HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-13-21 Council Workshop
To join Zoom meeting, click here.
Meeting ID: 829 0385 9671
Passcode: 133223
To join with mobile:
1-253-215-8782
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Barb Tolbert
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
Mayor Barb Tolbert – Wendy
APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
Mayor Pro Tem Jan Schuette
INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS
WORKSHOP ITEMS – NO FINAL ACTION WILL BE TAKEN
1. Resolution of the Arlington Airport Commission relating to ATTACHMENT A
Consumer Price Indexed leases at the Arlington Municipal Airport
Staff Presentation: Dave Ryan
Council Liaison: Michele Blythe
2. Resolution for a “Center of Excellence” to be established within ATTACHMENT B
the northwest portion of the Airport Business Park
Staff Presentation: Marc Hayes
Council Liaison: Mayor Pro Tem Jan Schuette
3. Ordinance establishing a water rate adjustment for ATTACHMENT C
customers outside the city limits of Arlington
Staff Presentation: Jim Kelly
Council Liaison: Debora Nelson
Arlington City Council Workshop
Monday, December 13, 2021 at 7:00 pm
4. Contract with Pacific Groundwater Group for services associated ATTACHMENT D
with the Haller Wellfield Improvement Project
Staff Presentation: Jim Kelly
Council Liaison: Debora Nelson
ADMINISTRATOR & STAFF REPORTS
MAYOR’S REPORT
COMMENTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS/COUNCILMEMBER REPORTS
PUBLIC COMMENT
For members of the public who wish to speak to the Council. Please limit your remarks to three minutes.
REVIEW OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
EXECUTIVE SESSION
RECONVENE
ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Pro Tem Jan Schuette / Mayor Barb Tolbert
City of Arlington Council Agenda Bill Item: WS #1 Attachment A COUNCIL MEETING DATE: December 13, 2021 SUBJECT: Resolution of the Arlington Airport Commission Relating to Consumer Price Indexed Leases at the Arlington Municipal Airport ATTACHMENTS: Resolution, Fee Schedule DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN Airport; Dave Ryan, Director 360-403-3474 EXPENDITURES REQUESTED: BUDGET CATEGORY: Professional Services BUDGETED AMOUNT: LEGAL REVIEW: DESCRIPTION: Each year, the Airport Commission is required to approve a resolution for changing fees and charges at the airport. As we completed our required five-year appraisal and now have the Consumer Price Index for 2021, (CPI 5.2%) we have included those figures in this year’s resolution. Most airport property values are based on the appraisal, but the CPI adjusts buildings owned by the airport. Staff recommends
Workshop; discussion only. At the January 3, 2022 Council meeting, the recommended motion will be, “I move to ratify the Resolution of the Arlington Airport Commission Relating to Consumer Price Indexed Leases at the Arlington Municipal Airport, and increases in airport fees as set forth therein.”
RESOLUTION NO. 20202021-XXX
A RESOLUTION OF THE ARLINGTON AIRPORT COMMISSION RELATING TO
CONSUMER PRICE INDEXED LEASES AT THE ARLINGTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
RESOLUTION 20210-XXX
WHEREAS, the Arlington Municipal Airport has numerous leases pertaining to airport
property; and
WHEREAS, some Airport leases provide for annual adjustments of rent based on the
Consumer Price Index (CPI), being more specifically described as “the Consumer Price Index for
All Urban Consumers as published by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor
Statistics, or its successor, for the smallest geographical region for which a separate index is
published and in which Seattle, WA is situated”; and
WHEREAS, the Bureau of Labor Statistics recently issued its September 2021 CPI
indexes, which establishes that the annual increase in the CPI-U for the Seattle metropolitan area
has been 1.65.2 percent over the past year;
NOW, THEREFORE, the Arlington, Washington Airport Commission do hereby resolve
as follows:
1. 1. The City CouncilAirport Commission finds that the hangars will
not increaserate increases for its CPI-based leases for the year beginning January
1, 20212022, however, businesses will have their rates increase 1.6%shall be
5.2% as stated in their leases.
2. The Airport Commission recommends the City Council increase airport fees
pursuant to the table set forth below.
APPROVED by the Arlington Airport Commission of the City of Arlington this _____ day
of November, 20202021.
CITY OF ARLINGTON
AIRPORT COMMISSION
____________________________________
Don Munson, Chairperson
ATTEST:
_________________________________
David Ryan, Airport Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
__________________________________
Steven J. Peiffle, City Attorney
Action / Service 2019 2020 2021 2022 Fee ($)
Rental Rates – Hangar
Rental Rates - Tie-Down
Land Lease Rates
Short Term Land Use – Special Events
EVOC
Use Agreement
Putnam Hall Meeting Room
Miscellaneous Fees
RESOLUTION NO. 2021-036
A RESOLUTION OF THE ARLINGTON AIRPORT COMMISSION RELATING TO
CONSUMER PRICE INDEXED LEASES AT THE ARLINGTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
WHEREAS, the Arlington Municipal Airport has numerous leases pertaining to airport
property; and
WHEREAS, some Airport leases provide for annual adjustments of rent based on the
Consumer Price Index (CPI), being more specifically described as “the Consumer Price Index for
All Urban Consumers as published by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor
Statistics, or its successor, for the smallest geographical region for which a separate index is
published and in which Seattle, WA is situated”; and
WHEREAS, the Bureau of Labor Statistics recently issued its September 2021 CPI
indexes, which establishes that the annual increase in the CPI-U for the Seattle metropolitan area
has been 5.2 percent over the past year;
NOW, THEREFORE, the Arlington, Washington Airport Commission do hereby resolve
as follows:
1. The Airport Commission finds that rate increases for its CPI-based leases for the
year beginning January 1, 2022, shall be 5.2% as stated in their leases.
2. The Airport Commission recommends the City Council increase airport fees
pursuant to the table set forth below.
APPROVED by the Arlington Airport Commission of the City of Arlington this _____ day
of November, 2021.
