Cl. 1/2 In. PG 64-22 Y TON 76.00 $ 76.00 $ 5,776.00
A-43 HMA for Approach Cl. 1/2 In. PG 64-22 Y TON 21.00 $ 100.00 $ 2,100.00
A-124 Cement Conc. Curb and Gutter Y LF 95.00 $ 16.00 $ 1,520.00
A-54 Cement Conc. Sidewalk Y SY 6.00 $ 29.00 $ 174.00
A-126 Planing Bituminous Pavement Y SY 450.00 $ 13.00 $ 5,850.00
A-82 Adjust Existing Utility Structure Y EA 1.00 $ 375.00 $ 375.00
A-120 Cement Conc. Pedestrian Curb Y LF 10.00 $ 20.00 $ 200.00
A-126 Cement Conc. Curb Ramp Type Parallel A
Modified Y LS 1.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 1,200.00
Total $ 19,002.50
Total Change $ 162,338.50
Attachments:
Copies: Contractor (Original & PDF)
Owner (Original & PDF)
Project File (Hard Copy and PDF)
City of Arlington
Council Agenda Bill
Item:
WS #2
Attachment
B
COUNCIL MEETING DATE:
January 27, 2014
SUBJECT:
WSDOT Turnback Agreement for Right of Way at SR-9 and SR-531
ATTACHMENTS:
- Turnback Agreement
DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN
Public Works – Jim Kelly
EXPENDITURES REQUESTED: None
BUDGET CATEGORY: N/A
LEGAL REVIEW: Pending final approval by the City Attorney
DESCRIPTION:
This is a standard WSDOT agreement allowing WSDOT to deed right-of-way purchased
during the SR-9 roundabout project to the City.
HISTORY:
WSDOT had to purchase right-of-way (ROW) from private property owners as part of the SR-9
roundabout project. Now that the project is complete, WSDOT wants to turn over ownership
and maintenance of the ROW to the City of Arlington. The “Turnback Agreement” is a
standard WSDOT agreement for completing such transactions.
ALTERNATIVES
- Table for further discussion
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Discussion only. At the Feb 3rd Council meeting staff will recommend the motion, “I move to
approve the Turnback Agreement with WSDOT and authorize the mayor to sign the
agreement, pending final review by the City Attorney.
City of Arlington
Council Agenda Bill
Item:
WS #3
Attachment
C
COUNCIL MEETING DATE:
January 27, 2014
SUBJECT:
8th Amendment of Interlocal Agreements for Jail Services
ATTACHMENTS:
8th Amendment of Interlocal Agreements for Jail Services
DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN
Police
EXPENDITURES REQUESTED:
BUDGET CATEGORY: Police – Marysville Jail Services
LEGAL REVIEW:
DESCRIPTION:
This is a renewal of the Interlocal Agreement for jail services between the City of
Arlington and the City of Marysville. The previous agreement expired on December 31,
2013 and the renewal was not received in time to present to Council prior to the end of
the year.
HISTORY:
This is an on-going Interlocal Agreement with Marysville to provide jail services to the
City of Arlington for prisoners charged with misdemeanors and/or serving sentences
for certain crimes committed within the City of Arlington.
ALTERNATIVES
Identify alternative jail facilities outside of the immediate area which could require
additional funds for booking and housing as well as additional time and/or expense
for prisoner transport.
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
No action taken. This item will be brought back to Council on February 3, 2014 for
approval.
City of Arlington
Council Agenda Bill
Item:
WS #4
Attachment
D
COUNCIL MEETING DATE:
January 27, 2014
SUBJECT:
WSP Agreement No. C140852GSC – State Fire Mobilization Reimbursement
ATTACHMENTS:
Interagency Agreement –State of Washington WSP and Arlington Fire Department
DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN
Fire
EXPENDITURES REQUESTED: -0-
BUDGET CATEGORY: N/A
LEGAL REVIEW:
DESCRIPTION:
The agreement allows for reimbursement for our costs of personnel, equipment and
resources used, during any Washing State Fire Services Resource Mobilization Plan.