CITY OF ARLINGTON
AIRPORT COMMISSION
____________________________________
Don Munson, Chairperson
ATTEST:
_________________________________
David Ryan, Airport Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
__________________________________
Steven J. Peiffle, City Attorney
RESOLUTION 2021-036
Action / Service 2022 Fee ($)
Rental Rates – Hangar
Rental Rates - Tie-Down
Land Lease Rates
Short Term Land Use – Special Events
EVOC
Use Agreement
Putnam Hall Meeting Room
Miscellaneous Fees
Lease Rate Table
Land Use 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
WS City of Arlington Council Agenda Bill Item: WS #2 Attachment B
research/development and employment support of advanced manufacturing industries. With the majority of available land being leased for industrial buildings, now more than ever, it is critical to reserve property in order to locate facilities for higher education, research/development and industry
RESOLUTION NO. 2020 – XX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ARLINGTON DESIGNATING AN AREA WITHIN THE AIRPORT
BUSINESS PARK TO ESTABLISH A CENTER OF EXCELLENCE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF FACILITIES
DEDICATED TO THE EDUCATION TRAINING INNOVATION AND SUPPORT OF THE
ADVANCED MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY
WHEREAS, the City of Arlington is the owner of the Arlington Municipal Airport, situated
within the Cascade Industrial Center. The Airport Business Park is an area zoned to allow uses
such as high technology research and development, training/educational facilities, offices, and
certain manufacturing and light industrial uses, within a park-like master-planned setting; and
WHEREAS, the City has determined that an area within the Airport Business Park be
designated as a “Center of Excellence” to construct facilities dedicated to the education,
training, research/development and long term support of advanced manufacturing industries,
especially in the development of robotics, artificial intelligence, advanced materials, additive
manufacturing, instrumentation and aerospace technologies ; and
WHEREAS, the City is committed to establishing a satellite campus, in partnership, with a
state university as the cornerstone of the “Center of Excellence”; and
WHEREAS, the City will pursue partnerships, with other entities, as key stakeholders in
both the development and longevity of the “Center of Excellence”;
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Arlington Washington do hereby
resolve as follows:
1. The Arlington City Council declares that real property described on
Exhibit “A” hereto, situated at the northwest corner of the Airport
Business Park, located on the Arlington Municipal Airport, be
designated for the sole purpose of establishing the
“Center of Excellence”.
APPROVED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Arlington this 18th day of
October, 2021.
CITY OF ARLINGTON
____________________________
Barbara Tolbert, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________________
Wendy Van Der Meersche, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________________
Steven J. Peiffle, City Attorney
Center For Excelle nceFuture Development Area±City of Arlington
Date:
File:
Cartographer:Maps and GIS data are distributed “AS-IS” without warranties of any kind, either express orimplied, including but not lim ited to warranties of suitability for a particular purpose or use. M apdata are compiled from a variety of sources which may contain errors and users who rely upon theinformation do so at their own risk. Users agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City ofArlington for any and all liability of any nature arising out of or resulting from the lack of accuracy orcorrectness of the data, or the use of the data presented in the maps.
Scale:Airport_Acres.5x11portrait_20
3/9 /20 20 akc
1 inch = 4 17 fe et
Legend
!H
!H
Airport Property Line
BUFFER ZONE
Round about and Road Extensio n (p ro posed)
Round about andRoad Exten sion (prop osed)
AIRPORT BLVD
43RD
AVE
NE
1.77acres est.
4.55acres est.
9.58acres est.6.26acresest.0.95acresest.
4.24acresest.
!H Roundabout (proposed)
Fire Station (proposed)
Roads (proposed)
Lots (pr oposed)
Airport P roperty
Parcels (SnoC o)Draft
City of Arlington Council Agenda Bill Item: WS #3 Attachment C COUNCIL MEETING DATE: December 13, 2021 SUBJECT: Water Rate Adjustment for customers outside city limits ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance establishing Outside City Limits Water Service Rate schedule Memo Summarizing Analysis of Establishing Outside City Rate ScheduleDEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN Public Works; Jim Kelly, Director 360-403-3505 EXPENDITURES REQUESTED: None BUDGET CATEGORY: N/A BUDGETED AMOUNT: N/A LEGAL REVIEW: DESCRIPTION: Proposed establishment of utility rate schedule for water service outside city limits. HISTORY: Since 1977, the City of Arlington has been in a Critical Water Service Area as designated by Snohomish County in accordance with the Public Water System Coordination Act (RCW 70.116 and WAC 246-293). As such, the City has worked with other local water purveyors to cooperatively establish water service areas. The City of Arlington’s water service area extends beyond Arlington’s incorporated city limits. Water service outside city limits is rural in character and less densely populated than within city limits. With a less dense water service population outside city limits, the City also recognizes that it is costlier for operations and maintenance of the water services outside city limits; the water service area outside city limits has 11% of the water distribution system and only 4% of the customer base. To offset this increased cost of operations, many other municipalities charge a separate water utility rate for water service in areas outside city limits. The City contracted with Katy Isaksen and Associates, to perform an outside city limits utility rate study to determine an appropriate outside city limits rate schedule to help defray the increase cost of
ORDINANCE NO. 2022-XXX
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ARLINGTON, WASHINGTON
AMENDING ARLINGTON MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 13.12
PERTAINING TO UTILITY RATES
WHEREAS, the City of Arlington has the authority to set rates and charges for its utility
system; and
WHEREAS, the City of Arlington’s authorized water service area extends past
Arlington’s incorporated city limits, and
WHEREAS, the City recognizes that the water service area outside city limits is less
densely populated, having 11% of the water distribution system and only 4% of the customer
base, and
WHEREAS, the City recognizes that it is more costly for operations and maintenance of
the water services outside city limits, and that other municipalities charge a separate water utility
rate for water service in areas outside city limits, and
WHEREAS, the City contracted with Katy Isaksen and Associates to perform an outside
city limit utility rate study;
WHEREAS, the City Council considered this amendment at their workshop on December
13, 2021 and at their regular meeting held on January 3, 2022, and determined approving the
amendment was in the best interest of the City and its citizens;
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Arlington do hereby ordain as
follows:
Section 1. Arlington Municipal Code Section 13.12.020 shall be and hereby is amended
to read as follows:
13.12.020 - Classifications defined.
(a) Single Family Residential (SFR) Unit. A single-family residential
building, or a single-family detached dwelling unit, that is designed for, permitted
for, and occupied exclusively by one family, and includes manufactured homes
and mobile homes, and is served by a single metered water meter. Each single
family residential unit shall be charged a minimum of one Base Charge based on
the meter size, as hereinafter defined, plus a charge based on the amount of water
consumption.
(b) Multi-Family Residential (MFR) Unit. A multifamily residential unit, also
referred to as a multidwelling unit, is a classification of housing where multiple
separate housing units designed and permitted for residential inhabitants are
contained within one building, or several buildings within one complex, and are
served by a single water meter. These structures may include duplexes, triplexes,
quadplexes, apartments, townhouse, condominiums, and mobile home parks.
Each multifamily residential metered water service shall be charged a minimum
of one Base Charge based on meter size, as hereinafter defined, plus a charge
based on the amount of water consumption.
(c) Commercial Units or Industrial Units. A commercial unit or industrial unit
consists of any public or private premises not defined as a SFR unit or MFR unit,
that has a metered water service and as hereinafter defined:
(1) Premises designed, permitted and occupied by only one business or
activity or tenant shall be deemed a separate commercial unit. Each such
commercial unit or industrial unit shall be charged one Base Charge, as
hereinafter defined, based on the meter size, plus a charge based on the
amount of water consumption.
(2) In case of multiple-occupancy commercial or industrial facilities
served by a single water meter, the individual/entity to whom the water
account is registered shall be charged one Base Charge based on actual
meter size, plus a charge based on amount of water consumption.
(d) Outside City Limits. Water service(s) that are not located within Arlington city
limits, but are within the Arlington Water Utility service area.
Section 2. Arlington Municipal Code Section 13.12.040 shall be and hereby is amended
to read as follows:
13.12.040 - Water rates and charges.
Applicable state and city utility taxes are included in the following rates and
charges for water service. The total monthly water charges for every service shall
include the Base Charge, and the consumption charge, as set forth below.
Beginning on January 15, 2019, the rates set forth for the year 2018 shall be
increased annually by the October reported percentage increase of the consumer
price index (CPI) for the Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton area for all urban consumers,
or other measure commonly used by the city should it change; provided, however,
that no CPI adjustment shall be made for the period from January 15, 2012 to
January 14, 2019; and provided further, however, that notwithstanding any
reduction in the CPI, rates shall not decrease.
(1) Minimum monthly Base Charge schedule:
Basic Charge
By Meter Size 2022INSIDE CITY
(2) Monthly rate schedule charged for water consumption:
Rate per 100 202218INSIDE
CITY RATES CITY
First 300 cf
Note - Included
in Base Charge
for SFR and
Commercial
water services
Charge for SFR
and Commercial
water services
only
(3) Fair and equitable minimum rates for water consumers having meters
larger than four inches shall be fixed by the city council and written agreements
shall be entered with the users setting forth said rates. The city council may enter
into contracts with water users deviating from such rates where special
circumstances dictate; provided that, such rates shall not be discriminatory.
(4) Temporary water service. Temporary water service for construction
purposes, or for any other purpose temporary in nature that will not require a
permanent service installation must be obtained through a Fire Hydrant Use
Permit as stipulated in AMC 13.04.100(e). Charges for temporary use of water
shall be as follows:
Temporary Water Services Charges
$2.94
$3.10
$3.10
(A) The security deposit shall be refunded to the customer after the equipment
has been returned and inspected for any damages; customer shall be solely
responsible for all damages. Customers shall be billed on a monthly basis for
monthly equipment rental charges and usage fees from the date of temporary
service installation.
(B) The usage rates set forth for temporary water service shall be increased
annually by the October reported percentage increase of the consumer price index
(CPI) for the Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton Bellevue area for all urban consumers,
or other measure commonly used by the city should it change; provided, however,
that no CPI adjustment shall be made for the period from January 15, 2021 2022
to January 14, 20222023, and provided further, however, that notwithstanding any
reduction in the CPI, rates shall not decrease.
Section 3. Severability. Should any section, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase
of this Ordinance, or its application to any person or circumstance, be declared unconstitutional
or otherwise invalid for any reason, or should any portion of this Ordinance be preempted by
state or federal law or regulation, such decision or preemption shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portions of this Ordinance or its application to other persons or circumstances.
Section 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance or a summary thereof shall be published
in the official newspaper of the City. The Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force five (5)
days after the date of publication or on ________________, 2022on the first day of the billing
cycle effective February 1, 2022, whichever occurs later.
PASSED BY the City Council and APPROVED by the Mayor this _____ day of January,
2022.
CITY OF ARLINGTON
_____________________________
Barbara Tolbert, Mayor
Attest:
_________________________
Wendy Van Der Meersche
City Clerk
Approved as to form:
_________________________
Steven J. Peiffle
City Attorney
City of Arlington
Public Works
Memo
To: Barbara Tolbert
From: James Kelly, Kris Wallace
Cc: Paul Ellis
Date: December 7, 2021
Re: Outside City Rate Analysis Summary
Public Works staff contracted with the utility rate analysis firm of Katy Isaksen & Associates (KIA) to
perform an analysis of utility rates and connection fees for water customers outside city limits, a
copy of the analysis is attached to this memorandum. This memorandum is only addressing the
utility rates analysis portion of the study.
- The basis used to establish utility rates is based on the “cost of service”. There is no established
method for separating and apportioning rates based on point of service location, current
industry practice is to use a benchmark approach to establish outside city limit rates.
- The KIA study evaluated 13 jurisdictions that are of similar size and population for utility
benchmark analysis; of these 13 cities, ten provide water service outside established city limits.
These ten cities were used in this benchmark analysis of outside service rates (includes
Arlington).
- Of the ten benchmark cities, only Arlington has the same water rates for inside and outside city
limits.
- Of the benchmark cities with a separate rate structure for outside city limit service, the
majority of jurisdictions use a 1.5 multiplier for the water base rate and excess water rate.
- Public Works staff conducted an assessment of local area benchmark cities to compare outside
city limits water rates, a summary of that comparison is below:
Outside City - 2021 Rates Base Rate Excess Monthly1
Sultan $57.11 $17.79 $74.90
Duvall $43.03 $29.28 $72.31
Monroe $38.53 $21.92 $60.45
Snohomish $39.84 $14.68 $54.52
Lake Stevens $22.98 $21.12 $44.10
Stanwood $43.40 $0.00 $43.40
Arlington Current $32.15 $8.82 $40.97
Granite Falls $34.00 $3.26 $37.26
Marysville $24.53 $11.72 $36.25
Note 1 - Monthly bills evaluated at 600 cubic feet of total water use.
Outside City Limits Rate
Analysis Summary
December 7, 2021
Page 2
- The average monthly cost impact to outside city limit customers from proposed 1.5x rate
increase is summarized below:
Outside City Limit Customer Type # of Accounts
Commercial: 5
Residential: 263
Total # Outside City Accounts: 268
Customer Class Current Rate Increase New Rate
based on Avg. Use Winter $52.73 $26.37 $79.10
$114.73 $57.37 $172.10
- The estimated annual revenue increase from a proposed 1.5x outside city limit rate increase
is $106,531.86.