HISTORY:
Chief Ganz had a similar agreement in place from 2003 - 2007. Chief Rankin did not
renew the agreement. He did not want to send any of our resources out of the area,
especially to Eastern Washington.
ALTERNATIVES
By not being a part of the WSP Mobilization Plan; if requested in a Zone or special
incident, we would not be reimbursed for any costs of personnel, equipment or any
resources used.
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
No action at this time. Council will be asked to approve the agreement at the February
3, 2014
City of Arlington
Council Agenda Bill
Item:
WS #5
Attachment
E
COUNCIL MEETING DATE:
January 27, 2014
SUBJECT:
Ordinance Correcting the legal description of the Country Charm Annexation
ATTACHMENTS:
- Draft Ordinance Correcting the Annexation
- Revised Legal Description
DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN
Community Development
EXPENDITURES REQUESTED: -0-
BUDGET CATEGORY: N/A
LEGAL REVIEW:
DESCRIPTION:
The City was recently alerted by Snohomish County of a correction that needs to be
made to the Country Charm Annexation legal description, which annexed the Country
Charm / Graafstra area into the Arlington City Limits. The attached draft ordinance
and corrected legal description will make the necessary corrections to the previous
ordinance.
HISTORY:
The City annexed the territory in August 2013.
ALTERNATIVES
N/A
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
No action at this time. The Council will be requested to take action on the proposed
ordinance and legal description at the February 3, 2014 Council meeting.
ORDINANCE NO. 2013-XXX 1
ORDINANCE NO. 2014-XXX
AN ORDINANCE CORRECTING A TYPOGRAPHICAL ERRORS IN THE LEGAL
DESCRIPTION ATTACHED TO ORDINANCE 2013-013, PROVIDING FOR THE
ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF ARLINGTON OF PROPERTY KNOWN AS THE
COUNTRY CHARM ANNEXATION
WHEREAS, on August 19, 2013 the City Council of the City of Arlington, Washington,
adopted ordinance 2013-013, which effectuated the annexation known as the Country Charm
Annexation; and
WHEREAS, as a result of the review by Snohomish County of the city’s ordinance it was
determined that the legal description of the annexed area contained typographical errors; and
WHEREAS, the City wishes to correct the error caused by the typographical errors;
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Arlington does hereby ordain as
follows:
Section 1. The legal description attached as Exhibit “A” to the City of Arlington
Ordinance 2013-013 shall be and hereby is amended to read as shown on the attached Exhibit
“A”. In all other respects, said Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect.
Section 2. The title of this ordinance which summarizes the contents shall be
published in the official newspaper of the City. The ordinance shall take effect and be in full
force five (5) days after the date of publication.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Arlington and APPROVED by the Mayor
this ______ day of _____________________, 2014.
CITY OF ARLINGTON
____________________________________
Barbara Tolbert, Mayor
ORDINANCE NO. 2013-XXX 2
ATTEST:
___________________________________
Kristin Banfield, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
___________________________________
Steven J. Peiffle, City Attorney
1
Legal Description for the “Country Charm Annexation” to the City of Arlington
Application File No.______________________
Applicant: City of Arlington
Legal Description for the “Country Charm Annexation”
That portion of Section 1, Township 31 North, Range 5 East, W.M. and Section 2, Township 31 North,
Range 5 East, W.M., that is more particularly described as follows;
Commencing at the point of intersection of Burke Ave. and Newberry Street, as shown on the Plat of
Haller City, as recorded under Volume 2 of Plats, page 22, records of Snohomish County, Washington,
which point is an existing concrete monument in a monument well case; thence N 87-35-53 W, along
the centerline of said Burke Ave., a distance of 469.96 feet to the point of intersection of Burke Ave and
Broadway St. as shown on said plat, which point is an existing concrete monument in a monument well
case ; thence N 2-24-07 E, along the centerline of said Broadway St., a distance of 600.54 feet to the line
of ordinary high water of the left bank of the South Fork Stillaguamish River and the True Point of
Beginning ; thence Northwesterly, along the said Ordinary High Water Line on the left bank of the South