Due to the rural setting and low housing density, the cost to provide potable water service outside
city limits is greater than the cost for similar service within city limits where the housing density is
much greater. Based on current information, outside city limits customers comprise 4% of water all
accounts but utilize 11% of all water distribution piping. A rate adjustment is warranted for the
increased cost of service. Proposed monthly rates are listed below.
Basic Charge By Meter
Size INSIDE CITY RATE OUTSIDE CITY RATE
5/8 "— 3/4"$32.15 $48.23
1"$44.96 $67.44
1.5"$57.78 $86.67
2"$93.07 $139.61
3"$353.50 $530.25
4"$450.05 $675.08
Consumption Rate per
100 cubic feet (cf)INSIDE CITY RATE OUTSIDE CITY RATE
First 300 cu ft included in base rate included in base rate
Next 700 cf $2.94 $4.41
Over 1,000 cf $3.10 $4.65
Over 3,000 cf $3.10 $4.65
Recommendation: Adopt a new water utility rate class for commercial and residential customers
outside city limits.
MEMORANDUM
Date: October 26, 2021
To: Kris Wallace & Jim Kelly, City of Arlington Public Works
From: Katy Isaksen, KI&A
Subject: Utility Rate and Connection Fee Analysis – Outside City Limits & Multifamily Examples
KI&A was requested to research the application of utility rates and connection fees regarding inside vs. outside
of city limits and inside city limits multifamily residential units from a variety of local and comparable cities for
both water and sewer service to benchmark current pricing and practices. The City of Arlington charges new
water and sewer connections based on the size of the meter required to serve the necessary plumbing fixtures.
The connection fee is currently the same for inside/outside city limits, where allowed (for example water is
allowed but sewer service is not allowed outside of city limits). Connection fees (also known as general facilities
charges, capital facilities charges, system development charges, etc.) are determined by each jurisdiction. Please
note that other fees for permits, installation, inspection are generally required to connect to a water or sewer
system and are set by each community.
Benchmark Communities – Twelve other jurisdictions were reviewed and included in the analysis for their
proximity to Arlington, Snohomish County, I-5 and similar sized communities that own their water and
wastewater facilities in western Washington. These communities include: Mount Vernon, Marysville,
Burlington, Sultan, Monroe, Snohomish, Stanwood, Duvall, Sedro-Woolley, Bonney Lake, Port Angeles, and Oak
Harbor. Each jurisdiction sets their own code, process and fee structure to meet the infrastructure and
customers being served. The data used was available on the utility websites dated fall 2020.
UTILITY RATES AND CONNECTION FEES OUTSIDE OF CITY LIMITS
The Outside city connection fees were reviewed and compared to inside city fees. Some websites were quite
clear in the fee structure, and others required reading the municipal code. After collecting the data and
reviewing the codes, patterns evolved, and example communities were put into one of several categories.
Instead of summarizing the dollar amount, the factor of outside city / inside city is shown (1.5 x means outside
city is charged 1.5 times the inside city fee).
WATER, among the 13 examples, I found several methods of charging outside city new connections,
including 1 with no difference, 2 charged higher for outside city connections, 7 charged the same connection
fee as inside city limits but monthly rates were higher, and 3 do not provide water service. Some
communities had additional special connection charges in specific areas, but it was hard to determine if this
was an inside/outside issue.
WATER
Outside City Limits
Connection Fee =
No Difference
Outside City Limits
Connection Fee =
Higher
Outside City Limits
Connection Fee = No
Difference but
Monthly Rates Higher
Do Not Provide
Water Service
Arlington Marysville, 1.16 x Sultan, 1.5 x Mount Vernon
Stanwood, 1.37 x Monroe, 1.5 x Burlington
Snohomish, 1.5 x Sedro-Woolley
Duvall, 1.5 x
Bonney Lake, 1.54 x
Port Angeles, 1.5 x
Oak Harbor, 1.5 x
KI&A Memo on Connection Fees (Draft 11-15-21).docx, 12/8/2021, Page 2
Connection Fee, No Difference – This is Arlington’s current methodology.
Connection Fee, Higher Outside than Inside City Limits – Marysville and Stanwood charge more for
connection fees outside of city limits by varying amounts, 1.16 or 1.37 times inside city.
Connection Fee, No Difference but Monthly Rates Higher – More than half of the example
communities charged the same connection fee for inside or outside city limits, but 1.5 times higher
monthly rates for outside city. The basis may be that the Connection Fee is for a share of the system
capacity but the cost of providing ongoing service is higher for outside city limits. This also provides an
incentive to annex.
Do Not Provide Service – Three communities in Skagit County rely on Skagit County PUD to provide
water service.
SEWER, among the 13 examples, I also found several methods of charging outside city new connections,
including 3 charged higher for outside city connections, 4 charged the same connection fee as inside city
limits but monthly rates were higher, and 6 do not provide sewer service outside of City limits, including
Arlington. Some communities had additional special connection charges in specific areas, but it was hard to
determine if this was an inside/outside issue.
Connection Fee, Higher Outside than Inside City Limits – Marysville, Burlington and Snohomish charge
more for connection fees outside of city limits by varying amounts ranging from 1.09 to 1.5 times inside
city.
Connection Fee, No Difference but Monthly Rates Higher – Monroe, Sedro-Woolley, Port Angeles and
Oak Harbor charge the same connection fee for inside or outside city limits, but 1.5 times higher monthly
rates for outside city. The basis may be that the Connection Fee is for a share of the system capacity but
the cost of providing ongoing service is higher for outside city limits.
Sewer Not Allowed Outside City Limits – Six communities, including Arlington, do not allow sewer
service outside of city limits. Some communities require annexation to the city prior to connecting to
sewer or have signed an agreement not to protest annexation. Other language discussed potential
emergency service for failed septic systems of existing homes, etc.
Conclusion on Utility Rates and Connection Fees Outside of City Limits – Arlington provides water service
outside of city limits but sewer service is not allowed outside of city limits. Arlington is the only city among the
benchmarked communities that charges the same utility rates and connection fees for inside and outside of city
limits.
MULTIFAMILY CONNECTION FEES
The same example communities were used to review how connection fees are applied to new multifamily
construction. Arlington currently charges new connections based on the meter size required to serve the
plumbing fixture counts for the application. This applies to single family, multifamily, commercial and mixed
SEWER
Outside City Limits
Connection Fee =
Higher
Outside City Limits
Connection Fee = No
Difference but
Monthly Rates Higher
Sewer Not
Allowed Outside
City Limits
Marysville, 1.09 x Monroe, 1.5 x Arlington
Burlington, 1.44 x Sedro-Woolley, 1.5 x Mount Vernon
Snohomish, 1.5 x Port Angeles, 1.5 x Sultan
Oak Harbor, 1.5 x Stanwood
Duvall
Bonney Lake
KI&A Memo on Connection Fees (Draft 11-15-21).docx, 12/8/2021, Page 3
development. It allows the flexibility to size the meter specific to the new development and charge connection
fees accordingly.
WATER, among the 13 examples, I found several methods of charging connection fees to multifamily
developments, including 6 by meter size or plumbing fixture counts, 5 by the number of dwelling units
ranging from 1.0 to 0.77 x single family per unit, and 1 by ERU based on number of units.
Multifamily Connection Fee by Meter Size or Fixture Count – This is Arlington’s current methodology
and was the most common method among the example communities.
Multifamily Connection Fee by Dwelling Unit – This was the next most popular method of determining
the connection fee for multifamily development, but there was a range of values applied to each unit.
Marysville and Monroe charge each unit the same as single family (1.0 per unit), Duvall charges
multifamily at 0.85 per unit compared to a single family unit. Bonney Lake uses 0.77 per multifamily
unit. Snohomish County PUD was included as 0.778 per multifamily unit.
Multifamily Connection Fee by ERU – Sultan charges per equivalent residential unit for multifamily
developments.
SEWER, among the 13 examples, I found several methods of charging connection fees to multifamily
developments, including 4 by meter size or plumbing fixture counts, 8 by the number of dwelling units at
varied values per unit, and by ERU based on number of units.
Multifamily Connection Fee by Meter Size or Fixture Count – This is Arlington’s current methodology
along with Snohomish, Stanwood, and Oak Harbor.
Multifamily Connection Fee by Dwelling Unit – This was the most popular method of determining the
connection fee for multifamily development, but there was a range of values applied to each unit, and
perhaps varying sizes of complexes. Some example communities charge the same per unit regardless
of the number of units, such as Marysville, Monroe and Sedro-Woolley at 1.0 (times single family) and
Duvall at 0.85 per unit. Some vary by size of complex, such as Mt. Vernon charges a duplex at 0.75
(times single family) per unit, and 3 or more units at 0.5 per unit or Burlington uses 1.0 per unit for
duplex and triplex, and 0.8 per unit for 4 or more units. Bonney Lake scales the connection fee based
WATER
Multifamily Connection Fee By
Meter Size / Fixture Count
Multifamily Connection Fee
By Dwelling Unit
Multifamily
Connection Fee
By ERU
Arlington Marysville, 1.0 per unit Sultan
Mt. Vernon Monroe, 1.0 per unit
Snohomish Duvall, 0.85 per unit
Stanwood Bonney Lake, >2, 0.77 per unit
Port Angeles Snohomish PUD, 0.778 per unit
Oak Harbor
SEWER
Multifamily Connection Fee By
Meter Size / Fixture Count
Multifamily Connection Fee
By Dwelling Unit
Multifamily
Connection Fee
By ERU
Arlington Mt. Vernon, Duplex 0.75, Multifamily 0.5 per unit Sultan
Snohomish Marysville, 1.0 per unit
Stanwood Burlington, Dup & Tri 1.0, 4+ units 0.8 per unit
Oak Harbor Monroe, 1.0 per unit
Duvall, 0.85 per unit
Sedro-Woolley, 1.0 per unit
Bonney Lake, >2 scaled on # bdrm/bonus rooms
Port Angeles, 0.9 for 1st unit, others 0.15 per unit
KI&A Memo on Connection Fees (Draft 11-15-21).docx, 12/8/2021, Page 4
on number of bedrooms or bonus rooms. Port Angeles is quite different in that they charge more like
a permit fee of $150 per unit for single family, and less for multifamily as shown.
Multifamily Connection Fee by ERU – Sultan charges per equivalent residential unit for multifamily
developments.
Conclusion on Multifamily Connection Fees – Arlington uses a methodology that scales up or down based on
the size of the meter required to provide service for the planned development. This is based on plumbing
fixture counts and reflects the difference in the size of multifamily units.
CONNECTION FEES OUTSIDE CITY LIMITS – DETAILS
Comparison of Residential 5/8" Meter
SF Residential Connection Fee Outside City Factor
Service Provider Inside City Outside City (Outside/Inside)Comments
City of Arlington
Water 6,868.00$ 6,868.00$ 1.00 No difference on inside/outside
Sewer 4,840.00$ not allowed n/a Sewer not allowed outside city limits
Mout Vernon
Water n/a n/a n/a City does not provide water service - Skagit PUD
Sewer 7,417.00$ not allowed n/a Sewer not allowed outside city limits
Marysville
Water 4,750.00$ 5,490.00$ 1.16 Inside/outside for Cap Impr Chg - per dwelling unit
Sewer 4,490.00$ 4,890.00$ 1.09 Inside/outside for Cap Impr Chg - per dwelling unit