Fork Stillaguamish River, the following courses and distances:
Course: N 67-16-46 W Distance: 303.91 feet
Course: N 68-18-20 W Distance: 107.00 feet
Course: N 53-33-23 W Distance: 107.53 feet
thence N 40-43-36 W, a distance of 86.99 feet more or less to a point on the north line of the south
2842.00 feet of said Section 2, as measured from the South line of the Southeast quarter of said Section
2; thence Easterly and Southeasterly, along a line lying between the right bank and left bank of the
South Fork Stillaguamish River, the following courses and distances:
Course: N67-58-29 E Distance: 231.05 feet
Course: S 68-53-31 E Distance: 324.00 feet
Course: S 60-51-07 E Distance: 648.16 feet
Course: S 64-17-24 E Distance: 326.22 feet
Course: S 68-11-55 E Distance: 483.65 feet
Course: S 65-54-34 E Distance: 272.75 feet
thence S 81-26-51 E, a distance of 28.20 feet more or less to the easterly right of way of State Route
530; thence S 50-30-24 W, along said easterly right of way, a distance of 148.22 feet more or less to an
angle point in said right of way; thence S 56-23-41 E, along said easterly right of way, a distance of 43.81
feet more or less to an angle point in said right of way; thence S 56-23-41 E, departing from said right of
way, a distance of 94.91 feet; thence southeasterly, along the following courses and distances:
Course: S 66-37-00 E Distance: 114.23 feet
Course: S 80-36-58 E Distance: 82.25 feet
Course: S 70-48-26 E Distance: 146.49 feet
thence S 77-25-18 E, a distance of 52.91 feet more or less to the east line of the southeast quarter of
said Section 2; thence N 01-23-04 E, along said east line, a distance of 527.62 feet; thence N 21-15-02 E,
2
departing from said section line into the northwest quarter of said Section 1, a distance of 105.12 feet;
thence Northerly, Northeasterly, Southerly, Southeasterly respectively, along a line lying between the
right bank and left bank of the South Fork Stillaguamish River, the following courses and distances:
Course: N 02-08-38 W Distance: 509.28 feet
Course: N 01-07-24 E Distance: 416.47 feet
Course: N 13-40-17 E Distance: 207.27 feet
Course: N 24-55-43 E Distance: 213.08 feet
Course: N 37-47-55 E Distance: 537.30 feet
Course: N 43-53-53 E Distance: 200.18 feet
Course: N 62-21-15 E Distance: 129.04 feet
Course: N 77-10-51 E Distance: 233.06 feet
Course: S 84-13-56 E Distance: 135.40 feet
Course: N 73-31-23 E Distance: 100.75 feet
Course: N 61-48-18 E Distance: 149.76 feet
Course: N 66-56-55 E Distance: 278.02 feet
Course: N 56-18-36 E Distance: 83.41 feet
Course: N 43-41-53 E Distance: 84.70 feet
Course: N 25-47-57 E Distance: 159.89 feet
Course: N 61-43-38 E Distance: 52.32 feet
Course: N 84-28-21 E Distance: 42.38 feet
Course: S 65-01-34 E Distance: 109.58 feet
Course: S 35-36-27 E Distance: 259.43 feet
Course: S 48-19-04 E Distance: 266.01 feet
Course: S 31-13-06 E Distance: 105.02 feet
Course: S 17-11-26 E Distance: 109.80 feet
Course: S 01-59-07 E Distance: 150.13 feet
Course: S 15-40-06 W Distance: 248.00 feet
Course: S 35-32-55 W Distance: 185.95 feet
Course: S 24-15-41 W Distance: 105.97 feet
Course: S 07-04-24 W Distance: 187.85 feet
Course: S 07-41-46 E Distance: 203.22 feet
Course: S 29-31-50 E Distance: 270.56 feet
Course: S 47-10-01 E Distance: 178.14 feet
Course: S 78-51-49 E Distance: 352.27 feet
Course: S 73-11-29 E Distance: 136.46 feet
Course: S 65-25-58 E Distance: 157.10 feet
Course: S 47-29-22 E Distance: 132.91 feet
Course: S 33-27-12 E Distance: 182.67 feet
Course: S 23-10-57 E Distance: 639.49 feet
Course: S 17-10-05 E Distance: 252.14 feet
thence S 07-03-44 W, a distance of 268.28 feet to the north line of Government Lot 12 of said Section 1;
thence S 88-30-48 W, along said north line of Government Lot 12 and the south line of Government Lot
10, a distance of 2055.34 feet to the west line of a water way known as “Sills Slough”; thence, northerly,
along the west line of said “Sills Slough”, the following courses and distances:
3
Course: N 11-34-58 E Distance: 41.51 feet
Course: N 02-45-33 E Distance: 62.32 feet
Course: N 30-25-42 E Distance: 131.30 feet
Course: N 00-39-35 E Distance: 110.62 feet;
thence N 79-48-29 W, departing from said west line of “Sills Slough”, a distance of 272.20 feet;
thence N 00-46-54 W, a distance of 72.94 feet; thence S 70-11-34 W a distance of 221.71 feet to the
Northeast corner of the Plat of Park Hill Estates, according to the plat recorded under Auditor’s File No.
2242708, records of Snohomish County , Washington; thence southwesterly, along the north boundary
of said Plat of Park Hill Estates, the following courses and distances:
Course: N 88-06-21 W Distance: 317.84 feet
Course: S 57-58-05 W Distance: 392.22 feet
Course: S 24-15-19 E Distance: 63.39 feet
Course: S 56-37-04 W Distance: 227.85 feet
thence S 77-30-07 W, a distance of 313.86 feet to the east margin of Alcazar Ave. as shown on said Plat
of Parkhill Estates; thence N 00-55-38 E, along said east line, a distance of 360.65 feet to a point on the
easterly extension of the centerline of Gilman Ave. as shown on said plat of Haller City; thence N 89-24-
35 W, along said centerline, a distance of 49.51 feet to the point of intersection of said centerline of
Gilman Ave. and the centerline of vacated Burke Ave. as shown on said plat of Haller City; thence N 61-
31-50 W, along the centerline of vacated Burke Ave. and the extension thereof, a distance of 659.95
feet; thence N 87-35-53 W, parallel with the centerline of Burke Ave. as shown on said plat of Haller
City, a distance of 16.27 feet; thence N 27-22-07 E, a distance of 145.31 feet more or less to the
Ordinary High Water line of the left bank of the South Fork Stillaguamish River; thence Northwesterly,
along said Ordinary High Water Line of said left bank, the following courses and distances:
Course: N 73-32-45 W Distance: 108.36 feet
Course: N 82-12-37 W Distance: 231.10 feet
Course: N 74-26-38 W Distance: 224.50 feet
Course: N 62-28-00 W Distance: 643.51 feet
Course: N 69-23-41 W Distance: 267.17 feet
thence N 67-16-46 W, a distance of 37.32 feet to the True Point of Beginning.
Together with the shore lands, lying within the perimeter of the above described parcel of land known
as the “Country Charm Annexation to the City of Arlington”.
Also together with the beds of navigable waters of the State of Washington, lying within the perimeter
of the above described parcel of land known as the “Country Charm Annexation to the City of
Arlington”.
Containing a land area of 201 acres more or less.
City of Arlington
Council Agenda Bill
Item:
WS #6
Attachment
F
COUNCIL MEETING DATE:
January 27, 2014
SUBJECT:
Discussion of Property Tax Levy Lid Lift
ATTACHMENTS:
DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN
Administration / Legal
EXPENDITURES REQUESTED: -0-
BUDGET CATEGORY: N/A
LEGAL REVIEW:
DESCRIPTION:
Discussion on the proposed property tax levy lid lift ballot measure to the voters.
HISTORY:
Since the recession in 2008, the City has applied every tool and band aid approach available to
maintain the current level of services. These approaches have reached the end of their useful
life and a more stable revenue stream must be implemented to continue services at the current
level.
Council requested staff to provide potential revenue options after the ten year budget
projection presented at the 2013 City Council retreat demonstrated that the City does not have
the financial capacity to continue to maintain status as a Full Service City. Without additional
revenues, the quality of life in Arlington will, out of necessity, have to be reduced to a level we
have never seen before.
ALTERNATIVES
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
No action at this time. Council will be asked to approve the proposed resolution at the
February 3, 2014 Council meeting.