Burlington
Water n/a n/a n/a City does not provide water service - Skagit PUD
Sewer 3,130.00$ 4,505.00$ 1.44 Inside city limits & UGA, or outside limits & western svcs area
Sultan
Water 6,147.00$ 6,147.00$ 1.00 No difference on SDC, but rates @ 1.5 x inside
Sewer 15,885.00$ not allowed n/a
Monroe
Water 4,111.00$ 4,111.00$ 1.00 No difference on SDC, but rates @ 1.5 x inside
Sewer 7,456.00$ 7,456.00$ 1.00 No difference on SDC, but rates @ 1.5 x inside
Snohomish
Water 2,816.00$ 1.50 No difference on SDC, but rates @ 1.5 x inside
Sewer 9,315.00$ 1.50 Cemetery Creek pay extra for trunk line, no diff on rates
Stanwood
Water 6,912.00$ 9,482.00$ 1.37 Higher for Cedarhome Benefit area
Sewer 7,719.00$ not allowed n/a Must annex to city for sewer service
Duvall
Water (+ spu $1,081)8,258.00$ 8,258 1.00 No difference on GFC, but rates @ 1.5 x inside
Sewer 11,754.00$ not allowed n/a
Sedro-Woolley
Water n/a n/a n/a City does not provide water service - Skagit PUD
Sewer 8,495.00$ 8,495.00$ 1.00 outside city, when allowed, same as inside, but rates more
Bonney Lake
Water 9,095.00$ 9,095.00$ 1.00 no difference for SDC, but rates @ 1.54 x inside
Sewer 11,606.00$ 11,606.00$ 1.00 city or county, @ 1.22 for fennel cr lift sta area, no diff on rates
Port Angeles
Water 1,280.00$ 1,280.00$ 1.00 No difference on conn fees, but rates @ 1.5 x inside
Sewer 150.00$ no mention n/a permit conn fee, no GFC
Oak Harbor
Water 3,081.00$ 3,081.00$ 1.00 by meter size, no difference for SDC, but rates @ 1.5 x inside
Sewer 1,680.00$ 1,680.00$ 1.00 by meter size, no difference for SDC, but rates @ 1.5 x inside
KI&A Memo on Connection Fees (Draft 11-15-21).docx, 12/8/2021, Page 5
CONNECTION FEES FOR MULTIFAMILY UNITS – DETAILS (cont’d)
Comparison of Residential 5/8" Meter
SF Residential Connection Fee Outside City Factor Multi Residential Connections
Service Provider Inside City Outside City (Outside/Inside)
City of Arlington
Water 6,868.00$ 6,868.00$ 1.00 by meter size / fixture count
Sewer 4,840.00$ not allowed n/a by meter size / fixture count
Mout Vernon
Sewer 7,417.00$ not allowed n/a Duplex @ 0.75 per unit, MF @ 0.5 per unit or by fixture
Marysville
Water 4,750.00$ 5,490.00$ 1.16 Residential incl. MF, 2012-2015 special $3k inside city
Sewer 4,490.00$ 4,890.00$ 1.09 Residential incl. MF, 2012-2015 special $3k inside city
Burlington
Sewer 3,130.00$ 4,505.00$ 1.44 SF, Duplex, Tri, 1.0 per dwelling unit, 4+ units 0.8 per unit
Sultan
Water 6,147.00$ 6,147.00$ 1.00 per ERU, by size of water meter req'd per city table
Sewer 15,885.00$ 15,885.00$ 1.00 per ERU
Monroe
Water 4,111.00$ 4,111.00$ 1.00 1 MCE per dwelling unit
Sewer 7,456.00$ 7,456.00$ 1.00 1 MCE per dwelling unit
Snohomish
Water 2,816.00$ 1.50 by meter size
Sewer 9,315.00$ 1.50 by meter size
Stanwood
Water 6,912.00$ 9,482.00$ 1.37 GFC per equivalent connection/meter size, connection by type (SFR 500, dup 750, tri 1000, 4+ 1000+250/unit
Sewer 7,719.00$ not allowed n/a per equivalent connection/meter size
Duvall
Water (+ spu $1,081)8,258.00$ 8,258 1.00 x .85 per unit
Sewer 11,754.00$ not allowed x .85 per unit
Sedro-Woolley
Sewer 8,495.00$ 8,495.00$ 1.00 x 1.0 per dwelling unit
Bonney Lake
Water 9,095.00$ 9,095.00$ 1.00 >2 units, x .77 per unit
Sewer 11,606.00$ 11,606.00$ 1.00 >2 units, scale based on #bdrm/bonus rooms
Port Angeles
Water 1,280.00$ 1,280.00$ 1.00 by meter size
Sewer 150.00$ no mention n/a $135 (.9) for 1st unit, + $10 add'l for each other unit
Oak Harbor
Water 3,081.00$ 3,081.00$ 1.00 by meter size
Sewer 1,680.00$ 1,680.00$ 1.00 by meter size
Snohomish Co PUD
Water 3,645.00$ n/a GFC = .778 ERU/dwelling unit
City of Arlington Council Agenda Bill Item: WS #4 Attachment D COUNCIL MEETING DATE: December 13, 2021 SUBJECT: Pacific Groundwater Group Hydrogeologic Assistance contract Haller Wellfield South ATTACHMENTS: Scope of Work and Fee DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN Public Works; Jim Kelly, Director 360-403-3505 EXPENDITURES REQUESTED: $136,225 BUDGET CATEGORY: Water Capital Fund (405) BUDGETED AMOUNT: $200,000 (2021) $750,000 (2022)LEGAL REVIEW: DESCRIPTION: Scope and Fee for Pacific Groundwater Group to provide hydrogeologic support and optional water right assistance to the Haller Wellfield Improvement Project. HISTORY: Public Works has been working for several years on securing and developing new water sources to ensure water availability for Arlington’s future. PGG is a strong hydrogeology consultant who has provided exceptional service for the City on previous projects and is well qualified to perform the geotechnical and hydrogeological work as needed to support the installation of up to two (2) new production wells at the Haller Wellfield. Brown & Caldwell is the lead consultant on this project and will provide direction to PGG, with City oversight.
Workshop; discussion only. At the January 3, 2022 Council meeting, the recommended motion will be, “I move to approve a contract with Pacific Groundwater Group in the amount of $136,225 for geotechnical and hydrogeological services associated with the Haller Wellfield Improvement Project, and authorize the Mayor to sign the contract, pending final approval by the City Attorney.”
Exhibit A
Project Cost Estimate
Hydrogeologic Assistance, City of Arlington Haller Wellfield Improvement Project
TASK/SUBTASK ESTIMATED HOURS DIRECT COSTS
1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT $17,098
1.01 Kickoff Meeting, Site Walk Through & PGG-MM Field Safety Plan 10 6 $2,800 Travel (1X)$58 $2,858
1.02 Project Coordination, Communication with City 12 26 45 $14,240 $14,240
2 WELL SITING ASSISTANCE $5,455
2.01 Consult with City about New Well Locations (2 virtual mtgs.)2 2 $720 $720
2.02 Assist with Selecting Well Diameter Alternatives 2 1 2 $850 $850
2.03 Analyze Proposed Locations for Yield Optimization (2 alternatives)1 12 2 4 $3,005 $3,005
2.04 Provide Input to Staging Optimization 3 2 $880 $880
3 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS & DRILLER SELECTION SUPPORT $11,338
3.01 Develop Technical Specifications 40 10 $8,400 Travel (1X)$58 $8,458
3.02 Assist with Bid Document Integration 8 4 $2,080 $2,080
3.03 Onsite Pre-Bid Meeting 5 $800 $800
4 PRODUCTION WELL DRILLING, INSTALLATION, TESTING & ANALYSIS $53,382
4.01 Preconstruction Meeting 5 $800 Travel (20X)$1,162 $1,962
4.02 Coordinating Drilling and Wellfield Operations 8 5 $2,280 Transducer Rent.$200 $2,480
4.03 Log Drilling (from 20 to 40 feet per well)80 4 $13,600 $13,600
4.04 Recommend Screen Design 12 8 $3,520 $3,520
4.05 Observe Screen Installation 16 1 $2,760 $2,760
4.06 Advise During Well Development 12 6 $3,120 $3,120
4.07 Confirm Invoicing (Removed from PGG Scope)0 $0 $0
4.08 Design Aquifer Tests, WDOH Approval, Lab Arrangements 6 8 $2,560 $2,560
4.09 Oversee Step Tests, Constant-Rate Tests, Recovery 52 8 4 $9,620 $9,620
4.10 Analyze Aquifer Test Data 32 32 $11,040 $11,040
4.11 Evaluate Water Quality Data 12 4 $2,720 $2,720
4.12 Provide Recommendations for Wellfield Operation (Removed from PGG Scope)0 0 $0 $0
5 HYDROGEOLOGIC REPORT $23,870
5.01 Draft Report 10 32 48 22 $18,170 $18,170
5.02 Discuss Comments 3 5 5 $2,235 $2,235
5.03 Final Report 3 6 6 6 $3,465 $3,465
6 DOH SOURCE APPROVAL & WHPA DELINEATION $4,670
6.01 Susceptability Assessment 2 12 4 10 $4,670 $4,670
TOTAL HOUR ESTIMATES 12 16 151 319 190
SUBTOTAL DOLLARS $1,080 $2,320 $21,895 $51,040 $38,000 $1,478
ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $115,813
OPTIONAL TASK/SUBTASK ESTIMATED HOURS DIRECT COSTS
Staff Senior Subtask TOTAL
Admin GIS Hydrogeol Hydrogeol Principal Labor Item Cost Cost TASK
$90 $145 $145 $160 $200 Cost Total COST
A (OPTIONAL) WATER RIGHT PERMITTING SUPPORT $17,150
A.01 Preapplication Meeting 1 4 4 $1,585 $1,585
A.02 Develop Water Right and Cost Reimbursement Application 1 4 8 2 $2,405 $2,405
A.03 Develop Mitigation Plan 8 16 $4,480 $4,480
A.04 Prepare ROE 24 8 $5,440 $5,440
A.05 Miscellaneous Water Right Assistance 6 3 $1,560 $1,560
A.06 Project Management for Permitting Support 8 2 $1,680 $1,680
B (OPTIONAL) UPDATE WHPZ DELINEATION $3,265
B.01 Update WHPZ Delineation 5 12 4 $3,265 $3,265
TOTAL HOUR ESTIMATES 0 7 16 58 39
SUBTOTAL DOLLARS $0 $1,015 $2,320 $9,280 $7,800
ADDITIONAL ESTIMATED COST FOR OPTIONAL TASKS A and B $20,415
Assumptions:
1.02 - Assumes PGG will only attend a subset of biweekly meetings.
4.03 - Assumes PGG will be onsite to log both holes from 20 feet below ground to total depth (assumed to be 40 feet).
4.04 - Assumes City will pay for soil lab analysis directly.
4.07 - Assumes City will confirm driller's invoices.
4.09 - Assumes WDOH allows a 24 hour test due to advance knowledge of wellfield
4.11 - Assumes City will pay for water lab analysis directly.
4.12 - Assumes Wellfield Optimization will be performed by City using adaptive management
6.01 - Contaminant source assessment limited to level of detail on WDOH SA form (not full contaminant source inventory).
Optional Task A - Assumes two production wells drilled under a Showing of Compliance (no preliminary permit needed), and that Ecology allows water right processing under the "streamlined" approach.
Optional Task A.03 - Level of effort required for mitigation plan uncertain, depending on Ecology guidance. Hours are "placeholder" estimate.
Optional Task A.05 - Level of effort required for miscellaneous assistance uncertain. Hours are "placeholder" estimate.
EXHIBIT A
November 2021
Name: Barb Tolbert
Local Government Meetings Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Date
Council Workshops 11/8/21 11/22/21
Council Meetings 11/1/21 11/15/21
5th Monday MeetingsJoint Meetings with City
Boards/Commissions
Special Purpose (WWU & WSU
studies,etc)
Liaison Meeting
Ops Meeting 11/1/21
Mayor/ City Administrator 11/2/21 11/9/21 11/16/21 11/23/21 11/30/21
Council 11/5/21 11/12/21
Senior managers 11/8/21
Youth Council 11/18/21
Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Date
Association of Washington
Cities
Community Transit
Economic Alliance Snohomish
County
Mayor's Association 11/4/21 11/18/21
Puget Sound Regional Council
Snohomish County Cities 11/8/21
Snohomish County Committee
for Improved Transportation
Snohomish County Tomorrow 11/3/21
Meetings with Snohomish
County personnel and/or
address issues with Legislature,
governor, State departments
National Government
Meetings Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Date
National League of Cities
Meetings in Washington, D.C.,
which address issues with
Congress, Executive and
Federal departments and
Business Meetings Date Date Date Date Date Date Date
Monthly Elected Official Strategic Report Due at month end
Date: December 6, 2021
Non-Profit Meetings Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Date
United Way 11/9/21 11/16/21
WSU Advisor meeting 11/12/21
Boys and Girls Club 11/30/21
Community & Volunteer
Meetings/Events Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Date
Stronger Together
Rotary
Stilly Valley Health Connections 11/10/21
Koop Grand Opening 11/11/21
Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Date
Zen city 16-Nov
NLC 18-Nov 19-Nov 20-Nov
(trends, developments, SWOT factors of note, i.e., strengths, weaknesses, opportunities,
threats)
November 2021
Local Government Meetings Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Date
Council Workshops 11/8/21 11/22/21
Council Meetings 11/15/21
5th Monday MeetingsJoint Meetings with City
Boards/Commissions 11/16/21
Special Purpose (WWU & WSU
studies,etc)
Liaison Meeting 11/9/21 11/23/21
Mayors Strategic Planning 11/12/21
Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Date
Association of Washington
Cities
Community Transit
Economic Alliance Snohomish
County
Mayor's Association
Puget Sound Regional Council
Snohomish County Cities
Snohomish County Committee
for Improved Transportation
Snohomish County Tomorrow
Meetings with Snohomish
County personnel and/or
Governor, State departments
National Government
Meetings Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Date
National League of Cities 11/17/21 11/18/21
Meetings in Washington, D.C.,
which address issues with
Congress, Executive, and
Federal departments and
Business Meetings Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Date
Non-Profit Meetings Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Date
Monthly Elected Official Strategic Report Due on 5th of month
Name: Debora Nelson Date: November 2021
Community & Volunteer
Meetings/Events Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Date
Stronger Together
Rotary
MRSC Local Climate Action 11/15/21
November 2021
Local Government Meetings Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Date
Council Workshops 11/1/21 11/15/21
Council Meetings 11/8/21 11/22/21
5th Monday Meetings
Joint Meetings with City
Boards/Commissions
Special Purpose (WWU & WSU
studies,etc)
Liaison Meeting
Meet with Barb & Paul 11/5/21
LEOFF 1 Board Meeting 11/17/21
Planning Commission Meeting 11/2/21 11/16/21
Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Date
Association of Washington
Cities 11/5/21 11/10/21
Community Transit
Economic Alliance Snohomish
County 11/3/21 11/16/21
Mayor's Association
Puget Sound Regional Council
Snohomish County Cities
Snohomish County Committee
for Improved Transportation
Snohomish County Tomorrow
Meetings with Snohomish
County personnel and/or
Governor, State departments
National Government
Meetings Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Date
National League of Cities
Meetings in Washington, D.C.,
which address issues with
Congress, Executive, and
Federal departments and
Business Meetings Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Date
Non-Profit Meetings Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Date
Monthly Elected Official Strategic Report Due on 5th of month
Name: Don Vanney Date: 11/24/2021
Community & Volunteer
Meetings/Events Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Date
Stronger Together
Rotary
Hometown Holidays Meeting 11/4/21
MONTH YEAR
Local Government Meetings Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Date
Council Workshops 11/8/21 11/22/21
Council Meetings 11/1/21 11/15/21
5th Monday MeetingsJoint Meetings with City
Boards/Commissions
Special Purpose (WWU & WSU tourism tourism
Regional Government
Meetings Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Date
Association of Washington
Cities
Community Transit
Economic Alliance Snohomish
County
Mayor's Association
Puget Sound Regional Council
Snohomish County Cities
Snohomish County Committee
for Improved Transportation
Snohomish County Tomorrow
Meetings with Snohomish
County personnel and/or
address issues with Legislature,
Governor, State departments
National Government
Meetings Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Date
National League of Cities
Meetings in Washington, D.C.,
which address issues with
Congress, Executive, and
Federal departments and
Business Meetings Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Date
Non-Profit Meetings Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Date
Monthly Elected Official Strategic Report Due on 5th of month
Name: Heather Logan Date: 12/2/21
Community & Volunteer
Meetings/Events Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Date
Stronger Together
Rotary
November 2021
Local Government Meetings Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Date
Council Workshops 11/8/21 11/22/21
Council Meetings 11/1/21 11/15/21
5th Monday MeetingsJoint Meetings with City
Boards/Commissions
Special Purpose (WWU & WSU
studies,etc)
Liaison Meeting Transportation Commission
Regional Government
Meetings Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Date
Association of Washington
Community Transit 11/4/21 Board
11/18/21
Executive
11/18/21
Finance EASC Transit
Mayor's Association
Puget Sound Regional Council Selection Project
Snohomish County Committee
County personnel and/or Rick Larson
Governor, State departments
Transportation Improvement B
National Government
Meetings Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Date
National League of Cities
Meetings in Washington, D.C.,
which address issues with
Congress, Executive, and
Federal departments and
Business Meetings Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Date
Non-Profit Meetings Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Date
Community & Volunteer
Meetings/Events Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Date
Stronger Together
Rotary
National Night Out
Chamber Meeting
Monthly Elected Official Strategic Report Due on 5th of month
Jan Schuette November 2021
Conferences & Training Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Date
NOTES:
November 2021
Local Government Meetings Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Date
Council Workshops 11/8/21 11/22/21
Council Meetings 11/15/21
5th Monday MeetingsJoint Meetings with City
Boards/Commissions
Special Purpose (WWU & WSU
studies,etc)
Meeting with Marc Hayes
Regional Government
Meetings Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Date
Association of Washington
Cities
Community Transit
Economic Alliance Snohomish
County
Mayor's Association
Puget Sound Regional Council
Snohomish County Cities
Snohomish County Committee
for Improved Transportation
Snohomish County Tomorrow
Meetings with Snohomish
County personnel and/or
address issues with Legislature,
Governor, State departments
National Government
Meetings Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Date
National League of Cities
Meetings in Washington, D.C.,
which address issues with
Congress, Executive, and
Federal departments and
Business Meetings Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Date
Non-Profit Meetings Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Date
Monthly Elected Official Strategic Report Due on 5th of month
Name Marilyn Oertle Date: November 28, 2021
Community & Volunteer
Meetings/Events Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Date
Stronger Together
Rotary
November 2021
Local Government Meetings Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Date
Council Workshops 11/8/21 11/22/21
Council Meetings 11/1/21 11/15/21
Joint Meetings with City
Boards/Commissions
LEOFF Board Meeting 11/17/21
Liaison Meeting - Airport,
viewed 11/16
Council Visioning- Barb, Paul 11/5/21
Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Date
Association of Washington Cities
11/10/21 11/30/21
11/4/21
SnoCo County on Aging Meeting 11/10/21
11/16/21
County personnel and/or
address issues with Legislature,
Governor, State departments
National Government
Meetings Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Date
Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Date
Stilly Senior Center Board
Meeting 11/1/21
NOAH 11/2/21
Monthly Elected Official Strategic Report Due on 5th of month
Name: Michele Blythe Date: NOVEMBER 2021
EASC -Everett Naval Base Update, Commanding Officer 11/10
EASC -Transit Planning 11/30
Nov. 2021
Local Government Meetings Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Date
Council Workshops 11/8/21
Council Meetings 11/1/21 11/15/21 11/22/21
5th Monday MeetingsJoint Meetings with City
Boards/Commissions
Special Purpose (WWU & WSU
studies,etc)
Liaison Meeting
Paul Ellis
Planning Commission
Airport Commission
PARC
Regional Government
Meetings Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Date
Association of Washington Cities
Snohomish County Cities
Snohomish County Tomorrow
County personnel and/or
address issues with Legislature,
Governor, State departments
National Government
Meetings Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Date
National League of Cities
Meetings in Washington, D.C.,
which address issues with
Congress, Executive, and
Federal departments and
Business Meetings Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Date
Monthly Elected Official Strategic Report Due on 5th of month
Mike Hopson
Non-Profit Meetings Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Date
United Way
Community & Volunteer
Meetings/Events Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Date
Stronger Together
Rotary